Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Breath versus Emotions: The Impact of Different Foci of Attention During
Mindfulness Meditation on the Experience of Negative and Positive Emotions
PII: S0005-7894(17)30136-3
DOI: doi:10.1016/j.beth.2017.12.006
Reference: BETH 773
Please cite this article as: Beblo, T., Pelster, S., Schilling, C., Kleinke, K., Iffland, B.,
Driessen, M. & Fernando, S., Breath versus Emotions: The Impact of Different Foci of
Attention During Mindfulness Meditation on the Experience of Negative and Positive
Emotions, Behavior Therapy (2017), doi:10.1016/j.beth.2017.12.006
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Running Head: Breath versus Emotions
Emotions
T
Thomas Beblo, PhDa, b, Sarah Pelsterb, Christine Schillingb, Kleinke, K., PhDb,
IP
Benjamin Iffland, PhDb, Martin Driessen, MD, PhDa, b, & Silvia Fernando, PhDa
R
SC
a
Clinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Bethel, Remterweg 69-71, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany
b
Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC
Division of Research
Tel.: ++49 521 772 78512, FAX: ++49 521 772 78511
E-Mail: thomas.beblo@evkb.de
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2 Breath versus Emotions
Abstract
However, it is still unclear whether the focus of attention during meditation influences these
T
effects. In the present study we aimed at comparing the effects of breathing meditation and
IP
emotion-focused meditation on the immediate and delayed processing of negative and
R
positive emotions. The study included 65 adult novice meditators who were exposed to
SC
positively and negatively valenced film clips. Participants were randomly assigned to three
conditions. While watching the films at t1, they were asked to mindfully focus on their breath
NU
(condition 1), on emotions (condition 2), or on nothing in particular (condition 3). Ten
MA
minutes later at t2, comparable film clips were shown but all participants watched them
without taking up a mindful attitude. Dependent measures were emotional states at t1 and t2.
emotional reaction to negative stimuli than participants of the control condition. Breathing
Introduction
Mindfulness has its origins in Buddhism and other Eastern meditative traditions.
T
(MBSR; Kabat-Zinn, 1990), mindfulness has recently been incorporated into psychological
IP
as well as medical research and practice. Kabat-Zinn defined mindfulness as “the awareness
R
that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non
SC
judgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment.” (p. 145; Kabat-Zinn,
2003). Although the practice of mindfulness was originally thought to be a life-long practice,
NU
research has demonstrated that even its application in the short-term has positive emotional
MA
consequences for healthy persons and patients (Grecucci, Pappaianni, Siugzdaite, Theuninck,
more adaptive way to deal with emotions. MBSR leads to a reduction of burnout, stress,
anxiety, and depression and also to an increase of empathy. Robins et al. (2012) compared
P
MBSR completers with a wait list control group and found significantly greater decreases in
CE
fear of emotions, suppression of anger, aggressive anger expression, worry, and difficulties
AC
regulating emotions. However, MBSR is a complex program that includes different types of
mindfulness-based exercises – for example the body scan, yoga, sitting meditation with
various meditation objects (such as breath, feelings, thoughts, body sensations, or open
regulation.
With respect to sitting meditation, Erisman and Roemer (2010) exposed their
participants to emotionally negative, positive, and mixed film clips. After watching the films
for the first time, participants were randomly assigned to a mindfulness condition (brief
breathing and emotions) or a control condition (psychoeducation). After this brief training,
participants watched the films for a second time. Participants of the mindfulness condition
reported significantly greater positive affect in response to the positive film, less negative
T
affect in response to the mixed film and a trend for more adaptive emotion regulation in
IP
response to the mixed film. Reported effect sizes were medium to large. Brake et al. (2016)
R
investigated patients with anxiety disorders who were assigned to a randomized order of
SC
blocks, utilizing either mindfulness- or avoidance-based strategies, while being exposed to
NU
internal experiences such as feelings, thoughts, and body sensations. Patients reported less
MA
distress in the mindfulness condition versus the avoidance condition. These studies indicate
the beneficial effects of mindfully realizing the breath or internal states, such as emotions or
D
thoughts. However, they did not differentiate between these different meditation objects.
TE
Arch and Craske (2006) compared the influence of breathing meditation, mind
wandering, and worrying on emotional responses to affectively valenced pictures and on the
P
willingness to remain in contact with aversive pictures. While participants of the breathing
CE
group reported moderately positive responses to neutral pictures before and after the
AC
breathing exercise, the mind wandering and worrying groups responded more negatively to
neutral slides after their exercises. Later on, the breathing group showed a greater willingness
than the mind wandering group to view highly negative pictures. The authors, when
comparing contrasting mind states, concluded that mindfulness is related to a more adaptive
response to negative stimuli. Of note, apart from mindfulness per se breathing meditation also
includes other emotion regulation strategies that have been proved successful, in particular
distraction (Webb, Miles, & Sheeran, 2012). Strauss et al. (2016) investigated the immediate
pictures. Results indicated that distraction successfully decreased self-reported negative affect
The emotional impact of exercises with other specific meditation objects has rarely
T
been investigated. This is surprising because mindfully focusing on emotions might be an
IP
important exercise in mindfulness programs. It is known that exposure to emotions is an
R
important mechanism of action in behavioral therapy (e.g., Hofmann, Mundy, & Curtiss,
SC
2015). While exposure is initially related to the experience of distress, emotional intensity
clearly decreases during the course of exposure and treatment (Hohagen, Stieglitz, Bohus,
NU
Caspar, & Berger, 2009). Delayed beneficial effects of the mindful focus on emotions is also
MA
suggested by a study of Campbell-Sills et al. (2006). The authors compared experiential and
physiological effects of emotion acceptance and suppression in patients with anxiety and
D
mood disorders. Patients were randomly assigned to either accept or suppress their emotions.
TE
Then, they watched an emotion-provoking film and applied the instructions. Although both
groups reported similar levels of distress during the film, the acceptance group displayed less
P
negative affect during the post-film recovery period. However, the instruction to accept
CE
Although mindfulness implies the acceptance of inner experiences, it also includes other
qualities, e.g., decentering (the ability to view internal experiences with increased objectivity
and without identifying with these experiences) and kindness with respect to these
Taken together, a few studies suggest the general benefit of breathing meditation on
the processing of emotions and a few other studies suggest delayed positive effects of
types might be preferable when faced with challenging emotions. To our knowledge, until
now no study has compared both types of mindfulness meditations. The aim of the present
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6 Breath versus Emotions
study is to investigate the immediate and delayed effects of breathing meditation, emotion-
focused meditation, and a passive viewing control condition on the processing of negative
T
effects of breathing meditation on the processing of negative emotions are superior to the
IP
effects of the control condition. That is, participants of the breathing meditation condition
R
show a less negative affective valence after exposure to negative stimuli (immediately and
SC
delayed) than participants of the control condition. Third, we hypothesize that the delayed
NU
stimuli is superior to the effects of the control condition. Fourth, we hypothesize that effects
MA
of breathing meditation on the immediate affective valence is superior to the effects of
the affective experience (arousal and dominance) and investigated the affective response to
TE
Methods
CE
Participants
AC
According to a power analysis (G-Power; α = .05, power = .95, medium effect size:
participants in total (18 per group). To ensure minimum subsample sizes, we finally included
65 adult volunteers. Experienced meditators or people younger than 18 years or older than 65
years were not included. Participants were recruited through advertisements. In order to
appeal to as many people as possible, we kept the advertisements rather general (“For a
psychological study we are looking for participants”) but also mentioned the exclusion
criteria. Eligible recruits who agreed to participate in the study, were individually enrolled.
We obtained written and informed consent from all participants. Forty-one (63.1%)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7 Breath versus Emotions
participants were female and 24 (36.9%) were male. On average, participants were 27.9 years
T
Instruments
IP
Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM; Bradley & Lang, 1994; Lang, 1980): The SAM is a
R
non-verbal pictorial assessment technique used to obtain self-assessments of the emotional
SC
state on the dimensions of affective valence, arousal, and dominance. Each dimension is
represented by one item that shows a picture of a manikin in five grades. Valence is
NU
operationalized by a manikin showing a rather negative or positive affective state. Arousal is
MA
operationalized by a manikin being more or less energetic, and dominance is operationalized
by showing a rather small (feeling of less dominance) or large manikin (feeling of much
D
dominance). The manikins representing valence and arousal are shown in Figure 2 and Figure
TE
3. Despite the small item number, several studies indicate sufficient reliability of the SAM
(Backs, da Silva, & Han, 2005; Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 2007). The SAMs’ validity was
P
shown by high correlations with the Semantic Differential Scale (Bradley & Lang, 1994;
CE
Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS-D, Baer, Smith, & Allen, 2004;
Stroehle, Nachtigall, Michalak, & Heidenreich, 2010): The KIMS-D is a German adaption of
the KIMS (Baer et al., 2004). The inventory contains 39 items and measures four basic trait-
mindfulness skills: Observing (12 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (10
items), and accepting without judgment (9 items). The items of the German version (Stroehle
et al., 2010) were rated on a rating scale ranging from 1 (“applies to me never or very
0.79 [acting with awareness], 0.89 [accepting without judgment]. In addition, construct
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8 Breath versus Emotions
validity was shown by moderate correlations of the four subscales (r = 0.53 – 0.21) with
other mindfulness scales such as the Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS)
(Brown & Ryan, 2003; Michalak, Heidenreich, Stroehle, & Nachtigall, 2008) and by negative
T
correlations of the four subscales (r = - 0.59 – - 0.10) with psychopathological measures such
IP
as depression, as assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck & Steer, 1994;
R
Hautzinger, Bailer, Worall, & Keller, 1994).
SC
Emotion Acceptance Questionnaire (EAQ; Beblo et al., 2011): The general (trait-
related) acceptance of positive and negative emotions was assessed by means of the EAQ.
NU
The EAQ contains 32 items divided equally by the two main subscales: acceptance of
MA
negative emotions and acceptance of positive emotions. Items were rated on a rating scale
ranging from 1 (“does not apply to me”) to 6 (‘‘applies to me completely”). Reliability was
estimated as high by Cronbach’s α of 0.91 for the total scale and 0.89 and 0.90 for the
D
TE
(Beblo et al., 2011). In addition, construct validity was shown by moderate correlations of the
P
total score and the subscale scores (r = 0.52 – 0.44) with the Difficulties in Emotion
CE
Regulation Scale (DERS) (Ehring, Tuschen-Caffier, Schnulle, Fischer, & Gross, 2010; Gratz
AC
& Roemer, 2004) and by moderate correlations of the total score and the subscale scores (r =
0.39 – 0.28) with a short version of the Symptom Checklist (Franke et al., 1995) (Beblo et al.,
2011). Reliability and validity was also confirmed in a clinical sample of depressed patients
The procedure (Figure 1) parallels the paradigm of a study by Walter et al. (2009)
who investigated the short- and delayed effects of emotion regulation on emotional state.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9 Breath versus Emotions
Baseline and Training (t0): After giving written and informed consent, participants
completed ratings about their current emotional state by means of the SAM. The participants
were then randomly assigned to one of the three experimental conditions and started with
T
brief trainings (about 10 min). In condition 1, participants were instructed to focus mindfully
IP
on their breath (“breathing meditation”). In condition 2, they were instructed to focus
R
mindfully on their emotions (“emotion-focused meditation”). Both instructions were based on
SC
guidelines from Erisman and Roemer (2010) and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy
(MBCT; Segal, Williams, & Teasdale, 2012). In condition 3 (passive viewing control
NU
condition), participants were told to imagine how they find relief by unburdening themselves
MA
from baggage, using a guided imagery procedure. This exercise was developed by
Deployed Mindfulness: First Presentation of the films (t1): After the training, we
administered the film paradigm, which included movie sequences with actors expressing fear
(negative films) or joy (positive films). The paradigm was based on a fearful face paradigm
developed by Schacher et al. (2006). Both films lasted 4 minutes and the order of the film
presentation (positive and negative) was randomized. That is, some participants watched the
positive films first and the other participants watched the negative films first. Pretests with 51
healthy participants indicated that negative films were rated significantly more negative than
neutral films (4.4 [0.33] > 3.1 [0.22]; t (50) = 22.7, p < 0.001, d = 4.50) while positive films
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10 Breath versus Emotions
were rated significantly more positive than neutral films (1.5 [0.33] < 3.1 [0.22]; t (50) =
25.2, p < 0.001, d = 5.00). With respect to the arousal ratings, pretests with the same 51
healthy participants indicated that negative films induced significantly more arousal than
T
neutral films (1.7 [0.77] > 1.2 [0.55]; t (50) = 7.4, p < 0.001, d = 1.47). Positive films also
IP
induced significantly more arousal than neutral films (1.3 [0.66] > 1.2 [0.55]; t (50) = 2.4, p =
R
0.018, d = 0.48).
SC
Participants of condition 1 were instructed to focus on their breath while watching the
films. Participants of condition 2 were instructed to focus on their emotions while watching
NU
the films, and participants of condition 3 were instructed to simply watch the films. During
MA
the film presentation, participants of condition 1 and 2 were reminded twice to focus on their
breath or their emotions, respectively. Just after the presentation of each film (the positive
D
film and the negative film), the emotional state of the participants was assessed by means of
TE
the SAM (Lang, 1980). That is, participants rated their present affective valence, arousal, and
emotions) were asked how well they thought they held a mindful attitude during the viewing
CE
of the films.
AC
Passive Viewing: Second Presentation of the films (t2): After a ten minute break in
which the participants completed cognitive tests (results are not part of the present study), we
again administered the film paradigm with fearful and joyful faces, respectively. For this
second presentation, comparable film scenes were used, but both films lasted only 1.5
minutes each. The order of the presentation of both films (positive and negative)
corresponded to the first presentation at t1. In order to investigate the effect of the initial
on the emotional response at a later moment (t2), at t2 all participants were instructed to just
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11 Breath versus Emotions
watch the films “naturally.” Just after the presentation of each film, the emotional state of the
End of the study (t3): Participants were asked to complete the KIMS-D (Baer et al.,
T
2004; Stroehle et al., 2010) for the assessment of trait-mindfulness, and the EAQ (Beblo et
IP
al., 2011) for the assessment of acceptance of negative and positive emotions. We presented
R
these questionnaires at the end of the study in order to avoid their influence on the
SC
experiment.
Statistical Analyses
NU
MA
Demographic data were compared between the three study groups by means of the
ANOVA (age) or the χ²-test (gender). Trait mindfulness and emotion acceptance were
D
compared between the three study groups by the multivariate analysis of variance
TE
(MANOVA). All hypotheses focused on the interaction between time and group with respect
to the SAM-scale “valence”. They were tested by a 3x3 (Time by Group) repeated measures
P
3x3 (time by group) repeated measures ANOVAs with respect to the remaining two SAM-
AC
performed 3x3 (Time by Group) repeated measures ANOVAs with respect to the three SAM-
All analyses were performed under a level of significance of = .05. To correct for
violations of the sphericity assumptions, we used the Huynh-Feldt-method, when > .75, and
the Greenhouse-Geisser method otherwise (cf. Girden, 1992). No adjustments for multiple
testing were made regarding the planned contrasts. For exploratory post hoc comparisons, we
adjusted the level of significance using the Sidak method. Effect sizes (d for t-Tests and
partial ŋ2 for analyses of variances) were provided for all t-Tests and Analyses of Variance.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12 Breath versus Emotions
Results
T
As described above, participants were randomly assigned to three experimental
IP
conditions: (1) focus on breath, (2) focus on emotion, and (3) the passive viewing control
R
condition. The respective groups were comparable in age, gender, and variables related to
SC
trait mindfulness (emotion acceptance with respect to both negative and positive emotions,
derived from the EAQ [Beblo et al., 2011]; and observing, acting with awareness, accepting
NU
without judgment, describing, derived from the KIMS-D [Baer et al., 2004; Stroehle et al.,
2010]; table 1). Participants of both mindfulness conditions reported medium success with
MA
maintaining a mindful attitude during the first film presentation (Breathing Meditation: m =
3.6, SD = 1.2; Emotion-Focused Meditation: m = 4.1, SD = 1.0 with 1 = very simple to focus
D
on object and 6 = very hard to focus on object). Participants of both mindfulness conditions
TE
did not differ significantly in this regard (t (40) = 1.50, p = 0.14, d = 0.45).
P
CE
Hypothesis-Related Results
All results are shown in table 2. Figure 2 illustrates affective valence of participants of
all conditions during the course of the experiment. Figure 2 shows that the affective valence
when negatively valenced films were presented while the affective valence of participants of
the two mindfulness conditions numerically worsened from t0 to t1 but improved from t1 to
t2.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13 Breath versus Emotions
T
R IP
Statistical analysis revealed a main effect of time (F (1.72, 106.46) = 11.66, p < 0.001,
SC
ŋ2 = 0.16) and of group F (2,62) = 4.60, p = 0.014, ŋ2 = 0.13). In accordance with our
hypotheses, affective valence in response to negatively valenced films differed in the three
NU
groups with respect to time (interaction Time x Group: F (3.43, 106.46) = 2.87, p = 0.032, ŋ2
MA
= 0.09). A follow-up simple effects analysis showed that initially at t0 there were no
significant differences in affective valence between either of the three groups (F (2,62) =
D
1.13, p =0.33), which means that all participants showed a comparable (and rather positive)
TE
affective valence, when they started the study. With respect to the four hypotheses planned
Valenced Films (Hypotheses 1 and 2): Predicted marginal means showed that affective
presentation): From 2.10 to 2.76 in the breathing meditation group and from 2.04 to 2.78 in
the control group. The difference in change from t0 to t1 between both groups was not
statistically significant (δ = 0.08; F (1,62) = 0.03, p = 0.86). That is, Hypothesis 1, assuming a
positive immediate effect of breathing meditation on affective valence, was not confirmed by
the data.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14 Breath versus Emotions
With respect to the delayed response, breathing meditation had a positive impact on
affective valence from t1 to t2 (after the second film presentation) when compared to the
control condition. A comparison of predicted marginal means revealed that from T1 to T2,
T
affective valence improved for participants in the breathing meditation condition from 2.76 to
IP
1.95 while in the control condition affective valence further worsened from 2.78 to 2.96. In
R
accordance with the second hypothesis, the difference in change from t1 to t2 between the
SC
breathing meditation group and the control group was statistically significant (δ = 0.99; F
NU
MA
Effects of Emotion-Focused Meditation on Affective Valence in Response to
Negatively Valenced Films (Hypothesis 3): We also hypothesized a positive delayed effect of
D
emotion-focused meditation. From t1 to t2, affective valence improved for participants in the
TE
emotion-focused meditation condition from 3.14 to 2.86 while in the control condition,
affective valence further worsened from 2.78 to 2.96. The difference from t1 to t2 between
P
the emotion-focused meditation group and the control group, however, was only marginally
CE
Response to Negatively Valenced Films (Hypothesis 4): According to the fourth hypothesis,
affective valence worsened from an initial value of 2.10 (t0) to 2.76 (t1) and in the emotion-
focused meditation group, affective valence worsened from an initial value of 2.48 (t0) to
3.14 (t1). The worsening of affective valence by 0.66 units was the same for both groups.
This means that there was no difference in change of affective valence between T0 and T1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15 Breath versus Emotions
when comparing the breathing meditation group and the emotion-focused meditation group (δ
= 0, F (1,62) = 0, p = 1).
T
Explorative Results
IP
For explorative purposes, we also performed 3 (time: t0, t1, t2) x 3 (group: breathing
R
meditation, emotion-focused meditation, control) ANOVAs with respect to arousal and
SC
dominance in response to negatively valenced films, and for affective valence, arousal, and
dominance in response to positively valenced films. Main effects and interactions are
NU
reported. With respect to post-hoc comparisons, only significant results are shown. All other
MA
results are available on request.
Negatively Valenced Films (figure 3): There was a main effect of time (F (2,124) = 12.07, p
TE
< 0.001, ŋ2 = 0.16) but not of group F (2,62) = 2.61, p = 0.082, ŋ2 = 0.08). Arousal in
response to negatively valenced films differed in the three groups with respect to time
P
revealed that arousal of participants of the breathing meditation condition was lower than
AC
0.005) and in participants of the control condition (predicted difference of marginal means =
0.65, p = 0.014). However, arousal then decreased from t1 to t2 only in participants of the
0.001).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16 Breath versus Emotions
T
Effects of Breathing and Emotion-focused Meditation on Dominance in Response to
IP
Negatively Valenced Films: There was a main effect of time (F (2,124) = 5.29, p = 0.006, ŋ2
R
= 0.08) but not of group F (2,62) = 1.22, p = 0.30, ŋ2 = 0.04). Posthoc analyses revealed that
SC
dominance in response to negatively valenced films decreased from t0 to t1 (predicted
NU
difference of marginal means = 0.24, p = 0.018). Dominance in response to negatively
MA
valenced films did not differ in the three groups with respect to time (no interaction Time x
Response to Positively Valenced Films: There was a main effect of time (F (2,124) = 9.00, p
P
< 0.001, ŋ2 = 0.13) but not of group F (2,62) = 2.22, p = 0.12, ŋ2 = 0.07). Posthoc analyses
CE
revealed that affective valence in response to positively valenced films improved from t0 to
AC
(predicted difference of marginal means = 0.47, p < 0.001). Affective valence in response to
positively valenced films did not differ in the three groups with respect to time (no interaction
Positively Valenced Films: There was no main effect of time (F (2,124) = 0.61, p = 0.55, ŋ2 =
0.01) and no main effect of group F (2,62) = 0.45, p = 0.64, ŋ2 = 0.01). However, arousal in
response to positively valenced films differed in the three groups with respect to time
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17 Breath versus Emotions
T
IP
Effects of Breathing and Emotion-focused Meditation on Dominance in Response to
R
Positively Valenced Films: There was also no main effect of time (F (2,124) = 2.65, p =
SC
0.075, ŋ2 = 0.041) and no main effect of group F (2,62) = 0.30, p = 0.74, ŋ2 = 0.01). Also,
dominance in response to positively valenced films did not differ in the three groups with
NU
respect to time (no interaction Time x Group: F (4,124) = 0.75, p = 0.56, ŋ2 = 0.02).
MA
Discussion
D
studies have demonstrated positive emotional consequences even in the short - term
(Grecucci et al., 2015). However, research has neglected comparing different mindfulness-
P
based meditation types in order to establish their potentially differential impact on emotions.
CE
In the present study, we investigated the immediate and delayed effects of breathing
AC
response to negative stimuli when compared to control participants (unlike the prediction of
hypothesis 1). However, arousal increased in participants of the control condition but not in
breathing meditation condition reported significantly less negative affective valence later on
than control participants (in agreement with hypothesis 2). Participants of the emotion-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18 Breath versus Emotions
focused meditation condition also seemed to show a less negatively valenced delayed
hypothesis 3). This result is supported by a significant delayed (from t1 to t2) decrease of
T
arousal in the emotion-focused meditation group. When participants of both meditation
IP
conditions were compared with respect to their immediate emotional response, participants of
R
the breathing condition showed less arousal in response to the negative films than participants
SC
of the emotion-focused meditation condition, indicating a more preferable immediate
emotional response. However, they did not report a less negative affective valence as
effects of mindfulness meditation on emotions (Goyal et al., 2014; Khoury, Sharma, Rush, &
D
Fournier, 2015). However, our study indicates that these effects occur primarily in the
TE
aftermath, but not exclusively. This specification does not conflict with existing studies (Arch
& Craske, 2006; Erisman & Roemer, 2010) and confirms the results of Campbell-Sills et al.
P
(2006). Cho et al. (2016) assessed the emotional response of students who were, first,
CE
exposed to negative pictures and then to neutral pictures. They found that the disposition of
AC
mindful attention was not associated with negative emotion in the immediate response to
negative stimuli but with reduced negative emotions later on (when neutral stimuli were
presented). In agreement with the results of our study, the authors concluded that mindfulness
predicted a greater recovery from negative emotions but not reduced reactivity to negative
stimuli. By contrast, some other studies did suggest immediate effects of mindfulness
meditation. In a fMRI study with healthy participants, Herwig et al. (2010) investigated the
condition. When compared to the neutral condition, amygdala activity decreased during
emotion - inspection and increased during cognitive self-reflection. These findings suggest
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19 Breath versus Emotions
that the mindful awareness of emotions may lead to an immediate attenuation of emotional
arousal. However, as Herwig et al. did not induce negative emotions, the study does not allow
for conclusions about the temporal mode of action with respect to mindfulness and negative
T
emotions. In patients with anxiety disorders, Brake et al. (2016) found immediate positive
IP
effects of mindfulness (with a focus on different objects) on distress in response to anxiety
R
related stimuli. The difference between this outcome and our results might be explained by
SC
the different study samples. As mindfulness meditation appears to yield greater anxiety-
related effects in patients with anxiety disorders, than in persons without anxiety disorders
NU
(Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010), the beneficial effects of mindfulness might be more
MA
profound in the Brake et al. study than in our study.
As our study did not focus on the mechanism of action, we can only speculate about
D
underlying mechanisms. At first, the positive results of both meditation conditions suggest
TE
that mindfulness itself is beneficial for the emotional response to negative stimuli. More
specifically, mindful awareness (applied by novices) does not appear to primarily influence
P
the immediate emotional response to negative stimuli. Instead, mindful awareness may
CE
particularly help to prevent (secondary) negative emotions that develop in the aftermath from
AC
suggested that correspond to this perspective, e.g. decentering (Holzel et al., 2011; van der
Velden et al., 2015). In meditation novices, Feldman et al. (2010) compared the effects of
mindfulness (breathing) meditation to the effects of loving kindness meditation and the
repetitive thoughts (e.g., worries or ruminative thoughts that typically lead to secondary
negative emotions), and the degree of negative reaction to thoughts. The results revealed that
the other two conditions. In addition, the relation between the frequency of repetitive
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20 Breath versus Emotions
thoughts and negative reactions to thoughts was relatively weaker in the breathing meditation
condition than in the other conditions. Thus, decentering may enable meditators to see
dysfunctional thoughts just as mental phenomenas that do not need to be taken so seriously.
T
With respect to the comparison between participants of the breathing and emotion-
IP
focused condition, our results indicate in parts a more preferable immediate emotional state in
R
participants of the breathing condition. They showed less arousal in response to the negative
SC
films than participants of the emotion-focused meditation condition (but not a less negative
affective valence). The more preferable immediate emotional state in participants of the
NU
breathing condition might be explained by the fact that breathing meditation offers distraction
MA
from emotional content (Webb et al., 2012). By contrast, emotion-focused meditation leads to
direct exposure to emotions with delayed positives effects on the emotional state (Hayes &
D
Feldman, 2004; Roemer & Orsillo, 2002) but direct exposure to emotions also leads to
TE
immediate distress (Hofmann et al., 2015; Hohagen et al., 2009). However, it is unclear why
these factors were only related to arousal but not to the valence dimension of the emotional
P
state.
CE
meditation techniques have the ability to improve emotional well-being when negative
emotions get triggered. Our results suggest that focusing on breathing and focusing on
emotions have positive effects. However, the results of breathing meditation were slightly
better than the results of emotion-focused meditation. Only the positive effect of breathing
meditation on affective valence was statistically secured and only breathing meditation
appeared to have immediate positive effects on arousal. The value of mindfulness meditation
is also reported by authors who compared the effects of mindfulness meditation and cognitive
reappraisal on the emotional state. Cognitive reappraisal is known to be one of the most
different groups of psychiatric patients (Cutuli, 2014). Keng et al. (2013) found that the
mindful awareness of thoughts and emotions lead to similar effects on the emotional state as
cognitive reappraisal but cognitive reappraisal was related to higher cognitive costs. Hayes-
T
Skelton and Graham (2013) reported that habitual cognitive reappraisal and habitual
IP
mindfulness are negatively related to anxiety via similar but also different mechanisms.
R
However, future studies need to investigate the effects of mindfulness under more serious
SC
emotional conditions (e.g., in serious, real-life situations such as before exams, in laboratory
settings with more intrusive paradigms, and in more challenged participants such as patients
NU
with mental disorders). These studies need to verify whether clinicians should make
MA
breathing meditation and / or emotion-focused meditation available to patients in emotionally
challenging situations.
D
Our study has several strengths such as the randomized experimental design, and the
TE
consideration of immediate and delayed reactions. However, some limitations also have to be
discussed. Size of the subgroups and statistical power were rather small. This shortcoming
P
might have prevented us from detecting further effects. In addition, at t1 the design of the
CE
study provides instructed mental activity for participants of the breathing and emotion-
AC
focused condition apart from watching the films (“dual-tasking”), but not for participants of
the control condition (“monotasking”). Thus, it cannot not be excluded that the effects of our
study were in some parts related to this factor. However, it is hard to explain why possible
effects caused by an instruction are primarily operant during the later phase of the experiment
where no instructions were given (delayed emotional response, t2) but barely operant during
the early phase of the experiment when the instructions were given (t1). Further, the
instructions for the participants of the breathing and emotion-focused conditions were only
operant for the first time they watched the films but not for the second time. By contrast,
participants of the control condition watched the films both times under the same
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
22 Breath versus Emotions
circumstances (no instruction). Possibly, this change of processing mode might have
T
effective emotion regulation strategies to improve the emotional response to negatively
IP
valenced stimuli. The effects of both mindfulness meditations appear to be similar with few
R
advantages for the breathing meditation. Thus, both meditations may contribute to beneficial
SC
effects of mindfulness based therapy programs such as MBSR. Future studies need to
investigate the effects of mindfulness on more intense emotional states to verify whether
NU
clinicians should make breathing meditation and / or emotion-focused meditation available to
MA
patients in emotional challenging situations.
D
Ethical Statement
TE
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the
experimentation and with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, and its most recent revisions.
CE
Conflict of Interest
Financial Support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-
for-profit sectors.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
23 Breath versus Emotions
References
T
1849-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.007
IP
Backs, R. W., da Silva, S. P., & Han, K. (2005). A comparison of younger and older adults'
R
self-assessment manikin ratings of affective pictures. Experimental Aging Research,
SC
31(4), 421-440. doi: 10.1080/03610730500206808
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report:
NU
the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191-206. doi:
MA
10.1177/1073191104268029
Beblo, T., Fernando, S., Klocke, S., Griepenstroh, J., Aschenbrenner, S., & Driessen, M.
D
Beblo, T., Scheulen, C., Fernando, S., Griepenstroh, J., Aschenbrenner, S., Rodewald, K., &
P
Huber.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and
25(1), 49-59.
Brake, A. C., Sauer-Zavala, S., Boswell, J. F., Gallagher, M. W., Farchione, T. J., & Barlow,
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role
T
in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4),
IP
822-848.
R
Campbell-Sills, L., Barlow, D. H., Brown, T. A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2006). Effects of
SC
suppression and acceptance on emotional responses of individuals with anxiety and
NU
Chiesa, A., Anselmi, R., & Serretti, A. (2014). Psychological mechanisms of mindfulness-
MA
based interventions: what do we know? Holistic Nursing Practice, 28(2), 124-148.
doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000017
D
Cho, S., Lee, H., Oh, K. J., & Soto, J. A. (2016). Mindful attention predicts greater recovery
TE
from negative emotions, but not reduced reactivity. Cognition and Emotion, 1-8. doi:
10.1080/02699931.2016.1199422
P
Cutuli, D. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the
CE
Ehring, T., Tuschen-Caffier, B., Schnulle, J., Fischer, S., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotion
Feldman, G., Greeson, J., & Senville, J. (2010). Differential effects of mindful breathing,
T
Beltz Test.
IP
Girden, E.R. (1992). ANOVA: Repeated measures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
R
Goyal, M., Singh, S., Sibinga, E. M., Gould, N. F., Rowland-Seymour, A., Sharma, R., . . .
SC
Haythornthwaite, J. A. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-
being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3), 357-
NU
368. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13018
MA
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and
Grecucci, A., Pappaianni, E., Siugzdaite, R., Theuninck, A., & Job, R. (2015). Mindful
P
6, 17-22.
Hayes-Skelton, S., & Graham, J. (2013). Decentering as a common link among mindfulness,
Hautzinger, M., Bailer, M., Worall, H., & Keller, F. (1994). Beck-Depressions-Inventar
Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context
T
Herwig, U., Kaffenberger, T., Jancke, L., & Bruhl, A. B. (2010). Self-related awareness and
IP
emotion regulation. NeuroImage, 50(2), 734-741. doi:
R
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.089
SC
Hofmann, S. G., Mundy, E. A., & Curtiss, J. (2015). Neuroenhancement of exposure therapy
10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.3.123
NU
MA
Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-
Hohagen, F., Stieglitz, R.-D., Bohus, M., Caspar, F., & Berger, M. (2009). Psychotherapie. In
Fischer.
CE
Holzel, B. K., Lazar, S., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011). How
AC
559.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to
Face Stress, Pain, and Illness. New York: Delta Trade Paperbacks.
Keng, S. L., Robins, C. J., Smoski, M. J., Dagenbach, J., & Leary, M. R. (2013). Reappraisal
T
Khoury, B., Sharma, M., Rush, S. E., & Fournier, C. (2015). Mindfulness-based stress
IP
reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic
R
Research, 78(6), 519-528. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.009
SC
Lamothe, M., Rondeau, E., Malboeuf-Hurtubise, C., Duval, M., & Sultan, S. (2016).
NU
systematic review with a focus on empathy and emotional competencies.
MA
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 24, 19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.11.001
Lang, P., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2007). International Affective Picture System
P
Michalak, J., Heidenreich, T., Stroehle, G., & Nachtigall, C. (2008). Die deutsche Version
Reddemann, L. (2010). Imagination als heilsame Kraft. Zur Behandlung von Traumafolgen
Robins, C. J., Keng, S. L., Ekblad, A. G., & Brantley, J. G. (2012). Effects of mindfulness-
10.1002/jclp.20857
Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2002). Expanding our conceptualization of and treatment for
T
generalized anxiety disorder: integrating mindfulness/acceptance‐based approaches
IP
with existing cognitive‐behavioral models. Clinical Psychology: Science and
R
Practice, 9(1), 54-68.
SC
Schacher, M., Haemmerle, B., Woermann, F. G., Okujava, M., Huber, D., Grunwald, T., . . .
NU
66(1), 81-87. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000191303.91188.00
MA
Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2012). Mindfulness-based cognitive
Strauss, G. P., Ossenfort, K. L., & Whearty, K. M. (2016). Reappraisal and distraction
TE
emotion regulation strategies are associated with distinct patterns of visual attention
and differing levels of cognitive demand. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0162290. doi:
P
10.1371/journal.pone.0162290
CE
Stroehle, G., Nachtigall, C., Michalak, J., & Heidenreich, T. (2010). Die Erfassung von
AC
van der Velden, A. M., Kuyken, W., Wattar, U., Crane, C., Pallesen, K. J., Dahlgaard, J., . . .
Walter, H., von Kalckreuth, A., Schardt, D., Stephan, A., Goschke, T., & Erk, S. (2009). The
temporal dynamics of voluntary emotion regulation. PLOS ONE, 4(8), e6726. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0006726
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
29 Breath versus Emotions
Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the
T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
30 Breath versus Emotions
Appendix
First, bringing yourself to sit in an upright position... just allowing your eyes to close
T
gently... noticing how you are sitting in the chair… noticing where you are touching the
IP
chair, where you are touching the floor… noticing where the air is touching your skin and
R
what that feels like… and now gently drawing your attention to your breath... noticing
SC
(without trying to change it) where your breath is coming from… noticing where it enters
your body when you inhale… how it travels through your body before you exhale… maybe
NU
even noticing a pause in between… noticing how your body moves… with each inhalation,
MA
each exhalation… focusing your attention on the place where your breath feels strongest…
allowing any thoughts or feelings that occur to naturally rise and fall… without trying to hold
onto them or get rid of them… just continue bringing your awareness to your breath as you
D
TE
allow whatever comes to come and whatever goes to go and whatever stays to stay…
P
…noticing how breath travels into your body, and back out of your body…
…and again bringing your awareness to the room… to the way you are sitting in the chair…
and gradually opening your eyes when you are ready and letting the experimenter know you
First, bringing yourself to sit in an upright position... just allowing your eyes to close
gently... begin by noticing how you are sitting in the chair… noticing the places where you
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
31 Breath versus Emotions
are touching the chair, the places where you are touching the floor… noticing where the air is
touching your skin and what that feels like… and now gently drawing your attention to your
body sensations… turning towards any feelings that occur… just experiencing and allowing
T
them to pass, without losing yourself in it... encountering them with a positive attitude…
IP
accepting them just how they are… notice how your feelings come up without judging them
R
or trying to change them…
SC
…allow any feelings that occur to naturally rise and fall… without trying to hold onto them
or get rid of them… just continue bringing your awareness to your sensations as you allow
NU
whatever comes to come and whatever goes to go and whatever stays to stay…
MA
…spending a few minutes just focusing your attention on your feelings...
D
TE
…if anytime you notice yourself distracted by thoughts or anything else, just guide your
…noticing, what your feelings are like and allowing them to naturally come and go…
AC
…and again bringing your awareness to the room… to the way you are sitting in the chair…
and gradually opening your eyes when you are ready and letting the experimenter know you
Bringing yourself to sit in an upright position… just allowing your eyes to close
gently…
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
32 Breath versus Emotions
…imagine yourself on a long travel… being loaded with heavy baggage… (…) on this long
travel you are reaching a plateau, a flat highland area… and because there is no need to climb
up anymore, you can take a breath… deciding to put down your baggage… (…) looking for a
T
place to store your baggage… maybe on a rock or a tree… for now, freeing yourself from
IP
your baggage…
R
SC
…and after putting down your baggage, feeling the ease, maybe you like to move or even
dance, feeling how light you have become… (…) and feeling that ease, becoming curious
NU
about what is around you, you are looking around…
MA
… not far away, making out something bright… which might be a light and feeling attracted
by that light, you decide to go towards it… reaching a place with warm, bright light… feeling
D
TE
you like to linger… looking for a spot where you can sit down and rest… or maybe you like
to take a walk or keep on dancing… in any case, you will find what is right for you… (…)
P
and at the same time, still taking in the bright light, feeling comfortable and your body
CE
warming up… you enjoy the ease that you are still feeling…
AC
…suddenly, noticing some friendly, bright being coming up to you, smiling at you and
presenting a gift... you are getting a gift which, to your astonishment, is useful for your
problems that you currently experience, something that supports you now… maybe it is a
symbolic gift not making sense to you at this moment… if you feel glad about it, you can say
thank you… (…) now you decide to return to your baggage, leaving this place… knowing
…now, returning to your baggage, think about which part of your baggage you like to take
along on your further way… what you really need from now on… maybe noticing things that
you do not need anymore… (…) or taking everything with you, which is also fine…
T
IP
…then, you continue your journey carrying the baggage that you still need… knowing from
R
now on that you can take a break and put down your baggage at any time…
SC
…and again bringing your awareness to the room… to the way you are sitting in the chair…
NU
and gradually opening your eyes when you are ready and letting the experimenter know you
MA
are ready to continue…
D
P TE
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
34 Breath versus Emotions
T0 Training T1 T2 T3
Baseline Watching Films Watching Films End
Focus on Breath
Randomisation
T
Focus on Emotion Just View
IP
Just View (Control)
R
SAM SAM (after pos. films) SAM (after pos. films) KIMS
SC
SAM (after neg. films) SAM (after neg. films) EAQ
SAM: Self Assessment Manikin, KIMS: Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills, EAQ: Emotion Acceptance
NU
Questionnaire MA
Figure 1: Procedure
D
P TE
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
35 Breath versus Emotions
T
5
Condition 3 (Control)
IP
4,5
R
SC
4
3,5
3
NU
MA
2,5
2
D
1,5
TE
1
P
T
5,00
Condition 3 (Control)
IP
4,50
R
4,00
SC
3,50
NU
3,00
MA
2,50
2,00
D
1,50
TE
1,00
t0 t1 - Negative Film t2 - Negative Film
P
Table 1
T
Breathing Emotion Control Statistics Effect
Focus Focus Sizes
IP
n = 21 n = 21 n = 23
Gender 57% women 71% women 61% women Chi2=1 0.61
R
M SD M SD M SD F p ŋ2
SC
Age 27.1 7.6 29.3 10.2 27.9 9.1 0.34 0.71 0.01
NU
3.9 0.8 3.8 0.6 4.1 0.9
a
Derived from the Emotion Acceptance Questionnaire (EAQ, Beblo et al., 2011). Please note: Scores were
CE
2
Ac. = Accepting; ŋ = Partial Eta Squared
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
38 Breath versus Emotions
Table 2
Emotional Reactions to Negatively and Positively Valenced Films of the Three Study Groups
T
Focus Focus n = 23
n = 21 n = 21
IP
T0 T1 T2 T0 T1 T2 T0 T1 T2 F p ŋ2
Negativ Valence1 2.1 2.8 2.0 2.5 3.1 2.9 2.0 2.8 3.0 11.66 0.0 0.1
R
T
ely (1. (0. (0. (1. (0. (0. (1. (0. (0. 01 6
G
Valence 0) 9) 9) 0) 9) 7) 0) 8) 8) 4.91 0.0 0.1
SC
d 2.78 14 3
TxG:
Films 0.0 0.0
32 8
NU
Arousal2 2.4 2.5 2.0 2.6 3.4 2.4 2.2 2,8 2.6 12.07 0.001 0
T
(1. (1. (1. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. 0.082 .
G
1) 0) 0) 9) 9) 7) 7) 9) 8) 2.61 0.013 1
MA
3.32 6
TxG
0
.
0
8
D
0
TE
.
0
1
P
Domina 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1 2.8 2.9 5.29T 0.006 0
nce3 (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. 1.22G 0.30 .
CE
7) 8) 7) 6) 6) 6) 6) 8) 7) 1.28T 0.28 0
xG
8
0
AC
.
0
4
0
.
0
4
Positive Valence1 2.1 1.8 2.4 2.5 1.9 2.3 2.0 1.5 1.9 9.00T 0.001 0
ly (1. (0. (0. (1. (1. (1. (1. (0. (0. 2.22G 0.12 .
Valence 0) 7) 9 0) 0) 0) 0) 7) 9) 0.86T 0.49 1
xG
d 3
Films 0
.
0
7
0
.
0
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
39 Breath versus Emotions
3
2 T
Arousal 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 0.61 0.55 0
(1. (1. (1. (0. (0. (1. (0. (1. (1. 0.45G 0.64 .
1) 0) 1) 9) 8) 0) 7) 0) 0) 3.10T 0.018 0
xG
1
0
T
.
0
IP
1
0
R
.
0
SC
9
Domina 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.3 2.65T 0.075 0
nce3 (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. (0. 0.30G 0.74 .
NU
7) 9) 6) 6) 7) 5) 6) 5) 6) 0.75T 0.56 0
xG
4
0
MA
.
0
1
0
D
.
0
TE
1
Higher values indicate a more negative affective valence, 2Higher values indicate more arousal, 3Higher values
P
Highlights
T
2. Emotion-focused meditation tends to yield similar delayed effects.
IP
3. Effects primarily affected the delayed emotional response.
R
4. Effects affected both, emotional valence and arousal.
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC