TO BE FILLED BY HAND

LISTINC PROFO RMA

1'R UC IO NS : ]. DO NOT WRITE OUTSIDE
THE BOXES.
Pagcl
3, ONE CHARAC TER IN
2. WRITE IN BLOC K CAPITAL EACH BOX

r
LETTERS. 4. DO NOT Staple the Sheet.

TN THE HIGH CO URT OF DELHI AT NEW

Case T).pe
DELHI LI
Number

tN THE MATTER OF:_

tL tC OF I o q
NAME ?
iT s
I
& R I H N h PLAINTIFF /
PETITIONER
vs
NAME
L.lp T DEFENDANT /
RESPONDEN'f

I (a) Case Caregory

(b) Case Categorv

I
2 Date of Imousned order
W/WI o o li
3 (a) Similar Maner
Case Type / Number
rrl OF
tr[[]
I
4 Statute lnvolved ? e+ I + i o N lL)Yn I / ( o ,V st I + L' to
e U "I I! ) I *

Criminal Matters - Code 100 to 105

FtR No.
FIR Date

Police Starion

Service Matters - Code 500 to 505

Department / Authority /
Organization etc.

Motors Accident Claim Matters - Code 600

Insurance ComPanY

'v ? o q 8 I I
t-l
La*'yers Code I
I
 IN TFIE HON'BLE HIGH COL]RT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ORIGINAI CIVIL WzuT JIJB.ISDICTION
W.P. (CIVIL) NO:
OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KzuSHNA ...,.PETITIONER

VERSUS

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

......RESPONDENTS
INDEX
I S. No. PARTICULARS PAGE No.
I Court Fees lr
l2 Notice of Motion 2

3. Urgent Application 3

14. Memo of Parties 4-13

5 Synopsis and List of Dates & Events l4- l8

6 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution 19-35
of India along with accompanying affidavit.
7. Annexure P/l 36-61
A Copy of the Impugned Order dated
18.49.20i4 passed by the Ld. Central
Administrative Tribunal in O.A No. 2179 of
2014 titled as 'Mukesh Kumar Suman Vs.
Union Public Service Commission & Ors.'
8 Annexure P/2 62-t32
Pleadings of the Original Application filed by
Sh. Mukesh Kumar Suman under Section 19
of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
before the Ld. Central Administrative
Tribunal under O.A. No: 21 79 of 2014
PLEADINGS OF O.A. NO: 2179 OF 2014
I Index of O.A. No: 2179 of 2014 62
I

2 List of Dates 63
I

3 Application 64-71

4 Annexure A/l 72-79

Final result of
Assistant Labour
Commissioner dated 1 7.06.20 i4
 5 Annexure A/i 80
Admit card issued by Applicant
by
Respondent/ UpSC
6 Annexure A/i
81-1I5
Special Recruitment Advertisement
No.51/2013 by Respondent/
UpSC
7 Annexure A./4
I
116-117
Result of Computer based
recruitment
test held on 04.08.2013 by
Respondent/ UPSC for post of
I

Assistant Labour Commissioner

dated
30.t2.2013
8. Annexure A/5
l 18- 126
List of shortlisted candidates lor
interview by Respondent/ UpSC
dated
03.03.2014
9. Annexure .{/6
t27-128
True copy of reply by Respondent/
TIPSC ofRTIdated 30.12. 2013
10. Annexure A./7
129-130
True copy of RTI reply by
Respondent/ UpSC dated 2 3.09.2013
11. Annexure A./8
l3l-132
True copy of RTI filed on20.06.2014
by the Applicant
12. A copy of the sh on reply affidavit
133- 1 51
filed by the Respondent No. 1/ UpSC
before the Ld. Tribunal against the
aforesaid Original Application
13. Writt en arguments filed on behalf of 152-168
Sh. Mukesh Kumar Suman i.e. the
Petitioner therein
9. Application under S ecti on 151 CPC on behalf
169-17 5
of the Petitioner seeking stay of the operation
ofthe Order dated 1g.09.201g passed by the
Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.
No: 2179 of 2014 titled as ,Mukesh Kumar
Suman Vs Union public Service Commission
& Ors.
10. Application under Secti on 151 CPC on behalf 176-180
of the Petitioner seeking leave ro file the
present writ petition.
a
11. Applicati on under Section 151 CPC seeking 181-185
exemption from filing the legible copy of
documents, page margins and certified copy
of the annexures along with accompanying
affidavit.
12, Certificate 186

13. Vakalatnama 187

Place: New Delhi

Dated: 29.05-2019
Petitioner

Surbhi Sharma & t Mangla

Advocates
204, Supreme Court Lawyers' Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane
New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838
E-mail : admin@orismlaw.in
 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
OzuGINAL CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION
W.P. (CIVIL) NO: oF 2019 _
I\ THE MATTER OF:
PATI KzuSHNA ......PETITIONER

VERSUS

L]NION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

......RESPONDENTS

*i--:9.sP-.tlr ,'!r \t itE /",:\$7.qp,""v'\*2 -\" te "\i \r

\ 00001 3
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF D ELHI
e-Court Fee

o8-JAN-2019 15:23:25
OATE & TIME :

USER : SHCIL
NAME9 OF THE ACC/ REGISTERED
DELHI HIGH COURT
LOCATION :
I
DLCT0816A1923P383
e-COURT RECEIPT NO :

{ 100
e.COURT FEE AMOUNT :

{ Rupoes One HLrndred Onry)

(

(
I ill illlrllilll,I[tuill[|ulJlllJllilllllllilllll

x
ne on $e website renders il
'nvalid'
ale. verilication & locklng by lhe Courl Ollcial
ThLs rocoipl rs valio onlY

Place: New Delhi

Dated:24. s. Icli Petitioner
Through

Surbhi Sharma &

vocates
204, Supreme Court Lawyers' Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane, New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838, E-mail: admin@prismlaw.in
 r)
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

OzuGINAL CIVIL WRIT JUzuSDICTION

w.P. (CIVIL) NO: _ OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KzuSHNA ......I'ETITIONER

VERSUS

TINION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

......RESPONDENTS

NOTICE OF MOTION
Sir/ Madam,
Take notice that the enclosed Petition is being filed on behalf of the

Petitioner and the same is likely to be listed on _ or any date

thereafter.

Place: New Delhi

Dated:fi.9. ;1
Petitioner
Through

Surbhi Sharma Ankit Mangla

Advocates
204, Supreme Court Lawyers' Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane
New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838
E-mai[: admin@prismlaw.in
 :
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ORIGINAL CIVIL WRIT JUzuSDICTION
w.P. (CIVIL) NO: OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KRISFINA ......PETITIONER

VERSUS

LINION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

...,..RESPONDENTS

URGENT APPLICATION
The Registrar

Hon'ble High Court of Delhi

New Delhi

Sir,

Kindly treat the accompanying Petition on an urgent basis and the

grounds of urgency are:

"As prayed for in the application"

Place: New Delhi

Dated:!Q. 9. 2otl
Petitioner

Surbhi Sharma & Mangla

Advocates
204, Supreme Court Lawyers' Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane
New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838
E-mail : admin@prismlaw.in
 Lt
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
OzuGINAL CIVIL WRIT JUzuSDICTION
w.P. (CIVIL) NO: OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KzuSHNA ......PETITIONER

VERSUS

LJNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

......RESPONDENTS

MEMO OF PARTIES

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION

OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

oR ANy OTHER APPROPRTATE WRrT (S), ORDER (S) OR

DIRECTION (S) FOR QUASTIING THE ORDER DATED

I8.09.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED CENTRAL

ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN O.A. NO. 2179 OF 2OI8

TITLI,D AS'MUKESH KUMAR SUMAN VERSUS UNION

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS'TO THE EXTENT

IT DIRECTS THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO REDO THE

EXERCISE BY RESTRICTING THE MARKS TO BE

ALLOCATED FOR INTERVIEW TO 15OlO, WITHOUT

INSISTING ON THE MINIMUM MARKS THEREIN, AND

THEN TO PUBLISH THE RESULTS;

AND

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE, CONSTITUTION

OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

oR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRrT (S), ORDER (S) OR

DIRECTION (S) FOR QUASHING THE ENTIRE

RECRUITMENT PROCESS AND A FURTHER WRIT OF

MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. I TO

CARRY OUT A FRESH PROCESS OF SELECTION FOR

THE POST OF ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER

(CENTRALY ASSISTANT LABOUR WELFARE

COMMISSIONER (CENTRALY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR IN

GRADE-V OF JUNTOR TrME SCALE (JTS) OF CENTRAL

LABOUR SERVICE (CLS), MINISTRY OF LABOUR &

EMPLOYMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

PRESCRIBED NORMS AND AFTER ISSUING AN

ADVERTISEMENT IN THIS REGARD

AND

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THII CONSTITUTION

OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

oR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT (S), ORDER (S) OR

DIRECTION (S) DECLARING THE PROCESS OF

SELECTION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE POST OF

ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRALY

ASSISTANT LABOUR WELFARE COMMISSIONER

(CENTRALY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR IN GRADE-V OF
JUNIOR TIME SCALE (JTS) OF CENTRAL LABOUR

SERVICE (CLS), MINISTRY OF LABOUR &

EMPLOYMENT TO BE ILLEGAL;
 ,/

Pati Krishna
House No: 2/199
Tamsam Street,
Gopalpur on sea
Ganjam, Odisha- 7 61002. .. ...Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Public Service Commission

Through its Secretary
Dholpur House,
Shahjahan Road,
New Delhi 110069.

2. Union of India
Through its secretary
Ministry of Labour & Employment
Shram Shakti Bhavan,
Rafi Marg,
New Delhi I 10001 .

3. Sumit
QU-1 86, Vishakha Enclave
Uttari Pitam Pura,
North West Delhi- I 1 0088.

4. Niranj an Kumar
Jeevan Deep Building
O/o Regional Labour Commissioner
Room No. 12 A,
4th Floor, Parliament Street,
New Delhi 1 10001.

5. Nirmal Chandra Kar

Quarter No. IV/TS/FF/76
Hi Tech Colony
NDMC Township Bacheli
District- South Basti Dantewala
Chattisgarh 494553.

6. Shoaibali Hasanli Sayyad

C/o Mahmud Sheik
Prince Commerce Institute
Chaomi. Nagpur 4400 13.

7. Rakesh Gaur
H. No. 571, Sector 16 A,
 Faridabad 121002.
+
8. Sachin Kumar
189-A, Alp Bagh Colony,
Near Nagar Mahapalika,
Allahabad 2l 100 I .

9. Shubha Tyagi
298112, Chandan Vihar
West Sant Nagar,
Burari,
Delhi i 10084.

10. Rahul Tyagi

7081412, Street No.2,
Arya Nagar,
Jawallapur, Haridwar,
Uttarakhand 249407.

I l. Resmi V.
T.C. 1/1917 (1)
Sivamanasam High School
Lane Kumarpuram
Thiruvantpuram.

12. Manikadan
30/2A, Aami Road,
Opposite Fire Station
Cheyyar
Thruvannamallai
Tamil Nadu 604407.

13. Bidhan Chandra Nayak

Bank of India
Zonal Office,
Sadanand Road,
Saketpuri, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.

14. Mohd. lmran Raza

H. No. C-21, Old Govind Pura,
St. No. l, Purwana Road,
Jagatpuri, P.O. Krishna Nagar,
East Delhi, Delhi I 1005 1.

15. Chanjeev Saikia

Near Nidhi Bhavan,
Ward No.8,
New Amolapatty,
PO & PS: Golaghat
 Assam 785621.
8
16. Nidhi Sharma
I 1, United India Apartments,
Mayur Vihar Phase I Extension
New Delhi 1 10091.

17. Karunkar Jannath Mohanty

Village Digneshwar
Post Palasole
District Jagatsingpur
Odisha754294.

1 8. Srinu Dara
Flat No. 3 10
Rajva Bav Complex3Boregain Chowk
Gorewala Road,
Nagpur 4400 13.

19.Kanhu Charan Sahu

Trainee Officer (HR)
Chutak Power Station
NHPC Ltd.
Po Minji, District Kargil
Laddakh,
Jammu & Kashmir.

20. Biswa Ranjan Satpathy

Flat No. Type- IV/3
Residential Complex
Office of the Dy. CLC (C)
Murti Nagar, Dhanwad
Jharkhand 836003.

2l . Susanta Kumar Nayak

CA-ll3AI, KAIGA Township
Mallapur, Po Kaigha
Distt. Uttara Kannada
Kamataka 581400.

22. Anjali Yadav

H. No. 40,
Old Govindpura Extension
PO Krishna Nagar
East Delhi,
Delhi 110051.

23.Sunil Kuamr Sahu

Bank of Baroda
 q
Zonal Office, Anand Vihar, West Boring Canal Road
Patna 800001, Bihar.

24. Washimul Haque

83/ A, Shujat Ganj
Post Office COD
Kanpur
IJrP 208013.

25. Rajeev Ranj an

C-5, Officers Colony,
Near Denobli School
Mahulbanni, Bowra
Dhanbad, Jharkhand 828302.

26. Khitii Jain

1 18, Basant Vihar

Hameerpur Road,
Naubasta
Kanpur 208021.

27. Mrinmoy Thakur

C/o Dipty Thakur
228,Zig Zig Road (near Namghar)
Central Chowkidinghee
Dibruhar 786001. (Assaam)

28. Ankur Dalal

H.No. 137, Sector 15,
Part I, Gurgaon,
Haryana 122001 .

29. Ashok Perumalla

1't Floor, HIG 103,
Housing Board Colony,
Bhavani Puram,
Vijaywada,
Krishn District 522012

30. Barun Kumar Jha

13315,Clo WB SEDCL
North Malda Division
Durgabari More P.S. Chanchal
District Malda732123
West Bengal.

31. Dharmendra Kumar Himanshu

House No. 507 2'd Floor,
Mukherjee Nagar,
 I e-)
Delhi 110009

32. Kanagvel Pandiyan Shanmugavel

Plot No. 4, Flat No. F1
Chairman Thambiah Reddy Colony
Madambakkham, Kanchipuram Di st.,
Chennai 600126, Tamilnadu.

33. MD Razi Alam Khan

QtrNo. 154, Type III Pocket I
Kendanchal Colony,
Preetam Nagar,
Post Dhoomanganj,
Allahabad.

34. Beena
A-97, Ground Floor,
Behind SBI Building,
Kamla Nagar, Thana Roop Nagar
Delhi 110007.

35. Annadurai
461116, TNBH Shanthi Colony
7th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai 400054.

36. Subhapriyadarshani Muthupandi

133/5, Westem Railway Colony,
Santakruj West, Mumbai 400054.

37. Madhavan
490tA
Opposite to Ration Shop
Hospital Road
Perambakkam Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu 631402.

38. Ram Krishan Meena

C- I 9, Indrapastha Colony,
Model Town, Malviya Nagar,
Jaipur, Rajasthan 302025.

39. Rajesh Kumar T.

D. No. 3-412, PIot No. 165,
Vishnupuram Colony,
Porank, Vijayvada Rural,
District Krishna (A.P.)

40. Praveen pondi Mohan das

C/201, Star Residency
Evershine City
-{ l1
Vsali (e)
Thane 401205, Maharashtra.

4l . Sunil Raghnath Mali

C/o A.J. Kulakrni
D-12, Green valley Society
S.No. 7/1/14, near Relicon Visha
Narhe Gaon, Tal haveli
Dist. Pune, Maharashtra 4 1 1 041 .

42. V.R. Ganeshan

l7l8, Ganapathy Street
Tripicane Ice House,
Chennai 600005.

43. Renu Yadav

H.No.731, Sector 17,
Defence Colony,
Gurgaon 122001,
Haryana.

44. Prem Kumar

D, No. 11/19th Street
New Manglore Port trust Colony
Panambur, Managlore 10,
Kamataka.

45.Pradyumna Kumar Rana

At Kalipoi
Post Bania
Via Kalatpatar 754009,
District Cuttack,
Cuttack 7 54009, Odisha.

46. Nayan Manik Tripura

S/o Tirthaj oy Tripura
Vill. Ratan Ropyaja Parar
P.O. Dhumachara, Dhalai
Tripura.

47. Riga Jaisingh Chauhan

Flat No. M8B Plot No.18
Vikram Enclave, 80ft Road,
Shalimar Garden,
Sahibabad,
Ghaziabad 201005.

48. MohammadOzair
Mohalla Shah Modhpur
 \2
P.O. Mubarakpur
Distt. Azamgarh, UP- 276404.
49. Vishal Ashok Amte
B/201, Sarvodaya Paradise
Opp. Sarvodya Ganga
Near Bhanu Sagar Talkies
Kelyafn (West)
District Thane 421301.

50. Atul Sing

419 A
Tularam Bagh
Post Daraganj,
Allahabad.

51. Hami Om Gautam

O/o Labour Enforcement Office
Ministry of Labour
Govt. of India
Opp, Vetenary Hospital
Barari Road
Tlkamanjhi
Bhagalpur 812001.

52. Harikesh Bahadur

2230- SQN AF, C/o 46 Wing AF
Air Force Station NAL
Bikaner, Raj asthan.

53. Hitler Thoudham

7/36A, 3'd Floor
Double Story
Vijay Nagar,
North Delhi i 10009.

54. Sagar Pradhan

Q. No. 2RA 58
Delta Type Colony
Unit VIII
Bhuvaneshvar Khurda, Odisha 75 1012.

55. Amardeep
Village & Post- Dungarwas
District Rewari
Haryana 122106.

56. Wonmi Horam

C/o Dr. Grace,44 E,
Quarrer NIHFW,
 (Nationai Institute of Health & Family Welfare)
l3
Munirka, Delhi I 10067.
57. S. Ravikanth Reddy
H.No. 428 Konwur Village
Kumari Bsth
Secundrabad
Bollarum Po
Hyderabad 50010.

58. Basavraj
1893 G Block
4th A MAIN (21't Cross 2nd Main)
Sahakar Nagar
Banglore 92, Kamataka.

59. Santosh Kumar Sethi

B-27, Gail
Vijaypur,
Guna, MP 473112. ....... Respondents

Place: New Delhi

Dated:PQ,9,2o11
Petitioner

Surbhi Sharma & Mangla

Advocates
204, Supreme Court Lawyers' Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane
New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838
E-mail: admin smlaw.in
 tv
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ORIGINAL CIVIL WRIT JUzuSDICTION
W.P. (CIVIL) NO: _ OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KRISHNA ......PETITIONER

VERSUS

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

......RESPONDENTS

SYNOPSIS

That the Petitioner by means of the accompanying Writ petition

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to challenge the

order dated 18.09.2018 passed by the Ld. Central Administrative

Tribunal in O.A No. 2179 of 2011t titled as 'Mukesh Kumar Suman

Vs. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.'ro the extent it directs

the Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to

be allocated for interview 15%, without insisting on the minimum

marks therein, and then to publish the results.

While passing the Impugned Order, the Ld. Tribunal failed to

deliberate on the two prominent issues raised by the Petitioner (Sh.

Mukesh Kumar Suman) therein i.e. (I) non-fulfillment of essential

and desirable educational qualifications by few of the selected

candidates and; (II) the candidates short listed for the interview did

not have the name of three candidates namely Sh. Kanagavel

Pandiyan Shanrnugavel (Roll No. 008396), Sh. Wonmi Horam (Roll

 t5
No.011056) and Sh. Washimul Haq (Roll No.005640); yet they

were selected and consequently appointed; and has passed the order

without appreciating the documentary evidence avaitable on record.

The said issues unambiguously show that ineligible persons have

been inducted and have found place in the list of appointed

candidates. Thus, the entire selection process being incorporated with

illegalities, ought to have been cancelled as a whole and the

appropriate course is to initiate the process afresh for the various

posts namely Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant

Labour Welfare Commissioner (Centrat)/ Assistant Director in

Grade-V of Junior Time Scale (JTS) of Central Labour Service

(CLS), Ministry of Labour & Employmenr, in accordance with the

prescribed norms and after issuing an advertisement in this regard.

The Ld. Tribunal lailed to take note ofthe fact that irrespective ofthe

percentage of allocation of rnarks for the interview, the ineligible

persons, who do not possess the essential educational qualification

have found place in the list of candidates shortlisted for the interview

and have consequently been selected by the Respondent No. 1. By

doing so, the Ld. Tribunal has adversely affected the case of the

Petitioner and other similarly situated persons in as much as many

persons who do not possess the requisite qualification prescribed by

the Respondent No. I might be selected for the posts again ra,hich

will, in normal course, be filled up from amongst the qualified

candidates.
 IA
LIST OF DATES & EVENTS

Date Description of Events

12.01 .2013 Special Recrui tment Advertisement No. 51/ 2013 u,as

published by the Respondent No. 1 for recruiting

candidates against 57 posts of Assistant Labour

Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Labour Welfare

Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Director in Grade-

V of Junior Time Scale (JTS) ol Central Labour

Service (CLS), Ministry of Labour & Employment.

The Petitioner, who was fully qualified for working

on the post as he possessed the essential educational

qualifi cations, appl ied for appointment.

04.08.2013 The computer-based test for the said 57 posts

mentioned above was conducted by the Respondent

No. l.

03.03.2014 The candidates who cleared the Computer based

recruitment test were shortlisted and pursuant to the

I I

successful scrutiny ofthe documents fumished by the

shortlisted candidates, 175 candidates were called for

the interview vide letter dated 03.03.2014 including

the Petitioner whose name appeared at S.No. 128 of

the said letter dated 03.03.20 14 vis-d-vis the interview

schedule for the post of Assistant Labour

C omm issioner
 t+
17.06.2014 That pursuant to th e interview, a final list of 5 7

candidates was issued who were finally selected for

the posts in the Central Labour Services, JTS and the

same was declared on 17 ,06.2014. The petitioner was

not included in the said list.

30.06.2014 That bein g aggrieved by the said final result declared

by the Respondent No. I and on the basis of the

material and information secured, one Sh. Mukesh

Kumar Suman filed an Original Application under

Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act. 1985

before the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal, New

Delhi under O.A. No: 2179 of 2014 primarily

challenging the procedure adopted by the Respondent

No. I in selection ofthe candidates in pursuance ofthe

advertisement. referred to above.

r 8.09.201 8 That the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal. after

considering the submissions ofthe parties thereto and

the materials made available to it, allowed the Petition

holding that the entire selection of 5 7 candidates who

are impleaded as private respondents is vitiated.

Resultantly, the selections made in pursuance of the

] I

eau..ti..r"nt No. 5l/2013 ro rhe posts of Assi.tant

I I

I ",:,::;;" -",::,.::-.-Hl::*:: I

] ..ao ,f,. exercise by restricting the marks to be

 -7
t8
allocates lor intervi ew to 15%, without insisting on

minimum marks therein, and then to publish the

results. The Petitioner submits that the Ld. Tribunal

was entitled to exercise discretion and cancel the

entire recruitment process instead of directing the

Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting

the marks to be allocated for interview to 15Yo,

without insisting on minimum marks therein.

08.0 r .2019
I
The Petitioner having no other remedy has been

constrained to file the present petition against the

Impugned Order passed by the Ld. Tribunal.
 tq
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ORIGINAL CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION
W.P. (CIVIL) NO: _ OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KzuSHNA ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

LINION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

RESPONDENTS

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF

INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY

oTHER APPROPRIATE WRrT (S), ORDER (S) OR DTRECTTON (S)

FOR QUASHTNG THE ORDER DATED 18.09.2018 PASSED By THE

LEARNED CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN O.A. NO.

2179 OF 2OI4 TITLED AS 'MUKESH KUMAR SUMAN VERSUS

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS' TO THE

EXTENT IT DIRECTS THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO REDO THE

EXERCISE BY RESTRICTING THE MARKS TO BE ALLOCATED

FOR INTERVIEW TO 1502, WITHOUT INSISTING ON THE

MINIMUM MARKS THEREIN, AND THEN TO PUBLISH THE
RESULTS;

AND

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF

INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY

OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT (S), ORDER (S) OR DIRECTION (S)

 2o
FOR QUASHING THE ENTIRE RECRUITMENT PROCESS AND A

FURTHER WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE

RESPONDENT NO. I TO CARRY OUT A FRESH PROCESS OF

SELECTION FOR THE POST OF ASSISTANT LABOUR

COMMISSIONER (CENTRALY ASSISTANT LABOUR WELFARE

COMMISSIONER (CBNTRALY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR IN

GRADE.VOFJUNIORTIME SCALE (JTS) OF CENTRAL LABOUR

SERVICE (CLS), MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRESCRIBED NORMS AND AFTER

ISSUTNG AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THIS REGARD.

AND

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF

INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY

OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT (S), ORDER (S) OR DIRECTION (S)

DECLARING THE PROCESS OF SELECTION FOR

APPOINTMENT TO THE POST OF ASSISTANT LABOUR

COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL)/ ASSISTANT LABOUR WELFARE

COMMISSIONER (CENTRALY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR IN

GRADE-VOFJUNIORTIME SCALE (JTS) OF CENTRAL LABOUR

SERVICE (CLS), MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT TO

BE ILLEGAL;

Most Respectfully Showeth;

l. By way ofthe present petition under Article 226 ofthe constitution oflndia,

the Petitioner seeks issuance of:

 fr
a. An appropriate order, direction or writ including a writ of certiorari for

quashing the order dated 18.09.2018 passed by the Ld. Central

Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal') in O.A No. 2179 of 20lltitled as

'Mukesh Kumar Suman Vs. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.' to

the extent it directs the Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting

the marks to be allocated for interview l5%o,, without insisting on the

minimum marks therein, and then to publish the results ('Impugned

Order');

b. An appropriate order, direction or writ including a writ of Certiorari for

quashing the entire recruitment process and a further writ of Mandamus

directing the Respondent No. I to caffy out a fresh process of selection for

the post of Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Labour

Welfare Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Director in Grade-V of Junior

Time Scale (JTS) of Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry of Labour &

Employment in accordance with the prescribed norms and after issuing an

advertisement in this regard;

c. An appropriate order, direction or writ including a writ of Certiorari

declaring the process of selection for appointment to the post of Assistant

Labour commissioner (central)/ Assistant Labour welfare commissioner

(Central)/ Assistant Director in Grade-V of Junior Time Scale (JTS) of

Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry of Labour & Employment, to be

itlegal;
 A copy of th e Impugned Order
v9o
dated lg.19.20tg is annexed hereto
and
marked as Annexure p/l.

2 The Petitioner has been constrained

to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction
of this Hon,ble Court in as much
as the Ld. Tribunal, while holding
that the
entire serection process was vitiated
and consequently correctly setting
aside
the selections made in pursuance
of the advertisement to the various
posts,
showed leniency and benevolence
in the case and wrongfulry directed
the
Respondent No' 1 to redo the exercise by restricting
the marks to be allocated
for interview to l5oh. On the contrary,
the appropriate course is to cance.l
the
entire selection process in entirety
and to initiate the process afresh
for the
various posts namely Assistant Labour
commissioner (central)/ Assistant
Labour welfare commissioner (central)/
Assistant Director in Grade-V of

Junior Time Scale (JTS) of Central Labour

Service (CLS), Ministry of
Labour & Employment, in accordance with the prescribed norms
and after
issuing an advertisement in this regard.

3. Further, while passing the Impugned Order, the Ld.

Tribunal failed to
deliberate on the two prominent issues raised by the petitioner
therein and
has passed the order without appreciating the documentary
evidence

available on record. The Ld. Tribunal failed to deliberate

on the folowing

two issues:

a. non-fulfillment of essential and desirable educational qualifications bv few

of the selected candidates:

 P3
b. the candidates short listed for the interview did not have the name of three

respondents/ candidates namety Sh. Kanagavel pandiyan Shanmugavel (Roll

No. 008396), Sh. Wonmi Horam (Roll No. 011056) and Sh. Washimul Haq

(Roll No. 005640); yet they were selected and consequently appointed.

4. The aforesaid undecided issues unambiguously show that ineligible persons

have been inducted and have found place in the list of appointed candidates.

Thus, the entire selection process being incorporated with glaring illegalities,

ought to have been cancelled as a whole and a fresh process of selection for

the various aforesaid posts be initiated in accordance with the prescribed

norms after issuing an advertisement in this regard.

5. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the Impugned Order dated 1g.09.201g,

seeks to impugn the same to the limited extent that it directs the Respondent

No. 1 to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated for

interview to l5Yo,, instead ofscrapping of the selection process in its entirety

including scrapping of the entire examination, in the light of detailed facts,

circumstances and grounds namated hereinafter. The Ld. Tribunal was

entitled to exercise discretion and cancel the entire recruitment process

instead ofdirecting the Respondenl No. 1 to redo the exercise by restricting

the marks to be allocated for interview to 15%, without insisting on

minimum marks therein.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND:

6. That although the Petitioner was not a party ro the proceedings before the

Ld. Tribunal, yet he is vitally interested in the case in as much as his chances
 pLl
of selection and consequent appointment has been severely affected despite

being qualified. The Petitioner is a similarly situated person like Sh. Mukesh

Kumar Suman i.e. the Petitioner before the Ld. Central Administrative

Tribunal who has fallen prey to the unconstitutional and arbitrary selection

process of the Respondent No. l. The petitioner herein had exhibited

excellent performance in so far as written examination is concemed but has

remained unsuccessful for the reason of not securing 50% marks in the

interview despite the fact that the notification issued by the Respondent No.

I did not specify the marks to be allocated for written test on the one hand

and interview on the other. The weightage to the inteNiew has virtually

become the only determinative factor in relation to the result of the entire

process.

7. That in the month of January 2013, the Respondent No. I (the Union Public

Service Commission, hereafter, "UPSC") published special recruitment

advertisement no. 5l/2013 for recruiting candidates against 57 posts of

Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Labour Welfare

Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Director in Grade-V of Junior Time Scale

(JTS) of Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry of l-abour & Employment.

The qualifications to be held by the intending candidates, as well as the scale

of pay attached to the posts, were indicated in the Advertisement. It was also

mentioned that a written objective type recruitment test, with multiple choice

questions, would be conducted, followed by interview, for selection. The

subjects in which the test would be conducted were also Iisted. Under the

heading 'Weightage', it was mentioned that respective weightage of the

recruitment test and interview shall be decided bv the Commission. That vide
 a corrigendum issued by the Respondent No.
2s
l, it decided to conduct a
computer Based Recruitment Test for filling up the aforesaid posts on

04.08.2013. A copy of the Special Recruitment Advertisement No. 5ll2013

issued by the Respondent No. 1 forms part of the annexures of the original
Application filed before the Hon'ble central Administrative Tribunal

separately annexed herewith.

8. That as per the aforesaid Special Recruitment Advertisement, the prescribed

essential educational qualification required to be possessed for working on

the said posts was as follows:

a Degree of a recognized University or equivalent;

b. Diploma in Social work/ Labour welfare/ Industrial Relations/ personnel

ManagemenV Labour Law from a recognized University/ Institution or

equivalent.

Furthermore, the Advertisement prescribed that the persons interested in

working on the said posts should desirably possess a Degree in law from a

recognized University.

9. That pursuant to the issuance of the aforesaid advertisement, the petitioner,

who was fully qualified for working on the post as he possessed the essential

educational qualifications, applied for appointment. The computer-based test

for the said 57 posts mentioned above was conducted on 04.08.2013. The

candidates who cleared the computer based recruitment test were shortlisted

and pursuant to the successful scrutiny of the documents fumished by the

shortlisted candidates, 175 candidates were called lor the interview vide
 "?6
letter dated 03.03.20 14 including the petitioner whose name appeared at

S.No. I 28 of the said letter dated 03.03.20 1 4 vis-d-vis the interview schedule

for the post of Assistant Labour Commissioner. A copy of the letter dated

03.03.2014 with respect to the Interview Schedule/ Shortlisted candidates for

the interuiew for the post of Assistant Labour Commissioner forms part of
the annexures of the Original Application filed before the Hon'ble Central

Administrative Tribunal separately annexed herewith.

10. That pursuant to the interview, a final list of 57 candidates was issued who

were finally selected for the posts in the Central Labour Services, JTS and

the same was declared on I 7.06.2014. The Petitioner was not included in the

said list. A copy of the said final result published by the Respondent No. 1

vis-d-vis 57 candidates forms part of the annexures of the Original

Application filed before the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal

separately annexed herewith.

I l. Aggrieved by the said final result declared by the Respondent No. I and on

the basis of the material and infbrmation secured, one Sh. Mukesh Kumar

Suman filed an Original Application under Section l9 of the Administrative

Tribunals Act, 1985 before the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal ('CAT')

New Delhi under O.A. No: 2179 of 2014 primarily challenging the procedure

adopted by the Respondent No. I in selection ofthe candidates in pursuance

of the advenisement, referred to above. A copy of the said Original

Application filed by Sh. Mukesh Kumar Suman before the Ld. CAT along

with all the annexures attached therewith and the pleadings therein are

annexed hereto and rnarked as Annexure P/2.

 2+
12. That the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal, after considering the

submissions of the parties thereto and the materials made available to it,

allowed the Petition holding that the entire selection of 57 candidates who

are impleaded as private respondents is vitiated. Resultantly, the selections

made in pursuance of the Advertisement No. 5 I /201 3 to the posts of

Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) and equivalent were set aside with

a direction to the Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting the

marks to be allocates for interview to l5Yo, without insisting on minimum

marks therein, and then to publish the results. The Tribunal also observed

that if any of the private respondents needs to be displaced on account of

such an exercise, the possibility of adjusting him against the existing or

subsequent vacancy may be considered, by addressing the department

concemed.

I 3. The Petitioner states that the Impugned Order passed by the Leamed

Tribunal is grossly erroneous and inconect to the extent it directs the

Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated

for interview 15%, without insisting on the minimum marks therein, and then

to publish the results. While passing the Impugned Order, the Ld. Tribunal

failed to deliberate on the two prominent issues raised by the Petitioner (Sh

Mukesh Kumar Suman) therein i.e. (I) non-fulfillment of essential and

desirable educational qualihcations by few of the selected candidates and;

(II) the candidates short Iisted for the interview did not have the name of

three candidates namely Sh. Kanagavel Pandiyan Shanmugavel (Roll No

008396), Sh. Wonmi Horam (Roll No. 0l I 056) and Sh. Washimul Haq (Roll
 2E
No.005640); yet they were selected and consequently appointed; and has

passed the order without appreciating the documentary evidence available

on record.

14. The said issues unambiguously show that inetigible persons have been

inducted and have found place in the list of appointed candidates. Thus, the

entire selection process being incorporated with illegalities, ought to have

been cancelled as a whole and a fresh process of selection for the various

aforesaid posts be initiated in accordance with the prescribed norms after

issuing an advertisement in this regard.

15. The Ld. Tribunal was entitled to exercise discretion and cancel the entire

recruitment process instead of directing the Respondent No. I to redo the

exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated for interview to 15Yo,

without insisting on minimum marks therein. The Petitioner is therefore,

challenging the said Impugned Order on the following grounds which are in

the altemative and are taken without prejudice to each other:

GROUNDS

I. Because the Impugned Order is liable to be set aside in as much as the

recruitment process incorporates an unfair selection process and glaring

illegalities and as such the entire selection ought to have been scrapped;

II. Because the entire selection process was riddled with discrepanciesl

therefore, the appropriate course to be adopted was to cancel the entire

selection/ recruitment process and to initiate the process afresh in accordance

with prescribed norms after issuing an advertisement in this regard rather

 ?oI
,)/'
than directing the Respondent No. 1 to redo the exercise by restricting
the

marks to be allocated for interview 15%:

III. Because the Ld. Tribunal, while quashing the selection and directing the

Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated

for interview 15%, did not consider the essential qualification as per Serial

No. 2(a). The Ld. Tribunal overlooked that there were two mandatory

educational qualifications which were required, and few candidates did not

possess the essential educational qualification and were unsuitable for the

interview;

IV Because the Ld. Tribunal, while quashing the selection and directing the

Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated

for interview 15%, failed to take note of the fact that irrespective of the

percentage of allocation of marks for the interview, the ineligible persons,

who do not possess the essential educational qualification have found place

in the list of candidates shortlisted for the interview;

V. Because the Ld. Tribunal failed to take note of the fact that unqualified
persons had been called for interview and such candidates do not have

requisite qualification as prescribed by the recruitment rules;

VI. Because the Ld. Tribunal failed ro rake note of the lact rhat the candidates

shortlisted for the interview did not have the name of three respondents/

candidates namely Sh. Kanagavel Pandiyan Shanmugavel (Roll No.

008396), Sh. Wonmi Horam (Roll No. 0l 1056) and Sh. Washimul Haq (Roll
 3o
No. 005640); but later on, they were called for the interview, selected and

consequently appointed;

vll. Because by not deliberating the issue ofeducational qualification and on the

contrary, directing the Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting

the marks to be allocated for interview 15o/o, the Ld. Tribunal has adversely

affected the case of the Petitioner and other similarly situated persons in as

much as many persons who do not possess the requisite qualification

prescribed by the Respondent No. l might be selected for the posts which
will, in normal course, be fitled up from amongst the quatified candidates;

vlII. Because the Ld. Tribunal faited to take note of the fact that names of the

unqualified candidates should be kept out from consideration and the posts

should be filled up from amongst the qualified candidates;

Ix. Because the Ld. Tribunal failed to appreciate that the recruitment to public

services should be held strictly in accordance with the terms of the

advertisement and recruitment rules and deviation from the rules allows

entry to ineligible persons and deprives many others who could have been

selected for the post;

x Because the Ld. Tribunal, while holding that the entire selection process was

vitiated and consequently setting aside the selections made in pursuance of

the advertisement to the various posts, wrongfully directed the Respondent

No. I to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated for

interview to 15oZ instead of scrapping the recruitment process in entirety;
 XI. Because the Ld' Tribunal
3t
grossly erred by
directing the Respondent
No. I to
redo the exercise
by restricting the marks
to be alrocated for interview
l5%
rn as much as once
it is determined that the
entire selection process
is vitiated,
a direction for fresh
adverlisement and selection
has to follow;

XII. Because the Ld. Tribunal,

despite holding that rhe
Respondent No. 1 acted
unfairry' failed to consider
the welr settred law that
ifthe illegality committed
goes to the root of
matter which vitiates the
entire selection process, then
even in such a case the
selection process as a whole
should be cancelled:

16' It is therefore, humbly submitted that the Impugned

order of rhe Ld. Tribunal
is erroneous in law and is bereft
ofany legality or propriety to the
extent it
directs the Respondent No. r to
redo the exercise by restricting
the marks to
be allocated for interview 15%, without
insisting on the minimum marks
therein, and then to publish the results,
and is thus, liable to be set aside.

17. The Petitioner craves liberty of this Hon,ble courl

to file additional

documents, add, alter, modif, or amend the grounds of the petition during

the pendency of this writ petition, if required or calred upon by this Hon,ble

Court.

18. The Petitioner has not filed any such similar petition in the given facts of the

case in this Hon'ble Court or in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.

19. There is no equally efficacious remedy available to the petitioner except to

file the present Petition. The present petition is bonafide and in the interest

ofjustice.
 ?2
PRAYER

Hon'b1e Court
ln the circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this

may kindlY be Pleased to:

a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate

writ' order or direction

quashing the order dated 18'09'2018 passed by the Ld' Central

Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal') in O.A No. 2179 of 201[ titled as

'Mukesh Kumar Suman Vs. Union Public Service Commission & Ors" to

the extent it directs the Respondent No. 1 to redo the exercise by restricting

the marks to be allocated for interview l5Yo, without insisting on the

minimum marks therein, and then to publish the results Call for records of

the casel

b) Issue a Writ of Cefiiorari for quashing the entire recruitment process and a

further writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to carry out a fresh

process of selection for the post of Assistant Labour Commissioner

(Central)/ Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant

Director in Grade-V of Junior Time Scale (JTS) of Central Labour Service

(CLS), Ministry of Labour & Employment in accordance with the prescribed

norms and after issuing an advertisement in this regard;

c) Issue a Writ of Cerliorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction

declaring the process of selection for appointment to the post of Assistant

Labour Commissioner (Centml)/ Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioner

(Central)/ Assistant Director in Grade-V of Junior Time Scale (JTS) of

Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry of Labour & Employment, to be

illegal;
 3s
Pass any other or further order(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit
and proper in the facts and circumstances ofthe present case.

Place: New Delhi

Dated:ft,g.Aot1 2ctl'"'/"''i /'^'
/ P"tition".

SuEBlit (uprnfr &

Advocates
204, Supreme Court Lawyers' Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane
New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838
E-mail: admin@o aw.rn
 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COITR.T OF DELHI AT NEW
sq
DELHI
W.D. (Civil) No: of 2019

IN THE MATTf,R OF:

PATI KRISHNA ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

I]}IION PI.,BLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS ...RESPONDENTS

AFFIDAVIT

I, Pati Krishna S/o Sh. pati Kali Das aged 34 years R/o: House No. 2/199,

Tamsam Street, Gopalpur on Sea, Dist. Ganjam, Odisha_761 002

and presently

at Delhi do hereby solemnly affirm, declare and submit as under:

1. That I am the Petitioner in the above-mentioned petition and am well aware of

the facts and circumstances of the case, as such, I am competent to swear this

affidavit in the present proceedings.

2. That the accompanying petition, contents of which may be read as part and

parcel of the present petition, has been drafted under my instructions and the

same are not being repeated herein for the sake ofbrevity. I have gone through

the contents of the same which are true and correct to my personal knowledge

and belief.

'ii
ANVOCA'IE
3. That the contents of to6;ig1 of List of Dates and Events are
Rr*d i'r.:. i ll'.i
by my counsel are tg tlrg best of my knowledge derived
/a - -

.ftom the s maintain l.' ''

,l'
I
it
21
ntents of Pa toi':.' ' of the Writ
drafted bv '.21 ,r ,

ounsel o-l-r Leg recel ved from

the counsel which I beli

 35
5. I say that the Annexures to the writ petition are true copies of their respective

originals, The Petitioner has not preferred any similar or other petition in the

abovementioned matter.

?ad.K,-yd^.
/ Deponent
VERIFICATION
'll q u[Y ?019
verified at Delhi on this - day of May iotg thut the contents of the above

affrdavit are true and correct to my knowledge and nothing material has been

concealed therefrom.

/WDeponent
P-Tf"c
NE
) \-q q
c
atSr )
ra lt ich

2 I t'4AY 2019
i.^

o T4
IRATH SINGH
ADVOCATE

* DELHI 'lt
REd. No 6374 I
 A xrrvexu& E -?- t
Ceutral Administrative ?ribunal
Principal Bench 3e
OANo.2l79/2OL4

Reserved on : 23.O8.2018
Pronounced on : 18.09,2O 18
Hon'ble Mr. Justlce L. Narasimha Reddy, Ch.airman
Hon'ble Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Member (A)
Mukesh Kumar Suman
.4/6, Christian Colony,
Opp. Morris Nagar police Station,
Delhi 110 007. ... Applicant.
(In person)

Vs

1. Union Public Service Commission

Dholpur House,
Shahjahan Road,
New Delhi 110 069.

2 Sumit
QU- 186, Vishakha Enclave
Uttari Pitam Pura,
North West Delh! 110 088.

o Niranjan Kumar
Jeevan Deep Building
O/o Regional Labour Commissioner
Room No.12 A,
4ti, Floor, Parliament Street
New Delhi I 10 O01.

4 Nirma-l Chandra Kar

Quarter No.rVl?S/FF/76
Hi ?ech Colony
NDMC Township Bacheli
District- South Basti Dartewala
Chattisgarh 494553.

5 Shoaibali Hasanli Sallzad

C/o Mahmud Shiek
Prince Commerce Institute
Chaoni, Nagpur 440 013.

Y
 6 Rakesh Gaur
3?
H. No.571, Sector 16 A,
Faridabad 121 OO2.

7. Sachin Kumar
189-A, Alp Bagh Coiony,
Near Nagar Mahapalika,
Allahabad 21 1001.

8 Shubha llagi
298 / L2, Chandan Vihar
West Sant Nagar,
Burari,
Delhi 110 084.

9 Rahul Tyagi
7Oa/472, Street No.2,
Arya Nagar,
Jawalpur, Haridwar,
U ttaral<hand 249 4O7 .

10. Resmi V.
r.c. 1/1917 (1)
Sivam anasaro High School
Lale Kumarpuram
Thiruvanapuram.

1 1. Manikada.n
30/2A, Aarni Road,
Opposite Fire Station
Cheyyar
Thruvarrna"'allai
Tamil Nadu 604407.

12. . Bidhan Chandra Nayak

Bank of India
Zonal Offtce,
Sadanand Road,
Saketpuri, Hazaribagh,
Jharkhand.
13. Mohd. Imran Raza
H. No.C-21, Old Govind pura,
St. No.1, Parwana Road,
Jagatpuri, P.O. Krishhna Nagar,
East Delhi,
Delhi 110 051.

T C
Y
 3

14. Chranjeev Saikia

38
Near Nidhi Bhavan,
Ward No.8,
' New Amolapatty,
PO & PS: Golaghat,
Assam 785 62 t.

15. Nidhi Sharama

11, United India Apartments,
Mayur Vihar Phase I Extension
New Delhi 1 10 09 1 .

16. Karunkar Jagnnath Mohanty

Village Dingeshwar
Post Palasole
District j agatsingpur
Odisha 754 294.

17. Srinu Dara

Flat No.3l0
Rqiva Bav Complex
Boregain Chowk
Gorewala Road,
Nagpur 440 013.

18. Kanhu Charan Sahu

Trainee OIIicer (HR)
Chutak Power Station
NHPC Ltd.
PO Minji, District Kargil
Laddakh,
Jammu & Kashmir.

19. Biswa Ranjan Satpathy

Flat No.'Ilpe-IV/3
Residential Complex
OIIice of the Dy. CLC (C)
Murti Nagar, Dhanwad
Jharkhand 826003.

20. Susanta Kumar Nayak

C/ H / 3 / N, KAIGA Township
Mallapur, PO Kaigha
Distt. Uttara Kannada
Karnataka 581400.

21. Lnjali Yadav

'r C
7
 H. No.40,
Old Govindpura Extension
31
PO Krisha Nagar
East Delhi,
Delhi 110 05l.

22. Sunil Kumar Sahu

Balk of Baroda
Zon Oflrce
Anand Vihar
West Boring Canal Road
Patna 800 0O 1.
Bihar.

23. Washimul Haque

83/A, Shujat Ganj
Post office COD
Kanpur
uP 208013.

24. Rajeev Ranjan

C-5, Officers Colony,
Near Denobli School
Mahulbanni, Bowra
Dhanbad, Jharkhand A2A3O2.

25. Khitij Jain

1 18, Basant Vihar
Hatreerpur Road,
Naubasta
Kanpur 2OaO2L.

26. MrinmoyThakur
C/o Dipty Thakur
22A, Zig Zig Road (near Naroghar)
Central Chowkidinghee
Dibruhar 786001 (Assarn ).

27. Ankur Dalal

H. No.137, Sector 15,
Part I, Gurgaon,
Haryana 122 OOl.

28. Ashok Perumalla

l"t Floor, HIG 103,
Housing Board Colony,
Bhavani Puram,
Vijaywada,

7-e
r
 5

Krishna District 522 OL2. Vc

29. Barun Kumar Jha
133/s, C/o wB SEDCL
North Malda Division
Durgabari More P.S. Chanchal
District Mdda 732723
West Benga.[.

30. Dharmendra Kumar Himanshu

House No.507 2"a Floor,
Mukherjee Nagar,
Delhi 110 OO9.

31. Kanagvel Pa.ndiyan Shanmugavel

Plot No.4, Flat No.Pl
Chairman Thambiah Reddy Colony
Madambakkam, Kanchipuram Dist,
Chennai 600126, Tamilnadu.

32. MD Razi Aiam Khan

Qtr No.154, \rpe III Pocket I
Kendranchal Colony,
Preetam Nagar,
Post Dhoomanganj,
Allahabad.

33. Beeria
A-97, Ground Floor,
Behind SBI Building,
Kamla Nagar,
Thana Roop Nagar
Delhi 110 007.

34. Annadurai
46L l16, TNBH Shanthi Colony
7th Main Road, Anna Nagar,
Chennai 400 054.

35. Subhapriyadarshini Muthupandi

133/5, Westem Railway Colony,
Santa-kn:j West,
Mumbai 40O 054.

36. Madhavan
49OlA
Opposite to Ration Shop
Hospital Road

T-C
r
 6

kr
Perambakkam Tiruvallur District
Tamil Nadu 631 4O2.

37. Ram Krishan Meena

C- 19, Indraprastha Colony,
Model Town, Malviya Nagar,
Jaipur, Raj asthan 302O25.
38. Rajesh Kumar ?.
D.No.3-4l2, Plot No. 165,
Vishnupuram Colony,
Pora;rk, Vijayvada RuraJ,
District Krishna (A.P.)

39. Praveen Pandi Mohandas

C/201, Star Residency
Evershine City
Vsa_ti (e)
Thane 4O1205,
Maharastra

40. Sunil Raghnath mali

C/o A. J. Kulkami
D-12, Green Va.lley Society
S.No.7/ 1 / 14, near RElicon Visha
Narhe Goaa, Ta] haveli
District Pune, Maharashtra 411 041.

41. V. R. Ganeshan
17/8, Ganapathy Street
Tripicale Ice House,
Chennai 600 OO5.

42. Renu Yadav

H. No.731, Sector 17,
Defence Colony,
Gurgaon 122 OOL,
Har5rana.

43. Prem Kumar

D. No. 1 1/ 19tt' Street
New Manglore Port Trust Colony
Panambur, Managlore 10,
Karnatalca.

44. Pradyumna Kumar Rana

At Kalipoi
Post Bania

?'Y C
 ?

Via Kalapatar 754OO9, tla

District Cuttack,
Cuttack 754 OO9, Odisha.

45. Nayan Malik ?ripura

S/o Tirthajoy Tripure
Vill Ratan Ropyaja parar
P.O. Dhumachara, Dhalai
Tripura.

46. Riga Jaisingh Chauhan

Flat No.M 88, Plot No.18
Vikram Enclave, 80ft Road,
Shalimar Garden,
Sahibabad,
Ghaziabad 20I 005.

47. Mohamm ad Ozair

Mohalla Shah Mohdpur
P.O. Mubarakpur
Distt. Azamgarh
uP 276404.

48. Vishal Ashok Amte

B / 201, Sarvodaya Paradise
Opp. Sarvodya Ganga
Near Bhanu Sagar Talkies
Kelyafn (West)
District Thane-42130 f .
49. Atul Sing
419 A,
T\rlararn Bagh
Post Daraganj,
Aliahabad.

50. Hari Om Gautam

O/o Labour Enforcement offce
Ministry of Labour
GoW. of India
Opp Vetenary Hospital
Barari Road,
Tilkamanjhi
Bhagalpur 812 001.

51. Harikesh Bahadur

2230-SQN AF, C/o 46 Wing AF
Air Force Station NAL

T.r
v
 8

Bikaner (Rajasthan).
52. Hitle r Thoudham
Qg
7/36A, 3.a Floor
Double Storey
Vijay nagar,
North Delhi 110 009.
53. Sagar Pradhan
Q. No.2RA 58
Delta Tlpe Colony
Unit VIII
Bhuvaneshvar Khurda
Odisha 751012.
54. Amardeep
Vi!*ge & Post-Dungarwas
District Rewari
Haryana 122 106.
55. Wonmi Horam
C/o Dr. Grace, 44 E,
Quarter NIHFW,
(National Institute of Hea.lth & Family Wetfare)
Munirka, Delhi 110 O67.

56. S. Ravikanth Reddy

H. No.428 Kowkur Village
Kumari Bsth
Secundarabad
Bollarum PO
Hyderabad 50010.

57. basawaj
1893 G Block
4t],A MAIN (21.t Cross 2"d Main)
Sahakar Nagar
Banglore 92, Karnata,ka.
58. Santosh Kumar Sethi
B-27, GAIL
Vijapur,
Guna, MP 473712.
59. Ministry of Labour & Emplol'rnent
Shram Shajrti Bhavan
Rafi Marg,
New Delhi 1 10 001. ... Respondents.

(By Advocates : Shri R. V. Sinha, Shri Amit Sinha, Shri M.

N. Singh, Shri G. P. Bhatia and Dr. Ch Shamsuddin Ktran)

..I' c
r
 9

14
\
:ORDER:

Justice L. Narasimha Reddv. Chairman :

The Union Public Service Commission, the premier

Constitutional recruitrnent agency of India, published

special recruitment advertisement No.51/2013 for

recruiting candidates against 57 posts of Assistant Labour

Commissioner (Central)/Assistant Labour Welfare

Commissioner (Central)/Assistant Director in Grade-V of
Junior Time Scale (JTS) of Central Labour Service (CLS),
Ministry of l,abour & Employment, in the year 2O13. The

qudifications to be held by the intending candidates, as

well as the scale of pay attached to the posts, were
indicated in the Advertiseraenr:. It was also mentioned
that a written objective qape recruitment test, with
multiple choice questions, would be conducted, followed
by intewiew, for selection. The subjects in which the test

would be conducted were also listed. Under a heading

WEIGHTAGE', it was mentioned that respective weightage

of the recruitment test and intewiews shall be decided by

the Commission.

2. The computer based test for the posts mentioned

above was conducted on O4.08.2013. On the basis of tl.e

marks obtajned by the applicalt, he was called fof

f-cr
 10
4s
interview. The final list of selected candidates was
published on 77.O6.2074. The name of the applicant did

not figure therein.

3. The applicant contends that he performed well both

in the written test and tJ"e interview, but in spite of his

efforts, he could not know tJ.e marks obtained by hirn in

those tests. According to him, an application was frled by

one of tlle candidates under t-lle Right to Information Act,

2005, to know the percentage of weightage given to the

interview, and in reply tlereto, it was mentioned tl.at the

interview was for 5O% of the total marks. He further

states that in response to another application frled under

the RTI Act, the Commission informed that the minirnum

marks in the interview, stipulated for'general candidates it

is 5O%, whereas for OBC and other reserved category
candidates, it is 45%.

4. The applicant challenges the procedure adopted by

the Commission in selection of the candidates in

pursuance of the advertisement, referred to above. He

contends tJ:at when the selection process comprises of

written test and interview, the marks aliocated fo,

intersiew cannot exceed 15%, in view of the law Iaid down

by the Hon'ble Supr-egE-.tCoJrrt#nd a-Ilocation of 50%

T C
r
 11
\a
marks for interview in the lnstant case is highly arbirrary.

He further contends that by stipr-rlating minimum

percentage of marks in the interview, the Commissi.on has

virtually topsA turuAed the results which were otherwise to

ensue. It is also argued that according to the deta.ils of
the marks allotted to candidates though he secured 75
marks in the written test, which is 4n in rank, he was
awarded 40 marks in tl.e interview, and thereby kept out

of selection, whereas a candidate who secured just 45

marks in t].e written test was awarded 74 marks in t]:e
interview and was selected. Similar instances are cited.

5. The Commission frled a short reply as well as a

detailed counter a.ffidavit. An objection as to tJre very

mairrtainability of the OA is raised. According to them,

the applicant cannot fde the OA challengtng t}le selection,

once he has participated therein. It is pleaded tJ:at in the

notification itseU, it was mentioned. that the ratio between

written test and interview would be decided by tlle

Commission, and accordingly it was decided, and no

exception can be taken to tl1e same. The respondents

further contend t}rat t}re Commission has discretion to
decide the method of selection, arrd the award of marks in

t-l:s interview cannot be challenged except by impleading

f? -(
 !2 qT
the members of the Interview Board. Other legal and
factual contentions are also urged.

6. The selected candidates were impleaded by the

applicant by filing an MA, and they were served with

notices. Some of them filed counter afiidavit almost on the

same lines, as that of t]re Commission.

7 . The applicant argued the matter in person. Apart

from narrating the facts, he has placed reliance upon
certain judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other

fora. The arguments on behalf of the Commission are

advanced by Shri R. V. Sinha, learned counsel. His

contention is that being an authority formed under t}le

Constitution of India, the Commission has every right to

decide the procedure to be adopted in the process of

selection, and that t}.e applicant has no right to question

the same. He further states that having participated in

ttre selection process, the applicant cannot question t}re

same

8. Learned counsel for the private respondents have

also argued on similar lines.

9. The objection raised as to the maintainability of the

OA needs to be examined first. The law is fairly well settled

c
r
 13
ka
in this regard. If the rules or guidelines of selection for
appointrnent are ir,rdicated in the recruitment notification,

a candidate vi,ho participated in the selection cannot assail

the same when it is found t].at he is not selected. in a

way, tJle principle of estoppel operates against him. In
other words, if he had any objection to the selection
process, he is required to approach t.I:e Court or Tribunal,

well in advalce, and before participation. He cannot

challenge the conditions a:fter conc]usion of t]re selection

process. Reference in this context can be made to the

judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mad.an Lal &

Ors, us. State oJ Jammu qnd. Ka.shnir & Ors l99S (3)

SCC 486t Chqnd.er prakesh Ttutay & Ors. o.

Shd.kuntld 2OO2 (6) SCC 127; VlJendra Kutnar Verrr.Ld o.

Publlc Servlce Commission, tlttaraktund qnd. Others

(2011) f SCC 150, to mention a few.

10. In case, tJe notifr.cation issued by tJre Commission

was clear about the percentage of marks to be allocated

for written test and interview, tl:e ratio of the judgments

referred to above gets straightaway attracted. What is

mentioned in the notification in the present case is as

under:-

"A Written Objective \pe Recruitment Test with

multiple choice questions shalt be conducted
foilowed by interview for selection."

T Tc
 \q
14

WEIGHTAGE

RESPECTIVE. WEIGHTAGE OF THE

RECRUITMNENT TEST AND INTERVIEWS SHALL BE
DECIDED BY THE COMMISSION."

This cannot be said to be the clear,or proper inforrnation.

Neither it spells out the percentage of marks allocated to

the written test on the one hand and interview on the

other, nor does it indicate so. Unless the candidate is
aware as to how much marks are to be secured in the

interview to remain in the fray, he or she would not be

able to get properly prepared. In other words, if the

written test is to become a dominant factor in the process

of seiec(ion, one may concentrate on that, and conversely

if the interview is to have predominant role in the

selection, a different approach, such as by undergoing

training with the professional agencies may be adopted.
Existence or otherwise, of minimum marks in the

interview is anot}rer aspect. A candidate who secured

fairly high marks in the written test would not be se;ted

if he is awarded less than minimum marks in t]:e

interview.

11. Be that as it may, having reserved to itself, the power

to decide the ratio between written test and the interview,

t}le Commission was required to act fairly, and in

-c
?
 15
50
accordance witll law. It is on account of this belief; that
the candidates participated in tlee selection and interview,

and may not have felt the necessity to seek relief, well in

advance-

L2. lf it ultimately emerges that the selection process

undertaken by the Commission is not in accordance witl:

law, and the traces of such illegality were not evident from

the notilication, t.I:e principle of estoppel or acquiescence

cannot be pressed into service when the aggrieved

ca-ndidate approaches the Tribunal or Court. Therefore, if
it emerges that the steps taken by the Commission,
subsequent to tle notiflcation are not in accordance with
iaw, the candidate aggrieved by such action can certainly

approach the Tribunal.

13. In tl.is context, it is relevant to refer to the judgment

of Hon'ble Supreme Court in ?he Dlrector Geaera.l,

Indlan Councll Jor Agrlcultural Reseatch dnd. Ors. as,

D. Sund.ara F,aJu (2OL 1l 6 SCC 605. Pa::a 47 tJrereof,
reads as under:-

"47. The respondent was not disclosed by tJ:e

appellate either that the interview would be held for
evaluating personal or intellectual qualities tJrat
attribute a Scientist and that it sha.ll carr5z 50% of
the total marks. This is controverted position. Had
the appellants disclosed the method of evaluation the
respondent may have challenged the sarne before
participating in tJ:e selection process."

c
7
 5r
l4- Identical situation obtains in the case on hand.
Therefore, the objection raised by the respondents as to
the maintainability cannot be sustained. Now, it needs to
be seen as to whether any illegaligz has crept in into the
selection process.

15. The ratio to be fixed between written test and the

interrriew in the context of selection to civil posts was a

matter of serious debate for decades together. The Courts

have been making endeavor to reduce the extent of

importalce to be given to interview so that a selection
takes place purely on merit and on the touchstone of
objectivity; and the element of subjectivity is reduced to

the minimum.

16. In Asholc Kum;rrr yadaa and. Ors, us, State oJ

Haryana snd. ers. 1985 (4) SCC 147, tl.e Hon,ble
Supreme Court was dealing with the selections
undertaken by Haryana State public Service Commission.

One of the grounds urged in that case was as regards

excessive allocation of marks for viva voce, i.e., intenriew.

In that case for Ex-servicemen, 33.3% was stipulated as

minimum in the interview, and, 22.2o/o for ottlers. At the

relevant point of time, the minimum stipulated marks for

viva voce/interview, for selections conducted. by the UpSC

Ir
 17 f
,*)-<-^
was 72.2o/o. In para 3O of the judgment, their Lordships

summed up the discussion. The same reads as under:_

"30. Now if t).e allocation of such a high percentage

of ma.::ks as 33.3 in case of ex-service officers and
22.2 tn case of ottrer candidates, for the yiva voce
test is excessive, as held by us, what should be the
proper percentage of marks to be a-llocated for the
viva voce test in both these cases. So far as
candidates in the general category are concerned we
think that it would be prudent and safe to follow the
percentage adopted by the Union public Seryice
Commission in case of selections to t]-e Indian
Administratjve Service and other allied senrices. The
percentage of marks allocated for the viva voce test
by tJ:e Union Public Serr'ice Commission in case of
selections to the indian Administrative Services and
other allied service is 12.2. and t]lat has been found.
to be fair and just, as striking a proper ba.Iance
between t]e written examination and t}te viva voce
test. We would therefore direct t].at hereafter in case
of selections to be made to t}re Haryana Civil Services
(Executive Branchl and other allied services, where
t.I:e competitive examination consists of a written
examination followed by a viva voce test, the marks
allocated for t].e viva voce test shall not exceed, 12.2
per cent of the total marks ta-ken into account for the
purpose of selection. We Id suesest this
DE tase sh a1 so be adoDted bv the blic
Servi ce Co sts other State s, because it is
de slra le that fh shorr'ld h e unifo rln itv 1n fhe
selection proces s throuehou t the coun try arr the
Union Dr rlrlin Servi
Commission sh ould be taken as a suide for t-l.e State
Pub lic Service Commissio ns to adoDt and follo w. The
percentage of marks allocated for the viva voce test
case of ex-service oflicers mav, for reasons we have
already discussed, be somewhat higher than tJ:e
percentage for tl:e candidates belonging to the
general category. We wouid therefore direct that in
case of ex- seryice officers, having regard to the fact
that they would ordinarily be middle aged persons
with personalities fully developed the percentage of
marks allocated for the viva voce test may be 25.
Whatever selections are made bv the Haryana public
Service Commission in the future shall be on t].e
basis t]-at the marks allocated for tlle viva voce test

T t
r
 ,, 95 t(- c)

shall not exceed, 12.Z per cent in case

of candidates
belongrng to the general caregory ala
zs fJ'I.rr, i.,
case of ex-service officers.,, (emphasis
"rlppil.af
In para 3I , the importance of maintaining such decent
balance between written test and viva voce was
explained
and general direction were issued. to all the
State
Governments to ensure that the law taid down
therein is
followed. The paragraph reads as under:_

"31. Before we part with this judgment would like

to point out tltat the public ServiceweCommission
occupies a pivotal place of importance in the -State
and the integrity and efficiency of lts aamhistraUrre
apjla-ratus depends considerabiy on the quality
of
selectiols made by the public Slrice Co[mi"-"iorr.the
is absolutely essentia.l that the best and i_."iL..t rt
should be drawn in the aamirri"t rtor.
administrative services must be composed of neen "na
who are honest, upright and independerrt _n.
are not swayed by the political winds blowing "rain t]"e
country. The selection of ca-ndidates fo. the
administrative services must therefore be mad.e
stric0y on merits, keeping in view various f""ao."
which go to ma-ke up a strong, ellicient ald people
oriented administrator. This can U" i"*J orrfv f
the Chairma:r and members of the""t pub[L- S.i,ri."
Commission are eminent men possessins a high
degee . of calibre, competence and integrity, who
would inspire conlidence in the public minj about
the objectivit5r and impartiality of ihe selections to
Ue
made bv them. We would tlerefore like to stronglv
impress upon every State Government to take care
to
see that its Public Service Commission is manned
by
competent, honest and independent persons of
outstanding abiliff and high reputation ,.ryho
command the confidence of the people and who
would not a-llow themselves to be deiiected by any
extrareous considerations from discharging their
dugz of making selections strictly on meriis."Wtrifst
mal<ing these observations we would like to ma_ke it
clear that we do no for a moment wish to suggest
that the Chairman and members of the HarfLa

7- c
Y
 19 <t
Public Service Commission in the present case \ /ere
lacking in calibre, competence or integrity.,,

In P. Mohanan PiIIol v. Stdte o.f Kerd.Ia and Ors- (2OOZ)

9 SCC 497, the notifrcation fixed 5O% marks for the
interview. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed. as
under:-

" 16. In this case a.llocation of marks for interwiew

was in fact misused. It not only contravened. tl.e
ratio laid down by this Court in Ashok Kumar yadav
and subsequent cases, but in the facts and
circumstances of tJ e case, it is reasonable to draw
an inference of favouritism. The power in this case
has been used by the appointing authorit5z for
unauthorized purpose. When a power is exercised for
an unauthorized purpose, the same would amount to
ma-lice in law."

ln D. Sundora RaJu,s ca,se (spra), the Hon,ble Supreme

Court referred to the judgment in Ashok Kumdr yad.av's
case (supral.

Ia K. Ma4Jusree vs. Stdte oJ A,p. and Ors., reported in

AIR 2OO8 SC 1470, the rules did not stipulate the
requirement of obtaining minimum marks in tJ:e

interview. However, at a later stage, tlle requirement as to

obtaining minimum marks in the interview was
introduced, altd tliat, in turn, affected the entire selection

process. The unsuccessful candidates approached the

High Court, but the writ petition was dismissed. The
Hon'ble Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal and has

1 C
r
 2A {s-
set aside the judgment of the High Court. The relevant
paragraph reads as under:-

"32. We, therefore, find t.I-at t}Ie .iudgment of. the

Division Bench of the High Court has to be set aside
with a direction to the Ap High Court to redraw the
merit list without appl),lng any minimum marks for
rnterview. The merit list wjll have to be prepared in
regard to 83 candidates by adding the marks secured
rn wriften examination and the marks secured in tlle
interview. Thereafter, separate lists have to be
prepared for each reservation category and then the
final selection of l0 candidat"" *ili'h"r" to be maJe_
The scaling down of the written exami.ratio., marks
with reference to 75 insGad of 100 is how.*r...
proper."

In that case, the percentage of marks allocated for viva

voce was 25%o, and that in the instant case, it is 5oyo.

17. Learned standing counsel for t}le Commission relied

upon certain precedents to support his contention. First of

such judgments is the one in Llla Dhar us. Storte oj

RqJastlrc,n and. orthers (1981) 4 SCC lS9. As a matter of
fact, t}lis judgment constituted t}le basis for t]"e one in
Ashok Kumqr Ycdau (supra). Even while upholding
the practice of allocating marks for interview in the
process of selection to any public emplo5mrent, tlle Hon,ble

Supreme Court felt that t}le marks a-llocated for interview

must not exceed 25olo. The relevant portion reads as

under:-

"Yet another factor worthy of consideration is tJ,.at

the candidates expected to offer tt e-"et ." ior
selection are not raw graduates freshly out of college

T-r
r
 21
s6
but are persons \^,ho have already received a certain
amount of professional training. The source-material
is such that some weightage must be given to the
interview-test and can it possibly be said that
twenQz-five per cent of t}le total marks is an
exaggerated weightage."

ln Anzar Ahrnd.d. as. State oJ Bthar and Others (1994) 1

SCC 150, the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred to various

judgrnents on the issue, and held that the marks allocated

for viva voce should not exceed l57o. para lS of the

judgment reads as under:-

'15. Applying tJ:e aforesaid decision in Ashok Kumar

Yadav case this Court has held t].at in the matter of
selection for two posts of Excise and Taxation
Inspectors on the basis of written test and viva voce
test where candidates are fresh from college/school
the allocation of marks for viva voce test should not
exceed 15 per cent."

In Mohind.er Sain Gcrg rrs. Stdte o;f PunJab and Others

(199 1) t SCC 662, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as

under:-

"33. In our view Ashok Kumar Yadav case clinches

t.I:e issues raised before us and being a decision
given by four Judges is also binding on us. That was
a case relating to public emplo5rment ald a direction
was given to all the Pub[c Service Commissions to
follow the marks allocated for viva voce test as done
by the UPSC which was L2.2 per cent of the total
marks. Ashok Kum-ar Yadau case was decided in
1985 and we fail to understand as to why tJ:e State
of Punjab did not follow the same for making
seiections in 1989 for the posts of Excise and
Taxation Inspectors. It is no doubt correct that the
selection of Taxation and Excise Inspectors is done
by a subordinate selection body and not by Public
Service Commission yet no valid reason has been
grven before us by learned counsel for the
respondents as to why tJ e principle enunciated in

'i-
?
 22 sr
Ashok Kumctr Yadau case should not be applied in
these cases as well. Even if Ashok yadav case may
not in terms apply in the cases before us to the
extent of laying down 12.2 per cent of the tota-l marks
for viva voce test which was made applicable for
selection to be made by UpSC, we deem it proper to
lay down after taking in view it dictum of all the
authorities decided so far that t]-e percentage of viva
voce test in t}le present cases at 25 per cent of the
total marks is arbitrary and excessive- There could
be no gainsaying that viva voce test cannot be totallv
dispensed with, but taking note of the situation ani
conditions prevailing in our countrJr, it would not be
reasonable to have the percentage of viva voce marks
more than 15 per cent of the total marks in t].e
selection of candidates fresh from college/school for
public employment by direct recruitment where the
rules provided for a composite process of selection
namely written examination and interview."

18. A perusal of the judgDnents, referred to above,

discloses that the very basis for fixatjon of t.I:e percentage

of marks to be allocated to interview at lSo/o was the

practice that was being followed by the UpSC, which

allocated 12.2V" marks for interview in t]:e selections

undertaken by it to various sereices. The Hon,lcle
Supreme Court had, in fact, exhorted all tJ:e State public
Service Commissions and otler recruiting agencies to
follow and emulate tJ:e UPSC whom, it has treated as an
ideal agency.

19. In Ashok Kumar Yad.av's ccse (supra), allocation of

22,2o/o marks for interview was held to be excessive on the

touchstone of the marks allocated by the UpSC, i.e.,

12.2%0. Similar references were made to UPSC in other

f -r
1
 f=()
23
b6
judgments also. Even in the wildest of dreams, one
cannot expect the UPSC, a constitutional body to remove

itself from tl.e position of an ideaj employer, that too after

t1-e Hon'ble Supreme Court treated it as a role model, ald

go to tlle extent of allocating 5O% of marks for interview,

that too without reveal.ing it in the notification. As though

tiat is not sufficient, the minimum marks to be secured in

the interview were stipulated when the selection process is

haifway through. For all practical purposes, t.Ire written

test was reduced to t.l:e level of irrelevance and t.l.e

selection process was shadowed by subjectivity.

20. Obviously, the Commission knew very well that in

case it discloses in the notification that 50% marks would

be allocated for interview, it is bcund to be challenged, in

all probability. Therefore, it has kept the candidates in
total dark. The secrecy which it was required to maintain,

in the context of conducting of examination was applied to

a vital condition of selection, namely, allocation of marks

for interview, and stipulation as to minirnum marks. The

result of such a secret operation has ultimately emerged.

on the expected iines. The applicant who has secured.
75% marks in the written test (highest being 79) was
awarded the least, tJ:at too below the minimum marks in

tlre interview, i.e., 40, and a caldidate who secured 42

7 e
r
\ ,,,
 24
5?
marks in the written test was awarded 74 marks in the
interview.

2I . Few other glaring examples are in respect of two

candidates who secured 51 & 52 marks in the written test.

They were awarded 50 & 57 marks in tl.e interview, and

though their aggregate was 101 & 109 respectively, as
against the aggregate of 1 15 of t}.e applicant, those two

candidates were selected and not the applicant. The

reason is that the applicant is the only candidate who was

awarded less than minimum marks in tJ-e interview, and

all others were awarded between 5Oo/o to 7 4o/". This kind

of exercise does not auger well for a premier and reputed

agency like the UPSC.

22. It may not be dilficult for them to snub a solitary,

unsuccessful, and unemployed candidate with tJre power

at their command. However, what is needed for

enhancing the reputation and transparency in such

premier organizations is a semblance of introspection, arrd

an effort to ensure the transparency in the exercise. With

impunity, the UPSC has disregarded the principles laid

down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in successive
judgrnents.

T I
€
 ?s
c
23. On the application of the principles laid down by the

Hon'ble Strpreme Court in the catena of decisions, some of

which are referred to above, the inevitable result that

would follow is that the entire selection of 57 caldidates

who are impleaded as private respond.ents is vitiated. The

allocation of marks for interview for t.l:e selection in

question, need.s to be reworked and downgraded, to be

15% of the total allocation. For this pu{pose, the marks

that have been awarded in the interview can be taken on

basis and must be slashed down to 15% of the total. The
requirement as to minimum marks must be igrrored. In

the entire process, in all probability, only one candidate is

likely to be displaced on account of selection of the

applicant, and if for any reasons any selected candidate
has not joined, or left service after joining, such caldidate

can a.lso be accommodated.

24. We, therefore, a]low the OAI (a) setting -eeide +he
selections made in pursuance of _the Advertisement
No.51/2013 to the posts of . Assistant, Labour
Commissioner (Central) and equivalent; (b) directing the

UPSC to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to be

allocated for interview to 15o/o, without insisting on

minimum marks therein, and t.l.en to publish the results;
and (c) obsen'ing that if any of the private respondents

T;r
 )6
bl
needs to be displaced on account of such an exercise, the

possibility of adjusting him against the existing or

subsequent vacancy may be considered, by addressing the

department concerned. There shall be no order as to

costs.

(Pradeep Kumar) (Justice L. Narasimha Reddy)

Member (A) Chairman

/pi/

T'cr
 /t
(a'"'.--

ts
:
Fo rui rr,, ,,, o r.,,. u, f*HHF.l.r",.,[t, P- t
CIINT'IIA t, AI)lvt I N rSt.RAt.t v trl,r,lt IrJ LINiA r,
AT NIIW DIiI,I,I I

APPI.,IC;A'IION N() .
_-"-=- oir 201 4

4I! ATI I Ni9 I 1'

A91rl,9S
INT 1'T T

MUKI]SH I(UMAR STJMAN

I.INION P UBLIC SSRVICE COMMIS;ION,,,.,.,,

.,,.,,,,.,.,,,,, it&$FONDIj]]Y1.

INDEX

S,NO,
PARlI]CULAITS PAGII
L isr olDates
I
{ 2 Applicatio:r
J L.
i Final Re sult of Assislant Labour. Conrmissioner
I l7 ,0.6. 20t 1 datecl
lo -t)
Admir ard issLred to A
) e
laant Res dent/UP SC tq
lSpecral Recr..litnent
lles s
Adveniser:rent No, 5l/2013 bv ( f-?_o
6 n
Ile s.lL of Con:puter Basecl
RecrLriurrenr Tesr held un
C4.0g.2013
by Responden/UPSC
- posr for
ess:sra"; oI i;;;;
Co nrmtssroner dated 30.
1 2,20 l l
I.isl ed candidates for. nterview
dated 03 .03,20t4 f
by RespodenVUpSC L].7 I
8 e
co pv of R e p v by Respond en/UP
R1 I dar 3 2 20 J
SC o I jL-31
9 ex
I T co j tr -1\-
b Res dent/UPSC dated 2 3.09.2013
t0 e
True co ofRTI fii ed on 20 .06.2 014 hv a rcant 36')

Date
f<
'<(
MUKDSI.I KUMAR SUMAN
APPLICANT
'i

PIace 4.6, (]HIiISTIAN COI,ON}'

DBLhI_l10007
 o)
z^ -z

LISl' OII DAI,IIS

Janutlrl, 2013
SPecial Rccrurtment
notified, by rhe
Adverr:seme
-'-
r1r ?s r/r,1
'
''\,, r.r
r wAs
Rcsponrient ir:
!rnployrnent News l2-ls
Januar.vr rnrr ,. --
."..,*,*.1.-' '"' ,'"""
j1:::: or Assistanr Labou,
- !,/u dr./,Asststant
ttrmmissioner t a^-,-^t,. Welfare
_

Comnrissioner,,":::^,,1".^tt''''nI Labour welfa,e

f)irecror jn crade-V
in Junior r,,,,',.'r*,.
,.raitststsnt rabour
(cr-S;, rr4;,,;,,,,of
;;il;ilili Sen,ice

04.08.2 0r3
Basod Recruirrucrir
3T::,
04.08.2013
Tcsr was hotd oD
by Rospondent
&r rhe sajd 57 posts
30.t 2,20t3
Result was deciarcd
by the
-rrr, R
'orrntt-0"'tdent of computer
Bosed Rooruitnon,
oh 04'08'2013 bY rho
Respoudonr
I
03.03.2014
Interview Scheduie
for candidar
found eiigibte,,,
..;;,;;;*i.".ll::, ;::: ;::
published by rhe
responclenr for the
said 57 posts

1 8, 03.20 t 4_2 s.0

3.20 1 1
was conducred by
the F.esponctenr for
lt:,1"-
J / posts
rhe saj<t

17.06.2014
!-i::l_Resurt was pubtished
by rhe lespondenr for
rhe
said 57 posrs

20.06.2011
RTI was filed wirh the
Respondent for relevant
and
crirical inlbrnratio:r
aboLrt the said Exam

'!,-. o1, ,, , t,
Aggrieved by Final
Result dated 17.06.2014
for the said
I
57,posrs, Applicant
files rhis Application
betbr.e Hon,ble
Tribunal

T/t
Y
 6/
,,:::u rHE HoN'BLr PRINcTPLE
B0NCir
CI'N]]tAI, ADMINISl]tA1] .nTIIiJUNAL VlJ
AT NI]W DELHJ

APPLICATION NO.
_*_.-- oF 20I4

]N T}I[ &IATTER OF;

. ... .. .... ......APPLICAN,I.

#eflul,mot.,;,*
I
vt!ttsus

' RE'.,NDENI'

";fl,lf*Hff:fiivlcEcoMMlssloN

PP
19

ACt" 198s

MOST R[ISPECTFtJJ,LY
SHow[1.I,I:

l That rhe App.licant

seeks relief a Final Result dared
Yl 06.2014 for 5't
posrs of
Assistanr Labour
ateainst
Comurissioner(Cerrrar)/Assjsraur
ttrrr.l,l""':, werihre
*.,o,,,.,
(Central)/Assistant """'' L'ommissioner
Director. of,, Time Scale (JTS)
Service
of central Labour
in rhe Ministry
.\ ", a.o,l''tt EmPloYment advefiised vidc Specral
1Y Recruitmenr Advertisement
No. ,rut'&
l/2013 by thg psspondent.
(Annexure A/I)
I
5
i

.I URISDICl'ION

'l'hat
fie Applicanr declares thal subjecr.ntarter of
rhrs App)ication is wirhin
the jurisdicrion ofrhe
Flon,ble Tribunal.

LI M I T'ATION

I 'ihar
rhe Applicant Funhy cleclares
thar the Applicarion is within.
the
timiration period prescribcci
in section 2l of Adnrinistrative
1,11gr',nu, o.,,
1985

BRIEF FACTS

4. Thar the Applicant(Roll

No, 009004) appeared
lbr Exrmination conducted
by the Respondentfor 57 posrs of Assistant Labour Commissionor
(Centraj)/Assistanr
Welfarc Commissioner(Cenrrai)/Assistani
Labour
Wolfale Comnris,sjonor (Co)ttral)/Assisrant
Djrcotor ol JLrnior l.jmc
Scalc
(Jl'S) of Cenrral.Labour.
Service in the Ministr).
of Labour& Employmenr
advelrised vicle Special Reci.
Lljtment Adve jsenrent ),io. 5ll2013.A copy of
Adnrir card issued bythe
Responde4tis enclosed, (Annexure
A,/2)

That the Applicant appeared

in the Recruihent Tcst
heid on 4rh Augusr 20I j
and successfully cleared the
computer based recruitment
test. Later he
apperred for inrerview in which
h, : could not succeed,
in spite of the fact thar
.re performed exceptionally well
in the wrirten exarnjnation.

That rhe Respondent is an

organization estabrished by
constitution of India
undel Article j 15. The duly
of the Respondent is tc coilduct
examinations for
apDointments to the services
of the union

That lhe Respondent has

a history of functicining in
secrecy and do nor
disclose informatjon easiry.
Soc,a,ly conscious citizens
have hard foughr to
make this oiganization
fansparent ancl accounteble. .l.he par.liamenr

{$ has
 6e

r,assed Rjght to Information Acl )nn<

pronlote transparency
accountabiiity, and
but the Responden in sec'ecv and conceais
r,egurariries rinder various
the ,.,,, .rr..;t lltt'ons

E
speciar Recruitment
Advs4j5smsnl
::"' :: i:::,::, :,,:* No 5 r/20r 3
"' commissioncr (central)/Assistanr
.,0",,r.o*. :::t:;:,,,-bour
c.nrmissioner (central)/455is16n1)ner(central)/Assistanl Labourwerfare
rn crade v of
(irs) Junior Time scale
of centtaj Labour
servic
e (cLS) in rhe Ministry of
Empioyment.(Arnexure Labour a,cl
o,3)
o
Thar the Con:puter
based Recruitment
test of. l00 nrarks
were conducEd
the Respondent by
on 04.0g,2013, fi
e2 candidaros

Test. (r{n56a1y6
prcvisionary,#::
x'il::;:X*#::;
A/4). Our of I9l
"*n'outt' cuncticlatos wore
interview by '175 cailod for I

th-e Respondenr,
,on' t' to"o'outts finaliy quaJirieci
,r..r*.,o*tjrr"t jr',
jn the
sajd recruirm.r,

{
il

CITOUNDS FOR
RELIEF

), 'l'hat the
lhree cand
Rotl No bearing
008196
shTiKANAGAVEa
,^rorr^'ou'ts
Shris/oNMI HoRAM. *0,, ,'
"'A"[JGAVEL' Rolt No 0r l056

il raiiy qualified *.r, no, or,r,nl,,],0::: :].,:::J:';.:ff;

for interview. There
is no public notitication
regarding Jrow these
candjdales
were included in
the final lisr. I

ll Thar rhe Respondent

in the said i
stated that a Recruirme
of 100 marks
lt Tesr
will be held ,o,,o*,ooutn"t''nt
o o''ntt"'t*
for selection The respective
weigh: ageof Recruitment
,.r, ; and interyiew
shall be decided by
conrmrssjon. the

\
L
(9-
{
€+
Ihat in the whole process
of the sy36in211sn the
Interview marks were never
djsclosed by rhe l{espondenr.
Transparency anci accountability is major
iriri tpotlent of denrocracy. Unl.orrtrnately
the llespo,tlcnt iiiri nr;i
choos. r.
irsclose the intervierv .i-he
nrarks. weighrage ancl totaliry
of interview marks
'r'erc critical fot. the interview process and career of caudidates and
should
have been tiisclosed publically
ar least bcfore the inlerview.
It shows rnala fi,jc
ircnrion and arbirrariness of Ihe
l{esponclent.
I

Tltal all candiclates

having the righr to know
ar.e
rhe rotality an<j weightage
of
ltrer\,iew marl<s. Nondisclosure
of interview rnarks :rncl qualitying
crileria ir)
itttetview if any during
tire process of examinario:r
is gr.oss violation of.Afliclc
21 of Consrirurion oflndia,
Secrion 4 (lXc) and Sedion
4 (l) (d) ofrhe Righr
to Information .Act, 2005 principle
and ofNatural Justice..

I .t. l'hrrr one of the aware an<i vigiJanr citieen fiied the RTI with the Rcspondent
lared 06.12.201J. In the
r.eply rhe respondenr rolo
rhat rhe marks of rhe
ntefview was 100. It means
that the weight age ofiutervjew
was 50 % oltotal
rnarks (written marks +
intervleuv nrarks).(Anncxurc
-{/6)

T'har anorher RTI was

filed with the respondent
regarding qualifying marks in
ll e inlerview by a socially
conscioLrs citizen on 06.09.2013.
(Annexurc A-7)
l was discrosed that a gencral candidatE
has to gcr iJ% marks and
a oBC
candidate has to get 45 yo
marks of rotal marks
of interview ro qualify in the
inrerview, This criterion was
never published durrng whole
process of
interview It also means that
a general category caDdirtate
huu.,o g., u, l.u$
50 marks and an OBC
candidate will have ro get at least 45 marks
out of 100
marksro qualify in inlerview. It furher means
that if a
general category
candidare has tqpped in
written examination and
he gets less than 50 marks
in
interview, he will be
disqualified. This nrakes
the interview further urrjust,
unfair, unreasonable aad
arbirrary. In other All
India Services and Cenrral
Ser,vices there are no qualifying
marks in interview

\
(
 /,q
i5 lhdt Respondent conducts
recr,,;r*^-. or various Arr rndja
services. rhe weishrage.r,,::::::,n*' central &
lllteruiew in Inclian
Ecortomic Service
,ri rotar nrarks. is 16.66%
The weighr u*t
o'interview in ],rlian
Statistical Servicc
6.66% ofroral narks. is
,.n.' *'',nt ale
of intervieu, in Indian
Engineering
:,er.vj6s i5 16.66yo of totar,rr,
*-* age of inrerview
in civ,
,xaminadon Servjce
* ,r rr*
"r,",]f;::
Irl .A.shok I(umar yadavAndorrsEtc.Erc.
Vc- cr^,- ^ r uatyana
v!g'r ur ,,
i 1987 &otrsErc Etc.
AIR 454) The Hon,btu"t"tt cou'r hel.l that In
Examination the 't civii Service
weight ur. 'r'est
rnore rhat I2.5% """'r*oarsonarity shouid nor be
otherwise,, *ot
'ill leaci to arbitmr.iness.

]E Thar the Cenn,al

Labour 5st.y1,." ,..
",-. ^

rrles ciid nor require

any .rr;; ;r;;r1,;,: ffi :;:,;";
such cjrcumstances
welghtage o, intervjew of 50%
of rotaj marks is unfajr,
:rnreasonable and
arbitrary, The
I
lanc es and prejudices

inrerrrew ro the
",
*.,r,", ::::'::;:: ;::: ;ff ; .:::,:T:
cxtent of 5[o/o t. general categot'v
(
candidates and 45%o
oBC candrdates puts tor
I rhe candidat
es at the mercy ofinterview
board and merit
loses comprele
rerevance.
I

The average inrerview

period of ( applicanr was around
l0- r5 minutes in
rhe said examination.
There is no'ach
established gvidence that
lour/five persons
can judge thoroughly
a caldi date in 5uqh h s'rali perioci' In such
circumslances to give complete
or a candidate to rhe
inre::view board is,nru,,, unluu,no'llillll::;:'-

:t That India is country

I

having vario reli'ions aad casles

There is a possibility
rhar persons in
the interview booroLls
cerkin prejudices
ln such social
scenario to give
arbitrary pow.r r.'u'ca(y
* interview marks ro the extent
ofrhe totar marks of50%
is unjusr, rnfoi,and Lrnreasonable
dnd contrary to
law.

a
 6? I

{
ilnr recnrilmenl of.
.t-
lr
any rypc t the rcipondc't
nor orrv ha st()bebya
froceciure estabrished
i, r.r, nl o'to it has to be hir,
j rrarion iusr an d reasonablc.
oI. 50% weighr or" n. irlterview oI total
marks (wri tten tnarks -f
:jrerview marks)
arrd arbitrary
criteria in inte,i ew is gross
'roration of Anicre 14, Articre ,o
"'u"ry']''t
Article 2I cf the consritu tion of
we, India
as as princrpre of
Narura, .,*,,]]'o

-.]'h;rr there
is no clarity in the
r elevanr advenjsemenr
, 5l/2013 whar was
p:ocedure followed the
in awardilg lllrerview .

marks was ir a decision

sorely of
airair.marr,/preside,t?
Mether rach
e n'lemoer had effbctive
right lo award
nrarks? Methor each member
I effective right t' dissent? In absence
of
ar.\ deflned criteria
for jn,urr,. the whoje inrer'rjew
' .process becomes
Lrntajr, 61uo.g1y
un, ,nrruronu,)le
Partjculariy when the wclght
ago of
inrer,vjew js to the
exlent of s,yo arks
of totalinterview marks.

-fhat
23 the jntervjew process
in the said exarnination was
flawed, illegal,
albrrrary and against established
principles oflaw

!q. t hat in the Special recruitment

advertisement 51,A013,
essential and
desirabie qualification
had been prescribed.
The essenrial qualification
prescribed was diploma in social worVlabcur
welfare/lndustrial
leJ,rtions/personnel managemen/labour
law fi.ora relrognizecJ univsl5jly
61
eqlLivalent. The desirable
qualification prescribed
was degree in law from
|ecogonized universiry.
In RTI Leply dated Seplemhdr
20lj it was shtec that
esscnrial qualification
has not been relaxed.
But many aul,didot.. have been
selecred who do not have
essential qualification as
acjvertised in the SpeciaJ
l<eci-uirment adve(isement
5 l/20 I ..1

;.i lhat RTI AppljcarioD has been

filed on 20.06.2014 by rhe
app]icanr kl ger
fLrnh3r relevant and clirical
inlbrnration relateci with said examination
{\
1,\nneru re A/8 ) There is
ever.y possibility thu
rnony lacrs wjll be gathered
't
 ?
rirrough this
RTI, w\ich
will prove ntaia ficlc
inrention, arbitrariness
luldirreguiaritles
o/ the Responclel,]r.

:5 Thar the Applicants

relies upont the
documents' i) list
whereof is annexecr
rrerero and any
other or f.urther
r:rav be rbuncilit
\virh rhe permissio" "' and prope,.

"r,n,,
r,,rllrl;::::
27 Trrat the Applicanr funher ..
srrbm,.- that no other Petition
has been filed by
lhe Appricants before any orrrer
clts
Ln seeking similar
relief.
R[L,II]T PITAY[D

:8. 1l] visly pf thc faots and circun

statcd abovc' lt is therof,ore mosr
humbJy prayedthat
this I,Ion,ble jbunai
,rtttuntttmay graciorrsly be pleased to:

Quash the final resuh dared

h,h.
lTrh ""rr!' zvr'{ L
,^," .,
0j/ the Respondenr for 57
posts of Assisrant Labour com
oner (central)/Assistant
werfare
commissioner(cenrrat)uassistanrm
I
(central), Assistanr
Director rr":::1;" :::td:';;;
"r
Labour Service in
the nrinistry of
Labour& Employment
advenised
{ vide Special Recruitnrenr
Adverdsernenr No.
5 l/20 1 3,

II.i Direcr Ihe Respondent

to res
for 57 posts of
Assisranr Labour .or.,rr,lnto''" .inten'iew
(centrai)/Assistant
\\uerfare
Commissioner(Central)/Assisranr
labour welfare commissioner
(centrar), Assistant
Director. of.Junior Time Scale (JTS) of
ceno.al
Labour Service in the
Ministry of Labour& Employment
advertised
vide Special RecrLrirrrrcnr
Acjverr.tsefient No. .j
l/201i after deciding
l
Just, talr and reasonabie *ciihtage
of interview marks of total
nrarks
(wri tten nrarks +interview
ntarks).

itl Award the cost ofthis

applicarion ln lavour
-t --(
ofrhe Applicanr. ?
 v/

{
IV Pass any orde(s), further order.(s),
and other relief(s) as
, this l{on'ble
Tribunal deems fit and pr.oper
in inrerest ofjusrice.

IN'TERIM RELIEF PRAYED

29. pending
final decision.it is
mosr humbly prayecl rhar
rhis Hon,ble Court
may
graciously be pleased
ror

L Crant stay on the recon.tntendation

of57 (fifty
seven) candidates fbr
appointment to the post
ol Assisranr Labour Comnrissioner
(Centlal),
Assistant Welfare
CJmnrissioner (Central)/A"-sistant
I-abrour wellirre
Connrissioner (Cenrral),
Assjsrant Dir.ector.in
Or.ade-V in Juniot..l-inrc
scale (J]'S) ol'Cenrral
L,abour Scrvice (CLS),
Minisrry of.Labour and
Employment, on the
basjs of resuir of the
recruirment resr held by
rhe
Respondent on 4rr, 4ugus1,
2013 snd intorvie.w held
on lgrh Maroh,
2014 ro 25tr, March,
20I 4,

l0 That the Appricanr has paid

the courr Fec through posrar
orcier No
. .... ..Dared

31. l. rsr oiEnclosures: As per I::dex

VERIFICATION

12. i ,Mukesh Kumar Suman, S/O Sadhu

Sharan Singh ,Age 35 years
,do hereby
verify thar contents ofpara
I to par.a 3l are tnle to best ofmy knowledge and that i
have nor suppresse{any
marerial fact.

MUKESH -'#ii:L?X
A.6, CIIRISTIAN COLONY
OPP. MOIIR]S NAGAR POLICE
STAi;N
Dale: "rrvg grr, DELHr lro oo7

Place r \U_
 u
v2

,t l o.
,4nro*x,rr*r.-- A/ -3"

F, No. 1,/2ll(9)/2012'l{'lv/sPC'tl

uNloN PUEtlc sERVlcE c0l\4lvllssl0N

p-r,rptPLlR.l'lou!l'.sHA"HJA|AN. RqAP
)L tl"l t.11 0c6 9

uQlilL oF RESULI

Posrs oF ASS|STANl'
'. uNloN PUBLIC sERVlcE ccMMlsslQN AovtRTlsED 57
wELFARE
A0ouR corMMlssloNER {cENIRAL)/AsslsTArlT -:?Yy:t'otu'
coMrvrrssrQNER {ctNTli'#AssrsrANT
iffi*yili'ii^-i- uroro *ttno,.u LASQv;( sERvlcE
Tll\4E scAtE (lTs) ol' cENTRAI
ra.:
irnrcron tru GRADE"V oF iuNloR
AovEnrrsEMENT N0 s1/2013
o ;.;;;; ;il;;;to'^ o*D
'*"ot'EN'r'
0AT[0 12
vlQE
0i 2013'
,ir'r, niit^rotct No, 1301s1027i2)

rTY SEVEN ) CANDIDA]'ES HAVI B[[X

-T'Iffi'Iiliflfitr;}ffi$.'*,*i':,j,[ffi
;i?;Ilil
jlrf,
lf{'t#tijffi
AUGUsT, 2013 ANo INTERVIEW
Ht',LLl
ll:i*l't;:vult:x);1,r"'
VJt'tt^Rt
.lrrq col\lMl55l0NEll {ct|lIsAu/ASSlSlANT
posTs oF rrr ro0rr
s7
"*til ^i::11';:it"'ttl""ii"'"^i)/^ssrsr^trr
(curm[yA5sr5T^Nl]"^tj0xravril tlrloull 0l'
*il
o
MrNrst Ry
tbvrarssroNEt
0l Lt
,;;,;,r, lcrs), ^rr0
ot JuNloR TlMt ScAt€ uT5)
^:o*ouu
\\s.# Itx,l.Oy].4tNT

ffiB,
I

r ')
.- ..t\;+:l
d lj\J
' './
I...r'
I
I \'.
1," " '

'I I

'-f
'1 I tt v.1., ir4 )
((
;.' V.
( L!,ra,,_^-,L,
l
t
I $
 is 73
l'
l!

.l
ROL LNO
N .t
sN0.
L

012890 stlIlrl' i
I
((lN^ll .l I
i 0(lt)72(' N IANIAN
i
I

N tllAl, cllANl)l{A l(All

ll
0Urr257 l'
0110 t5
s 0Al 0Al,l llAs ANALI
SAYYIiU -.::-_|
n

( 00000 3
RAlilisll (iAull
5
I l
--00016- sAclllN I yl'no I
-.--.- -------l
2.4 SIlUB HRA TY A(l
't 002 ."' - i-'

o -ffiIra7- Mll UI, TYA cl

llESIll v
I

l
enlr 0 2 2U9
')
Il ANI l(ANOAN
oo3o 60
t0
N^YA(
) Ull Ctltt ND N]\
0 q1003 I
11

'--rffi3 -- 'n orioifr[fi-iinfr--*"

I
I

0Q912
CI riRANIo [v SAIl(lA l
o0o+tt+ NlDlll Sll
'14
lTllM OItANfY
rl^ RUNAIO\I( irrOr.utl
0120 24
15 I
I
l
-rloilro siri*u onnn
I
.).6

ttu\ Nllu cltA rAN sAllu

loq('23 \
I
.t'l I
s'rr'rt'n'tttv
utstt'a rintltltt i

o I
"
lll riil'ii
00rtl I
I

stlsiNr"\ lNNAll
NAtAli
I

I
I ir i I
i
\"- mo,
l\NlAl.l
I
?Q I
tl'.1
lll suNlt liu t'iltttSl
L---*--'-'
\ 00326 9
2I,
\ ..---* 005640

..-*--- : .i i1
t.-.
',7i, t'i/)l
',::;:,
'l
.( j ' I

I 1
f
? frr-u-.,-
Ll/'1
[r.,,, [ 'Ilr"t'v*-'
 I

$
@ 7Ll

lzrl 0 09 945
I nalrv
nnrlnn

24 009443 t$ tTrjJArN

i5

-----1
0 00 011 iYlllNlr,l0y TltAt(un

26, 9t26.t1 AN:(l]R DALAI,

.t._.--..-.
l7 l)0010:J Jru l$lt0( t,liIitftrA',t.n
I
2U 007047 0AltuN I(uMAlt llrA

29 at2o7i ll I lA R Ll I.:N r) nil (urvnR rlt^N,lru --*---l

30 00u396 MNACAVIL PAN0IYIN SllANlrr UCAVI .

3t, 0 0 6989 rvlDlt zrltAll K IN

l!;;'
\\,'I

o
.1),
00128()

010402
I
UOCNA

ANNADUIIAI

.'tu J+ 0 01415 St,0ll'lllvlLlll5' llNI l,llUllJl'AN0l,

I

I I

l5 00 096 TIADIIAVAN

I
3( 00 .15 llAltl l(lSllAN ltll:tNA
.l
t..-. :--r- , -"--*----.*--.1
'J-t 00322 t] IlAt[sll KUil.tlt 1'

l PInv l:ANl)Aj
3ll Q06053

l9 012 016 suN , RA6rlUNA',rll lzAt.l

I

,10 003513 rVnoANeJAr

41 0013 0 6 RENLlvADnv

4',t 00410 0 l,lt01\l l(ullllll I

o I
4:l

,l,r
00r(l1u

t)l)51l6
Iit^l)YU N

'.....
l(U

NAl'.nN IlANll( 'r'tul,tJ lt/r

AIt ItANA I

'*P
.t -t-- 012143 r,rirj0AA llrs:NGII dii^tiir,\r.i-
- -
l
I
I
I
@, I .16 00u15? l l0ll,l l\l lllA l) 0ZAlil
I

.t I I
I

)'l
.:.:it:.V.1
I

';,i::,:/
-(
(." u' ir
lr\
rl
,t
T.Q
(
I
I

1,,.,'.
I
l"iY
lrg fo:ll

I
 di'f.\
\e{v v5

-l I
4i 00195 0 VIS AL A5llQl( A[lT l]

40 00s599 Al UL SlNCll
I

+\ 00115 5 I^t 0ir cAuTill\i

50 001109 AlllK[5fl BAIIADUn

5l 012'.140 ll LHl l ll0uDlll

52
- "iiirl,ios sI(iut I'll^DllAli
I

53 000431 AMAn0EE!

t,t 011V5 6 !v0Nt\ ll0l l{ I

ll v (
I

55 004291 s Nl ll R IiDOY

f:, '50 ----ifBo6t AR?l, I

\-:2
01 5ANTO t(u1\14 r scTlrY )
57 l
I

o
it:iiii
.rl:f
UNI UBTIC 5E R vrcI L0Nlt\4t5510N

.11 h 7'n l NE 4

egNcluo_Ltr-
I

i
I
'|

t (\
I
l
I
I CL,
l I

I
$.s

it",-) ;)
ii ,);luYet'7 I

\ >"(-'i"/ -
. llJ'i I

( ' ( ,'' '

H 'z
ll \

a
H
\
li I

!, r
1"v,.'.^.,.
l;r
I
I
,lt, ,
,,
J
dvt'[ (',r*."

ru
 F, No. 1/29(9)/20 r2-R-IV/SpC-rr v6
Union Public Service Commission
Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road
New Delhi-110069

NOTICE OF RESULT
Union public service commission advertised 57 posts of
assistant labour commission (Central/Assistant) welfare
commissioner (Central/Assistant labour welfare
commissioner (central/assistant Director in grade-V of
lunior time scale (JTS) of central labour service (CLS)
Ministry of labour and employment vide advertisement
no.5L/2013 item no.02 (vacant no. 13051027L20
Dated. 12.10.2013.

The following 57 (fifty seven) candidates have been

recommended for appointment to the post of assistant

labour commissioner (central /assistant) welfare
commissioner (Central/Assistant) welfare co m missio ne r

(Central/ assistant labour welfare commissioner

(central/Assistant) director in grade-V of Junior Time
scale (JTS) of central labour service (CLS), ministry of
labour and employment. On the basis of the result of
the recruitment test held by the union public service

commissioner on 4th august,2013 and interview held on

18th March 2014 to 25th March 2014.

a\ e
\
?
 -'?+
S. NO ROLL NO NAM E
1 0129090 SUMIT
2 009726 NIRANJAN
KU MAR
3 oo62s7 NIRMAL
CHANDRA KAR
4 011055
5 000863 RAKESH KUMAR
6 000161 SACHIN KUMAR
7 002024 SHUBHARA
TYAGI
B oto207 RAHUL TYAGI
9 0t2289 I
RESHIM
10. 00 3060 M AN I KARAM
11 001863 U DHAN
CHANDRA
NAYAK
t2 009393 MOJID IMRAN
RAZA
13 009t22 CHIRANJEEV
SAIKIA
t4 006484 NIDHI SHARMA
15 012024 KARU NAKAR
JAGAN NATH
MOHANTHY
16 002028 SRiNU DARA
t7 00062 3 KANHU CHARAN
SAHU
18 0t2247 DISWARANJAN
SATAPATHY
19 009531 SUSANTA
I
KUMAR NAYAK
20. 00400 5 AN]ALI YADAV
2l 00 3 269 SUNIL KU MAR
SAH U
22. 005640 WASHIMUL HAQ
23 009945 RA]IV RANJAN
24 009443 KSHIRAY ]A1N
25 000811 MRINMOY
THAKU R
26 0t2647 ANKAR DALAL
27 000103 SHI ASHOK L

\'f"t
V
 q3
PERMOALLA
28 007 047 HARUN KUMAR
JHA ]

29 012077 DHAUMI KUMAR

HI MANSH I
30 008396 KANAGAYAL
PAN DIYAN
SHANMUGAVEL
31 00 6989 MD KAZI ALAM
KHAN
32 001206 BEENA
33 010402 ANNADGRAI
34 001415 SUBA PRIYAD
DARS H NI
M UTH U PAN DI
35 000 096 MADA AWAN
36 009352 RAM KISHAN
M EENA
37 003228 RAJESH KUMAR
M EENA
38 0060 53 PRAVIN PANDI
MOHAN DAS
39 012616 SUNIL
RAG HU NATH
MALI
40 003513 VR GANESHAN
47 001386 RENU YADAV
42 004100 PREM KUMAR
43 009018 PRADYU MN
KUMAR RANA
44 005216 NAYAN MANIK
TRI PU RA
45 ol2r43 REEGAA
JAISINGHI
CHAU HAN
46 008357 MOHAM MAD
AZAi R
47 001958 VISHAL ASHOK
AMTE i

48 00 5 599 ATUL SINGH

49 001 15 5 HARI OM
GAUTAM

T .A.C
'F
 v?
50 001 100 HARKESH
BAHAD U R
51 012240 H ITES H
CHAU HAN
52 00796 5 SAGAR
PRADHAN
53 00431 AMARDEEP
54 011056 MANOHARAM
55 00429L S RAVINATH
REDDY
56 005061 BASAVARAN
57 010002 SANTOS H
KUMAR SETHY

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

NEW DELHI 110069 17TH JUNE 2OI4
CONCLU DE D

T'c
,?
 ;;;: ; di
",tr.,+,?sef,{d,!q{,r,,@nnx,$ilffi
$o
",,W**,ru,,,,,',,','.,
eq fif6''.l-dr sTqhl, tilfl'5l #+*m+** *k ,,ooun '''
Umion Public 5 ervic'e Comn'Plsslorr $
Dethi-110 069
DholPur House, Shahj ahan Road, New
t-c-ht 'T1
C.ADMIT CARD
y nltl'l;
lryra {dflrrv wnrr qll :tiF{lrr llrpil l'ilI)'r lr(l'fi;
'il;l wFfi mI Jfi5fil (t'trqy r6q'rTi'ult '

( }fill r{l!ltr' 1'r) i 1i\q q-Jir Ilrfl )ql tl

. 11 tr{'{r{rt Jllfr.I
,,, ir(rrd;iittcrttqtlroComputer0lte(necrultruct!lTcttr20l3lrrthrl)0't'0fAsstt'Lob;uiConrnrissi0rr0tl
t'd!our w0lfrro con!rn' (Contr{l)/lettl' Dlr(ctor
tclrntrat)/l$tl, wrllrro comm'(conlr!i) /Attlt'
I rit qtw I nrtn . Y r4ril , I'rt
lr:sti'4tll August 2013
' Date gf Rccrvifment '

MUI(ESH KUMAR SUMAN

I
4..
;-,',.1
009004

o I

Na fire l' SADHU STIARAN SINGIl

,lii:;:
.
tl
t:::r:::
-,A'Jiii !i,idii

OELH I
r '3Iq{(i r} t rr'rpr 'r'r" d
rrq {I{!t '1r" '
MI l,lfi(i
\r;r:ultftcnt Torti' ill l.
oT0bl0 from01'00P'M leol00i"M'
2' ntti ('nc: lrl
",,,";r M.naonmorlt ind TachnolotY l't{q r[I . :; ImG fiinr{ r6qtT :ilr '{)r
"
p,,i r oiooier tloida'2o1106
l;;;,;*" r I rrovr | \': {c'od(:0':
t{um,r Roiou'c' Minlrr^n\.irr

o !t:J' ril
c,tm ir qi irctt {fit 6lrlq : ldFr
: 11:304M'
Reporling.time!llhc RecruitmQnllestVcnu!
.4I?r
t nq c'tm tfi it rirr *r:rgrft;rdl ff mrtll
,*ffi 6t nc{T(a tr:tr r.J
p
altor: 12115 lvl
illov/! 0tlho Focru tmoirt'To5t Vonuo
No Cl0didlto willbo

'9ic I x tdt
lnrlructlbrl on Pago 2
q{rt EFiTfi
*r- / conrrolrlr o( Craminih!1:',il
':,:;f,,il1'
..)
.;i ):/
.'.1',,
''..'.'

IC
l
i ,.''',,-] T, t
T l
--(
liil,l h!\ I

d, , L ,irr,.rr,,,*1.
 w Utlor.t PuBLtc S ERVTCE cOUTUISSIOw
4&
SPECIAL RECRUITMENT ADVE RTISEMENT NO. 51/2O1,3
INVITES ONLINE RECRUITMENT APPLTCATIONS (ORA)
FOR RECRUITMENT BY SELECTION TO THE FOLLOWING POSTS
(': by using tho website http://www-upsconline.nic.in) "9,t
VACANCY DETAILS
1- (vacan.y No. 13015101712)
qflr*r rn l}I. o.p.nn.nr or M.dic.r .nd
Ili1l1lT.!."l:.1O.dra..d pubri. H..Ih, Acandidate will be otigi6te tc 9€t the bsn€tit ot com,iunity.e*tuation
N.gr. H.veti. Or the rh,rly-N,ne only in c€*
,6s15. tive posrs ar;
tosh6n lor sch.dJt6d Castos c.^ddar€6. lwo posls.16 ros€tu€o rh€ panjtubr qsto to which th6 6.ddar6s oetong ii
incruoeo in 116 iiiior
tor S;odut€d res€rvcd €o.nmu. rss rssued by ltu c€^[ar cov.mmenr. rra
,nDes Uano,dal€s le^ Oosts ars rss€ftoo to. Olhe,
Bactward Ctassos Cano,d;64 c.nddat€ indiJrel
a.d lhe r6mah'n9 t*enty rvyo posrs a,e unreseded o,rnu rn,ny-n,ne posrs, r.o h6/her appt,canon ro,m lrlal heJshs b€tongs lo SC/SrrOACiOen_.r *-r"Ii-,,J
'n
lur suDsooJentry wr,res ro rh€ comm,ssron lo chango his/h6r carogory.
a,e rereryed lol Phys(€rt, Handieppsd p6r6ons v,z. Oflnoo"io,er," ooirs s_,ici
Locomoror u'saDrny/ cereb,at patsy wrh on€ IegAfieclso (oL)
d.no,*i*a, .6quosl shail not b€ €nte.rained by the commission.
{R ghio/ Ls,l) o; bn; Phys'.any Hand,capDod tPH) pers€ns or p66ons wlh drssb rt€s. sur..i^d tr6h
ain Ali.ctod (OA) (R'gnr or L6i ) t6m lny clmm-un,ty rr,. a"o *,t0," o)
bo"ii roi .ol,ess Itun 40% or ,er6van. drs:brllty sh3 aton6 O" a,grbt.
:ly-rl:illl j:l!,!:e-!!d
psrso.s viu. onopaeo,caly Hsnd,cjppod/
",i Locomoor t";,h.L"iii;i
r6s.rvation and olhor concesslons & r6ta,Gtions as p€.-t"!iot" *o"iu,i,,jr.u.
Parsy.wui One L6g Afi6cl6o (OL) (REnt o. L;t) or On6 A/m
Ane.reo (o^) ltr€hl o, Lsrr). oUAuFtcATto s. EssEr.rtrrL, n. eoubllroxlr-:4 h) HE.AOOUARTERS: Ar otac€s spocir,caly s6red sgainst cenain posrs.
orheturse
A .sco9^is6d M€dicot Ouatitication indud6! in the lst
or thd Scnoduls o, pad oi th;
Ilgj:rled_ulo {otho. rh€n Lrc€ncEr€ quatficaLons) ro rhe lldr.n Med,catCoun jl acr, 4 PROBATION: Tho p€.so.rs i€tedsd win b€ €ppointed on p.ob3tio.r
ss por.ul€.
Educalonat quatitrc€llon hclud6{ .n rh6 pan lnd ot lh6 Thlri
s(r6oure shouro..tso l) A Wrnien Oblecti!€ Typ6 Rocruih€ot T6st with multipte choic€
quoslixE shat b€
_{ul{r]
lho co.d ron6 slputateo.n ssclion 13 (3) o, the lndra; conduded lollowod by lnt6rvlew for s€l€ction.
i,t'3f*''t'3T1,8"",:ti[.; r) SCIiEMEAND SYLLAAUS FOR TflE RECRUITMENT TEST FOR TIIE POSTS
f,T1[*.?.r"*fj ffi:l,ff 13:i:".1":i,rffi Or MEDICAL OFFTCER (For ttom No.1):.
2. (VacEncy No. 13015102712) i) Tha subjecb oi tho T6st witl b6 as u.der!
Labour Comhlr.ion.r (cadt..l)/A.3l5tani W€rr.re a) Gsns.al Abilily snd Go^eratAwarems6

d) su€€ry
ninoleon posis ar€ €) Gynaecology & Obslorics
, Provontiv€ A Soctal Medicjn€
ii) Th6lesr wi[ bo orlwo hours.duration 6nd wil carry s msxamum oI IOO madG.
iii) Th6 tost will be an objocli!€ typ€ quesljoG with mu[ipt6 choice sn6w6r5.
iv) Th6 l€vel of lhe q\,6sriorl p€pers wil O€ MBBS 3land6rd.
v) Th€ medrum of th€ Tost w[ b€ €ngtish onty,
vl) Ih6r6 wtl De pona,ry ro. wrmg answors. Ev€ry vong a^saer wil canv a d6duc-
non or one - lnrd o, rhc marlG assqnsd lo that qu6ston. tf no anslvoiis
Ior a quesnon, thero *ilt b€ no p€nalty for that quosrion.
m*ed
SCHEiIE.ANOSYLLAAUS FOR THE RECRUITMENT TEST FOR THE P]OSTS
oF assrsraNT LAEoUR couMrssroNER (ceruraly rcssrnnr wir-
0iploma in Sociat Woru FARE coitMrssroNER(cENTRAL)/ asstsriNT L.neoun wErraRi CbM-
!!l:!gl,/ER (cENr!4Lx
IIME SCALE (JTSI
otREcroR rr cmoe.v or Jur.loi
^ssrsrarr
OF CENTITAL LABOUR SERVTCE 1Ct-S1. 1ro.I"m xo.Z1:-
0 Th6 suqocB ol lno T.st wil bo as snd€r:
a) Trade tJnior Movemonr.
b) Soclal Worr E Socjar SecLrriiy hc.
c) hdusrriar R€hl|o rs.
Peoson Sch€me and d) Hlrman Rosourca O€v€toprn€nr.
3) Princloal ol Nalu€t Justic6.
IMPORTANT
CLOSING OA FOR SUBMISSlON 1)Tlado Union Acr.
OIOATES ARE N REOUIREO TO
OF ONLINE RECRUTTMENT SENOAIIY OOCUMENT OR CERTIFICATE 9) Labour W€llare.
APPIICATION (ORA) THROUGH
ORAWEBSITE lS 2!:59 8RS
OR PRINTOUT OF APPLICATION h) LaboiJ. La6: tndustrist Oisputas rd. 1947: paymont ot Wag€a rd, t836:
oN 31.0't.2013
INITIALLY TO THE COMMISSION
Y.{'l.nym wael !1 19.8: co.rr.q Labou (R.sulsrion a Abor;o.) Acr. r97o:
Child L6boll (P&R) r\ct, t9a6: paymenr or G..BIy Acr. 1972: BuiElng a oU,€;
TH E LAS T OAT€ INTING o COIVPLE 'rE L SU BM ITTE o o LIN E t-
Co^sl^,ction Wo 6rs (RE a CS) Acr, 1996.
s UPTO 23
CATION lt RS ON 01 .02.20 1 3 i) Curont Ev€nls.
DATE FO OETERi,II G ThE E o L CANO IE S IN E VE j) lndian Constitution.
RE SPE c T SHAL L BE THE RESC RIAEO CLOSING OATE o S I MISI
soN o k) 6.n6ral Montar Abilry.
oN L RECRU IM E NT ICATION (ORA)
NOTES i0 The te3t wit b€ ot bro hoors duBtbn and lho msdium of the qoestbn p6p€B 14iI
b. borh Hindi and Englbh.
a) Crnd dab-s aro.requ€sled lo appty onty uvolgn Onlrrc R6crurr.mnt Apptcation
(c,r.A) w€bs,t€ nupj/*try.uFEcontin..nic.in ;no NOT *nre b rh€ Ui) The l6st will b€ an objsctivs ty!€ wiul muttpl€ dlolc€s ot answers and wil ca,ry a
Cd;Ls"ion
l9r ADpLc5rion lolms, They ar6 atso r.quostod lo go lhrolgh carotvfiy tho .naximum ol 100 ma ..
d6E;a
or posls 3nd insrucrlons publishoo beto{;s wsl-ss on rire weOslti lv) Th€re_will be p€mtry ot wrong.nswer. Evary Mong answ€, wil c€rry. d.duo-
hnPr/www.up.coolin.,ntc.tn, lion ot om'thtd ol the m.rts asslgnod b ul3r qu€stion. lt no ansl/oitG m5(€d
b) NATURE Of POSTI ,or. qL€sl.cn. rhere 6 t bs no psnaly to. thatqu6sdon,
i) Po6l3 at ta.m No. I are lomporsry SYLLAAUS FOR THE IEST
ii) PosG at [.m No. 2 sre p€rmansn!. Th. .yllrbus ,or ths propo!.d t66r will b. bas.d on th. mtqrc ot th. du!.r of
c) PAY SCALE tCL SSTFTCAI|ON: (F€ur€s rn D,acr.d ar lho erld ot th€ Ev st6 th. po.t(.) conc6m.d.
hdlc3l6 lh€ appror lotar sdDlurEnrt (per rnonth) e\cttd,.g TA, HRA+Npd WEIGIITAGE
al rho
mmllnum 0l ih€ rc5r6t.
RESPECTIVE WEIGHTAGE.OF THE RECRUITMENT TESTANO INTERVIEWS
t4o0/. (Gr6de par)-NpA as admissrbre.fT.E
(1, Rs. 15.600.39,r00 (pB-3)+Rs
SHALT EE OECIOEO BY THE COMMISSION-
KsJbr20/.pm. approrflatsty+NpA as adh,ssibt€) G6nor5r C€nuat S€;c€.
uroup a, Ga:€(od. NoFMinist€riar to, rh6 r,osls ar tGm No.t. I Modo and Dato or Rocrullm.nt Tosr
(ii) Rs. 15,600-39.10! (pB-3)+Rs 54OO/- (Grad6 payxrE. tu.36,120/- Tho r8cruihent tsst as wolt as mods (wneh€r Computar bas€d or pap6r 6 pon
p.m spprorimarory) Generat A, ,n Grads -v o( Junio, il;o Scal6 uisr 6r ba6od) fo. th€so posB shall b€ docjdod by @omt6ston t6t6r d.
cent,ar Labou S€turce (CLS) O.ganEeo SeNi@ to, rne posr !r [i_ m) C..lr. fo. Rocruilm.nr Tort
4 Appricrnls a.e rcq!,ir3d to indr.ate
rhei..io.c€ or cont.€s (CENIRE cooEs) in
d) AGE LllllTAS ON NORMA! CLOSTNG OAIE i.e. Nor oxc..ding !5 yo.rslor or. Online R6cruit n€nl Applistion (ORA) 6t5lm.
the posE .t [.m Xos. I .nd Z.
ii) Howevo.. il any ot lhe Conlros registers b5s lh6n 10 candi.taEs. 0ro c€nr€ abll
e) The_age E relaraDte lc{ SC/ST canddates uplo 5
rea6 €nd upto 3 y€a.s tor OBC not b3 op€ratad for Rocruith6nt T€st, Csodid.tos opting for tiat Cgnrre shalt b€
canooal63 h rospect ot vaca^o€! resotusd tor hsm. SC/S'/OBa Candidates
nave lo produc€ a c6sls c€nficalo n !,roscflbod protorm.. For age corcsston allon.d som6 orho. cant.€, Th6 commission rss6^/6. ths nghr lo alot any olh€r
applcabls to otior-ca!8jones ot spptica^B pt6ase s6€ rotovani paras ot rhe c€nlr6 han lho canlra opGd for at ils dlscretion_
rtr$rucron8 and Addilonat htoiination to Caidrdat3s to. Rd.uitment by ill) Th€ candidalos should noto that no rgqu€51 tor chango ot C€nuo wlI bs cn!!r-
iainod und€r atrv circurl6l.a.c.i.

a'c
u
()Ihe cald'o.res 616 cuuoned rhar J an, c6no,dr'e aepear: dr a Cenlre olh€r lnao
lhs ona sllon€o Dy the Cohmrssr@ nrs/ h6r Adm,s5,o. C€fl,{rcal€, hrs./n€r
answer sh€€ls will not Dc evatu3red and'nt"Ls/ her cand,daUre wr| be tlabte lo can.
cellatron.
INSTRUCTIONS AND AOOIIIONAL INFORMATION TO CANOIOATES
RECRUITMENT, 'OR
1. } TEENSHIP:
A C&did.t8 nusl b€ e$er
(a)a cilizon ol l^dia or
(b) a subr€cl ol Nspsr or
(c) 3 subled orahut5n, or
(d) a Trbetan leluo€e who cam6 ov6r lo r4dra oc,o'e .sr Ja.uary, 1962 w,lh lhe
inlontbn ol permanendy senling in lndia or
(e) a p€lson ol lndE. o.9r^ who nas migrared kom P.krslan, Aurma, Sn Lanka
or Easi Alrcan colnlies ol kh!6, Uganda ths U^d.d Repubtic ot Tanzania (io.-
msrly Tangany'k! and zanziba0. zambra, Malawr, zaf6. Erh€pia and vi€ham
with lh6 inlenlon ol pohanonny se(ing in lnda Provid€d thal . candidaE
b€lo.rging to c€l€gones (b) {c). (d) and (6) above sharr b€ a p€rson in whos6
favou, a c€tulicato ol6ll9rbility has b€on rssued by lh€ Govoinrcnt ol lodia
I{OTE: Th€ applicilion ol a candidate i. whos€ cas€ . cr.riricaro of eligibiliry is .sc-
.as3ry tBy b€ coosidored by lhs Com,y!&sDn and, il re@mrend6d (d appoint rent.
lh€ candidalo may also be flovision.lly appolnted subtscr ro ih6 .ec€$ary c€rtifcars
bohg bsuod ln hl! favour by rhe Gov€mmenr ol lnd€ .
2. AGE LUIITS T Th€ Bge lin lor rh6 posl has b€6n 9iv3n lh€ adv6rtis6m€nt. For
c6ntin ago concsslions sdrnissiDla to varous el€lorioE 'n ploaso go through ho
hslruclio.r t6gadm! CorE€sson. E R6,sElions
3. tllNlMutl ESSENTIAL QUALTFICATIONS: Arr appricanb musr lurlirr rh6 €si6n'
tial r6qui.omsnts ofthe po6t and other conditioos siiputated in the advortis€mant,
Th3y ar€ advisod to saliily th€m3€lves b€lor€ applying ttlat lh6y poss6ss at toasl
lho cis€nt.l qualillcarions l3id down ,or vanols posls. No enquiry asLog lor
sdvic€ as !o olioibility will b€ ontonaingd
. APPUCATION FEE:
(a) Gndidatos ar€ reqursd to P8y a l3s ol Rs 2t- (Rupe€s Twonty live) only
eihar by r€mi6ng th€ rnoney n any branch of th€ SAI by cash or by using nel
bsnhng lacllly ol th€ SBI or by u6ing visrmasl€r crodivdebi c.rd.
(b)No ,€6 ror SC,/STFli/Wom6n c.ndid6les o, sny community. No'foe €x6mp
tbn' i5 availabl€ lo oBc dsle canoidal8! and lh6y a,o .oquirod to pay rh6 full pr6'
{c) Arrlicalions witholtih. ores..i&d lo3 would no( b. consld€rcd a.d sumntar
ily roi6cl6d, No represenlatoo aoainsl such relo.lon would be snlsn nod.
(d) Feoonc. !3ld shallnoi be .3fundlcl und.. any ckcum.[nc. norcsn tho
16. b. h.ld ln r.t..v€ tor any othor .ramlnltlon or.olecuon.
5, CONCESSIONS 6 RELAXATIONS:
(a) Th. spp.t .ge llmll ln ..3e ol As.rvicom.r and Comml..lon.d Offic.rs
lncludlng ECOS/SSCO..hall b..aluod by lh. l.nglh of Uilit ry S.rvlca
lncr6aod by thr€. ye.ri Eubl.cl 1o tho condltlon6 tha! on th. cloclng dat€
ol r.caipl ol .pplacauon. (i) lho conlinuous sorvho rond6.6d ln the A.mod
Fo.c$ by 3n Er-S€prc€ha. i5 nol los6 tha. Eix monlh! an6l atleslati@ .nd (ii)
lhal rh6 ,lsulla age allar d€ducling his p€iod ol s€Nic€ lrom hb aclual age
do€s not €xceed lh€ p.oscrlb€d 69€ limi( by morc lhan 3 ye3r9. Thb tolaxaf'on h
also av.ilablo ro ECOs/sScos Bto hav€ compl€led their iiilirl p€rird ol s.$gr
monr ot llvo yea.s o( Mrlil,ry Ssryica and whoso assignmed has b3€n 6!t€^d€d
b€yo.ld 5 ysar6 as on donng dalo and in whos€ ca6€ tho Ministy of O€l€rlc€
bsues cerlificat€3 that hsy will b€ rsleasod within 3 monlhs on 3€l€c1lon lrom lhe
dato o, rocorpt ol oiler of lppolntrn€nl. Csndldat€s daiming ag€ lolax{ion und€r
thir pa.a woqld b. Gqorad lo p.oduco . csni,icaG h the p.s6clibod Prolorfia to
NOIE: Er SoNlcem€n who hav6 al.oady rscursd rsgular Bmploym€nl und€r th€
Canlral Go( in a civil Posl sre p€rmitlsd lh6 bsnolil ol ago rehlalon .s admlssiu€
for E,(-sorvic6m6n for s€c{ring anolhd omploym€nl in any hl9h6r posl or 6ervh€
und6.lha Cenlral Govl. how6v6r. such ca.{idalss r/i[ nol b6 6]igible lor uE b6n€ft
ol rs6srvallm, ll any ,o. Er-So
icem€n in C.nlral Govt lob6-
(b) h ord.r io quallly lor lho conco.slon uodor (5) .bov€. c€ndidalo. conc€mad
rNluld be r6quir€{ lo produc€ a csdtrcli. thsl lh€y hsv6 bo€n r€lelaod trom lh€
O€fena€ Forc€s. Th6 c6diflcate lor Ex-Sotuiclmen and Commrssion€d Olf'cars
hduding EC&SSCOS should b€ sigr'6d by lh. app.op.slo .uthon!65 sPocinod
b€low snd 3ltdd also sp.cily lhe pofud ol servE€ inlh€ Oel€.lc6 Forces:'
(i) ln calo ol Commission6d Orrc8rs lncluding ECOvSSCo8I
Army: Oir6do.elo ot P6r3onn€l Servrc6, Army Hgsdqu.n6rs, New o€lhi.
Navyi Oiroclorab or PsrsonnolSo ic€s Mval Hordqutisrs, Now Oohi.
Ar Fo.c6: Oiroclo.sle ol PlrsoM6l S6diaes, Air H6sdquansr., N6w D6lhl.
(ll) ln cai. ol JCdORs a.d squral€nl ol th€ Navy tnd Ar Forc€s:
Army. By €nous R€glmontd Rocord Officos.
Nrvyi Nav3lRoco.or.EomDay
Air Forco: Air Forcs Rscods, Nsw Oalhi.
(c) A0. rol.x.tlon tor C€nlrrl Gov.mm.nt .mPloyssr:
Th. upp€r tgo lmil is .ol.xabb ror C€nllsVU.T. Govl. Sorv6nts uP ro 5 yearl as
pd imlruclions b.usd by lh€ Govt. ol lndia lrqr tims lo lim€. (10 v€als fo. peF
lorts Ddo.ping to Sch6dlled C.sl8/SEdulod Trib€t snd 6 v6ad lq P€rsons
bolongin! lo otn6l Bacrw.d Cla.s6s in r€sPscl ot tho Posls rss6rvo! lor thsm) itr
sccoriati, wiih lhs hstucrio.! or ord.rs issJod by th€ Govommo'l ol lndia' a
cand6al. dalmng lo b€to.g lo th. calogo.y ol Co^t el Gov.mmnl ssNant and
hlJs r6Ohho aot rohrution und6r lh.s Psrs *ould b€ roquirod lo p'oduc€ a
C.i,ficalo d lh; Drosc.D€d prclo.m 6u;d st.r ho dale or ldv€rt'r6mont l'om
hi!rlt6. Employe. on lh€ Ofic€ l.o€. hoid lo lho onod lhal ha/sh€ i! 6 roeul.tly
.ppolnl.d Canral Gov.rnmenl Sorvanl .nd hol on casusuadhoc/d6ilv
*loo64loirdy paidcoot acl baii. .hPb!€s.
Th€ &6 r.l3sttr sill b6 6dmisalbl6 lo 6ucn ol lh€ C'ovomoont totuanls Es ar€
wo*r,i,n poss *n,o aro rn lrF 3am6 lne or alll€d cadro. ano whorc a lolsuon_
sho ;E i. c.Lrblishod ulal ltt ssrv,c€ slreaov .eno..€d n . psrtrcul8l posl wrll
D€ ;s€lul td lho .moonl dbcharso ol lh. dut€. ot lh€ ,os(s) rc@ltmsnl !o
which
hs3 b€on adv€.li3€(t oooslon ln lhis r.gad w, 76st with lhs Comrnl6sbn'
(d) Ag. r.Lr.tlon tor Uorltodou. Spo.i. P.6on3:
Ths r€lalalian in upp€. !96 lmn uplo s maxrmun ol 5 v€ars (10 yaara lor p66o^s
b.lo.loim lo SC./ST Co.nmsnilos a.d I voar! ,o. P€rso'E b€longhg to utnor
grcri:,i Ctassos ,n,erxa ol po6ts r*€ivod to' h.m) mav b€ allo*€d kt uter'
Govemmonl lor suchpurpose rrovided lhey salrsry arr olhsr o.ditrons prescribod
flz
by Govemmenl from lims lo lm€ Th€ porsonsctaLm,ng a9€ retaxatDn under tii.
suEpata would b€ requ'red to txoduce a cenrfrarG Dy comp€re4l
'<suao
atrhorly ,n lhc prascrbso prolorma For olh6rs agc r,m.r 'he adhorco
*,I bo srnct,/
lo save in exc€ptlorul c/cumstancos. and rn no caso te ,6ra:6d b.yond a rimrt 0f
(s) Age relrx.tion lor Wdows. Oivo.c.d wodon and womon Jcdiolaly .rp..
tatod lrom HuBbands:
Ths upperag€ lirnrr G rolarable up lo tho age o,35 years {LrprolO y€ars tor rnom.
bors ol Scheduled C8sres/Schedured Tribes and upto 36 yearr for mornDori
b€longi.! to lh€ Othe. Backw.rd Cl36*s resp€cr ot the po€ls re5.rv€d for
lhem) lor Wdowi, divorcad Women s^d Women 'n Judicislty separatod trorn ltreir
Husbands who ar. nol r6damed. Th6 poGo^s clarmhg ago r€laxaion u^dsr thi.
suupara would b€ requ,6d to p,oduco lollowi.g d*umeniary evidence:
(i) In cas€ ol Wdow, Oeath C€^,f,i.le ol hor husband tog6the. wirh ths Aflidavir
thar she has nor ro6ari6d sinc6.
(ir) ln cas€ oI drvorced wonen and women tudrcrally separated ,rom thsi. hus.
bands, a corlilied cooy ol lhe tudomenvdec.€s of lhe aoDrop.ial€ Cou.l to orova
rhe iact or drvorco or ihe jodlcbl separation, as lhe case may b€, wilh an Atfidavii
n rospecr ol drorced wohen a^d lhey havo nol remarri€d since.
(0 Ag. r.l.rallon ro p€rson5 vrho had ordina.lly bo.n domlcued ln tho Sbto or
JEX dorlng th. p..lod trcm 1.t J.nu.ry 1980 ro 3l3t Oc€mb€r, 1980:
Tha rola$rion in upper a9€ Im( ol5 y6ars shsllb€ admissibl€ io all p€6on6 who
had ordim.ily b€en domEil€d in !t'.9.t€ ol J&K during th6 p..bd llom 1tl
Jsnuary, 1960 ro 31sl D€c€mb€r, I 969. The pe.sons daiming r€laxaUm und€r hi8
5uEpara would be r€quirsd lo produc€ a cadili65t€ to this elfecl lrom 0|. Dlstricl
Mlglslrale wilhin whos€ iurisdiclon lh€y had oldirrsrlly rcsid€d o. fom any olher
aulhorily dosignltod in this behall by !h€ Govsmmsnl of Jammu and Ke6hmi..
This rolaxalion shall romain in forc€ uplo 31.12.2013.
(g) Ago rol.x3iion to Phy.ldlly 8.ndic.p9.d (PH) p€rso..:
A9o rcla&rion ol5 y6.ri is alrowod (loLl 10 ye5.s fo. SCs/STs snd I yo3rs to,
OBCS in .especr ol lhe posts rss€ryod lo.lh6m) to blind. d€3l-ftrl8 and odhop.-
drcally haMicappod po.son6 ,or appornui€nt to Grep A .nd Group B'
a'ostysoprc€s. Th€ p€rso^€ cbimino agerobxation under lhis suup3rc would b.
requi.od lo produc€ a @rlrlicalo in pr€scrib€d prclo.m an support ol lh6k daims
cloarly indrcauno lhal th6 oegrea ol physical disablrly is 4 or tlrc.s. ln any
ca86. th€ appoinlmonl ol lhsse candidatos will b€ B'Jbjocl to lhoir b.ing tound
rn€dically lit n acaordanc€ with lhs sland.ds ol modical nhess aE P.escnb6d by
6. How TO APPLYI
s) candidalor musl .pply onlins lhrough tho *€bsil.
htp:/www.qpsconlin..nlc.in. appllcalions rocaivsd thrcugh mods
any oftsr
rolld not oe accept€d and summanly ,oJ6ct6d.
b) Aner submnrng th€ O^lin€ Rocruitn€nl ApPrcalioo (OAA), il€ csr6iral,os ar€
not roqunod !o s.nd sny Ooclmenl or C€rtificala or Printod of APPljcaton lnlli.l-
ry ro th€ CommEsion. Any Oo..urmnt or Cedficate or Printo!'t of AP9li:ation s!b-
mnG! init€lly by lhs candrdalo would be summa.aly igoored- Ho./oY€., h6/sh€
should €s$nlally rclain lhe Pnnloul ot lho online R€cruiknont APPlhatioo (oRA)
linally submi(€d tor submission to the Commission along wilh rolovanl
Oo.um€ot C€tullcal€s o d€mand. i. c.* h€r'6tu qualitos in lh6 Rooruitnonl
c) Tho applicaols ats advts€d to 5ubmn only singl€ Onlin6 RscruitnontAPPlicalion
,or €aci posli how€vsr, ii lomohow' il n€./slE submils multipb Crolim Roctuitrnom
Applicalions lo. on€ post, |hon h€/sho musl ansuro that onlin6 Roc.ultnanl
ai:itratroo wn tre trigr,or'appliEuon Nullt€a b cornpl€le i^ all r.sPoclt hdud'
in; le€ Tha aoDl@r'ils, who submd mutupl€ Onhn R€r,ruiln.nl APpl'c€Uont
shouE nors rhjr only ul. Onl'n. Rduitrnont APplrc5tion with hlgh.. 'Al9ucalio.r
Num!'ea ihad be i"ona,nsd oy lh€ Co.nmitsid and loo pa'd agaiEt o.r.
'Applk3lion Numb€r shall nol b€ sdjosled against anv olhor 'ApPlk to.l
d) Th€ c.^ddat€s ar€ advissd lo submil lns Onlios Rsc.urt mnl APpltakh w€ll
in sdvanc. wllhoui watung for lho clo3no dala
7. DOCUIENIS/CERTIFICATESI
al' lnthllv th. c.ndldat.. .ro not .3qulr.d lo .ond t.y Oocum€nl o. C.n!rlc.t.
or Pd;lout ot Appltc.lion lo lh. Cofrml!.lon. Sub.€qq.nilv lh€ c.ndld.i..
who ou.lllvln ihe R.crultn.nt T.rl sh.ll b. ..kod to .ubmlt oDlv lh. fol'
lowlng Do;um.nt6/ corlificll€s .long wlh rho Prlntout ol lho onlin.
R.crullrn.trt Appllc5 on (Oaa):
.t trh€'rl6 p€r
er S.lr allestsd coor63 ol O.ars6/DDbm. cenif'cab atong wnh rna.k
lalnino io €rl acadsmia voars as prool ol aducslrmal qll8llfic€lbn cl.h6d. ln
h;
Ua a&ancs ol O€oro€/Opl'oms c€rUfEst€, g.ovrsion l c€dilical6 abng udlh ft6
s,h66t5 gortsi^ing !o all lh6 ac€d€mc y6ars Hll b6 sccop!.d.
bl' sou alssbd coov ot ord€r/ letler in r€Gp€cl ot equival€nt Educotional
Ou.lfrstons cratirioO. tnO't5Ung th6 tutho.itv (wilh numb6r snd dal6) url(br
wtxch ( has b€sn so ueelcd, in tosp€cl o{ oqu8alenl daus€ in E$onlial
Oualilicsllonr. l( a csndldsls is cbimlng a psrUculiar qu6llficauoi as equlvalent
qualilicslir as P6r th6 r.quir€m€nt ot edv6r$5.mnt.
cr' s6[an6sGd coo,6s ol Conrlrc3l€ (s) in th€ pros.riUod prolorma hom th€ H€5d(')
o{ Oroanizauo.is}DsBdmen(31 lor tha sntro expe'ionc€ clali€d cl$dv ul€tu
lio"ln; lh. du,si6n oi e.plovham (dar€. monh a v€a') ndl=i]n! dl6 b'l'c Prv
and ;nsohdabd pav. The c€n,licale(s) 3hould abo mention lh€ €tur' or duuos
*ao.."oi"rmn,i^* obta:.3d ,n th. pd(s) sh dura0m(6)' Expad€nc'
aetufiel6 shoulo D6 n tha pr6scnbod {orEal t€l€va^t to lh' post Erp€noics cl''
iriJrii, ,io'-i" o.ii',xo p,ororma bqr containrn€ ell lh€ detaib as menuoood
above woub b; con3dor.d o. m€tit! bv lh6 Conms6bn
dl' s.f an.sl6d coov ol PhvsrcsUv Handicappod con;licalo in Pr€6"ibod prolo'm-b'
tra omoorent erirtrqrlv iroh Phvsic€lly Handicapp€d Psr3o'rs €ligluo lot apPohl'
m^r b lrb 6sl d lh€ tEsri of pr..c!ib6d slandlrds o' M€di5 tsit'a3 ln€
6J'i"iri""l irlrt",il, lo 'ssus Phvslcsllv nandic5PP€d c8tllfl.€lo rh€th3n b€ 3
u.aii-t g6"rd Ortv;ancl,lrt.d ov lh€ Conral ot. sld€ C'ov€mme't conttsu
lii i c",'"- ."i n", .".sriture M.d'cal aoad(.) co'BEu^9 ol ar l€t'i w'c
momberB out ol whch al l€631 on€ ihsu b€ a 6p€ci3lBt i6 lh€
poltrsltt l'€ro rc'
E toseng Locomotod C€.€bral / \4sual / Hsanng d'ssb nv as li€ cas€ may D€'
B! odolnal Oo€um.nts/ C.nll].rl.t rre to b' Ptoduad 'long wllh
-' F.ll6sln;
ritt atter-ted c-oplcr rt tho tlm. ot lnle.vLs. lncluding olh'r ntmt
hlh; C.ll l,ot.afo. lnl.rvle*, raun! u/hlchrho c'ndldtrt m'v nor D''Pcnl.o
r|o{c
lli iill"Il) ii rlii ii'ii'-r.* h 'nrch-c.r .uch c.ndrd'trr wirr no( b€
'nriu'd
ii iiilil ii'" cin;rrn"n't contrrbutron tow"d' trrv'rrlns
'rFnrosi:
.l Mluicul€tor/1olh SLndsrd o. €qqrvalsnl ca'ticato i'dicslrng d'ls ol bLlh' o'
" :;:;; ;,;.,*..,
-(
T
P
 - Bs
Boa.d ndlcartng Oato ol Srrth in supporl ol lher c am o( age lvhere dare of bnh c) proarnns mpersoner.n by any person , o,
is .ol availablo i. c€rritic.to/mark sheors issqed by concernod Edlcaional d) slbmitins labricatod dodm€nls d deumenls which havo b6eo Lm['orod
Bos.ds. Schod l€avirp c€dilirlo indicatmg Oalo ot Bidh w'll b€ consdorod (lke
n ese ofT.nilNadu & K6r.ra). or hlse or supprossing mal€rlalinfc{-
.) mrkng staromonts wheh aro mcorrsd
J) Oegroe/Oplofirs c€nincab along wlh mad(sh€eB pedarn'ng to all lhe academic
,.ars as proo( ol educaronal qualilrcalron claimed ln lhe abs€.ce ol in @^n€cl'@ wilh hiJher
0 rssonrn{ lo any oher fregula. or rmpiop€r m6a^s
irgtee/Drploma codllcel€, provisrodel corl,licale aiong wilh mark sheets penain_
dnddalure lor tha 63bc!on. or
ing lo all the acadBmic yea/s will be accepled
O) using unlan moans du.ing lhe tesl. or
Ordor/ lete. in rEpect ol 6qu'val€nl Educat'o^ar Ou.lificanons c a'med nd.caling
lhe Auuro.iy (wjlh numb6r and dsle) lhd€r whEh n has been so v€.lod, in h) wnti.g nrobvant maflor incrudhg obscene languago or Pornog.apnic ma(e( in
r€spacl ol6quval€nl cl5u6€ m Ess.nliar Oual ncato^s, tl a @ndidat€ € claiming
a particular q€lilic6lio. a. €quNal6nl qoarncarcn as Fr lhe requ(omenl ot t) m6D€iavno n any olher manner n ule eramlnalioo hall, or
i) ha.adin! or doin! bodily harm to th€ slaal emplov.d by lh. commission ld th€
CadirEats(3) ,n ths prsscnDsd pro(orma {rom th€ Head(s) or condEr of ltuar test, or
ory€nEafun(syoopanmen(s) lor lhe enllG orp€nonce clamod, cloallv menlion_ r) b nging mob{o phono/communicalDn dovioe in ths examrnation llalulnlorvi€w
ing th€ duratlon ol6mpbym6nl (oal6, monlh & year)indicatng tho basic Pay and
consoli{raled p.y. Ihe csn.licate(s) sholE also ho.tion tl€ natur€ ol dulies Pee $a commissioo
atempting lo commil or, as lhs cas€ mat bc, abetlng o, aI o.
Iomod./€rporienco oblain€o in the posl(6) wiih duralion(s). Exp€,isnco c€dificatB D
;ny ol lh6 ;cr6 6p€c/[od in lha lo.sgo,ng craus€s mav. in 6ddt'on lo ,€ndsring
should b6 issuod ln pr€6c4bod ,o.mal rel€vanl lo the post. Expo,ience c€rtificat8 hrlMrl/hdrsoll I'abt€ lo crimnal ,osscu 6 b€ liabl€:
nol in o.escnbod p,oto.ma bul conl,tinlng a lne details as menliomd abovo would
b€ consirorad m morits by lhe commassion. l) to b€ disqualiligd by lh€ Commissio. ftm .oroclroo for which h€/8tE i! . c5F
Caat€ csrlfEalo by candidal6 $oking rc$Natlon as SC/ ST/ OAC. in ltt€ P.&
!..ib€d grclorma lrom tlls oomp€l.nt aultbrily indicatng doady lh€ candidato. i0 to b. debad€d 6ilh.r p€m.n€nuy o.lo.. !9.crf'6d P€nodl
C!.ls,lll€AcV Od.. undor which lho Casls is recognized as SC/ S-r/ OAC and . by lhs Commission from any c:aminalon or selection h€ld Dy lhom
lh6 viltafs/ lown lh. c.ndidaG is o.dinarlly aresid€ol ol. . by lhe Canirel Go!€mm6nt fro.n any employm€nl u.d€r lh€m, .ttd
t) A daclarsuon in lh€ prosc.ibod lormal by csnddals s€okin! rssorvalion as OBC ill) l, h6/she ii .l.6ady in s€ ics undff Govomm€nt lo di..tdioarv adloo undor
h€l he,lsha d,o€s nol belon! to th€ creamy layer on lhe ctucial dol6 in addilion lo lh€ appropdat ruras.
lha communlly c€rliltc.le (o8c). unless lp3ongd ol,h€Misa, lha Prescrib€d cl09
hO date lbr rocalpl o{ Onlina Rec(uitmenl ApPlica on ,ot the Posl is lo b6 lr€led
I OTHER INFORMAION/INSTRUCT]ONS:
a) Atr csndidals3 wh€lh€r ln Govsrnmenl sGrvico or in Govemmenl own€d induslrial
in p,ssc.ab€d plo{orma by lhe d ouB slrniler o.oanizstbns o. in pQvstc smdoym.nl sttolld submlt lhc! lpp!'
cations onlina dir6ctly lo rhe Commi3slon. P6rson! slr.sdv h Rogultr
e) Phy.lcarly lt5MEappad cotulicst6
'ssuod
Comp6t6nl Auhodty by Phy6rcally Hand,capped p€rsons oligibl€ lor aPPointn€nl
Governm€nt seftic€, $heth€r in p€.mamnt or lamporary capadly olho' th6n
lo lh€ posl o.r lho ba!i. ol pt..o.ibod srandads ol Modical Fin..s. Tho casuaua6troc/d.ily wagssrloudy PKycootrsd bssls a'a hou/€v€r 6qul'€d !o tuE
comg€t6nt Authorly to lssu€ Phydcslly HandEappod certTrc.ts sh6ll ba 3 mit . d€clarstion ttial ttrcy trave inlo,m€d in wrlting to thoir Hold ol
M€dical Eosd duly constiblod by lha C€ntlal or € S1r!s Oovommont. Tho
Otlics/Dopsrtn€nt Ul,t lhoy hsv€ appliod to.lho sol€ctio'r.
C.nlrau Slt3 Gowmmod msy corlslilulo M6dicsl Eoad(6) coGisling of at l€agl
thrao nBmoa.s oul of$/hidl sl laa{ 0116 6hall b€ a speqalasl in ln6 partiixlat li€kl b) Ths 6516 lor d€l6mhin9 ths €ligibihtY ol all candidal€s in €very r$pect ah3u b'
d.b fo. 3ub;ion! lh. Onli^s Rocruilmsnt APPlicatbn on tho *6bsil'
,or s3363slng loaomotor/ C€rebral / Vilual / Hsaring disability, as lho cls€ msy lhe closino
htlpnw{/w.uP.conllm.nic.ln.
A caMidalo who claims oan96 rn n6me atlo. maticulalDn on msnieg€ ot r. m.D6cl ol oouivatonl claua€ rn Estent'al Os6nficatjoos, a candrdate rs daic
r€m6niago o, divo.c€ eL. lhs ,ollowing docum€nts shall be submiltedt no . ;didllar ou6l icalion as equivalsnt qual,licston as p€. tho roquiram€nt ot
- Photocopy ol Husband s passpod rhowng
.a-*ri*rnu.r, riron u'e cano'oare is requred lo P.oduc6 oder/l3tur in rru!
D ln cas. ol marnlg€ ol wom.n (
r€osrd. indrcalr.q lh6 arthontv {wilh numbe. snd dalc) undct wnic,l hes b€€n lo
;5mes ol 5oous65 or an allsslod copv of mamago csdl,icato ssusd by ths t .-.r"o ottu.*,i u" Onl,no iteouitment rppticat'on 's I'abls lo bs l6jocl6d'
R6gklrar o( Mad.le or an Atrrdavil irom husband and wii6 arong wilh 3 loinl Pho_
lo0r.ph duly &ro.n b€forc lho Oalh Commissionorr d) Candd.tos musl, il rcqurod, atlerid € P.so'al inlorvi .t $'ch dact' r! rl8y
ue nrea uv Ul€ Commrssbn. Th€ CommBsion do nol de{r.v ut€ l"vsling o' olh€'
li) ln c!.. ol.sfl6!rla!. ol wom€n . Divorco tloed/O$ti c€.lific€t6 as lho eoOiO{cs sumrnon6d lor inlsruiow Th€v how€vor, cont$ul'
G3r€ may bo in r6sped ol firsi sPousel and photocopy o! p'esont husband'' ",*l!s6'of
i"ii u. ,r.* . lat€ co.r€sPo.roitxl to lho snrounl o{ l't€ s'co'td
Da.spon 3howing namss ol sPou.o or an Atlestod copv ol m8mage c€rlitcal€ cle* "tp.".""
Mall rs.lwg; rsro bv"tlh€ sho.l6st route io lh€ plac. of in!'Msw Lo'n th'
issueO Oy rhe nig,slr.. ot [a;flisge d sa afldavit trcm lne husDand and * e n",r""" SrG" .6.r*t t i n* dhd Plsc€ or r6sd€,r ot lh€ csndidsta o' ht6''
from
.long wnh Flnl Pholog6ph dirly swo.n b€lore lhe Oalh Co'nmissronor n€ar€r to trt. Placa oI
Jid'i"-"ar"rr" xao.-t ,h€ ioumov *h'chaEr' isRairwav
I'l) ln c!s. ol dlvorc. ol wom.n ' C€nn,6o copv ol O,vorc6 Oecrc€ and Oe€6 ;; .";;J ih" *-" sraron or m€ amou or iar€
'duarrv '6aJr€d
t,i""nOiOat"'; Orct"uu, '3 l6ss. O€t'rls ol this will b€ lumishsd tlre^ lhoy
PoluAjfdsul ouly.qmm r€lo.€ tho oalh comnrissio^€r a'€
Ov
rl ln o$.t ckcumtunsa. lor chlno. ol nam. for both m'b !trd l.m'h '
oir"a PoiuAtroarit ort" s*om b€lo.s lh€ Oa(h CommE$on€' and p€p€r crrningr commlson'3 conlribulion rowa.ds lho lr.wling s4€n5€s ln r€spocl ol thos€
or lu; faaing o.,ry n i"paper m orEmsJ (On€ d6rlv ns*sPap€r should
b' ol lh' .:rldbsr6! who ara lnl6ryl€.r€(, at D€ltti wll b6 9ald on lho 6po! on rh€ 6'10 or
rltr ol rppt&nB X,lr'.mnr 6nd P.€3onl addross or n6aov a''a) and Gaz€lto ;"i"-*-iltuf U,uv tulfll all lh6 co^dlli'.t' h rssPc! ol lh66 cstdldato'
Nouficston, *lio t oi Prss€ot at mt€Morf,. 'l pbc€' oh6r han D'l tn'
oi.i";"d
i) c€ni6c.!s/ fuclnl.nl in GsP€cl ol A€E Glsxrlioa lo.:
"i"'ni*
6arlo i,iil bo .€rlt by Monoy Or(l,3r lalsr on-
l) Ersorvksntoo and Commisslonod Oltic€rs including ECOS/SSCOB ln
p'o' t) TtE suNmnino o( c€.ldrdal33 lor inl.tui6w co'rvay no 6ssuranc6 whatsootor lhal
fr,ey wiff b€ !€rirsd. Appo,nlrnsnl orders lo ael€clod
candrdat$ wu D€ !tu6o Dy
i..b€d protomu ,rom comp8lonl 3ut'o.ily
!) C€nrt UT Govomni€nl Emphys€s/SoryanE in p'6s"rb€d
prolorm' lrom com'
b€ pr€p'rcd !o
pslont auhorily i35u3d afisr h€ dal6 ol adverlls€menl. s) csndldales must bo ln sound bodily h6allh' Tnsv must, if
;;i;;-d ;;h"i €xrn naiio' 5nd $rist medicar sutho'lv 3r
such'61€cl6d
ll) Medlorious Sports panons in pr6sciib€d Prolo.tt\a lro'n comp'ted rolhodly' Govemmon! may .oqutr8.
Husb66ds'
lv) Wdo{.6/Divolcrd Wornsft^r'Vomen Judiclally s€par6t€d lrcm
h) c.rd'.rateB wlll b€ inlorm6d ol lh€ ftnsl t.su't in du3 cours€ tuough UPSC lwE
yl P.r.,oru wlo h.d ordbat v b€€n do.n'ol€d h lh€ Ssto ol J E l< dutug lha petl_ :,':i#;;;;; ; 3
snv n!..m $r'b. sbout u'. ro5un sre u'..eb.o
d'o mt onlo' rnto cd'
od lrom id Janu.ry l98O lo 3l.l O€c€moor. 1989' ;;;#;; iJ;fl ;a; rdno.d r'c rh6 commisltiqr
vl) P€rsoo. 6s€kng ag€ l.lt:albn undo, sP€oisl Fovlslor'/ o'd'r' ffin; *ri tr" ."noid.loc lbout ,6a.o.re lor lh€lr non s.hdion 'o' ht6t'
Par&n3 slr€ady in fugula. Govonvnont lsrvlco. r'h6th€r h pstm€nonl or t'm_
D catdldu!$ sdludgod mGtllotiqr!
;;;;-;ti ou*t fr;^ *su.uadhoc/dsilv wag$/houdv psl('!/conr'ct t3sl3 ro
D Th€ C;mmb.loo mav 9r6nt highor Inilial
pay to

irc n6*c,icr r&urea o ruucil . d€dsttlion thil lhov have lntorm€d 'n wrnrng
B.iO of Oitc.rD6p.ntt€nl hat lh6y havs sppli6d lor 0le r6l€ctlon'
Ur€lr D C.nvassing ln any lorm will disqual'rv a ca'didato-
k) c€diltcsl€i3) in..5p€cl ol dalm r6gsrd,no Prol6ssiodal Rtgi'lralion'
L6ngL'69e
LtsT: vERlFy rltE foLLowtNG aEFoRE
suaulTlNc
- cHE;x
Publications NET. GATE, Co.ts.enc€ hterhshiP' THE ONLINE RECRUITi'ETIT APPLICAIION
l) oocum€dory .uppon lor any oh6r chim(s) made' Thst no cdum ls wro.gly filled or k6Pl blsnk n lh6 onl'* Rocir'lrnonl
AT THE TII{E i,fi".iJiiiL h6lsin wdrrd b' us€d ro o€tsnrl('6 ih'
TOIE I: ORIGIiAL CERTIFICATES ARE TO BE PROOUCEO ONLY '"iiori"? fumished
OF INTERVIEW. ^r..,*t',i"
i.^0,0",". ,. o. csrl€<' lo' Rocdrtm'nt TesU lnrerybut'
NOTE l[ O6!a o, mentbned in Onllno Recruitmont Appliclllon is linal No sub'
brrt b)
ot dals ol binh will b€ con6rd€tod o' granl3d'
Gr-l ,"qu.a
NorE l: ll anv docll.rt€nv
ro.
"lt..Cu c6rtrlrc5ts fum6h€d rs h a languag€ ohq than Hhol or
or notary 13 lo o€
f,,Xkt"*qf*tf ffi *:{;U#;:#JffiTffi"lff
erpr,rt, a frenrlzipl ot Ut€ .sh6 dulv a[€!!6d by . G'z6tt6d onic'r
rutxllmr:i"m rir;*l:Jltl'**re*r,mffi}}8fr
wrh rsrev'nr oocJtrEnw c€dincaea o"
8. ACTION AGAINST CAXOIOATES FOUNO GUILTY OT
MISCONOUCT: i,lll,ii,iJiri
in'" c",-r!sion
t arons
paruculs6 trlal ar' lals6 ;;;;;. il;;;r;h q,aririos in tt'G R'cruirrnonr 106r
CsnddtLs sr€ trm€d lh:l ltts, should ^ol lJm3h any [.PORTAIT
i-iiffi"i"i'Jii"'r.ar,t m;rcn in tirhs up rho €Pprcauon rom c5ndrd5r" OF UPSC EXAT NATIOI{/
ii. *..* urr u"v *to.ld h m .sso co'recl o' sllor or ot'6 lso tamper .) MOBILE PHONES ARE EANNED IN THE CAMPUS
bv t€m no'
ffili-v ;;; ;;;;i;
"iJ. iB at6.r6drc'd'r'€d copv
i5 anv rnaccurtcv- o'
'lbntrod
INTERVIEW XALL
g€ndor btL'ca !o'n'n
.riril i
ir;i .iro,"t e.p",*,6bdood document rr rh€re b) i"r"..""t .*".," *". work lo'cs which 'et!€cts "d
."" .ri-iL* u.t ,*,i t*o o' nroro documontt o' lh6'{ att€slod/c€nmad @nd'd5r.3 er€ sncourag€d io apply'
;r;;;;;;l;;i;'.r.drnc 'uch
rhi6 d'6toPsncv 3hourd ba 3!btr'h'd'
c)
d€dar€d ti6 cornml'sion !o b€ guilly ol:

mi*ruffiffi#-nryUffim
A cand6alo wno a5 or has b€€n Dy
bv tnv m€3n3' ot
!) ou.lnhg iu9port ol hMtor.€txlidsture
b) &n9.nonalim o.

t -C
 EL(
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
SPECIAL RECRUITMENT ADVERTISEMENT NO.
sLl2oL3
Invites online recruitment applications (ORA)
For recruitment by selection to the following posts
(by using the websites
http./ /www.upsconline. nic.i n

VACANCY DETAILS
1. (Vacancy No. 13O15101712)
Thirty-nine Medical Officer in the Department of Medical
and Public Health, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar
Haveli. Of the Thirty-Nine posts, five posts are reserved
fo r Sched u led Castes ca n d id ates, two posts a re

reserved for Scheduled Tribes Candidates, ten posts are

reserved for Other Backward Classes Candidates and
the remaining twenty two posts are Unreserved. Of the
thirty-nine posts, two posts are reserved for Physically
Handicapped Persons viz. Orthopaedically Handicapped,
Locomotor Disability/ Cerebral Palsy with One Leg

Affected (OL) (Right or Left) or One Arm Affected (OA)

(Right or Left) from any community. The posts are also
suitable for Physically Handicapped Persons viz.
Orthopaedically Handicapped/ Locomotor Disability/
Cerebral Palsy with One Leg Affected (OL) (Right or
Left) or One Arm Affected (OA) (Ri9ht or Left).
QUALIFICATIONS: ESSENTIAL; A. EDUCATIONAL: i) A
recognised Medical Qualification included in the 1't or
2nd Schedule of Part lof the 3'd Schedule (other than

T.\-C
 E5
Licenciate qualifications) to the Indian Medical Council
Act, 1956. Holders of Educational qualification included
in the Part 2nd of the Third Schedule should also fulfill
the conditions stipulated in section 13 (3) of the indian
Medical Council Act, 1956. ii) Completion of compulsory
rotating Internship, DUTIES: To attend OPD, IPD,

emergency, post-mortem and MLC cases. HQ: Union

Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli.
2. (Vacancy No. 13O15102712)

Fifty-seve n Assista nt Labour Commissioner

( Ce n t ra l/Ass ista n t Welfare Com missioner

(Central)/Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioner

(Central)/Assistant Director In Grade-V of Junior Time
Scale (JTS) of Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry of
Labour & Employment. Of the fifty-seven posts, six
posts are reserved for Scheduled Castes Candidates,
three posts are reserved for Scheduled Tribes
Candidates, nineteen posts are reserved for Other
Backward Classes Candidates and the remaining twenty
nine posts are Unreserved. Of the fifty- seven posts,
three posts are reserved for Physically Challenged

persons and of these three posts, two posts a re

reserved for Physically Handicapped Persons with

d isa b ility v tz. Orthopaedically Handicapped/ Locomotor
Disability/ Cerebral Palsy with One Leg Affected (OL)

T.T -\
tr
 (Right or Left) or One Arm Affected (OA) (Right or Left)

or Muscular weakness and limited physical endurance

(MW), and one post is reserved for physically
Handicapped Persons viz. Low Vision (LV) /partially
Blind (PB)). The posts are also suitable for physically
Handicapped Persons viz. Low Vision (LV) /partially
Blind (PB) or Orthopaedically Handicapped/ Locomotor
Disability/ Cerebral Palsy with One Leg Affected (OL)
( Rig ht or Lett) or One Arm Affected (OA) (Right or Left)
or Muscular weakness and limited physical endurance
(MW). QUALIFICATIONS: ESSENTIAL: A. EDUCATIoNAL:
i) Degree of a recognized University or equivalent,
ii) Diploma in Social Work/ Labour Welfare/Industrial
Relations/Personnel Management/Labour taw from a

recognized University/Institution or equivalent.

DESIRABLE: Degree in law from a recognized
University. DUTIES: The CLS Off icers discharge
statutory functions in the Central Sphere under various
Labour Enactments. Their main function includes
prevention and settlement of Industrial disputes,
enforcement of various Labour Laws and to establish
harmonious relation between workers and management.
These Officers are notified as Inspectors, Conciliation
Officers and Appellate Authorities under the various
Acts. Any Other Conditions: Candidate recruited to the

t(
r
 f
post will be covered by the new Contributory pension
Scheme and the candidates selected are required to
join immediately.
I M PO RTANT

LOSING DATE FOR ANDIDATES ARE NOT

UBMISSION ON ONLINE EQUIRED TO SEND ANY

ECRUITMENT OCU M ENT OR

PPLICATION (oRA) ERTIFICATE OR

HROUGH ORA WEBSITE RI NTOUT OF

S 23:59 HRS ON PPLICATION INITIALLY

1.0 1.2013 O THE COMMISSION

HE LAST DATE FOR PRINTING OF COMPLETELY

UBMITTED ONLINE APPLICATION IS UPTO 23 :59

RS ON 01.02.2013

ATE FOR DETERMINING THE ELIGIBILITY OF ALL

ERt"totoRrrs tru EVERy RESpECT sHALL BE THE ]

L- -- --
PRESCRIBED CLOSING DATE FOR SUBMISISON OF

pr,rr-rrrrr REcRUTTMENT AppLrcArroN (oRA) I

NOTES:

a) Candidates are requested to apply only through Online

Recruitment Applicatlon (oRA) website
to the
http://vAvw.upsconilne.riic.in and NOT write
Commission for Application forms. They are also

I T
r
c
 8
requested to go through carefully the details of posts
and instructions published below as well as on the
website http ://www. upsconline. nic. in.
b) NATURE OF POST:

i) Posts at Item No. l are temporary,

ii) Posts at ltem No.2 are permanent.

c) PAY SCALE & CLASSIFICATION: (Figures in bracket at

the end of the pay scale indicate the approx total
emoluments (per month) excluding TA. HRA+NpA at the
minimum of the scale):
i) Rs. 15,600-39,100 (PB-3)+Rs 5400/- (Grade pay)+NpA
as admissible.(T.E. Rs.36,120/-p.m. approximately
+NPA as admissible) General Central Service, Group'A

Gazetted, Non-Ministerial for the posts at Item No.1.

ii) Rs. 15,600-39,100 (P8-3)+Rs. 5400/- (Grade pay)(T.E.
Rs.36,l2Q/- p.m approximately) Genera ! 'A', in Grade
V of Junior Time Scale (JTS) of central Labour Service
(CLS). Organized Service for the post at item No. 2

d) AGE LIMIT AS ON NORMAL CLOSING DATE i.e. Not

exceedlng 35 years for the posts at item Nos. l and 2

e) The age is relaxable for SC/ST candidates upto 5 years

and upto 3 years for OBC candidates in respect of
vacancies reserved for them. SC/ST/OBC Candidates
have to produce a caste certificate in prescribed
proforma. For age concession applicable to other

T rc
el
 ?
categories of applicants please see relevant paras of
the "lnstructions and Additional Information to
Candidates for Recruitment by____
f) A candidate will be eligible to get the benefit of
community reservation only in case the particular caste
to which the candidates belong is included in the list of
reserved communities issued by the Central
Government. If a candidate indicates in his/her
application form that he/she belongs to
SC/ST/OBC/General category but subsequently writes to

the Commission to change his/her category, such

request shall not be entertained by the Commission

g) Physically Handicapped (PH) Persons or Persons with
disabilities, suffering from not less than 40o/o of
relevant disability shall alone be eligible for the benefit
of reservation and other concessions & relaxations as

permissible under the rules.

h) HEADQUARTERS: At places specifically stated against
certain posts, otherwise anywhere ln India.
i) PROBATION: The persons selected will be appointed on

probation as per rule,

j) A Written Objective Type Recruitment Test with multiple

choice questions Shall be conducted followed by

Interview for selection,

\.7 0-(
 Qo
K) SCHEME AND SYLLABUS FOR THE RECRUITMENT TEST

FOR THE POSTS OF MEDICAL OFFTCER (For Item No.1):-

i) The subjects of the Test will be as under:-
a) General Ability and General Awareness
b) General Medicine
c) Paediatrics

d) Surgery
e) Gynaecology & Obstetrics
f) Preventive & Social Medicine
ii) The test will be of two hours'duration and will
carry a maximum of 100 marks.
iii) The test will be an objective type questions with
multiple choice answers.
iv) The level of the question papers will be MBBS
standard.
v) The medium of the Test will be English only.
vi) There will be penalty for wrong answers. Every wrong
a deduction of one - third of the
answer will carry
marks assigned to that question. If no answer is
marked for a question, there will be no penalty for that
question.

SCHEME AND SYLLABUS FOR THE RECRUITMENT TEST

FOR THE POSTS OF ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER

(CENTRAL)/ ASSISTANT WELFARE

COMMISSIONER(CENTRAL)/ ASSISTANT LABOUR

T,.T .r
\

f
 WELFARE COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL)/ ASSISTANT
DIRECTOR IN GRADE.V OF JUNIOR TIME SCALE (]TS)

OF CENTRAL LABOUR SERVICE (CLS). (For Item No.2):-

i) The subjects of the Test will be as under:
a) Trade Union Movement.
b) Social Work & Social Security laws.
c) industrial Relation
d) Human Resource Development.
e) Principal of Natural Justice.
f) Trade Union Act
g) Labour Welfare.
h) Labour Laws: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Payment
of Wages Act. 1936; Minimum Wages Act, t948;
Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act. L970;
Child Labour (P&R) Act, 1936; Payment of Gratuity Act,
1972; Buildi ng & other Construction Workers ( RE & CS)

Act. 1996-
i) Current Events.
j) Indian Constitution,
k) General Mental Ability.
ii) The test will be of two hours duration and the
medium of the question papers will be both Hindi and
English.

\
T C-
\
 1'z
iii) The test will be an objective type with multiple
choices of answers and will carry a maximum of 100
ma rks.

iv) There will be penalty of wrong answer. Every wrong

answer will carry a deduction of one_third of the marks
assigned to that question. If no answer is marked for a
question, there will be no penalty for that question.

SYLLABUS FOR THE TEST

The syllabus for the proposed test will be based on the

nature of the duties of the post(s) concerned.
WEIGHTAGE

RESPECTIVE WEIGHTAGE OF THE RECRUITMENT TEST

AND INTERVIEWS SHALL BE DECIDED BY THE

COMMISSION,

I. Mode and Date of Recruitment Test

The recruitment test as well as mode (whether
Computer based or Paper & pen based) for these posts
shall be decided by commission later on.
m) Centre for Recruitment Test
i) Applicants a re required to indicate their choice of
centres (CENTRE CODES) in the Online Recruitment
Application (ORA) system.
ii) However, if any of the Centres registers less than 10

candidates, the same shall not be operated for

Recruitment Test. Candidates opting for that Centre

r
 q3
shall be allotted some other Centre. The Commission
reserves the right to allot any other centre than the
centre opted for at its discretion.
iii) The candidates should note that no request for change
of Centre will be entertained under anv circumstances.
iv) The candidates are cautioned that if any candidate
appears a; a Centre other than the one allotted by the
Commissionin his/ her Admission Certificate, his/her
answer sheets will not be evaluated and his/ her
candidature will be liable to cancellation.
INSTRUCTIONS AND ADDSTIONAL INFORMATION TO
CANDIDATES FOR RECRUITMENT:-

1. CITIZENSHIP:

9A Candidate must be either:

(a) a citizen of india, or

(b) a subject of Nepal, or

(c) a subject of Bhutan, or

(d)a Tibetan refugee who came over to India before 1st
January, L962 with the intention of permanenUy
settling in India, or
(e) a person of Indian origin who has migrated f rom
Pakistan. Burma, Sri Lanka or East African countries of
Kenya. Uganda, the United Republic of Tanzania (for-
merly Tanganyika and Zanzibar), Zambia, Malawi,
Zaire, Ethiopia and Vietnam with the intention of

r\'(
\
Q-
 E
permanently settling in India. provided that a candidate

belonging to categories (b), (c), (d) and (e) above shall

be a person in whose favour a certificate of eligibility
has been issued by the Government of India
NOTE: The application of a candidate in whose case a

certificate of eligibility is necessary, may be considered

by the Co m m ission a nd, if recom mended for
appointment, the candidate may also be provisionally
appointed subject to the necessary certificate being
issued in his favour by the Government of India
2.AGE LIMITS: The age limit for the post has been given
in the advertisement. For certain age concessions
admissible to various categories please go through the
instruction regarding Concessions & Relaxations.
3. MINIMUM ESSENTIAL eUALIFTCATTONS: Ail
applicants must fulfill the essential requirements of the
post and other conditions stipulated in the
advertisement. They are advised to satisfy themselves
before applying that they possess at least the essential
qualifications laid down for various posts. No enquiry
asking for advice as to eligibility will be entertained.
4.APPLICATION FEE:
(a)Candidates are required to pay a fee of Rs. 25/-
(Rupees Twenty five) only either by remitting the
money in any branch of the SB I by cash or by using

T
\T)n
7
 q5
net banking facility of the SBI or by using visa/master
credit/debit card.
(b)No fee for SC/ST /PHlWomen candidates of any
community. No "fee exemption" is available to OBC
male candidates and they are required to pay the full
prescribed fee.
(c) Applications without the prescribed fee would not be
considered and summarily rejected. No representation
against such rejection would be entertained.
(d) Fee once paid shall not be refunded under any
circumstance nor can the fee be held in reserve for any
other examination or selection.
5. CONCESSIONS & RELAXATIONS:
(a) The upper age limit in case of Ex-Servicemen and
Commissioned Officers including ECOs/SSCOs shall be
relaxed by the length of Military Service increased by
three years subject to the conditions that on the closing
date of receipt of applications (i) the continuous service
rendered In the Armed Forces by an Ex-Serviceman is

not less than six months after attestation and (ii) that
the resultant age after deducting his period of service
from his actual age does not exceed the prescribed age
limit by more than 3 years. This relaxation is also
available to ECOs/SSCOs who have completed their
initial period of assignment of five years of Military

I '.r--o
r
 Service and whose assignment has been extended
beyond 5 years as on dosing date and in whose case
the Ministry of Defence issues certificates that they
will be released within 3 months on selection from the
date of receipt of offer of appointment. Candidates
claiming age relaxation under this para would be
required to produce a certificate in the prescribed
proforma to the Commission.
NOTE: Ex Servicemen who have already secured regular
employment under the Central Govt., in a Civil post are
permitted the benefit of age relaxation as admissible
for Ex-Servicemen for securing another employment tn
any higher post or service under the Central Govt.
However, such candidates will not be eligible for the
benefit of reservation, if any for Ex-Servicemen in

Central Govt. jobs.

(b) In order to qualify for the concession under (a)
above, candidates concerned would be required to
produce a certificate that they have been released from

the Defence Forces. The certificate for Ex-Servicemen

and Commissioned Officers including ECOs/SSCOs

should be signed by the approprlate authorities

specified below and should also specify the period of
service in the Defence Fo rces:

T \
p
 q+
(i) In case of Commissioned Officers including
ECOs/SSCOs:

Army: Directorate of personnel Service, Army

Headquarters, New Delhi.
Navy: Directorate of personnel Services Naval
Headquarters, New Delhi.
Air Force: Directorate of personnel Services. Air
Headquarters, New Delhi.
(ii) In case of iCOs/ORs and equivalent of the Navy and
Air Forces:
Army: By various Regimental Record Offices.
Navy: Naval Records, Bombay
Air Force: Air Force Records. New Delhi.
(c)Age relaxation for Central Government
employees:
The upper age limit is relaxable for Central/U.T. Govt.
Servants up to 5 years as per instructions issued by the
Govt., of India from time to time, (10 years for persons
belonging to Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes and g

years for persons belonging to other Backward Classes

in respect of the posts reserved for them) IN

accordance with the instructions or orders issued by the

Government of India. A candidate claiming to belong to
the category of Central Government servant and thus
seeking age relaxation under this para would be

\.7 t
e
 qE
required to produce a Certificate in the prescribed
proforma issued after the date of advertisement from
his/her Employer on the Office letter head to the effect
that he/she is a regularly appointed Central
Government Servant and not on casual/adho c/daily
wages/hourly paid/contract basis employee.
(d) The age relaxation will be admissible to such of the
Govern me nt servants as are working in posts which are
in the same line or a llied ca d res and where a relation-
ship could be established that the service already
rendered in a particular post will be useful for the
efficient discharge of the duties of the post(s)
recruitment to which has been advertised. Decision in
this regard will rest with the Commission.
(d) Age relaxation for Meritorious Sports
pe rso n s:

The relaxation in upper age limit upto a maximum of 5

years ( 10 years for persons belonging to SC/Sf

Communities and B years for persons belonging to
Other Backward Classes in respect of posts reserved for
them) may be allowed to mer-Government for such
pu rpose provid ed th ey satisfy a ll
r co n d itio ns
oth e

prescribed by Government from time to time. The

persons cla im in g age relaxation u nder th is sub-para
would be required to produce a certificate issued by the

T'.t't
C
 q7
competent authority in the prescribed proforma. For
others, age limit will be strictly adhered to save in
exceptional circu msta nces, and in no case be relaxed
beyond a limit of three years.
(e) Age relaxation for Widows, Divorced Women
and Women Judicially separated from Husbands:
The upper age limit is relaxable up to the age of 35
years (upto 40 years for members of Scheduled
Castes/Scheduled Tribes and upto 3B years for
members belonging to the Other Backward Classes in
respect of the posts reserved for them) for Widows,
divorced Women and Women Judicially separated from
their Husbands who are not remarried. The persons
claiming age relaxation under this sub-para would be

requlred to produce following documentary evidence:

(i) In case of Widow, Death Certificate of her husband

together with the Affidavit that she has not remarried

since.

(ii) In case of divorced Women and Women judicially

separated from their husbands, a certified copy of the
judgment/decree of the appropriate Court to prove the
fact of divorce or the judicial separation, as the case

may be. with an Affidavit in respect of divorced Women

and they have not remarried since.

T \
u
 /oo
(S) Age relaxation to persons who had ordinarily been
domiciled in the State of J&K during the period
from lst January, 1980 to 3lst December, 19g9:
The relaxation in upper age limit of 5 years shall be

admissible to all persons who had ordinarily been

domiclled in the State of J&K during the period from 1st
January, 1980 to 31st December, 1989, The persons
claiming relaxation under this sub-para would be

required to produce a certificate to this effect from the

District Magistrate within whose jurisdiction they had

ordinarily resided or from any other authority

designated in this behalf by the Government of lammu
and Kashmir. This relaxation shall remain in force upto
31. 12.2013.

(f ) A9e relaxation to Physically Handicapped (PH)

persons:
Age relaxation of 5 years ls allowed (total 10 years for
SCs/STs and B years for OSCs in respect of the posts
reserved for them) to blind, deaf-mute and

orthopedically handicapped persons for appointment to

Group'A' and Group'B' posts/services. The persons

claiming age relaxation under this sub-para would be

required to produce a certificate in prescribed proforma

in support of their claims dearly indicating that the
degree of physical disability is 4Oo/o or more. In any
YII *T.O
r
 lot
case, the appointment of these candidates will be

subject to their being found medically fit in accordance

with the standards of medical fitness as prescribed by
the Government.
6- HOW TO APPLY:
a) Candidates must apply online through the website
http://www.upsconiine.nic.in. Applications received
through any other mode would not be accepted and
summarily rej e cted.
b) After submitting the Online Recruitment Application
(ORA), the candidates are not required
to send any
Document or Certificate or printout of Application
initially to the Commission. Any Document or Certificate
or Printout of Application submitted initially by the
candidate would be summarily ignored. However,
he/she should essentially retain the printout of the
Online Recruitment Application (ORA) finally submitted
for submission to the Commission along with relevant
Documents/ Certificates on demand, in case he/she
qualifies in the Recruitment Test.
c) The applicants are advised to submit only single
Online Recruitment Application for each post; however,
if somehow, if he/she submits multiple Online
Recruitment Applicatlons for one post, then he/she
must ensure that Online Recruitment Application with

I 'T-^
(
 lD2_
the higher "Application Number', is complete in all
respects including fee. The applicants, who submit
multiple Online Recruitment Applications, should note
that only the Online Recruitment Application with higher
"Application Number" shall be entertained by the
Commission and fee paid against one "Application
Number" shall not be adjusted against any other
"Application Number".
d) The candidates are advised to submit the Online
Recruitment Application well in advance without waiting
for the closing date.
7. DOCUMENTS/ CERTIFICATES:
A) Initially the candidates are not required to send
any Document or Certificate or Printout of
Application to the Commission. Subsequently the
candidates who qualify in the Recruitment Test
shall be asked to submit only the following
Documents/ Certificates along with the Printout of
the Online Recruitment Application (ORA):
a)Self attested copies of Degree/Diploma certificate along
with mark statements pertaining to all the academic

years as proof of educational qualificatlon claimed. In

the absence of Degree/Diploma certificate, provisional
certificate along with mark sheets pertaining to all the
academic years wifi be accepted.
'1 'J'C
0
 (03
b) Self attested copy of order/ letter in respect of
equivalent Educational Qualifications claimed, indicating
the Authority (with number and date) under which it
has been so treated, in respect of equivalent clause in
Essential Qualifications, if a candidate is claiming a

particular qualificatlon as equivalent qualification as per

the req u ireme nt of advertisement,
c)Self- attested copies of Certificate (is in the prescribed
p rofo rm a fro m the Head(s) of
Organization(s)/Department(s) for the entire
experience claimed, clearly mentioning the duration of
employment (date, month & year) indicating the basic
pay and consolidated pay.The certificate^) should also
me n the n atu re of d uties pe rfo rm edlex pe rie n ce
ntio

obtained in the post(s) with duration(s). Experience

Certificate should be in the prescribed format relevant
to the post. Experience certificate not in prescribed
proforma but containing ail the details as mentioned
above would be considered on merits by the
Commission.

d) Self- attested copy of Physically Handicapped

certificate in prescribed proforma by the competent

authority from Physically Handicapped Persons eligible
for appointment to the post on the basis of prescribed
standards of Medical Fitness. The Competent Authority

\.Y I
p
 )oq
to issue Physically Handicapped certificate shail be a
Medical Board duly constituted by the Central or a State

Government. The Central/ State Government may

constitute Medical Board(s) consisting of at least three
members out of which at least one shall be a specialist
in the particular fleld for assessing Locomotor/ Cerebral
/ Visual / Hearing dlsability, as the case may be.
B) Following Original Documents/ Certificates are to
be produced along with self- attested copies at the
time of Interview, including other atems specified
in the Call letter for Interview, failing which the
candidate may not be allowed to appear in the
Interview in which case such candidates will not
be entitled to receive the Commission's
contribution towards travelling expenses;:
a)Matriculation/10th Standard or equivalent certificate
indicating date of birth, or Board indicating Date of
Birth in support of their claim of age. Where date of
birth is not avallable in certificate/mark sheets, issued
by concerned Educational Boards, School leaving
certificate indicating Date of Birth will be considered
(like in case of Tamil Nadu & Kerala),
b) Degree/Diploma certificate along with marks sheets
pertaining to all the academic ears as proof of
educational qualification claimed. in the absence of
"l ''l'(
e
 las-
Jegree/oiploma certificate, provisional certificate arong
with mark sheets pertaining to a lf the academic years
wiil be accepted.
c) Order/ letter in respect of equivalent Educational
Qualifications claimed, indicating the Authority {with
number and date) under which it has been so treated,
in respect of equivalent clause in Essential
Qualifications, if a candldate is claiming a particular
qualification as equivalent qualification as per the
requirement of advertisement
d) Certificate) in the prescribed proforma from the
Head{s) of Organization(s)/Department(s} for the
entire experience claimed, clearly mentioning the
duration of employment {date, month & year)
indicating the basic pay and consolidated pay. The
certificate(s) should also mention the nature of duties
performed/experience obtained in the post(s) with
durations). Experience Certificate should be issued in

prescribed format relevant to the post, Experience

certificate not in prescribed proforma but containing all
the details as mentioned above would be considered on

merits by the Commission.

e) Caste certificate by candidate seeking reservation as SC

/ Sf/ OBC. in the prescribed proforma from the

competent authority indicating clearly the candidate's

T-e
?
 to6
Caste, the Act/ Order under which the Caste is
recognized as SC/ ST/ OBC and the village/ town the
candidate is ordinarily a resident of.
f) A declaration in the prescribed format by candidate
seeklng reservation as OBC, that he/she does not
belong to the creamy layer on the crucial date, in
addition to the community certificate (OBC). Unless
specified otherwise, the prescribed closing date for
receipt of Online Recruitment Application for the post is

to be treated as crucial date.

g) Physically Handicapped certificate in prescribed
proforma issued by the Competent Authority by
Physically Handicapped persons eligible for appointment
to the post on the basis of prescribed standards of
Medical Fitness. The Competent Authority to issue
Physically Handicapped certificate shall be a Medical
Board duly constituted by the Central or a State
Government. The Central/ State Government may
constitute Medical Board(s) consisting of at least three
members out of which at least one shall be a specialist
in the particular field for assessing Locomotor/ Cerebral
/ Visual / Hearing disability, as the case may be.
h) A candldate who claims change in name after

matriculation on marriage or remarriage or divorce etc.

the following documents shall be submittedl-

\ T'-e \
 (oV
i) In case of marriage of women photocopy of Husband,s
passport showing names of spouses or an attested copy

of marriage certificate issued by the Registrar of

Marriage or an Affidavit from husband and wife along
with a joint photograph duly sworn before the Oath
Commissioner;
ii) In case of re-marriage of women - Divorce Deed/Death
certiflcate as the case may be in respect of fi rst
spouse; and photocopy of present husband's passport
showing names of spouse or an attested copy of
marriage certificate issued by the Registrar of Marriage
or an Affidavit from the husband and wife along with
joint photograph duly sworn before the Oath
Commissioner
iii) In case of divorce of women - Certified copy of Divorce
Decree and Deed Poll/Affidavit duly sworn before the
Oath Commissioner.
iv) In other circumstances for change of name for both
- Deed Poll/Affidavit duly sworn before
male and female
the Oath Commissioner and paper cuttings of two
leading daily newspaper in original {One daily
newspaper should be of the area of applicants
permanent and present address or nearby area) and
Gazette Notification.
i) Certificate/ Document in respect of Age relaxation for:

\ -r'n
(
 i) Ex-Servicemen and Commissioned Officers including
ECOs/SSCOs in prescribed proforma from competent
authority.
ii) Central/UT Government Employees/Servants in

prescribed proforma from competent authority issued

after the date of advertisement.
iii) Meritorious Sports persons in prescribed proforma
from competent authority.
iv) Widows/Divorced Women/Women Judicially
separated from Husbands.
v) Persons who had ordinarily been domiciled in the
State of I & K during the period from 1st January, 1980
to 31st December, 1989.
vi) Persons seeking age relaxation under special
provision/ order,
j) Persons already in Regular Government service
whether in permanent or temporary capacity other than
casual/adhoc/daily wages/hourly paid/contract basis are
however required to submit a declaration that they
have informed in writing to their Head of
Office/Department that they have applied for the
selection.
k) Certificate(s) in respect of claim regarding Professional
Registration, Language, Publications, NET. GATE.

Conference, Internship.

T C
F)
 te7
l) Documentary support for any other cla im (s)

made.

NOTE I: ORIGINAL CERTIFICATES ARE To BE

PRODUCED ONLY AT THE TIME OF INTERVIEW.

NOTE II: Date of birth mentioned in Online Recruitment

Application is final. No subsequent request for change
of date of birth will be considered or granted.
NOTE 111: if any document/ certificate furnished is in a
language other than Hindi or English, a transcript of the
same duly attested by a Gazetted officer or notary is to
be submitted.
8. ACTION AGAINST CANDIDATES FOUND GUILTY OF

M ISCON DUCT:

Candidates are warned that they should not furnish any

particulars that are false
or suppress any material
information in filling up the application form.
Candidates are also warned that they should in no case
correct or alter or otherwise tamper with any entry rn a

document or its attested/certified copy submitted by

them nor should they submit a tampered/fabricated
document, if there is any inaccu racy or any discrepancy
between two or more such documents or their
attested/certified copies, an explanation regarding this
discrepancy should be submitted.

T'T-o
r
 lto
A candidate who is or has been declared by the
Commission to be guilty of:
a) obtaining support of his/her candidature by any
means, or
b) impersonating, or
c) procuring impersonation by any person, or
d) submitting fabricated documents or documents which
have been tampered with,
e) making statements which are incorrect or false or
suppressing material information, or
f) resorting to any other irregular or improper means in
connection with his/her candidature for the selection,
or
g) using unfair means during the test, or
h) writing irrelevant matter including obscene language
or pornographic matter, in the script(s), or
i) misbehaving in any other manner in the examination
hall, or
j) harassing or doing bodily harm to the staff employed
by the Commission for the conduct of their test, or
k) bringing mobile phone/Communication device in the
exa m ination Hall/Interview room.
i) attemptlng to commit or, as the case may be.
abetting the Commission of all or any of the acts
specified in the foregoing clauses may. in addition to

\ I
r
rendering himself/herself liable to criminal prosecution,
tl/
be liable:

i) to be dlsqualified by the commission from serection

for which he/she is a candidate. and/or
i) to be debarred either permanenUy or for a specified
period:-

by the Commission from any examination or

selection held by them
by the Central Government from any employment
under them, and
iii) if he/she is already in service under Government to
disciplinary action under the appropriate rules,
9. OTH ER IN FORMATION/INSTRUCTIONS :

a) All candidates whether in Government service or in

Government owned industrial or other similar
organizations or in private employment should submit
their applications online direcUy to the Commission.
Persons already in Regular Government service,
whether in permanent or temporary capacity other than
casual/ad ho c/ daily wages/hou rly paid/contract basis are
however required to submit a declaration that they
have informed in writing to their Head of
Office/Department that they have applied for the
selection.

,\
'T. 0
 Irp
b) The date for determining the eligibility of all
candidates in every respect shall be the closing date for
submitting the Online Recruitment Application on the
website http://www.upsconline. nic. in.
c) in respect of equivalent clause in Essential
Qualifications, if a candidate is claiming a parUcular
qualification as equivalent qualification as per the
requirement of advertisement, then the candidate is
required to produce order/fetter in this regard,
indicating the Authority (with number and date) under
which it has been so treated otherwise the Online
Recruitment Application is liable to be rejected.
d) Candidates must, if required, attend a personal
interview at such place, as may be fixed by the
Commission. The Commisslon do not def ray the
traveling or other expenses of candidates summoned
for interview. They, however, contribute towards those
expenses at a rate corresponding to the amount of the
Second Class Mail railway fare by the shortest route to

the place of interview from the Railway Station nearest

to the normal place of residence of the candidate or
from which he actually performs the journey,
whichever, is nearer to the place of interview, and back
to the same station or the amount of Railway fare
actually incurred by the candidate whichever is less.

r.T
q
 tt3
Details of this will be furnished when they are called for
interview.
e) Commission's contribution towards the traveling
expenses in respect of those candidates who are
interviewed at Delhi will be paid on the spot on the
date of interview itself provided they fulfi ll all the
conditions. In respect of those candidates who have
been called to be present at interviews at places other
than De h the same will be sent by Money Order later
on.

f) The Summoning of candidates for interview convey

no assurance whatsoever that they will be selected.
Appointment orders to selected candidates will be
issued by the Government.
g) Candidates must be in sound bodily health. They
must, if selected be prepared to undergo such medical
examination and satisfy such medical authority AS

Government may require,

h) Candidates will be informed of the final result in due
course through UPSC website/ Employment News and
any interim enquiries about the result are therefore,
unnecessary and will not be attended to. The

Commission do not enter into correspondence with the

candidates about reasons for their non selection for
i nterview/appoi ntment.

T.T.C
(
 lt Y
i) The Commission may grant higher initial pay to
candidates adjudged meritorious in the interview.
j) Canvassing in any form will disqualify a candidate.
CHECK LIST: VERIFY THE FoLLOWING BEFORE

SUBMITTING THE ONLINE RECRUITMENT APPLICATION

a) That no column is wrongly fi led or kept blank in the

Online Recruitment Application as the information
furnished therein would be used to determine the
eligibility of candidates to be called for Recruitment
Test/ Interviews.
b) That after submitting the Online Recruitment
Application {ORA), the candidates are not required to
send any Document or Certificate or printout of
Application initially to the Commission. Any Document
or Certificate or Printout of Application submitted
initially by the candidate would be summarily ignored.
However, he/she should essentially retain the printout
of the Online Recruitment Application (ORA) for
submission to the Commission along with relevant
Documents/ Certificates on demand, in case he/she
qualifies in the Recruitment Test.
i M PORTANT

a) MOBILE PHONES ARE BANNED IN THE CAMPUS oF UPSC

EXAMINATION/ ]NTERVIEW HALL

7 "T' t
b-
b) Government
ll3-
strives to have work force which reflects
gender balance and women candidates are encouraged
to apply.
c) In case of any guidance/information/clarification
regarding their applications, candidature etc.
candidates can contact UpSC,s Facilitation Counter near
gate'C'of its campus in person or over Telephone No.
011-2338527r/OL1-23381 L2S/011-2308543 on working
between 10.00 hrs and 17.00 hrs

T ''r..c
e
 /\
ub
')-
,4 rnrn*rg, *U- * l'f
I

I l.
?0 1 2-R'lv/
sFcll
Ellg-U2gqi

uNtq't Rlzuc g&,lG q\4M rs0! u

DrcFJR HQU$. SIABJA].IA}] ROAI)

NA/V D8111"110069
l

NQ]-q:
I
. flJruCffi/IGCq\4MISq! AD\ffiNS]
UNION
57 PO!ISOYASSiANT
\ABFAFI tpvlMlsci\m
i;ecun CurrsmB (GNlIr,u/AssIA'\T
lll s cN'B (CB{
?Atyost"*y]
,o*r,ou, osora,, TAEOJR \ @FAFL ou
l

ffid v cF JJ.lloR n[/E sstl (JTs oF c]nML tAB{uR

il-*p.
& a'1FLo\I'4awvor [!.]
**-C to.q-,t *E t\ltNlsr*{ oF tABoJR nE,
o C,*i#**ng\48{INo 51i201-1' *JNlJcTEr
.vffi'*o ,s0,5102712 1HE ccM,''4lso\l
No02' D\IED
"-ot.'!
t Tttlq
I

ffitt I]E (AI\DlDc]6 Wml'Tl-lE

* *"' **r**T ISI'q{ 04002013'
.rlLY such
ffiil"*,- -os I.AVE QUAuno'F1\TVlsor\AlrY'
@NClTlOl'lS Sl-vu BF'
CAI\DIDATES WiO SA]I$YIFUIFIL 'cu'lHE BJcl8ltlrv
,CAIJJD FCR INTB\8,^/.
5r N]
(cE'r'rRAL/ Asfl
cn\lNl lsoNL-F
17 FOSts oF AssrANT IIBOJR
;i#il ffiili"** (ce'naot'nsro^' t P'f,rR !v'r-A{'r
I:
n'tEctoo rN stADtiv cr rji';hrlrlr/l
#ilt*Hi***)'owsro*' (qI! IN ]IIE M iI'IISI}{/
']'IABO'JR
ro\LE(JIS) OF CS{IRALWQURSRVI(S
,t, SlFLoYlvl ENf

000300 000322 I

0c0161 00023.1
00c096 000103

o
000095 L

0005M 000581 0000113

000533 cc05i5
000405 000431
001109 cc 001155
000803 001020 001039
000805 000811
001824 001 6al
001415 001534 001668
ootze6 0013E6
@ ()01267
-001966l 00?230'
001995 0c2024
895 Q01958

I
T*C tt\
? \

I
-.'i !
-- -l :r'-, ., l-'t ,!,1
\
l
!/.-
i

g''l {
 r6drfirrmir-rEB.a.eraffi

(# ll?

N2344 bo245e l
002s12 002528 01 0026c4 00270s

002735 002770 nnr700 002p7s 003023 003060 wiin

003269 003312 0033s5 21 003513 003563 003720

003763 003785 003867 00.1005 004100 004154 oiia r sz lN42tt1

ooaios
'wti cfi/17 004452 C0.1,i60 004866
I

0c4883

0048e8 Nr]lOAq 005074 0050s7 005216 nnSr?l

005014

005280 005289 005376 cc5599 005861 005e24 i

006021 006038 006053 006257 046279 006331 006465 0064 &1

o m6866

007554
006e95

007057
006989

007825
007047

007854
007101

007965
a07218

007900
I
007269

00B00rl
00736i

B?.43
1.,,)I I
I
, ltft'
008326 00835i 008378 008396 008460 008776 008984 oo9Qe

009011 0090 l8 009021 0t)9122 009163 009207 009277 009335 i.,

t!.
{ 009352 009393 mffit 009460 009488 009531 009595 9712
I

009726 009855 009e45 01 01c310 Q10.,102 0'1 0400 I

l()10oo2 1

010716 fiX020 010746 010794 010802 0'1c353

I
010410 01042C
,I $
010917 010944 011037 011055 011056 011203 01i411 011

011717 011763 Q11775 011

'011450 011529 0r rsqo 011060

012077 ( 12113 a122A2 01224Q a1224"i a|22e!

011955 012018 I

nlrqo? 012516 a12017 olzo c12833 012891

012502 012513

o rl ToTAL=192

:$
uNl gN JBIJc svlcE m\n rllslg! I

ffi Et

DAIEDI rNE 30, 12i2013

CONO-UDO 1l

f -c P

'\r' (,,,o
I
i, I

/;[ l-,ur.- -2 it'1

tL,t lt i i'..W
iL.
 hn u Ex uflE P-s_
F,N o, t / 29(9) /20t2.R.1VlSPC-ll
UNIOI'i PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION lt8
(SANGH LoK SEVA AYOC)
DHOLPUR HOUSE, SHAHIAHAN ROAD

Dat€:03.03.2014
To

Dear candidates,

Subject. Recruitment to 57 posts of Assistant Labour commissioner (Central)/Assistant

Welfare Commissioner(Central)/Assistant Labour Welfare Commissloner
(central)/Assistant Director in Grade v 0flunior Time Scale (JTS)0fCentral Labour Services
(CLS) in the Ministry ofLabour & EmploymenL

Sir/Madam,

With reference to your application for the above mentioned post, this is to inform
that you have been shortlisted for interview. You are accordingly requested to appear for
interview on As per schedule giv€n below at 09.00 A.M. (R€porting time for
Forenoon Session) and 11.00 A.M. (Reporting time for Afternoon Session) in the
UPSC Office, Oholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi - 110069.

2. You are requested to bring a,l the original documents (alongwith their attested
photocoples) regarding educational qualification, experience, age proof, community/PH
certillcate as per exhaustive details given in the Commissions website
(http/ ,vww.upsc.gov.in) under RecluitmenulnterviedList of documents (Annexure l)
while appearing for tho intBrview.

3. You are also requested to submit Attestation Form verified by a Gazetted Otficer
alongwith photograph and Ull TA Bill Form (if outstation candidates). ln this regard
please read carefully and follow the procedures. terms & conditions governing the
lnterview as indicated in the Commissions website under
Recruitmenvlnterview/Procedure, Terms & Conditions (Annexure ll) and download the
requisite forms.

4. Kindly acknowledge receipt of this communication and contirm your participation

in the interview, This communication entitles you to enter UPSC premises only on the
date of interview.

Yours faithfully,

(DEEP PANT)
under Secrelary (SPC-ll)
Union Public Service Commission
23098591 ex.47521478/.

', C
tP
 ttl
ANNE URE-I
List of o rioinal docume nts to be subm on the dav of lnterview
(i) Matriculation/ 1 Oth Standard or equivatent certificate indicating lbte of birth, or
mark sheet of Matriculation/1Oth Standard or equivalent issue?! Central/State
Board indicating Oate of Birth in support of their ctaim of age. Where date of birth is
not available in certificate/mark sheets, issued by concerned Educational Boards,
School leaving certiflcate indicatjng Date of Birth wil be considered (like in case oi
Tamil Nadu & Kerata).

(ii) PeqJee/Diploma certificate alono with mark sheets pertaining to all the
academic years as proof of educational qualification claim;d. ln the absence of
Degree/Diploma certificate, provisional certificate along with mark sheets pertaining
to all the academic years will be accepted.

(iii) Certificate(s) in the "orescribed oroforma,' from the Head(s) of Organization(s)

/Department(s) for the entire exoerience claimed, ctearly meniioninglne Ourati;n
of employment (date, month & year) indicating the basjc pay and coniolidated pay,
nature of duties performed/experience obtained in the post(s) with duration(s). Oniy
the experience in the field relevant to the post would be considered. Experience
certificate not in prescribed proforma would be considered on merits by the
Commission.

(iv) Caqle certiljgate in the orescribed proforma in case of candidates seeking

reservation as SC/ ST/ OBC from the competent authority indicating clearty th;
candidate's Caste, the AcV Order under which the Caste is recognized as SC/ ST/
OBC and the village/ town the candidate is ordinarity a resident of.

(v) A decla[ation in the "prescribed proforma,,by candidate seeking reservation

as OBC, that hdshe does not belong to the creamy layer on the crucial date, in
addition to the community -certificate (OBC). Untess specilied otherwise, the
prescribed last date for rJceipt of Online Recruitment Application on OR,\ website for
the post is to be treated as'erucial date.

(vi) Phvsicallv Handicaoped (PH) certificate in,,prescribed proforma', issued by

the competent authority by Physically Handicapped persons eligible for appointment
to the post on the basis of prescribed standards of Medical Fitness.

(vii) Candidate claiming change in name after matricutation on mariage or

remarriage or divorce etc. must submit the following documents:

a) ln case of marriaoe of women - Photocopy ol Husband's passport showing

names of spouses or an attested copy of marriage certiflcate issued by the
Registrar of Marriage or an Atfidavit from husband and wife along with a
joint photograph duly sworn before the Oath Commissioner.

b) In case of re-marriaoe of women - Divorce Deed/Death certificate as the

case may be in respect of first spouse; and photocopy oI present husband's
passport showing names of spouse or an attested copy of marriage
certificate issued by the Registrar of Marriage or an Affidavit from the
husband and wife along with joint photograph duly sworn before the Oath
Commissioner.

c) ln case of divorce of women - Certified copy of Oivorce Decree and Deed

Poll/Atlidavit duly sworn b€fore the Oath Commission€r.

I c
(-
 ',20
d) ln oJhglcircumstances for chanoe of name for both male and female - Deed.
Poll/Atfidavit duly sworn before the Oath Commissioner anO piper cuttings
of two leading daily newspaper in original(One daily newspaper should be
of the area of applicants permanent and present address or nearby area)
and Gazette Notification.
'e)
The candidates should ensure that in case o{ anv discreoancv between
name recorded in the l\ilatriculation/other certificates/documents and ORA
aoplication (such as spelling error or due to addition/deletion of part of any
name or when name of the candidate is inclusive of the name of father
and/or mothe0 an affidavlt in ORIGtNAL is required to be produced at the
time of interview that both the name/names in both the certificates belong to
one and same person.

(viii) Certificate in respect of Aoe relaxation in cas6 of:

a) Ex-Servlcemen and Commissioned Offlcers inctuding ECOS/S'SCOS in

"orescri proforma" Irom competent authority
b) CentraUUT Government Employees/Se rvants in "prescribed proforma"
from competent authority

c) Meritorious Sports persons in ,,orescribed oroforma" from competent

authority.

d) Widows/Oivorced WomenMomen Judicially separated from Husbands.

e) Persons who had ordinarily been domiciled in the State of J & K during the
period from 1" January, 1980 to 31d Oecember, 1989.

(ix) Persons alreadv Reoular Government service r in oermanent or

temoorary capacitv other than casual/adhoddaily wages/hourly paid/contract basis
are however required to submit a declaration that they have informed in writino to
their Head of Offlce/Deoartmenl that thev have aoolied for the selection.

(x) ln case you have claimed to be a Government servant a certificate from your
employer clearly stating that as on t}|e closing date for this/these posts(s) you
were a Govemment servant.

(xi) Any other condition' ('e.9., in case of ex-servicemen)

Noto: Candidates may refor to the relevant advertisement for the above post in
the Employment News or to ono of the recruitmsnt advertisements under the
tab 'Recruitment' on the Commlsslon's website www.upsc.gov.in for the
prescribed formats of certlficateg, etc.

xxxxxx

T-e
?
 lAt
Annexure ll
Proced res. Terms and Co nditions for Interview

1. DURING THE VERIFICATION Ot.,I THE DOCUMENTS/CERTIFICATES IF

ANY INFORMATION GIVEN BY YOU OR ANY CLAIM MADE FY YOU IN
YOUR ONLINE APPLICATION IS FOUND TO BE FALSE, YOUR
CANDIDATURE WILL BE LIABLE TO BE REJECTED AND YOU MAY ALSO
BE DEBARRED EITHER PERMANENTLY OR FOR A SPECIFIED PERIOD BY
THE :

. COMMISSION FROM ANY EXAMINATION OR SELECTION HELD BY

THEM
" THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT FROM ANY EMPLOYMENT UNDER
THEM

lf you are already in service under the government you would be liable to
dlscipllnary action under the appropriate rule.

2. Kindly fill up the Attestation Form (available in Commissions website) and

get the same duly attested by a Gazetted Officer, with one recent photograph
(Passport size) (5 cms x 7 cms) aflixed on it at the space specified therein and
submit the same on the day of checking of original documents/certilicates.
Candidate is also required to bring two additional identical photographs self
signed on front in ink and mentioning your (i) Roll Number, (ii) Date of interview
and (iii) the name of the Post in the back of it. Only the upper half of the
photograph should be utilized for writing Roll Number etc. and the lower half
should be left blank for Ofticial use.

3. You may bring along with you books, publications, manuscripts etc. the
authorship of which you claim, and/or any Thesis/Dissertation submitted for post-
graduate qualilication, reprints of papers published in journals of repute, any'
literary/artistic and architectural work done by you which may have relevance to
the advertised post and which you may wish to submit to the lnterview Board for
their scrutiny.

4. The candidature of candidates is PROVISIONAL subject to their being

found eligible in all respects. Candidates are summoned for interview subject to
production of documents/certificates in support of their claim relating to age,
claim for age relaxation as Government Servant, educational qualifications,
experience in relevant field, community, physical disability etc as per prescribed
eligibility criteria for the post IN ORIGINAL alongwith one set of attested
photocopies of documents/certificates at the time of interview. (EgsllS-dgle is
crucial date for receipt of application as all claims of essential qualification/age
relaxation/community etc. are govemed by the closing date). The candidates
are, therefore, advised to keep the said certificates ready and check beforehand
the requirement of certificates in accordance with important instructions available
in the detailed advertisement and their claim for the post.

5. The fact that you have been called for interview by the Commission does
not guarantee your selection for appointment or that your demand for a higher
starting salary, if ahy, will be supported by the Commission in case, you are
selected for appointment. The initial pay of a candidate already in Central
Government Service will be lixed ordinarily in accordance with the rules on the
subject.

1'T
P
 )12
6. The Union Public Service Commission does not defray traveling or other
expenses of candidates called for interview. Only the outstatio; candidates called
for interview are paid contribution towards these expenses to the elitenl
mentioned in the enctosed note. For this purpose, they are required to fill in
the
two b_lank T. A. bill forms and hand these over at the'Commission Office.. The
contribution would be paid in cash on the date of Interview itself and you sirould
collect it from the cashier in the Commission's Office before you leave.

NB: ln case a candidate is not allowed tor interuiew for any reason
mentioned in the above pafas, or any other reason the Commission,s
contribution towards his/her travelling expenses will not be paid. ln case
the candidate is interuiewad conditionally due to some reasoi, in that case
also the Commission's contribu on towads his/her travelling expenses wilt
not be paicl lill such condiaionality is cleared by the Commission. lt would,
theretore, be in the own interest of the canA@ate.to have with him/her
adaquate funds for the return journey.

7. Any change in your postal address should immediately be communicated

to this office.

q Please bring this letter with you and on arrival, report to the Reception
-
Oflicer in the Commission's Office for entering the Commission's premises and
quote the number and the date of this letter and the post apptied for in all future
correspondence.

Note 1: During the months of December to February the weather at Delhi is

cold. Candidates are, therefore, advlsed to equip themselves adequately.

Note 2: Use of mobile phones and other electronic gadgets in the UPSC
premises is banned. Candidates are, therefore, advised to avoid bringing
mobile phones with them, as the Commission does not undertake to keep
them for their custody.

f--
('
I
P
 tr?
ln-)

lnterview Schedule for the ost of Assistant Labour Commissioner..

Reponing
s.No. ROLT NO NAME lnterview Date Time ror
lnt€rview
1 10002 SANTOSH KUMAR SETHY 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M
2 533 OM PRAKASH 18-O3-2014 09.00 A.M
3 9011 NAGESWARA RAO ADARI 18-03,2014 09.00 A.M
4 338 RAJ BHARATH R 18-03,2014 09.00 A.M
5 1824 A RAMESH BAEU 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M
6 4291 S RAVIKANTH REDDY 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
1 5861 BASAVARA] 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M
8 2601 HIMANSHU MARTOLIA 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M
9 3421 KAPII- DEV SAMAO 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M
10 3785 RAGHAVENDRA NAYAKA M 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M
11 4377 SANI gEV 18.03-2014 09.00 A.M
r2 44r7 JITENORA KUMAR PRADHAN 18-03,2014 09.00 A.M
13 5216 NAYAN MANIK TRIPURA 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M
14 9352 RAM XISHAN MEENA 18-03,2014 09.00 A.M
15 12833 MANOJ LAKRA 18-03,2014 09.00 A.M
15 90 GAUTAM BHARAT WASNII( 18-03-2014 09.00 A.M
r7 405 ANUJ HEER 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M
18 SUSHE€I. KUMAR 18-03,2014 11.00 A.M
19 1109 HARIKESH EAHADUR 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M
2A 1286 BEE NA 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M
27 1415 suBAPRlyADARsHtNt uuruupalbi 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M
22 2735 SUBH€NDU GARUO 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M
2799 SIJAY (UMAR SAHOO 18-03,2014 11.00 A.M
24 3037 SANJAY (UMAR 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M
3720 MILIN D PRAKASH GAIKWAD 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M
26 4154 ANUPREET SINGH 18-03-2014 11.OO A.M
27 4r57 PRASAD 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M.
28 5215 PRADEEP KUMAR SONDI 18-03,2014 11.00 A_M
5924 BIPIN I(UMAR 18-03-2014 11.00 A.M
30 7218 RAVI KUMAR 18-03,2014 11.00 A.M
31 8984 SUOHIR XUMAR 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M
32 10310 VITTHAL PRAKASH BANSOOE 19{3-2014 09.00 A.M
33 10402 ANNAOURAI 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
34 10406 AMIT KUMAR SINGH 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M
10420 LAI.IT KUMAR KAPII. 19-03,2014 09.00 A.M
36 10853 RUPESH CHANORAKANT GUNJEGAONXAR 19{3-2014 09.00 A.M
37 10917 AISHWARYA CHANORA 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M,
12018 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M
39 12502 JAI.A RAM JAIPAL 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M
40 95 IOSEPH DHANARN 19{3-2014 09,00 A.M
41 96 MADHAVAN 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M
42 431 AMARDEEP 19-03,2014 09.00 A.M.
43 555 PRAHTAO KUMAR 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M
44 564 RAVI SHANKER RAMAN 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
45 623 (ANHU CHARAN SAHU 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M
46 1020 RAGESH PONNARASSERY RAGHAVAN 19-03-2014 09.00 A.M.

T-\ (
e
 l2t4
41 1039 PRASANTA (UMAR DAS 19-03-2014... .11.00 A.l\4
1155 HARI OM GAUTAM 19,03-2014 l1t.oo A.M.
49 7267 MANOJ KUMAR 19-03-2014 11_OO A.M
50 1386 R€NU YAOAV 19-03-2014 lrr.oo a.v.
51 1958 AMTI
VISHAL ASHOK 19-03-2014 l11.ooA.M.
52 1995 SUMANT SINHA 1r{tzo44--}1.oo Anr
53 SRINU DARA 19,03-2014 11.O0 A.M
2344 AIAY KUMAR SIN6H 19-03-2014 11.00 A.M.
55 2353 15HWAR DAYAT 19-03-2014 lrr.oo e.u.
56 25L2 AMEER KOGURU 19-03-2014 11.00 A.M
51 2604 NITIN MARUTI KUDALE 19-03-2014 lr r.oo a.u.
58 277A PRAKASH CHANDRA SAHOO 19-03-2014 11.00 A.M
59 2975 SUOHIR KUMAR 19-03.2014 l11.oo A.M.
60 3060 MAN IKANDAN 19-03-2014 11.00 A.M
3228 RAIESH KUMAR T 20-03-2014 l09.oo A.M.
62 3269 SUNIL KUMAR SAHU 20-03-2014 lo!40 4f,r-
63 3355 SANJAY I(UMAR 09_00 a_M
lZ'-03.ror4
64 V R GANESAN 20-03-2014 09.00 A.M
65 3563 SAUVIK EHUYAN 20-03-2014 log.oo n.u.
66 3763 TARUN KUMAR SIN6H 20-03,2014 l09.oo A.M.
67 4005 ANJAI-I YAOAV 20-03-2014 los.oo a.M.
68 4100 PREM KUMAR 20-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
69 4303 KRUSHNA CHANDRA 8EH€RA 20-03-2014 los.oo l.tvt.
70 4452 DIEPAK THEKEKAD PRABTEIf,EAN 20-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
71 4866 SAROJ KUMAR EARIK 20-03-2014 los.oo e.ra.
72 5014 BHUPESH KUMAR 20-03-2014 l09.oo A.M.
73 5376 SACHIN UDOHAVRAO'Ii4ARKAO 20-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
14 s599 ATUI. SINGH '2e03-2014 09.00 A.M
75 6038 NAVIN (UMAR SHARMA 20-03-2014 09,00 A.M.
76 6053 PRAVIN PANDI MOHANDAS 20-03-2014 09.00 A.M
7? 6391 ANANT POPATRAO BEDARE 20{3-2014 l11.oo A.M.
78 6465 SATHISH KUMAR U 20-03-2014 lrlooaf4.
79 6989 MORAZI ALAM KHAN 20-03-2014 l11.oo A.M.
80 7269 SANTOSH KUMAR YAOAV 20-03-2014 11.00 A.M.
7554 NISHANT CHAUDHARY 20-03-2014 11.00 A.M
7965 SAGAR PRADHAN 1r 90-03-2014
Il1oo A. r,,L
83 8326 YASHAVANT SINGH YADAV lzo-03-2014 l11.ooA,M.
84 8357 MOHAMMAD OZAIR 20-03-2014 11.00 A.M
85 8378 OEVARAJ HARISH lzoo:-zora 11.00 A.M
86 8776 SWETA VANDANA 20-03-2014 11.00 A.M.
81 T ,018 PRADYUMN KUMAR RANA 20-03-2014 11.00 A.M
88 9021 RAKESH XUMAR lzo-o:'zora I r 1-oo A"'\
9247 SANTOsH KUMAR MAHUR 20-03-2014 lI1-oo An
9277 111 ooa M
90
9393
PRAVIEN KUMAR PAL
MOHD IMRAN RAZA
20-03-2014
21-03-2014
{--
toq_oo a.M.
92 9466 ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA 2r-03-20t4 l09.oo A.M.
93 9488 JAYANTHI CHIOAMANA 21-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
94 959s RAMESH M 21'03-2014 09.00 A.M.
97 L2 NATWAR SINGH 21-03-2014 lorno A"\,r -
96 9945 RNIV RANJAN 2r-03-2014 l09.oo A.M.

T q(_
 t2s-
97 t 10410 NARPENDSR, 21-03-2014 09.OQ AM
98 10716 RAMBIR SINGH 21-03-2014 logoo A.r,^ l

99 70'120 5t8DAS 21-03-2014 los.oo n.v. I

100 10794 NARENDRA SINGH YAOAV l2r.o3-2014 los.ooa.rv.

]otoo a.r\ ---l
i
101 11411 ALO( YAOAV I21-03-2014
102 11450 RAJESH KUMAR 21-03-2014 los.oo e.v. I

103 lDlT PRADIP XUMAR SINGH 2!-03-2014 09.00 A.M.

104 7777 5 DEEPENORA MOHAN VERMA 21-03-2014 log.ool.rvr.
105 !2077 DHARMENORA KUMAR HIMANSHU 21-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
106 12143 REEGAA .JAISINGH CHAUHAN I 21-03-2014 lo9.oo A.M.
107 L2240 HITLER THOUDAM 27-03-2074 Iiloo A.r\
108 r22a9 R€SMI V l2r'03-2014 lrr.oo r.v.
109 12513 SATYA PRAKASH SAI 2r-03-2014 11.00 A.M.
110 SUNIL RAGHUNATH MALI 21-03-2014 lr r.oo l.u.
111 103 SRI ASHOK PERUMALLA 21-03,2014 hl'oo A.r\
112 SACHIN KUMAR 21-03-2014 11.00 A.M. _l
113 234 NIRWAN SINGH 21-03-2014 h1^oo AJ\4.
114 MAYANK KUMAR JAIN Lr!i"01. 11.00 A.M
115 581 VISHWANATH 21-03-2014 l11.oo A.M.
811 MRINMOY THAKUR 21-03-2014 11.00 A.M
863 RAKESH GAUR 21{3-2014 lrr.oo a.tr.
118 1688 AMREEN NAZ 21-03-2014 Ir r.oo n.v.
119 1863 BIDHAN CHANDRA NAYAK 21-03-2014 11.00 A.M
120 1966 ANUP SURESH DESHPANOE 21-03-2014 11.00 A.M
121 2024 SHUBHRA TYAGI 24-O3-2074 09.00 A.M
2230 ROHIT MANI TIWARI lzn-o:-zora los.ooa.u.
2459 LOKESH KUMAR UPADHYAY 24-03-20t4 09.00 A.M
124 2528 ABHINAV CHHABRA 24-03-2014 Ffuo A,\,r-
2:05 KRISHNA CHAITANYA JHA 24-03-2014 l09.oo A.M.
726 3023 ABHINAV TIWARI 24-03-2014 loe.oo n.u,
r27 3312 EALRAJ SINGH 24-03-2014 09.00 A.M
3332 KRISHNA PATI 24-03-2074 09.00 A.M
3867 SACHIN SHARMA 24-03-2014 loroo An/.
130 4460 BHIM BAHAOIJB 24-03-2014 09.00 A.M
4536 TUSHAR 5RIVASTAVA 24-03-2014 09.00 A.M
L32 4883 AVANEESH SHUKLA 24-03-2014 09.00 A.M
4888 ROBIN BALEJA 24-03-2014 09.00 A.M
134 I so63 VINAY KUMAR JAISWAL 24-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
135 5074 PRAVIN KUMAR 24-O3-20!4 09.00 A.M
136 ANJANI lzq-o:'zora lo9.ooA.M.
137 5280 SURINDER SINGH 24-O3-20r4 11.00 A.M.
138 5289 VAIBHAV SINGH CHAUHAN 2443-2014 l11.oo A.M.
139 VIKRAM SINGH OAHIYA 24-03-2014 11.00 A.M.
140 6021 GIRISH KUMAR SINGH 24.03-2014 l11.oo A.M.
74r 6257 NIRMAL CHANDRA KAR 24-03-20!4 11.00 A.M.
6279 AI,OK TRIPATHI 24-03-20!4 11.00 A.M
143 6484 NIDHI SHARMA 24-03-2014 11.00 A.M.
744 6895 RAMANUJAM 24-03-2014 11.00 A.M
1047 BARUN KUMAR JHA 24-03-2014 11.00 A.M
!46 7101 GEETANDRA KUMAR 24.03-2014 l11.oo A.M.

) .T'(
\
 t2(
7 651 M9 SHAI-.IID IMAM 24-0)-2074 111.00 A.M.
148 7854 SANJEEV KUMAR 24,03,2014 11.00 A.M
149 7980 AMARESH KUMAR LENKA 2{-03,2014 lrr.oo a.u.
150 8000 PRAVEEN CHANDRA 24-03-20t4 11.00 A.M
8243 RAMA KRU5HNA CHOUDHTRY 25,03,2014 09.00 A.M
152 8460 MAHESH MOHAN SATTIKAR 25-03,2014 los.oo a.u.
153 9004 MUXESH KUMAR SUMAN 25-03-2014 log.oo l.u.
154 9L22 CHIRANJEEV SAIKIA 25-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
155 9163 DHEERN KUMAR JHA 25-03-2014 l09.oo A.M.
156 9443 KSHITU JAIN lrs.oB.ror4 lorro414.
157 9531 SUSANTA KUMAR NAYAX 25-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
158 9726 NIRANJAN KUMAR 25-03,2014 lgloo e.u.
159 985s SHASHI EHUSHAN 2s-03-2014 l09.oo A.M.
160 10207 RAHUL TYAGI 25-03-2014 los.oo a.M.
161 10746 VIMLESH I(UMAR 25-03-2014 09.00 A.M
162 10802 MINATI SAHOO 25-03-2014 l09.oo A.M.
10944 DEVENDRA KUMAR SHUKTA 25-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
164 11055 SHOAIBALI HASANALI SAYYEO 25-03-2014 09.00 A.M.
165 11203 ABHISHEK BHATTACHARJEE 2s-03-2014 l09.oo A.M.
17427 ASHISH MITTAL 25-03-2014 lotoo A"\,1
767 11546 OEBNATH MITRA 25-03-2014 11.00 A.M
168 11660 INDRAJIT ANIL BAGAL z5{3-2014 lrr.oo e.u.
169
t70
11763 SALEENI SK
KAII.ASH CHANORA JOSHI
25-03-2014
25-03-2014
8044-
l11.oo A.M.
177 12202 ASHISH RANJAN SRIVAsTAVA 25-03-2014 11,00 A.M
L72 r2247 8IsWA RANJAN SATAPATHY 25-03,2014 11.00 A.M
173 12647 ANKUR DALAT 25-03-2014 11.O0 A.M.
174 12824 KARUNAKAR ]AGANNATH MOHANW 25-03-2014 l11no A-r\r.
r75 12890 SUMIT 25-03-2014 lrr.oo r.u.

T T C-
?
 $

@
t)+
A qrrat,,m&a frtL
lhJ
0nl,ne llTl Rqqxgst Fo,nr 0etails
t'ul,liH{dtorlty 0euil! }
I

U,(d r'Jlrtr tqqr Coll ,bio,,

,l

P.Go,:rl Dat,it ol lllr A0plkint

rvlil(

1tt tr sulntv urr,nr wodrt.

4lJlll

.t.
!rbin
ftlu(itlonrl Srit!t

0ctarlinol U(iijr(
r9l.9l0l2/?rt9
@ oriri$(do{hr.{lrrlitloildotksF

fh
irrri),rnrq nrl orlowPo!idY tlro I
!(lh{tnotlnlorrtlJthr fuplo S00 chrrrcltr.,
'or[N
i)$rirnlr0 olhlornrttlon-Sourhl .

,. r,1 ,,,,!r.t r.l ro Advli 5l/lgl! ll.rft m. I l!1t1. tabM Co'nd

iul.Dl($dklrlorppr0radlnatrm(cale l,eno'8or,n, iccld lt

tll oi ttl cil{oloATt An[ EuGn aS lt ro!1 rHnr Pos] (oNLY Gllar Mll on u ltt E'saMI LAU&0BNon
sr turrc d'r, M8A ^!o
l

lqljnl C^stlro Ail9 XAMI 0lcoullr

qtHtnt orotln^0t oulu. tN tNrtnvlEri I

flo. 0f !!Att At{o ftM^t c^liolo^T I APP, lli IXAM

N0l
I
uistgr or socnrivonx l,ptoAllaATloN lrl tA0oul
t^ R''llg Allo finlotlAl M^NAGM(Nr )ls tssTll QU^t' ofl

o t,.:.:;
I @ d mri kr ol lntc^riod

;'i(at'!dolo ^rrnc.'ur
npr':,
r-I jr
li,r,rh! ilo(moll ' ldrf,r/ 4ri, no/
I
4,ri I
':.iU,'

{
I 1,,\'l

I
l'c --[ r ' u-'

t' \i'
(.
"l
,"
a

t.Iltir
i7\.r,r( (,li
f\atI I L( tv(i i
tl
:i

tti
IT
 i) 128
I

')
)
,.sm*.
I
, ?mff
tffi R'il Cniine
,,-....:.,. A li. ril.rc ol Ocpirtoq\ ol ?."o,,^,., n.rrr, O**...r,i,rllil,l
: lq)mc suhnlt Rcquest Subntit Fi6t Appeat !1ew5tahr5
Urca M,,ru.tl IAO

. Qnlinc m Shtus Form

. rirr, rffi,",r.a *rr, . r. r,r,n r. rn
I

I
i
(tu) r\rttr( i [y(((oNr,r uo
Jttu!
i(0urjr0[f0t{UO, L o x/u/iot]

l trcply r L C.id,lt?t ,9rn.d 50Z4,roN : lt r i! |i, rdvqritlnrnr. tohtJ.Cot/.t .r,!

it: hi! &d.4d,nnry, Pdr al6. rh {n.t i\rk q,r b.. poiir,j o.,o *._,n",
dtrporrC o( nllutl h
I k
n,,,,r., o*,.,,"r,

o lm filll+

I
'x.{,r

I
tnnr l u
^2pt(
I

llarn{ | Nitio^}lpoilrt rndh l(06;tnhr!

ur S!(ond Arucitro c i I F^o
o lOr.^I.thn loi{d.t,i..i,uMqtn rid rojlc, ty NJrr.j, hroour,( (d({, Nflt.lh
l(.pr,rrn

ar,
ffiI

r[ Li,[ ' I
t.. ^]-'
, \/ (,1",,
(

.3 "lf,
I T C
I

C( ^/,
t'\L!i
i
I ll.lt, r
\
I /,
I lV, 11 't.,
". .I\r\,,!4r^ :

i
I
 I

tlnn
fP,'r
$t]u

',,i
r
ir.l[eth su$i,
slitEQT0P. (EXAlilNAilON)
'"ric,
iL CFIC $1^,t,rwt^,1,*ft/n i11
DHouuR rtousE
;IIAHIAHAN R0A0
!
i.rr:t DELN!. 110059

Dired : i- :. S,:D i0ii

Subject i l0lormetrrn r(q!ired under Rli Act :i005

qt lDl'hy :lO
t2 Ple€le Drovlde t\e iollotvlng lnlornrxrion .xrJc'I RTI 'acl 23f'5' Ia'n deoosltlng
'l--.9-C.5:..1.8:. g-. onpr,(atron re€.
t.t - tlql'>,',"s t
...,. a-'r,rooici,
iifditirtit,rronrrottoa r"l;,,t',,e tli'El spl.^,,!. ItI.:;)/;lr)I:J lVir(nrry llo ll0'i017r:'
'" (l- rr!rrl)/Arsl('lril l"rl'urr
. 57 A5si:itont Lab ,ur CgmnrlssigngriCenlr0l)/AJ i t(ilr( f/xllrrt Corr)lllrsiionrrr
!/hlch conlpiJt(i Boscd T;ti
' wrlfars conml!! loner (cenlrall), MinltlrY ol t lLrour !xd Errlployr)r'lrn fQr
'r'i
.4d oo 04-08.2013.

' l. Whether c6ndldales with [du(!liona' Q!'[li('Uor' Degrcc ['L' '' re(ognhcd univirtri'/ nri{
said po\l
. , , rYBA{Human Resource llonagcmenl) are Ellgible lor the
: .2. Whether candldlte wlth Educatiohal Quollljiation Oeqrec r'nn' ll'rco!' !e0 Uiiv0rsity !nd l'l^
. . (Personn€l Hanagement & lndustrrli ne Stlolsj orc elrgrlrl! fo/ Lhe :inr' poJt'
''.',;
' i. wh!lhff c0ndld.t! wllh !duc6tlon0l qu!llfictllon Oe0Iec lrom necognised Vnlvsrslty. ond on(l /(ir
a . ' ;ilicfu;;ffirnro.i
' poal.
rn-tpuito"*r''i"r9'm!nt d Indu:':rril ReLnloit) ir6
l
('lolble llr ilr' sni'

tor which (li(' t's\rntirl Qr)llfrc'tion mnY i'": rllirr"''l

. ,1. whr\JrG th€ tligher Educatlorl'l QLjlificationr
by uiSC lo'lhe
Pe5t 5ar,.l

Dlplo'rn rn l1/J3t-ii'
. 5.
- L'hal ara the Eouaatlonol Qurl('c'flore conrloere/ Equrvolccl Io
: i.iiironilp.rco,,nit t'tanaqemcrii/t':t'our t'a'' ror th' sorc t,!t l

' a, M.nrmlln Qu.lifvlng nrtrks ln l'tai/taw lor Gan'rol C3tagory Cordldnte rl For OIJC Cit€eo'i
c.ndldale.
lct liobl sale'ticn le lhQ ::'i(l po!t'
aflo InllNiew test mnrks
, , 7, tvalghl8g! Of wrlllen Test nldrkt {

'' 0. ruul,lEEao,aon(ld!t'!lppelrcClntheslloexanron0i'08"l0l3cal'gorywliovll'iT'5c'03(:1' I
' Gtoerol

' l'10A (liRl'l) ;ppllcd fir ihe siid pojt' I

i 9, NUNEER 0l crndidotes with educational Qualincltion

, Ih!nkirrl You,

'' I You'; tifiicltlj

i'":"'
it'
o- ,1
(tt-t'll r:rr'\N: l

ADDRESs
tt,_,
,GESTA CIII,ND
c/o BHno0r '!tNn
'i")i':
A.16,'
]L NEI: t/,
NEW I
!
// ,,
:

rt!l
t..1;..
I

,. ' ..1 .i: t:.' l,

rI Qr- v-
I
\r
{ 1',
I

,'... crll
[,, l ' j,.-,,.,,..^
 I

q$
t30

,(

11y*U_Ef[P097
RTI I"IATTE{I
F. t / s I 9 (+'tg)I 20 13. spc-tl
UnlOn Public Sen/ice Com.mtssicn
Dholpur House, Shajah.rn Road
New Dethi - 110 U69

Neu, Delhi, lsEfltomber 23, ?01.1

IO
Geeta Chand
C/o Bhopal Chano
(
A-16, Type.l Staff Quarters
I
.1 Jawaharl Lal Nehru Maig
Behind G.B, pant Hospitat

o I
New Delht - 110 002,

Sir/tlada m,
.$i,
Please refer tQ your appticqlion claied 6.9.20t f. 't'he lnformaUon
sought by you as follows:
': 1,i&3 : Pleose rclcr the concurned adv ertisem,t. rt.

.
Essentlal quallflcations anr not relaxed.
..,4
,, 5 Thls has to satisfied by th3 candiclatc.

' 6, For General category 500/0 and for oDC 459i,,

' 7. Welgbtaqe is 50:50 provided the cAndidate 0btains.minimurlt

'qualirying
marks for'.his cateqory.

o , 8. Gen: 69002, OBC: 408:1, SC:1a30i & 5t':416?.

9, This dala has not bcei conroiled. s

r,{Fr,
'jiP,i' ?, IF you are not satisfied \^rl:h lhe above reply, you moy vrrite t, thc
Appellate Authoi'ifv Smt, Iiilnju l(umar, lotnt Secrcljry, UpSC, Dholpur
House, New Delhi.
':
Yours faithii:iiyl
I t'-

,.^-*:
(ArUfl L:0ur)

'l-r,'"
rL.
,fl ,aurQ
i --r( t/, (.d
1

I
1
l\/,/ ! Li rL'
 i.trirl
I
t3t
r ^l -.
It t' ru w yt;'y.x txl
I
8
il

Darc 20,06.20t4

Ic,
(\

l'ublic lrrlbm tion O llccr, I

TJPSC (Uniol l\rblic .:'crvicc (irrrrrr: ir,rrrrr I

SIllrjuharr rulr,1,
DelIi

Strb: Application scckirrg inlormatk,rr

rrndrrprgvisij[ ot,li.l.l Acr, ?(r05

l'1,:irrc providc []c l0llurving

dcrurl. rcllrd,rrg AsrJtrxr I_i,lL.r i)orrrrnrssioncr
:\';sistltnt \v(llhrc conrmi:rionc.: (ccrirlnlr lcrnrriil),

o /\sri.l0nl Dircctor E\llt)r, 2013 tonducr,:rl .4.,s;j5;111

Lt(indly l)rovido tbllor,/ins dclnlls at cn didnrcsllhr,

laluLrr rrcl:i,rr .",,rriirrir,,l,l ,,*r,,ifr,
virlc Il.Jvcltis,j,,)c,,r S Z; Ij
$crc ux s(t ti,r r ,,rYicw c(ru i \.ijic
a) Ilqgistr0tion No./lloll \o. ol.cur:rtir.l ,,
I

' ii i,,,U.,:iiI;Tfl[lll (':i

'(
r',''.','", (,1,,:c,,t,,",,-..,i-
rl1Srnrc-ofinndidaic (l
c) 0arc rrfinrcrvicw
f) Morks in tlc rvlittcn cxarninDtiot l
g) M0rks in lhc intcrvicvpurson0lity rcsl
lr) Chairrnrn/prcsidcnt oftlc ir
( i,1,.'r'i'""'or,. i
tc/ &.u+1.,'f*s^f ro^ #"'i'l-o,ll#,.u-t, ii 1.,.,.v;L;
?. liirrdly pmvidc I ccpy,ofrclcvrnr rccl,uitr{rcnr
nrlc. ol tr,tlrrl tirb(,r,i rcrv,cr.,

i.lktll (r\Islillrudl
tnrnl, i;tltlvrcu, l)0Jrd \ycrc c(\Islrl rcdi \\,hrrr rlcrr ,rr,,,,,.
\vhrrr rr,.r,, , , ; ; . . i,rns
nrrrrc., riu,rlifir.r. .
" ,lrrJr r.lolrilrrcc
...._
, ,, , r . . r , . , , . . . .

,;,; ,,.il;ilffi;r0ar0rYcrc
.l.WjIlt \ycrc totill intr,rvictv nriIk:i]

o i 1)i 1.lPS(,',lucLx{ l)ul)lrcxll),\\.lrl

(.,\iII[lxlt0I /
is \t.rll irlr.ul i rrIvierv rrr:rr1u; rh,rirrg rvlrolc ori)r:(s. ol
I

' 6: Ii0\.i[Nrvic\\, t]ourd rivr r)ritrlis in illtr!i vi

s#,, . 7 ls rhcrc ony crirerir lixc.d ibr givirrg nrarr,s?

'
li..f)(tJlhc bui,d.hilvc {]lbilrsr),
[]\,cr to ui!c iplcrlrcl llrrkr:r

7. lVrs rhcrc lll,qullilying nrarks in rhls inrlrvicr.rl .

:.t. ll
les ulur \us rhc qullilyiru nrarks.'

I l,lrgl j

( ? (
. ,11
t)
l
u

I
(; I
[,,k I ci,r...:,.
 t32

' 9,)Vhittwrrs critcrin cnrJ rarionulc

ol.qualillvirg nrar\r7

. , l0.IVfls thcre ih0 (1ualilyirg nrnrks irr rvrirrlcrr crrrrr?

'. I l.Whnt is di,Tcrcncc I,cnvccn cssrnrint (UItillc0{jof Ir(l dcji,fll)tu.lulltilicario,r ,.r

-.. l2.ls thcrr, rrry nrrrliN li\Cd liu (lc$inrlll!.

ttlrlili(riti{nrl,

i:l:Aic in(crvicw ntulks givcn

scpirrarull, lirr ricsimblc quillilicutiorr./ .
I

,l,l.llowmnrypcrsoDstvcrenolhlvintJcssr;ntinlquolilicntionlsgivcnn,rd.rcniscntcnloLitol.
, -
, tltobc who lvcic callcC for intcrvicrv?

/X-' :' The requisilc fce ofRs. l0

i
{ is bcing pirkt hercu,irlr.
'\"'
o ;i::illl'ffiit]lfs
ro pnv,rhc rcquisirc clurtcs, ir'un], rs n,rv bc rcquircd r0, rurnis^ing

. 'lhanking
I
',fl:I, You,
'
' 1'1' x' $q/"la^'
Mukcsh Kumar Sumnn
, . Adr96alg
.liocm l,lo. 4
.;\:1
:A/6, Sgond floor,
' c itirsrior Colory,
4,,
1

Opp, lVionis Nagar Police Starion, i

'l,rclhi I l0 007 'fi.,,.,..,, I

i
? n l',Jn 21)1/t'

e {:,
dlll!
(
T
€
!

l)itrr I- I
-\';.'
(
,j

--r'
: / [,tr.. l, I

[,, /( 'r' ,..,,.v.,.-

t.
 I
71

IN -HE ADI,IINISTRAIIVE TR.BUNAL

-C€NTRAI
PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI
o'A' No 2179 oF 2014
itt rHE::/ATTER oF:
Sir 14tJKESl..t KUMAR SIJMAN
APPi.ICANI'
VERSUS

,,N]CN PUBLIC SERVICE COMIV1ISSION

RESPO,\Dgi\iT

;NDEX
S rlc Panic!liars
aoe No.

Sl"crt rep,/,affrdavrt on oehalf of responoent

1to
Annexure-R-1:
Cop^y_of order/judgemenl dated S.8.201 1
in Civit Appeal
--
' V" "
i\o 6344/201 .Sec,etary.
th;ed UoSC & Anr
S KRISHNA CHAITANYA'

I Memo ol appearance counse

i\';i Ne',v oelhi

DAI'ED. Septentber,20t4

(R.V. Sinha)
Senior Central Govt. Counsel
540-54'1, Lay/yers' Charnbers
Patiala Hoi.lse Couns
New Delhi-11000'j l
Tel. N0.2338616a, 23380965

li

T:C
r

I
 13q

t
rl

rN THE CENTRAL
AD^trNt.s I RA
oRrNCtpAL
r,\/E .ro,o,,\ .
eerlcn. rygyJ pi-n.."" "^.
o'A' No'217s oF 201;*----'
L-!J!€-M4r6&af
Si-] I,JUKESII KUI4AR SUI\,1AN APPLICANT

i,\riON PUBL lC SERVICE

COr!4t4lSStOt.l
RESPOI'JDEN'r.

:'Tr)\ REPi,,Y iiF F ID oN3 Fl.rA FO F REI]P ONDFNi

Deep Panl \,,,ort(ing as Undor

Secretary, Union public Servtce
ccDrnrssron Dhotpur House,
shahjahan Road, New Derhi-1 1o06g,
under the
'erl,, ng responcient, do he.eby
solemnly alrirm and declare as under: ,

{ Inat I am acquaintec lvith facts

and circumstances of the present
I case.
larn julhorjzeo'
ard hence compeient to depose this
shori reply
affidavit on behalf of reptying
respondent in rny official capaciiy.

Tial l have reacj the contenls of the present

application under reptv and
sldte l-at !^e co^:ents ,nenltoned therein
to rhe enen: rhey are
.c0ns slenl wrlh the subhtissions maOe
hereinafter in lhis reply affidavit
I

are rncoftecl ano denied. Unless any avermenl ano ccntenticn ls

speciflcally adnlii1ed or traversed. ihe sam€
may be treated as denied.

-rar no :ause cf act,o1 has accrued to tne applicarr agairsi the

-?r.yirg 'espondent ,nasmucn
as ,ro sratulory. constilJtronar or legal

;-: :l t^e app,,ca.tt nas besn In.r;.geo by:re repry.ng resp3ioe^r

"l'hat
the 0A undet reply ls not maintainable for non-Joinder cf
tecessEry panies. The applicanl has not impleacled
anybody wno
-\ rs

\r\
 !

t3{
/keiy to be adveisety
affeoted irr case the reliei(s)
sor,ght by lh€
appiicant is grantect by thF
Hon bie lribunai

Pr,Tlimin a n't l SS

Tnat (he Respoirderrt

is a Con6tjtulicna I
.booy eslablished unCer Arlicles
-11 5 ic 323 rn ine pa(-XlV
Chaplg,-11 of the Consttuticn
oi lncia and by
."'..te ci A,l cle 32,1 Ihe ResoonCenl
\aithn. ils l,.rr,r clio^S !es:eC
c| ihe
sato Anr,e n3s ntandalory culy of
ihe Unlon oi lno.ia io cor]cuci
sranlrnations For
appoinlments to lhe services
ol Unlon cf lndta eic. In
r e', cl the abc're. provisious, the Responaent
is an autonoincus bcdy
.rnd ihe Conslilutron of lndia has enjoined
upon the Respondent ihe
solenln duly of ntaking recfuitn.lerlt
to cll C]vil Services ano.posts
i
Li.roer
:re Govt. oi lndia. I

ilrat ln discharge oi its Constitrdional

oblrgationslduty, the Responcen:

s ,esteo r/ilh the power to devise its

auionomous mode of functioning
aiio procedures objsctively ln j!st. equitable
und legal manner in which
reasona0le classilicalion oF various
applicants, on the basis of their
lii.Jairiicatrons and experierlce in which
erpe ence rs an rnlEgral pan cf
l''e,. cratrftcatrons r he exercrse ci powe.s so Jestec bv l1€.
{
acrsliiution ilrclude io make reasoriatrld classification and s,.lch
e.ieicrse ol po,rlers nale been uphejd valid and iegal by various
I c-0unC€rt€nlS by JuOicjat AUtnorities idcllldtng
"e HO.\.olp Supreme
CcLrrt Ji lnCia.

l'ha: ihe Respondenl se(s In motion the process

of recruilment by
a'lve.trsing the pcsts altd inviilng applicaiions
l. stric y ln conlcrmlty wi r
1le nolliea re.ruiment tUles framed !rnder Arttcle 309
of COngiji,.jtrotr cf

(OLji.'oar.
yt;,t tll4 ,
ilY L9r, :r,.
I
\ {
, ,,

o
--.i

l3'/ I

lndla. When the number

I of the Bligible applicants is
u
substantially.nore
rhan the nlmber of posts,
the Respondent is herd justified
to reslrict the
number of csndidales
to be called.-For-_the purpose
of inierview for
selection. or\ the basrs
ol a reasonaote
classriicatrcn 0ascd or
'icfsccijsjy oevrsed
ob]ecttve shon listing crlter,a
ct, by hotdtnE
Recrutmenl 'lest. fhe ResponCeni
rn.bursuance lirereci la,/s
d^,i_n
ae(atit cirtelcn lcf seleclion
ci cancrdate in time-oourrd manter
for
.ar,oJS posls as ac.,en,sed. rre
experience of rne Resplnoei.I
crer
r4e years has rationaily
shown lhat to elfecttvely comptete
the
recruitment process in Iime"bound mannerltime ftarne
? ce(ain
gurdetines have to be
followed ,aithfu y. Accordingly,
the Responoent,
i:s a nraller ol policy at an
All lndia Levei fcr all
exarnlnaljons/recrujtmenls,
has lranred guide"lines in
this respecr and
I
fas ceen follolving the sanre
I
faithfully, In the presenl case
also, slrch
!irdeiines have been kepl in view in the
advertisement anci followed
rarll'fLtry
vrhite p.ocess of recruitntent
was being oerformec

rhe oA under repry rs bad

'irar and nor tenabre rn the eyes of raw
10r
^ar\.ro.nder ol recessary party.
II is suomrtted ihat lhe apptrcani
nas
cnarlenged the finat resuJl of the
selected persons without impteading
a.]i of the persons t.kety to be affected il
the relief sougnt for js granted.
S,rcn prayer is not maintainable in
vievr of the larv laid dov/n by the
r.cn'ble Supreme Coud ir s,gries
of cases. including In ,,prabodh \./ern.ra
& crs. Vs Stale of U.p. & Ors,. repofled
rn 19g4 (1) SCC 251 and aiso
r Al. ,rcjra SC d ST Emplovees
Assocratjon & Ors. Vs. A, ArthJr
Jeen
& crs reported rlr 2co1 (6) scc 3go. lr is funher submitied that the
ircr..cant nas atso nol irnpleaded lhe adrntnistrafive
l,/inistt,fo. !,/hich
''. tdr+C:,,1a _ :t-est Cn ,:as Ceen n,ltateo
anC COr,.trreiea

({N.r,n!
i|;:.-;ai.x; '1 \
@
--] j

t37
'f hal payer
for inrerim reijef, which amounts
to grant ot main relieF, is
nci permissible rn jav/ as held by the Hon,ble Apex Court
I in
o'cer/ucge,]lert oated 5g.20..,n C,vr, Appear No.634E/20r,
tiieo
Se6retarri,. UpSC & Anr Vs. S. KRISHNA CHAITANYA (Ann6xure.R-

i)

rhar rhe oA
under repry is also 0or mbintainabre
aod barred by
Dnr)ciple oi esloppels and acquiescence
inasmuch as lhe applicant
has admittedry, participated in
the serection process finar result
of
vrhicir he is cha,enging. Reriance
is praced on the raw raid down
by the
l-lon'l-.ie Apex Coud in.Chander prakash
Tiwari & ors. Vs Shakuntala,,.
rep.,dec tn 2002(6) scc 1?7

lri"", tcis of thB casc

''.ar
lne appticani (Mukesh Flmar
Suman/, Roll l{o 9004 rs one oi the
aaf(iidates lor rccruitmenl to 57 posls of Assistani Laborr
Ccnrtl gg gpgl {Central),/Assistant Welfare Commissionr_"r
lCentral)/Assistant Labour Weltare Commissioner (Centrat)/Assistanl

3ireclor in Grado V of JTS of Centrai Labour

Servjce in the l\,4inistry of I

-anou. & Emrloyment. The aoplicant was called for Interyiew on

25 3.2014 after qualifying in th6 recruitment test hold
on 4.B.20i3. The
{
I applicanl has howevor, failed to qualily in tho final list
declared on
r:5 201( Being aggrieved of lhe finaj resuit. lhe apDlicafi has
fiied
I
;-'reseri arplical on !nder repty, inler_aIa on ihe follorving orounc.s

a That the ihree candidates bearing Roll No 8396 RoI Ns 1iC5B

Roll No.564C have iina y qualified but were nol r. the tisr Df

candrdales called tor rntervtev,,

\.
("I1q,rri!) +r
"
$r
,. srf, r--x
nrt. / ir"n" :'.:,.,,i T t
I
?
 i

t38
b. Ihat the respon,Jent in the advertisement
stated that recruitment
test of 100 mafks rvill be held
( followod by interview for seieciion.
Ihe respective weighlage of RT
and intervrew shall be dscided
by the Commrssion.

c :nat lne rosoonoe^l

o d 1ol Jlsclose rntervrew marks, quallfv/ng
,

arileria weightage etc Defore rnleryie$,

!. Trat ircrn RTi dated 06.i2.2013

of Shrj Dhan Sngn. appiicant
ca-e tc :rno,,/ :ha: Nos o, canotdate appeareo ,n rhe Excnt_
5024, eligibility criteria- as per
advertisement. court case status-
disposed of and tctal marks of interyiew_totat 1OO nrarks
/Annexure.6 to the OA).
I
e Thar kon qTl datecj106.Og.20i3 of
Geera CharC lAnrgxupe-: ss
lhe 0A) tne appticant came lo
know thal Essential qualificatrons
are ror rejaxed ano is as per
advenisemeni, minimum qualjrying

i maik rn ttervrev/ for General category 5Oc/c and for OBC

calegcry 150/,0, we€htage for RT and inlervrew
is 50:5C prov,cjed
lhe candjdates obtajns mjnimum. qualtfying
marks rn hjs
calegory, nos of candidates appeared in the examination

, Thar the weightage of the interview

for Alt lndia Service Exam rs
less than lhe Cenkat Labour
Service (CLS) and RR of CLS did

"ot .equire any expqrience for appear in Examinatjon.

I

g That the Board of 4iS petsons cannot judge

a candjdate
:l'orodgriy - ,0 to .:,rinute ,n
sLch ct.curstance rl ,s a.oilr3ry

': g ue 5l . .1e ghlale ,c:.nrer"jgv, rn C_S

^ That ,n :he adveil,semenl procedlre rn

a\^/arding tnteryrew
Inarks. c tena iOr interviev,,iS r.tol deftned

\'
.rt'
qFr'r.rr 1r' T-C
€v. \iirL.. ,!, 5,r"r.!-/ F
 t31

I Thal rn RTI oated Seplember

2g13 of Geeta Chand, rt is stated
lnal essent.a, nas ooi
FU6.rficat,on been telaxeo, but many
candtdale selected who do not
have essenlials qualificalron
as
per adve(isernent

,. I'h6i cn RT dated 20.06 2014

(Annexure"g 10 rhe OA) there
is
possio lity that .onf foa,. may not be disciosecl
ilecruitntent process; ln this
connection, the detail of lhe recrurinrr-.nt
f)iocess cione So iar on subje.l post is
as under:-
lvl ni stry of I.abour
& ment vide ietter d aieci
Requisitjon 26.04 2A _Employ
rJ and 1e.10.20',2 fo^varded I

the requisition for the 57 pos ts oF Assislant Labour

Commissioner (Centrat) .Assistant VYelfa re
,ornmtSsrDner lcentral SlStant LabcUr !,/eliar.e
Commtssione: (Central)iAsi ssanl
Direcioi rn GraCe V
cl J-l-S cl Ceniral 16geur- Seruice in the llinr5in,si
i-a50 ur,! Enploynreni

iale o: The posr of ALC vra s adveftsed vid e Advertisernenl

F: , enlsemenl Nc.5112013 3aieo
12.01.2013 ltem No.2 rn
trfl] men I Nelvs.
osing date Online applications are invited and its cl
osing da te is
a/ Scale & Rs 156 0.3 91
assificaticn
(P 8.3 ) Gde Pay Rs.5a00^
a ?ay ale & Group Air Grade V qf JTS of Contrat
Labou r ice in classific ation the lviinistry of Labcur
&
eil ia
iualificalions i) Deg ree of a recognlzed Universily
or equivaienl.
ard Desirable ii) Diploma in Social rvo rklLabour Weiiare/lndustr|al
Qua rficallon .elations/Personal f,4;n agemenULabour Lalv
'ci lhe rosi ol
r!c
fronr a recognized Unlversity/lnslilute cr
equiyalent I

B. Desirable
Degree in Law fro.'n recognrzed universiiy

{ NOIE-I Tne
I
quatiiica-iions are
:,r case
retaxable at.
CoTtlrssron's Olscret.or c, :atdrdates
olherwise !.Je,; quariied
\OTE- r The qua.ifrcatrons regardlng experieace
,s/are relirla?le at Cgmmisston,s Ojscre!ton in the,
I
;ase o. candidates oeio'lg,ng Io Schecureo Castes
,rno SchBoujed Tribes, r at any clage o. serectio . .

:he Comri,issrL'n rs oF lne cpin;oa :i.a: sufilcient

'\umt-.el,i canotsales Jronr tnese comx-Lnriies
pcssessrng lhe requisite expenence are not llke
ly t,
be available to fill up lhe reserved for theiT'l

Srry+;i T\?
 0

Age as c. Not exce eding 5 5 Yea rs

i

.or|nal clos;n3 as on non; lclosjng ale

Not exce eding.i0 years Fcr d
lare for JR Schec ul ed castes and
Schedule d Tribes candidates
SC STA and nol Bxceeding 3g
Years For OBC candidates /n rsgpgs
{
OBC rese./ed for th em as t
Of vacancy
CanCtCaleS Relaxable lor reg ularly
on norn]al closrng oate
appointeC
Ce ntral,,UT Govl
seryant's upto liv e years
as per the insl.uctjons
rssred b tne Govl. oF ln dia frorn lime to lime
xeservation posts are ie serve
I
9osition lor 57 did ates,3 posls aae
reseNed for ST can didates,
posli ol 19 pos ts are resef,?ec For
At_C OBC I rernarnrng ? I posts
are un reserved. CF the 5 -,,
Posts, 3 posls are reserved for ph ysicaily
ChatiengeC
Persc n s with disabil iti' vtz. Onhopaedical
"{andicapped / Locomoto r Dis ability/CereOral pal
ly
vrlth One Leo Aifected (Right s)/
or Left) (OI-) qr q66
al'fected (r gn I or left) (OAl
or I uscu ar Weaknesss &
Iinrlred p hysi cal en!Lr166cegy W)
reseryed For physically & one p651 i5
chalten 9e PersOnS viz. Low
Vjslon i L'\ Panralty Etind( PB) Tne posts
Strlable ior Ph '/sjcall)j Challen ged are
Persons v.ih r..o\./
Vlsion ll..Vj i PadiaIy
0lind iPB) ar
Onrsp aeorcaily Handjcap ped/Lo.cnrotoi
D;sabiIl ,'l
Cereb ia i[)alsy lvrth Orre Leg Affected
(OL) cr une Arm Affe cled(OA) (flghr iRight or Le i:)
Muscular or tefi) at
) Weakfess lirnileo physrcal
endurance(Mtr/)

l:".-,t
posls oi ALC utory funclion in
labour enachnents
e
settlement ol jndustrrat diso ute, enfor6ernentand
prevention
various la5our laws and to establish of
I harmonious
reiai ion be$reen workers and
I management. These
cffi cers are.notified as lns
Pectors, Cbnciliation Otficer
and Appeltafe Authority under the various
Acts.
olal No 12,898 N os of application s received
for the posti oir
a iicaUo n s ALC
Ccmmissicn has co nducted C omDLtter Based
R€crLritrnent iiecruitmenl Iesl on 04.08.2013 to sho(list
the
candiJates to be calle d for interview n terrns
of
oiov slons conlained in t he advedisement

Schemoind he anc labus for reciuJrmenl test has

Syllabus been rni{rmeo ro lhe candidate vide acve(isemenl
, No.5 d
on 12- 18 January. 2013
lEmpl oyment N6ws. ll is also in fofmed thal Tes(
will
bea n objective type wjth mult ipie choice since oi
J ilst! er and !,/ill carr/ a maximu m
oF 100 nnarks

ln _aq,yenisemen t il rS also rniormed thal

the
r
!Ye lr,rejdntase of the reQruitrneni tes t ano
r.-s_Pq9
Lilervievvg shall be decided by the Commission

F
n the bas is cf the Recruitrneni Test

lJrJ.P!''u,", . '
 I

/
i lqt

Commlss ion have shonJiste

'Provisionally" ofl 30.12.20i3
d 192 c, ndidates
It is info rmed to the
caodidates in tie result that on ly such candidates
rvno q ualiry an d sarsfy,/fulfill
all the conditions of the
posts shall be called for inle
rvrg9r'

FLirnishing of Candida le who have qualilied RI have

cocurnenls by rnrough information bee n asked
on tvebsite to furnish documenrs
rrre candidates r rn supporl
cF their claim for the post imnredlalely
for
scruliny so as tc iden tify elig,b le candidates
as per
advert senrent icr inte rvterv

in thrs case was held frorr to.

'a5.- ' lresult posls was
'r
7.06 2014 and recommendatjon letter declared on
was issued tol

-'re rx'r.a., Scruiiny (pS): Afler pretimrnary scrutiny LPSj oi

rocL,menyce(;ftcates lurnrshe0 oy candidales rvho have qUairi eC
,lecruihent Tesl (RT), the
Con]mrssion initrallv relected the
eDpir.atior:s ol tr candida.e rnentioned below ior not fulfiiling requisite

assenlral Cual ircation cf the post as per advertisenreni {Lacking

Essential Oualification (LEe)(i), Lacking Essentiat
Ouatification (LEe)
iilr/not tl,n,"n,nn documents (ihcomplete)): .

s o. N]

7 425 L )

LEO{ij)

:r27 I tr^i ,\

1
5.14 tE0(ir)

1895 LEQ(ri)

o6bb LEO(ri)

13A7
{
i
i)

t.----_-__-_,_--
' 'a i1529

(:rFi
\ -tY
 4

IN COMP L ETE
989 lNCO

0lvl PL I

n ?ca.
; INC 0[1 pt Fitr

{ rNCO[4
I
'6 ,11955
rNc I"'1P

r 2592 ]NCO t't

nre./ew programme ,or lh€ posl

ol ALC vras fronr ig.C3 2oia 10
25 03.2C11 and inlerviely
schedule posted on Commission,s
urebsile for
(192-1j:17g) cancidates
''i 1-9lgg and inrervielvlsummon lerer y,,ere

serI ly post to 175 eljgible

candjdates. The above l7 Candidates were
rrarrllec rnd,vrouaili,by Comnussron
.l.^,,r rejeciion
I r thr6 .,h post
through ^^"r about ,^ ^-,:
of therr
application before interview.

5 Consideration ol rgprgssn1511.. against rejection

of appljcations; Atter
corrsaeration ol representations submitted by
candidates bearing Roll
,eJ \.-rJ c,,u , u!o and subSeqUently revrval of a pOlica
lron/cand id a tUre
cl i.l:)r \tos B3gS i1056,
|r]e above lable posted for rnForn]ation
io rhe
can0 oates on Commission,s website deloiing these
i two Rolt Nos g396
ano 11056 from labje (thu5 totai Nos
of rejected appllcatrons wer€ ieducsd
ftom 1 7 to 15 candidaies), Subsequen
y, dunng lhe course of recruitment
::oces:. valous ol).er repteseDtalior, *uru ,uau,r"o
to accepl thejr
apprrcalrcns ano consioer candidature
for the interview.

REV|'/AL OF Appl_tCA. ON: The

Commission has decided to consider
tle apceat of canCrcates ,nho hFd earlier nol
furnjshed their docu ents in
I

FN --.e
('
Y
 I

t V3
I
I

suppod of their claim ior the post as

stated in para 5 above, if olhen,r'ise
eriaibie Accordingly atter due consideration,
application of following
.andidates were revived and they
were called for iniervievJ. Due ro
;'l1age oi l,ore ltese candrdates were also infoin eo over le,ept.tcr.te
a1;
rlen,ier.? !efters il,ere iSS Ued bv speed posuemailiby hand for inierviev/
as
gcr detailst-

anre & Roll No Ca ndidature/daie Dale ol rnle tute !..

c1.1 , lvnich
Jecrsrcn lalea ST
Commtssron for
, revivat Ol
jcation
1 \'Vashimul Haq (Roll Rev 2 5.03.20 i.1
No.554C 1 2.03.2 1{
0
Sh t^lon mi Horam (Rolt Rev 25.03.201/,
No.1 1056 06.0
3 :Sh S. Kana gave I
ta 03.2014
Pan an Roll N0.83 g6 3.2014
Sh. P airas Hansdak
. .--Eoll N0,7825) (2C,0 3.2C 14)
rmend ra Kumar c ate of interviev/
iHimanshu 0li
(Ro rl chsnged from
No.12A77\ 21.03.2014 ro
25.03,2014 drJe
to Eleclion dLrt,,
lraining

Sh Ashok l(u irar Gupta lve 2

lRcl 1Nc1r95 5) (21.C3 2 014)

Irle^/er,/ Prcgra[.]rne: lnlerrreiv prograrnme

for the above itosls \vas
'r3m i3-C3,2014 to 25-03-20.14 (22,,"
and ?3,a [/arch 20.14 Hoiid21,1 16

i\,VO Boards. Final result ot S7 posts

of ALC for declared on
i 7 06 2014. and recommendaljon lettBr was issued on 2s.06.2011 to
the tulil1islry of Labour and Ernploym€ot,

Recommendaflon Lster, recornmendihg the

jThe candtdates for
appointment, is sent 10 |re Mlnistry along with thE appllcalion
dosslers
( containing ihe priot of th€ online application as wejl
as alt the reqL, s te
I
:€( f,caies erc ln the Reccm.nenoation Lelter the fcllov/rn.a ls also
ac.rveyec ic tne l,,lrnrslry Labour ond Ernployment

+.\
L

' ) {d""^' /\
,7 r.\; !.: L+r\]i
.o. ,1,:' ,..' ' \
'(D
I
 tqq -
"The candidates
called for interu_rev
the o,is nar certiricares rn,u.ppo,t
:iil: j::l:":,:il^:J:J::l
qualifications, Experience
Cedificate, claimed age relaxalion as
Govotnfi]enl Servant. Cedilicales,
^ie ry

aenrilcates
e'! r o$,eve
rn
r ti., e r,r in,sr,vroe Jujl J:.i:il:I :i:,il .ll:, : l
origrnal oefore rnaking lhe
,eccmmeno'ed
appojnlme?1t oi lhe
candioates

{
I 8!r As per guidelines oi ihe Commission,
the shereabie information
was furrrsh€d to lhe cancjidates
underths-RTl Act.2005 wrth r9f9796qs
i
lc his RTI apptjcation datec 6 12.2013
5.9.2013 and 2c 6 2c13
i j'a\. ie slated thal cniy lotai marks
scoreci by candidales tn u/riien
aTd ,ntervleH are shared aftcr
completion,of the rectuitmeni
Drocess
Sreak up cf marks scored in v/ritten
lest and interview is not shareci.
The ma er regarding
disclosure of personal o.etails o,
Expeds is sub-
tud,ce ilj lhe Hon.bie High Coun oF Delhi Wp(C) No.7a3111j UpSC vs.
Mahesh N4anglat fileo by the Conlmissioo,
hence the same are nct
Drcvideci. lt is aiso tnformeJ (o the agptrcant
thal the Hon,bte Supreme
::tri rn iis judgernenr da,.ec .13 j2 2A1Z rn Ci!il Appeat No,gCS2i2Ji2
Bhar Pubirc Service Commission Vs.
Saiyed Husaain Abbas Rrzvt &
Arother held thai Eihar public Service
Comrnissron is not bounc tc

arsclose the names, designaticn and

{
address oi ihe members of tho
'r:eniiew 6oarc

I Dela I sotR It After the declaration ot the resu[, the Comflrission

nas uploaded on 15.07,20i4, ths detaits of result with

regard to
-eccmfendeo canoidales, reserve pinel,
marks obtained cur-off of
varous caiego.ies in R-f
lnterview. final selection and u/eighlage etc
cn Cofimjssrons web-site and provided afi the admissible informatjon

:: ''e CanCrCaleS

ntlrl.f-ti
(ot: - '."' r I
l-r
Y
 I

tks-

I
Weiqhtaoe: Under Adicle S20
of the Constitutior cf lnoia, the
CoDjmrssion are, inler.alia ,equted
to be consurted on ali maners
-e3li.S lc rec.Lilmerti
lo Srvrl Servrces anC posts The recrtiiment
rs
"nace tnrougn iotlowtng
three nnethods by (he COmmission

", D,recr ;.lecrLltnenl

(2) Pronr91166 s66

(3) Deputaticn (ir]rcluding

shon term contract/absorption).
DIRECI RECRUTTMENT is conducted
broadty under loltowjng i,vo
methods:

, Recru irenl by bompelrtr,re Examjnation

tl Recrurtment by selectjon.

RECRUTTI'1ENT tsy COftpETtTtVE EX.Ai\,4tNAT|ON. i_nder

ihe
:onstitu'jon. one of the tunctions of
the Commission rs to conducl
exarllrnalrons fcr 3pp61n169115 io the servjces of the Union The
Commrssion usually conduct ove/ dozen
examination every year cn an
a. ..d.a oasrs These .nclLde exa.ninatjons ior recrurtrnent ro
se.vrces/oosis in ,.,arlous fields such as
Civil Services, Engrneering
Se",rcss 1r1a6,aa, SeNices, Foresl Service and Detence Secvices
etc
RECRUIIf.IENT By SELECTION: Recruitment
by setection is made for

I rng up vacancies lh+t are nol filled by the regular

conrpetilive

.rarninaiions conductedl by the Unjon public Service Commission.

ln

l.rs n)ethoo oi direct recruttmenl oy selection, requisitions for various

0osts afo .ecalv6d from diffrrent i/.ltnr6t.los/OopenmcntE. Roqutslllons

are also rEceived lrom slalutory organizations, locai authorities or

puSlrc instilul,cns fc: ,,vn,ch recrultment is nlade by the Unicn public
SorVrce Qommrssion in ierms of Articie_32.1 of the Constit!tion Dilect
Recruiiment 5y selection rs made by folowing methocs

t
,{Srr ,',ir
(: i -., ,.', -
T
?
--"-".'--*aT. ..:t-
 tt4/-

(a) Bv tnrervrew
onll].

/bl 8y Recrurtnreni
Test follorved by tnlervrew

'rnele ihe number ol applicanis is 13rgs,

1, rs not pracllcable tc call lcr
r.lervrew all lhe applicaIons rvho futfilJ the prescribeo rirnrcnt.rm
eiigrbitrty conditions The Commissiol), therefore, Shorlll$t .te

cand,dates to be called ior interview on lhe basis

ol cartatn prq-
lete-rn nec: C'rtefia .etated lo ta€ jOD. A large nurnber
Of recru;t,nent
I
:ases rs handted oy the Commiss;on by lne
melhod of inlsry,a.r a.,,
SY RECRUITfulENI IEST FOLLOWE;; NTERVIE\,1/:
i
Recfuilnient Tests enable shodlisting
of suitable number of canoicjales

.."eiever i1e ",rber cf cand.dales :s

very large co.,]p,rreo Io ihe
':L,noer oi,laoancies n such
cases. slnr'\teighlage ts ass,goei io tne

ae'1rj;1119na, oi ine candtdates ir the test fcr linal assessment. Funher

s.rr:n lests are alSg oCCasionally used rn case
lhe eS5eiltal qLialiftcaltcn
G,- a,own mrnrmum skill siandards ln this cateOory. ihere
are t"vc l!,pes
al ploCedLire lOllO'//ed:
I
An obiective-type yr'ritten and/or practical test to test the

skiil of ihe canoidates. followed by Inieruielv The linai seiection is

CeciCed bv intervievi, aided by the performance of the cancjidates in

ihe wrttien test and/or Draalicat tesl.

i
t.2) An objective-lype v/ritten and/or practical test lo screen

candid€lss to be called tor Intorvlew,. rhe fin!.Lssleot-t90.,.!el0!.*

derrdec by rnlerview only..

Fron] lhe above. rt may seen thal the process of ciirect recruit.oent by

!ieieqtron ls dlFlerent fro,n 1na( of direct recruitment by regulal.

a l"Dtl.lrve e (amrnalrOn COnclucteO by tne Comn:rsS.On

i'
t*i q,ri
rf..c' per-,r1
' '^ \ e
er'
',"i'i' "' "" 1 -^
'
rlt irlrr r'1 r F
txel 9 u': S!_ :? I ' '
 I
I

The CornmissLon fixes a lverohlage in lhe Written

Tesl and nterview for

I -rFa'-,tme4t -esiS
{ ^e.o n l-e Commrsrlon o^ 3 case Io ceje CaSrS

.\cccrdinov.
'n the Adve(isement N0.51/2013 pr.rbtisned on r2rh

January 2013, clearly sriputated thal: ,'Respoctive Werghrage ot the

necrurlmeni and the Interviews shall be decided by lhe Comniission,,.

lf lne present i.ecruitment case of Assistant Labour Commrssioner oi

Central Labour Service in Miristry of Labour & Employment, the

Commission fixeci Welbhtago of vrrjtten rnarl'<s and interview in the final

resull os 50t50.

As per Conrmission's policy contained in Circular N0.01/20C5 _

i: 16/1 1(6)/2001.R(C&P) qateC 4ln January, 2008, minimunn qua[fying

.

narKs for the rnlenrew in respect of candidales belonging to varicus

:ategorres na!e been fixed. according 1c whlch the minimum evel of

suitabiirty for Gerreral category rs 50% tor OBC category rs 45% & ior

j:'S: caiegoiLes lrs40% Thus, ony lnose candidates oui oi ine

rrtervrewei candrdales are placed in the consideratton zone,,,,,ho cctaI.l

sAok,154,1 anc 4004 marks or more (for rhe General, OBC and SC/ST

:arrdidales resoectively) in the lnteivie!./. The contents Of Circular are

.erng followed rn respect of rninimum qualifying marks in the interurey.,

r aii recruilmen( cases.

A the candicjates for the posts have to attain minirnum j.3vel oi

l
surrab Ity of rna'xs in thP Written Test in the category they belong lo

lor-findin.J place in resull of Written Test. Thereafter. these candid3les

v/ere as(ed to furnished documenis/certificates in supporl oi lllelr claim

lor tne Dosts and sc.utiny of documenls/certilicales takes place io order

:c see tlar on,y rhose candidales who fu,lill al, lne Eligrbrlrly condittons

sNail ae callei for inleJ.fle!'/. After scrutiny only eligible candidates wera l

a iolleo Lo appear rn the lntervrev/. These candidates are also requiied

{ (tri'u'r:
Lii, . ,,.
T--n
tt a
 tt{B

lo aitain mini.,rum level of suitabilily of marks in ihe jntervrew in

the
caregory they Oetongi thus, Final menl list rs prepared lor eiigible
aandLdates ,!ho had secured rninioium level of
suitab iiti, ot rnarks ir

lvr;llen lest as wellas in intgrview

UIEEYjEW--AaABSC. As per commission,s policy conrained in

circula, 1',o.t. ,Ur, ,,6y2004.R(Cgp) dated 4rh January, ?005 (lefining

lhe procedures fo be followed by lhe lnlervierv goards. The objectjve

of

I 1re inteNiew for personallty test is to assess the personai suitsbijity

r're candrdate lor the post for lvhich he/she has been
calted ior
oi

,.rerview fhe rdea is io find

out as -iirLtch as possrbte aboul ihe

candr0ale through iair and impartial assessment and assrgn rnarks

cased oi his,/her overall pedorma|ce in lhe rnlerview. ll is n61 69;9i, ,

:es: ol inowiEdge (whelher gen€ral or subleci malter) but Bn anempt tc

''leaSure anc assess wit.in ihe limtts Of the intervrew fcrmat the

pgtenlial oF the individual For being shap€cj inlo a compelent. dedicated

and honest officer who can be enlrusted vJith the onerous lasks and

'es pons, bil.tres tnat go wnh lhe pubJic service.

::r I

all select:ons throush'lhe .nethoo of intervrew. Ihe UpSC sets ug

fieNrer'/ Boards presided over by the Charrman or a f,4emDer oi lhe

Ccmrnission. Apart from the President, lhe board lvill have on it Dne,

hlc or moro oxpod Advisors who have specialized knorvledge and

I expenise to assess lhe candidales by asklng them questioris on ihe

ir

academic disciplines prsscribed in the adw. and on the areas, type and

evel of expenence possessed by them. They are chosen and engaged

)y lhe Comi"nrssron for oblaioing independenl expe( assistance al]d

aCyjce ir assessrng ine knowledge of the candidate in the concerired

' to<6'' T ,L=

E-
o."k'. ,,.
t'*"rb;sc' ''
 llr

..bieci aro h s sutlab,hty

1or llte ,ost in quesiion.
t Thet.also assess lne
)cienlral oi the Landioate
(
l he lnterujew boaro
have before it the information
for canclidates (lFC)
which gives the quallflcations
required and dufles
aflached to th€ post
ior lvhich the recruilmenr
is being macie. The president
alsc have
belore h,m the original applicatjon
submitted by the candidales
and
summary oF the academic
and other qualificaticns,
experience of the
candidates be jn9 intervjewed.

l ie candidares are .qalied for ifiierview Bfter scrutiny of

their
atpllcalioos cy lhe Commrssion.
The obtect of tne interyre!,/
rs tc
lssess ':e canotoa:e i st,,laoiI.ly .0. :,re Dosr
n q,es{,c. r \e
candroales are expected lto
have taken interest noi rn their o.ll
sublects ol acaderfrc study
but also in lhe evenls whlch are happenlng
arcund llrem The technique cf the intervi€ws
is not that of a crcss
exan-.inaticn, but o, a natural, though directed and purposrve
conversalion inlended to reveal the candidates n]enlai qualilies
and
rrsiher grasp of problems.

",2. 7^e appicant (tlLkesh Kumar

Suman. Roll No.gooa) rs one of the

randr0ate ior recrilitment lo 57 posts Assistanl Labour Commrsstole;

iCe nt ral)iAssisla n t Welfare Commrssioner (Cenlral) / Assistant LaboLrr

.'rerare Cornrrssiorer (Central) r Assistant Labour Commrssjoner

:Cenlral)/Assislant Welfalp Cu/rmission€r (Cenlrai)/Assistant Labour
l '.r/ellare Corlmlssioner (Central)/Assistant Director in Graoe V oi JTS

,rl Cenlrat Labour Service in the l!1inrstry oi Labour and Enrploymenl.

iie appircant lvas carled for iniervievr on 25.00.2014 after qualifying In

. l!r recrultrn€nl test helo on 04.08,2013.

Y
i

flle T r
) ""^
(D'L:
P
{
 t,s l5o

rr€ meri: crcer,,vas drawn by asigning rveightage

to bolir wi.itten as
rveri as inrervrev, marks, accqrding. to vihich
the applicant faileC lo
secure lhe rn,nrmunr quhlrfrng marks
ol wrjn€n lost plus inlBrviBlv (i.6.
2OO marks), hence could not flqure in the finat list declarod
on
1 7.06.2 01 4

ra,"! lvr
p;ras.1 The cortents of tho corrosponding para
of the OA, to the exrenr
ar oetng n:aner ol record. ieed no rcpty
Ho\,,ever, rl rs sL,brnttted thal

^: carse ci ac:on has accrued to lhe appljcanl ln !le\r cf

:iie
:!Llmrssrons maoe hereItabcve. the coFl6nt_
cf il-e cai.esDclnrj,.l)
I
;:ar;s cl lhe OA n6 1,,1na|. rap,r.
^ee4

1
tia as 233 The contents of the ccrresponding paras
of the OA. to the errent

,^f trerng o'raier cl record, neec, i)a reply However, it is leiterated that
no caLrse ol actlon has accrueJ to the applicant,
therefore, the question
ol lhe OA to be within the period ot tin.ritation or jurisdiciion
of this
, o,. bie Tr|bLrnal does not
aflsc

::.1.as.'i :a 2a fhe ccntents cf lhe correspondrno garas oi the CA.

except lhose belng matel Of record, 3re llrong. mrsleadrng

and
nlsco.ceived and hence vehemenfly denied. ln vie\r ol the

submtssions made heroinabove. ths contents of the corresponding

paras of the OA need no iurlher reply.

I
Pata-?,- That the contents of lhe corresponding para of the OA need no

'e: y for'ra'[ ol knowteoge.

I

,*'r',
-o;
:-ar..,.
T-/
q
\44

l-rr

Pa ras-Z8 & 29: Thal ,r) view of the submissions

made nereinabove. fhe
applicant is not entitled for any retief, interinl
and/or of ufh.troeuu,
natrlre

{
Paras-30 & 31: Need no reply.

PRAYER
ln view ot lhe submissions mado
h€r€irlabove, it is most respectFully
prayed that this llon'ble Tribunat
may graciously be pleased to
dismiss the OA
undBr reply

May also,pass any further

orde(s), as deemed just and proper
to meet
rne enas orjustiJe.

,/ERIF]CATION
Ode,,.lr_.... i...
I lhe deponent hereii. do ' contents of'i' l'o*<cz"- ""
verrry that the the #ove
shon reply affidavit to the OA ar€ true to
th€ best of my knowledge based or.l
records of the replying respondent
and the legal submissions therein are true
and correcl based on information re.eived
and believed to be true and nothing
r'r'ratenal has been suppressed
therefronr

Veriireo at Nerv Delhi on this

-_-_ day oi September, 2014.

Y'
DEPONENT
(rftc c<r)
I rD,EEP HNT)
gtaa \iiir" '"'"- l'' '" r'
I
{! rir' " ' ''
ur''9"":.;;r,, *'lJ',i"'

-l.PvE co
fy
,'L
{
 ')

lsa
i\ TI{I! HON' BI,[ CEN'IIIAI- ADi\4XJ\S|T[I{TIVI], TRIBI.JNAt,,
PIUNCIPI,E, B]'NCH. NE'W DBI,I{I

o.A2179t2014

IN THE MATTEII OF:

MIJKESIJ KIJMAR SWAry ....APPI,ICANT

V]]I{S I.JS]

UNIoN puuLIC srnvrcejcotttlssloN & oRS ....RESpoNDENTS

\\,RTTTEN ARGUMENTS ON BEI{ALF OF THE APPLICANT

}IOS'I }IU}IBI-Y SHOWETH:

BRII![ FACTS
l, That the Applicant begks relief against Final Result dated I 7.06.2014 fbr

5'/ lrosts of Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)/Assistant wellzue

(..rnmrssroner(Central)/Assistant l-abour Welfare Cornmissioner

(( enlral)/Assistant Director ofJuniol Tirne Scale (J'fS) ofCentral Labour

Service in the Ministry of LabouL & Ernployment advertised vide Special

llecruitment Advefiisement No. 5 I i201 I by tlre ll.espondern. (OA_ Page

to)
'lhat the Respondent issued Special Recruitment Adve(isernent No.

51/2013 for the post of Assistant l,abonr Comrnissioner

(Centlal)/Assistant Labour Welfar.e Comr:rissioner (Central)/Assis4ant

l-abour Welfare commissioner (Central)/Assistant Direcror in Crade V ol'

I
1l JLrnror Tjme Scale (JTS) of Cenrral l,abour Service (CLS) in thc Ministry

of Labour and Employment.(OA _page 15)

\.cv t- U/^/"/q
 ls-j
'l-iat
Applicanr was one of the jt.lost sllitable candidares as the Applicirnt

Iulfilled essential qualification.'Ihe Applicant has also complctcd lhc

dr:sirable qualification i,c. LL.B. frorn Faculty of I.aw Dclhi

UniversiN bcfore attending inierview and the same has bccrr

subrnitted to the Respondcnt No. tr before intcrview alongrvith othcr

d oc rr mcn ts,

l That the Applicant (Roll No. 00900,4) appearecl for Examindrion

conducted by the Respondent fbr 5'i posrs ol Assistant Labour

{ Commissioner'(Cenrral)/AssistantWelfareCornm issioner(Central)/Assista

nl Labour Wellale Comrnissioncr (Centr.al)/Assistant Director. ol Jr"rnior

'I-irne
Scaje (JTS) of Cenrra) .l-abour Ser.'yice in Lhe Ministry of LaboLrr.&

lirnployr:rent acivertised vitJe Special Recruitment .A,dvertisernent No.

ll
512013.

That the Applicanr appearod in the Recruitment Test held on 4rr,Augus[

{

2013 and successfuily cleared the cotnputer based recruitment test. Lalcr

he appealed for interviJw in which he could uot succeed, in spite of rhc

tact that he performed exceptionally weli in tire written examination.

(;
-[hrt
the Computer based Recruitment test of 100 mar.ks wer.e conducred

bl the Respondent on 04:08.2013. Result of this test was declarecl on

10.12.2013. 192 candidates provisionally qualified for in the Cornputer

Lrased Recruitment Tesl. (OA_ page 2l). Out of 192 candidates, t75

candidates rvere called foriinterview by the Respondenr. (OA_ pagc 23).

5? candidates finaliy qualified in the said recruitmenr process.

7. I har the Respondent

l

o. l, at Para 8 c.f the Pr.eliminarv Subrnissions of

Reply to OA has sLated.on oath:

i

".........It may be stated that only total marks scored by the

candidates in written interview are shared afrer

completion of the
st\' tr t / ,. ^,,t
Y
{
t."/
reCrutl.tnent pt Oce Is. Breaktqt of marks in ruriiien ancl interliel,t arc

nol shared. "

-[hat
E in contradiction to the abovesaid submission on ]2.11.20i4. thc

Respondent No. I put written and intt:rview mar.ks separately ol'lltc

ca.ndidates, who have appeared fbr intervir:rv in the impr.rgned recruiIntcrrl.

tor Assistant Labour Colnmissioner etc. on their,"vebsite.

-l'hat
9 aftel downloading the written and intervielv rnarks separately tlrc

r\pplrcant calne to l<nqw that the Applicant has scoreci one o1'the highcst

:ralks in the written eiamination but very poor marks were given in the

interview, 1'he Applicant scor.ed 75 marks out of 100 in the writr.c:rr

exarnination and was awarded only 40 n:arks out of 100 rnarks in the

interview. (Ilcjoincler.to R 2,3,7 etc _page l7). The Applicanr was nor

arvare of drese marks when rhe Applicant has Frled this Original

Application. But rh q Applicant's apprehension that intewiew pl.ocess

has been arbitrary, ltas colne true

r|RI1"t-[\ St]B]l ISSIONS

AI,LOTMINT OF MARI(S IN THE INTERVIBW \,VDI{[,;

ARBITRARY

10. Il is submilred that allolment of marks in the inter view has been arbitrar.y.

The Applicant has prepar.ed table of written ancl intervierv marlcs givcn

to 57 successful candidates as u,e1l as the Applicant in rhe iurpr.rgned

recnritment in descending order as per the writLen marks as under

on the
I
basis olmark sheets downloadecl fl.om the rvebsite of Respondent No. I

IJPSC (Rejoinder ro R 2,3, 7 etc _pag;e lg-75):

(
!

Tl\ rf
0.- t\ ur-2
 I(-s-
WRITTEN AND INTERVIEW MAITKS OT 57 STJCCIISS}'UL
C.4NDIDATES AND THD APPLICANT IN RtrCRUITMENT
TEST FOR POSITION OF ASSISTANT LABOUR
COMMISSIONER ETC.

Writte In Ie r"r,ie
Total
n
Sr.
Namc
No,
n"'n, n-o. lVIarl<
] -!Iarl$ Mr rks
I s

Resp No.
S r.rnr r I 19 62 r4r
2
I l

karunakaL
) Resp
No. l6
Jaga:rnath
Mohanty
'76
55 rr I

.) Resp No.7 Sachin Kurrar 75 61 ll6

;1 Applicaut Mukcsh Kumar

I
/5 40 I l5
Suman
Resp.
Rakesh Gar.rr 74 63 137
No.6

Resp No.5 Shoiabali

6
Hasanali Sayyad
73 6i LJ'

I
Resp Kanhu Charan
I 1
No.l8 Sahu
71 60 til
Resp 1l idhan Chandr a
s
No.l2 Nayak
10 63 I ]]3

Resp I Sunil Kumar

9 10 60 r30
No,22 .Sahu I

Resp
10 Maniicadan 6E 65 IJ-)
No.i I

Resp
L1 WasimLrl Haq 68 60
i\U,-J

Resp
lDhanlendra I
t? I(Lur.iar 68 58 t26
No.30
Himanshu

13 R-_t Ilahul Tyagi 67 b/ 131

I{esp Subapriyaoarshi
l4 67 57 taA
No.3 5 ni Muthupandi

\ \ ,^
",\Jr/Y
 (-/
Ir.-},t?
{

I Ilesp
15
I N0.41
V Il Ganeslran 67 55 )22

NI + /i
16 Resp No.3
66 74 I40

Ilesp
),7
No.3,1 66 58 1t4

Resp Pradyuurar.r
18
N0.44 I I(umar Ilana 55 5i 12t

l9 Resp No,8 ShubhLa Tyagi 65 10 135

Resp r.r I(urnal
2A
No.29 65 (,2 127
Jha
Resp
2l lVladhavan
No.i 6 65 5E 12i
Resp
22.
No.49 I ArLrl Sin13h 6_5
I
-55 120

Resp Chiranjee v
23
No.14 )a ll a 64 63 r32
Resp
No.l7 Srinr"L Dara 6.1 67 t3l
Ilesp
2_s
No.4j Prem I(urlar 64 51 12t

26- Nirmal Chandr.a

Resp No.4
Kar 63 75 lrt)
Resp Mohd. ImLan
27
L\O. ] J 63 69 132
.llaza
ta I
Resp
Nidhi Sharrna 6i 6ii r3l
No, l5

?.9
Resp Bi'swa Ranjan
No,19 Satpathy 63 67 130
I
l
l

Resp Sri Ashol<

l0
No.2 B l Perumala 6t, t27
Resp Mohanmad
JI
N0.47 Ozatr
63 5l 120

Resp Susanta Kutnai:

i2 I

No.20 Na ak
I
0l 68 130
I

Res p.,

No.2l An jaii Yadav 62 68 r30

{ I

l'+ Resp Mli::moy

l'Jo.2 6 Thakur' 62 (i5 i21

'f \-
i
( \/'r^'"'
 i'r$ ls?.
l5 Ilesp
N0.27 Anl<ur Dalal 62
I
6_5 I.,, I

Resp
i6 Resrni V
No, 10 6l 12 t-rJ

i r7 Resp
N0.25
I(shitij Jain 60 61 [7]
l

Resp Reega.laisingh
JE
No.46 Chauhar 60 6A r2o i

i9 Resp Sunil llaghunath

No..10 Maii 59 63 t22

!,4 Resp ,

No.3 8 Rajesh I(umar T 58 65 t23

Resp
11
Amardeep l
N0,54 58
I
50 li8
I
Resp
i 42 Rajeev Ranjan
No.24 I
57 t0 t27

43 Resp li
l
No.3 3 Beena 57 68 125

44 Resp
Nl}42 Renu Yadav 57 65
l L22

Resp
JJ Sagar Pladhan
N0.53 57 62 l19
I
{
I Resp
I
16 Basavraj
No.57 51 51 108

17 Resp Ram Kishan

No.3 7 56 61
;'Meena

.t3 I
Resp I(anagavel
No.31 Shanrnugave.l 55 7A I t2s

Resp Ashok
49 ,Vishal
No.48 ' Ar'..te 65 J20

I so Resp
No.3 2
lvldar azi Aiam
I(han 51 71 125

5i Resp Pravin Pandi

No.3 9 Mohandas 51 I 6El 122
I

\s_ \:>
I
 lsz
Resp Llarr Orn
52
No.50 I Gautam
54 55 lt9
I I{esp l
Harikesfh
<1
No.5l Bahadur
53 66 ll9

I{esp I-l itler

5rl
No.52
53 66 lt9
Thoudham

<i Resp
No.55
Womni I-loram 5l 6? ll5
Resp S Ravikanth
i6 52 ;i7 109
No.56 l{eddy
Resp Sar:tosh l(umar
57 5l 50 r0l
No.58 Sethy

Resp Nayan Manik

58 .Tripura 4-l 11 t2l
N0.45 I

I1. It is eviclent that in thl case ofthe Applicant, rhe marks ofthe interview

have proved determining. Even that the z\pplicant has scored one of the
I

highest marks in the written,test, the Applicant could not succeed. On the

otirer hand l{espondent No. 45 namely Nayan Manik Tripura scored only

,,l7 oLrt of 100 malks in wrilten examinal.ion, but was awarded 74 narks

in irterview and was selected, It can also be seen that no body lrom tirc

top ten scorer in the r{ritten examination have been given more than 65

rnalks in the interview, But on the other hand six out of l 0 lowest scorer

i:r rhe written examination have been awa.rdeci more than 65 marks rn the

intelvieq,. Three candidates out 1o IC) lowest scorer in the wlitten

cxanrination rvele given more than 70 marks.

-lhat
lZ. Applicant was one ofthe most suitable candidates as the Applicant

fulfilled essential qualification and the Applicant has also courpletccl the

desirabLe qualification i.e. L,L.B. frorn l;aculty of l-aw Deihi Llnivcrsity

betbre attending interview and the same has been submittecl to'thc

Respondent No. I before interview alongwith other doculnents. IlLrt

I
Despite tire same the Applicant was given one of the lowest rnar.ks itr thc

Y. t n,,d"r'
CI
 ls7
,
intervieu,. Irurther, the I{esponderrt No. I has hardly has takcn inr.o
l
I

consideration the dedirabie qualitloation, which was mentioneU in rhc

I{ecluitment Adveltisement

i3. Thar the:e is no clarity in the relevant adveltisement 5l/ZA 3, what rvus

,.he plocedu'e followed iu awarding inte:.view rnarks. it is not clear undcr

lltich heads marl<s have been awarded in the inrerview. It is further not

clear horv decision has been taken in tlte interview. h is iirrther not clear
* hat rveightage has been given ro tire de;ir.able qLralification. In absencc

o1'above said Iacts, the whole inter.view process becomes unfair, arbitr.ary

lunci unleasonable particularly when the weight age ol interviev,, is tortlrc

extenr o15004 rrarlcs of total marks (written .r, inter.view).

i
R. ALLOTMENT OF' 50% WDIGI,ITAGE OF INTEITVIEW MARKS;

'1'O TIIE TOTAL MARI(S {\?}TITTEN +INTTIRVIEW) MAKI,)S

I
SILIiCTION DETERMINISTIC, ARBITRARY AND \/IOLATIVIi

OF ARTICLE I4 OF CONSTITI,ITION
,

14. It is submitted that allotmeni of 50 % wei.ghtage of interviewrnu,ts to t[e

total marks (written + inrerview) mal<es rhe interview marl<s

{
I clererministic, uueasonable and ar.biu.ary, Wrifteu test ioses complete
i

relevance. h is evrdent with the example of the Applicant itseif.

l

15, h ts sr.rbmitted that scorilu every incLenrenral mar.i< in competitive

exa;ninafion is very tough and needs hard rvor-k, On the other. hand

atloning inrerview rnarks is discretionarv in natur.e.

16, Thlt Respondent condusts rccruitlneilt of various All lndia & Centr.al

Selvices. The weighrage of interview ir.r Indian Economic Ser.vice is

I

l.,.o6oi ol'rorrl rna:-l<s. The weighr age oIinLerview in Indian Sratisricel

Selvice is 16.66% of otal ritalks. -fhe r,veight age of inrerview in Indian

'ttr l'" \t-(

 l6o
l--ngineering service is I6.66% oftotaL marks. The rveight age ofinterview

rn Civil Service Examination is 13.58% of total n-ralks.

I
'Ihat
I
l:l the (lentlal Labour Service is also an organized service. Recruilntcnt
I

advertisement dicl not require any expelience for appearingl in this

exarnination. ln such circumstances weightage ol' interview of 50'X, ol'

total narks is urrfair, unreasonable and arbitrary. The candidate is toLllly

ar the disposal of whims, fancies and prejudices of the interview boald.

Firlther qualifying cLiteria in the interview to the extent of 50% lor gcncrll

category candidates and 45% ioL OBC candidates puts the candidates lt
I

rhe mercy of interview board and merit loses iomplete relevance.

ld.
'fhat lndra is country having valious religions and castes. Thele is l
possibility that persons in the il)tervjew boald uray carry certain

plejudices. ln sucir social scenario to give arl:itrary power to givc

int,,:r"riew malks to the extent of 50% of the totai marks is uniust, uniirir

and unreiuonable and contrary to law.

19. Ilon'ble Supreme Corfi and other Courts have consistently held that

excessive marks ir: thp inte5view will make selection process arbitraly.

llon'ble Supreme Coult has held in Ashok Kumar Yadav and Ors \/s

State of Haryana &Ors (1985)4SCC4l7 as under:

"27. We may now, in the background of this discussion, proceed lo

consider whether the. allocation of as high a percentage of markt

as 33.3 percent in case of ex-service officers and 22.2 percent in

case of other candidates, for the viya yoce test renders the selection

process arbitrary- So far as ex-sen,ice officers are corLcerned, there

can be no doubt that the percentage of marks allotted for the viva

voce test in t.\eir case.is undtrly high and it does suffer fronL the vice

of ttr bitrariness. lt has been Ttointed out b1'the Division Bench tn a

{
t-t /
?
 d
--'@r'/t
allq$
l
I lng pa)np l

aQ ot paau ailoluac.tad ?tll'rsauLt2)ltqtr l

Ji) lsll.aqr avullulla rcu /t ,tTstunatp

aJ epro u! puo ,ssawfi,trq)D
Lof aptar. .toop aqt suadr.t
ruac.racl , r, ,, l,ro* lo aiotuac.rad
r13tq o qcnslo uapnolle atlt lDtll stlor^qa
atolataql s! .!sal aco^
I
Data at1l ut 3u7,totu q?ry i\aputp.rout trD trq ts11 lLtaLu 31.1t ut ur:4tsocl

1\tnu do| ary ol paslDt aq pUoJ uottoLttutoxa

ual)tr| aql ut sl)tjLu
t.\)trtol o paLt?Dtqo otli| applpulJ o ,(lEutpuodsa.uoc puo )sa) ato^

t)t\t^ aqt u.! stl"tolu tsat.\al

?Ll wlll Bnp"tDAo
I

fq acot /b 1110 palcoul

;tg {1tsoa prua2 aLl 'uot)DLrLuDxa
u)r!..44 aqr,,,lrr,ro* tsa4a^tt..l aqt

f,).n1tas alDplpuDc olr uaaa asnocaq ,*,sacotd uallcaps I

atlt ut.tolco/
Suturwtalap D autocaq ot papuztl
lsal a)ott oA1^ Aqt 'uollt ulLuaxa
I

uallt)t all tr1 sl.totu poa.rds aqt o.t patodwoc a7.ro1

/o llsn,wtoua
lutaq ts arot bAlA atlt ut st1.ruur lo poa..tds .at11 .9y
lo aholuactac!
t1ltt1 (ptoutp.rour ot ttta pd4ow LlJtLtn\.slrDa
A0Z lo lotot a ut 1c 1

,\'D )/)tt^ sD snql sDt^ tsal azo^ D^t^ ut stl,toutllo paa.tds pun
/l I a.t;)n4
f)".ut)as e/"t2lu 1saq?ry aqt afqn4
0( a.ta/n pauroJqo q,out tsaMol I
;tt1l s'.titcrf{o a:tutras._xa./o asDc
ut lDt.l:t pu.g!.0/h ,tsat aoo^ D/r^ aqt
,

ut P?IttDtqo sJl.tout bql q utq aM ual4tt\ nB .yactac!

7.77 /b uorlD.t

ol lno .\'l.tot\
\crLlA\.9l.tDLu g6 fiuo )iuraq stllll uorlnutwoxa
ualtltnl
trt sT.tDLu.fb poatds atlt ,0lZ a.tatut s.tacy{o acmtas_xa.fb (toBaltc
aqt u! uo4buluDxa ua Ltl,t aL(
ut paurctqo sqtntu 1sa43u1 atlt
's'\.rbtu
69J LunrulmLu asaLlt tsutL,Bt) si:) puD 0B I ajD lsal axatr DtA aqt
.tct/ ttt 1rq8t1a .ro/ LlattDLuLun.,ya Lta1Ltt\ allt ut laal.nDtqo aq ol patutba.t

ellDLLt Lul.lLulu1lu aLlJ uoltDutLuoxa Lrat|ua at.lJ u1 qtout /b pr:a,rds

at1l ol pandwoc q?yl ,{1a1ou17t"tou1 sDtA
tsal aoo:,D(\ta ut el_tDLu

fo pae.tds aLfi 'pau,tarufi a.ro .s.tact//r.t acta.tas-xa

/u . o*att:s atlt
ul suoucaps luasa,td atp so .nj.ot,
toqt uotssnJsp alo.toqola {1"tm{
.'l

{?1
 {at
considering whal percentage. of nrurla ntay legitimatell,' l1t,

allocated for the viva voce test witl1out in cttring tl.e

reprLtach,af.

arbitrarine.ss it must be rememl.,ered that

ex_seryice of/icers woultl
{
I ordinarily be micldle aged persons of mature personality
and it
would be.hard on theit at tl,t<t age to go through a long u,riften

exantination involtting g strbjects and

hence it yvould not be unfair

ta requtre them to g, trtrough.shorter written exatninctrion in onr-v

5 subjcct,s and subntit to o vtvu voce

tc,rt c.at.rying u high percenruge

of marks than that mi,qht l,,t: prescribet! in case o[ )/ounger

candiclates. The personaliries rtl.the:;e ex_service
oflicers being./ull.v
I
nratttre and developed" it tuoulc! not be clifjicult to arrive at t1 Jait.
ossessntent of thgir merits on lhe ltasis
of searching and incisiv,c
I
i

viva voce tesl anh therefore in their case,

the viya yoce test ntu.y, fi1,

ac.corded relatively greater werght. But ln event

the marht ullocutctl

.fc.'t the fiva vace te,rt cannot be a,s high as j.3.3 percenr.,,

:0. H on 'bie Suprerne Court in .. The Dircctor Ge neral,Indian Council lirr.

Agriculfural Research & Ors Vs. D. Sundara
Raiu,, (201 l)6SCClt)S
has hcld as un der:

" <B. Nofault cak be jbund in the impugnted judgmen, in view

ol.thc
legal position wltich emerges o7", prop",
,r,rutiny of the /ctllou,ing
cases oJ this Court, namell, Ashc,k
Kumar yadav (supra), tlju.v

Hosia (supra), Lita Dhar gupra and Minor

A. peerikaruppan
/Supra). 50% marl<s allocared the
.[or intervie:nt were higl.v

excessive for the post of a principal Scientist ancl contrary t,t

setrled legal posirion crysralli,ed

fr.om a scries of judgments o1 thi.t
Court.

.I -Q-
j \ /v../
V Nz((
.-.
 leg
49 The appellants wer.e lotalh) tlnjustiJied in allocating 50(% mark.';

fbr the interview particulariy whett the appellants dicl not even

disclose to the respondent that the intenttew marks partic arly

when the appelllnts Qid not even tlisclose to the Respondent thctt

rhe intervieu' would also be held to evaluate suitability of tha

candidate /br the said post

54. The procedure ,evolved by the selection conntittee .fbr

evalualing the rcspondents was totally arbitrary and contrary to the

settled I egal positiotl.

It. Ilr.:l'ble Supreure Court has observecl in ,, Bisnu Visrvas & Ors Vs.

Union of India (UOI) and Ors" A1R20145C1570 ps under:

I

"20. ln the instant case, the rules of the game had been changes

after conducting the written test and admittedly not dt the stage of
I
inittatian of tlrc selection process. The marks allocatedfor the oral

interview had been lhe .same as for written test i.e. 51ak for eac:h.

The manner tnwhich ntarks have lteen awarded in the interview to

l
the candidates indiccited lack bf transparency. The candidates who

secured 47 marks out of 50 in the written test had been given onlv

20 marks in the intei.view vhile large number of candi(lates got

{ equal norks in the interview as itt the writrcn

I
exoninotit)n.
I

Candidates who secw:ed 34 marhi in the written exatninotiotl rvu.\

I

given 45 marlrs in the interview. Similarly, another candidute vyho

secured. 36 marl<s in thie written examination was awarded 4 5 murks

in rhe interview. The fact that today so callecl selected canclidotes

are not in employmenl, i:; also a relevant.factor to decide the cusc

finalLy. lf the whole selection is scrappecl mosr of rhe candiclates

I
v,otld be ineligiblL at least in respect of age as the advertisement

"I t- It \v$/*"
fo
 UL/

was issued nnre than six ),ears ago. ThtLs, in facts of this c:use tht'

di'ection o/ the High Court to'contitxLLe with the seLection proces.s

.forru the point it stood vitiated tloes not reqlire interference. hl

viev' of the above, the appe,al.s nre devoid ol merit und ctrLt
{
ac co rdi ngl1, dis m is.sed

1) 'lhat lecruitment of any type by the lespr:rndent

uot only has to be b1, a
i

plocedure estabiished by law, but aLso it has to be fair,.just and reasonablc.

Firltion o[ 50% weight age of intervierv of total marks (rvritter.r marks

- rnrervrew rnalks) and arbitraly qualifying ct'iterra in intetview is gross

vioiatior.r of Articie l4 and Iiable to be qr"rashed.

I-lon'ble Justice R. F, Nariman in "Shayara Eano Vs. lJnion of India

I
irrrd Ors" (Triple Taliq Casc) lYrit Petition (C) No. 1)8 of 20If has

observed as under:

/ \\. tt: d recent Constittttton Rench decision in Natural Resotrce,t

Ailocation, re, Special reJbrence NLt. I of 20 ) 2 this Court went into

the urbitrariness doctrine in son,re: detail. It referred to Royappa

I

(supra), Maneka Gandhi (Supra) and Ajay tlasia (Supra) and

quoted from para 16',vhich sayLzs tltat ( '.... the impugned legislative

ctction or executiye action woulcl be plainll, be arbitrary anh the

guaranlee o/ e q uali4t.under Articlc- l4 tvould be breached) .lt than

\t)enf on to state that " arbitrariness " and " mrea,sonabLeness " hav<t

been us ed interchangeably as.ft.tl Lows.

143. ls i.s evident frorn the aboye, the expressions "ar|>itrat ina"r

and unreasonableness ' have been used interchangeably untl itt

fact one has been definecl in terms of the other. l4ore rccentlf itt

Sharnn Transport Vs- Govt.fo A.P." this Cottrr has ob;;crved rts

tutder
rr
r/ Fa
v.,
 I
lav

25. In order to be de,tcrtbecl as arbitrary, it mr.tst be sholn i.lcrt i.l'

tvot n(,t reesdncrble and maniles y orbitrory. Tlte expressi,n

arbitrarily means ; in an unreasonable ntanner, as fxed or Jona
capriciously or at pleasure, tithout adequate cleterntittin,g
y:rinciple, not founderi in nature ofthings, nan_ratianal,
not clonc rtr

acting ctccording to reason or .iutlgtnent, depenc)ing on thd

wi/l
alone. "

c, rNTIRVIIIW MARKS AND QUALIT,YTNG NTARKS WEtr.ti Not.

D I SC LOSIiD IN THE ItECRUIT]VIII,NI- AD\/ERTISE,MENT

I-1. That the Responclent ir.: thi: saicl acivertiseulent stated that .x

IleclLritrnent Test of 100 rrarl<s will be freld followed by Inter.vicrv

tbr seleclion. The respecrive weil3htage of Recruitn.lent tesr an(l

i

interview shall be decided by the commission.

I
25, That in the whole process of the examination rhe Interview marks

wele nevel dis clo 5E d by the I(espondent. Transparerrcy and

accountability is rnajor component ofdemocracy. Unlorrunately the

Respondent did not choose to disclose tjre interview mal.ks. -the

--l- ir
weightage and totality of iniel-view rnarks were critical for the

intelview process and career of, candidates and shoulcl have been

i
disclosed publically at leasr before the interview. It sllows malaf.ide

intention and arbitrariness of.the Responden

26 'fhat all candidates

ar.e havrng the right to know the totaliry ancl

weightage of interview mar.ks. r,\ondisclost_u:e of intewiew lnarks

and quali$,ing criteria jn intervir:w if any during the process of

exarnination is gr(ss violarion of Siection a (I
)(c) and Section 4(l)

s
 tl/
..1 'lhat one of rhe aware and vigilant citizen filed the llTl with thc

I(espondent dated 06.12.2013, {n the reply the respondent told that

the rnarks of the interview was 100. It means that the weight agc 0l'

interview was 50 % of total tnarks (written matks + intervic\I

r:raLks). (OA _Pagc 32)

I 2S Tl:at another RTI was filed with the respondent regarding

qualilying marks in the interview by a socially consciotts citizcn ott

06.09.2013. (Page-34) It was disclosed that a genelal candidate hrrs

to get 50% malks and a OBC.canrJidate has ro get 45 % :narks ol'

total marks of interview to qualify in tlte ir.rterview. This criteliorr

lvas never published dr,rling whole process of interview. It also

means that a general category candidate have to get at least 50

marks ancl an OBC candiclate will have to get at leasr 45 Inarks otrt

of 100 rnarks tp qualify in interview. lt further means that ii' ir

general category candidate has topped in wrinen examinatiou artd

he gets less than 50 marks in intr:rview, he will be disqualificd.

Thrs rnakes the interview fulllter unjust, unfair, unreasonable and

albitlaly. In other AII India Services and Central Services there rrrc

no qualifying marks in intervier+.

29. It submined that putting quaiifying marks in intetview waslnot

rrentioned at $le time of Recruitment Advertisernent. There is no

record of pubiishing it before intervierv. Thus there could not have

been qualifying marks iu interview as per various judgrnent of

FIon'ble Sr"rprenre Cor.rrt.

I{on'ble Supreme Court has observes as uqder in " K. Manjushrce

Vs. State of A.P. & Ors" AtrR20085C1470.

.T-
lr
L
v N"
 t66
')4. Btrt whal cotLlci nc,t have been dotr,e was the secontl

change by inlroduction of'the criterion of minitnttm marks for

the tntervtetw. the minimun marks /br the interview had

never been adapted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court

carlier.for selection ol /-)irricr.(' .sesslons JutlBe.s (Gr'tdL

lI1. ln ,r.la rd lo the presenr seleclion, lhe Adntinistrative

Cc.,mmitee merelN adapte() tle previolLs procedtu'e in vo,qttct

'[he previous praceclure as slated abo\)e \ua,\ lt) tpl)l))

ntinimttm ntarhs on\,.for wriften examinalion and ru rttr llv

oral examinatiotl. We hLt|e re{errcd ro tlta 1'ro1rt

interpretatton of the earli.er resolutions dated 24.()7.2001

and 2t.2.2002 and heLd that \that utas atk\stetl tn

30.11.20A4 was only minimum ntclrlcs for wrilt,t'n

examinatiotx and nat for intenietts. Therefore, introtluclion

(
I
of the requiremenl of nrininturu marks flr inlen,iaw, rrlicr

tltc entire sclectiott proces.s (consisting ,tf writtt'tt

exantinalion and inlerviey') y,as contpleled, would tunourtl

lo charlging tlle rules o./ tlte game aJler llle game wns pkr.yad

whiclt is clearly impermis.sible. LYe are fortified in this victv

by seltersl clecisions oJ: this Cou'L lt is str/ficient lo refer yt

thrce o{ rhent P.K. Rantchand"a lycr Vs. l.Lniott of l,tt.'i,t

.
I
I
(1984)ILLJP 115C, Umesh Chandra ,lhttkla Vs. Union rl
lndia AIRl985SCl351 and Durgacharan Misra Vs. State o/
I

Orissa n( 1987).3SC1l I097.

3l Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Hennani Malhotra Vs, lligh Court

of Delhi" AIR 20A8 SC210.l has observed at Para 9 as under.:

'r -c Vtr 6t
,"
G2
 tt?
{
,
"l'here is no matter of doubt that the uthortlr* making rule,\

regulaling the selection can prescribe by n es the minimum

marks both for the wrltten examination and yiva voce, but if
minimum markti are not prescribed for vtva-voce before the

co mmencement of s election process, the authority concerne4

can not either .chLring the selection procds or aftet thc

{ .t e lec t i() t1 pracess add at1 additional

requirement/quaLrficatton that the candidate should also

.yectLre ntinimt,tnt ntarks in the interyie\|'. Therefore, thi.t cot.u t

is of the opinion: that pre.tcription of minimtnt. marks b)t the

ReSp,tp51un, at vive-\oce, tcst was illegal "

D, SIII,ECTION OiI CANDIDATES WITHOT]T IJAVINC

ISS I]NTIAL Q UAI,IFICATION

I

)/ TIrar in the Special lecluitrnent advertisement 511201,3, el;sential urrcl

des;rable qualification frad been prescribed. The essential qualification

prescribed was diploma in social work/labour welfale/l ndustritl

le.aLlons,personne) :nanagernent/labour law fronr recognized univu'rsity or'

eqLuvalent, The desirable qualification plescribed rvas degree in law l'r'orn

recogonized r"rniversiry, In RTI reply dated September'2013 it was statccl

th:Lt essential qualification has not been relaxed. (OA_lrage35) But uranv

a:mcloates nave been selecleci who clo not seern to have essentiul

qualificatior.r as adve sed in the Special Recluitment advertjselnelt

5 1/20 1 3.

-)J lire Applicant has :ollecrecl details of candidates who do not havc

<..sc..'i.r. q.ralificarior. fronr drart scnior.iry Iist oiJr.nior Tirle Scalc iJ-l-S1

ofllcers of Central Labour Service upto inclusion of 20 1 2- i j batch oi.ll S

otficel uploaded on Website. (Annexure Ag herein)

-rr
Y
 I t68

Sr. No, Candiciate

QuaJifications Hssential
Neme
Qualification as pct
Adv edisement
Surnit B .Com, M.Com

Rajesh Kumar
Di plorna in irl
T,
Work/Labour
(Respondent
Welfale/Industr.ial
No. 3 8)
Relation,/Per.somel
Managetnen/Labour.

Plavi n
Pandi B.(lom, I,L,B.,
Mohandas I-L,M,
(Responden
No.39
Ankur Dalal B,A. I-L .8,, LL.M
(Respondenr
No.27
j Anjali Yadav
(Respondenr
No.2i
6 S n u bh ra Tyag
(Re SPO n d en
No. 8
1 Reshni V. I LL.B , I,I,,M,
(Respondent
No, l0 )

l
E li,lanikadan N LL,B,
(Respondent
I No. ll

i4. It is subrnined rhat candidates who

was not havilg essential qualilication
at the relevant date could
not have been callecl for interview
or givcn
app0lntnent. Their appointment
l are void and illegal ab
injtlo.

PR.AYER

the tacrs and circrLmstances

Il-r
oUthe case, tJre Hon,ble
Tribunal n:ay be pieasccl
to granr rhe reliefs as prayed
in,O.A.

il-,
APPLICANI',IN-PBRSON
u 1)qr1a/-^A, )-*

{
.l
i
Date; 1_\i g utY
Pl:,c e
lRU E GtY
&
 M1
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ORIGINAL CIVIL WRIT JUzuSDICTION
W.P. (CIVIL) NO: OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KRISHNA ......PETITIONER

VERSUS

LINION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

......RESPONDENTS

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION I5I OF C.P.C ON

BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER SEEKING STAY OF THE

OPERATION OF THE ORDER DATED 18.09.2018 PASSED

BY THE LEARNED CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE

TRIBUNAL IN O.A. NO. 2179 OF 2014 TITLED AS
.MUKESH KUMAR SUMAN VERSUS
UNION PUBLIC
SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS' TO THE EXTENT IT
DIRECTS THE RESPONDENT NO. I TO REDO THE
EXERCISE BY RESTRICTING THE MARKS TO BE

ALLOCATED FOR INTERVIEW TO I57O, WITHOUT

INSISTING ON THE MINIMUM MARKS THEREIN, AND

THEN TO PUBLISH THE RESULTS

Most Respectfully Showeth;

l. That the Petitioner has fited the accompanying Writ petition under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying inter-alia for an

 t?o
appropriate order, direction or writ including a writ of
Cer-tiorari for

quashing the order dated 18.09.2018 passed by the Ld.

Central

Administrative Tribunal in O.A No. 2179 of 2014titled as ,Mukesh

Kumar Suman Vs. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.' to the

extent it directs the Respondent No. 1 to redo the exercise by

restricting the marks to be allocated for interview l5%, without

insisting on the minimum marks therein, and then to publish the

results; Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing the entire recruitment

process and a further writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent

No. 1 to carry out a fresh process of selection for the post of

Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Labour

Welfare Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Director in Grade-V of

Junior Time Scale (JTS) of Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry

of Labour & Employment in accordance with the prescribed norms

and after issuing an advertisement in this regard; An appropriate

order, direction or writ including a writ of Certiorari declaring the

process ofselection for appointment to the post of Assistant Labour

Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioner

(Central)/ Assistant Director in Grade-V of Junior Time Scale (JTS)

of Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry of Labour &

Employment, to be illegal. The facts and submissions contained in

the accompanying Petition are not being repeated herein for the sake

of brevity and to avoid prolixity. However, the same may kindly be

read as a part of the presenr Application.

 t+l
2. The Petitioner states that the Impugned Order passed
by the Leamed

Tribunal is grossly erroneous and incorrect to the extent it directs

the Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting the marks

to be allocated for interview l5%, without insisting on the minimum

marks therein, and then to publish the results. While passing the

Impugned Order, the Ld. Tribunal failed to deliberate on the rwo

prominent issues raised by the petitioner (Sh. Mukesh Kumar

Suman) therein i.e. (l) non-fulfillment of essential and desirable

educational qualifications by few ofthe selected candidates and; (II)
the candidates short listed for the interview did not have the name

of three candidates namely Sh. Kanagavel pandiyan Shanmugavel

(Roll No. 008396), Sh. Wonmi Horam (Roll No. 011056) and Sh.

Washimul Haq (Roll No. 005640); yet they were selected and

consequently appointed; and has passed the order without

appreciating the documentary evidence available on record.

3. It is submitted that the aforesaid issues unambiguously show tlat

ineligible persons have been inducted and have found place in the

list ofappointed candidates. Thus, the entire selection process being

incorporated with illegalities, ought to have been cancelled as a

whole and a fresh process ofselection for the various aforesaid posts

be initiated in accordance with the prescribed norms after issuing

an advertisement in this regard.

4. It is stated that the Ld. Tribunal, while holding that the entire

selection process was vitiated and consequently correctly setting

 tVz
aside the selections made in pursuance of
the advertisement to the

various posts, showed leniency and benevolence

in the case and
wrongfully directed the Respondent No. 1 to redo the exercise by

restricting the marks to be allocated for interview to

15%. on the

contrary, the appropriate course is to cancel the entire

selection

process in entirety and to initiate the process afresh

for the various
posts namely Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)/
Assistant

Labour Welfare Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Director in

Grade-V of Junior Time Scale (JTS) of Central Labour Service

(CLS), Ministry of Labour & Employment, in accordance

with the
prescribed norms and aller issuing an advertisement
in this regard.

5. The Ld. Tribunal failed to take note of the fact that irrespective of
the percentage of allocation of marks for the interview, the

ineligible persons, who do not possess the essential educational

qualification have found place in the list of candidates shortlisted

for the interview and have consequently been selected by the

Respondent No. 1. Thus, the entire selection process being

incorporated with illegalities, ought to have been cancelled

as a

whole and a fresh process ofselection for the various aforesaid posts

be initiated in accordance with the prescribed norms after issuing

an adveftisement in this regard.

6. By doing so, the Ld. Tribunal has adversely affected the case ofthe
Petitioner and other similarly situated persons in as much
as many

persons who do not possess the requisite qualification prescribed

by
 t+\
the Respondent No. 1 might be selected for
the posts again which

will, in normal course, be filled up from amongst the qualified

candidates.

7 ' Thar the Petitioner has a strong prima t'acie case in his
favour and

there is every likelihood of his succeeding in the writ petition.

The

balance of convenience lies in favour of the petitioner

and against

the Respondents. In the event the relief(s) claimed herein

are not

granted in favour of the petitioner, it would cause irreparable loss

and injury to the Petitioner which cannot be compensated

in terms
of money.

PRAYER

It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon,ble Couft mav

kindly be pleased to allow the present application and:

a) Stay the operation ofthe order dated 1g.09.201g passed by the Ld.

central Administrative Tribunal in o.A No. 2179 of 2014 titred as

'Mukesh Kumar Suman Vs. Union public Service Commission &

Ors.' to the extent it directs the Respondent No. I to redo the

exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated for interview 1502,

without insisting on the minimum marks therein, and then to publish

the results, till the disposal of the accompanying petition;

 lVtl
Pass any other or further order(s) which this
Hon,ble Court may deem fit
and proper in the facts and circumstances ofthe present
case.

Place: New Delhi

Dated: flq. 9,11
7i^,y/,"
tioner
Through

SuRBtrr lrrn*rr il & t Mangla

vocates
204, Supreme Court Lawyers, Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane
New Delhi-11000i
Tel: 9899948838
E-mail: admin@prismlaw.in
 t+s
IN TFIE HON'BLE HIGH COLRT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
w.p. (Civil) No: of Z0]r9

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KzuSHNA ...PETITIONER
VERSUS

LTNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS ...RESPONDENTS

AFFIDAVTT

I, Pati Krishna S/o Sh. Pati Kali Das aged 34 years R/o: House No. 2/199,

Tamsam Street, Gopalpur on Sea, Dist. Ganjam, Odisha-761002 and presently

at Delhi do hereby solemnly affirm, declare and submit as under:

1. That I am the Petitioner in the above-mentioned petition and am well aware of

the facts and circumstances ofthe case, as such, I am competent to swear this

affidavit in the present proceedings.

2. That the accompanying application, contents ofwhich may be read as part and

parcel of the present petition, has been drafted under my instructions and the

same are not being repeaied he for the sake of brevity. I have gone through
(;
the contents ofthe same w ETIq cerrect to my personal knowledge

and belief. * i.r. .r,- .i.171

/'Dt{,''/t-'Y[^ c
1C
' D"pon"nt
N
1e
Delhi on this _ day of May 20 19 that the contents of the above

affidavit are tnre and correct to my knowledge and nothing material has been
q:ERTIFIE !J DE r:..i:
concealed therefrom. gA
Di

thal

IJU9 A COfr e{:l rr i r.,

)1
? g MAY 2019
 tH
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

OzuGINAL CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION

W.P. (CIVIL) NO: OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KRISHNA ......PETITIONER
VERSUS

LINION PIJtsLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 15I C.P.C ;ffi;:HT:

THE PETITIONER SEEKING LEAVE TO EXEMPTION FROM
FILING THE LEGIBILE COPY OF DOCUMENTS WITH
APPROPRIATE PAGE MARGIN AND ORIGINAL/ CERTIFIED
COPY OF ANNEXURES TO THE PETITION

Most Respectfully Showeth;

1. That the Petitioner has filed the accompanying writ petition under Article

226 of the Constitution oflndia praying inter-alia for an appropriate order,

direction or writ including a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated

I 8.09.201 8 passed by the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A No.

2179 of 2014 titled as 'Mukesh Kumar Suman Vs. Union public Service

Commission & Ors.' to the extent it directs the Respondent No. 1 to redo

the exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated for interview 15%,

without insisting on the minimum marks therein, and then to publish the

results; Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing the entire recruitment

process and a futher writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1

to carry out a fresh process of selection for the post of Assistant Labour

Commissioner (Central)/ Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioner

 tT+
(central)/ Assistant Director in Grade-V of Junior Time Scale (JTS)
of
Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry of Labour & Employment in

accordance with the prescribed norms and after issuing an advertisement

in this regard; An appropriate order, direction or writ including a writ

of
certiorari declaring the process ofselection for appointment to the post of

Assistant Labour commissioner (centrar)/ Assistanr Labour welfare

commissioner (central)i Assistant Director in Grade-V of Junior Time

Scale (JTS) of Central Labour Service (CLS), Ministry of Labour &

Employment, to be illegal.

2' The facts and submissions contained in the accompanying petition

are not

being repeated herein for the sake of brevity and to avoid prolixity.

However, the same may kindly be read as a part of the present Application.

3. That along with the petition, the petitioner has filed various documents

including copy ofthe order dated 1g.09.20rg passed by the Ld. central

Administrative Tribunal in o.A No. 2179 of 2or4 titled as ,Mukesh

Kumar Suman Vs. Union public Service Commission & Ors.,, copy of
the

original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals

Act' 1985 filed by the petitioner therein, reply to the said Application filed

by the Respondent No. t herein, amongst others.

4' That the Petitioner submits that due to urgency of the

matter. certified
copy andior legible copies with appropriate page
margin of few
documents, which are being annexed with
the petition could not be filed

as per the rules framed by this Hon,ble

Courl in this regard.
5 The Petitioner undertakes to file the documents to the Hon'bre
l7a
Court &
other documents at the time of trial as per the Rures and guidelines issued

by this Hon'ble Court or within a period of twelve weeks from filing of

the above petition or within such time as directed by this Hon,ble Court.

6 That the Petitioner submits that due to urgency of the matter, few

documents which are being annexed with the petition, could not be filed

with appropriate page margins as per rhe Rules framed by this Hon,ble

Court in this regard.

7. That further some of the photocopy ofthe documents filed are dim and the

clearer copies of the same could not be filed due to urgency of the matter.

8. That the Petitioner undertakes to file clear and legibte copies of the said

documents along with the appropriate page margins of the documents filed

as per the rules and guidelines issued by this Hon'ble Court within a period

of twelve weeks lrom fiting of the above petition or within such time to

be directed by this Hon'bte Court.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most respectfutly prayed that in the interest ofjustice this

Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

a. Grant exemption from filing certified copy of the documents annexed with

the Petition;

b. Grant exemption from filing the legibte/ clearer photocopy of the

documents along with the Petition;

c. Grant exemption from filing documents with appropriate page margins

along with the Petition;

 tw
Pass any other or further order(s) which this Hon,ble Court may
deem fit
and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

Place: New Delhi

Dated:p{.9, 1q
/2a-0"'l'"'lrf^
Petitioner
"
Through

SvrlBfir SLtRqI.{n & t

ocates
204, Supreme Court Lawyers' Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane
New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838
E-mai1: smlaw.in
 tgo
IN T}IE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P. (Civil) No: of 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KzuSHNA ...PETITIONER
VERSUS

T]NION PIIBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS ...RESPONDENTS

AFFIDAVIT

I, Pati Krishna S/o Sh. Pati Kali Das aged 34 years R/o: House No. 2/199,

Tamsam Street, Gopalpur on Sea, Dist. Ganjam, Odisha-761002 and presently

at Delhi do hereby solemnly affirm, declare and submit as under:

1. That I am the Petitioner in the above-mentioned petition and am well aware of

the facts and circumstances ofthe case, as such, I am competent to swear this

affidavit in the present proceedings.

2. That the accompanying application, contents ofwhich may be read as part and

t petition, has been drafted under my instructions and the

t,
same are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity. I have gone through

i the contents ofthe s ,"i; which are true and correct to my personal knowledge
bnd belief. /
.-i '
//aar:P'-'nt"'
Deponent

?SfiTff%ttEoN
this _ day of May 2019 thatthe contents of the above

correct to my knowledge and nothing material has been

dr, tTtFlED DE NI
S, ir i/
S/o.

hes
lK^ ,M-*
v
lhat tro Cc/rl}I, ,
..i've b€€n tet.i Deponent
/- /
An 7.1
D' Itn
rL.. 39rllAt,t)tg
* r
 lBt
IN TT{E HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
OzuGINAL CIVIL WzuT JI.]RISDICTION

C.M. NO: OF 2019

IN
W.P. (CIVIL) NO: _ OF 2019
IN THE MATTER OF:
PATI KRISHNA ......PETITIONER
VERSUS

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

......RESPONDENTS

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 15I OF THE CODE OF

CIVIL PROCEDURE ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER

SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE THE WRIT PETITION

Most Respectfully Showeth;

l That the Petitioner has instituted the accompanying writ petition

against the Respondents and the contents thereof are not being

repeated herein for the sake of brevity and may kindly be read as an

integral part of this application also.

2. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the Order dated I 8.09.201 8 passed

by the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal') in O.A No.

2179 of 201! titled as 'Mukesh Kumar Suman Vs. Union Public

Service Commission & Ors.', seeks to impugn the same to the limited

extent that it directs the Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by

restricting the marks to be allocated for interview Io | 5o/o, instead of

 t8r
scrapping of the selection process in its entirety including scrapping

of the entire examination, in the light of detailed facts, circumstances

and grounds narrated hereinafter. The Ld. Tribunal was entitled to

exercise discretion and cancel the entire recruitment process instead

of directing the Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting

the marks to be allocated lor interview to | 5o/o, without insisting on

minimum marks therein.

3. That although the Petitioner was not a party to the proceedings before

the Ld. Tribunal, yet he is vitally interested in the case in as much as

his chances of selection and consequent appointment has been

severely affected despite being qualified. The petitioner is a similarly

situated person like Sh. Mukesh Kumar Suman i.e. the petitioner

before the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal who has fallen prey to

the unconstitutional and arbitrary selection process ofthe Respondent

No. l. The Petitioner herein had exhibited excellent performance in so

far as written examination is concemed but has remained unsuccessful

for the reason ofnot securing 50o% marks in the interview despite the

fact that the notification issued by the Respondent No. I did not

specify the marks to be allocated for written test on the one hand and

interview on the other. The weightage to the interview has virtually

become the only determinative f-actor in relation to the result of the

entire process.

4. The Petitioner states that the Impugned Order passed by the Leamed

Tribunal is grossly erroneous and incorrect to the extent it directs the

 483
Respondent No. I to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to be

allocated for interview l5%, without insisting on the minimum marks

therein, and then to publish the results. While passing the Impugned

Order, the Ld. Tribunal failed to deliberate on the two prominent

issues raised by the Petitioner (Sh. Mukesh Kumar Suman) therein i.e.

(I) non-fulfillment of essential and desirable educational qualifications

by few of the selected candidates and; (II) the candidates short listed

for the interview did not have the name of three candidates namely Sh.

Kanagavel Pandiyan Shanmugavel (Roll No. 008396), Sh. Wonmi

Horam (Roll No. 0l 1056) and Sh. Washimul Haq (Roll No. 005640);

yet they were selected and consequently appointed; and has passed the

order without appreciating the documentary evidence available on

record.

5. The Ld. Tribunal was entitled to exercise discretion and cancel the

entire recruitment process instead of directing the Respondent No. I

to redo the exercise by restricting the marks to be allocated for

interview to 15%, without insisting on minimum marks therein. Thus,

the same needs to be set aside bv this Hon'bte Court.

PRAYER

In these facts and circumstances of the case, it is most respectfully

prayed before this Hon'ble Court that it may graciously be pleased to:

(a) Grant leave to the Petitioner to 1lle the present writ petition in

accordance with rules and law: and

 lgLt \p g
Pass other and further such order(s) as deemed fit and proper in the facts
and circumstances of the case.

Place: Delhi

oatea: p!.9. 1l

2fi1i1
-
f,,,1!4 -,-
/ P",irio.r..
Through -
5u9-8tit St{Af'tA & t
Advocates
204, Lawyers' Chambers, C.K. Daphtary Block
Tilak Lane, New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838
Email : ankit.mangla@prismlaw.in
 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
I 8r
W.P. (Civil) No: of 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KzuSHNA ...PETITIONER
VERSUS

LINION PI.'BLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS ...RESPONDENTS

AFFIDAVIT

I, Pati Krishna S/o Sh. Pati Kali Das aged 34 years fuo: House No. 2/199,

Tamsam Street, Gopalpur on Sea, Dist. Ganjam, Odisha-761002 and presently

at Delhi do hereby solemnly affirm, deciare and submit as under:

1. That I am the Petitioner in the above-mentioned petition and am well aware of

the facts and circumstances ofthe case, as such, I am competent to swear this

affidavit in the present proceedings.

2. That the accompanying application, contents of which may be read as parl and

parcel of the present petition, has been drafted under my instructions and the

same are not being repe ated for the sake ofbrevi ty. I have gone through

the contents ofthe s

A d correct to my personal knowledge
TIRAIH SIN
ADVOCATE
and belief.
:+ DELH'
Ro.9d lvo. 6374
pn-d:f*,[/-c
r.,r-y-:r.2J / o.oon"rr..-
TION
on this I,&MU,n that the contents of the above

knowledge and nothing material has been

con .DE NEN

Sr /S
c...,
//a-4"K.t4.-"
Si

tdeniitied bY S "Zl' .)1

D.ponert
ir itt !hi' 4.. ,,
j ,.rre ui{el i!.l:.
:r., , . .rd i)Or ri?; ' 1' '
&,A y ?0lg
 t86
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ORIGINAL CIVIL WRIT JUzuSDICTION

W.P. (CIV[) NO:_ OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KzuSHNA ......PETITIONER
VERSUS

LINION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS

.....'RESPONDENTS
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Petitioner is filing the complete set of O.A. No:

2179 of 2014 along with all the annexures thereto as well as pleadings

therein. Complete record has been filed and no additional document has

been filed by the Petitioner.

Place: New Delhi

Dated.P!.9. 11
Petitioner
Through

SuPtst4l S+{neun &

Advocates
204, Supreme Court Lawy ' Chambers
C.K. Daphtary Block, Tilak Lane
New Delhi-110001
Tel: 9899948838
E-mail : admin@prismlaw.in
 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AT NEW DELHI
W.P. (Civil) No: of 2019
l8V
IN THE MATTER OF:

PATI KRISHNA
...PETITIONER

VERSUS

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS ...RESPONDENTS

KNow ALL to whom these present shall come that I, pati Krishna S/o sh. pati Kali Das aged 34
years R/o: House No. 2/199, Tamsam Street, Goparpur on Sea, Dist.
Ganjam, odisha-76r002,
presently at New Delhi do hereby solemnly affirm that I am Petitioner in the
above matter and
do hereby appoint .-i-;z---' Mr, Ankit Mangla, Ms. Mehak Khurana, Ms. Surbhi
Sharma and Mr. Sahil Singhal, 204, Supreme Court Lawyers' Chamber, C.K. Daphtary
Block' Tilak Lane, New Delhi - 110001 (herein after called the advocate/s) to be my/our Advocate
in the above-noted matter and I/we authorize him/them:-
To act, appear and plead in the above-noted case in this court or in any other Court in which
the same may be tried or heard and also in the appellate court including High coun subject to
payment offees separately for each court by me/us.
To sign file, verify and present pleadings, appeals cross-objections or petitions for executions
review, revision, withdrawal, compromise or other petitions or affidavits or other documents as may
be deemed necessary or proper for the prosecution of the said case in all its stages subjects to
pa),Tnent of fees for each stage.
To file and take back documents, to admit and/or deny the documents ofopposite party.
To withdraw or compromise the said case or submit to arbitration any differences or disputes
that may arise touching or in any manner relating to the said case.
To take execution pleadings.
The deposit, draw and receive money. cheques. cash and grant receipts hereof and to do all
other acts and things which may be necessary to be done for the progress and in the course of the
prosecution ofthe said case.
To appoint and instruct any other legal practitioner authorizing him to exercise the power
and authority hereby confened upon the Advocate whenever he may think fit to do so and to sign
the power of attomey on our behalf.
And Vwe the undersigned do hereby agree to ratify and confirm all acts done by the Advocate
or his substitute in the matter as my/our own acts, as ifdone by me/us to all intents pulpose.
And I/we undertake that l/we or my/our duly authorized agent would appear in court on all
hearings and will inform the Advocate for appearance when the case is called.
And Vwe undersigned do hereby agree not to hold the advocate ofhis substitute responsible
for the result ofthe said case. The adjoumment costs whenever ordered bv the coul-t shall be ofthe
Advocate which he shall receive and retain for himself.
And I/we undersigned do hereby agree that in the event ofthe whole or part ofthe fee agreed
by me/us to be paid to the advocate remaining unpaid he shall be entitled to withdraw from the
prosecution of the said case until the sanle is paid up. The fee settled is only for the above
case and
above Court. VWe hereby agree that once the fee is paid, IiWe will not be entitled for the refund o1
the same in any case whatsoever and if the case prolongs for more than 3 years the original fee shall
be paid again by me/us.

IN WITNESS WHERE oF I/We do here in to set my/our hand to these presents the contents of
which have been understood by me/us on this
{{ dayofMay,2019.
Accepted subject to the lerms of the lees

\S,.,-t,'J
\tD trt^*
*"* //a/'tg"'
nt &,h q cli.nt
t I t))^r*'z ll+ri cttlu.a)
I \ -r',8
h^ ,q^$ 9l"o t t'
-q