Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Math Statement
Anita Youngman
ED 698
YOUNGMAN MATH STATEMENT 2
Math
Teachers know, understand, and use the major concepts and procedures that define
number and operations, algebra, geometry, measurement, and data analysis and probability. In
doing so they consistently engage problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication,
connections, and representation. In these math fluency lessons students work to gain automatic
recall of math facts, creating the foundations for the more abstract, higher level thinking math.
Fluency can be incorporated into a daily math routine as students work on fluency in number
Our Kindergarten math begins with a routine of daily fluency lessons, this is a signal to
the class that math has begun. The time it takes to deliver and manage a quick fluency check
takes about ten minutes, a small portion of our math block of learning. I have observed over
time that as students become fluent in a variety of math facts they begin to have more fun
engaging in math games and work. In a study on math automaticity by Axtell, McCallum, Mee
if a student has to actively think about the answer to 5x5 in an algebraic equation,
he/she has fewer cognitive resources to think about the next step in an algebraic
algorithm. As such, this increases the time and effort it takes to complete complex
math problems. Not only does this increased time and effort hamper more complex
As this quote suggests, the more comfortable students become with math facts, and fluency, the
more comfortable they will become with abstract concepts and numeracy.
YOUNGMAN MATH STATEMENT 3
Fluency work in my Kindergarten is set up similarly to the math fluency artifact. The
fluency worksheets are a one minute timed test. Old medals are re-used and given to students
when they pass a test. The medals along with being deemed a math master for the day works as
a reward system. Math masters then work to help everyone else finish or correct the problems on
their worksheets. This behaviorist reward system makes the start to our math day extremely
motivational for the students, and the students are enthusiastically working on developing math
fact knowledge. Research by Poncy, McCallum, & Schmitt, (2010) stated, “the study provides
support that behaviorally oriented instructional methods result in increased rates of learning
when compared to constructivist-influenced instruction.” (p. 925) I see the benefits of this
behaviorist approach to learning math facts for the beginning of our hour long math block
however, the rest of our math is designed around constructivist learning with games and small
group work.
Math fluency alone is not the answer to students understanding of math concepts, it is just
the muscle that “mathletes” need to play the games. Math numeracy is just as important as
fluency, and this is where constructivist teaching comes into play. In a research study about
kindergarten students playing games, LeFevre, Skwarchuk, Smith-Chant, Fast, & Kamawar,
(2009) explain, “ intervention studies support the correlational conclusions from the present
research: Children’s indirect experiences with numbers, particularly in motivation contexts such
as games, may be important contributors to their preparation for numeracy experiences in the
early grades.” (p.63) Alone fluency is not the answer to hold student interest, however,
transferring the fluency skills to games, makes math enjoyable for students.
YOUNGMAN MATH STATEMENT 4
All aspects of math can be enjoyable, even the seemingly mundane work of rote
memorization can be revitalized with some resourcefulness. According to Zager, (2016) “Our
students arrive in kindergarten with powerful mathematical ideas, observations, and wonderings.
If we create the most favorable conditions we can for all students, we’ll equip them to enjoy
mathematics all their lives.” (p. 356) By giving students opportunities to play math games and
feel confident in their math abilities, learning and teaching math is enjoyable.
YOUNGMAN MATH STATEMENT 5
References
Axtell, P.K. McCallum, R.S., Mee Bell, S., & Poncy, B. (2009). Developing math automaticity
using a classwide fluency building procedure for middle school students: A preliminary
Lefevre, J.-A., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Smith-Chant, B.L., Fast, L., &Kamawar, D. (2009). Home
numeracy experiences and children’s math performance in the early school years.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014532
Poncy, B. C., McCallum, E., & Schmitt, A.J. (2010). A comparison of behavioral and
Zager, T. (2016). Becoming the Math Teacher You Wish You’d Had : Ideas and Strategies From
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1457761&site=eds-live