FKCCI AUDITORIUM,BANGALORE COMPARISION

Project : FKCCI AUDITORIUM

Comparison between all 3 options

Option-1 : Centralized Chilled Water System with Radiant Option-2 : Centralized Chilled Water System with Ductable
Sl No
cooling for Auditorium AC for Auditorium

1 Negligible Maintenance Cost Maintenance Cost is average

Space saving due to elimination of duct work, reducing Space required for Air handling units.ducting etc
2 construction costs
3 Absolutely noiseless & vibration free Noice & sound will be there
4 Life period of 50 years Life period of 20 years
Not Possible throughout life period
5 Uniform system efficiency levels, throughout its life period
Shall be possible
Hygienic, does not lead to cold shock, provides a gentle,
6 naturally pleasant & soothing cooling effect
7 Does not produce any draf Not possible
Constant temperature maintenance not possible through out
year
Can also be used for heating purposes in cold climates,
providing constant indoor temp for 365 days, irrespective of
8 external hot or cold temperatures

In this system First cost & operational cost will be less as

9 compare to other two options First cost & operational cost will be more than option-1

Ralys Consulting Engineers, Bangalore page 1 of 2

FKCCI AUDITORIUM,BANGALORE COMPARISION

Option-3 : Centralized VRV System with Ductable AC

for Auditorium

Maintenance Cost is more

Same as option-2

Same as option-2
Life period of 10 years
Same as option-2

Same as option-2

Not possible
Same as option-2

First cost & operational cost will be more as compare to

option-1 & 2

Ralys Consulting Engineers, Bangalore page 2 of 2