Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
(MPSW5013/PPSW6013)
PREPARED FOR:
PREPARED BY:
1
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
MPSW5013/PPSW6013
ASSIGNMENT 4
INSTRUCTIONS:
a) Use R software (R Studio)/SPSS/Any Software to complete this assignment.
b) There is only one submission for this assignment. Put all your R code, commands, answers and
respective graph in the report.
There has been a concern to the top management of UTeM over the continuously low achievements in
Mathematics and Statistics courses among UTeM’s first and second year students. One of the main reasons,
which has been commonly raised, is due to their inherited lack of Mathematics Competency before entering
UTeM. An initiative was conducted to test mathematics competency to all UTeM’s first year students in an
attempt to find remedial actions to the problem. The (regenerated) results from the test were included in the
attached excel files, namely MATRIC STUDENTS and STPM STUDENTS, which contain the test
achievements of 500 entering students with KPM Matriculation Certificate and 300 students with STPM
Certificate, respectively. Also included in the files are the results of the students’ achievements in BITI2233
STATISTICS and PROBABILITY course taken recently.
a) Randomly select 50 out of 500 MATRIC students, and also 50 out of 300 STPM students. Use the attached
500 random numbers list to select the MATRIC Students, and the 300 random numbers list to select the
STPM Students. Use the last two digit number of MyKad ID of one of your group members to start the
selection, and horizontally follow the random number list to select the next 49 students. Based on the
selected samples, conduct a basic descriptive analysis on the Mathematics Competency test achievements of
both the MATRIC and STPM students. Document the selected students’ samples and give the summary of
the analyses (which should include the average and standard deviation of both samples).
2
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
1. MATRIC students
40 65 6 38.60
41 83 24 586.26
42 71 12 149.15
43 63 4 17.75
44 57 -2 3.19
45 65 6 38.60
46 60 1 1.47
47 66 7 52.02
48 56 -3 7.77
49 58 -1 0.62
50 76 17 296.28
51 65 6 38.60
52 73 14 202.00
53 79 20 408.56
54 69 10 104.30
55 48 -11 116.36
56 64 5 27.17
57 49 -10 95.79
58 50 -9 77.22
59 47 -12 138.94
60 54 -5 22.92
61 52 -7 46.07
62 53 -6 33.49
63 53 -6 33.49
64 49 -10 95.79
65 69 10 104.30
66 56 -3 7.77
67 68 9 84.88
68 71 12 149.15
69 55 -4 14.34
3
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
70 51 -8 60.64
71 52 -7 46.07
72 43 -16 249.24
73 71 12 149.15
74 62 3 10.32
75 46 -13 163.51
76 82 23 538.83
77 41 -18 316.39
78 57 -2 3.19
79 58 -1 0.62
80 71 12 149.15
81 49 -10 95.79
82 55 -4 14.34
83 52 -7 46.07
84 41 -18 316.39
85 46 -13 163.51
86 42 -17 281.81
87 52 -7 46.07
88 68 9 84.88
89 61 2 4.90
90 72 13 174.58
Deviation about the mean
MATH COMPETENCY TEST MARK/100 Observation (x) (x-mean)2
x-mean
Median 57
Mode 71
Count (n) 47 47 47
50 samples are randomly selected from no. 40 up to no. 90. The summation of math
competency test mark is 2,763 with an average of 58.787. The median is 57 and mode is 71
respectively. The highest mark is 83 and the lowest is 41.
4
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
40 62 5 24.22
41 71 14 193.81
42 70 13 166.97
43 49 -8 65.26
44 57 0 0.01
45 67 10 98.44
46 48 -9 82.42
47 66 9 79.59
48 56 -1 1.16
49 50 -7 50.10
50 60 3 8.54
51 52 -5 25.79
52 51 -6 36.95
53 64 7 47.91
54 57 0 0.01
55 47 -10 101.57
56 68 11 119.28
57 62 5 24.22
58 53 -4 16.63
59 56 -1 1.16
60 64 7 47.91
61 46 -11 122.73
62 65 8 62.75
63 45 -12 145.89
64 68 11 119.28
65 61 4 15.38
66 76 19 358.03
67 57 0 0.01
68 51 -6 36.95
69 58 1 0.85
70 39 -18 326.83
71 44 -13 171.05
5
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
72 64 7 47.91
73 51 -6 36.95
74 45 -12 145.89
75 58 1 0.85
76 43 -14 198.20
77 45 -12 145.89
78 61 4 15.38
79 63 6 35.06
80 63 6 35.06
81 58 1 0.85
82 57 0 0.01
83 47 -10 101.57
84 67 10 98.44
85 61 4 15.38
86 53 -4 16.63
87 78 21 437.71
88 47 -10 101.57
89 48 -9 82.42
90 62 5 24.22
Deviation about the mean
MATH COMPETENCY TEST MARK/100 Observation (x) (x-mean)2
x-mean
Median 57
Mode 57
Count (n) 51 51 51
50 samples are randomly selected from no. 40 up to no. 90. The summation of math
competency test mark is 2,911 with an average of 57.078. The median is 57 and mode is 57
respectively. The highest mark is 78 and the lowest is 39.
6
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
2. STPM students
MATH COMPETENCY TEST MARK/100 Mark Test Observation Deviation about the mean (x-mean)2(x-mean)2(x-
(x) mean)2(x-mean)2
40 81 5 23.62
41 59 -17 293.78
42 77 1 0.74
43 70 -6 37.70
44 91 15 220.82
45 80 4 14.90
46 79 3 8.18
47 92 16 251.54
48 71 -5 26.42
49 77 1 0.74
50 84 8 61.78
51 68 -8 66.26
52 50 -26 683.30
53 70 -6 37.70
54 84 8 61.78
55 73 -3 9.86
56 100 24 569.30
57 60 -16 260.50
58 67 -9 83.54
59 74 -2 4.58
60 79 3 8.18
61 77 1 0.74
62 73 -3 9.86
63 86 10 97.22
64 78 2 3.46
65 100 24 569.30
66 67 -9 83.54
67 53 -23 535.46
68 100 24 569.30
7
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
69 69 -7 50.98
70 84 8 61.78
71 63 -13 172.66
72 100 24 569.30
73 63 -13 172.66
74 92 16 251.54
75 75 -1 1.30
76 100 24 569.30
77 65 -11 124.10
78 61 -15 229.22
79 59 -17 293.78
80 75 -1 1.30
81 75 -1 1.30
82 96 20 394.42
83 61 -15 229.22
84 80 4 14.90
85 84 8 61.78
86 54 -22 490.18
87 76 0 0.02
88 72 -4 17.14
89 83 7 47.06
90 100 24 569.30
Deviation about the mean
MATH COMPETENCY TEST MARK/100 Observation (x) (x-mean)2
x-mean
Median 76
Mode 100
Count (n) 50 50 50
50 samples are randomly selected from no. 40 up to no. 90. The summation of math competency
test mark is 3,807 with an average of 76.14. The median is 76 and mode is 100 respectively. The
highest mark is 100 and the lowest is 50.
8
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
BITI 2233 MARK/100 Mark Test Observation Deviation about the mean (x-mean)2(x-mean)2(x-
(x) mean)2(x-mean)2
40 45 -9 87.11
41 51 -3 11.11
42 42 -12 152.11
43 60 6 32.11
44 57 3 7.11
45 48 -6 40.11
46 54 0 0.11
47 56 2 2.78
48 60 6 32.11
49 53 -1 1.78
50 53 -1 1.78
51 44 -10 106.78
52 52 -2 5.44
53 59 5 21.78
54 53 -1 1.78
55 56 2 2.78
56 58 4 13.44
57 49 -5 28.44
58 51 -3 11.11
59 57 3 7.11
60 47 -7 53.78
61 50 -4 18.78
62 56 2 2.78
63 58 4 13.44
64 55 1 0.44
65 60 6 32.11
66 61 7 44.44
67 55 1 0.44
68 61 7 44.44
69 56 2 2.78
70 56 2 2.78
9
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
71 70 16 245.44
72 54 0 0.11
73 50 -4 18.78
74 59 5 21.78
75 58 4 13.44
76 54 0 0.11
77 45 -9 87.11
78 54 0 0.11
79 56 2 2.78
80 54 0 0.11
81 58 4 13.44
82 53 -1 1.78
83 58 4 13.44
84 56 2 2.78
85 47 -7 53.78
86 53 -1 1.78
87 47 -7 53.78
88 61 7 44.44
89 52 -2 5.44
90 59 5 21.78
Deviation about the mean
MATH COMPETENCY TEST MARK/100 Observation (x) (x-mean)2
x-mean
Median 55
Mode 56
Count (n) 51 51 51
50 samples are randomly selected from no. 40 up to no. 90. The summation of math competency
test mark is 2,771 with an average of 54.33. The median is 55 and mode is 56 respectively. The
highest mark is 70 and the lowest is 42.
10
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
b) Conduct a test of hypothesis with the intent of showing that, at the 0.05 level of significance, there is no
significant difference in the average Mathematics Competency between MATRIC students and STPM
students. Report the hypothesis testing process step by step and conclude the findings.
1. MATRIC students
40 65
41 83
42 71
43 63
44 57
45 65
46 60
47 66
48 56
49 58
50 76
51 65
52 73
53 79
54 69
55 48
56 64
57 49
58 50
59 47
60 54
61 52
62 53
63 53
64 49
65 69
11
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
66 56
67 68
68 71
69 55
70 51
71 52
72 43
73 71
74 62
75 46
76 82
77 41
78 57
79 58
80 71
81 49
82 55
83 52
84 41
85 46
86 42
87 52
88 68
89 61
90 72
12
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
SUMMAR
Y OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
0.32442858
Multiple R 09
0.10525390
R Square 41
Adjusted 0.08699377
R Square 97
Standard 10.3813279
Error 655
Observati
ons 51
ANOVA
Significance
df SS MS F F
Regressio 621.21266968 621.2126696 0.02019749
n 1 33 833 5.7641394864 48
5280.8265460 107.7719703
Residual 49 03 266
5902.0392156
Total 50 863
Lower Upper
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% 95.0% 95.0%
74.5490196 11.32653789 2.745921240336 61.3223951 87.775644 61.3223951 87.775644
Intercept 078 6.5818011 98 22E-015 016 114 016 114
- - - - - -
STUDENT 0.23710407 2.400862238 0.43556546 0.0386426 0.43556546 0.0386426
ID 24 0.0987578832 1 0.0201974948 89 759 89 759
13
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
2. STPM students
40 81
41 59
42 77
43 70
44 91
45 80
46 79
47 92
48 71
49 77
50 84
51 68
52 50
53 70
54 84
55 73
56 94
57 60
58 67
59 74
60 79
61 77
62 73
63 86
64 78
65 95
66 67
67 53
68 92
69 69
70 84
14
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
71 63
72 94
73 63
74 92
75 75
76 100
77 65
78 61
79 59
80 75
81 75
82 96
83 61
84 80
85 84
86 54
87 76
88 72
89 83
90 93
15
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
SUMMAR
Y OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
0.01855197
Multiple R 37
0.00034417
R Square 57
-
Adjusted 0.02005696
R Square 35
Standard 12.4510183
Error 237
Observati
ons 51
ANOVA
Significance
df SS MS F F
Regressio 2.615384615 0.89718822
n 1 2.6153846154 4 0.0168704171 61
7596.3650075 155.0278572
Residual 49 415 968
7598.9803921
Total 50 569
Conclusion:
MATRIC students: Since the level of significance is 0.05 (95%) and P-value is 0.8971882261 is
more than 0.05 so the correlation is not statistically significant.
STPM students: Since level of significance is 0.05 (95%) and P-value is 0.0201974948 less
than 0.05 so the correlation is statistically significant.
16
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
c) Construct a scatter diagram of the Mathematic Competency test achievements and achievements in
BITI2233 course for the 500 MATRIC students and 300 STPM students, independently. Determine their
correlation coefficients, and write a short conclusion on the findings. Do the same analyses for all combined
MATRIC and STPM students and compare the results.
1. MATRIX students
100
80
60
Math Comp Test Mark
40
20
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Student ID
100
80
60
BITI 2233 Test Mark
40
20
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Student ID
17
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
100
90
80
70
60
Column B
Math Comp & BITI 2233 Test Mark 50 Column C
40
30
20
10
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Student ID
Correlation Coefficients
Positive relationship:
This means that as the number
Matrix Math 0.0053
of students increase, the test
mark for Math also increases.
Negative relationship:
This means that as the number
Matrix BITI
-0.0695 of students increase,
2233
the test mark for BITI
decreases.
Positive value:
This means that as the number
Matrix Math &
0.9973 of students increase, the test
BITI 2233
mark for Math and BITI also
increases.
18
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
2. STPM students
120
100
80
80
70
60
50
BITI 2233 Test Mark 40
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Student ID
19
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
120
100
80
Column B
Math Comp & BITI 2233 Test Mark 60 Column C
40
20
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Student ID
Correlation Coefficients
Positive relationship:
This means that as the number
STPM Math 0.0681
of students increase, the test
mark for Math also increases.
Positive relationship:
This means that as the number
STPM BITI 2233 0.0098
of students increase, the test
mark for BITI also increases.
Positive relationship:
This means that as the number
STPM Math & BITI 2233 0.9820 of students increase, the test
mark for Math and BITI also
increases.
20
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
d) Conduct a basic descriptive analysis on the achievement of MATRIC students and STPM students in the
BITI2233 course, separately and jointly. Describe the performance of students. Based on the above
analyses, give several recommendations to UTeM’s top management what strategy/policy/action should be
adopted in order to improve the overall students’ achievement in the University’s Mathematics and
Statistics courses.
1) Matric students
Mean 54.71
Standard Error 0.45
Median 55.00
Mode 55.00
Standard Deviation 10.05
Sample Variance 100.97
Kurtosis 0.37
Skewness -0.12
Range 69.00
Minimum 21.00
Maximum 90.00
Sum 27357.00
Count 500.00
21
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
1 20 20.0
2 23.4
Bin
3 26.8 Frequency
4 30.1 21.0 1.0
5 33.5 24.1 1.0
6 36.9 27.3 3.0
7 40.3
30.4 2.0
33.5 3.0
8 43.7
36.7 9.0
9 47.0
39.8 13.0
10 50.4
43.0 23.0
11 53.8
46.1 46.0
12 57.2 49.2 51.0
13 60.6 52.4 50.0
14 63.9 55.5 68.0
15 67.3 58.6 47.0
16 70.7 61.8 52.0
17 74.1 64.9 58.0
68.0 30.0
18 77.5
71.2 21.0
19 80.8
74.3 13.0
20 84.2
77.5 5.0
21 87.6
80.6 1.0
22 91 91.0
83.7 1.0
86.9 1.0
More 1.0
22
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
80
70
60
50
40
Frequency
30
20
10
0
01/20/1900 02/04/1900 02/20/1900 03/08/1900 03/23/1900
Bin
According to MATRIC students in the BITI2233 test graph result, majority of MATRIC
student score mark from 35 to 78. 68 students score 55.5 marks. If let say the passing mark is
B- which is 65 marks, so therefore more than half of the student have to repeat the BITI 2233
paper.
23
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
2) STPM students
Mean 54.40
Standard Error 0.27
Median 54.00
Mode 56.00
Standard Deviation 4.75
Sample Variance 22.56
Kurtosis 0.00
Skewness -0.04
Range 28.00
Minimum 42.00
Maximum 70.00
Sum 16320.00
Count 300.00
24
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
1 41 41 Bin Frequency
2 43 41 0
3 45 43 1
4 46 45 6
5 48 46 10
48 19
6 50
50 5
7 52
52 41
8 53
53 40
9 55
55 46
10 57 57 30
11 59 59 53
12 60 60 20
13 62 62 14
14 64 64 7
15 66 66 6
16 67 67 1
69 0
17 69
71 1
18 71 71
More 0
25
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
60
50
40
30
Frequency
20
10
0
02/09/1900 02/16/1900 02/23/1900 03/02/1900 03/09/1900
Bin
According to STPM students in the BITI2233 test graph result, majority of STPM student score
mark from 40 to 66. 53 students score 58.5 marks. If let say the passing mark is B- which is 65
marks, so therefore more than 3 quarter of the student have to repeat the BITI 2233 paper.
26
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
Column1
Mean 54.59625
Standard Error 0.2990038445
Median 55
Mode 54
Standard Deviation 8.4571058428
Sample Variance 71.5226392365
Kurtosis 1.2987926796
Skewness -0.0955420648
Range 69
Minimum 21
Maximum 90
Sum 43677
Count 800
27
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
1 20 20 Bin Frequency
2 23 20 0
3 25 23 1
4 28 25 2
5 31 28 2
6 33 31 2
7 36 33 3
8 38 36 4
9 41 38 13
10 44 41 16
11 46 44 18
12 49 46 57
13 52 49 75
14 54 52 73
15 57 54 127
16 60 57 89
17 62 60 116
18 65 62 73
19 68 65 52
20 70 68 31
21 73 70 19
22 75 73 11
23 78 75 10
24 81 78 3
25 83 81 0
26 86 83 1
27 89 86 1
28 91 91 89 0
91 1
More 0
28
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
140
120
100
80
Frequency 60
40
20
0
01/19/1900 02/01/1900 02/14/1900 02/27/1900 03/12/1900 03/26/1900
Bin
According to MATRIC and STPM students in the BITI2233 Test graph, majority of MATRIC
and STPM student score mark from 38 to 75. 127 students score 54.3 marks. If let say the
passing mark is B- which is 65 marks, so therefore more than half of the student have to repeat
the BITI 2233 paper. Overall, majority of both MATRIC and STPM student scores are below
par if let say the passing mark is B- (65 marks). So there UTeM’s top management has to revise
the strategy of teaching and learning to improve the overall students’ achievement in the
University’s Mathematics and Statistics courses.
Based on the above analyses, some of the strategies are as follows. The objective of this
strategies is to improve the overall students’ achievement in the University’s Mathematics and
Statistics courses.
1) Mathematics lectures should be sent for workshops, retraining, conferences and seminars
in order to improve their teaching techniques. Scholarships and in-service training with pay
should be granted to mathematics teachers
2) The effective uses of instructional materials by mathematics lectures go a long way to
stimulate and sustain students’ interest in mathematics. Their effective use helps in
reducing the level of obstruction in teaching a topic i.e. they concretize the abstract nature
of mathematics. They also stimulate students’ imagination and help them retain the
concepts learnt. Teaching aids should be provided for mathematics lectures.
29
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology FTMK 2015/2016
30