Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
REQUIRED READINGS:
The Domestic Sphere in GCCP (p.97-99 – top paragraph
of p 99 ONLY)
Hegemonic Masculinity
4
• Another component of Gender Stereotypes:
Traits, activities & roles “assigned” to
masculinity or femininity tend to fall into two
different “spheres” -- the Domestic and Public
Spheres
7
Domestic Sphere
• Denotes the physical location &
types of activities that take place in
association with the home
• Gendered Feminine 8
• As pointed out in GCCP, Rosaldo didn’t think that women’s
“Domestic orientation” was a “necessary one” (p. 98. “In other
words, biology is not destiny” (p. 98).
• But rather the association between women & the Domestic was
“structurally and culturally constructed” (p. 98) – a major factor
(although not the only one) – the degree to which mother + child
care tasks were associated in a given society (p. 98) – in some
societies, this overlap is greater than in others
-2011 OECD
(industrialized
countries) study of
unpaid household
labour in 29
countries: Title of the
report: Cooking,
caring and
volunteering: unpaid
work around the
world
15
-Used Stats Canada
data
CDN men: vs other countries = above
2.5 hrs/ day average time spent on unpaid work
M
E
N
16
2 Trends:
1______________________________________________
Canadian women do more household labor than men
2_______________________________________________
Canadian men do more as compared to past years
17
• Is the Domestic Gendered Feminine in Canada?
• Qualified Yes.
18
2) The Public Sphere in Canada
• On one hand:
• i) In 2016, Women
made up 47.7% of
the workforce in
Canada (Stats Canada
2017)
• Source:
• http://www5.statcan.gc.ca
/cansim/a26?lang=eng&ret
rLang=eng&id=2820002&p
attern=&csid= 19
ii) Stats Canada: Employment rates of women
and men, 1953 to 2014
20
Labour force participation rate: Total labour force expressed as a percentage of the population aged 15
and over. The participation rate for a particular group (e.g. age, sex, marital status, geographic area, etc.)
is the total labour force in that group expressed as a percentage of the population 15 years of age and over
in that group.
• The Problem: This equality does not
extend to the top levels of business &
politics
21
22
See next slide for details of the McKinsey Canada report
• From the McKinsey Canada report (titled: The Power of
Parity, (June 2017): “Although 53 percent of the degree
holders in Canada are female, women are a minority of
corporate leaders. Our workplace survey of 69 Canadian
companies representing more than 500,000 employees sheds
light on the barriers women face in the workplace. It found
that women make up approximately 45 percent of all entry-
level employees but only 25 percent of vice presidents and 15
percent of CEOs. The first bottleneck for female advancement
appears to occur between the entry and manager levels, and
the second between director and vice-president levels, where
men advance three times more than women do.”
23
https://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/gender-equality/the-power-
of-parity-advancing-womens-equality-in-canada
Why the underrepresentation of
women at the top levels of business?
The 3 most common attempts to explain this situation:
1. Pipeline Problem/ “Just Give It time” argument (slides 25-28)
2. “Double-Bind”: Gender Stereotypes lead to disadvantages at
top levels of business/leadership for women (slides 32-43)
3. “Opt-out” Revolution (which we discussed is a myth last
class)
28
• Take Home Point: Men & women lead in similar ways
Underrepresentation of Women in CDN
Political Landscape
• Federal: 2015 (election):
Women make up 26% of
Members of House of
Commons: 88 seats out
of 338
• Alberta: 2015 (election)
Women make up 33% of
the legislature
• Calgary: 2017 (election):
Calgary City Council:
3/15 seats (Councillors & House of Commons
29
Mayor) held by women Canada, Ottawa
= 23%
Who is
this?
30
• From “The Atlantic” article:
“There is no one reason—no
finite number of reasons—why
Hillary Clinton lost the U.S.
presidential election. No amount
of poring over polls will tell us
the precise degree to which bias
against women influenced the
vote. What we do know is this:
The United States still doesn’t
have a female leader, as it hasn’t
for the last 227 years. America
remains outside the club of 67
nations, out of 144 surveyed
countries, that have had a female
prime minister, a female
president, or both over the last
50 years, according to the World
http://www.theatlantic.com/ Economic Forum’s latest study on
international/archive/2016/ the gender gap in politics.” 31
11/clinton-woman-leader-
world/506945/
Let’s look at another idea to explain the lack of
diversity at top levels of business/politics
32
The “Double-Bind" for Women
• On one hand, women can succeed in jobs - idea of gender stereotype in leadership
stereotyped as ‘Masculine’; such as jobs
within the political realm or leadership jobs in
business - these traits assigned to masculinity
• Meaning, they can be seen as competent,
they have the ‘agentic’ skills for the job
• On the other hand, these women are
frequently assumed to lack ‘communal’
qualities
catch 22 • “People tend to assume not only that
professionally successful women possess
agentic qualities but also that they suffer
from a deficit of stereotypically feminine
communal qualities” (Benard & Correll,
2010)
• So called ‘Agentic Women’ are frequently
viewed as hostile, cold, deceitful, bitter,
selfish, devious and personally disliked
(Heilman 2001)
• The Double-Bind = The problem is not that - success in this stereotype leads to backlash 33
women can have ‘agentic’ skills, but that they
are presumed to lack communal qualities if
they have ‘agentic’ skills
Women & Politics
• In the following slides we will look
at a study by Okimoto & Brescoll
(2010) which sought to investigate
these dynamics as one potential
source of gender bias in politics
• They wanted to know: Does
violation of our society’s
prescriptive gender norms— i.e. a
woman is perceived as lacking
communal qualities—lead to voter
“backlash” in politics ?
• “Backlash effect” (Rudman 1998):
refers to the negative
characterization of women who
violate communal prescriptions Hillary Clinton, former US
- not about having ge...tic skills but not having them
Secretary of State
CNN political contributor Alex Castellanos commenting on
Hillary Clinton (2008): "[S]he is a tough -- that tough lady, tough 34
in politics, that's been her great strength. But let's face it, she
can be a very abrasive, aggressive, irritating person, and a lot of
voters, I think, see her that way."
Study Design (Okimoto & Brescoll 2010)
• Participants told the purpose of the study was to investigate first
impressions and memory about political candidates
37
Results
1) Voters were less likely to vote for the power-seeking female
politician. The female power-seeking politician had the lowest
voter preference.
39
• The authors of the study suggest that the voters’
perceptions of the power-seeking female politician
as lacking communality is driving the moral outrage.
They write:
46
From: Sabin and Kirkup (2016) Competing Masculinities and political campaigns
48
Take-home messages
• Gender stereotypes about agency and communality are
very pervasive
50
Introduction to Asante Market Women:
Domestic / Public Split is not universal
51
Some societies do not
conceive of the public
world as a man’s world
E.g West Africa: Public world is
arena where both men and
women have important roles
(Movie: “Asante Market
Women”)
52
Yoruba market women, Nigeria
Gender, Business, and Space Control in
GCCP
• The “Market” is the social
and economic hub in most
African countries
53
Gender, Business, and Space Control
in GCCP
• Yoruba market women of Nigeria
57
60
• Western countries (Europe & North America):
focus on Conjugal relationships
• Asante: women’s relationships are built around
Consanguineal relationships
63
• Slides 65-77 are not required reading for class/
test. They are not testable.
64
The “Lean In” Argument
• A frequently touted “explanation” for the gender gap
in senior leadership is that women haven’t mastered
the skills needed to get ahead in the same way men
have. In other words, are women not “leaning in”?
• Carter & Silva (2011) write: “Career self-help books, corporate pundits, and
mentors alike contribute to the conventional wisdom imparted to high
potentials in the pipeline: career advancement depends on individuals’
actions—and more precisely—on doing “all the right things” to get ahead.
Prescriptions about what it takes to get ahead have been so ubiquitous they
have coalesced into a detailed description of an “Ideal Worker,” someone
who:
• • Actively seeks high-profile assignments,
• • Rubs shoulders with influential leaders,
• • Communicates openly and directly about their career aspirations,
• • Seeks visibility for their accomplishments,
• • Lets their supervisor know of their skills and willingness to
contribute,
• • Continually seeks out new opportunities,
• • Learns the political landscape or unwritten rules of the company,
and
• • Isn’t afraid to ask for help
66
• Carter & Silva (2011) further ask: “Mastery of these skills seemingly paves
the way to the top. But do these tactics really get high potentials to the
top? And do the same strategies work for both women and men?”
• Study of 3,345 “high potentials”, men and women who stayed
on a “traditional” career path following graduation from a full-
time MBA program (Carter & Silver 2011)
67
1) CLIMBERS Seek to Advance in Their Current Company
• Almost one-third of high potentials were “Climbers” (32% of men
and 31% of women).
• “Among the high potentials we studied, more than half of both women
and men had adopted the full range of advancement strategies
attributed to an ideal worker [Climbers & Hedgers]. However, men
benefitted more than women when they adopted the proactive
strategies of the proverbial ideal worker. Even when women used the
same career advancement strategies—doing all the things they have
been told will help them get ahead—they advanced less than their
male counterparts.” 70
Results: Doing “All the Right Things” Helped Men—But
Not Women—Advance Further and Faster
From the study:
1) Men in the most proactive group—Hedgers—received the greatest
advancement payoff. Twice as many men Hedgers ( 21%) as women
Hedgers ( 11%) had advanced to senior executive/CEO level by 2008.
• Additionally, compared to other men, male Hedgers advanced furthest,
followed by men Climbers, Coasters, and Scanners.
• While women in the Hedgers group did advance further than Coasters—
women doing comparatively less to get ahead—being proactive didn’t
71
provide as great an advantage for women Hedgers as it did for men
Hedgers
• Take Home Message: This research suggests women are
“Leaning In” but are not being rewarded in the same way
that men are for using the same career advancement
strategies
72
• Slides 74-77 are not required reading for class/ test. They
are extra information about the different concepts of
mother for people who want to read further
73
Different concepts of ‘mother’
• Moore (1988) explains this idea (p.25):
• “It has been noted that in a wide range of different societies the
concept of ‘woman’ is not elaborated through ideas about
motherhood, fertility, nurturance and reproduction.
Readings on Australian Aborigines, American, Asian and
African hunter-gatherers and hunter-horticulturalists led to the
discovery that themes of motherhood and sexual reproduction
are far less central to such people’s conceptions of ‘woman’ than
we had assumed. Contrary to our expectations that motherhood
provides women everywhere with a natural source of emotional
satisfaction and cultural value, we found that neither women nor
men in very simple societies [non-industrial] celebrate women as
nurturers or women’s unique capacity to give life…Women the
Fertile, the Mother and Source of All Life was, quite remarkably,
absent from all available accounts (Collier and Rosaldo, 1981: 275-6) 76
Different concepts of ‘mother’
• A bit more to think about—Moore writes (p. 26):