Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I.I INTRODUCTION
"7'lr prccess of simultqneously cuoni:ing tuttl clesic'c.ating.fiuid a¡d soli¿l substances, and its tppli<'trtiort
to the pwpose oJ the exhtustioil ofuoísturc fiom su<'lt ntbstar(es, atrl.for lhe preyent¡ofi of.lesm«fh,e
chc»úcal clwtge."
Samuel R. Percy (1872)
'I-he above words are excerpts frorn the first ever detailed description of ar drying technique,
which is now well-known and appreciated as "Spray Drying". Spray drying is a 140 years
young and flourislring drying techrique. Tlroughout all these yea's, this perpetual prccess has
FigureLI Processstepso[sproydrying.(l]Atomizotion.(2)Sproy-hotoirconioct.{3)Evoporotionof
exhibited ari ebullient grcs'th, imbibing innumerable innovations ir telms of its operational moisture. {41 Product seporotion.
design and widely varied applications.
Spray drying lras its origin in the United States, since the first patented design was registered
there in 1872. World War II was a significant chonological event in the history of spray drying, Each of the above exe¡ts influence on rhe Iinal product quality. Understanding the process
rnonopolizing the process in the dairy industries lbr continuous production of rnilk powder. steps, al.ong with lhe hardware systerns involved in it, will enable visualization ofthe operation
Since then, the process has adapted ítself to a nunrber of design nrodiñcations, and today has on a glinpse of a reading. Hence. subsequent sections will narr¿rte in det¿ril each of the above-
evolved as an industry-friendly drying technique. Spray drying stands out from other processes mentioned uuit operations, with a description of the associated lialdw¿ue conlponents.
involving liquid drying by its ability to handle f'eedstock ofvarying nature, producing flowiug
ptiwders of specific particle size, high productivity and versatile applications.
By definition. "Spray drying is the translonntrtiott of JZetl .fionr o fluitl snte into u drietl 1.2 STAGE l: ATOMIZATION
particulote fonn b¡'spraf ing tlrc feed into a hot drying ntedium." (Masters. 1991)
A spray drver operates on corivection mode. The principle of working is moisture removal Ator¡ization is the lieart ol spray drying, and is the first transfonnatioll process that the teed
by application of heat l.o the feed product and controlling the humidity of the drying medium. undergoes during spray drying. Although several deltnitions of atonrization exist, one of tl¡e
Here, the uniqueness is tlr{t the evaporatior of moisru¡e is promoted by spraying the léed into a initial defrnitions of the process, by Samuel Percy, is as interesting as it is precise: "bring,ing fluid
heated atmospher.e, resulting in improved drying rate. The mechanism can be better understood, or sLtlül substonces into a stote of minute divisiott". The breakup of butk liquid into a large
wllen the spray drying process is divided into its constituent unit operati.ons. number ofdroplets drives the rest ofthe spray drying process by teducing the intetnal rcsistances
A liquid feed entering the spray dryer undergoes it series oftranstbnnations before it becornes to moisture ü;uisf'er tlom tlie droplet to the sr.trrounding medium. This is because of the enor-
powder The changes are due to the inlluence of each of the four stages (Figure l. I ) involved in mous iucrease in surtace area of the bulk fluid as the droplet ñssion proceeds, with its instability
spray drying, namely: increasing in accordance with the intensity of atomization.
A:omization is central to the spray drying process, owing to its influence on shape,
1. Atumizalion of the lccd sululion.
struc.rrre, r,elocity and size distribution ofthe droplets and, in turn, Ihe particle size and
2. Confact ofspray with the hot gas.
nature of the final product. A cubic meter of liquid tbnns approxinately 2 x l0rr unifoll
3. Evaporation of moisture. 100 rnicron-sized droplets, offering a total surface area ofover 60,000 m'¿(Masters,2002)
4. Particle separation.
This sreater surface-to-volume ratio enablcs spray drying to achieve a faster drying rate (as
dryir g time is proportional to the square of the particle dimensiol). Consequeutly, there is
Spttt Dn ing IirLhnitltes lbr Food lngredicnt Encapsulation, Fi.rst Edirioo. C. Allandliara¡nakishnal
and Pudma [shwaya S. mini nal Ioss of heat sensitive compounds and, eventually, particles of the desired morphology
O 201 5 John Wiicy & Sons, Ltd. Publishcd 201 5 by John irviicy & Sons, Ltd. and,rl; ysical chxracteristics are obtained.
l
lntroduction io sproy drying 3 4 Sproy drying lechniques for food ingredient encopsulotion
I.2.1 Principle of otomizqtion Where D is the droplet diameter, which can be obtained as:
The working principle of the atomizers is governed by the liquid disintegation pluromenon D =1.89¿l (t.2)
explained by several researchers- It is worth understandirry the progression in the co[cepts on atom-
ization phenomenon across the years. This will also help in appreciating the science of droplet Although Rayleigh's analysis considered surface tension and inertial forces, the influence of vis-
forrnation fiom an atomizer. cosity, atomization gas and the surrounding nir were neglected. The above gaps in knowledge
Joseph Plateau was the first to characterize iiquid instability in 1873, tlrough his experimental
were addressed by the work ofWeber (1931) and Ohnesorge (1936). Weber revealed that the aü
observations. A liquid jet, initially of constant radius, falls vertically under gravity. The liquid friction shofens the oplimum wavelenglh (,l"rr) for drop formaÚon. He obtained a value of,1"o, =
length inüeases and reaches a critical value. At this critical value, the jet loses its cylindrical 4.44i ¡t zero relative velocity, which is close'to the value of J.51d predicted by Rayleigh for this
case- Weber showed that as the relative velocity increases to 15 r/s, ,loo, becomes 2.8d and the
shape and decomposes into a stream of droplets that occuls primarily due to decrease ilr suúáce
tension (Figure 1.2). droplet diameter is I .6¡,L Thus, the increase in relative velociry between the liquid jet and ihe sur-
Lord Rayleigtr, in 1 878, coroborated the above stated theory tmd gave an malytical explanation rouruling air reduces the optimum wavelength forjet breakup and results in a smaller droplet size.
of the physical obse¡vation: He provided a mathematical insight to the break-up of nou-viscous The explanation given by Ohnesorge in 1936 on the mechanism of atomization is credited for
liquid under lamina¡ flow conditions, now famously known as tJ.,r- "Liquil jer theorv'. Rayleigh its cldrity. The relationship proposed by him included all the significant factors responsible for
considered the simple situation of a laminarjet issuing from a circular orifice, and postulated the atomization. He proposed üe Reynolds number relationship, and expressed the tendency of the
growth of small distulbances that produce bleakup when the fastest growing disturbance attains a liquidjet to disintegrate in tems of its viscosity, density, surface tension andjet size. The relation-
wavelength (i.e. ,1.r, of 4.51d, where d is the initial jet diilneter). After heakup, the cylinder of ship c:rn be numerically expressed by the dimeusionless Ohnesorge number (Oh) which is the
length 4.5 1d becorires a spherical drop (Figure 1.3) and. hence. can be approximated to a sphere of
rafio ofWeber number to Reynolds number (Equation 1.3), as described by fhe equation below:
equal voiume (Equation 1.1).
oh:{il" :-L= Viscous forces
(1.3)
4.5td^(L\d, =f.¿]r, (1.1) Ite ,l pot l(hrerriu
x surfitce tensiott)
(4./ l.6i
where:
W¿ is the Weber number;
Re is the Reynolds number;
p, p and o arc the viscosity, density and surface tension of the feed droplet, respectively;
I
is the characteristic dimension of the feed droplet (i.e. volume per unit area).
Constant radius Disintegration of the liquid at the periphery or tip of the atomizel is by virtue of the turbu-
lence in the emerging liquid jet and the actior of air forces; the l€sistance to disintegration is
Growth of perturbat¡ons offered by viscosity and sudace tension tbrces in the Iiquid. The realignment of shear stresses
Cr¡tical length within the liquid, once the droplet is airborne, contributes to the droplet fission during
Droplet atomization.
Toble l.l Rotionolefor olomizerclossificoiion. Advantages: The major advantages ofrotary atomizers are that they do not clog, and they tend
to produce more uniformly sized droplets. Since t}te necessary atomization energy is supplied
Bocis of otomizer clqssification Quonrifying poromeler by the rotating wheel, the feed supply unit can operate at low pressure than that required in
Energy utilized for olomizolion. Cenirifugol, pressure, kinelic, sonic or el«kicol energy. hydraulic and pneumatic nozzle atomizers.
Desired type of sproy. Fine, medium or coorse,
Required finol size ronge of droplets. Men droplet size in pm or nm.
Limifations: Rotary atomizers present difficulties i-n handling viscous feed. The lÍuge amount
The relotionship between meon size of droplets Direi or inverse relolionship of the mmn droplet size with of fine particles produced can potentially lead to environmental pollution. Furthermore, it is not
qnd olom¡zotion poromeiers. qlom¡zqtion pressure or otomizer speed of rolotion, possible to accommodate the spray produced by rotary atomizer in a horizontal spray dryer.
diometer or eleckic poteniiol ocross the chorged nozle
Physicol properlies of lhe feed thot con be Viscosity ond obrosiveness of ihe feed.
hondled by the otomizer. 1.2.).2 Pressure nozzle (or hydraulic) otomízer
Copociiy of feed thot the otomizer con hondle. Feed rote in ml/min or L,/h.
Principle: Facilitated by discharge of liquid under pressure drough an onfice (Figure 1.5).
Need for duplicotion of otomizers. The rótio of increose in the otom¡zer copocity to the
number of qtomizers linked in series, Pressgre energy is convefied to kinetic energy, aud feed emerging liorn the nozzle orifice as a
high rpeed film readily breaks into a spray of droplets.
Atornization energ¡i: Pressure energy.
Atomization parameters: Nozzle pressure.
Feed¡ng tube
Atomizer duplication: Rótary atomizers are l«rowD for their ability to handle high feed rates
without atomizer duplication. Figuré 1.5 Pressurenozzle
lntroduction lo sproy drying 7 8 Sproy drying techniques for food ingredient encopsulotion
Relationship between mean droplet size (d) and atomization parameters: d is directly Relationship between mean droplet size (d) and atomization parameters: d is directly
proportional to feed rate and viscosity, and inversely related to atomization pressu.re. propofional to feed rale and viscosity and inversely related to atomization pressure.
Physical property of feed: Low viscosity t'eed. Physical property of feed: Can handle highly viscous t'eed.
Atomizer duplication: Prcssure nozzles can be integrated in multiple nozzle arrangements to Atomizer duplication: Rather than atomizer duplication, more than one atomization fluid is
obtain ¿n inc¡eased amourt of flow rate and particle size flexibility. employed to transmits the kinetic energy to the feed. The use of fbur fluid nozzles is the latest
advancement (Niwa et al,, Z0l0).
Advantages: Pressure nozzles result in particles with less occluded air when compaled to twin
fluid atomizers. Consequently, the powdered product is of higher density, with good flow char Advantages: Twin fluid nozzles are capable of handling lúglrly viscous feed. These atomizers
acteistics. Depending on the specifications of the end product, it is also capable of producing also produce much finer and morc homogeneous spray when compared to plessure nozzles.
particles with relatively greater size. These nozzles exert better control over the droplet size.
Limitations: At high feed rates, sprays are generally less homogeneous and coarser than rotary Limitation: The requirement of compressed air adds to the cost of operation. TWin fluid noz-
atomizer'-s. zles result in high occluded air content within the particles, resulting in low density. The use
of thr:se nozzles also introduces extra cold air into the spray chamber in the zone of atomiza-
tio[ and, hence, reduces the temperature gradient that exists between the finely divided
1.2.2.3 TwoJluid nozzle otomizer
dropi.e,t and the surrounding drying medium. This impairs the effecúveness of heat transfer
Principle: The operational principle is based on Weber's findings, as explained in section 1.2. l. betweun the droplet and hot drying medium. Twin fluid nozzles exhibit a higher tendency to
Two-fluid atomizers featurc the break-up of liquid on impact with high-velocity air or other clog. especially when the liquid t'eed is of mucilaginous or fib¡ous nature. A further disadvan-
gaseous flow. Cornpressed air crcates a shear field, which atomizes the liquid and produces a tage of tlris type of liquid-gas nozzle is the "downstr¿ant furbLtlence" which causes the fine
wide range ofdroplet sizes (Figure 1.6). particles to be c¿rried away to the atmosphere by the large gas flows used. This phenomenon
has been termed as "overspray"i it tends to contaminate the atmospherc which is in close
Atomization energy: Kinetic energy.
proximity to the nozzle, and demands expensive cleanup and tedious maintenance procedures
Atomization parameters: Nozzle pressure. (Sewe11, 1987).
Operating pressure range: 250-10,000 PSI With the rotary and nozzle atomizers dominating in dreir spray applications and association with
lab scaie and commercial spray dryers, it is also inportant to understand the working principle
§pe of spray: Mediurn coarseness but poor homogeneity
of other rypes of atonúzets: sonic and electrohydrndynamic atomizels. With the continuous
Mean droplet sizer 30-150 pm. advancements in this field, the future spray üying teclnology might be dominated by the use of
these atomizers.
Piez@lectric disks
Polymer solution
addition to the vibration frequency, amplitude and the area of vibrating surface also play a
role in ultrasonic atomization (Lixin et a1.,2O04).
In contrast to conventional pressure nozzle atomizers, which impart a high initial velocity to
wu Monod¡sperse
drcplets
High voltage
DC supply
the droplets, resulting in wider droplet distribution, the velocity of droplets emerging from the crounded collector plale
ultrasonic atomizer is one to iwo orders of magnitude smaller than the fome¡. This is found to II
result in more uniform droplet size distribuúon (Lixin et a1.,2004). Consequendy, the shorter
residence tirne of the unifonn droplets generated by the ultrasonic nozzie results in higher reten- Figurel.S Mechqnismofelectrosproying.{BhushoniondAnondhoromokrishnon,2Ql4.Reproduced
tion of the active components plesent in feed (Semyonov et al.,20ll). The low velocity spray with permission of Elsevier).
also allows the spray drying chamber to be designed with shorter dimensions, thus enabling the
ultrasonic atomizer system to be installed in a laminar flow cabinet or isolator (Freitas et ul.,
2004). Furthermore, in an ultrasonic atomizer, the feed droplet outlet is larger, with no moving
pafts, and this arrangement sen'es to prevent clogging (Semyonov et a1.,2011) and facilitales
easy maintenance and operation.
Because of the properties described above, ultrasonic atornizers have been effectively used
for the drying of plobiotic cells (Semyonov et al., 20ll), in ordel to obtain higher viability.
However, ultrason.ic atomization technology is effective only for low-viscosity Newtonian
fluids. Since reduced pressure acts as the driving lbrce fbr moisture evaporation lrom the atom-
ized droplets, use ofthe ultrasonic spray head demands large quantities of hot air. Nevertheless,
the use of sterile ¿urd l.rot drying medium would render this method appropdate for aseptic
manufaeturing of spray dried particles (Dalnoro et al., 2Ol2).
'I
lntroduclion to sproy drying tl l2 Sproy dryinq techniques for food ingredient encopsulotion
The relationslúp between droplet size and conductivity is given by the Equation 1.4, after In this anangemenl, the atomized droplets entering the dryer are ir contact with the hot inlet
being confirmed by many experiments (Jaworek, 2007): air, but theüJemperature is kept low due to a high rate of evaporation taking place and is
imatelyatthewet-bulFtempéiá-tffi WFFullitém@i[reisthethtffiTte.nergy air used
tbr evaporation { i.e.. the removal of-ia-i
a,=o(Q"'P)". (1.4)
\tToy ) -.--
i3-iéiñEiIa-§-tvaoorative cooling". This allows the particle to be maintained at a temperature
below the out-liltemperatuleiTihe drying air'.) The cold air, in tum, pneumatically conveys the
where: dried particles through the system. The contact time of the hot air with the spray droplets is -o-nly
dn is the droplet size; a fe*;econd*, during whcñ dryin li.
dme of particles, with the added
O is the llow ¡ate;
eo is the pemittivity of vacuum; - merit of less themal degradaúon of heat sensitive products.
p, o and y te the density, conductivity and surface tension of the feed liquid, respectively; In contrmt. iD tle counter-current configumÚoD (Fipure l-10(b)). the product and dryirrg
¿ is a constant which is generally equated to 2.9. medium enter at ttre offiSfiéÉñffii the dliing ct amuei. Here, the outlet prortuct tempelature
is higher than üe exhaust ail temperature, and is almost at the f-eed air temperature, with which
Requirement of solvents for feed preparation and extremely low flow rates limit the usage of it is in contact. This type of arangement is used only for healresistant products. z
electrospray atomization for food applications and commercial exploitation respectively. In irnother type. called mrxed llow, the dryer design incorporniF56[li'iffiuÍent l1ow and
coullt€r-current flow. This type of arrailgement is used for drying coarse free-flowing powde¡
but tlrD drawback is the higher exit temperature of the product. The criteria for spray dryet
1.3 STAGE 2: SPRAY-AIR CONTACT design selection are summarized in Box l. l.
This stage, and the subsequent process steps of spray drying, constitute the parricle formation
phase. With the bulk feed atomized inlo tiny droplets, the next step is to bring the droplets into
intimate contact with the hot gas. This enables rapid evaporation of moisture from the surface Box l.I Ten guidelines on lhe choice of sprqy drying
of all the droplets in a uniform manner. Here, the critical requilement is uniform gas flow to all process Porqmeler§
palts of the drying chamber'.
l. The inlet temperature must be as high as possible in order to achieve a final product
f)uring spray-air contact, the droplets usually meet hot air in the spraying chamber, either in with low rcsidual moisture and a higher thermal efficiency (choice of inlet temperature
co-ctrrent tlow orcounter-cmenlUow@g!fl9(Figure 1.10(a)), the product and drying shoríiáf iñGliiññi1he heat señsiE-vii!6f-iE-EE[óomponents to prevent ürema]
medium passes tlrough the dryer in the same di¡ection. deg¡adation).
p 2- Increasing the feed flow rate lowers the outlet temperature and thus íncreases the
(a) (b) ' temperature difference between fhe inlet temperature and the outlet temperature. This
results in product with higher residual moisture content.
/ 3. High asp.irator speed leads to higher degree of separation in the cycJone.
4. Lower aspirator speed leads to lower residual moisture content. /
-5- The hisher the leed flow mte- lhe lrser is thc size of the Da-rticles iu the lrnal Droducl.
6. I he hlgher [he leed conceltratron, the greatel rs the morslur€ conlent of the parhcles
aM, hence, the greater the possibiüty ofagglomeration and the occurrence ofirregular
particle shapes.
7. The drying air temperature should be below the glass transition temperature in order
to prevent product collapse and stickiness in the spray chamber.
8 . The 7 of the feed material can be made higher for a convenient spray drying operation
An air disperser to ensure unifbrm gas llow, and an appropriately designed drying chambe¡
al'e the importaDt hardu,aLe elements associated with this step. The function of an air disperser is
to create pressure drop by means ofperfbrared plates or vaned channels, through rvhich the gas
is directed to facilitate equilized flow in all directions of the spray drying charnber. The air dis-
perser is normally placed in the roof of tlre dlying chamber, adjacent to the atomizer The dryirg
chiunber usuiLlly h¿s a conic¿¡l bottorn, witlr its height to diameter ratio (aspect ratio) dctermined by
the end applications. The ditt'erent types o1'drying chambers re discussed ir later sectio¡rs. Figure l.I2 A diogrommotic represenlotion of the droplei drying process (Modified from Chorlesworth
ond Morsholl, l9ó0; Wolton ond Mumford, 1999).
I.4 STAGE 3: EVAPORATION OF MOISTURE Wet-bulb temperature ({,,,) is the temperature that the drying gas rerches when it is saturated
with vapor from the liquid (Seydel at r1., 2006). Also, the droplet slrinks due to the evaporation
The most critical step in particle Iorn.)ation, this process step is associated with the moryhology of lhe aqucous phasc { Figure I . ] 2, stcp 1 ),
oI the linal product. Ev:rpoiation ofmoisture during spray drying can be visualized as two stages: The quantitication of evaporation rate at this stdge can be understt¡od by the "rf law" (Law
and Law, 1982). THs is based on the flrct that, during the constant rate period, the evaporiltion
(i) cc¡nstant rate period; and of a liquid droplet of diameter d is proporrional to its surface area. B¡sed on this lilw is the
Peclet nurnber (Pe) relationship given by the er¡uation below (Equation 1.5). With this equation,
tiil firlling rate period.
Peclet number is depicted as the m¿rin controlling palalieter of the droplet drying ptocess and,
hencc, the prticle fbr¡nation (Hu¿ng,20l l):
Examining the drying kinetics of thc spray drying process is critical in predicting the heat il1d
mass transfer in the drying material. This cau be lrest explained by a mathematical model for the
e\rapolalion of a single droplet which is subjected to convective drying in a spray dryer
{: o".c (i.5)
Ar
(Figure 1.8). Initially, when the droplet is exposed to hot gas, rapid evaporatior) takes place.
During this exposure, the dloplet is heated from its initial temperature (20) to the terlpelaturc of where:
equilibrium evaporation tempel?tul€ ({r) (Figure 1. I l, AB). During this period, the removal of C ls the concen[¿rtion of thc solute on weight by weight basis;
moistur€ fbllows the u)nstant rate period of the ú'ying rate curve as the moisture is removed r is the droplet radius;
corrstantly from the surtáce of the droplet keeping it sufhciently cool. The droplet suúhce P¿ is the Peclet number, which is the rertio of evaporation rate to difl'usion rate (Equation 1.6).
remains saturated with moisture at tlis stage antl its temperature is constant at the wet-bulb
temperature (Figure 1.1 1, BC: Doliusky, 2001). P, =LD ( 1.6)
wherc:
K is the evaporation rate;
D is the diffusion rate.
As the tnoisture rernoval tiom the droplet proceeds, the solute dissolved in Lhe liquid reaches a
concentration beyond its saturation concentration and tend to fbrm a thin shell at the droplet
sur1rce described :.s"trutsl.forntation" (step 2, Figure 1.12).
o The comencing o1'crust tbnnation event is an imporlart kinetic characteristic of the spray
E
drying process as it transforms from low to high temperature tlrying. After tlre crust formation,
c tlre moisture remov¿rl turns into a di.ffusiort-controlled process, and the evaporation rtte is
V o
dependelt upon the rate of water vapor dilTnsion through the dried surface shell (Figure 1.12.
-q step 3; Farid, 2003). This consti.tutes the.fhlling roÍe peñod. During the thlling rate period,
e although the particle will begin to lieat (Figure I . t l, CD). it is ahlost at the coolest part of tlie
o
dryer, where the drying gzrs is at or near the outlet tempelature of the dryer. Consequently, the
piu'ticles ae never heated above the outlet temperature of the dryer, despite the lact that the inlet
temperaturc may be considerably higher. The final dried powder will be at a temperature
approxirnately 20'C lower than the air outlet temperature (Gohel ¿¡ «1., 2009).
Time An irteresting phenomenon that luppens during the falling rate peiod is "bubble Jbnnntion"
(Figure l.12, step 4, and Figure 1. t3). When dre parlial pressure ofmoisture vapot at the droplet cenre
Figure l.l ITemperoture history during sproy drying of o liquid droplel {Hondscomb et al., 2OO9
Reproduced with permissioñ of Elsevierj. exceeds albient pressure, it results in bubble fbnnation and a subsequent increase in temperature.
lntroduclion io sproy drying l5 16 Sproy drying techniques for food ingredient encopsulotion
Oullet gas
dryer outlet
[4.'r;i¡s.: .i
B,l.;i:4§ÍBñ
w7
-
-
Dry'ns @e"*,۟l&*ffi lnner vorlex
A cor.rsiderable amount of energy is required for üis vaporization, which halB üe sensible heating
(Figure 1.I I, DE). The dropiet inflates to the outer radius md finally results in irregular randomly Outer voftex Conical bottom
shaped particles (Figure l. 13; EEel cI a/., 1996). As lnentioned above, a crust is formed as the rnois-
ture content decreases, and the droplet temperahr¡e ultimately rises towards the dry-bulb temperatue
of the air (Figure 1. I l, EF). The varied morphologies of the spray dried particles resulting fiom üe
bubble inflation phenofirenon axe discussed in detail ir ¡he forthcoming section.
Two systems are emp§ed in separating the product trom the drying medium: the ptimary and Outlet for dr¡ed product
secondary separation. Note üat the spray drying chamber often has a conical bottom to lácilitate
the easy collection of the dried powder. Duing the prinary separation, the dry powder is collected
Figure I.t4 A lypicol cycloneseporotor (Utikor elol., 2010. Reproduced with permission of lnlech)
at the base of the dryer, followed by removal using a screw conveyor or a pneuñaúc system with
a cyclone separator at tlre time of seco[dary separation. The gas stream loaded with the evaporated
moisture is drawn from the centre of the cone above the conical bottom and is discharged through
a side oudet. The relatively low efficiency of collection necessitates the use of an additional par-
ticle collection system, compdsing dry collectors followed by wet scrubbeN. The dry collectors
include a cycloue sepa['ator, a bag filter and an e]ectrostatic p[ecipitator, depending on tlrc size of
the particles carried away by the exhaust gzu and the final product specitications.
the ñlter bag, which retains the product panicles on ils surface. The clean air passes out through
1.5.2 Bog filter bags and plenum to the outlet ofbag filt'el'. Accumulation of dust on bags causes an increase in the
The bag filter (Figure l. 15) comprises a metallic housing desigued for continuous operation and diiTerential pressure across the filter bags. Compressed air is pulsed by a timer-actuated series of
automatic cleaning. The particleJaden air enters unde¡ suction or pressure through the collector in normally closed pulse valves at preset intervals, causing the valves to open- The compressed air is
the cenuE or bottom pafi (i,e. the hopper) of üe bag ñltu-. The air', with particles, uavels through stored in a reservoir located beside the higher filter chamber. Above each row of bags there is a
tube with holes that are aligned with the central air passage gap, located on 1op of the bags.
lntroduciion to sproy drying l7 I 8 Sproy dryinq techniques {or food ingredient encopsulqtion
Morphology is one delicate aspect of spray drying wlich makes it versirtile as well as intricate
Flow direction The lireranrre shows it is possible to alter the moryhology of spray dried particles by optimizing
@ the process patameters. At the same tirne, quantitying and assessing the process variables
Negatively charged
?r influencing rlorphology is ditlicult. due to tlie cornplex interactions between the variables and
unique drying pattems of differcnt materials subjected to spray drying. In the case of spray
partic¡e
drying, the interaction l¡etween vriables such as in]et and outlet temperatue, flow rate of
drying gas, the f'eed properties constituting its concertration, solute dilfusion coefticient and
solvent latent heatJ govern the tinal particle rnorphology.
Drying kinetics is central to the understanding of particle rnorphology (Vehring, 2008). The
Cylindrical particle
collecting electrode impact of different dryirg partems on rhe producr rnorphology is depicted in Figure l. t 7. The
(anode) crust fonnation stage is central to the particle fbrmaúon during spray drying. Follou'ing the
cmst formation, the &oplet may fbllow one of the two ptincipal pathways, leading either to
small, sotid particles or large, hollow ptuticles. The first is the "dry.rl¿¿ll" route, whÍch is similar'
to a sluinking core, producing pafiicles which zre susceptible to shattering when dried at lrigh
tempernture. The second route is the "w¿t shell" type, which tends to tblm hollow p;x.ticles
.: which may inllate wlien subjected to higher drying temperature. Thus, the lnolpllology of the
spray drie<l particles also depends on rhe narure of the shell formed (Handscomb c¡ a1..2009).
It is also apparent tiorn the illustration that the drying temperature and solid content of the feed
","?i,?l#ii",113[r solution or suspension ilt the key factors in deciding the particle r.norphology.
Figurel.ló Schemotico[lheworkingprincipleo[eleciroslolicprec¡p¡toior{Leeelol.,20ll). Tlr. scope of further discussion is intended to plovide an insight to the plausible rnorpholog-
ical patterns of spr.ay dr.ied products, and the impact of major influential spray drying parameters
on th: below.
though which complessed air is injected to invert the gas f]ow momentarily. This causes the
particulate material accumulated outside the bags to be removed. .,¡¡ a j\
1.5.3 Electrostoiic precip¡totor No parlicle Shanered Solid particte /
formatron part;c¡e W
t :
Electrostatic precipitation is a method of particle collection in spray drying that uses 1 I j+\ collapse
electrostatic force. An electrostntic precipitator (ESP) cornprises of discharge wircs and col- LowsotidslAp4{t
lectilg plates (Figure 1.1ó). A trigh voltage is applietl to tlre discharge wires to lbrm an concentratnn, Htgh \¡7 -#
¡
electrical field between rhe wires anrl the collecting platc's. This high voltage ionizes the air <t iowtw tetnpetature
around the discharge wires to supply ions. As the drying air that contains the product parti- t ,rr, "n"ln-'lt''t'on I
cles flows between the collecting plates and the dischalge wircs, the particles in the gas are ,ffi. - a¿+-. -i
-:- \^/
\
^. /
charged by the ions. Tlie Coulomb fblce cau§ed by the electric tield causes the charged par-
ticles to bl¡ collected on tlie collectirg plates and the air is purified. The particles collected
on the collecting plates are removed by rapping the collecting plates, scraping off with a
brush or washing off with water, and removiug from a hopper. Furtlier discussion on ESP
@-@-ffir-"*^@_-
lnit¡al droplet Saturated
dry¡ng
surface Crust formation lnternal bubb¡e Uninflaled shell
@
nucleal¡on
will be provided in Chapter 8.
The selection ofparticle separation equipment is governed by various thctors such as collection
efticiency, suitability for product handling, operaúonal t'eatures, cost ¿rnd space requilenrent.
()t\()
I
*
-^
I.ó MORPHOTOGY OF SPRAY DRIED PARTICIES
\-/
\_-/ \)
Paticle morpholo-ly is an indicative signal which inlluences the decision on spray drying pro- Blisteredparticle Shrivelledparticle lnflated'pl:tfed'
cess parameters. Morpholo-uy aff'ects the key quality characteristics ofspray dried products such
as particle size distribution, i-lowability, friabitity, moisture content and bulk and particle density.
t¡gurel.I7 Differentmorphologiesduetobubbleinflotionduringsproydrying{Hondscombetol,2009
Hence, it is yital to understand the variables which decide the morphology, and the lrequently Reproduced with permission of Elsevier).
occuning rnorphology patterns in dte spray dried products.
lntroduclion lo dr t9 20 Sproy dryinq lechniques for food ingredient encopsulotion
Lrge particles dried at gas temperaturcs abo\e tlle k)ihng point of the water may inflate after shell outward anrl unilbrml¡, around lhe droplet. This creates sub-atmospheric internal pressures.
fomatiol. due to build-up of intemal gas pressure. potentrally causing shell rupture or "blow-holes" whiclr eventually result in the collapse of the particles. It mzry nlso be due to ilcorrect cltoice
in the shells (Walton and Mumf'ord, 1999). of inlet drling air temperaturc and insufticient solid content in the feed solution, resulting in
The fbm.ration of structurally rigid panicle shell is favored by rapid drying and high particle deficient drying of the t'eed droplets. Consequently, the wet particles irnpact on the walls of the
mobility.'fhis evert occurs befble the piúicles in the interior ofthe tlroplet come into contact with drying clranrber which, in the course of the process, deforms on impact and collapses to result
each other. Hele. the dryhg rate is decreased, as the lou,permeability of the shell hinders the in the cap-shaped, dented structures. Yet anotlrer reason is that tlre highcr drying rate l€ads lo
liquid florv to the surface. Evertually, the rigid shell structue leads to the formation of hollow rapid wall solidification prior to expansion of the particles, which tbrnrs a slrong crust on the
granules that visually appe:us like craters or "blow- holes", lbnned by an inwarcl collapse of the palticle surlace and restricts the complete bubble inllation. thus [esulted in caved-in or dented
shell. The inwnrd collapse can be explained by the formation of a partial vacuum due to the surfaces (Anandharamak¡ishnan et aI.,2O07)- However, surláce dents result tiom a complex
capillarity-induced movement ofpanicles lion the intedor to the surface shell (Oberacker, 20 l2). inter¿rction between several factors, such as the drying r¿rte, ¿rtomization mechanism and
uneven shrinkirge at early stages of drying, viscoelastic properties of the rvall materials and
rapid wall solidification.
l.ó.3 Agglomerote Thus, an observation of the particle morphology, along u'ith drying kinetics nay etlable the
experts involved in product developmert to a[ive at optimum process settings to achieve desired
Structurally, an agglomerate can be detined as a p¿fiicle composed of individual grains of
product ploperties and qudity.
material bound together by sub-micron dust or a binder (Figure 1.1 9(c)). Agglomeration between
tlie paÍicles inside the spray drying churber occurs as a result of ¿idhesion (solid link between
the particles) and collision tbrces betrveen them. The collision within the spray ch¿mber can
occur between two liquid droplets, or between a liquid drop and an already dried pnticle, or bet-
1.7 SPRAY-DRYING PROCESS PARAMETERS AND THEIR
ween two dry parricles. Tlie collision can also be between üróre th¿rn tu,o dry parricles. The adhe- INFLUENCE ON PRODUCT QUALITY
sion depends upon the tbrce of impact and contlrct time between the colliding prticles. The
relati\,e speed ofparticles and the particle nrass de'cide the irnpact o1'adhesior. It isc¡br,ious lrom the previous sections on the spray drying process steps that spray drying
The agglomeration also depends upon the nature of particle surflce. cornprising of its cornpo- is a method which strongly and equally depends on marerial properties, equipment design
sition, viscosity, temperature and water activity, all of which change during dre spray drying and sctting of operation par¡meters. The above listed factors inlluence the final product
process. As the droplets of the feed solution undergo drying, the water activity of the droplet qualit',,, mainly in terrs of residual rnoisture, particle size and rnorphology. Although the
surthce decreases while its ternperature increases. The viscosity of'drop suúace also continues to optimization ofthese variables is usually achieved by a "trial and error" approach, an under'
increase until it reaclres a critical value Q¡.), which is elluivalent to I 07 Pa.s. This critical viscosity standi,lg of the basic guidelines of spray drying would result in intelligent operation of the
is associ¿ted u,ith stickiness, which eventually leads to tlre tbrmation of viscous bridges between equilunent. The different spray dryiug process parafiIeters, conesponding to each of thr: four
the particles to fbrm agglomerate. 4, is also related to the glass transition temperature or sticki- steps of spray drying, are discussed in the following section. General guidelines lbr deciding
ncss tenlperalurr'. whÍch is c'xplaincd in scction 1.8..1. the paramefers lor a spray drying operation and intbrmation related to its impact on product
In addition, the solubility ofthe material to be dried in waLc'r is also an intluencing firctor on c¡ualty are also listed.
spray dried pafiicle agglomeration. Generally, insoluble and sparingly soluble solids in the t'eed
result in agglornerates. To a certain extent. agglomeration is beneficial in 'instant', products, such 1.7.1 Atomiz<¡tion porometers
as instant coff¡e. for achieving better wettability and dispersibility in water. Llowever, excessive
'l'he pt-rlbrnance ol'atomizers depends on three pararneters: the atornizirtion pressure, feed flow
aggkmeration may result in llow diltculties and severc caking problerns (Barbosa-Cánovas
et al.,2005). rate, \,iscosity and density. These paranreters have an influence on the droplet size.
1.6.4 Formoiion of denied slructure qnd presence of smqll L/. 1. 1 Atomtzotton pressure
port¡cles within lorge porticles Witlr the same t),pe olnozzle and leed material, as the atomization ptessrtre is increased, droplet
size decreases according to the relationship below (Equation I .7; Masters, l99l ):
It is also interesting to leam about some unusual morplrological pattems that ae encountercd durilg
spr ay drying ofsorne tbod componerts. One is cap-shaped, slightly dented structLnes (Figure l. I 9(d)),
D. /¿ \''
ruldtheotheristhepresenceof srnallparticleswitlrrlargeparticles(Figurc l.l9(c)),whichareusu-
ally noticed in spray dried coll'ee. The phenomenon of smaller particles inside luger particles cam be ,,=le] (1.7)
due to the en[y of lomer into the latter tlrough blowlioles, or it may possibly occu'where m¿u'ly
snraller pru'ticles conbine to lbrm luge puticles durirg dryilg. Wrere D, and D, are the initial and tinal droplet sizes on changing the irtolniz¿tion pressure
The lbrmation ofdcntcd oI cap-shapcd stluctures is artributctl to scvcral catrscs b¡'di1]clent tiorn P, to P", respectively, This is due to the requirement of an efficient delivery of the atom-
works published in this contcxt. Crosby antl Marshall (19-58) ascertain that the cap-shaped ization ener-ey to the bulk liquid to drive droplet fission.
particles result tiom capillary action of the dried p¿lrticle surtilces drau ing the litluid and solids
lntroduclion to sproy drying 23 24 Sproy dryinq techniques for food inqredient encopsulotion
Where D, and D, ale the initial and ñnal droplet sizes on changing the Ieed viscosrty lrom /r to
I.8.2 lnletlemperolure
¡r", respectively. Inlet iemperaturc. is rhe temperature of the heared drying air. The inlet temperature is significent in
cooh,rg the atomized feed droplets to their wet-bulb temperature. In addition, it has a direct rela-
tionslrip to die wet-bulb temperature of the surrounding hot air (Oldlield et al., 2005; Figure 1.20).
1.7.1.4 Feed surfoce tension
stages of sprav drying. The lrade-oif between llre albrementioned circumstances is important in 30
deciding an optrmal ililet temperature tbr rhe spray drying process.
c25
1.8.3 Ouiletlemperofure 9¿ 20
3>
o6
The temperature of tlre air laden with solid paticles befbre entering the cyclone is detined as 15
the outlet temperatureJhis tempgl¿lgIg is a result of the heat and mass halance in the drying 'áo 10
cylinder, and therefore cañn6t be regulaterl. Striking the optimum tq!¡psüü¡{qJUffelgnce =O
betweeu the inlet and ourlet te ma o-
ace topography of the
final product (Maas er n1., 201 l). For instance, operation at high ouflet temperature is carried 0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
out to acllieve high moisture content to obtain agglome¡ated ''instant" powdered products. This Water act¡v¡ty
is because higher outlet aií temperature promotes rapid crust fbrmation while the drying of the
inner co¡e is still Dot complete. Fruthemore, an increase in the outlet temperature also incrcases Figure 1.22 Moislure sorplion isotherm of o WPI powder (Guggenheim-Anderson-De Boer (GAB) sorption
the particlc tempcrature by shiliing the wct-bulb lines on thc psychrometric chart. When the isotherm model doto) (Foster et ol., 2005. Reproduced with permission of Elsevier).
inlet and outlet air temperatures are known, it is possible to calcul¿tte the particle temperature
using the above relationship. Figure l.2l illustrates all example of esrimating the temperature
of whey protein panicles using a psychrometric chart. sorption isotherm (Figure 1.22). The outlet particlc temperatures are thcn calculated flom
The wet-bulb temperature is constant along the dotted lines. Curved lines of constant wet-bulb lines using the lbllowing rclarionships:
water activity, ¿¿*, are also shown in Figufe 1.2i, in which a valve of 5.zEa corlesponds to Mass transfer rate from particle:
the relative humidity of the outlet gas and that of 16%o is the equilibrium relative humidity
corrcspontiing to the whey ploduct bulk moisture contenl, obtained ll'om its moisture -n; :r,.eo(v,' -r,,,,) (1.e)
where
fr js the mass transf'er coelicient (m/s);
0.08 A, i; the surface area ofthe particle (m'?);
lx ii
the heat transfer coefñcient (Wm'? K);
f is the water activity at surface of the porlicles:
0.06
7., iLnd T, are the temperatures of the surrounding air and pardcle respectively.
0.00 The outlet piuticle tempcrature is then estimated by ibllowing the wcrbLrlb lines lrom thc gas ouüet
20 40 60 80 'r00 120 140 160 180 200 220
conditions to the rekrtive humidity line coresponding to the equilibrium relative hurnidity (ERH) on
Temperature ("C)
tlre surface of the whey powder. The ERH of the whey powder is obtained from its water activity
Figure l.2l Psychromelric chort showing typicol gos ond porticle inlet qnd outlet conditions = ERlVlO0), detenniled liom the moisture sorpúon isotherm of whey protein isolate powder
(a,,,
(Anondhoromokrishnon, 2008). (Figure 1.22) at 50'C, reported by Foster ¿l d., (2005) using the rneasuredproduct moisnne content.
lntroduction to sproy drying 27 28 Sproy drying lechniques for food ingredient encopsulotion
Howeve¡ the above metllod of estimation for particle outlef temperature assumes that there Feed Heater
is no significant effect of temperature, and üe measured moisture content is representative of
the surface moistue content as the panicles exit the spray dryer. But, in reality, the surface
rnoisture content will always be lower than the average rnoisture content and thus the estimated
particle oudet temperatures would be lower than üe actual value.
w.T . +cw"T -
(1. l3)
' wr+cwz Figure I.23 Schemoiic o[ on open cycle sproy dryer.
wherc: the hearilg medium is recycled/reused; as single-stage and two-stago dryers, depending on the
w, atd w, are mass tiactio[ of solute and water; number of passes before the üied product is separated; and as short-form and tall-form, based
Tr,andTrrare Elass transition temperatures (K) ofsolute and water (138 K), respectively on tlre aspect ratio. Each of the above categories of sp¡ay dryer is briefly described as below:
¿ is the ratio of specitic heat change of solute to water at üe glass transiúon temperature.
1.9.t Open cycle sproy dryer
Further discussions on the relevance of d in spray drying process ale presented in detail in
This is the st¿urdard layout of spray dryer, with wide usage. It involves d¡awing the drying air from
Chapter 4,
the annosphere, heaúng and conveying it through rhe chamber once, and üen exhausting it back
to the i¡ünosphere (Figure 1.23). The variations in this layout could be with respect to the type of
1.8.5 Residence fime of port¡cles in the sproy chomber separation equipment used (i.e. use of cyclone separator, bag filter or electrostatic pl€cipitator).
This parameter is important from two perspectives - namely, with respect to complete drying of
feed droplets to achieve optimum product specifications, and in the control of particle temper 1.9"2 Closed cycle sproy dryer
atu€ to minimize aroma loss and themal degradation of heat sensitive materials. The particle Closr:d cycle dryers work on the principie of recycüng and reusing the gaseous medium , which
residence lime (RT) also affects product qualiry indices such as solubility and bulk density. RT is us relly a relatively inert gas such as nitrogeu, or air in special cases (Figure 1.24). A closed
is divided into two parts: primary and secondary residence times. The primary RT is calculated cycle dryer is used when the feedstock is prepared by dissolving the solids in flammable sol-
from the time taken for droplets leaving the nozzle to impact on the wall or leave at the outlet. vents. in ordel to rcduce the explosion risk and to obtain a complete recovery of the solvent.
The secondary residence time can be deñned as the time taken fo¡ a particle to slide along the When the spray dried ploduct is susceptible to oxidation, then a closed cycle dlyer is the most
wall from üe impact position to the exit (Kuriakose and Anandharamakrishnan, 2010). While appropriate choice (Gohel et a1.,2009). It is also advantageous to use this type of dryer when a
prediction of RT in a spray charnber is experirnentally difficult, recent advancements in mod- toxic feed is subjected to drying, and the resultant poilution due to roxious vapors and u¡rdesir-
eling and powerfulcomputational simulation techniques aid in efñciently calculating the RT. able particulate emissions or odot are not permitted by the regulatory norms. However, these
conditions are normally not encountered in a food industry.
Wet scrubber
Box I.2 Advontoges of sproy drying Ioble I.3 Food opplicotions of sproy drying
o The ability to be operated as fully automated control systern, enabling continuous Applicotion Reference
monitodng and recording of all the associated process variables simultaneously. Doiry products {whole milk, Ye et ol. l2OO7); Fong et o/. 12012); Kin et al. 120091; Fu et ol. 120121;
e A variety of spray dryer designs to meet dift'elent product specifications. skim milk, whey protein) Anondhoromqkrishnon et ol. (2008)
¡ Few moving parts and no moving p¿u'ts are in direct contact with the product, mini- Egg-bosed producis Kincol (l 987); Ronnou el o/. (201 3)
mizi.ng corrosion problems. lnslont coffee ond teo Yu etoL {2012}
Boyrom el o/. 12005); Ghorsollooui er o/. {201 2}; Yoshii et ol. (20Q1);
¡ The ability to handle vuied nature of feedstock, with the only mandate being that it has
Flovoring compounds
Sooititontowot ef o/. {2005}.
to be pumpable (solution, sluny, paste, gel, suspension or melt tbrm). Meot ond fish products Kurozowo et ol- l2OQ9l;Zhong et ol- {201 3}; Anwor ond Kunz, (2Ol 1 )
r The possibility of obtaining tailor-made particle size ald btrlk dersity, depending on end Fruit ond vegetoble products Kho et o/. (20 t 0); Goulo ond Adomopoulos (2005); Fozoeli et ol. 12012)
product specifications, by optimization of nozzle design and operation paramete-rs. Edible profein products Oil¡z et al. {2009); Wong et oi. {2013}
¡ Unique morphology of pretlominantly spherical pa'ticies, with unifbrm size and hollow Corn producls Zhong ond Jin (2009)
Wheot bosed products for Lioo ef o/. (2013)
structulc, thus reducing the bulk density of the product.
bo[. e'y purpose
Sugor products .Joyosundero et o/. (201 1); Truong er o/. (2005); Adhikori et ol. {2009);
ConoChouco et ol. (2005)
600lo of the panicles impact on the cylindrical wail, which has an adverse eft'ect on the product
quality due to the solids adhedng to the wall for appreciable times, drying out and losing their Thus, in a nutshell, the resourcefulness of splay drying lies in its capacity in terms of con-
wet-bulb protection (Anandharamakrishnan er a/., 2008). tinu(,u.r opemtion, wide range of operating temperatures, short residence times, production of
a powdercd prodrct, suitability fbr both heat-sensitive and heati'esisl.ant materials. rapid
drying and flexibility in capacity design (feed rates range from a few pounds per hour to o\,er
I.IO APPTICATIONS AND ADVANTAGES OF SPRAY DRYING 100 turs per hour), to listjust a ftw. In the following chapters, the spray drying technique is
intloduced to readers in its all¡rew dimensiou as an encapsulation process for food ingredi-
Tlie maior advantages and applications of spray dryilg ale presented in Box 1.2 and ents, l'lle fundarnental aspects of spray drying covered in this chapter are presented with an
Figure 1.27, respectively. The applications of spray drying have been categorized as food intention to assist readers to further relish the "language of spt'tqt tlrytiag" in the new accent of
and non-food applications in Figure 1.27. The exclusive lood applications of spray drying "encu¡tsulatiort" in the forthcoming chapters.
are presented in Tablc 1.3.
lniroduciion to sproy drying 33 34 Sproy drying techniques for food ingredieni encopsulotion
Fu, N.. 1voo, M.W., SDlomulya, C., ¿l ¿1. (2012). Dryiog kinetics of skim milk wilh -507¿ rnitial solnls. Journal of Food
References En 4:rceriq lO9. 101-J I 1.
Fukunrcto, H., Aizawa, J. and Takeda, M. 12U)6). Líquid spnyet'. US Patent 7,086.6 I 7.
Adhikari,B.Howes'T..Bh¿udai,B.R.a¡dLalgñsl¡.T'AC-(2009) Effectof¡dditionofproteilsontheproduction Ghüs¿iliaoui, A.. Roudaul, G., Be¡ey. L.. Chmbin. O., Voillcy, A. and Saurel, R. (20i2). Properties oi spray dried tbod
ol amorphous sucrose powder t}lrough spray dryitg. Jounml ol Foo¿ Eil9¡neer¡ng 94, 141-153. Ila/ours ,licroetrcapsulated with two-layered trlembrAlcs: Rolcs oI itrlertacial intemclions atd waler. Food
Al¡milla-IJclúan, L., Canona-Perez. -T., Jimenez-^puicio, A. and Guüenez-Lopez, G. 12005). Description oimoryho- Cl:enisrr1 132, 1713 1720.
fogical changes ofpmicles along spray dryi ng, Joumul of Footl Engineerittg 67, 119-184. Gohel C.M-,Pxrikh,R.K.,Nagori,S.A.,eral-(2009).SprayDtying:AReview-P¡¡@r?xdcettticdRevi¿v's7(5)
Anandlrram¡krishnan. C. 12008). ErTrrirl enxil an(l comp!¡ational.flui¿l tl\nan¡i¿ s stu¿ies on sprtLI Ji??a?-¿r]'it1g an¿ Goula, A.M. and Adamopoulos, K.G. (2005). Stabilily of lycolene dudng spray d¡yi ng of toma(o pulp. LwT - Food
sptq,alh-¡il! o¡ proteir¡r. Ph-D thesis, Loughborough Uiliversity. UK Scie,tc and Technologr 38 (5), 479-487.
Anandhramukrish¡an. C.. Reilly, C.D. and Stap¡ey, A.G.F. (2007). Ell'ccts oiprocess vilriablcs on the denatu¡ation oI Handscomb, C.S., Kraft. M. and Bayly, A.E. (2009). A new model tbr ¡he drytug ot' droplels conlaiuing suspcnded
wlrey proteins duing sp¡ay üyi¡g. Dry¡,,s ?i'rh,tolog! 25,'199-807. sohds. C lrcrn i c a l En g in e e r í n g S ci e n c e 64, 628437.
Auudlr¡a¡¡akishr¡r. C.' Ginbül J., St¡ple]'. A.c.F. and Reilly. C.D. (2008). A sruú'of paiicle histaties ¡lutittg Hassa¡, H.M., Sayed, A.A. and Mumfb¡d, C-J. ( t996). Volatiles retetrlion iD the drying of skiD fomjng Datelials. lII.
spr.ty lrying using c-ampüt,ttiondl Jl!i¿.bndillics sínulations.ln: l6ü Intcrnatiooal Drying Sympo§ium IDS 2008, Heai sensitive ¡naterials. Dn;,g Techiob$' 14(3/4), 581-593.
9-[2d] Nolerrbe¡ 2008. Hyderabad. India, VolA, pp- 265-272. Hocvc, W.V-, Gckle, S., Snoeijer, J.H.. Vcrsluis, M., Brcnocr, M.P dd Lohse, D. (20t0). BreÑup o[ diminuúve
Ailu Bhushani, J. aildAnaodharamakrishnan, C. (2014). Electrospinnirg and electrospr¡ying techniques: Potential fmd Rayleigh ¡ers, P/¡rricr of Flui¿s 22, 122003, l-11-
based applicatio[s. Tre»ds it Food Sci¿ttce orulTechtrologl, j8(l
), 21-33. Huang, D. 1201 l). ,44odeling of ptutícle fornuú¡on during spnt\ dllirS. Europcan Drying Conlérence - EuroDrying'
Aluldhia, C.J., R¿r,al, J.A., Patel. N{.M., ¿f dl. (20I I). Spray dlfit¡g in the PhilDaceutical iñlustry - A Review. 1illo 201 l. Palna. Balearc Island, Spain, 2ó-28 October 20.1 l
Aner¡cnil Joilraal oJ Phdrmnteuücal R¿seatch2t1),125 138. laworrl, A. (2007). I\,licro- od Nanopaflicle l'roducLioü hy Electlosprayin-c. Potr'd¿l fecáralog) 176(l), l8-35.
A¡war; S.H. atrd Kuü, B. (201 I). The influence ofdiJing methods on the stabilizatio¡ ofijsh oil nicroencapsulates: Jayilsundera, M.. Adhikil i. 8.. Howes, T. anLi Aldred. P (201 I ). Surt¿ce protei¡ coverage md its implicalio¡s on spray-
Comparison of spray granulatiolt. spriry dryirrg and fieeze dryl}g. Jour\úl of l'ood Engineerin| lO5{Z). drying ot model sugil-rich tbods: Solubilily, powder production a¡d characLcnsatio¡. Food Chenistry 128.
367 378. 1003 1016.
Ijarhosa-Cárrovns.G.V. O¡tega-Rivas- ti., -luliaio. P afld Yan. H. (200-5). lJu]k f¡nfe¡Lies.ln: Food Po*lers- Ph.tsical Kha, T. C., Nguyen, M. H. and Roach. P D. (2010). Ellicts of spray dryin-s conditions o¡r tlrc physicochemical ed
Propeñien'Pto.tssitlg tttd Luilt'tionality,pp. 55 88, KluwerAcadcmic/Plenum Publishcrs, NewYork drtio¡idart p(openies of the Cac (lvlomordica cochilchilensis) fiuit ail powder: Jourtul of Foo¿ Eil{¡t¡eeúng
B¿yrdr, O.A., Bayram, M. and Tekin, A.R. (2005). Spray drying of su¡nac flavour ilsing sodium chloride, sucrose, 98(3),385 392.
glucosc ¿trd shrch as ctriers. Jourtal of Food Engitteering 69,1-53 ?.60. Kim, tr.H.J., Chcn, X.D. ud Petrce, D. (2009). Sutace compositio¡ of indilstri¿l spray-dried milk powder§.
Ca¡o-Chauca. M.. Stringhetü. PC., Ramos. A.M. and Cal-Vidal, J. (2005). Eúect of cilriers on lhc microstructure of l. Developme[t of suúáce composition during nra¡utaclurc. Jorl?¡dl of Footl Engineering94,163-168.
ü[ngo powder obrained by spray drying a¡d its functional characrerization. lNtovu¡w Food Science a]il EnetS¡t¡8 Ki¡cal. N.S. (1987). T¡anspofl properúes oI li.luid egg relatcd to spray drying bghavioú Jourfrdl of Foo¡ Engineering
7echn o kt g i es 6@1, 42O.128. 6(6),167414.
Chtrlesivo[h, D.H. and Marshall, W.R. (1960). Evapo¡ation lron drops containing dissolvcd solids. AIChE Jounral Kü.iakose, R. and Anandharamakúshnan. C, (2010). Computalional Fluid Dynamics (CFD) applications in spray
6(l).9-23. drying of food p¡oducfs. Treilds ¡il Foo.l Sc¡ere and Technolog¡ 21, 383-398.
Crosby. E.J. ¿nd IUilshall. W.l{. ( I 958). Illlects oI drying uouditiuns uD the propcrlics ol spray rlded pa.Licles. C&emicíl Ku¡ozawa, L.E., Pak, K.J. ard Hubinger, M.D. (2009). Eft'ect ofcffiier agents o0 the physiuochernical prope¡ties ofa
Etq in, rit¡6 P rugr. ss s-lt 7 r. 56-6J. spray dricd chicken mcat protcin hydrolysatc. Jownal oJ lbod Engineering 94,326-333.
"
Dalmoro, A., Ba¡ba, A.A., La¡nbeni. G. and d'Amore. M. (2012). Ltrensit-vitrg tl¡e microencapsulation p'oce'ss: Lugrish, T.A.G. and Fletche¡, D.F- (200 l). Spray d¡ying of tbod irgredients ald upplications of CFD io sp¡ay drying.
Lllfasonic atomisstion as an innovative app¡oacl\. Eurcpedn JoLtrnd oÍPharnucetlics ilil¿ Biapharilúceulic§ 80, Chcm¡ col Ei1 g ¡i1ee r ¡n g an ri P roc ess i n g 40, 345-351.
471471. Law, C.K. and Law, H.K. (1982). A d? law lbr multicomponcnt droplct vaporization and combustion. AIAA Journ«l
Dobre, M. ard Bolle, L. (2002). Practical design ofultrasonic spray dcvices: experimental tesliDg 01'sevcr¿l atomizcr 20(4),522-527.
geometries. Etprrlnrental Thernal arul Flttil ScieÍce 26.105-21 \. Lec, S.H., Heng, D., Ng. W.K., Chan, H.K. and Tun, R.B. (20¡ 1 ). Nano spray dryin-c: A novel method fbr p¡eparing
Doli¡sky, (2001). Higlr{enpemture sPray dryir! ¡Ietho(L\. l)rúng Technology f9. 785-806. protein nanoparticles tbr protein therapy. lrrr¿rwtioilal Joumal of Pharnnceuit:s 403, 192-200.
^.
Edly, R. (1998). Milk concenuatcs aqd milk powders. Ir: Eariy, R. (Ed), I'ethnotogt'o[ Dairy Pro¡lrcrr, 2nd editiotr, Liao, L., Watrg, Q. and Zrao, M. (2013). Functioual, conlbrmatiotral and topogrxphical changes ol succiüic acid
pp. 265-266, Blackie Academic and Protession¡Ll, UK. dcri¡tridared whcat gluten upon fteeze- and spray drying: A compüatíve study. ¿lyf- F¿o(l Science an l Technology
[lvcrsson. J. E.. I\litlqvist F!rcby.,\-, Aldcrbom. O. and Ebl\son, U. (2003). Droplcl and Pa(iclc sizc ¡tl¿tionship 50.177-184.
and shcll thickness ol uüalable ]actosc ptrticles du¡ing spray thyinl. Joilrnul of PhdrmuLetni«il Scieilc?§ 92, Lindcln!, J.S. and Wahlbcrg, M. (2009). Spr¡y Drying fbr Processi¡g of N¡nomatorials. ,lournil of Ph)'siL:s Conleteicc
900-910_ Scri.:s,170.
Ekel, M.R., Sue¡r, S.Y, Halversoil. S.L. and Budijono. S. (1996). Enzymc inactivation in a droplct lbrming ¿ bubblc Lixin. fl-. Kuma, K. ard Mujumdar. A.S. (2004). Simulatio¡ of spriu evapomtiotr usi0g pressure and ultrasodc
duriog drJing. JorDr¿l oJ Food Ergitteeriry 21, 11-34. at(nJser-acornptrative¿úalysis.R&.jirl./fSTUIrarr(EúglishVe bD)10(1A),83-100.
Ezhiltrasi, P,N., Iudmtú, D.. Jena, B.S. ard Anandhu¿u1a-krish[an, C. (2013). Microelcapsulatior of CtrciDia t'ruit Lord t:ayleigh ( I 878). OD úe instatriliry of jes. Proceedin¡s of the Loildon Mathenrutícal So¡:i¿n 10, 4-1 3.
cdtract by splay drying and its ell¡ct on brcad quatity. lournal tf the Science oJ Foo¿ tttl Agrículure 94. Loser, R. (2002). Ukrasonic atomizer. US Patent 6,402,046.
I 1 16-l l2l. Maas, (i.S., Schaldach. G., Littingc4 E.M., ¿/ ¿1. (201 I ). The impact oI spny drying outle¡ tc¡rpcrature on the pa-úcle
Fang, Y. Rogcrs. S., Sclomulya, C. and Chen, X.D. (201 2). F\0ctiondily of milk prolcin concsntrate: Ell'cct of spray mr r'¡lrology of rna0nitol. Po» der Teclnolog¡ 213,2-1-35.
drying temperalure. Bioch(iltical EttBiileerüry Joumal 62, l0l ll)5. N,taste,s. K. ( 199 I ). Sp,z¿r, D¡t'ing H¿o¿láo¿t, 5th edition, Longman Scientillc and Tech¡icrl, H¡rlow
Farid, M. (2003). A new approach to modeliug of si¡rgle droplet ,Jrying. Chenicut Engircerin| sci¿rc¿ 58. Ivlasteis. K. (2002)- Spray Dryiry in Prat:tit:¿, pp. l-35. Spray Dry Co¡sult, De¡mark.
298s-2993. Murali. K,, Kar1ne1, S.M., Prabhu, M.S.. et al. l2}l4). Cotrrlatio[ develop¡rent fo¡ Saute¡ mem diaoreter of rotary
F¿zaeli. M.. IlmdD-Diomeh, 2.. Asht{ri, A.K. and Oüiid. Nl. (2012). Eli¡ct ol spray drying co¡dition§ on the phy§ical aloú\L7,eL Ame ficdn Jour nal of Engine e ri ng Re search 3(3 l, 139-145 .
propeñies ofbl¿ck mulbenyjuice powder. Food utrd Bioprodncts ProLessit¡g90{4),667 675.
--iwr. 1., Shi¡¡abaa. H. and Danio, K. (2010). Novcl Spray lrrceze-drying Technique Usin! Four Fluid Nozzle
Fostert K.D., Bronlund, J.E. and Paterson,A.H.J. (2005). The prediction ol moisturc sorptionisothef¡s tbrdairJ powders. Dev,rlopme¡t o[ Organic so]venl svsteñ to expand jts applicalion 10 poorly water soluble drugs. Chetnicul an¿
I ntenntí onul Daüt J oufl Ml 15. 4l l-,+ 18. P h ti;¡nace Lt i cal B ul leú¡ 58(2), 195-200.
tircitas. S.. Mcrkiu H.1,. dli GanLlcr Il. (2(Xl4). U¡lras(»ic atomisütion into lcduuud nrc:surc xtflu\phore-cnvisrlrtng O¿Iile\.D.E.(2004).Spraydryermodeliugirtheoryandpllcdce.DryíngTechnoktg¡'22(6),1371 1,102.
aseptic spr¿y-drying fbr microc¡capstrlalioo - JLntrnal <tf Cottrollerl /i¿1¿as¿ 95, 185-195.
lnlroduction to sproy drying 35 3ó Sproy drying techniques for food ingredient encopsulotion
Oberacker, R. (2012). Powder comp¿ction by dry prcssiúg. ln: Riedel, R. atrd Che¡. I-W. lEds), Cemm¡cs Science aMl Yoslrii, H., Soottitantawat, A., Liu, X.D., ¿f at. OOOI} Fl¿voM relea§e from spray-dried maltodexrin/gm Ambic
Technolog¡'Volunte3:synthesisatLdPruerri,¿E,lsleditio¡l-lP.3 37,Witey-VCHVerlagGnhHandCo.KGaA. or soy matrices as a futrction of storaBe relative humidity. lnzovat¡ve Food Scie\ce a,¡d EnkrginE Tecluologies
Germany. 2, 1,5-61.
Ohnesorge, W.V (1936). Die Bildung von Troplbn an Daisen und die Auflósung tliissiger Strahle¡. Ze¡¡schrift fiir Yu, T.. I{acnaüghtan,8.. Boyer, M., Linfbrth, R., Dinsdale, K. md Fisk, LD. (2012). Aroma delivery 1ioú¡ §pray dried
Angewandte Mdthanatík und Mechanik 16, 355-358. coü¡)e coltaitrilg p¡essurised intemaüised gts. Food Res4rch Internafional 49,'702-'109.
Oldfield, D.1.. Taylor M.W. and Singh, H. (2005). Etfect of preheating ard othcr process peameters on whey proteins Zhang.1., Xia. W.S., Xu, YS.. Jíu8, Q.X., Wmg, C-X. and Wmg, WJ. (2013). Effeots of spmy-drying operaÚonal
reactions duilng skim rülli powder rnanufacúe. húerilLtioil¿tl Daí4 Jouilml 15, 5Ol-51 l. pdameters on tle quality offreshwater mussel powder ¡oal drrl Bioprodilct! Proc¿s§ing 9l(3),242-248-
Oiliz. S.E-M.. Mauú, A., Iuontef,Ey-Quintero. E.S., T¡jDdade, M.A.. Suntafla. A.S. and Favaro-Tti¡dade, C.S. (2009). Zhong. (.). and Jin, M. (2009). Nanoscal¿rslructrues oispray-driedzeir microcapsules and il1-viho lele¿sc kinctics oi the
e¡japsulatedlysozyntasaffecfedbyfonnula¡ions,JourntlofAgricLtlÍureonlFoo.lCltefriJlrJ57,3886 3894.
Production md properties of casein hydrolysate microencapsulated by sp¡ay drying with soybem prctein isolate.
LWT - Food Science ak¿kchnohqf 42.919-923.
Percy, S.R. ( 1872). Improvement in drying and concentrating liquid substances by aromising. US Patent 125. 406.
Plareau, J. ( 1873). Experimental üd úeoretical statics ol'liquids subject b molecular lorces o¡ly. Gauthier-villüs,
Puis 1,4-13.
Pyo, S.Y, Kirn, H.G., Yeg, B-Y., Lee, D.H. and Lee, K.S. (2006). DryiDg appsarus and washing machine havi¡g the
silxe. US Pate¡t 7.017,282-
Rahman,M.S.(1995).Foodptopenieshadbootls¡edition,87 lTT,CRCRess,BocaRato¡.
RajM. R., Kdthit, P. Pilüasaathi, S., Joseph, G.S. ed Anandlrúamakrishna¡, C. (2012). EÍÍ'ect of whey goteir -
alginate wall system oD suüiv¿ü of microencapsul¿ted Ltrctob¿cillus plMtmm itr simulated gasrointestim.l cotr-
ditions. Joumal oJ Ftotctíonal Foods 4(4).89 I-898.
Rannou, C., Texier, F., Moreau, M., Courcoux, P, Meynier, A. and I'rost, C. (201 3). Odou quaiity of spray-dried
hens' egg powders: The inf'luence of composition, processitrg aild storage conditions. Food Clrctnístry^ 138,
905-914.
Schwu-tzbach, C- a[d Masten. K. (2001)- Perfomance of spray dryer with itrtegrared ñlte¡ ard fluid bed- Dr¡r)rg
-Ib
e hn ol o gy l9l8), 1909 1 923.
Semyonov, D-, Rmon, O. and Shimo¡i, E- (201 l), Using ultrasonic vacuum spray üyer to produce highly tiable dry
protriotics. ItlT- Food Scieilce andTechnolog-) /l4, 1844-1852.
Scwcll, P-C. (t 987). Low pGssu¡e atom¿atlú iozzle. EP O2M204 A 1.
Seydel. P-, Blomer- J. aúd Befiling, J. (200ó). I{odetitrg paricle tbr¡¡¿tion aI spray dryirg usilg populatioD b¿üarces.
D 4' in g Te chno I o gy 24, 1 37 -1 46.
Soottitantawat, A., Takayama, K., Okamua, K.. ¿l dl. (2005). MicrocncapsulaLion of l-mentltol by spray drying ild its
¡ele¿se ch¿ractedsti.s. I¡útotatite Footl Science and Eillery¡frg Technologies 6(1). 163-17O.
Truong. V., Bhandai. B.lt. md Hows. T. (2005). Optimizatio¡ ofcoculent spray dryiug process lbr sug¿tr-rich lbods.
Püt ll-Optirnization of spray dryiDB process based on glass rmsitioD co\cept, Jounr¿i of Food Engineerítry 71,
66-:72.
Utikil, Dtrmawa!, N., Tade, M., ¿t ¿1. (2010). Hyúod)mamic simulation of cyclotre sepaators. ln: Oh. H.W. (Ed),
R.,
Conqutatioral fluid ¿&¡a¡¡ics, lSllN: 978-951-7619-59-6. lnTech, DOI; 10.5772"11106. Availahlc lio¡tr: httJ,://
www.inLcchopcn.com/books/comput¿tionai-fltrid-dynamics/hy(hodynamic-simulation-ol:ryclone-scpualurs
(Accessed on 8th Jmuary, 2015).
Velrdrg, R, (2008) Pharmaceutical ptricle ergineerirg via spray drying. Phattndceu¡ical Research 25(5),
999 t022.
Veluing. li., Foss W.li. md l-echuga-Ballestercs. D. (2007). Pdticle fomatio¡ itr s¡ray drying.,4erosol Sciente 38,
'728-746.
Walron. D. E. a¡d Mumlbrd, C.J. (1999). The nrorphology of spray-dicd particles - The eftect of process vüi-
ables opon üe norphology of spray-dried parlicles, Chenxical Eng¡rcefiilg Research and Design 17(L5\,
442460.
wan8, w.. Jiatrg, Y and Zhou, W. (2013). Cbaractelistics of soy sauce powdLTs spray-d¡ied usi¡g dairy whey poteins
arrd maltodextrins as dryinguds. Jounul of Food Engiueeri»g 119,124-73O.
Wcber. C., (193I). Zum Zcdall ei¡es FliissigkeitsstraNes. Zeitschr¡rt Íir Anga,a\Clte lvlaÍhenatik tnd Methdnik ll,
136-154.
Westeryaffd, V (1994), Milk potrder technolog),: Evaporotion und spra! ¡lrying,Niro NS, I58. httpl//www.niro.com/
¡iro/cñüesoüces,nsfltlle¡ameyeo_Milk-Powdcr-Techrology-Book-All.pdí$tile/cn_Milk-Powder-Technology-
Book_Al1.pdi
Westergaild, V (2010). ¡,1¡lk pott¿?r techtologyevapotation and spra¡'rlryirg. GEA-NIRO.
Wu. WD., Liu, W., Ge!-seDbacL, T', e¡ ¿¡1. (20[4). Towuds spray dryiug of higtr solids dairy liquid: Eft-ecrs of téed solid
content o¡ particle sbuctue and lunctionaltly. Jout,lal of Foo¿ Eilg¡neeinB 123, 130-135.
Ye, A., Anema, S.G. and Singh, H. (2007). Behaviour ot' homogcnized tht globules du¡ing the sp¡ay d¡ying of whole
A7il]r bÍernationdl Duiry Journal l7 l4\, 314-182.
Anexo 6 Anexo 7
.!§
o
*E '
ASda -**->
€ - §§"*
slñántÉ sJónfó 6
si¡tutode so¿io
:
.§ ü §.EH€
tustu eélidor -*
->
E*X ü§É3
atE*§fiEH
§§§§,r§E§
'¡ É1 ,ni$ si'§
5úffiiár ortád6§
issx¡td*de d€8.ad*¡é¡
réhte
4.L. Descripción global
:n la descripción global del proceso se encuentra una breve descripción del
Droceso y ¡as reacciones que tienen lugar en el proceso de fabricación.
DETERGENTE EN POLVO Después. el LAS se hace reacc¡onar con ei h¡dróx¡do de sodio (sosa cáustica)
para formar la sal de éste, es decir, el dodecilbencenosulfonato de sodio que es
el tensoactivo an¡ónico por excelencia de los detergentes en polvo.
1
Slurry: Es una mezcla de liqu¡dos y sólidos no disueltos
Fdbricación de detersente en Dolvo
. En la etapa de secado,
I
. Para enfriar el detergente seco.
Enz¡mas
PROCESO
I
CONT]NUO I
I
4,3. Etapas del proceso
EI proceso de elaboración de detergente en polvo se divide en cuatro etapas Perfumes
pr¡ncipales: pre-adición, torre de secado, post-adicién y envasado. El slguiente
esquema queda r€presentado el proceso.
4.3.7. Pre-adición
as la primera etapa del proceso de elaboración del detergente en polvo. Como
esta etapa se trabaja con líquidos, soluciones (acuosas) y agua, se denomina
etapa de mezcla húmeda, se puede dividir en: reacción de sulfonación, reacción
de neutrallzac¡én y finalmente pasta slurry,
11. Reacción de sulfonación ia masa formada en la reacc¡ón (2), se mezcla con los insumos elegidos para
elaborar el detergente. La operación se reallza en tanques de mezcla
En la ¡ndustria de los detergentes es común emplear el dodec¡lbenceno (DDB) ,lenom¡nados crouthers (rec¡pientes c¡líndricos de base cónica y dispuesta de una
como agente activo. El DDB es sulfonado con el oleum, para formar el respect¡vo chaqueta de calentamiento y un agitador), en donde se forma un lodo pastoso
ácido dodecilbencensulfón¡co (LAS). La reacción que t¡ene lugar es la reacción 1 denominado slurry con un conten¡do del 40 al 600/o de sólidos. Es necesar¡o
(Ver 4.1.2) rnantener un control estricto de la compos¡ción del producto resultante, la
La velocidad de reacción es extremadamente ráp¡da y exotérmica. Es necesario temperatura y el pH.
mantener la temperatura a 55 oC a f¡n de ev¡tar el exceso de sulfonación y el !)arámetros de la formación de la pasta slurry:
cons¡gu¡ente oscurecimiento de la mezcla, para mantener la temperatura se
emplea un intercambiador alrededor del reactor, el conjunto del reactor y del . Temperatura de mezcla: 600 C.
intercamb¡ador de calor se denom¡na reactor con cam¡sa. . pH de la mezcla: 10 (básico).
La sulfonación produce una conversión del 96% en menos de un minuto. Pero,
para facil¡tar Ios cálcr.llos y los diseños del proceso se ha supuesto una conversión - Comprobación de un pH básico cual¡tativamente:
del 100oá. La mezcla cont¡ene agua y dodec¡lbencenosulfonato de sodio. EI agua es neutra
Las variables a controlar son: y la sal del LAS es bás¡ca porque la sal se descompone en cat¡ón sod¡o y en el
anión dodecilbenecenosulfonato, reacción (4). El catión sod¡o no reacciona con el
. Efect¡v¡dad del agente sulfonante. agua por lo tanto, el pH del med¡o es neutro, pero el anión de la sal del LAS si
que reacciona con el agua, formando LAS y hidroxilos, reacción (5).
. Relac¡ón de agente activo y agente sulfonante.
. Temperatura.
CH:(CHz)g(CH)zC6H5SOrNa -> CHr(CHr)r(CH)2C6H5SO3- + Na* (4)
. Técn¡ca y tiempo de agregado del agente sulfonante.
HrO + CH3(CHr)9(CH)rC6H5SO3 ) CH3(CHr)r(CH)rC6H5SO3H + OH (s)
. Grado de agitac¡ón en la sulfonación.
. Temperatura y t¡empo de agitación de la mezcla reaccionante. Finalizada la mezcla, el slurry se bombea a la torre de secado. El detergente
desechado del tamiz y los detergente devueltos por el consumidor se vierten en
. Pureza de¡ agente sulfonante. el mezclador de la pasta slurry, para que no haya residuos.
Actualmente Ia mayoría de las industrias el¡m¡nan la etapa de sulfonación y Ver el anexo de cálculos para conocer más información del dimensionado.
adquiren por parte de otras industrias químicas el ácido Sulfónico de
Dodec¡lbenceno como mater¡a pr¡ma para la producción de los detergentes, como
por ejemplo, Henkel, debido a que el coste del LAS es mucho más bajo que
4.3.2. Torre de secado
dodec¡lbenceno. En el anexo se hace un estud¡o económico de esto último. La pasta slurry contiene entre un 30 y el 40 o/o de humedad (los cálculos se han
realizado con un valor del 360lo de agua, ver anexo de cálculos) hasta un
12. Reacción de neutralización producto term¡nado del 10 o/o máximo de humedad. El secado se efectúa en la
El LAS formado se neutraliza con una solución de sosa cáust¡ca, para formar el -orre de aspersión o dispersión.
tensoactivo an¡ón¡co, dodecilbencensulfonato de sodio. La reacción es la reacción -a masa pastosa o slurry es bombeada a la torre de dispersión a una pres¡ón de
2 ver 4.L.2. 75 a 150 Psi., las partículas dispersas son puestas en contracorriente con a¡re
La neutralización se efectúa de la siguiente manera: se deposita Ia soluc¡ón de caliente (400 oC).
NaOH (20olo) en el neutral¡zador, después se agrega el LAS y se agita a una r:n ésta sección se realizan las siguientes operaciones:
velocidad tal que su temperatura en el neutral¡zador se mantenga en un rango
de 50-55 oC (el cual debe tener una capacidad mínima lgual al doble de la . Generación de a¡re caliente.
capacidad del sulfonador). . Secado del producto.
Durante la neutralización es necesario controlar la temperatura para mantener la
fluidez de ¡a pasta. Esta reacc¡ón es altamente exotérmica, generando de 6 a 8
. Separación de polvo de arrastre.
veces más calor que en la reacción de sulfonación (1). La producción de a¡re cal¡ente necesar¡a para el secado del producto se obt¡ene
Los equipos empleados para controlar la temperatura en las etapas de mediante el horno generador de combust¡ón de gas natural (el gas natural
sulfonación y neutralizac¡ón son intercambiadores de calor de flujo circulante. contiene entre un 90Vo y un 95o/o de metano y el resto es n¡trógeno, sulfuro de
h¡drógeno y helio, pero los cálculos se han realizado con el porcentaje máximo
de metano, es decir, 100%). El generador está dotado de los dispositivos para el :as partículas de 0,5 a 1 micras pasan como producto deseado (se recogen en Ia
control de la combust¡ón y la regulación automát¡ca de la temperatura del aire parte ¡nferior del tamizado) y el resto se desecha en el mezclador de la pasta
cal¡ente a 400 oC. Cerca del generador está s¡tuado el vent¡lador que ha de slurry.
enviar el aire cal¡ente a la torre, prov¡sto de válvulas de regulación de caudal y Después de realizar una granulometría se añaden los insumos que no se han
enfr¡am¡ento. .:ñadido en la pasta slurry, porque las altas temperaturas de la torre se secado
El aire de secado entra por la parte inferior de la torre y sale por arriba, en supondría una desactivación de las de las propiedades de las sustanc¡as, como
sentido contrario al descenso de las partículas atomizadas por los ¡nyectores. El por ejemplo, el perfume y enz¡mas mediante dos¡ficadoras.
distribuidor está prov¡sto de numerosas bocas de entrada de aire para garant¡zar
una inyección uniforme y regular del a¡re al interior de la torre. En camb¡o, la
pasta slurry sale atom¡zada por la parte de arriba de la torre. Mtentras el Las tres etapas anteriores (pre-adic¡ón, torre de secado y post-adición) se
producto seco sale por la parte inferior de la torre, el aire (húmedo) lo hace por oueden esquematizar en un diagrama de flujo como es el siguiente.
la parte superior, pasando a través del conducto a la batería de c¡clones.
. Torre de Aspersión o dispersión
Se al¡menta de un gran volumen de aire ca¡¡ente sufjc¡ente
para abastecer el calor necesar¡o para completar Ia
evaporación del agua. La transferenc¡a de masa y energía se
logra med¡ante el contacto drlgclf,-del gas caliente con las
sotkasffi ?ese cáalffi -gasr
saliente por la parte super¡or es enfriado (por el calentam¡ento
global) y las partículas finas se separan del gas por medio de
un f¡ltro (para que las partículas finas no pasen a la atmosfera
contam¡nándola).La torre de aspersión generalmente está
constru¡da con chapa de acero común, está provista de mirillas Figura 4,2. Torre
o puntos de observación, e inyectores de pulverización. de secado
DETERGENTE Tamizado
T¡enen forma y dimensiones estud¡adas para obtener valores óptimos de la EN POLVO
velocidad y temperatura del arre además del t¡empo de contacto. Normalmente
la altura promedio es 24 metros (la torre que se instalará será de 20,4m).
. Batería de cic¡ones
La recolección de finos y n¡eblas en la parte superior de la torre de aspers¡ón son Figura 4.3. D¡agrama de flujo proceso de fabr¡cación.
atrapados por medio de filtros que atrapan más del 90 o/o de los sól¡dos. Los
c¡clones están ajustados con mangas de alta resistencia a la temperatura. Los
f¡nos son cont¡nuamente recogidos y rec¡clados dentro de la torre de dispersión, 4.4. Generadores
así se asegura una aspersión libre de niebla y se evita la operación manual. El
aire sale a la atmósfera con un conten¡do de finos y material part¡culado por Los generadores del proceso de manufactura de los detergentes son: el vapor, el
debajo de 5 mg/m3. ntercamb¡ador de calor y el quemador.
Para ver el dimens¡onado de la torre ver anexos. 13.Vapor: Es requerido como sum¡nistro de energía en el crouther, para
mantener las cond¡ciones de temperatura ex¡gidas, la cual es
. S¡stema de enfriamiento aprox¡madamente de 60 - 70 oC
El producto cal¡ente que sale de la descarga de la torre es transportado por el L4.Intercamb¡ador de calor: Las reacciones del proceso, son fuente generadora
conducto en donde sufre un enfriamiento. En el paso por el conducto de de energía por cuanto allí se efectúan unas reacciones altamente
enfriam¡ento, los grumos más pesados se descargan en la parte ¡nfer¡or del exotérm¡cas, por tanto es necesario disponer del agua como fluido de
conducto. enfr¡am¡ento que absorba la energía produc¡da. Necesar¡amente las aguas
cal¡entes son env¡adas a un sistema de torres de enfr¡amiento donde son
4.3.3. Post-adición enfriadas y recirculadas.
La mezcla es seca porque el porcentaje de agua es de un 100/0, esto se considera ;stos intercambiadores cons¡sten de un número de tubos paralelos encerrados en
un polvo seco. En esta última etapa se realiza la operación de tam¡zado, en que una carcasa cilíndrica y se clasifican de acuerdo a la construcc¡ón del cabezal de
tubos. En todos los casos los tubos están mandrilados o soldados al cabezal para il c¡rcuito del envaso se puede describir de la siguiente forma: la primera
impedir pérdidas hac¡a ei casco. Los t¡pos de ¡ntercamb¡adores util¡zados son: náqulna del envasado realiza tres operaciones: coge los cartones desplegados,
ios pliega, corta el asa a la d¡stanc¡a adecuada y la inserta en el cartón, es decir,
a) Intercamb¡adores de cabezal fijo: Es el t¡po de ¡ntercambiador más s¡mple. ,nonta la caja para poder llenar el envase con facilidad y sin la ayuda de
pero tiene algunas lim¡tac¡ones:
'rersonal. Después, se transporta a la sigu¡ente máquina que es el llenador de los
. Diferenc¡a de temperatura l¡m¡te de 65 oC entre los flu¡dos, dado que no envases, esta máqu¡na o puede que conjunto de máquinas tiene un dosificador,
hay toleranc¡as para expans¡ón. ,rna báscula y un sensor para detectar el nivel de llenado. La siguiente máquina
se encarga de cerrar el envase y sellarlo (poner una c¡nta adhesiva para
. No se puede l¡mpiar dentro del casco, por lo tanto el líqu¡do del mismo asegurarse de que el envase este cerrado). Luego, se seca Ia cinta adhesiva con
debe estar lo más limp¡o pos¡ble. ,rna máquina que expulsa arre cal¡ente, para que el secado se realice más rápido.
b) Intercambiadores de cabezal flotante: Para permit¡r que los tubos puedan Una vez secado, se imprime un código de barras en cada cartón. La sigu¡ente
expandirse debido a la d¡ferencia de temperatura en el ¡ntercambiador, ináquina agrupa los envases de seis en seis y los envuelve f¡rmemente en papel
uno de los cabezales del tubo se mueve libremente dentro del casco. Esta f¡lm, por lo tanto, debe tener un mecan¡smo de esperar los envases, agruparlos
cabeza debe estar encerrada dentro del casco con una tapa para retornar por lotes de seis en seis. envolverlos (el f¡lm de rodearlos por las 6 caras) y
el fluido de los tubos a la sal¡da. f¡nalmente cortar el f¡lm. Luego, el lote de se¡s cartones se pega la etiqueta
(contiene fecha, ¡dent¡f¡cación de la sustancia y de la empresa, compos¡c¡ón e
c) Intercamb¡adores de tubos en U: Los tubos son de una sola pieza y hechos
información y código). La última máquina va pon¡endo los lotes de se¡s en seis en
para cada caso. Los tubos pueden expandirse y contraerse y sólo un
palees y una vez lleno y con una altura, La últ¡ma etapa del envasado es el
cabezal es necesar¡o. El haz de tubos puede ser sacado para transporte de los palees al almacén de detergente en polvo.
inspecc¡onarlo y limp¡arlo, los cuales sólo pueden ser limpiados med¡ante
el uso de react¡vos quimicos.
15. Quemador: Es el disposit¡vo que sum¡n¡stra la energía necesaria para 4.6. Diagrama de flujo
mantener la temperatura del aire a la entrada de la torre de secado a 400 oC.
En el documento de planos se adjunto el diagrama de flujo del proceso de
Una vez obtenido el detergente en polvo se realiza la operac¡ón de envasado. elaboración de detergente en polvo.
El iH' '-tl
*- Í-^ - r*: "'
Figura 4.4. Proceso de envasado
§l §d'": t | :El :"El
Us -.--.¡ f-- *'' *-)
Figura 4,5, Esquema de automat¡zación
Anexo 7
Anexo 6
Diagrama de equipo tlel proceso químico "§ecado por *on¡izaciétf'
A8úa _""F
§arl¡*ÍE ánaérl¿o tll§
_ --+
sliülo d€ s&io +
forf¡1o, sólidor '*i;
turuei¿s ü¡á¡i65
*rreptjb¡es de deÍr¿d¡cid¡
térñl¿¡