Revised Chick-fil-A Plans and Related Traffic Study

July 30, 2019
TPD# WMSC.00002
Camp Hill Chick-Fil-A

Transportation Impact Study
Camp Hill Borough, Cumberland County, PA
For Submission To:

www.TrafficPD.com
CAMP HILL CHICK-FIL-A
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
FOR SUBMISSION TO:
Prepared For:
Consolidated Properties, LLC
400 North Front Street July 30, 2019
Wormleysburg, PA 17043 TPD # WMSC.00002
Prepared By:
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc.
4000 Crums Mill Road, Suite 102
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112
Phone: (717) 234-1430

Fax: (717) 234-4490
E-mail: TPD@TrafficPD.com
Web Site: www.trafficpd.com
Jarred L. Neal, P.E.

Project Manager
Pennsylvania License Number PE083971
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................ i
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................1
EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK .......................................................................................................................................1
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................................2
BASE (NO-BUILD) CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................................3
PROPOSED SITE ACCESS .......................................................................................................................................................4
TRIP GENERATION ...................................................................................................................................................................5
TRIP DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................................................................................6
PROJECTED (BUILD) CONDITION TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..............................................................................................7
LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR AN INTERSECTION ................................................................................................................7
CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................................8
CHESTNUT STREET – TRAFFIC CALMING AND PEDESTRIAN SAFTEY EVALUATION ................................ 10
LEVELS OF SERVICE IN THE STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................... 11
95TH PERCENTILE QUEUE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 20
AUXILIARY TURN LANE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................. 22
FAST FOOD RESTAURANT QUEUING ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 22
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................. 24
FIGURES 1 – 23
TECHNICAL APPENDICES
Appendix A: Project Correspondence
Appendix B: Study Area Photographs
Appendix C: Traffic Count Data
Appendix D: Nearby Developments
Appendix E: Trip Generation Worksheets
Appendix F: Volume Development Worksheets
Appendix G: Capacity/Queue Analysis Printouts
Appendix H: Traffic Signal Permit Plans
Appendix I: Critical and Follow-up Headway Calculations
Appendix J: Turn Lane Warrant Analysis
Appendix K: Drive-Thru Count Data
Appendix L: Simtraffic Analysis Printouts
Appendix M: Conceptual Pedestrian Improvements Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is to assess potential traffic impact associated with
the proposed Chick-fil-a development on the roadway network in Camp Hill Borough, Cumberland County,
PA. Based on this evaluation, the following conclusions were reached:
1. The project site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of S. 32nd Street (S.R. 0015) &
Chestnut Street.
2. The study area intersections included in this TIS are as follows:
» Chestnut Street and N-S Alley/Select Medical PT parking lot;
» S. 32nd Street (S.R. 0015) and Chestnut Street;
» Chestnut Street and S. 31st Street;
» Chestnut Street and S. 30th Street;
» S. 31st Street & E-W Alley;
» Bramar Road and N-S Alley/Camp Hill Family Chiropractic;
» S. 32nd Street and Harvard Avenue/Shopping Center Driveway;
» Market Street and 30th Street;
» Market Street and 29th Street.
3. The proposed development will consist of a 5,031 s.f. Chick-fil-a with 106 seats to be constructed and
operational by 2020.
4. Access for the development is proposed via the existing N-S Alley to Chestnut Street. Left turning
movements will be prohibited to exit the N-S Alley during the weekday A.M., weekday midday,
weekday P.M. and Saturday midday peak periods (7-9 AM; 4-6 PM; 11AM-1PM) via signage. The N-
S Alley at Chestnut Street will exceed PennDOT’s Desirable and Safe Stopping Sight Distance (SSSD)
criteria.
5. Upon full build-out, the proposed development is expected to generate 46 new vehicle-trips during
the weekday A.M. peak hour, 261 new vehicle-trips during the weekday midday peak hour, 142 new
vehicle-trips during the weekday P.M. peak hour, and 253 new vehicle-trips during the Saturday
midday peak hour.
6. Under 2020 projected conditions with full build-out of the proposed Chick-fil-a implementation of
the recommended roadway improvements, all levels of service (LOS) at the study area intersections
will operate the same overall intersection level of service (ILOS) as under 2020 base conditions, during
the weekday A.M., weekday midday, weekday P.M., and Saturday midday peak hour.
7. All approaches and turning movements at the site driveway intersection will operate at LOS B or
better under 2020 Projected Conditions during the weekday A.M., weekday midday, weekday P.M.,
and Saturday midday peak hours.
8. An eastbound right-turn lane of minimum 150 feet is warranted at the site driveway on Chestnut
Street. Therefore, TPD recommends parking be restricted along the southern side of Chestnut Street
from 32nd Street to the N-S Alley and the installation of a right-turn lane of minimum 150 feet at this
location.
9. TPD has made the following recommendations in relation to the proposed Chick-fil-a development
in Camp Hill Borough:
Chestnut Street & N-S Alley (CFA driveway)
» Widen and improve the alley to a three-lane road which will operate as the site driveway;
» Construct a 150 foot northbound right turn lane;
» Construct a 150 foot northbound left turn lane;
» Construct a minimum 150 foot eastbound right turn lane;
» Prohibit exiting left turn movements at the driveway during the weekday A.M., weekday midday,
weekday P.M. and Saturday midday peak periods (7-9 AM; 4-6 PM; 11AM-1PM) via signage.
E-W Alley (from eastern site property line to 31st Street)
» Construct signage indicating “No Thru Traffic, Local Use Only” at the eastern site property line and at
the 31st Street intersection.
N-S Alley (from southern site property line to Bramar Road)
» Construct signage indicating “No Thru Traffic, Local Use Only” at the southern site property line and at
the Bramar Road intersection.
Chestnut Street
» In order to accommodate the minimum 150 foot eastbound right turn lane; parking is proposed to be
restricted along Chestnut Street from S. 32nd Street to the N-S Alley (CFA driveway).
Chestnut Street/E. Trindle Road & S. 32nd Street
» Restripe the eastbound through lane to a shared eastbound left/through lane.

» Optimize timings.
Chestnut Street & S. 31st Street
» Construct a raised crosswalk crossing S. 31st Street.

» Relocate stop sign and stop bar behind the proposed raised crosswalk.
Chestnut Street & S. 30th Street
» Construct a raised intersection including crosswalks on all approaches.

» Relocate all four stop signs and stop bars behind the proposed raised intersection crosswalks.
» Construct a raised crosswalk crossing the north and south approaches of S. 28th Street.
» Construct a raised crosswalk crossing the north and south approaches of S. 27th Street.
Page ii www.TrafficPD.com
10. Levels of Service (LOS) for the study area intersections have been summarized in matrix form. Table I
details the overall intersection LOS for each study area intersection.
TABLE I
OVERALL INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY
Time Opening Year 2020 Meets LOS
Intersection Existing
Period Base Projected Projected1 Requirements?
A.M. A (1.5) A (1.5) A (2.0) A (2.0) Yes
Chestnut Street &
MID A (1.7) A (1.7) A (3.5) A (3.5) Yes
N-S Alley (CFA driveway)/ Select
P.M. A (1.2) A (1.2) A (2.5) A (2.5) Yes
Medical PT Parking Lot
SAT A (0.4) A (0.4) A (2.9) A (2.9) Yes
A.M. D (51.5) E (55.3) E (68.6) E (60.4) Yes
Chestnut Street/
MID D (48.2) D (46.9) E (58.8) D (54.4) Yes
Trindle Road &
P.M. E (56.1) E (60.0) E (74.4) E (69.4) Yes
S 32nd Street
SAT D (45.5) D (52.3) E (65.1) D (54.6) Yes
A.M. A (0.9) A (0.9) A (0.9) A (0.9) Yes
Chestnut Street & MID A (0.6) A (0.5) A (0.6) A (0.6) Yes
31st Street P.M. A (1.0) A (1.0) A (1.0) A (1.0) Yes
SAT A (0.6) A (0.6) A (0.5) A (0.5) Yes
A.M. A (10.0) B (10.1) B (10.3) B (10.3) Yes
Chestnut Street & MID A (9.6) A (9.6) B (10.8) B (10.8) Yes
30th Street P.M. A (9.2) A (9.2) A (9.7) A (9.7) Yes
SAT A (8.4) A (8.4) A (9.2) A (9.2) Yes
A.M. A (0.2) A (0.2) A (0.2) A (0.2) Yes
31st Street & MID A (0.0) A (0.0) A (0.2) A (0.2) Yes
E-W Alley P.M. A (0.1) A (0.1) A (0.2) A (0.2) Yes
SAT A (0.2) A (0.2) A (0.2) A (0.2) Yes
A.M. A (1.5) A (1.5) A (0.7) A (0.7) Yes
Bramar Road &
MID A (2.7) A (2.7) A (0.7) A (0.7) Yes
N-S Alley/
P.M. A (6.0) A (6.0) A (3.7) A (3.7) Yes
Camp Hill Family Chiropractic
SAT A (1.6) A (1.6) A (0.2) A (0.2) Yes
A.M. C (21.4) C (21.8) C (22.7) C (22.7) Yes
S 32nd Street &
MID C (26.7) C (27.5) C (30.5) C (30.5) Yes
Harvard Avenue/
P.M. C (30.7) C (32.0) C (34.0) C (34.0) Yes
Shopping Center Driveway
SAT C (24.9) C (25.6) C (29.2) C (29.2) Yes
A.M. A (4.5) A (4.6) A (4.9) A (4.9) Yes
Market Street & MID A (2.1) A (2.1) A (3.9) A (3.9) Yes
30th Street P.M. A (2.1) A (2.1) A (3.1) A (3.1) Yes
SAT A (1.7) A (1.7) A (3.2) A (3.2) Yes
A.M. A (8.1) A (8.2) A (9.3) A (9.3) Yes
Market Street & MID A (7.7) A (7.7) B (11.2) B (11.2) Yes
29th Street P.M. A (8.5) A (8.6) B (10.0) B (10.0) Yes
SAT A (8.3) A (8.3) B (11.0) B (11.0) Yes
Base = No-Build scenario

Projected = Build scenario
Unsignalized ILOS calculated in accordance with Figure 5 of Policies and Procedures for Transportation Impact Studies.
1
Projected conditions with implementation of recommended improvements,
Page iii www.TrafficPD.com

INTRODUCTION
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. (TPD) has completed a Transportation Impact Study (TIS) for the proposed
Chick-fil-a development in Camp Hill Borough, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. As shown in Figure 1,
the project site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of S. 32nd Street (S.R. 0015) & Chestnut
Street. As shown in Figure 2, the proposed development will consist of a 5,031 s.f. Chick-fil-a with 106 seats
to be constructed and operational by 2020.
This report has been prepared in accordance with PennDOT’s Policies and Procedures for Transportation
Impact Studies, found in PennDOT’s Publication 282, Appendix A, dated July 2017 and Camp Hill Borough’s
Zoning Ordinance, Part 7, Section 731. All relevant correspondence pertaining to this project has been
included in Appendix A.
Site Access Locations

Access for the development is proposed via the existing N-S Alley (CFA driveway) to Chestnut Street. Left
turning movements will be prohibited to exit the N-S Alley during the weekday A.M., weekday midday,
EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK

A field review of the existing roadway system in the study area was conducted. The existing roadway
characteristics within the study area are summarized in Table 1. The existing lane configuration and
intersection controls for the study area intersections are shown in Figure 3. Photographs of the study area
intersections are included in Appendix B.
TABLE 1
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS WITHIN STUDY AREA
Functional Predominant
Average Daily Posted
Roadway Ownership Classification/ Directional
Traffic Speed Limit
Roadway Type Orientation
S. 32nd Street State (SR 0015) Principal Arterial North-South 34,524 35 mph
Chestnut Street Borough Local East-West 5,6501 25 mph
S. 31st Street Borough Local North-South 714 25 mph
S. 30th Street Borough Local North-South 1,7301 25 mph
Bramar Road Borough Local East-West 4701 Not posted
S. 29th Street Borough Local North-South 6401 Not posted
Market Street State (SR 1010) Principal Arterial East-West 9269 25 mph
Harvard Avenue Borough Local East-West 18001 Not posted
1
Based on TPD Counts
Land Use Context

In Chapter 4 of PennDOT & NJDOT’s Smart Transportation Guidebook, dated March 2008, there is guidance
pertaining to defining the land use context(s) for a given area. Based upon review of this information, the
land uses surrounding the proposed site best fits the Suburban Corridor, designation, as described below:
Suburban Corridor, “…characterized by big box stores, commercial strip centers, restaurants, auto
dealerships, office parks, and gas stations. These uses are sometimes interspersed with natural areas and
occasional clusters of homes. Buildings are usually set back from the roadway behind surface parking.”
Page 1 www.TrafficPD.com
Roadway Type
In Chapter 5 of PennDOT & NJDOT’s Smart Transportation Guidebook, there is guidance pertaining to defining
the transportation context(s) for a given area. Comparing the existing condition roadway characteristics to the
various options presented in Table 5.1 of the Smart Transportation Guidebook, the study area roadways best fit
the following categories, as described below:
Regional Arterial, traffic volumes of 10,000 to 40,000 vehicles per day, intersection spacing of 660 to 1,320
feet, a desired operating speed of 30-55 mph, and a description as follows: “Roadways in this category
would be considered “Principal Arterial” in traditional functional classification.”
» S. 32nd Street (S.R. 0015)
» Market Street (S.R. 1010)
Neighborhood Collector, traffic volumes of <6,000 vehicles per day, intersection spacing of 300 to 660
feet, a desired operating speed of 25-35 mph, and a description as follows: “similar in appearance to local
roadways. Typically classified as Minor Collector.”
» Chestnut Street
Local Road, traffic volumes of <3,000 vehicles per day, intersection spacing of 0 to 660 feet, a desired
operating speed of 20-30 mph.
» S. 31st Street
» S. 30th Street
» S. 29th Street
» Bramar Road
» Harvard Avenue
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities

Based on observations at the study area intersections, sidewalks are present on all study roadways in the
vicinity of the site.
Mass Transit Facilities

CAT bus stops are present on S. 32nd Street immediately adjacent to the site.
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Manual Turning Movement Counts

Manual traffic counts were conducted in 15-minute intervals during the weekday morning (6:00 to 9:00
A.M.), weekday midday, (11:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M.), weekday evening (3:00 to 6:00 P.M.) and Saturday Midday
(11:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M.) peak periods. Data pertaining to heavy vehicles, pedestrians and transit vehicles
were observed during the manual counts. Peak hours and count dates for the study area intersections are
identified in Table 2.
TABLE 2
MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT INFORMATION
Time Intersection
Intersection Date of Traffic Counts
Period Peak Hour1
Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Weekday A.M. 7:30 to 8:30 A.M.
Chestnut Street &
Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Weekday Midday 11:15 A.M. to 12:15 P.M.
N-S Alley/ Select Medical PT
Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Weekday P.M. 4:30 to 5:30 P.M.
Parking Lot
Saturday, December 1, 2018 Saturday Midday 11:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M.
Chestnut Street/
Thursday, March 28, 2019 Weekday Midday 11:45 A.M. to 12:45 P.M.
Trindle Road &
S 32nd Street
Chestnut Street & Thursday, December 6, 2018 Weekday Midday 11:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M.
31st Street Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Weekday P.M. 4:45 to 5:45 P.M.
Chestnut Street & Thursday, December 6, 2018 Weekday Midday 11:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M.
30th Street Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Weekday P.M. 4:45 to 5:45 P.M.
31st Street & Thursday, December 6, 2018 Weekday Midday 11:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M.
E-W Alley Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Weekday P.M. 4:45 to 5:45 P.M.
Bramar Road &
Thursday, December 6, 2018 Weekday Midday 11:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M.
N-S Alley/
Camp Hill Family Chiropractic
Thursday, March 28, 2019 Weekday A.M. 7:15 to 8:15 A.M.
S 32nd Street &
Thursday, March 28, 2019 Weekday Midday 11:45 A.M. to 12:45 P.M.
Harvard Avenue/
Thursday, March 28, 2019 Weekday P.M. 4:30 to 5:30 P.M.
Saturday, March 30, 2019 Saturday Midday 12:00 P.M. to 1:00 P.M.
Market Street & Thursday, March 28, 2019 Weekday Midday 11:45 A.M. to 12:45 P.M.
30th Street Thursday, March 28, 2019 Weekday P.M. 4:45 to 5:45 P.M.
Saturday, March 30, 2019 Saturday Midday 10:30 to 11:30 A.M.
Market Street & Thursday, March 28, 2019 Weekday Midday 11:45 A.M. to 12:45 P.M.
29th Street Thursday, March 28, 2019 Weekday P.M. 4:30 to 5:30 P.M.
Saturday, March 30, 2019 Saturday Midday 10:30 to 11:30 A.M.
1
Peak Hour consists of the four consecutive 15-minute intervals where the highest traffic volumes occur.
Existing condition traffic volumes for the weekday A.M., weekday P.M., and Saturday midday peak hours are
illustrated in Figures 4-7. Manual traffic count data sheets are provided in Appendix C.
BASE (NO-BUILD) CONDITIONS

In order to develop future base (no-build) traffic volumes, a background growth factor was developed based
on growth rates obtained from the PennDOT Bureau of Planning and Research (BPR). A background growth
rate of 0.80% per year is recommended for urban non-interstate roadways in Cumberland County. As such, the
background growth factor was applied annually to yield overall growth percentages of 1.61% (0.80% per year,
compounded over 2 years) for the 2020 opening year. Based on discussions with Borough staff, the following
nearby approved development (but not yet constructed) was specifically included in this study:
Quattro Redevelopment is a proposed mixed use redevelopment, which will raze the VA Clinic building and
be replaced with the construction of two one-story buildings, which will include a 4,002 s.f. furniture store,
3,544 s.f. fast casual restaurant, 3,000 s.f. fast casual restaurant, and 1,782 s.f. fast casual restaurant. Trip
generation and distribution for this development was based on the TIS prepared by Traffic Planning and
Design, Inc., dated July 13, 2018.
Base condition volumes for the weekday A.M., weekday midday, weekday P.M., and Saturday midday peak
hours are illustrated in Figures 8-11 for the 2020 opening year conditions Nearby trip generation and
distributions are included in Appendix D.
PROPOSED SITE ACCESS

Access for the development is proposed via the existing N-S Alley (CFA driveway) to Chestnut Street. Left
turning movements will be prohibited to exit the N-S Alley during the weekday A.M., weekday midday,
Sight Distance Analysis

A sight distance analysis was prepared for the proposed site driveway. In general, recommended safe sight
distances depend upon the posted speed limit and roadway grades. The existing sight distances at the
proposed driveway were measured in accordance with PennDOT Publication 282 Highway Occupancy Permit
Guidelines and compared to PennDOT’s desirable sight distance standard, which is identified in 67 PA Code
Chapter 441.8(h), “Access to and Occupancy of Highways by Driveways and Local Roads.” In addition, measured
sight distances at the proposed driveway were compared to PennDOT’s safe stopping sight distance standard,
which is calculated by the following equation:
SSSD = 1.47VT + V2/[30(f±g)]

SSSD = safe stopping sight distance (acceptable sight distance)
V = Vehicle Speed
T = Perception Reaction Time of Driver (2.5 seconds)
f = Coefficient of Friction for Wet Pavements
g = Percent of Roadway Grade Divided by 100
Table 3 shows the measured sight distances, desirable sight distances, and acceptable (SSSD) sight distances
at the site driveway for vehicles entering and exiting the site.
TABLE 3
SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
Chestnut Street & N-S Alley (CFA Driveway)
Posted Sight Distances (feet)
Direction Grade1
Speed DES SSSD EXIST
Exiting To the left 25 mph 0% 250’ 147’ 250’2,3
Movements To the right 25 mph 0% 195’ 147’ 300’3+
Entering Approaching same direction 25 mph 0% --- 147’ 300’+
Left Turns Approaching opposite direction 25 mph 0% 190’ 147’ 285’2
1
SSSD = PennDOT Acceptable Sight Distance Roadway Grade Approaching Driveway
2
DES = PennDOT Desirable Sight Distance Distance to S. 32nd Street Signalized Intersection
3
EXIST = Existing (Measured) Sight Distance Clear sight triangle requirements enforced
As shown in Table 3, the measured sight distances at the site driveway exceed the applicable PennDOT and
Borough sight distance requirements provided the landscaping and vegetation is properly maintained as
well as clear sight triangle requirements enforced.
TRIP GENERATION
TPD conducted traffic counts at three (3) existing Chick-fil-a restaurants of similar size and orientation in order
to develop trip generation rates for the proposed Chick-fil-a redevelopment. Based on the trip generation
methodology, Table 4 shows the trip generation rates for the proposed Chick-fil-a.
TABLE 4
LOCAL TRIP GENERATION DATA
Directional Splits Pass-by
Time Period Rate per 1000 sq. ft.
Enter % Exit % Percentage1
Weekday A.M. Peak Hour of Generator T = 17.91*(X) 51% 49% 49%
Weekday Midday Peak Hour of Generator T = 86.41*(X) 51%2 49%2 40%3
Weekday P.M. Peak Hour of Generator T = 56.50*(X) 52% 48% 50%
Saturday Midday Peak Hour of Generator T = 83.65*(X) 51% 49% 40%2
T = number of site-generated vehicular trips
X = independent variable
1
Pass-by percentages used from ITE Trip Generation Manual LUC #934
2
No weekday midday directional splits available; assumed consistent with Saturday midday peak hour
3
No weekday midday Pass-by Data available; assume 10% less than the PM Peak hour
4
No Saturday Pass-by Data available; assume 10% less than the PM Peak hour
Table 5 summarizes the number of trips that will be generated by the 5,031 s.f. Chick-fil-a development during
the weekday A.M. peak hour, weekday midday peak hour, weekday P.M. peak hour, and the Saturday Midday
peak hour.
TABLE 5
TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
Total Pass-by Trips New Trips
Peak Hour
Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit
Weekday A.M. Peak Hour of Generator 90 46 44 44 22 22 46 24 22
Weekday Midday Peak Hour of Generator 435 222 213 174 89 85 261 133 128
Weekday P.M. Peak Hour of Generator 284 148 136 142 74 68 142 74 68
Saturday Midday Peak Hour of Generator 421 215 206 168 86 82 253 129 124
Based on the trip generation analysis summarized in Table 5, the proposed Chick-fil-a will generate 46 new
vehicle-trips during the weekday A.M. peak hour of generator, 261 new vehicle-trips during the weekday
midday peak hour of generator, 142 new vehicle-trips during the weekday P.M. peak hour of generator, and
253 new vehicle-trips during the Saturday midday peak hour of generator. Details of the trip generation
calculations are included in Appendix E.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The distribution and assignment of new trips generated by the proposed development was based upon an
analysis of the following: (1) existing traffic patterns and distributions of the turning movements within the
study area; and (2) available routes for travel. The new trips for the proposed development were distributed
to the local roadway network based on the percentages shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6
TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES – NEW TRIPS
Direction - Assignment Distribution
To/From (To/From) Percentage
32nd Street 38%
North
30th Street 2%
32nd Street 38%
South 31st Street 1%
30th Street 1%
East Chestnut Street 5%
West Trindle Road 15%
Pass-by trips were established based on the existing traffic patterns in the vicinity of the site and the location
and configuration of the site driveway. The percentages used for the distribution of pass-by trips to the
project site are shown below in Table 7.
TABLE 7
TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES – PASS-BY TRIPS
Distribution Percentage
Direction From
Weekday A.M. Weekday Midday Weekday P.M. Saturday Midday
nd
North via 32 Street 36% 42% 42% 43%
South via 32nd Street 49% 41% 41% 39%
East via Chestnut Street 7% 8% 7% 7%
West via Chestnut Street 8% 9% 10% 11%
The assignment of site-generated trips for the proposed development during the weekday A.M., weekday
midday, weekday P.M., and Saturday midday peak hours are shown in Figures 12-15, respectively.
Exiting left turn movements at the N-S Alley (CFA driveway) will be prohibited during the weekday A.M.,
weekday midday, weekday P.M. and Saturday midday peak periods (7-9 AM; 4-6 PM; 11AM-1PM) via
signage. Therefore, existing traffic making a northbound left has been rerouted during the weekday A.M.,
weekday midday, weekday P.M., and Saturday midday peak hours, as shown in Figures 16-19, respectively.
PROJECTED (BUILD) CONDITION TRAFFIC VOLUMES

The site-generated trips for the proposed Chick-fil-a were added to the 2020 base (no-build) condition traffic
volumes to calculate 2020 projected (build) condition traffic volumes. Projected condition traffic volumes are
shown in Figures 20-23 for the 2020 opening year for the weekday A.M., weekday midday, weekday P.M., and
Saturday midday peak hours.
Traffic volume development worksheets for the study area intersections are contained in Appendix F.
LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR AN INTERSECTION

For analysis of intersections, level of service is defined in terms of delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort
and frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. LOS criteria is stated in terms of control delay per vehicle
for a one-hour analysis period. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped
delay, and final acceleration delay. The criteria are shown in Table 8. Delay, as it relates to level of service, is a
complex measure and is dependent upon a number of variables. For signalized intersections, these variables
include the quality of vehicle progression, the cycle length, the green time ratio, and the volume/capacity ratio
for the lane group in question. For unsignalized intersections, delay is related to the availability of gaps in the
flow of traffic on the major street and the driver’s discretion in selecting an appropriate gap for a particular
movement from the minor street (straight across, left or right turn).
TABLE 8
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA
UNSIGNALIZED AND SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS1
Control Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds)
Level of Service
Signalized Unsignalized
A < 10 < 10
B > 10 and < 20 > 10 and < 15
C > 20 and < 35 > 15 and < 25
D > 35 and < 55 > 25 and < 35
E > 55 and < 80 > 35 and < 50
F > 80 or v/c > 1.0 > 50 or v/c > 1.0
1
Obtained from Exhibits 18-4 and 19-1 of the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual 2010
CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

Capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday A.M., weekday midday, weekday P.M. and Saturday
midday peak hours at the study area intersections. These analyses were conducted according to the
methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition using Synchro 10 software
(Version 10.3, Build 5, Revision 0), a Trafficware product.
The following conditions were analyzed, as applicable:

» Existing conditions;
» 2020 base conditions (Build-out year without development);
» 2020 projected conditions (Build-out year with development).
The following items should be noted with respect to the capacity analyses:
» The Pennsylvania default values for the suburban land use context contained in Chapter 10 of
PennDOT’s Publication 46 were utilized for the base saturation flow rate, start-up lost time, extension
of effective green time and number of left turn sneakers, at all signalized intersections.
» The Pennsylvania default values for the suburban land use context contained in Chapter 10 of
PennDOT’s Publication 46 were utilized for the base critical headway and base follow-up headways at
unsignalized intersections.
In addition, capacity analyses were conducted at the proposed site driveway intersection under the 2020
projected conditions. The capacity analysis worksheets are included in Appendix G. The PennDOT-
approved signal plans are included in Appendix H. Critical and follow-up headway calculations are
provided in Appendix I.
PennDOT’s Transportation Impact Study Guidelines outlined in PennDOT’s Policies and Procedures for
Transportation Impact Studies, found in PennDOT’s Publication 282, Appendix A, dated July 2017 contain
the following criteria regarding levels of service:
» Page 29 of the Guidelines state that if evaluation of the With Development Horizon Year Scenario to
the Without Development Horizon Year Scenario indicates that the overall intersection level of service
has dropped, the applicant will be required to mitigate the level of service if the increase in overall
intersection delay is greater than 10-seconds. If the overall intersection delay increase is less than or
equal to 10-seconds, mitigation of the intersection will not be required.
» Page 29 of the Guidelines state that for mitigation scenarios, applicants are expected to mitigate the
overall intersection LOS to the original Without Development LOS; the 10-second delay variance is not
applied to mitigation scenarios. Applicants may be required to address available storage and queue
lengths at critical movements or approaches even if the overall LOS requirements are met.
» Page 31 of the Guidelines state that if signalization is the preferred alternative for mitigation, overall
intersection LOS C in rural areas and LOS D in urban areas is acceptable.
» Page 31 of the Guidelines states new signalized or unsignalized intersection established to serve as
access to the development shall be designed to operate at minimum LOS C for rural areas, and
minimum LOS D for urban areas.
» Camp Hill Borough’s Zoning Ordinance, Part 7, Section 731 indicates the following requirements
relative to required levels of service:
» The recommendations of the traffic impact study shall provide safe and efficient movement of traffic
to and from and within and past the proposed development, while minimizing the impact to non-site
trips. The current levels-of-service must be maintained if they are levels “C” or “D”, not allowed to
deteriorate to worse than level “C” if they are currently levels “A” or “B”, and improved to level “D” if
they are levels “E” or “F”.
Initial Queues
Based on TPD’s initial queue observations, TPD made the following assumptions for the initial queue inputs for
the existing conditions at the S. 32nd Street (S.R. 0015) and Trindle Road (S.R. 0641)/Chestnut Street intersection.
As instructed by the township, TPD collected intersection queueing data by observing the approaches of
each signalized intersection as instructed in the PennDOT Publication 46. TPD utilized video recordings of
the peak hours used in the analysis. In order to determine the initial queue inputs for each movement, TPD
observed the queuing at the study intersection for the study time periods to determine if there were any
initial queues. TPD estimated the initial queues for each approach by documenting the number of queued
vehicles. As outlined in the HCM, the initial queue was determined by monitoring the queue count
continuously during each of the three consecutive cycles that occur just before the start of the analysis
period.
The initial queue observations for the S. 32nd Street (S.R. 0015) and Trindle Road (S.R. 0641)/Chestnut Street
intersection are included in Appendix G.
Due to limitations in HCM methodology, intersections with all-pedestrian phases cannot be modeled with
HCM 6. Therefore, Synchro percentile method was used for analysis results at the signalized intersections
with all-pedestrian phases. Initial queues can only be input via HCM methodology since Synchro percentile
methodology does not accept initial queue inputs. However, due to the low initial queue observation results
with the highest average of one vehicle in the eastbound left turn maneuver for weekday A.M., weekday
P.M., and Saturday midday time periods, the results will have a minimal impact.
CHESTNUT STREET – TRAFFIC CALMING AND PEDESTRIAN SAFTEY
EVALUATION
Based on feedback received at Borough Council and Planning Commission meetings, concerns were raised
regarding the increase of non-local traffic to Chestnut Street between 32nd Street and the Camp Hill High
School. The feedback received at Borough Council and Planning Commission meetings discussed the need
to calm traffic along this corridor due to walkable nature of the Borough, specifically for the school students
who walk to and from school as well as students who are released for lunch. In TPD’s opinion, the concerns
are not specifically related to capacity issues (i.e., Levels of Service, or amount of delay experience by
motorists). Rather, the concerns are related to the undesirable nature of having additional traffic utilizing
the roadway network adjacent to the school. Accordingly, TPD has investigated two relevant traffic calming
measures for slowing traffic in this area in accordance with PennDOT’s Publication 383, “Traffic Calming
Handbook”, as described below:
Raised Crosswalk
Raised crosswalks are marked and elevated pedestrian areas that are an extension of the sidewalk at
mid-block locations or intersections. Raised crosswalks are typically 3 to 6 inches above street level. In
many jurisdictions, raised crosswalks are level with the curb, about 6 inches above the street. A graphic
illustration of a curb extension from PennDOT’s Traffic Calming Handbook is provided below:
According to PennDOT’s Traffic Calming Handbook, raised crosswalks have the following advantages:
» Reduce speeds and improve visibility of the pedestrians by defining crossings

» Raised crosswalks reduce speeds an average of 6 mph.
» Traffic volumes are reduced an average of 12%.
Raised intersection
A Raised Intersection, including crosswalks, which are raised 3 to 6 inches above street level. Long ramps
are included on all approaches. Graphic illustrations of a raised intersection from PennDOT’s Traffic
Calming Handbook are provided below:
According to PennDOT’s Traffic Calming Handbook, a raised intersection can offer the following
advantages:
» Reduce vehicle speeds on all approaches.

» Decrease conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians by better demarcating crossing areas and
elevating pedestrians above the street.
A conceptual plan showing the type and location of the proposed traffic calming treatments is provided in
Appendix M of this report. Coordination efforts with the Borough and School District are currently ongoing
to ensure that location and type of treatments are preferred. The proposed treatments are listed in the
executive summary of this study.
LEVELS OF SERVICE IN THE STUDY AREA

Level of service (LOS) matrices for the study area intersections are shown in Tables 9-12 for the weekday
A.M., weekday midday, weekday P.M., and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. Per PennDOT
standards, the signal timings at the signalized study area intersections have been optimized under base
conditions and projected conditions.
TABLE 9
LEVEL OF SERVICE DELAY (SECONDS) SUMMARY
Weekday A.M. Peak Hour
Existing 2020 Opening Year
Intersection Movement
Conditions Base Projected Proj1
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
1 Chestnut Street & NB LTR B A -- --
N-S Alley/ Select Medical NB L -- -- A A
PT Parking Lot NB TR -- -- A A
SB LTR B B B B
ILOS A (1.5) A (1.5) A (2.0) A (2.0)
EB L F (136.2) F (179.5) F (179.1) F (91.2)
EB T D E (57.9) E (57.9) F (88.8)
EB R C C C C (24.3)
WB L F (86.0) E (80.0) E (79.2) F (92.6)
2 Chestnut Street/ WB TR F (98.6) F (89.3) F (88.2) F (107.3)
Trindle Road & NB L F (166.9) F (182.1) F (195.5) F (112.9)
S 32nd Street NB TR D D E (70.5) E (67.8)
SB L E (59.1) E (59.7) E (63.7) E (63.9)
SB T C C C D
SB R A A A A
ILOS D (51.5) E (55.3) E (68.6) E (60.4)
EB TR A A A A
3 Chestnut Street & WB LT A A A A
31st Street NB LR B B B B
ILOS A (0.9) A (0.9) A (0.9) A (0.9)
EB LTR B B B B
WB LTR A A B B
4 Chestnut Street &
NB LTR A A A A
30th Street
SB LTR A B B B
ILOS A (10.0) B (10.1) B (10.3) B (10.3)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
5 31st Street &
NB LTR A A A A
E-W Alley
SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (0.2) A (0.2) A (0.2) A (0.2)
EB LTR A A A A
6 Bramar Road & WB LTR A A A A
N-S Alley/
NB LTR A A A A
Camp Hill Family
Chiropractic SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (1.5) A (1.5) A (0.7) A (0.7)

1
Projected conditions with implementation of recommended improvements
ILOS = Overall Intersection Level of Service
Unsignalized ILOS calculated in accordance with Figure 5 of Policies and Procedures for Transportation Impact Studies
TABLE 9 (CONTINUED)
Weekday A.M. Peak Hour
EB L D D D D
EB T D D D D
EB R A A D D
7 S 32nd Street & WB LTR E (61.7) E (61.8) E (62.1) E (62.1)
Harvard Avenue/ NB L B B B B
Shopping Center Driveway NB TR B B B B
SB L B B B B
SB TR C C C C
ILOS C (21.4) C (21.8) C (22.7) C (22.7)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
8 Market Street &
NB LTR B B C C
30th Street
SB LTR C C C C
ILOS A (4.5) A (4.6) A (4.9) A (4.9)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
9 Market Street &
NB LTR B B B B
29th Street
SB LTR B B B B
ILOS A (8.1) A (8.2) A (9.3) A (9.3)

1
TABLE 10
Weekday Midday Peak Hour
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
1 Chestnut Street & NB LTR B B -- --
PT Parking Lot NB TR -- -- B B
SB LTR A A B B
ILOS A (1.7) A (1.7) A (3.5) A (3.5)
EB L F (82.5) F (99.3) F (99.3) E (78.2)
EB T D D D E (73.5)
EB R C C C C
WB L F (84.5) F (104.2) F (99.1) F (99.1)
2 Chestnut Street/ WB TR E (67.9) E (77.7) E (74.5) E (74.5)
Trindle Road & NB L F (213.6) E (79.8) F (102.5) F (102.5)
S 32nd Street NB TR C C E (57.9) D
SB L D D F (93.8) F (118.0)
SB T D D D D
SB R A A A A
ILOS D (48.2) D (46.9) E (58.8) D (54.4)
EB TR A A A A
ILOS A (0.6) A (0.5) A (0.6) A (0.6)
EB LTR A A B B
WB LTR A A B B
4 Chestnut Street &
NB LTR A A A A
30th Street
SB LTR A A B B
ILOS A (9.6) A (9.6) B (10.8) B (10.8)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
5 31st Street &
NB LTR A A A A
E-W Alley
SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (0.0) A (0.0) A (0.2) A (0.2)
EB LTR A A A A
N-S Alley/
NB LTR A A A A
Camp Hill Family
ILOS A (2.7) A (2.7) A (0.7) A (0.7)

1
TABLE 10 (CONTINUED)
Weekday Midday Peak Hour
EB L E (60.9) E (61.0) D D
EB T D D D D
EB R A A A A
7 S 32nd Street & WB LTR E (57.3) E (57.2) E (65.4) E (65.4)
Harvard Avenue/ NB L D D E (61.4) E (61.4)
SB L B B B B
SB TR C C D D
ILOS C (26.7) C (27.5) C (30.5) C (30.5)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
8 Market Street &
NB LTR C C D D
30th Street
SB LTR C C C C
ILOS A (2.1) A (2.1) A (3.9) A (3.9)
EB LTR A A B B
WB LTR A A A A
9 Market Street &
NB LTR C C C C
29th Street
SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (7.7) A (7.7) B (11.2) B (11.2)

1
TABLE 11
Weekday P.M. Peak Hour
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
SB LTR B B B B
ILOS A (1.2) A (1.2) A (2.5) A (2.5)
EB L F (105.8) F (109.4) F (109.4) F (118.9)
EB T E (60.2) E (60.7) E (63.0) F (112.6)
EB R C C C C
WB L F (98.4) F (120.4) F (115.8) F (115.8)
2 Chestnut Street/ WB TR E (68.4) E (75.2) E (73.3) E (73.3)
Trindle Road & NB L F (234.4) F (106.1) F (122.2) F (102.9)
S 32nd Street NB TR C C E (73.8) E (60.5)
SB L E (59.4) E (59.4) F (87.5) F (87.5)
SB T D E (80.0) E (77.6) E (69.6)
SB R A A A A
ILOS E (56.1) E (60.0) E (74.4) E (69.4)
EB TR A A A A
ILOS A (1.0) A (1.0) A (1.0) A (1.0)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
4 Chestnut Street &
NB LTR A A A A
30th Street
SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (9.2) A (9.2) A (9.7) A (9.7)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
5 31st Street &
NB LTR A A A A
E-W Alley
SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (0.1) A (0.1) A (0.2) A (0.2)
EB LTR A A A A
N-S Alley/
NB LTR A A A A
Camp Hill Family
ILOS A (6.0) A (6.0) A (3.7) A (3.7)

1
Weekday P.M. Peak Hour
EB L D D D D
EB T D D D D
EB R A A A A
7 S 32nd Street & WB LTR E (68.6) E (68.8) F (82.1) F (82.1)
Harvard Avenue/ NB L E (75.9) E (79.6) F (83.1) F (83.1)
SB L B B B B
SB TR D D D D
ILOS C (30.7) C (32.0) C (34.0) C (34.0)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
8 Market Street &
NB LTR C C C C
30th Street
SB LTR C C C C
ILOS A (2.1) A (2.1) A (3.1) A (3.1)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
9 Market Street &
NB LTR B B C C
29th Street
SB LTR C C C C
ILOS A (8.5) A (8.6) B (10.0) B (10.0)

1
TABLE 12
Saturday Midday Peak Hour
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (0.4) A (0.4) A (2.9) A (2.9)
EB L F (89.1) F (92.5) F (92.5) F (106.2)
EB T D D D F (102.2)
EB R C B B C
WB L F (86.2) F (89.2) F (83.5) F (83.5)
2 Chestnut Street/ WB TR D D D D
Trindle Road & NB L F (148.5) E (69.1) F (84.2) F (84.2)
S 32nd Street NB TR C C E (64.1) D
SB L D D E (79.5) E (79.5)
SB T D E (74.2) E (73.0) D
SB R A A A A
ILOS D (45.5) D (52.3) E (65.1) D (54.6)
EB TR A A A A
31st Street NB LR A A B B
ILOS A (0.6) A (0.6) A (0.5) A (0.5)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
4 Chestnut Street &
NB LTR A A A A
30th Street
SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (8.4) A (8.4) A (9.2) A (9.2)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
5 31st Street &
NB LTR A A A A
E-W Alley
SB LTR A A A A
ILOS A (0.2) A (0.2) A (0.2) A (0.2)
EB LTR A A A A
N-S Alley/
NB LTR A A A A
Camp Hill Family
ILOS A (1.6) A (1.6) A (0.2) A (0.2)

1
Saturday Midday Peak Hour
EB L D D D D
EB T D D D D
EB R A A A A
7 S 32nd Street & WB LTR D D E (55.8) E (55.8)
Harvard Avenue/ NB L D D E (57.3) E (57.3)
SB L B B B B
SB TR C C D D
ILOS C (24.9) C (25.6) C (29.2) C (29.2)
EB LTR A A A A
WB LTR A A A A
8 Market Street &
NB LTR C C D D
30th Street
SB LTR C C C C
ILOS A (1.7) A (1.7) A (3.2) A (3.2)
EB LTR A A B B
WB LTR A A A A
9 Market Street &
NB LTR B B C C
29th Street
SB LTR C C C C
ILOS A (8.3) A (8.3) B (11.0) B (11.0)

1
As shown in Tables 9-12, under 2020 projected conditions with the development of the proposed site and
construction of the recommended roadway improvements, all overall levels of service at the study area
intersections comply with the requirements outlined in the Borough’s and PennDOT’s TIS Guidelines during
the weekday A.M., weekday midday, weekday P.M., and Saturday midday peak hours. Additionally, all
approaches and turning movements at the site driveway intersections will operate at LOS B or better under
2020 Projected Conditions during the weekday A.M., weekday midday, weekday P.M., and Saturday midday
peak hours.
95TH PERCENTILE QUEUE ANALYSIS
TABLE 13
95TH PERCENTILE QUEUE SUMMARY (FEET) SYNCHRO/HCM 6
2020 Base Conditions 2020 Projected Conditions1
Lane Existing 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft) Proposed 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft)
Intersection
Group Storage Storage
A.M. MID P.M. SAT A.M. MID P.M. SAT
Length Length
EB LTR -- 5/8 2/3 1/3 0/0 -- 5/8 2/3 1/3 0/0
WB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 -- 0/0 1/3 1/3 2/3
Chestnut Street &
NB LTR -- 0/0 1/0 1/0 0/0 -- -- -- -- --
N-S Alley/ Select Medical
NB L -- -- -- -- -- -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
PT Parking Lot
NB TR -- -- -- -- -- -- 5/5 27/25 17/15 30/28
SB LTR -- 1/3 6/5 6/5 1/0 -- 2/3 6/5 6/5 1/0
EB L 250’ 671/-- 536/-- 506/-- 474/-- 250’ 507/-- 447/-- 472/-- 412/--
EB T -- 301/-- 214/-- 303/-- 177/-- -- 524/-- 450/-- 482/-- 417/--
EB R 250’ 96/-- 125/-- 167/-- 117/-- 250’ 89/-- 125/-- 173/-- 117/--
WB L 150’ 242/-- 323/-- 417/-- 322/-- 150’ 251/-- 316/-- 407/-- 309/--
Chestnut Street/
WB TR -- 275/-- 264/-- 310/-- 163/-- -- 286/-- 251/-- 300/-- 155/--
Trindle Road &
NB L 640’ 318/-- 306/-- 380/-- 285/-- 640’ 303/-- 359/-- 400/-- 333/--
S 32nd Street2
NB TR -- 1301/-- 765/-- 1051/-- 747/-- -- 1320/-- 837/-- 1085/-- 791/--
SB L 110’ 33/-- 37/-- 24/-- 34/-- 110’ 64/-- 255/-- 167/-- 217/--
SB T -- 725/-- 744/-- 1028/-- 785/-- -- 752/-- 728/-- 1007/-- 746/--
SB R -- 59/-- 63/-- 115/-- 63/-- -- 63/-- 62/-- 117/-- 62/--
EB TR -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
Chestnut Street &
WB LT -- 1/3 1/0 1/3 1/0 -- 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/0
31st Street
NB LR -- 4/3 3/3 5/5 2/3 -- 4/5 5/5 6/5 3/3
EB LTR -- --/38 --/33 --/28 --/20 -- --/43 --/63 --/40 --/38
Chestnut Street & WB LTR -- --/30 --/35 --/33 --/23 -- --/30 --/38 --/33 --/25
30th Street3 NB LTR -- --/5 --/5 --/3 --/3 -- --/5 --/5 --/3 --/3
SB LTR -- --/30 --/13 --/10 --/5 -- --/30 --/15 --/10 --/8
EB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
31st Street & WB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
E-W Alley NB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
SB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
Bramar Road & EB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
N-S Alley/ WB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 1/0 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 1/0 0/0
Camp Hill Family NB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 2/3 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 2/3 0/0
Chiropractic SB LTR -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 -- 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
EB L 150’ 41/-- 200/-- 120/-- 165/-- 150’ 41/-- 192/-- 120/-- 164/--
EB T -- 26/-- 57/-- 42/-- 36/-- -- 26/-- 57/-- 42/-- 36/--
EB R -- 28/-- 40/-- 47/-- 37/-- -- 28/-- 40/-- 47/-- 37/--
7 S 32nd Street &
WB LTR -- 176/-- 177/-- 264/-- 159/-- -- 208/-- 321/-- 356/-- 284/--
Harvard Avenue/
NB L 400’ 138/-- 497/-- 431/-- 476/-- 400’ 142/-- 506/-- 431/-- 488/--
NB TR -- 1144/-- 576/-- 883/-- 501/-- -- 1154/-- 616/-- 913/-- 535/--
SB L 160’ 25/-- 14/-- 11/-- 10/-- 160’ 25/-- 14/-- 11/-- 10/--
SB TR -- 779/-- 884/-- 1268/-- 806/-- -- 770/-- 873/-- 1258/-- 796/--
EB LTR -- 0/0 1/0 1/3 0/0 -- 0/0 1/0 1/3 0/0
8 Market Street & WB LTR -- 5/8 2/3 4/5 2/3 -- 5/8 3/3 4/5 3/3
30th Street NB LTR -- 20/20 11/10 11/13 8/8 -- 26/25 44/45 29/30 36/38
SB LTR -- 37/33 16/15 12/10 13/13 -- 37/33 17/15 13/10 14/13
EB LTR -- 340/-- 300/-- 308/-- 377/-- -- 340/-- 307/-- 309/-- 380/--
9 Market Street & WB LTR -- 200/-- 291/-- 392/-- 298/-- -- 200/-- 294/-- 394/-- 300/--
29th Street NB LTR -- 28/-- 27/-- 19/-- 22/-- -- 37/-- 88/-- 46/-- 72/--
SB LTR -- 30/-- 6/-- 30/-- 20/-- -- 30/-- 6/-- 30/-- 20/--
Projected1 = full build-out scenario of development with improvements recommended in this TIS
2 = Intersections with pedestrian phases do not produce HCM 6 results. Therefore, only synchro percentile method results are included
3 = All-way Stop-control synchro does not include queueing results. Therefore, only HCM 6 results are included
As shown in Table 13, all of the 2020 Projected Condition queues will largely be accommodated within the
projected storage length, or are comparable to the base (no-build) conditions. Queue analysis worksheets
are included with the capacity analysis worksheets provided in Appendix G.
AUXILIARY TURN LANE ANALYSIS

TPD evaluated auxiliary turn lane warrants at the Chestnut Street & N-S Alley (CFS driveway) based upon
the warrant analysis methodology contained within Chapter 11 of PennDOT’s Publication 46, Section 11.17.
The findings are summarized in Table 14. The auxiliary turn lane warrant analysis worksheets are contained
in Appendix J.
TABLE 14
AUXILIARY TURN LANE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Warrant Satisfied? Required Proposed
Intersection Auxiliary Lane
AM MID PM SAT Lane Length Lane Length
Chestnut Street &
EB Right-Turn Lane No Yes-150’ Yes-100’ Yes-150’ 150’ Min 150’
N-S Alley (CFA driveway) /
Select Medical PT Parking
WB Left-Turn Lane No No No No -- --
Lot
Based on the aforementioned methodology, the right-turn lane warrant is satisfied for a 150 foot
eastbound right-turn lane during the weekday midday peak hour, 100 foot eastbound right-turn lane during
the weekday P.M. peak hour, and an eastbound 150 foot right-turn lane during weekday midday peak hour
and Saturday midday peak hour for the N-S Alley driveway. Therefore, TPD recommends the installation
of a right-turn lane of minimum 150 feet at this location.
FAST FOOD RESTAURANT QUEUING ANALYSIS
Methodology
TPD evaluated the projected drive-thru queues for the Chick-fil-a during the Saturday midday peak hour
(anticipated busiest hour). Typical Chick-fil-a restaurants deploy three types of vehicle/order processing;
(1) standard ordering with payments at the food pick-up window, (2) pay station in advance of the food
pick-up window, and (3) pay stations, tablet ordering and a three car, employee-assisted, pick-up window.
Counts were conducted by TPD to compare the three types of vehicle payment processing to determine
the resulting queues in the drive-thru. The results are included in Table 15. Drive-thru count data are
included in Appendix K.
TABLE 15
VEHICLE PAYMENT PROCESSING TIMES
Payment Processing Type Vehicle Dwell Time
(1) Standard Ordering/Payment 45 seconds
(2) Pay Station 39 seconds
(3) Pay Station , tablet orders, assisted pick-up 33 seconds
During the necessary peak hours, the CFA operator will implement the necessary measures (i.e. pay station,
tablet orders, assisted pick-up window to expedite the processing time and minimize the vehicle queue.
Based on counts at existing Chick-fil-a restaurants, TPD calculated the rate of vehicles utilizing the drive-
thru. The drive-thru rate and resulting drive thru trips for the proposed Chick-fil-a are shown in Table 16.
TABLE 16
DRIVE-THRU TRIPS
Drive Thru Rate Total Trips Drive-Thru Walk-In Trips
Time Period
per 1000 sq. ft. Total Enter Exit Trips Total Enter Exit
Saturday Midday Peak
T = 20.84*(X) 421 215 206 105 211 110 101
Hour of Generator
Weekday Midday Peak
T = 20.95*(X) 435 222 213 105 225 117 108
Hour of Generator
T = number of site-generated drive-thru vehicular trips as part of the total trips
X = independent variable
Based on the trip generation analysis summarized in Table 16, the proposed Chick-fil-a will generate 105 drive-
thru trips during the Saturday midday peak hour of generator and weekday midday peak hour of generator.
Simtraffic analyses were conducted at the Chick-fil-a driveway to calculate the proposed queue for Saturday
Midday peak hour. Using a vehicle payment processing time of 33 seconds, the average queue from the menu
board is 6 vehicles and 95th percentile queue is 13 vehicles. Simtraffic results are included in Appendix L.
Additionally, the anticipated storage required for the Chick-fil-a drive thru lane was calculated based on
the methodology outlined in Chapter 19 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. TPD utilized equation 19-
68, as shown below:
  3600  V x 
   
 Vx 2  C  C   C 
 Vx 
Q95 ≈ 900T  −1+  − 1 +   m, x   m, x 
m , x
 
 Cm , x  Cm , x  150T  3600 
 
 
Q95 = 95th Percentile Queue (Vehicles)
Vx = Flow Rate for Movement (veh/hr)
Cm,x = Capacity of Movement (veh/hr)
T = Analysis Time Period (hr)
With a service time of 33 seconds per customer, the drive-thru can have a capacity (Cm,x) of 109 customers
per hour. It was determined that Saturday is the busiest period for this use, generating 105 trips per hour.
The drive-thru flow rate (Vx) for this highest peak hour (Saturday Midday) is 105 customers per hour during
the busiest part of the day. Utilizing equation 17-37, the anticipated 95th percentile queue length is
calculated to be 290 feet, or 12 vehicles. As depicted on the proposed site plan, there is approximately 160
feet (6 vehicles) of storage space between the pick-up window and order menu. Furthermore, there are
two 110 foot lanes (5 vehicles each) from the order menu boards to the first internal intersection.
Additionally, there is an additional 225 feet (9 vehicles) of storage outside of the designated storage area
where vehicle queuing can occur without impacts to the public street (Chestnut Street) traffic. As such, 11
vehicles can stack internally and 20 vehicles can stack without impacts to the public street traffic. Therefore,
it is our opinion that adequate storage length for the Chick-fil-a is available for typically normalized time
periods.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

The conclusions for this Transportation Impact Study are identified in the Executive Summary.
$FILE$
$DATE$ $TIME$ $USER$ $MODEL$
PROPOSED
SITE N
PITTSBURGH HARRISBURG
(412)765-3717 (717)234-1430
POTTSTOWN
(610)326-3100
LEHIGH VALLEY SOUTH JERSEY
(610)625-4242 (856)966-4242
WWW.TRAFFICPD.COM
FIGURE 1
(C) 2018 Google Earth
LOCATION MAP
c:\pwworking\projectwise\jshetler\d0497892\TIS Figures 2019.01.08.dgn
2/16/2019 8:43:22 PM jshetler $MODEL$
N
CHESTNUT STREET
STOPSTOP
BYPASS
LANE
BYPASS
LANE
PROPOSED
RANT
RESTAUS.F. OUTDOOR
SEATING
5,031± AREA
11) . 00
T (S.R
TREE
32nd S
STOP
DRIVE DRIVE
THRU THRU
ALLEY
STOP
ALLEY
Est. 1989
TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

www.TrafficPD.com 610.326.3100 TPD@TrafficPD.com
FIGURE 2
SITE PLAN
4/23/2019 11:55:03 AM jshetler $MODEL$
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
SELECT M EDI
PARKING LOT
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
S ALLEY
30TH STREET
32ND STREET
N-
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
N-
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
HARVARD
AVENUE
Est. 1989
KEY: TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

STOP CONTROLLED
FIGURE 3
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
LANE USE AND TRAFFIC CONTROL
SCHEMATIC DRAWING:NOT TO SCALE
24
71
18
7
6
3
4 3
223 272
62 26
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
1 5
344 401
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
22 11
4
4
8
13
68
18
218
986
PARKI
10
10
57
75
36
0
2
15 2 10
99 224 191 137
101 0 17 25
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
301 73 203 52
S ALLEY
161 206 37 127
30TH STREET
116 2 21
1
112
1340
10
4
117
18
16
19
32ND STREET
N-
53
0
0
1
0
0
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
1
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
1
N-
3
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
0
5
31ST STREET
0
1
0
0
1230
12
21
2
8
87
HARVARD AVENUE
16
8
67
1562
10
133
Est. 1989

FIGURE 4
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
EXISTING COUNTS
A.M. PEAK HOUR
21
25
18
6
0
4
7 10
380 396
31 19
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
7 5
391 408
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
16 4
20
9
8
3
8
8
200
916
PARKI
14
49
44
29
0
3
2
18 3 5
98 203 239 179
141 0 10 18
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
265 26 189 31
S ALLEY
140 177 3 153
30TH STREET
161 0 7
12
140
4
0
0
10
896
46
9
7
5
32ND STREET
N-
15
1
0
0
0
0
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
25
0
N-
5
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
2
8
31ST STREET
1
0
0
3
1171
57
5
25
81
HARVARD AVENUE
115
29
284
301
1062
16
Est. 1989

FIGURE 5
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
EXISTING COUNTS
MIDDAY PEAK HOUR
13
16
8
9
6
9
13 11
415 452
49 38
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
17 6
385 424
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
9 7
2
14
30
0
4
9
1242
247
PARKI
42
53
31
7
0
1
7
5 1 10
145 304 251 191
191 0 17 23
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
246 21 175 53
S ALLEY
168 218 24 146
30TH STREET
223 0 4
2
174
4
1238
49
13
26
19
7
32ND STREET
N-
38
1
0
0
0
1
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
38
0
N-
2
15
BRAMAR
ROAD
1
7
31ST STREET
5
1
22
0
1696
34
10
13
117
HARVARD AVENUE
70
18
275
238
1448
15
Est. 1989

FIGURE 6
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
EXISTING COUNTS
P.M. PEAK HOUR
14
15
11
8
3
3
6 4
396 421
31 16
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
7 9
430 457
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
8 3
2
12
4
6
26
3
178
998
PARKI
14
10
36
17
0
0
0
8 3 4
84 243 203 167
159 0 9 8
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
257 4 150 21
S ALLEY
125 169 9 125
30TH STREET
156 0 11
911
2
0
4
147
37
6
9
8
5
32ND STREET
N-
18
0
0
0
0
1
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
1
N-
3
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
0
4
31ST STREET
0
1
0
0
1106
75
1
22
87
HARVARD AVENUE
113
16
329
310
997
8
Est. 1989

FIGURE 7
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
EXISTING COUNTS
SATUIRDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR
24
72
18
7
6
3
4 3
227 276
63 26
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
1 5
350 407
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
22 11
4
4
8
13
69
18
1004
222
PARKI
10
10
58
76
37
0
2
15 2 10
101 228 194 139
103 0 17 25
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
306 74 206 53
S ALLEY
164 209 38 129
30TH STREET
118 2 21
1
1372
114
10
4
119
18
16
19
32ND STREET
N-
54
0
0
1
0
0
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
1
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
1
N-
3
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
0
5
31ST STREET
0
1
0
0
1250
12
21
2
8
88
HARVARD AVENUE
16
8
68
10
1587
135
Est. 1989

FIGURE 8
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
BASE 2020 CONDITIONS
A.M. PEAK HOUR
21
25
18
6
0
4
7 10
386 402
31 19
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
7 5
397 415
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
16 4
20
9
8
3
8
8
203
942
PARKI
14
50
45
29
0
3
2
18 3 5
100 206 243 182
143 0 10 18
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
269 26 192 31
S ALLEY
142 180 3 155
30TH STREET
164 0 7
142
12
4
0
0
10
937
47
9
7
5
32ND STREET
N-
15
1
0
0
0
0
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
25
0
N-
5
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
2
8
31ST STREET
1
0
0
3
1190
58
5
25
82
HARVARD AVENUE
117
29
289
306
1079
16
Est. 1989

FIGURE 9
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
WEEKDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR
13
16
8
9
6
9
13 11
422 459
50 39
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
17 6
391 431
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
9 7
2
14
30
0
4
9
1273
251
PARKI
43
54
31
7
0
1
7
5 1 10
147 309 255 194
194 0 17 23
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
250 21 178 54
S ALLEY
171 222 24 148
30TH STREET
227 0 4
2
50
4
177
13
26
19
7
1285
32ND STREET
N-
39
1
0
0
0
1
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
39
0
N-
2
15
BRAMAR
ROAD
1
7
31ST STREET
5
1
22
0
1723
35
10
13
119
HARVARD AVENUE
71
18
279
1471
242
15
Est. 1989

FIGURE 10
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
P.M. PEAK HOUR
14
15
11
8
3
3
6 4
402 428
31 16
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
7 9
437 464
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
8 3
2
12
4
6
26
3
1046
181
PARKI
14
10
37
17
0
0
0
8 3 4
85 247 206 170
162 0 9 8
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
261 4 152 21
S ALLEY
127 172 9 127
30TH STREET
159 0 11
1001
2
0
4
149
38
6
9
8
5
32ND STREET
N-
18
0
0
0
0
1
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
1
N-
3
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
0
4
31ST STREET
0
1
0
0
1124
76
1
22
88
HARVARD AVENUE
115
16
334
1013
8
315
Est. 1989

FIGURE 11
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR
(5)
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
5)
5)
4(
4(
5)
8)
-
PARKI
3(
9(
(-1) (-2) 2 1
(-1) 2 (2)
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
10 (10) 5 (5)
S ALLEY
4 (-2) 12 (11) 5 (5)
30TH STREET
22 (20)
1)
7)
11)
22)
1
3(
-
3(
9(
22 (
11)
32ND STREET
12 (
N-
Entering: 24 (22)
Exiting: 22 (22)
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
1
N-
7 (5)
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
-
3(6)
5 (6)
HARVARD AVENUE
9
Est. 1989

KEY:
FIGURE 12
NEW(PASS-BY)TRIPS VOLUME FIGURES
SITE TRIPS
A.M. PEAK HOUR
(18) 3
3
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
3
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
18)
18)
3
24 (
24 (
23)
37)
-
19 (
51 (
PARKI
3
(-4) (-8) 11 6
(-4) 12 (8)
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
59 (36) 27 (18)
S ALLEY
20 (-7) 69 (43) 31 (18)
30TH STREET
121 (81) 1
3)
22)
36)
85)
1
19 (
-
51 (
128 (
19 (
43)
32ND STREET
69 (
N-
Entering: 133 (89)
Exiting: 128 (85)
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
1
N-
38 (17)
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
-
19 (28)
29 (26)
HARVARD AVENUE
51
Est. 1989

KEY:
FIGURE 13
SITE TRIPS
(14) 1
1
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
1
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
14)
14)
1
13 (
13 (
19)
31)
-
10 (
28 (
PARKI
1
(-4) (-7) 6 3
(-4) 7 (7)
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
31 (29) 14 (14)
S ALLEY
11 (-5) 37 (35) 16 (14)
30TH STREET
67 (67) 1
3)
19)
30)
68)
1
10 (
-
28 (
68 (
10 (
35)
32ND STREET
37 (
N-
Entering: 74 (74)
Exiting: 68 (68)
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
1
N-
20 (14)
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
-
10 (19)
16 (20)
HARVARD AVENUE
28
Est. 1989

KEY:
FIGURE 14
SITE TRIPS
P.M. PEAK HOUR
(16) 3
3
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
2
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
16)
17)
2
24 (
24 (
23)
37)
-
19 (
50 (
PARKI
3
(-3) (-9) 10 6
(-6) 12 (9)
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
57 (33) 26 (16)
S ALLEY
19 (-6) 67 (43) 30 (16)
30TH STREET
117 (77) 1
3)
21)
34)
82)
1
19 (
-
49 (
124 (
19 (
43)
32ND STREET
67 (
N-
Entering: 129 (86)
Exiting: 124 (82)
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
1
N-
37 (16)
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
-
19 (29)
29 (27)
HARVARD AVENUE
49
Est. 1989

KEY:
FIGURE 15
SITE TRIPS
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
SELECT M EDI
PARKING LOT
1
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
S ALLEY
30TH STREET
1
1
-
32ND STREET
N-
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
1
N-
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
HARVARD AVENUE
Est. 1989

FIGURE 16
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
REROUTED N-S ALLEY TRIPS
A.M. PEAK HOUR
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
SELECT M EDI
PARKING LOT
4
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
S ALLEY
30TH STREET
4
4
-
32ND STREET
N-
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
4
N-
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
HARVARD AVENUE
Est. 1989

FIGURE 17
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
SELECT M EDI
PARKING LOT
3
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
S ALLEY
30TH STREET
3
3
-
32ND STREET
N-
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
3
N-
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
HARVARD AVENUE
Est. 1989

FIGURE 18
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
P.M. PEAK HOUR
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
SELECT M EDI
PARKING LOT
2
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
S ALLEY
30TH STREET
2
2
-
32ND STREET
N-
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
2
N-
BRAMAR
ROAD
31ST STREET
HARVARD AVENUE
Est. 1989

FIGURE 19
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
24
72
18
7
6
3
4 3
232 276
63 26
CAL PT
MARKET
STREET
N
29TH STREET
1 5
350 407
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
22 11
4
17
13
69
13
18
1002
222
PARKI
27
10
58
76
37
0
2
15 3 10
100 226 196 140
102 4 17 25
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
306 74 226 63
S ALLEY
168 207 61 139
30TH STREET
118 44 21
12
134
0
0
44
4
123
1368
18
16
19
32ND STREET
N-
77
0
0
1
0
0
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
1
N-
15
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
0
5
31ST STREET
0
1
0
0
1247
12
21
2
8
99
HARVARD AVENUE
16
8
68
10
1596
135
Est. 1989

FIGURE 20
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
PROJECTED 2020 CONDITIONS
A.M. PEAK HOUR
21
25
18
6
0
4
7 10
404 405
34 19
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
7 5
397 418
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
16 4
51
8
23
8
8
45
203
938
102
PARKI
50
48
29
0
3
2
18 3 5
96 202 254 188
139 20 10 18
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
269 26 287 76
S ALLEY
162 173 115 204
30TH STREET
164 202 8
164
934
134
0
0
14
10
213
13
5
32ND STREET
127
N-
0
0
0
0
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
0
N-
60
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
2
8
31ST STREET
1
0
0
3
1181
58
5
25
137
HARVARD AVENUE
117
29
289
1130
306
16
Est. 1989

FIGURE 21
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
13
16
8
9
6
9
13 11
436 460
51 39
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
17 6
391 432
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
9 7
31
14
4
29
27
9
1264
251
PARKI
66
43
55
31
0
1
7
5 1 10
143 305 261 197
190 14 17 23
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
250 21 238 82
S ALLEY
182 217 96 178
30TH STREET
227 134 5
190
0
0
1276
108
138
17
26
19
7
5
32ND STREET
111
N-
0
0
0
1
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
3
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
40
0
N-
36
15
BRAMAR
ROAD
1
7
31ST STREET
5
1
22
0
1714
35
10
13
155
HARVARD AVENUE
71
18
279
242
1499
15
Est. 1989

FIGURE 22
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
P.M. PEAK HOUR
14
15
11
8
3
3
6 4
402 428
31 16
CAL PT
MARKET
N STREET
29TH STREET
7 9
437 464
SELECT M EDI
NG LOT
8 3
2
12
4
6
26
3
1042
181
101
PARKI
10
40
17
0
0
0
8 3 4
82 240 216 176
156 21 9 8
TRINDLE CHESTNUT
ROAD STREET
261 4 242 104
S ALLEY
146 166 119 133
30TH STREET
159 194 12
171
121
0
0
4
999
208
9
9
6
8
32ND STREET
128
N-
0
0
0
1
E-W ALLEY
S ALLEY
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
1
N-
56
1
BRAMAR
ROAD
0
4
31ST STREET
0
1
0
0
1124
76
1
22
88
HARVARD AVENUE
115
16
334
1013
8
315
Est. 1989

FIGURE 23
KEY: VOLUME FIGURES
APPENDIX A:
Project Correspondence
WWW.TRAFFICPD.COM
MEMORANDUM
To: Patrick Dennis, Borough Manager

From: Jarred L. Neal, P.E., Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. (TPD)
Cc: Mark Metil, Gannett Fleming
P. Eric Mains, Gannett Fleming
Date: November 14, 2018
Re: Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Scope Determination Request

Camp Hill Chick-Fil-A
TPD#: WMSC.00002
This memo regards the proposed Chick-Fil-A Development in Camp Hill Borough, Cumberland
County, PA. The proposed development will be located on the southeastern side of the intersection
of 32nd Street (SR 0011) and Chestnut Street (see attached location map). Upon full build-out, the
proposed development will consist of a 5,031 sq. ft. fast food restaurant with a drive-thru. Access will
be provided via one (1) full-movement driveway to Chestnut Street. TPD proposes the following
scope for the TIS, per Borough’s “Abbreviated Traffic Impact Study” requirements as identified in
Section 731.A.1 of the Borough’s Zoning Ordinance:
Study Area:
 Chestnut Street and Proposed Site Driveway.
Study Time Periods:

 Weekday A.M. Peak Hour (between 6:00-9:00 A.M.);
 Weekday P.M. Peak Hour (between 3:00-6:00 P.M.);
 Saturday Midday Peak Hour (between 11:00 A.M. - 1:00 P.M.).
Background Growth Factor & Nearby Developments:

 A background growth factor of 0.80% compounded annually will be applied to the existing traffic
volumes in accordance with the current PennDOT BPR statistics.
 TPD will include the Quattro Redevelopment at the intersection of N. 32nd Street and 31st Street
as a background development. Please advise of any other nearby planned developments that
the Borough is aware of in the vicinity of the proposed development.
4000 Crums Mill Road, Suite 102 717.234.1430

TPD@TrafficPD.com
Harrisburg, PA 17112
Trip Generation:
 The trip generation rates for the proposed development were obtained from the Trip Generation
Manual, Tenth Edition, 2017, an Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Informational Report.
The statistics in Trip Generation Manual are empirical data based on more than 4,800 trip
generation studies. The data are categorized by Land Use Codes, with total vehicular trips for a
given land use estimated using an independent variable and statistically generated rates or
equations.
For the proposed development, Land Use Codes 934 (Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru) from
Trip Generation was used to calculate the number of vehicular trips the development will
generate during the following time periods: (1) average weekday; (2) weekday A.M. peak hour;
(3) weekday P.M. peak hour and (4) Saturday midday peak hour. Table 1 shows the trip generation
equations and directional split for the analyzed time periods.
TABLE 1
ITE TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
Land Use Time Directional Split
Units Rates
Component Period Enter Exit
Fast-Food Average Weekday T = 470.95*X 50% 50%
Restaurant A.M. Peak Hour T = 40.19*X 51% 49%
with Drive- 5,031 sq. ft.
Thru P.M. Peak Hour T = 32.67*X 52% 48%
(ITE #934) Saturday Peak Hour T = 54.86*X 51% 49%
T = number of site-generated vehicular trips;
X = independent variable (ksf gross floor area)
The calculated trip generation for the proposed development for the opening year is shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2
TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
Total Trips Pass-by Trips New Trips
Time Period
Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit
Weekday 2,370 1,185 1,185 --- --- --- --- --- ---
A.M. Peak Hour 202 103 99 99 50 49 103 53 50
P.M. Peak Hour 164 85 79 82 43 39 82 42 40
SAT Midday
276 141 135 110 56 54 166 85 81
Peak Hour
Trip Distribution:
 The distribution and assignment of new trips generated by the development will be based upon
an analysis of the following: (1) existing traffic patterns and distributions within the study area;
(2) available routes for travel; and (3) the proposed site driveway location.
4000 Crums Mill Road, Suite 102 717.234.1430 November 14, 2018 / Page 2
TPD@TrafficPD.com
Capacity Analyses:
 Capacity analyses will be conducted according to the methodologies contained in the 2010
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) using Synchro 10 software:
o Existing Conditions;
o 2020 Opening Year Conditions (without the proposed development);
o 2020 Opening Year Conditions (with the proposed development).
We would appreciate your review of the enclosed information. If there are any questions or comments,
please call any time.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Following submission of the Scoping memorandum a meeting was held to discuss the project with
Borough Staff. During the meeting it was determined the TIS should be completed using Chick-fil-A
transaction data.
Also the following study area intersections were requested to be included in the TIS:
--Chestnut Street & N-S Alley (CFA driveway)/ Select Medical PT Parking Lot;
--Chestnut Street/Trindle Road & S 32nd Street;
--Chestnut Street & 31st Street;
--Chestnut Street & 30th Street;
--31st Street & E-W Alley;
--Bramar Road & N-S Alley/Camp Hill Family Chiropractic.
4000 Crums Mill Road, Suite 102 717.234.1430 November 14, 2018 / Page 3
TPD@TrafficPD.com
APPENDIX B:
Study Area Photographs
Job #: WMSC.00002 Date Taken: 12/10/2018 Intersection Of: Chestnut Street & Alley
Direction / Road: EB Chestnut Street

Approach / Departure: Approach
Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: EB Chestnut Street

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: WB Chestnut Street

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: NB Alley

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: NB Alley

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: SB Alley

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: SB Alley

Distance: 200 feet
Job #: WMSC.00002 Date Taken: 12/10/2018 Intersection Of: Chestnut St & Trindle Road/32nd St
Direction / Road: EB Trindle Road

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: EB Trindle Road

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: NB 32nd Street

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: SB 32nd Street

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Job #: WMSC.00002 Date Taken: 12/10/2018 Intersection Of: Chestnut & 30th Street
Direction / Road: NB 30th Street

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: SB 30th Street

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: WB Chestnut

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Job #: WMSC.00002 Date Taken: 12/10/2018 Intersection Of: Chestnut & 31st Street
Direction / Road: NB 31st Street

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: EB Chestnut

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: EB Chestnut

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Job #: WMSC.00002 Date Taken: 12/10/2018 Intersection Of: 31st Street & Alley
Direction / Road: EB E-W Alley

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: SB 31st Street

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: SB 31st Street

Distance: 200 feet
Job #: WMSC.00002 Date Taken: 12/10/2018 Intersection Of: Bramar Road & N-S Alley
Direction / Road: EB Bramar Road

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: WB Bramar Road

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: WB Bramar Road

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: SB N-S Alley

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: SB N-S Alley

Distance: 200 feet
Job #: WMSC.00002 Date Taken: 03/29/2019 Intersection Of: 29th Street & Market Street
Direction / Road: EB Market Street

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: WB Market Street

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
Job #: WMSC.00002 Date Taken: 03/29/2019 Intersection Of: 32nd Street & Harvard Avenue
Direction / Road: EB Shopping Center

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: EB Shopping Center

Distance: 200 feet
Direction / Road: WB Harvard Avenue

Distance: 50 feet
Direction / Road: WB Harvard Avenue

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet

Distance: 50 feet

Distance: 200 feet
APPENDIX C:
Traffic Count Printouts
Count Name: AM_PM Alley &
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Chestnut Street
2500 East High Street Site Code: AM_PM Alley &
Suite 650 Chestnut Street
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States 19464 Start Date: 12/04/2018
610.326.3100 jwheeler@trafficpd.com Page No: 1
Turning Movement Data

Chestnut Street Chestnut Street Alley Office Park Driveway
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Start Time App. App. App. App. Int.
Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds
Total Total Total Total Total
6:00 AM 1 4 0 0 5 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 12
6:15 AM 4 8 1 0 13 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 27
6:30 AM 1 17 0 0 18 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 35
6:45 AM 8 20 0 0 28 0 26 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 56
Hourly Total 14 49 1 0 64 0 60 0 0 60 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 6 130
7:00 AM 6 33 0 0 39 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 3 65
7:15 AM 8 51 1 0 60 0 38 1 1 39 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 2 101
7:30 AM 16 55 2 0 73 0 59 2 0 61 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 2 5 139
7:45 AM 25 46 0 0 71 0 52 0 0 52 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 126
Hourly Total 55 185 3 0 243 0 172 3 1 175 0 1 0 11 1 2 0 10 2 12 431
8:00 AM 18 62 0 0 80 0 42 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 3 125
8:15 AM 14 43 0 0 57 0 71 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 130
8:30 AM 14 32 1 0 47 0 50 0 1 50 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 5 104
8:45 AM 6 42 0 0 48 2 54 0 0 56 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 4 109
Hourly Total 52 179 1 0 232 2 217 0 1 219 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 11 1 14 468
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 5 41 0 0 46 0 79 2 0 81 1 0 2 7 3 0 0 8 0 8 138
3:15 PM 1 42 0 0 43 0 81 0 0 81 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 6 0 6 132
3:30 PM 4 49 0 0 53 0 60 1 0 61 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 12 0 13 128
3:45 PM 7 32 1 0 40 1 58 0 0 59 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 14 0 14 116
Hourly Total 17 164 1 0 182 1 278 3 0 282 4 1 4 9 9 1 0 40 0 41 514
4:00 PM 6 43 2 0 51 0 55 0 0 55 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 14 0 17 124
4:15 PM 2 40 0 0 42 0 62 0 0 62 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 15 0 16 121
4:30 PM 4 62 0 0 66 0 74 0 0 74 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 20 1 21 162
4:45 PM 4 58 0 0 62 0 71 1 0 72 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 7 0 7 142
Hourly Total 16 203 2 0 221 0 262 1 0 263 2 0 2 1 4 4 1 56 1 61 549
5:00 PM 9 41 0 0 50 0 88 0 0 88 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 8 148
5:15 PM 4 57 0 1 61 0 71 0 0 71 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 7 140
5:30 PM 4 63 0 0 67 1 58 0 0 59 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 6 133
5:45 PM 3 39 0 0 42 0 58 1 0 59 5 1 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 7 114
Hourly Total 20 200 0 1 220 1 275 1 0 277 9 1 0 0 10 0 0 28 0 28 535
Grand Total 174 980 8 1 1162 4 1264 8 2 1276 18 3 6 23 27 11 1 150 4 162 2627
Approach % 15.0 84.3 0.7 - - 0.3 99.1 0.6 - - 66.7 11.1 22.2 - - 6.8 0.6 92.6 - - -
Total % 6.6 37.3 0.3 - 44.2 0.2 48.1 0.3 - 48.6 0.7 0.1 0.2 - 1.0 0.4 0.0 5.7 - 6.2 -
Lights 173 972 8 - 1153 4 1251 7 - 1262 18 3 6 - 27 10 1 148 - 159 2601
% Lights 99.4 99.2 100.0 - 99.2 100.0 99.0 87.5 - 98.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 90.9 100.0 98.7 - 98.1 99.0
Other Vehicles 1 8 0 - 9 0 13 1 - 14 0 0 0 - 0 1 0 2 - 3 26
% Other 0.6 0.8 0.0 - 0.8 0.0 1.0 12.5 - 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 9.1 0.0 1.3 - 1.9 1.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 2 - - - - 23 - - - - 4 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Office Park Driveway [N]

Out In Total
183 159 342
2 3 5
0 0 0
185 162 347
148 1 10 0
2 0 1 0
0 0 0 4
150 1 11 4
R T L P
173
174
R
1
0
8
0
1
7
Total
2570
2594
997
988
Out
24
0
0
9
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

1264
1251
972
980
13
T
T
8
0
0
12/04/2018 6:00 AM
1153
1162
1276
1262
14
In
In
9
0
0
Ending At
12/04/2018 6:00 PM
R
8
0
0
8
L
4
0
0
4
Lights
1417
1432
2273
2250
Total
Out
15
23
Other Vehicles
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
L T R P
18 3 6 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 23
18 3 6 23
13 27 40
0 0 0
0 0 0
13 27 40
Out In Total
Alley [S]
Turning Movement Data Plot

Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)

7:30 AM 16 55 2 0 73 0 59 2 0 61 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 2 5 139
7:45 AM 25 46 0 0 71 0 52 0 0 52 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 126
8:00 AM 18 62 0 0 80 0 42 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 3 125
8:15 AM 14 43 0 0 57 0 71 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 130
Total 73 206 2 0 281 0 224 2 0 226 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 10 3 12 520
Approach % 26.0 73.3 0.7 - - 0.0 99.1 0.9 - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - 16.7 0.0 83.3 - - -
Total % 14.0 39.6 0.4 - 54.0 0.0 43.1 0.4 - 43.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 - 0.2 0.4 0.0 1.9 - 2.3 -
PHF 0.730 0.831 0.250 - 0.878 0.000 0.789 0.250 - 0.796 0.000 0.250 0.000 - 0.250 0.500 0.000 0.625 - 0.600 0.935
Lights 73 204 2 - 279 0 220 2 - 222 0 1 0 - 1 2 0 10 - 12 514
% Lights 100.0 99.0 100.0 - 99.3 - 98.2 100.0 - 98.2 - 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 98.8
Other Vehicles 0 2 0 - 2 0 4 0 - 4 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 6
% Other 0.0 1.0 0.0 - 0.7 - 1.8 0.0 - 1.8 - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 1.2
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - - - - 3 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -

Out In Total
76 12 88
0 0 0
0 0 0
76 12 88
10 0 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 3
10 0 2 3
R T L P
73
73
R
0
0
2
0
0
2
Peak Hour Data
Total
509
515
208
206
Out
6
0
0
2
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

204
206
224
220
T
T
2
0
0
4
12/04/2018 7:30 AM
279
281
226
222
In
In
2
0
0
4
Ending At
12/04/2018 8:30 AM
R
2
0
0
2
L
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
230
234
434
428
Out
Other Vehicles
4
0
0
6
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 1 0 1
2 1 3
0 0 0
0 0 0
2 1 3
Out In Total
Alley [S]
Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM)

Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)

4:30 PM 4 62 0 0 66 0 74 0 0 74 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 20 1 21 162
4:45 PM 4 58 0 0 62 0 71 1 0 72 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 7 0 7 142
5:00 PM 9 41 0 0 50 0 88 0 0 88 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 8 148
5:15 PM 4 57 0 1 61 0 71 0 0 71 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 7 140
Total 21 218 0 1 239 0 304 1 0 305 3 0 2 0 5 1 0 42 1 43 592
Approach % 8.8 91.2 0.0 - - 0.0 99.7 0.3 - - 60.0 0.0 40.0 - - 2.3 0.0 97.7 - - -
Total % 3.5 36.8 0.0 - 40.4 0.0 51.4 0.2 - 51.5 0.5 0.0 0.3 - 0.8 0.2 0.0 7.1 - 7.3 -
PHF 0.583 0.879 0.000 - 0.905 0.000 0.864 0.250 - 0.866 0.375 0.000 0.500 - 0.625 0.250 0.000 0.525 - 0.512 0.914
Lights 21 216 0 - 237 0 303 1 - 304 3 0 2 - 5 1 0 42 - 43 589
% Lights 100.0 99.1 - - 99.2 - 99.7 100.0 - 99.7 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 99.5
Other Vehicles 0 2 0 - 2 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 3
% Other 0.0 0.9 - - 0.8 - 0.3 0.0 - 0.3 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.5
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -

Out In Total
22 43 65
0 0 0
0 0 0
22 43 65
42 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
42 0 1 1
R T L P
21
21
R
0
0
1
0
0
1
Peak Hour Data
Total
585
588
221
219
Out
3
0
0
2
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

216
218
304
303
T
T
2
0
0
1
12/04/2018 4:30 PM
237
239
305
304
In
In
2
0
0
1
Ending At
12/04/2018 5:30 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
348
349
526
523
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
3
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
L T R P
3 0 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
3 0 2 0
0 5 5
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 5 5
Out In Total
Alley [S]
Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)

Count Name: SAT Alley &
2500 East High Street Site Code: SAT Alley & Chestnut
Suite 650 Street

Chestnut Street Chestnut Street Alley Office Park Dw
11:00 AM 2 46 0 0 48 0 55 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 107
11:15 AM 4 33 0 0 37 0 51 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 94
11:30 AM 0 37 0 0 37 0 53 1 0 54 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 3 95
11:45 AM 0 39 0 0 39 0 52 1 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 95
Hourly Total 6 155 0 0 161 0 211 2 0 213 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 16 1 16 391
12:00 PM 2 49 0 1 51 0 72 1 0 73 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 1 3 128
12:15 PM 2 44 0 0 46 0 66 0 0 66 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 115
12:30 PM 2 39 0 0 41 0 44 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 93
12:45 PM 4 28 0 0 32 0 49 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 87
Hourly Total 10 160 0 1 170 0 231 1 0 232 2 0 1 1 3 0 0 18 1 18 423
1:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Grand Total 17 315 0 1 332 0 442 3 0 445 2 0 2 1 4 0 0 34 2 34 815
Approach % 5.1 94.9 0.0 - - 0.0 99.3 0.7 - - 50.0 0.0 50.0 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - -
Total % 2.1 38.7 0.0 - 40.7 0.0 54.2 0.4 - 54.6 0.2 0.0 0.2 - 0.5 0.0 0.0 4.2 - 4.2 -
Lights 16 315 0 - 331 0 442 2 - 444 2 0 2 - 4 0 0 33 - 33 812
% Lights 94.1 100.0 - - 99.7 - 100.0 66.7 - 99.8 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 97.1 - 97.1 99.6
Other Vehicles 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 - 1 3
% Other 5.9 0.0 - - 0.3 - 0.0 33.3 - 0.2 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 2.9 - 2.9 0.4
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - - - - 2 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Street
Office Park Dw [N]

Out In Total
18 33 51
2 1 3
0 0 0
20 34 54
33 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
34 0 0 2
R T L P
16
17
R
1
0
3
0
1
2
Total
808
810
317
317
Out
2
0
0
0
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

315
315
442
442
T
T
0
0
0
0
12/01/2018 11:00 AM
331
332
445
444
In
In
1
0
0
1
Ending At
12/01/2018 1:15 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
477
478
762
761
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
L T R P
2 0 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
2 0 2 1
0 4 4
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 4 4
Out In Total
Alley [S]

Suite 650 Street

Chestnut Street Chestnut Street Alley Office Park Dw
11:30 AM 0 37 0 0 37 0 53 1 0 54 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 3 95
11:45 AM 0 39 0 0 39 0 52 1 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 95
12:00 PM 2 49 0 1 51 0 72 1 0 73 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 1 3 128
12:15 PM 2 44 0 0 46 0 66 0 0 66 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 115
Total 4 169 0 1 173 0 243 3 0 246 2 0 2 1 4 0 0 10 2 10 433
Approach % 2.3 97.7 0.0 - - 0.0 98.8 1.2 - - 50.0 0.0 50.0 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - -
Total % 0.9 39.0 0.0 - 40.0 0.0 56.1 0.7 - 56.8 0.5 0.0 0.5 - 0.9 0.0 0.0 2.3 - 2.3 -
PHF 0.500 0.862 0.000 - 0.848 0.000 0.844 0.750 - 0.842 0.250 0.000 0.500 - 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.833 - 0.833 0.846
Lights 4 169 0 - 173 0 243 2 - 245 2 0 2 - 4 0 0 10 - 10 432
% Lights 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 66.7 - 99.6 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 99.8
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 1
% Other 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 33.3 - 0.4 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 0.2
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - - - - 2 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Street
Office Park Dw [N]

Out In Total
6 10 16
1 0 1
0 0 0
7 10 17
10 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
10 0 0 2
R T L P
R
4
0
0
4
L
3
0
1
2
Peak Hour Data
Total
428
428
171
171
Out
0
0
0
0
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

169
169
243
243
T
T
0
0
0
0
12/01/2018 11:30 AM
173
173
246
245
In
In
0
0
0
1
Ending At
12/01/2018 12:30 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
255
255
417
416
Out
Other Vehicles
0
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
L T R P
2 0 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
2 0 2 1
0 4 4
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 4 4
Out In Total
Alley [S]

Count Name: 1100-1300
Chestnut Street & Existing
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Alley/Select Medical PT
2500 East High Street Site Code: 1100-1300 Chestnut
Suite 650 Street & Existing Alley/Select
610.326.3100 mosmulski@trafficpd.com Page No: 1

Chestnut Street Chestnut Street Existing Alley Select Medical PT
11:00 AM 10 37 0 0 47 0 51 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 0 10 108
11:15 AM 13 54 0 0 67 0 36 0 0 36 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 12 0 12 117
11:30 AM 2 37 0 2 39 0 45 2 0 47 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 12 99
11:45 AM 6 40 0 0 46 0 69 0 0 69 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 4 9 125
Hourly Total 31 168 0 2 199 0 201 2 0 203 4 0 0 0 4 2 0 41 4 43 449
12:00 PM 5 46 0 0 51 0 53 1 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 16 1 19 124
12:15 PM 9 32 1 0 42 1 54 0 0 55 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 9 0 11 108
12:30 PM 8 28 0 0 36 0 43 2 0 45 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 11 0 12 93
12:45 PM 10 33 0 0 43 0 45 1 2 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 10 99
Hourly Total 32 139 1 0 172 1 195 4 2 200 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 46 3 52 424
Grand Total 63 307 1 2 371 1 396 6 2 403 4 0 0 3 4 8 0 87 7 95 873
Approach % 17.0 82.7 0.3 - - 0.2 98.3 1.5 - - 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 8.4 0.0 91.6 - - -
Total % 7.2 35.2 0.1 - 42.5 0.1 45.4 0.7 - 46.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 - 0.5 0.9 0.0 10.0 - 10.9 -
Lights 63 297 1 - 361 1 390 5 - 396 4 0 0 - 4 7 0 87 - 94 855
% Lights 100.0 96.7 100.0 - 97.3 100.0 98.5 83.3 - 98.3 100.0 - - - 100.0 87.5 - 100.0 - 98.9 97.9
Other Vehicles 0 10 0 - 10 0 6 1 - 7 0 0 0 - 0 1 0 0 - 1 18
% Other 0.0 3.3 0.0 - 2.7 0.0 1.5 16.7 - 1.7 0.0 - - - 0.0 12.5 - 0.0 - 1.1 2.1
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 3 - - - - 7 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Select Medical PT [N]

Out In Total
68 94 162
1 1 2
0 0 0
69 95 164
87 0 7 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 7
87 0 8 7
R T L P
63
63
R
0
0
6
0
1
5
Total
842
858
315
304
Out
16
11
0
0
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

297
307
396
390
10
T
0
0
6
12/04/2018 11:00 AM
361
371
403
396
10
In
In
0
0
7
Ending At
12/04/2018 1:00 PM
R
1
0
0
1
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
481
487
718
700
Out
18
Other Vehicles
6
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
2
2
2
2
0
0
L T R P
4 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 3
4 0 0 3
2 4 6
0 0 0
0 0 0
2 4 6
Out In Total
Existing Alley [S]


Chestnut Street Chestnut Street Existing Alley Select Medical PT
11:15 AM 13 54 0 0 67 0 36 0 0 36 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 12 0 12 117
11:30 AM 2 37 0 2 39 0 45 2 0 47 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 12 99
11:45 AM 6 40 0 0 46 0 69 0 0 69 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 4 9 125
12:00 PM 5 46 0 0 51 0 53 1 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 16 1 19 124
Total 26 177 0 2 203 0 203 3 0 206 4 0 0 0 4 3 0 49 5 52 465
Approach % 12.8 87.2 0.0 - - 0.0 98.5 1.5 - - 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 5.8 0.0 94.2 - - -
Total % 5.6 38.1 0.0 - 43.7 0.0 43.7 0.6 - 44.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 - 0.9 0.6 0.0 10.5 - 11.2 -
PHF 0.500 0.819 0.000 - 0.757 0.000 0.736 0.375 - 0.746 0.500 0.000 0.000 - 0.500 0.250 0.000 0.766 - 0.684 0.930
Lights 26 170 0 - 196 0 198 2 - 200 4 0 0 - 4 3 0 49 - 52 452
% Lights 100.0 96.0 - - 96.6 - 97.5 66.7 - 97.1 100.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 97.2
Other Vehicles 0 7 0 - 7 0 5 1 - 6 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 13
% Other 0.0 4.0 - - 3.4 - 2.5 33.3 - 2.9 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 2.8
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 2 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 5 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Select Medical PT [N]

Out In Total
28 52 80
1 0 1
0 0 0
29 52 81
49 0 3 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 5
49 0 3 5
R T L P
26
26
R
0
0
3
0
1
2
Peak Hour Data
Total
447
459
180
173
Out
12
0
0
7
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

170
177
203
198
T
T
7
0
0
5
12/04/2018 11:15 AM
196
203
206
200
In
In
7
0
0
6
Ending At
12/04/2018 12:15 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
251
256
386
373
Out
13
Other Vehicles
5
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
L T R P
4 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
0 4 4
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 4 4
Out In Total
Existing Alley [S]

Count Name: AM_PM S.32nd
Street & Chestnut Street/E.
Trindle Road
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Site Code: AM_PM S.32nd
2500 East High Street Street & Chestnut Street/E.
Suite 650 Trindle R

E.Trindle Road Chestnut Street 32nd Street 32nd Street
Start Time Right Right Right Right
App. App. App. App. Int.
Left Thru Right on Peds Total Left Thru Right on Peds Total Left Thru Right on Peds Total Left Thru Right on Peds Total Total
Red Red Red Red
6:00 AM 24 1 6 2 0 33 4 3 0 0 0 7 20 134 2 0 0 156 3 86 27 14 0 130 326
6:15 AM 39 6 9 3 0 57 8 3 1 0 0 12 15 156 5 0 0 176 2 135 21 4 0 162 407
6:30 AM 54 8 8 8 0 78 14 7 0 0 3 21 28 281 7 0 1 316 1 180 25 14 0 220 635
6:45 AM 65 14 8 12 0 99 18 10 1 0 0 29 24 338 12 0 2 374 5 164 35 14 0 218 720
Hourly Total 182 29 31 25 0 267 44 23 2 0 3 69 87 909 26 0 3 1022 11 565 108 46 0 730 2088
7:00 AM 66 17 11 12 0 106 9 16 2 0 0 27 27 354 18 0 2 399 3 175 31 12 0 221 753
7:15 AM 68 33 10 9 0 120 16 15 4 0 1 35 15 257 16 3 4 291 11 191 25 12 0 239 685
7:30 AM 47 38 15 9 0 109 36 22 4 0 0 62 27 343 23 2 1 395 2 236 32 26 2 296 862
7:45 AM 103 46 13 18 0 180 28 16 3 0 0 47 27 323 29 0 0 379 2 319 34 15 0 370 976
Hourly Total 284 134 49 48 0 515 89 69 13 0 1 171 96 1277 86 5 7 1464 18 921 122 65 2 1126 3276
8:00 AM 87 44 6 24 0 161 13 16 2 0 0 31 34 333 27 1 0 395 5 215 35 19 1 274 861
8:15 AM 64 33 12 19 0 128 24 45 6 0 0 75 29 341 29 1 0 400 1 216 45 12 0 274 877
8:30 AM 68 16 10 15 0 109 29 27 2 0 0 58 48 285 21 4 0 358 5 215 28 10 0 258 783
8:45 AM 64 20 8 20 0 112 23 40 2 0 0 65 49 308 22 2 1 381 3 206 34 19 0 262 820
Hourly Total 283 113 36 78 0 510 89 128 12 0 0 229 160 1267 99 8 1 1534 14 852 142 60 1 1068 3341
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 51 29 18 19 0 117 39 32 4 0 2 75 36 209 13 0 6 258 3 252 24 12 2 291 741
3:15 PM 49 32 18 15 0 114 43 35 4 0 3 82 43 252 9 0 2 304 0 277 28 20 0 325 825
3:30 PM 57 37 13 18 0 125 45 38 7 0 0 90 36 263 15 0 0 314 3 342 37 18 0 400 929
3:45 PM 63 29 14 31 0 137 31 26 0 0 0 57 41 260 7 1 0 309 2 354 38 28 0 422 925
Hourly Total 220 127 63 83 0 493 158 131 15 0 5 304 156 984 44 1 8 1185 8 1225 127 78 2 1438 3420
4:00 PM 56 31 19 33 0 139 44 31 6 0 0 81 40 285 13 1 1 339 6 311 38 18 0 373 932
4:15 PM 62 33 13 32 0 140 47 23 2 0 0 72 50 297 8 0 0 355 2 374 44 17 0 437 1004
4:30 PM 63 54 15 37 0 169 48 41 1 0 1 90 50 302 10 0 0 362 4 314 41 15 0 374 995
4:45 PM 62 42 25 30 0 159 44 42 1 0 1 87 41 322 18 2 0 383 1 269 36 23 1 329 958
Hourly Total 243 160 72 132 0 607 183 137 10 0 2 330 181 1206 49 3 1 1439 13 1268 159 73 1 1513 3889
5:00 PM 59 39 25 46 0 169 52 39 1 0 0 92 33 317 11 0 1 361 0 285 53 18 0 356 978
5:15 PM 63 45 17 34 0 159 49 34 2 0 0 85 48 340 11 0 0 399 0 292 48 15 0 355 998
5:30 PM 70 51 11 26 0 158 35 28 2 0 0 65 51 289 11 0 0 351 0 281 59 23 0 363 937
5:45 PM 68 31 17 32 0 148 40 27 2 0 0 69 42 229 10 0 0 281 0 276 46 30 0 352 850
Hourly Total 260 166 70 138 0 634 176 128 7 0 0 311 174 1175 43 0 1 1392 0 1134 206 86 0 1426 3763
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Grand Total 1472 729 321 504 0 3026 739 616 59 0 11 1414 854 6819 347 17 21 8037 64 5965 864 408 6 7301 19778
Approach % 48.6 24.1 10.6 16.7 - - 52.3 43.6 4.2 0.0 - - 10.6 84.8 4.3 0.2 - - 0.9 81.7 11.8 5.6 - - -
Total % 7.4 3.7 1.6 2.5 - 15.3 3.7 3.1 0.3 0.0 - 7.1 4.3 34.5 1.8 0.1 - 40.6 0.3 30.2 4.4 2.1 - 36.9 -
Lights 1451 727 309 489 - 2976 737 605 57 0 - 1399 825 6696 342 16 - 7879 62 5838 847 401 - 7148 19402
% Lights 98.6 99.7 96.3 97.0 - 98.3 99.7 98.2 96.6 - - 98.9 96.6 98.2 98.6 94.1 - 98.0 96.9 97.9 98.0 98.3 - 97.9 98.1
Other 21 2 12 15 - 50 2 11 2 0 - 15 29 123 5 1 - 158 2 127 17 7 - 153 376
Vehicles
% Other 1.4 0.3 3.7 3.0 - 1.7 0.3 1.8 3.4 - - 1.1 3.4 1.8 1.4 5.9 - 2.0 3.1 2.1 2.0 1.7 - 2.1 1.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 11 - - - - - 21 - - - - - 6 - -
% - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Trindle Road
Suite 650 Trindle R
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
8204 7148 15352
146 153 299
0 0 0
8350 7301 15651
1248 5838 62 0
24 127 2 0
0 0 0 6
1272 5965 64 6
R T L P
1451
1472
21
59
57
R
0
0
2
Total
5654
5768
1157
1147
114
Out
10
0
0
E.Trindle Road [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

727
729
616
605
11
T
T
2
0
0
12/04/2018 6:00 AM
2976
3026
1414
1399
50
15
In
In
0
0
Ending At
12/04/2018 6:15 PM
798
825
739
737
27
R
0
0
2
Lights
2678
2742
2571
2546
Total
Out
64
25
Other Vehicles
0
0
Pedestrians 11
11
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
825 6696 358 0
29 123 6 0
0 0 0 21
854 6819 364 21
7373 7879 15252

156 158 314
0 0 0
7529 8037 15566
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Trindle Road
Suite 650 Trindle R

Red Red Red Red
7:30 AM 47 38 15 9 0 109 36 22 4 0 0 62 27 343 23 2 1 395 2 236 32 26 2 296 862
7:45 AM 103 46 13 18 0 180 28 16 3 0 0 47 27 323 29 0 0 379 2 319 34 15 0 370 976
8:00 AM 87 44 6 24 0 161 13 16 2 0 0 31 34 333 27 1 0 395 5 215 35 19 1 274 861
8:15 AM 64 33 12 19 0 128 24 45 6 0 0 75 29 341 29 1 0 400 1 216 45 12 0 274 877
Total 301 161 46 70 0 578 101 99 15 0 0 215 117 1340 108 4 1 1569 10 986 146 72 3 1214 3576
Approach % 52.1 27.9 8.0 12.1 - - 47.0 46.0 7.0 0.0 - - 7.5 85.4 6.9 0.3 - - 0.8 81.2 12.0 5.9 - - -
Total % 8.4 4.5 1.3 2.0 - 16.2 2.8 2.8 0.4 0.0 - 6.0 3.3 37.5 3.0 0.1 - 43.9 0.3 27.6 4.1 2.0 - 33.9 -
PHF 0.731 0.875 0.767 0.729 - 0.803 0.701 0.550 0.625 0.000 - 0.717 0.860 0.977 0.931 0.500 - 0.981 0.500 0.773 0.811 0.692 - 0.820 0.916
Lights 294 161 43 67 - 565 100 97 14 0 - 211 111 1312 108 3 - 1534 9 963 143 72 - 1187 3497
% Lights 97.7 100.0 93.5 95.7 - 97.8 99.0 98.0 93.3 - - 98.1 94.9 97.9 100.0 75.0 - 97.8 90.0 97.7 97.9 100.0 - 97.8 97.8
Other 7 0 3 3 - 13 1 2 1 0 - 4 6 28 0 1 - 35 1 23 3 0 - 27 79
Vehicles
% Other 2.3 0.0 6.5 4.3 - 2.2 1.0 2.0 6.7 - - 1.9 5.1 2.1 0.0 25.0 - 2.2 10.0 2.3 2.1 0.0 - 2.2 2.2
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 3 - -
% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Trindle Road
Suite 650 Trindle R
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
1620 1187 2807
36 27 63
0 0 0
1656 1214 2870
215 963 9 0
3 23 1 0
0 0 0 3
218 986 10 3
R T L P
294
301
15
14
R
7
0
0
1
Peak Hour Data
Total
1012
988
283
281
Out
24
0
0
2
E.Trindle Road [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

161
161
99
97
T
T
0
0
0
2
12/04/2018 7:30 AM
565
578
215
211
13
In
In
0
0
4
Ending At
12/04/2018 8:30 AM
110
116
101
100
R
6
0
0
1
Lights
Total
423
434
498
492
Out
11
Other Vehicles
0
0
6
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
111 1312 111 0
6 28 1 0
0 0 0 1
117 1340 112 1
1173 1534 2707

30 35 65
0 0 0
1203 1569 2772
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Trindle Road
Suite 650 Trindle R

Red Red Red Red
4:15 PM 62 33 13 32 0 140 47 23 2 0 0 72 50 297 8 0 0 355 2 374 44 17 0 437 1004
4:30 PM 63 54 15 37 0 169 48 41 1 0 1 90 50 302 10 0 0 362 4 314 41 15 0 374 995
4:45 PM 62 42 25 30 0 159 44 42 1 0 1 87 41 322 18 2 0 383 1 269 36 23 1 329 958
5:00 PM 59 39 25 46 0 169 52 39 1 0 0 92 33 317 11 0 1 361 0 285 53 18 0 356 978
Total 246 168 78 145 0 637 191 145 5 0 2 341 174 1238 47 2 1 1461 7 1242 174 73 1 1496 3935
Approach % 38.6 26.4 12.2 22.8 - - 56.0 42.5 1.5 0.0 - - 11.9 84.7 3.2 0.1 - - 0.5 83.0 11.6 4.9 - - -
Total % 6.3 4.3 2.0 3.7 - 16.2 4.9 3.7 0.1 0.0 - 8.7 4.4 31.5 1.2 0.1 - 37.1 0.2 31.6 4.4 1.9 - 38.0 -
PHF 0.976 0.778 0.780 0.788 - 0.942 0.918 0.863 0.625 0.000 - 0.927 0.870 0.961 0.653 0.250 - 0.954 0.438 0.830 0.821 0.793 - 0.856 0.980
Lights 244 168 78 145 - 635 191 144 5 0 - 340 171 1219 46 2 - 1438 6 1233 170 72 - 1481 3894
% Lights 99.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 99.7 100.0 99.3 100.0 - - 99.7 98.3 98.5 97.9 100.0 - 98.4 85.7 99.3 97.7 98.6 - 99.0 99.0
Other 2 0 0 0 - 2 0 1 0 0 - 1 3 19 1 0 - 23 1 9 4 1 - 15 41
Vehicles
% Other 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 - - 0.3 1.7 1.5 2.1 0.0 - 1.6 14.3 0.7 2.3 1.4 - 1.0 1.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 - -
% - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Trindle Road
Suite 650 Trindle R
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
1468 1481 2949
21 15 36
0 0 0
1489 1496 2985
242 1233 6 0
5 9 1 0
0 0 0 1
247 1242 7 1
R T L P
244
246
R
2
0
5
0
0
5
Peak Hour Data
Total
1192
1203
224
222
Out
11
0
0
2
E.Trindle Road [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

168
168
145
144
T
T
0
0
0
1
12/04/2018 4:15 PM
635
637
341
340
In
In
2
0
0
1
Ending At
12/04/2018 5:15 PM
223
223
191
191
R
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
557
566
565
562
Out
Other Vehicles
9
0
0
3
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
L T R P
171 1219 48 0
3 19 1 0
0 0 0 1
174 1238 49 1
1647 1438 3085

9 23 32
0 0 0
1656 1461 3117
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Count Name: SAT S.32nd Street
& Chestnut Street/E. Trindle
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Road
2500 East High Street Site Code: SAT S.32nd Street &
Suite 650 Chestnut Street/E. Trindle Roa

E. Trindle Road Chestnut Street 32nd Street 32nd Street
Red Red Red Red
11:00 AM 73 34 21 20 0 148 36 23 2 0 0 61 38 204 15 1 1 258 0 222 18 19 0 259 726
11:15 AM 59 31 17 21 0 128 39 21 1 0 0 61 49 195 5 0 1 249 4 219 21 13 0 257 695
11:30 AM 63 26 20 23 0 132 27 28 1 1 0 57 41 209 8 1 0 259 1 277 25 12 1 315 763
11:45 AM 59 26 10 17 0 112 38 16 0 0 0 54 30 223 8 0 1 261 4 256 31 19 1 310 737
Hourly Total 254 117 68 81 0 520 140 88 4 1 0 233 158 831 36 2 3 1027 9 974 95 63 2 1141 2921
12:00 PM 62 32 21 21 0 136 47 24 2 0 0 73 33 242 8 0 1 283 5 228 26 30 0 289 781
12:15 PM 73 41 20 24 0 158 47 16 4 0 0 67 43 237 11 1 0 292 4 237 17 18 0 276 793
12:30 PM 70 25 23 31 0 149 30 25 2 0 0 57 48 202 8 2 1 260 3 218 26 8 0 255 721
12:45 PM 68 25 21 27 0 141 29 17 2 0 0 48 49 230 7 1 0 287 2 244 31 15 0 292 768
Hourly Total 273 123 85 103 0 584 153 82 10 0 0 245 173 911 34 4 2 1122 14 927 100 71 0 1112 3063
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Grand Total 527 240 153 184 0 1104 293 170 14 1 0 478 332 1743 70 6 5 2151 23 1901 195 134 2 2253 5986
Approach % 47.7 21.7 13.9 16.7 - - 61.3 35.6 2.9 0.2 - - 15.4 81.0 3.3 0.3 - - 1.0 84.4 8.7 5.9 - - -
Total % 8.8 4.0 2.6 3.1 - 18.4 4.9 2.8 0.2 0.0 - 8.0 5.5 29.1 1.2 0.1 - 35.9 0.4 31.8 3.3 2.2 - 37.6 -
Lights 524 240 153 182 - 1099 292 170 14 1 - 477 328 1725 69 6 - 2128 23 1881 193 133 - 2230 5934
% Lights 99.4 100.0 100.0 98.9 - 99.5 99.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 99.8 98.8 99.0 98.6 100.0 - 98.9 100.0 98.9 99.0 99.3 - 99.0 99.1
Other 3 0 0 2 - 5 1 0 0 0 - 1 4 18 1 0 - 23 0 20 2 1 - 23 52
Vehicles
% Other 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 - 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.2 1.2 1.0 1.4 0.0 - 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.0 0.7 - 1.0 0.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 5 - - - - - 2 - -
% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
2264 2230 4494
21 23 44
0 0 0
2285 2253 4538
326 1881 23 0
3 20 0 0
0 0 0 2
329 1901 23 2
R T L P
524
527
15
15
R
3
0
0
0
Total
1923
1935
339
338
Out
12
E. Trindle Road [W]
0
1
Chestnut Street [E]

240
240
170
170
T
T
0
0
0
0
12/01/2018 11:00 AM
1099
1104
478
477
In
In
5
0
0
1
Ending At
12/01/2018 1:15 PM
335
337
293
292
R
2
0
0
1
Lights
Total
824
831
817
815
Out
Other Vehicles
7
0
0
2
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
328 1725 75 0
4 18 1 0
0 0 0 5
332 1743 76 5
2508 2128 4636

23 23 46
0 0 0
2531 2151 4682
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]


E. Trindle Road Chestnut Street 32nd Street 32nd Street
Red Red Red Red
11:30 AM 63 26 20 23 0 132 27 28 1 1 0 57 41 209 8 1 0 259 1 277 25 12 1 315 763
11:45 AM 59 26 10 17 0 112 38 16 0 0 0 54 30 223 8 0 1 261 4 256 31 19 1 310 737
12:00 PM 62 32 21 21 0 136 47 24 2 0 0 73 33 242 8 0 1 283 5 228 26 30 0 289 781
12:15 PM 73 41 20 24 0 158 47 16 4 0 0 67 43 237 11 1 0 292 4 237 17 18 0 276 793
Total 257 125 71 85 0 538 159 84 7 1 0 251 147 911 35 2 2 1095 14 998 99 79 2 1190 3074
Approach % 47.8 23.2 13.2 15.8 - - 63.3 33.5 2.8 0.4 - - 13.4 83.2 3.2 0.2 - - 1.2 83.9 8.3 6.6 - - -
Total % 8.4 4.1 2.3 2.8 - 17.5 5.2 2.7 0.2 0.0 - 8.2 4.8 29.6 1.1 0.1 - 35.6 0.5 32.5 3.2 2.6 - 38.7 -
PHF 0.880 0.762 0.845 0.885 - 0.851 0.846 0.750 0.438 0.250 - 0.860 0.855 0.941 0.795 0.500 - 0.938 0.700 0.901 0.798 0.658 - 0.944 0.969
Lights 256 125 71 85 - 537 159 84 7 1 - 251 145 904 35 2 - 1086 14 985 97 78 - 1174 3048
% Lights 99.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 99.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 98.6 99.2 100.0 100.0 - 99.2 100.0 98.7 98.0 98.7 - 98.7 99.2
Other 1 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 2 7 0 0 - 9 0 13 2 1 - 16 26
Vehicles
% Other 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 1.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 - 0.8 0.0 1.3 2.0 1.3 - 1.3 0.8
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 2 - -
% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
1168 1174 2342
8 16 24
0 0 0
1176 1190 2366
175 985 14 0
3 13 0 0
0 0 0 2
178 998 14 2
R T L P
256
257
R
1
0
8
0
0
8
Peak Hour Data
Total
941
947
176
176
Out
E. Trindle Road [W]
6
0
0
0
Chestnut Street [E]

125
125
84
84
T
T
0
0
0
0
12/01/2018 11:30 AM
537
538
251
251
In
In
1
0
0
0
Ending At
12/01/2018 12:30 PM
156
156
159
159
R
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
404
409
427
427
Out
Other Vehicles
5
0
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
145 904 37 0
2 7 0 0
0 0 0 2
147 911 37 2
1300 1086 2386

13 9 22
0 0 0
1313 1095 2408
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Count Name: WD 32nd &
2500 East High Street Chestnut
Suite 650 Site Code: WD 32nd & Chestnut
610.326.3100 jfunk@trafficpd.com Page No: 1

Chestnut Street E.Trindle 32nd Street 32nd Street
Westbound Eastbound Southbound Northbound
Red Red Red Red
6:00 AM 4 3 1 0 0 8 22 5 3 5 0 35 1 89 25 4 0 119 19 138 2 0 0 159 321
6:15 AM 8 5 0 0 0 13 43 2 10 2 0 57 3 138 23 9 0 173 20 174 3 0 0 197 440
6:30 AM 5 9 1 0 0 15 48 8 6 11 0 73 0 188 30 12 0 230 22 250 4 0 0 276 594
6:45 AM 21 5 2 0 0 28 46 10 6 6 0 68 4 191 46 10 0 251 15 355 9 0 0 379 726
Hourly Total 38 22 4 0 0 64 159 25 25 24 0 233 8 606 124 35 0 773 76 917 18 0 0 1011 2081
7:00 AM 13 15 1 0 1 29 62 19 10 8 0 99 5 156 25 26 0 212 22 289 13 1 5 325 665
7:15 AM 21 18 4 0 0 43 72 44 11 14 0 141 10 239 40 15 0 304 24 340 18 0 1 382 870
7:30 AM 30 31 5 0 0 66 88 43 18 20 0 169 8 277 42 10 0 337 15 398 23 1 0 437 1009
7:45 AM 11 16 1 0 0 28 95 40 18 19 0 172 7 321 30 12 0 370 46 280 30 1 0 357 927
Hourly Total 75 80 11 0 1 166 317 146 57 61 0 581 30 993 137 63 0 1223 107 1307 84 3 6 1501 3471
8:00 AM 21 23 2 0 0 46 76 55 9 14 0 154 2 244 47 14 0 307 41 329 32 1 0 403 910
8:15 AM 25 32 2 0 0 59 62 28 6 19 1 115 1 179 29 10 0 219 38 318 20 3 0 379 772
8:30 AM 16 38 5 0 0 59 58 14 11 13 0 96 8 238 37 16 0 299 52 272 17 0 0 341 795
8:45 AM 30 16 3 0 0 49 66 35 13 10 0 124 6 185 54 14 0 259 45 322 36 1 0 404 836
Hourly Total 92 109 12 0 0 213 262 132 39 56 1 489 17 846 167 54 0 1084 176 1241 105 5 0 1527 3313
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11:00 AM 33 27 2 0 0 62 62 38 22 19 1 141 2 223 40 11 0 276 23 153 9 0 0 185 664
11:15 AM 26 27 3 0 0 56 59 25 17 27 0 128 4 221 27 21 0 273 41 208 15 0 1 264 721
11:30 AM 38 36 11 0 0 85 56 33 22 23 0 134 4 220 35 14 0 273 35 210 11 0 0 256 748
11:45 AM 41 25 3 0 0 69 79 36 19 21 0 155 2 251 35 16 0 304 36 217 9 2 1 264 792
Hourly Total 138 115 19 0 0 272 256 132 80 90 1 558 12 915 137 62 0 1126 135 788 44 2 2 969 2925
12:00 PM 22 29 2 1 0 54 55 39 14 23 0 131 6 202 25 14 1 247 34 212 3 0 0 249 681
12:15 PM 29 24 7 0 0 60 65 28 15 22 0 130 2 231 29 21 1 283 33 220 12 0 0 265 738
12:30 PM 49 20 5 0 3 74 66 37 17 30 0 150 4 232 35 25 1 296 37 247 20 0 2 304 824
12:45 PM 22 19 3 0 1 44 71 26 12 28 0 137 3 233 19 22 2 277 39 246 8 1 4 294 752
Hourly Total 122 92 17 1 4 232 257 130 58 103 0 548 15 898 108 82 5 1103 143 925 43 1 6 1112 2995
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 27 26 9 0 0 62 60 27 15 31 0 133 5 253 33 10 0 301 37 231 19 0 3 287 783
3:15 PM 49 38 5 0 1 92 55 38 17 28 0 138 4 296 28 15 0 343 40 275 13 4 0 332 905
3:30 PM 44 31 4 0 0 79 55 22 24 33 0 134 2 325 41 29 0 397 38 246 15 0 0 299 909
3:45 PM 40 23 3 0 0 66 65 29 24 26 2 144 5 300 33 25 0 363 44 275 7 3 2 329 902
Hourly Total 160 118 21 0 1 299 235 116 80 118 2 549 16 1174 135 79 0 1404 159 1027 54 7 5 1247 3499
4:00 PM 35 26 6 0 0 67 62 27 13 24 0 126 2 343 47 21 0 413 30 287 11 0 0 328 934
4:15 PM 28 33 2 0 1 63 58 23 7 27 0 115 2 373 41 12 1 428 37 246 12 1 0 296 902
4:30 PM 56 31 5 0 0 92 63 37 28 46 0 174 6 309 40 16 0 371 37 317 9 1 0 364 1001
4:45 PM 46 32 7 0 0 85 58 35 22 28 0 143 4 325 41 23 1 393 47 316 8 3 1 374 995
Hourly Total 165 122 20 0 1 307 241 122 70 125 0 558 14 1350 169 72 2 1605 151 1166 40 5 1 1362 3832
5:00 PM 45 37 5 0 0 87 58 36 32 35 0 161 4 351 27 21 1 403 42 304 9 0 0 355 1006
5:15 PM 44 31 0 0 0 75 62 35 15 26 0 138 2 341 51 23 1 417 44 287 7 1 0 339 969
5:30 PM 44 33 3 0 0 80 60 30 20 26 0 136 4 284 36 19 1 343 49 261 12 0 0 322 881
5:45 PM 33 25 3 0 0 61 58 39 12 27 0 136 4 282 45 20 0 351 42 257 13 0 1 312 860
Hourly Total 166 126 11 0 0 303 238 140 79 114 0 571 14 1258 159 83 3 1514 177 1109 41 1 1 1328 3716
Grand Total 956 784 115 1 7 1856 1965 943 488 691 4 4087 126 8040 1136 530 10 9832 1124 8480 429 24 21 10057 25832
Approach % 51.5 42.2 6.2 0.1 - - 48.1 23.1 11.9 16.9 - - 1.3 81.8 11.6 5.4 - - 11.2 84.3 4.3 0.2 - - -
Total % 3.7 3.0 0.4 0.0 - 7.2 7.6 3.7 1.9 2.7 - 15.8 0.5 31.1 4.4 2.1 - 38.1 4.4 32.8 1.7 0.1 - 38.9 -
Lights 946 777 113 1 - 1837 1938 938 479 662 - 4017 124 7866 1114 518 - 9622 1087 8283 414 24 - 9808 25284
% Lights 99.0 99.1 98.3 100.0 - 99.0 98.6 99.5 98.2 95.8 - 98.3 98.4 97.8 98.1 97.7 - 97.9 96.7 97.7 96.5 100.0 - 97.5 97.9
Other 10 7 2 0 - 19 27 5 9 29 - 70 2 174 22 12 - 210 37 197 15 0 - 249 548
Vehicles
% Other 1.0 0.9 1.7 0.0 - 1.0 1.4 0.5 1.8 4.2 - 1.7 1.6 2.2 1.9 2.3 - 2.1 3.3 2.3 3.5 0.0 - 2.5 2.1
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 7 - - - - - 4 - - - - - 10 - - - - - 21 - -
% - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
32nd Street [SB]

Out In Total
10335 9622 19957
226 210 436
0 0 0
10561 9832 20393
1632 7866 124 0

34 174 2 0
0 0 0 10
1666 8040 126 10
R T L P
1938
1965
116
114
27
R
0
0
2
Total
7513
7661
1522
1500
148
Out
22
Chestnut Street [WB]

0
0
E.Trindle [EB]
938
943
784
777
T
T
5
0
0
7
03/28/2019 6:00 AM
4017
4087
1856
1837
70
19
In
In
0
0
Ending At
03/28/2019 6:00 PM
1141
1179
956
946
38
10
R
0
0
Lights
3496
3574
3378
3337
Total
Out
78
41
Other Vehicles
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
4
4
7
7
0
0
L T R P
1087 8283 438 0
37 197 15 0
0 0 0 21
1124 8480 453 21
9953 9808 19761

222 249 471
0 0 0
10175 10057 20232
Out In Total
32nd Street [NB]


Chestnut Street E.Trindle 32nd Street 32nd Street
Westbound Eastbound Southbound Northbound
Red Red Red Red
11:45 AM 41 25 3 0 0 69 79 36 19 21 0 155 2 251 35 16 0 304 36 217 9 2 1 264 792
12:00 PM 22 29 2 1 0 54 55 39 14 23 0 131 6 202 25 14 1 247 34 212 3 0 0 249 681
12:15 PM 29 24 7 0 0 60 65 28 15 22 0 130 2 231 29 21 1 283 33 220 12 0 0 265 738
12:30 PM 49 20 5 0 3 74 66 37 17 30 0 150 4 232 35 25 1 296 37 247 20 0 2 304 824
Total 141 98 17 1 3 257 265 140 65 96 0 566 14 916 124 76 3 1130 140 896 44 2 3 1082 3035
Approach % 54.9 38.1 6.6 0.4 - - 46.8 24.7 11.5 17.0 - - 1.2 81.1 11.0 6.7 - - 12.9 82.8 4.1 0.2 - - -
Total % 4.6 3.2 0.6 0.0 - 8.5 8.7 4.6 2.1 3.2 - 18.6 0.5 30.2 4.1 2.5 - 37.2 4.6 29.5 1.4 0.1 - 35.7 -
PHF 0.719 0.845 0.607 0.250 - 0.868 0.839 0.897 0.855 0.800 - 0.913 0.583 0.912 0.886 0.760 - 0.929 0.946 0.907 0.550 0.250 - 0.890 0.921
Lights 138 98 17 1 - 254 261 138 63 94 - 556 14 897 120 74 - 1105 130 867 41 2 - 1040 2955
% Lights 97.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 98.8 98.5 98.6 96.9 97.9 - 98.2 100.0 97.9 96.8 97.4 - 97.8 92.9 96.8 93.2 100.0 - 96.1 97.4
Other 3 0 0 0 - 3 4 2 2 2 - 10 0 19 4 2 - 25 10 29 3 0 - 42 80
Vehicles
% Other 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 1.2 1.5 1.4 3.1 2.1 - 1.8 0.0 2.1 3.2 2.6 - 2.2 7.1 3.2 6.8 0.0 - 3.9 2.6
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 3 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 3 - - - - - 3 - -
% - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
32nd Street [SB]

Out In Total
1146 1105 2251
33 25 58
0 0 0
1179 1130 2309
194 897 14 0
6 19 0 0
0 0 0 3
200 916 14 3
R T L P
261
265
18
18
R
4
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
1004
978
200
195
Out
26
Chestnut Street [WB]

0
0
5
E.Trindle [EB]
138
140
98
98
T
T
2
0
0
0
03/28/2019 11:45 AM
556
566
257
254
10
In
In
0
0
3
Ending At
03/28/2019 12:45 PM
157
161
141
138
R
4
0
0
3
Lights
Total
422
438
457
449
Out
16
Other Vehicles
0
0
8
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
L T R P
130 867 43 0
10 29 3 0
0 0 0 3
140 896 46 3
1192 1040 2232

26 42 68
0 0 0
1218 1082 2300
Out In Total
32nd Street [NB]

Count Name: AM_PM S. 31
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Street & Chestnut Street
2500 East High Street Site Code: AM_PM S. 31 Street
Suite 650 & Chestnut Street

Chestnut Street Chestnut Street 31st Street
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
Start Time
Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Peds App. Total Left Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
6:00 AM 3 1 0 4 1 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 16
6:15 AM 8 1 0 9 0 11 0 11 0 0 1 0 20
6:30 AM 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 10 1 1 0 2 22
6:45 AM 19 2 0 21 0 19 0 19 1 0 0 1 41
Hourly Total 40 4 0 44 1 51 0 52 2 1 1 3 99
7:00 AM 31 1 0 32 1 27 0 28 2 1 6 3 63
7:15 AM 60 5 0 65 3 40 0 43 4 5 6 9 117
7:30 AM 51 8 0 59 7 61 0 68 2 5 1 7 134
7:45 AM 42 12 0 54 4 47 0 51 4 4 0 8 113
Hourly Total 184 26 0 210 15 175 0 190 12 15 13 27 427
8:00 AM 50 12 0 62 3 43 0 46 0 4 0 4 112
8:15 AM 19 6 0 25 2 59 0 61 2 1 0 3 89
8:30 AM 28 6 0 34 0 44 0 44 1 0 1 1 79
8:45 AM 34 2 0 36 2 45 0 47 1 2 0 3 86
Hourly Total 131 26 0 157 7 191 0 198 4 7 1 11 366
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 41 5 0 46 3 58 0 61 3 11 9 14 121
3:15 PM 49 7 0 56 4 60 0 64 0 14 1 14 134
3:30 PM 38 4 0 42 1 53 0 54 2 14 0 16 112
3:45 PM 53 3 0 56 0 51 0 51 5 1 1 6 113
Hourly Total 181 19 0 200 8 222 0 230 10 40 11 50 480
4:00 PM 30 3 0 33 6 58 0 64 1 1 0 2 99
4:15 PM 40 3 0 43 3 63 0 66 1 7 0 8 117
4:30 PM 36 3 0 39 7 75 0 82 3 4 3 7 128
4:45 PM 38 3 0 41 6 56 0 62 4 10 0 14 117
Hourly Total 144 12 0 156 22 252 0 274 9 22 3 31 461
5:00 PM 46 5 0 51 2 64 0 66 3 9 0 12 129
5:15 PM 50 9 0 59 5 54 0 59 2 3 0 5 123
5:30 PM 41 7 0 48 4 77 2 81 4 4 1 8 137
5:45 PM 38 4 0 42 4 46 0 50 2 4 1 6 98
Hourly Total 175 25 0 200 15 241 2 256 11 20 2 31 487
Grand Total 855 112 0 967 68 1132 2 1200 48 105 31 153 2320
Approach % 88.4 11.6 - - 5.7 94.3 - - 31.4 68.6 - - -
Total % 36.9 4.8 - 41.7 2.9 48.8 - 51.7 2.1 4.5 - 6.6 -
Lights 850 110 - 960 67 1128 - 1195 48 104 - 152 2307
% Lights 99.4 98.2 - 99.3 98.5 99.6 - 99.6 100.0 99.0 - 99.3 99.4
Other Vehicles 5 2 - 7 1 4 - 5 0 1 - 1 13
% Other Vehicles 0.6 1.8 - 0.7 1.5 0.4 - 0.4 0.0 1.0 - 0.7 0.6
Pedestrians - - 0 - - - 2 - - - 31 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - 100.0 - - - 100.0 - -
Fake Approach [N]

Out In Total
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Total
2136
2147
1132
1128
850
855
960
954
Out
11
Chestnut Street [W]
T
0
5
0
0
4
0
6
Chestnut Street [E]

12/06/2018 6:00 AM
1200
1195
960
967
110
112
68
67
In
In
R
7
0
2
0
0
1
0
5
Ending At
12/06/2018 6:00 PM
Lights
1176
1180
2160
2149
Total
Out
11
Other Vehicles
P
P
4
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
Pedestrians
L R P
48 104 0
0 1 0
0 0 31
48 105 31
177 152 329

3 1 4
0 0 0
180 153 333
Out In Total
31st Street [S]


Start Time
7:15 AM 60 5 0 65 3 40 0 43 4 5 6 9 117
7:30 AM 51 8 0 59 7 61 0 68 2 5 1 7 134
7:45 AM 42 12 0 54 4 47 0 51 4 4 0 8 113
8:00 AM 50 12 0 62 3 43 0 46 0 4 0 4 112
Total 203 37 0 240 17 191 0 208 10 18 7 28 476
Approach % 84.6 15.4 - - 8.2 91.8 - - 35.7 64.3 - - -
Total % 42.6 7.8 - 50.4 3.6 40.1 - 43.7 2.1 3.8 - 5.9 -
PHF 0.846 0.771 - 0.923 0.607 0.783 - 0.765 0.625 0.900 - 0.778 0.888
Lights 201 36 - 237 17 190 - 207 10 18 - 28 472
% Lights 99.0 97.3 - 98.8 100.0 99.5 - 99.5 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.2
Other Vehicles 2 1 - 3 0 1 - 1 0 0 - 0 4
% Other Vehicles 1.0 2.7 - 1.3 0.0 0.5 - 0.5 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.8
Pedestrians - - 0 - - - 0 - - - 7 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Fake Approach [N]

Out In Total
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Peak Hour Data

Total
437
441
201
203
191
190
221
219
Out
Chestnut Street [W]
T
4
0
2
0
0
1
0
2
Chestnut Street [E]

12/06/2018 7:15 AM
237
240
208
207
36
37
17
17
In
In
R
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Ending At
12/06/2018 8:15 AM
Lights
Total
200
201
429
426
Out
Other Vehicles
P
P
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Pedestrians
L R P
10 18 0
0 0 0
0 0 7
10 18 7
53 28 81
1 0 1
0 0 0
54 28 82
Out In Total
31st Street [S]


Start Time
4:45 PM 38 3 0 41 6 56 0 62 4 10 0 14 117
5:00 PM 46 5 0 51 2 64 0 66 3 9 0 12 129
5:15 PM 50 9 0 59 5 54 0 59 2 3 0 5 123
5:30 PM 41 7 0 48 4 77 2 81 4 4 1 8 137
Total 175 24 0 199 17 251 2 268 13 26 1 39 506
Approach % 87.9 12.1 - - 6.3 93.7 - - 33.3 66.7 - - -
Total % 34.6 4.7 - 39.3 3.4 49.6 - 53.0 2.6 5.1 - 7.7 -
PHF 0.875 0.667 - 0.843 0.708 0.815 - 0.827 0.813 0.650 - 0.696 0.923
Lights 175 24 - 199 17 250 - 267 13 25 - 38 504
% Lights 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 99.6 - 99.6 100.0 96.2 - 97.4 99.6
Other Vehicles 0 0 - 0 0 1 - 1 0 1 - 1 2
% Other Vehicles 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.4 - 0.4 0.0 3.8 - 2.6 0.4
Pedestrians - - 0 - - - 2 - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - 100.0 - - - 100.0 - -
Fake Approach [N]

Out In Total
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Peak Hour Data

Total
462
463
175
175
251
250
201
200
Out
Chestnut Street [W]
T
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Chestnut Street [E]

12/06/2018 4:45 PM
199
199
268
267
24
24
17
17
In
In
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Ending At
12/06/2018 5:45 PM
Lights
Total
263
264
469
467
Out
Other Vehicles
P
P
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
2
Pedestrians
L R P
13 25 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
13 26 1
41 38 79
0 1 1
0 0 0
41 39 80
Out In Total
31st Street [S]

Count Name: SAT S. 31st Street
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc & Chestnut Street
2500 East High Street Site Code: SAT S. 31st Street &

Start Time
11:00 AM 32 3 0 35 3 54 0 57 2 3 0 5 97
11:15 AM 38 1 0 39 1 55 0 56 1 4 1 5 100
11:30 AM 39 3 0 42 3 48 0 51 1 1 2 2 95
11:45 AM 36 3 0 39 1 37 0 38 1 1 3 2 79
Hourly Total 145 10 0 155 8 194 0 202 5 9 6 14 371
12:00 PM 37 2 0 39 4 63 0 67 3 3 0 6 112
12:15 PM 45 2 0 47 1 46 0 47 1 5 2 6 100
12:30 PM 39 1 0 40 4 30 0 34 3 4 0 7 81
12:45 PM 35 2 0 37 0 40 0 40 2 0 0 2 79
Hourly Total 156 7 0 163 9 179 0 188 9 12 2 21 372
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 301 17 0 318 17 373 0 390 14 21 8 35 743
Approach % 94.7 5.3 - - 4.4 95.6 - - 40.0 60.0 - - -
Total % 40.5 2.3 - 42.8 2.3 50.2 - 52.5 1.9 2.8 - 4.7 -
Lights 300 17 - 317 17 372 - 389 14 21 - 35 741
% Lights 99.7 100.0 - 99.7 100.0 99.7 - 99.7 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.7
Other Vehicles 1 0 - 1 0 1 - 1 0 0 - 0 2
% Other Vehicles 0.3 0.0 - 0.3 0.0 0.3 - 0.3 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.3
Pedestrians - - 0 - - - 0 - - - 8 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Fake Approach [N]

Out In Total
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Total
703
705
300
301
373
372
322
321
Out
T
T
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

12/08/2018 11:00 AM
317
318
390
389
17
17
17
17
In
In
R
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Ending At
12/08/2018 1:15 PM
Lights
Total
386
387
712
710
Out
Other Vehicles
P
P
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Pedestrians
L R P
14 21 0
0 0 0
0 0 8
14 21 8
34 35 69
0 0 0
0 0 0
34 35 69
Out In Total
31st Street [S]


Start Time
11:15 AM 38 1 0 39 1 55 0 56 1 4 1 5 100
11:30 AM 39 3 0 42 3 48 0 51 1 1 2 2 95
11:45 AM 36 3 0 39 1 37 0 38 1 1 3 2 79
12:00 PM 37 2 0 39 4 63 0 67 3 3 0 6 112
Total 150 9 0 159 9 203 0 212 6 9 6 15 386
Approach % 94.3 5.7 - - 4.2 95.8 - - 40.0 60.0 - - -
Total % 38.9 2.3 - 41.2 2.3 52.6 - 54.9 1.6 2.3 - 3.9 -
PHF 0.962 0.750 - 0.946 0.563 0.806 - 0.791 0.500 0.563 - 0.625 0.862
Lights 150 9 - 159 9 202 - 211 6 9 - 15 385
% Lights 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 99.5 - 99.5 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.7
Other Vehicles 0 0 - 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 - 0 1
% Other Vehicles 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.5 - 0.5 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.3
Pedestrians - - 0 - - - 0 - - - 6 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Fake Approach [N]

Out In Total
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Peak Hour Data

Total
367
368
150
150
203
202
159
159
Out
T
T
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

12/08/2018 11:15 AM
159
159
212
211
In
In
R
0
0
9
0
0
9
L
9
0
0
9
0
1
Ending At
12/08/2018 12:15 PM
Lights
Total
208
209
371
370
Out
Other Vehicles
P
P
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Pedestrians
L R P
6 9 0
0 0 0
0 0 6
6 9 6
18 15 33
0 0 0
0 0 0
18 15 33
Out In Total
31st Street [S]

Count Name: 1100-1300 S.31st
2500 East High Street Site Code: 1100-1300 S.31st
Suite 650 Street & Chestnut Street

Chestnut Street Chestnut Street S.31st Street
Start Time
11:00 AM 36 4 0 40 0 44 0 44 1 6 1 7 91
11:15 AM 38 2 0 40 1 46 0 47 2 3 0 5 92
11:30 AM 45 0 0 45 2 55 0 57 4 5 0 9 111
11:45 AM 57 1 0 58 4 79 0 83 4 0 0 4 145
Hourly Total 176 7 0 183 7 224 0 231 11 14 1 25 439
12:00 PM 40 2 0 42 2 46 0 48 1 1 0 2 92
12:15 PM 47 0 1 47 2 59 0 61 0 1 0 1 109
12:30 PM 36 0 0 36 4 39 0 43 2 3 0 5 84
12:45 PM 26 4 0 30 3 36 0 39 1 4 0 5 74
Hourly Total 149 6 1 155 11 180 0 191 4 9 0 13 359
Grand Total 325 13 1 338 18 404 0 422 15 23 1 38 798
Approach % 96.2 3.8 - - 4.3 95.7 - - 39.5 60.5 - - -
Total % 40.7 1.6 - 42.4 2.3 50.6 - 52.9 1.9 2.9 - 4.8 -
Lights 318 13 - 331 17 398 - 415 15 23 - 38 784
% Lights 97.8 100.0 - 97.9 94.4 98.5 - 98.3 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 98.2
Other Vehicles 7 0 - 7 1 6 - 7 0 0 - 0 14
% Other Vehicles 2.2 0.0 - 2.1 5.6 1.5 - 1.7 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 1.8
Pedestrians - - 1 - - - 0 - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - 100.0 - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Fake Approach [N]

Out In Total
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Total
744
757
318
325
404
398
348
341
Out
13
T
0
7
0
0
6
0
7
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

12/06/2018 11:00 AM
331
338
422
415
13
13
18
17
In
In
R
7
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
Ending At
12/06/2018 1:00 PM
Lights
Total
413
419
770
756
Out
14
Other Vehicles
P
P
6
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Pedestrians
L R P
15 23 0
0 0 0
0 0 1
15 23 1
30 38 68
1 0 1
0 0 0
31 38 69
Out In Total
S.31st Street [S]


Chestnut Street Chestnut Street S.31st Street
Start Time
11:30 AM 45 0 0 45 2 55 0 57 4 5 0 9 111
11:45 AM 57 1 0 58 4 79 0 83 4 0 0 4 145
12:00 PM 40 2 0 42 2 46 0 48 1 1 0 2 92
12:15 PM 47 0 1 47 2 59 0 61 0 1 0 1 109
Total 189 3 1 192 10 239 0 249 9 7 0 16 457
Approach % 98.4 1.6 - - 4.0 96.0 - - 56.3 43.8 - - -
Total % 41.4 0.7 - 42.0 2.2 52.3 - 54.5 2.0 1.5 - 3.5 -
PHF 0.829 0.375 - 0.828 0.625 0.756 - 0.750 0.563 0.350 - 0.444 0.788
Lights 185 3 - 188 9 235 - 244 9 7 - 16 448
% Lights 97.9 100.0 - 97.9 90.0 98.3 - 98.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 98.0
Other Vehicles 4 0 - 4 1 4 - 5 0 0 - 0 9
% Other Vehicles 2.1 0.0 - 2.1 10.0 1.7 - 2.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 2.0
Pedestrians - - 1 - - - 0 - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - -
Fake Approach [N]

Out In Total
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Peak Hour Data

Total
432
440
185
189
239
235
196
192
Out
T
T
8
0
4
0
0
4
0
4
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

12/06/2018 11:30 AM
188
192
249
244
10
In
In
R
4
0
3
0
0
3
0
1
9
0
5
Ending At
12/06/2018 12:30 PM
Lights
Total
244
248
445
436
Out
Other Vehicles
P
P
4
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
Pedestrians
L R P
9 7 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
9 7 0
12 16 28
1 0 1
0 0 0
13 16 29
Out In Total
S.31st Street [S]

Count Name: AM_PM S. 30th
2500 East High Street Site Code: AM_PM S. 30th

Chestnut Street Chestnut Street 30th Street 30th Street
6:00 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 5 15
6:15 AM 2 6 0 1 8 0 8 1 0 9 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 20
6:30 AM 2 7 1 0 10 2 5 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 3 0 5 24
6:45 AM 3 14 2 1 19 0 9 0 3 9 2 1 0 1 3 2 9 7 0 18 49
Hourly Total 7 30 3 2 40 2 28 1 4 31 6 1 0 2 7 3 10 17 0 30 108
7:00 AM 6 19 4 1 29 0 17 1 1 18 1 4 2 5 7 3 2 11 1 16 70
7:15 AM 16 38 4 0 58 1 31 4 0 36 1 4 2 11 7 18 15 13 1 46 147
7:30 AM 12 38 3 0 53 7 53 6 0 66 8 7 1 5 16 15 18 12 0 45 180
7:45 AM 12 24 4 2 40 2 31 0 0 33 3 3 0 0 6 2 7 17 0 26 105
Hourly Total 46 119 15 3 180 10 132 11 1 153 13 18 5 21 36 38 42 53 2 133 502
8:00 AM 12 27 10 1 49 15 22 0 0 37 4 5 1 0 10 1 35 15 0 51 147
8:15 AM 0 15 2 0 17 9 39 1 0 49 4 6 0 0 10 3 29 19 1 51 127
8:30 AM 5 18 0 1 23 2 32 0 0 34 1 2 0 0 3 1 4 15 0 20 80
8:45 AM 10 24 2 0 36 2 31 0 0 33 1 1 1 0 3 0 3 16 0 19 91
Hourly Total 27 84 14 2 125 28 124 1 0 153 10 14 2 0 26 5 71 65 1 141 445
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 19 32 1 1 52 6 37 2 1 45 9 12 5 6 26 2 16 13 1 31 154
3:15 PM 24 33 2 2 59 4 47 0 0 51 6 11 5 1 22 4 5 11 0 20 152
3:30 PM 20 29 1 2 50 2 37 0 1 39 1 4 6 3 11 1 8 14 0 23 123
3:45 PM 10 35 2 0 47 7 40 0 3 47 1 3 0 1 4 0 8 10 1 18 116
Hourly Total 73 129 6 5 208 19 161 2 5 182 17 30 16 11 63 7 37 48 2 92 545
4:00 PM 11 19 1 2 31 8 47 3 0 58 1 2 5 1 8 1 3 10 1 14 111
4:15 PM 9 36 0 1 45 5 45 1 0 51 3 1 3 0 7 0 12 18 0 30 133
4:30 PM 8 29 4 1 41 2 55 2 0 59 1 1 1 4 3 0 7 9 0 16 119
4:45 PM 16 32 2 0 50 4 40 2 0 46 1 7 3 0 11 2 5 11 0 18 125
Hourly Total 44 116 7 4 167 19 187 8 0 214 6 11 12 5 29 3 27 48 1 78 488
5:00 PM 11 41 1 1 53 6 52 3 1 61 0 5 1 1 6 1 7 10 0 18 138
5:15 PM 14 39 1 2 54 4 43 1 5 48 2 3 3 2 8 2 12 16 5 30 140
5:30 PM 12 34 0 0 46 9 56 4 1 69 1 4 0 1 5 2 7 16 2 25 145
5:45 PM 8 35 1 0 44 2 35 4 3 41 3 3 0 3 6 4 8 8 0 20 111
Hourly Total 45 149 3 3 197 21 186 12 10 219 6 15 4 7 25 9 34 50 7 93 534
Grand Total 242 627 48 19 917 99 818 35 20 952 58 89 39 46 186 65 221 281 13 567 2622
Approach % 26.4 68.4 5.2 - - 10.4 85.9 3.7 - - 31.2 47.8 21.0 - - 11.5 39.0 49.6 - - -
Total % 9.2 23.9 1.8 - 35.0 3.8 31.2 1.3 - 36.3 2.2 3.4 1.5 - 7.1 2.5 8.4 10.7 - 21.6 -
Lights 242 623 46 - 911 97 814 35 - 946 57 88 39 - 184 65 215 279 - 559 2600
% Lights 100.0 99.4 95.8 - 99.3 98.0 99.5 100.0 - 99.4 98.3 98.9 100.0 - 98.9 100.0 97.3 99.3 - 98.6 99.2
Other Vehicles 0 4 2 - 6 2 4 0 - 6 1 1 0 - 2 0 6 2 - 8 22
% Other 0.0 0.6 4.2 - 0.7 2.0 0.5 0.0 - 0.6 1.7 1.1 0.0 - 1.1 0.0 2.7 0.7 - 1.4 0.8
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 19 - - - - 20 - - - - 46 - - - - 13 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
365 559 924
1 8 9
0 0 0
366 567 933
279 215 65 0
2 6 0 0
0 0 0 13
281 221 65 13
R T L P
242
242
35
35
R
0
0
0
0
Total
2061
2074
731
727
Out
13
0
0
4
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

623
627
818
814
T
T
4
0
0
4
12/06/2018 6:00 AM
911
917
952
946
In
In
6
0
0
6
Ending At
12/06/2018 6:00 PM
46
48
99
97
R
2
0
0
2
Lights
1150
1157
1683
1673
Total
Out
10
Other Vehicles
7
0
0
Pedestrians
19
19
20
20
P
P
0
0
0
0
L T R P
57 88 39 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 46
58 89 39 46
358 184 542

10 2 12
0 0 0
368 186 554
Out In Total
30th Street [S]


7:15 AM 16 38 4 0 58 1 31 4 0 36 1 4 2 11 7 18 15 13 1 46 147
7:30 AM 12 38 3 0 53 7 53 6 0 66 8 7 1 5 16 15 18 12 0 45 180
7:45 AM 12 24 4 2 40 2 31 0 0 33 3 3 0 0 6 2 7 17 0 26 105
8:00 AM 12 27 10 1 49 15 22 0 0 37 4 5 1 0 10 1 35 15 0 51 147
Total 52 127 21 3 200 25 137 10 0 172 16 19 4 16 39 36 75 57 1 168 579
Approach % 26.0 63.5 10.5 - - 14.5 79.7 5.8 - - 41.0 48.7 10.3 - - 21.4 44.6 33.9 - - -
Total % 9.0 21.9 3.6 - 34.5 4.3 23.7 1.7 - 29.7 2.8 3.3 0.7 - 6.7 6.2 13.0 9.8 - 29.0 -
PHF 0.813 0.836 0.525 - 0.862 0.417 0.646 0.417 - 0.652 0.500 0.679 0.500 - 0.609 0.500 0.536 0.838 - 0.824 0.804
Lights 52 125 20 - 197 25 137 10 - 172 15 19 4 - 38 36 73 56 - 165 572
% Lights 100.0 98.4 95.2 - 98.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 93.8 100.0 100.0 - 97.4 100.0 97.3 98.2 - 98.2 98.8
Other Vehicles 0 2 1 - 3 0 0 0 - 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 2 1 - 3 7
% Other 0.0 1.6 4.8 - 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 - 2.6 0.0 2.7 1.8 - 1.8 1.2
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 3 - - - - 0 - - - - 16 - - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
81 165 246
0 3 3
0 0 0
81 168 249
56 73 36 0
1 2 0 0
0 0 0 1
57 75 36 1
R T L P
52
52
10
10
R
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
405
410
167
165
Out
5
0
0
2
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

125
127
137
137
T
T
2
0
0
0
12/06/2018 7:15 AM
197
200
172
172
In
In
3
0
0
0
Ending At
12/06/2018 8:15 AM
20
21
25
25
R
1
0
0
0
Lights
Total
208
210
339
337
Out
Other Vehicles
2
0
0
2
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
L T R P
15 19 4 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 16
16 19 4 16
118 38 156
3 1 4
0 0 0
121 39 160
Out In Total
30th Street [S]


4:45 PM 16 32 2 0 50 4 40 2 0 46 1 7 3 0 11 2 5 11 0 18 125
5:00 PM 11 41 1 1 53 6 52 3 1 61 0 5 1 1 6 1 7 10 0 18 138
5:15 PM 14 39 1 2 54 4 43 1 5 48 2 3 3 2 8 2 12 16 5 30 140
5:30 PM 12 34 0 0 46 9 56 4 1 69 1 4 0 1 5 2 7 16 2 25 145
Total 53 146 4 3 203 23 191 10 7 224 4 19 7 4 30 7 31 53 7 91 548
Approach % 26.1 71.9 2.0 - - 10.3 85.3 4.5 - - 13.3 63.3 23.3 - - 7.7 34.1 58.2 - - -
Total % 9.7 26.6 0.7 - 37.0 4.2 34.9 1.8 - 40.9 0.7 3.5 1.3 - 5.5 1.3 5.7 9.7 - 16.6 -
PHF 0.828 0.890 0.500 - 0.940 0.639 0.853 0.625 - 0.812 0.500 0.679 0.583 - 0.682 0.875 0.646 0.828 - 0.758 0.945
Lights 53 145 4 - 202 21 190 10 - 221 4 18 7 - 29 7 31 53 - 91 543
% Lights 100.0 99.3 100.0 - 99.5 91.3 99.5 100.0 - 98.7 100.0 94.7 100.0 - 96.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.1
Other Vehicles 0 1 0 - 1 2 1 0 - 3 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 5
% Other 0.0 0.7 0.0 - 0.5 8.7 0.5 0.0 - 1.3 0.0 5.3 0.0 - 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 3 - - - - 7 - - - - 4 - - - - 7 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
81 91 172
1 0 1
0 0 0
82 91 173
53 31 7 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 7
53 31 7 7
R T L P
53
53
10
10
R
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
449
451
160
159
Out
2
0
0
1
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

145
146
191
190
T
T
1
0
0
1
12/06/2018 4:45 PM
202
203
224
221
In
In
1
0
0
3
Ending At
12/06/2018 5:45 PM
23
21
R
4
0
0
4
0
2
Lights
Total
247
248
384
380
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
4
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
3
3
7
7
0
0
L T R P
4 18 7 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 4
4 19 7 4
56 29 85
2 1 3
0 0 0
58 30 88
Out In Total
30th Street [S]

Count Name: SAT S.30th Street
2500 East High Street Site Code: SAT S.30th Street &

11:00 AM 8 24 2 1 34 3 44 1 1 48 0 1 3 0 4 0 1 13 0 14 100
11:15 AM 8 30 4 0 42 2 44 1 0 47 4 2 1 1 7 0 3 9 0 12 108
11:30 AM 4 34 2 0 40 4 37 0 1 41 1 4 1 3 6 0 8 10 0 18 105
11:45 AM 4 29 2 0 35 0 32 1 0 33 0 1 0 4 1 0 5 4 0 9 78
Hourly Total 24 117 10 1 151 9 157 3 2 169 5 8 5 8 18 0 17 36 0 53 391
12:00 PM 5 32 3 0 40 2 54 2 1 58 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 13 1 14 115
12:15 PM 5 43 1 1 49 2 32 0 0 34 1 4 3 2 8 1 3 13 1 17 108
12:30 PM 7 36 0 4 43 2 29 0 0 31 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 3 0 8 82
12:45 PM 5 30 1 0 36 2 30 2 0 34 2 3 3 0 8 1 5 7 0 13 91
Hourly Total 22 141 5 5 168 8 145 4 1 157 3 8 8 3 19 2 14 36 2 52 396
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 46 258 15 6 319 17 302 7 3 326 8 16 13 11 37 2 31 72 2 105 787
Approach % 14.4 80.9 4.7 - - 5.2 92.6 2.1 - - 21.6 43.2 35.1 - - 1.9 29.5 68.6 - - -
Total % 5.8 32.8 1.9 - 40.5 2.2 38.4 0.9 - 41.4 1.0 2.0 1.7 - 4.7 0.3 3.9 9.1 - 13.3 -
Lights 46 256 15 - 317 17 302 7 - 326 8 16 13 - 37 2 31 71 - 104 784
% Lights 100.0 99.2 100.0 - 99.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.6 - 99.0 99.6
Other Vehicles 0 2 0 - 2 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 - 1 3
% Other 0.0 0.8 0.0 - 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 - 1.0 0.4
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 6 - - - - 3 - - - - 11 - - - - 2 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
69 104 173
0 1 1
0 0 0
69 105 174
71 31 2 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
72 31 2 2
R T L P
46
46
R
0
0
7
0
0
7
Total
698
701
273
271
Out
Chestnut Street [W]
3
0
0
2
Chestnut Street [E]

256
258
302
302
T
T
2
0
0
0
12/08/2018 11:00 AM
317
319
326
326
In
In
2
0
0
0
Ending At
12/08/2018 1:15 PM
15
15
17
17
R
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
381
382
599
597
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
2
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
6
6
3
3
0
0
L T R P
8 16 13 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 11
8 16 13 11
63 37 100
0 0 0
0 0 0
63 37 100
Out In Total
30th Street [S]


11:15 AM 8 30 4 0 42 2 44 1 0 47 4 2 1 1 7 0 3 9 0 12 108
11:30 AM 4 34 2 0 40 4 37 0 1 41 1 4 1 3 6 0 8 10 0 18 105
11:45 AM 4 29 2 0 35 0 32 1 0 33 0 1 0 4 1 0 5 4 0 9 78
12:00 PM 5 32 3 0 40 2 54 2 1 58 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 13 1 14 115
Total 21 125 11 0 157 8 167 4 2 179 5 8 4 8 17 0 17 36 1 53 406
Approach % 13.4 79.6 7.0 - - 4.5 93.3 2.2 - - 29.4 47.1 23.5 - - 0.0 32.1 67.9 - - -
Total % 5.2 30.8 2.7 - 38.7 2.0 41.1 1.0 - 44.1 1.2 2.0 1.0 - 4.2 0.0 4.2 8.9 - 13.1 -
PHF 0.656 0.919 0.688 - 0.935 0.500 0.773 0.500 - 0.772 0.313 0.500 0.500 - 0.607 0.000 0.531 0.692 - 0.736 0.883
Lights 21 124 11 - 156 8 167 4 - 179 5 8 4 - 17 0 17 35 - 52 404
% Lights 100.0 99.2 100.0 - 99.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 97.2 - 98.1 99.5
Other Vehicles 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 - 1 2
% Other 0.0 0.8 0.0 - 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 2.8 - 1.9 0.5
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 2 - - - - 8 - - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
33 52 85
0 1 1
0 0 0
33 53 86
35 17 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
36 17 0 1
R T L P
21
21
R
0
0
4
0
0
4
Peak Hour Data
Total
363
365
129
128
Out
Chestnut Street [W]
2
0
0
1
Chestnut Street [E]

124
125
167
167
T
T
1
0
0
0
12/08/2018 11:15 AM
156
157
179
179
In
In
1
0
0
0
Ending At
12/08/2018 12:15 PM
11
11
R
0
0
L
8
0
0
8
Lights
Total
207
208
308
307
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
L T R P
5 8 4 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 8
5 8 4 8
36 17 53
0 0 0
0 0 0
36 17 53
Out In Total
30th Street [S]

Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Chestnut & S.30th Street
Suite 650 & S.30th Street

Chestnut Street Chestnut Street S.30th Street S.30th Street
11:00 AM 7 26 5 1 38 4 31 1 0 36 2 3 1 3 6 0 8 6 0 14 94
11:15 AM 6 38 1 0 45 5 31 1 0 37 3 4 2 1 9 2 8 10 0 20 111
11:30 AM 6 40 4 0 50 4 47 0 0 51 2 2 2 2 6 0 4 8 0 12 119
11:45 AM 9 47 2 0 58 4 59 2 0 65 1 3 0 3 4 1 6 20 0 27 154
Hourly Total 28 151 12 1 191 17 168 4 0 189 8 12 5 9 25 3 26 44 0 73 478
12:00 PM 5 32 1 0 38 5 32 0 0 37 1 4 2 0 7 0 6 12 0 18 100
12:15 PM 11 34 0 0 45 5 41 3 0 49 8 1 1 3 10 1 13 4 1 18 122
12:30 PM 7 30 0 1 37 1 32 1 0 34 1 6 0 0 7 1 0 7 0 8 86
12:45 PM 8 19 0 0 27 6 31 0 0 37 0 4 0 0 4 0 2 7 0 9 77
Hourly Total 31 115 1 1 147 17 136 4 0 157 10 15 3 3 28 2 21 30 1 53 385
Grand Total 59 266 13 2 338 34 304 8 0 346 18 27 8 12 53 5 47 74 1 126 863
Approach % 17.5 78.7 3.8 - - 9.8 87.9 2.3 - - 34.0 50.9 15.1 - - 4.0 37.3 58.7 - - -
Total % 6.8 30.8 1.5 - 39.2 3.9 35.2 0.9 - 40.1 2.1 3.1 0.9 - 6.1 0.6 5.4 8.6 - 14.6 -
Lights 57 263 13 - 333 34 301 8 - 343 16 24 8 - 48 4 41 74 - 119 843
% Lights 96.6 98.9 100.0 - 98.5 100.0 99.0 100.0 - 99.1 88.9 88.9 100.0 - 90.6 80.0 87.2 100.0 - 94.4 97.7
Other Vehicles 2 3 0 - 5 0 3 0 - 3 2 3 0 - 5 1 6 0 - 7 20
% Other 3.4 1.1 0.0 - 1.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 - 0.9 11.1 11.1 0.0 - 9.4 20.0 12.8 0.0 - 5.6 2.3
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 2 - - - - 0 - - - - 12 - - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
S.30th Street [N]

Out In Total
89 119 208
5 7 12
0 0 0
94 126 220
74 41 4 0
0 6 1 0
0 0 0 1
74 47 5 1
R T L P
57
59
R
2
0
8
0
0
8
Total
724
734
279
275
Out
10
0
0
4
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

263
266
304
301
T
T
3
0
0
3
12/06/2018 11:00 AM
333
338
346
343
In
In
5
0
0
3
Ending At
12/06/2018 1:00 PM
13
13
34
34
R
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
391
396
625
618
Out
Other Vehicles
5
0
0
7
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
L T R P
16 24 8 0
2 3 0 0
0 0 0 12
18 27 8 12
88 48 136
6 5 11
0 0 0
94 53 147
Out In Total
S.30th Street [S]


Chestnut Street Chestnut Street S.30th Street S.30th Street
11:30 AM 6 40 4 0 50 4 47 0 0 51 2 2 2 2 6 0 4 8 0 12 119
11:45 AM 9 47 2 0 58 4 59 2 0 65 1 3 0 3 4 1 6 20 0 27 154
12:00 PM 5 32 1 0 38 5 32 0 0 37 1 4 2 0 7 0 6 12 0 18 100
12:15 PM 11 34 0 0 45 5 41 3 0 49 8 1 1 3 10 1 13 4 1 18 122
Total 31 153 7 0 191 18 179 5 0 202 12 10 5 8 27 2 29 44 1 75 495
Approach % 16.2 80.1 3.7 - - 8.9 88.6 2.5 - - 44.4 37.0 18.5 - - 2.7 38.7 58.7 - - -
Total % 6.3 30.9 1.4 - 38.6 3.6 36.2 1.0 - 40.8 2.4 2.0 1.0 - 5.5 0.4 5.9 8.9 - 15.2 -
PHF 0.705 0.814 0.438 - 0.823 0.900 0.758 0.417 - 0.777 0.375 0.625 0.625 - 0.675 0.500 0.558 0.550 - 0.694 0.804
Lights 31 151 7 - 189 18 177 5 - 200 10 10 5 - 25 1 27 44 - 72 486
% Lights 100.0 98.7 100.0 - 99.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 - 99.0 83.3 100.0 100.0 - 92.6 50.0 93.1 100.0 - 96.0 98.2
Other Vehicles 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 0 - 2 2 0 0 - 2 1 2 0 - 3 9
% Other 0.0 1.3 0.0 - 1.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 - 1.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 - 7.4 50.0 6.9 0.0 - 4.0 1.8
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 8 - - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
S.30th Street [N]

Out In Total
46 72 118
0 3 3
0 0 0
46 75 121
44 27 1 0
0 2 1 0
0 0 0 1
44 29 2 1
R T L P
31
31
R
0
0
5
0
0
5
Peak Hour Data
Total
420
426
160
157
Out
6
0
0
3
Chestnut Street [W]
Chestnut Street [E]

151
153
179
177
T
T
2
0
0
2
12/06/2018 11:30 AM
189
191
202
200
In
In
2
0
0
2
Ending At
12/06/2018 12:30 PM
18
18
R
7
0
0
7
0
0
Lights
Total
231
235
362
357
Out
Other Vehicles
4
0
0
5
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
10 10 5 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 8
12 10 5 8
52 25 77
2 2 4
0 0 0
54 27 81
Out In Total
S.30th Street [S]

Count Name: AM_PM S. 31st
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Street & Alley
2500 East High Street Site Code: AM_PM S. 31st
Suite 650 Street & Alley

Alley Alley 31st Street 31st Street
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
6:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2
6:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 3
Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 5 8
7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 6
7:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 7 0 0 7 0 10 0 0 10 18
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 18 0 0 18 24
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 14 0 0 14 23
Hourly Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 26 0 0 26 0 44 0 0 44 71
8:00 AM 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 12
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 9 0 0 9 12
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 6 7
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 9
Hourly Total 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 8 0 1 8 1 29 0 0 30 40
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 9 0 0 9 24
3:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 17 0 6 0 0 6 24
3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 0 5 1 0 6 17
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 4 10
Hourly Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 49 0 24 1 0 25 75
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 9 0 0 9 13
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 1 0 9 0 8 0 0 8 17
4:30 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 8 0 0 8 15
4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 16 0 8 0 0 8 24
Hourly Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 33 2 0 36 0 33 0 0 33 69
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 11 0 9 0 0 9 21
5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 12 1 0 13 16
5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 9 18
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 7 0 0 7 12
Hourly Total 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 28 0 0 28 0 37 1 0 38 67
Grand Total 2 0 0 8 2 1 0 2 4 3 1 147 2 1 150 2 171 2 0 175 330
Approach % 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 33.3 0.0 66.7 - - 0.7 98.0 1.3 - - 1.1 97.7 1.1 - - -
Total % 0.6 0.0 0.0 - 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.6 - 0.9 0.3 44.5 0.6 - 45.5 0.6 51.8 0.6 - 53.0 -
Lights 2 0 0 - 2 1 0 2 - 3 1 145 2 - 148 2 168 2 - 172 325
% Lights 100.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 - 98.7 100.0 98.2 100.0 - 98.3 98.5
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 2 0 - 2 0 3 0 - 3 5
% Other 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 - 1.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 - 1.7 1.5
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 8 - - - - 4 - - - - 1 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - -
31st Street [N]

Out In Total
149 172 321
2 3 5
0 0 0
151 175 326
2 168 2 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 171 2 0
R T L P
R
2
0
0
2
L
2
0
0
2
Total
Out
5
0
0
5
4
0
0
4
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Alley [W]
Alley [E]
12/06/2018 6:00 AM
In
In
2
0
0
2
3
0
0
3
Ending At
12/06/2018 6:00 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
Other Vehicles
3
0
0
3
7
0
0
7
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
8
8
4
4
0
0
L T R P
1 145 2 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 1
1 147 2 1
169 148 317

3 2 5
0 0 0
172 150 322
Out In Total
31st Street [S]


7:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 7 0 0 7 0 10 0 0 10 18
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 18 0 0 18 24
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 14 0 0 14 23
8:00 AM 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 12
Total 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 3 1 0 22 0 0 22 0 53 0 0 53 77
Approach % 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 1.3 0.0 0.0 - 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 - 1.3 0.0 28.6 0.0 - 28.6 0.0 68.8 0.0 - 68.8 -
PHF 0.250 0.000 0.000 - 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.250 - 0.250 0.000 0.611 0.000 - 0.611 0.000 0.736 0.000 - 0.736 0.802
Lights 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 1 - 1 0 22 0 - 22 0 52 0 - 52 76
% Lights 100.0 - - - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 98.1 - - 98.1 98.7
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 0 - 1 1
% Other 0.0 - - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 1.9 - - 1.9 1.3
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 2 - - - - 3 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -
31st Street [N]

Out In Total
24 52 76
0 1 1
0 0 0
24 53 77
0 52 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 53 0 0
R T L P
R
1
0
0
1
L
1
0
0
1
Peak Hour Data
Total
Out
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Alley [W]
Alley [E]
12/06/2018 7:15 AM
In
In
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
Ending At
12/06/2018 8:15 AM
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
Out
Other Vehicles
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
2
2
3
3
0
0
L T R P
0 22 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 22 0 0
52 22 74
1 0 1
0 0 0
53 22 75
Out In Total
31st Street [S]


4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 16 0 8 0 0 8 24
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 11 0 9 0 0 9 21
5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 12 1 0 13 16
5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 9 18
Total 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 38 1 0 39 0 38 1 0 39 79
Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 97.4 2.6 - - 0.0 97.4 2.6 - - -
Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 - 1.3 0.0 48.1 1.3 - 49.4 0.0 48.1 1.3 - 49.4 -
PHF 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 - 0.250 0.000 0.633 0.250 - 0.609 0.000 0.792 0.250 - 0.750 0.823
Lights 0 0 0 - 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 37 1 - 38 0 38 1 - 39 78
% Lights - - - - - 100.0 - - - 100.0 - 97.4 100.0 - 97.4 - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 98.7
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 1
% Other - - - - - 0.0 - - - 0.0 - 2.6 0.0 - 2.6 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 1.3
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 3 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
31st Street [N]

Out In Total
37 39 76
1 0 1
0 0 0
38 39 77
1 38 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 38 0 0
R T L P
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
Out
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Alley [W]
Alley [E]
12/06/2018 4:45 PM
In
In
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
Ending At
12/06/2018 5:45 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
L T R P
0 37 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 38 1 0
39 38 77
0 1 1
0 0 0
39 39 78
Out In Total
31st Street [S]

Traffic Planning and Design, Inc & Alley
Suite 650 Alley

11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 12
11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 3 7
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 6 8
11:45 AM 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 3 7
Hourly Total 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 14 1 0 15 0 18 0 1 18 34
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 7 0 0 7 12
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 4 0 1 4 9
12:30 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 2 6 0 4 0 0 4 10
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 3
Hourly Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 18 0 4 18 0 16 0 1 16 34
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 32 1 4 33 0 34 0 2 34 68
Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 97.0 3.0 - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 - 1.5 0.0 47.1 1.5 - 48.5 0.0 50.0 0.0 - 50.0 -
Lights 0 0 0 - 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 32 1 - 33 0 34 0 - 34 68
% Lights - - - - - 100.0 - - - 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
% Other - - - - - 0.0 - - - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 7 - - - - 6 - - - - 4 - - - - 2 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Alley
31st Street [N]

Out In Total
32 34 66
0 0 0
0 0 0
32 34 66
0 34 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
0 34 0 2
R T L P
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Total
Out
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Alley [W]
Alley [E]
12/08/2018 11:00 AM
In
In
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
Ending At
12/08/2018 1:15 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
Other Vehicles
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
7
7
6
6
0
0
L T R P
0 32 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 4
0 32 1 4
35 33 68
0 0 0
0 0 0
35 33 68
Out In Total
31st Street [S]

Suite 650 Alley

11:45 AM 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 3 7
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 7 0 0 7 12
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 4 0 1 4 9
12:30 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 2 6 0 4 0 0 4 10
Total 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 19 0 2 19 0 18 0 2 18 38
Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 - 2.6 0.0 50.0 0.0 - 50.0 0.0 47.4 0.0 - 47.4 -
PHF 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 - 0.250 0.000 0.792 0.000 - 0.792 0.000 0.643 0.000 - 0.643 0.792
Lights 0 0 0 - 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 19 0 - 19 0 18 0 - 18 38
% Lights - - - - - 100.0 - - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
% Other - - - - - 0.0 - - - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 7 - - - - 3 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Alley
31st Street [N]

Out In Total
19 18 37
0 0 0
0 0 0
19 18 37
0 18 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
0 18 0 2
R T L P
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Alley [W]
Alley [E]
12/08/2018 11:45 AM
In
In
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
Ending At
12/08/2018 12:45 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
Other Vehicles
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
7
7
3
3
0
0
L T R P
0 19 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
0 19 0 2
19 19 38
0 0 0
0 0 0
19 19 38
Out In Total
31st Street [S]

Traffic Planning and Design, Inc & Existing Alley
2500 East High Street Site Code: 1100-1300 S.31st &
Suite 650 Existing Alley

Existing Alley Existing Alley S.31st Street S.31st Street
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 4 11
11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 2 1 0 3 8
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 3 0 0 3 11
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 6 0 0 6 11
Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 15 1 0 16 41
12:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 5
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 4
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 4 9
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 9 0 0 9 14
Hourly Total 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 1 0 12 0 0 12 0 18 0 0 18 32
Grand Total 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 1 0 37 0 0 37 0 33 1 0 34 73
Approach % 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - 0.0 97.1 2.9 - - -
Total % 1.4 0.0 0.0 - 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 - 1.4 0.0 50.7 0.0 - 50.7 0.0 45.2 1.4 - 46.6 -
Lights 1 0 0 - 1 1 0 0 - 1 0 37 0 - 37 0 31 1 - 32 71
% Lights 100.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 - - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 93.9 100.0 - 94.1 97.3
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 2 0 - 2 2
% Other 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 6.1 0.0 - 5.9 2.7
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 3 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - -
S.31st Street [N]

Out In Total
38 32 70
0 2 2
0 0 0
38 34 72
1 31 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 33 0 0
R T L P
R
1
0
0
1
L
0
0
0
0
Total
Out
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Existing Alley [W]
Existing Alley [E]

T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12/06/2018 11:00 AM
In
In
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
Ending At
12/06/2018 1:00 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
L T R P
0 37 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 37 0 0
32 37 69
2 0 2
0 0 0
34 37 71
Out In Total
S.31st Street [S]


Existing Alley Existing Alley S.31st Street S.31st Street
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 4 11
11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 2 1 0 3 8
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 3 0 0 3 11
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 6 0 0 6 11
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 15 1 0 16 41
Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - 0.0 93.8 6.3 - - -
Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 61.0 0.0 - 61.0 0.0 36.6 2.4 - 39.0 -
PHF 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.781 0.000 - 0.781 0.000 0.625 0.250 - 0.667 0.932
Lights 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 25 0 - 25 0 15 1 - 16 41
% Lights - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
% Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
S.31st Street [N]

Out In Total
25 16 41
0 0 0
0 0 0
25 16 41
1 15 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 15 0 0
R T L P
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
Out
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Existing Alley [W]
Existing Alley [E]

T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12/06/2018 11:00 AM
In
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ending At
12/06/2018 12:00 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
0 25 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 25 0 0
15 25 40
0 0 0
0 0 0
15 25 40
Out In Total
S.31st Street [S]

Count Name: AM_PM Bramar
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Road & Alley
2500 East High Street Site Code: AM_PM Bramar
Suite 650 Road & Alley

Bramar Road Bramar Road Camp Hill Chiropractic Alley
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
6:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
7:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Hourly Total 0 5 0 0 5 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11
8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 4
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Hourly Total 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 8
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 1 1 1 0 3 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
3:15 PM 0 5 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 12
3:30 PM 0 3 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 8
3:45 PM 0 2 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
Hourly Total 1 11 2 0 14 7 5 0 0 12 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 2 32
4:00 PM 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
4:15 PM 0 5 1 0 6 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9
4:30 PM 0 4 2 0 6 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 3 0 12
4:45 PM 0 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 9
Hourly Total 0 12 4 1 16 6 1 0 0 7 2 0 9 2 11 0 0 0 4 0 34
5:00 PM 0 3 2 0 5 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 15
5:15 PM 1 0 1 0 2 6 1 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 17
5:30 PM 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 13
5:45 PM 0 1 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 8
Hourly Total 1 6 6 0 13 16 2 0 0 18 1 0 20 0 21 1 0 0 0 1 53
Grand Total 2 35 12 1 49 34 13 1 0 48 4 0 34 3 38 2 0 3 6 5 140
Approach % 4.1 71.4 24.5 - - 70.8 27.1 2.1 - - 10.5 0.0 89.5 - - 40.0 0.0 60.0 - - -
Total % 1.4 25.0 8.6 - 35.0 24.3 9.3 0.7 - 34.3 2.9 0.0 24.3 - 27.1 1.4 0.0 2.1 - 3.6 -
Lights 2 34 12 - 48 34 13 1 - 48 4 0 34 - 38 2 0 3 - 5 139
% Lights 100.0 97.1 100.0 - 98.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 99.3
Other Vehicles 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 1
% Other 0.0 2.9 0.0 - 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.7
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 3 - - - - 6 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Alley [N]
Out In Total
3 5 8
0 0 0
0 0 0
3 5 8
3 0 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 6
3 0 2 6
R T L P
R
2
0
0
2
L
1
0
0
1
Total
Out
68
69
71
70
1
0
0
1
Bramar Road [W]
Bramar Road [E]

34
35
13
13
T
T
1
0
0
0
12/06/2018 6:00 AM
48
49
48
48
In
In
1
0
0
0
Ending At
12/06/2018 6:00 PM
12
12
34
34
R
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
119
118
Out
20
20
Other Vehicles
0
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
L T R P
4 0 34 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 3
4 0 34 3
46 38 84
0 0 0
0 0 0
46 38 84
Out In Total
Camp Hill Chiropractic [S]


7:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 5 0 0 5 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11
Approach % 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - 20.0 60.0 20.0 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 0.0 45.5 0.0 - 45.5 9.1 27.3 9.1 - 45.5 0.0 0.0 9.1 - 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 -
PHF 0.000 0.625 0.000 - 0.625 0.250 0.750 0.250 - 0.417 0.000 0.000 0.250 - 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.458
Lights 0 5 0 - 5 1 3 1 - 5 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 11
% Lights - 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
% Other - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 - - - - - 0.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Alley [N]
Out In Total
1 0 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
R T L P
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Peak Hour Data
Total
Out
8
0
0
8
6
0
0
6
Bramar Road [W]
Bramar Road [E]

T
T
5
0
0
5
3
0
0
3
12/06/2018 7:00 AM
In
In
5
0
0
5
5
0
0
5
Ending At
12/06/2018 8:00 AM
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
11
11
Other Vehicles
3
0
0
3
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
1 1 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 1 2
Out In Total


4:45 PM 0 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 9
5:00 PM 0 3 2 0 5 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 15
5:15 PM 1 0 1 0 2 6 1 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 17
5:30 PM 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 13
Total 1 7 5 1 13 15 2 0 0 17 1 0 22 1 23 1 0 0 1 1 54
Approach % 7.7 53.8 38.5 - - 88.2 11.8 0.0 - - 4.3 0.0 95.7 - - 100.0 0.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 1.9 13.0 9.3 - 24.1 27.8 3.7 0.0 - 31.5 1.9 0.0 40.7 - 42.6 1.9 0.0 0.0 - 1.9 -
PHF 0.250 0.583 0.625 - 0.650 0.625 0.500 0.000 - 0.607 0.250 0.000 0.786 - 0.821 0.250 0.000 0.000 - 0.250 0.794
Lights 1 6 5 - 12 15 2 0 - 17 1 0 22 - 23 1 0 0 - 1 53
% Lights 100.0 85.7 100.0 - 92.3 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 - - - 100.0 98.1
Other Vehicles 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 1
% Other 0.0 14.3 0.0 - 7.7 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 1.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Alley [N]
Out In Total
1 1 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 1 2
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 0 1 1
R T L P
R
1
0
0
1
L
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
Out
15
16
30
29
1
0
0
1
Bramar Road [W]
Bramar Road [E]

T
T
6
1
0
7
2
0
0
2
12/06/2018 4:45 PM
12
13
17
17
In
In
1
0
0
0
Ending At
12/06/2018 5:45 PM
15
15
R
5
0
0
5
0
0
Lights
Total
Out
47
46
Other Vehicles
3
0
0
3
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
L T R P
1 0 22 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
1 0 22 1
20 23 43
0 0 0
0 0 0
20 23 43
Out In Total

Count Name: SAT Bramar Road
2500 East High Street Site Code: SAT Bramar Road &
Suite 650 Alley

11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Hourly Total 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
12:00 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
12:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
12:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
12:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Hourly Total 0 5 0 0 5 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 0 7 0 0 7 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13
Approach % 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - 20.0 60.0 20.0 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 0.0 53.8 0.0 - 53.8 7.7 23.1 7.7 - 38.5 0.0 0.0 7.7 - 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 -
Lights 0 7 0 - 7 1 3 1 - 5 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 13
% Lights - 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
% Other - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 - - - - - 0.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Suite 650 Alley
Alley [N]
Out In Total
1 0 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
R T L P
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Total
Out
10
10
0
0
8
0
0
8
Bramar Road [W]
Bramar Road [E]

T
T
7
0
0
7
3
0
0
3
12/08/2018 11:00 AM
In
In
7
0
0
7
5
0
0
5
Ending At
12/08/2018 1:15 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
13
13
Other Vehicles
3
0
0
3
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
1 1 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 1 2
Out In Total

Suite 650 Alley

11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
12:00 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
12:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
12:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 4 0 0 4 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10
Approach % 0.0 100.0 0.0 - - 20.0 60.0 20.0 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 0.0 40.0 0.0 - 40.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 - 50.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 - 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 -
PHF 0.000 0.500 0.000 - 0.500 0.250 0.375 0.250 - 0.417 0.000 0.000 0.250 - 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.500
Lights 0 4 0 - 4 1 3 1 - 5 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 10
% Lights - 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
% Other - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 - - - - - 0.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Suite 650 Alley
Alley [N]
Out In Total
1 0 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
R T L P
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Peak Hour Data
Total
Out
7
0
0
7
5
0
0
5
Bramar Road [W]
Bramar Road [E]

T
T
4
0
0
4
3
0
0
3
12/08/2018 11:45 AM
In
In
4
0
0
4
5
0
0
5
Ending At
12/08/2018 12:45 PM
R
0
0
0
0
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
10
10
Other Vehicles
3
0
0
3
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
1 1 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 1 2
Out In Total

Count Name: 1100-1300 Bramar
Road & Existing Alley & Camp
Hill Chiropractiv
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Site Code: 1100-1300 Bramar
2500 East High Street Road & Existing Alley & Camp
Suite 650 Hill

Bramar Road Bramar Road Camp Hill Chiropractic Dw Alley
11:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6
11:15 AM 1 3 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 9
11:30 AM 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
11:45 AM 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Hourly Total 2 8 1 1 11 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 1 0 1 21
12:00 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
12:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
12:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
12:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
Hourly Total 0 5 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 10
Grand Total 2 13 1 1 16 1 7 0 0 8 1 0 5 6 6 0 0 1 0 1 31
Approach % 12.5 81.3 6.3 - - 12.5 87.5 0.0 - - 16.7 0.0 83.3 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - -
Total % 6.5 41.9 3.2 - 51.6 3.2 22.6 0.0 - 25.8 3.2 0.0 16.1 - 19.4 0.0 0.0 3.2 - 3.2 -
Lights 2 13 1 - 16 1 6 0 - 7 1 0 5 - 6 0 0 1 - 1 30
% Lights 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 85.7 - - 87.5 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 96.8
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 1
% Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 14.3 - - 12.5 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 3.2
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 6 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - -
Hill Chiropractiv
Suite 650 Hill
Alley [N]
Out In Total
2 1 3
0 0 0
0 0 0
2 1 3
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
R T L P
R
2
0
0
2
L
0
0
0
0
Total
Out
24
25
18
18
1
0
0
0
Bramar Road [W]
Bramar Road [E]

13
13
T
T
0
0
7
0
1
6
12/06/2018 11:00 AM
16
16
In
In
0
0
8
0
1
7
Ending At
12/06/2018 1:00 PM
R
1
0
0
1
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
26
25
Other Vehicles
8
1
0
9
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
L T R P
1 0 5 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 6
1 0 5 6
2 6 8
0 0 0
0 0 0
2 6 8
Out In Total
Camp Hill Chiropractic Dw

Hill Chiropractiv
Suite 650 Hill

Bramar Road Bramar Road Camp Hill Chiropractic Dw Alley
11:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6
11:15 AM 1 3 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 9
11:30 AM 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
11:45 AM 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 2 8 1 1 11 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 1 0 1 21
Approach % 18.2 72.7 9.1 - - 16.7 83.3 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - - -
Total % 9.5 38.1 4.8 - 52.4 4.8 23.8 0.0 - 28.6 0.0 0.0 14.3 - 14.3 0.0 0.0 4.8 - 4.8 -
PHF 0.500 0.667 0.250 - 0.688 0.250 0.417 0.000 - 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.375 - 0.375 0.000 0.000 0.250 - 0.250 0.583
Lights 2 8 1 - 11 1 4 0 - 5 0 0 3 - 3 0 0 1 - 1 20
% Lights 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 80.0 - - 83.3 - - 100.0 - 100.0 - - 100.0 - 100.0 95.2
Other Vehicles 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 1
% Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 20.0 - - 16.7 - - 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0 4.8
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 2 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - -
Hill Chiropractiv
Suite 650 Hill
Alley [N]
Out In Total
2 1 3
0 0 0
0 0 0
2 1 3
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
R T L P
R
2
0
0
2
L
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
Out
16
17
11
11
1
0
0
0
Bramar Road [W]
Bramar Road [E]

T
T
8
0
0
8
5
0
1
4
12/06/2018 11:00 AM
11
11
In
In
0
0
6
0
1
5
Ending At
12/06/2018 12:00 PM
R
1
0
0
1
L
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
Out
17
16
Other Vehicles
5
1
0
6
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
L T R P
0 0 3 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
0 0 3 2
2 3 5
0 0 0
0 0 0
2 3 5
Out In Total
Camp Hill Chiropractic Dw

Count Name: WD 32nd &
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Harvard Ave
2500 East High Street Site Code: WD 32nd & Harvard
Suite 650 Ave

Camp Hill Mall Harvard Ave 32nd Street 32nd Street
Start Time Right Right Right
Left Thru Right on Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right on Peds Left Thru Right on Peds
Red Red Red
6:00 AM 2 0 1 3 0 6 1 0 1 0 2 2 175 0 0 0 177 1 104 0 0 0 105 290
6:15 AM 2 0 1 5 0 8 5 0 0 0 5 3 203 1 0 0 207 0 158 1 0 0 159 379
6:30 AM 2 0 1 9 0 12 9 0 0 0 9 15 330 0 0 0 345 0 214 1 0 0 215 581
6:45 AM 7 1 3 14 0 25 18 0 1 0 19 21 364 1 0 0 386 0 211 6 0 0 217 647
Hourly Total 13 1 6 31 0 51 33 0 2 0 35 41 1072 2 0 0 1115 1 687 8 0 0 696 1897
7:00 AM 6 2 0 17 0 25 13 1 0 0 14 34 390 0 0 0 424 1 201 1 0 0 203 666
7:15 AM 5 1 0 17 0 23 20 1 2 0 23 30 395 1 0 0 426 2 260 3 0 0 265 737
7:30 AM 1 2 1 20 0 24 22 3 0 1 25 32 385 1 1 0 419 4 383 3 0 0 390 858
7:45 AM 3 2 1 11 0 17 23 2 0 0 25 30 405 3 0 0 438 6 327 4 0 0 337 817
Hourly Total 15 7 2 65 0 89 78 7 2 1 87 126 1575 5 1 0 1707 13 1171 11 0 0 1195 3078
8:00 AM 7 3 2 15 0 27 22 2 0 0 24 41 377 4 0 0 422 9 260 2 0 0 271 744
8:15 AM 7 0 2 8 0 17 21 0 2 0 23 26 385 1 0 0 412 4 252 1 0 0 257 709
8:30 AM 4 1 3 5 0 13 20 2 2 0 24 43 404 3 0 0 450 1 247 4 0 1 252 739
8:45 AM 6 0 4 15 0 25 10 3 2 0 15 58 401 2 0 0 461 4 232 4 0 0 240 741
Hourly Total 24 4 11 43 0 82 73 7 6 0 86 168 1567 10 0 0 1745 18 991 11 0 1 1020 2933
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11:00 AM 17 3 34 24 0 78 21 2 2 0 25 66 202 3 0 0 271 4 242 13 0 0 259 633
11:15 AM 25 5 31 34 0 95 14 6 2 0 22 59 227 6 0 0 292 1 281 14 2 0 298 707
11:30 AM 23 6 31 30 0 90 16 9 2 1 27 65 253 5 0 0 323 3 251 19 0 1 273 713
11:45 AM 23 7 34 33 0 97 14 5 0 0 19 89 256 5 0 0 350 2 314 16 0 0 332 798
Hourly Total 88 21 130 121 0 360 65 22 6 1 93 279 938 19 0 0 1236 10 1088 62 2 1 1162 2851
12:00 PM 23 8 36 32 0 99 30 10 3 0 43 68 247 5 0 0 320 2 257 13 0 1 272 734
12:15 PM 40 5 44 33 0 122 22 6 2 0 30 89 266 1 0 0 356 4 256 13 0 0 273 781
12:30 PM 29 9 36 36 0 110 15 4 0 0 19 55 293 5 0 0 353 1 344 15 0 0 360 842
12:45 PM 36 6 27 38 0 107 19 9 2 0 30 66 274 5 0 0 345 2 235 11 0 0 248 730
Hourly Total 128 28 143 139 0 438 86 29 7 0 122 278 1080 16 0 0 1374 9 1092 52 0 1 1153 3087
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 20 2 36 27 0 85 34 9 6 0 49 57 307 2 0 0 366 2 329 6 1 0 338 838
3:15 PM 20 6 40 24 0 90 35 12 0 0 47 53 305 5 0 0 363 1 390 6 0 2 397 897
3:30 PM 26 5 42 33 0 106 27 7 0 0 34 50 331 7 0 0 388 4 393 18 1 0 416 944
3:45 PM 25 5 31 24 0 85 31 2 0 0 33 66 302 4 0 0 372 2 397 8 0 0 407 897
Hourly Total 91 18 149 108 0 366 127 30 6 0 163 226 1245 18 0 0 1489 9 1509 38 2 2 1558 3576
4:00 PM 19 10 41 34 0 104 27 5 1 0 33 54 338 5 0 0 397 4 402 10 0 0 416 950
4:15 PM 20 5 46 20 0 91 21 4 2 0 27 58 326 3 0 0 387 1 413 13 2 0 429 934
4:30 PM 20 3 34 29 0 86 27 2 2 0 31 71 366 3 1 0 441 2 426 5 0 0 433 991
4:45 PM 16 4 42 27 0 89 26 0 3 0 29 67 372 5 0 0 444 1 388 12 0 2 401 963
Hourly Total 75 22 163 110 0 370 101 11 8 0 120 250 1402 16 1 0 1669 8 1629 40 2 2 1679 3838
5:00 PM 17 5 48 27 0 97 36 8 3 0 47 34 345 4 0 0 383 1 464 8 0 0 473 1000
5:15 PM 17 6 43 25 0 91 28 3 2 1 33 66 365 2 0 0 433 3 418 9 0 1 430 987
5:30 PM 11 3 28 26 0 68 32 4 0 0 36 59 349 2 0 0 410 4 356 11 0 0 371 885
5:45 PM 25 10 23 24 0 82 27 8 2 0 37 54 306 3 0 0 363 3 333 12 0 0 348 830
Hourly Total 70 24 142 102 0 338 123 23 7 1 153 213 1365 11 0 0 1589 11 1571 40 0 1 1622 3702
Grand Total 504 125 746 719 0 2094 686 129 44 3 859 1581 10244 97 2 0 11924 79 9738 262 6 8 10085 24962
Approach % 24.1 6.0 35.6 34.3 - - 79.9 15.0 5.1 - - 13.3 85.9 0.8 0.0 - - 0.8 96.6 2.6 0.1 - - -
Total % 2.0 0.5 3.0 2.9 - 8.4 2.7 0.5 0.2 - 3.4 6.3 41.0 0.4 0.0 - 47.8 0.3 39.0 1.0 0.0 - 40.4 -
Lights 465 124 735 713 - 2037 679 129 44 - 852 1571 10019 94 2 - 11686 78 9550 260 6 - 9894 24469
% Lights 92.3 99.2 98.5 99.2 - 97.3 99.0 100.0 100.0 - 99.2 99.4 97.8 96.9 100.0 - 98.0 98.7 98.1 99.2 100.0 - 98.1 98.0
Other 39 1 11 6 - 57 7 0 0 - 7 10 225 3 0 - 238 1 188 2 0 - 191 493
Vehicles
% Other 7.7 0.8 1.5 0.8 - 2.7 1.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.8 0.6 2.2 3.1 0.0 - 2.0 1.3 1.9 0.8 0.0 - 1.9 2.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 3 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 8 - -
% - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Ave
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
10528 9894 20422
264 191 455
0 0 0
10792 10085 20877
266 9550 78 0
2 188 1 0
0 0 0 8
268 9738 79 8
R T L P
465
504
39
44
44
R
0
0
0
Total
4003
4072
303
298
Out
69
0
0
5
Camp Hill Mall [W]
Harvard Ave [E]

124
125
129
129
T
T
1
0
0
0
03/28/2019 6:00 AM
2037
2094
859
852
57
In
In
0
0
7
Ending At
03/28/2019 6:00 PM
1448
1465
686
679
17
R
0
0
7
Lights
1966
1978
1162
1150
Total
Out
12
12
Other Vehicles
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
L T R P
1571 10019 96 0
10 225 3 0
0 0 0 0
1581 10244 99 0
11677 11686 23363

212 238 450
0 0 0
11889 11924 23813
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Suite 650 Ave

Red Red Red
7:15 AM 5 1 0 17 0 23 20 1 2 0 23 30 395 1 0 0 426 2 260 3 0 0 265 737
7:30 AM 1 2 1 20 0 24 22 3 0 1 25 32 385 1 1 0 419 4 383 3 0 0 390 858
7:45 AM 3 2 1 11 0 17 23 2 0 0 25 30 405 3 0 0 438 6 327 4 0 0 337 817
8:00 AM 7 3 2 15 0 27 22 2 0 0 24 41 377 4 0 0 422 9 260 2 0 0 271 744
Total 16 8 4 63 0 91 87 8 2 1 97 133 1562 9 1 0 1705 21 1230 12 0 0 1263 3156
Approach % 17.6 8.8 4.4 69.2 - - 89.7 8.2 2.1 - - 7.8 91.6 0.5 0.1 - - 1.7 97.4 1.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 0.5 0.3 0.1 2.0 - 2.9 2.8 0.3 0.1 - 3.1 4.2 49.5 0.3 0.0 - 54.0 0.7 39.0 0.4 0.0 - 40.0 -
PHF 0.571 0.667 0.500 0.788 - 0.843 0.946 0.667 0.250 - 0.970 0.811 0.964 0.563 0.250 - 0.973 0.583 0.803 0.750 0.000 - 0.810 0.920
Lights 11 8 3 62 - 84 86 8 2 - 96 133 1530 9 1 - 1673 21 1210 12 0 - 1243 3096
% Lights 68.8 100.0 75.0 98.4 - 92.3 98.9 100.0 100.0 - 99.0 100.0 98.0 100.0 100.0 - 98.1 100.0 98.4 100.0 - - 98.4 98.1
Other 5 0 1 1 - 7 1 0 0 - 1 0 32 0 0 - 32 0 20 0 0 - 20 60
Vehicles
% Other 31.3 0.0 25.0 1.6 - 7.7 1.1 0.0 0.0 - 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 - 1.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 - - 1.6 1.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - -
% - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Ave
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
1543 1243 2786
37 20 57
0 0 0
1580 1263 2843
12 1210 21 0
0 20 0 0
0 0 0 0
12 1230 21 0
R T L P
11
16
R
5
0
2
0
0
2
Peak Hour Data
Total
237
244
Out
39
39
7
0
0
0
Camp Hill Mall [W]
Harvard Ave [E]

T
T
8
0
0
8
8
0
0
8
03/28/2019 7:15 AM
84
91
97
96
In
In
7
0
0
1
Ending At
03/28/2019 8:15 AM
65
67
87
86
R
2
0
0
1
Lights
Total
153
153
136
135
Out
Other Vehicles
0
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
L T R P
133 1530 10 0
0 32 0 0
0 0 0 0
133 1562 10 0
1361 1673 3034

23 32 55
0 0 0
1384 1705 3089
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Suite 650 Ave

Red Red Red
11:45 AM 23 7 34 33 0 97 14 5 0 0 19 89 256 5 0 0 350 2 314 16 0 0 332 798
12:00 PM 23 8 36 32 0 99 30 10 3 0 43 68 247 5 0 0 320 2 257 13 0 1 272 734
12:15 PM 40 5 44 33 0 122 22 6 2 0 30 89 266 1 0 0 356 4 256 13 0 0 273 781
12:30 PM 29 9 36 36 0 110 15 4 0 0 19 55 293 5 0 0 353 1 344 15 0 0 360 842
Total 115 29 150 134 0 428 81 25 5 0 111 301 1062 16 0 0 1379 9 1171 57 0 1 1237 3155
Approach % 26.9 6.8 35.0 31.3 - - 73.0 22.5 4.5 - - 21.8 77.0 1.2 0.0 - - 0.7 94.7 4.6 0.0 - - -
Total % 3.6 0.9 4.8 4.2 - 13.6 2.6 0.8 0.2 - 3.5 9.5 33.7 0.5 0.0 - 43.7 0.3 37.1 1.8 0.0 - 39.2 -
PHF 0.719 0.806 0.852 0.931 - 0.877 0.675 0.625 0.417 - 0.645 0.846 0.906 0.800 0.000 - 0.968 0.563 0.851 0.891 0.000 - 0.859 0.937
Lights 110 29 149 134 - 422 81 25 5 - 111 297 1022 15 0 - 1334 9 1143 57 0 - 1209 3076
% Lights 95.7 100.0 99.3 100.0 - 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 98.7 96.2 93.8 - - 96.7 100.0 97.6 100.0 - - 97.7 97.5
Other 5 0 1 0 - 6 0 0 0 - 0 4 40 1 0 - 45 0 28 0 0 - 28 79
Vehicles
% Other 4.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 - 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 1.3 3.8 6.3 - - 3.3 0.0 2.4 0.0 - - 2.3 2.5
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 1 - -
% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Ave
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
1137 1209 2346
45 28 73
0 0 0
1182 1237 2419
57 1143 9 0
0 28 0 0
0 0 0 1
57 1171 9 1
R T L P
110
115
R
5
0
5
0
0
5
Peak Hour Data
Total
801
811
Out
10
54
53
0
0
1
Camp Hill Mall [W]
Harvard Ave [E]

29
29
25
25
T
T
0
0
0
0
03/28/2019 11:45 AM
422
428
111
111
In
In
6
0
0
0
Ending At
03/28/2019 12:45 PM
283
284
81
81
R
1
0
0
0
Lights
Total
379
383
165
164
Out
Other Vehicles
4
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
297 1022 15 0
4 40 1 0
0 0 0 0
301 1062 16 0
1507 1334 2841

29 45 74
0 0 0
1536 1379 2915
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Suite 650 Ave

Red Red Red
4:30 PM 20 3 34 29 0 86 27 2 2 0 31 71 366 3 1 0 441 2 426 5 0 0 433 991
4:45 PM 16 4 42 27 0 89 26 0 3 0 29 67 372 5 0 0 444 1 388 12 0 2 401 963
5:00 PM 17 5 48 27 0 97 36 8 3 0 47 34 345 4 0 0 383 1 464 8 0 0 473 1000
5:15 PM 17 6 43 25 0 91 28 3 2 1 33 66 365 2 0 0 433 3 418 9 0 1 430 987
Total 70 18 167 108 0 363 117 13 10 1 140 238 1448 14 1 0 1701 7 1696 34 0 3 1737 3941
Approach % 19.3 5.0 46.0 29.8 - - 83.6 9.3 7.1 - - 14.0 85.1 0.8 0.1 - - 0.4 97.6 2.0 0.0 - - -
Total % 1.8 0.5 4.2 2.7 - 9.2 3.0 0.3 0.3 - 3.6 6.0 36.7 0.4 0.0 - 43.2 0.2 43.0 0.9 0.0 - 44.1 -
PHF 0.875 0.750 0.870 0.931 - 0.936 0.813 0.406 0.833 - 0.745 0.838 0.973 0.700 0.250 - 0.958 0.583 0.914 0.708 0.000 - 0.918 0.985
Lights 66 18 166 108 - 358 116 13 10 - 139 238 1439 14 1 - 1692 7 1685 34 0 - 1726 3915
% Lights 94.3 100.0 99.4 100.0 - 98.6 99.1 100.0 100.0 - 99.3 100.0 99.4 100.0 100.0 - 99.5 100.0 99.4 100.0 - - 99.4 99.3
Other 4 0 1 0 - 5 1 0 0 - 1 0 9 0 0 - 9 0 11 0 0 - 11 26
Vehicles
% Other 5.7 0.0 0.6 0.0 - 1.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 - 0.7 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 - 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 - - 0.6 0.7
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 3 - -
% - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Ave
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
1515 1726 3241
13 11 24
0 0 0
1528 1737 3265
34 1685 7 0
0 11 0 0
0 0 0 3
34 1696 7 3
R T L P
66
70
10
10
R
4
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
643
648
Out
40
40
5
0
0
0
Camp Hill Mall [W]
Harvard Ave [E]

18
18
13
13
T
T
0
0
0
0
03/28/2019 4:30 PM
358
363
140
139
In
In
5
0
0
1
Ending At
03/28/2019 5:30 PM
274
275
117
116
R
1
0
0
1
Lights
Total
285
285
180
179
Out
Other Vehicles
0
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
L T R P
238 1439 15 0
0 9 0 0
0 0 0 0
238 1448 15 0
2075 1692 3767

13 9 22
0 0 0
2088 1701 3789
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Count Name: SAT 32nd &
2500 East High Street Site Code: SAT 32nd & Harvard
Suite 650 Ave

Red Red Red
10:00 AM 16 2 26 6 0 50 12 9 0 0 21 71 215 2 1 0 289 3 249 20 0 2 272 632
10:15 AM 18 4 49 16 0 87 8 4 1 0 13 78 247 4 0 0 329 1 227 17 1 1 246 675
10:30 AM 23 8 48 15 0 94 18 2 2 0 22 58 204 1 1 0 264 2 243 19 0 0 264 644
10:45 AM 21 2 51 6 0 80 11 8 1 0 20 87 241 3 0 0 331 1 274 18 0 0 293 724
Hourly Total 78 16 174 43 0 311 49 23 4 0 76 294 907 10 2 0 1213 7 993 74 1 3 1075 2675
11:00 AM 21 3 31 35 0 90 16 5 1 0 22 85 203 2 1 0 291 3 270 17 1 3 291 694
11:15 AM 27 2 41 35 0 105 20 2 0 0 22 64 241 4 0 0 309 2 272 24 0 7 298 734
11:30 AM 20 5 38 36 0 99 17 7 1 0 25 88 226 11 0 0 325 1 304 22 3 1 330 779
11:45 AM 32 6 46 40 0 124 16 9 1 0 26 82 236 1 1 0 320 1 278 22 1 1 302 772
Hourly Total 100 16 156 146 0 418 69 23 3 0 95 319 906 18 2 0 1245 7 1124 85 5 12 1221 2979
12:00 PM 23 6 79 10 0 118 21 6 1 1 28 86 237 0 0 0 323 4 261 21 0 0 286 755
12:15 PM 29 3 75 7 0 114 20 5 0 0 25 75 244 1 0 0 320 0 281 22 1 3 304 763
12:30 PM 29 5 74 7 0 115 21 5 0 0 26 71 240 4 0 0 315 0 283 13 2 1 298 754
12:45 PM 32 2 75 2 0 111 25 6 0 0 31 78 276 2 1 0 357 2 281 14 2 0 299 798
Hourly Total 113 16 303 26 0 458 87 22 1 1 110 310 997 7 1 0 1315 6 1106 70 5 4 1187 3070
1:00 PM 26 3 45 40 0 114 13 0 2 0 15 67 242 4 0 0 313 1 247 16 0 1 264 706
1:15 PM 26 1 45 32 0 104 11 1 0 0 12 87 243 0 1 0 331 2 261 18 0 5 281 728
1:30 PM 25 1 66 33 0 125 13 7 0 0 20 66 241 1 0 0 308 2 280 14 1 5 297 750
1:45 PM 24 6 55 18 0 103 12 5 1 2 18 65 237 2 0 0 304 2 253 14 0 6 269 694
Hourly Total 101 11 211 123 0 446 49 13 3 2 65 285 963 7 1 0 1256 7 1041 62 1 17 1111 2878
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 392 59 844 338 0 1633 254 81 11 3 346 1208 3773 42 6 0 5029 27 4264 291 12 36 4594 11602
Approach % 24.0 3.6 51.7 20.7 - - 73.4 23.4 3.2 - - 24.0 75.0 0.8 0.1 - - 0.6 92.8 6.3 0.3 - - -
Total % 3.4 0.5 7.3 2.9 - 14.1 2.2 0.7 0.1 - 3.0 10.4 32.5 0.4 0.1 - 43.3 0.2 36.8 2.5 0.1 - 39.6 -
Lights 385 59 837 338 - 1619 252 81 11 - 344 1204 3729 41 6 - 4980 27 4221 291 11 - 4550 11493
% Lights 98.2 100.0 99.2 100.0 - 99.1 99.2 100.0 100.0 - 99.4 99.7 98.8 97.6 100.0 - 99.0 100.0 99.0 100.0 91.7 - 99.0 99.1
Other 7 0 7 0 - 14 2 0 0 - 2 4 44 1 0 - 49 0 43 0 1 - 44 109
Vehicles
% Other 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 - 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 - 0.6 0.3 1.2 2.4 0.0 - 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.3 - 1.0 0.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 3 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 36 - -
% - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Ave
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
4125 4550 8675
51 44 95
0 0 0
4176 4594 8770
302 4221 27 0
1 43 0 0
0 0 0 36
303 4264 27 36
R T L P
385
392
11
11
R
7
0
0
0
Total
3206
3225
134
133
Out
19
0
0
1
Camp Hill Mall [W]
Harvard Ave [E]

59
59
81
81
T
T
0
0
0
0
03/30/2019 10:00 AM
1619
1633
346
344
14
In
In
0
0
2
Ending At
03/30/2019 2:15 PM
1175
1182
254
252
R
7
0
0
2
Lights
1587
1592
Total
480
477
Out
Other Vehicles
5
0
0
3
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
L T R P
1204 3729 47 0
4 44 1 0
0 0 0 0
1208 3773 48 0
5648 4980 10628

52 49 101
0 0 0
5700 5029 10729
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Suite 650 Ave

Red Red Red
12:00 PM 23 6 79 10 0 118 21 6 1 1 28 86 237 0 0 0 323 4 261 21 0 0 286 755
12:15 PM 29 3 75 7 0 114 20 5 0 0 25 75 244 1 0 0 320 0 281 22 1 3 304 763
12:30 PM 29 5 74 7 0 115 21 5 0 0 26 71 240 4 0 0 315 0 283 13 2 1 298 754
12:45 PM 32 2 75 2 0 111 25 6 0 0 31 78 276 2 1 0 357 2 281 14 2 0 299 798
Total 113 16 303 26 0 458 87 22 1 1 110 310 997 7 1 0 1315 6 1106 70 5 4 1187 3070
Approach % 24.7 3.5 66.2 5.7 - - 79.1 20.0 0.9 - - 23.6 75.8 0.5 0.1 - - 0.5 93.2 5.9 0.4 - - -
Total % 3.7 0.5 9.9 0.8 - 14.9 2.8 0.7 0.0 - 3.6 10.1 32.5 0.2 0.0 - 42.8 0.2 36.0 2.3 0.2 - 38.7 -
PHF 0.883 0.667 0.959 0.650 - 0.970 0.870 0.917 0.250 - 0.887 0.901 0.903 0.438 0.250 - 0.921 0.375 0.977 0.795 0.625 - 0.976 0.962
Lights 111 16 301 26 - 454 86 22 1 - 109 309 986 7 1 - 1303 6 1095 70 5 - 1176 3042
% Lights 98.2 100.0 99.3 100.0 - 99.1 98.9 100.0 100.0 - 99.1 99.7 98.9 100.0 100.0 - 99.1 100.0 99.0 100.0 100.0 - 99.1 99.1
Other 2 0 2 0 - 4 1 0 0 - 1 1 11 0 0 - 12 0 11 0 0 - 11 28
Vehicles
% Other 1.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 - 0.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 - 0.9 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 - 0.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.9 0.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 4 - -
% - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Ave
32nd Street [N]

Out In Total
1098 1176 2274
13 11 24
0 0 0
1111 1187 2298
75 1095 6 0
0 11 0 0
0 0 0 4
75 1106 6 4
R T L P
111
113
R
2
0
1
0
0
1
Peak Hour Data
Total
860
865
Out
30
30
5
0
0
0
Camp Hill Mall [W]
Harvard Ave [E]

16
16
22
22
T
T
0
0
0
0
03/30/2019 12:00 PM
454
458
110
109
In
In
4
0
0
1
Ending At
03/30/2019 1:00 PM
327
329
87
86
R
2
0
0
1
Lights
Total
406
407
140
139
Out
Other Vehicles
1
0
0
1
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
L T R P
309 986 8 0
1 11 0 0
0 0 0 0
310 997 8 0
1508 1303 2811

14 12 26
0 0 0
1522 1315 2837
Out In Total
32nd Street [S]

Count Name: WD 30th & Market
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Street
2500 East High Street Site Code: WD 30th & Market
Suite 650 Street

Market Street Market Street 30th Street 30th Street
6:00 AM 0 15 0 2 15 2 28 0 0 30 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 2 1 49
6:15 AM 2 27 0 0 29 2 19 0 1 21 1 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 0 5 57
6:30 AM 0 42 2 0 44 4 31 0 1 35 0 1 4 0 5 2 1 2 0 5 89
6:45 AM 0 45 0 0 45 5 37 1 0 43 1 0 6 0 7 2 14 1 1 17 112
Hourly Total 2 129 2 2 133 13 115 1 2 129 2 1 14 1 17 5 18 5 3 28 307
7:00 AM 1 59 4 0 64 10 37 2 0 49 0 3 7 0 10 2 5 4 2 11 134
7:15 AM 0 78 7 1 85 11 54 0 0 65 2 6 18 0 26 1 28 4 0 33 209
7:30 AM 1 97 2 0 100 16 60 3 0 79 2 5 20 0 27 1 19 10 0 30 236
7:45 AM 0 89 3 2 92 7 56 1 0 64 3 0 18 0 21 3 6 2 0 11 188
Hourly Total 2 323 16 3 341 44 207 6 0 257 7 14 63 0 84 7 58 20 2 85 767
8:00 AM 0 80 10 0 90 28 53 0 1 81 1 2 12 1 15 2 18 8 0 28 214
8:15 AM 3 85 4 0 92 19 58 0 0 77 2 2 6 0 10 3 4 2 0 9 188
8:30 AM 0 72 4 0 76 12 59 1 0 72 2 1 5 0 8 1 4 5 0 10 166
8:45 AM 2 111 1 1 114 12 64 1 0 77 0 2 8 0 10 1 2 4 0 7 208
Hourly Total 5 348 19 1 372 71 234 2 1 307 5 7 31 1 43 7 28 19 0 54 776
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11:00 AM 1 79 4 0 84 4 98 1 3 103 0 1 8 2 9 1 5 3 1 9 205
11:15 AM 4 91 5 0 100 5 103 3 0 111 1 2 5 0 8 3 3 3 2 9 228
11:30 AM 0 77 5 0 82 10 102 2 0 114 2 0 3 1 5 3 1 1 0 5 206
11:45 AM 2 103 3 0 108 9 102 1 0 112 4 5 2 0 11 2 5 4 0 11 242
Hourly Total 7 350 17 0 374 28 405 7 3 440 7 8 18 3 33 9 14 11 3 34 881
12:00 PM 2 89 7 0 98 5 80 3 0 88 0 2 6 0 8 1 7 5 0 13 207
12:15 PM 1 101 1 1 103 7 91 2 3 100 2 0 2 0 4 2 7 6 1 15 222
12:30 PM 2 98 5 0 105 10 107 1 0 118 3 1 10 1 14 1 6 6 0 13 250
12:45 PM 2 94 1 2 97 11 81 2 0 94 3 4 8 3 15 2 2 2 0 6 212
Hourly Total 7 382 14 3 403 33 359 8 3 400 8 7 26 4 41 6 22 19 1 47 891
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 3 67 3 0 73 13 79 0 0 92 1 7 11 0 19 2 4 1 1 7 191
3:15 PM 2 95 1 0 98 7 84 1 0 92 0 3 5 2 8 0 3 1 0 4 202
3:30 PM 2 102 4 0 108 9 86 3 3 98 2 3 8 0 13 1 6 2 1 9 228
3:45 PM 2 83 7 1 92 6 109 1 0 116 1 3 7 0 11 3 1 4 1 8 227
Hourly Total 9 347 15 1 371 35 358 5 3 398 4 16 31 2 51 6 14 8 3 28 848
4:00 PM 2 96 3 0 101 13 87 1 0 101 0 2 7 0 9 0 5 2 0 7 218
4:15 PM 5 94 3 0 102 10 95 3 0 108 0 6 7 0 13 1 2 3 0 6 229
4:30 PM 4 96 2 0 102 10 84 1 0 95 1 1 14 0 16 1 4 1 0 6 219
4:45 PM 3 104 2 0 109 6 102 0 0 108 0 3 10 1 13 2 5 4 1 11 241
Hourly Total 14 390 10 0 414 39 368 5 0 412 1 12 38 1 51 4 16 10 1 30 907
5:00 PM 7 92 2 0 101 20 107 3 0 130 0 7 6 0 13 2 5 3 2 10 254
5:15 PM 2 98 3 0 103 11 115 4 0 130 0 1 6 0 7 3 5 1 1 9 249
5:30 PM 5 91 2 0 98 12 91 6 0 109 2 3 8 0 13 1 1 5 0 7 227
5:45 PM 2 91 3 0 96 13 82 2 1 97 0 5 9 0 14 1 8 9 0 18 225
Hourly Total 16 372 10 0 398 56 395 15 1 466 2 16 29 0 47 7 19 18 3 44 955
Grand Total 62 2641 103 10 2806 319 2441 49 13 2809 36 81 250 12 367 51 189 110 16 350 6332
Approach % 2.2 94.1 3.7 - - 11.4 86.9 1.7 - - 9.8 22.1 68.1 - - 14.6 54.0 31.4 - - -
Total % 1.0 41.7 1.6 - 44.3 5.0 38.6 0.8 - 44.4 0.6 1.3 3.9 - 5.8 0.8 3.0 1.7 - 5.5 -
Lights 62 2582 100 - 2744 317 2387 49 - 2753 35 81 248 - 364 49 188 109 - 346 6207
% Lights 100.0 97.8 97.1 - 97.8 99.4 97.8 100.0 - 98.0 97.2 100.0 99.2 - 99.2 96.1 99.5 99.1 - 98.9 98.0
Other Vehicles 0 59 3 - 62 2 54 0 - 56 1 0 2 - 3 2 1 1 - 4 125
% Other 0.0 2.2 2.9 - 2.2 0.6 2.2 0.0 - 2.0 2.8 0.0 0.8 - 0.8 3.9 0.5 0.9 - 1.1 2.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 10 - - - - 13 - - - - 12 - - - - 16 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Street
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
192 346 538
0 4 4
0 0 0
192 350 542
109 188 49 0
1 1 2 0
0 0 0 16
110 189 51 16
R T L P
62
62
49
49
R
0
0
0
0
Total
5275
5393
2942
2879
118
Out
63
0
0
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

2582
2641
2441
2387
59
54
T
T
0
0
03/28/2019 6:00 AM
2744
2806
2809
2753
62
56
In
In
0
0
Ending At
03/28/2019 6:00 PM
100
103
319
317
R
3
0
0
2
Lights
2531
2587
5751
5632
Total
119
Out
56
Other Vehicles
0
0
Pedestrians
10
10
13
13
P
P
0
0
0
0
L T R P
35 81 248 0
1 0 2 0
0 0 0 12
36 81 250 12
605 364 969

6 3 9
0 0 0
611 367 978
Out In Total
30th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

7:15 AM 0 78 7 1 85 11 54 0 0 65 2 6 18 0 26 1 28 4 0 33 209
7:30 AM 1 97 2 0 100 16 60 3 0 79 2 5 20 0 27 1 19 10 0 30 236
7:45 AM 0 89 3 2 92 7 56 1 0 64 3 0 18 0 21 3 6 2 0 11 188
8:00 AM 0 80 10 0 90 28 53 0 1 81 1 2 12 1 15 2 18 8 0 28 214
Total 1 344 22 3 367 62 223 4 1 289 8 13 68 1 89 7 71 24 0 102 847
Approach % 0.3 93.7 6.0 - - 21.5 77.2 1.4 - - 9.0 14.6 76.4 - - 6.9 69.6 23.5 - - -
Total % 0.1 40.6 2.6 - 43.3 7.3 26.3 0.5 - 34.1 0.9 1.5 8.0 - 10.5 0.8 8.4 2.8 - 12.0 -
PHF 0.250 0.887 0.550 - 0.918 0.554 0.929 0.333 - 0.892 0.667 0.542 0.850 - 0.824 0.583 0.634 0.600 - 0.773 0.897
Lights 1 333 20 - 354 61 216 4 - 281 8 13 68 - 89 7 71 24 - 102 826
% Lights 100.0 96.8 90.9 - 96.5 98.4 96.9 100.0 - 97.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 97.5
Other Vehicles 0 11 2 - 13 1 7 0 - 8 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 21
% Other 0.0 3.2 9.1 - 3.5 1.6 3.1 0.0 - 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 2.5
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 3 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 0 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - -
Suite 650 Street
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
18 102 120
0 0 0
0 0 0
18 102 120
24 71 7 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
24 71 7 0
R T L P
R
1
0
0
1
L
4
0
0
4
Peak Hour Data
Total
602
622
419
408
Out
20
11
0
0
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

333
344
223
216
11
T
0
0
7
03/28/2019 7:15 AM
354
367
289
281
13
In
In
0
0
8
Ending At
03/28/2019 8:15 AM
20
22
62
61
R
2
0
0
1
Lights
Total
248
255
708
689
Out
19
Other Vehicles
7
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
3
3
1
1
0
0
L T R P
8 13 68 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
8 13 68 1
152 89 241
3 0 3
0 0 0
155 89 244
Out In Total
30th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

11:45 AM 2 103 3 0 108 9 102 1 0 112 4 5 2 0 11 2 5 4 0 11 242
12:00 PM 2 89 7 0 98 5 80 3 0 88 0 2 6 0 8 1 7 5 0 13 207
12:15 PM 1 101 1 1 103 7 91 2 3 100 2 0 2 0 4 2 7 6 1 15 222
12:30 PM 2 98 5 0 105 10 107 1 0 118 3 1 10 1 14 1 6 6 0 13 250
Total 7 391 16 1 414 31 380 7 3 418 9 8 20 1 37 6 25 21 1 52 921
Approach % 1.7 94.4 3.9 - - 7.4 90.9 1.7 - - 24.3 21.6 54.1 - - 11.5 48.1 40.4 - - -
Total % 0.8 42.5 1.7 - 45.0 3.4 41.3 0.8 - 45.4 1.0 0.9 2.2 - 4.0 0.7 2.7 2.3 - 5.6 -
PHF 0.875 0.949 0.571 - 0.958 0.775 0.888 0.583 - 0.886 0.563 0.400 0.500 - 0.661 0.750 0.893 0.875 - 0.867 0.921
Lights 7 385 16 - 408 31 376 7 - 414 8 8 20 - 36 6 24 21 - 51 909
% Lights 100.0 98.5 100.0 - 98.6 100.0 98.9 100.0 - 99.0 88.9 100.0 100.0 - 97.3 100.0 96.0 100.0 - 98.1 98.7
Other Vehicles 0 6 0 - 6 0 4 0 - 4 1 0 0 - 1 0 1 0 - 1 12
% Other 0.0 1.5 0.0 - 1.4 0.0 1.1 0.0 - 1.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 - 2.7 0.0 4.0 0.0 - 1.9 1.3
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 1 - - - - 3 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Street
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
22 51 73
0 1 1
0 0 0
22 52 74
21 24 6 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1
21 25 6 1
R T L P
R
7
0
0
7
L
7
0
0
7
Peak Hour Data
Total
813
824
417
411
Out
11
0
0
6
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

385
391
380
376
T
T
6
0
0
4
03/28/2019 11:45 AM
408
414
418
414
In
In
6
0
0
4
Ending At
03/28/2019 12:45 PM
16
16
31
31
R
0
0
0
0
Lights
Total
405
410
835
825
Out
10
Other Vehicles
5
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
3
3
0
0
L T R P
8 8 20 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
9 8 20 1
71 36 107
1 1 2
0 0 0
72 37 109
Out In Total
30th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

4:45 PM 3 104 2 0 109 6 102 0 0 108 0 3 10 1 13 2 5 4 1 11 241
5:00 PM 7 92 2 0 101 20 107 3 0 130 0 7 6 0 13 2 5 3 2 10 254
5:15 PM 2 98 3 0 103 11 115 4 0 130 0 1 6 0 7 3 5 1 1 9 249
5:30 PM 5 91 2 0 98 12 91 6 0 109 2 3 8 0 13 1 1 5 0 7 227
Total 17 385 9 0 411 49 415 13 0 477 2 14 30 1 46 8 16 13 4 37 971
Approach % 4.1 93.7 2.2 - - 10.3 87.0 2.7 - - 4.3 30.4 65.2 - - 21.6 43.2 35.1 - - -
Total % 1.8 39.6 0.9 - 42.3 5.0 42.7 1.3 - 49.1 0.2 1.4 3.1 - 4.7 0.8 1.6 1.3 - 3.8 -
PHF 0.607 0.925 0.750 - 0.943 0.613 0.902 0.542 - 0.917 0.250 0.500 0.750 - 0.885 0.667 0.800 0.650 - 0.841 0.956
Lights 17 382 9 - 408 49 410 13 - 472 2 14 30 - 46 8 16 13 - 37 963
% Lights 100.0 99.2 100.0 - 99.3 100.0 98.8 100.0 - 99.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.2
Other Vehicles 0 3 0 - 3 0 5 0 - 5 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 8
% Other 0.0 0.8 0.0 - 0.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 - 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.8
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 1 - - - - 4 - -
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Street
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
44 37 81
0 0 0
0 0 0
44 37 81
13 16 8 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 4
13 16 8 4
R T L P
17
17
13
13
R
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
833
841
423
420
Out
8
0
0
3
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

382
385
415
410
T
T
3
0
0
5
03/28/2019 4:45 PM
408
411
477
472
In
In
3
0
0
5
Ending At
03/28/2019 5:45 PM
49
49
R
9
0
0
9
0
0
Lights
Total
425
430
900
892
Out
Other Vehicles
5
0
0
8
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
2 14 30 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
2 14 30 1
74 46 120
0 0 0
0 0 0
74 46 120
Out In Total
30th Street [S]

Count Name: SAT 30th &
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc Market Street
2500 East High Street Site Code: SAT 30th & Market
Suite 650 Street

10:00 AM 4 107 1 0 112 7 87 1 0 95 1 2 3 0 6 2 5 2 0 9 222
10:15 AM 1 113 0 4 114 7 103 0 0 110 1 6 6 1 13 2 2 3 0 7 244
10:30 AM 1 106 1 0 108 9 88 1 0 98 4 1 9 0 14 4 4 4 0 12 232
10:45 AM 2 113 1 0 116 9 105 2 2 116 1 1 5 1 7 1 3 5 1 9 248
Hourly Total 8 439 3 4 450 32 383 4 2 419 7 10 23 2 40 9 14 14 1 37 946
11:00 AM 3 101 1 4 105 7 95 2 0 104 0 0 4 1 4 4 2 2 2 8 221
11:15 AM 1 110 5 0 116 6 108 1 0 115 1 2 8 2 11 2 6 3 0 11 253
11:30 AM 2 101 4 0 107 5 100 0 2 105 2 2 5 0 9 2 3 5 0 10 231
11:45 AM 3 104 1 1 108 4 113 2 0 119 2 0 2 0 4 3 6 3 0 12 243
Hourly Total 9 416 11 5 436 22 416 5 2 443 5 4 19 3 28 11 17 13 2 41 948
12:00 PM 1 73 4 1 78 6 103 1 0 110 1 2 3 0 6 0 4 5 1 9 203
12:15 PM 1 88 3 7 92 6 107 0 0 113 0 3 9 3 12 4 5 1 0 10 227
12:30 PM 6 97 3 0 106 13 97 2 0 112 1 1 8 4 10 4 1 2 0 7 235
12:45 PM 2 99 2 3 103 4 81 0 0 85 0 0 7 0 7 2 4 5 3 11 206
Hourly Total 10 357 12 11 379 29 388 3 0 420 2 6 27 7 35 10 14 13 4 37 871
1:00 PM 2 94 0 1 96 7 88 2 0 97 2 1 8 0 11 1 6 0 0 7 211
1:15 PM 6 104 1 0 111 3 112 5 1 120 2 2 4 0 8 1 4 5 3 10 249
1:30 PM 3 107 2 1 112 3 89 0 0 92 1 2 5 0 8 2 2 0 0 4 216
1:45 PM 4 104 2 0 110 6 86 2 0 94 2 3 5 0 10 2 3 5 0 10 224
Hourly Total 15 409 5 2 429 19 375 9 1 403 7 8 22 0 37 6 15 10 3 31 900
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 42 1621 31 22 1694 102 1562 21 5 1685 21 28 91 12 140 36 60 50 10 146 3665
Approach % 2.5 95.7 1.8 - - 6.1 92.7 1.2 - - 15.0 20.0 65.0 - - 24.7 41.1 34.2 - - -
Total % 1.1 44.2 0.8 - 46.2 2.8 42.6 0.6 - 46.0 0.6 0.8 2.5 - 3.8 1.0 1.6 1.4 - 4.0 -
Lights 42 1612 31 - 1685 101 1547 21 - 1669 21 28 90 - 139 36 60 50 - 146 3639
% Lights 100.0 99.4 100.0 - 99.5 99.0 99.0 100.0 - 99.1 100.0 100.0 98.9 - 99.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.3
Other Vehicles 0 9 0 - 9 1 15 0 - 16 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 26
% Other 0.0 0.6 0.0 - 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 - 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.1 - 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.7
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 22 - - - - 5 - - - - 12 - - - - 10 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Street
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
91 146 237
0 0 0
0 0 0
91 146 237
50 60 36 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 10
50 60 36 10
R T L P
42
42
21
21
R
0
0
0
0
Total
3303
3327
1748
1738
Out
24
10
0
0
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

1612
1621
1562
1547
15
T
T
9
0
0
03/30/2019 10:00 AM
1685
1694
1685
1669
16
In
In
9
0
0
Ending At
03/30/2019 2:15 PM
102
101
31
31
R
0
0
0
1
Lights
1618
1633
3433
3407
Total
Out
15
26
Other Vehicles
0
0
Pedestrians
22
22
P
P
0
0
5
5
0
0
L T R P
21 28 90 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 12
21 28 91 12
192 139 331

1 1 2
0 0 0
193 140 333
Out In Total
30th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

10:30 AM 1 106 1 0 108 9 88 1 0 98 4 1 9 0 14 4 4 4 0 12 232
10:45 AM 2 113 1 0 116 9 105 2 2 116 1 1 5 1 7 1 3 5 1 9 248
11:00 AM 3 101 1 4 105 7 95 2 0 104 0 0 4 1 4 4 2 2 2 8 221
11:15 AM 1 110 5 0 116 6 108 1 0 115 1 2 8 2 11 2 6 3 0 11 253
Total 7 430 8 4 445 31 396 6 2 433 6 4 26 4 36 11 15 14 3 40 954
Approach % 1.6 96.6 1.8 - - 7.2 91.5 1.4 - - 16.7 11.1 72.2 - - 27.5 37.5 35.0 - - -
Total % 0.7 45.1 0.8 - 46.6 3.2 41.5 0.6 - 45.4 0.6 0.4 2.7 - 3.8 1.2 1.6 1.5 - 4.2 -
PHF 0.583 0.951 0.400 - 0.959 0.861 0.917 0.750 - 0.933 0.375 0.500 0.722 - 0.643 0.688 0.625 0.700 - 0.833 0.943
Lights 7 428 8 - 443 31 392 6 - 429 6 4 25 - 35 11 15 14 - 40 947
% Lights 100.0 99.5 100.0 - 99.6 100.0 99.0 100.0 - 99.1 100.0 100.0 96.2 - 97.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.3
Other Vehicles 0 2 0 - 2 0 4 0 - 4 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 - 0 7
% Other 0.0 0.5 0.0 - 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 - 0.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 - 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.7
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - 4 - - - - 2 - - - - 4 - - - - 3 - -
% Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - -
Suite 650 Street
30th Street [N]

Out In Total
17 40 57
0 0 0
0 0 0
17 40 57
14 15 11 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 3
14 15 11 3
R T L P
R
7
0
0
7
L
6
0
0
6
Peak Hour Data
Total
855
861
467
464
Out
6
0
0
3
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

428
430
396
392
T
T
2
0
0
4
03/30/2019 10:30 AM
443
445
433
429
In
In
2
0
0
4
Ending At
03/30/2019 11:30 AM
31
31
R
8
0
0
8
0
0
Lights
Total
412
416
900
893
Out
Other Vehicles
4
0
0
7
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
4
4
2
2
0
0
L T R P
6 4 25 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 4
6 4 26 4
54 35 89
0 1 1
0 0 0
54 36 90
Out In Total
30th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

Red Red Red Red
6:00 AM 0 17 0 0 0 17 0 27 0 0 1 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 46
6:15 AM 0 30 0 0 0 30 1 20 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 52
6:30 AM 1 48 1 0 2 50 0 35 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 87
6:45 AM 1 50 1 0 1 52 1 41 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 96
Hourly Total 2 145 2 0 3 149 2 123 0 0 1 125 0 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 0 4 6 4 281
7:00 AM 0 65 3 0 0 68 1 45 0 1 1 47 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 6 123
7:15 AM 1 92 4 1 0 98 14 60 1 0 1 75 1 2 0 5 0 8 3 4 2 2 2 11 192
7:30 AM 3 109 3 0 1 115 8 73 2 0 1 83 1 0 1 3 0 5 0 1 1 5 1 7 210
7:45 AM 1 109 0 0 0 110 2 61 0 0 0 63 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 179
Hourly Total 5 375 10 1 1 391 25 239 3 1 3 268 3 2 2 11 0 18 4 7 4 12 4 27 704
8:00 AM 0 91 3 0 0 94 2 78 0 0 0 80 1 2 4 3 1 10 0 1 0 5 1 6 190
8:15 AM 0 92 0 0 0 92 3 70 0 0 0 73 0 1 0 2 0 3 1 0 2 4 0 7 175
8:30 AM 0 75 0 0 0 75 0 70 0 0 0 70 1 1 0 2 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 3 152
8:45 AM 0 121 1 0 0 122 3 72 0 0 0 75 1 0 0 5 0 6 2 0 0 1 0 3 206
Hourly Total 0 379 4 0 0 383 8 290 0 0 0 298 3 4 4 12 1 23 4 2 2 11 1 19 723
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11:00 AM 0 89 1 0 1 90 6 101 0 0 3 107 1 0 0 5 0 6 3 0 1 1 4 5 208
11:15 AM 2 95 0 0 0 97 1 107 0 0 1 108 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 2 209
11:30 AM 2 79 2 0 0 83 3 115 2 0 1 120 0 0 0 2 1 2 3 1 0 1 0 5 210
11:45 AM 0 105 0 0 0 105 6 104 6 0 0 116 0 3 1 3 0 7 0 0 2 4 0 6 234
Hourly Total 4 368 3 0 1 375 16 427 8 0 5 451 2 3 1 11 1 17 7 1 3 7 5 18 861
12:00 PM 1 95 0 0 0 96 4 85 3 0 0 92 1 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 0 3 1 6 197
12:15 PM 3 102 2 0 0 107 7 95 1 0 0 103 1 4 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 0 5 220
12:30 PM 1 106 2 0 0 109 2 112 0 0 0 114 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 0 1 3 0 5 232
12:45 PM 4 100 0 0 0 104 1 94 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 201
Hourly Total 9 403 4 0 0 416 14 386 4 0 0 404 3 5 2 3 5 13 5 0 1 11 1 17 850
*** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3:00 PM 1 77 1 0 1 79 13 95 3 0 2 111 3 6 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 3 1 7 206
3:15 PM 1 100 1 0 2 102 24 83 5 0 0 112 1 2 1 2 4 6 2 4 0 0 0 6 226
3:30 PM 1 106 0 0 1 107 8 97 1 0 0 106 1 0 3 0 0 4 3 0 0 1 0 4 221
3:45 PM 1 94 1 0 0 96 6 117 1 0 0 124 0 3 1 1 0 5 1 2 0 0 1 3 228
Hourly Total 4 377 3 0 4 384 51 392 10 0 2 453 5 11 5 3 4 24 6 10 0 4 2 20 881
4:00 PM 2 97 1 0 0 100 7 101 1 0 0 109 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 212
4:15 PM 3 98 0 0 0 101 7 101 1 0 0 109 1 0 1 2 0 4 1 0 1 2 0 4 218
4:30 PM 1 105 2 0 0 108 18 93 1 0 2 112 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 4 225
4:45 PM 0 118 0 0 0 118 10 108 6 0 0 124 0 1 1 3 1 5 1 1 0 0 1 2 249
Hourly Total 6 418 3 0 0 427 42 403 9 0 2 454 1 1 2 8 1 12 5 2 2 2 2 11 904
5:00 PM 4 97 0 0 0 101 6 126 1 1 0 134 0 3 2 0 1 5 4 2 3 1 2 10 250
5:15 PM 1 104 5 0 1 110 4 125 2 0 0 131 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 4 0 8 251
5:30 PM 3 97 1 0 2 101 2 105 2 0 0 109 1 0 0 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 0 6 220
5:45 PM 5 95 2 0 0 102 10 92 4 0 0 106 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 4 214
Hourly Total 13 393 8 0 3 414 22 448 9 1 0 480 1 3 4 5 1 13 6 8 7 7 3 28 935
Grand Total 43 2858 37 1 12 2939 180 2708 43 2 13 2933 18 29 20 56 15 123 37 30 19 58 24 144 6139
Approach % 1.5 97.2 1.3 0.0 - - 6.1 92.3 1.5 0.1 - - 14.6 23.6 16.3 45.5 - - 25.7 20.8 13.2 40.3 - - -
Total % 0.7 46.6 0.6 0.0 - 47.9 2.9 44.1 0.7 0.0 - 47.8 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.9 - 2.0 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.9 - 2.3 -
Lights 40 2798 36 1 - 2875 179 2655 42 2 - 2878 17 29 20 56 - 122 37 30 19 57 - 143 6018
% Lights 93.0 97.9 97.3 100.0 - 97.8 99.4 98.0 97.7 100.0 - 98.1 94.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 99.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 - 99.3 98.0
Other 3 60 1 0 - 64 1 53 1 0 - 55 1 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1 - 1 121
Vehicles
% Other 7.0 2.1 2.7 0.0 - 2.2 0.6 2.0 2.3 0.0 - 1.9 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 - 0.7 2.0
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 12 - - - - - 13 - - - - - 15 - - - - - 24 - -
% - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Street
29th Street [N]

Out In Total
113 143 256
4 1 5
0 0 0
117 144 261
76 30 37 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 24
77 30 37 24
R T L P
40
43
45
44
R
3
0
0
1
Total
5623
5742
2971
2911
119
Out
60
0
0
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

2798
2858
2708
2655
60
53
T
T
0
0
03/28/2019 6:00 AM
2875
2939
2933
2878
64
55
In
In
0
0
Ending At
03/28/2019 6:00 PM
180
179
37
38
R
1
0
0
1
Lights
2748
2803
5904
5789
Total
115
Out
55
Other Vehicles
0
0
Pedestrians
12
12
13
13
P
P
0
0
0
0
L T R P
17 29 76 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 15
18 29 76 15
246 122 368

2 1 3
0 0 0
248 123 371
Out In Total
29th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

Red Red Red Red
7:15 AM 1 92 4 1 0 98 14 60 1 0 1 75 1 2 0 5 0 8 3 4 2 2 2 11 192
7:30 AM 3 109 3 0 1 115 8 73 2 0 1 83 1 0 1 3 0 5 0 1 1 5 1 7 210
7:45 AM 1 109 0 0 0 110 2 61 0 0 0 63 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 179
8:00 AM 0 91 3 0 0 94 2 78 0 0 0 80 1 2 4 3 1 10 0 1 0 5 1 6 190
Total 5 401 10 1 1 417 26 272 3 0 2 301 4 4 5 13 1 26 3 6 3 15 4 27 771
Approach % 1.2 96.2 2.4 0.2 - - 8.6 90.4 1.0 0.0 - - 15.4 15.4 19.2 50.0 - - 11.1 22.2 11.1 55.6 - - -
Total % 0.6 52.0 1.3 0.1 - 54.1 3.4 35.3 0.4 0.0 - 39.0 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.7 - 3.4 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.9 - 3.5 -
PHF 0.417 0.920 0.625 0.250 - 0.907 0.464 0.872 0.375 0.000 - 0.907 1.000 0.500 0.313 0.650 - 0.650 0.250 0.375 0.375 0.750 - 0.614 0.918
Lights 4 391 9 1 - 405 26 265 3 0 - 294 4 4 5 13 - 26 3 6 3 14 - 26 751
% Lights 80.0 97.5 90.0 100.0 - 97.1 100.0 97.4 100.0 - - 97.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 93.3 - 96.3 97.4
Other 1 10 1 0 - 12 0 7 0 0 - 7 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 1 - 1 20
Vehicles
% Other 20.0 2.5 10.0 0.0 - 2.9 0.0 2.6 0.0 - - 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 - 3.7 2.6
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 1 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 4 - -
% - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Street
29th Street [N]

Out In Total
11 26 37
1 1 2
0 0 0
12 27 39
17 6 3 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 4
18 6 3 4
R T L P
R
4
1
0
5
L
3
0
0
3
Peak Hour Data
Total
691
711
422
412
Out
20
10
0
0
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

391
401
272
265
10
T
0
0
7
03/28/2019 7:15 AM
405
417
301
294
12
In
In
0
0
7
Ending At
03/28/2019 8:15 AM
10
11
26
26
R
1
0
0
0
Lights
Total
286
294
723
706
Out
17
Other Vehicles
8
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
L T R P
4 4 18 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
4 4 18 1
42 26 68
1 0 1
0 0 0
43 26 69
Out In Total
29th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

Red Red Red Red
11:45 AM 0 105 0 0 0 105 6 104 6 0 0 116 0 3 1 3 0 7 0 0 2 4 0 6 234
12:00 PM 1 95 0 0 0 96 4 85 3 0 0 92 1 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 0 3 1 6 197
12:15 PM 3 102 2 0 0 107 7 95 1 0 0 103 1 4 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 0 5 220
12:30 PM 1 106 2 0 0 109 2 112 0 0 0 114 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 0 1 3 0 5 232
Total 5 408 4 0 0 417 19 396 10 0 0 425 3 8 3 5 2 19 4 0 3 15 1 22 883
Approach % 1.2 97.8 1.0 0.0 - - 4.5 93.2 2.4 0.0 - - 15.8 42.1 15.8 26.3 - - 18.2 0.0 13.6 68.2 - - -
Total % 0.6 46.2 0.5 0.0 - 47.2 2.2 44.8 1.1 0.0 - 48.1 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.6 - 2.2 0.5 0.0 0.3 1.7 - 2.5 -
PHF 0.417 0.962 0.500 0.000 - 0.956 0.679 0.884 0.417 0.000 - 0.916 0.750 0.500 0.750 0.417 - 0.679 0.333 0.000 0.375 0.750 - 0.917 0.943
Lights 5 402 4 0 - 411 19 392 10 0 - 421 3 8 3 5 - 19 4 0 3 15 - 22 873
% Lights 100.0 98.5 100.0 - - 98.6 100.0 99.0 100.0 - - 99.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 98.9
Other 0 6 0 0 - 6 0 4 0 0 - 4 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 10
Vehicles
% Other 0.0 1.5 0.0 - - 1.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 - - 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 1.1
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 1 - -
% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Street
29th Street [N]

Out In Total
23 22 45
0 0 0
0 0 0
23 22 45
18 0 4 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
18 0 4 1
R T L P
10
10
R
5
0
0
5
L
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
824
834
420
414
Out
10
0
0
6
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

402
408
396
392
T
T
6
0
0
4
03/28/2019 11:45 AM
411
417
425
421
In
In
6
0
0
4
Ending At
03/28/2019 12:45 PM
19
19
R
4
0
0
4
0
0
Lights
Total
413
417
845
835
Out
10
Other Vehicles
4
0
0
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
3 8 8 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
3 8 8 2
23 19 42
0 0 0
0 0 0
23 19 42
Out In Total
29th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

Red Red Red Red
4:30 PM 1 105 2 0 0 108 18 93 1 0 2 112 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 4 225
4:45 PM 0 118 0 0 0 118 10 108 6 0 0 124 0 1 1 3 1 5 1 1 0 0 1 2 249
5:00 PM 4 97 0 0 0 101 6 126 1 1 0 134 0 3 2 0 1 5 4 2 3 1 2 10 250
5:15 PM 1 104 5 0 1 110 4 125 2 0 0 131 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 4 0 8 251
Total 6 424 7 0 1 437 38 452 10 1 2 501 0 4 5 4 2 13 9 6 4 5 4 24 975
Approach % 1.4 97.0 1.6 0.0 - - 7.6 90.2 2.0 0.2 - - 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 - - 37.5 25.0 16.7 20.8 - - -
Total % 0.6 43.5 0.7 0.0 - 44.8 3.9 46.4 1.0 0.1 - 51.4 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 - 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 - 2.5 -
PHF 0.375 0.898 0.350 0.000 - 0.926 0.528 0.897 0.417 0.250 - 0.935 0.000 0.333 0.625 0.333 - 0.650 0.563 0.750 0.333 0.313 - 0.600 0.971
Lights 6 419 7 0 - 432 38 448 10 1 - 497 0 4 5 4 - 13 9 6 4 5 - 24 966
% Lights 100.0 98.8 100.0 - - 98.9 100.0 99.1 100.0 100.0 - 99.2 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.1
Other 0 5 0 0 - 5 0 4 0 0 - 4 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 9
Vehicles
% Other 0.0 1.2 0.0 - - 1.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 - 0.8 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 1 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 4 - -
% - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Street
29th Street [N]

Out In Total
21 24 45
0 0 0
0 0 0
21 24 45
9 6 9 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 4
9 6 9 4
R T L P
11
11
R
6
0
0
6
L
0
0
Peak Hour Data
Total
889
898
442
437
Out
9
0
0
5
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

419
424
452
448
T
T
5
0
0
4
03/28/2019 4:30 PM
432
437
501
497
In
In
5
0
0
4
Ending At
03/28/2019 5:30 PM
38
38
R
7
0
0
7
0
0
Lights
Total
457
461
943
934
Out
Other Vehicles
4
0
0
9
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
L T R P
0 4 9 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
0 4 9 2
51 13 64
0 0 0
0 0 0
51 13 64
Out In Total
29th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

Red Red Red Red
10:00 AM 0 111 1 0 0 112 1 94 2 0 1 97 0 1 1 1 0 3 1 2 0 1 0 4 216
10:15 AM 1 116 0 0 0 117 4 103 0 0 0 107 2 1 0 1 1 4 2 2 3 2 0 9 237
10:30 AM 2 120 0 0 0 122 4 97 1 0 0 102 1 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 228
10:45 AM 1 115 0 0 0 116 4 113 3 0 0 120 0 0 0 4 0 4 1 1 1 2 0 5 245
Hourly Total 4 462 1 0 0 467 13 407 6 0 1 426 3 2 1 8 1 14 5 5 4 5 1 19 926
11:00 AM 1 105 1 0 0 107 5 100 0 0 0 105 0 1 1 4 1 6 0 1 1 2 1 4 222
11:15 AM 5 117 2 0 0 124 3 111 0 0 0 114 2 1 0 1 2 4 1 1 0 2 0 4 246
11:30 AM 0 109 0 0 1 109 5 101 1 0 1 107 1 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 0 3 0 4 223
11:45 AM 0 105 0 0 1 105 1 121 0 0 3 122 0 1 0 3 1 4 1 3 0 0 0 4 235
Hourly Total 6 436 3 0 2 445 14 433 1 0 4 448 3 3 1 10 4 17 3 5 1 7 1 16 926
12:00 PM 0 77 0 0 0 77 10 106 2 0 0 118 3 1 1 1 0 6 0 1 0 3 0 4 205
12:15 PM 1 97 4 0 0 102 4 114 3 0 8 121 0 1 0 5 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 229
12:30 PM 0 108 1 0 0 109 6 106 4 0 0 116 1 0 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 2 2 3 230
12:45 PM 1 107 0 0 0 108 3 86 1 0 0 90 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 201
Hourly Total 2 389 5 0 0 396 23 412 10 0 8 445 4 2 1 9 7 16 2 1 0 5 2 8 865
1:00 PM 0 100 1 0 0 101 3 91 1 0 0 95 3 1 0 1 0 5 2 0 1 1 3 4 205
1:15 PM 3 106 0 0 0 109 2 119 3 0 2 124 1 0 2 1 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 3 240
1:30 PM 1 112 0 0 0 113 2 90 3 0 0 95 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 2 2 3 213
1:45 PM 5 109 0 0 0 114 3 92 1 0 0 96 2 2 1 2 0 7 1 1 1 0 2 3 220
Hourly Total 9 427 1 0 0 437 10 392 8 0 2 410 6 3 3 6 0 18 6 2 2 3 7 13 878
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 21 1714 10 0 2 1745 60 1644 25 0 15 1729 16 10 6 33 12 65 16 13 7 20 11 56 3595
Approach % 1.2 98.2 0.6 0.0 - - 3.5 95.1 1.4 0.0 - - 24.6 15.4 9.2 50.8 - - 28.6 23.2 12.5 35.7 - - -
Total % 0.6 47.7 0.3 0.0 - 48.5 1.7 45.7 0.7 0.0 - 48.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.9 - 1.8 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.6 - 1.6 -
Lights 21 1705 10 0 - 1736 59 1628 25 0 - 1712 16 9 6 33 - 64 16 13 7 20 - 56 3568
% Lights 100.0 99.5 100.0 - - 99.5 98.3 99.0 100.0 - - 99.0 100.0 90.0 100.0 100.0 - 98.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.2
Other 0 9 0 0 - 9 1 16 0 0 - 17 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 27
Vehicles
% Other 0.0 0.5 0.0 - - 0.5 1.7 1.0 0.0 - - 1.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 - 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.8
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 2 - - - - - 15 - - - - - 12 - - - - - 11 - -
% - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Street
29th Street [N]

Out In Total
55 56 111
1 0 1
0 0 0
56 56 112
27 13 16 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 11
27 13 16 11
R T L P
21
21
25
25
R
0
0
0
0
Total
3407
3432
1769
1760
Out
25
0
0
9
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

1705
1714
1644
1628
16
T
T
9
0
0
03/30/2019 10:00 AM
1736
1745
1729
1712
17
In
In
9
0
0
Ending At
03/30/2019 2:15 PM
10
10
60
59
R
0
0
0
1
Lights
1671
1687
3498
3472
Total
Out
16
26
Other Vehicles
0
0
Pedestrians 15
15
P
P
0
0
2
2
0
0
L T R P
16 9 39 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 12
16 10 39 12
82 64 146
1 1 2
0 0 0
83 65 148
Out In Total
29th Street [S]

Suite 650 Street

Red Red Red Red
10:30 AM 2 120 0 0 0 122 4 97 1 0 0 102 1 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 228
10:45 AM 1 115 0 0 0 116 4 113 3 0 0 120 0 0 0 4 0 4 1 1 1 2 0 5 245
11:00 AM 1 105 1 0 0 107 5 100 0 0 0 105 0 1 1 4 1 6 0 1 1 2 1 4 222
11:15 AM 5 117 2 0 0 124 3 111 0 0 0 114 2 1 0 1 2 4 1 1 0 2 0 4 246
Total 9 457 3 0 0 469 16 421 4 0 0 441 3 2 1 11 3 17 3 3 2 6 2 14 941
Approach % 1.9 97.4 0.6 0.0 - - 3.6 95.5 0.9 0.0 - - 17.6 11.8 5.9 64.7 - - 21.4 21.4 14.3 42.9 - - -
Total % 1.0 48.6 0.3 0.0 - 49.8 1.7 44.7 0.4 0.0 - 46.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 1.2 - 1.8 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.6 - 1.5 -
PHF 0.450 0.952 0.375 0.000 - 0.946 0.800 0.931 0.333 0.000 - 0.919 0.375 0.500 0.250 0.688 - 0.708 0.750 0.750 0.500 0.750 - 0.700 0.956
Lights 9 454 3 0 - 466 15 417 4 0 - 436 3 2 1 11 - 17 3 3 2 6 - 14 933
% Lights 100.0 99.3 100.0 - - 99.4 93.8 99.0 100.0 - - 98.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 99.1
Other 0 3 0 0 - 3 1 4 0 0 - 5 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 8
Vehicles
% Other 0.0 0.7 0.0 - - 0.6 6.3 1.0 0.0 - - 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.9
Vehicles
Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 3 - - - - - 2 - -
% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - - 100.0 - -
Pedestrians
Suite 650 Street
29th Street [N]

Out In Total
15 14 29
0 0 0
0 0 0
15 14 29
8 3 3 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
8 3 3 2
R T L P
R
9
0
0
9
L
4
0
0
4
Peak Hour Data
Total
894
901
472
469
Out
7
0
0
3
Market Street [W]
Market Street [E]

454
457
421
417
T
T
3
0
0
4
03/30/2019 10:30 AM
466
469
441
436
In
In
3
0
0
5
Ending At
03/30/2019 11:30 AM
16
15
R
3
0
0
3
0
1
Lights
Total
428
432
913
905
Out
Other Vehicles
4
0
0
8
Pedestrians
P
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L T R P
3 2 12 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 3
3 2 12 3
21 17 38
1 0 1
0 0 0
22 17 39
Out In Total
29th Street [S]

APPENDIX D:
Nearby Development Information
EXCERPT OF FULL TIS
N
NORTH DRIVEWAY
1
10
N.31ST STREET
Enter = 13
Exit = 5
1
REAR DRIVEWAY
SOUTH DRIVEWAY
SR 0011)
2
10
3
N.32ND STREET (
MARKET STREET
$MODEL$
$USER$
(412)765-3717 (717)234-1430
KEY: POTTSTOWN
$TIME$
(610)326-3100
STOP CONTROLLED (610)625-4242 (856)966-4242
WWW.TRAFFICPD.COM
FIGURE 6
NEW(PASS-BY)TRIPS QUATTRO REDEVELOPMENT
$FILE$
$DATE$
WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR

TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
N
10 (18)
NORTH DRIVEWAY
23)
28)
-
27 (
3(
N.31ST STREET
Enter = 38(28)
Exit = 30(23)
2
3 (5)
REAR DRIVEWAY
SOUTH DRIVEWAY
2
SR 0011)
15
27
9
N.32ND STREET (
MARKET STREET
$MODEL$
$USER$
(412)765-3717 (717)234-1430
KEY: POTTSTOWN
$TIME$
(610)326-3100
STOP CONTROLLED (610)625-4242 (856)966-4242
WWW.TRAFFICPD.COM
FIGURE 7
$FILE$
$DATE$
WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR

N
30 (34)
NORTH DRIVEWAY
44)
52)
-
75 (
10 (
N.31ST STREET
Enter = 106(52)
Exit = 87(42)
5
10 (8)
REAR DRIVEWAY
SOUTH DRIVEWAY
4
SR 0011)
43
26
75
N.32ND STREET (
MARKET STREET
$MODEL$
$USER$
(412)765-3717 (717)234-1430
KEY: POTTSTOWN
$TIME$
(610)326-3100
STOP CONTROLLED (610)625-4242 (856)966-4242
WWW.TRAFFICPD.COM
FIGURE 8
$FILE$
$DATE$

APPENDIX E:
Trip Generation Worksheets
Lansdale FSU
4943 SF
132 Seats
Saturday Tuesday
Parking Total Transactions/ Parking Total Transactio
Time Hour
Drive Thru Drive Thru
Trips Transactio 1000 SF Trips Transactio ns/1000
12:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0.4 0 2 2 0.4
1:00 AM 1 0 2 2 0.4 0 2 2 0.4
2:00 AM 2 0 1 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.0
3:00 AM 3 0 1 1 0.2 0 1 1 0.2
4:00 AM 4 0 1 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.0
5:00 AM 5 0 1 1 0.2 1 1 2 0.4
6:00 AM 6 5 7 12 2.4 9 9 18 3.6
7:00 AM 7 17 13 30 6.1 30 16 46 9.3
8:00 AM 8 27 23 50 10.1 31 17 48 9.7
9:00 AM 9 36 29 65 13.1 26 22 48 9.7
10:00 AM 10 37 34 71 14.4 26 21 47 9.5
11:00 AM 11 67 61 128 25.9 71 64 135 27.3
12:00 PM 12 91 98 189 38.2 107 110 217 43.9
1:00 PM 13 85 89 174 35.2 81 66 147 29.7
2:00 PM 14 72 68 140 28.3 61 44 105 21.2
3:00 PM 15 60 49 109 22.1 55 38 93 18.8
4:00 PM 16 55 50 105 21.2 60 41 101 20.4
5:00 PM 17 64 66 130 26.3 74 65 139 28.1
6:00 PM 18 63 69 132 26.7 74 68 142 28.7
7:00 PM 19 54 52 106 21.4 64 49 113 22.9
8:00 PM 20 43 36 79 16.0 51 35 86 17.4
9:00 PM 21 30 23 53 10.7 30 20 50 10.1
10:00 PM 22 1 11 12 2.4 1 11 12 2.4
11:00 PM 23 0 5 5 1.0 0 14 14 2.8
Lindle Road FSU
4739 SF
126 Seats
Saturday Tuesday
Parking Total Transactio Parking Total Transactio
Trips Transactio ns/1000 Trips Transactio ns/1000
12:00 AM 0 3 3 0.6 0 2 2 0.4
1:00 AM 0 1 1 0.2 0 1 1 0.2
2:00 AM 0 1 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.0
3:00 AM 0 1 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.0
4:00 AM 0 1 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.0
5:00 AM 2 3 5 1.1 0 2 2 0.4
6:00 AM 8 8 16 3.4 11 9 20 4.2
7:00 AM 21 17 38 8.0 29 13 42 8.9
8:00 AM 34 28 62 13.1 30 19 49 10.3
9:00 AM 45 39 84 17.7 30 20 50 10.6
10:00 AM 47 48 95 20.0 34 29 63 13.3
11:00 AM 75 89 164 34.6 81 85 166 35.0
12:00 PM 97 121 218 46.0 116 122 238 50.2
1:00 PM 95 115 210 44.3 91 79 170 35.9
2:00 PM 85 94 179 37.8 65 52 117 24.7
3:00 PM 74 76 150 31.7 56 46 102 21.5
4:00 PM 70 76 146 30.8 60 48 108 22.8
5:00 PM 74 89 163 34.4 72 69 141 29.8
6:00 PM 74 91 165 34.8 75 75 150 31.7
7:00 PM 70 79 149 31.4 69 63 132 27.9
8:00 PM 63 63 126 26.6 60 46 106 22.4
9:00 PM 50 47 97 20.5 44 34 78 16.5
10:00 PM 2 17 19 4.0 2 14 16 3.4
11:00 PM 0 10 10 2.1 0 5 5 1.1
Lincoln Highway East
4831 SF
138 Seats
Saturday Tuesday
Parking Total Transactio Parking Total Transactio
Trips Transactio ns/1000 Trips Transactio ns/1000
12:00 AM 0 7 7 1.4 0 4 4 0.8
1:00 AM 0 2 2 0.4 0 1 1 0.2
2:00 AM 0 1 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0
4:00 AM 0 1 1 0.2 2 12 14 2.9
5:00 AM 1 1 2 0.4 1 2 3 0.6
6:00 AM 4 8 12 2.5 5 6 11 2.3
7:00 AM 13 13 26 5.4 16 12 28 5.8
8:00 AM 21 23 44 9.1 17 16 33 6.8
9:00 AM 28 32 60 12.4 18 19 37 7.7
10:00 AM 31 39 70 14.5 22 24 46 9.5
11:00 AM 61 81 142 29.4 56 64 120 24.8
12:00 PM 84 116 200 41.4 81 91 172 35.6
1:00 PM 85 116 201 41.6 66 74 140 29.0
2:00 PM 76 102 178 36.8 47 55 102 21.1
3:00 PM 63 83 146 30.2 40 42 82 17.0
4:00 PM 60 81 141 29.2 44 48 92 19.0
5:00 PM 67 100 167 34.6 57 73 130 26.9
6:00 PM 68 102 170 35.2 59 78 137 28.4
7:00 PM 59 85 144 29.8 46 58 104 21.5
8:00 PM 49 65 114 23.6 36 41 77 15.9
9:00 PM 39 52 91 18.8 24 35 59 12.2
10:00 PM 2 18 20 4.1 1 15 16 3.3
11:00 PM 0 19 19 3.9 0 12 12 2.5
Existing Average Chick-fil-a Sites
4837.7 SF
132.0 Seats
Saturday Tuesday
Time rate Avg Transactions
Avg Trips rate Avg Transactions
Avg Trips
12:00 AM 4.0 8.0 2.7 5.3
1:00 AM 1.7 3.3 1.3 2.7
2:00 AM 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
3:00 AM 0.7 1.3 0.3 0.7
4:00 AM 1.0 2.0 4.7 9.3
5:00 AM 2.7 5.3 2.3 4.7
6:00 AM 13.3 26.7 16.3 32.7
7:00 AM 31.3 62.7 15.99 38.7 77.3
8:00 AM 52.0 104.0 17.91 43.3 86.7
9:00 AM 69.7 139.3 45.0 90.0
10:00 AM 78.7 157.3 52.0 104.0
11:00 AM 59.81 144.7 289.3 58.02 140.3 280.7
12:00 PM 83.65 202.3 404.7 86.41 209.0 418.0
1:00 PM 195.0 390.0 152.3 304.7
2:00 PM 165.7 331.3 108.0 216.0
3:00 PM 135.0 270.0 92.3 184.7
4:00 PM 130.7 261.3 41.48 100.3 200.7
5:00 PM 153.3 306.7 56.50 136.7 273.3
6:00 PM 155.7 311.3 143.0 286.0
7:00 PM 133.0 266.0 116.3 232.7
8:00 PM 106.3 212.7 89.7 179.3
9:00 PM 80.3 160.7 62.3 124.7
10:00 PM 17.0 34.0 14.7 29.3
11:00 PM 11.3 22.7 10.3 20.7
APPENDIX F:
Volume Development Spreadsheets
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Traffic Volumes Worksheet
Intersection: Chestnut Street & N-S Alley/Select Medical PT Parking Lot
Synchro Node: 1 Adjacent intersections: West 0 East 0 North 0 South 0
Time Period: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour

Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection
left thru right left thru right left thru right left thru right Volume
2018 Existing Counts 73 206 2 0 224 2 0 1 0 2 0 10 520
Seasonal Adjustment Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Balancing
Existing Volumes (Balanced) 73 206 2 0 224 2 0 1 0 2 0 10 520
2020 Background Growth 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 74 209 2 0 228 2 0 1 0 2 0 10 528
Retail Use #2 Use #3 Use #4

New P-By New P-By New P-By New P-By
ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90
Retail Trip Assignment % - Enter 91% 9%

Retail Trip Assignment % - Exit 100%
Total New Trips 0 0 22 2 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 46
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Enter -7% 92% 8% -8%
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Exit 100%
Total Pass-By Trips 0 -2 20 2 -2 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 40
2020 Rerouted Trips 1 -1 0
2020 Projected Volumes 74 207 44 4 226 3 0 0 44 2 0 10 614
Time Period: Midday Weekday Peak Hour

2018 Existing Counts 26 177 0 0 203 3 4 0 0 3 0 49 465
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 26 180 0 0 206 3 4 0 0 3 0 50 472

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 0 0 121 12 0 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 261
Time Period: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour

2018 Existing Counts 21 218 0 0 304 1 3 0 2 1 0 42 592
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 21 222 0 0 309 1 3 0 2 1 0 43 602

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 0 0 67 7 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 142
Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour

2018 Existing Counts 4 169 0 0 243 3 2 0 2 0 0 10 433
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 4 172 0 0 247 3 2 0 2 0 0 10 440

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 0 0 117 12 0 0 0 0 124 0 0 0 253
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Intersection: Chestnut Street & 32nd Street

2018 Existing Counts 301 161 116 101 99 15 117 1340 112 10 986 218 3576
Balancing
Nearby 1 10 2 12
2020 Base Volumes 306 164 118 103 101 15 119 1372 114 10 1004 222 3648

ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90
Retail Trip Assignment % - Enter 15% 38% 38%

Retail Trip Assignment % - Exit 15% 15% 15%
Total New Trips 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 9 9 3 0 31
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Enter -4% -3% -1% -49% 49% 36% -36%
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Exit 3% 20% 14%
Total Pass-By Trips 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 1 -7 11 8 -5 0 6
2020 Rerouted Trips 0

2018 Existing Counts 265 140 161 141 98 18 140 896 46 14 916 200 3035
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 27 11 38
2020 Base Volumes 269 142 164 143 100 18 142 937 47 14 942 203 3121

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 0 20 0 0 0 0 19 19 51 51 19 0 179
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Enter -5% -4% -41% 41% 42% -42%

2018 Existing Counts 246 168 223 191 145 5 174 1238 49 7 1242 247 3935
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 27 11 38
2020 Base Volumes 250 171 227 194 147 5 177 1285 50 7 1273 251 4037

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 0 11 0 0 0 0 10 10 28 28 10 0 97

2018 Existing Counts 257 125 156 159 84 8 147 911 37 14 998 178 3074
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 75 32 107
2020 Base Volumes 261 127 159 162 85 8 149 1001 38 14 1046 181 3231

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 0 19 0 0 0 0 19 19 49 50 19 0 175
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Intersection: Chestnut Street & 31st Street

2018 Existing Counts 203 37 17 191 10 18 476
Balancing
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 206 38 17 194 0 10 0 18 0 0 0 483

ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90

Retail Trip Assignment % - Exit 46% 54%
Total New Trips 0 10 12 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Enter
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Exit 44% 49%
Total Pass-By Trips 0 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
2020 Rerouted Trips 1 1

2018 Existing Counts 189 3 10 239 9 7 457
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 192 3 10 243 0 9 0 7 0 0 0 464

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 0 59 69 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 140

2018 Existing Counts 175 24 17 251 13 26 506
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 178 24 17 255 0 13 0 26 0 0 0 513

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 0 31 37 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 75

2018 Existing Counts 150 9 9 203 6 9 386
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 152 9 9 206 0 6 0 9 0 0 0 391

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 0 57 67 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 135
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Intersection: Chestnut Street & 30th Street

2018 Existing Counts 52 127 21 25 137 10 16 19 4 36 75 57 579
Balancing
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 53 129 21 25 139 10 16 19 4 37 76 58 587

ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90

Total New Trips 5 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11

2018 Existing Counts 31 153 7 18 179 5 12 10 5 2 29 44 495
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 31 155 7 18 182 5 12 10 5 2 29 45 501

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 27 31 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 69

2018 Existing Counts 53 146 4 23 191 10 4 19 7 7 31 53 548
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 54 148 4 23 194 10 4 19 7 7 31 54 555

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 14 16 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 36

2018 Existing Counts 21 125 11 8 167 4 5 8 4 0 17 36 406
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 21 127 11 8 170 4 5 8 4 0 17 37 412

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 26 30 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 67
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Intersection: 31st Street & E-W Alley

2018 Existing Counts 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 53 0 77
Balancing
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 54 0 78

ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90
Retail Trip Assignment % - Enter 1%

Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 13

2018 Existing Counts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 15 1 41
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 15 1 41

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 69 0 70

2018 Existing Counts 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 38 1 0 38 1 79
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 39 1 0 39 1 81

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 37 0 38

2018 Existing Counts 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 0 0 18 0 38
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 0 0 18 0 38

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 67 0 68
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Intersection: Bramar Road & N-S Alley/Camp Hill Chiropractic

2018 Existing Counts 0 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 11
Balancing
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 11

ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90
Retail Trip Assignment % - Enter

Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7

2018 Existing Counts 2 8 1 1 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 21
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 2 8 1 1 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 21

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38

2018 Existing Counts 1 7 5 15 2 0 1 0 22 1 0 0 54
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 1 7 5 15 2 0 1 0 22 1 0 0 54

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20

2018 Existing Counts 0 4 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 10
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 0 4 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 10

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Intersection: Harvard Avenue & 32nd Street

2018 Existing Counts 16 8 67 87 8 2 133 1562 10 21 1230 12 3156
Balancing
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 16 8 68 88 8 2 135 1587 10 21 1250 12 3205

ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90

Total New Trips 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 17
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Enter -40%
Total Pass-By Trips 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 -6 0 0

2018 Existing Counts 115 29 284 81 25 5 301 1062 16 9 1171 57 3155
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 117 29 289 82 25 5 306 1079 16 9 1190 58 3205

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 51 0 0 19 0 99
Total Pass-By Trips 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 -28 0 -2

2018 Existing Counts 70 18 275 117 13 10 238 1448 15 7 1696 34 3941
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 71 18 279 119 13 10 242 1471 15 7 1723 35 4003

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 28 0 0 10 0 54
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Enter 17%
Retail Pass-By Trips % - Exit 30% -47%
Total Pass-By Trips 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 -19 0 1

2018 Existing Counts 113 16 329 87 22 1 310 997 8 6 1106 75 3070
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 115 16 334 88 22 1 315 1013 8 6 1124 76 3118

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 49 0 0 19 0 97
Total Pass-By Trips 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 -29 0 -2
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Intersection: 30th Street & Market Street

2018 Existing Counts 1 344 22 62 223 4 8 13 68 7 71 24 847
Balancing
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 1 350 22 63 227 4 8 13 69 7 72 24 860

ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90

Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4

2018 Existing Counts 7 391 16 31 380 7 9 8 20 6 25 21 921
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 7 397 16 31 386 7 9 8 20 6 25 21 933

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 0 0 0 3 0 0 24 0 3 0 0 0 30

2018 Existing Counts 17 385 9 49 415 13 2 14 30 8 16 13 971
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 17 391 9 50 422 13 2 14 30 8 16 13 985

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 15

2018 Existing Counts 7 430 8 31 396 6 6 4 26 11 15 14 954
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 7 437 8 31 402 6 6 4 26 11 15 14 967

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 0 0 0 3 0 0 24 0 2 0 0 0 29
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
WMSC.00002
7/26/2019
Intersection: 29th Street & Market Street

2018 Existing Counts 5 401 11 26 272 3 4 4 18 3 6 18 771
Balancing
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 5 407 11 26 276 3 4 4 18 3 6 18 781

ENTER = 24 22 46
EXIT = 22 22 44
90

Total New Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4

2018 Existing Counts 5 408 4 19 396 10 3 8 8 4 0 18 883
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 5 415 4 19 402 10 3 8 8 4 0 18 896

ENTER = 133 89 222
EXIT = 128 85 213
435

Total New Trips 0 3 0 0 3 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 30

2018 Existing Counts 6 424 7 38 452 11 0 4 9 9 6 9 975
Balancing 0

Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 6 431 7 39 459 11 0 4 9 9 6 9 990

ENTER = 74 74 148
EXIT = 68 68 136
284

Total New Trips 0 1 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 15

2018 Existing Counts 9 457 3 16 421 4 3 2 12 3 3 8 941
Balancing 0
Nearby 1 0
2020 Base Volumes 9 464 3 16 428 4 3 2 12 3 3 8 955

ENTER = 129 86 215
EXIT = 124 82 206
421
Total New Trips 0 2 0 0 3 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 29
7/26/2019 11:46 AM
APPENDIX G:
Capacity and Queue Analysis Worksheets
TABLE 1
INITIAL QUEUE OBSERVATIONS
S. 32nd Street (SR 0015) & Trindle Road (SR 0641)/Chestnut Street
Signal Cycle1 Initial
Time Period Movement
Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Queue2
EB L 1 2 0 1
EB T 0 0 0 0
EB R 0 0 0 0
WB L 0 0 0 0
Weekday A.M. Peak Hour WB TR 0 0 0 0
7:30 – 8:30 A.M. NB L 0 0 0 0
NB TR 0 0 0 0
SB L 0 0 0 0
SB T 0 0 0 0
SB R 0 0 0 0
EB L 0 0 0 0
EB T 0 0 0 0
EB R 0 0 0 0
WB L 0 0 0 0
Weekday Midday Peak Hour WB TR 0 0 0 0
11:45 A.M. – 12:45 P.M. NB L 0 0 0 0
NB TR 0 0 0 0
SB L 0 0 0 0
SB T 0 0 0 0
SB R 0 0 0 0
EB L 1 1 0 1
EB T 0 0 0 0
EB R 0 0 0 0
WB L 0 0 0 0
Weekday P.M. Peak Hour WB TR 0 0 0 0
4:15 – 5:15 P.M. NB L 1 0 0 0
NB TR 0 0 0 0
SB L 0 0 0 0
SB T 0 0 0 0
SB R 0 0 0 0
EB L 1 3 0 1
EB T 0 0 0 0
EB R 0 0 0 0
WB L 0 0 0 0
Saturday Midday Peak Hour WB TR 0 0 0 0
11:30 A.M. – 12:30 P.M. NB L 1 0 0 0
NB TR 0 0 0 0
SB L 0 0 0 0
SB T 0 0 0 0
SB R 0 0 0 0
1
Signal cycles immediately prior to the beginning of the peak period
2
Initial Queue = Average of the three (3) signal cycles
Existing Conditions
1: N-S Alley & Chestnut Street WMSC.00002
Existing Conditions Timing Plan: A.M. Peak Hour
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 73 206 2 0 224 2 0 1 0 2 0 10
Future Volume (vph) 73 206 2 0 224 2 0 1 0 2 0 10
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1860 0 0 1861 0 0 1855 0 0 1670 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.992
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1860 0 0 1861 0 0 1855 0 0 1670 0
Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 325 227 190 155
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 1 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 299 0 0 240 0 0 1 0 0 13 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
WMSC.00002 01/08/2019 Existing Conditions Synchro 10 Report

TPD Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 206 2 0 224 2 0 1 0 2 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 73 206 2 0 224 2 0 1 0 2 0 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 78 219 2 0 238 2 0 1 0 2 0 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2

Conflicting Flow All 243 0 0 222 0 0 622 620 221 619 620 242
Stage 1 - - - - - - 377 377 - 242 242 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 245 243 - 377 378 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.7 5.1 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 992 - - 1008 - - 483 436 882 453 407 848
Stage 1 - - - - - - 770 646 - 879 709 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 900 728 - 738 619 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 989 - - 1007 - - 444 395 881 420 369 846
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 444 395 - 420 369 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 700 587 - 797 707 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 889 726 - 670 563 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.3 0 14.1 10.1
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 395 989 - - 1007 - - 724
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.079 - - - - - 0.018
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.1 8.9 0 - 0 - - 10.1
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.3 - - 0 - - 0.1

TPD Page 2
2: S 32nd Street & Trindle Road/Chestnut Street WMSC.00002
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Storage Length (ft) 250 250 150 0 640 0 110 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1809 1562 1588 1608 0 1566 3189 0 1458 3257 1472
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1675 1809 1541 1582 1608 0 1566 3189 0 1458 3257 1472
Right Turn on Red No No Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 220
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 2% 1% 10% 2% 1%
Turn Type Split NA pm+ov Split NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov
Protected Phases 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Permitted Phases 4 6
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 7.0
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 13.6 15.0 15.0 13.6 55.5 13.5 55.4 24.0
Total Split (%) 16.0% 16.0% 9.1% 10.0% 10.0% 9.1% 37.0% 9.0% 36.9% 16.0%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None
Act Effct Green (s) 19.4 19.4 27.2 10.1 10.1 8.3 59.3 8.2 47.4 72.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.52 0.07 0.42 0.64
v/c Ratio 1.13 0.56 0.34 0.77 0.87 1.11 0.94 0.10 0.79 0.23
Control Delay 136.2 53.9 25.9 86.0 98.6 166.9 38.7 59.1 35.0 3.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 136.2 53.9 25.9 86.0 98.6 166.9 38.7 59.1 35.0 3.0
LOS F D C F F F D E C A
Approach Delay 91.1 92.7 48.3 29.4
Approach LOS F F D C
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~245 108 49 73 83 ~93 438 7 304 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) #648 #283 92 #251 #284 #312 #1262 33 #704 55

TPD Page 3
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 7.0
Minimum Split (s) 42.0
Total Split (s) 42.0
Total Split (%) 28%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 0.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Queue Length 50th (ft)

TPD Page 4
Internal Link Dist (ft) 445 245 1153 232
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 250 150 640 110
Base Capacity (vph) 289 310 372 142 143 114 1673 105 1468 1021
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.13 0.56 0.34 0.77 0.87 1.11 0.94 0.10 0.73 0.23
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 113.1
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.13
Intersection Signal Delay: 51.5 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.4% ICU Level of Service E
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Splits and Phases: 2: S 32nd Street & Trindle Road/Chestnut Street

TPD Page 5
Lane Group Ø9
Internal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 6
3: 31st Street & Chestnut Street WMSC.00002
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR

Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 203 37 17 191 10 18
Future Volume (vph) 203 37 17 191 10 18
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1836 0 0 1875 1714 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1836 0 0 1875 1714 0
Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 227 445 204
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 270 0 0 234 31 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 7
Intersection
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 203 37 17 191 10 18
Future Vol, veh/h 203 37 17 191 10 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 7 7 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 1 3 0 1 0 0
Mvmt Flow 228 42 19 215 11 20
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1

Conflicting Flow All 0 0 277 0 509 256
Stage 1 - - - - 256 -
Stage 2 - - - - 253 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.1
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.2 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3 - 3 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 965 - 613 839
Stage 1 - - - - 921 -
Stage 2 - - - - 924 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 959 - 595 833
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 595 -
Stage 1 - - - - 915 -
Stage 2 - - - - 904 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.7 10.2
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT

Capacity (veh/h) 729 - - 959 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 - - 0.02 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 - - 8.8 0
HCM Lane LOS B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 8
4: 30th Street & Chestnut Street WMSC.00002
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1816 0 0 1862 0 0 1801 0 0 1766 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.993 0.980 0.989
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1816 0 0 1862 0 0 1801 0 0 1766 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 1 1 16 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 5% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 3% 2%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 127 21 25 137 10 16 19 4 36 75 57
Future Vol, veh/h 52 127 21 25 137 10 16 19 4 36 75 57
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 2
Mvmt Flow 65 159 26 31 171 13 20 24 5 45 94 71
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 10.3 9.9 9 10
HCM LOS B A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1

Vol Left, % 41% 26% 15% 21%
Vol Thru, % 49% 64% 80% 45%
Vol Right, % 10% 10% 6% 34%
Traffic Vol by Lane 39 200 172 168
LT Vol 16 52 25 36
Through Vol 19 127 137 75
RT Vol 4 21 10 57
Lane Flow Rate 49 250 215 210
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.073 0.333 0.29 0.286
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.423 4.802 4.848 4.905
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 653 743 735 727
Service Time 3.521 2.871 2.919 2.979
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.075 0.336 0.293 0.289
HCM Control Delay 9 10.3 9.9 10
HCM Lane LOS A B A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 1.5 1.2 1.2

TPD Page 10
5: 31st Street & E-W Alley WMSC.00002
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1644 0 0 1890 0 0 1863 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1644 0 0 1890 0 0 1863 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 53 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 53 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 0 0 66 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2

Stage 1 68 68 - 31 31 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 29 31 - 66 68 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.1 4.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1060 817 1074 1032 795 1116 1138 - - 1171 - -
Stage 1 1121 858 - 1153 873 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1166 881 - 1103 842 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1057 813 1072 1029 791 1113 1136 - - 1168 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1057 813 - 1029 791 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1119 856 - 1150 870 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1165 878 - 1103 840 - - - - - - -
HCM Control Delay, s 8.4 8.2 0 0
HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1136 - - 1057 1113 1168 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.001 0.001 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 8.4 8.2 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -

TPD Page 12
6: Bramar Road & N-S Alley WMSC.00002
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1872 0 0 1873 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Flt Permitted 0.991
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1872 0 0 1873 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 13
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 11 0 2 7 2 0 0 2 0 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 11 11 - 12 12 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 12 13 - 12 11 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1190 - - 1158 873 1145 1161 878 1150
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1184 891 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1182 889 - 1184 892 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1190 - - 1156 871 1145 1158 876 1150
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1156 871 - 1158 876 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1184 889 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1180 887 - 1182 892 -
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.6 8.2 0
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1145 1192 - - 1190 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.002 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 - - 8 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - -

TPD Page 14
7: S 32nd Street & Harvard Avenue WMSC.00002
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1406 1939 1600 0 1702 0 1719 3366 0 1727 3384 0
Flt Permitted 0.769 0.742 0.110 0.080
Satd. Flow (perm) 1138 1939 1600 0 1320 0 199 3366 0 145 3384 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 73 1 1 1
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 31% 0% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Turn Type Perm NA pm+ov Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 4 5 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.4 24.4 16.2 24.4 24.4 16.2 76.1 11.5 71.4
Total Split (%) 16.3% 16.3% 10.8% 16.3% 16.3% 10.8% 50.7% 7.7% 47.6%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None
Act Effct Green (s) 14.6 14.6 29.9 14.6 76.9 73.2 67.1 60.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.14 0.71 0.68 0.62 0.56
v/c Ratio 0.11 0.03 0.15 0.60 0.50 0.75 0.13 0.71
Control Delay 49.3 48.2 6.8 61.7 15.7 18.7 10.9 22.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 49.3 48.2 6.8 61.7 15.7 18.7 10.9 22.7
LOS D D A E B B B C
Approach Delay 17.9 61.7 18.5 22.5
Approach LOS B E B C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 5 0 60 21 246 3 291
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 26 28 #168 #120 #1118 25 750

TPD Page 15
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 25%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 16
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 400 160
Base Capacity (vph) 209 356 501 243 298 2278 182 2138
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.03 0.15 0.44 0.49 0.75 0.13 0.63
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150
Intersection Signal Delay: 21.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.7% ICU Level of Service D
Splits and Phases: 7: S 32nd Street & Harvard Avenue

TPD Page 17
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 18
8: 30th Street & Market Street WMSC.00002
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1633 0 0 1634 0 0 1677 0 0 1667 0
Flt Permitted 0.989 0.995 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1633 0 0 1634 0 0 1677 0 0 1667 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 3 1 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 9% 2% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 19
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 344 22 62 223 4 8 13 68 7 71 24
Future Vol, veh/h 1 344 22 62 223 4 8 13 68 7 71 24
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 9 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 382 24 69 248 4 9 14 76 8 79 27

Stage 1 - - - - - - 397 397 - 388 388 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 444 390 - 442 409 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 985 - - 870 - - 289 299 678 355 352 848
Stage 1 - - - - - - 688 581 - 760 639 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 644 585 - 712 627 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 985 - - 869 - - 210 271 677 281 319 846
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 210 271 - 281 319 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 687 580 - 759 580 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 488 531 - 616 626 -
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 14.5 19
HCM LOS B C
Capacity (veh/h) 477 985 - - 869 - - 370
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.207 0.001 - - 0.079 - - 0.306
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.5 8.7 0 - 9.5 0 - 19
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0 - - 0.3 - - 1.3

TPD Page 20
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1567 0 0 1743 0 0 1435 0 0 1384 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1563 0 0 1666 0 0 1444 0 0 1389 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 1 1 4 1 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 3% 9% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 2 6 8 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode Min Min Min Min None None None None
Act Effct Green (s) 45.6 45.6 6.9 6.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.88 0.88 0.13 0.13
v/c Ratio 0.33 0.22 0.13 0.15
Control Delay 8.1 6.7 16.6 17.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.1 6.7 16.6 17.0
LOS A A B B
Approach Delay 8.1 6.7 16.6 17.0
Approach LOS A A B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 2 2
Queue Length 95th (ft) #317 197 28 30
Base Capacity (vph) 1372 1462 208 201

TPD Page 21
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 22
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.22 0.13 0.15
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Actuated Cycle Length: 52
Natural Cycle: 80
Intersection Signal Delay: 8.1 Intersection LOS: A
Splits and Phases: 9: 29th Street & Market Street

TPD Page 23
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 24
Existing Conditions Timing Plan: Weekday Midday P
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1825 0 0 1834 0 0 1762 0 0 1652 0
Flt Permitted 0.994 0.950 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1825 0 0 1834 0 0 1762 0 0 1652 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 4% 0% 0% 3% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 177 0 0 203 3 4 0 0 3 0 49
Future Vol, veh/h 26 177 0 0 203 3 4 0 0 3 0 49
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 3 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 28 190 0 0 218 3 4 0 0 3 0 53

Stage 1 - - - - - - 248 248 - 220 220 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 247 221 - 246 248 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1009 - - 1032 - - 583 522 915 578 496 872
Stage 1 - - - - - - 897 725 - 905 725 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 898 742 - 875 705 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1009 - - 1030 - - 533 505 913 564 480 871
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 533 505 - 564 480 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 867 701 - 877 725 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 843 742 - 848 682 -
HCM LOS B A
Capacity (veh/h) 533 1009 - - 1030 - - 844
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 0.028 - - - - - 0.066
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.2

TPD Page 2
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1809 1562 1588 1598 0 1566 3200 0 1458 3257 1472
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1675 1809 1536 1574 1598 0 1566 3200 0 1449 3257 1472
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 3 3 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 2% 1% 10% 2% 1%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 13.5 17.0 17.0 13.5 43.5 13.5 43.5 24.0
Total Split (%) 17.1% 17.1% 9.6% 12.1% 12.1% 9.6% 31.1% 9.6% 31.1% 17.1%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 19.4 19.4 27.0 12.1 12.1 8.2 50.5 8.2 38.8 63.8
v/c Ratio 0.94 0.46 0.45 0.85 0.70 1.28 0.67 0.13 0.84 0.22
Control Delay 82.5 47.2 27.0 84.5 67.9 213.6 27.4 54.8 39.9 3.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 82.5 47.2 27.0 84.5 67.9 213.6 27.4 54.8 39.9 3.1
LOS F D C F E F C D D A
Approach Delay 58.0 77.0 51.4 33.6
Approach LOS E E D C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 176 84 59 94 77 ~115 222 9 283 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) #515 210 137 #307 #248 #350 #725 38 #687 50

TPD Page 3
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 30%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 4
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.94 0.46 0.45 0.85 0.70 1.28 0.67 0.13 0.84 0.22
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 5
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 6

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1860 0 0 1853 1745 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1860 0 0 1853 1745 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 10% 2% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 7
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 189 3 10 239 9 7
Future Vol, veh/h 189 3 10 239 9 7
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 239 4 13 303 11 9

Stage 1 - - - - 241 -
Stage 2 - - - - 330 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.4 - 6.2 6.1
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.1 - 3 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 956 - 564 855
Stage 1 - - - - 935 -
Stage 2 - - - - 852 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 956 - 554 855
Stage 1 - - - - 935 -
Stage 2 - - - - 838 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 - - 0.013 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -

TPD Page 8
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1861 0 0 1859 0 0 1696 0 0 1683 0
Flt Permitted 0.992 0.995 0.978 0.998
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1861 0 0 1859 0 0 1696 0 0 1683 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 17% 0% 0% 50% 7% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.6
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 153 7 18 179 5 12 10 5 2 29 44
Future Vol, veh/h 31 153 7 18 179 5 12 10 5 2 29 44
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 50 7 0
Mvmt Flow 39 191 9 23 224 6 15 13 6 3 36 55
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 9.5 9.7 8.8 9.6
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 44% 16% 9% 3%
Vol Thru, % 37% 80% 89% 39%
Vol Right, % 19% 4% 2% 59%
LT Vol 12 31 18 2
RT Vol 5 7 5 44
Degree of Util (X) 0.051 0.301 0.317 0.145
Cap 656 790 793 642
Service Time 3.489 2.583 2.561 3.615
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 0.303 0.318 0.146
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 1.3 1.4 0.5

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1818 0 0 1900 0 0 1890 0 0 1885 0
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1818 0 0 1900 0 0 1890 0 0 1885 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 15 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 15 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 16 1

Stage 1 17 17 - 27 27 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 27 27 - 17 17 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1134 862 1139 1121 852 1121 1184 - - 1175 - -
Stage 1 1180 889 - 1159 877 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1168 883 - 1174 885 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1134 862 1139 1121 852 1121 1184 - - 1175 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1134 862 - 1121 852 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1180 889 - 1159 877 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1168 883 - 1174 885 - - - - - - -
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 0
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1184 - - - - 1175 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - 0 - -

TPD Page 12
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1831 0 0 1650 0 0 1644 0 0 1613 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1831 0 0 1650 0 0 1644 0 0 1613 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 13
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 8 1 1 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 8 1 1 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 3 14 2 2 9 0 0 0 5 0 0 2

Stage 1 - - - - - - 23 23 - 13 13 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 15 13 - 24 24 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1183 - - 1131 860 1136 1140 865 1147
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1165 880 - 1183 891 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1177 889 - 1168 883 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1181 - - 1122 854 1134 1131 859 1146
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1122 854 - 1131 859 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1159 876 - 1179 889 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1172 887 - 1159 879 -
HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 1.3 8.2 8.1
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1134 1192 - - 1181 - - 1146
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.003 - - 0.001 - - 0.002
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 8 0 - 8.1 0 - 8.1
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1771 1939 1632 0 1726 0 1702 3297 0 1727 3366 0
Flt Permitted 0.706 0.765 0.084 0.248
Satd. Flow (perm) 1314 1939 1632 0 1368 0 150 3297 0 451 3366 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% 6% 0% 2% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 24.0 24.2 24.2 24.0 66.4 11.4 53.8
Total Split (%) 17.3% 17.3% 17.1% 17.3% 17.3% 17.1% 47.4% 8.1% 38.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 15.4 15.4 38.9 15.4 74.0 72.3 55.6 49.5
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.11 0.38 0.59 0.84 0.51 0.03 0.83
Control Delay 60.9 44.0 3.7 57.3 46.8 13.8 12.0 32.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 60.9 44.0 3.7 57.3 46.8 13.8 12.0 32.2
LOS E D A E D B B C
Approach Delay 21.7 57.3 21.0 32.1
Approach LOS C E C C
Queue Length 95th (ft) #196 57 39 #175 #477 563 14 #862

TPD Page 15
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 27%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 16
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.09 0.38 0.47 0.84 0.51 0.03 0.83
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 17
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 18
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1660 0 0 1676 0 0 1680 0 0 1594 0
Flt Permitted 0.999 0.996 0.988 0.994
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1660 0 0 1676 0 0 1680 0 0 1594 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 19
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 391 16 31 380 7 9 8 20 6 25 21
Future Vol, veh/h 7 391 16 31 380 7 9 8 20 6 25 21
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 4 0
Mvmt Flow 8 425 17 34 413 8 10 9 22 7 27 23

Stage 1 - - - - - - 451 451 - 486 486 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 511 490 - 468 459 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.61 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.14 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3.1 4 3.1 3 4.036 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 860 - - 845 - - 224 239 640 295 289 688
Stage 1 - - - - - - 612 546 - 676 578 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 562 523 - 691 593 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 859 - - 844 - - 190 223 638 262 270 687
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 190 223 - 262 270 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 604 539 - 667 547 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 489 495 - 647 585 -
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.7 17.7 17
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 323 859 - - 844 - - 356
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.125 0.009 - - 0.04 - - 0.159
HCM Control Delay (s) 17.7 9.2 0 - 9.4 0 - 17
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.6

TPD Page 20
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1593 0 0 1774 0 0 1531 0 0 1433 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1589 0 0 1738 0 0 1541 0 0 1446 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 46.5 46.5 6.9 6.9
v/c Ratio 0.32 0.30 0.10 0.10
Control Delay 7.7 7.2 20.3 3.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 7.7 7.2 20.3 3.1
LOS A A C A
Approach LOS A A C A

TPD Page 21
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 22
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.30 0.10 0.10
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 23
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 24
Existing Conditions Timing Plan: P.M. Peak Hour
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1875 0 0 1900 0 0 1704 0 0 1648 0
Flt Permitted 0.996 0.971 0.999
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1875 0 0 1900 0 0 1704 0 0 1648 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 218 0 0 304 1 3 0 2 1 0 42
Future Vol, veh/h 21 218 0 0 304 1 3 0 2 1 0 42
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 23 240 0 0 334 1 3 0 2 1 0 46

Stage 1 - - - - - - 286 286 - 336 336 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 359 336 - 287 286 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 921 - - 994 - - 467 434 862 450 405 749
Stage 1 - - - - - - 858 701 - 779 645 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 786 670 - 830 679 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 920 - - 994 - - 428 421 862 438 393 748
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 428 421 - 438 393 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 833 681 - 756 644 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 737 669 - 804 659 -
HCM LOS B B
Capacity (veh/h) 536 920 - - 994 - - 736
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 0.025 - - - - - 0.064
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 9 0 - 0 - - 10.2
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.2

TPD Page 2
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1702 1809 1640 1604 1663 0 1612 3203 0 1407 3290 1457
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1698 1809 1618 1600 1663 0 1612 3203 0 1403 3290 1457
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 2% 2% 14% 1% 2%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 15.0 20.0 20.0 15.0 52.5 13.5 51.0 22.0
Total Split (%) 14.7% 14.7% 10.0% 13.3% 13.3% 10.0% 35.0% 9.0% 34.0% 14.7%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.3 17.3 26.5 15.2 15.2 9.7 59.5 8.1 46.3 69.2
v/c Ratio 1.00 0.64 0.62 0.93 0.71 1.34 0.80 0.07 0.97 0.27
Control Delay 105.8 60.2 34.7 98.4 68.4 234.4 30.3 59.4 53.4 5.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 105.8 60.2 34.7 98.4 68.4 234.4 30.3 59.4 53.4 5.6
LOS F E C F E F C E D A
Approach Delay 68.9 85.2 54.6 45.5
Approach LOS E F D D
Queue Length 95th (ft) #496 #295 #241 #400 #295 #418 #1011 24 #961 100

TPD Page 3
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 28%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 4
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.00 0.64 0.62 0.93 0.71 1.34 0.80 0.07 0.97 0.27
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150
Intersection Signal Delay: 56.1 Intersection LOS: E

TPD Page 5
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 6

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1870 0 0 1894 1665 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1870 0 0 1894 1665 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 175 24 17 251 13 26
Future Vol, veh/h 175 24 17 251 13 26
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 190 26 18 273 14 28

Stage 1 - - - - 204 -
Stage 2 - - - - 311 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.14
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1012 - 608 894
Stage 1 - - - - 972 -
Stage 2 - - - - 869 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1011 - 593 893
Stage 1 - - - - 971 -
Stage 2 - - - - 849 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 10
HCM LOS B

Capacity (veh/h) 764 - - 1011 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 - - 0.018 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10 - - 8.6 0
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 8
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1856 0 0 1837 0 0 1784 0 0 1752 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.995 0.994 0.996
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1856 0 0 1837 0 0 1784 0 0 1752 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 7 7 4 3 7 7 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 9% 1% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 53 146 4 23 191 10 4 19 7 7 31 53
Future Vol, veh/h 53 146 4 23 191 10 4 19 7 7 31 53
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 9 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 56 154 4 24 201 11 4 20 7 7 33 56
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 13% 26% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, % 63% 72% 85% 34%
Vol Right, % 23% 2% 4% 58%
LT Vol 4 53 23 7
RT Vol 7 4 10 53
Degree of Util (X) 0.043 0.268 0.3 0.123
Cap 723 797 783 772
Service Time 2.986 2.535 2.613 2.67
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 0.269 0.301 0.124
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1.1 1.3 0.4

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1818 0 0 1805 0 0 1831 0 0 1894 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1818 0 0 1805 0 0 1831 0 0 1894 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 38 1 0 38 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 38 1 0 38 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 46 1 0 46 1

Stage 1 50 50 - 47 47 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 47 47 - 47 50 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1060 819 1096 1036 797 1093 1154 - - 1157 - -
Stage 1 1141 869 - 1130 860 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1145 871 - 1130 857 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1058 817 1093 1036 795 1093 1151 - - 1157 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1058 817 - 1036 795 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1139 867 - 1130 860 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1145 871 - 1130 855 - - - - - - -
HCM Control Delay, s 0 8.5 0 0
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1151 - - - 1036 1157 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.001 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 8.5 0 - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 0 - -

TPD Page 12
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1641 0 0 1859 0 0 1650 0 0 1771 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.959 0.998 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1641 0 0 1859 0 0 1650 0 0 1771 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 7 5 15 2 0 1 0 22 1 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 7 5 15 2 0 1 0 22 1 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 9 6 19 3 0 1 0 28 1 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 15 15 - 42 42 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 41 42 - 28 18 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1196 - - 1185 - - 1100 838 1142 1089 843 1156
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1177 887 - 1145 870 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1139 864 - 1163 887 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1195 - - 1184 - - 1085 822 1141 1048 827 1155
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1085 822 - 1048 827 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1175 885 - 1143 855 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1121 849 - 1133 885 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1138 1195 - - 1184 - - 1048
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.001 - - 0.016 - - 0.001
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1738 1939 1540 0 1694 0 1719 3396 0 1727 3410 0
Flt Permitted 0.753 0.748 0.053 0.136
Satd. Flow (perm) 1372 1939 1540 0 1320 0 96 3396 0 247 3410 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 0% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 19.0 24.2 24.2 19.0 76.4 11.4 68.8
Total Split (%) 16.1% 16.1% 12.7% 16.1% 16.1% 12.7% 50.9% 7.6% 45.9%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 17.7 17.7 35.9 17.7 83.7 81.9 70.5 64.4
v/c Ratio 0.35 0.06 0.42 0.71 0.93 0.63 0.03 0.94
Control Delay 53.5 48.4 4.9 68.6 75.9 15.6 10.9 37.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 53.5 48.4 4.9 68.6 75.9 15.6 10.9 37.2
LOS D D A E E B B D
Approach Delay 16.5 68.6 24.0 37.1
Approach LOS B E C D
Queue Length 95th (ft) 119 42 47 #260 #422 #816 11 #1238

TPD Page 15
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 25%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 16
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.06 0.42 0.65 0.93 0.63 0.03 0.94
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.8% ICU Level of Service F

TPD Page 17
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 18
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1677 0 0 1672 0 0 1714 0 0 1628 0
Flt Permitted 0.998 0.995 0.998 0.990
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1677 0 0 1672 0 0 1714 0 0 1628 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 19
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 385 9 49 415 13 2 14 30 8 16 13
Future Vol, veh/h 17 385 9 49 415 13 2 14 30 8 16 13
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 18 401 9 51 432 14 2 15 31 8 17 14

Stage 1 - - - - - - 443 443 - 545 545 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 557 552 - 465 447 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 841 - - 867 - - 220 221 668 271 277 668
Stage 1 - - - - - - 645 551 - 630 554 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 549 487 - 693 606 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 838 - - 866 - - 188 197 667 224 247 665
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 188 197 - 224 247 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 626 535 - 610 509 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 480 447 - 625 588 -
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 363 838 - - 866 - - 308
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.132 0.021 - - 0.059 - - 0.125
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.4 9.4 0 - 9.4 0 - 18.4
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.1 - - 0.2 - - 0.4

TPD Page 20
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1607 0 0 1770 0 0 1451 0 0 1502 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1601 0 0 1692 0 0 1451 0 0 1523 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 2 2 4 1 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA NA Perm NA
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 47.3 47.3 6.8 6.8
v/c Ratio 0.32 0.35 0.07 0.12
Control Delay 7.8 8.2 18.8 21.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 7.8 8.2 18.8 21.5
LOS A A B C
Approach LOS A A B C
Queue Length 95th (ft) 298 #382 19 30

TPD Page 21
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 22
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.35 0.07 0.12
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80
Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service C

TPD Page 23
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 24
Existing Conditions Timing Plan: Saturday Midday
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1898 0 0 1888 0 0 1687 0 0 1644 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1898 0 0 1888 0 0 1687 0 0 1644 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 1 2 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 169 0 0 243 3 2 0 2 0 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 4 169 0 0 243 3 2 0 2 0 0 10
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 5 199 0 0 286 4 2 0 2 0 0 12

Stage 1 - - - - - - 210 210 - 290 290 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 295 292 - 210 210 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 954 - - 1026 - - 574 502 906 547 476 795
Stage 1 - - - - - - 938 749 - 826 676 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 848 697 - 916 732 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 952 - - 1025 - - 562 497 905 542 472 793
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 562 497 - 542 472 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 931 744 - 819 675 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 835 696 - 908 727 -
HCM LOS B A
Capacity (veh/h) 693 952 - - 1025 - - 793
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.005 - - - - - 0.015
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 2
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 1809 1640 1604 1664 0 1628 3239 0 1604 3290 1457
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 1809 1615 1594 1664 0 1628 3239 0 1604 3290 1457
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 20.0 20.0 13.5 16.0 16.0 13.5 38.5 13.5 38.5 20.0
Total Split (%) 15.4% 15.4% 10.4% 12.3% 12.3% 10.4% 29.6% 10.4% 29.6% 15.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 15.4 15.4 23.1 11.2 11.2 8.2 45.6 8.2 33.8 54.8
v/c Ratio 0.97 0.45 0.41 0.89 0.49 1.10 0.64 0.10 0.89 0.20
Control Delay 89.1 45.7 24.4 86.2 52.9 148.5 25.1 48.9 41.9 3.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 89.1 45.7 24.4 86.2 52.9 148.5 25.1 48.9 41.9 3.7
LOS F D C F D F C D D A
Approach Delay 60.2 74.0 41.7 36.3
Approach LOS E E D D

TPD Page 3
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 32%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 4
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.97 0.45 0.41 0.89 0.49 1.10 0.64 0.10 0.89 0.20
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 5
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 6

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1887 0 0 1878 1723 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1887 0 0 1878 1723 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 7
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Future Vol, veh/h 150 9 9 203 6 9
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 174 10 10 236 7 10

Stage 1 - - - - 185 -
Stage 2 - - - - 256 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1034 - 671 918
Stage 1 - - - - 991 -
Stage 2 - - - - 921 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1028 - 660 913
Stage 1 - - - - 985 -
Stage 2 - - - - 911 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 792 - - 1028 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -

TPD Page 8
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1853 0 0 1881 0 0 1817 0 0 1699 0
Flt Permitted 0.993 0.998 0.985
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1853 0 0 1881 0 0 1817 0 0 1699 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 8 8 1 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 125 11 8 167 4 5 8 4 0 17 36
Future Vol, veh/h 21 125 11 8 167 4 5 8 4 0 17 36
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Mvmt Flow 24 142 13 9 190 5 6 9 5 0 19 41
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 29% 13% 4% 0%
Vol Thru, % 47% 80% 93% 32%
Vol Right, % 24% 7% 2% 68%
LT Vol 5 21 8 0
RT Vol 4 11 4 36
Degree of Util (X) 0.025 0.212 0.236 0.073
Cap 760 844 846 826
Service Time 2.739 2.282 2.272 2.36
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.211 0.24 0.073
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.8 0.9 0.2

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1818 0 0 1805 0 0 1890 0 0 1900 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1818 0 0 1805 0 0 1890 0 0 1900 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 7 3 3 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 0 0 18 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 0 0 18 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24 0 0 23 0

Stage 1 30 30 - 27 27 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 26 27 - 25 30 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1117 851 1119 1107 838 1119 1172 - - 1175 - -
Stage 1 1165 881 - 1159 877 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1169 883 - 1162 874 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1109 843 1111 1101 830 1114 1165 - - 1172 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1109 843 - 1101 830 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1158 876 - 1156 874 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1167 880 - 1160 869 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1165 - - - 1101 1172 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 0 - -

TPD Page 12
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1872 0 0 1867 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Flt Permitted 0.990
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1872 0 0 1867 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 13
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 8 0 2 6 2 0 0 2 0 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 8 8 - 11 11 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 11 12 - 9 8 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - 1193 - - 1165 878 1149 1167 882 1152
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1188 893 - 1185 892 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1188 894 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - 1193 - - 1163 876 1149 1163 880 1152
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1163 876 - 1163 880 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1188 893 - 1185 890 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1181 888 - 1186 894 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1149 1193 - - 1193 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.002 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - -

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1806 1939 1632 0 1716 0 1719 3399 0 1727 3388 0
Flt Permitted 0.729 0.759 0.094 0.273
Satd. Flow (perm) 1378 1939 1632 0 1354 0 170 3399 0 496 3388 0
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 343 1 6
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 22.0 24.2 24.2 22.0 56.4 11.4 45.8
Total Split (%) 18.6% 18.6% 16.9% 18.6% 18.6% 16.9% 43.4% 8.8% 35.2%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 13.8 13.8 35.4 13.8 64.2 62.6 47.7 41.6
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.42 0.58 0.82 0.46 0.02 0.82
Control Delay 52.8 39.4 3.5 52.9 40.9 13.5 12.7 31.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.8 39.4 3.5 52.9 40.9 13.5 12.7 31.0
LOS D D A D D B B C
Approach Delay 17.0 52.9 20.0 30.9
Approach LOS B D B C
Queue Length 95th (ft) 162 36 37 158 #460 491 10 #788

TPD Page 15
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 29%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 16
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.04 0.42 0.41 0.82 0.46 0.02 0.82
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 17
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 18
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1678 0 0 1676 0 0 1633 0 0 1623 0
Flt Permitted 0.999 0.996 0.992 0.986
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1678 0 0 1676 0 0 1633 0 0 1623 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 4 4 3 4 2 2 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 19
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 430 8 31 396 6 6 4 26 11 15 14
Future Vol, veh/h 7 430 8 31 396 6 6 4 26 11 15 14
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 7 457 9 33 421 6 6 4 28 12 16 15

Stage 1 - - - - - - 480 480 - 493 493 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 510 496 - 494 484 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.44 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3.1 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 854 - - 827 - - 219 227 611 280 282 678
Stage 1 - - - - - - 596 529 - 670 581 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 571 519 - 670 586 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 852 - - 824 - - 193 211 608 249 262 673
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 193 211 - 249 262 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 587 521 - 661 548 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 511 490 - 626 577 -
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 388 852 - - 824 - - 327
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.009 - - 0.04 - - 0.13
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.4

TPD Page 20
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1609 0 0 1773 0 0 1464 0 0 1486 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1599 0 0 1743 0 0 1476 0 0 1503 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 6% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 48.0 48.0 6.7 6.7
v/c Ratio 0.35 0.30 0.09 0.07
Control Delay 8.5 7.3 18.5 20.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.5 7.3 18.5 20.5
LOS A A B C

TPD Page 21
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 22
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.30 0.09 0.07
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 23
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 24
2020 Base (No-Build) Conditions
Base 2020 Conditions Timing Plan: A.M. Peak Hour
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1860 0 0 1861 0 0 1855 0 0 1670 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1860 0 0 1861 0 0 1855 0 0 1670 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other
WMSC.00002 01/08/2019 Base 2020 Conditions Synchro 10 Report

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 74 209 2 0 228 2 0 1 0 2 0 10
Future Volume (Veh/h) 74 209 2 0 228 2 0 1 0 2 0 10
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Hourly flow rate (vph) 79 222 2 0 243 2 0 1 0 2 0 11
Pedestrians 1 3
Lane Width (ft) 11.0 12.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 325
pX, platoon unblocked 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
vC, conflicting volume 248 225 637 630 224 628 630 247
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 248 103 554 547 102 545 547 247
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 94 100 100 100 100 99 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1326 1369 382 383 874 391 383 794
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 303 245 1 13
Volume Left 79 0 0 2
Volume Right 2 2 0 11
cSH 1326 1369 383 686
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02
Control Delay (s) 2.5 0.0 14.4 10.4
Lane LOS A B B
Approach Delay (s) 2.5 0.0 14.4 10.4
Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 1.6

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 74 209 2 0 228 2 0 1 0 2 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 74 209 2 0 228 2 0 1 0 2 0 10
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 79 222 2 0 243 2 0 1 0 2 0 11

Stage 1 - - - - - - 382 382 - 247 247 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 250 248 - 382 383 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 988 - - 1006 - - 476 430 879 446 401 842
Stage 1 - - - - - - 765 643 - 874 706 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 895 725 - 733 616 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 985 - - 1005 - - 436 389 878 413 363 840
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 436 389 - 413 363 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 694 583 - 791 704 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 884 723 - 664 559 -
HCM LOS B B
Capacity (veh/h) 389 985 - - 1005 - - 717
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.08 - - - - - 0.018
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.3 - - 0 - - 0.1

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1809 1562 1588 1609 0 1566 3189 0 1458 3257 1472
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1674 1809 1541 1583 1609 0 1566 3189 0 1458 3257 1472
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 2% 1% 10% 2% 1%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 13.6 16.0 16.0 13.6 55.5 13.5 55.4 23.0
Total Split (%) 15.3% 15.3% 9.1% 10.7% 10.7% 9.1% 37.0% 9.0% 36.9% 15.3%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 26.1 11.1 11.1 8.3 61.7 8.1 49.9 73.9
v/c Ratio 1.25 0.62 0.37 0.74 0.82 1.16 0.95 0.11 0.78 0.24
Control Delay 179.5 57.9 27.7 80.0 89.3 182.1 38.9 59.7 34.3 3.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 179.5 57.9 27.7 80.0 89.3 182.1 38.9 59.7 34.3 3.2
LOS F E C E F F D E C A
Approach Delay 115.2 84.9 49.5 28.9
Approach LOS F F D C
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~277 115 53 76 86 ~101 458 7 312 5

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 28%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.25 0.62 0.37 0.74 0.82 1.16 0.95 0.11 0.76 0.24
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1836 0 0 1875 1714 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1836 0 0 1875 1714 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 206 38 17 194 10 18
Future Volume (Veh/h) 206 38 17 194 10 18
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Hourly flow rate (vph) 231 43 19 218 11 20
Pedestrians 7
Lane Width (ft) 12.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5
Percent Blockage 1
Median storage veh)
pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96
vC, conflicting volume 281 516 260
vCu, unblocked vol 229 474 207
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 98 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1287 519 799
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 274 237 31
Volume Left 0 19 11
Volume Right 43 0 20
cSH 1700 1287 671
Volume to Capacity 0.16 0.01 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 4
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.8 10.6
Lane LOS A B
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.8 10.6
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.9

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 206 38 17 194 10 18
Future Vol, veh/h 206 38 17 194 10 18
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 231 43 19 218 11 20

Stage 1 - - - - 260 -
Stage 2 - - - - 256 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 962 - 607 834
Stage 1 - - - - 917 -
Stage 2 - - - - 921 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 956 - 589 828
Stage 1 - - - - 911 -
Stage 2 - - - - 900 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1817 0 0 1862 0 0 1801 0 0 1766 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.993 0.980 0.989
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1817 0 0 1862 0 0 1801 0 0 1766 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 1 1 16 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 5% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 3% 2%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Volume Total (vph) 253 218 49 214
Volume Left (vph) 66 31 20 46
Volume Right (vph) 26 13 5 73
Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.01 0.06 -0.13
Departure Headway (s) 4.9 5.0 5.5 5.0
Degree Utilization, x 0.35 0.30 0.07 0.30
Capacity (veh/h) 688 682 569 657
Control Delay (s) 10.5 10.1 9.0 10.2
Approach Delay (s) 10.5 10.1 9.0 10.2
Approach LOS B B A B
Delay 10.2
Level of Service B

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS B
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 53 129 21 25 139 10 16 19 4 37 76 58
Future Vol, veh/h 53 129 21 25 139 10 16 19 4 37 76 58
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 2
Mvmt Flow 66 161 26 31 174 13 20 24 5 46 95 73
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 10.4 10 9 10.1
HCM LOS B A A B

Vol Left, % 41% 26% 14% 22%
Vol Thru, % 49% 64% 80% 44%
Vol Right, % 10% 10% 6% 34%
LT Vol 16 53 25 37
RT Vol 4 21 10 58
Degree of Util (X) 0.075 0.34 0.294 0.292
Cap 649 741 731 722
Service Time 3.55 2.892 2.943 3.002
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 0.343 0.298 0.296
HCM Control Delay 9 10.4 10 10.1
HCM Lane LOS A B A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 1.5 1.2 1.2

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1644 0 0 1890 0 0 1863 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1644 0 0 1890 0 0 1863 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Pedestrians 2 3
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 882 790 997 882 789 1046 1541 1590
Volume Left 1 0 0 0
cSH 882 1046 1541 1590
Control Delay (s) 9.1 8.4 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 9.1 8.4 0.0 0.0
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.2

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 54 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 54 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 0 0 68 0

Stage 1 70 70 - 31 31 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 29 31 - 68 70 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1057 815 1071 1028 793 1116 1136 - - 1171 - -
Stage 1 1119 857 - 1153 873 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1166 881 - 1100 841 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1054 811 1069 1025 789 1113 1134 - - 1168 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1054 811 - 1025 789 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1117 855 - 1150 870 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1165 878 - 1100 839 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1134 - - 1054 1113 1168 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.001 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1872 0 0 1873 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Flt Permitted 0.991
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1872 0 0 1873 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1624 1621 993 872 1076 988 873 1080
Volume Left 0 2 0 0
cSH 1624 1621 1076 1700
Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 8.4 0.0
Lane LOS A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 1.3

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 11 0 2 7 2 0 0 2 0 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 11 11 - 12 12 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 12 13 - 12 11 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1190 - - 1158 873 1145 1161 878 1150
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1184 891 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1182 889 - 1184 892 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1190 - - 1156 871 1145 1158 876 1150
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1156 871 - 1158 876 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1184 889 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1180 887 - 1182 892 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1145 1192 - - 1190 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.002 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - -

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1406 1939 1600 0 1702 0 1719 3366 0 1727 3384 0
Flt Permitted 0.770 0.742 0.105 0.075
Satd. Flow (perm) 1140 1939 1600 0 1320 0 190 3366 0 136 3384 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 31% 0% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 16.2 24.2 24.2 16.2 76.4 11.4 71.6
Total Split (%) 16.1% 16.1% 10.8% 16.1% 16.1% 10.8% 50.9% 7.6% 47.7%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 14.7 14.7 30.1 14.7 77.1 73.4 67.1 60.9
v/c Ratio 0.11 0.03 0.15 0.60 0.51 0.76 0.13 0.72
Control Delay 49.4 48.4 6.8 61.8 16.8 19.1 11.0 23.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 49.4 48.4 6.8 61.8 16.8 19.1 11.0 23.1
LOS D D A E B B B C
Approach Delay 17.8 61.8 18.9 22.9

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 25%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.03 0.15 0.45 0.50 0.76 0.13 0.64
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1633 0 0 1634 0 0 1679 0 0 1667 0
Flt Permitted 0.989 0.996 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1633 0 0 1634 0 0 1679 0 0 1667 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 3 1 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 9% 2% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Pedestrians 3 1 1
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 0 0 0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 94 95 95 88 96 73 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1321 1144 200 300 650 218 296 788
Volume Total 414 326 100 115
cSH 1321 1144 476 337
Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.3 14.6 21.1
Lane LOS A A B C
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 2.3 14.6 21.1
Approach LOS B C
Average Delay 4.9

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 350 22 63 227 4 8 13 69 7 72 24
Future Vol, veh/h 1 350 22 63 227 4 8 13 69 7 72 24
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 9 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 389 24 70 252 4 9 14 77 8 80 27

Stage 1 - - - - - - 404 404 - 394 394 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 451 396 - 450 416 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 981 - - 865 - - 283 293 671 347 346 844
Stage 1 - - - - - - 681 576 - 754 636 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 638 581 - 706 623 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 981 - - 864 - - 203 265 670 273 312 842
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 203 265 - 273 312 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 680 575 - 753 576 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 480 526 - 608 622 -
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 14.7 19.5
HCM LOS B C
Capacity (veh/h) 470 981 - - 864 - - 362
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.213 0.001 - - 0.081 - - 0.316
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0 - - 0.3 - - 1.3

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1567 0 0 1743 0 0 1435 0 0 1384 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1564 0 0 1666 0 0 1444 0 0 1389 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 1 1 4 1 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 3% 9% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 45.6 45.6 6.9 6.9
v/c Ratio 0.33 0.23 0.13 0.15
Control Delay 8.2 6.7 16.6 17.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.2 6.7 16.6 17.0
LOS A A B B

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.23 0.13 0.15
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Base 2020 Conditions Timing Plan: Weekday Midday P
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1825 0 0 1834 0 0 1762 0 0 1652 0
Flt Permitted 0.994 0.950 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1825 0 0 1834 0 0 1762 0 0 1652 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 4% 0% 0% 3% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Pedestrians 1 2
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 100 99 100 100 99 100 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 1356 1401 441 493 897 520 494 819
cSH 1356 1401 441 795
Control Delay (s) 1.1 0.0 13.2 9.9
Lane LOS A B A
Approach LOS B A
Average Delay 1.7

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 180 0 0 206 3 4 0 0 3 0 50
Future Vol, veh/h 26 180 0 0 206 3 4 0 0 3 0 50
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 3 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 28 194 0 0 222 3 4 0 0 3 0 54

Stage 1 - - - - - - 252 252 - 224 224 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 252 225 - 250 252 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1006 - - 1029 - - 575 517 910 570 491 867
Stage 1 - - - - - - 893 722 - 900 722 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 893 740 - 870 702 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1006 - - 1027 - - 525 500 908 556 475 866
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 525 500 - 556 475 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 864 698 - 872 722 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 837 740 - 843 679 -
HCM LOS B A
Capacity (veh/h) 525 1006 - - 1027 - - 840
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 0.028 - - - - - 0.068
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.2

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1809 1562 1588 1599 0 1566 3200 0 1458 3257 1472
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1675 1809 1537 1573 1599 0 1566 3200 0 1451 3257 1472
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 3 3 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 2% 1% 10% 2% 1%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 18.0 16.0 16.0 18.0 44.0 15.0 41.0 23.0
Total Split (%) 16.4% 16.4% 12.9% 11.4% 11.4% 12.9% 31.4% 10.7% 29.3% 16.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 18.4 18.4 30.6 11.1 11.1 12.8 52.3 8.4 36.2 60.2
v/c Ratio 1.01 0.49 0.40 0.94 0.78 0.82 0.68 0.13 0.92 0.24
Control Delay 99.3 49.0 21.5 104.2 77.7 79.8 26.5 53.9 48.9 4.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 99.3 49.0 21.5 104.2 77.7 79.8 26.5 53.9 48.9 4.1
LOS F D C F E E C D D A
Approach Delay 64.7 92.2 33.2 41.1
Approach LOS E F C D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 182 87 56 97 79 94 225 9 308 5

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 30%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.01 0.49 0.40 0.94 0.78 0.82 0.68 0.11 0.92 0.24
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1860 0 0 1853 1745 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1860 0 0 1853 1745 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 10% 2% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 1
Percent Blockage 0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.2 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.3 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 13 11
Volume Right 4 0 9
cSH 1700 1280 592
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.6

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Future Vol, veh/h 192 3 10 243 9 7
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 243 4 13 308 11 9

Stage 1 - - - - 245 -
Stage 2 - - - - 335 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.4 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 953 - 557 850
Stage 1 - - - - 931 -
Stage 2 - - - - 848 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 953 - 548 850
Stage 1 - - - - 931 -
Stage 2 - - - - 834 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 - - 0.013 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1860 0 0 1861 0 0 1696 0 0 1682 0
Flt Permitted 0.992 0.996 0.978 0.998
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1860 0 0 1861 0 0 1696 0 0 1682 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 17% 0% 0% 50% 7% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Hadj (s) 0.02 0.02 0.11 -0.28
Capacity (veh/h) 763 761 605 669
Control Delay (s) 9.5 9.7 8.6 8.5
Approach LOS A A A A
Delay 9.4
Level of Service A

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 155 7 18 182 5 12 10 5 2 29 45
Future Vol, veh/h 31 155 7 18 182 5 12 10 5 2 29 45
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 50 7 0
Mvmt Flow 39 194 9 23 228 6 15 13 6 3 36 56
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 44% 16% 9% 3%
Vol Thru, % 37% 80% 89% 38%
Vol Right, % 19% 4% 2% 59%
LT Vol 12 31 18 2
RT Vol 5 7 5 45
Degree of Util (X) 0.051 0.305 0.323 0.147
Cap 654 786 792 641
Service Time 3.51 2.592 2.568 3.63
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 0.307 0.323 0.148
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 1.3 1.4 0.5

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1818 0 0 1900 0 0 1890 0 0 1885 0
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1818 0 0 1900 0 0 1890 0 0 1885 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 964 852 1068 964 852 1054 1613 1600
Volume Left 0 0 0 0
cSH 1700 1700 1613 1600
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.0

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 15 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 15 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 16 1

Stage 1 17 17 - 27 27 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 27 27 - 17 17 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1134 862 1139 1121 852 1121 1184 - - 1175 - -
Stage 1 1180 889 - 1159 877 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1168 883 - 1174 885 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1134 862 1139 1121 852 1121 1184 - - 1175 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1134 862 - 1121 852 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1180 889 - 1159 877 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1168 883 - 1174 885 - - - - - - -
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 0
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1184 - - - - 1175 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1831 0 0 1650 0 0 1644 0 0 1613 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1831 0 0 1650 0 0 1644 0 0 1613 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Pedestrians 1 2
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1624 1609 962 856 1066 962 855 1076
Volume Left 3 2 0 0
cSH 1624 1609 1066 1076
Control Delay (s) 1.2 1.3 8.4 8.4
Lane LOS A A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 2.6

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 8 1 1 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 8 1 1 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 3 14 2 2 9 0 0 0 5 0 0 2

Stage 1 - - - - - - 23 23 - 13 13 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 15 13 - 24 24 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1183 - - 1131 860 1136 1140 865 1147
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1165 880 - 1183 891 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1177 889 - 1168 883 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1181 - - 1122 854 1134 1131 859 1146
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1122 854 - 1131 859 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1159 876 - 1179 889 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1172 887 - 1159 879 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1134 1192 - - 1181 - - 1146
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.003 - - 0.001 - - 0.002
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1771 1939 1632 0 1726 0 1702 3297 0 1727 3366 0
Flt Permitted 0.706 0.764 0.079 0.243
Satd. Flow (perm) 1314 1939 1632 0 1366 0 141 3297 0 442 3366 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% 6% 0% 2% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 24.0 24.2 24.2 24.0 66.4 11.4 53.8
Total Split (%) 17.3% 17.3% 17.1% 17.3% 17.3% 17.1% 47.4% 8.1% 38.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 15.6 15.6 39.1 15.6 74.0 72.3 55.6 49.5
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.11 0.39 0.59 0.86 0.52 0.03 0.85
Control Delay 61.0 43.9 3.7 57.2 51.4 14.0 12.1 33.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 61.0 43.9 3.7 57.2 51.4 14.0 12.1 33.0
LOS E D A E D B B C
Approach Delay 21.7 57.2 22.2 32.9
Approach LOS C E C C

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 27%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.09 0.39 0.48 0.86 0.52 0.03 0.85
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1660 0 0 1676 0 0 1680 0 0 1594 0
Flt Permitted 0.999 0.996 0.988 0.994
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1660 0 0 1676 0 0 1680 0 0 1594 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Pedestrians 1 3 1 1
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.2 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 97 95 96 96 97 89 96
cM capacity (veh/h) 1135 1120 184 246 615 208 241 651
cSH 1135 1120 324 315
Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.9 17.7 18.9
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.9 17.7 18.9
Approach LOS C C
Average Delay 2.3

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 397 16 31 386 7 9 8 20 6 25 21
Future Vol, veh/h 7 397 16 31 386 7 9 8 20 6 25 21
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 4 0
Mvmt Flow 8 432 17 34 420 8 10 9 22 7 27 23

Stage 1 - - - - - - 458 458 - 493 493 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 518 497 - 475 466 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.61 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.14 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3.1 4 3.1 3 4.036 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 855 - - 841 - - 218 234 634 289 284 682
Stage 1 - - - - - - 606 542 - 670 574 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 556 519 - 685 589 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 854 - - 840 - - 184 218 632 256 265 681
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 184 218 - 256 265 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 598 534 - 661 543 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 483 491 - 640 581 -
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.7 18 17.3
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 316 854 - - 840 - - 350
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.127 0.009 - - 0.04 - - 0.161
HCM Control Delay (s) 18 9.3 0 - 9.5 0 - 17.3
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.6

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1593 0 0 1774 0 0 1531 0 0 1433 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1588 0 0 1738 0 0 1541 0 0 1446 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 46.5 46.5 6.9 6.9
v/c Ratio 0.32 0.30 0.10 0.10
Control Delay 7.9 7.3 20.3 3.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 7.9 7.3 20.3 3.1
LOS A A C A
Approach LOS A A C A

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.30 0.10 0.10
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Base 2020 Conditions Timing Plan: P.M. Peak Hour
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1875 0 0 1900 0 0 1704 0 0 1648 0
Flt Permitted 0.996 0.971 0.999
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1875 0 0 1900 0 0 1704 0 0 1648 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Pedestrians 1 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 100 99 100 100 100 100 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 1227 1347 349 400 851 402 400 703
cSH 1227 1347 457 693
Control Delay (s) 0.8 0.0 13.0 10.6
Lane LOS A B B
Approach Delay (s) 0.8 0.0 13.0 10.6
Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 1.2

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 222 0 0 309 1 3 0 2 1 0 43
Future Vol, veh/h 21 222 0 0 309 1 3 0 2 1 0 43
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 23 244 0 0 340 1 3 0 2 1 0 47

Stage 1 - - - - - - 290 290 - 342 342 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 365 342 - 291 290 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 917 - - 991 - - 460 429 857 443 400 743
Stage 1 - - - - - - 853 698 - 773 642 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 781 666 - 825 676 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 916 - - 991 - - 421 416 857 431 388 742
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 421 416 - 431 388 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 828 678 - 750 641 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 731 665 - 799 656 -
HCM LOS B B
Capacity (veh/h) 529 916 - - 991 - - 730
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 0.025 - - - - - 0.066
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.2

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1702 1809 1640 1604 1663 0 1612 3203 0 1407 3290 1457
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1698 1809 1618 1600 1663 0 1612 3203 0 1403 3290 1457
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 2% 2% 14% 1% 2%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 53.5 13.5 48.0 22.0
Total Split (%) 14.7% 14.7% 12.7% 12.7% 12.7% 12.7% 35.7% 9.0% 32.0% 14.7%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.3 17.3 30.5 14.1 14.1 13.7 60.5 8.1 43.2 66.1
v/c Ratio 1.01 0.65 0.54 1.02 0.77 0.95 0.82 0.07 1.06 0.28
Control Delay 109.4 60.7 28.4 120.4 75.2 106.1 30.3 59.4 80.0 6.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 109.4 60.7 28.4 120.4 75.2 106.1 30.3 59.4 80.0 6.6
LOS F E C F E F C E E A
Approach Delay 68.1 100.5 39.2 67.9
Approach LOS E F D E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 177 114 89 138 105 125 350 5 ~470 22

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 28%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.01 0.65 0.54 1.02 0.77 0.95 0.82 0.07 1.06 0.28
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1870 0 0 1894 1665 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1870 0 0 1894 1665 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Pedestrians 2 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 18 14
cSH 1700 1369 709
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 1.1

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 178 24 17 255 13 26
Future Vol, veh/h 178 24 17 255 13 26
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 193 26 18 277 14 28

Stage 1 - - - - 207 -
Stage 2 - - - - 315 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.14
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1010 - 602 891
Stage 1 - - - - 969 -
Stage 2 - - - - 866 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1009 - 588 890
Stage 1 - - - - 968 -
Stage 2 - - - - 846 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

Capacity (veh/h) 760 - - 1009 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - - 0.018 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1858 0 0 1837 0 0 1784 0 0 1752 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.995 0.994 0.996
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1858 0 0 1837 0 0 1784 0 0 1752 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 7 7 4 3 7 7 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 9% 1% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hadj (s) 0.05 0.02 -0.05 -0.34
Capacity (veh/h) 764 768 640 697
Control Delay (s) 9.2 9.4 8.3 8.3
Delay 9.1
Level of Service A

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 54 148 4 23 194 10 4 19 7 7 31 54
Future Vol, veh/h 54 148 4 23 194 10 4 19 7 7 31 54
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 9 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 57 156 4 24 204 11 4 20 7 7 33 57
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 13% 26% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, % 63% 72% 85% 34%
Vol Right, % 23% 2% 4% 59%
LT Vol 4 54 23 7
RT Vol 7 4 10 54
Degree of Util (X) 0.043 0.272 0.305 0.125
Cap 720 796 784 770
Service Time 3.005 2.544 2.621 2.683
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 0.273 0.305 0.126
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1.1 1.3 0.4

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1818 0 0 1805 0 0 1831 0 0 1894 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1818 0 0 1805 0 0 1831 0 0 1894 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82
Pedestrians 3
Percent Blockage 0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 883 792 1020 889 791 1026 1563 1571
Volume Left 0 1 0 0
cSH 1700 889 1563 1571
Control Delay (s) 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.1

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 39 1 0 39 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 39 1 0 39 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 48 1 0 48 1

Stage 1 52 52 - 49 49 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 49 49 - 49 52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1054 815 1094 1030 793 1090 1152 - - 1155 - -
Stage 1 1139 868 - 1127 858 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1143 870 - 1127 856 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1052 813 1091 1030 791 1090 1149 - - 1155 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1052 813 - 1030 791 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1137 866 - 1127 858 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1143 870 - 1127 854 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1149 - - - 1030 1155 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1641 0 0 1859 0 0 1650 0 0 1771 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.959 0.998 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1641 0 0 1859 0 0 1650 0 0 1771 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 1 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 100 100 97 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1629 1613 935 826 1072 874 823 1084
cSH 1629 1613 1067 874
Control Delay (s) 0.5 6.3 8.5 9.1
Lane LOS A A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 5.9

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 7 5 15 2 0 1 0 22 1 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 7 5 15 2 0 1 0 22 1 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 9 6 19 3 0 1 0 28 1 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 15 15 - 42 42 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 41 42 - 28 18 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1196 - - 1185 - - 1100 838 1142 1089 843 1156
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1177 887 - 1145 870 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1139 864 - 1163 887 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1195 - - 1184 - - 1085 822 1141 1048 827 1155
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1085 822 - 1048 827 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1175 885 - 1143 855 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1121 849 - 1133 885 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1138 1195 - - 1184 - - 1048
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.001 - - 0.016 - - 0.001
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1738 1939 1540 0 1696 0 1719 3399 0 1727 3410 0
Flt Permitted 0.755 0.748 0.053 0.131
Satd. Flow (perm) 1376 1939 1540 0 1321 0 96 3399 0 238 3410 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 0% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 19.0 24.2 24.2 19.0 76.4 11.4 68.8
Total Split (%) 16.1% 16.1% 12.7% 16.1% 16.1% 12.7% 50.9% 7.6% 45.9%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 17.8 17.8 36.0 17.8 83.7 81.9 70.5 64.4
v/c Ratio 0.35 0.06 0.42 0.71 0.95 0.64 0.03 0.96
Control Delay 53.4 48.4 4.9 68.8 79.6 15.8 10.9 39.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 53.4 48.4 4.9 68.8 79.6 15.8 10.9 39.6
LOS D D A E E B B D
Approach Delay 16.4 68.8 24.7 39.4

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 25%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.06 0.42 0.66 0.95 0.64 0.03 0.96
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1677 0 0 1672 0 0 1714 0 0 1628 0
Flt Permitted 0.998 0.995 0.998 0.990
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1677 0 0 1672 0 0 1714 0 0 1628 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Pedestrians 1 4
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 95 99 93 95 95 92 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1102 1152 185 219 643 176 221 634
cSH 1102 1152 377 270
Control Delay (s) 0.5 1.3 15.9 20.6
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.5 1.3 15.9 20.6
Approach LOS C C
Average Delay 2.4

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 391 9 50 422 13 2 14 30 8 16 13
Future Vol, veh/h 17 391 9 50 422 13 2 14 30 8 16 13
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 18 407 9 52 440 14 2 15 31 8 17 14

Stage 1 - - - - - - 449 449 - 555 555 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 562 - 471 453 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 835 - - 863 - - 214 216 662 264 271 661
Stage 1 - - - - - - 639 548 - 622 549 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 541 482 - 688 603 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 832 - - 862 - - 182 192 661 217 241 658
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 182 192 - 217 241 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 620 532 - 602 502 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 471 441 - 620 586 -
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 356 832 - - 862 - - 301
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.135 0.021 - - 0.06 - - 0.128
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.1 - - 0.2 - - 0.4

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1607 0 0 1770 0 0 1451 0 0 1502 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1601 0 0 1690 0 0 1451 0 0 1523 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 2 2 4 1 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA NA Perm NA
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 47.3 47.3 6.8 6.8
v/c Ratio 0.33 0.35 0.07 0.12
Control Delay 7.9 8.4 18.8 21.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 7.9 8.4 18.8 21.5
LOS A A B C
Queue Length 95th (ft) #308 #392 19 30

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.35 0.07 0.12
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80
Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.8% ICU Level of Service C

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Base 2020 Conditions Timing Plan: Saturday Midday
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1898 0 0 1888 0 0 1687 0 0 1644 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1898 0 0 1888 0 0 1687 0 0 1644 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 1 2 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Pedestrians 1 1 2
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 11.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1273 1390 475 476 879 490 477 746
Volume Left 5 0 2 0
cSH 1273 1390 617 746
Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 10.9 9.9
Lane LOS A B A
Approach LOS B A
Average Delay 0.4

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 172 0 0 247 3 2 0 2 0 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 4 172 0 0 247 3 2 0 2 0 0 10
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 5 202 0 0 291 4 2 0 2 0 0 12

Stage 1 - - - - - - 213 213 - 295 295 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 300 297 - 213 213 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 950 - - 1024 - - 568 497 902 540 471 790
Stage 1 - - - - - - 935 747 - 821 673 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 843 694 - 913 730 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 948 - - 1023 - - 556 493 901 535 467 788
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 556 493 - 535 467 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 928 742 - 814 672 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 830 693 - 905 725 -
HCM LOS B A
Capacity (veh/h) 688 948 - - 1023 - - 788
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.005 - - - - - 0.015
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 1809 1640 1604 1664 0 1628 3242 0 1604 3290 1457
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 1809 1616 1594 1664 0 1628 3242 0 1604 3290 1457
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 20.0 20.0 17.0 16.0 16.0 17.0 38.5 13.5 35.0 20.0
Total Split (%) 15.4% 15.4% 13.1% 12.3% 12.3% 13.1% 29.6% 10.4% 26.9% 15.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 15.4 15.4 26.6 11.2 11.2 11.8 45.6 8.2 30.2 51.2
v/c Ratio 0.98 0.45 0.37 0.90 0.50 0.78 0.70 0.10 1.05 0.22
Control Delay 92.5 45.8 19.4 89.2 53.1 69.1 26.2 48.9 74.2 4.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 92.5 45.8 19.4 89.2 53.1 69.1 26.2 48.9 74.2 4.9
LOS F D B F D E C D E A
Approach Delay 60.4 76.0 31.6 63.8
Approach LOS E E C E

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 32%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.98 0.45 0.37 0.90 0.50 0.78 0.70 0.10 1.05 0.22
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1887 0 0 1878 1723 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1887 0 0 1878 1723 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Pedestrians 6
Percent Blockage 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 10 7
cSH 1700 1390 719
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.6

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Future Vol, veh/h 152 9 9 206 6 9
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 177 10 10 240 7 10

Stage 1 - - - - 188 -
Stage 2 - - - - 260 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1032 - 665 915
Stage 1 - - - - 988 -
Stage 2 - - - - 917 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1026 - 654 910
Stage 1 - - - - 982 -
Stage 2 - - - - 907 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 787 - - 1026 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1853 0 0 1881 0 0 1817 0 0 1697 0
Flt Permitted 0.993 0.998 0.985
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1853 0 0 1881 0 0 1817 0 0 1697 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 8 8 1 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Hadj (s) 0.00 -0.01 -0.09 -0.38
Capacity (veh/h) 812 812 691 742
Control Delay (s) 8.5 8.7 7.9 7.8
Delay 8.4
Level of Service A

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 127 11 8 170 4 5 8 4 0 17 37
Future Vol, veh/h 21 127 11 8 170 4 5 8 4 0 17 37
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Mvmt Flow 24 144 13 9 193 5 6 9 5 0 19 42
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 29% 13% 4% 0%
Vol Thru, % 47% 80% 93% 31%
Vol Right, % 24% 7% 2% 69%
LT Vol 5 21 8 0
RT Vol 4 11 4 37
Degree of Util (X) 0.025 0.215 0.24 0.074
Cap 758 842 844 825
Service Time 2.753 2.288 2.277 2.369
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.215 0.245 0.074
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.8 0.9 0.2

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1818 0 0 1805 0 0 1890 0 0 1900 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1818 0 0 1805 0 0 1890 0 0 1900 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 7 3 3 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 7 3 2 2
Lane Width (ft) 10.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 933 831 1040 941 831 1047 1587 1595
Volume Left 0 1 0 0
cSH 1700 941 1587 1595
Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.2

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 0 0 18 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 0 0 18 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24 0 0 23 0

Stage 1 30 30 - 27 27 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 26 27 - 25 30 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1117 851 1119 1107 838 1119 1172 - - 1175 - -
Stage 1 1165 881 - 1159 877 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1169 883 - 1162 874 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1109 843 1111 1101 830 1114 1165 - - 1172 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1109 843 - 1101 830 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1158 876 - 1156 874 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1167 880 - 1160 869 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1165 - - - 1101 1172 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1872 0 0 1867 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Flt Permitted 0.990
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1872 0 0 1867 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1625 1625 999 877 1080 994 878 1081
Volume Left 0 2 0 0
cSH 1625 1625 1080 1700
Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.5 8.3 0.0
Lane LOS A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 1.6

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 8 0 2 6 2 0 0 2 0 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 8 8 - 11 11 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 11 12 - 9 8 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - 1193 - - 1165 878 1149 1167 882 1152
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1188 893 - 1185 892 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1188 894 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - 1193 - - 1163 876 1149 1163 880 1152
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1163 876 - 1163 880 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1188 893 - 1185 890 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1181 888 - 1186 894 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1149 1193 - - 1193 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.002 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - -

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1806 1939 1632 0 1716 0 1719 3399 0 1727 3391 0
Flt Permitted 0.730 0.759 0.089 0.269
Satd. Flow (perm) 1380 1939 1632 0 1354 0 161 3399 0 489 3391 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 22.0 24.2 24.2 22.0 56.4 11.4 45.8
Total Split (%) 18.6% 18.6% 16.9% 18.6% 18.6% 16.9% 43.4% 8.8% 35.2%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 13.9 13.9 35.5 13.9 64.2 62.6 47.7 41.6
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.42 0.59 0.84 0.47 0.02 0.84
Control Delay 53.1 39.4 3.5 52.9 44.3 13.7 12.7 31.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 53.1 39.4 3.5 52.9 44.3 13.7 12.7 31.7
LOS D D A D D B B C
Approach Delay 17.0 52.9 20.9 31.6
Approach LOS B D C C
Queue Length 95th (ft) 165 36 37 159 #476 501 10 #806

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 29%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.04 0.42 0.41 0.84 0.47 0.02 0.84
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1678 0 0 1676 0 0 1633 0 0 1623 0
Flt Permitted 0.999 0.996 0.992 0.986
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1678 0 0 1676 0 0 1633 0 0 1623 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 4 4 3 4 2 2 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Pedestrians 4 2 4 3
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 97 97 98 95 94 93 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1125 1091 192 232 582 195 232 639
cSH 1125 1091 393 279
Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.9 15.1 20.2
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.9 15.1 20.2
Approach LOS C C
Average Delay 1.9

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 437 8 31 402 6 6 4 26 11 15 14
Future Vol, veh/h 7 437 8 31 402 6 6 4 26 11 15 14
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 7 465 9 33 428 6 6 4 28 12 16 15

Stage 1 - - - - - - 488 488 - 500 500 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 517 503 - 502 492 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.44 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3.1 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 850 - - 822 - - 214 222 604 274 277 672
Stage 1 - - - - - - 589 524 - 665 578 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 566 515 - 663 582 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 848 - - 819 - - 188 206 601 244 258 668
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 188 206 - 244 258 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 580 516 - 656 546 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 507 486 - 619 573 -
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 381 848 - - 819 - - 322
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 0.009 - - 0.04 - - 0.132
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.5

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1609 0 0 1773 0 0 1464 0 0 1486 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1599 0 0 1743 0 0 1476 0 0 1503 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 6% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 48.0 48.0 6.7 6.7
v/c Ratio 0.35 0.31 0.09 0.07
Control Delay 8.6 7.3 18.5 20.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.6 7.3 18.5 20.5
LOS A A B C

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.31 0.09 0.07
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
2020 Projected (Build) Conditions
Projected 2020 Conditions Timing Plan: A.M. Peak Hour
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1862 1615 0 1858 0 1855 1577 0 0 1670 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.999 0.992
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1862 1615 0 1858 0 1855 1577 0 0 1670 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other
WMSC.00002 01/08/2019 Projected 2020 Conditions Synchro 10 Report

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Pedestrians 1 3
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 94 100 100 100 95 99 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1328 1314 378 379 871 339 355 797
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1
Volume Total 299 47 247 0 47 13
Volume Left 79 0 4 0 0 2
Volume Right 0 47 3 0 47 11
cSH 1328 1700 1314 1700 871 660
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 0 4 2
Control Delay (s) 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 9.4 10.6
Lane LOS A A A A B
Approach LOS A B
Average Delay 2.1

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 74 207 44 4 226 3 0 0 44 2 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 74 207 44 4 226 3 0 0 44 2 0 10
Storage Length - - 150 - - - 0 - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 79 220 47 4 240 3 0 0 47 2 0 11

Stage 1 - - - - - - 379 379 - 253 253 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 255 254 - 425 426 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 989 - - 972 - - 475 429 882 412 376 845
Stage 1 - - - - - - 768 645 - 867 701 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 890 721 - 694 589 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 986 - - 971 - - 433 385 881 359 337 843
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 433 385 - 359 337 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 694 583 - 782 695 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 874 715 - 595 532 -
HCM Control Delay, s 2 0.1 9.3 10.3
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - 881 986 - - 971 - - 688
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.053 0.08 - - 0.004 - - 0.019
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 9.3 9 0 - 8.7 0 - 10.3
HCM Lane LOS A A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 0.3 - - 0 - - 0.1

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1809 1562 1588 1609 0 1566 3186 0 1458 3257 1472
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1674 1809 1541 1583 1609 0 1566 3186 0 1458 3257 1472
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 2% 1% 10% 2% 1%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 13.6 16.0 16.0 13.6 55.5 13.5 55.4 23.0
Total Split (%) 15.3% 15.3% 9.1% 10.7% 10.7% 9.1% 37.0% 9.0% 36.9% 15.3%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 26.1 11.1 11.1 8.3 55.8 8.2 49.8 73.8
v/c Ratio 1.25 0.62 0.37 0.73 0.81 1.21 1.06 0.28 0.78 0.24
Control Delay 179.1 57.9 27.7 79.2 88.2 195.5 70.5 63.7 34.3 3.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 179.1 57.9 27.7 79.2 88.2 195.5 70.5 63.7 34.3 3.2
LOS F E C E F F E E C A
Approach Delay 115.0 84.0 80.0 29.4
Approach LOS F F E C
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~278 115 53 76 86 ~109 ~680 19 311 5

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 28%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.25 0.62 0.37 0.73 0.81 1.21 1.06 0.28 0.76 0.24
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1819 0 0 1875 1720 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1819 0 0 1875 1720 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Pedestrians 7
Percent Blockage 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 19 13
cSH 1700 1232 617
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.9

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 226 61 17 196 12 18
Future Vol, veh/h 226 61 17 196 12 18
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 254 69 19 220 13 20

Stage 1 - - - - 296 -
Stage 2 - - - - 258 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 925 - 577 797
Stage 1 - - - - 883 -
Stage 2 - - - - 919 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 919 - 559 792
Stage 1 - - - - 877 -
Stage 2 - - - - 897 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Control Delay (s) 10.6 - - 9 0
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1818 0 0 1862 0 0 1801 0 0 1766 0
Flt Permitted 0.986 0.993 0.980 0.989
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1818 0 0 1862 0 0 1801 0 0 1766 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 1 1 16 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 5% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 3% 2%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Hadj (s) 0.03 -0.01 0.06 -0.13
Capacity (veh/h) 687 675 558 646
Control Delay (s) 11.0 10.2 9.1 10.3
Approach Delay (s) 11.0 10.2 9.1 10.3
Delay 10.5
Level of Service B

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS B
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 139 21 25 140 10 16 19 4 37 76 58
Future Vol, veh/h 63 139 21 25 140 10 16 19 4 37 76 58
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 2
Mvmt Flow 79 174 26 31 175 13 20 24 5 46 95 73
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS B B A B

Vol Left, % 41% 28% 14% 22%
Vol Thru, % 49% 62% 80% 44%
Vol Right, % 10% 9% 6% 34%
LT Vol 16 63 25 37
RT Vol 4 21 10 58
Degree of Util (X) 0.076 0.375 0.298 0.296
Cap 640 736 724 712
Service Time 3.631 2.917 2.989 3.073
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.077 0.379 0.302 0.301
HCM Lane LOS A B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 1.7 1.2 1.2

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1644 0 0 1890 0 0 1863 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1644 0 0 1890 0 0 1863 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Pedestrians 2 3
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 845 761 962 845 761 1045 1505 1589
Volume Left 3 0 0 0
cSH 845 1045 1505 1589
Control Delay (s) 9.3 8.4 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.3

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 23 0 0 77 0
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 23 0 0 77 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 29 0 0 96 0

Stage 1 98 98 - 32 32 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 30 32 - 96 98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1018 792 1037 983 764 1114 1112 - - 1170 - -
Stage 1 1088 840 - 1152 872 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1165 880 - 1061 818 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1015 788 1035 980 760 1111 1110 - - 1167 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1015 788 - 980 760 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1086 838 - 1149 869 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1164 877 - 1061 816 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1110 - - 1015 1111 1167 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.002 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1872 0 0 1919 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Flt Permitted 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1872 0 0 1919 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1589 1621 955 844 1076 951 845 1045
Volume Left 0 2 0 0
cSH 1589 1621 1076 1700
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 8.4 0.0
Lane LOS A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.6

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 1 15 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 1 15 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 11 0 2 33 2 0 0 2 0 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 11 11 - 38 38 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 38 39 - 12 11 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1168 - - 1190 - - 1112 845 1145 1119 853 1115
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1150 873 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1143 866 - 1184 892 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1168 - - 1190 - - 1110 843 1145 1116 851 1115
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1110 843 - 1116 851 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1150 871 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1141 864 - 1182 892 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1145 1168 - - 1190 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.002 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - -

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1406 1939 1600 0 1704 0 1719 3366 0 1727 3384 0
Flt Permitted 0.774 0.739 0.103 0.070
Satd. Flow (perm) 1146 1939 1600 0 1316 0 186 3366 0 127 3384 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 31% 0% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 16.2 24.2 24.2 16.2 76.4 11.4 71.6
Total Split (%) 16.1% 16.1% 10.8% 16.1% 16.1% 10.8% 50.9% 7.6% 47.7%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 16.0 16.0 31.4 16.0 77.0 73.3 67.0 60.8
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.03 0.15 0.62 0.52 0.78 0.14 0.73
Control Delay 48.8 48.1 6.7 62.1 17.8 19.9 11.4 23.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.8 48.1 6.7 62.1 17.8 19.9 11.4 23.8
LOS D D A E B B B C
Approach Delay 17.6 62.1 19.8 23.6

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 25%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.03 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.78 0.14 0.65
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1633 0 0 1636 0 0 1687 0 0 1667 0
Flt Permitted 0.990 0.991 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1633 0 0 1636 0 0 1687 0 0 1667 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 3 1 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 9% 2% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other
Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.7% ICU Level of Service B

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Pedestrians 3 1 1
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 94 90 95 88 96 73 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1315 1144 197 297 650 216 294 786
Volume Total 414 332 110 115
cSH 1315 1144 420 335
Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 16.6 21.3
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 16.6 21.3
Approach LOS C C
Average Delay 5.2

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 350 22 63 232 4 17 13 69 7 72 24
Future Vol, veh/h 1 350 22 63 232 4 17 13 69 7 72 24
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 9 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 389 24 70 258 4 19 14 77 8 80 27

Stage 1 - - - - - - 404 404 - 400 400 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 457 402 - 450 416 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 977 - - 865 - - 280 291 671 344 343 837
Stage 1 - - - - - - 681 576 - 749 633 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 632 577 - 706 623 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 977 - - 864 - - 201 263 670 270 310 835
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 201 263 - 270 310 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 680 575 - 748 573 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 475 522 - 608 622 -
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 418 977 - - 864 - - 359
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.263 0.001 - - 0.081 - - 0.319
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0 - - 0.3 - - 1.3

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1567 0 0 1743 0 0 1467 0 0 1384 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.952 0.912 0.959
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1564 0 0 1666 0 0 1360 0 0 1332 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 1 1 4 1 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 3% 9% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 43.0 43.0 6.8 6.8
v/c Ratio 0.36 0.24 0.20 0.16
Control Delay 9.2 7.5 19.7 18.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.2 7.5 19.7 18.1
LOS A A B B

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.24 0.20 0.16
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Projected 2020 Conditions Timing Plan: Weekday Midday P
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1825 1615 0 1830 0 1855 1577 0 0 1652 0
Flt Permitted 0.994 0.995 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1825 1615 0 1830 0 1855 1577 0 0 1652 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 4% 0% 0% 3% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Pedestrians 1 2
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 98 100 100 73 99 100 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 1361 1163 398 452 858 240 340 824
Volume Total 214 217 242 0 229 57
Volume Right 0 217 3 0 229 54
cSH 1361 1700 1163 1700 858 731
Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.0 0.9 0.0 10.7 10.3
Lane LOS A A A B B
Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.9 10.7 10.3
Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 3.7

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 173 202 20 202 3 0 0 213 3 0 50
Future Vol, veh/h 26 173 202 20 202 3 0 0 213 3 0 50
Storage Length - - 150 - - - 0 - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 3 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 28 186 217 22 217 3 0 0 229 3 0 54

Stage 1 - - - - - - 244 244 - 263 263 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 291 264 - 465 461 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1010 - - 872 - - 550 498 919 381 354 873
Stage 1 - - - - - - 901 727 - 856 694 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 852 714 - 658 569 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1010 - - 870 - - 489 465 917 272 330 872
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 489 465 - 272 330 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 866 699 - 824 674 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 776 693 - 475 547 -
HCM LOS B B
Capacity (veh/h) - 917 1010 - - 870 - - 775
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.25 0.028 - - 0.025 - - 0.074
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 10.2 8.7 0 - 9.2 0 - 10
HCM Lane LOS A B A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.2

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1809 1562 1588 1597 0 1566 3158 0 1458 3257 1472
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1675 1809 1537 1574 1597 0 1566 3158 0 1452 3257 1472
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 3 3 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 2% 1% 10% 2% 1%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 18.0 16.0 16.0 18.0 44.0 15.0 41.0 23.0
Total Split (%) 16.4% 16.4% 12.9% 11.4% 11.4% 12.9% 31.4% 10.7% 29.3% 16.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 18.4 18.4 30.6 11.1 11.1 12.8 39.3 9.7 36.2 60.2
v/c Ratio 1.01 0.56 0.40 0.92 0.75 0.95 0.99 0.84 0.92 0.24
Control Delay 99.3 50.8 21.5 99.1 74.5 102.5 57.9 93.8 48.5 4.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 99.3 50.8 21.5 99.1 74.5 102.5 57.9 93.8 48.5 4.0
LOS F D C F E F E F D A
Approach Delay 64.7 88.0 63.8 45.0
Approach LOS E F E D
Queue Length 95th (ft) #536 #268 125 #316 #251 #359 #860 #245 #740 62

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 30%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.01 0.56 0.40 0.92 0.75 0.95 0.99 0.84 0.92 0.24
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1800 0 0 1853 1765 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1800 0 0 1853 1765 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 10% 2% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 1
Percent Blockage 0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.2 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.3 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 13 18
cSH 1700 1016 419
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.6

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 287 115 10 254 14 7
Future Vol, veh/h 287 115 10 254 14 7
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 363 146 13 322 18 9

Stage 1 - - - - 436 -
Stage 2 - - - - 349 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.4 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 770 - 423 665
Stage 1 - - - - 762 -
Stage 2 - - - - 835 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 770 - 414 665
Stage 1 - - - - 762 -
Stage 2 - - - - 817 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - - 0.016 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1855 0 0 1861 0 0 1693 0 0 1681 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.996 0.978 0.998
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1855 0 0 1861 0 0 1693 0 0 1681 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 17% 0% 0% 50% 7% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Hadj (s) 0.05 0.02 0.12 -0.29
Capacity (veh/h) 745 731 547 621
Control Delay (s) 11.6 10.2 9.0 9.0
Approach Delay (s) 11.6 10.2 9.0 9.0
Approach LOS B B A A
Delay 10.6
Level of Service B

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS B
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 76 204 8 18 188 5 13 10 5 2 29 48
Future Vol, veh/h 76 204 8 18 188 5 13 10 5 2 29 48
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 50 7 0
Mvmt Flow 95 255 10 23 235 6 16 13 6 3 36 60
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS B B A B

Vol Left, % 46% 26% 9% 3%
Vol Thru, % 36% 71% 89% 37%
Vol Right, % 18% 3% 2% 61%
LT Vol 13 76 18 2
RT Vol 5 8 5 48
Degree of Util (X) 0.056 0.463 0.344 0.161
Cap 614 774 762 607
Service Time 3.866 2.677 2.755 3.944
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0.465 0.346 0.163
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 2.5 1.5 0.6

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1900 0 0 1890 0 0 1898 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1900 0 0 1890 0 0 1898 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 804 731 916 803 730 1053 1458 1599
Volume Left 4 0 0 0
cSH 804 1700 1458 1599
Control Delay (s) 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.2

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 127 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 127 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 137 1

Stage 1 138 138 - 28 28 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 28 28 - 138 138 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 970 765 990 926 730 1120 1077 - - 1174 - -
Stage 1 1045 817 - 1158 876 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1167 883 - 1005 786 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 970 765 990 926 730 1120 1077 - - 1174 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 970 765 - 926 730 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1045 817 - 1158 876 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1167 883 - 1005 786 - - - - - - -
HCM Control Delay, s 8.7 0 0 0
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1077 - - 970 - 1174 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.004 - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 8.7 0 0 - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1831 0 0 1619 0 0 1644 0 0 1613 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1831 0 0 1619 0 0 1644 0 0 1613 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Pedestrians 1 2
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1502 1609 836 760 1066 836 760 955
Volume Left 3 2 0 0
cSH 1502 1609 1066 955
Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.1 8.4 8.8
Lane LOS A A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.7

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 8 1 1 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 8 1 1 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 3 14 2 2 103 0 0 0 5 0 0 2

Stage 1 - - - - - - 23 23 - 107 107 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 109 107 - 24 24 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1107 - - 1183 - - 977 764 1136 1000 780 1024
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1165 880 - 1065 825 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1044 811 - 1168 883 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1107 - - 1181 - - 969 759 1134 992 775 1023
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 969 759 - 992 775 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1159 876 - 1062 823 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1039 809 - 1159 879 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1134 1107 - - 1181 - - 1023
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.003 - - 0.001 - - 0.002
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1771 1939 1632 0 1722 0 1702 3297 0 1727 3366 0
Flt Permitted 0.740 0.743 0.072 0.219
Satd. Flow (perm) 1378 1939 1632 0 1332 0 129 3297 0 398 3366 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% 6% 0% 2% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 24.0 24.2 24.2 24.0 66.4 11.4 53.8
Total Split (%) 17.3% 17.3% 17.1% 17.3% 17.3% 17.1% 47.4% 8.1% 38.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 19.3 19.3 42.6 19.3 73.6 71.8 55.3 49.2
v/c Ratio 0.51 0.09 0.37 0.76 0.91 0.56 0.04 0.87
Control Delay 52.2 43.2 3.5 65.4 61.4 15.6 12.2 36.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.2 43.2 3.5 65.4 61.4 15.6 12.2 36.1
LOS D D A E E B B D
Approach Delay 19.2 65.4 25.3 35.9

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 27%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.09 0.37 0.76 0.91 0.56 0.04 0.87
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1660 0 0 1676 0 0 1644 0 0 1594 0
Flt Permitted 0.999 0.996 0.970 0.994
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1660 0 0 1676 0 0 1644 0 0 1594 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Pedestrians 1 3 1 1
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.2 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 97 68 96 96 96 88 96
cM capacity (veh/h) 1115 1120 174 235 615 195 230 643
cSH 1115 1120 226 302
Control Delay (s) 0.2 1.0 31.0 19.7
Lane LOS A A D C
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 1.0 31.0 19.7
Approach LOS D C
Average Delay 4.1

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 397 16 34 404 7 51 8 23 6 25 21
Future Vol, veh/h 7 397 16 34 404 7 51 8 23 6 25 21
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 4 0
Mvmt Flow 8 432 17 37 439 8 55 9 25 7 27 23

Stage 1 - - - - - - 458 458 - 518 518 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 543 522 - 477 466 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.61 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.14 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3.1 4 3.1 3 4.036 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 842 - - 841 - - 209 226 634 277 275 666
Stage 1 - - - - - - 606 542 - 651 561 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 536 504 - 683 589 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 841 - - 840 - - 175 210 632 243 255 665
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 175 210 - 243 255 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 598 534 - 642 527 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 462 474 - 635 581 -
HCM LOS D C
Capacity (veh/h) 224 841 - - 840 - - 337
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.398 0.009 - - 0.044 - - 0.168
HCM Lane LOS D A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.6

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1593 0 0 1774 0 0 1551 0 0 1433 0
Flt Permitted 0.996 0.977 0.771 0.951
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1588 0 0 1736 0 0 1239 0 0 1375 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 39.6 39.6 6.7 6.7
v/c Ratio 0.40 0.38 0.43 0.11
Control Delay 10.2 9.4 34.1 3.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.2 9.4 34.1 3.3
LOS B A C A
Approach LOS B A C A
Queue Length 95th (ft) #307 294 #88 6

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.38 0.43 0.11
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80
Intersection Signal Delay: 11.2 Intersection LOS: B

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Projected 2020 Conditions Timing Plan: P.M. Peak Hour
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1875 1615 0 1896 0 1855 1577 0 0 1648 0
Flt Permitted 0.996 0.998 0.999
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1875 1615 0 1896 0 1855 1577 0 0 1648 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Pedestrians 1 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 99 100 100 82 100 100 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 1232 1182 330 381 834 244 311 708
Volume Total 261 147 351 0 152 48
Volume Right 0 147 1 0 152 47
cSH 1232 1700 1182 1700 834 681
Control Delay (s) 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.3 10.7
Lane LOS A A A B B
Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.5 10.3 10.7
Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 2.6

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 217 134 14 305 1 0 0 138 1 0 43
Future Vol, veh/h 21 217 134 14 305 1 0 0 138 1 0 43
Storage Length - - 150 - - - 0 - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 23 238 147 15 335 1 0 0 152 1 0 47

Stage 1 - - - - - - 284 284 - 367 367 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 390 367 - 434 431 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 920 - - 886 - - 447 420 864 339 321 748
Stage 1 - - - - - - 860 702 - 748 626 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 758 652 - 685 586 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 919 - - 886 - - 401 397 864 268 304 747
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 401 397 - 268 304 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 832 679 - 723 612 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 694 638 - 546 567 -
HCM LOS B B
Capacity (veh/h) - 864 919 - - 886 - - 718
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.176 0.025 - - 0.017 - - 0.067
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.6 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.2

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1702 1809 1640 1604 1663 0 1612 3181 0 1407 3290 1457
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1698 1809 1618 1600 1663 0 1612 3181 0 1403 3290 1457
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 2% 2% 14% 1% 2%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 53.5 13.5 48.0 22.0
Total Split (%) 14.7% 14.7% 12.7% 12.7% 12.7% 12.7% 35.7% 9.0% 32.0% 14.7%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.3 17.3 30.5 14.1 14.1 13.7 48.8 8.1 43.2 66.1
v/c Ratio 1.01 0.69 0.54 1.00 0.75 1.02 1.06 0.68 1.06 0.28
Control Delay 109.4 63.0 28.4 115.8 73.3 122.2 73.8 87.5 77.6 6.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 109.4 63.0 28.4 115.8 73.3 122.2 73.8 87.5 77.6 6.5
LOS F E C F E F E F E A
Approach Delay 68.6 97.2 79.6 66.8
Approach LOS E F E E

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 28%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.01 0.69 0.54 1.00 0.75 1.02 1.06 0.68 1.06 0.28
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1826 0 0 1894 1679 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1826 0 0 1894 1679 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Pedestrians 2 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 18 18
cSH 1700 1205 577
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 1.0

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 238 96 17 261 17 26
Future Vol, veh/h 238 96 17 261 17 26
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 259 104 18 284 18 28

Stage 1 - - - - 312 -
Stage 2 - - - - 322 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.14
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 901 - 518 778
Stage 1 - - - - 868 -
Stage 2 - - - - 859 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 900 - 504 777
Stage 1 - - - - 867 -
Stage 2 - - - - 837 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 - - 0.021 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1855 0 0 1838 0 0 1782 0 0 1750 0
Flt Permitted 0.985 0.995 0.992 0.996
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1855 0 0 1838 0 0 1782 0 0 1750 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 7 7 4 3 7 7 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 9% 1% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hadj (s) 0.06 0.02 -0.05 -0.34
Capacity (veh/h) 761 752 612 669
Control Delay (s) 10.1 9.6 8.5 8.5
Approach LOS B A A A
Delay 9.6
Level of Service A

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 82 178 5 23 197 10 5 19 7 7 31 55
Future Vol, veh/h 82 178 5 23 197 10 5 19 7 7 31 55
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 9 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 86 187 5 24 207 11 5 20 7 7 33 58
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 10 9.9 8.4 8.6
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 16% 31% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, % 61% 67% 86% 33%
Vol Right, % 23% 2% 4% 59%
LT Vol 5 82 23 7
RT Vol 7 5 10 55
Degree of Util (X) 0.046 0.352 0.314 0.13
Cap 695 789 767 745
Service Time 3.184 2.579 2.711 2.842
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 0.354 0.316 0.132
HCM Control Delay 8.4 10 9.9 8.6
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1.6 1.3 0.4

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1805 0 0 1831 0 0 1898 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1805 0 0 1831 0 0 1898 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82
Pedestrians 3
Percent Blockage 0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 774 708 913 779 708 1025 1453 1570
Volume Left 4 1 0 0
cSH 774 779 1453 1570
Control Delay (s) 9.7 9.6 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.3

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 40 1 0 111 1
Future Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 40 1 0 111 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 49 1 0 135 1

Stage 1 139 139 - 50 50 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 50 50 - 136 139 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 942 748 989 898 709 1089 1076 - - 1154 - -
Stage 1 1044 816 - 1126 857 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1141 869 - 1008 785 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 940 747 987 898 708 1089 1073 - - 1154 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 940 747 - 898 708 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1042 814 - 1126 857 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1141 869 - 1008 783 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1073 - - 940 898 1154 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.004 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1641 0 0 1911 0 0 1650 0 0 1771 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.986 0.998 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1641 0 0 1911 0 0 1650 0 0 1771 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 1 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 100 100 97 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1572 1613 877 783 1072 819 780 1027
cSH 1572 1613 1064 819
Control Delay (s) 0.5 2.2 8.5 9.4
Lane LOS A A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 3.6

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 7 5 15 36 0 1 0 22 1 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 7 5 15 36 0 1 0 22 1 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 9 6 19 46 0 1 0 28 1 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 15 15 - 85 85 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 84 85 - 28 18 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1157 - - 1185 - - 1028 794 1142 1025 805 1097
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1177 887 - 1092 840 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1078 828 - 1163 887 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1156 - - 1184 - - 1014 779 1141 986 790 1096
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1014 779 - 986 790 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1175 885 - 1090 826 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1061 814 - 1133 885 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1135 1156 - - 1184 - - 986
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.001 - - 0.016 - - 0.001
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1738 1939 1540 0 1694 0 1719 3399 0 1727 3410 0
Flt Permitted 0.785 0.740 0.053 0.121
Satd. Flow (perm) 1431 1939 1540 0 1309 0 96 3399 0 220 3410 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 0% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 19.0 24.2 24.2 19.0 76.4 11.4 68.8
Total Split (%) 16.1% 16.1% 12.7% 16.1% 16.1% 12.7% 50.9% 7.6% 45.9%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 19.3 19.3 37.5 19.3 83.5 81.7 70.4 64.3
v/c Ratio 0.31 0.06 0.42 0.85 0.96 0.66 0.03 0.96
Control Delay 52.1 48.3 4.8 82.1 83.1 16.4 11.0 41.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.1 48.3 4.8 82.1 83.1 16.4 11.0 41.4
LOS D D A F F B B D
Approach Delay 16.1 82.1 25.6 41.3
Approach LOS B F C D

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 25%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.06 0.42 0.85 0.96 0.66 0.03 0.96
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1677 0 0 1672 0 0 1742 0 0 1628 0
Flt Permitted 0.998 0.995 0.981 0.990
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1677 0 0 1672 0 0 1742 0 0 1628 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Pedestrians 1 4
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 95 83 93 95 95 92 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1087 1152 179 213 643 169 214 626
cSH 1087 1152 268 262
Control Delay (s) 0.5 1.3 23.8 21.1
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.5 1.3 23.8 21.1
Approach LOS C C
Average Delay 3.3

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 391 9 51 436 13 29 14 31 8 16 13
Future Vol, veh/h 17 391 9 51 436 13 29 14 31 8 16 13
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 18 407 9 53 454 14 30 15 32 8 17 14

Stage 1 - - - - - - 449 449 - 571 571 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 583 578 - 471 453 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 826 - - 863 - - 208 211 662 258 266 649
Stage 1 - - - - - - 639 548 - 611 541 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 529 473 - 688 603 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 823 - - 862 - - 177 187 661 211 236 647
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 177 187 - 211 236 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 620 532 - 591 494 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 459 432 - 619 586 -
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 259 823 - - 862 - - 294
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.298 0.022 - - 0.062 - - 0.131
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.1 - - 0.2 - - 0.4

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1607 0 0 1770 0 0 1524 0 0 1502 0
Flt Permitted 0.995 0.950 0.917
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1601 0 0 1689 0 0 1569 0 0 1397 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 2 2 4 1 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 43.3 43.3 6.8 6.8
v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.20 0.13
Control Delay 8.9 9.4 23.6 22.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.9 9.4 23.6 22.1
LOS A A C C
Approach LOS A A C C

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.20 0.13
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Projected 2020 Conditions Timing Plan: Saturday Midday
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1898 1615 0 1881 0 1855 1577 0 0 1644 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1898 1615 0 1881 0 1855 1577 0 0 1644 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 1 2 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Pedestrians 1 1 2
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 11.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 98 100 100 71 100 100 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1283 1145 430 437 850 217 324 755
Volume Total 200 228 311 0 245 12
Volume Right 0 228 4 0 245 12
cSH 1283 1700 1145 1700 850 755
Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.0 10.9 9.8
Lane LOS A A A B A
Approach LOS B A
Average Delay 3.1

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 166 194 21 240 3 0 0 208 0 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 4 166 194 21 240 3 0 0 208 0 0 10
Storage Length - - 150 - - - 0 - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 5 195 228 25 282 4 0 0 245 0 0 12

Stage 1 - - - - - - 206 206 - 336 336 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 341 338 - 442 434 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 957 - - 858 - - 540 477 910 352 333 800
Stage 1 - - - - - - 942 752 - 779 645 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 803 669 - 678 585 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 955 - - 857 - - 514 456 909 249 318 798
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 514 456 - 249 318 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 934 746 - 772 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 763 644 - 492 580 -
HCM LOS B A
Capacity (veh/h) - 909 955 - - 857 - - 798
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.269 0.005 - - 0.029 - - 0.015
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 10.4 8.8 0 - 9.3 0 - 9.6
HCM Lane LOS A B A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 1809 1640 1604 1664 0 1628 3208 0 1604 3290 1457
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 1809 1616 1595 1664 0 1628 3208 0 1604 3290 1457
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 20.0 20.0 17.0 16.0 16.0 17.0 38.5 13.5 35.0 20.0
Total Split (%) 15.4% 15.4% 13.1% 12.3% 12.3% 13.1% 29.6% 10.4% 26.9% 15.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 15.4 15.4 26.6 11.2 11.2 11.8 33.8 8.2 30.2 51.2
v/c Ratio 0.98 0.52 0.37 0.87 0.48 0.89 1.02 0.76 1.04 0.22
Control Delay 92.5 47.5 19.4 83.5 52.6 84.2 64.1 79.5 73.0 4.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 92.5 47.5 19.4 83.5 52.6 84.2 64.1 79.5 73.0 4.9
LOS F D B F D F E E E A
Approach Delay 60.4 72.2 66.7 64.2
Approach LOS E E E E

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 32%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.98 0.52 0.37 0.87 0.48 0.89 1.02 0.76 1.04 0.22
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1816 0 0 1878 1737 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1816 0 0 1878 1737 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Pedestrians 6
Percent Blockage 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 10 10
cSH 1700 1139 540
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.5

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 242 119 9 216 9 9
Future Vol, veh/h 242 119 9 216 9 9
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 281 138 10 251 10 10

Stage 1 - - - - 356 -
Stage 2 - - - - 271 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 858 - 523 738
Stage 1 - - - - 829 -
Stage 2 - - - - 906 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 853 - 513 734
Stage 1 - - - - 824 -
Stage 2 - - - - 893 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - 0.012 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1849 0 0 1881 0 0 1819 0 0 1692 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.998 0.984
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1849 0 0 1881 0 0 1819 0 0 1692 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 8 8 1 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Hadj (s) 0.03 -0.01 -0.08 -0.39
Capacity (veh/h) 802 785 639 691
Control Delay (s) 9.7 9.0 8.2 8.1
Delay 9.2
Level of Service A

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 173 12 8 176 4 6 8 4 0 17 40
Future Vol, veh/h 63 173 12 8 176 4 6 8 4 0 17 40
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Mvmt Flow 72 197 14 9 200 5 7 9 5 0 19 45
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 9.6 9 8.2 8
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 33% 25% 4% 0%
Vol Thru, % 44% 70% 94% 30%
Vol Right, % 22% 5% 2% 70%
LT Vol 6 63 8 0
RT Vol 4 12 4 40
Degree of Util (X) 0.028 0.34 0.261 0.083
Cap 714 829 818 779
Service Time 3.047 2.368 2.412 2.624
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 0.34 0.262 0.083
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1.5 1 0.3

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1805 0 0 1890 0 0 1900 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1805 0 0 1890 0 0 1900 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 7 3 3 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 7 3 2 2
Lane Width (ft) 10.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 757 697 872 764 696 1045 1413 1594
Volume Left 3 1 0 0
cSH 757 764 1413 1594
Control Delay (s) 9.8 9.7 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.2

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 128 0
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 128 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 25 0 0 162 0

Stage 1 169 169 - 28 28 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 27 28 - 164 169 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 933 742 953 889 702 1117 1051 - - 1174 - -
Stage 1 1013 799 - 1158 876 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1168 883 - 972 763 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 926 735 946 885 696 1112 1045 - - 1171 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 926 735 - 885 696 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1007 794 - 1155 873 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1166 880 - 970 758 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1045 - - 926 885 1171 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.003 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1872 0 0 1932 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Flt Permitted 0.999
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1872 0 0 1932 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1488 1625 853 767 1080 849 768 945
Volume Left 0 2 0 0
cSH 1488 1625 1080 1700
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 8.3 0.0
Lane LOS A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.3

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 1 56 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 1 56 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 8 0 2 112 2 0 0 2 0 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 8 8 - 117 117 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 117 118 - 9 8 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1098 - - 1193 - - 988 768 1149 1007 785 1013
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1188 893 - 1053 818 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1033 802 - 1188 894 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1098 - - 1193 - - 986 766 1149 1004 783 1013
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 986 766 - 1004 783 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1188 893 - 1053 816 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1031 800 - 1186 894 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1149 1098 - - 1193 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.002 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - -

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1806 1939 1632 0 1710 0 1719 3399 0 1727 3388 0
Flt Permitted 0.750 0.743 0.079 0.250
Satd. Flow (perm) 1420 1939 1632 0 1324 0 143 3399 0 454 3388 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 22.0 24.2 24.2 22.0 56.4 11.4 45.8
Total Split (%) 18.6% 18.6% 16.9% 18.6% 18.6% 16.9% 43.4% 8.8% 35.2%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 18.6 18.6 40.0 18.6 63.7 62.0 47.4 41.3
v/c Ratio 0.45 0.05 0.40 0.70 0.91 0.52 0.02 0.87
Control Delay 44.8 38.6 3.3 55.8 57.3 15.6 13.0 36.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 44.8 38.6 3.3 55.8 57.3 15.6 13.0 36.1
LOS D D A E E B B D
Approach Delay 14.8 55.8 25.1 36.0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 164 36 37 #284 #488 535 10 #796

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 29%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.04 0.40 0.67 0.91 0.52 0.02 0.87
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1678 0 0 1676 0 0 1712 0 0 1623 0
Flt Permitted 0.999 0.996 0.971 0.986
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1678 0 0 1676 0 0 1712 0 0 1623 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 4 4 3 4 2 2 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Pedestrians 4 2 4 3
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 97 73 98 95 93 93 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1106 1091 183 223 582 185 223 630
cSH 1106 1091 246 268
Control Delay (s) 0.2 1.0 26.9 21.0
Lane LOS A A D C
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 1.0 26.9 21.0
Approach LOS D C
Average Delay 3.4

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 437 8 34 418 6 46 4 28 11 15 14
Future Vol, veh/h 7 437 8 34 418 6 46 4 28 11 15 14
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 7 465 9 36 445 6 49 4 30 12 16 15

Stage 1 - - - - - - 488 488 - 523 523 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 540 526 - 503 492 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.44 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3.1 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 838 - - 822 - - 206 215 604 264 269 658
Stage 1 - - - - - - 589 524 - 647 566 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 548 502 - 662 582 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 836 - - 819 - - 180 199 601 233 249 654
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 180 199 - 233 249 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 580 516 - 638 531 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 487 471 - 616 573 -
HCM LOS D C
Capacity (veh/h) 242 836 - - 819 - - 310
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.343 0.009 - - 0.044 - - 0.137
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.5

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1609 0 0 1773 0 0 1532 0 0 1486 0
Flt Permitted 0.992 0.981 0.816 0.946
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1598 0 0 1743 0 0 1296 0 0 1422 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 6% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 40.7 40.7 6.7 6.7
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.08
Control Delay 10.5 9.0 28.4 20.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.5 9.0 28.4 20.6
LOS B A C C
Approach Delay 10.5 9.0 28.4 20.6
Approach LOS B A C C

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.08
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
2020 Projected (Build) Conditions with Improvements
Projected 2020 Conditions with Improvements Timing Plan: A.M. Peak Hour
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1862 1615 0 1858 0 1855 1577 0 0 1670 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.999 0.992
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1862 1615 0 1858 0 1855 1577 0 0 1670 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other
WMSC.00002 01/08/2019 Projected 2020 Conditions with Improvements Synchro 10 Report

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Pedestrians 1 3
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 94 100 100 100 94 99 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1328 1306 366 374 823 330 352 797
Volume Total 299 47 247 0 47 13
Volume Right 0 47 3 0 47 11
cSH 1328 1700 1306 1700 823 654
Control Delay (s) 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 9.6 10.6
Lane LOS A A A A B
Approach LOS A B
Average Delay 2.1

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 74 207 44 4 226 3 0 0 44 2 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 74 207 44 4 226 3 0 0 44 2 0 10
Storage Length - - 150 - - - 0 - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 79 220 47 4 240 3 0 0 47 2 0 11

Stage 1 - - - - - - 379 379 - 253 253 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 255 254 - 425 426 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 989 - - 972 - - 475 429 882 412 376 845
Stage 1 - - - - - - 768 645 - 867 701 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 890 721 - 694 589 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 986 - - 971 - - 433 385 881 359 337 843
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 433 385 - 359 337 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 694 583 - 782 695 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 874 715 - 595 532 -
HCM Control Delay, s 2 0.1 9.3 10.3
HCM LOS A B
Capacity (veh/h) - 881 986 - - 971 - - 688
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.053 0.08 - - 0.004 - - 0.019
HCM Lane LOS A A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 0.3 - - 0 - - 0.1

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1601 1680 1562 1588 1608 0 1566 3186 0 1458 3257 1472
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.984 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1591 1677 1541 1583 1608 0 1566 3186 0 1458 3257 1472
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 2% 1% 10% 2% 1%
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 25%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 16.0 15.0 15.0 16.0 55.5 13.5 53.0 24.0
Total Split (%) 16.0% 16.0% 10.7% 10.0% 10.0% 10.7% 37.0% 9.0% 35.3% 16.0%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 19.3 19.3 29.5 10.1 10.1 10.7 56.7 8.1 48.3 73.3
v/c Ratio 0.94 0.94 0.33 0.81 0.90 0.94 1.05 0.28 0.81 0.24
Control Delay 91.2 88.8 24.3 92.6 107.3 112.9 67.8 63.9 36.9 3.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 91.2 88.8 24.3 92.6 107.3 112.9 67.8 63.9 36.9 3.5
LOS F F C F F F E E D A
Approach Delay 76.8 100.4 71.2 31.6
Approach LOS E F E C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 180 187 51 76 87 93 ~680 19 325 6

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 28%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.94 0.94 0.33 0.81 0.90 0.94 1.05 0.28 0.81 0.24
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1819 0 0 1875 1720 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1819 0 0 1875 1720 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Pedestrians 7
Percent Blockage 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 19 13
cSH 1700 1233 615
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.9

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 226 61 17 196 12 18
Future Vol, veh/h 226 61 17 196 12 18
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 254 69 19 220 13 20

Stage 1 - - - - 296 -
Stage 2 - - - - 258 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 925 - 577 797
Stage 1 - - - - 883 -
Stage 2 - - - - 919 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 919 - 559 792
Stage 1 - - - - 877 -
Stage 2 - - - - 897 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Control Delay (s) 10.6 - - 9 0
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1818 0 0 1862 0 0 1801 0 0 1766 0
Flt Permitted 0.986 0.993 0.980 0.989
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1818 0 0 1862 0 0 1801 0 0 1766 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 1 1 16 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 5% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 3% 2%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Hadj (s) 0.03 -0.01 0.06 -0.13
Capacity (veh/h) 687 675 558 646
Control Delay (s) 11.0 10.2 9.1 10.3
Approach Delay (s) 11.0 10.2 9.1 10.3
Delay 10.5
Level of Service B

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS B
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 139 21 25 140 10 16 19 4 37 76 58
Future Vol, veh/h 63 139 21 25 140 10 16 19 4 37 76 58
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 2
Mvmt Flow 79 174 26 31 175 13 20 24 5 46 95 73
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS B B A B

Vol Left, % 41% 28% 14% 22%
Vol Thru, % 49% 62% 80% 44%
Vol Right, % 10% 9% 6% 34%
LT Vol 16 63 25 37
RT Vol 4 21 10 58
Degree of Util (X) 0.076 0.375 0.298 0.296
Cap 640 736 724 712
Service Time 3.631 2.917 2.989 3.073
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.077 0.379 0.302 0.301
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 1.7 1.2 1.2

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1644 0 0 1890 0 0 1863 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1644 0 0 1890 0 0 1863 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Pedestrians 2 3
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 845 761 962 845 761 1045 1505 1589
Volume Left 3 0 0 0
cSH 845 1045 1505 1589
Control Delay (s) 9.3 8.4 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.3

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 23 0 0 77 0
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 23 0 0 77 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 29 0 0 96 0

Stage 1 98 98 - 32 32 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 30 32 - 96 98 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1018 792 1037 983 764 1114 1112 - - 1170 - -
Stage 1 1088 840 - 1152 872 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1165 880 - 1061 818 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1015 788 1035 980 760 1111 1110 - - 1167 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1015 788 - 980 760 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1086 838 - 1149 869 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1164 877 - 1061 816 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1110 - - 1015 1111 1167 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.002 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1872 0 0 1919 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Flt Permitted 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1872 0 0 1919 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1589 1621 955 844 1076 951 845 1045
Volume Left 0 2 0 0
cSH 1589 1621 1076 1700
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 8.4 0.0
Lane LOS A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.6

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 1 15 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 1 15 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 11 0 2 33 2 0 0 2 0 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 11 11 - 38 38 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 38 39 - 12 11 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1168 - - 1190 - - 1112 845 1145 1119 853 1115
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1150 873 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1143 866 - 1184 892 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1168 - - 1190 - - 1110 843 1145 1116 851 1115
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1110 843 - 1116 851 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1183 890 - 1150 871 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1141 864 - 1182 892 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1145 1168 - - 1190 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.002 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - -

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1406 1939 1600 0 1704 0 1719 3366 0 1727 3384 0
Flt Permitted 0.774 0.739 0.103 0.070
Satd. Flow (perm) 1146 1939 1600 0 1316 0 186 3366 0 127 3384 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 31% 0% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 16.2 24.2 24.2 16.2 76.4 11.4 71.6
Total Split (%) 16.1% 16.1% 10.8% 16.1% 16.1% 10.8% 50.9% 7.6% 47.7%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 16.0 16.0 31.4 16.0 77.0 73.3 67.0 60.8
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.03 0.15 0.62 0.52 0.78 0.14 0.73
Control Delay 48.8 48.1 6.7 62.1 17.8 19.9 11.4 23.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.8 48.1 6.7 62.1 17.8 19.9 11.4 23.8
LOS D D A E B B B C
Approach Delay 17.6 62.1 19.8 23.6

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 25%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.03 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.78 0.14 0.65
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1633 0 0 1636 0 0 1687 0 0 1667 0
Flt Permitted 0.990 0.991 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1633 0 0 1636 0 0 1687 0 0 1667 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 3 1 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 9% 2% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Pedestrians 3 1 1
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 94 90 95 88 96 73 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1315 1144 197 297 650 216 294 786
Volume Total 414 332 110 115
cSH 1315 1144 420 335
Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 16.6 21.3
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 16.6 21.3
Approach LOS C C
Average Delay 5.2

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 350 22 63 232 4 17 13 69 7 72 24
Future Vol, veh/h 1 350 22 63 232 4 17 13 69 7 72 24
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 9 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 389 24 70 258 4 19 14 77 8 80 27

Stage 1 - - - - - - 404 404 - 400 400 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 457 402 - 450 416 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 977 - - 865 - - 280 291 671 344 343 837
Stage 1 - - - - - - 681 576 - 749 633 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 632 577 - 706 623 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 977 - - 864 - - 201 263 670 270 310 835
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 201 263 - 270 310 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 680 575 - 748 573 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 475 522 - 608 622 -
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 418 977 - - 864 - - 359
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.263 0.001 - - 0.081 - - 0.319
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0 - - 0.3 - - 1.3

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1567 0 0 1743 0 0 1467 0 0 1384 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.952 0.912 0.959
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1564 0 0 1666 0 0 1360 0 0 1332 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 1 1 4 1 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 3% 9% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 43.0 43.0 6.8 6.8
v/c Ratio 0.36 0.24 0.20 0.16
Control Delay 9.2 7.5 19.7 18.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.2 7.5 19.7 18.1
LOS A A B B

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.24 0.20 0.16
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Projected 2020 Conditions with Improvements Timing Plan: Weekday Midday P
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1825 1615 0 1830 0 1855 1577 0 0 1652 0
Flt Permitted 0.994 0.995 0.997
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1825 1615 0 1830 0 1855 1577 0 0 1652 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 4% 0% 0% 3% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Pedestrians 1 2
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 98 100 100 73 99 100 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 1361 1163 398 452 858 240 340 824
Volume Total 214 217 242 0 229 57
Volume Right 0 217 3 0 229 54
cSH 1361 1700 1163 1700 858 731
Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.0 0.9 0.0 10.7 10.3
Lane LOS A A A B B
Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.9 10.7 10.3
Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 3.7

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 173 202 20 202 3 0 0 213 3 0 50
Future Vol, veh/h 26 173 202 20 202 3 0 0 213 3 0 50
Storage Length - - 150 - - - 0 - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 3 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 28 186 217 22 217 3 0 0 229 3 0 54

Stage 1 - - - - - - 244 244 - 263 263 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 291 264 - 465 461 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1010 - - 872 - - 550 498 919 381 354 873
Stage 1 - - - - - - 901 727 - 856 694 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 852 714 - 658 569 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1010 - - 870 - - 489 465 917 272 330 872
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 489 465 - 272 330 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 866 699 - 824 674 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 776 693 - 475 547 -
HCM LOS B B
Capacity (veh/h) - 917 1010 - - 870 - - 775
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.25 0.028 - - 0.025 - - 0.074
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 10.2 8.7 0 - 9.2 0 - 10
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.2

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1601 1688 1562 1588 1597 0 1566 3158 0 1458 3257 1472
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.987 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1591 1685 1537 1575 1597 0 1566 3158 0 1451 3257 1472
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 3 3 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 2% 1% 10% 2% 1%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 18.0 16.0 16.0 18.0 46.0 14.0 42.0 22.0
Total Split (%) 15.7% 15.7% 12.9% 11.4% 11.4% 12.9% 32.9% 10.0% 30.0% 15.7%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.3 17.3 29.6 11.1 11.1 12.8 41.3 8.7 37.3 60.2
v/c Ratio 0.89 0.86 0.41 0.92 0.75 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.24
Control Delay 78.2 73.5 22.3 99.1 74.5 102.5 47.2 118.0 45.0 4.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 78.2 73.5 22.3 99.1 74.5 102.5 47.2 118.0 45.0 4.0
LOS E E C F E F D F D A
Approach Delay 61.1 88.0 54.6 44.3
Approach LOS E F D D

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 30%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.89 0.86 0.41 0.92 0.75 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.24
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1800 0 0 1853 1765 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1800 0 0 1853 1765 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 10% 2% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 1
Percent Blockage 0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.2 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.3 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 13 18
cSH 1700 1016 419
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.6

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 287 115 10 254 14 7
Future Vol, veh/h 287 115 10 254 14 7
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 363 146 13 322 18 9

Stage 1 - - - - 436 -
Stage 2 - - - - 349 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.4 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 770 - 423 665
Stage 1 - - - - 762 -
Stage 2 - - - - 835 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 770 - 414 665
Stage 1 - - - - 762 -
Stage 2 - - - - 817 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - - 0.016 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1855 0 0 1861 0 0 1693 0 0 1681 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.996 0.978 0.998
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1855 0 0 1861 0 0 1693 0 0 1681 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 17% 0% 0% 50% 7% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Hadj (s) 0.05 0.02 0.12 -0.29
Capacity (veh/h) 745 731 547 621
Control Delay (s) 11.6 10.2 9.0 9.0
Approach Delay (s) 11.6 10.2 9.0 9.0
Approach LOS B B A A
Delay 10.6
Level of Service B

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS B
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 76 204 8 18 188 5 13 10 5 2 29 48
Future Vol, veh/h 76 204 8 18 188 5 13 10 5 2 29 48
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 50 7 0
Mvmt Flow 95 255 10 23 235 6 16 13 6 3 36 60
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS B B A B

Vol Left, % 46% 26% 9% 3%
Vol Thru, % 36% 71% 89% 37%
Vol Right, % 18% 3% 2% 61%
LT Vol 13 76 18 2
RT Vol 5 8 5 48
Degree of Util (X) 0.056 0.463 0.344 0.161
Cap 614 774 762 607
Service Time 3.866 2.677 2.755 3.944
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0.465 0.346 0.163
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 2.5 1.5 0.6

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1900 0 0 1890 0 0 1898 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1900 0 0 1890 0 0 1898 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 804 731 916 803 730 1053 1458 1599
Volume Left 4 0 0 0
cSH 804 1700 1458 1599
Control Delay (s) 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.2

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 127 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 127 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 137 1

Stage 1 138 138 - 28 28 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 28 28 - 138 138 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 970 765 990 926 730 1120 1077 - - 1174 - -
Stage 1 1045 817 - 1158 876 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1167 883 - 1005 786 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 970 765 990 926 730 1120 1077 - - 1174 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 970 765 - 926 730 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1045 817 - 1158 876 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1167 883 - 1005 786 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1077 - - 970 - 1174 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.004 - - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1831 0 0 1619 0 0 1644 0 0 1613 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1831 0 0 1619 0 0 1644 0 0 1613 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Pedestrians 1 2
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1502 1609 836 760 1066 836 760 955
Volume Left 3 2 0 0
cSH 1502 1609 1066 955
Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.1 8.4 8.8
Lane LOS A A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.7

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 8 1 1 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 8 1 1 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 3 14 2 2 103 0 0 0 5 0 0 2

Stage 1 - - - - - - 23 23 - 107 107 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 109 107 - 24 24 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1107 - - 1183 - - 977 764 1136 1000 780 1024
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1165 880 - 1065 825 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1044 811 - 1168 883 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1107 - - 1181 - - 969 759 1134 992 775 1023
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 969 759 - 992 775 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1159 876 - 1062 823 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1039 809 - 1159 879 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1134 1107 - - 1181 - - 1023
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.003 - - 0.001 - - 0.002
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1771 1939 1632 0 1722 0 1702 3297 0 1727 3366 0
Flt Permitted 0.740 0.743 0.072 0.219
Satd. Flow (perm) 1378 1939 1632 0 1332 0 129 3297 0 398 3366 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% 6% 0% 2% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 24.0 24.2 24.2 24.0 66.4 11.4 53.8
Total Split (%) 17.3% 17.3% 17.1% 17.3% 17.3% 17.1% 47.4% 8.1% 38.4%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 19.3 19.3 42.6 19.3 73.6 71.8 55.3 49.2
v/c Ratio 0.51 0.09 0.37 0.76 0.91 0.56 0.04 0.87
Control Delay 52.2 43.2 3.5 65.4 61.4 15.6 12.2 36.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.2 43.2 3.5 65.4 61.4 15.6 12.2 36.1
LOS D D A E E B B D
Approach Delay 19.2 65.4 25.3 35.9

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 27%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.09 0.37 0.76 0.91 0.56 0.04 0.87
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1660 0 0 1676 0 0 1644 0 0 1594 0
Flt Permitted 0.999 0.996 0.970 0.994
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1660 0 0 1676 0 0 1644 0 0 1594 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Pedestrians 1 3 1 1
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.2 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 97 68 96 96 96 88 96
cM capacity (veh/h) 1115 1120 174 235 615 195 230 643
cSH 1115 1120 226 302
Control Delay (s) 0.2 1.0 31.0 19.7
Lane LOS A A D C
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 1.0 31.0 19.7
Approach LOS D C
Average Delay 4.1

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 397 16 34 404 7 51 8 23 6 25 21
Future Vol, veh/h 7 397 16 34 404 7 51 8 23 6 25 21
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 4 0
Mvmt Flow 8 432 17 37 439 8 55 9 25 7 27 23

Stage 1 - - - - - - 458 458 - 518 518 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 543 522 - 477 466 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.61 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.14 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3.1 4 3.1 3 4.036 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 842 - - 841 - - 209 226 634 277 275 666
Stage 1 - - - - - - 606 542 - 651 561 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 536 504 - 683 589 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 841 - - 840 - - 175 210 632 243 255 665
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 175 210 - 243 255 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 598 534 - 642 527 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 462 474 - 635 581 -
HCM LOS D C
Capacity (veh/h) 224 841 - - 840 - - 337
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.398 0.009 - - 0.044 - - 0.168
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.6

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1593 0 0 1774 0 0 1551 0 0 1433 0
Flt Permitted 0.996 0.977 0.771 0.951
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1588 0 0 1736 0 0 1239 0 0 1375 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 39.6 39.6 6.7 6.7
v/c Ratio 0.40 0.38 0.43 0.11
Control Delay 10.2 9.4 34.1 3.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.2 9.4 34.1 3.3
LOS B A C A
Approach LOS B A C A

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.38 0.43 0.11
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Projected 2020 Conditions with Improvements Timing Plan: P.M. Peak Hour
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1875 1615 0 1896 0 1855 1577 0 0 1648 0
Flt Permitted 0.996 0.998 0.999
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1875 1615 0 1896 0 1855 1577 0 0 1648 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Pedestrians 1 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 99 100 100 81 100 100 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 1232 1185 326 378 806 241 311 708
Volume Total 261 147 351 0 152 48
Volume Right 0 147 1 0 152 47
cSH 1232 1700 1185 1700 806 680
Control Delay (s) 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.5 10.7
Lane LOS A A A B B
Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.5 10.5 10.7
Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 2.6

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 217 134 14 305 1 0 0 138 1 0 43
Future Vol, veh/h 21 217 134 14 305 1 0 0 138 1 0 43
Storage Length - - 150 - - - 0 - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 23 238 147 15 335 1 0 0 152 1 0 47

Stage 1 - - - - - - 284 284 - 367 367 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 390 367 - 434 431 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 920 - - 886 - - 447 420 864 339 321 748
Stage 1 - - - - - - 860 702 - 748 626 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 758 652 - 685 586 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 919 - - 886 - - 401 397 864 268 304 747
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 401 397 - 268 304 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 832 679 - 723 612 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 694 638 - 546 567 -
HCM LOS B B
Capacity (veh/h) - 864 919 - - 886 - - 718
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.176 0.025 - - 0.017 - - 0.067
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.6 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.2

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1616 1702 1640 1604 1663 0 1612 3181 0 1407 3290 1457
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.992 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1613 1701 1618 1600 1663 0 1612 3181 0 1403 3290 1457
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 2% 2% 14% 1% 2%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 19.0 19.0 20.0 55.5 13.5 49.0 20.0
Total Split (%) 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 12.7% 12.7% 13.3% 37.0% 9.0% 32.7% 13.3%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 15.3 15.3 29.5 14.1 14.1 14.8 50.9 8.1 44.3 65.1
v/c Ratio 1.03 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.75 0.95 1.01 0.68 1.03 0.29
Control Delay 118.9 112.6 28.9 115.8 73.3 102.9 60.5 87.5 69.6 6.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 118.9 112.6 28.9 115.8 73.3 102.9 60.5 87.5 69.6 6.8
LOS F F C F E F E F E A
Approach Delay 85.8 97.2 65.6 60.4
Approach LOS F F E E
Queue Length 95th (ft) #472 #482 #173 #407 #300 #400 #1085 #167 #1007 117

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 28%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.03 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.75 0.95 1.01 0.68 1.03 0.29
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1826 0 0 1894 1679 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1826 0 0 1894 1679 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Pedestrians 2 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 18 18
cSH 1700 1205 577
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 1.0

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 238 96 17 261 17 26
Future Vol, veh/h 238 96 17 261 17 26
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 259 104 18 284 18 28

Stage 1 - - - - 312 -
Stage 2 - - - - 322 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.14
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 901 - 518 778
Stage 1 - - - - 868 -
Stage 2 - - - - 859 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 900 - 504 777
Stage 1 - - - - 867 -
Stage 2 - - - - 837 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 - - 0.021 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1855 0 0 1838 0 0 1782 0 0 1750 0
Flt Permitted 0.985 0.995 0.992 0.996
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1855 0 0 1838 0 0 1782 0 0 1750 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 7 7 4 3 7 7 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 9% 1% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hadj (s) 0.06 0.02 -0.05 -0.34
Capacity (veh/h) 761 752 612 669
Control Delay (s) 10.1 9.6 8.5 8.5
Approach LOS B A A A
Delay 9.6
Level of Service A

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 82 178 5 23 197 10 5 19 7 7 31 55
Future Vol, veh/h 82 178 5 23 197 10 5 19 7 7 31 55
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 9 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 86 187 5 24 207 11 5 20 7 7 33 58
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 10 9.9 8.4 8.6
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 16% 31% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, % 61% 67% 86% 33%
Vol Right, % 23% 2% 4% 59%
LT Vol 5 82 23 7
RT Vol 7 5 10 55
Degree of Util (X) 0.046 0.352 0.314 0.13
Cap 695 789 767 745
Service Time 3.184 2.579 2.711 2.842
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 0.354 0.316 0.132
HCM Control Delay 8.4 10 9.9 8.6
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1.6 1.3 0.4

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1805 0 0 1831 0 0 1898 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1805 0 0 1831 0 0 1898 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82
Pedestrians 3
Percent Blockage 0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 774 708 913 779 708 1025 1453 1570
Volume Left 4 1 0 0
cSH 774 779 1453 1570
Control Delay (s) 9.7 9.6 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.3

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 40 1 0 111 1
Future Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 40 1 0 111 1
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 49 1 0 135 1

Stage 1 139 139 - 50 50 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 50 50 - 136 139 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 942 748 989 898 709 1089 1076 - - 1154 - -
Stage 1 1044 816 - 1126 857 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1141 869 - 1008 785 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 940 747 987 898 708 1089 1073 - - 1154 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 940 747 - 898 708 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1042 814 - 1126 857 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1141 869 - 1008 783 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1073 - - 940 898 1154 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.004 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1641 0 0 1911 0 0 1650 0 0 1771 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.986 0.998 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1641 0 0 1911 0 0 1650 0 0 1771 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 1 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 100 100 97 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1572 1613 877 783 1072 819 780 1027
cSH 1572 1613 1064 819
Control Delay (s) 0.5 2.2 8.5 9.4
Lane LOS A A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 3.6

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 7 5 15 36 0 1 0 22 1 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 7 5 15 36 0 1 0 22 1 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 9 6 19 46 0 1 0 28 1 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 15 15 - 85 85 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 84 85 - 28 18 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1157 - - 1185 - - 1028 794 1142 1025 805 1097
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1177 887 - 1092 840 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1078 828 - 1163 887 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1156 - - 1184 - - 1014 779 1141 986 790 1096
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1014 779 - 986 790 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1175 885 - 1090 826 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1061 814 - 1133 885 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1135 1156 - - 1184 - - 986
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.001 - - 0.016 - - 0.001
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1738 1939 1540 0 1694 0 1719 3399 0 1727 3410 0
Flt Permitted 0.785 0.740 0.053 0.121
Satd. Flow (perm) 1431 1939 1540 0 1309 0 96 3399 0 220 3410 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 0% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 19.0 24.2 24.2 19.0 76.4 11.4 68.8
Total Split (%) 16.1% 16.1% 12.7% 16.1% 16.1% 12.7% 50.9% 7.6% 45.9%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 19.3 19.3 37.5 19.3 83.5 81.7 70.4 64.3
v/c Ratio 0.31 0.06 0.42 0.85 0.96 0.66 0.03 0.96
Control Delay 52.1 48.3 4.8 82.1 83.1 16.4 11.0 41.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.1 48.3 4.8 82.1 83.1 16.4 11.0 41.4
LOS D D A F F B B D
Approach Delay 16.1 82.1 25.6 41.3
Approach LOS B F C D

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 25%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.06 0.42 0.85 0.96 0.66 0.03 0.96
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1677 0 0 1672 0 0 1742 0 0 1628 0
Flt Permitted 0.998 0.995 0.981 0.990
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1677 0 0 1672 0 0 1742 0 0 1628 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Pedestrians 1 4
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 95 83 93 95 95 92 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1087 1152 179 213 643 169 214 626
cSH 1087 1152 268 262
Control Delay (s) 0.5 1.3 23.8 21.1
Lane LOS A A C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.5 1.3 23.8 21.1
Approach LOS C C
Average Delay 3.3

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 391 9 51 436 13 29 14 31 8 16 13
Future Vol, veh/h 17 391 9 51 436 13 29 14 31 8 16 13
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 18 407 9 53 454 14 30 15 32 8 17 14

Stage 1 - - - - - - 449 449 - 571 571 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 583 578 - 471 453 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 826 - - 863 - - 208 211 662 258 266 649
Stage 1 - - - - - - 639 548 - 611 541 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 529 473 - 688 603 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 823 - - 862 - - 177 187 661 211 236 647
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 177 187 - 211 236 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 620 532 - 591 494 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 459 432 - 619 586 -
HCM LOS C C
Capacity (veh/h) 259 823 - - 862 - - 294
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.298 0.022 - - 0.062 - - 0.131
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.1 - - 0.2 - - 0.4

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1607 0 0 1770 0 0 1524 0 0 1502 0
Flt Permitted 0.995 0.950 0.917
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1601 0 0 1689 0 0 1569 0 0 1397 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 2 2 4 1 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 43.3 43.3 6.8 6.8
v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.20 0.13
Control Delay 8.9 9.4 23.6 22.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.9 9.4 23.6 22.1
LOS A A C C
Approach LOS A A C C

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.20 0.13
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
Projected 2020 Conditions with Improvements Timing Plan: Saturday Midday
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1898 1615 0 1881 0 1855 1577 0 0 1644 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1898 1615 0 1881 0 1855 1577 0 0 1644 0
Travel Time (s) 8.9 6.2 5.2 4.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 1 2 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 1
Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Pedestrians 1 1 2
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 11.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 98 100 100 71 100 100 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1283 1145 430 437 850 217 324 755
Volume Total 200 228 311 0 245 12
Volume Right 0 228 4 0 245 12
cSH 1283 1700 1145 1700 850 755
Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.0 10.9 9.8
Lane LOS A A A B A
Approach LOS B A
Average Delay 3.1

TPD Page 2
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 166 194 21 240 3 0 0 208 0 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 4 166 194 21 240 3 0 0 208 0 0 10
Storage Length - - 150 - - - 0 - - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - -2 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 5 195 228 25 282 4 0 0 245 0 0 12

Stage 1 - - - - - - 206 206 - 336 336 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 341 338 - 442 434 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 6.7 6.1 6 7.1 6.5 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 957 - - 858 - - 540 477 910 352 333 800
Stage 1 - - - - - - 942 752 - 779 645 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 803 669 - 678 585 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 955 - - 857 - - 514 456 909 249 318 798
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 514 456 - 249 318 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 934 746 - 772 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 763 644 - 492 580 -
HCM LOS B A
Capacity (veh/h) - 909 955 - - 857 - - 798
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.269 0.005 - - 0.029 - - 0.015
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 10.4 8.8 0 - 9.3 0 - 9.6
HCM Lane LOS A B A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0

TPD Page 3
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 14 10 10 10 11 11 11 10 11 11
Grade (%) -1% -1% 1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1633 1694 1640 1604 1664 0 1628 3208 0 1604 3290 1457
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.986 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1623 1692 1615 1595 1664 0 1628 3208 0 1604 3290 1457
Travel Time (s) 10.2 8.9 24.0 6.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2%
Detector Phase 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 1 6 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.1 13.1 13.5 16.5 13.5 16.5 13.0
Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 16.0 16.0 17.0 41.5 13.5 38.0 17.0
Total Split (%) 13.1% 13.1% 13.1% 12.3% 12.3% 13.1% 31.9% 10.4% 29.2% 13.1%
Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
All-Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0
Act Effct Green (s) 12.3 12.3 23.6 11.2 11.2 11.8 36.9 8.2 33.3 51.2
v/c Ratio 1.00 0.99 0.41 0.87 0.48 0.89 0.94 0.76 0.95 0.22
Control Delay 106.2 102.2 21.7 83.5 52.6 84.2 44.3 79.5 48.6 4.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 106.2 102.2 21.7 83.5 52.6 84.2 44.3 79.5 48.6 4.9
LOS F F C F D F D E D A
Approach Delay 81.0 72.2 49.6 44.9
Approach LOS F E D D

TPD Page 4
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 32%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 5
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.00 0.99 0.41 0.87 0.48 0.89 0.94 0.76 0.95 0.22
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 6
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 7

Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 0% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1816 0 0 1878 1737 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1816 0 0 1878 1737 0
Travel Time (s) 6.2 12.1 5.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 8

Lane Configurations
Grade 0% 0% -1%
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Pedestrians 6
Percent Blockage 1
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Volume Left 0 10 10
cSH 1700 1139 540
Lane LOS A B
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 0.5

TPD Page 9
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 242 119 9 216 9 9
Future Vol, veh/h 242 119 9 216 9 9
Grade, % 0 - - 0 -1 -
Mvmt Flow 281 138 10 251 10 10

Stage 1 - - - - 356 -
Stage 2 - - - - 271 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - 6.2 6.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 858 - 523 738
Stage 1 - - - - 829 -
Stage 2 - - - - 906 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 853 - 513 734
Stage 1 - - - - 824 -
Stage 2 - - - - 893 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - 0.012 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -

TPD Page 10
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 0% 1% -1% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1849 0 0 1881 0 0 1819 0 0 1692 0
Flt Permitted 0.987 0.998 0.984
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1849 0 0 1881 0 0 1819 0 0 1692 0
Travel Time (s) 12.1 5.9 8.7 14.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 8 8 1 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 11
Lane Configurations
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Hadj (s) 0.03 -0.01 -0.08 -0.39
Capacity (veh/h) 802 785 639 691
Control Delay (s) 9.7 9.0 8.2 8.1
Delay 9.2
Level of Service A

TPD Page 12
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 173 12 8 176 4 6 8 4 0 17 40
Future Vol, veh/h 63 173 12 8 176 4 6 8 4 0 17 40
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Mvmt Flow 72 197 14 9 200 5 7 9 5 0 19 45
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 9.6 9 8.2 8
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 33% 25% 4% 0%
Vol Thru, % 44% 70% 94% 30%
Vol Right, % 22% 5% 2% 70%
LT Vol 6 63 8 0
RT Vol 4 12 4 40
Degree of Util (X) 0.028 0.34 0.261 0.083
Cap 714 829 818 779
Service Time 3.047 2.368 2.412 2.624
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 0.34 0.262 0.083
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1.5 1 0.3

TPD Page 13
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -5% 0% 1% 0%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1805 0 0 1890 0 0 1900 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1727 0 0 1805 0 0 1890 0 0 1900 0
Travel Time (s) 4.1 4.9 5.6 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 7 3 3 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 14
Lane Configurations
Grade -5% 0% 1% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
Pedestrians 7 3 2 2
Lane Width (ft) 10.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 757 697 872 764 696 1045 1413 1594
Volume Left 3 1 0 0
cSH 757 764 1413 1594
Control Delay (s) 9.8 9.7 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.2

TPD Page 15
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 128 0
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 128 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - -5 - - 0 - - 1 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 25 0 0 162 0

Stage 1 169 169 - 28 28 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 27 28 - 164 169 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.1 5.5 5.7 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.3 - - 4.3 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1 3 - - 3 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 933 742 953 889 702 1117 1051 - - 1174 - -
Stage 1 1013 799 - 1158 876 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1168 883 - 972 763 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 926 735 946 885 696 1112 1045 - - 1171 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 926 735 - 885 696 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 1007 794 - 1155 873 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 1166 880 - 970 758 - - - - - - -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1045 - - 926 885 1171 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.003 0.001 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -

TPD Page 16
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
Grade (%) 3% -4% 0% -3%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1872 0 0 1932 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Flt Permitted 0.999
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1872 0 0 1932 0 0 1644 0 0 1864 0
Travel Time (s) 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.9
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 17
Lane Configurations
Grade 3% -4% 0% -3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Percent Blockage
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1488 1625 853 767 1080 849 768 945
Volume Left 0 2 0 0
cSH 1488 1625 1080 1700
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 8.3 0.0
Lane LOS A A A
Approach LOS A A
Average Delay 0.3

TPD Page 18
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 1 56 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 0 1 56 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 3 - - -4 - - 0 - - -3 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 8 0 2 112 2 0 0 2 0 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - - - 8 8 - 117 117 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 117 118 - 9 8 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.9 5.9
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1098 - - 1193 - - 988 768 1149 1007 785 1013
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1188 893 - 1053 818 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1033 802 - 1188 894 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1098 - - 1193 - - 986 766 1149 1004 783 1013
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 986 766 - 1004 783 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1188 893 - 1053 816 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1031 800 - 1186 894 -
HCM LOS A A
Capacity (veh/h) 1149 1098 - - 1193 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.002 - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - -

TPD Page 19
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Lane Width (ft) 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) -2% 0% -1% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 1806 1939 1632 0 1710 0 1719 3399 0 1727 3388 0
Flt Permitted 0.750 0.743 0.079 0.250
Satd. Flow (perm) 1420 1939 1632 0 1324 0 143 3399 0 454 3388 0
Travel Time (s) 9.7 8.6 10.7 24.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.2 24.2 11.4 24.4 11.4 24.4
Total Split (s) 24.2 24.2 22.0 24.2 24.2 22.0 56.4 11.4 45.8
Total Split (%) 18.6% 18.6% 16.9% 18.6% 18.6% 16.9% 43.4% 8.8% 35.2%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
All-Red Time (s) 3.2 3.2 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Total Lost Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Act Effct Green (s) 18.6 18.6 40.0 18.6 63.7 62.0 47.4 41.3
v/c Ratio 0.45 0.05 0.40 0.70 0.91 0.52 0.02 0.87
Control Delay 44.8 38.6 3.3 55.8 57.3 15.6 13.0 36.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 44.8 38.6 3.3 55.8 57.3 15.6 13.0 36.1
LOS D D A E E B B D
Approach Delay 14.8 55.8 25.1 36.0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 164 36 37 #284 #488 535 10 #796

TPD Page 20
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width (ft)
Grade (%)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 29%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS

TPD Page 21
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.04 0.40 0.67 0.91 0.52 0.02 0.87
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Natural Cycle: 150

TPD Page 22
Lane Group Ø9
Base Capacity (vph)
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 23
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Grade (%) 1% 1% 2% -2%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1678 0 0 1676 0 0 1712 0 0 1623 0
Flt Permitted 0.999 0.996 0.971 0.986
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1678 0 0 1676 0 0 1712 0 0 1623 0
Travel Time (s) 11.6 10.2 14.0 5.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 4 4 3 4 2 2 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Type: Other

TPD Page 24
Lane Configurations
Grade 1% 1% 2% -2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Pedestrians 4 2 4 3
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Median storage veh)
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 97 73 98 95 93 93 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1106 1091 183 223 582 185 223 630
cSH 1106 1091 246 268
Control Delay (s) 0.2 1.0 26.9 21.0
Lane LOS A A D C
Approach Delay (s) 0.2 1.0 26.9 21.0
Approach LOS D C
Average Delay 3.4

TPD Page 25
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 437 8 34 418 6 46 4 28 11 15 14
Future Vol, veh/h 7 437 8 34 418 6 46 4 28 11 15 14
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grade, % - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - -2 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 7 465 9 36 445 6 49 4 30 12 16 15

Stage 1 - - - - - - 488 488 - 523 523 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 540 526 - 503 492 -
Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.3 - - 7.5 6.9 6.44 6.7 6.1 6
Follow-up Hdwy 3 - - 3 - - 3.1 4 3.1 3 4 3.1
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 838 - - 822 - - 206 215 604 264 269 658
Stage 1 - - - - - - 589 524 - 647 566 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 548 502 - 662 582 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 836 - - 819 - - 180 199 601 233 249 654
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 180 199 - 233 249 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 580 516 - 638 531 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 487 471 - 616 573 -
HCM LOS D C
Capacity (veh/h) 242 836 - - 819 - - 310
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.343 0.009 - - 0.044 - - 0.137
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.5

TPD Page 26
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Grade (%) -1% 0% -2% -1%
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1609 0 0 1773 0 0 1532 0 0 1486 0
Flt Permitted 0.992 0.981 0.816 0.946
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1598 0 0 1743 0 0 1296 0 0 1422 0
Travel Time (s) 10.2 7.4 7.6 5.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 6% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Switch Phase
Minimum Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (%) 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Act Effct Green (s) 40.7 40.7 6.7 6.7
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.08
Control Delay 10.5 9.0 28.4 20.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.5 9.0 28.4 20.6
LOS B A C C
Approach Delay 10.5 9.0 28.4 20.6
Approach LOS B A C C

TPD Page 27
Lane Group Ø9
Lane Configurations
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Parking (#/hr)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 9
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Total Split (%) 44%
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Base Capacity (vph)

TPD Page 28
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.08
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Natural Cycle: 80

TPD Page 29
Lane Group Ø9
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

TPD Page 30
APPENDIX H:
Traffic Signal Plans
AM
SAT
PM
MID
AM
SAT
MID
PM
APPENDIX I:
Critical and Follow-up Headway Calculation Worksheets
WMSC.00002 Int. 1
Chestnut Street & N-S Alley/Select Medical PT Parking Lot
Crititcal Headway
tc base tc hv phv t cg G t 3lt Base Crit
AM EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
Major left PM EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
SAT EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
AM WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
Major left PM WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
SAT WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
AM NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.7
Minor left PM NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.7
SAT NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.7
AM NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.1
Minor
PM NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.1
through
SAT NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.1
AM NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -2 0 6.0
Minor right PM NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -2 0 6.0
SAT NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -2 0 6.0
AM SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
Minor left PM SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
SAT SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
AM SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
Minor
PM SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
Through
SAT SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
AM SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
Minor right PM SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
SAT SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
Follow-up headway
t fbase t fhv phv Follow-up
AM EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Major left PM EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Major left PM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Minor left PM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Minor
PM NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
through
SAT NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
AM NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
Minor right PM NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
SAT NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
AM SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Minor left PM SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Minor
PM SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Through
SAT SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
AM SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
Minor right PM SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
SAT SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
WMSC.00002 Int. 3
Chestnut Street & 31st Street
Crititcal Headway
AM WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
major left PM WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
SAT WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
AM NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -1 0 6.1
minor right PM NBR 6.2 1 4% 0.1 -1 0 6.1
SAT NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -1 0 6.1
AM NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -1 0.7 6.2
minor left PM NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -1 0.7 6.2
SAT NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -1 0.7 6.2
Follow-up headway
AM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
major left PM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
minor right PM NBR 3.1 0.9 4% 3.1
SAT NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
AM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
minor left PM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
WMSC.00002 Int. 5
31st Street & E-W Alley
Crititcal Headway
AM NBL 4.3 1 0% 0 1 0 4.3
Major left PM NBL 4.3 1 0% 0 1 0 4.3
SAT NBL 4.3 1 0% 0 1 0 4.3
AM SBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
Major left PM SBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
SAT SBL 4.3 1 0% 0 0 0 4.3
AM EBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -5 0 6.1
Minor left PM EBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -5 0 6.1
SAT EBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -5 0 6.1
AM EBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -5 0 5.5
Minor
PM EBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -5 0 5.5
through
SAT EBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -5 0 5.5
AM EBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -5 0 5.7
Minor right PM EBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -5 0 5.7
SAT EBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -5 0 5.7
AM WBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
Minor left PM WBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
SAT WBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
AM WBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
Minor
PM WBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
Through
SAT WBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
AM WBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
Minor right PM WBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
SAT WBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
Follow-up headway
AM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Major left PM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Major left PM SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Minor left PM EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM EBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Minor
PM EBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
through
SAT EBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
AM EBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
Minor right PM EBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
SAT EBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
AM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Minor left PM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM WBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Minor
PM WBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Through
SAT WBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
AM WBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
Minor right PM WBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
SAT WBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
WMSC.00002 Int. 6
Bramar Road & N-S Alley
Crititcal Headway
AM EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 3 0 4.3
Major left PM EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 3 0 4.3
SAT EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 3 0 4.3
AM WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 -4 0 4.3
Major left PM WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 -4 0 4.3
SAT WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 -4 0 4.3
AM NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
Minor left PM NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
SAT NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 0 0 7.1
AM NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
Minor
PM NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
through
SAT NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 0 0 6.5
AM NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
Minor right PM NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
SAT NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 0 0 6.2
AM SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -3 0 6.5
Minor left PM SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -3 0 6.5
SAT SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -3 0 6.5
AM SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -3 0 5.9
Minor
PM SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -3 0 5.9
Through
SAT SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -3 0 5.9
AM SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -3 0 5.9
Minor right PM SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -3 0 5.9
SAT SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -3 0 5.9
Follow-up headway
AM EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Major left PM EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Major left PM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Minor left PM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Minor
PM NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
through
SAT NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
AM NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
Minor right PM NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
SAT NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
AM SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Minor left PM SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Minor
PM SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Through
SAT SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
AM SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
Minor right PM SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
SAT SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
WMSC.00002 Int. 8
Market Street & 30th Street
Crititcal Headway
AM EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 1 0 4.3
MID EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 1 0 4.3
Major left
PM EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 1 0 4.3
SAT EBL 4.3 1 0% 0 1 0 4.3
AM WBL 4.3 1 2% 0 -1 0 4.3
MID WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 -1 0 4.3
Major left
PM WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 -1 0 4.3
SAT WBL 4.3 1 0% 0 -1 0 4.3
AM NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 2 0 7.5
MID NBL 7.1 1 11% 0.2 2 0 7.6
Minor left
PM NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 2 0 7.5
SAT NBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 2 0 7.5
AM NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 2 0 6.9
Minor MID NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 2 0 6.9
through PM NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 2 0 6.9
SAT NBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 2 0 6.9
AM NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 2 0 6.4
MID NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 2 0 6.4
Minor right
PM NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 2 0 6.4
SAT NBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 2 0 6.4
AM SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.7
MID SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.7
Minor left
PM SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.7
SAT SBL 7.1 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.7
AM SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.1
Minor MID SBT 6.5 1 4% 0.2 -2 0 6.1
Through PM SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.1
SAT SBT 6.5 1 0% 0.2 -2 0 6.1
AM SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -2 0 6.0
MID SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -2 0 6.0
Minor right
PM SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -2 0 6.0
SAT SBR 6.2 1 0% 0.1 -2 0 6.0
Follow-up headway
AM EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
MID EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Major left
PM EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT EBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM WBL 3 0.9 2% 3.0
MID WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Major left
PM WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT WBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
MID NBL 3 0.9 11% 3.1
Minor left
PM NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT NBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Minor MID NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
through PM NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
SAT NBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
AM NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
MID NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
Minor right
PM NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
SAT NBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
AM SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
MID SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
Minor left
PM SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
SAT SBL 3 0.9 0% 3.0
AM SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
Minor MID SBT 4 0.9 4% 4.0
Through PM SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
SAT SBT 4 0.9 0% 4.0
AM SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
MID SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
Minor right
PM SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
SAT SBR 3.1 0.9 0% 3.1
APPENDIX J:
Auxiliary Turn Lane Warrant Analysis Worksheets
Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis
Workbook
STUDY LOCATION AND ANALYSIS INFORMATION

Municipality: Camp Hill Borough Analysis Date: 2/16/2019
County: Cumberland County Conducted By: JJS
PennDOT Engineering District: 8 Checked By: JLN
Agency/Company Name: Traffic Planning & Design, Inc.
Intersection & Approach Description: Chestnut Street & N-S Alley
Analysis Period: 2020 Build Number of Approach Lanes: 1

Design Hour: AM Peak Hour Undivided or Divided Highway: Undivided
Intersection Control: Unsignalized
Posted Speed Limit (MPH): 25 Type of Analysis
Type of Terrain: Level Left or Right-Turn Lane Analysis?: Left Turn Lane
VOLUME CALCULATIONS
Left Turn Lane Volume Calculations
Movement Include? Volume % Trucks PCEV

Left Yes 4 0.0% 4 Advancing Volume: 236
Advancing Through - 226 2.0% 229 Opposing Volume: 327
Right Yes 3 0.0% 3 Left Turn Volume: 4
Left Yes 74 0.0% 74
Opposing Through - 207 1.0% 209
Right Yes 44 0.0% 44 % Left Turns in Advancing Volume: 1.69%
Right Turn Lane Volume Calculations

Left Yes 74 0.0% N/A
Advancing Through - 207 1.0% N/A Advancing Volume: N/A
Right - 44 0.0% N/A Right Turn Volume: N/A
TURN LANE WARRANT FINDINGS

Left Turn Lane Warrant Findings Right Turn Lane Warrant Findings
Applicable Warrant Figure: Figure 1 Applicable Warrant Figure: N/A

Warrant Met?: No Warrant Met?: N/A
TURN LANE LENGTH CALCULATIONS
Design Hour Volume of Turning Lane: 4
Cycles Per Hour (Assumed): 60
Cycles Per Hour (If Known): Average # of Vehicles/Cycle: N/A
PennDOT Publication 46, Exhibit 11-6

Speed (MPH)
25-35 40-45 50-60
Type of Traffic Control
Turn Demand Volume
High Low High Low High Low
Signalized A A B or C B or C B or C B or C
Unsignalized A A C B B or C B
Left Turn Lane Storage Length, Condition A: N/A Feet

Condition B: N/A Feet
Condition C: N/A Feet
Required Left Turn Lane Storage Length: N/A Feet
Additional Findings:
N/A
Additional Comments / Justifications:
2/16/2019 Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis Workbook Chestnut AM.xlsx
Figure 1. Warrant for left turn lanes on two-lane roadways
(speeds to 35 mph, unsignalized and signalized intersections)
(L = % Left Turns in Advancing Volume)
900
800
700
Left Turn Lane
Warranted
600
Opposing Volume (VPH)
500 Volume Data Point

1.7%
400
236, 327
300
200
Left Turn
Lane Not
Warranted
100
40%30%20%15% 10% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1%
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Advancing Volume (VPH)
Workbook


Design Hour: AM Peak Hour Undivided or Divided Highway: Undivided
Type of Terrain: Level Left or Right-Turn Lane Analysis?: Right Turn Lane
VOLUME CALCULATIONS

Left Yes 4 0.0% N/A Advancing Volume: N/A
Advancing Through - 226 2.0% N/A Opposing Volume: N/A
Right Yes 3 0.0% N/A Left Turn Volume: N/A
Opposing Through - 207 1.0% N/A
Right Yes 44 0.0% N/A % Left Turns in Advancing Volume: N/A

Left Yes 74 0.0% 74
Advancing Through - 207 1.0% 209 Advancing Volume: 327
Right - 44 0.0% 44 Right Turn Volume: 44

Applicable Warrant Figure: N/A Applicable Warrant Figure: Figure 9

Warrant Met?: N/A Warrant Met?: No

Speed (MPH)
25-35 40-45 50-60
Turn Demand Volume
Right Turn Lane Storage Length, Condition A: N/A Feet

Required Right Turn Lane Storage Length: N/A Feet
N/A
2/16/2019 Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis Workbook Chestnut AM.xlsx
Figure 9. Warrant for right turn lanes on two-lane roadways
(40 mph or lower speeds, unsignalized and signalized intersections)
160
140
120
Right Turn Lane

Right Turning Traffic (VPH)
100 Warranted
Volume Data Point

80
60
327, 44
40
Right Turn
Lane Not
Warranted
20
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Advancing Volume including Right Turns (VPH)

Workbook


Design Hour: Weekday Midday Peak Hour Undivided or Divided Highway: Undivided
VOLUME CALCULATIONS

Left Yes 26 0.0% 26




Speed (MPH)
25-35 40-45 50-60
Turn Demand Volume

N/A
4/5/2019 Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis Workbook Chestnut MID.xlsx
900
800
700
Left Turn Lane
Warranted
600

8.7%
400 230, 405
300
200
Left Turn
Lane Not
Warranted
100
40%30%20%15% 10% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1%
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Workbook


Design Hour: Weekday Midday Peak Hour Undivided or Divided Highway: Undivided
VOLUME CALCULATIONS


Left Yes 26 0.0% 26


Warrant Met?: N/A Warrant Met?: Yes
Cycles Per Hour (If Known): Average # of Vehicles/Cycle: 3.0

Speed (MPH)
25-35 40-45 50-60
Turn Demand Volume
Right Turn Lane Storage Length, Condition A: 150 Feet

Required Right Turn Lane Storage Length: 150 Feet
N/A
4/5/2019 Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis Workbook Chestnut MID.xlsx
250
200 405, 202
Right Turn Lane

Warranted
150
Volume Data Point
100
Right Turn
50 Lane Not
Warranted
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Workbook


Design Hour: PM Peak Hour Undivided or Divided Highway: Undivided
VOLUME CALCULATIONS

Left Yes 21 0.0% 21




Speed (MPH)
25-35 40-45 50-60
Turn Demand Volume

N/A
2/16/2019 Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis Workbook Chestnut PM.xlsx
900
800
700
Left Turn Lane
Warranted
600

4.4%
400
317, 374
300
200
Left Turn
Lane Not
Warranted
100
40%30%20%15% 10% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1%
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Workbook


Design Hour: PM Peak Hour Undivided or Divided Highway: Undivided
VOLUME CALCULATIONS


Left Yes 21 0.0% 21



Speed (MPH)
25-35 40-45 50-60
Turn Demand Volume

N/A
2/16/2019 Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis Workbook Chestnut PM.xlsx
160
140
374, 134
120
Right Turn Lane

100 Warranted
Volume Data Point

80
60
40
Right Turn
Lane Not
Warranted
20
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Workbook


Design Hour: Saturday Midday Peak Hour Undivided or Divided Highway: Undivided
VOLUME CALCULATIONS

Left Yes 4 0.0% 4

Left Yes 4 0.0% N/A



Speed (MPH)
25-35 40-45 50-60
Turn Demand Volume

N/A
2/16/2019 Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis Workbook Chestnut SAT.xlsx
900
800
700
Left Turn Lane
Warranted
600

7.9%
400
265, 364
300
200
Left Turn
Lane Not
Warranted
100
40%30%20%15% 10% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1%
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Workbook


Design Hour: Saturday Midday Peak Hour Undivided or Divided Highway: Undivided
VOLUME CALCULATIONS

Left Yes 4 0.0% N/A

Left Yes 4 0.0% 4



Speed (MPH)
25-35 40-45 50-60
Turn Demand Volume

N/A
2/16/2019 Turn Lane Warrant and Length Analysis Workbook Chestnut SAT.xlsx
250
200
364, 194
Right Turn Lane

Warranted
150
Volume Data Point
100
Right Turn
50 Lane Not
Warranted
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200

APPENDIX K:
Drive-Thru Count Data
Drive Thru Rate Calculations
Saturday
sf trips rate
store 0721 4971 107 21.52484
store 3536 5200 105 20.19231
10171 212 20.84
Weekday Midday
sf trips rate
Lansdale 4943 107 21.64677
Lindle Rd 4739 116 24.47774
Lincoln Hwy 4831 81 16.76671
14513 304 20.95
Standalone Payments
Time Date
1200 - 1300 1/26/2019
Drive - Thru
Drive - Thru Times Total
Vehicles Drive - Thru Times (Sec) No Car Vehicles Drive - Thru Times (Sec) Times Total (Sec) (Mins)
1 104 41 29 3472 57.86666667
2 40 42 28
3 23 43 36 No Car (Sec)
4 42 44 49 Average (Sec) 39
5 11 45 130 46.91891892
6 39 46 57
7 16 47 14 Average No Car (Sec)
8 25 48 119 Highest (Sec) 19.5
9 39 49 20 224
10 10 50 84
11 103 51 17
12 25 52 68 Lowest (Sec)
13 92 53 37 10
14 17 54 16
15 27 55 17
16 26 56 33 Mode (Sec)
17 53 57 37 17
18 19 58 14
27
19 180 59 23
20 15 60 113
21 28 61 35
22 34 62 59
23 19 63 88
24 16 64 17
25 17 65 16
26 88 66 64
27 30 67 24
28 224 68 53
29 45 69 17
30 34 70 29
31 36 71 17
32 22 72 16
12
33 56 73 201
34 84 74 15
35 45
36 23
37 20
38 47
39 49
40 57
Time Date
1200 - 1300 1/26/2019
Drive - Thru Drive - Thru

Times Total Times Total
Vehicles Drive - Thru Times (Sec) No Car Vehicles Drive - Thru Times (Sec) (Sec) (Mins) No Car (Sec)
1 22 41 31 3426 57.1 0
2 18 42 29
3 62 43 42
4 63 44 81 Average (Sec) Average No Car (Sec)
5 45 45 22 45.07894737 #DIV/0!
6 31 46 27
7 39 47 18
8 21 48 31 Highest (Sec)
9 99 49 21 140
10 52 50 24
11 114 51 31
12 21 52 23 Lowest (Sec)
13 38 53 38 15
14 33 54 40
15 139 55 53
16 40 56 58 Mode (Sec)
17 24 57 74 31
18 140 58 49
19 54 59 80
20 39 60 36
21 63 61 101
22 21 62 65
23 30 63 44
24 31 64 18
25 15 65 29
26 50 66 61
27 29 67 32
28 46 68 23
29 32 69 31
30 17 70 30
31 45 71 17
32 18 72 22
33 16 73 63
34 91 74 99
35 40 75 34
36 55 76 27
37 51
38 114
39 35
40 29
Time Date
1200 - 1300 1/26/2019

1 26 41 37 3326 55.43333333 0
2 42 42 75
3 53 43 32
5 30 45 68 42.40740741 #DIV/0!
6 70 46 67
7 33 47 36
9 35 49 50 165
10 28 50 21
11 165 51 24
12 41 52 37 Lowest (Sec)
13 35 53 21 15
14 47 54 33
15 52 55 31
16 28 56 20 Mode (Sec)
17 24 57 29 29
18 68 58 68
19 37 59 40
20 22 60 61
21 29 61 73
22 31 62 80
23 39 63 64
24 23 64 29
25 31 65 18
26 15 66 30
27 54 67 41
28 65 68 22
29 32 69 52
30 30 70 74
31 29 71 27
32 34 72 81
33 57 73 29
34 40 74 34
35 39 75 32
36 34 76 26
37 117 77 60
38 31 78 21
39 27 79 41
40 53 80 22
81 25
Pay Station
11:00 AM - 12:00 PM PEAK 12:00 PM PEAK
Vehicles Dwell Time Vehicles Dwell Time Vehicles Dwell Time Vehicles Dwell Time
1 30.6 51 63.9 1 70 51 20.7
2 81.8 52 35.9 2 35.2 52 43.1
3 23.9 53 34.5 3 18.8 53 12.3
4 22.3 54 20.1 4 24.5 54 8.1
5 37.8 55 17.9 5 35.3 55 89.6
6 50.2 56 26.1 6 100.1 56 40.2
7 38.3 57 51.2 7 78.4 57 29.3
8 41.6 58 42.1 8 16.8 58 14.5
9 16.4 59 22.6 9 92.1 59 49.4
10 22.3 60 34.5 10 99.1 60 18.9
11 60.2 61 38.3 11 63.6 61 44.3
12 57.7 62 22.3 12 46.4 62 18.8
13 60.7 63 58.5 13 19.1 63 9.7
14 49.2 64 112.4 14 59.7 64 30.2
15 63.5 65 19.8 15 20.7 65 13.8
16 19.1 66 59.2 16 8.4 66 131.4
17 53.3 67 82.8 17 30.9 67 16.3
18 25.1 68 24 18 10.9 68 109.3
19 39.9 69 12.4 19 15.1 69 15.5
20 129.8 70 19.8 20 21.8 70 47.2
21 99.7 71 13 21 29.2 71 23.3
22 10.6 72 8.7 22 27.9 72 65.8
23 85.7 73 11.4 23 48.5 73 18
24 16.2 74 27.9 24 30.4 74 14.7
25 26 75 21.5 25 53.6 75 45.9
26 22.4 76 20.1 26 31.5 76 41.8
27 27.5 77 20.8 27 11.5 77 17.6
28 29 78 33.9 28 11.2 78 30.7
29 16.6 79 12.3 29 17 79 23.6
30 11.4 80 11.1 30 56.2 80 30.2
31 37.7 81 69.8 31 46.5 81 16.2
32 13 82 19.9 32 151.9 82 12.8
33 14.8 83 15.9 33 21.1 83 28
34 16.1 84 68.2 34 50.6 84 23.9
35 14.9 35 26.5 85 16.4
36 18.5 36 75.4 86 13.2
37 49 37 15.9 87 37
38 17.8 38 38.6 88 33.9
39 9.5 39 98.2 89 17.3
40 69.3 40 17.6 90 16.7
41 20.6 41 25.9 91 62.8
42 21.3 42 97.9 92 50.5
43 70.8 43 11.9 93 28
44 13.6 44 27 94 102.3
45 67.6 45 17.2
46 40 46 15
47 36.4 47 54
48 33.8 48 59
49 25.6 49 22.5
50 43.5 50 36
36.37380952 38.57234043
39
iPad orders with assisted pick-up
Time Date
1200 - 1300 1/26/2019

1 10 41 30 3570 59.5 18
2 8 42 36
3 48 43 48
5 20 45 32 33.36448598 0
6 19 46 70
7 32 47 77
9 25 49 23 171
10 15 50 33
11 11 51 43
12 87 52 18 Lowest (Sec)
13 24 53 10 3
14 25 54 44
15 100 55 13
16 22 56 38 Mode (Sec)
17 28 57 26 15
18 16 58 34
0
19 26 59 32
20 20 60 26
21 20 61 65
22 11 62 19
23 73 63 9
24 14 64 9
25 18 65 16
26 33 66 70
27 20 67 35
28 30 68 5
29 70 69 75
30 9 70 15
31 36 71 55
32 23 72 10
0
33 40 73 12
34 15 74 30
35 42 75 15
36 26 76 30
18
37 27 77 25
38 28 78 25
39 15 79 11
40 29 80 24
81 31
82 22
83 47
84 78
85 79
86 8
87 8
88 3
89 4
90 10
91 35
92 32
93 15
94 160
95 25
96 171
97 24
98 76
99 36
100 72
101 38
102 22
103 74
104 35
105 18
106 25
107 30
Time Date
1200 - 1300 2/9/2019

1 28 41 14 3600 60 0
2 10 42 13
3 12 43 15
5 70 45 38 34.28571429 0
6 30 46 20
7 15 47 21
9 20 49 8 180
10 21 50 18
11 38 51 85
12 9 52 43 Lowest (Sec)
13 10 53 85 6
14 12 54 15
15 60 55 10
16 11 56 14 Mode (Sec)
17 14 57 13 10
18 14 58 15
0
19 14 59 93
20 25 60 95
21 49 61 75
22 67 62 9
23 8 63 27
24 16 64 19
25 10 65 9
26 21 66 33
27 31 67 20
28 90 68 21
29 53 69 22
30 10 70 33
31 22 71 24
32 54 72 25
0
33 29 73 57
34 20 74 15
35 25 75 10
36 31 76 18
0
37 16 77 13
38 21 78 100
39 94 79 22
40 18 80 21
81 17
82 12
83 40
84 13
85 180
86 65
87 20
88 30
89 42
90 20
91 27
92 20
93 17
94 13
95 14
96 25
97 60
98 15
99 40
100 10
101 52
102 51
103 43
104 175
105 180
APPENDIX L:
SimTraffic Analysis Printouts
Queuing and Blocking Report WMSC.00002
Projected 2020 Conditions Saturday Midday
Intersection: 7: Site Egress/Site Driveway & Drive-Thru Lane

Movement EB WB WB
Directions Served T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 54 79 70
Average Queue (ft) 23 3 7
95th Queue (ft) 49 26 34
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 7
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 13: N-S Alley & Site Driveway/E-W Alley

Movement EB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 30 44
Average Queue (ft) 30 3
95th Queue (ft) 31 21
Link Distance (ft) 16 149
Upstream Blk Time (%) 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 26
Intersection: 24: Drive-Thru Booth & Drive-Thru Lane

Movement WB B23 B23 NB
Directions Served T T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 119 112 164 80
Average Queue (ft) 115 65 70 56
95th Queue (ft) 137 115 160 68
Upstream Blk Time (%) 94 6 17 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 98 3 9 0
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 144
WMSC.00002 SimTraffic Report

TPD Page 1
APPENDIX M:
Conceptual Pedestrian Improvements Plan
CHESTNUT STREET PROPOSED RAISED CROSSWALK (TYP.)
RELOCATED STOP
SIGN (TYP.)
24"/W (TYP.)
MATCHLINE A
S 31
ST S
TR E
ET
S 32N
D ST
Est. 1989
R EET
TRAFFIC PLANNING
0 25 50 FEET
AND DESIGN, INC.
1:25
CONCEPT PLAN NOTES DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SECTION SHEET

THESE NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS CONCEPT PLAN. THIS CONCEPT PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED AT ANY UTILITY FACILITIES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE UNVERIFIED AND MUST BE CONFIRMED THROUGH SURVEY ALTHOUGH NOT NECESSARILY DEPICTED ON THIS CONCEPT PLAN, DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
CLIENT'S REQUEST, IS CONCEPTUAL AND PRELIMINARY IN NATURE, AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR PURPOSES OF AND UTILITY RESEARCH. SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING MAY BE NECESSARY TO ACCURATELY LOCATE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. 8-0 CUMBERLAND -- -- 1 OF 3
CONSTRUCTION OR ANY OTHER USE. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND REFINEMENT AS THE DESIGN IS UNDERGROUND UTILITY FACILITIES. EVEN IF NOT DEPICTED HEREIN, UTILITY RELOCATIONS MAY BE
CAMP HILL BOROUGH
2:01:09 PM
FURTHER DEVELOPED AND REVIEWED BY MUNICIPALITIES, AGENCIES, AND OTHERS. NECESSARY AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. UTILITY RELOCATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON ENGINEERED AND APPROVED ALL DOCUMENTS, DESIGNS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ("INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE") PREPARED
PLANS. SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS PROJECT BY PREPARER ("ENGINEER") ARE NOT INTENDED OR REPRESENTED TO BE
ENGINEER DOES NOT MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION REGARDING THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED SUITABLE FOR USE BY CLIENT OR ANYONE ELSE ON FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT OR ON ANY OTHER
HEREIN AND ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.
CLIENT MUST OBTAIN WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM PREPARER PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THIS PLAN TO ANY THIRD PARTY.
ANY ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE UNVERIFIED AND MUST BE CONFIRMED THROUGH
RESEARCH, FIELD SURVEYS, AND STUDIES. EVEN IF NOT DEPICTED HEREIN, ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MAY
PROJECT. IN ACCEPTING AND UTILIZING INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE, OR ANY FORM OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA
GENERATED AND PROVIDED BY ENGINEER WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT, ANY REUSE OR MODIFICATION OF
CHESTNUT STREET
ANY OTHER USE BY A THIRD PARTY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. BE IMPACTED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. THIS CONCEPT PLAN DOES NOT PURPORT TO CONSIDER ALL INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT BY ENGINEER FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE INTENDED
THIS CONCEPT PLAN IS BASED ON UNVERIFIED SURVEY/MAPPING INFORMATION PROVIDED TO PREPARER BY OTHERS.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE IMPACTS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED DUE TO ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. WILL BE AT CLIENT'S SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY OR LEGAL EXPOSURE TO ENGINEER. CLIENT AGREES
TO WAIVE ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ENGINEER RESULTING IN ANY WAY FROM ANY UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES OR REUSE
PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
FINAL PROJECT DESIGN SHALL BE BASED ON ACTUAL SURVEY PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND CONTROL OF A
ANY ROADWAY STRUCTURES (E.G. BRIDGES, CULVERTS, RETAINING WALLS) DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE OF INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE BY ANYONE OTHER THAN ENGINEER. IN ADDITION, CLIENT AGREES, TO THE
PROFESSIONAL LICENSED SURVEYOR.
UNVERIFIED AND MUST BE CONFIRMED THROUGH RESEARCH, FIELD SURVEYS, AND STUDIES. EVEN IF NOT FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY CONCEPT
7/30/2019
ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES OR PROPERTY LINES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE UNVERIFIED AND MUST BE CONFIRMED BY DEPICTED HEREIN, ROADWAY STRUCTURES MAY BE IMPACTED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. THIS CONCEPT DAMAGE, LIABILITY, OR COST, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS OF DEFENSE,
A PROFESSIONAL LICENSED SURVEYOR. EVEN IF NOT DEPICTED HEREIN, RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS PLAN DOES NOT PURPORT TO CONSIDER ALL IMPACTS TO ROADWAY STRUCTURES THAT MAY BE REQUIRED DUE TO ARISING FROM ANY UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OR CHANGES TO INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE.
MAY BE NECESSARY AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. FINAL RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS SHALL BE BASED ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.
ON ENGINEERED AND APPROVED PLANS. 12/17/2018
S 29
TH
STR
EET
24"/W (TYP.)
RELOCATED STOP
SIGN (TYP.)
PROPOSED RAISED INTERSECTION
CHESTNUT STREET
MATCHLINE A
MATCHLINE B
S 30
TH
STR
EET Est. 1989
TRAFFIC PLANNING
0 25 50 FEET
AND DESIGN, INC.
1:25

12:12:19 PM
FURTHER DEVELOPED AND REVIEWED BY MUNICIPALITIES, AGENCIES, AND OTHERS. NECESSARY AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. UTILITY RELOCATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON ENGINEERED AND APPROVED ALL DOCUMENTS, DESIGNS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ("INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE") PREPARED CAMP HILL BOROUGH
CHESTNUT STREET
12/17/2018
24"/W (TYP.)
RELOCATED STOP PROPOSED RAISED CROSSWALK

SIGN (TYP.) PROPOSED RAISED CROSSWALK
CHESTNUT STREET
MATCHLINE B
S 28T
S 27TH S
H STR
TR EET
EET
Est. 1989
TRAFFIC PLANNING
0 25 50 FEET
AND DESIGN, INC.
1:25

12:12:23 PM
FURTHER DEVELOPED AND REVIEWED BY MUNICIPALITIES, AGENCIES, AND OTHERS. NECESSARY AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. UTILITY RELOCATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON ENGINEERED AND APPROVED ALL DOCUMENTS, DESIGNS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ("INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE") PREPARED CAMP HILL BOROUGH
CHESTNUT STREET
12/17/2018
PRELIMINARY / FINAL SUBDIVISION
& LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANS
3115 - 3133 CHESTNUT STREET
PROPOSED Chick-fil-A RESTAURAN
Borough of Camp Hill Cumberland County, PA
3115 - 3133 CHESTNUT STREET - PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT
CONSOLIDATED PROPERTIES
WORMLEYSBURG, PA 17043
SHEET INDEX:
400 NORTH FRONT STREET
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
INVENTORY OF REQUIRED PERMITS / APPROVALS:
AGENCY DATE SUBMITTED PERMIT NO. APPROVAL DATE
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)

SHEET DESCRIPTION CUMBERLAND COUNTY
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
SHEET
1 TITLE SHEET
2 TOPOGRAPHIC & BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAN
APPLICANT:
SITE
3 SUBDIVISION PLAN (PROPERTY CONSOLIDATION) REQUESTED WAIVERS:
4 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SUBDIVISION & LAND DEVELOPMENT:
1. SECTION 404 - PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMISSION
REQUIREMENTS
5 SITE PLAN
TITLE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE:
6 GRADING / UTILITIES PLAN
1. SECTION 174-18 - GROUNDWATER RECHARGE
REQUIREMENTS
7 SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
8 POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
BOROUGH OF CAMP HILL

MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
9 SITE LANDSCAPING PLAN
10 SITE LIGHTING PLAN
11 UTILITY PROFILES & OTHER INFORMATION
OWNER:
12 UTILITY PROFILES & OTHER INFORMATION CAMP HILL BOROUGH COUNCIL
13 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS & OTHER INFORMATION VICINITY MAP This plan approved by the Borough Council of Camp Hill Borough this
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
day of 20 .
14 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS & OTHER INFORMATION
15 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS & OTHER INFORMATION PRESIDENT
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-TITLE.dwg, 7/29/2019 1:39:04 PM, briley
16 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS & OTHER INFORMATION DRAINAGE PLAN CERTIFICATION STORMWATER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
SECRETARY
Douglas S. Gosik, P.E., on this date Consolidated Properties hereby acknowledges that the stormwater management
OWNER: have reviewed and hereby certify that the Drainage Plan meets all design
standards and criteria of the Camp Hill Borough Stormwater Management
Ordinance.
facilities and BMP's are to be permanent fixtures that can be altered or removed
only after approval of a revised plan by Camp Hill Borough.
CAMP HILL BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION
This plan recommended for approval by the Camp Hill Borough Planning
Commission this day of 20 .
MICHAEL A. SERLUCO Douglas S. Gosik, P.E., Design Engineer

Equitable Owner: Consolidated Properties
Michael A. Serluco
CHAIRMAN
400 NORTH FRONT STREET BOROUGH ENGINEER REVIEW STATEMENT OWNER'S CERTIFICATION
SECRETARY
WORMLEYSBURG, PA 17043 This plan reviewed by the Camp Hill Borough Engineer this COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
TELEPHONE: (717) 761-3558 day of 20 .
On this, the day of , 20 before me
CUMBERLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
the undersigned personally appeared, This plan reviewed by the Cumberland County Planning Commission this
APPLICANT: BOROUGH ENGINEER
MICHAEL A. SERLUCO, OWNER

day of 20 .
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION CHAIRMAN
CONSOLIDATED PROPERTIES I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,the survey and plan shown
and described hereon is true and correct.
Who being duly sworn according to law, depose and say that he is the owner of
the property shown on this plan and that he acknowledges the same to be his act
and deed and desire the same to be recorded as such according to law. SECRETARY
ATTENTION: SCOTT STAIGER Witness my Hand and Notarial Seal the day and date above written.
RECORDER OF DEEDS
400 NORTH FRONT STREET This plan recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds in and for
Registered Surveyor
WORMLEYSBURG, PA 17043 Cumberland County this day of 20 .
James C. Hockenberry, P.L.S.
TELEPHONE: (717) 761-3558 533 Bucks Valley Road
Newport, Pa 17074
INSTRUMENT NUMBER SHEET
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC:
1 OF 16
N SITE
CHESTNUT STREET
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
ALLEY
LOT / OWNER INFORMATION:
PARCEL 431
PARCEL 431 OWNER: Michael A. Serluco
ADDRESS: 3115 Chestnut Street
PARCEL 434 PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO.: 01-21-0273-431
PARCEL 436 PARCEL 435 PARCEL 433 PARCEL 432 INSTRUMENT NUMBER: 201725777
PLAN REFERENCE: Lot 7 - Plan Book 1-98
LOT AREA: 8,750 S.F.
TOPOGRAPHIC & BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAN

PARCEL 432

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO.: 01-21-0273-432
INSTRUMENT NUMBER: 201320955
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
PARCEL 433
1)
OWNER: Michael A. Serluco
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)

. 001

R

S .
PARCEL 434
(
APPLICANT:
T

E
DEED REFERENCE: Deed Book 266, Page 582

E

R

T
PARCEL 435
32nd S

TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
PARCEL 436

MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
ALLEY PARCEL 437

OWNER:
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-TOPO.dwg, 7/25/2019 10:02:31 AM, bgrove
LIST OF AREA UTILITY PROVIDERS

(PER PA ONE CALL SERIAL NUMBER 20180523139)
KARST GEOLOGY DISCLAIMER: GENERAL NOTES:
LEGEND:
ONE CALL
IA SY
V AN
ST
YL
EM
PENNS
1-
, INC.
80
0-
24
2-
17
!
76
DI A
G
8- DI
L
SHEET
1-1 O
BEFORE Y
2 OF 16
N SITE
CHESTNUT STREET
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
LOT / OWNER INFORMATION:

PARCEL 431
PARCEL 434 PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO.: 01-21-0273-431
PARCEL 436 PARCEL 435 PARCEL 433 PARCEL 432 INSTRUMENT NUMBER: 201725777
SUBDIVISION PLAN (PROPERTY CONSOLIDATION)

PARCEL 432

PROPOSED PLAN REFERENCE: Lot 6 - Plan Book 1-98
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
LOT
60,365.09 S.F. PARCEL 433
11)
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)

1.39 ACRES ADDRESS: 3121 Chestnut Street
0

0

R .

T (S .
PARCEL 434
APPLICANT:
E

E

R

T
PARCEL 435
32nd S

TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
PARCEL 436

MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
ALLEY LOT AREA: 8,750 S.F.
PARCEL 437
OWNER:
ALLEY
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-SUB.dwg, 7/29/2019 11:05:04 AM, briley
GENERAL NOTES:
LEGEND:
ONE CALL
IA SY
AN
ST
YL
EM
PENNS
1-
, INC.
8
00
- 24
2-
1
77
G!
DI A
DI
8-
L
U
SHEET
1 -1 O
BEFORE Y
3 OF 16
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-DEMO.dwg, 7/25/2019 1:29:54 PM, briley
LEGEND:
R . 001 1)
T (S .
T R E E
32nd S
DEMOLITION DATA:
CHESTNUT STREET
ALLEY
DI A PENNS
L YL
V
8-
AN
IA
1-1
1-
00 8
24 -
2-
77 1
6
ONE CALL
BEFORE Y
SY
O
U
ST
DI EM
G! , INC.
ALLEY
N
DEMOLITION NOTES:
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
LOCATION MAP
SITE
SITE DEMOLITION PLAN

OWNER: APPLICANT:
MICHAEL A. SERLUCO CONSOLIDATED PROPERTIES
400 NORTH FRONT STREET (c/o SCOTT STAIGER)
WORMLEYSBURG, PA 17043 400 NORTH FRONT STREET
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558 WORMLEYSBURG, PA 17043
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
4 OF 16
BOROUGH OF CAMP HILL CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA

SHEET
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-SITE.dwg, 7/29/2019 11:27:05 AM, briley
SITE DATA:
. 0 011)
T (S .R
T R E E
32nd S
PARKING DATA:
BYPASS
LANE
5,031± S.F.
PROPOSED
RESTAURANT
AREA
SEATING
OUTDOOR
CHESTNUT STREET
BYPASS
LANE
GENERAL NOTES:
THRU THRU
DRIVE DRIVE
STOP
ALLEY
STOP
STOPSTOP
ALLEY
N
BYPASS
LANE
DI A PENNS
L YL
V
8-
AN
IA
1 -1
1-
80
0-
24
-1 2
77
6
ONE CALL
BE FORE Y
SY
U ST
DI EM
G! , INC.
THRU THRU
DRIVE DRIVE
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
LOCATION MAP
SITE
LANE DETAIL
DRIVE THRU STACKING
SITE PLAN
OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
5 OF 16

SHEET
N SITE
CHESTNUT STREET
I-5
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
I-6
CO-4
STORM SEWER SCHEDULE
I-7
PROPOSED CLEANOUT CO-1 TO INLET I-1
CO-2
CO-2
CO-1
I-4
PROPOSED INLET I-1 TO PROPOSED MANHOLE MH-1
I-1
CO-3
CO-3
PROPOSED INLET I-6 TO PROPOSED SUBSURFACE BASIN
PROPOSED
RESTAURANT

FFE - 406.40
CO-1
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
1)
GRADING/UTILITIES PLAN
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)

. 001
PROPOSED
STORMWATER
INFILTRATION
R
BED
(S .
APPLICANT:
PROPOSED INLET I-7 TO PROPOSED INLET I-5
E T
I-DE
E
PROPOSED INLET I-8 TO PROPOSED TERRE KLEEN TK-09

T R
32nd S
I-3 PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DRAIN TO MANHOLE MH-2
I-2
MH-2
MH-1
KARST GEOLOGY DISCLAIMER:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558

MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
TK-09
ALLEY
OWNER:
I-8
ALLEY
ES-1 PROPOSED
SUBSURFACE
OS-1 STORMWATER
BASIN
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-GRADE.dwg, 7/29/2019 12:27:57 PM, briley
GENERAL NOTES: AN
IA
ONE CALL
SY
ST
YL
EM
PENNS
1-
, INC.
80
0-
2
42
-1
77
G!
DI A
DI
8-
L
LEGEND:
U
1 -1 O
BE FORE Y
SHEET
6 OF 16
N SITE
CHESTNUT STREET
I-5
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
I-6
CO-4
I-7
RECEIVING WATER / CLASSIFICATION
CO-2
CO-2
CO-1
I-4
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
I-1
CO-3
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN

CO-3
PROPOSED
RESTAURANT

FFE - 406.40 DuA NPDES PERMIT BOUNDARY
CO-1
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
1)
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)

. 001
PROPOSED
STORMWATER LIST OF PROPOSED BMPS
INFILTRATION
R
BED
(S .
APPLICANT:
E T
I-DE
R E
NATIVE SOIL TYPE:

T
32nd S
I-3
HaB DuA DUFFIELD SILT LOAM
I-2
MH-2
MH-1
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
HaB HAGERSTOWN SILT LOAM

MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
TK-09
ALLEY
OWNER:
I-8
ALLEY
ES-1 PROPOSED
SUBSURFACE
OS-1 STORMWATER
BASIN
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-SOIL.dwg, 7/26/2019 4:30:42 PM, briley
E & S MAINTENANCE PROGRAM:
ONE CALL
IA SY
AN
ST
YL
EM
PENNS
1-
, INC.
80
0-
2
42
-1
77
G!
DI A
DI
8-
U
1 -1 O
BE FORE Y
LEGEND: SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES: INLET PROTECTION

DRAINAGE AREAS RECOMMENDED SEEDING RATES & TYPES:
FOR GENERAL E & S NOTES & RECOMMENDED STAGING OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES - SEE SHEET 15 SHEET
7 OF 16
N SITE
CHESTNUT STREET
I-5
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
I-6
CO-4
RECEIVING WATER / CLASSIFICATION
I-7
CO-2
CO-2
CO-1
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
I-4
I-1
POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

CO-3
CO-3
PROPOSED DuA NPDES PERMIT BOUNDARY

RESTAURANT

FFE - 406.40
CO-1
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
BMP - POROUS PAVEMENT/INFILTRATION BED
) 11
STORMWATER RATE/VOLUME/WATER QUALITY
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)

LIST OF PROPOSED BMPS
0
PROPOSED
0
STORMWATER
.
INFILTRATION
R
BED
T (S .
APPLICANT:
BMP - STREET SWEEPING
STORMWATER QUALITY NATIVE SOIL TYPE:
E
I-DE
T RE
DuA DUFFIELD SILT LOAM

32nd S
I-3
HaB
MH-2
I-2 HaB HAGERSTOWN SILT LOAM
MH-1
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558

PCSM LEGEND:
MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
TK-09
BMP - SUBSURFACE DETENTION BASIN

ALLEY
STORMWATER RATE/WATER QUALITY
INLET PROTECTION
OWNER:
I-8
DRAINAGE AREAS
ALLEY
ES-1 PROPOSED
SUBSURFACE
OS-1 STORMWATER
BASIN
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-PCSM.dwg, 7/26/2019 4:35:57 PM, briley
PCSM PLAN STATEMENT OF INTENT:

LEGEND:
·
RECEIVING SURFACE WATER:
ONE CALL
IA SY
AN
ST
YL
EM
PENNS
1-
, INC.
80
0-
24
SHEET
2-
17
G!
76
DI A
DI
8-
L
1 -1 OU
BE FORE Y
8 OF 16
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-LANDSCAPE.dwg, 7/29/2019 11:13:31 AM, briley
LANDSCAPING NOTES:
R . 001 1)
T (S .
T R E E
32nd S
PROPOSED
RESTAURANT
CHESTNUT STREET
PLANTING SCHEDULE:
LANDSCAPING DATA:
ALLEY
DI A PENNS
L YL
V
8-
AN
IA
1-1
1-
80
0-
24
-1 2
ALLEY
77
6
ONE CALL
BEFORE Y
SY
U O
ST
DI EM
G !
, INC.
N
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL

LOCATION MAP
TREE PLANTING DETAIL

SITE
SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN

OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
9 OF 16

SHEET
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-LIGHT.dwg, 7/29/2019 8:58:36 AM, briley
11)
F
A
0
D
0
STATISTICS
(S. R .
SCHEDULE
E E T
2n d S TR
3
E
C
F EE
E
B
E
E
E
F F FF
E
F
E
GENERAL NOTE:
F
PROPOSED
RESTAURANT
F F
B
C
F F
CHESTNUT STREET
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
ALLEY
C
ALLEY
N
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'

LOCATION MAP
SITE
3115 - 3133 CHESTNUT STREET - PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT DI A PENNS

L YL
V
8-
AN
IA
1 -1
1-
80
0-
24
-1 2
SITE LIGHTING PLAN 77
6
ONE CALL
BE FORE Y
SY
U ST
DI EM
G! , INC.
OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
10 OF 16

SHEET
STORM PIPE TRENCH
BUILDING DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION DETAIL
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
UTILITY PROFILES & OTHER INFORMATION
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)

STORM SEWER PROFILE STORM SEWER PROFILE
INLET I-6 TO SUBSURFACE BASIN INLET I-8 TO INLET TK-09
APPLICANT:
PROPOSED OUTLET STRUCTURE OS-1

TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
STORM SEWER CLEANOUT DETAIL
MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL #9-1
RIPRAP APRON AT PIPE OUTLET STRUCTURAL STEEL GRATE
WITH FLARED END SECTION OR ENDWALL BICYCLE SAFE
OWNER:
TYPE "C" INLET
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-PROFILES.dwg, 7/29/2019 12:13:22 PM, briley
NE CALL
IA O SY
AN
YLV
ST
EM,
PENNS
1-
80
INC.
0-
24
2-
!
1
DIA
DIG
77
6
8-
L
1-1 OU
BEFORE Y
SECTION VIEW A-A
STORM SEWER PROFILE

STORM SEWER PROFILE STORM SEWER PROFILE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DRAIN
INLET I-7 TO INLET I-5 INLET I-1 TO MANHOLE MH-1 I-DE TO MANHOLE MH-2 A
SUBSURFACE DETENTION BASIN DETAIL
SHEET
11 OF 16
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-PROFILES.dwg, 7/29/2019 12:09:14 PM, briley
BACKFILLING IN PAVED AREAS
DEEP SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION

SHALLOW SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION
BACKFILLING IN UNPAVED AREAS
COMMERCIAL GREASE INTERCEPTOR

SANITARY SEWER PROFILE
KITCHEN WASTE LATERAL
SANITARY CLEANOUT DETAIL

SANITARY SEWER PROFILE
RESTROOM WASTE LATERAL
NEW CONSTRUCTION & REPAIR OF BUILDING SEWER & LATERAL
UTILITY PROFILES & OTHER INFORMATION

OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
12 OF 16
SHEET

DO NOT
STOP ENTER
TYPICAL SITE PAVEMENT SECTION SAW-CUT/PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL
X X X X
DO NOT ENTER / STOP SIGNS DETAIL

(DRIVE THRU EXIT AREA) HANDICAP PARKING STALL DETAIL
HEAVY DUTY SITE PAVEMENT SECTION
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS & OTHER INFORMATION

CONCRETE PAVING
DRIVE-THRU LANE
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)
APPLICANT:
POROUS PAVEMENT SECTION
STOP BAR PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL
HANDICAP PARKING SIGN

TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
BOLLARD MOUNTED SIGN DETAIL
MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
NT
PROPOSED RESTAURA
FFE - 40 6. 40
OWNER:
TYPICAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-DETAILS.dwg, 7/26/2019 4:20:33 PM, briley
VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN (PADOT R7-8A) ADA PARKING FACILITIES DETAIL
CHESTNUT STREET
END TRANSITION FOR STANDARD CURBING
011) S.R. 0
ET (
2 n d S TRE
DUMPSTER 3 EXISTING BUILDING SETBACKEXISTING BUILDING SETBACK
ALONG 32nd STREET ALONG CHESTNUT STREET AN
IA O
NE CALL
SY
ENCLOSURE DETAIL TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB DETAIL
YLV
DUMPSTER PAD SECTION
ST
EM,
PENNS
1-
80
INC.
0-
24
BASIS FOR FRONT YARD BUILDING SETBACKS
2-
SHEET
!
17
DIA
DIG
6 7
8-
L
1-1 OU
BEFORE Y
13 OF 16
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-DETAILS.dwg, 7/29/2019 12:33:04 PM, briley
CHESTNUT STREET
TYPICAL WIDENING CROSS-SECTION
LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PROTECTOR

24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
WEST DRIVE-THRU ADA RAMPS

FFE - 406.
EAST DRIVE-THRU ADA RAMPS
TYPICAL PARKING LOT
40
PROPOSED RESTAURA
LIGHTING STANDARD DETAIL
NT
·
·
·
·
·
STOPSTOP
MAIN ENTRANCE ADA RAMPS

SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE RAMP
INFILTRATION BED DETAIL
DIA
L PENNS
YLV
8-
AN
1-1
1-
IA O
80
0-
24
2-
17
NE CALL
7
BEFORE Y
6
SY
OU
ST
DIG EM,
! INC.

OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
14 OF 16
SHEET

CURLEX MATTING
ROCK FILTER OUTLET #4-06 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL #4-16 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL #4-15
FILTER BAG INLET PROTECTION - TYPE M INLET FILTER BAG INLET PROTECTION - TYPE C INLET
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
(c/o SCOTT STAIGER)
APPLICANT:
COMPOST FILTER SOCK REPAIR
DETAIL (UTILITY CUT)

TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
MICHAEL A. SERLUCO
OWNER:
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL #3-1
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAIL
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-DETAILS.dwg, 7/25/2019 3:17:28 PM, bgrove
GENERAL E & S NOTES:

RECOMMENDED STAGING OF
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES:
NE CALL
IA O SY
AN
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL #3-16 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL #4-1
YLV
ST
EM,
PENNS
1-
80
INC.
0-
24
PUMPED WATER FILTER BAG COMPOST FILTER SOCK
2-
SHEET
!
17
DIA
DIG
6 7
8-
L
1-1 OU
BEFORE Y
15 OF 16
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\Chick-Chestnut-DETAILS.dwg, 7/29/2019 10:26:45 AM, briley
PENNDOT TYPE "C"
PENNDOT TYPE "M"

CONCRETE INLET TOP
CONCRETE INLET TOP
12'' x 18'' CATCH BASIN
24'' x 48'' CATCH BASIN
PRECAST INLET MANHOLE

4 FT. DIAMETER W/ FLAT LID
FOR PENNDOT INLET TOPS
PRECAST INLET BOX 24" x 45"
B
B
TERRE KLEEN 09 DETAIL

INVERTED FILTER 2
SINKHOLE TREATMENT
DIA
L PENNS
YLV
8-
AN
1-1
1-
IA O
80
0-
24
2-
17
NE CALL
7
BEFORE Y
6
SY
OU
ST
DIG EM,
! INC.

OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
16 OF 16
SHEET

W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\SWM Plans\Chick-Chestnut-INLET.dwg, 7/29/2019 1:22:42 PM, briley
LEGEND:
R . 001 1)
T (S .
T R E E
32nd S
I-1
I-8
OS-1
MH-1
TK-09
CO-3
I-1
ES-1
I-8
FFE - 406.40
PROPOSED
RESTAURANT
BASIN
PROPOSED
SUBSURFACE
CO-2
STORMWATER
I-DE
I-7
I-7
I-DE
DRAINAGE AREAS
CHESTNUT STREET
INLET PROTECTION
CO-1
MH-2
I-2
I-2
ALLEY
I-4
I-5
I-3
I-3
I-4
BED
I-6
PROPOSED
I-5
I-6
STORMWATER
INFILTRATION
ALLEY
DI A PENNS
L YL
V
8-
AN
IA
1 -1
1-
80
0-
24
2-
17
76
ONE CALL
BEFORE Y
SY
U ST
DI EM
G! , INC.
N
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'

LOCATION MAP
SITE
INLET DRAINAGE AREA PLAN

OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
DA-INL

SHEET
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT NARRATIVE
AND CALCULATIONS
FOR
3115-3133 Chestnut Street

Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant
WSC Project – 2018CFAEST
LOCATED IN:
Camp Hill Borough

Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
CLIENT:
Consolidated Properties, LLC

400 North Front Street
Wormleysburg, PA 17043
Phone: (717) 761-3558
December 4, 2018
Last Revised July 26, 2019
PREPARED BY:
2325 Paxton Church Road

(717) 412-0142
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE.................................................................................................................................... 1
DESIGN CRITERIA AND TECHNICAL REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 1
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE PREPARER ......................................................................................................................... 1
EXISTING SITE STORMWATER DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................... 2
SOIL TYPES ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING ............................................................................................................................................. 2
REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATION ..................................................................... 2
PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................ 3
POSTDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................................. 3
STORMWATER VOLUME CONTROL .............................................................................................................................. 4
STORMWATER QUALITY VOLUME ................................................................................................................................ 4
THERMAL IMPACTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
STORMWATER COLLECTION/CONVEYANCE .............................................................................................................. 4
POSTCONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) ............................................................................ 5
INFILTRATION RATES ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
POLLUTION PREVENTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5
EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT #1 SITE LOCATION MAP

EXHIBIT #2 U.S.G.S. MAP
EXHIBIT #3 SOIL SURVEY MAP
APPENDICES:
APPENDIX A - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WORKSHEETS

PREDEVELOPMENT, POSTDEVELOPMENT AND STORM INLET
DRAINAGE AREA, C-FACTOR AND CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS
WQV CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX B - HYDROGRAPH SUMMARIES
APPENDIX C - PREDEVELOPMENT HYDROGRAPHS
APPENDIX D - POSTDEVELOPMENT HYDROGRAPHS
APPENDIX E - BASIN DETAIL CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX F - BASIN DEWATERING CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX G - STORM SEWER CONVEYANCE DESIGN
APPENDIX H - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
BACK POCKETS:
PREDEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA PLAN (SHEET 1 OF 3)

POSTDEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA PLAN (SHEET 2 OF 3)
INLET DRAINAGE AREA PLAN (SHEET 3 OF 3)
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Consolidated Properties proposes to consolidate six (6) residential properties with a small tract near the
32nd Street/Chestnut Street intersection recently purchase from Camp Hill Borough, and vacate/abandon
portions of two existing private alleys, to develop a 5,000± square foot Chick-fil-A Restaurant. The total
resulting property size is ±1.4 acres. The land is currently used for agricultural purposes, and has been for
at least the past 50-years, and it is located entirely within Camp Hill Borough, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania (see Exhibits 1 & 2, Site Location Map and U.S.G.S. Map, provided within this Narrative).
The receiving waters for the project area is an unnamed tributary to Cedar Run, with a PA Code
Designation of CWF (Cold Water Fishes), MF (Migratory Fishes).
Improvements associated with the project include construction of the proposed building, new parking
facilities and utility services, site access, completion of various utility connections, and installation of
stormwater management facilities.
Stormwater management for the development will be provided via a subsurface detention facility that has
been designed to control the rate of stormwater runoff for the 1 through 100-year design storms. Due to
the relatively small size of the site, Rational Method has been utilized for rate control calculations,
resulting in smaller basin outflows which is more protective than TR-55 SCS would require. TR-55 SCS
Methodology is recommended/required for much larger areas, 200+ acres in size. However, TR-55 SCS
Methodology has been utilized for volume control calculations that require a full hydrograph. The project
is located within Camp Hill Borough’s 100% Runoff Rate District, therefore postdevelopment runoff rates
will be attenuated to discharge no more than predevelopment runoff rates.
The purpose of this Narrative is to describe proposed stormwater management improvements,

summarize the stormwater analysis performed for the project, and provide supporting calculations.
DESIGN CRITERIA AND TECHNICAL REFERENCES
Design criteria and technical references used to complete the analyses and calculations found in this
Narrative include:
1. Camp Hill Borough Stormwater Management Ordinance No. 2004-1012.
2. Camp Hill Borough Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, April 1993.
3. Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension, Version 12, by Autodesk, Inc.
4. HydraCAD Version 10.00-22, (utilizing Soil Conservation Service – Technical Release 20 (TR-20,
SCS, USDA)).
5. Geotechnical Testing Results, dated August 2018, prepared by Maser Consulting Engineers.
6. NOAA Atlas 14 Volume 8, Version 2 – Point Precipitation Frequency (PF) Estimates.
7. Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Practices Manual, PADEP, dated December, 2006.
8. PennDOT Design Manual Part 2 (DM-2), Chapter 10 – Drainage Design and Related Procedures.
9. Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual, PADEP, March, 2012.
10. The NRCS Web Soil Survey.
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE PREPARER
Douglas S. Gosik, P.E., Director of Land Development for Williams Site Civil, LLC (2325 Paxton Church
Road, Harrisburg, PA 17110), graduated from Pennsylvania State University in 1985 with a Bachelor of
Science degree in Civil Engineering. He was employed by J. Michael Brill & Associates, Inc. from 1990
until joining Williams Site Civil in March, 2017. Over the past thirty (30) years he’s been intimately
involved with Post Construction Stormwater Management designs for projects ranging in size from less
than one (1) acre to more than 100 acres.
Recent Post Construction Stormwater Management Plans Mr. Gosik has been involved with include:
Project Name County Municipality

La-Z-Boy Furniture Gallery Cumberland Hampden Township
Ahold Supply Chain Facility Cumberland Lower Allen Township
Giant Distribution Center Cumberland Borough of Carlisle
EXISTING SITE STORMWATER DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS
The project area currently contains residential/mixed use buildings with various accessory structures
(sheds/garages). Topography across the property generally slopes to the southwest and northeast. Much
of the stormwater runoff from the subject site area drains to a large channel along the southwest side of
the property. The remainder of the site drains northeast to Chestnut Street.
SOIL TYPES
The NRCS Web Soil Survey confirms the project is situated on Duffield Silt Loam and Hagerstown Silt
Loam – see Exhibit #3, Soil Survey Map, included herein.
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING
On-site infiltration tests were performed by Maser Consulting Engineers during November 2018. Due to
the presence of underlying Karst (limestone) geology, the project Geotechnical Engineer recommends
avoiding infiltration because of the inherent risk of promoting sinkhole activity. To maximize volume
control and water quality treatment in accordance with Township requirements, a minimal amount of
infiltration is proposed under porous pavement in the outlying parking spaces. The infiltration bed under
the porous pavement is designed to spread the stored runoff across the greatest area practical.
The Geotechnical Report is contained in Appendix H.
REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
The analysis and design of stormwater management facilities has been completed in accordance with the
below criteria, per Camp Hill Borough Stormwater Management Ordinance No. 2004-1012:
1. Post-development discharge rates shall not exceed the pre-development discharge rates for the
1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100-year design storms.
2. For the purposes of predevelopment flow rate determination, undeveloped land shall be
considered as "meadow" good condition, unless the natural ground cover generates a lower
curve number or rational "C" value (i.e., forest).
3. Adequate storage and treatment facilities shall be provided necessary to capture and treat a
volume of stormwater runoff termed as “water quality volume” (WQV).
Please note, due to the presence of Karst Geology at the project site, infiltration is not recommended by
the Geotechnical Engineer because of the inherent risk of sinkhole propagation. As a result, a waiver has
been requested from groundwater recharge requirements. However, a minimal amount of infiltration will
occur from the porous pavement area to achieve Camp Hill Borough water quality requirements. Water
quality will be managed in accordance with DEP requirements as determined by the NPDES design and
approval process. Evidence of NPDES permit approval will be provided to the Camp Hill Borough upon
receipt.
PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
As previously noted, much of the stormwater runoff from the subject site area drains to a large channel
along the southwest side of the property. The remainder of the site drains northeast to Chestnut Street.
The southwesterly channel and the northeasterly Chestnut Street right-of-way are each identified as a
“Point of Interest” (POI “1” and POI “2”) as part of the stormwater analysis.
Point of Interest “1” (POI-“1”)

The predevelopment drainage area to the channel along the southwest side of the property
(Predevelopment Drainage Area 1) is 0.78 acres, and the weighted c-factor is 0.33 for the 1 to 10-year
storms and 0.40 for the 25 to 100-year storms. A Tc flow path analysis calculates the time of
concentration to be 10.4 minutes.

Predevelopment Drainage Area 2 contains 0.79 acres, and its weighted c-factor is 0.43 for the 1 to 10-
year storms and 0.51 for the 25 to 100-year storms. A Tc flow path analysis calculates the time of
concentration to be 10.8 minutes.
Refer to Appendix A for Predevelopment Data Sheets, and Appendix C for Predevelopment Hydrographs.
Additionally, the Predevelopment Drainage Area Plan can be found in the rear pocket of this Narrative.
POSTDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
Proposed improvements significantly decrease the size of on-site drainage areas to the Chestnut Street
ROW (POI “2”, Postdevelopment Drainage Area 2). This reduction results in satisfaction of stormwater
rate, water quality and volume control requirements without need for new stormwater management
facilities. However, the drainage area to the large channel along the southwest side of the property (POI
“1”, Postdevelopment Drainage Area 1) is increased, and stormwater management facilities are needed
to control discharge to POI “1”.

Postdevelopment Drainage Area 1 to POI-“1” contains the proposed 5,000 square foot restaurant. Its
size, 1.29 acres, is larger than the predevelopment drainage area to POI “1”, and the resulting additional
runoff will be managed by the subsurface detention and infiltration facilities.
Point of Interest “2” (POI-“ 2”)

Postdevelopment Drainage Area 2 to POI-“2” consists of the northeastern portion of the property near
Chestnut Street, and contains 0.28 acres (about 35 percent of the predevelopment drainage area to POI
“2”).
Time of concentration for each tributary area is assumed to be 5 minutes for rational method and 0.1
hours for SCS calculations, which is the minimum for each method and conservatively produces the
highest peak rate value for postdevelopment flows.
Stormwater rate control requirements are satisfied for the 1 through 100-year design storms for both
POIs. Refer to Appendix B for Hydrograph Summaries.
Refer to Appendix A for Postdevelopment Data Sheets, and Appendix B&C for Postdevelopment
Hydrographs. Additionally, the Postdevelopment Drainage Area Plan can be found in the rear pocket of
this Narrative.
STORMWATER VOLUME CONTROL
Due to the presence of Karst Geology at the project site, infiltration is not recommended by the
Geotechnical Engineer because of the inherent risk of sinkhole propagation. However, a minimal amount
of infiltration will occur from the porous pavement area to achieve Camp Hill Borough water quality
requirements.
STORMWATER QUALITY VOLUME
For the purpose of maintaining and preserving the quality of stormwater runoff that is discharged from the
site, adequate storage and treatment facilities are provided to treat the water quality volume (WQV)
based on calculations located in Section 174-17 of the Camp Hill Borough Stormwater Management
Ordinance No. 2004-1012. The WQV requirement is 0.181 acre-feet. The infiltration bed below the porous
pavement are will infiltrate 0.022 acre-feet of stormwater runoff, and the Terre Kleen TK 09 water quality
structure will treat 0.161 acre-feet for a total of 0.183 acre-feet of treatment volume. Refer to Appendix A
for detailed Water Quality Volume Calculations.
THERMAL IMPACTS
Potential thermal impacts from proposed improvements will be avoided, minimized or mitigated through
the following:
1. Heated stormwater runoff from proposed paved areas and from the building roof areas will be
collected and conveyed to the pervious sediment trap during construction and to pervious subsurface
infiltration and surface extended detention basins post construction. This will promote infiltration of the
initial runoff or "first flush" which is most affected by thermal impacts, and prevent the affected runoff
from entering surface waters.
2. Runoff from the building rooftop will be collected, conveyed directly to a water quality filter and
subsurface extended detention basin (Pond 2) without exposure to elevated temperatures associated
with pavement.
RUNOFF.
STORMWATER COLLECTION/CONVEYANCE
The proposed stormwater collection/conveyance system has been designed using the Rational Formula,
(Q=CiA), based on the following criteria:
• Intensities (i) utilize site-specific intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves derived from NOAA
Atlas 14 Volume 8, Version 2 – Point Precipitation Frequency (PF) Estimates.
• Runoff coefficients (C) used in calculations are consistent with Table 10.2.1 – Runoff Factors for
the Rational Equation, as provided in PennDOT Design Manual – Part 2 (DM-2).
• Runoff coefficients (C) used in calculations are consistent with the Camp Hill Borough Stormwater
Management Ordinance No. 2004-1012
• Storm sewers must be able to convey post development runoff from a 25-year storm design
without surcharging inlets.
• Adequate erosion protection shall be provided along all open channels and at all points of
interest.
Since the stormwater conveyance is tributary to a stormwater management facility that manages 1 to 100-
year design storms, the system has been designed for the 100-year storm, and calculations are provided.
In addition to verifying the capacity of pipes within the proposed storm sewer system, inlet control, outlet
control and hydraulic grade line design calculations have been completed.
Refer to Appendix A for Inlet Data Sheets, and Appendix G for stormwater collection/conveyance design
printouts. Additionally, the Inlet Drainage Area Plan can be found in the rear pocket of this Narrative.
INFILTRATION RESULTS
On-site infiltration tests were performed by Maser Consultants P.A. on July 20, 2018 using stand pipes for
percolation testing in accordance with Appendix C of the PA Stormwater BMP Manual. One test was
performed within or in close proximity to the footprint of the proposed porous pavement and infiltration
bed. The resulting infiltration rate was 2.0”/hour. No bedrock, groundwater or redoximorphic features were
observed at the test location.
POSTCONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs)
Due to the presence of Karst Geology, infiltrating the net increase in volume for the 2-year design storm is
not feasible. NPDES and PA Code requirements for POI #1 will be met through a combination of Water
Quality BMPs. Worksheets 11-13 are included to document that the water quality requirements are met.
NPDES and PA Code requirements for POI #2 are met through runoff rate and volume reduction that
results from the reduction of tributary area.
Proposed improvements feature the following BMPs:
• Porous Pavement/Infiltration Bed (POND 1): This BMP receives runoff from the storm sewer and
from the porous pavement. There is 0.5 feet (6 inches) depth of permanent storage that will
infiltrate, and the remaining runoff will be routed to the water quality structure and subsurface
detention facility for treatment. The tested infiltration rate is 2.0 inches/hour. For a reduction factor
of 3 and safety factor of 3 in accordance with the PA BMP Manual, the design rate is reduced to
0.22 inches/hour. For 6 inches of depth, the dewatering time will be approximately 27 hours. (6
inches/0.22 inches per hour = 27 hours)
• Subsurface Stormwater Detention (POND 2): This BMP detains stormwater runoff from
Postdevelopment Drainage Area 1. The basin’s proposed outlet structure has been designed
control discharge rates in accordance with Camp Hill Borough Stormwater Management
Ordinance No. 2004-1012 requirements.
The proposed basin is a network of 24” pipes with a bottom elevation at 397.30.
Per calculations provided in Appendix F, the basins have been designed to detain the 1-yr, 24-hour
design storm with a minimum dewatering time of 24-hours using the SCS Type II distribution. Also, All
detention, water quality and groundwater recharge facilities and BMPs have been designed to be
completely dewatered within 48 hours of any design storm in accordance with the Camp Hill Borough
Stormwater Management Ordinance No. 2004-1012.
• Street Sweeping: The intent of this BMP is to reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm
sewer conveyance system. Street sweeping of parking lot and access drive areas with a vacuum
filter sweeper shall be conducted on a quarterly basis.
POLLUTION PREVENTION
1. All construction personnel shall be trained via biweekly tailgate sessions pertaining to pollution
prevention for the project site.
2. The site contractor shall not store erodible or hazardous materials on any roadway.
3. All waste material will be collected and disposed of into metal trash dumpsters in the materials
storage area on site. The site contractor is responsible for locating an acceptable upland location
for the disposal of any excess soil or rock waste that cannot be disposed of on the property.
4. Construction equipment and maintenance materials shall be stored at the combined staging area
and materials storage areas. Gravel bag berms shall be installed around the perimeter to
designate the staging and materials storage area. A watertight shipping container shall be used
to store hand tools, small parts, and other construction materials.
5. Several types of vehicles and equipment will be used on-site throughout the project. All major
equipment / vehicle fueling and maintenance shall be performed off-site. A small pickup bed fuel
tank shall be kept on-site in the combined staging area. When vehicle fueling must occur on-site,
the fueling activity shall occur in the staging area. Only minor equipment maintenance shall occur
on-site. All equipment fluids generated from maintenance activities will be disposed of into
designated drums stored on spill pallets. Absorbent, spill-cleanup materials and spill kits shall be
available at the combined staging and materials storage area. Drip pans shall be placed under all
equipment receiving maintenance and vehicles and equipment parked overnight.
6. All spills shall be cleaned up immediately upon discovery. Spent absorbent materials and rags
shall be hauled off-site immediately after the spill is cleaned up for disposal at the local landfill.
Spills large enough to discharge to surface water shall be reported to the National Response
Center at 1-800-424-8802.
7. Dust control shall be implemented as needed once site grading has begun and during windy
conditions (forecasted or actual wind conditions of 20 mph or greater) while site grading is
occurring. Spraying of potable water at a rate of 300 gallons per acre or less shall be performed
by a mobile pressure-type distributor truck no more than three times a day during the months of
May-September and once per day during the months of October-April or whenever the dryness of
the soil warrants it.
8. Landscaping irrigation waters shall not be sprayed onto impermeable surfaces such as paved
driveways and roads. Waters shall be directed onto soil and lawns by using hoses and correctly
sized sprinklers with adjustable spray patterns. To avoid discharges of irrigation water, the
sprinklers shall have low-flow rates and increased watering time. The irrigated area shall be
inspected for excess watering and to adjust watering times and schedules.
9. Material safety data sheets, a material inventory, and emergency contact information shall be
maintained at the on-site project trailer.
10. Permanent seeding shall be applied immediately after the final design grades are achieved on
portions of the site but no later than fourteen (14) days after construction activities have
permanently ceased. After the entire site is stabilized, any sediment that has accumulated shall
be removed and hauled off-site for disposal. Construction debris, trash, and temporary BMP’s
shall be removed and any areas disturbed during removal shall be seeded immediately. The
owner and/or operators shall contact the County Conservation District for a final inspection.
APPENDIX A
_______________________________________
PREDEVELOPMENT, POSTDEVELOPMENT AND INLET

DRAINAGE AREA, C-FACTOR AND CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS
WQV CALCULATIONS
_______________________________________
3115 - 3133 Chestnut Street Chick-fil-A Restaurant
Drainage Areas, C-Factors and Curve Numbers
Predevelopment
Rate
Area * Cover C-Factor (1 to 10-Yr) C-Factor (25 to 100-Yr)
Pre 1 0.57 Meadow B 0.13 0.19
0.21 Impervious B 0.86 0.96
Total 0.78
Weighted Average 0.33 0.40
Pre 2 0.49 Meadow B 0.13 0.19

0.30 Impervious B 0.86 0.96
Total 0.79
Weighted Average 0.41 0.48
Postdevelopment
Rate Volume
Area Cover C-Factor (1 to 10-Yr) C-Factor (25 to 100-Yr) Curve Number
Post 1 Pond 1 0.05 Lawn B 0.22 0.28 61
0.33 Impervious 0.86 0.96 98
Total 0.38
Weighted Average 0.78 0.87 93
Post 1 Pond 2 0.01 Lawn B 0.22 0.28 61

0.72 Impervious 0.86 0.96 98
Total 0.73
Post 1 Bypass 0.17 Lawn B 0.22 0.28 61

0.01 Impervious 0.86 0.96 98
Total 0.18
Post 2 0.17 Lawn B 0.22 0.28 61

0.11 Impervious 0.86 0.96 98
Total 0.28
Total Impervious Area 1.17

Total Area 1.57
Conveyance
Inlet ID Area C-Factor
I-1 0.15 0.95
I-2 0.06 0.95
I-DE 0.01 0.95
I-3 0.10 0.95
I-4 0.08 0.95
I-5 0.01 0.95
I-6 0.02 0.95
I-7 0.16 0.95
I-8 0.48 0.95
012310425 6789

7889 8787
+,--.-/012.345.67089:.;5.6:<2=7>.?.
@7A1/=7>.>19:B.C19D.E=005.F:>>2G0H1>=15.IJ-K.
@1/=/8L:B.4MN;?O4P5.@7>Q=/8L:B.RSTNU??TP.
V0:YH1/=77>B .4MTNWW.X/KK
98Z[\]
YY798^_
F,+̀a.FbVCF̀à-a,̀+.cbVdIV+Ce.VJaf̀-aVJ
_]g
h] 7
hgi
hj6 7klmh]n8m h [
"8
opqqho
"r8 8787
98h
"877
h] 7"
6 l" 7s6 7
9 "s] ' 87
"
Fc./1t801<
FuJRt12:L.D7=>/.D<:A=D=/1/=7>.X<:v8:>AG.:2/=91/:2.w=/x.UMy.A7>X=L:>A:.=>/:<H102.z=>.=>Ax:2{3
u8<1/=7> 3 -H:<1Q:.<:A8<<:>A:.=>/:<H10.zG:1<2{
; W 3M ;W WM 3MM ;MM WMM 3MMM
WR9=> |40M3N5?};4;&~3|4&M%N%?}O44%03|4%M4N*4}W4;~4%|4%M~N4W}M44~*4|4~M4N~W}T4O*&4|4~M%N*T}34W*3&|4~M3N5T}T4T)&3|4*M0N*S}34;)35|4*M)N&S}S4;3~*|4)M4N5O};4M545
3MR9=> |4%M~N5W}433~*5|4~M%N)T}34M*32|4*M%N*S};4334&|4)M2N)O}M4?35& |43M4NU&}M2;44 |43M*NU*}S2T43 |4530N3M}2W2* |4533N%3}2;0% |243*N};23&% |2232N};2O%0
3WR9=> |4~M)N&T}?4O)24|4*M3N)S}T4T3~% |43M2NU*}32M42 |4534N%M}232& |2432N}3240* |2435N};2?&) |223)N}?2;%) |203%N}423~* |2&3&N}W2;*5 |2&35N}T23)3
?MR9=> |4)M3N0O}S435*5 |453%N%M}2W23 |223~N};2U%& |2&34N}42T*0 |2%35N}T2O3* |2*3%N}O044~ |2);3N}M030& |25;0N}30O%2 |04;5N}40M** |00;&N}W0O3*
TMR9=> |453)N&M}2O02 |2233N}?2;%) |2%33N}T2W3& |2*35NO}0U22 |25;3N};0?%) |00;2N}40U)* |0%;%N}S&S4* |0*?)N}M&4&) |05?5N}4&?34 |&0?%N}S%42~
;Rx< |223&N};2T%4 |2&3)N}W2?)4 |2)3&N}U0?2~ |04;0N};0T~4 |0%;0N}S&?40 |0)?)N}3&?%* |&2?&N}W&S5% |&~4&N}M%W%* |%242N}S~T0~ |%~W5N}?~O5&
?Rx< |203%N}?2O~% |2~34N}T2S3) |23;5N}303&* |00;4N}40T)~ |0*;%N}U&S&2 |&4?0N}4&3)5 |&%?0N}U%M&0 |&34~N}4%?54 |%%W5N};~;)5 |~4W0N}U*M~~
TRx< |2~30N}S2M52 |23;%N}M0W&2 |0&;4N}W0S54 |0*?5N}M&3&3 |&0?~N}T%S24 |&)40N};%4)0 |%04~N}O~S%0 |%3W0N}W*O04 |~*T)N}T)W&5 |*&S5N}W3U%&
3;Rx< |23;&N}M0S&* |00;4N}40U3% |0)?3N}3&4~3 |&0?*N}S%M02 |&543N}W~W2~ |%*W4N}?~M55 |~0T5N}3*T5~ |*4S*N}33?40 |)0O0N}T5?*5 |30U0NU}2T20
;4Rx< |00;0N}403** |0*;)N}U&M04 |&&?*N}T%W40 |&54*N}?%;)% |%3W)N}?~T3* |~*T3N}?*33) |**S0N}43;4% |)*O3N}S5M%4 |5&3%M}N2O2* |2433;}N2T&~
;RL1G |0~;~N}S&U24 |&4?)N}?&W)% |&34~N};%;*5 |%~40N}U~S~0 |~~T%N}3*4)5 |*%S%N};)M5% |)%O)N}45;0) |3*U%N}O2443 |243%;}N23&0 |20344}N23~%
?RL1G |0);0N}U&S03 |&0?)N}W&S5~ |%445N}4%S5~ |%3W4N};~T32 |~3T)N}4)U2% |*3S0N}W3U&& |)3O5N}O5T)4 |5234M}N2?2& |2234;}2NT&3 |203*4}N2S*4
4RL1G |03?5N}3&W%) |&%?3N}S%O2* |%&4%N}S~?02 |~4W3N}W*T24 |*0T4N}O)?%3 |)0S4N}U3O)0 |3&U2N}?2M42 |5~3*M}N2O23 |223~?}2N;%& |2&30W}N2?**
SRL1G |&%?4N}T%O4& |%44)N}4%33& |~4W%N}4~T53 |~3T)N}?*O53 |)2S4N}S3O~4 |32U5N}M543~ |5%32M}N2W2% |2433;}N23&2 |20334}N2T~3 |2%3*T}N2O3&
3MRL1G |&54%N};%4~5 |%)W2N}M~T%5 |~)T*N};*M)2 |**S%N}3)S)* |)5O%N}T5?&0 |54U)N}O2U4) |243&3}N2?00 |223*;}2NU&5 |2&3*W}N2?*~ |2~3%S}N243)
;MRL1G |~%W0N}S*S2) |*%T2N}O);&4 |)*O2N}333*3 |3~U5N}35O32 |2434M}N2S2~ |2230;}2NM03 |203%?}N2W%% |2&33W}N2M*4 |2~33S}N2?3% |2)3%U}N0;4~
?MRL1G |*)S&N}3)4*4 |)5O&N}4335~ |50U*N}O2?4~ |243&3}N2M2) |2235;}2NS&~ |2&324}N23~4 |2%3~W}N2T*~ |2~35S}N2;30 |2)35U}N0W4) |25;~3}N0403
4WRL1G |3~O%N}U5U%5 |2434M}N2W22 |223~;}2N303 |203)?}N24%2 |2%3%W}N2;*4 |2~3)T}N2T)~ |2)34O}N2354 |233%U}N0T4* |04;&3}N0O05 |02;3?}N0W%3
TMRL1G |2430M}N2S2& |2235;}2NW&0 |2&3*4}N2?~4 |2%35W}N2S*~ |2*3)S}N2T3~ |2332U}N0342 |25;~M}N0S2) |02;4;}N0?&% |0&;44}N0W~3 |0%;~T}N0?))
26789

7889|68
! 8

l"8 78l 87889 "
7
"7
87
8|6
o!l87
788
7868
! 8 "87 87l8549
898
87 "j87l l
"
789

78898
! 8|7

87
87 878977898
87 "
""l878 87 887l|7"8 8"87l
~Z
! 8 87l 78
989m8
7l l"8!
!!789

|6]68
! 8 ! l8
87 9778" "
6]6 "8
6"8 87887opqqq" 2%9!87!78
7!

g 9mj
Fc.Q<1Dx=A10
119 19117

8!"#" $%40&3%'"$()*5&&*' $8'
$8"
'87
8$ 21%
012310425 6789

7889 8787
+ 9,-
./01232/456/71
89/7721:/742;455/6<
119 19117

8!"#" $%40&3%'"$()*5&&*' $8'
$8"
'87
8$ 01%
012310425 6789

7889 8787
9
;<7
:
=75
+,-./012,3/04/--,56
9
>??<7
:
@?75
+,-./012,3/07,8
9
>??<7
:
@?75
+,-./012,3/0,/-5,3
119 19117

8!"#" $%40&3%'"$()*5&&*' $8'
$8"
'87
8$ &1%
012310425 6789

7889 8787
;
=>>?@
<
A>@B

+ 9,-

.8 7!8/!!8798
0
"198
9 2!87
92!

7

0
"38 8787
98
0
"3 87/887
2&045 386

"877
7804524
98
#6/98
:

9"
!87
119 19117

8!"#" $%40&3%'"$()*5&&*' $8'
$8"
'87
8$ %1%
012310425 6789

7889 8787
+,--.-/012.345.67089:.;5.6:<2=7>.?.
@7A1/=7>.>19:B.C19D.E=005.F:>>2G0H1>=15.IJ-K.
@1/=/8L:B.4MN;?O4P5.@7>Q=/8L:B.RSTNU??TP.
V0:YH1/=77>B .4MTNWW.X/KK
98Z[\]
YY798^_
F,+̀a.FbVCF̀à-a,̀+.cbVdIV+Ce.VJaf̀-aVJ
_]g
h] 7
hgi
hj6 7klmh]n8m h [
"8
opqqho
"r8 8787
98h
"877
h] 7"
6 l" 7s6 7
9 "s] ' 87
"
Fc./1t801<
FuJRt12:L.D7=>/.D<:A=D=/1/=7>.X<:v8:>AG.:2/=91/:2.w=/x.UMy.A7>X=L:>A:.=>/:<H102.z=>.=>Ax:2{x78<|3
u8<1/=7> 3 -H:<1Q:.<:A8<<:>A:.=>/:<H10.zG:1<2|
; W 3M ;W WM 3MM ;MM WMM 3MMM
WR9=> }&%?)N~O%T&4 }%24&N~T32% }%3W)N~4*;4 }%T4N~M*W)0 }*4T*N~O);* }*SN~?3O04 })4S)N~U3U3* })O2N~W54%) }34U3N~;2T4& }3U2N~O2445
3MR9=> }0)?N~M&S%2 }&0?3N~T%T45 }&343N~?%?30 }%&44N~O;&* }%3W0N~4*342 }0W4N~O*T4 }T)N~?*353 }5T4N~S);%% }*&S&N~;3S4 }**S%N~T3O0
3WR9=> }00;5N~W0W3% }0)?N~M&T%0 }&0?*N~T%44* }&*40N~M%44 }%44N~WW4 }%&43N~U?%) }%*W3N~?M3) }%5WN~T*40% }&T2N~M*U)* }T*N~4);20
?MR9=> }23*N~S245% }23;5N~303& }0&;2N~W0S3) }0*;2N~U&;0% }05?3N~?&W)0 }&0?)N~T%U45 }&4*N~M%?%* }&34&N~?%T3& }%245N~OM&0 }%%W*N~3W)2
TMR9=> }453)N&M~2O02 }2233N~?2;%) }2%33N~T2W3& }2*35NO~0U22 }25;3N~;0?%) }00;2N~40U)* }0%;%N~S&S4* }0*?)N~M&4&) }05?5N~4&?34 }&0?%N~S%42
;Rx< }4M*N*T~;4U)42}4*M3N*S~T4W30 }43M*NU*~T2T4) }2432N~32?0 }2032N~?2T2 }2&33N~W2T)& }23)N~S2O5) }2);*N~M0;0& }04;N~?0O*& }0&;4N~T0U5)
?Rx< }4%M2N04~W4O2&}4%M5N5W~W4W*02}4*M&N4S~M43)3}4)M&N%O~34U52 }43M3NU4~U2M24 }2434N~3240* }223%N~?2M%% }2033N~42S*& }234N~S245& }2*3)N~U0S23
TRx< }40MN%;~O4?&25}4&M4N)?~44;&3*}4&M3N4~?4M%3%}4%M%N3W~M4?*}4M%N0T~34?*3}4*M0N0S~M4S)35}4)M4N5O~34454 }43M4NU~?2;4& }453%)N3~320& }243)N~;2S%2
3;Rx< }42MN03~S4325*}42M3N&;~M4S0&*}40M&N4;~T4M05)}40M)N4?~M4S&%5}4&M&N4?~S4S%03}4&M3N04~44M%5)}4%M&N5W~433))}4M4N&W~U43**}4M5N5S~34T34%}4*M3N0O~;4T503
;4Rx< }44M5N03~M4M222 }42M22N3~4;32&&}42M%N43~W4;2*3}42M*N3~O4M253}40M4N&;~;440%%}40M&N);~T4?03*}40M)N*?~M4U&&}4&M0N4?~T4?&50}4&M3N54~44O%30}4%MN4W~;4T*%
;RL1G }44MN&M~W4O4*}44M*N%M~S4M4)3}44M3N4M~O4O453}44M5N%3~M4422}42M2N3~4;O2%0}42M&N%3~W4M2*}42MN*3~S4W25&}42M3N4;~M4W00}40M2N);~W4;0)}40MN4;~U44&02
?RL1G }44M&N3M~4434%*}44M%NM~W4M4}44MN)M~T4;4*5}44M*N)M~S4?432}44M3N0M~U4M455}44M5N3~M4W22*}42M2N43~4;?2&}42M0N*3~44?2)}42MN03~S4W252}42M)N;~M4400&
4RL1G }44M&N4M~?4?4&*}44M&N*M~?4U4%&}44M%NM~44U4%}44MN&M~W4O4*%}44M*NM~S434)3}44M)NM~O4?452}44M3N)M~U4S24*}42M4N43~34?20&}42M0N43~?4S2%5}42M&N)3~T4M2)&
SRL1G }44M0N4M~;4;40%}44M0N%M~;4T405}44M&N4M~?4?4&*}44M&NM~?4O4%0}44M%N0M~44T42}44M%N5M~W4445}44MN*M~T4;4*3}44M*N%M~S4;4)3}44M)N*M~O4S45%}44M3N)3~M4M245
3MRL1G }44M2N*M~34O425}44M0N4M~;4340&}44M0N%M~;4T403}44M0N3M~?4M4&0}44M&N&M~?4T4&5}44M&N3M~4434%%}44M%N&M~44S42}44M%N3M~W4443}44MN)M~T444*5}44M*N%M~S4?4)3
;MRL1G }44M2N2M~43;42&}44M2N&M~34442}44M2N*M~34S423}44M2N3M~34U404}44M0N2M~;4;40%}44M0N&M~;4W40)}44M0N*M~;4O4&4}44M0N5M~?434&&}44M&N&M~?4T4&3}44M&N*M~44M4%&
?MRL1G }44M4N5M~34M422}44M2N2M~43;420}44M2N&M~34442}44M2N%M~34W42*}44M2N)M~34O425}44M2N3M~;4M402}44M0N4M~;4;40&}44M0N0M~;4440}44M0NM~;4S405}44M0N)M~?4M4&0
4WRL1G }44M4N3M~M4O445}44M4N5M~34M424}44M22NM~433420}44M2N0M~34;42&}44M2N&M~34442}44M2NM~34W42*}44M2N*M~34S423}44M2N)M~34O425}44M2N5M~;4M402}44M0N4M~;4;40&
TMRL1G }44M4N)M~M4S443}44M4N3M~M4U445}44M4N5M~34M424}44M2N4M~343422}44M2N0M~34;42&}44M2N&M~34?42%}44M2N%M~34442}44M2NM~34W42*}44M2N*M~34S423}44M2N)M~34O425
26789

7889}68
! 8

l"8 78l 87889 "
7
"7
87
8}6
o!l87
788
7868
! 8 "87 87l8549
898
87 "j87l l
"
789

78898
! 8}7

87
87 878977898
87 "
""l878 87 887l}7"8 8"87l
Z
! 8 87l 78
989m8
7l l"8!
!!789

}6]68
! 8 ! l8
87 9778" "
6]6 "8
6"8 87887opqqq" 2%9!87!78
7!

g 9mj
Fc.Q<1Dx=A10
119 19117

8!"#" $%40&3%'"$()*5&&*' $
8
'
$8"
'87
8$ 21%
012310425 6789

7889 8787
+ 9,-
./01232/456/71
89/7721:/742;455/6<
119 19117

8!"#" $%40&3%'"$()*5&&*' $
8
'
$8"
'87
8$ 01%
012310425 6789

7889 8787
9
;<7
:
=75
+,-./012,3/04/--,56
9
>??<7
:
@?75
+,-./012,3/07,8
9
>??<7
:
@?75
+,-./012,3/0,/-5,3
119 19117

8!"#" $%40&3%'"$()*5&&*' $
8
'
$8"
'87
8$ &1%
012310425 6789

7889 8787
;
=>>?@
<
A>@B

+ 9,-

.8 7!8/!!8798
0
"198
9 2!87
92!

7

0
"38 8787
98
0
"3 87/887
2&045 386

"877
7804524
98
#6/98
:

9"
!87
119 19117

8!"#" $%40&3%'"$()*5&&*' $
8
'
$8"
'87
8$ %1%
Water Quality Volume Calculation
WQV = water quality volume = [(2.0)(Rv)(A)]/12

A = area
Rv = 0.05 + 0.009 (I) where I is percent impervious cover
Rv = 0.05 + 0.009 (1.17/1.57) =

= 0.05 + 0.009 (74.5) =
= 0.72
WQV = [(2.0)(Rv)(A)]/12
= [(2.0)(0.72)(1.57)]/12
= 0.188 ac-ft
Total WQV Volume Treated Pond 1 (0.023 ac-ft) and 2 (0.197 ac-ft) = 0.220 acre feet
Water Quality Type II 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.90"
Prepared by Williams Site Civil, LLC Printed 7/29/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10656 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Pond 5P: POND 1
Inflow Area = 0.380 ac, 86.84% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.16" for 2-yr event
Inflow = 1.38 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af
Outflow = 1.13 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af, Atten= 18%, Lag= 2.8 min
Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 8.71 hrs, Volume= 0.023 af
Primary = 1.12 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 400.15' @ 12.02 hrs Surf.Area= 1,944 sf Storage= 837 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 164.7 min calculated for 0.068 af (100% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 164.8 min ( 957.8 - 792.9 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 399.07' 2,278 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)
5,696 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store

(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
399.07 1,944 0 0
402.00 1,944 5,696 5,696
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Primary 399.57' 15.0" Round HDPE Round 15"
L= 14.3' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet / Outlet Invert= 399.57' / 399.44' S= 0.0091 '/' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
#2 Discarded 399.07' 0.220 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 8.71 hrs HW=399.10' (Free Discharge)

2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=1.12 cfs @ 12.02 hrs HW=400.15' (Free Discharge)

1=HDPE Round 15" (Barrel Controls 1.12 cfs @ 2.99 fps)
Peak Elev= 398.89' @ 12.25 hrs Surf.Area= 3,992 sf Storage= 4,465 cf
Center-of-Mass det. time= 320.3 min ( 1,091.8 - 771.5 )

#1A 396.97' 3,003 cf 31.60'W x 126.33'L x 3.00'H Field A
11,977 cf Overall - 4,470 cf Embedded = 7,507 cf x 40.0% Voids
#2A 397.30' 3,534 cf ADS N-12 24" x 54 Inside #1
Inside= 23.8"W x 23.8"H => 3.10 sf x 20.00'L = 62.0 cf
Outside= 28.0"W x 28.0"H => 3.92 sf x 20.00'L = 78.4 cf
9 Rows of 6 Chambers
29.93' Header x 3.10 sf x 2 = 185.6 cf Inside
6,536 cf Total Available Storage
Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf
#2 Device 1 396.97' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 399.30' 3.7' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s)

1=HDPE Round 15" (Passes 0.66 cfs of 6.58 cfs potential flow)
2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 6.60 fps)
4=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Worksheet 4. Change in Runoff Volume for 2-YR Storm Event
PROJECT: 3115-3133 Chestnut Street – Proposed Chick-fil-A

Drainage Area: Drainage Area #1
2-Year Rainfall: 2.90 in
Total Site Area: 0.780 acres

Protected Site Area: 0.000 acres
Managed Area: 0.780 acres
Existing Conditions:
Q Runoff
1 2
Soil Area Area la Runoff Volume
3
Cover Type/Condition Type (sf) (ac) CN S (0.2*S) (in) (ft )
Woodland B 0 0.000 55 8.18 1.64 0.17 0
Meadow B 26,572 0.610 58 7.24 1.45 0.24 537
Meadow C 0 0.000 71 4.08 0.82 0.70 0
Impervious N/A 7,405 0.170 98 0.20 0.04 2.67 1,647
TOTAL: 33,977 0.780 2,184

* NOTE: Total impervious area reflects 20% of the existing impervious area being considered meadow in good condition.
Developed Conditions:
Q Runoff
Soil Area Area la Runoff1 Volume2
Cover Type/Condition Type (sf) (ac) CN S (0.2*S) (in) (ft3)
Open Space B 10,019 0.230 61 6.39 1.28 0.33 274
Open Space C 0 0.000 74 3.51 0.70 0.85 0
Impervious N/A 46,174 1.060 98 0.20 0.04 2.67 10,269
TOTAL: 56,192 1.290 10,543
2-Year Volume Increase (ft3): 8,359
2-Year Volume Increase = Developed Conditions Runoff Volume – Existing Conditions Runoff Volume
1. Runoff (in) = Q = (P-0.2S)2 / (P+0.8S) where

P = 2-Year Rainfall (in)
S = (1000/ CN)-10
2. Runoff Volume (CF) = Q x Area x 1/12
Q = Runoff (in)
Area = Land use area (sq. ft)
Note: Runoff Volume must be calculated for EACH land use type/condition and HSGI.
The use of a weighted CN value for volume calculations is not acceptable.
Worksheet 4. Change in Runoff Volume for 2-YR Storm Event
PROJECT: 3115-3133 Chestnut Street – Proposed Chick-fil-A

Drainage Area: Drainage Area #2
2-Year Rainfall: 2.90 in
Total Site Area: 0.790 acres

Protected Site Area: 0.000 acres
Managed Area: 0.790 acres
Existing Conditions:
Q Runoff
1 2
Soil Area Area la Runoff Volume
3
Cover Type/Condition Type (sf) (ac) CN S (0.2*S) (in) (ft )
Woodland B 0 0.000 55 8.18 1.64 0.17 0
Meadow B 23,958 0.550 58 7.24 1.45 0.24 484
Meadow C 0 0.000 71 4.08 0.82 0.70 0
Impervious N/A 10,454 0.240 98 0.20 0.04 2.67 2,325
TOTAL: 34,412 0.790 2,809

* NOTE: Total impervious area reflects 20% of the existing impervious area being considered meadow in good condition.
Developed Conditions:
Q Runoff
Soil Area Area la Runoff1 Volume2
Cover Type/Condition Type (sf) (ac) CN S (0.2*S) (in) (ft3)
Open Space B 7,405 0.170 61 6.39 1.28 0.33 202
Open Space C 0 0.000 74 3.51 0.70 0.85 0
Impervious N/A 4,792 0.110 98 0.20 0.04 2.67 1,066
TOTAL: 12,197 0.280 1,268
2-Year Volume Increase (ft3): -1,541
2-Year Volume Increase = Developed Conditions Runoff Volume – Existing Conditions Runoff Volume
1. Runoff (in) = Q = (P-0.2S)2 / (P+0.8S) where

P = 2-Year Rainfall (in)
S = (1000/ CN)-10
2. Runoff Volume (CF) = Q x Area x 1/12
Q = Runoff (in)
Area = Land use area (sq. ft)
Note: Runoff Volume must be calculated for EACH land use type/condition and HSGI.
The use of a weighted CN value for volume calculations is not acceptable.
APPENDIX B
_______________________________________
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARIES
_______________________________________
Hydrograph Summaries
Runoff Rate Calculations Water Surface Elevation
Cubic Feet/Second (CFS) Feet
Pre 1 Post 1 w/o BMP Post 1 w/ BMPs Decrease Pre 2 Post 2 Decrease Pond 1 Pond 2
1-yr 0.76 3.67 0.19 75% 0.96 0.50 48% 399.99 398.01
2-yr 0.91 4.36 0.23 75% 1.15 0.60 48% 400.05 398.13
5-yr 1.08 5.14 0.30 72% 1.36 0.70 49% 400.10 398.25
10-yr 1.20 5.73 0.40 67% 1.51 0.78 48% 400.14 398.35
25-yr 1.64 7.26 0.59 64% 1.99 1.03 48% 400.24 398.60
50-yr 1.77 7.85 0.66 63% 2.15 1.12 48% 400.28 398.70
100-yr 1.90 8.50 0.72 62% 2.31 1.21 48% 400.32 398.82
APPENDIX C
_______________________________________
PREDEVELOPMENT HYDROGRAPHS
_______________________________________
1S 2S
PRE 1 PRE 2
Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for PRE (small)

Prepared by Williams Site Civil, LLC, Printed 7/24/2019
PRE (small) PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 1-yr Duration=11 min, Inten=2.94 in/hr
HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10656 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: PRE 1
Runoff = 0.76 cfs @ 0.18 hrs, Volume= 0.012 af, Depth= 0.18"
Runoff by Rational method, Rise/Fall=1.0/1.0 xTc, Time Span= 0.00-3.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 1-yr Duration=11 min, Inten=2.94 in/hr
Area (ac) C Description

0.570 0.13 MEADOW B
0.210 0.86 IMPERVIOUS B
0.780 0.33 Weighted Average
0.780 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
9.9 100 0.0220 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.90"
0.5 97 0.0380 3.14 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps
10.4 197 Total
Subcatchment 1S: PRE 1

Hydrograph
0.85 Runoff
0.8 0.76 cfs
0.75 PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 1-yr

0.7 Duration=11 min,
0.65 Inten=2.94 in/hr
0.6
Runoff Area=0.780 ac
0.55
0.5
Runoff Volume=0.012 af
Flow (cfs)
0.45 Runoff Depth=0.18"

0.4 Flow Length=197'
0.35 Tc=10.4 min
0.3 C=0.33
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.490 0.13 MEADOW B

10.6 100 0.0480 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.90"
10.8 141 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1 0.96 cfs
PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 1-yr

Duration=11 min,
Inten=2.94 in/hr
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.22"
Flow Length=141'
Tc=10.8 min
C=0.41
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.570 0.13 MEADOW B

9.9 100 0.0220 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.90"
10.4 197 Total

Hydrograph
1 Runoff
0.91 cfs

Duration=11 min,
Inten=3.51 in/hr
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.21"
Flow Length=197'
Tc=10.4 min
C=0.33
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.490 0.13 MEADOW B

10.6 100 0.0480 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.90"
10.8 141 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1.15 cfs

Duration=11 min,
1
Inten=3.51 in/hr
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.26"
Flow Length=141'
Tc=10.8 min
C=0.41
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.570 0.13 MEADOW B

9.9 100 0.0220 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.90"
10.4 197 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1.08 cfs

1 Duration=11 min,
Inten=4.15 in/hr
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.25"
Flow Length=197'
Tc=10.4 min
C=0.33
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.490 0.13 MEADOW B

10.6 100 0.0480 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.90"
10.8 141 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1.36 cfs

Duration=11 min,
Inten=4.15 in/hr
1
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.31"
Flow Length=141'
Tc=10.8 min
C=0.41
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.570 0.13 MEADOW B

9.9 100 0.0220 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.90"
10.4 197 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1.20 cfs

Duration=11 min,
1 Inten=4.62 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.28"
Flow (cfs)
Flow Length=197'
Tc=10.4 min
C=0.33
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.490 0.13 MEADOW B

10.6 100 0.0480 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.90"
10.8 141 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1.51 cfs

Duration=11 min,
Inten=4.62 in/hr
1
Runoff Depth=0.35"
Flow (cfs)
Flow Length=141'
Tc=10.8 min
C=0.41
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)
1S 2S
PRE 1 PRE 2
Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for PRE (large)

PRE (large) PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 25-yr Duration=11 min, Inten=5.20 in/hr

0.570 0.19 MEADOW B
0.210 26.92% Impervious Area

9.9 100 0.0220 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.90"
10.4 197 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1.64 cfs

Duration=11 min,
Inten=5.20 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.38"
Flow (cfs)
1
Flow Length=197'
Tc=10.4 min
C=0.40
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.490 0.19 MEADOW B

10.6 100 0.0480 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.90"
10.8 141 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1.99 cfs
2 PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 25-yr
Duration=11 min,
Inten=5.20 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.46"
Flow (cfs)
Flow Length=141'
1
Tc=10.8 min
C=0.48
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.570 0.19 MEADOW B

9.9 100 0.0220 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.90"
10.4 197 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
1.77 cfs

Duration=11 min,
Inten=5.62 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.41"
Flow (cfs)
1 Flow Length=197'
Tc=10.4 min
C=0.40
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.490 0.19 MEADOW B

10.6 100 0.0480 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.90"
10.8 141 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
2.15 cfs

2 Duration=11 min,
Inten=5.62 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.49"
Flow (cfs)
Flow Length=141'
1 Tc=10.8 min
C=0.48
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.570 0.19 MEADOW B

9.9 100 0.0220 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.90"
10.4 197 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
2 1.90 cfs

Duration=11 min,
Inten=6.04 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.44"
Flow (cfs)
Flow Length=197'
1
Tc=10.4 min
C=0.40
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)

0.490 0.19 MEADOW B

10.6 100 0.0480 0.16 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.90"
10.8 141 Total

Hydrograph
Runoff
2.31 cfs

Duration=11 min,
2
Inten=6.04 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.53"
Flow (cfs)
Flow Length=141'
Tc=10.8 min
1
C=0.48
0
0 1 2 3
Time (hours)
APPENDIX D
_______________________________________
POSTDEVELOPMENT HYDROGRAPHS
_______________________________________
6S
POST 1 POND 1
5P
1S POND 1 2S 5S
POST 1 POND 2
POST 1 BYPASS
POST 2
3P
POND 2
4L
EAST POI
Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for POST (small)

POST (small) PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 1-yr Duration=5 min, Inten=3.86 in/hr
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: POST 1 POND 2

0.010 0.22 LAWN B

5.0 Direct Entry, MINIMUM
Subcatchment 1S: POST 1 POND 2

Hydrograph
Runoff
2.36 cfs

Duration=5 min,
2 Inten=3.86 in/hr
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.55"
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.85
1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: POST 1 BYPASS

0.170 0.22 LAWN B
0.010 0.86 IMPERVIOUS

Subcatchment 2S: POST 1 BYPASS

Hydrograph
Runoff
0.19
0.18 cfs
0.18
0.17
0.14
0.13
0.12 Runoff Volume=0.003 af
Flow (cfs)

0.1
0.09
Tc=5.0 min
0.08 C=0.26
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Summary for Subcatchment 5S: POST 2

0.170 0.22 LAWN B

Subcatchment 5S: POST 2

Hydrograph
0.55 Runoff
0.50 cfs
Inten=3.86 in/hr
0.4
Flow (cfs)

Tc=5.0 min
0.25
C=0.47
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.050 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
1.13 cfs

1
Duration=5 min,
Inten=3.86 in/hr
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.50"
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.78
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

#1A 396.97' 3,003 cf 31.60'W x 126.33'L x 3.00'H Field A
#2A 397.30' 3,534 cf ADS N-12 24" x 54 Inside #1

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 3P: POND 2

Hydrograph
Inflow
2.58 cfs Primary
Inflow Area=1.110 ac
Peak Elev=398.01'
2 Storage=1,972 cf
Flow (cfs)
0.06 cfs
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)


399.57 1,944 0 0
402.00 1,944 4,724 4,724

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 5P: POND 1

Hydrograph
Inflow
1.13 cfs Primary
1
Peak Elev=399.99'
Storage=327 cf
15.0"
Flow (cfs)
0.64 cfs
Round Culvert
n=0.013
L=14.3'
S=0.0091 '/'
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Summary for Link 4L: EAST POI
Inflow Area = 1.290 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.48" for 1-yr event
Primary = 0.19 cfs @ 0.09 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Link 4L: EAST POI

Hydrograph
Inflow
0.21 0.19 cfs Primary
0.2
0.19 cfs
0.19 Inflow Area=1.290 ac
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
Flow (cfs)
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.010 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
3
2.81 cfs

Duration=5 min,
Inten=4.61 in/hr
2
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.65"
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.85
1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
0.23 Runoff
0.22
0.21 cfs
0.2
0.17
0.16 Runoff Area=0.180 ac
0.15
0.14
Flow (cfs)

0.12
0.11 Tc=5.0 min
0.1 C=0.26
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
0.65 Runoff
0.60 cfs
0.6
Flow (cfs)
0.35
Runoff Depth=0.36"
Tc=5.0 min
0.3
C=0.47
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.050 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
1.34 cfs

Duration=5 min,
Inten=4.61 in/hr
1 Runoff Area=0.380 ac
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.60"
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.78
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

#1A 396.97' 3,003 cf 31.60'W x 126.33'L x 3.00'H Field A
#2A 397.30' 3,534 cf ADS N-12 24" x 54 Inside #1

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 3P: POND 2

Hydrograph
Inflow
3.12 cfs Primary
3
Peak Elev=398.13'
Storage=2,293 cf
Flow (cfs)
0.16 cfs
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)


399.57 1,944 0 0
402.00 1,944 4,724 4,724

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 5P: POND 1

Hydrograph
Inflow
1.34 cfs Primary
Peak Elev=400.05'
Storage=369 cf
1
15.0"
Flow (cfs)
0.80 cfs
Round Culvert
n=0.013
L=14.3'
S=0.0091 '/'
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Link 4L: EAST POI

Hydrograph
Inflow
0.24
0.23 cfs
0.23
0.22
0.21
0.2
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
Flow (cfs)
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.010 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
3.31 cfs

3 Duration=5 min,
Inten=5.42 in/hr
Flow (cfs)
2 Runoff Depth=0.77"
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.85
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
0.26
0.25 cfs
0.24
Duration=5 min,
0.22
Inten=5.42 in/hr
0.2
0.18
0.16
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.23"
0.14
Tc=5.0 min
0.12
C=0.26
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
0.75
0.70 cfs
0.6
Inten=5.42 in/hr
0.55
0.5
0.45
Flow (cfs)
Runoff Depth=0.42"
0.4
Tc=5.0 min
0.35
C=0.47
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.050 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
1.58 cfs

Duration=5 min,
Inten=5.42 in/hr
Flow (cfs)
1
Runoff Depth=0.70"
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.78
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

#1A 396.97' 3,003 cf 31.60'W x 126.33'L x 3.00'H Field A
#2A 397.30' 3,534 cf ADS N-12 24" x 54 Inside #1

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 3P: POND 2

Hydrograph
Inflow
3.71 cfs Primary
4
Peak Elev=398.25'
3
Storage=2,645 cf
Flow (cfs)
0.29 cfs
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)


399.57 1,944 0 0
402.00 1,944 4,724 4,724

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 5P: POND 1

Hydrograph
Inflow
1.58 cfs Primary
Peak Elev=400.10'
Storage=414 cf
0.98 cfs
15.0"
Flow (cfs)
1
Round Culvert
n=0.013
L=14.3'
S=0.0091 '/'
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Link 4L: EAST POI

Hydrograph
Inflow
0.30 cfs Primary
0.32
0.30 cfs
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.2
Flow (cfs)
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.010 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
4 Runoff
3.69 cfs

Duration=5 min,
Inten=6.05 in/hr
3
Runoff Depth=0.86"
Flow (cfs)
2 Tc=5.0 min
C=0.85
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
0.3
0.28 cfs
0.24
Inten=6.05 in/hr
0.22
0.2
0.18
Runoff Depth=0.26"
Flow (cfs)
0.16
Tc=5.0 min
0.14
C=0.26
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
0.85 Runoff
0.78 cfs
0.8
0.75
0.7
Duration=5 min,
Flow (cfs)
0.45
Tc=5.0 min
0.4
C=0.47
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.050 0.22 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
1.76 cfs

Duration=5 min,
Inten=6.05 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.79"
Flow (cfs)
1 Tc=5.0 min
C=0.78
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

#1A 396.97' 3,003 cf 31.60'W x 126.33'L x 3.00'H Field A
#2A 397.30' 3,534 cf ADS N-12 24" x 54 Inside #1

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 3P: POND 2

Hydrograph
Inflow
4.16 cfs Primary
4
Peak Elev=398.35'
Storage=2,922 cf
3
Flow (cfs)
0.37 cfs
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)


399.57 1,944 0 0
402.00 1,944 4,724 4,724

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 5P: POND 1

Hydrograph
Inflow
1.76 cfs Primary
Peak Elev=400.14'
Storage=446 cf
1.12 cfs
15.0"
Flow (cfs)
1
Round Culvert
n=0.013
L=14.3'
S=0.0091 '/'
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Link 4L: EAST POI

Hydrograph
Inflow
0.420.40 cfs
0.38
0.36
0.34
0.32
0.3
0.28
0.26
Flow (cfs)
0.24
0.22
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
6S
POST 1 POND 1
5P
POND 1
1S 2S 5S
POST 1 POND 2 POST 1 BYPASS POST 2
3P
POND 2
4L
EAST POI
Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for POST (large)

POST (large) PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 25-yr Duration=5 min, Inten=6.82 in/hr

0.010 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
5
4.65 cfs

Duration=5 min,
4 Inten=6.82 in/hr
3
Runoff Depth=1.08"
Flow (cfs)
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.95
2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
0.42 Runoff
0.4
0.39 cfs

0.34
0.28
0.26
Runoff Depth=0.36"
Flow (cfs)
0.24
0.22 Tc=5.0 min
0.2
0.18 C=0.32
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
1.03 cfs
1
Duration=5 min,
Inten=6.82 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.62"
Flow (cfs)
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.55
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.050 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
2.22 cfs

2 Duration=5 min,
Inten=6.82 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.99"
Flow (cfs)
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.87
1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

#1A 396.97' 3,003 cf 31.60'W x 126.33'L x 3.00'H Field A
#2A 397.30' 3,534 cf ADS N-12 24" x 54 Inside #1

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 3P: POND 2

Hydrograph
Inflow
5.33 cfs Primary
5
Peak Elev=398.60'
4
Storage=3,644 cf
Flow (cfs)
1
0.53 cfs
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)


399.57 1,944 0 0
402.00 1,944 4,724 4,724

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 5P: POND 1

Hydrograph
Inflow
2.22 cfs Primary
2 Peak Elev=400.24'
Storage=522 cf
1.47 cfs 15.0"
Flow (cfs)
Round Culvert
1
n=0.013
L=14.3'
S=0.0091 '/'
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Link 4L: EAST POI

Hydrograph
Inflow
0.59 cfs
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
Flow (cfs)
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.010 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
5.03 cfs
5 PA-Cumberland-Camp Hill 50-yr
Duration=5 min,
Inten=7.38 in/hr
4
Runoff Depth=1.17"
Flow (cfs)
3
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.95
2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
0.46 Runoff
0.44
0.42 cfs
0.4
0.34
0.3
0.28
Runoff Depth=0.39"
Flow (cfs)
0.26
0.24
Tc=5.0 min
0.22
0.2 C=0.32
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
1.12 cfs

1
Duration=5 min,
Inten=7.38 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.68"
Flow (cfs)
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.55
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.050 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
2.40 cfs

Duration=5 min,
2 Inten=7.38 in/hr
Runoff Depth=1.07"
Flow (cfs)
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.87
1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

#1A 396.97' 3,003 cf 31.60'W x 126.33'L x 3.00'H Field A
#2A 397.30' 3,534 cf ADS N-12 24" x 54 Inside #1

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 3P: POND 2

Hydrograph
Inflow
5.81 cfs Primary
6
5
Peak Elev=398.70'
Storage=3,941 cf
4
Flow (cfs)
1
0.58 cfs
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)


399.57 1,944 0 0
402.00 1,944 4,724 4,724

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 5P: POND 1

Hydrograph
Inflow
2.40 cfs Primary
Peak Elev=400.28'
2
Storage=551 cf
1.61 cfs
15.0"
Flow (cfs)
Round Culvert
n=0.013
1
L=14.3'
S=0.0091 '/'
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Link 4L: EAST POI

Hydrograph
Inflow
0.66 cfs Primary
0.70.66 cfs
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
Flow (cfs)
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.010 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
6 Runoff
5.45 cfs

5 Duration=5 min,
Inten=7.99 in/hr
4
Runoff Depth=1.26"
Flow (cfs)
3 Tc=5.0 min
C=0.95
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
0.5 Runoff
0.48
0.45 cfs
0.46
0.4
0.36
0.34
0.3
Runoff Depth=0.43"
Flow (cfs)
0.28
0.26
0.24
Tc=5.0 min
0.22 C=0.32
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.170 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
1.21 cfs

Duration=5 min,
1 Inten=7.99 in/hr
Runoff Depth=0.73"
Flow (cfs)
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.55
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

0.050 0.28 LAWN B


Hydrograph
Runoff
2.60 cfs

Duration=5 min,
Inten=7.99 in/hr
2 Runoff Area=0.380 ac
Runoff Depth=1.16"
Flow (cfs)
Tc=5.0 min
C=0.87
1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

#1A 396.97' 3,003 cf 31.60'W x 126.33'L x 3.00'H Field A
#2A 397.30' 3,534 cf ADS N-12 24" x 54 Inside #1

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 3P: POND 2

Hydrograph
Inflow
7 6.33 cfs Primary
6
Peak Elev=398.82'
5 Storage=4,267 cf
Flow (cfs)
10.63 cfs
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)


399.57 1,944 0 0
402.00 1,944 4,724 4,724

n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf

Pond 5P: POND 1

Hydrograph
Inflow
2.60 cfs Primary
Peak Elev=400.32'
2
Storage=583 cf
1.77 cfs
15.0"
Flow (cfs)
Round Culvert
n=0.013
1 L=14.3'
S=0.0091 '/'
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
Link 4L: EAST POI

Hydrograph
Inflow
0.750.72 cfs
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
Flow (cfs)
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
APPENDIX E
_______________________________________
BASIN DETAIL CALCULATIONS

_______________________________________
Weir Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jul 24 2019
Emergency Spillway
Rectangular Weir Highlighted

Crest = Sharp Depth (ft) = 0.63
Bottom Length (ft) = 3.77 Q (cfs) = 6.330
Total Depth (ft) = 1.83 Area (sqft) = 2.39
Velocity (ft/s) = 2.65
Calculations Top Width (ft) = 3.77
Weir Coeff. Cw = 3.33
Compute by: Known Q
Known Q (cfs) = 6.33
Depth (ft) Emergency Spillway Depth (ft)
2.00 2.00
1.50 1.50
1.00 1.00
0.50 0.50
0.00 0.00
-0.50 -0.50
0 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Weir W.S.
Length (ft)
APPENDIX F
_______________________________________
BASIN DEWATERING CALCULATIONS

_______________________________________
Hydrograph for Pond 5P: POND 1
Time Inflow Storage Elevation Outflow Discarded Primary

(hours) (cfs) (cubic-feet) (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
0.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.00 0.00 2 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
7.00 0.00 5 399.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
8.00 0.01 10 399.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
9.00 0.01 17 399.09 0.01 0.01 0.00
10.00 0.02 30 399.11 0.01 0.01 0.00
11.00 0.04 83 399.18 0.01 0.01 0.00
12.00 1.01 741 400.02 0.74 0.01 0.73
13.00 0.05 481 399.69 0.07 0.01 0.06
14.00 0.03 453 399.65 0.04 0.01 0.03
15.00 0.03 441 399.64 0.03 0.01 0.02
16.00 0.02 433 399.63 0.02 0.01 0.01
17.00 0.02 425 399.62 0.02 0.01 0.01
18.00 0.02 420 399.61 0.02 0.01 0.01
19.00 0.01 415 399.60 0.01 0.01 0.00
20.00 0.01 410 399.60 0.01 0.01 0.00
21.00 0.01 406 399.59 0.01 0.01 0.00
22.00 0.01 401 399.59 0.01 0.01 0.00
23.00 0.01 397 399.58 0.01 0.01 0.00
24.00 0.01 394 399.58 0.01 0.01 0.00
25.00 0.00 361 399.53 0.01 0.01 0.00
26.00 0.00 325 399.49 0.01 0.01 0.00
27.00 0.00 290 399.44 0.01 0.01 0.00
28.00 0.00 254 399.40 0.01 0.01 0.00
29.00 0.00 218 399.35 0.01 0.01 0.00
30.00 0.00 183 399.31 0.01 0.01 0.00
31.00 0.00 147 399.26 0.01 0.01 0.00
32.00 0.00 111 399.21 0.01 0.01 0.00
33.00 0.00 76 399.17 0.01 0.01 0.00
34.00 0.00 40 399.12 0.01 0.01 0.00
35.00 0.00 10 399.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
36.00 0.00 2 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
37.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
38.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
39.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
40.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
41.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
42.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
43.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
44.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
45.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
46.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
47.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
48.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
49.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
50.00 0.00 0 399.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
Time Inflow Storage Elevation Primary

(hours) (cfs) (cubic-feet) (feet) (cfs)
0.00 0.00 0 396.97 0.00
2.00 0.00 1,856 397.94 0.03
4.00 0.00 1,681 397.88 0.02
6.00 0.00 1,514 397.81 0.02
8.00 0.00 1,350 397.75 0.02
10.00 0.00 1,193 397.68 0.02
12.00 0.00 1,042 397.62 0.02
14.00 0.00 899 397.55 0.02
16.00 0.00 766 397.47 0.02
18.00 0.00 646 397.37 0.02
20.00 0.00 540 397.30 0.01
22.00 0.00 444 397.24 0.01
24.00 0.00 360 397.19 0.01
26.00 0.00 286 397.14 0.01
28.00 0.00 223 397.10 0.01
30.00 0.00 171 397.07 0.01
32.00 0.00 130 397.05 0.00
34.00 0.00 100 397.03 0.00
36.00 0.00 79 397.02 0.00
38.00 0.00 64 397.01 0.00
40.00 0.00 53 397.00 0.00
42.00 0.00 46 397.00 0.00
44.00 0.00 39 396.99 0.00
46.00 0.00 34 396.99 0.00
48.00 0.00 29 396.99 0.00
50.00 0.00 25 396.99 0.00
52.00 0.00 21 396.98 0.00
54.00 0.00 18 396.98 0.00
56.00 0.00 16 396.98 0.00
58.00 0.00 14 396.98 0.00
60.00 0.00 12 396.98 0.00
62.00 0.00 10 396.98 0.00
64.00 0.00 9 396.98 0.00
66.00 0.00 7 396.97 0.00
68.00 0.00 6 396.97 0.00
70.00 0.00 6 396.97 0.00
72.00 0.00 5 396.97 0.00
Porous Pavement/Infiltration Bed (POND 1) Dewatering Time
The tested infiltration rate is 2.0 inches/hour. For a reduction factor of 3 and safety
factor of 3 in accordance with the PA BMP Manual, the design rate is reduced to
0.22 inches/hour.
The elevation bottom of the infiltration bed is 399.07 feet. The outflow pipe invert
elevation is 399.57 feet. Therefore, the infiltration storage depth is 0.5 feet or 6
inches.
For 6 inches of depth, the dewatering time will be approximately 27 hours.
6 inches/0.22 inches per hour = 27 hours


0.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
2.00 0.00 23 399.60 0.00
4.00 0.00 10 399.58 0.00
6.00 0.00 5 399.58 0.00
8.00 0.00 2 399.57 0.00
10.00 0.00 1 399.57 0.00
12.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
14.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
16.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
18.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
20.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
22.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
24.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
26.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
28.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
30.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
32.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
34.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
36.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
38.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
40.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
42.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
44.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
46.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
48.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
50.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
52.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
54.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
56.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
58.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
60.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
62.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
64.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
66.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
68.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
70.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00
72.00 0.00 0 399.57 0.00

0.00 0.00 0 396.97 0.00
2.00 0.00 2,250 398.11 0.14
4.00 0.00 1,800 397.95 0.03
6.00 0.00 1,616 397.88 0.02
8.00 0.00 1,446 397.81 0.02
10.00 0.00 1,282 397.74 0.02
12.00 0.00 1,124 397.67 0.02
14.00 0.00 975 397.60 0.02
16.00 0.00 834 397.53 0.02
18.00 0.00 703 397.44 0.02
20.00 0.00 588 397.34 0.02
22.00 0.00 485 397.27 0.01
24.00 0.00 394 397.22 0.01
26.00 0.00 314 397.17 0.01
28.00 0.00 245 397.12 0.01
30.00 0.00 188 397.09 0.01
32.00 0.00 141 397.06 0.01
34.00 0.00 107 397.04 0.00
36.00 0.00 82 397.02 0.00
38.00 0.00 65 397.01 0.00
40.00 0.00 54 397.00 0.00
42.00 0.00 46 397.00 0.00
44.00 0.00 39 396.99 0.00
46.00 0.00 33 396.99 0.00
48.00 0.00 28 396.99 0.00
50.00 0.00 24 396.99 0.00
52.00 0.00 21 396.98 0.00
54.00 0.00 18 396.98 0.00
56.00 0.00 15 396.98 0.00
58.00 0.00 13 396.98 0.00
60.00 0.00 11 396.98 0.00
62.00 0.00 10 396.98 0.00
64.00 0.00 8 396.98 0.00
66.00 0.00 7 396.97 0.00
68.00 0.00 6 396.97 0.00
70.00 0.00 5 396.97 0.00
72.00 0.00 4 396.97 0.00
APPENDIX G
_______________________________________
STORM SEWER CONVEYANCE DESIGN
_______________________________________
APPENDIX H
_______________________________________
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
_______________________________________
Report of Geotechnical
Exploration
FOR
Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04342
Camp Hill FSU
Borough of Camp Hill, Cumberland County, PA
August 17, 2018

Prepared For
John Martinez
Development Manager, Design & Construction
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
5200 Buffington Road
Atlanta, GA 30349
Prepared By
Maser Consulting P.A.
410 Eagleview Boulevard, Suite 104
Exton, PA 19341
610.254.9140
__________________________
Matthew J. Church, PE
License No. PE081072
Maser Project No. 17000373B
MC Project No. 000000000

Engineers 410 Eagleview Blvd., Suite 104
Planners Exton, PA 19341
Surveyors T: 610.254.9140
Landscape Architects F: 610.254.9141
Environmental Scientists www.maserconsulting.com
August 17, 2018
Mr. John Martinez, P.E. (john.martinez@cfacorp.com)

Development Manager, Design & Construction
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
5200 Buffington Road
Atlanta, GA 30349
Re: Report of Geotechnical Exploration Program

Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04342
Camp Hill FSU
Parcel IDs 01-21-0273-431, 01-21-0273-432, 01-21-0273-433, 01-21-0273-434,
01-21-0273-435 & 01-21-0273-436
Borough of Camp Hill, Cumberland County, PA
MC Project No. 17000373B
Dear Mr. Martinez:
Maser Consulting P.A. is pleased to present the results of a geotechnical exploration program
performed for the referenced project. This program was performed in accordance with our
Agreement dated July 17, 2018 and our Master Agreement dated December 1, 2015. This exploration
program included 9 subsurface explorations, laboratory testing, engineering evaluation, and
preparation of this report. The results of the field and laboratory testing and our geotechnical
recommendations for design and construction of the proposed project are included in this report.
Maser appreciates the opportunity to assist you with this project. Please contact this office
should you have questions regarding this report.
Sincerely,
MASER CONSULTING P.A.
John C. Walton, P.E. Matthew J. Church, P.E.

Principal Associate Project Engineer
MJC/jcw
Attachments
cc: Donald Bowman, PE (Maser)
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction

TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF APPENDICES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................1

INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................3
SITE CONDITIONS ..............................................................................................................................4
Location and Surface Features ............................................................................................................4
Geology ...............................................................................................................................................4
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ...........................................................................................................5
EXPLORATION AND TESTING ........................................................................................................6
Subsurface Exploration Program ........................................................................................................6
Subsurface Conditions ........................................................................................................................8
Geophysical.........................................................................................................................................8
Groundwater .......................................................................................................................................8
Laboratory Testing ..............................................................................................................................9
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................9
General ................................................................................................................................................9
Construction Considerations in Karst Geology ................................................................................10
Demolition ........................................................................................................................................12
Earthwork ..........................................................................................................................................12
Fill and Backfill Materials ................................................................................................................13
Groundwater and Surface Water Control .........................................................................................15
Frost Considerations .........................................................................................................................16
Subsurface Utilities ...........................................................................................................................16
Foundations .......................................................................................................................................16
Seismic Considerations .....................................................................................................................18
Floor Slab ..........................................................................................................................................18
Lateral Earth Pressure Parameters ....................................................................................................19
Stormwater Management ..................................................................................................................20
Pavements .........................................................................................................................................21
LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................................22
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – FIGURES
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Exploration Location Plan
Figure 3 – Karst Features
APPENDIX B – EXPLORATION LOGS

Test Boring Logs (TB-1 through TB-9)
APPENDIX C – LABORATORY DATA

Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Particle Size Distribution
APPENDIX D – INFILTRATION DATA

Proposed Chick-fil-A
Borough of Camp Hill, PA August 2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
• This geotechnical engineering program was performed for a proposed Chick-fil-A (CFA)
restaurant considered for construction at a site in the Borough of Camp Hill, Cumberland County,
PA. The subject property is generally located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection formed
by Chestnut Street and South 32nd Street.
• The subject property consists of 6 individual parcels along Chestnut Street. According to
topographic data the ground surface generally slopes down to the northeast and southwest from a
ridgeline extending from the northwestern portion of the site to the southeastern portion of the site
with surface grades ranging from approximately elevation (EL) 402.0 feet to EL 407.0 feet,
respectively.
• According to the Bedrock Geologic Map of Pennsylvania (2001), the site is underlain by the
Ordovician age Pinesburg Station Formation (Ops) in the southern half of the site and the
Ordovician age St. Paul Group (Osp) in the northern half of the site. These formations are
susceptible to karst/sinkhole activity.
• The proposed construction will include a ±5,031 SF Chick-fil-A restaurant (P12-LC-LARGE-V2)
located in the northern portion of the subject parcel, a trash enclosure located southeast of the
proposed CFA building, and the concrete drive-thru will begin in the southeastern portion of the
parcel and continue along the north and west sides of the proposed building.
• Based on proposed grading, mass cuts/fills of less than ±2 feet are anticipated. Excavations
ranging up to ±3 feet below finished grade are anticipated for foundation construction and deeper
excavations for proposed utilities and stormwater structures.
Exploration and Testing
• This study included 9 test borings performed throughout the property. The borings extended to
depths ranging from ±8 to ±16 feet BGS. Laboratory testing was performed on representative
samples obtained from the explorations.
• Topsoil was encountered at the ground surface of the boring locations and ranged from ±3.0 to
±8.0 inches in thickness.
• Natural/residual soils were encountered below the topsoil and extended to the completion depths
of the explorations. The natural/residual soils generally consisted fine-grained soil (silt and clay)
with variable amounts of sand and gravel/rock fragments. SPT N-Values indicate that the in-situ
consistencies of the site soils range from ‘medium stiff’ to ‘hard’, averaging ‘very stiff’.
• Several suspected karst features were encountered during the geophysical survey along with
evidence of underground utilities, previous structures, and site activities. The suspected karst
features generally consist of pinnacled bedrock and near surface voids.
• No evidence of groundwater or seasonal high groundwater was encountered in the explorations
performed for this study.
1
Conclusions and Recommendations
• Based on the results of this study, construction of the proposed CFA restaurant is feasible;
however, the geotechnical issues that will likely impact site development include:
o The need to demolish the existing structures and associated site features.
o The presence of carbonate geology and the potential for karst activity.
o The site soils contain high percentages of fine-grained soil (silt and clay) and will
present the following challenges:
▪ They will be sensitive to disturbance from construction equipment and
precipitation.
▪ Their suitability for reuse on-site will likely be dependent on
moisture-conditioning.
▪ They will be subject to frost action.
• There is a moderate to high potential for karst related issues during this project.
• The excavated natural soils will be suitable for reuse as compacted structural fill with some
limitations. The site soils consist primarily of silt and clay and will be subject to moisture-related
compaction problems. Moisture conditioning of the excavated materials should be anticipated
prior to reuse.
• The is potential to encountered cobbles and/or boulders during earthwork and/or footing, utility,
and stormwater management structures. The use of heavy duty equipment such as large track-
mounted excavators equipped with rock teeth and/or rock rippers may be required for portions of
earthwork activities.
• Provided the recommendations contained herein are followed, the proposed building can be
supported on conventional shallow spread footings established in suitable site soils or new
compacted structural fill and may be designed for a maximum allowable net bearing pressure of
3,000 pounds per square foot.
• The project should be designed assuming a Seismic Site Class C– “Very Dense Soil and Soft
Rock” profile.
• The proposed floor slab can be constructed as a slab-on-grade and designed assuming a modulus
of subgrade reaction of 150 pounds per cubic inch.
• Standard thickness pavement sections are acceptable for this project, provided the earthwork
recommendations herein are followed. Timing of pavement construction will be critical to prevent
destabilization of pavement subgrade soils.
This executive summary is provided as an abbreviated general discussion of the geotechnical

considerations that will impact development of the subject project and should not be relied upon
without reading the report in its entirety. The following sections of the report present a detailed
discussion of the findings of this exploration program and our recommendations for design and
construction of the subject project.
2
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a geotechnical exploration program performed for a proposed
Chick-fil-A (CFA) restaurant considered for construction in the Borough of Camp Hill, Cumberland
County, PA. The subject property is generally located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection
formed by Chestnut Street and South 32nd Street. Please refer to Figure 1 – Site Location Map included
in Appendix A.
The following information was provided and used as the basis for the subsurface exploration
program and preparation of this report:
• A site plan entitled “Concept Plan” prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A. dated June 26,
2018.
• A survey plan entitled “ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey for Michael A. Serluco; 3117
– 3133 Chestnut Street” prepared by James C. Hockenberry, PLS dated March 7, 2017.
• A grading plan entitles “Grading Concept Plan: 3117 – 3133 Chestnut Street” prepared
by Williams Site Civil, LLC dated May 2, 2018.
The plans indicate the existing site features, existing utilities, existing topography, conceptual
grading, and conceptual site layout. It should be noted that proposed utilities, structural plans, and
architectural plans were not available at the time of this geotechnical exploration program.
The scope of our exploration program for this project included the following services:
• Subsurface exploration program consisting of 9 borings.
• Laboratory testing of representative soil samples.
• Review of publicly available geologic data as it pertains to the proposed development.
• Preparation of this report, which includes our findings and recommendations regarding:
o Earthwork, including suitability of on-site materials for reuse and
associated compaction requirements
o Foundation and floor slab support, including bearing capacity and
anticipated settlements
o Seismic considerations
o Surface water and groundwater control
o Lateral earth pressure parameters
3
o Pavement design parameters

SITE CONDITIONS
Location and Surface Features
The subject property is bordered to the north by Chestnut Street, to the west by South 32 nd
Street, to the south by a commercial property, and to the east by residential properties. The subject
property consisted of 6 individual parcels along Chestnut Street (Parcel IDs 01-21-0273-431, 01-21-
0273-432, 01-21-0273-433, 01-21-0273-434, 01-21-0273-435 & 01-21-0273-436). The subject
property contains 2 alley ways in the eastern and southern portions of the property, respectively. The
individual parcels included 2-story houses with basements set along Chestnut Street. The parcels were
generally separated by fences but also contained sheds set toward the rear of the properties. It should
be noted that the front yards and houses were situated approximately 2 feet above Chestnut Street and
several had a ±2 ft high retaining wall adjacent to the concrete sidewalk along Chestnut Street. It
should also be noted that areas along Chestnut Street were densely vegetated. The balance of the
parcels consisted of asphalt pavements and grass lawn areas. According to topographic data presented
on the referenced survey plan, the ground surface generally slopes down to the northeast and southwest
from a ridgeline extending from the northwestern portion of the site to the southeastern portion of the
site with surface grades ranging from approximately elevation (EL) 402.0 feet to EL 407.0 feet.
Geology
The National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey indicates the site soils
consist of Duffield silt loam (DuA, 0 to 3 percent slopes) located in the northeastern portion of the site
and Hagerstown silt loam (HaB, 3 to 8 percent slopes) located in the southwestern portion of the site.
Duffield silt loam (DuA, 0 to 3 percent slopes) is generally mapped to consist of silt loam with gravel
present below 56 inches. Hagerstown silt loam (HaB, 3 to 8 percent slopes) is generally mapped to
consist of silt loam and transitioning to silty clay loam/clay loam to the surface of lithic bedrock below
73 inches. The survey indicates that litithic bedrock is typically encountered within 60 to 80 inches
(DuA) and within 43 to 98 inches (HaB) of the ground surface.
The project site is situated within the Great Valley Section of the Ridge and Valley
Physiographic Province. According to the Bedrock Geologic Map of Pennsylvania (2001), the site is
underlain by the Ordovician age Pinesburg Station Formation (Ops) in the southern half of the site and
the Ordovician age St. Paul Group (Osp) in the northern half of the site. The Pinesburg Station
4
Formation (Ops) is mapped to consist primarily of “Light-colored, thick-bedded, finely laminated

dolomite; some limestone”. The St. Paul Group (Osp) is mapped to consist primarily of “Very finely
crystalline, "birdseye" limestone at top and base, granular fossiliferous limestone, black chert, and
dolomite in middle”. The Pinesburg Station Formation and St. Paul Group is carbonate bedrock and
is susceptible to karst/sinkhole activity. It should be noted that the geophysical survey indicated
several suspected karst features, there mapped sinkhole activity (a large closed depression) as close as
±200 feet southeast of the site, and several other closed depressions within 1 mile of the project site
(See Figure 3 – Karst Features).
Carbonate bedrock formations can dissolve over geologic time when in direct contact with
acidic soil and/or groundwater, i.e. low pH levels. Depending on the orientation of bedding planes
within the rock mass, this dissolution characteristic often results in weathered rock zones, voids in the
rock mass, soil-filled voids, and a pinnacled bedrock surface characterized by deep troughs and high
ridges. These features develop as accelerated dissolution of less-resistant portions of the rock mass
occurs relative to adjacent portions of the rock mass that are more resistant to dissolution. These
dissolution patterns can be highly variable in size and orientation, with rock voids ranging from small
irregular patterns (similar to that of a sponge) to large open caverns. Over time, the overburden soils
tend to migrate into these rock voids by groundwater transport and gravity effects. As the soil
migrates, arching effects of the overlying soil bridges the ‘washed out’ soil creating a soil void. The
soil voids then collapse resulting in soft soil zones above. As this process continues, subsidence of
the soft soil zones occur, which is manifest as depressions at the ground surface and ultimately
development of sinkholes. These features are collectively referred to as karst.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed construction will include a ±5,031 SF Chick-fil-A restaurant
(P12-LC-LARGE-V2) located in the northwestern portion of the site, a trash enclosure located
southeast of the proposed CFA building, and the concrete drive-thru will begin in the southeastern
portion of the site and continue along the north and west sides of the site. At-grade parking areas,
drive lanes, and landscaped islands will be provided throughout the remainder of the parcel. The site
will be accessed from ingress/egress points along Chestnut Street and South 32nd Street. Based on the
referenced grading plan, stormwater runoff will be controlled by three (3) potential stormwater
management (SWM) basin locations as follows: an above ground basin located on the western side of
5
the site, an underground basin established below the proposed parking field in the southern portion of
the site, and/or an underground basin established below the proposed parking field/drive lane in the
eastern portion of the site.
Based on the referenced grading plan the finished floor elevation (FFE) of the restaurant will
be established at EL ±406.5 feet and proposed site grades will be established at or near existing site
grades. As such, mass cuts and fills of less than ±2 feet are anticipated to achieve the proposed site
grades and cuts/fills are expected to be less than ±1 foot at the proposed building. Excavations for
foundations will range up to 3 feet below proposed finished grade and deeper excavations will likely
be required for installation of subsurface utilities and the proposed SWM systems.
Based on projects of similar scope, we anticipate the building will consist of a wood and steel
frame and a concrete slab-on-grade. It is assumed that the building will have maximum column loads
ranging up to 40 kips and wall loads ranging up to 3 kips per lineal foot.
EXPLORATION AND TESTING

Subsurface Exploration Program
The subsurface exploration program included nine (9) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings
(TB-1 through TB-9) performed throughout the site. The borings were performed using Diedrich D-50
drilling equipment and extended to depths ranging from ±8.0 feet to ±16.0 feet below the ground
surface (BGS). The locations of the test borings performed for this exploration program are shown on
Figure 2-Exploration Location Plan in Appendix A. See below for a summary of the explorations
performed for this program.
Exploration Summary
Exploration Approx.
Exploration Depth (Elev.) General Exploration Location
Number G.S. Elev.
TB-1 407.0' 16.0' (391.0') Southwest Corner of Building
TB-2 406.5' 16.0' (390.5') Northwest Corner of Building, Drive-Thru
TB-3 406.5' 16.0' (390.5') Southeast Corner of Building
TB-4 406.5' 10.0' (396.5') Trash Enclosure
TB-5 406.0' 12.0' (394.0') Drive-Thru, Drive-Thru Canopy
TB-6 407.0' 6.0' (401.0') Parking Area
6
Exploration Approx.
Exploration Depth (Elev.) General Exploration Location
Number G.S. Elev.
TB-7 405.0' 8.0' (397.0') Parking Area, Potential SWM Basin
TB-8 405.0' 8.0' (397.0') Potential SWM Basin

Parking Area/Drive lane, Potential SWM
TB-9 406.5' 8.0' (398.5') Basin
A geophysical survey was completed using a combination of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR),
Electromagnetic Induction (EM), and Radio Detection (RD) surveying techniques to evaluate the first
8-to-10 feet below grade. It should be noted that relevant subsurface features collected during the
geophysical survey will be included with the site plans. As indicated previously, several suspected
karst features consisting pinnacled bedrock and/or voids were identified in the geophysical survey and
have been included on Figure 3 – Karst Features as well as the site plans.
The exploration locations were selected by Maser Consulting and field-located by measuring
from existing site features using conventional taping methods. Test borings were performed under the
full-time technical observation of Maser Consulting. Soils encountered were classified in the field in
accordance with the Burmister Soil Classification System. Soil samples obtained from the
explorations were delivered to our office for visual classification, and representative samples were
subjected to limited laboratory testing as discussed in the Laboratory Testing section of this report.
Test borings were advanced by Eichelberger’s Inc., using standard hollow stem auger drilling
techniques. Split spoon sampling was performed in accordance with ASTM D-1586 (Standard
Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils). The number of blows required to
drive the split spoon every six (6) inches into the soil was recorded and is shown on the logs. The sum
of blows for the 6 to 18-inch interval is the N-value. The SPT N-value indicates the soil resistance
encountered at each sample layer. Sampling was generally performed continuously from the ground
surface to a depth of 12 feet and then at five (5) feet intervals to the completion depth of each test
boring. Details pertaining to the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on the Test Boring Logs
in Appendix B. The ground surface elevations reported on the logs were estimated from topographic
contours as shown on the referenced ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey and should be considered
approximate.
7
Subsurface Conditions
Topsoil was encountered at the ground surface of all the explorations performed for this
program and ranged from ±3.0 to ±8.0 inches in thickness.
Natural/residual soils were encountered below the topsoil at all the test boring locations
performed for this exploration program. The natural/residual soils generally consisted fine-grained
soil (silt and clay) with variable amounts of sand and gravel/rock fragments. It should be noted that
shallow refusal was encountered at 2 of the explorations (TB-1 and TB-7) and is likely evidence of
cobbles and/or evidence of pinnacled bedrock. The natural/residual soils extended to the completion
depths of the explorations. SPT N-Values indicate that the in-situ consistencies of the natural/residual
soils range from ‘medium stiff’ to ‘hard’, averaging ‘very stiff’. It should also be noted that the several
of the higher N-Values were likely the result of increased gravel or friable rock content at the
corresponding sample depths and may not be representative in-situ conditions at those depths.
Geophysical
Geophysical surveying results indicated the presence of buried utilities (stormwater, sewer
connections, etc.) in the subject area within the first ±3 to ±6 feet BGS. The is evidence of foundations
for former structures in the northwest portion of the site (up to ±2.5 feet BGS) and an excavation
scar/pea gravel backfill adjacent to a brick garage in the southwest portion of the site (up to ±4 feet
BGS). As previously indicated, several suspected karst features were identified during the geophysical
survey in the western and eastern portions of the site. There were 2 anomaly’s located in the western
portion of the site and are described as “shallow, pinnacled bedrock and/or decomposed rock” with
possible air voids at approximate ±3.4 feet BGS. The 3rd suspected karst feature located in the eastern
portion of the site is likely an air-void related to uncompacted soil.
Groundwater
Neither evidence of groundwater nor seasonal high groundwater levels was encountered in the
explorations performed for this study. It should be noted that fluctuation in groundwater levels can
occur due to several factors, including variations in precipitation, seasonal changes, and site
development activities, which can alter surface water drainage paths.
8
Laboratory Testing
Representative soil samples obtained from the borings were subjected to laboratory testing to
supplement the visual classification of the soils and evaluate their general engineering characteristics.
The testing performed for this program included natural moisture contents, particle size analyses, and
Atterberg limits. A general summary of laboratory test results is presented in the following table and
detailed test results are included in Appendix C.
LABORATORY TESTING SUMMARY
Approx. Sample Moisture Particle Size Liquid

Exploration Limit /
G.S. Depth General Soil Description Content (% passing
Number Plasticity
Elev. (Elev.) (%) #200 Sieve) Index
2.0'
TB-2 406.5' CLAY, some(-) Sand 15.1 77.9 47/25
(404.5')
2.0'
TB-3 406.5' CLAY, little cmf Sand 20.5 84.4 85/60
(404.5')
4.0' cmf SAND, some mf
TB-7 405.0' 16.9 6.7 -
(401.0') Gravel, trace Silt/Clay
4.0' cmf SAND, little(-) f
TB-8 405.0' 22.4 2.6 -
(401.0') Gravel, trace Silt/Clay
4.0' cmf SAND, some f
TB-9 406.5' 21.6 1.9 -
(402.5') Gravel, trace(-) Silt/Clay
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Based on the results of this exploration program, it is our opinion that construction of the
proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant as planned is feasible, given that the geotechnical recommendations
contained herein are followed and that the standard level of care is maintained during construction.
Geotechnical issues identified during this study that will likely impact site development include:
• The need to demolish the existing structures and associated site features.
• The presence of carbonate geology and the potential for karst activity.
• The site soils contain high percentages of fine-grained soil (silt and clay)
and will present the following challenges:
o They will be sensitive to disturbance from construction equipment
and precipitation.
9
o Their suitability for reuse on-site will likely be dependent on

moisture-conditioning.
o They will be subject to frost action.
The following sections of this report provide further discussion of these issues and present our
recommendations for design and construction of the subject project.
Construction Considerations in Karst Geology

Based on the evidence revealed by this study, it is anticipated that karst related issues could
pose a risk for this project. With any site in karst geology there are several karst-related issues that
could impact development of the site, including:
• The need to remediate voids and soft soil zones.

• The potential for sinkhole development during construction.
• The need to control surface and subsurface drainage during and after
construction.
• Limitations on designing stormwater systems for infiltration/recharge.
The risk of sinkhole development is typically elevated during construction at sites that are
underlain by karst geology, and the risk at this site is considered moderate to high. The primary
construction activities that can accelerate sinkhole development include reduction of overburden soil
thickness in cut areas and changes in surface water drainage patterns. Removal of overburden soils
can destabilize soil arches and increase the chance of exposing bedrock to the elements. Changes in
surface water drainage patterns as a result of earthwork activities can concentrate the flow of water in
localized areas and accelerate the rate of soil migration into cracks/voids in the rock mass, particularly
after heavy precipitation events.
Taking proper design-phase and construction-phase precautions will reduce the risks
associated with sinkhole development at this site. Final design plans should incorporate precautionary
measures that will reduce/control surface and subsurface drainage, which is the primary cause of
sinkhole development. These measures include but may not be limited to the following:
• Provide water-tight connections of subsurface drainage systems.

• Drain roof leaders directly into the stormwater management system.
10
• Avoid utilities in close proximity to building foundations.

• Seal pavements at interface with curbs, catch basins, etc.
• Limit pervious areas directly adjacent to buildings and provide positive drainage
away from buildings.
• Reduce or eliminate stormwater infiltration by using sealed/lined stormwater
detention systems.
During construction, it is critical that surface drainage be controlled as discussed in the Surface
Water and Groundwater Control Section of this report. Should sinkholes develop during construction,
the methods of repair can be numerous and varied because not all sinkholes are the same. In general,
an attempt should be made to locate the throat of the sinkhole, which should be plugged, and the
remainder of the sinkhole should be backfilled in a manner that will stabilize the subgrade and prevent
or limit the flow of water and possible future subsidence. The exact nature of sinkhole repair should
be determined by a qualified geotechnical engineer at the time of construction, but may include the
following:
• Remove sufficient soil, boulders, and/or bedrock to expose the throat.

• Permeation grouting to fill voids in the rock mass.
• Use large stones in conjunction with low slump grout and/or concrete to plug the
throat.
• Backfill the sinkhole with grout or low permeability backfill soils reinforced with
geosynthetics.
• Remove rock pinnacles to accommodate backfill compaction efforts.
Although a considerable volume of soil and/or rock may need to be removed during sinkhole
repair, the excavated materials can sometimes be reused as backfill with some limitations as discussed
in the Fill and Backfill Materials Section of this report. Due to the variable nature of sinkhole repair,
we suggest the contract documents incorporate sinkhole repair on a time and materials basis with unit
fees provided for all aspects of the work. Although it is impossible to predict the magnitude of
sinkhole repair that may be required, we recommended the project budget account for construction-
phase sinkhole repair on a percentage basis of the total construction cost.
11
Demolition
Demolition and off-site disposal of the existing buildings and site improvements not to remain,
including their below-grade components, such as foundations, basements, utilities, and storage tanks,
will be required prior to new construction activities. Should excavations to remove existing site
features extend below the proposed building and pavement subgrade levels, the excavations should be
backfilled with structural fill, placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations
presented in the Fill and Backfill Materials Section of this report.
Existing durable below-grade structural elements, such as existing foundations, may remain
in-place below proposed pavement areas provided the top of the elements remain at least 3 feet below
the finished pavement surface and will not interfere with subsequent underground utility installation.
Basement walls and slabs should be completely removed below the proposed building; however;
basement slabs can remain in-place below parking and landscape areas provided they are sufficiently
broken to facilitate drainage and backfill can be tightly compacted around the remnants. Existing
utilities to be abandoned below proposed pavements may also remain in-place, provided they remain
at least 3 feet below the finished pavement surface and are permanently sealed or in-filled with grout
or flowable fill. If existing utilities are abandoned and only sealed, they should be evaluated to
determine if they are structurally sound.
Earthwork
Following demolition, clearing, and stripping operations, subgrade soils exposed in proposed
areas to remain at-grade or receive fill should be compacted by several passes with a minimum 10-ton
roller and proof-rolled with a fully loaded tandem-axle dump truck under the observation of the
geotechnical engineer. Other proof-rolling methods may be deemed appropriate by the geotechnical
engineer depending on the prevailing weather and subgrade soil conditions at the time earthwork is
performed. Any subgrade areas that are observed to be soft, loose, or otherwise unstable during
proof-rolling operations should be selectively excavated as directed by the geotechnical engineer and
replaced with structural fill, placed and compacted in accordance with the Fill and Backfill Materials
Section of this report.
The soils encountered during this exploration program contain high percentages of fine-grained
soil (silt and clay), which will be sensitive to disturbance during earthwork operations. These soils
12
can become unstable under the heavy loads of construction equipment and will become soft when the
soil moisture content increases, such as after precipitation events. It should be expected that the
stripping and earthwork operations may result in extensive disturbance to the subgrade, particularly if
the work is performed during or after wet weather and during the typically colder months. If possible,
peak earthwork activities should be scheduled for the drier summer months, which will limit the
amount of precipitation that the soils are exposed to and will provide better opportunity to air-dry soils
which are too moist.
Due to the potential to encountered cobbles, boulders, and/or pinnacled bedrock, it should be
anticipated that the use of heavy-duty equipment, such as large track-mounted machines equipped with
rock teeth and/or rock rippers may be required for portions of earthwork activities.
All construction excavations should be sloped and shored in accordance with OSHA
excavation regulations or stricter local governing safety codes. It is our opinion that the existing site
soils and new structural fill will generally be classified as “Type C” soils under OSHA excavation
regulations. Excavation stability and corresponding side slopes and/or support requirements should
be evaluated by a qualified professional at the time of construction and should take into consideration
the adverse impacts of groundwater seepage, if encountered.
Fill and Backfill Materials

The excavated soils can be reused as compacted structural fill with some limitations. The
majority of soil encountered during this exploration program contained high percentages of silt and
clay and may be subject to moisture-related compaction problems. Based on the laboratory test results,
it should be anticipated that portions of the excavated site soils will have in-situ moisture contents
above the optimum moisture content required for compaction purposes. Additionally, excavated soils
left unprotected during precipitation events can become unsuitable for compaction. As such, and
depending on the prevailing weather conditions at the time earthwork is performed, moisture
conditioning of the excavated soils will likely be required prior to their reuse as fill or backfill. If
air-drying of the soil is not possible due to precipitation and/or colder temperatures, or if the project
schedule cannot accommodate the time required for air-drying of the soil, it should be anticipated that
the soil will need to be amended with cement to reduce moisture contents and increase workability of
13
the soils. If soil amendment is not feasible due to time constraints or cost considerations, it should be
anticipated that unsuitable soils will need to be exported from the site and suitable structural fill
materials will need to be imported. Consideration should be given to placing tarps or similar protective
cover over stockpiles prior to precipitation events to help reduce the amount of moisture conditioning
and/or soil amendment that may be required prior to reuse.
As previously stated, there is the potential to encounter cobbles and boulders during earthwork
and in excavations. As such, there is potential for reuse of cobbles and boulders assuming they can
be processed to a suitable particle size. The maximum particle size of material used in structural fills
should generally be limited to a maximum of 6 inches up to 2 feet below subgrade levels and a
maximum of 2 inches within 2 feet of the subgrade.
It is anticipated that this will be a net import site due to the existing basements. We recommend
using on-site, fine-grained soils to backfill basements in proposed parking/landscape areas, and reserve
imported granular materials for backfill of basements in the proposed building area, as well as for
general fill to establish the building pad and pavement subgrade.
Off-site borrow material, if required to achieve the proposed grading, should consist of
well-graded predominantly granular material and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to
use. If clean open-graded stone is used as fill or backfill, it should be completely separated from
adjacent soil with a non-woven geotextile filter fabric to prevent particle migration.
Fill materials supporting loads from buildings and pavements is considered structural fill and
should be installed under the observation of the geotechnical engineer. Mass structural fill consisting
of predominantly fine-grained soil (silt and clay) should be placed in maximum 8-inch thick loose
lifts. Due to the sensitivity of these soils, the use of a pad-foot roller may be required for proper
compaction. Predominantly granular fill materials can be placed in lifts ranging up to 12 inches in
loose thickness and compacted using a smooth drum roller. Backfill placed in confined areas, such as
utility and foundation excavations, should be spread in thinner layers and compacted using the largest
equipment possible without damaging the utilities or compromising the subgrade soils. Backfill
placed within 3 feet of below-grade walls or retaining walls should be compacted with manually
14
operated compaction equipment. Fill and backfill should be compacted to the following minimum
requirements:
COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS
Percent of Maximum Dry Density
Location
(ASTM D-1557)
Structural fill below foundations, floor
95%
slabs, and pavements
Backfill for retaining walls, below-grade
92%
walls, and utility trenches
General fill for landscaped and other non-
90%
structural areas
The 2015 International Building Code (IBC) requires that subgrades should be evaluated for
stability by the geotechnical engineer prior to fill placement, and compactive effort for each lift of fill
should be verified by in-place density testing prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Adjustments to
the lift thickness and/or compaction equipment may be required, as directed by the geotechnical
engineer, based on prevailing weather conditions at the time of fill placement and performance of the
compacted soils.
Groundwater and Surface Water Control

Evidence of groundwater was not encountered in the explorations performed for this program.
As such, it is anticipated that groundwater will not pose a significant problem during mass earthwork
or building construction. However, following periods of precipitation or snowmelt, it is possible that
seepage of water perched or trapped atop relatively impermeable soil layers, or emanating from within
relatively porous zones, may occur in open excavations. It is expected that such seepage can be
controlled by pumping from sumps located within the excavations. Sump pits should be filled with
minimum ¾-inch clean stone and lined with geotextile filter fabric to prevent soil migration. Pumped
water should be discharged away from the building pad and open excavations.
Surface grading should be maintained on a continual basis during construction to direct surface
water runoff away from open excavations and prevent water from pooling on subgrade soils and reduce
the potential for development of sinkholes. The contract documents should require the contractor to
provide whatever means and methods are necessary to maintain stable excavations and subgrade
15
conditions at all times during construction. Disturbed areas should be compacted daily to seal the
ground surface and inhibit infiltration of surface water.
Frost Considerations
Considering that the site soils contain high percentages of silt and clay, we recommend the use
of finger drains and pavement underdrains to limit the potential for frost heave. Finger drains should
be installed on each side of catch basins in pavement areas and should consist of minimum 4-inch
diameter perforated pipe surrounded by at least 6 inches of clean stone, and the stone should be
wrapped in geotextile filter fabric. The finger drain pipes should penetrate the catch basin and extend
a minimum of 15 feet from the catch basins. The finger drains should be located deep enough to allow
construction of the full pavement section above, including the aggregate subbase layer. Pavement
underdrains should be provided at the interface of flush asphalt and concrete flatwork. The
underdrains should consist of pipe, stone, and fabric, similar to the finger drains; however, the
underdrains should be a minimum of 2 feet wide and extend a minimum of 3 feet below finished
surface grades.
Subsurface Utilities
The site soils and new structural fill materials will be suitable for support of subsurface utilities.
Subsurface utility excavations should be sloped, benched, or shored in accordance with OSHA
requirements as discussed in the Earthwork section of this report. Should very soft, loose, or wet soils
be encountered at the utility invert levels, the subgrade should be over-excavated a minimum depth of
6 inches and backfilled with granular material to provide uniform support. Cobbles and/or boulders
should be completely removed and replaced with structural fill. Utility excavations should be
backfilled using structural fill, placed and compacted in accordance with the Fill and Backfill
Materials section of this report. Utility pipes should use water-tight connections to reduce potential
for sinkholes, and flexible connections should be used at the interface with the building.
Foundations
Based on the results of this exploration program, it is our opinion that the proposed building
can be supported by conventional shallow spread footings established in stable site soils or new
compacted structural fill. Based on the assumed design loads, and provided the earthwork
16
recommendations contained herein are followed, foundations can be designed for a maximum
allowable net bearing pressure of 3,000 PSF.
Subgrade materials exposed in foundation excavations should be evaluated by the geotechnical

engineer prior to placement of structural fill, reinforcing steel, or concrete, to confirm stability of the
subgrade and verify adequate bearing exists. The evaluation should consist of proof-rolling and
compacting the subgrade soils with the largest practical equipment and observation or testing as
deemed necessary by the geotechnical engineer. Any subgrade soils that are determined to be soft,
loose, wet, contain cobbles/boulders, or otherwise determined to be unstable should be selectively
excavated and replaced with structural fill, placed and compacted in accordance with the
recommendations presented in the Fill and Backfill Materials section of this report.
The bottom of exterior foundations should be established a minimum depth of 36 inches below
the finished exterior grades to provide protection from frost action, or deeper if required by local code.
Interior foundations in permanently heated portions of the building may be established at convenient
depths below the floor slab that will not interfere with subsequent floor slab construction.
The minimum dimensions of continuous and isolated footings should be 24 inches and 36
inches, respectively, to prevent a punching-type shear failure regardless of the actual applied bearing
pressure. Based on the assumed structural loads, total settlements on the order of 1 inch and
differential settlements on the order of ½ inch can be anticipated for footings established on stable site
soils or new compacted structural fill.
Unless foundation construction proceeds within 24 hours of foundation subgrade preparation,

including approval by the geotechnical engineer, subgrades should be protected from the elements to
reduce exposure and potential weakening of the subgrade soils, particularly if precipitation or freezing
temperatures are expected prior to foundation construction. Preventative measures such as placing a
lean concrete “mud mat” on the subgrade or providing suitable cover for the excavations may be
considered appropriate, depending on the prevailing weather conditions. Foundation excavations
should be protected from frost and water infiltration until the foundations have been constructed and
backfilled.
17
Seismic Considerations
Based on the SPT data collected at the site, geologic review, and our experience in the area,
the Site class Definition for the site is “C” in accordance with the latest edition of the International
Building Code [2015] (IBC). As such, the following design parameters are provided utilizing tables
in the IBC code and United States Geological Survey (USGS) design tools:
From the USGS and using ASCE 7-10 information:

Short Period Spectral Acceleration (SS) 0.139g
Spectral Acceleration at 1 Second (S1) 0.053g
Since the site is a Site Class Definition of “C”, straight line interpretation of values for Fa and
Fv based upon SS and S1, respectively are:
Site Coefficient, Fa 1.2
Site Coefficient, Fv 1.7
Utilizing Equations 16-36 thru 16-39 set forth in the IBC, the following design parameters
were calculated:
SMS = Fa*SS = 0.166g ; SM1 = Fv*S1 = 0.091g
SDS = 2/3*SMS = 0.111g ; SD1 = 2/3*SM1 = 0.060g
Floor Slab
It is our opinion that the proposed floor slab can be constructed as a slab-on-grade and designed
assuming a Modulus of Subgrade Reaction of 150 pounds per cubic inch.
The floor slab subgrade soils should be compacted and proof-rolled under the direction of the
geotechnical engineer to evaluate stability. Any areas that are determined to be soft, loose, or
otherwise unstable and/or contain deleterious material should be selectively excavated and replaced.
Fills required to achieve the proposed floor slab subgrade level, including backfill of over-excavations
should consist of structural fill that is placed and compacted in accordance with the Fill and Backfill
Materials section of this report.
We recommend a minimum 4-inch thick bedding of free draining aggregate be placed below
the floor slab to interrupt the rise of capillary moisture through the slab and allow for proper curing of
the concrete. The floor slab may bear on footing projections; however, control joints should be
18
provided at the slab and wall/column interfaces to reduce the potential for slab cracking, should the
building settle differentially from the floor slab.
Lateral Earth Pressure Parameters

The excavated predominantly fine-grained (silt/clay) on-site soils are not well-suited for
backfill of below-grade walls and should be avoided, if possible. These soils should also not be used
as backfill within the reinforced zone of segmental block retaining walls. These soils will be sensitive
to moisture-related compaction problems and their inherently poor drainage characteristics typically
result in hydrostatic pressures exerted on the back-face of walls. Predominantly granular portions of
the excavated site soils or imported well-graded granular soils will be better-suited for use as wall
backfill material. The maximum particle size in wall backfill materials should be limited to 3 inches,
and the backfill should be free of deleterious matter and debris. Retaining walls should be designed
with a zone of free-draining material directly behind the back face of the wall to prevent the buildup
of hydrostatic pressures, and include discharge channels, such as weep holes to direct drainage away
from the wall. Walls constructed in cut areas should be designed with back drainage to intercept
seepage that may occur from the excavated slope. Recommended soil parameters for design of below-
grade walls and retaining walls are presented in the following table.
LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE PARAMETERS

Structural
Site Soils
Fill
In-Situ Moist Unit Weight
115 -
(pcf)
Compacted Moist Unit
120 130
Weight (pcf)
Angle of Internal Friction
28 36
(F, degrees)
Coeff. of Friction at Base
0.3 0.6
(Concrete on Soil)
* Values based on industry standard empirical correlations.
Specific values should be confirmed via lab testing prior to final
design.
Walls restrained from lateral movement at the top of the wall and/or intermediate points should
be designed using the at-rest earth pressure coefficient. Walls that are not restrained from lateral
displacement (free to rotate) should be designed using active earth pressure coefficients. We
19
recommend that passive earth pressures be omitted from the wall designs. Surcharge loads imposed
by sloping backfill, pavements, terraced walls, material stockpiles, construction equipment, etc. must
be considered in the wall designs. Retaining wall design should consider internal stability and external
global stability at all critical stages during and following construction. Retaining walls should be
designed assuming a maximum allowable net bearing pressure of 3,000 psf.
Light pole bases bearing in the natural site soils can be designed assuming a maximum
allowable lateral soil pressure of 100 psf per foot of base depth BGS in addition to sliding resistance
of 130 psf at the contact between the pole base and subgrade materials.
Stormwater Management
As previously discussed, it is anticipated that stormwater runoff will be controlled by proposed
underground SWM system below the proposed drive lanes/parking areas and/or a basin located at the
ground surface to the west of the proposed building. In-situ infiltration testing was performed at offset
locations from TB-7, TB-8, and TB-9 to establish preliminary permeability characteristics of the site
soils. Infiltration testing was performed in general accordance with Appendix C of the Pennsylvania
Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual (BMP). For design of the new SWM system, the
BMP mandates that a minimum separation of 2 feet be maintained between the infiltration level and
the seasonal high groundwater (SHGW) level. Indicators of seasonal high water were not observed
within the test borings.
SUMMARY OF PERMEABILITY TESTING

Estimated
Ground Tested/Calc. Design
Exploration SHGW or Test Depth
Surface Infiltration Infiltration Rate
Number Restrictive Level (Elevation)
Elevation Rate (In./Hr.) (In./Hr.) (FS=2)
Depth
TB-7 405.0' >8.0' (<397.0') 4.0' (401.0) 0.13 0.06
TB-8 405.0' >8.0' (<397.0') 4.0' (401.0) 14.2 N/A
TB-9 406.5' >8.0' (<398.5') 4.0' (402.5) 2.00 1.00
*Notes: All depths and elevations are approximate. Measurements rounded up to the nearest hundredth.
After comparing the test boring locations to the anomalies identified during the geophysical
survey, it is likely that TB-8 was performed at or near the suspected remnants of a former structure.
As such, it is our opinion that the elevated permeability results observed in TB-8 may have been
influenced by the anomaly. Caution should be exercised when utilizing the permeability data at TB-8.
20
It should be noted that additional SWM testing may be required pending regulatory review.
Stormwater management systems should be designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with
all applicable regulatory agencies, including but not limited to the BMP and associated DEP
requirements, to preserve functionality over the service life of the systems. The systems should be
constructed under the observation of the geotechnical engineer to evaluate compliance with such
regulations and confirm the engineering properties of the subsoils encountered at the detention system
locations are consistent with those encountered during this exploration.
Due to the potential for karst-related activity at this site, we recommend consideration be given
to avoiding designing for infiltration/recharge.
Pavements
New pavements can be constructed on suitable site soils or new compacted structural fill.
Immediately prior to pavement construction, the exposed pavement subgrade should be compacted
with a minimum 10-ton smooth-drum roller and be proof-rolled with a loaded tandem-axle dump truck
under the observation of the geotechnical engineer to evaluate stability. Any subgrade areas that are
observed to be unstable or contain debris/deleterious matter should be selectively excavated and
replaced with compacted structural fill or granular subbase material.
As previously indicated, the site soils have high silt and clay content and will be susceptible to
disturbance from excessive moisture and construction equipment. Depending on the timing between
pavement subgrade preparation and pavement section construction, the contractor should anticipate
that remedial work could be required to achieve a stable subgrade prior to paving, even if the subgrade
soils had previously been compacted to the required densities. Prudent scheduling of pavement
construction and control of construction equipment traffic will reduce the need for potential remedial
work.
Provided the pavement subgrade is prepared in accordance with the recommendations

contained herein, we have assumed a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of 5 to account for the
fine-grained soils throughout the site. The following tables present recommended minimum flexible
and rigid pavement sections.
21
FLEXIBLE ASPHALT PAVEMENT

Standard Duty Heavy Duty
Material
(inches) (inches)
Wearing Course 1.5 1.5
Binder Coarse 2.5 3.5
Aggregate Subbase 5.0 7.0
RIGID CONCRETE PAVEMENT

Heavy-Duty
Material
(inches)
4,000 psi Reinforced Concrete 6.0
Aggregate Subbase 6.0
We recommend that rigid concrete pavements be reinforced with minimum No. 3 bars at 18
inches on-center, each way. These recommended pavement sections may be subject to municipal
approval.
LIMITATIONS
This geotechnical exploration program has been performed in accordance with generally
accepted engineering practice and any applicable design standards as referenced herein. This report
and all supporting documentation have been prepared exclusively for the use of Chick-fil-A Inc.
(Chick-fil-A) pursuant to the Agreement between Maser Consulting P.A. and Chick-fil-A dated July
17, 2018. All provisions set forth in the Agreement and the General Terms and Conditions attached
thereto are incorporated herein by reference. No warranty, express or implied, is made herein.
The findings, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on data
revealed by limited exploration and testing of the subsurface at the referenced project site. The
explorations indicate subsurface conditions at the specific locations and times explored, and only
within the depths penetrated. Should deviations from the described subsurface conditions be
encountered at any time prior to or during construction, Maser Consulting should be notified
immediately so that modifications to our recommendations can be made, if necessary.
This report is applicable only to the contemplated site design described herein, and any changes
in the design should be brought to our attention so that we may evaluate whether our recommendations
will be affected. Maser Consulting is not responsible for any claims, damages, or liability associated
22
with interpretation of subsurface data or reuse of the subsurface data or engineering analysis without
the expressed written authorization of Maser Consulting. As such, the conclusions and
recommendations contained in this report are pending our review of final plans and specifications, and
verification of subsurface conditions by direct observation at the time of construction.
This report and supporting documentation are instruments of service. The subject matter of
this report is limited to the facts and matters stated herein.
The scope of this geotechnical program did not include investigation or evaluation of any
environmental issues, such as wetlands, or hazardous or toxic materials on, below, or in the vicinity
of the subject site. Any statements in this report or supporting documentation regarding odors or
unusual or suspicious items or conditions observed are strictly for the information of our Client.
23
APPENDIX A
(FIGURES)
N
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
(*BASE MAP SOURCE: USGS.gov)

TITLE:
SITE LOCATION MAP

PROJECT:
PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A #04342

DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.:

* MJC 17000373B
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.:
N.T.S. 07/23/2018 1
NORTH
B-9
PLAN
N
B-5
B-4
B-3
B-6
B-7
B-2
B-1
B-8
LEGEND: NOTES:
B-1 INDICATES THE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF 1.) *BASE PLAN PREPARED BY MASER CONSULTING, P.A.,
TEST BORINGS PERFORMED FOR THIS STUDY. TITLED "CONCEPT PLAN," DATED JUNE 26, 2018.
2.) THIS DRAWING IS PART OF MASER CONSUTLING, P.A.'S

GEOTECHNCIAL REPORT (PROJECT NO. 17000373B) DATED
AUGUST 2018 AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE REPORT.
Title:
EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN

Project:

Drawn By: Checked By: Project No.:

* MJC 17000373B
Scale: Date: Figure No.:
N.T.S. 07/23/2018 2
NORTH
PLAN
N
LEGEND: NOTES:
INDICATES THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND 1.) *BASE PLAN PREPARED BY MASER CONSULTING, P.A.,
LIMITS OF MAPPED SURFACE DEPRESSIONS TITLED "CONCEPT PLAN," DATED JUNE 26, 2018 AND
GOOGLE EARTH.
INDICATES THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND 2.) THIS DRAWING IS PART OF MASER CONSUTLING, P.A.'S
LIMITS OF SUSPECTED KARST FEATURES PER GEOTECHNCIAL REPORT (PROJECT NO. 17000373B) DATED
THE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY AUGUST 2018 AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE REPORT.
Title:
KARST FEATURES
Project:

Drawn By: Checked By: Project No.:

* MJC 17000373B
Scale: Date: Figure No.:
N.T.S. 08/16/2018 3
APPENDIX B
(EXPLORATION LOGS)
BORING TB-1
Project: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT #04342 PAGE 1 OF 1
Location: BOROUGH OF CAMP HILL, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA
Number: 17000373B
Date Started: 07/20/18 Ground Surface Elevation (ft.): 407

Date Completed: 07/20/18 Datum: Topo
Drilling Contractor: Eichleberger, Inc. Groundwater: Depth (ft.) Date
Driller: Mike First Encountered NE 7/20/2018
Equipment: Diedrich D-50
Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger End of Drilling (0 Hrs.) NR 7/20/2018
Sampling Method: Split Spoon After Drilling (> 24 Hrs.)
RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION REMARKS
0 407.0
7 inches of TOPSOIL S-01 14 2-2-6-4 8
0.6
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, trace mf Sand, trace f Gravel (dry
to moist)
2
Light to dark brown, CLAY and Silt, little mf Sand, trace f Gravel S-02 17 2-5-7-7 12
(moist)
4
Brown, Silty CLAY, trace mf Sand, trace f Gravel (moist) S-03 12 5-6-8-9 14
MASER BORING - KZA DATA TEMPLATE.GDT - 08/17/18 10:02 - \\MVCAD01\GEOTECH\GINT\PROJECTS\17000373B CFA CAMP HILL PA.GPJ
5 402.0
6
Light brown, Silty CLAY, trace mf(+) Sand (moist) S-04 18 8-10-8-7 18
8
Light to dark brown, Silty CLAY, little mf Sand, trace f Rock S-05 24 9-10-11-10 21
Fragments (moist)
10 10 397.0
Light brown, Silty CLAY, trace f Sand, trace f Rock Fragments S-06 21 5-5-5-13 10
(moist)
Spoon broke inside hole at 12

feet. Drilling was offset and
augered down to 14 feet before
continuing.
14
Light brown, Silty CLAY, trace f Sand (moist) S-07 16 17-19-16-16 35
14.8
15 392.0
Light brown, mf Sand, Clayey SILT, trace f Rock Fragments
(moist to wet)
16
Bottom of Boring at 16.0 Ft.
Logged By: AY Checked By: MJC
Notes: BORING TB-1

PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING TB-2
Number: 17000373B
Date Started: 07/20/18 Ground Surface Elevation (ft.): 406.5

RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
0 406.5
0.7
Light brown, SILT and Clay, trace mf(+) Sand (dry to moist)
2
Light to dark brown, CLAY, some(-) cmf Sand (moist) S-02 17 3-2-5-7 7
4
Light to dark brown, CLAY and Silt, trace f Sand (moist) S-03 15 4-7-8-8 15
5 401.5
6
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, trace mf Sand, trace f Gravel S-04 24 6-7-8-7 15
(moist)
8
10 10 396.5
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, little mf Sand, trace f Gravel (moist) S-06 24 11-8-9-7 17
12
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, little mf Sand, some cmf Gravel S-07 18 10-8-4-4 12
(moist)
14
Light to dark brown, Silty CLAY, trace f Sand (moist) S-08 16 4-4-4-4 8
15 391.5
16
Notes: BORING TB-2

PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING TB-3
Number: 17000373B

RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
0 406.5
0.6
Light to dark brown, SILT and Clay, little mf Sand (moist)
2
Light to dark brown, CLAY, little cmf Sand (moist) S-02 19 2-4-6-6 10
4
Light to dark brown, CLAY and Silt, trace f Sand, trace f Gravel S-03 17 5-6-5-7 11
(moist)
5 401.5
6
Light to dark brown, CLAY and Silt, trace mf Sand, trace f S-04 24 7-7-12-12 19
Gravel (moist)
S-05 21 17-15-16-16 31
10 10 396.5
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, trace cmf(+) Sand (moist) S-06 18 17-16-17-17 33
12
Light to dark brown, SILT and Clay, trace f Sand (dry to moist) S-07 17 17-17-18-19 35
S-08 19 17-19-17-17 36
15 391.5
16
Logged By: JK Checked By: MJC
Notes: BORING TB-3

PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING TB-4
Number: 17000373B

RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
0 406.5
0.7
Light brown, SILT and Clay, trace f Sand (moist)
2
Light brown, SILT and Clay, trace f Sand (dry to moist) S-02 16 8-6-10-12 16
S-03 18 8-13-15-17 28
5 401.5
6
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, little mf(+) Sand (moist) S-04 22 17-13-19-18 32
8
(moist)
10 10 396.5
Notes: BORING TB-4

PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING TB-5
Number: 17000373B

RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
0 406.0
0.4
Light brown, SILT and Clay, trace f Sand (dry to moist)
2
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, trace f Sand (moist) S-02 12 5-9-12-14 21
4
5 401.0
6
Dark brown, Silty CLAY, trace f Sand, trace cmf Rock S-04 17 15-17-15-10 32
Fragments (moist)
8
Dark brown, Silty CLAY, trace f Sand (moist) S-05 18 8-11-15-15 26
10 396.0
S-06 24 15-15-17-16 32
12
Notes: BORING TB-5

PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING TB-6
Number: 17000373B

RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
0 407.0
0.7
Light to dark brown, SILT and Clay, trace f Sand (moist)
2
(moist)
4
Dark brown to gray, CLAY and Silt, trace mf Sand, trace f Rock S-03 18 8-7-11-20 18
Fragments (dry to moist)
5 402.0
6
Notes: BORING TB-6

PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING TB-7
Number: 17000373B

RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
0 405.0
0.5
Light brown, SILT and Clay, trace f Sand (dry to moist)
2
Light brown, cmf SAND, some mf Gravel, trace Silt/Clay (moist) S-02 10 6-10-50 60
Auger refusal at 3.5 feet.

S-03 17 5-6-7-6/0" 13 Drilling was offset 4 feet south.
5 400.0
6
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, some f Sand, trace(+) f Gravel S-04 16 7-8-9-7 17
(moist)
8
Notes: BORING TB-7

PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING TB-8
Number: 17000373B

RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
0 405.0
0.4
Brown, SILT and Clay, some (-)cmf Sand, trace f Gravel (dry to
moist)
2
Light to dark brown, SILT and Clay, trace f Sand, little (+)f S-02 13 5-4-8-18 12
Gravel (dry to moist)
4
Light to dark brown, cmf SAND, little(-) f Gravel, trace Silt/Clay S-03 16 9-6-8-11 14
(moist)
5 400.0
6
Light brown, Silty CLAY, trace f Sand (moist) S-04 24 8-10-15-16 25
8
Notes: BORING TB-8

PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING TB-9
Number: 17000373B

RECOVERY (in.)
SAMPLE TYPE
ELEVATION
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
N-VALUE
COUNTS
(per 6 in.)
DEPTH
BLOW
LOG
(ft.)
(ft.)
0 406.5
0.3
Light brown, CLAY and Silt, little (-)mf Sand (moist)
S-02 12 6-5-7-9 12
4
Light brown, cmf SAND, some f Gravel, trace(-) Silt/Clay (moist) S-03 15 6-8-9-10 17
5 401.5
6
Dark brown to brown, mf(+) Sand and Clayey SILT, little mf(+) S-04 12 10-11-11-22 22
Gravel (moist to wet)
8
Notes: BORING TB-9

PAGE 1 OF 1
APPENDIX C
(LABORATORY DATA)
Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Moisture <#200 Dry Optimum Satur-
Sample Depth Liquid Plasticity Void
Source Content Sieve K-Class Density Moisture ation
I.D. (Ft.) Limit Index Ratio
(%) (%) (pcf) Content (%) (%)
B-2 S-02 2.0 15.1 77.9 47 25

B-2 S-03 4.0 19.9
B-2 S-04 6.0 27.3
B-2 S-05 8.0 26.0
B-2 S-06 10.0 28.0
B-3 S-02 2.0 20.5 84.4 85 60
B-3 S-03 4.0 23.6
B-3 S-04 6.0 22.0
B-3 S-05 8.0 27.3
B-3 S-06 10.0 31.2
B-7 S-01 0.0 24.9
B-7 S-02 2.0 30.4
B-7 S-03 4.0 16.9 6.7
B-7 S-04 6.0 26.4
B-8 S-01 0.0 14.7
B-8 S-02 2.0 17.1
B-8 S-03 4.0 22.4 2.6
B-8 S-04 6.0 25.2
LAB SUMMARY: NON KZA PROJECTS - US_LAB.GDT - 08/14/18 10:30 - \\MVCAD01\GEOTECH\GINT\PROJECTS\17000373B CFA CAMP HILL PA.GPJ
B-9 S-01 0.0 20.0

B-9 S-02 2.0 20.0
B-9 S-03 4.0 21.6 1.9
B-9 S-04 6.0 29.8
Project: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT #04342

Number: 17000373B
Figure LS- 1
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER
4 2 1 1/2 3 6 10 16 30 50 100 200
6 3 1.5 3/4 3/8 4 8 14 20 40 60 140
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
GRAVEL SAND
COBBLES SILT OR CLAY
coarse medium fine coarse medium fine
Source I.D. Depth Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu

B-2 S-02 2.0 CLAY, some(-) cmf Sand 47 22 25
B-3 S-02 2.0 CLAY, little cmf Sand 85 25 60
B-7 S-03 4.0 cmf SAND, some mf Gravel, trace Silt/Clay 0.91 11.67
B-8 S-03 4.0 cmf SAND, little(-) f Gravel, trace Silt/Clay 0.96 5.67
B-9 S-03 4.0 cmf SAND, some f Gravel, trace(-) Silt/Clay 0.31 8.04
Source I.D. Depth W (%) D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay
B-2 S-02 2.0 15.1 2 0.0 22.1 77.9
B-3 S-02 2.0 20.5 2 0.0 15.6 84.4
B-7 S-03 4.0 16.9 19 1.18 0.33 0.1 28.2 65.2 6.7
B-8 S-03 4.0 22.4 9.5 0.64 0.26 0.11 10.3 87.1 2.6
B-9 S-03 4.0 21.6 19 0.73 0.14 0.09 23.5 74.6 1.9
*Testing performed in accordance with ASTM Standards
Project: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT #04342

Number: 17000373B
Figure PS- 1
APPENDIX D
(INFILTRATION DATA)
Infiltration Test
Project: Proposed Chick-Fil-A - Camp Hill, PA (Maser Num. 17000373B)

Location: B-7 Location: B-8
G.S. Elev.: 405.0' G.S. Elev.: 405.0'
Test Depth/Elev.: 4.0'/401.0' Test Depth/Elev.: 4.0'/401.0'
Date: 7/20/2018 Date: 7/20/2018
Drop (in.): 0.0 Drop (in.): 5.0

1 1
Time (min.): 30.0 Time (min.): 30.0
Drop (in.): 0.0 Drop (in.): 7.0
2 2
Drop (in.): 0.0 Drop (in.): 6.0
3 3
Drop (in.): 0.3 Drop (in.): 8.5
4 4
Drop (in.): Drop (in.): 9.0
5 5
Time (min.): Time (min.): 30.0
Drop (in.): Drop (in.): 7.0
6 6
Time (min.): Time (min.): 30.0
Drop (in.): Drop (in.):
7 7
Time (min.): Time (min.):
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 0.13 Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 14.2
NOTES: All tests performed in general accordance with the Appendix C of the Pennsylvania
BMP Manual.
Matthew J. Church, P.E.

Lic. No.: PE081072
Infiltration Test
Project: Proposed Chick-Fil-A - Camp Hill, PA (Maser Num. 17000373B)

Location: B-9 Location:
G.S. Elev.: 406.5' G.S. Elev.:
Test Depth/Elev.: 4'/402.5' Test Depth/Elev.:
Date: 7/20/2018 Date:
Drop (in.): 1.0 Drop (in.):

1 1
Time (min.): 30.0 Time (min.):
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 2.0 Infiltration Rate (in./hr.)
NOTES: All tests performed in general accordance with the Appendix C of the Pennsylvania
BMP Manual.
Matthew J. Church, P.E.

Lic. No.: PE081072
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\SWM Plans\Chick-Chestnut-PRE.dwg, 7/25/2019 1:48:15 PM, briley
LEGEND:
R . 001 1)
T (S .
T R E E
32nd S
Tc P
ATH
PARCEL 437
PARCEL 436
POI #1
PARCEL 435
D.A. #1
PRE-DEV.
PARCEL 434
PARCEL 433
ALLEY
D.A. #2
CHESTNUT STREET
PRE-DEV.
Tc
PAT
H
PARCEL 432
ALLEY
DI A PENNS
L YL
V
8-
AN
IA
1-1
1-
80
0-
24
2-
17
76
ONE CALL
BEFORE Y
SY
O
U
ST
DI EM
G !
, INC.
POI #2
PARCEL 431
N
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'

LOCATION MAP
SITE
PRE-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA PLAN

OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
DA-PRE

SHEET
W:\2018 Land Projects\Chestnut Street\CADD\LD Plans\SWM Plans\Chick-Chestnut-POST.dwg, 7/29/2019 12:57:15 PM, briley
LEGEND:
R . 001 1)
T (S .
E E
POST-DEV.
T R
32nd S
D.A. #1 - BYP
I-1
I-8
OS-1
MH-1
TK-09
CO-3
POI #1
ES-1
POST-DEV.
BMP #2
D.A. #1 - BYP
FFE - 406.40
PROPOSED
RESTAURANT
BASIN
PROPOSED
SUBSURFACE
CO-2
STORMWATER
D.A. #1
I-7
POST-DEV.
I-DE
CHESTNUT STREET
CO-1
MH-2
DRAINAGE AREAS
I-2
INLET PROTECTION
ALLEY
I-4
I-5
BMP #1
I-3
BED
PROPOSED
POI #2
I-6
STORMWATER
INFILTRATION
ALLEY
DI A PENNS
L YL
V
8-
AN
IA
1 -1
1-
00 8
24 -
2-
77 1
6
ONE CALL
BEFORE Y
SY
U ST
DI EM
G! , INC.
D.A. #2
POST-DEV.
POST-DEV.
D.A. #1 - BYP
N
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
LOCATION MAP
SITE
POST-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA PLAN

OWNER: APPLICANT:
TELEPHONE: 717-761-3558
DA-POST

SHEET

Revised Chick-fil-A Plans and Related Traffic Study

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Revised Chick-fil-A Plans and Related Traffic Study

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

July 30, 2019

Camp Hill Chick-Fil-A

For Submission To:

Camp Hill Borough, Cumberland County, PA

Phone: (717) 234-1430

Jarred L. Neal, P.E.

Chestnut Street & N-S Alley (CFA driveway)

E-W Alley (from eastern site property line to 31st Street)

N-S Alley (from southern site property line to Bramar Road)

Chestnut Street/E. Trindle Road & S. 32nd Street

» Restripe the eastbound through lane to a shared eastbound left/through lane.

Chestnut Street & S. 31st Street

» Construct a raised crosswalk crossing S. 31st Street.

Chestnut Street & S. 30th Street

» Construct a raised intersection including crosswalks on all approaches.

Chestnut Street & S. 28th Street

Chestnut Street & S. 27th Street

Base = No-Build scenario

Page iii www.TrafficPD.com

Site Access Locations

EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK

Land Use Context

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities

Mass Transit Facilities

EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

Manual Turning Movement Counts

BASE (NO-BUILD) CONDITIONS

PROPOSED SITE ACCESS

Sight Distance Analysis

SSSD = 1.47VT + V2/[30(f±g)]

PROJECTED (BUILD) CONDITION TRAFFIC VOLUMES

LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR AN INTERSECTION

CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

The following conditions were analyzed, as applicable:

» Reduce speeds and improve visibility of the pedestrians by defining crossings

» Reduce vehicle speeds on all approaches.

LEVELS OF SERVICE IN THE STUDY AREA

Base = No-Build scenario

Base = No-Build scenario

Base = No-Build scenario

Base = No-Build scenario

Base = No-Build scenario

Base = No-Build scenario

Base = No-Build scenario

Base = No-Build scenario

95TH PERCENTILE QUEUE ANALYSIS

AUXILIARY TURN LANE ANALYSIS

FAST FOOD RESTAURANT QUEUING ANALYSIS

RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

KEY: TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.

TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN, INC.