Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Plaint珊S,
Defendants.
ORDER
The matter comes before the co両on Defendant Attomey General Steve Marsha=,s
“Motion to Dismiss’" in which the Attomey General argues that the 】bunger abstention doctrine
requires the court to abstain from exercisingjurisdiction over Plaintif鵜’claims. (Doc. 16). For
the reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, the co血DENIES
the Attomey General)s motion to dismiss. The parties sha11 begin preparing for a hearing on
Plaintif鴇’motion for a preliminary i巾unction, Which the co血will schedule by separate Order.