Four Laning of Neraluru - ThorapalliAgraharam section

of New NH-844 from Km 0+000 to Km 23+350 (Design

Chainage) under Bharatmala Pariyojana, Phase I
(National Corridor) on Hybrid Annuity Mode in the
States of Karnataka & Tamil Nadu.

PATSC Memo

Page 0
 National Highways Authority of India

Format for Project appraisal and Technical Scrutiny Committee (PATSC Memo) for Appraisal
of Projects

1. Project Outline

1.1 Title of the Project: Four Laning of Neraluru - ThorapalliAgraharam section of

New NH-844 from Km 0+000 to Km 23+350 (Design Chainage) under
BharatmalaPariyojana, Phase I (National Corridor) on Hybrid Annuity Mode in the
States of Karnataka & Tamil Nadu. (Package-I of Hosur-Dharmapuri Section).

1.2 Proposed Cost of the Project

Amount
Sr. No. Particulars
(Rs. in Cr.)
409.91
(i) Base Civil Construction Cost
@ 17.55
(ii) Pre-operative expenses @1% of total EPC cost 4.10
(iii) Financing expenses on Debt. 2.31
(iv) Interest during construction(IDC) 12.21
(v) Estimated project cost as on bid date (i+ii+iii+iv) 428.53
(vi) Contingencies @ 1.0% of Civil Cost 4.10
(vii) Provision for Preconstruction Activities & Contingencies
(viii) Land Acquisition Cost and R&R 507.96
(ix) Utility Shifting Cost 7.69
(x) Environmental Cost 8.20
(xi) Sub Total (viii+ix+x+xi) 523.84
Total Capital Cost (Estimated Project Cost + Contingency +
(xii) 956.47
Cost of Pre-construction Activities)

1.3 Construction period (Months): 24 months

1.4 Reports

a) Whether Feasibility Report (FR) and/or Detailed Project Report (DPR) has been
prepared? Please indicate whether it is approved by Competent Authority (RO/CGM
level).
Feasibility Report (FR) is submitted.

b) Whether FR/DPR has been prepared as per NHAI Circular (Policy Matter
-10.1.16/2017) No. 11014/11/2016-HR-I dated 12.06.2017.

• If yes, enclose checklist Item wise regarding compliance of above circular.

•If Not, reasons therefore and whether FR/DPR now updated to account for the
Page 1
 provisions in above circular and check list submitted.

Detailed Checklist for the circular is attached.

1.5 Whether the proposal is an Original Cost Estimate or a Revised Cost Estimate?

The Proposal is an Original Cost Estimate

1.6 Whether any land acquisition or pre-investment activity was under-taken or is

contemplated for this Project? Whether the cost of such intervention has been included in the
Project Proposal?

Yes, Land Acquisition is under Progress. Status of Land acquisition is given below
Sl.N
Description Quantity/Status
o
1 Total land required 151.86 Ha
2 Existing RoW 3.50 Ha
3 Land to be acquired 148.36 Ha
4 3(A) Notification published under NH Act, 1956 148.36 Ha (100 %)
5 3(D) Notification published under NH Act, 1956 66.98 (45%)

* The above details are for 60m ROW & 70m for structures and does not include additional
land for Toll Plaza, junctions, Rest areas etc.
Cost of Preconstruction Activities
Sr. No. Description Cost (Rs. In Cr.)
a) Land Acquisition Cost and R&R cost 507.96
b) Utility Shifting Cost 7.69
c) Environmental Cost 8.20
Total of Pre construction activities, Rs Crore 523.84

1.7 Project is approved under which head/ categories of Bharatmala Pariyojna and
Notification of the NH and entrustment to NHAI.
The subject project is included under National Corridor at Sr.No. 05 of Annexure-II(d)
(Page No 23) in Bharatmala Pariyojana Phase-I, SOP issued by MoRT&H vide Office Memo
dated 21.12.2017.

Further the Project has been categorized as High Priority Project (at S.No.85 of Page
no.50) vide MoRT&H Office Memorandum No.RW/NH-37011/37/2018-PPP(Part)
dated:30.11.2018.

1.8 Approval of Competent Authority for proposed mode of implementation.

Competent Authority (Member (T)) has approved to take up the subject Project Package

Page 2
 on BOT Mode. Subject Stretch is Package I.

1.9 Details of the Project.

i) Salient features of the projects as per the following format

S.No Description Details

(i) Length 23.350 km ( Design Km 0+000 to Km 23+350)
(ii) Civil Construction Cost 409.91 Crores
(iii) Major Bridges 2 Nos
(iv) Minor Bridges 3 Nos
(v) Culverts 32 Nos
(vi) VUP/VOP/LVUP/SVUP 3 Nos / 1 No / 1 No / 5 Nos
(vii) Major Junctions Nil
(viii) Minor Junctions 13 Nos
(ix) ROBs 2 Nos
Details LHS RHS
Service Road 4.06 km 4.06 km
(x) Length of Service Road/Slip Road
Slip Road 2.500 km 2.500 km
Connecting Road 0.225 km 0.320 km
(xi) Toll Plaza Design Ch: 6+950 (Halehalli)
(xii) Re-alignment Length NIL
(xiii) Bypass 23.350 km
Bus bays with bus shelter : NIL
(xiv) Bus bays
Bus shelters : 13 Nos
(xv) Rest Area NIL

ii) Total traffic (No of PCUs) and the Month & year in which traffic survey conducted
Traffic surveys on the project highway were carried out in the month of July 2018.
design Section Section from Actual Traffic (AADT) in July,
from Km to Km Place to Place 2018 (PCU per day)
KM 0+000 to Km
From Neralur – Thorapalli Agraharam 24842
23+350

iii) Alignment Plan and Longitudinal section showing radius of curvature and gradient of
Highway and approaches to structures (Minor/ Major bridges/
VUPs/PUPs/Flyover/interchanges) to be enclosed.

Alignment plan and longitudinal sections with requisite details are enclosed.

iv) Cross section of main Highway in general and various structures (culvert/ Minor/ Major
bridges/ VUPs/PUPs/Flyover/interchanges) to be enclosed.
Typical Cross sections of main highway & GAD of structures enclosed.
Page 3
v) Enumerate deviation in Standards in comparison to relevant Manual of Specification and
Standard for 4 Lane/6 Lane I Expressway and relevant IRC/MoRTH Standards/ Codes
referred in relevant Manuals.

S. Manual Clause Provision as per

Item Modified Provision
No. reference Manual

Gradients from Design Limiting Gradient of 3.3% may be adopted

Chainage 3+200 to at these stretches under plain and rolling
3+425, 13+730 to terrain.
Ruling Gradient
1 14+125, 18+625 to 2.9.6.2
2.5%
19+025, 21+950 to
22+100 and 23+000 to
23+150
The lateral and vertical clearance of all Light
Lateral & vertical
Vertical clearance vehicular underpasses, Pedestrian
2 clearance at 2.10
for LVUP - 3.5m underpasses/ cattle underpasses shall be
PUP/CUP/LVUP/VUP
as given in Schedule B.
The location & width of the connecting
3 Connecting Roads 2.12.3 -
roads shall be as specified in Schedule B
TCS for service The typical cross section shall be as given
4 Typical Cross Section 2.17
roads - Fig 2.5 in Schedule B.

The Overall Deck Configuration for all Road

Overall width of Over Bridges shall be as per the GAD
5 7.3 Fig 7.2A
structures approved by Railways Authority as per
Schedule B.
The project facilities and building structures
shall be constructed in accordance to
Annexure II , Annexure III and Annexure IV
6 Project Facilities 12 -
of this Schedule and are minimum. Other
facilities shall be as per IRC: SP: 84-
2014/Annex-II of Schedule-D.

vi) Justification for adopting Standards deviated from relevant Manual and IRC/MoRTH
Standards
a) The limiting gradient of 3.3% is followed in few locations to avoid the formation cost
(Embankment/cutting)
b) The LVUP clearance is provided as 4.0m w.r.t the Ministry's memorandum, circular

Page 4
 No. NHAI/Planning/EC/DPR/2016 Dated: 05.05.2018
c) Connecting roads are provided for the traffic approach the under passes at grade
separated locations from the nearby roads.
d) Earthen shoulders are not provided along the ROW boundaries in service roads,
minding the future widening to 8 lane.
e) The GADs' of ROBs' is under scrutiny of Railways department, hence the Overall Deck
Configuration is referred to the approved Railways GAD.

vii) Main Carriageway

 No. of lane/Width: 4 Lane Divided Carriage way with 2 x 7m (MCW) + 2x0.5m (shy off) +
2 x 1.5m (Paved Shoulder) + 2 x 2.0 m (Earthen Shoulder)

 MSA and CBR of soil for calculating pavement thickness:

Flexible pavement which is to be designed for CBR of 10% and design traffic of 95 MSA
for sub-base, base layers and bituminous layers except Toll plaza location.

 Pavement Composition and Reason for not adopting rigid pavement:

As per Life Cycle cost analysis, Cost of rigid pavement is more than flexible pavement.
Also, due to Sand quarries ban in Tamil Nadu, Flexible Pavement has been proposed.

 The Flexible pavement compositions are given below.

S. Minimum Crust Thickness

Description
No. (mm)
1 Bituminous Concrete (BC) 50
Dense Bituminous Concrete
2 110
(DBM)
3 Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) 250
4 Granular Subbase (GSB) 200
Total 610

 The Rigid pavement compositions are given below.

Pavement Composition Minimum crust Thickness (mm)

Design Life (Yrs) 30
Design CBR (%) 10
PQC (mm) 280
DLC (mm) 150
GSB (mm) 200

Page 5
 Total 630
viii) Service Road
• Width of Service Road : 7.00 m.
• Million Standard Axles (MSA) for which designed: 10 MSA
• Service Road Pavement (Flexible/Rigid) - Composition and Reason for not adopting
rigid pavement: Flexible Pavement Proposed.

The Pavement composition is given below.

Service/Slip Road
Design
Composition MSA Thickness, mm
CBR (%)
BC 40
DBM 50
WMM 10 10 250
GSB 200
Total 540

ix) Traffic at junctions

• In case VUPs/PUPs/CUPs no of peak hour traffic and PCU on main NH and cross road
separately of per following table

There is no direct intersection proposed. The minor intersection are proposed with service
Road as per site conditions wherever required grade separators in the form of flyover, VUP,
LVUP and SVUP has been proposed

2. Outcomes and Deliverables

2.1 Stated aims and objectives of the Project

This project has been conceived with an aim of providing a network of good quality
highways in India. With construction of four laning with Grade Separators and service
roads, smooth and safe traffic flow shall be ensured and will result in substantial gain in
terms of reduced Vehicle Operating Cost (VOC) and reduced delays. Moreover,
implementation of the project would result in development of basic infrastructure and
connectivity from Neralur – Thorapalli Agraharam further with NH - 44 which would
ultimately lead to overall economic development of the region. Further the Project would
curtail the existing distance from Neralur (near Hosur) to Dharmapuri by 20.00 Km from
existing length of 114 Km, which is substantial saving in length. Thus, the proposed project
is justified.
2.2 Indicate year-wise outputs/deliverables for the project in a tabular form.
Description Year Cumulative Cumulative

Page 6
 physical Financial Progress
progress (Rs in Cr)
LA and Preconstruction Activities 2019 - 20 100% 523.85
Civil Cost 2019 - 20 10%
2020 - 21 50%
2021 - 22 100% 956.47

2.3 Indicate final outcomes for the project in the form of measurable indicators which can
be used for impact assessment/evaluation after the project is complete. Baseline
data or survey against which such outcomes would be benchmarked should also be
mentioned.
Direct benefit accruable from the project is substantial reduction in travel distance from
Hosur (near Bangalore) to Dharmapuri, which will save time and Vehicle Operating Cost.
Further the highway would open up hinterland for their socio economic growth.

3. Project Cost
3.1 Cost estimates for the project.

Amount
Sr. No. Particulars
(Rs. in Cr.)
409.91
(i) Base Civil Construction Cost
@ 17.55
(ii) Pre-operative expenses @1% of total EPC cost 4.10
(iii) Financing expenses on Debt. 2.31
(iv) Interest during construction(IDC) 12.21
(v) Estimated project cost as on bid date (i+ii+iii+iv) 428.53
(vi) Contingencies @ 1.0% of Civil Cost 4.10
(vii) Provision for Preconstruction Activities & Contingencies
(viii) Land Acquisition Cost and R&R 507.96
(ix) Utility Shifting Cost 7.69
(x) Environmental Cost 8.20
(xi) Sub Total (viii+ix+x+xi) 523.84
Total Capital Cost (Estimated Project Cost + Contingency +
(xii) 956.47
Cost of Pre-construction Activities)

Page 7
3.2 Cost justification with respect to normative cost as per the following format

Sl. No. Description Unit Quantity

1 Total Length of Project Road Km 23.350
Length of Structures
(i) Structures km 0.598
(ii) Approaches Km 9.655
(iii) Length of Toll plaza Km 0.8
Length of Road Km 12.297

Difference
between
Estimated Normative Normative
Estimated Normative
Road Works Unit Length/Area Cost per Cost per unit cost Remarks
Cost Cost
unit unit and
Estimated
Unit cost
A Main Carriageway
(i) Green Field Alignment
4 Lane (Embankment Km 12.297 80.20 6.522 6.55 80.55 0.0282
Height - 2.0m)
Sub-Total 80.20 80.55
Service Roads/Slip
B
Roads
(i) Slip Roads with Km 5.000 11.39 2.277 2.26 11.30 -0.0174
Flexible Pavement 7.50 m
carriageway

Page 8
 Difference
between
Estimated Normative Normative
Estimated Normative
Road Works Unit Length/Area Cost per Cost per unit cost Remarks
Cost Cost
unit unit and
Estimated
Unit cost
(ii) Service & Connecting
Roads with Flexible
Km 8.665 19.73 2.277 2.26 19.58 -0.0174
Pavement 7.00 m
carriageway
Sub-Total 31.12 30.88
C Structure

Comparable with
(i) Major Bridges Sqm 7881.6 22.33 0.0028 0.0032 25.22 0.0004
normative cost

The cost is inclusive of

protection work like
stone pitching, floor
(ii) Minor Bridges Sqm 730.8 4.40 0.0060 0.0032 2.34 -0.0028
protection etc. hence
slightly higher than
normative cost.
Sub-Total 26.73 27.56

Span configuration for

VUP's vary from 20m
D VUP(Viaduct Portion) Sqm 1698.4 3.88 0.0023 0.003 5.10 0.0007
to 30m and open
foundation is provided
Due to rolling terrian
Approaches No 3 38.58 12.86 12.15 36.45 -0.7105 the approach costs
more
Sub-Total 42.46 41.55

Page 9
 Difference
between
Estimated Normative Normative
Estimated Normative
Road Works Unit Length/Area Cost per Cost per unit cost Remarks
Cost Cost
unit unit and
Estimated
Unit cost

(i) LVUP (Viaduct

E Sqm 345 1.43 0.0041 0.003 1.04 -0.0011 Box section is adopted
Portion)
instead of girder, hence
(ii) SVUP (Viaduct cost is more
Sqm 1000 3.73 0.0037 0.003 3.00 -0.0007
Portion)
Due to rolling terrian
(ii) Approaches No 5 28.12 5.62 8.55 42.75 2.9266
the approach costs less
Sub-Total 33.28 46.79

As per Normative cost

Boundary wall height
is 0.90 m including
foundation (0.30m),
however as per new
F (i) Boundary wall Rm 26,323.00 14.40 0.00055 0.00018 4.74 -0.0004 circular, Boundary wall
with RCC precast panel
of 1.5m above and
1.0m below ground
level is provided,
hence cost is more
Sub-Total 14.40 4.74
Total items covered in
circular issued for 228.18 232.06 -3.87
normative cost
ROB (Viaduct Portion)
G Sqm 4312 29.22 0.0068
(2Nos)
H Approaches of ROBs Km 2.536 35.85 14.1373

Page 10
 Difference
between
Estimated Normative Normative
Estimated Normative
Road Works Unit Length/Area Cost per Cost per unit cost Remarks
Cost Cost
unit unit and
Estimated
Unit cost
I VOP (Viaduct Portion) Sqm 910 3.68
J Approaches of VOPs Km 0.712 6.77
K Interchange - Structure Sqm 1740 2.94
L Interchange - Road work Km 3.355 21.93

Rigid pavement for toll

M Km 0.8 13.01 16 Lanes (2 lanes are
plaza
full ETC and other
Construction of toll lanes are Hybrid ETC)
N Nos 1 9.58
plaza
O FOB
P Culverts: Box/Pipe Nos 32 10.91 0.3411
Repair & Rehabilitation
Q
of Existing Bridges
Lined
Drain:30020Rmt,
R Drains 7.68 Unlined
Drain:6328Rmt, RCC
pipe Drain:5000Rmt
S Protective works 21.46
BUS BAYS / BUS Single side bus shelter
T Nos 16.00 0.40 0.025
SHELTERS = 16 Nos
U TRUCK LAY BYE Nos
"W" Metal Beam Crash
V Rm 22,945.00 7.73 0.0003
Barrier

Page 11
 Difference
between
Estimated Normative Normative
Estimated Normative
Road Works Unit Length/Area Cost per Cost per unit cost Remarks
Cost Cost
unit unit and
Estimated
Unit cost
Single Arm Pole = 306
Lightings in ceilings,
Nos, Double Arm Pole
W arm pole lights, Street 2.07
= 297 Nos, Solar
Lights
Blinkers = 26 Nos

Kilometer, Hectometer
and Guard stone =
0.025Cr, Pavement
marking = 1.85Cr, Sign
Road Appurtenances, and information
X 5.59
Traffic Signs & Kerbs board=0.23 Cr, Road
Delinatores = 0.66Cr,
Overhead & Cantilever
signs = 1.17Cr, Kerb
wall=1.64Cr

Utility service pipe =

0.48 Cr, Rumble strips
= 0.28 Cr, Culverts at
Landscaping, Junctions, junction = 0.40Cr, Rain
Y 2.89
& Other Items water harvesting =
0.12Cr, Junction
Improvement = 1.01cr
Horiculture=0.6Cr

Total cost of items not

covered in circular
181.72
issued for normative
cost

Page 12
 Difference
between
Estimated Normative Normative
Estimated Normative
Road Works Unit Length/Area Cost per Cost per unit cost Remarks
Cost Cost
unit unit and
Estimated
Unit cost
TOTAL CIVIL COST
409.91
(Rs/Cr)
Cost Per km 17.55

Page 13
3.3 In case land is to be acquired, the details of land cost, including cost of
Rehabilitation/Resettlement needs to be provided.

Sl.No Description Quantity/Status

1 Total land required 151.86 Ha
2 Existing RoW 3.50 Ha
3 Land to be acquired 148.36 Ha
4 3(A) Notification published under NH Act, 1956 148.36 Ha (100 %)
5 3(D) Notification published under NH Act, 1956 66.98 (45%)

3.4 In case pre-investment activities are required, how much is proposed to be spent on
these, with details activity-wise?
Cost of Preconstruction Activities

Sr. No. Description Cost (Rs. In Cr.)

a) Land Acquisition Cost and R&R cost 507.96
b) Utility Shifting Cost 7.69
c) Environmental Cost 8.20
Total of Pre construction activities, Rs Crore 523.84

3.5 Whether price escalation during the project time cycle has been included in the cost
estimates and at what rates?

The rates of all items of construction work have been analyzed as per Standard Data Book of
MORT&H. The basic cost of materials has been taken from SOR 2018 – 19 of Tamil Nadu.

3.6 Whether the Project involves any foreign exchange element, the provision made or
likely impact of exchange rate risks?
-NIL-

3.7 In case of the Revised Cost Estimates, a variation analysis along with the Report of
the Revised Cost Committee needs to be attached.
Not Applicable

4. Project Finance

4.1 Indicate the sources of project finance: budgetary support, internal and extra budgetary
sources, external aid, etc.

Page 14
 The subject project is included under National Corridor at Sr.No. 05 of Annexure-II(d) (Page
No 23) in Bharatmala Pariyojana Phase-I, SOP issued by MoRT&H vide Office Memo dated
21.12.2017, expenditure shall be met from budgetary sources accordingly.

5. Project Viability

5.1 For projects, which have identifiable stream of financial returns, the financial
internal rate of return may be calculated. The hurdle rate will be considered at 12
percent.

Concession Period in Years 23 Years including Construction Period

Estimated Project Cost in Rs. Crore 428.53
Estimated O&M Cost in Rs. Crore (for first Year) 2.82
Project IRR 15.40 %
Equity IRR 18.10 %
Estimated Bid Price in Rs Crore 535.66

5.2 In case of projects with identifiable economic returns, the economic rate of return
may be calculated. In such cases project viability will be determined by taking both
financial and economic returns together.
The economic internal rate of return is 24.5% for development of the project road for four lane
divided carriageway with flexible pavement which is more than the present 12% of discounted
rate and larger positive value of NPV of net benefits indicate the firm viability of project for the
proposed improvement and hence recommended for implementation.

5.3 In case of proposals where both financial and economic returns are not readily
quantifiable, the measureable benefits/outcomes imply may be indicated.

Not Applicable

6. Approvals and Clearances

Requirement of mandatory approvals/clearances of various local, state and national bodies and
their availability may be indicated in a tabular form (land acquisition, environment, forestry,
wildlife etc.). In case land is required, it may be clearly mentioned whether the land is in the
possession of the agency free from encumbrances or encroached or stuck in legal processes

Sr.
Approvals/Clearances Status Remarks
No.
1 Land Acquisition Status Under Progress
Description Quantity/Status
Sl.No
1 Total land required 151.86 Ha
2 Existing RoW 3.50 Ha

Page 15
Sr.
Approvals/Clearances Status Remarks
No.
3 Land to be acquired 148.36 Ha
3(A) Notification published 148.36 Ha (100
4
under NH Act, 1956 %)
3(D) Notification published
5
under NH Act, 1956 66.98 (45%)
2 Environment clearance Not Required As per MoEF notification dated 22nd August 2013,Environmental
Clearance is not required
3 Pollution clearance Not Required Clearance not Required for this package.
4 Status of ROB clearance Required Applied through RORACS Portal and joint site inspection is likely
to be scheduled shortly.

5 Cutting of Live Trees Under progress Enumeration of Trees in progress.

6 Utility Shifting Estimates Under progress Joint site with respective departments are in progress
7 Forest Clearance Not Required -

7. Monitoring and Evaluation

7.1 Indicate the Project Management Agency (s), if any.

National Highways Authority of India (NHAI).

7.2 Mode of implementation of individual works: Departmental/ Item-rate/ Turnkey/ EPC/

HAM/ Public-Private Partnership, etc.
BOT Mode

7.3 Please indicate timelines of activities in PERT/Bar Chart along with critical
milestones.

Project Milestone-I

Project Milestone-I shall occur on the date falling on the [300th (there hundred)] day from the
Appointed Date (the “Project Milestone-I”).

Prior to the occurrence of Project Milestone-I, the Concessionaire shall have expended not
less than 20% (twenty per cent) of the total capital cost set forth in the Financial Package.

Prior to the occurrence of Project Milestone –I, the Concessionaire shall have commenced
construction of the Project and achieved 20% Physical Progress.

Project Milestone-II

Project Milestone-II shall occur on the date falling on the [450th (Four Hundred Fifty)] day
from the Appointed Date (the “Project Milestone-II”).

Prior to the occurrence of Project Milestone-II, the Concessionaire shall have expended not
less than 35% (thirty five per cent)] of the total capital cost set forth in the Financial

Page 16
 Package. Provided, however, that at least 70% (seventy percent) of the expenditure referred
to hereinabove shall have been incurred on physical works which shall not include advances of
any kind to any person or expenditure of any kind on plant and machinery.

Prior to the occurrence of Project Milestone –II, the Concessionaire shall have commenced
construction of the Project and achieved 35% Physical Progress

Project Milestone-Ill

Project Milestone-Ill shall occur on the date falling on the [600 th (Six Hundred) day from the
Appointed Date (the “Project Milestone-Ill”).

Prior to the occurrence of Project Milestone-Ill, the Concessionaire shall have commenced
[construction of all Project Facilities and expended not less than 75% (seventy five per cent)]
of the total capital cost set forth in the Financial Package.

Prior to the occurrence of Project Milestone –III, the Concessionaire shall have commenced
construction of the Project and achieved 75% Physical Progress

Scheduled Completion Date

The Scheduled Completion Date shall be the [730th (Seven Hundred Thirtieth)] day from the
Appointed Date.

On or before the Scheduled Completion Date, the Concessionaire shall have completed the
Project in accordance with this Agreement.

7.5 Please indicate what arrangement has been made for impact assessment after the project
is complete?

EMP & SIA is considered.

8. Whether checklist is submitted along with the proposal.

Yes, checklist attached

9. Approval Sought: Recommendation of PATSC is solicited for total capital cost of Rs.
956.47Crore for the work of Four Laning of Neraluru to Thorapalli Agraharam Section of NH-844
from Design Km.0+000 to Km. 23+350 (Total Length – 23.350 Km) under Bharatmala Pariyojana
Phase-I under the category of Residual Works of NHDP on BOT in the State of Tamil Nadu.

(Alok Deepankar)
CGM (Tech.)
Tel No: 011-25074100,200
Extn no: 1013
e-mail: alokdeepankar@nhai.org

Page 17