Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3. Court has rejected as evidence Xerox copy (duly authenticated by the Registrar) of a Return filed by the
Company with the Registrar: Is the treatment valid:
a. Yes , Xerox copy is invalid whether or not b. No, Xerox copy is authenticated and u/s 397 gains
authenticated validity without original document
c. Yes, Xerox authenticated by Registrar is not d. No, provided that the Xerox is
admissible proof at Court but is admissible at Tribunal authenticated in the preceding 6 months
4. A person wanted to exercise his right to inspect documents delivered to the Registrar with a Prospectus
u/s 26 (Matters to be stated in Prospectus): 30 days had elapsed since the publication of Prospectus, can
he inspect?
a. Yes, inspection is not time bound b. No, as 14 days have elapsed, he cannot
c. Yes, as 45 days have not elapsed d. No, Such documents can’t be inspected at all
5. A person wanted to exercise his right to inspect documents delivered to the Registrar with a Prospectus
u/s 388(1)(b) (expert’s consent and allotment): 30 days had elapsed since the publication of Prospectus,
can he inspect ?
a. Yes, inspection is not time bound b. No, as 14 days have elapsed, he cannot
c. Yes, as 45 days have not elapsed d. No, Such documents can’t be inspected at all
7. In exercise of Power of Board u/s 179(3) resolutions were passed by Board on certain matters enlisted
therein. The same resolutions were filed in compliance of Sec 117(3)(g) with Registrar: Can the same be
inspected by a person exercising right u/s 399?
a. Yes, as Board resolutions and GM resolutions are not b. No, as the same is prohibited under
seen separately for this right u/s 399 law
c. Yes, provided that a 14 days’ notice is given to Registrar d. None of the above
8. Where a physical Form is prescribed for submission to Registrar, an electronic form can be used to:
a. be submitted exclusive of physical form b. be submitted in alternative to physical form
c. be submitted in addition to physical form d. All of these
9. In case the Companies Act 2013 and the Information Technology Act 2000 are inconsistent with each
other: Which of the Acts shall be given effect to w.r.t. that inconsistency?
a. Companies Act, 2013 b. Information Technology Act, 2000
c. As per case by case basis, ruling of HC/SC d. As per case by case basis, ruling of Tribunal
© CA Darshan D. Khare
Chapter 14 REGISTRATION OFFICES AND FEES
11. Where a Document/(s) was/were required to be filed but weren’t so filed, the same may be filed on
payment of ________ fee u/s 403:
a. Additional Fee b. Compensatory Fee
c. Conciliatory Fee d. None of the above
12. Additional Fee for filing after due date of submissions u/s 92 or 137 shall not be less than:
a. Rs 100 per day b. Rs 200 per day
c. Rs 500 per day d. Rs 1000 per day
13. Where there is a repetitive failure of two or more times to make timely submissions of requisite records
u/s of the Companies Act, 2013 the same shall be filed on payment of:
a. Higher Additional Fee b. Higher Compensatory Fee
c. Higher Conciliatory Fee d. None of the above
14. Quantum of Higher Additional Fee as above shall not be less than……the additional fee:
a. 2x b. 3x
c. 10x d. 20x
15. Will the payment of Additional Fee or Higher Additional Fee (as the case may be), absolve the Company
and its Officers of any other liability under Companies Act, 2013 for such failure:
a. Yes b. No
c. Yes, Company will be absolved d. Yes, Officers will be absolved
© CA Darshan D. Khare
Chapter 14 REGISTRATION OFFICES AND FEES
Answer
© CA Darshan D. Khare