Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Rafael I. Gaite
Romeo Robert C. Indico IV
Joshua Ivan A. Roldan
March 2019 i
Evaluation for the Presence of Kinetin in Rice (Oryza sativa)
by
Rafael I. Gaite
Romeo Robert C. Indico IV
March 2019
ii
ABSTRACT
iii
APPROVAL SHEET-
This research work entitled, “Evaluation for the Presence of Kinetin in Rice (Oryza
sativa)” by Rafael I. Gaite, Romeo Robert C. Indico IV, and Joshua Ivan A. Roldan,
presented to the Faculty of the Philippine Science High School – Bicol Region Campus in
accepted.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Approval Sheet......................................................................................................................... iv
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1
Bibliography ........................................................................................................................... 14
Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 16
v
List of Tables
vi
List of Figures
1 Causal Model 6
2 Process Flowchart 7
10 Use of spectrophotometer 11
vii
INTRODUCTION
Kinetin is a plant hormone that plays a vital role in inhibiting growth to plants. It
inhibits chlorophyll production of plants and decreases the rate of cell division, effectively
reducing their growth rate (Amasino, 1955). Fruits can be treated with this compound to
further extend their shelf life. Application of kinetin on Kinnow mandarins shows that it can
reduce their rate of rotting, thus extending their shelf life as shown in the research
Kinetin is a cytokinin that can be found in all plant and animal tissues. A study
conducted by Miller (1960) suggested that the presence of a kinetin-like compound could be
found in corn. This kinetin could be extracted and used in extending the shelf life of fruits.
Rice (Oryza sativa) is the most important food crop in the world, directly feeding
more people than any other crop. According to CGIAR Research Program on Climate
Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), nearly half of the world’s population has
relied on rice every day in 2012. However, its importance is focused mainly on its fruit,
which is utilized as staple food in almost all countries. The stems and roots are usually
neglected and did not establish any use at all. With rice being a plant with high potential
content for kinetin from its fruit, stem, and roots, prompts the researchers to make use of
Which part of the rice plant (Oryza sativa)tested : roots, stem, or fruit, would be positive for
Specific Problems:
1. Which part of the rice plant (Oryza sativa) would produce the highest percent
yield of kinetin?
2. Which part of the rice plant (Oryza sativa) would produce the best quality of
kinetin?
3. Would the solvent used in the extraction affect the kinetin yield of the rice plant?
4. Which part of the rice plant (Oryza sativa) would produce the optimum kinetin
production level?
This study aimed to contribute to the overall study of kinetin and can be used as a
basis for other studies in a similar or related field. In addition, this study would also benefit
the rice industry, as it would put more importance on the whole rice plant if it is a possible
source of kinetin. By doing this, it can reduce the amount of waste caused by the disposal of
This study has focused on the rice plant (Oryza sativa) as a natural source of kinetin.
The kinetin was extracted using the ethanol extraction method. This study has assessed the
2
efficiency of the rice plant as a source based on the percent yield and the quality of the
kinetin. The quality of extracted kinetin was evaluated using the Ninhydrin Test and
Spectrophotometer. Ethanol being the most commonly used as solvent , this study however
3
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Kinetin
almost all plant and animal tissues. A study by Miller et al in 1955, as cited in an article by
Amasino in 2005, isolated the first kinetin sample from herring sperm. Another study by
Miller in 1956 extracted kinetin from coconut and brewer’s yeast. Kinetin is a type of
cytokinin, which are compounds that promote cytokinesis, or the physical process of cell
division. A study by Lou et al in 2012 indicated that kinetin could prolong the harvest date of
2014, kinetin slows down the spoilage of fruits through the reduction of several chemicals,
such as polygalactouranose and cellulose enzymes, that induce deterioration in kinnow fruits.
Most studies have focused on the optimal source of extraction of kinetin using several plants.
A study by Miller in 1956 investigated the optimum yield of kinetin from three (3) sources –
coconut, brewer’s yeast, and DNA. Another study by Miller in 1960 extracted a kinetin-like
compound from corn. However, there have been no studies that have focused specifically on
the parts of the plant. This prompts the researchers to investigate on the optimum yield of
Rice
Rice (Oryza sativa) is the second most produced crop globally. It is a staple in all
common households in almost every country. It is a grainy crop which is similar to corn (Zea
mays), which was used in Miller’s study. It has three parts – the roots, the stems, and the
4
bran. These factors make the rice plant an ideal sample for investigation on the optimum
Ethanol Extraction
from various materials. It involves the soaking of the material in ethanol and then heating the
solution to evaporate the ethanol, a process known as distillation. However, ethanol is used
because it has a low evaporation temperature. Other alcohols may also be used which also
have low melting points, such as methanol, which may affect the yield of the extract. This
prompts the researchers to investigate the effect of the solvent used in extraction on the yield
of the extract.
5
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESEARCH DESIGN
The source of kinetin and the solvent used were used as the independent
variables since they would determine the kinetin yield and quality of the samples, which
were the dependent variables in the setup. The extraneous variables were the rice growing
methods and conditions as these were included in the setup. However, all the plants were
6
PROCESS FLOWCHART
Plant Samples
Preparation
Distillation Process
Ninhydrin Test
Spectrophotometry
Data Analysis
The rice plant was procured in a farm located in Tagongtong, Goa, Camarines Sur.
The researchers had specifically searched for rice plants that were 100 days old. Rice plants
7
enter its ripening age during this period and it is the time when kinetin levels were at its peak
(Miller, 1956).
After procurement, the rice plant was separated into its four parts namely: rice fruit
(pre-mill rice grain), leaves, stem, and roots. The rice plants were washed to remove physical
contaminants. After washing, the rice plant parts were air dried until completely void of
water.
The researchers had weighed 10g of bran, leaves and roots which were soaked in
100mL ethanol and methanol,then the solutions were left to stand for 24 hour.
After letting the methanol and ethanol solutions stand for 24 hour, the samples were
filtered using No.1 Whatman filter paper and a funnel. The volume of the filtrate was
Distillation of Filtrates
The filtrates were distilled using a simple setup which consisted of a hot plate,
condenser, connecting glass tubes, and two flasks. The distilling temperatures were 125°C
and 155°C for the methanol and ethanol solutions respectively. The concentrated extract after
distillation was measured using a graduated cylinder to determine the volume. This process
was repeated for the other plant parts and their respective replicates
Ninhydrin Test
Six test tubes were prepared for the Ninhydrin test. Pipettors were used to measure
and transfer the liquids. Each test tube contained 1mL of each solution diluted with 3mL
8
distilled water; then 1mL of the Ninhydrin reagent was added. The test tubes were soaked in
a water bath at 90°C for 15min. The presence of Ruhemann’s purple color served as an
Spectrophotometry
spectrophotometer, the cuvettes containing the solutions were analyzed with each filtrate
having 3 replicates, for a total of 24 samples analyzed. UV light at 268 nm wavelength was
passed through the cuvettes and the absorbance of each sample was measured.
DATA ANALYSIS
For the third objective, the Independent t-Test was used, as there was only one
independent variable, the type of solvent, and one dependent variable, percent yield, which
was a ratio variable. The Independent t-Test evaluates if there was a significant difference
𝑥̅𝑚𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑙 − 𝑥̅𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑙
𝑡=
1 1
𝑆𝑝 √ +
𝑛𝑚𝑒ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑙 𝑛𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑙
9
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The percent yield after the distillation process was taken to show which combination
of plant part and solvent produced the highest amount of the remaining unknown compound
after removal of the alcohol solvent. The results showed that the samples which contained the
bran and roots produced the highest yields of the remaining unknown compound for both
compared to the other methanol filtrates. The leaves filtrates contained the next highest
percentage yield with the ethanol solution having the higher percentage over its methanol
counterpart. The root filtrates had the least percent yield with a lesser ethanol filtrates than
their methanol counterpart. This suggested that the solvent used in extraction affects the
percent yield. However, results from the Independent t-test showed that there was no
30
25
Volume of Filtrates
20
15
10
0
Roots Leaves Stem Fruit
Rice Plant Part
Ethanol Methanol
10
Figure 11. Average Yield of Samples after Distillation.
The Ninhydrin Reagent tested was negative in all the samples, as Ruhemann’s purple,
which indicated the presence of amines in the filtrate. This indicated that the filtrates did not
Based on the absorbance values, only the bran and root filtrates in ethanol have a
maximum absorbance at 268 nm. This was similar to a previously mentioned study by Miller
(1960) wherein a kinetin-like compound was extracted from corn. The aforementioned
study’s extract also tested negative in Ninhydrin Reagent but had a similar absorbance with
kinetin in ultraviolet light. The extract from Miller (1960), albeit not being kinetin, also
exhibited cytokinin properties. However, this was not tested in the samples.
11
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Based on the findings, the bran and roots of the rice plant (Oryza sativa) yielded the
highest percentage yield of the unknown compound after extraction as compared to the fruit
and the roots. In addition, the results from the Independent t-test show that there was no
significant difference in the percent yield between the solvents used. However, after testing
for the presence of kinetin using Ninhydrin test, no color change was detected, indicating that
there were no amines in the samples present in kinetin. Spectrophotometry indicated that
none of the samples both in ethanol and methanol had the same absorbance as kinetin, both
Based on the findings, the researchers conclude that none of the samples contained
kinetin. Therefore, rice (Oryza sativa) is not a viable source for kinetin based from the
12
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the researchers should improve the method of separating the
plant parts. Separating the rice bran from the husk using a rice miller was suggested by one
of the researchers. Another option is purchasing the husks and the bran separately but it is
feared that it may affect the data as the parts come from different sources.
For further study, the researchers recommend that the cytokinin properties of rice
roots be tested, as they have similar properties to a kinetin-like compound extracted by Miller
in 1960, which promoted cell division and prolonged the shelf life of plants. It is also
recommended that other methods of extraction for kinetin from plants be studied, which will
13
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Letham, D. S. (1963) Zeatin, a Factor Inducing Cell Division Isolated from Zea mays. Fruit
Research Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.
Miller, C. O., Skoog, F., Von Saltza, M. H., & Strong, F. M. (1955). Kinetin, a cell division
factor from deoxyribonucleic acid1. Journal of the American Chemical Society,
77(5), 1392-1392.
Kaul, K. & Sabharwal, P. S. (1971). Effects of sucrose and kinetin on growth and chlorophyll
synthesis in tobacco tissue cultures. Plant physiology, 47(5), 691-695.
Dadzie, B.K. & Orchard, J.E. (1997). Routine Post Harvest Screening of Banana/Plantain
Hybrids: Criteria and Methods. INIBAP Technical Guidelines 2. International Plant
Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy; International Network for the Improvement
of Banana and Plantain, Montpellier, France; ACP-EU Technical Centre for
Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
14
15
APPENDIX A
METHODOLOGY DOCUMENTATION
16
Figure 3. Separated Rice Fruit
17
18
TABLES
1 89 74
Fruit 2 78 79
3 88 79
1 88 80
`Leaves
2 82 81
3 83 80
1 88 83
Stem 2 91 81
3 82 79
1 79 87
Roots 2 85 76
3 88 80
19
Fruit 25 20
Leaves 17 12
Stem 15 11
Roots 20 15
20
Ethanol 268 2.698
21
APPENDIX C
t-test:
𝑥̅𝑚 − 𝑥̅𝑒
𝑡=
1 1
𝑆𝑝 √ +
𝑛𝑚 𝑛𝑒
With
2
(𝑛𝑚 − 1)𝑆𝑚 + (𝑛𝑒 − 1)𝑆𝑒2
𝑆𝑝 = √
𝑛𝑚 + 𝑛𝑒 − 2
Where
Confidence level = 95%
α = 0.05
22
Sp = pooled standard deviation
df = degree of freedom
𝑁
1
𝜎 = √ ∑(𝑥𝑖 − 𝜇)2
𝑁
𝑖=1
Sm = 16.3
Se = 9.6
Subsitution to formula for Sp:
2905.1 + 1014.2
𝑆𝑝 = √
22
𝑆𝑝 = 13.3
1021 − 959
𝑡=
1 1
13.3√ +
12 12
62
𝑡=
5.4
𝑡 = 11.5
Calculation for df:
𝑑𝑓 = 𝑛1 + 𝑛2 − 2
23
𝑑𝑓 = 12 + 12 − 2
𝑑𝑓 = 22
Rice Fruit
Methanol Solution
25 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡
× 100 = 29.4%
85 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Ethanol Solution
20 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡
× 100 = 25.9%
77.3 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Methanol Solution
17 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡
× 100 = 20.2%
84.3 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Ethanol Solution
12 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡
× 100 = 14.9%
80.3 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
24
Rice Stems
Methanol Solution
15 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡
× 100 = 17.2%
87 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Ethanol Solution
11 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡
× 100 = 13.6%
81 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Methanol Solution
20 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡
× 100 = 23.8%
84 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Ethanol Solution
15 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡
× 100 = 18.5%
81 𝑚𝐿 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
25