As global community, TH prefer to heavily invest on earth 2.

0 as oppose to fight against

climste chsnge (-)

In the statusquo human lives in worst condition of this earth wich is sun temperature is increas being
so hot, ice at the north and south pole are melting drastically, lot of animals, plant, and the other
living things also have no place to live.

As opposite team of the house, we Prefer to ban heavily invest on earth 2.0 mean while we will fight
against climate change. Difinies fight against climate change is we will use any way to repare our
earth condition to be more good rather than doing investation itseslf LG.

Our goal as the opposite team are provide the best place for human & also the other lives thing to
continue their life itself, with repare the earth condition bcs we think that earth is the best place for
us to life.

What are we going to do are:

 Create many program such as reforestation, create an new invention (friendly vehicle) and
so on to repare the climate change
 Try to decreas the utilise of some thing that effected polution such as: limit the utilise of
vehicle for every familly, limit the smoke or the other things.
 Sosialize to the society about “how important to keep the condition of this earth especially
the climate change, air, and so on”
 Do research to restore the bad condition of the earth.

Welcome to my substantive, here I have some reason that will prove about why it is justifiable to
fight against the climate change.

Let’s move to my first point about why it is within interest for the gov itself. As we know that gov
also have to introduce all about the environment to the society, they have to teach environmentally
friendly life and always protect the earth’s environment. As the sq right now that the government
already have some program such as go green and so on to fight against the climate change mean
while it’s to repare our earth condition with plant some three to increas the supply of clean air and
also try to decreas the global warming. Considering the interest of government is like that already I
say, so that with fight against the climate change it more helpfull for the gov to instill the habit of
loving the environment. Gov exsist to manage their sosiety and also give the best service for them.
Here, as the gov to give the best service for society in form of their place to live I think gov must
show their capability in front of society when they fight against the climate change because if this is
succesfull, it can increas the awareness of the society about gov is have the important role in their
life rather than they doing investation itself LG, because gov have the big responsibility towards
their society and also the region included environment that being their place to live. Here if they are
not doing investation, it can make they being more focus to their society condition bcs as the sq
right now we know that not all elements of the society are in the good condition, bcs stay there any
crisis that happen in their element. When they are not doing investation, they can to more focus at 2
thing wich is to the prosperity of society and also fight the climate change it.s more effective, why?
Bcs if you doing investation you also wanna have an problem in 3 things wich is the prosperity, the
condition of the environment when you are not already find a new place / new planet for being our
live place, and the investation itself LG. So I think it will more overload the gov. As gov, we have to
responsible about the condition that happen and also we have to managed the society, we can’t just
focus in the 1 thing so I think fight against the climate is more show our responsibility and it’s more
effective.

Then, let’s talk about why it is within interest for the society? The society must be aware about how
important this earth is. The way that used to increas the awareness of society is involving society in
improving this earth . I think when we face this problem wich is the worst condition of earth, it make
society feel about how is the feel if this earth in the worst condition, indirectly they will aware about
how important this earth actually. With fight against the earth society will know about how difficult
to repare the earth to the past condition anymore. Then at the end of the day, if the earth in good
condition it can make an possibility that the society will keep the earth as well.

Society are taught to be responsible for something they have made, the earth will not be worst if the
society don’t destroy it. As we know if at the fact, people are the most elements that effected this
worst condition of earth, they doing something as fun as they want. They don’t think about what is
the future impact that will them get at the end. So that here, I think fight against the climate change
is a form to show their responsible about whatever that already they do at the past until effected
this worst condition of our earth. But, if they doing investation and will move to the other planet I
think it show that they run from their responsibillity of what already they do LG.

Fight against the climate change will happen because we have to find an fast resolution if we fight
against the climate change, bcs why? Here we will just focus in the repare the earth condition only
and we also will try to find the best resolution/ the best way to fight against the climate change, it
will more effective, bcs why? Because if we move to the other planet it will take many time. It start
from how we can find the planet that have an complete needed that we need such as oxygen and so
on, then we also have to move all of the human and also the other living things from this earth to
the new planet and so on that need longer time rather than fight against the climate change.

It’s also a form of compensation from gov towards the society & the earth, bcs why? In the past
condition of this earth was verry good, even pollution rarely happen. But now,when the gov allow a
lot of development such as hotel, department, industry and so on that resulted deforestation and
also the use of other technologies that also effected global warming. So, after the worst condition of
this earth it will be nice if the gov fight against the climate change. Then, I think it also will be a form
of compesation from society towards the earth itself LG. Like what already I explain before that this
condition wich is global warming is happen, ice at the north and south pole are melting drastically
it’s because of the activity from the people/the society itself LG. They already doing some activity
such as smoking, using electronik tools (refigerator, and so on), their activity in industry and so on
without any limitation. So, it’s effected the bad impact for this earth such as depletion of the ozone
layer,and so on. So, it’s prove how cruel the people to the earth itself LG. If they fight against the
change, I think it will be a form of compesation from society towards the earth for the cruel action
that already they do at this current momentum.

Beside of that, if we fight against the climate change, it also will fulfill the standard of place that
utilise to survive wich is suistanability, because here we need an way that make our life last more
and at the end fight against the change will prove it because with we stay at the earth it can
guaranty our needed especially oxygen, water, food and so on rather than have to start it from zero
with move to the other planets that it’s not sure if in that planet we can fulfill our needed as living
things itself LG.

We live in condition that the earth is at the worst condition, where the global warming, ice melting,
and so on are happen. So that, it make all layer of living things can’t be calm anymore bcs it threaten
for their survive. As we know that they need this earth as the place for survive bcs here they can get
the needed that being their priority when they life such as oxygen, water, gravity,and so on.

The benefit that will we get if we fight against the change is it’s more guaranty for our survive.
Because why? As we know that almost all of the people are get dificulty when they try to adapt in
the new condition/place. More over, the place is not same with the past mean while at that place/
planet is not guaranty that we can doing our daily activity as well bcs so far, no planet that have
oxygen, natural resources, gravity and so on. This benefit is exclusive, bcs in the prime minister side
if they will move to the other planet they can’t get the same thing that they need as easy bcs the
amount of the water, oxygen and so on are limited. So, it will influence the adapt activity of the
people and the other living things itself LG. The other benefit is we can to increas the awareness and
also the responsibility of the society from this worst condition, if we fight against the climate change
indirectly we can teach about how important this earth to the society and at the end when the
condition is back as the past wich is good, it can make posibility that the society will more care
towards this earth, so they will think carefully before take an action that will effected the same
worst condition. This benefit is exclusive bcs when we doing invest we can’t increas the
responsibillity and also the awareness of society fully bcs it’s same with teach them to run from their
responsibillity towards the earth and they leave this earth in the worst condition. And it’s also not
close posibillity that the society will do the same action wich is to make their new planet at the worst
condition bcs they don’t fully know about the awareness and responsibillity itself LG.

The both of benefit are so important because here we are not only look for our new place to live but
we also need the right place that make us can survive as well, can adapt and can get our needed as
simple as well LG. Beside of that, we also need the awareness and responsibility from society to
close the posibillity that there’s no same condition that will happen at the end of the day LG. Even,
our argumen already fulfill almost all of the elements that related with this motion, we already find
the solution, and so on. So that, I think it will be important in our debate today.

Even if our acceptance in not exclusive, why our argument still oerway this? We know that both of
way to repare the condition of the earth wich is doing investation also move to other planet and
fight against the climate change are have an same goal wich is togive the best place to survive for us.
But I think if fight against the climate change is still being an best way bcs vain if we already find an
new planet for live but our earth condition is still bad bcs it’s see same as you run from your
responsibillity and if you fight against the climit change it will more better bcs you already try to
repare our lovely earth even if the result is not maximall.

Perhabs the opposite team said that It’s not easy to repare our earth condition bcs it have an acute
ravage and it will need much cost to reapre it. Yeah we know that, but I think it will be same if you
doing investation wich is it also will need much money and it enable bust also for bring all of the
living things to the new planet also need much money than fight against the climate change itself LG.
If we repare the earth condition, even if we need much money to doing it but there’s only little
posibillity if it will be failed. And even if it’s failed atleast it useful for our earth bcs stay there is an
change that happen to the good condition of this earth

Mitha Astriana