Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Unit IV
Compensation and Maintenance: Compensation: job evaluation – concept, process and
significance; components of employee remuneration – base and supplementary; Performance and
Potential appraisal – concept and objectives; traditional and modern methods, limitations of
performance appraisal methods, 360 degree appraisal technique; Maintenance : overview of
employee welfare, health and safety, social security.
JOB EVALUATION
1. Job Analysis
It is a process through which required information about various aspects of jobs can be obtained.
Job analysis involves two dimensions:
i. Job description
Under job description, a profile of job information is prepared indicating the duties,
responsibilities and working condition of work. It explains about what the job entails.
2. Job Rating
Job rating includes the process of using same methods to study job descriptions and
specifications in order to assign a relative worth for each job. Some of job rating methods are:
ranking, point rating factor comparison, and so on.
3. Money Allocation
After rating the worthiness of each job, a pay structure is determined and the money for each job
is allocated. It means, it is the arrangement of paying rewards/compensation for each job
according to its worth or value.
4. Job Classification
Job classification is the last step of job evaluation which is concerned with the categorization of
jobs according to their pay scale. For example, high paying jobs are represented at the top of the
hierarchy.
There are three basic methods of job evaluation: (1) ranking, (2) classification, (3) factor
comparison (4) Point Comparison Method. While many variations of these methods exist in
practice, the three basic approaches are described here.
1. Ranking Method
According to this method, jobs are arranged from highest to lowest, in order of their
value or merit to the organization.
Jobs also can be arranged according to the relative difficulty in performing them.
The jobs are examined as a whole rather than on the basis of important factors in the job; and
the job at the top of the list has the highest value and obviously the job at the bottom of the
list will have the lowest value.
2. Classification Method
According to this method, a predetermined number of job groups or job classes are
established and jobs are assigned to these classifications.
This method places groups of jobs into job classes or job grades. Separate classes may
include office, clerical, managerial, personnel. Following is a brief description of such a
classification in an office.
(a) Class I - Executives: Further classification under this category may be Office manager,
Deputy Office manager, Office superintendent, Departmental supervisor, etc.
(b) Class II - Skilled workers: Under this category may come the Purchasing assistant Cashier,
Receipts clerk, etc.
(c) Class III - Semiskilled workers: Under this category may come Steno typists, Machine
operators, Switchboard operators, etc.
(d) Class IV - Semiskilled workers: This category comprises Daftaris, File clerks, Office boys,
etc.
The job classification method is less subjective when compared to the earlier ranking
method. The system is very easy to understand and acceptable to almost all employees
without hesitation.
Even when the requirements of different jobs differ, they may be combined into a single
category, depending on the status a job carries.
It is difficult to write all-inclusive descriptions of a grade.
The method oversimplifies sharp differences between different jobs and different grades.
When individual job descriptions and grade descriptions do not match well, the
evaluators have the tendency to classify the job using their subjective judgments.
A more systematic and scientific method of job evaluation is the factor comparison method.
Though it is the most complex method of all, it is consistent and appreciable.
Under this method, instead of ranking complete jobs, each job is ranked according to a series
of factors. These factors include mental effort, physical effort, skill needed, supervisory
responsibility, working conditions and other relevant factors (for instance, know-how,
problem solving abilities, accountability).
Pay will be assigned in this method by comparing the weights of the factors required for each
job, i.e., the present wages paid for key jobs may be divided among the factors weighed by
importance (the most important factor, for instance, mental effort, receives the highest
weight). In other words, wages are assigned to the job in comparison to its ranking on each
job factor.
The steps involved in factor comparison method may be briefly stated thus:
Select key jobs (say 15 to 20), representing wage/salary levels across the organization.
The selected jobs must represent as many departments as possible.
Find the factors in terms of which the jobs are evaluated (such as skill, mental effort,
responsibility, physical effort, working conditions, etc.).
Rank the selected jobs under each factor (by each and every member of the job
evaluation committee) independently.
Assign money value to each factor and determine the wage rates for each key job.
The wage rate for a job is apportioned along the identified factors.
All other jobs are compared with the list of key jobs and wage rates are determined.
4. Point method
This method is widely used currently. Here, jobs are expressed in terms of key factors. Points
are assigned to each factor after prioritizing each factor in the order of importance.
The points are summed up to determine the wage rate for the job. Jobs with similar point
totals are placed in similar pay grades. The procedure involved may be explained thus:
(a) Select key jobs. Identify the factors common to all the identified jobs such as skill, effort,
responsibility, etc.
(b) Divide each major factor into a number of sub factors. Each sub factor is defined and
expressed clearly in the order of importance, preferably along a scale.
I. Skill (key factor): Education and training required, Breadth/depth of experience required,
Social skills required, Problem-solving skills, Degree of discretion/use of judgment, Creative
thinking;
II. Responsibility/Accountability: Breadth of responsibility, Specialized responsibility,
Complexity of the work, Degree of freedom to act, Number and nature of subordinate staff,
Extent of accountability for equipment/plant, Extent of accountability for product/materials;
III. Effort: Mental demands of a job, Physical demands of a job, Degree of potential stress.
The educational requirements (sub factor) under the skill (key factor) may be expressed thus in
the order of importance.
Degree Define
1. Able to carry out simple calculations; High School educated
4. Find the maximum number of points assigned to each job (after adding up the point values
of all sub-factors of such a job). This would help in finding the relative worth of a job. For
instance, the maximum points assigned to an officer's job in a bank come to 540. The manager's
job, after adding up key factors + sub factors' points, may be getting a point value of, say 650
from the job evaluation committee. This job is now priced at a higher level.
5. Once the worth of a job in terms of total points is expressed, the points are converted into
money values keeping in view the hourly/daily wage rates. A wage survey, usually, is
undertaken to collect wage rates of certain key jobs in the organization. Let's explain this:
The point method is a superior and widely used method of evaluating jobs. It forces raters to
look into all keys factors and sub-factors of a job. Point values are assigned to all factors in a
systematic way, eliminating bias at every stage.
It is reliable because raters using similar criteria would get more or less similar answers.
“The methodology underlying the approach contributes to a minimum of rating error”.
It accounts for differences in wage rates for various jobs on the strength of job factors. Jobs
may change over time, but the rating scales established under the point method remain
unaffected.
Demerits
On the negative side, the point method is complex. Preparing a manual for various jobs,
fixing values for key and sub-factors, establishing wage rates for different grades, etc., is a
time consuming process.
According to Decenzo and Robbins, “the key criteria must be carefully and clearly identified,
degrees of factors have to be agreed upon in terms that mean the same to all rates, the weight
of each criterion has to be established and point values must be assigned to degrees”.
This may be too taxing, especially while evaluating managerial jobs where the nature of
work (varied, complex, novel) is such that it cannot be expressed in quantifiable numbers.
1. Job simplification
Job simplification is a design method whereby jobs are divided into smaller components and
subsequently assigned to workers as whole jobs.
Simplification of work requires that jobs be broken down into their smallest units and then
analysed. Each resulting sub-unit typically consists of relatively few operations.
These subunits are then assigned to the workers as their total job. Many fast food restaurants
such as McDonald's, Burger King and Nirula's use simplification because employees can
learn tasks rapidly; short work cycles allow task performance with little or no mental effort
and low-skilled and low-paid employees can be hired and trained easily.
On the negative side, job simplification results in workers experiencing boredom, frustration,
alienation, lack of motivation and low job satisfaction. This, in turn, leads to lower
productivity and increased cost.
2. Job Enlargement
Job enlargement expands a job horizontally. It increases job scope; that is, it increases the
number of different operations required in a job and the frequency with which the job cycle is
repeated.
3. Job Rotation
Job rotation refers to the movement of an employee from one job to another. Jobs themselves
are not actually changed, only the employees are rotated among various jobs. An employee
who works on a routine job moves to work on another job for some hours/days/months and
returns to the first job.
This measure relieves the employee from the boredom and monotony, improves the
employee's skills regarding various jobs and prepares worker's self-image and provides
personal growth. However, frequent job rotations are not advisable in view of their negative
impact on the organisation and the employee.
4. Job Enrichment
It considers the individual abilities while job evaluation considers the requirement of the job
in terms of job specification and job description.
The purpose of performance appraisal is to take the decisions regarding the pay, transfer,
promotion etc. while the purpose of job evaluation is to determine the worth of the job.
Performance appraisal rates the man not the job but job evaluation determines the relative
worth of the job.
Performance appraisal helps in making decision like transfer or promotion while job
evaluation helps in making decisions regarding wage policy.
Despite being a part of the broader job evaluation process, job analysis is an important
program in itself.
While job evaluation aims at finding the net worth of different jobs in an organization with
the aim of finding salaries and wage differentials, job analysis tries to find out everything
about a specific job including the role, responsibility, working conditions, skills required,
demands and hazards associated with a job.
Management of any organization always endeavours to make the salaries and wages
associated with jobs attractive so as to able to compete with other companies in luring better
talent.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
“It is a systematic evaluation of an individual with respect to performance on the job and
individual’s potential for development.”
“It is formal, structured system of measuring, evaluating job related behaviours and
outcomes to discover reasons of performance and how to perform effectively in future so that
employee, organization and society all benefits.”
Performance Appraisal is defined as an assessment of employees by the manager, in which
he evaluates the overall contribution made by the employee to the organization.
It is a systematic and logical review, conducted by the organization annually to judge his
potential in performing a task. It helps to analyze the skills and abilities of an employee for
their future growth that increases productivity of employees.
2. These standards are then communicated the employees as well as to the evaluators. This
step helps the employees know what is expected from them and the feedback from the
employees can be used for making any require changes in these standards.
3. The next step is to measure the actual performance against these standards a suitable
technique for measurement is selected and the internal and external factors that influence the
performance are also identified. Information on results is gathered and four sources are most
commonly used to measure the actual performance. These are personal observations, Oral
reports, written reports and statistical reports.
4. The results of the appraisal are then shared with the employee so that he become aware of
the deviation in performance and can also identify and analyze the cause behind this deviation.
This help and employee in identifying his strengths and weaknesses and improve future
performance.
5. Corrective actions is then undertaken to improve the performance of the employees the
common tools for corrective action are coaching, counselling and training.
9. Confidential Records:
Mostly used by government departments, however its application in industry is not ruled out.
Here the report is given in the form of Annual Confidentiality Report (ACR) and may record
ratings with respect to following items; attendance, self expression, team work, leadership,
initiative, technical ability, reasoning ability, originality and resourcefulness.
The system is highly secretive and confidential.
Feedback to the assesses is given only in case of an adverse entry.
Disadvantage is that it is highly subjective and ratings can be manipulated because the
evaluations are linked to HR actions like promotions etc.
12. Comparative Evaluation Method (Ranking & Paired Comparisons): These are
collection of different methods that compare performance with that of other co-workers. The
usual techniques used may be ranking methods and paired comparison method.
B) MODERN METHODS
2. Psychological Appraisals:
These appraisals are more directed to assess employee’s potential for future performance
rather than the past one.
It is done in the form of in-depth interviews, psychological tests, and discussion with
supervisors and review of other evaluations.
It is more focused on employees emotional, intellectual, and motivational and other
personal characteristics affecting his performance. This approach is slow and costly and
may be useful for bright young members who may have considerable potential. However
quality of these appraisals largely depends upon the skills of psychologists who perform the
evaluation.
3. Assessment Centres:
This technique was first developed in USA and UK in 1943. An assessment centre is a
central location where managers may come together to have their participation in job related
exercises evaluated by trained observers.
It is more focused on observation of behaviours across a series of select exercises or work
samples.
Assesses are requested to participate in in-basket exercises, work groups, computer
simulations, role playing and other similar activities which require same attributes for
successful performance in actual job.
4. 360-Degree Feedback:
It is a technique which is systematic collection of performance data on an individual group,
derived from a number of stakeholders like immediate supervisors, team members,
customers, peers and self.
In fact anyone who has useful information on how an employee does a job may be one of the
appraisers.
This technique is highly useful in terms of broader perspective, greater self-development and
multi-source feedback is useful. 360-degree appraisals are useful to measure inter-personal
skills, customer satisfaction and team building skills. However on the negative side,
receiving feedback from multiple sources can be intimidating, threatening. Multiple raters
may be less adept at providing balanced and objective feedback.
2. Horn Effect:-
In this case only the negative qualities of the employee are considered and based on this
appraisal is done.
This again will not help the organization because such appraisal may not present a true
picture about the employee.
3. Central tendency:-
In this case the superior gives an appraisal by giving central values.
7. Lack of Clarity:-
The objective of performance appraisal is to evaluate and develop employees. An
organization should avoid using one appraisal system to achieve both objectives.
The particular system of the appraisal system should clarify before it is designed and should
be discussed with all managers and employees to gain their commitment. Any performance
appraisal system, however good the design, is unlikely to succeed if the managers and
employees are suspicious of its objectives.
8. Cultural Factors:-
Culture has profound impact on the appraisal system as it should be in consonance with the
organizational culture.
‘Readymade’ performance review system imported from other organization rarely function
satisfactorily. Their failure is partly due to culture differences. Thus culture is a vital factor to
look after.
9. Inconsistent Message
If a manager does not keep notes and accurate records of employee behavior, they may not
be successful in sending a consistent message to the employee.
We all struggle with memory with as busy as we all are so it is critical to document issues
(both positive and negative) when it is fresh in our minds.
Basis for
Performance Appraisal Performance Management
Comparison
Performance Appraisal means the analysis of Performance Management is the
Meaning an employee's performance and their calibre management of human resources
for future growth and development. in an organization.
What is it? It is a system. It is a process.
Nature Rigid Supple
Type of tool Operational Tool Strategic Tool
Owned by Human Resource Department Managers
Conducted Annually Continuously
Approach Individualistic Holistic
Focused on Quantitative Aspects Qualitative Aspects
Corrections Retrospective Prospective
POTENTIAL APPRAISAL
Potential appraisal is defined as a process of determining an employee’s strengths and
weaknesses with a view to use this as a predictor of his future performance.
This would help in determining the promotability of an individual to a higher position and
chalk out his career plan. Most organisations incorporate potential appraisal in their appraisal
processes for identifying and developing suitable employee base for succession planning.
Potential appraisal is a powerful tool of employee development. Potential Appraisal is the
process of tracking unrevealed talent, skills and abilities in a person which even he/she is
unaware of.
It is a future oriented appraisal, whose main objective is to identify and evaluate the potential
of the employees to rise up in the organisational structure.
Managers use it as predictors to determine whether the employee has the potential to execute
added responsibilities in the future, therefore is a potent device for employee advancement. It
is a future – oriented appraisal.
Potential appraisal helps to identify what can happen in future so that it can be guided and
directed towards the achievement of individual and organizational growth and goals. Many
organisations consider and use potential appraisal as a part of the performance appraisal
processes.
Potential appraisal data is extremely useful for career panning, as the latent abilities of an
individual can be captured and linked with the future role and responsibilities.
COMPENSATION
includes direct cash payments, indirect payments in the form of employee benefits and incentives
to motivate employee to strive for higher level of productivity is a critical component of the
employment relationship. Compensation is affected by forces as diverse as labour market factors,
collective bargaining, government legislation and top management’s philosophy regarding pay
benefits.” Wayne F Cascio
One factor that influences Base Compensation is demand and supply of labor in the market.
Labor union pressure is also another factor influencing Base Compensation. This is because
unions always try their best to fight for their members’ rights.
Nature of job as determined by the job description, each employee deserves a different
compensation package.
Size of the organization and its ability to pay its employees.
Product market compensation is yet another factor influencing Base Compensation.
REMUNERATION
Remuneration is the compensation that one receives in exchange for the work or services
performed. Typically, this consists of monetary rewards, also referred to as wage or salary.
A number of complementary benefits, however, are increasingly popular remuneration
mechanisms. Remuneration is one component of reward management.
An average employee in the organised sector is entitled to several benefits — both financial
as well as non-financial.
To be specific, typical remuneration of an employee comprises—wages and salary,
incentives, fringe benefits, perquisites, and non-monetary benefits.
Individual incentives are applicable to specific employee performance. Where a given task
demands group effort for completion, incentives are paid to the group as a whole. The amount is
later divided among group members on an equitable basis.
3. Fringe Benefits:
Payment to a worker in addition to salary or wages. These include employee benefits as
provident fund, gratuity, medical care, hospitalization, accident relief, health and group
insurance, canteen, uniform, recreation and me like.
4. Perquisites:
Several new benefits have been initiated by industrial giants particularly for the executives. Such
Benefits are referred to as ‘perquisites’ or ‘perks’. Perks include chauffeur driven car, corporate
aircraft, home security, company apartment, club membership, paternity leave, self-defence
training, company credit card, entertainment.
5. Non-monetary Benefits
these include challenging job responsibilities, recognition of merit, growth prospects, competent
supervision, comfortable working conditions, job sharing, and flexitime.
A) Internal Factors
1. Ability to pay
This is one of the most significant factors influencing employee compensation. Generally, a firm,
which is prosperous and successful, has the ability to pay more than the competitive rate. This
way it can attract a superior caliber of personnel
Often the labor unions also demand an increase in compensation on the grounds that the
organisation is prosperous and is able to pay more.
2. Employee
Numerous employees related factors also influence his or her compensation. These include the
following:
3. Job requirements
Wages arc also influenced by the requirements of a job such as physical and mental requirement.
Jobs, which demand more skill, responsibility, efforts and are of hazardous in nature, will carry
high wage tag with them.
4. Job Evaluation
Job evaluation establishes a consistent and systematic relationship among base compensation
rates for all jobs. In other words, it establishes the satisfactory wage differentials.
5. Organization’s Strategy
The organization’s strategy regarding wages also influences employee compensation. For
example, an organisation, which wants rapid growth, will set higher wages than competitors. On
the other hand, organisations that want smooth going and just maintain the current earning will
pay average or below average
B) EXTERNAL FACTORS
1. The Cost of Living Adjustment is an annual adjustment in wages to account for a change in
purchasing power as measured by the Consumer Price Index
2. Laws and Regulations
Laws and regulations impact the remuneration of employees in many areas, such as:
In India, some of the central laws which have a bearing on employee remuneration are the
Payment of Wages Act, 1936; the Minimum Wages Act, 1948; the Payment of Bonus Act. 1965;
Equal Remuneration Act, 1976; and the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Payment of Wages
Act was passed to regulate payment of wages to certain classes of persons employed in the
industry.
3. Labor market
Official laws on wage and salary, labor contract, payment time, wage payment delay,
working insurance, and so on.
People’s standard of living in the areas where the offices of the company are.
People’s living and consuming customary.
The average wage rate in the labor market of similar work.
4. Economy
The state of economy also influences the wage and salary-fixation. Wage rates will be different
in a stable economy than in a depressed economy. In case of depressed economy there may be
increase in supply of labor and this results in the fixation of lower wage rates.
5. Inflation
Increase in the prices of commodities and decrease in value of the money is called as inflation.
The causes of inflation are many which are raising costs, fall in the currency value in
international markets, raising taxes by government and stagnation in the development of
economy, etc.
In India year 2012, due to the inflation nearly 22 listed companies had increased salary of its
employees ranging between 12% to 27% compared to last year. Example Reliance Industries Ltd
had paid nearly13% increase in salaries to its employees compared to last year salaries and
HDFC (Housing Development Finance Corporation) Bank had paid nearly 21% increase in
salaries to its employees compared to last year salaries.
6. Technological changes:
Technological changes also influence the fixation of wage levels. Due to the advancements in the
technology there may be shortage of skilled manpower in that area. So, the organisation will
provide high wages for skilled personnel. For example, information technology (IT) industry in
India and abroad is suffering from the shortage of IT experts.
Having good academic qualifications from Reputed and standard educational institution
influence the compensation of the potential candidate in their recruitment in companies.
Example, Indian Top Business schools like Indian Institute of Management, and IIT (Indian
Institute of Technology) graduates demands higher pay packages compared to other normal
institutions. Candidates seeking admission into theses institution requires to qualify tests
conducted on domain knowledge. Candidates those who admit in these institution are
determined, having competence and good domain knowledge which companies require
An organization has to design its compensation system in such ways that it is able to attain its
three main objectives, namely:
1. Attracting the talent: It is widely accepted that human resources of an organization give it
an edge over its competitors. By offering a well designed pay package, an organization can
get best talent available in the job market.
2. Retaining the talent: In present times, because of globalization and subsequent
privatization, the workforce has become highly mobile. The practice of lifelong employment
and commitment between the employer and the employee which was practiced in some
economies of the world
3. Motivating the employees: Employees may have talent but they will not be motivated to
use their talent unless they know that they will be rewarded duly for their contribution
towards organizational objectives or be punished for not contributing as per the demands of
the job.
4. For attracting the talent towards the organization, it is necessary that each organization
should design a compensation system that is externally competitive. With that end in mind,
wage and salary surveys are to be conducted and pay levels be determined accordingly.
Health and Safety provisions under Indian Factories Act 1948. The Act has been promulgated
primarily to provide safety measures and to promote the health and welfare of the workers
employed in factories. To take care of the health of workers in factories, the Factories Act, 1948
has provided for certain measures which are stated below:
Organizations provide welfare facilities to their employees to keep their motivation levels high.
The employee welfare schemes can be classified into two categories viz. statutory and non-
statutory welfare schemes. The statutory schemes are those schemes that are compulsory to
provide by an organization as compliance to the laws governing employee health and safety.
These include provisions provided in industrial acts like Factories Act 1948, Dock Workers Act
(safety, health and welfare) 1986, Mines Act 1962. The non-statutory schemes differ from
organization to organization and from industry to industry.