INTERPRETING TEST SCORE

A. VALIDITY
In terms of test validity, we can show the tests to the colleagues for face validity,
compare the course objective and the test items for validity, check whether the students
respond in the way they are expected in doing the test for response validity, and calculate the
point bi-serial correlation for item validity using the following formula:

𝑴𝒑 − 𝑴𝒕 𝒑
𝒓𝒑𝒃𝒊 = √
𝑺𝑫 𝒒

rpbi = Point bi-serial Correlation Coefficient, i.e. item validity coefficient.

Mp = Mean score of testees correctly answering the analyzed item.
Mt = Mean score of the total score.
SD = Standard deviation of the total score.
p = Proportion of testees correctly answering the analyzed item.
q = Proportion of testees incorrectly answering the analyzed item.
Nomor Butir Instrumen
NO Nama x x2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sri
14 196
1 Widayanti 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 Haliyah 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196
3 Haslinda 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196
4 Sandy. P 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196

5 Herawati. A 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196
6 Rismayanti 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169
7 Dirgayanti 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169
8 Rasdiyanah 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 12 144
9 Diana 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 144
10 Diana 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 144
11 Wildayati 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 11 121
12 Sitra 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 11 121
13 Norma 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 11 121
14 Hasniyanti 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 10 100
15 Nasirah 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 9 81

∑x 7 7 6 14 14 15 13 15 14 15 9 15 15 11 14 184 2294
Mp 12,5 13,2 12 12,5 12,2 12,2 12,5 12,2 12,3 12,2 13,3 12,2 12,2 13 12,5
Mt 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2 12,2
SD 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58 1,58
P 0.47 0.47 0.4 0.93 0.93 1 0.87 1 0.93 1 0.6 1 1 0.73 0.93
Q 0,53 0,53 0,6 0,07 0,07 0 0,13 0 0,07 0 0,4 0 0 0,27 0,07
Rpbi

The following steps are recommended for calculation, taking item number 1 as the sample of
calculation.
1. Determining the proportion of testees correctly answering the analyzed items:
∑𝑥 7 ∑𝑥 15 ∑𝑥 9
𝑝1 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.47 𝑝6 = 𝑁
= 15
=1 𝑝11 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.6
∑𝑥 7 ∑𝑥 13 ∑𝑥 15
𝑝2 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.47 𝑝7 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.87 𝑝12 = 𝑁
= 15
=1
∑𝑥 6 ∑𝑥 15 ∑𝑥 15
𝑝3 = = = 0.4 𝑝8 = = =1 𝑝13 = = =1
𝑁 15 𝑁 15 𝑁 15
∑𝑥 14 ∑𝑥 14 ∑𝑥 11
𝑝4 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.93 𝑝9 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.93 𝑝14 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.73
∑𝑥 14 ∑𝑥 15 ∑𝑥 14
𝑝5 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.93 𝑝10 = 𝑁
= 15
=1 𝑝15 = 𝑁
= 15
= 0.93

2. Determining the proportion of testees incorrectly answer the analyzed items:

q1 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 0,47 = 0,53 q6 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 1 =0
q2 = 1 – p2 = 1 – 0,47 = 0,53 q7 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 0,87 = 0,13
q3 = 1 – p3 = 1 – 0,4 = 0,6 q8 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 0,1 = 1
q4 = 1 – p4 = 1 – 0,93 = 0,07 q9 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 0,93 = 0,07
q5 = 1 – p5 = 1 – 0,93 = 0,07 q10 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 1
q11 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 0,6 = 0,4
q12 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 1 =0
q13 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 1 =0
q14 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 0,73 = 0,27
=0 q15 = 1 – p1 = 1 – 0,93 = 0,07

3. Calculating the mean score of the total scores:

∑𝑥 184
𝑀𝑡 = = = 12,2
𝑁 15

4. Calculating the mean score of testees correctly answering the analyzed items.
88 183 120
𝑀𝑝1 = 7
= 12.5 𝑀𝑝6 = 15
= 12.2 𝑀𝑝11 = 9
= 13.3
93 163 183
𝑀𝑝2 = 7
= 13.2 𝑀𝑝7 = 13
= 12.5 𝑀𝑝12 = 15
= 12.2
72 183 183
𝑀𝑝3 = 6
= 12 𝑀𝑝8 = 15
= 12.2 𝑀𝑝13 = 15
= 12.2
175 173 143
𝑀𝑝4 = 14
= 12.5 𝑀𝑝9 = 14
= 12.3 𝑀𝑝14 = 11
= 13
 171 183 175
𝑀𝑝5 = = 12.2 𝑀𝑝10 = = 12.2 𝑀𝑝15 = = 12.5
14 15 14

5. Calculating the standard deviation of the total score:

2
∑ 𝑥2 ∑𝑥
𝑆𝐷 = √ −( )
𝑁 𝑁

2294 184 2
=√ −( )
15 15

= √152.9 − 150.4
= √2.5
= 1.58

6. Calculating the item validity coefficient:

 Test item 1
𝑀𝑝 −𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,5−12,2 0.47
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √𝑞 = √ = 0,2
𝑆𝐷 1,58 0.53

 Test item 2

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 13,2 − 12,2 0,47

𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ = 0,6
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,53

 Test item 3

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12 − 12,2 0,4
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ = −0,1
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,6

 Test item 4

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,5 − 12,2 0,93

𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ = 0,7
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,07

 Test item 5

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,2 − 12,2 0,93

𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ =0
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,07

 Test item 6
 𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,2 − 12,2 1
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ =0
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0

 Test item 7

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,5 − 12,2 0,87

𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ = 0,5
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,13

 Test item 8

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,2 − 12,2 1
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ =0
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0

 Test item 9

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,3 − 12,2 0,93

𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ = 3,6
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,07

 Test item 10

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,2 − 12,2 1
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ =0
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0

 Test item 11

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 13,3 − 12,2 0,6

𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ = 0,9
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,4

 Test item 12

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,2 − 12,2 1
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ =0
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0

 Test item 13

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,2 − 12,2 1
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ =0
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0

 Test item 14

𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 13 − 12,2 0,73
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ = 0,8
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,27

 Test item 15
 𝑀𝑝 − 𝑀𝑡 𝑝 12,5 − 12,2 0,93
𝑟𝑝𝑏𝑖 = √ = √ = 0,7
𝑆𝐷 𝑞 1,58 0,07

B. RELIABILITY
In terms of test reliability, we can use single-test single trial method with split-half
reliability, applying Pearson product moment correlation and Spearman-Brown odd even
modal correlation this calculation may be processed through SPSS program, based on the
level of significance of 5. The formula of Pearson product moment correlation is as follows:

𝑵 ∑ 𝒙𝒚 (∑ 𝒙)(∑ 𝒚)
𝒓𝒙𝒚 =
√[𝑵𝒙𝟐 − (𝒙)𝟐 ][𝑵𝒚𝟐 − (𝒚)𝟐 ]

rxy = Pearson product moment correlation between variable x and y

N = Number of students taking the test
∑x = sum of variable x
∑y = sum of variable y
∑xy = sum of multiplication of variable x and variable y
∑x2 = sum of square x
∑y2 = sum of square y

- Test Item 1
No X Y X2 Y2 XY 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
1 0 14 0 196 0 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
√[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
2 1 14 1 196 14
3 1 14 1 196 14
(15 x 88) − (7 x 184)
4 1 14 1 196 14 =
5 14 √[(15 𝑥 7) − (7)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
0 0 196 0
6 0 13 0 169 0
7 13 32 32
0 0 169 0 = = = 0.18
8 1 12 1 144 12 √[56][554] 176,13
9 1 12 1 144 12
10 0 12 0 144 0
11 1 11 1 121 11
 12 0 11 0 121 0
13 1 11 1 121 11
14 0 10 0 100 0
15 0 9 0 81 0
7 184 7 2294 88

The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd ven model
correlation to see the realibility of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.18 0,36
𝑟11 = = = 0.30
1 + 0.18 1.18

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0.30)

- Test Item 2
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
1 1 14 1 196 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
2 0 14 0 196 0 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
3 1 14 1 196 14
4 1 14 1 196 14 (15 x 93) − (7 x 184)
=
5 1 14 1 196 14 √[(15 𝑥 7) − (7)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
6 1 13 1 169 13
7 1 13 1 169 13 107 107
= = = 0.60
8 0 12 0 144 0 √[56][554] 176,13
9 0 12 0 144 0
10 0 12 0 144 0
11 0 11 0 121 0
12 0 11 0 121 0
 13 1 11 1 121 11
14 0 10 0 100 0
15 0 9 0 81 0
7 184 7 2294 93

The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.60 1,2
𝑟11 = = = 0.75
1 + 0.60 1.60

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is reliable (r11 = 0.75)

- Test item 3
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 1 14 1 196 14 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
2 1 14 1 196 14 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
3 0 14 0 196 0
4 0 14 0 196 0 (15 x 72) − (6 x 184)
5 1 14 1 196 14 =
√[(15 𝑥 6) − (6)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
6 0 13 0 169 0
7 0 13 0 169 0
24 24
8 0 12 0 144 0 =− =− = −0,13
√[54][554] 172,96
9 0 12 0 144 0
10 0 12 0 144 0
11 0 11 0 121 0
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 0 11 0 121 0
 14 1 10 1 100 10
15 1 9 1 81 9
6 184 6 2294 72

The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ
rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)
rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 (−0,13) −0.26
𝑟11 = = = −0.29
1 + (−0.13) 0,87

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = - 0.29)

- Test item 4
No X Y X2 Y2 XY 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
1 14 196 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
1 1
√[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
2 1 14 1 196 14
3 1 14 1 196 14
(15 x 175) − (14 x 184)
4 1 14 1 196 14 =
√[(15 𝑥 14) − (14)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
5 1 14 1 196 14
6 1 13 1 169 13
49 49
7 1 13 1 169 13 = = = 0.55
8 1 12 1 12 √[14][554] 88,06
144
9 1 12 1 144 12
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
 14 1 10 1 100 10
15 0 9 0 81 0
14 184 14 2294 175

The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.55 1,1
𝑟11 = = = 0.70
1 + 0.55 1.55

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is reliable (r11 = 0.70)

- Test item 5
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 1 14 1 196 14 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
2 1 14 1 196 14 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
3 1 14 1 196 14
4 1 14 1 196 14 (15 x 172) − (14 x 184)
5 14 14 =
1 1 196 √[(15 𝑥 14) − (14)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
6 1 13 1 169 13
7 1 13 1 169 13
4 4
8 1 12 1 144 12 = = = 0.04
√[14][554] 88,06
9 0 12 0 144 0
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
 14 1 10 1 100 10
15 1 9 1 81 9
14 184 14 2294 172

The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ
rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)
rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.04 0.08
𝑟11 = = = 0.07
1 + 0.04 1.04

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0.07)

- Test item 6
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 14 14
1 1 196 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
2 1 14 1 196 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
√[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
3 1 14 1 196 14
4 1 14 1 196 14
(15 x 184) − (15 x 184)
5 1 14 1 196 14 =
6 13 13 √[(15 𝑥 15) − (15)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
1 1 169
7 1 13 1 169 13
8 1 12 1 12
0 0
144 = = =0
9 12 12 √[0][554] 0
1 1 144
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
14 1 10 1 100 10
 15 1 9 1 81 9
15 184 15 2294 184

The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2𝑥0 0
𝑟11 = = =0
1+0 1

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0)

- Test item 7
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 1 14 1 196 14 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
2 1 14 1 196 14 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
3 1 14 1 196 14
4 1 14 1 196 14 (15 x 163) − (13 x 184)
5 14 14
=
1 1 196 √[(15 𝑥 13) − (13)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
6 1 13 1 169 13
7 1 13 1 169 13
53 53
8 1 12 1 144 12 = = = 0.44
√[26][554] 120,01
9 1 12 1 144 12
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 0 11 0 121 0
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
14 0 10 0 100 0
15 1 9 1 81 9
 13 184 13 2294 163

The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.44 0.88
𝑟11 = = = 0.61
1 + 0.44 1.44

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0.61)

- Test item 8
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 1 14 1 196 14
2 14 14
1 1 196
3 14 196 14 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
1 1 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
4 1 14 1 196 14 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
5 1 14 1 196 14
6 1 13 1 169 13 (15 x 184) − (15 x 184)
=
7 1 13 1 169 13 √[(15 𝑥 15) − (15)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
8 1 12 1 144 12
9 1 12 1 144 12 0 0
10 12 12 = = =0
1 1 144
√[0][554] 0
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
14 1 10 1 100 10
15 1 9 1 81 9
15 184 15 2294 184
 The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the realibility of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2𝑥0 0
𝑟11 = = =0
1+0 1

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0)

- Test item 9
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 14 14
1 1 196
𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
2 1 14 1 196 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
3 14 14 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
1 1 196
4 1 14 1 196 14
5 1 14 1 196 14 (15 x 173) − (14 x 184)
=
6 1 13 1 169 13 √[(15 𝑥 14) − (14)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
7 1 13 1 169 13
8 1 12 1 144 12 19 19
= = = 0.21
9 1 12 1 144 12 √[14][554] 88,06
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 0 11 0 121
14 1 10 1 100 10
15 1 9 1 81 9
14 184 14 2294 173
 The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd ven model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.21 0,42
𝑟11 = = = 0.34
1 + 0.21 1,21

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0.34)

- Test item 10
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 14 14
1 1 196
𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
2 1 14 1 196 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
3 14 196 14 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
1 1
4 1 14 1 196 14
5 1 14 1 196 14 (15 x 184) − (15 x 184)
=
6 1 13 1 169 13 √[(15 𝑥 15) − (15)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
7 1 13 1 169 13
8 1 12 1 144 12 0 0
= = =0
9 1 12 1 144 12 √[0][554] 0
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
14 1 10 1 100 10
15 1 9 1 81 9

15 184 15 2294 184

 The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2𝑥0 0
𝑟11 = = =0
1+0 1

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0)

- Test item 11
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 1 14 1 196 14
2 14 14
1 1 196
𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
3 1 14 1 196 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
4 14 14 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
1 1 196
5 1 14 1 196 14
6 1 13 1 169 13 (15 x 120) − (9 x 184)
=
7 1 13 1 169 13 √[(15 𝑥 9) − (9)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
8 0 12 0 144 0
9 1 12 1 144 12 144 144
= = = 0.83
10 1 12 1 144 12 √[54][554] 172,96
11 0 11 0 121 0
12 0 11 0 121 0
13 0 11 0 121 0
14 0 10 0 100 0
15 0 9 0 81 0
9 184 9 2294 120
 The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.83 1,66
𝑟11 = = = 0.90
1 + 0.83 1,83

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is reliable (r11 = 0.90)

- Test item 12
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 1 14 1 196 14
2 14
1 14 1 196 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
3 14 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
1 1 196 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
4 1 14 1 196 14
5 1 14 1 196 14
(15 x 184) − (15 x 184)
6 1 13 1 169 13 =
√[(15 𝑥 15) − (15)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
7 1 13 1 169 13
8 1 12 1 144 12
0 0
9 1 12 1 144 12 = = =0
√[0][554] 0
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
14 1 10 1 100 10
15 1 9 1 81 9
15 184 15 2294 184
 The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2𝑥0 0
𝑟11 = = =0
1+0 1

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0)

- Test item 13
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 14 14
1 1 196
𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
2 1 14 1 196 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
3 14 14
√[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
1 1 196
4 1 14 1 196 14
5 14 14 (15 x 184) − (15 x 184)
1 1 196 =
6 1 13 1 169 13 √[(15 𝑥 15) − (15)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
7 1 13 1 169 13
8 1 12 1 144 12 0 0
= = =0
9 1 12 1 144 12 √[0][554] 0
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
14 1 10 1 100 10
15 1 9 1 81 9
15 184 15 2294 184
 The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2𝑥0 0
𝑟11 = = =0
1+0 1

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is not reliable (r11 = 0)

- Test item 14
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 1 14 1 196 14
14
2 1 14 1 196 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
3 14 14
𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
1 1 196 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
4 1 14 1 196 14
5 1 14 1 196 14
(15 x 143) − (11 x 184)
6 1 13 1 169 13 =
√[(15 𝑥 11) − (11)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
7 1 13 1 169 13
8 1 12 1 144 12
121 121
9 1 12 1 144 12 = = = 0.77
√[44][554] 156,12
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 0 11 0 121 0
13 0 11 0 121 0
14 0 10 0 100 0
15 0 9 0 81 0
11 184 11 2294 143
 The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd ven model
correlation to see the realibility of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.77 1,54
𝑟11 = = = 0.87
1 + 0.77 1,77

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is reliable (r11 = 0.87)

- Test item 15
No X Y X2 Y2 XY
1 14 14
1 1 196
𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
2 1 14 1 196 14 𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
3 1 14 1 196 14 √[𝑁𝑥 2 − (𝑥)2 ][𝑁𝑦 2 − (𝑦)2 ]
4 1 14 1 196 14
5 1 14 1 196 14 (15 x 175) − (14 x 184)
=
6 1 13 1 169 13 √[(15 𝑥 14) − (14)2 ][(15 𝑥 2294) − (184)2 ]
7 1 13 1 169 13
8 1 12 1 144 12 49 49
= = = 0.55
9 1 12 1 144 12
√[14][554] 88,06
10 1 12 1 144 12
11 1 11 1 121 11
12 1 11 1 121 11
13 1 11 1 121 11
14 1 10 1 100 10
15 0 9 0 81 0
14 184 14 2294 175
 The result of this calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.
2𝑟𝑡𝑡
𝑟11 =
1 + 𝑟ℎℎ

rtt = Total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)

rhh = Product moment Correlation Coefficient between the first half and the second
half of the test (hh = half – half)
1&2 = constant numbers
2 𝑥 0.55 1,1
𝑟11 = = = 0.70
1 + 0.55 1.55

To interpret the test reliability (r11) Sudjono (2003.209) provides criteria. If the resulted
calculation ((r11) is the same or greater than 0.70, the evaluated test is highly reliable.
Conversely, if the resulted calculation (r11) is smaller than 0.70, the evaluated test is not
highly reliable. Therefore, the result of calculation is reliable (r11 = 0.70)

C. ITEM DIFFICULTY
𝑹
𝑰𝑭 =
𝑵

IF = Index of facility
R = represents the number of correct answers
N = the number students taking the test

𝑅 7
𝐼𝐹1 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.46 (Medium Question)

𝑅 7
𝐼𝐹2 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.46 (Medium Question)

𝑅 6
𝐼𝐹3 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.4 (Medium Question)

𝑅 14
𝐼𝐹4 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.93 (Easy Question)

𝑅 14
𝐼𝐹5 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.93 (Easy Question)
 𝑅 15
𝐼𝐹6 = 𝑁 = 15 = 1 (Easy Question)

𝑅 13
𝐼𝐹7 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.86 (Easy Question)

𝑅 15
𝐼𝐹8 = 𝑁 = 15 = 1 (Easy Question)

𝑅 14
𝐼𝐹9 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.93 (Easy Question)

𝑅 15
𝐼𝐹10 = 𝑁 = 15 = 1 (Easy Question)

𝑅 9
𝐼𝐹11 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.6 (Medium Question)

𝑅 15
𝐼𝐹12 = 𝑁 = 15 = 1 (Easy Question)

𝑅 15
𝐼𝐹13 = 𝑁 = 15 = 1 (Easy Question)

𝑅 11
𝐼𝐹14 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.73 (Easy Question)

𝑅 14
𝐼𝐹15 = 𝑁 = 15 = 0.93 (Easy Question)
D. ITEM DISCRIMINATION
Nomor Butir Instrumen
NO Nama x
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Sri Widayanti 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14
2 Haliyah 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14
3 Haslinda 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 Upper
4 Sandy. P 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 Group
5 Herawati. A 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 (UG)
6 Rismayanti 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13
7 Dirgayanti 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13
8 Rasdiyanah 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 12
9 Diana 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
10 Diana 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
11 Wildayati 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 11 Lawer
12 Sitra 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 11 Group
13 Norma 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 11 (LG)
14 Hasniyanti 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 10
15 Nasirah 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 9
UG 3 6 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 96
LG 3 1 3 6 6 7 5 7 6 7 2 7 7 3 6 76

𝑼𝑮 − 𝑳𝑮
𝑰𝑫 =
𝒏
ID = index discrimination
N = number of students in one group (1/2N)
UG = frequency of score by upper group (upper half)
LG = frequency of score by lower group (lower half)

𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 3−3 0
𝐼𝐷1 = = =7=0 (Low)
𝑛 7

𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 6−1 5
𝐼𝐷2 = = = 7 = 0.71 (Excellent)
𝑛 7

𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 3−3 0
𝐼𝐷3 = = =7=0 (Low)
𝑛 7

𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−6 1
𝐼𝐷4 = 𝑛
= 7
= 7 = 0.14 (Low)
 𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−6 1
𝐼𝐷5 = = = 7 = 0.14 (Low)
𝑛 7

𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−7 0
𝐼𝐷6 = = =7=0 (Low)
𝑛 7

𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−5 2
𝐼𝐷7 = = = 7 = 0.28 (Enough)
𝑛 7

𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−7 0
𝐼𝐷8 = = =7=0 (Low)
𝑛 7

𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−6 1
𝐼𝐷9 = = = 7 = 0.14 (Low)
𝑛 7
𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−7 0
𝐼𝐷10 = = = =0 (Low)
𝑛 7 7
𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−2 5
𝐼𝐷11 = = = 7 = 0.71 (Excellent)
𝑛 7
𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−7 0
𝐼𝐷12 = = =7=0 (Low)
𝑛 7
𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−7 0
𝐼𝐷13 = = =7=0 (Low)
𝑛 7
𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−3 4
𝐼𝐷14 = = = 7 = 0.57 (Excellent)
𝑛 7
𝑈𝐺−𝐿𝐺 7−6 1
𝐼𝐷15 = = = 7 = 0.14 (Low)
𝑛 7