Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

DISCUSSION ON "THE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OF ELECTRICAL CONTROL GEAR FOR MACHINE TOOLS" 287

With reference to Fig. 22, no unsatisfactory test results were not contemplated. The control is simple to apply, and no special
obtained with the motor terminals placed on the upper side of machine is required.
the support bar. There is a point Mr. Buckle has rather overlooked in his dis-
In answering Mr. McVie's statement on the amplidyne, I wish cussion on the ideal thermal overload, i.e. the reset period. If
to draw his attention to Section 11.3, which does refer to this the thermal-overload trip is placed near the motor hot-spot the
machine. The cost question is not relevant. The d.c. injection device will respond correctly to overloading, but the reset time will
method of speed control is limited on machine tools to inching be proportional to the motor cooling time. This would reflect
duty and to close adjustment of machine parts; continuous use is adversely on production, and a compromise should be adopted.

DISCUSSION ON
"THE COST AND EFFICIENCY OF EARTHING ON LOW- AND MEDIUM-VOLTAGE
OVERHEAD LINE SYSTEMS"*
SOUTHERN CENTRE, AT SALISBURY, 29TH MARCH, 1950
Mr. H. L. White: The cost/accident-rate graph shows that for in saying that, with a leakage voltage to earth as low as 20 volts,
three seconds in the year one person might be killed, but it does hot spots can develop in conduit in a building and may cause a
not define the particular year, so that it is probable he would fire. When I was in Manchester I gathered a lot of valuable
never be killed. To evaluate the risk of death against cost might information regarding fire risk in cotton warehouses, where there
satisfy statisticians, but is of very little value to the unfortunate is a large amount of combustible material usually stocked from
victim, and in a court of law might be a dangerous argument. floor to roof.
Mr. R. A. McCulloch: I think that the calculations employed to Regarding the earth-leakage circuit-breaker, I think it has not
ascertain comparative costs for the various methods of protective been applied because many authorities did not know how to
earthing discussed are far from reliable. For example, where a apply it. I believe that, in Germany, almost all of the service
continuous earth wire is used, the degree of safety does not earthing in the densely populated areas was based on the use of
depend in any way upon earth resistivity, and to compare the cost the earth-leakage circuit, using a thermal device which was
of attaining a degree of safety for this method with that for any manufactured by Siemens Schuckert, and the German authorities
other method, in which the degree of safety will depend upon the had very good data which proved, over a period of years, that
value of earth resistance, would surely lead to wrong conclusions, fire risks were practically negligible. I am surprised that the
since earth resistivity is likely to vary considerably with varying authorities in this country have not been able to do something
soil-conditions experienced during the year. similar.
Mr. A. Abbott: An earth resistance of 10 ohms on a 400-volt [The author's reply to the above discussion will be found on
3-phase supply to a factory would worry me. I think I am right page 292.]

NORTH-WESTERN CENTRE, AT MANCHESTER, 25TH APRIL, 1950


Mr. F. Mather: Table 3 shows that the "external risk index" installation after the initial inspection without informing the
with direct earthing by means of electrodes is likely to be 30-9. supply authority.
Without any earthing system it would be 34-2, so that little is Recommendation (Ji) (iv) calls for a test of each earth-continuity
achieved by expenditure on electrodes. The corresponding conductor at 15 amp for 1 min. This represents three times the
figure for protective multiple earthing (relaxed) is 0-94, for rated current of a 1/-044 earth conductor in the 3/ 036 t.r.s. cable
continuous earth wires it is 0-47 and for earth-leakage circuit- which is commonly used in domestic installations.
breakers it is 0-185. Protective multiple earthing offers the best In view of the extreme importance of keeping the line and
value for money and is probably safer than the figures indicate. service neutrals intact in a protective-multiple-earthing system,
If, as seems likely, breakages in neutral lines could be reduced it is suggested that the recommendations should draw attention
from 2-5 to 1 0 per 1 000 miles per annum and breakages in to this point, and particularly to the need for robust and non-
neutral service conductors from 0 1 to 0 01 per 1 000 services corrodible fittings at joints.
per annum, the risk index would fall from 0 • 94 to 0 • 32. Mr. A. L. Shaw: With reference to Section 5,1 suggest that a
In the case of the earth-leakage circuit-breaker it is doubtful number of consumers' earth-electrodes may be reduced by
whether the appliance risk (ab) and the protection risk (jnn) are utilizing the building itself as an earth electrode in certain cases.
truly random so as to give a total risk of abmn. If the regular At present, this practice is not permitted by the Institution's
testing of the circuit-breakers is neglected, mn may become Regulations for the Electrical Equipment of Buildings, e.g.
unity, in which case the risk index will become 34-2. Regulation 1004A (Buildings of Steel-Frame Construction) states:
Recommendations (a) and (6) could be more readily applied if "Metal required to be earthed may, where convenient, be con-
they called for electrodes "near" instead of "at" the transformer nected to the structural steelwork of a building provided that
and the end of each main and branch. such steelwork is itself earthed in accordance with Regulations
Recommendation (h) states that supply shall not be continued 1 005 to 1 008 inclusive."*
to any consumer unless certain requirements are observed. I suggest that, if it can be shown that a steel-frame building
This is impracticable so long as the consumer is free to alter the has a low resistance to earth, then the installation of a conven-
* Paper by L. GOSLAND (see 1950, 97, Part II, p. 563). * The building steelwork must be connected to a recognized form of earth electrode.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi