CSR New

ISO/TS 16949 Requirements Tracking Tool
QF-0914-13, issued 4/7/2003, revised 1/14//09

Facility Info - list all facilities covered by this checklist and whether they are a site or remote location. While this
tool may be used to cover multiple remote locations, it may only cover 1 site.
Name and Address Site or RL?
Project Info
File#: Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA 4th CA 5th CA Recert
(6 month) (1st Annual) (6 month) (2nd Annual) (6 month)
Date
Project #
CSR's (list all
tabs
completed
and any
additional
CSR's
assessed)
QF-0914-13 Issued:4/7/2003 Revised: 1/14/09
Instructions for Use: This tool should not be used to drive the audit, but instead should be used to ensure coverage of requirements. The
following policies are in effect for this tool (a) Not to be
carried on auditing paths (b) A single
tool will reflect each site (or stand alone RL) audit conducted, regardless of the number of auditors involved (c ) The
lead assessor is responsible for completion of the tool - it is highly recommended that the lead meet with the team at the end of each day to
review progress towards the completion (d) AR's must
be cross referenced from the report - you can put them in the box that appears in the cell
Instructions for Completion Codes - The following codes shall be used to show competion of the requirement - no other codes are allowed:
"C"=Complies, " N"=Not a
function of the QMS, may only be used for product design, " R"= QMS function
done at the RL. For non-conformances, your AR
number shall be filled in to show non-compliance. If the function is not part of the system, but is addressed in the system (e.g. no customer
supplied product), use the "C" code, unless otherwise instructed in the checklist.
Instructions for Frequency requested per TS/CSR requirement: Frequencies regarding ISO/TS 16949 requirements are identified on a
separate section on this tool, including Upgrade audits from ISO 9001:2000 or ISO9001:2008.
CSR's are to be covered as follows:
1) S2 – 100% of the requirements of the subscribing IATF OEM CSR’s shall be audited.
2) Continuous – All IATF subscribing OEM CSR’s shall be sampled as the process trail Indicates. For a new IATF subscribing customer
after the S2, all requirements must be assessed. Any revisions to the CSR’s must include an audit of the gaps from the previous revision
and noted in the TSA.
3) Triennial – Must include a sampling of all IATF subscribing OEM CSR’s linked to 7.3, 8.2.4, 8.2.4.1and 8.3. If there is lack of compliance
on the majority of those requirements, a Major AR must be issued and 100% of CSR need to be verified during the OSV/SA. (See CSR's
highlighted in red)
4) Any other customers (non subscribing IATF OEM, non OEM – Tier 1, Customers requesting compliance and non-subscribers) can be
assessed during any part of the cycle.
5) All Audits – All subscribing customers with documented CSR’s that are included in
the scope of the audit shall be listed in the Report.
Use of the tool for Stand-alone RL Audits - This should be completed for the clauses (and CSR's) related to the primary function of the RL and
any secondary clause requirements (e.g. records, control of documents) at the RL location. There is no need to fill in the balance of the tool for the
requirements that would be not applicable to the RL
Probations/Limited Reassessments - This tool is not to be used to document the results of Probation audits or limited reassessments. In these
cases, the turtle should be used to document the evidence observed.
QF-0914-13 Revised: 10/22/07

Use of Turtles - The turtle form should be used to document evidence observed. No other form of notetaking (e.g. Detail notes, client documents,
CSR mark-ups) may be used
CSR Revisions - Each CSR map is based on the revision in effect as follows:Ford (Aug 08), GM (Sep 08), CX (Sep 08), VW FormelQ, Sept 1998,
Renault ANPQP (2, March 2007), BMW QMT Requirements (V 1.9), Fiat Group (as published on Jan 09 in IATF web page)
As subsequent revisions will likely be released, the Lead should note the date of the new requirement, the CSR requirement affected,
indicate when audited and whether compliance was noted. This tool is intended to be used for 1 complete cycle of the life of the
certificate - updated tools should not be used until the cycle is complete. It will be understood that for subsequent audits that the
requirement referenced in the main portion of the tool is the updated requirement.
NOTE - The descriptions contained herein are summaries - this is not intended to replace the specification or CSR's. In cases where the
verbiage of the requirement is not included herein, and an AR is raised against the requirement, the AR should be noted based on the
clause number (or CSR section number).
QF-0914-13 Revised: 10/22/07

TS Requirement Upgrade ISO 9k2k Every Visit Annual Triennial
4.1 X X X
4.2 X X X
5.1 X X X
5.2 X X X
5.3 X X X
5.4 X X X
5.5 X X X
5.6 X X X
6.1 X
6.3 X
6.4 X
7.1 X X X
7.2 X X X
7.3 X X X
7.4 X X
7.5 X X X
7.6 X X
8.1 X X
8.3 X X
8.4 X X X
8.5 X X X
4.2.3 X
4.2.3.1 X
4.2.4 X X X
6.2.1 X
6.2.2 X
6.2.2.1 X X X
6.2.2.2 X X
6.2.2.3 X X
6.2.2.4 X X
6.3.1 X X
6.3.2 X X
7.5.1.4 X X
7.5.1.5 X X
7.5.1.6 X X
7.5.1.7 X
7.5.2 X X
7.5.3 X X
7.5.4 X X
7.5.5 X
8.1.1 X X
8.1.2 X X
8.2.1 X X X
8.2.2 X X X
8.2.3 X X
8.2.4 X
8.2.4.1 X X
8.2.4.2 X X
QF-0914-13 Rev 1/14/09

Once in the CA cycle
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
QF-0914-13 Rev 1/14/09

Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 1st 3rd CA 4th CA 5th CA
Reference the Turtle Number(s) for evidence (6 month) Annual (6 month) (2nd Annual) (6 month)
of coverage of the following requirements
document/engineering spec control process
management review processes
training process
quoting, contracting and order entry
If product design is excluded, check here
product or process design
quality planning
design changes
purchasing process
purchased products verification process
production processes
production part approval process
preventive maintenance processes
tooling management processes
packaging and shipping processes
calibration and MSA processes

customer satisfaction
internal audits
disposition of non-conforming product
continual improvement
corrective action
other significant process (add it)
Recert
"C"=Complies, "N"=Not a function of the QMS, may only be used for product design, "R"= QMS function done at the RL. For non-conformances, your A
number shall be filled in to show non-compliance. If the function is not part of the system, but is addressed in the system (e.g. no customer supplied prod
use the "C" code, unless otherwise instructed in the checklist.
Ford TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA (6 4th CA

Reqt Clause (6 month) 1st Annual month) (2nd Annual)
Map
Requirement
4.1 4.2.2 Scope of Quality Manual
4.2 4.2.3 Control of documents - Specific

call out for Ford external
documents
4.3 4.2.3.1, Engineering Specs - organizations

7.3.5 and subcontractors comply with W-
HTX and CQI-9. Annual
assessment.
4.4 4.2.4 Control of Records - Defines

records retention. Requires
inspection records to show results
(no pass/fail)
4.5 5.2, 8.2.4, Customer Focus - Meet

8.5.1 Continuous Improvement
requirements of Q1, demonstrated
via QOS.
4.6 5.6, 5.1 Customer Representative - Notify

STA in 10 days for changes to
senior management or company
ownership
4.7 5.6, 5.1 Management Review - Hold
monthly QOS. QOS part of senior
management review.
4.8 5.6.2 Management Review Input - Input

includes Q1 Manufacturing site
assessment results
4.9 6.2.2, Training - Only trained and

6.2.2.3, qualified people work on Ford parts.
6.2.2.4 Training include current processes
and requirements.
4.10 6.2.2.2, Provision of resources - when

6.3.1, considering RFQ, the organization
6.2.2, must account for all necessary
6.2.2.1 resources (trained personnel and
equipment)
4.11 6.3.1, Plant, Facility and Equipment

7.3.3.2, Planning - Evidence of Lean
5.1.1 Manufacturing implementation
plans required
4.12 6.3.2 Contingency Plans - Plant, Buyer

and STA must be notified in 24
hours of production interruption,
along with actions taken to ensure
supply.
4.13 6.4.2 Cleanliness of Premises -

Dunnage included in this
requirement
4.14 7.1, 7.3.1 Planning of Product Realization -

Organization must meet Q&R SOW
4.14 7.3.4.1, Planning of Product Realization -
7.3.1 Organization shall report APQP
Status
4.14 7.3.6.2 Planning of Product Realization -

Data from prototype fab must be
used to plan production. PIST and
PIPC necessary if required by STA.
4.15 7.1.2 Acceptance Criteria - Tables A & B

of Ford CSR required for
qualification of product
characteristics and on-going
monitoring
4.16 7.2.1 Customer Related Processes -

Manufacturing sites to report
materials per WSS-M99P9999-A1
4.17 7.2.2.1 Review of requirements related

to product - supplemental -
Customer authorization for waiving
review may be obtained from the
buyer and when appropriate the
Engineer
4.18 7.2.2.2 Manufacturing Feasibility -

Feasibility reviews shall include
supplier and Ford engineering, as
appropriate.
4.18 7.2.2.2 Manufacturing Feasibility -
Production volume changes
increasing volume by 20% or more
over previous verified capacity
require full volume feasibility
studies
4.19 7.2.3.1 Customer communication -

supplemental - Assistance in C3P
or legacy data system compatibility
with Ford CAD
4.20 7.3.3.2 Multidisciplinary Approach -

PFMEA and Control plans for
inverted Delta components
approved by Ford Engineering and
STA

DFMEA's for inverted delta
components approved by Ford
Engineering

FMEA and Control plan approvals
obtained prior to PPAP submission

Revisions to P/DFMEAs and
Control Plans for inverted delta
components also approved
4.20 7.3.3.2 Multidisciplinary Approach - Use

of Family PFMEA approved by STA.
Use of Family DFMEA approved by
Ford Engineering
FMEAs meet Ford Handbook
requirements
4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach - All

7.5.1.1 Ford parts have control plans. The
control plans focus on prevention
rather than detection.
4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach -

7.5.1.1 Repaired/Reworked products re-
inspected in accordance with
control plan and/or procedures
4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach - If

8.2.3.1 high degree of capability on SC's,
control plan changes can be
requested via SREA
4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach - For

7.4.3.1 Control Item Fasteners, heat
treated parts, prior to release of
metal from a mill heat, sample
analyzed and tested for
conformance. Sample from each
additional coil/bundle in the heat
also tested. (applicable to
purchased material and material
produced by the organization)
4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach - For
7.4.3.1 control item fasteners, non-heat
treated parts, material identification
shall be visually checked to
determine mill heat number agrees
with steel suppliers mill analysis
document. Each coil/bundle tested
for hardness and other physical
properties.
4.20 7.5.3 Multidisciplinary Approach - For

control item fasteners, lot
traceability shall be maintained
4.21 7.3.2.3, SC's - The organization contacted
7.2.1.1 Ford Engineering to obtain
concurrence to use Ford symbols.
4.22 7.3.4, Design and Development Review

7.3.1, - The organization shall use GPDS
7.3.6.1 when reviewing product design and
development stages
4.22 7.3.4, Design and Development Review

7.3.1, - For inverted delta parts, design
7.3.6.1 responsible suppliers include Ford
Eng. And Assbly/Manf. in GPDS
milestone reviews and design
reviews.
4.23 7.3.5 Design and Development

Verification - Perform DV to show
conformance with Ford Vehicle
Design Spec and System design
Spec.
4.24 7.3.6.2 Prototype Program - The
organization is responsible for the
quality of it's prototype parts
4.25 7.3.6.3 PPAP - Comply with PPAP manual.

Subcontractors must meet all
requirements of PPAP.
4.25 7.3.6.3 PPAP - All design change requests

must be made via WERS. Process
changes requests via SREA
4.25 7.3.6.3 PPAP - Run at Rate
4.26 7.4.1.1 Regulations - Regulations include

international export requirements
as specified by Ford and ELV.
4.27 7.4.1.2 Subcontractor Development -

Subcontractor s can meet the
requirement via registration to TS02
or ISO9001:2000 or via
assessment by STA approved 2nd
party
4.27 7.4.1.2 Subcontractor Development -

Subcontractor list updated twice
annually
4.28 7.4.1.3 Customer Approved Sources -

When required, subcontractor
approval shall be obtained from the
Ford buyer and STA.
4.29 7.4.3.1 Incoming Part Quality - The
organization shall have incoming
quality measures and use them as
a key indicator of subcontractor
quality management.
4.30 7.4.3.2 Scheduling Subcontractors - The

organization shall require 100%
OTD from subcontractors.
Premium Freight should be
monitored and minimized.
4.31 7.5.1.2 Job Instructions - Operators use

the most current job instructions
4.32 7.5.1.3 Verification of Job Set-ups - Set-

up verification includes manual tool
exchanges. Records of set-up
verification retained for 1 year.
4.33 7.5.1.4 PM - The organization shall have a

documented system for PM,
including timely review of planned
maintenance activities and an
action plan to address any backlog.
Action plans are to be included as
part of management review.
4.34 7.5.3 ID, Traceability, Preservation,

Storage and Inventory - The
organization meets all requirements
of MP&L

organization complies with MS-
9000, MMOG or Odette
organization maintains annual
certification to the above
4.34 7.5.3, ID, Traceability, Preservation,

7.5.5 Storage and Inventory - The
organization maintains lot
traceability through shipping
(including subcontracted
components associated to FMVSS)

organization uses Ford form 1121R

Storage and Inventory - For
inverted delta parts, the inverted
delta symbol precedes the Ford
Part Number on the label
4.35 7.6.1 MSA - All gauges used for

checking parts per control plan
have GR&R performed. Any gauge
not meeting requirements of MSA
manual approved by STA
4.35 7.6.1 MSA - Use of family MSA

approved by STA
4.35 7.6.1 MSA - Variable gage studies use

10 parts, 3 operators, 3 trials.
Attribute gage studies use 50 parts,
3 operators, 3 trials.
4.36 7.6.3 Lab Requirements -
Commercial/Independent labs
approved by organization prior to
use. Approval based on ISO 17025
and documented. Alternate
methods of approval accepted by
STA.
4.37 8.1.1, Statistical Tools and concepts -

8.1.2 Organization uses the latest edition
of AIAG SPC, MSA and VDA
Volume 4 Part 1 as appropriate
4.38 8.2.1.1 Customer Satisfaction - Notify

registrar in 5 working days in case
of Q1 revocation.
4.38 8.2.1.1 Customer Satisfaction - At least

twice per year, the organization
shall communicate customer sat
metrics to all employees who affect
the quality of Ford parts.
4.39 8.2.2 Internal Quality Audits - Internal

audits of the processes shall be
conducted at least annually
4.39 8.2.2 Internal Quality Audits - The

internal auditors shall be trained per
4.39.1 or 4.39.2. The trainer must
be successfully qualified.
4.40 8.2.3.1 Monitoring and Measurement of

manufacturing processes - All
process controls shall have a goal
of reduction of variability and all
process metrics shall be traceable
to Ford requirements
4.41 8.2.4 Monitoring and Measurement of
Product - ES test failures stop
production. Ford Engineering, the
STA and the using plant are
immediately notified, shipments
suspended and suspect lots
identified.
4.41 8.2.4 Monitoring and Measurement of

Product - PV testing frequencies
shall be noted in the control plan
and PFMEA.
4.42 8.2.4.1 Layout Inspection and Functional

Testing - Performed annually.
Measurements documented on
CFG-1003 or equivalent
4.43 8.2.4.2 Appearance Items - When process

or environment can affect
craftsmanship, the organization
shall implement processes and
measures such as Ford Global
Craftsmanship. These shall be
implemented in the control plan and
APQP reporting.
4.44 8.3 Control of Non-Conforming

Product - 8D methodology used.
Containment and root cause in 5
days for QR's. Full 8D in 10 days.
4.44 8.3, 8.5.3 Control of Non-Conforming
Product - documented system for
internal notification, analysis and
communication for returned
product. Ford PPM communicated
to all plant team members.
4.44 8.3, 8.5.3 Control of Non-Conforming

Product - Returned product test
results included in monthly QOS
report as part of the Management
Review
4.45 8.3.4 Customer Waiver - WERS system

used for waivers
Revision History - Note any revisions to the CSR's below, including rev date, paragraph affected and whether compliance was noted
Revision Level Changes (list CSR paragraph numbers or indicators as above) Date Audited Complies/NA/AR
Aug-08
he RL. For non-conformances, your AR
stem (e.g. no customer supplied product),
5th CA Recert
(6 month)
nce was noted
Complies/NA/AR
"C"=Complies, "N"=Not a function of the QMS, may only be used for product design, "R"= QMS function done at the RL. For non-conformances, your AR
number shall be filled in to show non-compliance. If the function is not part of the system, but is addressed in the system (e.g. no customer supplied
product), use the "C" code, unless otherwise instructed in the checklist.
DCX TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA 4th CA 5th CA

Reqt Clause (6 month) 1st Annual (6 month) (2nd Annual) (6 month)
Map
Requirement
4.1.1 4.2.4.1 Records Retention - Retention
times meet CX minimum
requirements
4.1.2 7.3.7 Design Changes - design

changes shall have written CX
approval or waiver prior to
production implementation.
4.1.3 7.3.6.3 PPAP - The organization shall

comply with PPAP. The
organization shall require PPAP
from it's suppliers.
4.1.4 5.5.2.1 Deleted
4.1.5 7.4.1.2 Supplier Quality Management

System Development -
Assessment by OEM or OEM
approved second party (rules
for approval defined). Requires
decision criteria for 'small
suppliers.
4.2.2 7.1, 7.3 Product Creation Process -

AQP used as part of product
creation process. Organization
shall use AQP method. N/A for
NEA office
4.2.3 7.3.2.3 Special Characteristics Not
Identified with Symbols -
Suppliers (if applicable)
should be knowledgeable of
the following standards: PF-
Homologation <H>, PS-
10125<T>, and
AS-10119<A>.
4.2.4 7.3.2.3 The Shield - defines the shield

as related to safety or
regulatory.
4.2.5 7.3.2.3 The Diamond - defines the

diamond as key to functional or
customer acceptance.
4.2.6 8.2.4.1 Annual Layout - Complete

annual layout, including all sub-
components, shall be required
for all parts (unless waived in
writing by CX)
4.2.7 7.3.5/6 Design Verification and

Product Validation - Defines
DV as tests, inspections and
procedures that must be
accomplished before
production to verify design
intent. Defines PV as tests to
validate production tooling,
methods and processes. DV
and PV must be done prior to
PSO.
4.2.8 8.2.4 Continuing Conformance -

CC tests shall be performed
during the model year
4.2.9 8.2.2 Internal Quality Audits -
minimum frequency is annual,
Includes Elements of
Manufacturing
4.2.9.1 8.2.2.2 Layered Process Audit-
Production part and component
manufacturing plants shall
conduct LPA's
4.2.9.1 8.2.2.2 Layered Process Audits-

Audit to involve mulitple levels
in the org. Top management
must conduct an LPA once a
week (no delegation)
4.2.9.1 8.2.2.2 Layered Process Audits - LPA

structure must be documented
(auditor level and frequency).
Process control audits 1x per
shift for build techniques and
craftmanship related
processes. Error-proofing
audits daily.
4.2.9.1 8.2.2.2 Layered Process Audits -

Compliance charts completed
monthly. Reaction plans to
resolve LPA non-
conformances. Corrective
action required (with
containment and root cause).
Communication process for
non-conformances noted
required.
4.2.9.2 8.2.2.2 Compliance to CQI-9 2nd ed,
CQI-11 & CQI-12: extensive to
suppliers of the organization
(7.4.1.2)
4.2.10 8.5.2 Corrective Action Plan- CX 8

Step required for issues not in
e-CIMS
4.2.11 8.5.2 eCIMS- Organization shall

have two individuals at each
location who have completed
CX eCIMS training.
4.2.12 8.2.4.2 Appearance Masters -

Masters for color, gloss and
texture shall be approved by
the CX Design Office
4.2.13 7.5.5 Packaging, Shipping and

Labeling - Organizations shall
be familiar and comply with CX
Packaging, Shipping and
Labeling Instructions.
4.2.14 7.6.3.1 Process Approval - PSO

must be completed by the
Product Team, prior to PPAP.
Parts out of production for 12
months require a PSO. N/A for
NEA office
4.2.15 7.5.1.1 PFMEAs and Control Plans -

Required for prototype, pre-
launch and production phases
4.2.16 7.2.3 Forever Requirements -
Extended Enterprise- The
organization shall communicate
with CX on changes that may
impact product quality,
including notification to the
Supplier Quality, Engineering
and Purchasing agent on
material changes, process
changes and location changes,
supplier issues and potential
supply and capacity issues.
4.2.17 7.2.3 Electronic Communication -

Establish a connection for
electronic communication
through the Global Supplier
Portal.
Sep-08
on-conformances, your AR
g. no customer supplied
Recert
oted
mplies/NA/AR
GM Reqt TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA (6 4th CA 5th CA

Clause (6 month) 1st Annual month) (2nd Annual) (6 month)
Map
Requirement
4.1.1 7.5.1.5
Tooling requirements not
applicable in warehouses or
distribution centers
4.1.2 4.2.4 Records - Retention times
meet GM minimum
requirements
4.1.3 7.2.3.1 Electronic Communication -

For NAO organizations,
examples include 830, 862,866
and EDIFACT
4.1.4 7.2.3.1 ASN - For NAO organizations,

examples include 856 and
EDIFACT
4.1.5 7.2.1.1 Special Characteristics - The

organization shall use KCDS
definitions and symbology
(GMW 15049)
4.1.6 7.3.7 Design Changes - Design

changes need written customer
approval or waiver prior to
implementation
4.1.8 7.3.6.3 PPAP - the organization shall

comply with AIAG PPAP
4.1.9 8.2.1 Customer Satisfaction -
trends in quality system
performance and customer
satisfaction shall be compared
with competitors or appropriate
benchmarks and reviewed by
top management
4.1.10 8.2.2.5 Internal Auditor

Qualifications - Internal
auditors should be qualified as
recommended in ISO 19011.
Internal auditors should be
qualified and competent in the
process approach, core tools
and GM CSR's.
4.1.11 7.4.1.2 Supplier QMS Development

(cl 7.4.1.2) - Clarification of
type of supplier included
4.1.11.2 7.4.1.2 Customer Acceptance of 2nd

Party Audits and criteria fro
approval
4.1.11.3 7.4.1.2 Supplier Development for

small suppliers- decision
criteria and written evidence of
acceptance by the
Organization
4.1.12 8.2.2 Heat Treating Process- CQI-

9. 2nd ed
4.1.13 8.2.2 Plating System Assessment -
CQI-11
4.1.14 8.2.2 Coating System Assessment
- CQI-12
4.2.2 4.2.3 General Procedures and
Other Requirements - the
organization shall verify current
versions of GM documents
annually
4.2.2.1 7.3.6, Pre-production/Pilot Material

7.5.5 Shipping Procedure
(GM1407)
4.2.2.2 7.5.5 Shipping Parts Identification

Label Standard, (GM 1724).
4.2.2.3 7.5.3 Component Verification &

Traceability Procedure (GM
1730) - EXPIRED
4.2.2.4 7.5.3, Traceability Identifier
7.5.5 Equipment (GM 1731)
4.2.2.5 7.5.5 Bar Code Standard for

Part/Component/Module
Identification and Traceability
(GM 1737)
4.2.2.6 8.2.1, 8.1 Supplier Quality Processes

and Measures Procedure
(GM 1746)
4.2.2.7 8.5.1 Continuous Improvement

Procedure (GM1747)
4.2.2.8 7.6.3.2 GP-10 Eval and Accreditation

Test Facilities (GM 1796/A)
4.2.2.9 7.5.5 Shipping and Delivery
Performance Requirements
(GM 1797)
4.2.2.10 7.3.2.3 Key Characteristic

Designation System (GM
1805 QN). GMW-15049
replaces GM 1805 QN in MY
2009Global programs and all
other on 2010
4.2.2.11 7.3.6.2 GP-11 General procedure for

Pre-Prototype and Prototype
Material (GM 1820)
4.2.2.12 6.3 C4 Technology Program (GM

1825)
4.2.2.13 7.3.6.3 GP-12 Early Production

Containment Procedure (GM
1920)
4.2.2.14 7.3.6.3 Run-at-Rate Procedure (GM

1960)
4.2.4 7.5.5 UPC Labeling for

Commercial Service
Applications - SPO requires
use of UPC labeling instead of
AIAG labeling for certain
applications.
4.2.8 8.2.1.1 Certification Body
Notification and Certification
Status - NBH-Q - CB must be
notified in 5 business days after
being placed on NBH-Q
4.2.9 8.2.1.1 Certification Body

Notification and Certification
Status - CSII - site must notify
Registrar within 5 business
days
4.2.10 5.6 Management Review -

Management Review of quality
system performance shall be
conducted at planned intervals,
not less than annually
5.1 to 7.3.6.3 PPAP - the organization shall

5.3 comply with AIAG PPAP
5.4 7.3.6.3 Driver codes id on GM1411
5.5 7.3.6.3 GM 1411 to be submitted

when PPAP status is not
'approved' (e.g. Saleable or
Non-Saleable)
Sep-08
n-conformances, your AR
Recert
ted
mplies/NA/AR
Formel TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA (6 4th CA 5th CA

Q Reqt Clause (6 month) 1st Annual month) (2nd Annual) (6 month)
Map
Requirement
1.1-15 4.2 QMS Requirements - Develop
and maintain a QMS that meets
industry Standard. The balance
of these requirements pertain to
VW's Formel Q auditing program
and award.
2.1 5.4.1.1 Preparation of quality

business plan - highlights
startegic and operational quality
objectives, tied to targets. Must
be updated at regular intervals.
2.2 5.5.2 Nomination of Quality Officers

- contact person, equilalent of
mgmt rep. Must be on written
org chart, with names of officers
and deputies.
2.3 7.2 Nomination of Order overseer

- Person for each product order
to ensure management to
schedule.
2.4 7.3 Scheduling - Must use standard

flow project plan, with key dates
identified.
2.5 7.2 Ascertainment and prompt
implementation of customer
wishes - apply procedure to
translate voice of customer into
technical prescriptions and
designs.
2.6 7.2.2.2 Feasibility studies-conduct

studies and security runs for new
products, product mods, process
and procedure mods.
2.7 5.4.1 Zero-defect strategy - goal is

zero defects
2.8 7.3 FMEA for products and

processes - Use FMEA for
allphases of product creation
and use. Required for new
products and processes and
modifications
2.9 7.3 Process flow diagrams -

required as part of the process
development (defines content)
2.10 7.5.1.1 Control Plan - Develop control

plan and include SC's.
2.11 7.3 Test Equipment Planning -
Develop test equipment plan for
what equipment used to
measure various characteristics.
Capability study required for test
quipment
2.12 7.3 Operational Equipment
Planning - develop plan to
ensure suitable machinery and
equipment, with proven machine
capability and adequate
employee training.
2.13 7.5.1.4 Planning of PM - Develop a PM

system. Develop contingency
plans. Develop PM plan. Write
maintenance manuals.
2.14 7.5.5 Packaging planning - Prior to

series production, org must
agree to packaging decision with
client and conduct packaging
audit.
2.15 6.2.2.2 Personnel qualification -

Record existing qualifications.
Determine reequired training.
2.16 NA Environmental Protection and

recycling - Parts must be
identieid. Supplier must indicate
recycling concepts or disposal
methods. Sample reports give
material origin, with chemical
composition of materials
3.1(most 7.3 3.1.3 - develop list of

ly VE specs/requirements based on
activities clinet info 3.1.4 - SC's on
)` drawings, identified by CFT
3.2.1 7.3 Qual program for new parts - a
schedule should be maintained
for the part qualification
3.2.2 7.3 Dimensional Stability Forcast -

produce measurement record of
parts to importance
characteristics and calculate
stability indicator MI.
3.2.3 7.3 Process capability forecast -

selected important
characteristics calcualte the PI
during prototype or pre-series
runs. Min requirements defined
in CSR.
3.2.4 7.3.6.3 First samples and approval

conditions - manf. Under series
conditions, must be delivered
with inspection report and
include EU safety info sheet.
The VDA booklet requirements
apply to sub-suppliers. (this is
like PPAP- defines approval and
submittal processes)
3.2.5 7.3 Pre-production run - defines

timing for 2 day pre-production
run. Defines criteria for pre-
production runs, and approval.
3.2.6 4.2 Quality Management

handbook - produce one and
keep it up to date. Guiding
principle is ISO.
4.1 8.2.3.1 Ascertainment of ongoing
rocess capability - requires
long-term observation of the
process, required for important
characteristics.
4.2 7.5 Control of Manf. Processes -

achieved through montioring
SC's, process parameters
4.3 8.2.2 Internal Audit System - Internal

audits carried out at set intervals
4.4 8.2.2.2 Conduct of Internal Process

Audits - Basis is procedures
and process specs. Defines
when process audits should be
done. Defines output of process
audits - and requires
documentation.
4.5 8.2.2.3 Conduct of Internal Product

Audits - Defines what a product
audit is, and hat product is to be
scrutinized from view of client.
Defines output as measures for
rectification.
4.6 7.6 Measuring and test equipment

for important characteristics -
be able to fully measure and test
the function of parts by PV.
4.7 7.6 Calibration of measuring and
test equipment - precision must
be documented. Calibrations
recorded and gages marked,
including next due date.
4.8 7.3 Conduct and record of

reliability test - carry out
reliability tests in production and
design. Test frequency/sample
per control plan
4.9 4.2.4 Quality data - Keep records for

defined time periods - defines
the retention time for some
quality records
4.10 7.5.3 Parts ID in manfacturing -

defines that materials, semi-
finished and finished products
be identified and stored in such
ways that they are clearly
identified. "D" parts marked in
containers as such.
4.11 8.3.4 Application for Deviation

Approval - Deviations applied
in writing to VW design group
4.12 8.5.2.4 Analysis of returns - Returns

must be analysed. Latsing
corrective action must be taken.
4.13 5.6.2.1 Field Observation - Supplier to

analyse the info and where
applicable initiate corrective
measures
4.14 7.3 Product safety and product
liability - Increase safety of
parts for manf and purchased
and minimize liability risk.
Includes high level of quality
awareness in company, empasis
on product safety in planning,
action take to reduce occurance
of safety failures, etc.
4.15 7.4 Qualification of sub-suppliers

- communication on SC's, use of
quality assurance systems with
suppliers
4.16 7.5.3 Disruption case limitation -

must be able to pin-point
problems and trace to batch in
case of issue, including trace to
sub-supplier level. Supplier
must design a traceability
system to ensure this.
4.17 5.6 Ascertainment of product

related defect costs - install a
system to monitor this.
. no customer supplied
Recert
ed
mplies/NA/AR
PSA TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA (6 4th CA

Map
Requirement
NO GLOBAL CSR (REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY APPLY, I.E. BRAZIL)
5th CA Recert
(6 month)
nce was noted
Complies/NA/AR
Fiat TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA (6 4th CA

Map
Requirement
1 5.5.2.1
Customer rep from the quality or
technical area
2 7.2.1
IMDS
3 7.3.2.3
Id of special characteristics Q
4 8.2.4.1
Layout inspections and materials
control every year. Complete self-
qualification every two years
5 8.5.2.4
Participation in the Tutorship and
Field Management programs if
required
6 8.2.1 Analyze customer satisfaction
factors monthly
7 7.3.6.3
Product Approval process on
suppliers based on Fiat-like
methodologies or the one validated
by the SQE
No rev date, posted
on IATF web page
5th CA Recert
(6 month)
nce was noted
Complies/NA/AR
Renault TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA (6 4th CA

Reqmt Clause (6 month) 1st Annual month) (2nd Annual)
Map
Requirement
ANPQP 7.3 Product Process Concept Proposal at
Phase 1, the time of the RFQ submission
1.1
ANPQP 7.3.3 Product Quality and Reliability Study

Phase 1, Plan, methods to achieve targets for
1.2 Quality and Reliability
ANPQP 7.4.1 Definition of a Product Development

Phase 1, System for sub-suppliers (meeting
1.3 TS16949 requirements), List of Sub
Suppliers. The procedure must be
included in the Supplier Quality Plan
ANPQP 5.1, 7.3.4 Senior Management to review Quality

Phase 1, Plan and Quality System Procedures,
1.4 as well as compliance to TS16949.
Senior Management Support Meeting
Minutes available upon Renault/Nissan
request
ANPQP 8.2.1 Action Plan to achieve Customer's QCD

Phase 1, Targets
1.5
ANPQP 7.5.5 ANPQP Logistic data Sheet

Phase 1,
1.6
ANPQP 7.3.3 Analysis of Design Failure and Effects
Phase 2, (if product is subject to simultaneous
2.1 engineering, also the Analysis of
Process Failure and Effects). Use of
DFMEA or FTA, and AMDEC
ANPQP 7.3.3 List of supplier constraints, results of

Phase 2, preliminary product study and test,
2.2 sensitivity to process variations, Results
of the Analysis of process Failure and
Effects
ANPQP 7.3.5 ANPQP Supplier Test Report (Design

Phase 2, Verification), including calculation
2.3 (performance, function, durability,
reliability, dimensional, etc) and Final
design verfiication/validation plan
ANPQP 7.3.4 Design reviews according to schedule,

Phase 2, record on Design Review Record and
2.4 List of Project hazards
ANPQP 7.3.6 Develope Prototype Control Plan,

Phase 2, Control Plan Key Features Diagram and
2.5 Process Flow Charts
ANPQP 7.3.3 Develope of Engineering Product Specs

Phase 2, and Drawings, including test specs,
2.6 material specs, special chars, technical
design goals (function, performance,
reliability, etc).
ANPQP 7.3.7 Design change requests supported by

Phase 2, Design Notes or approval from
2.7 Renault/Nissan
ANPQP 7.3.3 Equipment, gauges and tooling for new
Phase 2, product, incorporated into the Supplier
2.8 Master Schedule, Supplier Plan,
ANPQP Gauge Specification &
Approval Sheet, Installation Plan and
Floor Plan Lay-out
ANPQP 7.3.2 Special Products and Process

Phase 2, Characteristics (Important A, Important
2.9 B, OBD, MLIT) id on Control Plan,
drawings, and Process Flow Chart
ANPQP 5.1, 7.3.4 Senior Management Support Meeting

Phase 2, Minutes available upon Renault/Nissan
2.10 request
ANPQP 7.3.3, Review of logistics route and packaging

Phase 2, 7.5.5 styles, develope Logistics Data Sheet
2.11 and Packaging Specification Sheet
ANPQP 7.3.3 Develope of a Preliminary Process Flow

Phase 2, Chart
2.12
ANPQP 7.3.3 Develope of a Design Assurance Plan

Phase 2,
2.13
ANPQP 7.3.1 Develope of a Supplier Master

Phase 2, Schedule
2.14
ANPQP 7.3.3 Record of concerns that could affect

Phase 2, QCD
2.15
ANPQP 7.2.2/7.3.3 To fix the design and the tooling
Phase 2, release, the supplier must confirm their
2.16 ability to achieve Renault and / or
Nissan QCD targets, this will be
demonstrated on agreed relevant
project documentation and the
Suppliers feasibility commitment
ANPQP 7.3.3 The supplier will carry out an analysis

Phase 2, (e.g. QFD, FTA, HCPP or analysis of
2.17 failure & effects) to understand the
relationship between part & process
characteristics and manufacturing steps
ANPQP 7.3.3 The supplier's multi-function team shall

Phase 2, make an initial plan within ANPQP
2.18 Phase 2, on how to study process
capability, based upon the available
product and process information and
appropriate assumptions
ANPQP 7.3.4 The supplier shall generate the Supplier

Phase 2, Plan, which will be used at subsequent
2.19 stages of Production Preparation
Monitoring to provide the basis of the
Supplier Plan Status Report. This
document is the primary document for
overall project monitoring.
ANPQP 7.3.3/7.5.5 Packaging Specification document is

Phase 3, completed and submitted for cross-
3.1 functional approval at Renault and / or
Nissan
ANPQP 7.1 The supplier to review the
Phase 3, manufacturing location quality system
3.2 procedures / quality plan (including
project specific design assurance plans)
and other appropriate documentation.
ANPQP 7.3.3 Develope of Process Flow Chart (see

Phase 3, 2.12)
3.3
ANPQP 7.3.3/6.3.1 Develope of a Floor Plant Lay Out
Phase 3, to determine the acceptability of
3.4 Inspection points, Control Chart
location, the applicability of Visual
Aids, Process Instructions, Interim
Repair stations and storage areas
for defective material
ANPQP 7.3.3 Analysis of Process Failure and Effects

Phase 3, using AMDEC or PFMEA
3.5
ANPQP 7.3.3/7.5.1 Develope of Pre-Production / Pre-
Phase 3, Launch Control Plan
3.6
ANPQP 7.3.3,/7.1 Develope of Process Instructions
Phase 3,
3.7
ANPQP 7.3.3/7.1 Develope of the Final Process
Phase 3, Capability Study Plan
3.8
ANPQP 5.1/7.3.4 Senior Management Support Meeting
Phase 3, Minutes available upon Renault/Nissan
3.9 request
ANPQP 7.3.6 Validation of Off-tool Condition,

Phase 3, providing Inspection Reports
3.10
ANPQP 7.3.4 At the Production Preparation
Phase 3, Monitoring meetings (or alternative
3.11 confirmation activity) target performance
against actual achievement shall be
reviewed to give Renault and / or
Nissan and the supplier a clear
understanding of current project status
ANPQP 7.3.4 To carry out internal design reviews to

Phase 3, confirm progress against the plans to
3.12 achieve the product and process targets
ANPQP 7.3.6 The supplier shall make trial builds in

Phase 4, line with Renault and / or Nissan
4.1 product specification, volume & timing
requirements. At each individual trial,
the criteria specified in the Supplier Plan
shall be met.
ANPQP 7.3.3 The supplier's multi-function team shall

Phase 4, carry out the process capability study,
4.2 using the final plan and products
manufactured off the production
process.
ANPQP 7.3.6 Supplier shall submit the Part

Phase 4, Submission Warrant to Renault and / or
4.3 Nissan with the necessary attachments
ANPQP 7.3.6 The supplier must validate the off-tool

Phase 4, and off-process product through tests to
4.4 confirm that the product achieves the
performance / function / reliability
targets. The 'Supplier Test Report' is
used for Product and Process Validation
ANPQP 7.3.6 Validation of the packaging condition
Phase 4, compared to the 'ANPQP Packaging
4.5 Specification' and 'ANPQP Logistics
Data' documents
ANPQP 7.3.3/7.5.1 Develope the Supplier Production Plan,

Phase4, it is an extension of the Pre-Production
4.6 Control Plan based on process
experience up to full-volume conditions.
ANPQP 5.1/7.3.4 A formal internal review (or reviews),

Phase 4, between the supplier's multi-function
4.7 team and the senior management must
be done, to be scheduled to reinforce
the Supplier's Senior Management
commitment by informing Supplier's
Senior Management of programme
status against the Renault and / or
Nissan QCD project development
targets and gaining their assistance in
resolving any open issues
ANPQP 7.3.4/8.2.2 Suppliers shall review / audit their

Phase 4, process prior to the start of volume
4.8 production. The activity shall be carried
out during a trial volume production run
representative of the proposed final
conditions for man, material, machine
and method.The supplier shall create a
plan detailing their proposed activities
during Ramp Up.
ANPQP 7.3.4 At the Production Preparation
Phase 4, Monitoring meetings (or alternative
4.9 confirmation activity) target performance
against actual achievement shall be
reviewed to give Renault and / or
Nissan and the supplier a clear
understanding of current project status.
ANPQP 7.3.4 The supplier's multi-function team is

Phase 4, required to carry out internal design
4.10 reviews to confirm progress against the
plans to achieve the product and
process targets at each phase of
ANPQP
ANPQP 8.1, 8.2.3 The supplier shall monitor process

Phase 5, variation using the appropriate method
5.1 e.g Control chart etc.
Where process variation does not
achieve Renault and / or Nissan
requirements the supplier shall establish
root cause(s) and implement effective
countermeasure
ANPQP 8.2.1 The supplier must have a system that

Phase 5, obtains, and reacts to Renault and / or
5.2 Nissan feedback. Feedback will be
based on QCD.
ANPQP 7.5.1, The supplier's additional ramp-up

Phase 5, 8.2.3 activities shall be documented in a
5.3 Ramp Up Plan (Early Stage Instability
Control) for Nissan or similar document
for Renault. This document may exist
independently or as an attachment to
the control documents e.g. ANPQP
Control Plan, ANPQP Control Plan Key
Features Diagram.
ANPQP 7.1 Potential impact of process changes,
Phase 5, Renault and / or Nissan require
5.4 notification via a change management
plan. The Process Change / Facility Site
Transfer document shall be used
ANPQP 7.1, 7.3.7 There will be certain situations when a

Phase 5, supplier may wish to request a design
5.5 change. These situations may be
brought about by new material
availability, ease of manufacture, cost
reduction, etc. The requirement is to
submit an 'ANPQP Design Change
Request' document to the relevant
Renault and / or Nissan design
department.The supplier shall not
commence delivery of product subject
to design change until authority is
received from relevant Renault and / or
Nissan function.
ANPQP 5.1 A periodic (e.g. quarterly) internal

Phase 5, review, between the supplier's relevant
5.6 functions and the senior management,
to be scheduled to reinforce the
Supplier's senior management
commitment by informing Supplier's
senior management of QCD status and
gaining their assistance in resolving any
open issues
ANPQP 8.3, 8.5.2 The supplier shall have a system that

Phase 5, will respond to the reporting of product
5.7 non conformance by Renault and / or
Nissan
Appearance approval, Renault specifics

Lot control, Renault specifics
Parts Labeling, Renault specifics
Environmental requirements, Renault

specifics
2, March 2007 ANPQP
5th CA Recert
(6 month)
nce was noted
Complies/NA/AR
BMW TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA (6 4th CA 5th CA

Reqt Clause (6 month) 1st Annual month) (2nd Annual) (6 month)
Map
Requirement
1.3 7.4 Suppliers State-of-arte QMS
System (e.g. TS16949) for
organization and its suppliers
1.3 8.2.3 Regularly reporting to BMW

reliability indicators, sub-supplier
management, results of
product/process audits,
SPQM/RMT
1.4.1 7.2 Feasibility Study Results
1.4.2 7.3 FMEA according VDA Band 4

chapter 3
1.4.3 7.3 Process Capability Studies

(Cmk>=1.67, 50 pc; Ppk>=1.67;
Cpk>=1.33, 125 pc, for <SC>)
1.4.4 7.3 Production Process and Production

Release, submission level 3, per
VDA vol 2
1.4.5 8.2.3 Set and statistically monitor

Reliability Indicators according to
GS-90017 for significant
characteristics
1.4.6 8.2.4/7.3 Requalification tests per GS-

90018-1 and -2
1.4.7 8.2.2 Process audits according to the
defined frequency agreed with
BMW. Process audits per VDA
Band 6.3
1.4.8 7.5.3 Traceability requirements to be

agreed with BMW for components
and materials (incl. Sub-suppliers)
1.4.9 8.2.3 Action limits for Quality (ppm)

agreed upon with BMW
1.4.10 8.3 Rework: Fault Analysis and

correction is to be peformed
according to GS 95015
1.4.11 8.3 Component analysis per GS95004

and Failure Analysis and Failure
Correction per GS95015
1.4.12 7.3 Planning of launch-ensuring

measures
1.4.13 7.3 Measuring Plan per GS 91007 and

Functional Dimension Concept
(FMK) per GS 91008
1.5 7.4 Sub-suppliers management:

Compliance to QMT for the parts of
the sub-supplier is responsability of
the main supplier. It does not
absolve supplier from the quality of
parts delivered by sub-suppliers
1.6 7.5.5 Compliance to the Manual

'Logistics of Development Parts'
1.7.1 7.4 Report materials content on IMDS
per GS 93008-1 and VDA Band 2
V. 1.9 QMT requirements
Recert
ted
mplies/NA/AR

CSR New

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

CSR New

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

ISO/TS 16949 Requirements Tracking Tool

QF-0914-13, issued 4/7/2003, revised 1/14//09

QF-0914-13 Revised: 10/22/07

QF-0914-13 Revised: 10/22/07

QF-0914-13 Rev 1/14/09

QF-0914-13 Rev 1/14/09

management review processes

quoting, contracting and order entry

If product design is excluded, check here

product or process design

purchased products verification process

production part approval process

preventive maintenance processes

tooling management processes

packaging and shipping processes

calibration and MSA processes

Ford TS Upgrade/Reg 1st CA 2nd CA 3rd CA (6 4th CA

4.2 4.2.3 Control of documents - Specific

4.3 4.2.3.1, Engineering Specs - organizations

4.4 4.2.4 Control of Records - Defines

4.5 5.2, 8.2.4, Customer Focus - Meet

4.6 5.6, 5.1 Customer Representative - Notify

4.8 5.6.2 Management Review Input - Input

4.9 6.2.2, Training - Only trained and

4.10 6.2.2.2, Provision of resources - when

4.11 6.3.1, Plant, Facility and Equipment

4.12 6.3.2 Contingency Plans - Plant, Buyer

4.13 6.4.2 Cleanliness of Premises -

4.14 7.1, 7.3.1 Planning of Product Realization -

4.14 7.3.6.2 Planning of Product Realization -

4.15 7.1.2 Acceptance Criteria - Tables A & B

4.16 7.2.1 Customer Related Processes -

4.17 7.2.2.1 Review of requirements related

4.18 7.2.2.2 Manufacturing Feasibility -

4.19 7.2.3.1 Customer communication -

4.20 7.3.3.2 Multidisciplinary Approach -

4.20 7.3.3.2 Multidisciplinary Approach -

4.20 7.3.3.2 Multidisciplinary Approach -

4.20 7.3.3.2 Multidisciplinary Approach -

4.20 7.3.3.2 Multidisciplinary Approach - Use

4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach - All

4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach -

4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach - If

4.20 7.3.3.2, Multidisciplinary Approach - For

4.20 7.5.3 Multidisciplinary Approach - For

4.22 7.3.4, Design and Development Review

4.22 7.3.4, Design and Development Review

4.23 7.3.5 Design and Development

4.25 7.3.6.3 PPAP - Comply with PPAP manual.

4.25 7.3.6.3 PPAP - All design change requests

4.25 7.3.6.3 PPAP - Run at Rate

4.26 7.4.1.1 Regulations - Regulations include

4.27 7.4.1.2 Subcontractor Development -

4.27 7.4.1.2 Subcontractor Development -

4.28 7.4.1.3 Customer Approved Sources -

4.30 7.4.3.2 Scheduling Subcontractors - The

4.31 7.5.1.2 Job Instructions - Operators use

4.32 7.5.1.3 Verification of Job Set-ups - Set-

4.33 7.5.1.4 PM - The organization shall have a

4.34 7.5.3 ID, Traceability, Preservation,

4.34 7.5.5 ID, Traceability, Preservation,

4.34 7.5.3, ID, Traceability, Preservation,