SPE-176811-MS

Designing, Planning and Installation of an 8-Zone All-Electric Intelligent

Completion System in an Extreme Reservoir Contact Well
S. Jacob, and I. J. Bellaci, Saudi Aramco; P. Nazarenko, and P. Joseph, Baker Hughes

Copyright 2015, Society of Petroleum Engineers

This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Middle East Intelligent Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition held in Dubai, UAE, 15–16 September 2015.

This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents
of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect
any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written
consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may
not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.

Abstract
Advances in drilling and well construction technologies have enabled extended-reach horizontal and
multilateral wells to increase reservoir contact and improve recovery. Completion systems with passive
inflow control devices (ICD) or intelligent wells are used to optimize and control inflow from the
compartments or laterals. ICD completions are passive systems with torturous paths or orifices designed
to choke back inflow from dominant zones and equalize influx along the wellbore. ICDs combined with
openhole packers provide very fine compartmentalization of the open hole and it is common to have
completions with 40 inflow compartments in some extended-reach wells. ICD completions require well
intervention to close zones with high water or gas. Intelligent completions, on the other hand, have
downhole valves that can be remotely operated from surface. The requirement for downhole control lines
and penetrations at the wellhead and packers has limited the number of downhole valves to a maximum
of six in a well. This limitation excludes a significant number of applications where greater compart-
mentalization can yield superior well performance. The industry has recently developed innovative
completion systems that increase the number of surface-controlled downhole valves while minimizing the
number of downhole lines. These technologies improve completion design while overcoming limitations
like the number of control lines, feedthrough ports on packers and wellhead.
Saudi Aramco has recently installed an all-electric intelligent completion with 8 downhole active
flow-control devices (AFCD) controlled via a single downhole control line. This installation is currently
the world record for the highest number of inflow control valves installed for an intelligent completion.
This paper presents details of technology development, evaluation, completion design, installation and
in-well testing of the all-electric intelligent completion system in a multilateral well. The paper presents
the novel completion design with redundancies, system components, advantages of the chosen technol-
ogies and the completion method. The section about the planning phase of installation highlights steps
taken to ensure successful execution of the job while minimizing operational risks associated with the
deployment of the new technology. Finally, the execution phase of the installation is presented with
special emphasis on procedures and actions during installation to improve operational efficiency and
minimize health and safety (HSE) risks. Thorough design, planning and execution of the job yielded the
successful installation of an advanced and complex intelligent completion system in an efficient and safe
manner.
2 SPE-176811-MS

All-electric intelligent completion systems capable of controlling multiple downhole valves are
anticipated to increase well life and recovery through improved downhole monitoring and control. This
system can control as many as 27 AFCDs on a single electric control line.
Introduction
As the industry moves towards long horizontal reservoir sections, production and reservoir engineers are
increasingly tasked with understanding the inflow profile along the horizontal wellbore to optimize well
performance and recovery. Where pattern reservoir developments in the past had perhaps dozens or
hundreds of discrete observation points for rate and pressure measurement from which to understand
reservoir fluid movement, today’s long horizontal well developments yield far fewer discrete measure-
ments for the same drainage area. Real-time downhole inflow control and monitoring of laterals and
horizontal segments is described as having the benefits of enabling proactive and reactive reservoir
management, in addition to proper wellbore cleanup of laterals or segments (Bouldin et al. 2013). A lack
of such segmentation and control in long horizontal wellbores limits understanding of well behavior.
The trial test candidate for this technology was selected from a Saudi Aramco field, where long
horizontal and multi-lateral wells, coupled with intelligent completions, are being utilized for more than
10 years. Wells drilled with reservoir contact greater than 5 km are referred to as Maximum Reservoir
Contact (MRC) wells. MRC wells have shown to increase well productivity, reduce unit development cost
and enable the control of unwanted fluids (Saleri et al. 2002; Salamy et al. 2006; Salamy et al. 2008). The
completion design in the subject well was planned with segmentation of the mother bore based on the
facies and fluid distribution observed during drilling.
Application, Technology and Completion Design
Extended-reach and multilateral wells have improved the performance of wells in the field by increasing
productivity, reducing drawdown and reducing water/gas breakthrough. The wells are completed as intelligent
wells with downhole sensors and inflow control valves to remotely monitor and control inflow from laterals.
Hydraulically operated intelligent completion systems with a dedicated line per valve are used in the field. Over
the years, the number of laterals in the wells has increased to 8-10 to improve well performance. However,
difficulty in handing the increased number of hydraulic lines and limitations in feedthrough ports through the
completion has limited the number of downhole valves to a maximum of six valves per well. In some wells,
this required adjacent laterals to be controlled with one downhole valve as shown in (Fig. 1).

Figure 1—8-lateral well completed with 5-zone intelligent completion

SPE-176811-MS 3

Various intelligent well technologies, i.e., hydraulic addressing systems, electro-hydraulic systems and
all-electric systems are available in the industry to increase the number of downhole zones (Shaw 2011).
The all-electric intelligent well system was selected for the candidate well because of its advantages over
other systems. Table 1 compares the features of the systems and highlights the benefits of the all-electric
system.

Table 1—Advantages of All-Electric Intelligent Well System over Hydraulic and Electro-Hydraulic systems
Drawbacks of Electro-Hydraulic
Features Benefits of Electric Valves Drawbacks of Hydraulic Valves Valves

Valve size ● Electric valve is only 6-ft. long
because of choke actuation
mechanism with compact elec-
tronics and DC motor.
Operating speed ● Fastest operation of the electric
motor.
● Motor allows bi-directional
movement.
Accuracy and simplicity of ● Accurate operation and sensi-
position sensing tive rotation counters in the
electronics enable accurate po-
sitioning of the valves.
Diagnostics and self-test ● Electric systems can continu-
capabilities ously conduct health status
checks and enable advance de-
tection of issues.
Surface control systems ● Very simple and compact de-
sign comprising only electronic
parts. No hydraulic leaks or
fluid contamination issues.
● Hydraulic valve assemblies are
12 to 18-ft. long because of the
integration of the hydraulic sys-
tems, choking/indexing mod-
ules and hydraulic addressing
modules.
● Slowest operation as needed to
hydraulically activate address-
ing and choking/indexing sys-
tem.
● Choking/indexing is typically
only in one direction.
● Position determination is per-
formed at the surface. Hydrau-
lic-positioning has potential for
errors because of fluid compres-
sion and friction effects.
● Hydraulic systems do not have
downhole health checks. Sys-
tem health must be inferred
from control line pressure sig-
nals on surface.
● Usually large and complex pan-
els with many components: mo-
tors, pumps, accumulator tanks,
hydraulic plumbing, etc.
● Hydraulic valve assemblies are
18 to 20-ft. feet long because of
the integration of the hydraulic
systems, choking/indexing
modules and electronic address-
ing modules.
● Medium speed of operation be-
cause of need for electronic ad-
dressing first and hydraulic ac-
tuation later.
● Complicated downhole valve
position sensing using separate
electro-magnetic sensor.
● Can perform health checks of
the solenoids and electric sys-
tems. Hydraulic system health
must be inferred from control
line pressure signals on surface.
● Usually complicated panels that
need electric and hydraulic
components.

Technology Description: All-Electric Intelligent Well System

The all-electric intelligent well system chosen for this field trial comprises a series of electrically actuated
active flow control device (AFCD) valves connected to a surface control system by means of a single
tubing-encased conductor (TEC) control cable. A large number of AFCD valves can be installed in a
cased-hole or open-hole well to segment and control the reservoir (Joseph et al. 2014). Fig. 2 shows the
AFCD valve is the primary downhole component in the system. The AFCD is a compact, all-electric
downhole flow control valve that enables selective remote adjustment of local inflow/outflow character-
istics without conventional well intervention methods. Each AFCD valve contains a choke stem with six
discrete positions and electronic circuitry for communications, power management, choke stem actuation
and system diagnostics. Each AFCD is individually operated from the surface control unit. Commands
from the surface control unit are received and interpreted by the onboard electronics module that
independently manages downhole operations within the AFCD. Upon command from the surface, the
actuation system with a powerful DC motor accurately positions the choke stem into the selected choke
position. The choke position is confirmed using an integrated position sensor and a closed-loop feedback
system. Electronic sensors such as pressure, temperature or fiber-optic distributed sensors are installed on
a separate downhole control line as required by the application and are integrated with the all-electric
control unit at the surface. The surface control unit also provides a flexible interface to the customer’s
SCADA systems, enabling remote system monitoring and control.
4 SPE-176811-MS

Figure 2—All-electric active flow control device (AFCD) valve

Fig. 3 shows a typical sketch of the all-electric intelligent well system completion. The general concept
can be applied to both extended-reach openhole horizontal wellbores and multilateral wellbores. In
single-lateral applications, the system is used to divide the horizontal section into a large number of
intervals to provide for high-resolution active inflow control. In multilateral applications, the system can
be installed in the main bore to control production from a large number of laterals, optimizing overall well
performance.
SPE-176811-MS 5

Figure 3—Typical all-electric intelligent well system completion

Custom Choke Design for AFCD Valve

The electric AFCD valve uses a patented mini-maze choke stem to control inflow through the valve at
various choke settings. Fig. 4 shows the choke stem which is made out of tungsten carbide and provides
four distinct choke positions in addition to the ⬙full open⬙ and shut-off positions. This erosion-resistant
design uses friction to reduce the velocity of incoming fluid and specific slot width and height dimensions
manufactured on the four baffles controls the inflow. The choke stem for the candidate well was
custom-designed for the expected flow rates using mathematical models of the fluid flow through baffle
slots. Computation fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was performed to confirm that the design meets the
performance targets. Fig. 5 shows the flow performance characteristics of the stem using the CFD
analysis. The CFD data is closely correlated to flow test data.
6 SPE-176811-MS

Figure 4 —AFCD valve’s mini-maze choke stem

Figure 5—Calculated performance of inflow control choke stem

Well Construction for the Candidate Well

The candidate multilateral well selected for the application has 95⁄8-in. casing in the upper section and a
7-in. liner in the reservoir section. The 61⁄8-in. open-hole main bore is drilled below the 7-in. liner. The
main bore has more than 10,000 ft. of openhole section. While drilling the main bore, various fluid and
facies distribution was observed in the open hole below the liner shoe. The trajectory of the MB was
revised upward to target the best reservoir section.
After drilling the main bore (MB) to the target depth (TD), three laterals were drilled from the 7-in.
liner. Level-2 multi-lateral junctions with cased and cemented main bore and open-hole laterals were used
in the well (Fig. 6).
SPE-176811-MS 7

Figure 6 —Multilateral wellbore design for candidate well

Well Completion Design for Candidate Well

Multiple design objectives were considered to test the new all-electric intelligent completion. The main
objectives include:
1. Evaluate technology in both cased-hole and openhole application
2. Minimize production loss in case the new technology fails
3. Test inflow control capability of the electric valve
4. Verify open-hole packer sealing between adjacent compartments
5. Enable for completion workover in the event of failure
6. Reduce operational risks during installation
The following sections describe steps taken to meet each of the above objectives and how the
objectives influenced the completion design. Fig. 7 shows the final intelligent completion configuration
designed to accomplish the field trial objectives.

Figure 7—Final completion design

8 SPE-176811-MS

Objective 1: Evaluate technology in both cased-hole and openhole application Typical intelligent
completions in the industry have a maximum of six inflow control zones in cased-hole wells, while
completions with passive ICD have 30 inflow compartments in open-hole wells. The new, all-electric
intelligent well system can control up to 27 valves on a single cable for application in both intelligent
completion and ICD wells. The completion for the candidate well was designed with five inflow control
valves in the open-hole section of the main bore and three inflow control valves in the cased-hole to
control inflow from the laterals (Fig. 7). Combining the two applications in one test well enables
simultaneous technology evaluation in both applications. Open-hole swellable packers with control line
feedthrough slots were used to provide isolation between compartments in open-hole zones, and mechan-
ical packers were used to isolate cased-hole zones.
Objective 2: Minimizing production loss in case of failure of the new technology Despite technol-
ogy qualification and quality assurance, there is risk for the new technology to fail under down-hole
conditions. The completion for the candidate well was designed to minimize the impact on production
rates from the well if the electric intelligent completion system fails. Field-proven hydraulically operated
downhole valves were added as backup in four of the eight inflow control zones. The four redundant
hydraulic valves were placed in zones with the highest productivity, ensuring 85% well productivity, even
if all the electric valves fail in the closed position. In addition to providing redundancy, the hydraulic
valves can be used to increase the maximum inflow from these 4 zones.
Objective 3: Test inflow control capability of electric valve at various choke settings The six-posi-
tion down-hole choke is operated remotely to choke back and, if required, shut off zones with high water or gas.
The inflow area of each choke position was customized for optimal performance at expected rates and pressure drop.
During production, the electric valve is flow tested at various choke settings to confirm the ability to control inflow
at various down-hole conditions. Fig. 8 shows an example of inflow from the 8 zones.

Figure 8 —An example of normalized flow contribution of the well compartments versus depth
SPE-176811-MS 9

Objective 4: Verify sealing of open-hole packer An openhole swellable packer with bypass grooves
for control lines was used to provide zonal isolation between adjacent openhole compartments in the main
bore. Using feedthrough swellable packers avoids splicing the lines and improves reliability of the
intelligent completion system by minimizing the number of potential leak paths and failure points. The
sealing capability of the swellable packer is verified using down-hole pressure gauges in compartments
on either side of the swell packer. Fig. 7 shows the completion schematic with the zonal pressure and
temperature gauges in various compartments. The packer sealing can be verified by monitoring the
annulus pressure in one compartment while flowing from the adjacent compartment.
Objective 5: Workover of completion if early failure New technologies can be susceptible to failure in
down-hole conditions because of temperature, fluid ingress and vibration effects. If there is a failure
during deployment, the failed components must be retrieved to conduct a full failure analysis and make
design improvements. The well completion was designed such that the completion can be retrieved in case
of early failure of the all-electric system. The completion is fully retrievable within the first 14 days before
the swell packer seals inside the 61⁄8-in. open hole. After the swelling of the open-hole packer, the upper
four electric AFCD valves inside the cased-hole section can be retrieved by unsetting the mechanical
packers and cutting tubing above the upper open-hole packer.
Objective 6: Improving reliability during installation The completion design and procedures were de-
veloped to reduce operational risks and increase the reliability of the completion. Some of the specific
steps taken to reduce installation risks include reducing the number of splices in the control line by using
a swellable feedthrough packer which enables the control lines to be passed through the packer without
splicing the control line. To simplify deployment, reduce installation time and risks at the rig floor,
subassemblies comprising multiple intelligent completion components were assembled in the shop with
hydraulic control lines pre-connected to the valves and fully tested. The bending stresses between
assemblies were reduced by adding pup joints between the components and insuring proper space-out
within subassemblies.

Planning Phase: Ensuring the Technology is Ready for Field Deployment

The planning phase for this deployment comprised, among other things, reviewing the new technology in
full detail including the design and qualification testing, ensuring the chosen equipment fits the application
and minimizing potential deployment risks through careful planning and preparation. To accomplish the
field trial objectives, customized design and validation were required for some of the components such as
inflow control choke or the AFCD valve and the design of the swellable packers. To evaluate and reduce
potential operational risks, several failure modes and effects analysis (FMEAs) were conducted. This
section describes some of the important steps performed during the planning phase.

New Technology Design Review and Evaluation

All aspects of the all-electric intelligent well system were carefully reviewed through joint-design reviews
prior to committing to the field trial deployment of the new technology. Special attention was placed on
reviewing the product qualification and reliability program throughout the development to obtain full
confidence that the technology was ready for field deployment. Below is a summary of major factors
covered during technology evaluation.
Design Review of System Components A thorough design review was conducted on all components of
the all-electric intelligent well system, including surface control system, AFCD valve, TEC control cable,
wellhead outlet, control line splices and installation equipment. The review included examination of the
specifications for each component, reviewing critical design features in detail and ensuring that specifi-
cations and designs are a good fit in the intended application. Any potential concerns for the designs were
10 SPE-176811-MS

identified and clarified or addressed. The design review provided a better understanding of the technology
and its components.
Evaluation of Design Qualification and Reliability Testing The all-electric intelligent completion sys-
tem was developed in a rigorous, phased approach. All components that go into the product were
evaluated. Following successful qualification of individual parts, tool-level qualification tests were
performed, where qualification and reliability testing was conducted on the prototypes. The final
system-level qualification comprised various tests to qualify components working together as a system.
Special attention was placed on qualification testing and reliability of the AFCD valve and its down-hole
electronics, which are the most critical component of the system. Fig. 9 shows a summary of major
qualification tests. The results of the reliability tests on the all-electric system confirmed the designs are
fully qualified and ready for the field trial deployment.

Figure 9 —Major reliability and qualification tests performed on AFCD valve and its downhole electronics

Installation Risk Evaluation and Reduction through Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
To evaluate the risks associated with installation of various system components, a number of failure
modes and effects analysis (FMEA) were completed on various parts of the system. These FMEAs helped
identify potential risks and design improvements and installation procedures were revised to either reduce
probability of failure, reduce effect of failure or improve early detection of failure. Below is a brief
summary of the FMEAs performed.
FMEA 1: Electric Control Line Splice The reliability of the system is heavily dependent upon the
integrity of the single-electric cable, and therefore, special importance was placed on the FMEA for
splicing of the electric control line. The results of the FMEA indicated that most potential failures of
control lines have good detection rating scores (high probability of detecting the potential failure) and,
therefore, the effect for majority of these failures is associated with increased rig time having to re-do the
splice. A number of control processes were introduced to ensure that an improperly made splice is
detected early. Metal-to-metal seals are used in the splice assembly and the mechanical integrity of each
inline splice body is checked by performing a pressure test of the splice. Functional and communications
SPE-176811-MS 11

tests are performed on the entire string of AFCD valves each time a control line splice is made to ensure
that the splice has proper electrical connectivity.
FMEA 2: Installation Process The FMEA reviewed the completion design and installation procedures
to identify the effects of failures caused during installation. The study helped identify and improve the
detection of failures and recovery from failures. Additional steps were added to minimize the probability
of failures. Additional features were incorporated in the surface system’s software to minimize the
probability of human error and to automatically detect failures early to make sure they can be addressed
before becoming critical. In addition, the FMEA analysis contributed to the development of the trouble-
shooting matrix for the system to further improve detection and identification of potential failures.

Swellable Packer for Zonal Isolation

A swellable packer with control line feedthrough capability was selected for isolating openhole compart-
ments in the main bore. The control lines can be laid inside the grooves during installation without
splicing, improving completion reliability. The element slowly swells in contact with hydrocarbon fluid
in the well to provide zonal pressure isolation. The swellable packer for this well was designed with a
14-day delay in swelling time to run the completion string to depth, test downhole valves and retrieve
completion in case of any failures. Special software was then used to simulate and confirm the swelling
times and pressure rating of the designed packer.

System Integration Tests (SIT)

Multiple system integration tests were conducted to evaluate the performance of the system at various
configurations. A preliminary SIT was conducted in Houston prior to shipping to Saudi Arabia and a final
SIT was performed in Saudi Arabia prior to shipping to the rig for installation (Fig. 10 and 11). The steps
for the all-electric intelligent well system include:

Figure 10 —Preliminary system integration test performed in Houston

12 SPE-176811-MS

Figure 11—System integration test setup at operations base in Saudi Arabia

1. SIT Run-In-Hole Simulation

● Set up Field Installation Unit FIU for run-in-hole operation mode, load previously created
run-in configuration file.
● Follow the FIU step-by-step process to simulate installation of the valves by connecting and
testing the valves one after another in the same manner as it is done on the rig floor.
● When all the valves are connected and tested, create and export the final well configuration
file containing all tool addresses, last choke position settings and locations within the
completion.
2. SIT Production Operation Testing
● Load the well configuration file onto the Surface Control Unit SCU.
● Connect the string of AFCD valves to SCU.
● Connect any applicable permanent well-monitoring equipment to SCU.
● Perform tests on the entire system. Actuate each valve through all choke positions. Record
system data such as health statuses, voltages and currents; ensure everything is within
specifications.

Field Deployment
This section describes the final completion revision, wellbore preparation, setup of the installation
equipment and procedures taken at the rig-site for successful field deployment of the new all-electric
intelligent well system.
Final Completion Design
Variation in fluid and facies were detected at the start of the open-hole section of the main bore,
necessitating separate compartments with valves to control inflow for each segment in the main bore. The
separate compartments enable each segment to be individually flow-tested and monitored. The plug-and-
play design of the all-electric intelligent completion system, with multiple valves on a single cable enabled
the valve and packer locations to be changed easily. The torque and drag simulation for running
completion in open hole was repeated with the new completion design to confirm sufficient string weight
to run completion to depth.
SPE-176811-MS 13

Wellbore Preparation
Good hole cleaning and hole stability are critical for successful installation of intelligent completion in
openhole (Al-Arnout et.al 2007). After drilling and casing the well, several steps were performed to clean
the wellbore and ensure the completion reached landing depth. Well cleaning trips with junk baskets and
magnets were run to remove metal and other solid debris created during milling the windows. A six-arm
caliper was run in the open-hole section to identify any washouts or undersize sections in the main bore
open hole. The open-hole caliper data was also used to select the setting location of the open-hole packers.
Following the caliper run, a reamer run was performed to enlarge some undersized sections in the
open-hole main bore. Finally, a drift with centralizers and drill collars was run to confirm there were no
tight spots. The drift string was run to target depth without rotation or circulation to simulate the intelligent
completion installation. The preparation steps demonstrated that the wellbore was clean and the comple-
tion can reach the bottom without any problems.
Rig-Site Setup and Preparation
All the equipment and installation kits were inspected and tested upon delivery to the rig site to ensure
no damage occurred during shipping. The control line spoolers were set up in optimal spots with clear
access to the control line sheaves hung in the derrick. Special surface cables and connectors were used to
connect the portable control panel in the cabin to the electric control line spooler to provide the power and
interface to the AFCD valves for check-outs, monitoring and testing during run-in-hole. The subassem-
blies with intelligent completion components were laid out next to the control cabin and functioned tested.
Completion Installation
The completion was successfully installed with 8 electric-operated, downhole valves and 8 packers (4
mechanical packers for cased-hole isolation and 4 swellable packers for openhole isolation) (Fig. 7).
Annulus and tubing ported pressure and temperature were installed in five of the compartments to
measure. The redundant hydraulic valves were installed in four major inflow compartments as a backup
for the electric systems. The completion was installed without any downtime. All electric valves,
permanent sensors and redundant hydraulic valves performed as expected.
Post-Installation Operation and Tests
The electric down-hole valves were checked and operated on a monthly basis, with a portable control
panel mobilized at the wellsite, while the well is waiting for production to begin. Following each monthly
operation, all diagnostics data such as internal voltages, currents, and health status, are downloaded and
analyzed. A permanent wellsite control panel was installed in the wellsite shelter and connected to the
wellhead. The panel is being commissioned at the time of writing this paper. The valves will be tested with
the permanent panel for tests during production.

Conclusions
● The first 8-zone completion utilizing the all-electric intelligent well system was successfully
installed with all systems operating and without any downtime.
● Careful planning and job preparation performed prior to deployment minimized installation risks
and rig time, resulting in a flawless installation.
● The completion was installed as a hybrid open-hole and cased-hole application to test the
performance of the all-electric system in two environments.
● The choking and inflow control capability of the six-position choke will be tested during
production.
● The completion included hydraulically operated valves in addition to the electric valves for
redundancy and to increase the rates for selected high-productivity zones.
● The technology enabled adapting the completion design to address changes in facies and fluid
distributions observed in the well during drilling.
14 SPE-176811-MS

● The rig time for installing and function testing the electric valves were considerably less than for
conventional hydraulic valve installation. This is due to operating all the electric valves on only
one cable and the ability to operate the choking valve in both open and closed direction.
● The electric valves are being tested monthly while the well is waiting for hook up. The downhole
valves will be tested extensively in well conditions to evaluate its long-term reliability.
● The individual zones in the well will be flow tested to monitor productivity and inflow from zones
will be commingled at optimum choke setting.

Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the management of Saudi Aramco and Baker Hughes for granting permission
to publish this paper.

Nomenclature
AFCD ⫽ active flow control device
BOP ⫽ blow-out preventer
BPD ⫽ barrels per day
CFD ⫽ computational fluid dynamics
DC ⫽ direct current
ERC ⫽ extreme reservoir contact
FIU ⫽ field installation unit
FMEA ⫽ failure modes and effects analysis
HS&E ⫽ health, safety and environment
ICD ⫽ inflow control device
ICV ⫽ interval control valve
ID ⫽ inside diameter
MB ⫽ mainbore
MRC ⫽ maximum reservoir contact
MWD ⫽ measurement while drilling
OD ⫽ outside diameter
P/T ⫽ pressure and temperature
psi ⫽ pounds per square inch
SCADA ⫽ supervisory control and data acquisition
SIT ⫽ system integration test
SCU ⫽ surface control unit
TD ⫽ target depth
TEC ⫽ tubing encased conductors

References
Al-Arnaout, I.H., Al-Zahrani, R.M., Kumar, S., and Jacob, S. 2007. Smart Well Experiences and Best
Practices at Haradh Increment III, Ghawar Field. Paper SPE 105618 presented at SPE 15th Middle
East Oil Show, Bahrain, 11-14 March 2007.
Al-Awami, F., Hemanthkumar, K., Salamy, S. and Sadler, R. 2005. A Mega-Cell Simulation Model
of the Shaybah Field. Paper IPTC 10240 prepared for presentation at the International Petroleum
Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 21-23 November 2005.
Bouldin, B., Verma, C., Bellaci, I., Black, M., Dyer S., Algeroy, J., Oliveria, T., and Pan, Y. 2013.
SPE-176811-MS 15

Prototype Test of an All-Electric Intelligent Completion System for Extreme Reservoir Contact
(ERC) Wells. Paper SPE 166507 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and
Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 30 September-2 October 2013.
Salamy, S.P., Al-Mubarak, H.K., Ghamdi, M.S. and Hembling, D. 2008. Maximum Reservoir Contact
Wells Performance Update: Shaybah Field, Saudi Arabia. SPEPO (11) 439 –445. SPE 105141.
Salamy, S.P., Al-Mubarak, H.K., Hembling, D.E. and Al-Ghamdi, M.S. 2006. Deployed Smart
Technologies Enablers for Improving Performance in Tight Reservoirs-Case: Shaybah Field,
Saudi Arabia. Paper SPE 99281 presented at the Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 11-13 April.
Saleri, N.G., Salamy, S.P., Mubarak, H.K., Sadler, R.K., Dossary, A.S. and Muraikhi, A.J. 2002.
SHAYBAH-220: A Maximum Reservoir Contact (MRC) Well and Its Implications for Develop-
ing Tight Facies Reservoirs. Paper SPE 81487 presented at the SPE 13th Middle East Oil Show,
Bahrain, 9-12 June 2003.
Shaw, J.: ⬙Comparison of Downhole Control System Technologies for Intelligent Completion⬙ paper
CSUG/SPE 147547 presented at Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference Held in Cal-
gary, Canada, 15-17 November 2011.
Joseph, P., Galimzyanov, A., Nazarenko, P., 2014. Increasing Oil Recovery from Long Horizontal
Wells Using Advanced Lower Completion Systems, 170754, SPE ATCE, Amsterdam, Oct 27-29,
2014.