Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A Research Paper
Presented to
The Faculty of Senior High School
Our Lady of La Porteria Academy
Calabanga, Camarines Sur
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the
General Academic Strand
Claire O. Contreras
Emil Dominick P. Morena
Jan Derrick T. Villamora
March 2019
2
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
they interact with their students, and how they look task
questions:
b. Visual effects
c. Traditional method
use?
Conceptual Framework
students.
Appropriate
Teaching teaching
strategies strategies for
used by the Questionnaire Senior High
teachers in School students
teaching Effective
English to the
teaching
students in
strategies of
Grade 11
Figure 2 English teachers
Senior High
School
Most
learning
strategies used
Figure 1
Conceptual Paradigm
7
Theoretical Framework
The Theory of
Connectionism
Student Perception
on the
Practice Effectiveness of Active
Theory Teaching Strategies Theory
in English: A
Descriptive Study
Approach toward
Immediacy
Theory
Figure 2
Theoretical Paradigm
10
Assumption
Hypotheses
strategies in English.
strategies in English.
11
subject.
Definition of Terms
the problem.
area.
Porterian.
solution to a problem.
13
English.
Notes
CHAPTER II
present study.
presented.
Related Studies
practices.
Related Literature
in class.
learning.
their genders.
in the class.
25
Notes
Center (ACAP).
American Studies.
Panama.
221-233.
CHAPTER III
Research Design
subject.
Sampling Procedure
weighed mean.
∑ 𝑓𝑥
WM =
𝑁
N – number of items
31
CHAPTER IV
Table I
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
H
S
G U
T
GAS STEM HUMSS GAS STEM HUMSS A M
E
S S
M
S
Multimedia
4.8 4.13 4.27 VS S VS 1 2 1
Presentation
Ebooks 3.4 3.47 3.33 S S S 3 4 3
Audio Books 2.93 2.93 2.87 G G G 4 5 5
Laptop 4.8 4.33 3.87 VS VS S 1 1 2
Online
3.8 3.8 3.27 S S G 2 3 4
Lecture
Average
Weighted 3.95 3.73 3.52 S&VS S G&S
Mean
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
33
first rank in GAS with the same weighted mean of 4.8 and
Table II
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
H
S
G U
T
GAS STEM HUMSS GAS STEM HUMSS A M
E
S S
M
S
PowerPoint
4.8 4.67 4.13 VS VS S 1 1 1
Presentation
Projector 4.13 4.07 4.2 S S S 3 3 2
Visual Movie
4. 53 4.13 3.13 VS S G 2 5 5
Clips
Film Viewing 3.2 4 2.8 G S G 6 4 6
Charts and
3. 73 4.33 3.4 S VS G 5 2 3
imagery
Realia 3.87 4.07 3.33 S S G 4 3 4
Average
Weighted
4.04 4.21 3.50 S S G
Mean
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
36
visual effects.
Table III
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
H
S
G U
T
GAS STEM HUMSS GAS STEM HUMMS A M
E
S M
M
S
Chalkboard
4.87 4.8 4.8 VS VS VS 2 1 1
lecture
Textbook 4.47 4.2 4.07 VS S S 3 3 2
Graded
5 4.67 4 VS VS S 1 2 3
recitation
Individual
3.2 2.47 2.73 G S G 5 5 5
Reporting
Group
3.67 3.8 3.27 S S G 4 4 4
Reporting
Average
Weighted
4.24 4.31 3.77 VS S S&G
Mean
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
38
Oral Communication
Table IV
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
H
S
G U
T
GAS STEM HUMSS GAS STEM HUMSS A M
E
S S
M
S
Multimedia
Presentation 4.73 4.2 4 VS S S 2 2 2
Ebooks 3.33 2.87 2.67 G G G 3 5 4
Audio book 2.93 2.93 2.6 G G F 4 4 5
Laptop 4.87 4.27 4.27 VS VS VS 1 1 1
Online
Lecture 3.33 3.8 3.2 G S G 3 3 3
Average
Weighted
Mean 3.84 3.61 3.35 G&VS G&VS G
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
40
good. In GAS and HUMSS, audio books got the lowest rank
good.
Oral Communication
Table V
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
H
S
G U
T
GAS STEM HUMMS GAS STEM HUMSS A M
E
S M
M
S
Power Point
4.8 4.8 3.87 VS VS S 1 1 1
Presentation
Projector 4 3.47 3.07 S S G 2 4 5
Visual Movie
3.4 3.87 3.4 G S G 5 3 2
Clips
Film Viewing 3.2 3.8 3.33 G S G 6 2 3
Charts and
3.6 3.8 3.13 S S G 4 2 4
imagery
Realia 3.87 3.4 2.73 S G G 3 5 6
Average
Weighted Mean 3.81 3.86 3.26 S S G
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
42
the most used teaching strategy and got the first rank with
STEM and 3.87 in HUMSS. Film viewing and chart and imagery
are got the second rank in STEM with weighted mean of 3.8
the variables, film viewing got the lowest rank in GAS with
description of good.
3.81 in GAS, 3.86 in STEM and 3.26 in HUMSS with the same
good in HUMSS.
43
Oral Communication
Table VI
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
G S H
A T U
GAS STEM HUMSS GAS STEM HUMSS S E M
M S
S
Chalkboard 4.6 4 4.2 VS S S 1 3 3
lecture
Textbook 4.2 3.47 3.6 S S S 3 5 4
Graded 4.4 4.27 3.6 VS VS S 2 1 4
recitation
Individual 4.2 3.67 4.73 S S VS 3 4 1
Reporting
Group 4.13 4.13 4.6 S S VS 4 2 2
Reporting
Average 4.31 3.91 4.15 S S S
Weighted
Mean
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
44
the other strand, HUMSS got the lowest rank in textbook and
Table VII
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
H
S
G U
T
GAS STEM HUMSS GAS STEM HUMSS A M
E
S S
M
S
Multimedia
4.87 4.2 4.27 VS S VS 1 2 2
Presentation
Ebooks 3.33 3.2 2.8 G G G 4 4 4
Audio Visual 3.13 2.87 2.6 G G F 5 5 5
Laptop 4.8 4.6 4.6 VS VS VS 2 1 1
Online
3.47 3.6 3.93 S S S 3 3 3
Lecture
Average
Weighted
3.92 3.69 3.64 G-VS G-VS VS
Mean
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
46
Porteria Academy.
strands.
47
Table VIII
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
H
S
G U
T
GAS STEM HUMSS GAS STEM HUMSS A M
E
S S
M
S
Power Point
4.93 4.67 4.67 VS VS VS 1 1 1
Presentation
Projector 3.93 3.53 3.53 S S S 3 6 2
Visual Movie
3.33 4.07 2.8 G S G 5 2 5
Clips
Film Viewing 3.27 3.87 2.67 G S G 6 3 6
Charts and
3.8 3.6 3 S S G 4 5 4
imagery
Realia 4.2 3.67 3.07 S S G 2 4 3
Average
Weighted Mean 3.9 3.90 3.29 S S G
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
48
are always used by the teachers are shown on the right part
of the table.
satisfactory.
Table IX
Qualitative
Variables Weighted Mean Rank
Description
H
S
G U
T
GAS STEM HUMSS GAS STEM HUMSS A M
E
S S
M
S
Chalkboard
4.8 3.73 3.87 VS S S 1 3 2
lecture
Textbook 4.27 3.53 3.67 VS S S 4 4 3
Graded
4.47 4 3.2 VS S G 2 2 4
recitation
Individual
3.93 3.73 3.67 S S S 5 3 3
Reporting
Group
4.4 4.2 4.2 VS S S 3 1 1
Reporting
Average
Weighted
3.17 3.84 3.72 VS S S
Mean
Legend:
2.61-3.40Good (G)
50
CHAPTER V
Traditional Method?
Findings
entire strand.
Professional Purposes.
got the first rank in STEM and HUMSS and chalk board
lecture in GAS.
53
mostly use?
Findings
method in HUMSS.
Findings
Conclusion
students and gain more knowledge that they can use in the
near future.
Recommendation
a two way process. Teach the student and learn from them.