TAX 1

CASES FOR STUDY

 1. CIR v. Dash Engineering Phils., Inc., 712 SCRA 347

 2. Camp John Hay Development Corp. v. CBAA, 706 SCRA 547

 3. First Lepanto Taisho Insurance Corp. v. CIR, 695 SCRA 639

 4. CIR v. San Roque Power Corp., 690 SCRA 336

 5. CIR v. BPI, 521 SCRA 373

 6. CIR v. PINEDA, 21 SCRA 105

 7. MISAEL P. VERA, ET AL. v. HON. JOSE F. FERNANDEZ, ET AL., 89 SCRA 199

 8. CIR v. CTA, 234 SCRA 348

 9. CIR v. ALGUE, INC., 158 SCRA 9

 10. YMCA v. CIR, 298 SCRA

 11. DAVAO GULF LUMBER CORP. v. CIR, 293 SCRA 77

 12. FERDINAND R. MARCOS II v. CA, et al., 273 SCRA 47

 13.JOSE REYES v. PEDRO ALMANZOR, 196 SCRA 322

 14. PHIL. BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS v. CIR, 302 SCRA 250

 15. PHIL. GUARANTY CO., INC. V. CIR, 13 SCRA 775

 16. PHILEX MINING CORP. V. CIR, 294 SCRA 687

 17. NORTH CAMARINES LUMBER CO. V. CIR, 109 PHIL. 511

 18. SPOUSES PACQUIAO V. THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ETC. ET AL., GR NO.
213394, APRIL 6, 2016

 19. Walter Lutz vs. J. Antonio Araneta, 98 Phil. 148

 20. Benjamin Gomez v. Enrico Palomar, et al., 25 SCRA 827

 21. Silvestre Punsalan v. The Mun. Board of the City of Manila, 95 Phil. 46

 22. FRANCIA V. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL., 162 SCRA 753

 23. MELECIO R. DOMINGO V. LORENZO C. GARLITOS, 8 SCRA 443

 24. VALENTIN TIO V. VIDEOGRAM REGULATORY BOARD, 151 SCRA 208

 25. CITY OF BAGUIO V. FORTUNATO DE LEON, 25 SCRA 938

 26. HON. RAMON BAGATSING, ET AL. V. HON. PEDRO RAMIREZ, ET AL., 74

SCRA 306

 27. PASCUAL V. SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WORKS, 110 PHIL. 331

 28. Board of Assessment Appeals of Laguna v. CTA, 8 SCRA 224

 29. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of the Phils. Vs. City of Butuan, 24 SCRA 789

 30. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. Of the Phils., Inc. Vs. Municipality of Tanauan,
Leyte, 69 SCRA 460

 31. John H. Osmeña v. Oscar Orbos, 220 SCRA 703

 32. Mayor Antonio J. Villegas v. Hiu Chiong Tsai Pao Ho and Judge Arca, 86
SCRA 270