Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

WEEK 4: PAST & FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE

FACT MYTH FALLACIES


Past climate change tells us “Natural climate change in the Jumping to conclusions: past
climate is sensitive to the past implies current climate climate change actually sends
warming effect of CO2. change is also natural.” the opposite message than
what the myth concludes.

Natural influences that “Current warming is just the Red Herring: the natural factors
ended the Little Ice Age continuation of natural recov- that ended the Little Ice Age
have been swamped by ery from the Little Ice Age.” are no longer significant.
recent human activity.

In the past when the sun was “CO2 was higher in the past Cherry picking: ignores the
cooler, CO2 was higher. The but the world didn't boil away role of the sun which was
two roughly balanced each so the greenhouse effect is cooler in the past.
other. We are now raising weak.”
CO2 levels with a warmer sun.

While the Medieval Warm “The Medieval Warm Period Cherry Picking: For average
Period saw unusually warm was warmer than current temperature over wide
temperatures in some regions, conditions. This implies recent regions, the hot regions were
globally the planet was warming is not unusual and cancelled out by other cool
cooler than now. must be natural.” regions.

Models are based on funda- “Models are unreliable.” Impossible expectations: no


mental physical principles. model is perfect but they are
useful tools that can reproduce
the past and provide insights
into the future.

Models have made a “Models predictions have Impossible expectations:


number of successful predic- failed, making them unrelia- climate models have had great
tions. ble.” success at predicting long-term
effects like greenhouse warm-
ing.

Climate models simulate “Scientists can’t even predict Red herring: Confusing weather
climate which is weather weather.” with climate distracts from the
averaged over time. fact that short-term predictions
have little relevance to
long-term climate predictions.

In the 1970s, the majority of “In the 1970s, climate scien- Misrepresentation: confuses
climate papers were predict- tists were predicting an ice mainstream media reports with
ing warming. age.” scientific papers which over-
whelmingly pointed towards
warming.

Even if the sun fell to Maun- “We're heading into another Misrepresentation: overstating
der Minimum levels, it would ice age because of the the role of solar activity on
only delay global warming cooling sun.” climate - it actually has had
by a decade. little effect.

The IPCC is 20 times more “Climate models and the Cherry picking: selectively looks
likely to underestimate rather IPCC are alarmist.” at a few examples where the
than exagerate climate IPCC overestimated climate
impacts. change, ignoring the much
larger number of examples of
underestimation.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi