Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Johnnie Ben-Edigbe
Drainage System
Main Objectives
• Remove storm-water from roadway
• Prevent flooding and damage to roadway and
upstream properties
Main Functions
• Convey storm-water from roadway to outfalls
• Control the level of water table in the subgrade
• Intercept encroaching groundH20 and surface H20
• Convey controlled H20 across road alignments
Components of Drainage System
HYDROLOGY HYDRAULIC DESIGN
t = the duration
a, b, and n are constants
FLOOD ESTIMATION METHODS
Methods include:
• Analysis of flow data
• Runoff modeling
• Regionalized flood formulae
Analysis of flow data
Analysis of flow data using manning equation:
Q = A x 1/n x R2/3 x S ½
Q = discharge in m3 sec-1
A = cross-sectional area in m2
n = Manning roughness coefficient
S = longitudinal slope of the stream bed
Runoff modeling
Run-Off components are; surface runoff, interflow and
ground water flows . Using rational method;
Q = CIA / 3.6
A = drainage area (km2)
I = average rainfall intensity (mm/hr)
C = run-off coefficient
Time of concentration,
Tc = ((0.87 x L2) /1000 x S)0.385
L = length of main stream (km)
S = average slope of main stream (mm-1)
Regionalized flood formulae
General form: Q = C x An
Q = flood discharge
C = constant
A = the catchment area
n = a constant exponent
Regressed Model: Q = K x Am x Bn x Cp
K = a constant
B = mean annual precipitation
C = elevation
m, n and p are exponents
FIELD INVESTIGATIONS
• In order to estimate runoff and select the
design discharge, data on rainfall runoff,
catchment and river characteristics should be
collected.
• Check estimate against historic evidence, local
experience and practice, research and earkier
studies.
Field Information
Important data include;
• Cross-sectional area
• Bed material (for manning roughness)
• Longitudinal slope of stream bed
• Details of historic floods
DESIGN DISCHARGE
• Depends on selected flood frequency or
recurrence interval
• Large recurrence interval = lower risk of
damage with high cost of structures and vce
versa
• Always supplement design calculations with
sensitivity analyses, showing consequences in
terms of damage for different recurrence
intervals
Highway Drainage
• A means by which surface water is removed
from pavement and ROW
• Redirects water into appropriately designed
channels
• Eventually discharges into natural water
systems
Inadequate Drainage
• Damage to highway structures
• Loss of capacity
• Visibility problems with spray and retro-
reflectivity
• Safety problems, reduced friction and
hydroplaning
Highway Drainage
• Transverse slopes
– Removes water from pavement surface
– Facilitated by cross-section elements (cross-
slope, shoulder slope)
• Longitudinal slopes
– Minimum gradient to maintain adequate slope
in longitudinal channels
• Longitudinal channels
– Ditches along side of road to collect surface
water after run-off
Drainage System
Three phases
1. To Estimate the quantity of water to reach
the system
2. Hydraulic design of system elements
3. Comparison of different materials to serve
the purpose
Steep slopes provide good hydraulic
capacity and lower costs, but reduces
safety and increases erosion and
maintenance costs
Hydrologic Analysis
Intercepting
channel
Toe-of-slope Flume
channel
Roadside
channel
Drainage Channels
Drainage channels should:
• have adequate capacity for the design runoff,
• minimize damage to the highway caused by unusual
storm water,
• minimize risk for motorists,
• be resistant to the high speed water flows where
expected,
• prevent sedimentation of the particles carried by
water.
Roadside Channels
Safety consideration
• Rounded hinge point reduces the chance of an errant vehicle
becoming airborne
• Fore slopes 1:6 or flatter can be negotiated by errant vehicles
• Fore slopes 1:3 with liberal rounding provide a good chance for
recovery
• Slopes steeper than 1:3 can be used only where justified by local
conditions. The use of roadside barriers should be considered
Maintenance consideration
• Flat and well-rounded side slopes simplify establishment of turf and
its maintenance
• Slopes 1:3 or flatter enable the use of motorized equipment
Side slopes
Other rules
Flat, well-rounded side slopes create a streamlined cross
section. Advantages for the streamlined cross sections
are:
• natural, pleasant appearance,
• improved traffic safety,
• snow drift prevented,
• easy maintenance.
Retaining walls should be considered where slopes would
be steeper than 1:2.
Standard slope for rock cuts is 2:1. In good-quality rock,
slopes ranges from 6:1.
Sideslopes
Culvert Design - Basics
44
Gutter Capacity
• Q is determined via rational method
• Slopes are based on the vertical alignment
and pavement cross slope (normal and
superelevated values)
• Usually solving for width of flow in gutter and
checking it against criteria
45
Gutter Capacity
• Modified form of Manning’s equation
– Manning’s roughness coefficient
– Width of flow (or spread) in the gutter
– Gutter cross slope
– Gutter longitudinal slope
• Equation or nomograph
• Inlets placed where spread exceeds criteria
46
Gutter Capacity
• Q=(0.376/n)*Sx1.67S0.5T2.67
• Where:
• Q=flow rate (cms)
• N=manning’s roughness coefficient
• Sx=cross slope (m/m)------decimal
• S=longitudinal slope (m/m)-----decimal
• T=width of flow or spread in the gutter (m)
47
48
Inlets
• Curb-opening inlet
– No grate (not hydraulically efficient; rarely used)
• Gutter Inlet
– Grate only-used if no curb (common if no curb)
– Slotted (rarely used)
• Combination Inlet
– Used w/ curbs (common for curbed areas)
49
Grates
• Reticuline
• Rectangular
• Parallel bar
50
Interception Capacity
• Depends on geometry and characteristics of
gutter flow
• Water not intercepted is called carryover,
bypass or runby
• On-grade (percent efficiency)
• Sag location
– Acts as a weir for shallow depths and as an orifice
for deeper depths
51
Factors for Inlet Location
• Drainage areas/spread
• Maintenance
• Low points
• Up-grade of intersections, major driveways,
pedestrian crosswalks and cross slope
reversals to intercept flow
52
Storm Drainage System Layout
Basic Steps
1. Mark the location of inlets needed w/o drainage
area consideration
2. Start at a high point and select a trial drainage
area
3. Determine spread and depth of water
4. Determine intercepted and bypassed flow
5. Adjust inlet locations if needed
6. With bypass flow from upstream inlet, check the
next inlet
53
Storm Sewer Outfall
Erosion Control
• Reduce Velocity
• Energy Dissipator
• Stilling Basin
• Riprap
• Erosion Control Mat
• Sod
• Gabion
54
Storm Sewer Outfall
Erosion Control-Riprap
• Various Design Methods/Standards
–Type of stone
–Size of stone
–Thickness of stone lining
–Length/width of apron
55
Schematic GIS drainage map
Typical Manhole
Definitions (cont’d)
• Catch Basin: A basin, typically with a grated
cover, to which surface runoff drains. The
basin may be along a curb side or in the
middle of a field. The bottom of the basin is
typically connected to a drainage pipe, and
the basin serves as an inlet to the storm drain
system.
58
Catch Basin
Storm Drain System Design
1. Layout drainage channels and pipes to provide
transport of runoff
2. Delineate the drainage area from which runoff
drains toward a pipe or channel
3. Determine drainage pipe or channel size
4. Design catch basins, manholes, detention
basins, and other pertinent structures
5. Conduct system-wide drainage analysis to
ensure connectivity and system capacity
Design Considerations
1. Free surface flow exists for the design
discharge. Practical design limit for free
surface (open channel) flow is 80% full.
2. Use commercially available pipe sizes >8” in
diameter. Sizes include 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21,
24, 27, 30, 36, 42, 48 inches, etc.
3. A minimum flow velocity of 2 ft/sec is
desirable to reduce deposition
Design considerations (cont’d)
4. Reasonable velocity may be 10 ft/sec
5. At any junction or manhole, the downstream
pipe should not be smaller than any of the
upstream pipes
6. Typically, the rational method is used to
determine design discharge because of its
simplicity and suitability to small urban
drainage areas
Rational Method
• Q = iCA
Q: discharge in cfs
C: dimensionless runoff coefficient depending
on surface condition and area slope
i: rainfall intensity in inches per hour
A: drainage area in acres
• when there is more than one basin that drains
into a junction, use
Q = iΣ(CA)
Rational Method Runoff Coeff. C
Fall 2009 64
Rainfall Intensity “i”
• Typically prepared by local water agency as
part of rainfall intensity-duration-frequency
curve such as Figure I-1 of DSD
• “i” is a function of design return period and
rainfall duration (which is equal to time of
concentration)
100T r
0.2
i=
T c
+ 25
Rainfall Intensity “i” (cont’d)
• Where
Tr = design return period in years
Tc = rainfall period in hours which is assumed
to be the same as the time of concentration
• Sonoma County proposed this relationship
for the local area (note: this Tc is in minutes):
i = 5.12T r T
0.1469 −0.528
c
• For either case, need to determine Tc
Time of Concentration Tc
• Usually a function of watershed slope, length,
surface roughness and rainfall intensity
• May be computed by runoff calculation or from
flood hydrograph
• Simplified time of concentration estimate by Yen
and Chow [FHWA-RD-82-063, 064 & 065, 1983]
0.6
NL
Tc
= K
So
Time of Concentration Tc
• Tc = time of concentration in hours
• N = overland texture factor (see next slide)
• L = length of longest flow path in feet
• So = average slope
• K = constant defined below
i = 5.12T r T
0.1469 −0.528
c
Assumptions:
The period of concentration is calculated on the sum of periods of flow across the grass reserve land
to the ditch (11mm) and the period of flow along the longitudinal drain (8min), 19mins.
Critical rainfall intensity occurs when the duration of the storm = period of duration of the storm =
period of concentration = 19min; with a period of concentration = 19min and the appropriate return
period storm curve, the corresponding rainfall intensity, I works out to be 125 mm/h (0.0347mm/s).
Where run-off discharge, Q = CIA, allowing for unit conversion, Q = 0.278CIA
Runoff Discharge
The drainage area consists of:
Q1 = Pavement surface (carriageway, C = 0.8) 3.5 x 400 = 1400m2
Q2 = Shoulder/adjoin land (grass verge, C = 0.25) 8 x 400 = 3200m2
Q3 = Land on the other side of drain (grass verge, C = 0.35) 25 x 400 = 10,000m2
Run-off = 0.278CIA
Q1 = 0.278 x 0.8 x 125 x 1.4 x 10-3 = 0.039m3/s
Q2 = 0.278 x 0.25 x 125 x 3.2 x 10-3 = 0.028m3/s
Q3 = 0.278 x 0.35 x 125 x 10 x 10-3 = 0.122m3/s
Total run-off = 0.189 m3/s
Cross section design
A = Q/V = 0.189/0.8 = 0.236m2
Assume a bottom width of 0.5m with slopes of 1:1.5 then
A = (0.5 + 1.5d) d
Where d = depth of ditch
So that, 1.5d2 + 0.5d = 0.236
d = 0.263m
Therefore, size of trapezoidal ditch is:
Bottom width = 0.5m
Slope = 1:1.5
Depth, d = 0.263m
Cross section design
Slope drain
Wetted perimeter, P = 0.5 + 2(d2 + 1.5d2)1/2
= 0.5 + 2(0.416) = 1.33m
Area, A = 0.235m2
R = A/P = 0.235/1.33 = 0.177
Where: a = cross-section area (m2); C = constant = 0.10; and A = drainage area (ha)
Therefore:
4
𝑎𝑎 = 0.10 253 = 1.12𝑚𝑚2
𝜋𝜋𝑑𝑑2
= 1.12 ∴ 𝑑𝑑 = 1.2𝑚𝑚
4
Pipe Sizing
• If using Manning’s formula (in English units):
3/8
n Q
D = 3.208
1.486 S
o
1/ 5
f 2
D = 0.811
g So
Q