Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
bank selection
Table I
Commercial banking industry in Sweden: lending, deposits and assets (SEK Billion)
Lending Deposit Total assets
1991 1992 1993 1991 1992 1993 1991 1992 1993
S-E Banken 224.4 246.5 203.6 131.9 138.6 153.1 348 384 356
Handelsbanken 161.1 164.2 143.9 138.1 136.1 147.4 355 319 320
Nordbanken 150.5 152.1 126.6 130.7 154.2 159.1 259 267 251
Gota Banka 71.7 63.7 34.4 40.1 36.1 38.8 95 89 75
Foreningsbanken 60.0 54.5 49.3 58.6 57.5 60.2 96 81 83
Ostgota Enskilda Bank 10.1 8.4 8.0 6.5 6.4 8.3 12 11 12
JP Bank 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.7 2 2 2
Bohusbanken 1.5 1.1 1.3 0.8 0.9 1.3 2 2 2
Total: Swedish banks 680.2 691.0 567.6 506.9 530.2 568.9 1,169 1,155 1,101
ABN AMRO Bank 3.4 8.0 6.4 0.3 0.5 7.7 5 13 13
Banque Indosuez Sverige 1.4 1.9 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 7 7 7
Crédit Lyonnais Bank 2.2 3.2 1.5 2.1 1.5 1.7 2 5 5
Midland Montagu Bank 1.4 0.5 0.2 1.4 0.1 0.1 2 2 1
Citibank 0.8 1.5 1.1 – – 0.1 1 2 2
OKO Banken (Sverige)b 1.9 0.7 – 0.4 0.6 – 2 1 –
Total: foreign banks 11.1 12.8 10.8 4.3 2.8 9.9 17 30 28
Total: commercial banking sector 691.1 703.8 578.4 511.2 533.0 578.8 1,186 1,185 1,129
Notes:
a As from 31 December , 1993, Gota bank became a wholly owned subsidiary of Nordbanken
b As from December 1992 converted into a branch
[ 17 ]
Mosad Zineldin main competitors in the deposits area are the However, it appears that although the
Bank strategic positioning savings banks. NB has a leading position as a Swedish banking system does not suffer from
and some determinants of business partner for the government, munici- regulatory barriers or government restric-
bank selection
palities and county councils. NB with Sweden tions, which reduce competitiveness, foreign
International Journal of as its base, has subsidiaries and branch banks have a limited presence in the Swedish
Bank Marketing
offices in five foreign countries including financial market. In 1986, 12 foreign banks
14/6 [1996] 12–22
Norway. were in Sweden, the number has gradually
S-E Banken (S-E) on the other hand, has a reduced and today five of them remain in the
larger outstanding volume of loans to house- market. Foreign banks had at the end of 1993
holds and companies than customers’ total below 2 per cent of the total deposits and loans
volume of deposits. One important segment outstanding. Midland Montagu Bank is an
for S-E bank is high-income earners and example of a bank that failed to compete with
wealthy customers. However, at the end of Swedish banks in private banking market.
1993, S-E Banken had an average share of 25-
30 per cent of the Swedish corporate market.
S-E Banken has subsidiaries and branch Determinants of bank selection
offices in 14 different foreign countries (none and customers’ perceptions of a
of them in Nordic countries). bank and its products
Handelsbanking (HB) has an outstanding As we earlier stated, trying to be all things to
volume of loans that almost equalled cus- all customers is difficult, if not impossible in
tomers’ total deposits at the end of 1993. In a competitive marketplace. Many banks are
1993, HB moved its position forward where selecting a position that concentrates on few
customer satisfaction is concerned. It consid- key market targets/segments and
ers Norway, Denmark and Finland as natural products/services. Bank respondents were
domestic markets. The bank has subsidiaries asked about their competitive positions and
and branch offices in nine foreign countries how they wish to be in the marketplace.
including three Nordic countries with total To be a leading bank in the market for large
assets in these countries of SEK 20 billion at Nordic companies and institutions is one
the end of 1993. The bank’s units concentrate main goal of S-E Banken. It is a bank seeking
mainly on Nordic-related business. a leadership position in the market for large
Foreningsbanken (FB) is a commercial Nordic companies and institutions. It has
bank that focuses its operations on the farm- built a strong position in debt-related prod-
ers’ segment in the agricultural sector. FB’s ucts/services in the money and capital mar-
units are concentrated mainly around vil- kets for Nordic borrowers.
lages and small towns. It occupies a strong NB tends to be primarily a consumer bank
position as a leading bank with over 50 per serving a broad customer base. That bank has
cent market share in the agricultural sector. a strong position in the salary and pension
It also competes with other banks in other payments market. The bank’s main strategy
financial areas. is to utilize economies of scale by providing
JP Bank has residents of Stockholm as a its private customers with efficient, simpli-
key target group using on the spot presence fied, and standardized banking services at
and unconventional means at low cost, close competitive price.
to its target group and open at times that HB is a bank that attempts to occupy a mar-
meet their needs. ket position as a universal bank in the Nordic
ABN AMRO Bank (Sverige) is a bank that countries. FB is a niche bank that built its
attempts to target corporate business in a strategy to support and help the farming
careful and selective manner. The principal community, attacking new entrants where
area of activity is to provide credits and other necessary. It occupies a strong position as a
financial services to Swedish corporations. leading bank in the agricultural sector. FB
Banque Indosuez’s (Sverige) core area of provides an example of a bank that differenti-
banking services is to finance the interna- ates itself and attempts to meet unsatisfied
tional trade and export transactions. needs and wants and to meet specific needs
Citibank (CB) in Sweden is also a bank that better than other banks.
concentrates its resources to build a strong, So far the discussion of positioning has
long-term and close relationship with a lim- been generated from the point of view of the
ited number of customers. CB’s core financial bank’s concept of how it considers itself and
services are cash management, export financ- what it wants to be in the marketplace. How-
ing, and risk management products including ever, because positioning is significant to
foreign exchange and derivatives trading. customers in that it provides a basis for com-
Most foreign banks in Sweden concentrate paring alternative choices in the market-
their interest on the corporate segment. place, we need to investigate how a bank has
[ 18 ]
Mosad Zineldin been selected and perceived from the point of in the choice of their bank. These factors
Bank strategic positioning view of its customers in relation to its com- were:
and some determinants of petitors in that marketplace. 1 Trust and confidence (81 per cent).
bank selection The customer was asked to indicate the first 2 Price competitiveness on loans and other
International Journal of impression that comes to his/her mind about services (66 per cent).
Bank Marketing
their main bank and other competing banks. 3 Flexibility in tailoring services (adapta-
14/6 [1996] 12–22
18 possible position descriptions have been tions) (43 per cent).
used. From the customers’ perspective, the 4 Contacts with bank decision-maker (42 per
most frequent position descriptions men- cent).
tioned are summarized in Table II. S-E 5 Speed of the decision and of processing
Banken has a clear position as a bank for transactions (36 per cent).
large corporations, Handelsbanken has a
Gupta and Torkzadeh (1988) surveyed 500
position as a bank with excellent product/ser-
residents of Winnipeg, Canada. They dealt
vice quality, Nordbanken and FB as a family
with questions related to the importance of
banks, Ostgota Enskilda bank as a regional
services offered by a financial institution in
bank, and J P bank is known as a niche bank.
the customer’s process of selection and the
Most foreign banks are not well known. But,
level of performance of these services by the
25 per cent of respondents considered Crédit
institution patronized. The results showed
Lyonnais as a global bank.
that the most important factors are the care-
The investigation reveals that 80 per cent of
ful management of the accounts, rate of inter-
respondents had a relationship with one of
est paid, politeness and courtesy, and proce-
the three big Swedish banks, and there is no
dures for transactions.
crystal-clear leading bank in all financial
In another survey, Laroche et al. (1986)
areas, but there are a number of leaders: a
found that speed of service, and factors relat-
leader in terms of deposits base, a leader in
ing to the competence and friendliness of
terms of loans outstanding base, a niche
bank personnel were the major factors which
leader bank and a large number of
consumers in Montreal, Canada, perceived as
followers.
important in their selection a bank. Conve-
Regarding the determinants of bank selec-
nience of location only ranked fourth of the
tion, our analysis produced five valid criteria
most important ten factors. Most media
which represent dimensions by which cus-
advertising was perceived as having little
tomers evaluate and perceive the attributes of
impact on the selection decision.
their banks, i.e. service quality, credit avail-
Many earlier studies and results indicated
ability and price competition, delivery sys-
that locational convenience was concluded to
tem, promotion and reputation and differenti-
be the primary choice determinant. Our
ation. Somewhat, similar surveys have previ-
general hypothesis is that there exist major
ously been conducted. Zineldin (1995) sur-
differences between the determinants of bank
veyed 300 business firms in Sweden. One of
selection before and after the 1990s. Hence,
his objectives dealt with the major factors
locational convenience to either a customer’s
that determine the choice of principal bank.
home or work, although not important, is the
From 179 valid responses, five factors were
major determinant in selecting a bank in the
identified as most important for corporations
1990s.
The reasons for this are not difficult to
Table II
understand. Through the late of 1980s and the
Customers’ image of competing banks
early 1990s, the nature of banking industry
Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 has altered as a result of a combination of
Market leader 13 12 – – – – changes in competitive and market condi-
Market challenger – – 13 12 – – – tions. Today, most customers can choose
Market nicher – – – – 4 13 14 whether to bank in person at a branch, at a
Technologically innovative 9 8 12 – – – – POS, EFT, banking centre, at another compet-
Friendly bank 9 4 6 5 3 – – ing bank, or even over the PC or phone – any-
Excellent product/service quality 18 20 7 5 4 – – thing he/she wants, 24 hours a day, seven
Domestic/national bank 8 7 6 – 11 13 10 days a week. Locational convenience is a
Regional bank – 4 11 7 18 33 10 predetermined factor and can be considered
Bank for families – 8 20 – 18 13 10 as an infrastructure element that all banks
A bank for small/medium businesses – 8 – 17 28 6 10 must have. Today’s telecommunications,
A bank for large corporations 33 19 7 – – – – ATMs, computers, home banking, credit
cards, etc. would appear to minimize many
Note: locational inconveniences. Thus, the tradi-
1: Skandinaviska Enskildau Banken (S-E Banken); 2: Svenska Handelsbanken; 3: Nord- tional great importance of a close bank or
banken; 4: Gota Bank; 5: Foreningsbanken; 6: Ostgota Enskilda Bank; 7: J B Bank bank branch to customers’ home or work is
[ 19 ]
Mosad Zineldin no longer the most important factor in select- bank selection. As shown in Table III, the
Bank strategic positioning ing a bank. average score for convenience of location was
and some determinants of Table III provides the results for the ques- 3.1 and ranked as important by only 31 per
bank selection tion related to customers’ selection of a bank. cent of respondents. The average score for
International Journal of A list of 19 potential factors was identified. advertising was as low as 1.42 and ranked as
Bank Marketing The factors included most of those found important by only 8 per cent of respondents.
14/6 [1996] 12–22
significant in previous studies as well as a This would support our hypothesis. It would
number of new factors. Respondents were also support similar results found in the
asked to rate the importance of each of these Gupta and Torkzadeh (1988) study, and in
dimensions on a scale of 5 (very important) to some extent, Laroche et al. (1986) study.
1 (completely unimportant). From the bank customers’ point of view,
As expected, we found that convenience of friendliness and helpfulness of personnel
location was not the major determinant in (4.42), account accuracy in transaction man-
agement (4.20), and efficiency in correcting
mistakes (4.00) clearly emerged as the most
Table III
important determinants of bank selection.
Determinants of bank selection
The results imply that functional quality is a
Mean importance Percentage of more important factor than traditional mar-
rating on 5-point respondents indicating keting activities. Moreover, the results indi-
Factor scale (mean scores) factor is very important cate that the performance of contact person-
Reputation 3.08 38 nel, word-of-mouth/reputation, and techno-
Recommendation by others 2.55 8 logical based services may compensate for an
Interesting advertising 1.42 8 overall lower score on factors such as full
Convenience of location 3.10 31 service provider (2.82) and first with new
Opening hours 3.36 31 supporting, facilitator and different services
Friendliness and helpfulness of personnel 4.42 69 (2.17) which represent technical quality.
High technological services (ATMs, etc.) 3.10 31 Functional quality refers to how the
Full service provider 2.82 15 customer receives service and technical qual-
First with new supporting, facilitator and ity refers to what the customer receives
different products/services 2.17 15 (Grönroos, 1990; Gummesson, 1993).
Offer more detailed information and knowledge Also, because most banks offer almost the
of customer’s accounts, portfolio and services same product/service, factors such as recom-
offered 3.08 31 mended by others, interesting advertising,
Price competitive on loans 3.33 31 full service provider, and supporting or facili-
Price competitive on savings 3.17 23 tator services appear to be less important in
Price competitive on service charges 3.42 39 selecting a bank. The top ten determinants of
Safety of funds and high confidence 3.16 16 bank selection are summarized in Table IV.
Speed of service and decision making 3.67 31 The higher mean scores factors are placed
High ability of flexibility in loan negotiations 3.25 31 first, although with different frequency rank-
Accuracy in transaction account management 4.20 61 ing. Clearly, factors relating to functional
Efficiency in correcting mistakes 4.00 46 quality or how the customers wishes to
Availability of loans 3.82 46 receive banking services such as friendliness
and helpfulness, account accuracy in transac-
tion management efficiency in correcting
mistakes, and speed of services and decision
Table IV process are particularly important.
Top ten determinants of bank selection As also expected, price competitiveness was
Mean importance Percentage of shown as even less important than for exam-
rating on 5-point respondents ple speed of service and decision making.
scale (mean scores) indicating factor is This would support Zineldin’s (1992, 1995)
Factor X Rank very important view, which assumes that banking services
are unique and differ from most other service
Friendliness and helpfulness of personnel 4.42 1 69 industries. The price or cost factor is not the
Accuracy in account/transaction management 4.20 2 61 most important one in the banking industry.
Efficiency in correcting mistakes 4.00 3 46 Because banking services are produced in
Availability of loans 3.82 4 46 interaction with the customer, bank selection
Speed of service and decision making 3.67 5 31 is more influenced by the way in which the
Price competitive on service charges 3.42 6 39 customer expected to perceive the services.
Opening hours 3.36 7 31 To determine the importance of services
Price competitive on loans 3.33 8 31 offered by a bank in the customers’ process of
High ability of flexibility in loan negotiations 3.25 9 31 selection and the level of performance of
Price competitive on savings 3.17 10 23 these services by the bank, we asked the
[ 20 ]
Mosad Zineldin respondents to rate the actual perceived ity and delivery system were 4.00 and 4.42
Bank strategic positioning attributes of their banks. The analysis shown respectively. This would reflect the impor-
and some determinants of in Table V, produced five valid criteria which tance of reliability and responsiveness of the
bank selection
represent dimensions by which respondents banking services for the customers. Reliabil-
International Journal of evaluate their business relationship with ity can be defined as the ability to perform the
Bank Marketing
14/6 [1996] 12–22 banks. The aim was to measure how impor- desired service accurately and consistently.
tant bank customers perceived a number of Responsiveness is the willingness to provide
attributes to be, in relation to their selection prompt service and help customers.
of a bank, as well as to measure the gap On the other hand, it is evident from Table
between customers’ expectations and their V that the customers are least satisfied with
actual satisfaction. The results of such analy- the rate of interest charged on loans, the rate
sis shape the customers’ assessment of the of interest paid on savings, and service
quality of a particular service or dimension. charges. Also, banks do not need to invest
When there is a discrepancy between cus- more funds in traditional marketing activi-
tomers’ expectations or the importance of a ties, such as advertising and promotion. Such
particular service and management’s under- investments have less impact on customers’
standing of customer expectations/impor- selection of a bank. The reputation gap was a
tance, perceived service quality or customers’ considerable factor. This could be due to the
satisfaction will suffer. Management’s failure Swedish financial crisis between 1990-1993.
to identify customer desires accurately is one Confidence in the Swedish banks declined
kind of quality gap (Zeithaml et al., 1990). during the financial crisis. But, banks have to
However, Table V reveals that for customers conduct the necessary actions and strategies
the most important criteria used in selecting to minimize the gaps between the expecta-
a bank was related to service quality and tions and customers’ experience. The persis-
delivery system. The scores for service qual- tence of gap may lead to conflict arousal and
the bank can suffer from disappointed cus-
tomers. An unsatisfied bank customer is
Table V probably a potential customer for a compet-
Important attributes for bank selection and customers’ satisfaction ing bank. Also, word-of-mouth from a disap-
pointed and unsatisfied customer may cause
Mean Mean the bank’s image to deteriorate.
Attribute factor satisfactory importance Gap
Service quality
Range of services offered 3.33 2.82 +0.51 Conclusion
Information on services 3.17 3.08 –0.09
Safety of funds and confidence 3.09 3.16 –0.07 In banking today, the different actors offer a
Speed of services process 2.67 3.67 –1.00 wide variety of products/services. Every
Account and transaction accuracy 3.40 4.20 –0.80 bank has to consider how to build and protect
Efficiency in correcting mistakes 3.20 4.00 –0.80 its competitive position. They are forced to
Average scores 3.14 3.49 find a new basis for competition. A bank must
Credit availability and price competition examine its opportunities and take a position
Rate of interest charged 1.92 3.33 –1.41 in the marketplace. Positioning is an attempt
Rate of interest paid 1.92 3.17 –1.25 to distinguish the bank from its competitors
Service charges 2.30 3.42 –1.14 along real dimensions in order to be the most
Flexibility in loan negotiations 2.69 3.25 –0.56 preferred bank for a certain market segment.
Availability of loans 2.61 3.82 –1.21 Consequently, strategic positioning has
Average scores 2.29 3.40 become increasingly relevant and important
Delivery system for the banking industry. The study high-
Convenience of location 3.17 3.10 +0.07 lights the importance of effective market
Opening hours 2.97 3.36 –0.39 positioning and has examined the concept of
Telecommunication/technology 3.17 3.10 –0.07 bank positioning and different approaches
Friendly/helpful personnel 3.40 4.42 –1.02 that a bank can use to occupy a competitive
Average scores 3.18 3.50 position in the competitive marketplace.
Promotion Attention has been focused on the strategies
Advertising 2.07 1.42 +0.65 and approaches that a bank can use in posi-
Average scores 2.07 1.42 tioning itself in the competitive marketplace
Reputation, word-of-mouth and differentiation (e.g. institutional, product/service, delivery
Reputation 2.29 3.08 –0.79 system, and segment positioning). The study
First with new products/services 2.29 2.17 +0.12 also reviews different variables and bases for
Recommended by others 2.57 2.55 –0.02 bank positioning in the retail and corporate
Average scores 2.38 2.60 markets.
[ 21 ]
Mosad Zineldin This paper suggests that using only one or Citicorp (1993), Annual Report, Citicorp/
Bank strategic positioning two approaches is often insufficient to occupy Citibank, NY, New York, p. 5.
and some determinants of a competitive position in the competitive Dixon, R. (1992), Banking in Europe: The Single
bank selection marketplace. Thus, there is no substitute for Market, Routledge, London.
International Journal of using a combination or integration of several Donnelly, J., Berry, L. and Thompson, T. (1985),
Bank Marketing approaches, bases, and indicators at the same Marketing Financial Services: A Strategic
14/6 [1996] 12–22 Vision, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL.
time. A well integrated application of technol-
Grönroos, C. (1990), Service Management and
ogy and staff encourage customers to use a
Marketing, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
whole range of banking products/services
Gummesson, E. (1993), Quality Management in
rather than just a few. It also helps to build
Service Organizations – An Interpretation of
loyalties by creating deeper and fuller cus-
the Service Quality Phenomenon and a Synthe-
tomer relationship. sis of International Research, ISQA, New York,
Because positioning is significant to cus- NY.
tomers in that it provides a basis for compar- Gupta, Y. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988), “Re-designing
ing alternative choices in the marketplace, the bank service: systems for effective market-
present study surveyed how a bank has been ing”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 21 No. 6.
selected and perceived from the point of view J P Bank (1993), Annual Report, Stockholm.
of its customers in relation to its competitors Kotler, P. (1980), Principles of Marketing, Prentice-
in that marketplace. Our analysis produced Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
five dimensions by which customers evaluate Kotler, P. (1994), Marketing Management – Analy-
and perceive the attributes of their banks, i.e. sis, Planning, Implementation, and Control,
service quality, credit availability and price Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
competition, delivery system, promotion, Laroche, M., Rosenblatt, J. and Manning, T. (1986),
reputation and differentiation. “Services used and factors considered impor-
From the bank customers’ point of view, tant in selecting a bank: an investigation
factors relating to functional quality such as across diverse demographic segments”, Inter-
friendliness and helpfulness of personnel, national Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 4
No. 1, pp. 35-55.
accuracy in account transaction manage-
Lovelock, C. (1983), “Classifying services to gain
ment, efficiency in correcting mistakes, and
strategic marketing insights”, Journal of
speed of service and decision making clearly
Marketing, Vo1. 47, Summer, pp. 9-20.
emerged as the most important determi-
Midland Montague Bank (1993), Redesigning for
nants of bank selection. However, the results 1993/Annual Report, Stockholm.
imply that functional quality is more impor- Nordbanken (1993), Annual Report, Nordbanken
tant than traditional marketing activities. Group, Stockholm.
Convenience of location, price and advertis- Ries, A. and Trout, J. (1986), Positioning: The
ing had a minor effect in a bank selection. As Battle for your Mind, McGraw-Hill, London.
also expected, price competitiveness was Schmenner, W. ( 1986), “How can service busi-
shown as even less important than for exam- nesses survive and prosper?”, Sloan Manage-
ple speed of service and decision making. ment Review, Spring, pp. 21-32.
However, designing a high quality and effec- Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (1993), Annual
tive delivery system mix could have a major Report, 1993, Group Communications, Stock-
short and long-term impact on banks’ com- holm.
petitive positions. The results also indicates Stemper, R. (1990), The Guide to Successful Con-
that the performance of contact personnel, sumer Banking Strategy, John Wiley & Sons,
word-of-mouth, and the technological based New York, NY.
services may compensate for an overall Urban, G. and Star, S. (1991), Advanced Marketing
lower score of factors such as full service Strategy: Phenomena, Analysis and Decisions,
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
provider.
Zeithaml, V., Parasuraman, A. and Berry, L.
Finally, the results of this analysis can
(1990), Developing Quality Service – Balancing
be used as a message from the customers to
Customer Perceptions and Expectations, The
the banks. The message is short and clear.
Free Press, New York, NY.
Be reliable, reassuring and responsive. A Zineldin, M. (1990), The Economics of Money and
survey of customers’ perceptions of the com- Banking, Almqvist & Wiksell International,
peting banks and their attributes is essential Stockholm.
in providing the bank manager with a visual Zineldin, M. (1992), Bank-Corporate Client Interac-
representation of the customers’ view on tions and Relationships “A New Marketing
the bank’s attributes and position in the Approach”, Research Report Series No. 4,
marketplace. Stockholm University.
Zineldin, M. (1995), “Bank-company interaction
References and further reading and relationships: some empirical evidence”,
Bankerna (1992), Statistiska Centralbyrån, SCB, International Journal of Bank Marketing,
Örebro, . Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 30-40.
[ 22 ]