Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
and
Defense Mechanism
Personality Structure
Personality Structure
Defense Mechanisms
Freud
Unconscious mental processes
employed by the ego to reduce
anxiety
Defense Mechanisms
Disavowal Level
Action Level
Defense Levels
High Adaptive Level: Defense mechanisms in
this group result in optimal adaptation to stress.
The defenses usually maximize feelings of well
being and
Allow the conscious awareness of feelings, ideas,
and their consequences.
promote an optimum balance among conflicting
motives
High Adaptive Level
anticipation
affiliation
altruism
humor
self-assertion
self-observation
sublimation
suppression
Defense Levels
dissociation
intellectualization
isolation of affect
reaction formation
repression
undoing
Defense Levels
omnipotence
Defense Levels
rationalization
Defense Levels
help-rejecting complaining
passive aggression
Defense Levels
psychotic distortion
High Adaptive Level
•Affiliation - involves dealing with stressors by turning to others for help or support. This involves sharing problems with
others but not trying to make someone else responsible for them.
•Altruism - involves dealing with stressors by dedicating yourself to meeting the needs of others. The individual receives
satisfaction vicariously or from the response of others.
•Anticipation - involves dealing with stressors by anticipating the consequences and feelings associated with possible future
events and considering realistic solutions.
•Humor - involves dealing with stress by emphasizing the amusing or ironic aspects of the situation.
•Self-Assertion - involves dealing with stress by expressing your feelings and thoughts directly in a way that is not aggressive,
coercive, or manipulative.
•Self-Observation - involves dealing with stress by reflecting on your own thoughts, feelings, motivation, and behavior, and
then responding appropriately.
•Sublimation - involves dealing with stress by channeling potentially disruptive feelings or impulses into socially acceptable
behavior (e.g., playing rugby to channel angry impulses).
•Suppression involves dealing with stress by intentionally avoiding thinking about disturbing problems, wishes, feelings, or
experiences.
Mental Inhibition Level
•Displacement - involves dealing with stress by transferring strong feelings about on situation onto
another (usually less threatening) substitute situation.
•Dissociation - involves dealing with stress by breaking off part of memory, consciousness, or perception
of self or the environment to avoid a problem situation (e.g., amnesia).
•Intellectualization - involves dealing with stress by excessively using abstract thinking and
generalizations to avoid or minimize unpleasant feelings.
•Reaction - Formation involves dealing with stress by substituting behavior, thoughts, or feelings that are
the exact opposite of your own unacceptable thoughts or feelings (which the person is usually not aware
of).
•Repression - involves dealing with stress by removing disturbing wishes, thoughts, or experiences from
conscious awareness. The person may still be aware of the feelings associated with the repressed issue, but
will not know where the feelings come from.
•Undoing - involves dealing with stress by using words or behaviors designed to negate or make amends
symbolically for unacceptable thoughts, feelings, or actions.
Minor Image Distorting Level
Projective identification - As in projection, the individual deals with emotional conflict or internal
or external stressors by falsely attributing to another his or her own unacceptable feelings, impulses,
or thoughts. Unlike simple projection, the individual does not fully disavow what is projected.
Instead, the individual remains aware of his or her own affects or impulses but misattributes them as
justifiable reactions to the other person. Not infrequently, the individual induces the very feelings in
others that were first mistakenly believed to be there, making it difficult to clarify who did what to
whom first.
•Acting Out - involves dealing with stress by using action rather than
reflection or feeling. Defensive acting out is often associated with "bad
behavior" when there are underlying emotional conflicts.
/ / / /
/
/
Communicator /
/
/
/
Receiver /
/
Event
/
/
/
/ Message
/
/
/
/
X
/ / / /
/ / • Context / /
/ / / /
/ / • Affect / /
Affirm contact
Expressive speaking
Empathetic listening
Persuasive leadership
Sensitivity to feelings
Informative management
Barriers to Communication
Communication
Physical separation
Barriers -
factors that block Status differences
or significantly Gender differences
distort successful Cultural diversity
communication Language
Defensive Communication
communication breakdowns
alienation
retaliatory behaviors
nonproductive efforts
Nondefensive Communication -
communication that is assertive, direct,
& powerful
Provides
basis for defense when attacked
effectiveness
Two Defensiveness Patterns
Subordinate Defensiveness -
characterized by passive,
submissive, withdrawing
behavior
Dominant Defensiveness -
characterized by active,
aggressive, attacking behavior
Defensive Tactics
Facial & Eye Behavior - movements that add cues for the
receiver
Paralanguage - variations in speech, such as pitch,
b = personal 1.5-4’
c = social 4-12’ a
b
c
d = public >12’ d
Proxemics: Seating Dynamics
X O X O
Non-
Competition
Communication
O
Examples of
Decoding Nonverbal Cues
He’s
unapproachable!
He’s angry! I’ll
stay out of
his way!
Boss breathes
Boss fails to acknowledge heavily &
employee’s greeting waves arms
No eye contact
while
communicating
Manager sighs deeply
SOURCE: Adapted from “Steps to Better Listening” by C. Hamilton and B. H. Kleiner. Copyright © February 1987. Reprinted with permission, Personnel Journal, all rights reserved.
New Technologies
for Communication
Informational databases
Electronic mail systems
Voice mail systems
Fax machine systems
Cellular phone systems
How Do New Technologies
Affect Behavior?
Is the Regularly
message disconnect
really from the
necessary? technology
Don’t
Provide
Strive for Build in assume
social
message feedback immediate
interaction
completeness opportunities opportunities
response