Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Now imagine this: elementary students walk into a classroom and see a basic skeleton with a
models of the heart, lungs, kidneys, stomach, and intestines laying on a table in the center of the
room. Students gather around in a circle, see the model organs, giggle, and begin to guess the
name of each body part, its function, and, through trial and error, figure out where each organ fits
in the model.
Both lessons have been used by teachers, but one lesson has students actively involved, curious,
and engaged. The other relies on direct instruction, rote memorization, and knowing information
“for the test.” One lesson is memorable for students. The other relies on a student memorizing
information. Which lesson will have a lasting impression?
Teaching methods that rely on student-centered learning are considered a more effective style of
teaching because, as the name suggests, lessons are based on the student and meeting his or her
psychological needs to achieve learning outcomes. If an educator takes a child’s development
into consideration, he or she can prepare lessons that will not only engage the student but also
leave a lasting impression.
John Dewey famously wrote about student-centered learning in the early part of the 20th century.
In his book The Child and The Curriculum, he stressed that children need a chance to explore,
experience and connect information in order to truly understand and internalize abstract
principles. Dewey also felt that curriculum shouldn’t be made interesting to students, but should
instead already be of interest to students in order to avoid apathy.
One of the most used versions of student-centered learning is the Discovery Learning Method.
The Discovery Learning Method is also unique in how it presents problems. Teachers will give
students a problem and some resources to solve it. This concept alone is very different from
standard science experiments you may remember when you were growing up. Most science
teachers would give the instructions for an experiment, perform the experiment, show the result
of the experiment, and then grade the students on their write-ups of the experiment. There’s not
much discovery happening when students see every step and the desired outcome before they
even attempt it on their own. Students are simply performing a task they watched someone else
do.
The Discovery Learning Method may have a specific end result, but the focus is on the steps and
the critical thinking involved in getting there. Teachers have to observe the process, not just
grade a written paper at the end of the experience.
Educational Psychologist Jean Piaget viewed children as little philosophers and scientists
building their own theories of knowledge. The book Hands-On Science Teaching best
summarizes this:
“Piaget’s research clearly mandates that the learning environment should be rich in physical
experiences. Involvement, he states, is the key to intellectual development, and for the elementary
school child this includes direct physical manipulation of objects.”
It needs a solid framework, because the endless wandering and seeking for
answers might be confusing.
It shouldn’t be used as a main instruction method, because it has limitations in
practice and might produce inadequate education.
Instructors need to be well prepared and anticipate the questions they may
receive, and be able to provide the right answers or guidelines.
At a certain level, it rejects the idea that there are significant skills and
knowledge that all learners should need to learn.