Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF RIZAL SYSTEM


Rodriguez Campus

GRADUATE SCHOOL
First Semester, SY 2019-2020

COURSE SYLLABUS

Course Title: Educational Planning Course Code: MAED-EM 205


Credits: 3 units Contact Hours: 54 hours
Course Prerequisites: None Type of Course: Cognate

I. Vision
The leading University in human resource development, knowledge and technology generation, and environmental stewardship.

II. Mission
The University of Rizal System is committed to nurture and produce upright and competent graduates and empowered community through
relevant and sustainable higher professional and technical instruction, research, extension and production services.

III. Goals:

National: To train the nation’s manpower in the skills required for the national development for the quality of human life.

Regional: To train the nation’s manpower with the skills required for the regional development.

University: To develop the full potential of an individual in academic and technological discipline for an empowered, productive and morally upright
citizenry.

IV. Core Values: Responsiveness, Integrity, Service, Excellence, Social Responsibility

V. Graduate Attributes: Globally Competitive, Innovative, Adaptive, Nationalistic, Trustworthy, Service Oriented

VI. Program: Master of Arts in Education- Educational Management

URS-ROD-GS-ISY-M-EDM- Rev.00 Effectivity Date: November 18, 2017


VII. Program Outcomes: To keep pace with the demands of global competitiveness.
To produce professionals who aim to contribute to the delivery of student services, and management of educational programs.

VIII. Program Outcomes Addressed by the Course

Upon completion of this course, students are expected to: train the prospective school executive to practice strategic leadership that promotes a
vision, mission, values, beliefs and goals for 21st century school and develop the knowledge, skills and dispositions needed to be a visible and accessible
effective school leader.

IX. Course Objectives: At the end of the course, the students are expected to attain the following competencies and high level of valuing:

1. Provide the students with a working knowledge on the basic concepts of planning and the planning process and their
application to the educational setting.
2. Enable the students to prepare project proposal on any area of concern in their respective work situation.
3. Imbibe in them the value of planning which will help in attaining efficiency and effectiveness in their undertakings.

X. Course Description: This course is designed to provide understanding of the fundamental concepts of educational planning, the why, the what,
the how and its impact on the organization’s operation. It will also analyze the elements that go into the plan, discuss the
approaches to planning, the planning process and the links between planning implementation and evaluation of educational
plans.

XI. Course Outline

Work/ Time Intended Learning Outcomes Based Content Teaching and Learning Reference/s
Allotment Outcome Assessment Learning Activities Resources
Orientation of URS Vision, URS Handbook
Determining and Graded Recitation Mission, College Goals and Panel Discussion URS
1-3 understanding the Objectives. Handbook Franco, Ernesto
(9 hours) University VGMO by Oral Recitation Deductive Method A. Educational
religiously doing their Discussion of University Planning, 1994
role as students. Academic Policies and Syllabus
Course Requirements and De Guzman,
Learning Competencies Sofia C. et al,
- Nature and Scope of Background
Educational Planning Information on

URS-ROD-GS-ISY-M-EDM- Rev.00 Effectivity Date: November 18, 2017


- Concept of Educational
Educational Planning Planning, 1994
- Types of Planning
According to
Functions
- Approaches to
Educational Planning

4 Research Day Research Day Research Day Research Day Research Day Research Day
(3 hours)
Franco, Ernesto
Understanding the Presentation of Foundation of Educational Reporting Multimedia A. Educational
5-6 foundations of Researches Planning Planning, 1994
(6 hours) educational planning.
De Guzman,
Sofia C. et al,
Background
Information on
Educational
Planning, 1994
Formulating a skeletal Oral Discussion Educational Planning at the Deductive Method Syllabus Franco, Ernesto
7-8 framework of an Institutional Level A. Educational
(6 hours) institutional plan for Planning, 1994
any school/ institution
in their locality.
Citing some examples Presentation of Trends in Educational Cooperative Multimedia Kaufman, Roger
9-10 of educational Researches Planning Learning A. Educational
(6 hours) planning activities that System Planning
were performed before for the
the adoption of the Philippines
present educational
planning activities.
Determining planning Graded Recitation Planning for Quality Partner Learning Power point Inigo, Conrado
11 for quality in their Presentation E. Management
(3 hours) specific area. for Filipinos,
2005
URS-ROD-GS-ISY-M-EDM- Rev.00 Effectivity Date: November 18, 2017
Identifying people Lecture/ Discussion Planning for Nonformal Reporting Library Franco, Ernesto
12-13 involved in the Education A. Educational
(6 hours) formulation of plan, Planning, 1994
the role in their
planning activities. De Guzman,
Sofia C. et al,
Background
Information on
Educational
Planning, 1994
Enumerating the Written Reports Educational Planning Panel Discussion Unpublished Kaufman, Roger
14-15 educational planning Process Theses A. Educational
(6 hours) process. Feasibility Testing System Planning
Forecasting for the
Benchmark Philippines
Budgeting
Identifying some major Writing Project Identification of Programs Lecture/ Discussion Unpublished Kaufman, Roger
16-17 programs and their Proposal and Projects Theses A. Educational
(6 hours) corresponding projects System Planning
and activities. for the
Philippines
Preparing project
proposal on any of the
existing programs in
their own school.
18 Final Examinations Final Examinations Final Examinations Final Examinations Final Final
(3 hours) Examinations Examinations

XII. Course Policies

1. Decorum must always be observed with the campus premises.


2. Submission on time of requirements relative to the subject.
3. The University Rating System is observed.
4. Grading Sheets are the official documents in case of discrepancies.

URS-ROD-GS-ISY-M-EDM- Rev.00 Effectivity Date: November 18, 2017


XIII. Grading System

70% - Class Standing (Assignment, Reflection Paper, Case Study Output, Attendance, Oral Report, Class Participation)
30% - Final Examination
______________
100%

Prepared by:

Dr. MARIA CRISTINA S. MARASIGAN ___________________________


Professorial Lecturer Date

Reviewed by:

JOANNA RUTH CASTILLO ___________________________


Graduate School Secretary Date

Approved by:

Dr. NAMEROD F. MATEO ___________________________


Dean, Graduate School Date

URS-ROD-GS-ISY-M-EDM- Rev.00 Effectivity Date: November 18, 2017

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi