CHAPTER 12: LEADERSHIP They consult their subordinates before making decisions.
Under pressure, they become
Personal Characteristics associated with Leadership socially withdrawn. Tend to appreciate humor. Leader Emergence – idea that people who become leaders possess traits or characteristics Task oriented leaders – see their employees as lazy, extrinsically motivated, different from people who do not become leaders. wanting security, undisciplined and shirking responsibility. Under pressure they become o Leadership gene? We inherit certain traits and abilities that might influence our anxious, defensive and dominant. Tend to produce humor. decision to seek leadership Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (LCQ) o People High in openness, conscientiousness and extraversion and low in neuroticism are more likely to emerge as leaders Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) o High self-monitors o Unsuccessful Leaders o More intelligent people Lack of training o Looking at patterns of abilities and personality traits Cognitive Deficiencies – poor leaders are unable to learn from experience and o 3 ASPECTS/FACTORS IN MOTIVATION are unable to think strategically, they consistently make the same mistakes and do not plan Affective identity motivation – enjoy being in charge and leading others. ahead People score high on this has the high leadership potential Personality Noncalculative motivation – perceive positions that will result in personal gain • Paranoid/passive aggressive – appear to be supportive but at the same time Social-normative motivation – sense of duty they will stab another person in the back. o Role of gender is complex. Men emerge as leaders more in short-term groups with low • High likability floater – insecure and seldom rocks the boat or causes trouble. social interaction. Women involves in high social interaction Their employees have high morale but low performance. o Glass ceiling for women • Narcissists – insecurity by overconfidence. “center of attention. Leader Performance – leaders who perform well possess certain characteristics that poorly performing leaders do not. Interaction between Leader and Situation o Traits Management, decision-making and oral communication skills were highly Situational Favorability correlated with leadership effectiveness o Fiedler’s Contingency model – any individual’s leadership style is effective only in Self monitoring – focus on what leaders do as opposed to what they are certain situations. o Cognitive Ability – when the leader is not distracted by stressful situations and when o Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale the leader uses a more directive leadership style o Favorableness of a situation is determined by 3 variables: o Needs Task Structuredness –goals that are clearly stated and known by group Need for power, achievement, and affiliation members. Implies that an effective leader should be concerned more with results than with Leader position power – the greater the position or legitimate power of the being liked leader, the more favorable the situation Leadership motive pattern – high need for power and low need for affiliation Leader member relations – the more the subordinates like their leader, the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) more favorable the situations o Leader Match - Fiedler’s training program Job Choice Exercise (JCE) o Gender – women are more effective as leaders in situations traditionally defined in less Organizational Climate masculine terms and vice versa for men o Task vs. Person Orientation o IMPACT Theory Person Oriented Leaders – act in a warm and supportive manner and show Informational Style – provides information in a climate of ignorance, where concern for their subordinates. They believe that employees are intrinsically motivated. important information is missing from the group Magnetic Style – leads through energy and optimism and is effective only in a o Leader member exchange (LMX) – originally called vertical dyad linkage (VDL) climate of despair which is characterized by low morale. The chances of successful theory. It is a unique situational theory that makes good intuitive sense. Concentrates on the leadership increase in a situation of general despair when a magnetic or charismatic interactions between leaders and subordinates. Ingroup- high quality relationship with leader. individual assumes control. Trusting, friendly. Out-group – low quality of relationship with leader
Position Style – leads by virtue of the power inherent in that position
Leadership through Decision Making Affiliation style – leads by liking and caring about others. Most effective in a o Vroom-Yetton Model – provide a flowchart that can tell a leader what process to go climate of anxiety through to make a decision in a particular situation. Coercive style – leads by controlling reward and punishment and is most effective in a climate of crisis Leadership through Contact: Management by Walking Around (MBWA) – leaders and Tactical style – leads through the use of strategy and is most effective in a managers are most effective when they are out of their offices, walking around and meeting with and climate of disorganization talking to employees and customers around their needs and progress. o How to become an effective leader according to IMPACT Theory? Find a climate consistent with your leadership style Leadership through Power - obtain more resources, dictate policy and advance farther in an organization than those who have little or no power. 5 basic types of power: Change you leadership style to better fit the existing climate o Expert power – knowledge must be something that others in an organization need. Change you follower’s perception of the climate Must be aware that the leader knows something Change the actual climate o Leadership power – best able to get employees to comply with their order but low follower satisfaction o Reward and coercive powers Subordinate Ability Reward – having control over both financial rewards, salary increases, promotions o Leaders will be successful only if their subordinates perceive them as working with them to meet certain goals and if those goals offer a favorable outcome for the subordinates Coercive – willing to use her ability to punish o Path Goal Theory – a leader can adopt one of four behavioral leadership styles o Referent Power – leaders who are well liked can influence others even in the absence Instrumental style – planning, organizing and controlling the activities of of reward and coercive empower. employees Leadership through Vision: Transformational Leadership Supportive style – shows concern for employees o Transformational leadership - setting goals, monitoring performance and providing a Participative style – shares information with employees and let them consequence to success or failure. 3 dimensions: participate in decision making Contingent reward – leaders who reward followers for engaging in desired Achievement oriented style – sets challenging goals and rewards increases in activity performance Management by exception-active – leaders who monitor performance and o Situational Leadership theory – a leader typically uses one of four behavioral styles: take corrective action when needed Directing Approach – unable and unwilling or insecure. The leader directs the Management by exception-passive – leaders who do not actively monitor follower by telling him what to do and how to do it follower behavior and who take corrective action only when problems are serious. Coaching approach – unable but willing or confident. They are willing to work o focuses on changing or transforming the goals, values, ethics, standards, and but are not sure how to do it performance of others. Leaders are often labeled as being “visionary,” “charismatic,” and Supporting approach – Able but unwilling or insecure. Given plenty of “inspirational.” emotional support o 3 highly related dimensions to transformational leadership: Delegating approach – Able and willing or confident. Most productive and Charisma happy Intellectual stimulation Individual Consideration. Relationship with Subordinates Good leaders possess 5 characteristics: o Humane style – modest & helpful o Vision o Team-oriented - collaborative o Differentiation o Participative – getting the opinions & help of others o Values o Autonomous – independent & individualistic & making one’s own decisions of vision o Transmission and values o Flaws
Leadership through Persuasion
o By Communication Expertise – for leaders to persuade their followers, they must be the most knowledgeable about their common interest Trustworthiness – communicate not only that he is similar to them but also his goals are the same as theirs Attractiveness – more persuasive than unattractive people o By Message Message Discrepancy One-sided vs. Two-sided arguments Threats
Cultural Differences in Leadership
PROJECT GLOBE o Discover differences and similarities in cultures o Determine why these differences exist Cultures can differ in 9 dimensions: o Uncertainty avoidance – a culture avoids uncertainty by using social norms & rituals o Power distance – extent to which power is unequally shared o Social collectivism – a culture encourages collective distribution of resources o Ingroup collectivism – extent to which individuals express pride in their organizations & families o Gender egalitarianism – a culture tries to minimize differences in gender roles & prevent discrimination o Assertiveness – individuals in a culture are assertive & challenging in social relationships o Future orientation – culture plans for & invests in the future o Performance orientation – culture encourages & rewards improvement in performance o Humane orientation – culture encourages & rewards people for being fair, caring & giving
Project Globe 6 main leadership styles
o Charismatic – involves vision, inspiration, integrity o Self-protective – follows procedure, emphasizing status differences, self centered
Jane Laurel Swanson - Nadya Fouad - Editor Elect - . Nadya A. Fouad - Career Theory and Practice - Learning Through Case Studies-Sage Publications (CA) (1999) PDF