Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Astroparticle Physics 86 (2017) 18–20

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Astroparticle Physics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/astropartphys

Acceleration of particles to high energy via gravitational repulsion in


the Schwarzschild field
Charles H. McGruder III∗
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101, United States

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Gravitational repulsion is an inherent aspect of the Schwarzschild solution of the Einstein-Hilbert field
Received 14 September 2016 equations of general relativity. We show that this circumstance means that it is possible to gravitationally
Revised 1 October 2016
accelerate particles to the highest cosmic ray energies.
Accepted 17 October 2016
Available online 22 October 2016 © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:
Acceleration of particles
Gravitation
Cosmic rays

1. Introduction sive gravity associated with gravitating bodies may seem strange
to some, a number of authors have employed this concept [9–32].
It is widely believed that there are only two sources of energy
available to accelerate cosmic particles to relativistic velocities -
magnetic field energy, which accelerates through magnetic connec-
tion and kinetic energy, which accelerates through Fermi accelera- 2. Acceleration and velocity in the Schwarzschild field
tion (see Drury [1] for a review). However, the recent discovery of
pulsed TeV photons from the Crab pulsar contradicts current mod- Einstein [33] and independently Hilbert [34] developed field
els of relativistic cosmic particle formation [2]. Here we point out equations for general relativity (See Janssen & Renn [35] for de-
that there is a third energy source - gravitational energy, which is tails). The spherically symmetric solution of the Einstein–Hilbert
capable of accelerating particles to the highest cosmic ray energies field equations for the empty space surrounding a non-rotating
observed (∼ 1020 eV). point mass was discovered by Schwarzschild [36] and indepen-
It is well known that special relativity leads to space, time and dently by Droste [13]:
mass dependency on velocity. It is however, not so well known,  
that Einstein’s theory of gravitation, general relativity, leads to the dr2 α
d s2 = + r 2 (dθ 2 + sin(θ )2 dφ 2 ) − 1 − dt (1)
dependency of the gravitational acceleration on velocity. In fact, 1 − αr r
in the Schwarzschild field particles can experience gravitational
repulsion as was discovered independently by Droste [3], Hilbert ds is the line element, t Schwarzschild time coordinate, r
[4,5] and Bauer [6]. After decades of debate the existence of grav- Schwarzschild radial coordinate, θ colatitude, φ longitude and α
itational repulsion and the circumstances under which it occurs, is the Schwarzschild radius, which is:
was clarified by Treder and Fritze [7] and McGruder [8]. In par-
ticular McGruder [8] pointed out that gravitational repulsion can 2GM
only be detected by distant observers and not by observers located
α= (2)
c2
in the Schwarzschild field.
We will show that gravitational repulsion leads to the acceler- where M is the mass of the gravitating body and c the speed of
ation of particles to high energy. Although the concept of repul- light. When r → ∞ Eq. (1) becomes the Minkowski metric of spe-
cial relativity. It is important to understand that the Schwarzschild
coordinates in Eq. (1), as well as the Schwarzschild velocities and
accelerations are quantities measured by a distant observer, who is

Fax: 2707452014. not located in the gravitational field of the point mass. Thus, they
E-mail address: mcgruder@wku.edu are the quantities an astronomer perceives.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2016.10.003
0927-6505/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C.H. McGruder III / Astroparticle Physics 86 (2017) 18–20 19

Fig. 1. Gravitational attraction and repulsion. Fig. 2. Schwarzschild radial velocity.

For purely radial motion the Schwarzschild gravitational accel-


2
eration, ddt 2r , experienced by a particle in the Schwarzschild field is
(McGruder [8]):
  2 
d2 r 3 dr
 α
=g − 1− (3)
dt 2 1 − αr dt r

where
GM
g= (4)
r2
and the speed of light, c = 1. We see that it depends upon the
Schwarzschild velocity, dr
dt
. Therefore, to compute the gravitational
acceleration we require an expression for the velocity. It was first
derived by Droste [3] and independently by Hilbert [4,5] and con-
firmed by Treder and Fritze [7]:
 2 
dr α 2  α 3
= 1− +A 1− (5)
dt r r
Fig. 3. Schwarzschild radial acceleration.
where A is a constant. Differentiation of Eq. (5) yields Eq. (3).
Eq. (3) reduces for r → ∞ to:
 2 [3] states (written in Dutch and translated by Van der Meer): “... .
dr the acceleration never becomes zero; in that case there is accord-
v2 = =1+A (6)
dt ing to equation (54) repulsion and the velocity is maximal at infi-
nite distance; during the motion there is always repulsion”.
where v is the velocity according to special relativity. If v = 0, then
As noted above when r → ∞ we have the Minkowski metric of
Eq. (7) leads to A = −1. This refers to free fall motion from infinity.
special relativity. The special relativistic kinetic energy is:
It is discussed in detail by Treder and Fritze [7].
E = (γ − 1 )mc2 (8)
3. Acceleration of particles to high energy via gravitational
repulsion where γ is the Lorentz factor given by:
1
From Droste [3] and Hilbert [4,5] and confirmed by Treder and γ=√ (9)
1 − v2
Fritze [7] and McGruder [8], we learn that gravitational repulsion
occurs when: Inserting (6) into this expression we obtain:
dr 1
 α 1
> √ 1− (7) A=− (10)
dt 3 r γ2
Inequality (7) tells us that all particles in the Schwarzschild field As an example if we let E = 1020 eV in Eq. (8), which is approx-
with dr
dt
> √1 experience gravitational repulsion. Fig. 1 shows the imately the highest energy cosmic rays observed and insert the
3
areas of gravitational attraction and repulsion. If the Schwarzschild proton rest mass in (8), we obtain: γ = 1.06579× 1011 . Plugging γ
field contains only a single particle, which is moving radially out- into Eq. (10) leads to: A = −8.80354×10−23 . If we consider a sin-
ward and experiencing gravitational repulsion it will continue to gle particle which is moving radially outward and obeys inequality
do so until r → ∞. W. Van der Meer (private communication) has (7), then it will experience gravitational repulsion to r → ∞, end-
pointed out that this idea is apparently not new because Droste ing up with E = 1020 eV. Fig. 2 depicts the Schwarzschild velocity
20 C.H. McGruder III / Astroparticle Physics 86 (2017) 18–20

according to Eq. (5) out to r = 10α . Our numbers are only an ex- [13] J. Droste, Field of a single center in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the
ample and it is certainly possible to achieve even higher particle motion of a particle in that field, Kon. Ak. Wetensch. Proc. 19 (1917) 197.
[14] M. Kutschera, W. Zajiczek, Shapiro effect for relativistic particles - testing Gen-
energies. eral Relativity in a new window, 2009. arXiv:0906.5088.
We now turn to the gravitational acceleration in the [15] F. Winkler, The Geodesic Equations and the Mass-Energy Relation from the
Schwarzschild field, which is given by Eq. (3). Fig. 3 is a plot Coordinate Perspective, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 3045.
[16] M. Katanaev, Point massive particle in General Relativity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.
of Eq. (3) out to r = 10α . It shows that for our example the 45 (2013) 1861.
gravitational acceleration is always positive, meaning that gravi- [17] A. Spallicci, Free fall and self-force: an historical perspective, in Mass and Mo-
tational repulsion is taking place. The figure also shows that as tion in General Relativity, Fundamental Theories of Physics 162 (2011) 561.
[18] M. Barua, Gravitational repulsion by a Reissner-Nordström Black Hole, Ind. J.
the distance becomes large, the acceleration approaches +2g [8],
Pure App. Phys. 23 (1985) 634.
where g is given by Eq. (4). [19] J. Gariel, N. Santos, J. Silk, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) id.063505.
Finally, we note that unlike electrostatic and magnetic forces, [20] A. Loinger, T. Marsico, On Hilbert’s Gravitational Repulsion (A Historical Note),
2009. arXiv:0904.1578.
which require charged particles, the gravitational acceleration
[21] J. Gariel, N. Santos, J.A. Wang, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 48 (2016) id. #66.
of elementary particles is only slightly charge dependent as [22] J. Broekaert, A \Lorentz-Poincare" - Type Interpretation of Relativistic Gravita-
McGruder [37] has shown. This means that uncharged particles like tion, in Beyond Einstein - Physics for the 21st Century" (2006).
neutrons and neutrinos can be accelerated to very high energies [23] J. Broekaert, A spatially-VSL gravity model with 1-PN limit of GRT, Found. Phys.
38 (2008) 409.
too. [24] L. Herrera, N. Santos, A General Relativistic Effect in quasi-spherical Objects as
the possible Origin of Relativistic Jets, Astrophys. Space Sci. 310 (2007) 251.
References [25] F. Felber, Exact ‘antigravity’ field solutions of Einstein’s equation, 2008
arXiv:0803.2864.
[1] L. Drury, Origin of Cosmic Rays, Astro. Part. Phys. 39 (2012) 52. [26] C. Chicone, B. Mashhoon, Explicit Fermi Coordinates and Tidal Dynamics in de
[2] S. Ansoldi, et al., Teraelectronvolt pulsed emission from the Crab Pulsar de- Sitter and Gödel Spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) id. 064019.
tected by MAGIC, Astron. Astrophys. 585 (2016) A133. [27] A. Loinger, T. Marsico, Protons do not exert any Hilbertian gravitational repul-
[3] J. Droste, Het zwaartekrachtsveld van een of meer lichamen volgens de theorie sion, 2009 arXiv:0912.1323.
van Einstein, E. J. Brill, Leiden (1916). [28] L. Herrera, Geodesics in a Quasi-Spherical Spacetime - A case of Gravitational
[4] D. Hilbert, Die Grundlagen der Physik (zweite Mitteilung), Nachrichten von Repulsion, Found. Phys. Lett. 18 (2005) 21.
der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische [29] I. Denisova, B. Mehta, A. Zubrilo, The Investigation of the Model of Gravita-
Klasse 53 (1917). tional Repulsion in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.
[5] D. Hilbert, Die Grundlagen der Physik, Math. Ann. 92 (1924) 1. 31 (1999) 821.
[6] H. Bauer, Mathematische Einführung in die Gravitationstheorie Einsteins, [30] J. Ponce de Leon, Gravitational repulsion in sources of the Reissner-Nordström
Leipzig, 1922. field, J. Math. Phys. 29 (1988) 197.
[7] H. Treder, K. Fritze, Die Fallbeschleunigung in der Schwarzschild-Metrik, As- [31] K. Krori, M. Barua, Gravitational repulsion by Kerr and Kerr-Newman black
tron. Nachr. 296 (1975) 109. holes, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 3135.
[8] C. McGruder, Gravitational Repulsion in the Schwarzschild field, Phys. Rev. D [32] K. Krori, J. Sarmah, D. Goswami, Gravitational repulsion in the Einstein-zero–
25 (1982) 3195. mass scalar theory, Can. J. Phys. 62 (1984) 629.
[9] N. Gorkavyi, A. Vasilkov, A repulsive force in the Einstein theory, MNRAS 461 [33] A. Einstein, Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich
(2016) 2929. Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin) 884 (1915).
[10] N. Santos, V. Satheeshkumar, Some Surprises in Relativistic Gravity, 2016 [34] D. Hilbert, Die Grundlagen der Physik (Erste Mitteilung), Nachrichten von
arXiv:1606.08300. der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische
[11] A. Spallicci, M. van Putten, Gauge dependence and self-force from Galilean to Klasse (1915) 395.
Einsteinian free fall, compact stars falling into black holes, Hawking radiation [35] M. Janssen, J. Renn, Phy. Today 68 (2015) 30.
and the Pisa tower at the general relativity centennial, 2016. arXiv:1607.02594. [36] K. Schwarzschild, Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Ein-
[12] A. Spallicci, P. Ritter, A fully relativistic radial fall, Inter. J. Geome. Meth. Mod. steinschen Theorie, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der
Phys. 11 (2014) id 1450090. Wissenschaften zu, Berlin, 1916, p. 189.
[37] C. McGruder, Field energies and principles of equivalence, Nature 272 (1978)
806.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi