Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Graduate Program in Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering

Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology - Institut Teknologi Bandung


CONCEPT PAPER ASSESSMENT FORM
Form No. 5103.02

Title :

Author Name : Student Number: 2 5 1

A. ELEMENTS
Aspects [Weight] Mark* Points

01. Is the title clear and grammatically correct? - The words are well structured and the construction
of the sentence is logical. The grammatical aspects are accurate. [1]
02. Are the key terms related to the title well introduced? - Specific terms are defined. The reader
is taught about the topic. Lots of important information is provided. The field being examined is described. [1]
03. Is the importance of the related issues properly underlined? - The research will add value to
the field. The implication is addressed. It will address any unanswered questions in this field. [1]
04. Is the state-of-the-art of the underlying research acceptably synthesized? - The current
(and relevant) topics is described. Strengths and weaknesses of previous studies are presented. [2]
05. Does controversy and/or debate on the issues exist and described? - The issue (i.e. the main
points of view) or controversy that surrounds the issue being investigated is stated. [1]
06. Is the closing stage appropriate? - Further study that needs to be done in that area or possible
solutions to the issue that have not been considered before is presented. Gaps are highlighted. [1]
07. Does the paper title represent its content? - After having read the key parts of the paper, it is
assured that the title describes fundamental idea of the concept. [1]
08. Are the references used relevant? - The references are novel (mostly from the recent years),
originated from reliable sources, and help to strengthen the justification of all statements. [1]
09. Language - In Bahasa: All words must be originated from KBBI. PUEBI is to follow. In English: Rules (US
or British) in writing must be followed. The transitions are smooth and logical. [0.5]
10. Writing accuracy - No mechanical errors (i.e. grammar, spelling, punctuation) are found. The visual
impression of the lay out is neat and tidy. Use of typography is clear and readable. [0.5]

*1=convincingly indicated, 0.5=sort of indicated but less convincing, 0=not indicated or does not exist | Points = MarkWeight

B. DECISION
(A) convincingly satisfies all elements of assessments with minor concerns {>9}
(AB) satisfies almost all elements of assesments with minor deficiency {8-9}
(B) satisfies almost all elements of assesments with larger deficiency {7-8}
(BC) fails to satify major parts of assessment elements {6-7}
(C) only satisfy limited parts of assessment elements {5-6}
(E) needs serious help {<5}

C. COMMENTS

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...................

VERSION: 01 | DATE: 28 NOVEMBER 2017

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi