Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FOR ANALYST CERTIFICATION AND DISCLOSURES, PLEASE SEE DISCLOSURES SECTION AT THE END OF
THIS REPORT. This report has been prepared by Laidlaw & Co (UK), Ltd. Investors should be aware that the firm may
have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a
single factor in making their investment decision. All prices are those current at the end of the previous trading session
unless otherwise indicated. Prices and consensus estimates are sourced from a reliable market source
Laidlaw & Company
May 20, 2019 Est. 1842
• Other pipeline updates. For AKCEA-TTR-LRx, the Phase I study (in healthy
volunteers) should be completed soon and the two separate Phase III studies
in polyneuropathy and cardiomyopathy, respectively, could start in 2H19.
Given the very low dose needed of a LICA drug and a likely superior
mechanism of action of tackling the root cause, instead of stabilizing the
protein; IONS believes AKCEA-TTR-LRx should likely to have greater
therapeutic benefits over other marketed or in-development cardiomyopathy
therapies. IONIS-FXIRx in atrial fibrillation of ESRD dose optimizing Phase
IIb study and IONIS-FXI-LRx Phase I study results are expected in mid-2019
and shortly thereafter, respectively. Bayer would have to make a go/no go
decision advancing one or both programs forward to potential pivotal studies.
Given Bayer has paid $100MM and $75MM, respectively for each program,
it is possible that they might advance both forward for different indications.
For IONIS-HBVRx, GSK should report the in HBV Phase II study top-line
results in 2H19. IONIS-HBVRx targets four viral RNAs.
Familiar partial lipodystrophy (FPL) Report of Phase III study top-line results Mid-19 ****
IONIS-FXI-LRx Novel anti-thrombotic agent Potential to report Phase I study results 2019 ***
High risk CV patients with elevated Report Phase II dose optimization study results 1H20 ****
ACKEA-APOCIII-LRx
triglyceride as major risk factor NVS start Phase III CV outcome study 2020 ****
IONIS-DMPK-2.5Rx Myotonic dystrophy 1 Develop the next gen. product 2019 ***
IONIS-PKKRx Hereditary angioedema Possibly to start a LICA version drug Phase I trial 2019 ***
IONIS-TMPRSS6-LRx β-Thalassemia Potentially report Phase II POC study results 2H19/1H20 ****
Report topline Phase I/II study results at the AAN May 4-10, 2019 ****
IONIS-SOD1Rx (BIIB067) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (SOD1)
Report topline Phase III study results 2H20 ****
IONIS-C9Rx (BIIB078) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (C9) Report Phase II POC study results 2H19 ***
IONIS-BIIB4 - 6Rx Neurodegenerative disease Report Phase I study results 2019 ***
AD/Frontotemporal dementia Potentially report Phase I/II study results 2020 ****
IONIS-MAPTRx (BIIB080)
Frontotemporal dementia Potentially start Phase III study 2020 ***
Major risks
Clinical risks of study failure could have significant impacts on IONS share
value. Although many ongoing studies have provided encouraging clinical
outcomes following prior studies; risks remain that some current trials might not
meet study endpoints in order to advance forward. As such, the value of any such
clinical asset could be significantly impaired and therefore IONS shareholder
value could diminish. Such a negative impact could be more pronounced if the
clinical program is in very advanced development stages or with high investor
expectations. Regulatory risks are part of the clinical risks as even if a drug met
its endpoints for pivotal studies. The regulatory agency might not grant approval
and therefore, the drug cannot be commercialized.
Although antisense drugs have been approved, this modality might not be
broadly accepted and therefore limit its commercial potential. Although two
antisense drugs are already approved and commercialized in the U.S. and other
part of the world; this treatment modality remains with limited exposure to the
medical world. As such, it is possible that going forward, antisense or other RNA-
based medication could have limited use due to market acceptance. Such a
scenario could reduce the market potential of antisense drugs and have negative
impact on IONS shareholder value.
Net Income (Loss) GAAP (86.6) (17.3) 215.0 90.0 (36.3) (30.1) (41.8) (18.1) 9.0 56.8
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in Akcea 11.3 58.8 (6.0) 9.7 9.7 9.6 23.0 24.2 25.4
Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Shareholders (86.6) (5.9) 273.7 84.0 (26.6) (20.4) (32.2) 4.9 33.2 82.2
Non-GAAP net income (losses) (14.4) 84.7 393.5 126.0 7.5 15.2 5.6 154.4 181.7 238.7
Net Earnings (Losses) Per Share—Basic ($0.72) $0.08 $2.09 $0.63 ($0.19) ($0.14) ($0.22) $0.03 $0.22 $0.53
Net Earnings (Losses) Per Share—Non-GAAP ($0.12) $0.67 $2.94 $0.89 $0.05 $0.10 $0.04 $1.07 $1.21 $1.54
Shares outstanding—basic 120.9 124.0 132.3 138.6 141.6 145.1 148.1 143.3 149.3 154.3
Shares outstanding--diluted 120.9 126.1 134.1 141.5 141.6 145.1 148.1 144.1 150.1 155.1
Total Other Income, net 207% 28% -69% -100% -116% -210% 2264% -115% 255% 70%
EPS -3% -111% 2511% -5624% -36% 341% -109% -98% 551% 140%
Est. 1842
Source: Bloomberg LP; Company reports; Laidlaw & Company estimates.
Laidlaw & Company
May 20, 2019 Est. 1842
DISCLOSURES:
ANALYST CERTIFICATION
The analyst responsible for the content of this report hereby certifies that the views expressed regarding the company or companies and their securities accurately represent
his personal views and that no direct or indirect compensation is to be received by the analyst for any specific recommendation or views contained in this report. Neither
the author of this report nor any member of his immediate family or household maintains a position in the securities mentioned in this report.
EQUITY DISCLOSURES
For the purpose of ratings distributions, regulatory rules require the firm to assign ratings to one of three rating categories (i.e. Strong Buy/Buy-Overweight, Hold, or
Underweight/Sell) regardless of a firm's own rating categories. Although the firm’s ratings of Buy/Overweight, Hold, or Underweight/Sell most closely correspond to
Buy, Hold and Sell, respectively, the meanings are not the same because our ratings are determined on a relative basis against the analyst sector universe of stocks. An
analyst's coverage sector is comprised of companies that are engaged in similar business or share similar operating characteristics as the subject company. The analysis
sector universe is a sub-sector to the analyst's coverage sector, and is compiled to assist the analyst in determining relative valuations of subject companies. The
composition of an analyst's sector universe is subject to change over time as various factors, including changing market conditions occur. Accordingly, the rating assigned
to a particular stock represents solely the analyst's view of how that stock will perform over the next 12-months relative to the analyst's sector universe.
RATINGS INFORMATION
Rating and Price Target Change History
Laidlaw & Company Rating System* % of Companies for which Laidlaw & Company
% of Companies has performed services for in the last 12 months
Under Coverage
With This Rating Investment Banking Brokerage
Strong Buy Expected to significantly outperform the sector over 12
(SB) months.
0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Buy (B) Expected to outperform the sector average over 12 months. 62.50% 23.44% 3.13%
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
As of the date of this report, neither the author of this report nor any member of his immediate family or household maintains an ownership position in the securities of
the company (ies) mentioned in this report.
NOTES: