Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PRE-ASSESSMENT ESSAY
Pre-Assessment Essay
Pre-Assessment Essay 2
My current research mindset and skills are as Stuart Gold put in, rather ‘a mile wide and
an inch deep’. I need to bring my perspective and focus on the research topic of Knowledge
Management so that is ‘a mile deep and an inch wide’. Given below are some pointers on my
Since I have been working with the Federal Government, I have a lot of practical
knowledge and experience of field practices. However, what I need to develop is a good base of
academic research methods, practices, method of writing, referencing and so on. This has
become all the more important when I have to consider that my thesis would be focusing on
knowledge management and capturing the knowledge of hundreds of senior Federal staff. The
mindset is therefore very positive and I am clear about what has to be done and I am also clear
about the subject of my research. Coming to the skills and ethics that I have and the skills that
are required for carrying out the research, it is clear that there is some amount of gap between my
current skills and what is required. I have very good and promising plans for the research, but
these ideas can come to fruition only if they follow the set path of academic data gathering and
I have to carefully follow ethics and maintain the required ethical behavior while
conducting the research. The ethical behavior can be compromised in a number of factors such as
bias, plagiarism, reuse of data, institutional review board, reviewing and reporting results.
Bias can occur from actions of the researcher as well as the respondents. It is true that
many of my colleagues would be ready to help me complete the research and I also would have
sufficient organizational support. However, this should not lead to a situation where ethics are
compromised. I should not wittingly or unwittingly attempt to goad and direct the research
Pre-Assessment Essay 3
subjects to give responses that I want. In effect, the research should be clear, unbiased and be
natural. It is also important that all instances of plagiarism be avoided and this extends to beyond
citing sources used in the paper. Efforts should be taken to carefully avoid any previously
published research and the research should be original in content, thoughts and spirit. Plagiarism
can be avoided by paraphrasing, carefully rewriting the content but this is not observing the
spirit.
Reuse of data comes about when already published data is used without acknowledging
the source or informing the author about this act. Even when a case study approach of research is
used, this aspect has to be followed and while reanalysis of old data from a different perspective
may be allowed, this information must be informed to the board and prior approval taken. The
last factors are institutional review board, reviewing and reporting results. Institutional review
board refers to informing the board about any ethical dilemmas that can occur such as using
subjects who are underage. Reviewing and reporting results can create ethical issues when the
researcher finds that the results are not following the model and path that was proposed in the
proposal. To ensure that controversies are not created, the researcher can suppress some readings
and observations and fabricate other results so that the results that are reported would follow the
desired model and pattern. This is ethically wrong and I would not indulge in such behavior.
required skills and my current skills. I have also examined various ethical dilemmas and issues
REFERENCES
Kacmar, M, K., (2009). "An Ethical Quiz". Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52, No. 3,
432–434
Schminke, M., (2009)."Better Angels of Our Nature – Ethics and Integrity in the Publishing
Process". University of Central Florida. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34, No.
4, 586–591