Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Note: Appeal will not stay the implementation of Wage Order, unless there is a bond (a) In case of failure of mandatory mediation/conciliation, compliance order shall be
issued within 10 days from submission of the case of resolution
NATIONAL WAGES AND PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION (b) In case of adverse decision, file MR within 10 days from receipt of resolution.
(1) Power to Review Regional Wage Levels set by RTWPBs to determine if these are in (c) In case of adverse decision of the MR, file appeal with the Secretary of Labor within
accordance with the prescribed guidelines and national development funds (No 10 days from receipt thereof.
Appeal: may only be reviewed via Rule 65)
(2) Appellate jurisdiction over wage Orders issued by the RTWPB (5) Power to issue compliance order regarding terms and conditions of employment by
(3) Review and Approve Exceptions from Wage Orders homeworkers
(6) Complaints for violations of labor standards and the terms and conditions of
DOLE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OR DULY AUTHORIZED HEARING OFFICERS employment involving money claims of homeworkers in an amount of NOT more
than P5000 per homeworker
(1) Power: Visitorial and Enforcement under Art. 128 (Amount is immaterial because the
(7) Administrative enforcer of VAWC leave under R.A. 9262 pursuant to Rule 129
issue here is with the violation of the Labor Standards Law) (Remedy: MR within 7
(8) Power to call a national, regional or industrial tripartite conference of
days, then, Appeal to the DOLE Secretary within 10 days, Rule 65 with CA, MR, Rule
representatives of government, workers and employers for the consideration and
45 with SC)
adoption of voluntary codes of principles designed to promote industrial peace based
on social justice or to align labor movement relations with established priorities in
(a) Power to inspect employees record and work premises
economic and social development (Art. 290[275](b))
(b) Power to issue compliance orders
(c) Power to issue compliance orders
(d) Power to issue writs of execution EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(e) Power to order stoppage of work or suspension of operation Exclusive Jurisdiction
(a) Issue writ of execution in case of decision, or resolution which has become final and
Note: Balladares, (2009). The visitorial and enforcement powers of the RD to order and executory (Art. 188[182](b))
enforce compliance with labor standards can be exercised even where the individual Appellate Jurisdiction
(a) Over matters decided by the GSIS and SSS which shall decide appealed cases within (b) Any money claim, regardless of the claim of reinstatement, exceeding the amount of
20 working days from the submission of the evidence (Art. 182[176]) P5,000 per claimant (which does not necessarily involve termination of employment)
(b) In case of adverse decision of the ECC, file MR.
(c) If MR is denied, file a petition for review under Rule 43 with the CA XPN: Money claims for Employee’s Compensation, Social Security, Philhealth and
(d) In case of adverse decision, file MR Maternity Benefits are not cognizable by the LA since these claims are cognizable by other
(e) In case denied, file petition for review on certiorari with the CA Government Agencies such as SSS and Philhealth.
GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM (4) Claims for damages (actual, moral, exemplary and attorney’s fees) arising from e-e
Exclusive Jurisdiction relations; (includes counter-claims of employers, damages & attorney’s fees of the
civil aspect of a criminal case under the Labor Code)
(a) Settle any dispute arising from Title II of Book IV with respect to:
(5) Cases arising from violations of Art. 264 of this Code, including questions involving
the Legality of Strike and Lockouts, except those staged in industries indispensable to
(1) Coverage
(2) Entitlement to benefits the National Interest the following may take cognizance: (1) The President; (2) DOLE
Secretary himself may certify them to the NLRC for compulsory arbitration
(3) Collection and payment of contributions
(4) Penalties in relation thereto (6) Wage Distortion cases in Unorganized Establishments not voluntarily settled by the
parties pursuant to R.A. 6727
(5) Any other matter related thereto (Art. 186[180])
(7) Enforcement of Compromise Agreements when there is non-compliance by any of
the party pursuant to Art. 227
SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM (8) Money Claims of OFWs, disability or death benefits under R.A. 8042, as amended
Exclusive Jurisdiction by R.A. 10022
(a) Settle any dispute arising from Title II of Book IV with respect to:
Note: Estate of Dulay v. Aboitiz Jebsen Maritime, Inc. (2012). It is only in the “absence of
(1) Coverage a CBA” that parties may opt to submit to either the NLRC or to Voluntary Arbitrations”
(2) Entitlement to benefits
(3) Collection and payment of contributions (9) Other cases provided by law.
(4) Penalties in relation thereto Other Jurisdiction
(5) Any other matter related thereto (Art. 186[180]) (1) Contested Cases Under the Exception Clause of Art. 128(b), as amended by R.A. 7730
(Visitorial and Enforcement Powers of the DOLE Regional Directors)
LABOR ARBITER
Under Art. 217, Labor Code The presence of the following elements will divest the DOLE-RD of jurisdiction (the DOLE-
RD will have to endorse the case to the LA):
GR: Cases arising from e-e relationship
XPN: Seafarer or OFW which has POEA-approved employment contract but was not (d) That the Employer contests the findings of the labor regulations and raises issues
deployed thereon;
(e) That in order to resolve such issues, there is a need to Examine Evidentiary Matters;
(1) ULP – includes violations of CBA which are GROSS in character (flagrant and/or and
malicious refusal to comply with the economic provisions) (retaliatory measures in (f) That such matters are Not Verifiable in the Normal Course of Inspection
case it is ULP under Art. 259)
(2) Rehabilitation Receivership only Suspends the jurisdiction of the LA; Once the
Note: If violation of the CBA is NOT GROSS, it is not considered as ULP, else jurisdiction is receivership proceedings have ceased and liquidation takes place, monetary claims
with Voluntary Arbitrator (Art. 261) may resumed to be asserted to the LA
(3) Wage Distortion Cases ONLY in Unorganized establishments
(2) Termination Disputes (or illegal dismissal case) – unless the parties decide to submit (4) Direct Contempt under Rule 9, Sec. 1 of the 2011 NLRC Rules of Procedure
the same to voluntary arbitration (Atlas Farms v. NLRC, 2002)
(3) Money Claims which may be classified into two: Note: Land Bank of the Philippines v. Listana, Sr. (2003). With respect to INDIRECT
CONTEMPT, the prevailing rule is, quasi-judicial agencies that have power to cite persons
(a) Any money claim, regardless of amount, accompanied with a claim for reinstatement in indirect contempt pursuant to Rule 71 can ONLY do so by initiating them thru the
(which necessarily involves termination of employment as the principal action); or
proper RTC. It is not within the jurisdiction and competence to decide the indirect
contempt cases. These matters are still within the province of the RTC (1) All cases decided by the LA
(2) Direct Contempt Cases decided by the LA
Note: Although the case has been decided in 2003 and the NLRC Rules has been (3) Cases decided by the DOLE-RD or his duly authorized hearing officer (under Art. 129)
promulgated in 2011, such Rules of Procedure cannot however supersede an SC Ruling involving recovery of wages, simple money claims and other benefits not exceeding
under the principle of Stare Decisis which has the force and effect of law as if an integral P5,000 and not accompanied by a claim for reinstatement
part thereof from the time such law became effective (4) “Extraordinary Remedy” (Duano calls it “Mini certiorari”) under 2011 NLRC Rules,
Rule XII
(5) Money claims and illegal dismissal of Employees of Cooperatives; however with
respect to issues on Termination of Membership (members), the LA has no BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS
jurisdiction under R.A. 6938 Original and Exclusive
(6) Illegal dismissal cases involving priests and religious ministers with respect to their e-
e relationship or employment; However, the LA has no jurisdiction on issues of (1) “Inter-Union Dispute” or “Representation Dispute” which refers to cases involving
excommunication or expulsion from the Membership
petition for certification election filed by a duly registered labor organization which is
(7) Cases involving employees of GOCCs WITHOUT Original Charters (those organized by seeking to be recognized as the sole and exclusive bargaining agent of the rank-and-
the Corporation Code)
file employees in the appropriate bargaining unit of a company, firm of
(8) Private Corporation Employees except Corporate Officers under the by-laws or
establishment
appointed by the Board (RTC), unless such officer is also holding another non-
corporate position. The LA under this case has jurisdiction. The person would be
Note:
considered as a corporate officer and employee at the same time.
(9) Legality of Deduction for Tax Purposes intertwined with the main issue of employees’
(a) If ORGANIZED, the grant or denial is appealable
full payment of benefits arising from e-e relationship (b) If UNORGANIZED, the DENIAL shall be appealable, GRANT may only be reviewed via
Rule 65
Note: Motion to Dismiss based on JVRPF, before mandatory conciliation and mediation
conference may be filed otherwise prohibited; Denial – Unappealable, Remedy: file
(2) “Intra-Union Disputes” or “Internal Union Disputes” which refer to disputes or
position paper grievances arising from any violation of or disagreement over any provision of the
constitution and by-laws of the Union, including any violation of the rights and
conditions of union membership provided for in the Labor Code
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (3) All disputes, Grievance or Problems arising from or affecting labor management
Note: The NLRC DOES NOT HAVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION on the cases over which the LA relations in all work places, except those arising from the interpretation and
has Original and Exclusive Jurisdiction (No appeal, may only be reviewed via Rule 65) implementation of the CBA which are subject to grievance procedure and/or
Original Jurisdiction voluntary arbitration.
(1) Injunction or TRO in Ordinary Labor Disputes to enjoin or restrain any actual or Administrative Functions
threatened commission of any or all prohibited or unlawful acts or to require the
performance of a particular act in any labor dispute which, if not restrained or (1) Registration of Labor Union (Multi-employer)
performed forthwith, may cause grave and irreparable damage to any party; (2) Keeping Registry of Labor Unions
(2) Injunction in Strikes and Lockouts under Art. 264 (An aggrieved party may directly file (3) Maintenance and Custody of CBAs
an injunction despite the pendency of the case pertaining to the legality of the Strike
or Lockout with the LA or VA) Appellate and Exclusive
(3) Certified Labor Disputes causing or likely to cause a strike or lockout in an industry (1) Over cases decided by the Regional Labor Relations Office
indispensable to the national interest, certified to it by the SOLE for compulsory (2) Med-Arbiter on Intra-Union Disputes
arbitration
(4) Direct Contempt under Rule 9, Sec. 1 of the 2011 Rules of Procedure Remedy: Petition for certiorari via Rule 65 with the Court of Appeals
(5) Indirect Contempt
(6) Annulment or Modification of Orders or Resolutions (by verified petition) of the LA DOLE LABOR RELATIONS REGIONAL OFFICE
during execution proceedings (writ of execution, etc.) under Rule 12, Sec. 1 of the
Original and Exclusive
2011 NLRC Rules
Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction
(1) “Inter-Union Dispute” or “Representation Dispute” which refers to cases involving Remedy: Appeal to the CA under Rule 43
petition for certification election filed by a duly registered labor organization which is
seeking to be recognized as the sole and exclusive bargaining agent of the rank-and- Duano: Appeal of VA to the CA under Rule 43 is 10 days lang since ang controlling ay
file employees in the appropriate bargaining unit of a company, firm of Labor Code (substantive) rather than ROC (procedural)
establishment
(1) ULP if the parties agree that it be submitted to voluntary arbitration (Art. 275)
Note: (2) Termination disputes upon agreement of the parties under Art. 275, LC
(3) All Unresolved Grievances arising from CBA (SIMPLE violations NOT GROSS in
(c) If ORGANIZED, the grant or denial is appealable character, otherwise, LA (since ULP))
(d) If UNORGANIZED, the DENIAL shall be appealable, GRANT may only be reviewed via (4) All Unresolved Grievances arising from Company Policies;
Rule 65 (5) All Unresolved Wage Distortion Cases in Organized Establishments (Art. 261)
(6) All Labor Disputes including ULP (not GROSS in character) and bargaining deadlocks,
(2) “Intra-Union Disputes” or “Internal Union Disputes” which refer to disputes or upon agreement of the parties
grievances arising from any violation of or disagreement over any provision of the (7) Over Strikes and Lockouts –
constitution and by-laws of the Union, including any violation of the rights and
conditions of union membership provided for in the Labor Code (8) Before or at any stage of the compulsory arbitration process, the parties may opt to
(3) All disputes, Grievance or Problems arising from or affecting labor management submit their dispute to voluntary arbitration (Art. 263(h))
relations in all work places, except those arising from the interpretation and (9) Illegality of Strikes and Lockouts, if parties mutually agree to submit the same to VA,
implementation of the CBA which are subject to grievance procedure and/or otherwise LA
voluntary arbitration.
Administrative Functions (10) National interest cases
(11) Unresolved grievances for interpretation/implementation of CBA
(4) Registration of Labor Union (single-enteprise)
(5) Keeping Registry of Labor Unions Note: Termination Disputes (legality of the employee’s dismissal for LACK of JUST CAUSE
(6) Maintenance and Custody of CBAs & LACK OF DUE PROCESS)
Note:
(a) All grievances submitted which are NOT settled within seven (7) calendar days from
the date of its submission shall automatically be referred to Voluntary Arbitration
prescribed in the CBA
(b) Halaguena v. PAL. Constitutionality/Legality of CBA provisions with the RTC