SYSTRA-RITES-OCG-AECOM

General Engineering Consultant for Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project Phase I

Audit Check List

No Audit Guide of Action Doc. Reference.

Is Project Document Control Procedure available? PQP

2.1
Is the master register of documentation available? PQP
2.2 Is the numbering system of documentation properly?
Random exam & review documents to ensure the docs are: PQP
2.3 Well coding? Readily retrieved? Controlling copy? Securely
maintenance & backup?
Do the used/using materials have obtained NOC? Review it ER-TS
3.1

Are there ITPs to list up the required test items for PQP
acceptance?
3.2 Are the auditees familiar with all the required acceptance
test items?

All the required tests have been done? ER-TS

3.3
Are all the tests results acceptable?
Review them.

Are the following documents available? Confirm and review. ER-TS

 List of major temporary works?
 Design drawing/data approved?
4
 NOC
 3rd party certificate?

 Is the register/summary of each material available and PQP

up to date? MQR
5.1  Are there sufficient information (records of store,
inspection, used, sampling, test) in the registers?

 Are the MTCs available? ER-TS

 Are the MTCs corresponding with stored quantity? STANDARDS
 Were the MTCs fully endorsed by the approved PQP
5.2 manufacturer? ITP
 Were the MTCs checked & reviewed & signed by the
person in charge of the contractor?

 Are the sampling records available? ER-TS

 Are the frequencies of sampling complying with the STANDARDS
requirements of Specifications/ Standards/ ITPs? PQP
 Were the sampling activities witnessed by GEC/MEGA ITP
5.3
according to the ITP & Specifications?
 Were the sampling records fully signed by participant?
 Can the designation of signer be identified?

Form No. GEC-CQA-FOM-AUD_03- Rev A0 File No.:GEC-CQA-AUD-NSP1_1704_A01

 SYSTRA-RITES-OCG-AECOM
General Engineering Consultant for Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project Phase I
Audit Check List

No Audit Guide of Action Doc. Reference.

 Are the test records available? ER-TS

 Were the tests implemented by authorized agency? (3rd STANDARDS
party? Site lab? Manufacturers?) PQP
 Were the tests records fully endorsed by the test ITP
agencies?
 Were the tests activities witnessed by GEC/MEGA
according to the ITP & Specifications?
5.4  Were the tests records checked and signed by the
person in charge of contractor & GEC/MEGA?
 Can the designation of signer be identified?
 Are the test results acceptable?

 Are the register / summary available and up to date? PQP

 Are there sufficient information (date, quantity, MQR
6.1
sampling, test, analysis…etc.) in the registers?

 Are the challans generated by computerized system? PQP

6.2  Is the information of challans clear and readable? Contract Agr..

 Are the samplings & tests records available? ER-TS

 Are the frequencies of samplings & tests complying with STANDARDS
the requirements of Specifications/ Standards/ ITPs? PQP
 Were the samplings activities witnessed by GEC/MEGA ITP
according to the ITP & Specifications?
 Where the samplings records signed by the participant?
And can the designation of signers be identified?
 Were the tests implemented by authorized agency? (3rd
party? Site lab? Field?)
6.3
 Were the tests records fully endorsed by the test
agencies?
 Were the tests records checked and signed by the
person in charge of contractor & GEC/MEGA? And can
the designation of signer be identified?
 Were the tests records fully endorsed by the test
agencies?
 Are the test results acceptable?

 Is there any documented (in written and consented by PQP

GEC) procedure for RFI? MS
7.1  Are the ITPs for various work items approved &
available?

 Are the RFIs with inspection records available and up to ER-TS

date? STANDARDS
 Were all check items of the checklists fully recorded & PQP
signed by the person in charge of contractor and/or MS & ITP
7.2 GEC/MEGA? And can the designation of signer be
identified?
 Had the necessary support documents (e.g. photos,
sketches, certificates…etc.) been attached with the
RFI?

Form No. GEC-CQA-FOM-AUD_03- Rev A0 File No.:GEC-CQA-AUD-NSP1_1704_A01

 SYSTRA-RITES-OCG-AECOM
General Engineering Consultant for Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project Phase I
Audit Check List

No Audit Guide of Action Doc. Reference.

 Is the register available and up to date? PQP

 Is there documented procedure for drawing control?
 Is the controlling of drawings complying with the
8
Procedure? (Including control of filing, numbering,
revision, copy, distribution, superseding…etc.)

 Is the register available and up to date? ER-GS

 Is there documented procedure for NCR control? ISO 9000
 Were the NCRs descriptions: readable? Logical? PQP
 Were the NCRs signed by authorized person? And can
the designation be identified?
9
 Were the NCRs closed out with full evidence and
comply with the Procedure?
 What are the countermeasures to against the pending
NCRs?

Form No. GEC-CQA-FOM-AUD_03- Rev A0 File No.:GEC-CQA-AUD-NSP1_1704_A01