Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 94

16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document

Pg 1 of 94
Page 1

1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

3 Case No. 16-13569-scc

4 Adv. Case No. 17-01009-scc

5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

6 In the Matter of:

8 919 PROSPECT AVE LLC,

9 Debtor.

10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

11 RODRIGUEZ et al.,

12 Plaintiff,

13 v.

14 919 PROSPECT AVE.,

15 Defendants.

16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

17

18 U.S. Bankruptcy Court

19 One Bowling Green

20 New York, NY 10004

21

22 January 25, 2017

23 1:02 PM

24

25

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 2 of 94
Page 2

1 B E F O R E :

2 HON SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN

3 U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 3 of 94
Page 3

1 Hearing re: 16-13569-scc Doc #20 Order to Show Cause

2 Shortening Notice and Scheduling Hearing to Consider the

3 Tenant-Petitioners Emergency Motion for an Order (I)

4 Granting Relief from the Automatic Stay and (II) Dismissing

5 the Chapter 11 Case and Imposing Sanctions.

7 Hearing re: 16-13569-scc Order to Show Cause

9 Hearing re: 17-01009-scc Doc #5 Order to Show Cause

10 Shortening Notice and Scheduling Hearing to Consider the

11 Tenant-Petitioners’ Emergency Motion for Abstention and

12 Remand.

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25 Transcribed by: Sonya Ledanski Hyde

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 4 of 94
Page 4

1 A P P E A R A N C E S :

3 ROSEN, KANTROW & DILLON, PLLC

4 Attorney for the Debtor

5 38 New Street

6 Huntington, NY 11743

8 BY: AVRUM J. ROSEN

10 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

11 Attorney for the Movants / Tenants

12 180 Maiden Lane

13 New York, NY 10038

14

15 BY: KENNETH PASQUALE

16

17 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

18 Attorney for the U.S. Trustee

19 201 Varick Street, Room 1006

20 New York, NY 10014

21

22 BY: ANDREA B. SCHWARTZ

23

24

25

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 5 of 94
Page 5

1 NYC DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION & DEVELOPMENT

2 Managing Attorney

3 100 Gold Street, Room 6-02

4 New York, NY 10038

6 BY: JEMMA AN

7 GDORIDA CACUCI

9 URBAN JUSTICE CENTER

10 Staff Attorney

11 123 William Street, 16th Floor

12 New York, NY 10038

13

14 BY: STEPHANIE RUDOLPH

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 6 of 94
Page 6

1 P R O C E E D I N G S

2 THE COURT: Thank you, please have a seat. Could

3 I have appearances, please?

4 MR. PASQUALE: Good afternoon, Your Honor.

5 Kenneth Pasquale from Stroock & Stroock & Lavan for the

6 tenant movants. With me is my co-counsel, Stephanie

7 Rudolph, from the Urban Justice Center. You've granted her

8 pro hac application.

9 THE COURT: Very good. Ms. Cacuci, how are you?

10 MS. CACUCI: Good. How are you, Judge?

11 THE COURT: Okay.

12 MS. CACUCI: And with me is Ms. An from HPD, an

13 attorney.

14 THE COURT: Okay. Very good. Mr. Rosen, how are

15 you?

16 MR. ROSEN: Good afternoon, Your Honor. Avrum

17 Rosen of the firm of Rosen, Kantrow & Dillon representing

18 the Debtor.

19 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Schwartz, good afternoon.

20 MS. SCHWARTZ: Good afternoon, Your Honor. Andrea

21 Schwartz for the United States Trustee.

22 THE COURT: All right, very good. All right.

23 I've received a lot of papers in the last several days,

24 including last evening -- I don't know at what time it was

25 filed, but Ms. Cacuci filed a response to the Debtor's

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 7 of 94
Page 7

1 opposition. And so you can safely assume that I have

2 everything and that I've read everything, but I'm going to

3 look to you folks to tell me the order in which you'd like

4 to discuss the various matters that are before me.

5 MS. CACUCI: If I may be heard just for a minute,

6 Your Honor, it seems the Debtor has admitted that HPD can

7 proceed with its action. I'm going to let Mr. Pasquale take

8 a look --

9 THE COURT: Okay. Let me confirm that with Mr.

10 Rosen. Mr. Rosen, the Debtor does not object and agrees

11 that the exercise of the police power exception to the

12 automatic stay is in play here and that HPD can proceed.

13 MR. ROSEN: Correct, Your Honor. They can and we

14 would like them to.

15 THE COURT: Okay.

16 MR. ROSEN: We're prepared for that.

17 THE COURT: All right. Very good.

18 MR. PASQUALE: Thank you, Your Honor. Again,

19 Kenneth Pasquale from Stroock & Stroock & Lavan for the

20 movants. (COUGHS) Excuse me. Your Honor, thank you first

21 for expediting --

22 THE COURT: Sure.

23 MR. PASQUALE: -- the hearing today.

24 THE COURT: Just let me say --

25 MR. PASQUALE: Yes.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 8 of 94
Page 8

1 THE COURT: Just let me say something about that

2 because in reading everything, I think we have to address a

3 concern that it was very expedited and due process rights

4 are, of course, important.

5 One of the reasons it was expedited was because

6 there were allegations made with respect to certain

7 emergency conditions that were in existence at the building,

8 so that was point number one.

9 And point number two, was the reality of my

10 schedule, which is -- and I'll just put it out there because

11 it is what it is -- I’m starting a two-month trial on Monday

12 and, you know, to the extent that we don't finish today and

13 we have to schedule things to resume at some point, we're

14 going to have to work around that and we will work around

15 it.

16 But there was -- it was important to me that we at

17 least get started today. So if anyone has anything to say

18 about the shortened time periods, I'm happy to hear them

19 later.

20 MR. ROSEN: Your Honor --

21 THE COURT: Mr. Rosen.

22 MR. ROSEN: -- the only thing I'd add to that is

23 in terms of the shortened time periods and I think you

24 understand the thrust to my argument in my papers, but I'll

25 wait for that. One of the things I realized when I went

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 9 of 94
Page 9

1 through -- also because it is expedited, there's also a

2 problem that I don't think there was -- I don't think not --

3 not only was it short notice and I want to put it out there

4 now, so Mr. Pasquale can address it, but the way it was

5 presented to you, I don't think you knew there were other

6 tenants who were not represented by them, that there were

7 other creditors, and that there was a bank -- there was the

8 first mortgagee. None of those people have notice of any of

9 these proceedings; they got nothing. They weren't included

10 in the order to show cause; they weren't set forth in the

11 papers as parties so you didn't know that. So in terms of a

12 motion to dismiss, motion to lift stay, I don't think you've

13 got --

14 THE COURT: Well you just -- you grouped together

15 a motion to dismiss and a motion to lift stay. Those are

16 two different things.

17 MR. ROSEN: Right.

18 MR. PASQUALE: Your Honor, and as I said --

19 THE COURT: So we have to walk before we can run.

20 MR. PASQUALE: Yes.

21 MR. ROSEN: Okay. I just -- while we're talking

22 about the --

23 THE COURT: Sure.

24 MR. ROSEN: -- process issues, I just wanted that

25 --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 10 of 94
Page 10

1 THE COURT: Right.

2 MR. ROSEN: -- to be out there.

3 THE COURT: But you should --

4 MR. ROSEN: I hadn't even really --

5 THE COURT: -- understand that based on the

6 bankruptcy pleadings that have been filed with me, it's

7 entirely unclear exactly who the Creditors are.

8 MR. PASQUALE: And that's the point, Your Honor,

9 and we made that point in our motion papers.

10 MR. ROSEN: Well there’s now -- there’s a matrix

11 that’s been updated, Your Honor.

12 THE COURT: Okay, he --

13 MR. ROSEN: I'll sit down.

14 THE COURT: Mr. Rosen, you know very well what the

15 rules of the road are. Okay, Mr. Pasquale's at the podium,

16 he's going to speak, you're going to have an opportunity.

17 MR. ROSEN: Thank you.

18 THE COURT: Okay? Go ahead.

19 MR. PASQUALE: Thank you, Your Honor. Your Honor,

20 just mentioning the urgency of the matter and I appreciate

21 the Court's schedule. The one thing I'd add with respect to

22 the timing that's very important and drives really all the

23 relief that the tenants have requested, is the fact that the

24 Housing Court is prepared to start trial tomorrow.

25 THE COURT: Yes, I was going to get to that.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 11 of 94
Page 11

1 MR. PASQUALE: So that was the urgency, you know,

2 tied to the very significant dangerous conditions in the

3 units in the building. It's important to note, Your Honor,

4 that the Housing Court trial, the Article 7A trial, concerns

5 hundreds of violations against the building. It was 327

6 violations at the time of the petition; it's now 342

7 violations, a hundred and four of which are called class C

8 violations which represent immediately hazardous conditions.

9 So this is significant.

10 Part of the relief being requested by the tenants

11 in the Article 7A proceeding is for the appointment of an

12 administrator under that local law. And I think it's clear,

13 and we'll get to this as I get into the merits of the

14 particular claims for relief, that's what the landlord

15 doesn't want to happen and they say so in their papers.

16 So, Your Honor, unless the Court has a preference,

17 I think I'd like to start with the remand motion because

18 right now the entire Housing Court case is before Your

19 Honor.

20 THE COURT: Right.

21 MR. PASQUALE: So I'd like to start with that. I

22 think that'll be short, talk a bit about the lift stay and

23 then if the Court prefers, I can talk about the bad faith.

24 THE COURT: Well, the remand doesn't do you any

25 good without the lift stay.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 12 of 94
Page 12

1 MR. PASQUALE: Well, it does and it doesn't, so --

2 THE COURT: Okay.

3 MR. PASQUALE: -- obviously, we can't proceed with

4 the case if it's not in Housing Court. We can proceed with

5 the case tomorrow against everybody except the Debtor, if it

6 is remanded. There are many other defendants in the --

7 THE COURT: I see your point.

8 MR. PASQUALE: -- case, including Mr. Miller,

9 individually, who is the managing member of the Debtor. So

10 the case can continue tomorrow.

11 Of course, that then leads to one of the key

12 issues on the lift stay which is, how efficient would that

13 be to proceed with a state law local real estate-related

14 issue in the Housing Court against all the other parties.

15 And then at some point, in light of Your Honor's schedule

16 according to what the Debtor has requested, we try the rest

17 of the Housing Court case before you?

18 THE COURT: Well, yeah. I mean I have a lot of

19 questions about all of that and we're going to get to them.

20 One thing I'd like you to do with whatever commentary Ms.

21 Cacuci and you, Mr. Rosen, want to supply is, you need to

22 help me understand beyond what I've read in the papers

23 because it doesn't necessarily all agree; is the implication

24 of the appointment of a 7A Administrator, and what that

25 means in terms of the current control of the building,

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 13 of 94
Page 13

1 future control of the building, and what the implications

2 also are for the mechanics of providing the funding for the

3 repairs that are required for the building.

4 MR. PASQUALE: Okay.

5 THE COURT: There seems to be an area of lack of

6 disagreement between the parties that repairs are ongoing

7 and are necessary, and that requires money. And I couldn't

8 tell if the suggestion was being made by the Debtor that in

9 the event of the appointment of the 7A Administrator that

10 funding source is gone -- is necessarily gone, either by

11 operation of law or because the Debtor's principal will

12 simply refuse to provide the funding. So there's that whole

13 constellation that we need to talk about, but we also need

14 to talk about, what are we doing here?

15 MR. PASQUALE: Yes, well --

16 THE COURT: Why is this case here?

17 MR. PASQUALE: Yes.

18 THE COURT: And I'm just very aware -- I'm very

19 focused on doing things in the right order.

20 MR. PASQUALE: Right. So, as you're --

21 THE COURT: So --

22 MR. PASQUALE: Thank you, Your Honor.

23 THE COURT: Okay.

24 MR. PASQUALE: So, as you know, I'm the bankruptcy

25 attorney.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 14 of 94
Page 14

1 THE COURT: Yes.

2 MR. PASQUALE: So I'm going to address the second

3 of those two, and I'm -- when I finish, Ms. Rudolph will

4 address your questions --

5 THE COURT: Okay.

6 MR. PASQUALE: -- on the housing proceeding, the

7 Article 7A Administrator and the like.

8 THE COURT: Okay.

9 MR. PASQUALE: So let's start just with one

10 overall thing and then, as I said, I'll talk about the

11 remand. The papers that we submitted, the exhibits -- both

12 Ms. Rudolph's declaration itself and the exhibits - there

13 was a comment made that these are just mere allegations,

14 there's no evidence in the record. That is not true. Ms.

15 Rudolph's declaration talks about her own personal knowledge

16 as to the proceeding in the Housing Court action, and most

17 importantly, Your Honor, the petition that's annexed, that's

18 Exhibit A, the Housing Court petition is verified by the

19 tenants under oath. So there was sworn testimony in the

20 record. Okay?

21 THE COURT: Let me ask you to pause. Are we -- do

22 you believe that we're having an evidentiary hearing?

23 MR. PASQUALE: No, Your Honor --

24 THE COURT: Okay.

25 MR. PASQUALE: -- but I did want to state your

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 15 of 94
Page 15

1 purposes --

2 THE COURT: All right.

3 MR. PASQUALE: -- of the motion.

4 THE COURT: So we're not having an evidentiary

5 hearing today.

6 MR. PASQUALE: Correct, Your Honor.

7 THE COURT: Right, Mr. Rosen?

8 MR. ROSEN: Your Honor, my understanding is when

9 matters are first on any hearing in this day, it's not on

10 for an evidentiary hearing.

11 THE COURT: Right.

12 MR. ROSEN: If you're asking me if I think we need

13 one, I think the answer's yes, but we're not.

14 THE COURT: Well, we'll get to that.

15 MR. ROSEN: Okay.

16 THE COURT: But right now --

17 MR. PASQUALE: All I'm --

18 THE COURT: Yeah.

19 MR. PASQUALE: Yes, Your Honor --

20 THE COURT: Yes.

21 MR. PASQUALE: -- I understand that, of course.

22 THE COURT: Yes.

23 MR. PASQUALE: I'm just making the point that the

24 declarations are sworn like they should be. This is not

25 just allegations thrown in and a complaint that's not

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 16 of 94
Page 16

1 verified.

2 THE COURT: Okay.

3 MR. PASQUALE: On the motion to remand, Your

4 Honor, frankly, the Debtor concedes that remand is

5 appropriate. If you look at their opposition, they don't

6 even discuss the standard for mandatory abstention under 28

7 U.S.C. 1334(c)(2). Instead, they make an argument that the

8 Court has related to jurisdiction, which I conceded in our

9 motion. That's not the issue. So the -- I think it's

10 conceded, but I will go through the factors because I think

11 it's important.

12 First, the motion to abstain is timely; filed it

13 within 10 days of the removal. Second, the Housing Court

14 proceeding that was removed, it's now the adversary

15 proceeding before Your Honor, is based solely upon state

16 law. It's solely Article 7A of the New York Real Property

17 Actions and Proceedings Law.

18 The Housing Court proceeding is not a court

19 proceeding. The Debtors, again, do not argue with this --

20 although they did in their notice of removal, they've

21 abandoned that argument. So if it's related to, doesn't

22 work for mandatory abstention purposes.

23 The only basis for removal was the bankruptcy

24 jurisdiction from a result of the filing of the petition.

25 The Housing Court proceeding will be timely adjudicated in

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 17 of 94
Page 17

1 state court. I wish we could get a judgment tomorrow, but

2 the trial can start tomorrow and so it certainly will be

3 timely adjudicated.

4 So, Your Honor, it's pretty simple. Mandatory

5 abstention, all the factors have met, and the Housing Court

6 action should be remanded. Permissive abstention also would

7 apply, but Your Honor doesn't need to go there.

8 Now, upon remand, Your Honor, if your -- Court

9 were to agree with me, as I mentioned earlier, the Housing

10 Court case would start tomorrow. It would not start against

11 the Debtor unless the stay is lifted. And I do think, Your

12 Honor, although agreed -- not an evidentiary hearing today,

13 you don't need one on the lift stay motion.

14 We go through all the details in our papers as to

15 the (indiscernible) factors; let me just hit a few. The

16 balance of the harm weighs overwhelmingly in favor of the

17 tenants. We already talked about the conditions they face

18 in the building; illegal construction, release of toxic dust

19 during construction, removal of bathrooms, children bathing

20 in sinks, exposure to lead paint, infestation. These are

21 all the things, plus more, alleged in the proceeding that

22 will be tried tomorrow.

23 The only harm the Debtor raises is, well, it's

24 going to cost us money to litigate the case. Well, they're

25 going to spend that money anyway. We're going to try that

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 18 of 94
Page 18

1 case either in Housing Court or it's going to be tried here

2 -- I don't think that would happen, but that's what they're

3 asking. It's not as if they don't get to try the case; that

4 they can abandon the tenants' claims. The tenants' claims

5 are legitimate claims; they will get addressed somewhere, in

6 some court. So the balance of the harms is overwhelmingly

7 in favor of the tenants. The Debtor's going to spend that

8 money anyway.

9 Now, Mr. Miller, in his affidavit and the Debtor

10 try to raise all these factual issues as to what they're

11 doing and Your Honor mentioned that and again, my co-counsel

12 will address some of them. But that said, none of it

13 matters. Because what we're really talking about is, where

14 should the claims be litigated?

15 WOMAN: Right.

16 MR. PASQUALE: That's the issue on the lift stay

17 here. There is a pending proceeding. So all of those facts

18 that are raised are appropriate to be raised as potential

19 defenses to the tenants' claims; they have nothing to do

20 with the questions of, should this court -- this bankruptcy

21 court litigate those claims against the Debtor? Adjudicate

22 those claims, excuse me. Second, again, the case is ready

23 for trial tomorrow in the Housing Court. As Your Honor

24 said, Your Honor can't try this case tomorrow. I wouldn't

25 expect Your Honor to do that.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 19 of 94
Page 19

1 THE COURT: How long is the trial expected to

2 take?

3 MR. PASQUALE: It will take a lot. I don't think

4 we know exactly yet. I wish, as I said earlier --

5 THE COURT: Yeah. I mean, I guess a lot of my

6 questions relate to that, but --

7 MR. PASQUALE: Yeah, and again, my co-counsel is -

8 -

9 THE COURT: Sure.

10 MR. PASQUALE: -- counsel off record in that case

11 --

12 THE COURT: Right.

13 MR. PASQUALE: -- so she can talk to that --

14 THE COURT: Right.

15 MR. PASQUALE: -- but it will not be quick. It

16 will not be quick. Third, Your Honor --

17 THE COURT: But the --

18 MR. PASQUALE: Yes?

19 THE COURT: But they ask --

20 MR. PASQUALE: Yes.

21 THE COURT: -- the relief sought is the

22 appointment of the administrator.

23 MR. PASQUALE: Yeah. That is --

24 THE COURT: Is --

25 MR. PASQUALE: -- part of the relief in that

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 20 of 94
Page 20

1 action, correct. Correct. Absolutely, again, just to touch

2 on, you know, judicial economy again, were Your Honor to

3 agree with me in the case to get remanded, we're now looking

4 at two separate litigations.

5 Obviously, that is not efficient use of judicial

6 resources, either of this Court or the housing court. And

7 finally, and I think this is pretty significant, the Housing

8 Court is a specialized court. It was created to handle

9 exactly this type of litigation.

10 Why this Court would take the burden of litigating

11 matters designed for the Housing Court seems nonsensical.

12 Judge Beatty -- former Judge Beatty in the (indiscernible)

13 case cited in our motion said, this Court sees no reason to

14 substitute the bankruptcy court itself or the civil court as

15 the enforcement forum, speaking about a 7A proceeding, which

16 has special expertise in these matters. We would suggest

17 the Court should do the same here.

18 Your Honor, before I forget on the lift stay, were

19 Your Honor to agree and grant that relief, but also ask that

20 you waive the 14-day stay of effectiveness so that we could

21 proceed tomorrow. Your Honor, the last, you know, section I

22 had to discuss was on the dismissal. I'm happy to stop here

23 for now.

24 THE COURT: Thank you. Why don't you stop there

25 for the moment?

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 21 of 94
Page 21

1 MR. PASQUALE: Yeah.

2 THE COURT: Yeah.

3 MR. PASQUALE: And as we said in the papers,

4 that's something that does not have to be handled today.

5 THE COURT: Right. So before you sit down --

6 MR. PASQUALE: Yes.

7 THE COURT: So -- because you're wearing the

8 bankruptcy hat --

9 MR. PASQUALE: Yes.

10 THE COURT: -- what if I were to say to you, tell

11 you what? You're here. How about if I gave you a Chapter

12 11 Trustee?

13 MR. PASQUALE: It's something I've discussed with

14 the U.S. Trustee. I don't think that would help us very

15 much.

16 THE COURT: Can you explain that?

17 MR. PASQUALE: It seems to me that it's -- the

18 process -- the administrator will take longer, granted.

19 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

20 MR. PASQUALE: The Trustee could be in today. It

21 seems to me that -- I'm struggling because I -- the

22 interplay between --

23 THE COURT: Well, let's talk --

24 MR. PASQUALE: Yeah.

25 THE COURT: Let's talk about the interplay between

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 22 of 94
Page 22

1 the two of them. Maybe we can do both.

2 MR. PASQUALE: Maybe we could do both.

3 THE COURT: Maybe we could do both.

4 MR. PASQUALE: That, I would have --

5 THE COURT: And this gets to what --

6 MR. PASQUALE: Yeah.

7 THE COURT: -- I'll ask Ms. Rudolph about and Mr.

8 Rosen will have a chance to --

9 MR. PASQUALE: I would --

10 THE COURT: Yeah.

11 MR. PASQUALE: -- not struggle with that, Your

12 Honor, as much as alternatively between the two.

13 THE COURT: Right; to reflect on that. But to the

14 extent that there would be a functional way to have the

15 underlying Housing Court issues decided by the Housing

16 Court, who unquestionably has that expertise which I do not.

17 But at the same time, then subject to appropriate arguments

18 showings, et cetera that control of this case, the Debtor,

19 the building, the renovations be put in the hands of a

20 Chapter 11 Trustee instead of a 7A Administrator, then as

21 I'd like to say, you're here with me. I have control; I

22 have very broad enforcement powers.

23 MR. PASQUALE: Mm hmm.

24 THE COURT: I have very broad jurisdiction so that

25 I have the ability to oversee this Debtor and this case

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 23 of 94
Page 23

1 without going beyond the scope of what I know. So --

2 MR. PASQUALE: I understand, Your Honor.

3 THE COURT: And that would seem to, in its

4 entirety, address the alleged concern about the Debtor in

5 the future being deprived of a potential tax abatement,

6 which I have a lot of questions about, but among other -- it

7 has some aspects of it that frankly are appealing to me.

8 MR. PASQUALE: I understand, Your Honor. I guess

9 the only thing I'd add and I don't need -- I agree with you

10 that we need to get into the details today, but if it's a

11 bad faith filing it's still a bad faith filing. And --

12 THE COURT: Right.

13 MR. PASQUALE: -- I think we would need to discuss

14 whether or not the case has any business being in the court,

15 but I understand Your Honor's comments --

16 THE COURT: Right.

17 MR. PASQUALE: -- and I take them very seriously.

18 And it's --

19 THE COURT: Okay.

20 MR. PASQUALE: -- something we will need --

21 THE COURT: All right.

22 MR. PASQUALE: -- to discuss.

23 THE COURT: So let's everybody think about that.

24 MR. PASQUALE: So let me --

25 THE COURT: I don't think -- I can't recall if it

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 24 of 94
Page 24

1 was suggested anywhere.

2 MR. PASQUALE: It was suggested in the Debtor's

3 papers.

4 THE COURT: Yes, it was. It was.

5 MR. ROSEN: It was, Your Honor, and I'll be happy

6 to --

7 THE COURT: It was suggested in the Debtor's

8 papers.

9 MR. PASQUALE: So let me see the podium, please,

10 and I --

11 THE COURT: Yeah, sure.

12 MR. PASQUALE: Okay.

13 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. Hello.

14 MS. RUDOLPH: Good afternoon, Your Honor.

15 THE COURT: Good afternoon.

16 MS. RUDOLPH: I'll just start with the basic --

17 kind of, like, the mechanics of how a 7A case works, based -

18 -

19 THE COURT: Please.

20 MS. RUDOLPH: -- on my experience and my reading

21 of the statute. We've done this in my office at The Urban

22 Justice Center on behalf of low-income tenants many times

23 before. So the actual appointment of the administrator

24 after trial is governed by the RPAPL 778.

25 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 25 of 94
Page 25

1 MS. RUDOLPH: It spells out exactly how the

2 administrator's to run the building and it -- and usually as

3 soon as a judgment is entered in favor of the tenants -- the

4 petitioning tenants, an order is very expeditiously issued

5 that explains exactly how the administrator will run the

6 building; that includes the tenant's receiving notice, both

7 petitioning and non-petitioning tenants, that they will be

8 depositing their rents immediately with the 7A Administrator

9 as opposed to the owner. The owner maintains the ownership

10 of the building, responsibilities for the mortgages and the

11 taxes and things like that. However, the administrator is

12 charged with making those repairs.

13 The question you had, Your Honor, seemed to be

14 about how the administrator without a pool of money to begin

15 with would be able to affect those very necessary repairs.

16 In this particular instance, there are a couple of special

17 circumstances, but typically what happens is, when you file

18 a 7A case, the 7A unit of HPD -- and HPD can speak a bit

19 more to this -- goes out and does what's called a roof to

20 cellar inspection.

21 THE COURT: Right.

22 MS. RUDOLPH: A roof to cellar inspection.

23 THE COURT: Roof to cellar, okay.

24 MS. RUDOLPH: This includes the common areas, the

25 roof, the cellar, and all of the apartments including non-

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 26 of 94
Page 26

1 petitioning apartments that they are able to get access to.

2 In this case, we --

3 THE COURT: What's the number -- what's the -- how

4 many apartments total, and how --

5 MS. RUDOLPH: Right.

6 THE COURT: -- many petitioning versus non-

7 petitioning?

8 MS. RUDOLPH: So it's a little bit complicated

9 because there are commercial units, but the residential

10 units, by my count there are 35 units, 29 of which are

11 actually occupied and then, one of them belongs to the super

12 who was recently fired, so that's actually about to be a

13 vacant unit when Mr. Miller effects the eviction, and then I

14 have 19 petitioning apartments, but because we also have

15 folks who are -- have rights to the apartments. On the

16 case, we have 29 petitioners, but 19 apartments out of the

17 29 occupied units, if that makes sense.

18 THE COURT: Nineteen of -- units out of the 29

19 occupied units?

20 MS. RUDOLPH: Correct. That is my count. There's

21 a little bit of confusion. There's also seven separate

22 commercial units, only one of which is vacant and then,

23 there are tenants who are relocated because of not having a

24 bathroom or part -- or a demolished wall or something, and

25 those tenants are living in vacant units with the consent of

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 27 of 94
Page 27

1 the owner at this point and at the direction of city

2 agencies. So it's a little bit complicated.

3 THE COURT: What's the law with respect to the

4 rights of the tenants and the obligations of the owner on

5 relocating tenants or providing alternative housing

6 arrangements because of violations that make a unit

7 uninhabitable or because of repairs to a particular unit?

8 MS. RUDOLPH: So it's a little bit complicated.

9 It depends on whether the city has placed in a vacate order.

10 Once the city has vacated the apartment officially, the

11 tenant can maintain their rights to the apartment if they're

12 rent stabilized through the state agency DHCR and then, the

13 Red Cross in conjunction with HPD will relocate the tenants.

14 In this case and that's the kind of special circumstances I

15 was getting to, not only has AEP -- HPD done their 7A scope

16 of work which lays out how much money it would cost and

17 typically our administrators are able to access a pool of

18 money from HPD who does support our case in this matter, so

19 that money's ready to go typically right away when the 7A

20 Administrator takes over, so I've had my --

21 THE COURT: The money is ready to go to defray the

22 costs of the relocated tenant?

23 MS. RUDOLPH: To help renovate the building,

24 whatever it takes. Relocating tenants; it might be putting

25 in new gas lines, putting in new sewage lines.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 28 of 94
Page 28

1 THE COURT: But let me ask my question again --

2 MS. RUDOLPH: Okay.

3 THE COURT: -- because perhaps it wasn't clear.

4 One of the allegations has to do with doing renovations to

5 the bathroom, say line-by-line.

6 MS. RUDOLPH: Right.

7 THE COURT: The A line, the B line and the C line,

8 okay? So -- and everyone seems to agree that that is

9 something you have to do. So when you're doing that and you

10 get to somebody's particular -- apartment 2E --

11 MS. RUDOLPH: Mm hmm.

12 THE COURT: -- let's say --

13 MS. RUDOLPH: Sure.

14 THE COURT: -- right, because you're doing the E

15 line, and 2E is not going to have a working bathroom and

16 there's going to be dust and the apartment, everyone can

17 agree, is not a place you would want your family to be

18 living during the renovation. Who has the monetary

19 responsibility? Who has the responsibility to find

20 alternate housing or relocation site and who pays?

21 MS. RUDOLPH: So, absolute litigation. Typically,

22 it's just whatever the landlord and the tenant negotiate.

23 If you're in Housing Court or for -- in state court for

24 maybe a damages claim, usually a Judge will order that the

25 landlord actually pay for the cost of relocation.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 29 of 94
Page 29

1 But without litigation, it's really whatever,

2 whatever. And so at this point, prior to litigation,

3 several tenants had been relocated at their own expense;

4 paying rent elsewhere or just sort of living between two

5 apartments, cooking in one apartment, going to bathroom in

6 another. We're talking about tenants with children.

7 The biggest concern and the reason we filed this

8 case, at least -- like, I filed it almost immediately after

9 entering the building was because of the landlord enter --

10 and landlord's agents entering the building, unlicensed

11 contractors saying, you know, we're going to do a repair,

12 ripping out a bathroom that has lead paint in the walls, and

13 releasing lead dust.

14 And so one of the biggest concerns of the

15 Department of Health -- which is a party in this case -- has

16 placed many violations for lead dust and several children

17 have tested positive for lead poisoning.

18 So that work is continuing where we had, as

19 recently as December 19th the landlord go in or landlords'

20 workers go in, knock on the door of apartment 2C where a

21 child resides, say, you know, we're going to fix a wall up

22 or just patch a hole, demolish part of the wall, release

23 lead dust, and we do have violations for both lead paint in

24 those apartments, class A violations, and lead dust placed

25 by two separate city agencies.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 30 of 94
Page 30

1 So what you have here is not just the fact that we

2 have a lot of work that needs to get done, but the manner in

3 which has gotten done in the past and has been done since we

4 started this litigation is extremely problematic.

5 And what's more problematic is when we went back

6 to court on an emergency motion to try to get that work to

7 stop and to get them to abate the lead in apartments

8 (indiscernible) correctly on December 23rd, I let their

9 attorneys know about the OSC on December 21st and they

10 immediately filed this matter for bankruptcy court and told

11 me that we could not appear. So there's been an attempt to

12 delay.

13 Furthermore, the trial's tomorrow, yes, but my

14 adversary in Housing Court refused to file an answer as per

15 the Judge's orders in the Housing Court case. And I assume

16 they're going to use that as a basis to say they're not

17 trial-ready even though the Judge ordered --

18 THE COURT: Is that true, Mr. Rosen?

19 MR. ROSEN: I don't know, Your Honor. I believe

20 they took the position --

21 THE COURT: What do you mean you don't know?

22 MR. ROSEN: Can I check with my client? Let me

23 talk to him.

24 THE COURT: Well, first of all, let's have --

25 let's do -- we'll do a little bankruptcy law, okay? Mr.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 31 of 94
Page 31

1 Pasquale will, I think, probably tell you that Mr. Rosen was

2 within his rights in not filing an answer because once the

3 petition is filed -- which I know it's your position that it

4 was filed in bad faith -- a stay does come into place.

5 Okay? And Mr. Pasquale's agreeing with me.

6 MR. PASQUALE: Right. We're here, Your Honor,

7 and, Your Honor, that --

8 THE COURT: Okay. But -- so that's why we're

9 here. So -- and I'll give you a little lesson in

10 bankruptcy; there is case law to the effect that -- well,

11 that there would need to be relief from the automatic stay

12 even for the Debtor to file a pleading that would defend its

13 rights.

14 MS. RUDOLPH: Fair enough, but --

15 THE COURT: But the point that you're raising is

16 something that I'm going to be interested in because if

17 that's something that the Debtor intends to do, that's

18 something I want to know about today.

19 MS. RUDOLPH: This is -- my point was, that this

20 is a delay tactic to try to hide from what could have

21 resulted and may have resulted in lead poisoning in children

22 and that's -- that is kind of the point. But, I think, to

23 return to your questions about the 7A --

24 THE COURT: Sure.

25 MS. RUDOLPH: -- there are two extenuating

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 32 of 94
Page 32

1 circumstances in this case.

2 One is, HPD has been in the building since 2013

3 because the building is the Alternative Enforcement Program,

4 which is the program for the 200 worse buildings. It has

5 remained there since 2013 while HPD has also been in court

6 prosecuting their own action for enforcement and is at the

7 civil and criminal contempt stage which is also scheduled

8 for tomorrow morning, their hearing on that matter.

9 So I guess because AEP has done a scope of work

10 and knows what the costs are and has already lent money to

11 Mr. Miller, the real difference is not going to be, is the

12 city going to be giving money to Mr. Miller or to an

13 administrator. So the question really is, who is going to

14 be in charge of that pool of money that AEP and HPD are

15 already giving to the 7A Administrator -- to the owner?

16 THE COURT: But there's an identifiable pool of

17 money that's available to remediate and repair this

18 building?

19 MS. RUDOLPH: Well right now, AEP -- we -- in

20 order to file a 7A, you need to do a title search and find

21 out who has given money, who has liens, so HPD, the city of

22 New York, ECB, all are also parties to this case, both as

23 enforcement agencies and lien holders, but the city is -- I

24 -- and the city can speak more to this, but the city has

25 already given Mr. Miller loans to help rehabilitate this

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 33 of 94
Page 33

1 property.

2 Our position is that he has abused that money and

3 used it to essentially try to vacate the building by causing

4 essentially what is --

5 THE COURT: Constructive evictions.

6 MS. RUDOLPH: Constructive eviction is the word I

7 was looking for. So we're at a point here where it's an

8 absolute emergency. I receive calls from my clients, many

9 of whom are here today, at all hours of the night; bursted

10 pipe, gas leak, you know, lead dust, all kinds of issues,

11 lack of heat and hot water at the beginning of the season

12 and this is a constant emergency. I mean, I do not sleep

13 because of this case and neither do my clients and I imagine

14 it's much worse for them.

15 So I think that the real question is, who's going

16 to manage the money? Is it going to be Mr. Miller or is it

17 going to be the 7A Administrator who will have access to

18 grants and interest-free loans and I think the city can

19 speak more about that but that is a huge part of our case

20 and why HPD is a party, and why HPD supports our case and

21 would testify in our case about what needs to get done and

22 how it needs to get done, and we hope that a 7A

23 Administrator would be able to do the work in a way that

24 respects the health, life and dignity of our clients, which

25 has not happened thus far and that's really the concern.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 34 of 94
Page 34

1 So I would also say that the statute requires RPAL

2 -- RPAPL 774 requires a trial within five days of the first

3 appearance. We did extend the time that the landlord could

4 answer as a courtesy, a courtesy which we -- which was

5 abused, especially knowing that the holidays were coming.

6 So this comes as quite -- I wouldn't say a shock, but is

7 quite prejudicial to our clients at this juncture when we're

8 trial-ready and we gave them far more than the five days

9 that the statute allows for an adjournment out of a courtesy

10 over the holidays and because they requested it.

11 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.

12 MS. CACUCI: May I approach?

13 THE COURT: Sure.

14 MS. CACUCI: Just a few points. First of all, in

15 terms of the papers that I filed last night, Your Honor,

16 just wanted to make sure because it seemed like at least it

17 was implied they’re expressed in the opposition that, you

18 know, somehow HPD and the tenants were not on the same side

19 and I wanted to make sure that the Court understands that

20 HPD is supporting, you know, the tenants' position so that

21 there's no question about that and then of course the relief

22 that tenants are asking, as well.

23 In terms of -- I would like to address a little

24 bit the suggestion of a Chapter 11 Trustee, Your Honor, and

25 I think --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 35 of 94
Page 35

1 THE COURT: Yes.

2 MS. CACUCI: -- I find that -- I think that'll be

3 very problematic because that would mean the third layer of

4 expense. Again, this case has --

5 THE COURT: What are the three?

6 MS. CACUCI: Right. The -- first of all, because

7 the building has had so many issues, as I mentioned in my

8 papers, it was twice in the Alternative Enforcement Program.

9 THE COURT: Yes.

10 MS. CACUCI: The first fund right before -- up to

11 two months before the Debtor acquired the property. It was

12 out of the program in June, then the acquired it in August,

13 and then it was placed again in 2013.

14 When a building is placed in this program -- Mr.

15 Rosen is very familiar with the program because he's had

16 other cases -- there is an additional layer of expenses.

17 You know, the reason -- and it's all statutory. The reason

18 HPD is forced to do this just really to compel the property

19 owner and the principal, whoever's responsible under the

20 municipal codes for ownership, to do something. So that

21 means additional inspection fees --

22 THE COURT: Right.

23 MS. CACUCI: -- additional --

24 THE COURT: Okay.

25 MS. CACUCI: -- you know, enforcing compliance.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 36 of 94
Page 36

1 So --

2 THE COURT: Right.

3 MS. CACUCI: -- that in itself --

4 THE COURT: Okay.

5 MS. CACUCI: -- makes it very expensive, and --

6 THE COURT: Okay.

7 MS. CACUCI: -- so the building has been --

8 THE COURT: Sure.

9 MS. CACUCI: -- for four years in that. Then, on

10 top of that, if the 7A is appointed, that makes it even more

11 expenses -- expensive because, again, they're additional

12 things that have to happen. Under the AEP program, they're

13 mandated to make -- so they're beyond making ordinary, you

14 know, little repairs here and there. HPD had to compel them

15 to make capital improvements because --

16 THE COURT: Right.

17 MS. CACUCI: -- you know, they're required. So,

18 you know, to have a Trustee, the Trustee could not displace,

19 you know, the AEP program. That has to stay in place.

20 THE COURT: Right, but why do --

21 MS. CACUCI: So --

22 THE COURT: -- you have to have the AEP program

23 and -- right now, you have the AEP program and the Debtor in

24 control.

25 MS. CACUCI: Right.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 37 of 94
Page 37

1 THE COURT: Right? So as you know, if a Chapter

2 11 Trustee came in, the Debtor -- they -- the Debtor would

3 no longer --

4 MS. CACUCI: Right.

5 THE COURT: -- be in control.

6 MS. CACUCI: Right.

7 THE COURT: The Chapter 11 Trustee would be in

8 control.

9 MS. CACUCI: Right, but how would the Trustee make

10 -- what would be the role, really, and how would -- in terms

11 of the repairs and all that?

12 THE COURT: That the Chapter 11 Trustee would --

13 MS. CACUCI: They would have to hire all kinds of

14 -- the --

15 THE COURT: So imagine the person who would be --

16 serve as the 7A Administrator.

17 MS. CACUCI: Right.

18 THE COURT: Is -- instead of wearing that hat, as

19 a hat that says Chapter 11 Trustee.

20 MS. CACUCI: Yeah, but the difference is that the

21 7A Administrators do just that.

22 THE COURT: I understand.

23 MS. CACUCI: And they're very knowledgeable and

24 qualified to do that kind of housing work, whereas, a

25 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Trustee, you know, would call the city

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 38 of 94
Page 38

1 and say, what do I do now? It's just a totally different

2 ball game. I also want to make one other point in terms of

3 the funding. There are kind of a few things that I need to

4 address, and my colleague from HPD is going to also --

5 THE COURT: What's the recourse of the tenants?

6 So the 7A Administrator is put in place and things don't go

7 smoothly.

8 MS. CACUCI: In terms of repairs?

9 THE COURT: Repairs.

10 MS. AN: I can speak to that.

11 MS. CACUCI: Yes, you can.

12 THE COURT: Yeah. My -- I mean, the -- my notion

13 -- and I'm being educated on this, obviously, is that I

14 think the tenants want recourse, they want someone to be

15 responsive to their needs and concerns and have the

16 assurance that things are going to move forward.

17 MS. CACUCI: Yeah.

18 THE COURT: So would --

19 MS. CACUCI: The 7A Administrator works hand-in-

20 hand with HPD, and HPD approved contractors and companies

21 and, you know, they all have to have the experience and

22 they're vetted by HPD as far as I'm concerned. And also --

23 because in terms of the funding -- and then my colleague

24 address that, as well -- normally -- and again, I say

25 normally --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 39 of 94
Page 39

1 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

2 MS. CACUCI: -- because maybe this case is a

3 little bit unusual in the sense that it appears that Mr.

4 Miller is an equity owner and is part of some pension-

5 sharing plan -- anyway. So he may have some money,

6 personally and he's already invested some money in the

7 property. In a lot of cases, there is no money, and repairs

8 have to be made, and then the 7A Administrator is authorized

9 by --

10 THE COURT: Okay.

11 MS. CACUCI: -- statute to borrow from the city.

12 When they borrow money from the city, of course, the city

13 then, you know, there are all kinds of protections and so on

14 and the city can impose a lien.

15 THE COURT: Is that -- so is that where we are

16 now, is the -- are at -- because the petition doesn't shed

17 any light on this, Mr. Rosen. What -- is the first

18 mortgagee on the property now the city?

19 MR. ROSEN: No.

20 MS. CACUCI: No, no.

21 THE COURT: Or is it a private lender?

22 MR. ROSEN: No. It's a --

23 MS. CACUCI: It's a commercial lender.

24 MR. ROSEN: -- commercial lender, Your Honor.

25 THE COURT: Commercial lender. Okay.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 40 of 94
Page 40

1 MR. ROSEN: And just to point out, what's being

2 said here and not being said is --

3 THE COURT: Mr. Rosen --

4 MR. ROSEN: Okay, I'm sorry.

5 THE COURT: -- I only asked one question.

6 MS. CACUCI: The city has not, to my knowledge,

7 and my colleague --

8 THE COURT: Okay.

9 MS. CACUCI: -- will speak to that --

10 THE COURT: Ms. Rudolph said that money was

11 loaned.

12 MS. CACUCI: No, apparently, that has not --

13 THE COURT: That has not occurred.

14 MS. CACUCI: -- happened yet, and I -- I've -- as

15 far -- you know --

16 THE COURT: Has money been granted?

17 MR. ROSEN: No.

18 THE COURT: No?

19 MS. AN: Your Honor, no. As far as I know, there

20 --

21 THE COURT: Thank you.

22 MS. AN: -- has been talks of giving some funding

23 to the owner, but that never came to fruition.

24 MR. PASQUALE: Your Honor, I can clarify that --

25 THE COURT: Okay.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 41 of 94
Page 41

1 WOMAN: -- if you like.

2 THE COURT: All right.

3 MS. CACUCI: And as far as I --

4 WOMAN: May I --

5 MS. CACUCI: -- know, the city does not yet --

6 again, you know, I was not part of any negotiations, but I -

7 -

8 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

9 MS. CACUCI: -- did check in terms of what I know

10 normally happens, and they're not -- there are not any liens

11 yet by the city on account of funding or on account of

12 tenant relocations because -- and I want to go through

13 relocations --

14 THE COURT: Does the city -- when the city would

15 make a loan, they would -- what -- so, hypothetically --

16 MS. CACUCI: Right.

17 THE COURT: -- and I have no idea, but

18 hypothetically, if it -- and just common sense tells me that

19 there's a difference between doing repairs on an emergency

20 basis, on kind of a scattered basis and undertaking a

21 complete plan, right? It seems to me that the latter might

22 be more cost efficient than the former. So there would have

23 to be a scope of work and there would have to be a budget.

24 So, hypothetically, say that that number is a half a million

25 dollars, okay? And the city would -- one or more of the

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 42 of 94
Page 42

1 agencies would either -- this is a question -- make a grant

2 and/or make a loan in order to finance that? Is that --

3 MS. CACUCI: There's never grant, but yes.

4 THE COURT: Oh, a loan. Okay, and would the loan

5 be in a priming position? Would it be --

6 MS. CACUCI: Yes.

7 THE COURT: It would be secured by a lien in the

8 first position?

9 MS. CACUCI: The primary responsibility -- it's

10 all statutory, but, you know, a property owner in New York

11 City has a lot of responsibilities and basically an owner's

12 responsible to maintain, to make just very simple in

13 accordance of maintain -- you know, housing maintenance

14 code, building code, everything else; it's completely the

15 owner's responsibility.

16 And then if the owner doesn't do what they're

17 supposed to do, the city's trying to, again, put pressure

18 and compel them to do it, which is -- you know, by way of

19 notices and violations and all of this, which we have

20 hundreds of, as it -- and then, you know, motions for

21 sanctions and --

22 THE COURT: Sure. So --

23 MS. CACUCI: And then, of course, you have this

24 type of programming, where the repairs are just -- you need

25 here and there, and if there is no money this is when the

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 43 of 94
Page 43

1 city's --

2 THE COURT: Understood.

3 MS. CACUCI: -- (indiscernible) have the --

4 THE COURT: Okay.

5 MS. CACUCI: -- emergency repair liens --

6 THE COURT: Got it.

7 MS. CACUCI: -- and they become in the priming

8 position. When much more has to be done, such as capital

9 repairs, again, initially if the owner has the funds and it

10 sounds ells like in this case, you know, they put some

11 money, I don't know, maybe, you know, at what point they

12 started the negotiations, but right now, as far as I know,

13 there are no liens for capital repairs by the city.

14 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

15 MS. CACUCI: Also, I don't necessarily -- and I

16 don't -- I tried to find out the answer the other day. It's

17 very hard because you need to contact so many agencies, and

18 --

19 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

20 MS. CACUCI: -- even for us, this was a very short

21 notice. So I appreciate the Court's --

22 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

23 MS. CACUCI: -- responding fast. But I don't

24 think there's necessarily -- even though a 7A Administrator

25 by statute has control over the property, I don't

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 44 of 94
Page 44

1 necessarily think that -- if the owner has funds, I don't

2 think that the owner is necessarily precluded from --

3 THE COURT: Okay, but there's something -- but the

4 city can't --

5 MS. CACUCI: -- putting that money --

6 THE COURT: Right, but the city --

7 MS. CACUCI: -- (indiscernible) city.

8 THE COURT: -- can't compel -- the city can't

9 compel the owner to -- that's my question.

10 MS. CACUCI: I don't know if they can compel the

11 owner, but --

12 THE COURT: I don't think the city could compel

13 the owner to continue to contribute, if you will, the funds.

14 So my next question is, one of the things that the Debtor

15 has said in its papers is that if you go down the 7A route

16 and the funding is put in place from the city or some other

17 source, that that would cause an event of default under the

18 existing --

19 MS. CACUCI: Maybe.

20 THE COURT: -- mortgage. So --

21 MS. CACUCI: There are no facts. I -- you know,

22 the Debtor -- it's the Debtor's obligation to indicate what

23 the situation is with the mortgage. And also, I was

24 advised, and I don't know, but -- that apparently, initially

25 was this Debtor that was the purchaser of the mortgage.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 45 of 94
Page 45

1 MR. ROSEN: Mm hmm.

2 MS. CACUCI: So I don't know whether it got

3 assigned or what the situation is, but there's nothing in

4 Mr. Rosen's papers --

5 THE COURT: We're going to talk --

6 MS. CACUCI: -- indicating who --

7 THE COURT: We're going to talk about that.

8 MS. CACUCI: -- the mortgagee is --

9 THE COURT: We're going to talk about it.

10 MS. CACUCI: -- what the situation is.

11 THE COURT: We're going to find out that.

12 MS. CACUCI: And it's also unusual that the

13 mortgagee would not put a notice of appearance in a case

14 like this.

15 THE COURT: Well, it's moving pretty quickly.

16 MS. CACUCI: But we're going to (indiscernible)

17 THE COURT: We're going to find out. The petition

18 --

19 MS. CACUCI: Right.

20 THE COURT: -- doesn't shed any light on that.

21 MS. CACUCI: I don't know J51, you know, I don't

22 know if it's something they contemplate. I don't know if

23 it's something they contemplate --

24 THE COURT: That's the taxable one?

25 MS. CACUCI: Right. I don't know. You know, that

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 46 of 94
Page 46

1 would be completely up to HPD to determine if an obligation

2 is made, and it's very nebulous as to who had made the

3 application. I don't know; I tried to find out if it's

4 property-based or not. So it may very well be, if it's not

5 owner-based, then Mr. Miller may want to do that and he owns

6 several properties, and I don't know that --

7 THE COURT: All right. We'll find out. Well,

8 that's a little --

9 MS. CACUCI: -- that would inure to the Creditor's

10 benefit.

11 THE COURT: Okay. All right.

12 MS. CACUCI: But just on the relocation, it's a

13 little bit complicated that different agencies sometimes

14 with concurrent jurisdiction and it depends which one steps

15 in. As Stephanie indicated, sometimes could be the Red

16 Cross, whatever. I know from talking to the Department of

17 Health that right now there are these two tenants that

18 apparently are under the Department of Health jurisdiction.

19 Their house under the DOE fund or something like that, so it

20 could be that those expenses to the extent they're incurred

21 by the city and I've had that in a different case, then, you

22 know, the city agency could approve a client if they

23 incurred the --

24 THE COURT: I see.

25 MS. CACUCI: -- relocation expenses. Also, I've

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 47 of 94
Page 47

1 had a case with a lot of relocations where, you know, the

2 department building said you should have full vacate order,

3 so all the buildings had to be -- in this case have been

4 some partial vacate orders. And in that case --

5 MR. ROSEN: (indiscernible)

6 MS. CACUCI: -- if the city is required to then

7 find scattered or housing for those --

8 THE COURT: Right.

9 MS. CACUCI: -- tenants, again, those would be

10 primer liens because it is, in the end, the owner's

11 obligation to take care of the property, to maintain the

12 property, and when you purchase a property -- whether in

13 bankruptcy or otherwise -- you have the burden to maintain

14 it.

15 THE COURT: Okay.

16 MS. CACUCI: Thank you, Your Honor. I -- do you

17 have anything else?

18 MS. AN: No, I don't.

19 MS. CACUCI: Okay, thanks.

20 MS. AN: All right.

21 MR. ROSEN: My turn?

22 THE COURT: Yes, Mr. Rosen.

23 MR. ROSEN: Thank you, Your Honor. Good

24 afternoon, Your Honor. Avrum Rosen for the Debtor. Let me

25 -- let me just clear up a couple of misconceptions that are

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 48 of 94
Page 48

1 out there right off the bat that made sure things. First,

2 DOE funds -- there are no -- there's only been on partial

3 vacate order that we're aware of and that's because when we

4 move people into the super's apartment to get them out, one

5 of the other ones and we have that. Everybody else has been

6 voluntarily located. If you look through the evidence we

7 put in and the emails, you will see that we have paid for

8 someone to go to another building; that we have moved people

9 around the apartments; that people have -- some people have

10 gone. Some people have refused.

11 To answer your concern, we're going to be very

12 focused on what I think your concerns are.

13 THE COURT: So why don't you answer the -- why

14 don't you say whether or not you dispute Ms. Rudolph's

15 recitation of facts relating to the lead issue and the lead

16 poisoning and the lead dust?

17 MR. ROSEN: I do -- to a certain degree, Your

18 Honor, I do very much. Because the reason why this petition

19 -- if you look at that stipulation that was entered into --

20 THE COURT: I'm not -- that's not my question.

21 I'm asking you a question. Ms. Rudolph has stated

22 affirmatively that there was an unlicensed contractor who

23 did a demolition that caused the release of lead dust and

24 that there are children who have tested positively for lead

25 -- true or false?

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 49 of 94
Page 49

1 MR. ROSEN: There's four questions there. I do

2 not believe there was anyone there unlicensed. There was a

3 contractor back there in August who was doing work that we -

4 -

5 THE COURT: Do you know whether or not he was

6 unlicensed or not?

7 MR. ROSEN: I can check. The contractor that was

8 there, that we hired was licensed. Every --

9 THE COURT: Did the contractor who did the -- was

10 the contractor who did the demolition licensed or

11 unlicensed?

12 MR. ROSEN: May I show it to my client?

13 THE COURT: Please.

14 MR. ROSEN: My understanding is everyone in that

15 building was licensed, Your Honor. Is that correct?

16 THE COURT: I'm asking a very specific and pointed

17 question. Did the contractor who did the demo that caused

18 the lead to be released, was that contractor licensed?

19 MR. ROSEN: May I have a second, Your Honor?

20 THE COURT: Yes.

21 MR. ROSEN: There was no demo in that apartment?

22 Okay. My client's telling me there was no demolition done

23 in that apartment. Your Honor, if I can step back a second

24 --

25 THE COURT: No, you cannot step back. I am asking

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 50 of 94
Page 50

1 you a series of questions.

2 MR. ROSEN: Okay.

3 THE COURT: Counsel for the tenants has made the

4 statements that there was a demolition (a) done, okay. Was

5 there a demolition done?

6 MR. ROSEN: No, my client says there's not. There

7 was a plumber in there. We had contractors -- if I can go

8 through it, Your Honor --

9 THE COURT: No.

10 MR. ROSEN: Okay.

11 THE COURT: You're going to answer my questions.

12 MR. ROSEN: Okay. My client says --

13 THE COURT: Counsel has stated --

14 MR. ROSEN: -- there was no unlicensed contractor

15 in there and there was no demolition done.

16 THE COURT: Counsel has stated that there was lead

17 dust released into the building; true or false?

18 MR. ROSEN: Yes.

19 THE COURT: Who released it?

20 MR. ROSEN: The contract -- the licensed

21 contractor that was there. If you go through the emails in

22 there, you will --

23 THE COURT: I'm not going to go through the

24 emails.

25 MR. ROSEN: Well, you don't even have to go

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 51 of 94
Page 51

1 through the emails, but this --

2 THE COURT: Mr. Rosen, this is not going to go

3 well if you're going to argue with me.

4 MR. ROSEN: Okay.

5 THE COURT: All right? I am --

6 MR. ROSEN: Your Honor, we fired -- the answer is

7 we fired the contractor.

8 THE COURT: Mr. Rosen, that's your second warning.

9 MR. ROSEN: Okay. Go ahead.

10 THE COURT: Counsel has stated that children in

11 the building tested positively for lead, true or false?

12 MR. ROSEN: My understanding is that is true.

13 THE COURT: And how did that happen?

14 MR. ROSEN: That's my understanding of what

15 happened from the record that we've put in that's there is

16 that the prior contractor, who was licensed, who was on the

17 job was doing sloppy work. Work was raised -- that was

18 raised to us, we reprimanded him.

19 It came up again when somebody from HPD -- because

20 people from HPD were there every other day, sometimes every

21 day supervising the work and they complained again and

22 brought it up on August 31st. That person was promptly --

23 was told to stop it; to get everything together and at that

24 point, they walked off the job and we hired another licensed

25 contractor who -- the contractor I've attached from the

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 52 of 94
Page 52

1 second week of September who has been doing the work since

2 there. We've also hired some of the preeminent lead

3 abatement people to go in there and the reason why -- I

4 won't go beyond your questions, Your Honor. I answered that

5 question. We attached and gave you the evidence, Your

6 Honor, that yes, there were problems there. And we fired

7 the person and got somebody else.

8 THE COURT: Show me in your submission the

9 documents that rebuke --

10 MR. ROSEN: Sure.

11 THE COURT: -- the assertion that's made with

12 respect to apartment, I think it was 2C, Ms. Rudolph.

13 MS. RUDOLPH: So -- but I want to just clarify,

14 there have been multiple with young children where lead dust

15 has been released. The apartment where the lead poisoning

16 occurred happened back -- in his time frame in August and

17 that's apartment 1D where two children are tested positive.

18 I have the results for one of the children in front of me.

19 THE COURT: Okay.

20 MS. RUDOLPH: In terms of apartment 2C, that was

21 an example of how after the "firing of the bad contractors"

22 we still had this problematic work happening under the guise

23 that we're just going to fix something and while being torn

24 down with lead paint and dust being released. That's 2C --

25 that happened December 19th, but what he's referring to is

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 53 of 94
Page 53

1 stuff that happened back in August in multiple, multiple

2 apartments --

3 THE COURT: Right, I was focusing --

4 MS. RUDOLPH: Right.

5 THE COURT: -- focusing on the --

6 MS. RUDOLPH: So we don't know if the child in 2C

7 has tested positive yet.

8 THE COURT: I see.

9 MS. RUDOLPH: Because it just happened.

10 THE COURT: Very good. Okay. So there --

11 MR. ROSEN: (indiscernible)

12 THE COURT: -- were a bunch of facts that were

13 being inflated.

14 MR. ROSEN: But the answer is so now you

15 understand, Your Honor. We had a problem with someone. We

16 fired them and we got another contractor.

17 THE COURT: Okay.

18 MR. ROSEN: Okay. On the one that happened now,

19 if we can take a second back and we just understand and I

20 think you do, but I want to walk you through the

21 construction problems. The other thing that you have to

22 understand also, we have now -- so dealing with the vacate

23 issues, I just want to clear up a couple of things fast.

24 On the vacate issues what we've done is, as

25 apartments have freed up and as we -- remember, we have

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 54 of 94
Page 54

1 fire, so we have three or four apartments completely out of

2 work. We got ran out of them.

3 I've attached the photographs so you see what they

4 look like when they're done and what all the bathrooms will

5 look like when we're done. As soon as we have all those

6 apartments done, we now have four or five apartments freed

7 up. We do five apartments at a time. We can move people

8 into the finished apartment and not have people in the

9 apartments.

10 THE COURT: And so aren't these people so excited

11 and happy?

12 MR. ROSEN: I don't know. Your Honor, well,

13 that's what we're talking about --

14 THE COURT: Well, let's find out because your

15 papers, Mr. Rosen --

16 MR. ROSEN: Mm hmm.

17 THE COURT: -- your papers portray this as being

18 all the tenants' fault.

19 MR. ROSEN: No, I didn't say that, Your Honor, I

20 didn't.

21 THE COURT: Well, I can --

22 MR. ROSEN: I said there was a fire. I said there

23 was some issues with some tenants. Your Honor, we did two

24 stacks in this building. We did them with no problems.

25 We're on the east, which are just about done and we've had

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 55 of 94
Page 55

1 lots of problems. I think you can see from the emails, Your

2 Honor, and there weren't bold -- they weren't just

3 statements. We attached detailed emails with the back and

4 forth.

5 As you can see in the state court -- in the civil

6 court, my client has authorized counsel to communicate

7 directly with them. There were emails on a daily basis

8 going back over problems. We've got people -- the problem

9 with these, if the person in the first floor or the second

10 floor won't get out --

11 THE COURT: I understand.

12 MR. ROSEN: -- it stops the whole job. Right now,

13 because we've offered -- there's even an email that I have -

14 - we offered to put someone up in a hotel, so they don't --

15 they don't want any more dust -- they don't want any dust.

16 We've offered them to more out; they don't want to move out.

17 They won't let us in. We offered to put them into a hotel.

18 So meanwhile, the problem is and we're giving --

19 in order to let them out, we're giving a stipulation that

20 says you have to waive any rights to get any rent increases

21 based on anything you do in the building, which would been

22 applied to the whole building, Your Honor.

23 So when that stuff happens, we're not making vague

24 allegations. We're giving you a -- every allegation that

25 we've made there, we have given you backup document from it,

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 56 of 94
Page 56

1 in admissible form that shows you that there are issues

2 here. And to go to the heart of the -- and so the other

3 things so you understand first, we have a commercial

4 mortgage with Flushing Bank, all right. We --

5 THE COURT: How much?

6 MR. ROSEN: A couple of million dollars?

7 MAN 1: About $2.3 million.

8 MR. ROSEN: $2.3 million.

9 THE COURT: What's the yearly debt service on that

10 mortgage?

11 MR. ROSEN: You’ve got on the spreadsheet there --

12 do you have the yearly debt service?

13 THE COURT: Eighty something thousand dollars?

14 MR. ROSEN: No, including principal and interest

15 it's more. I don't know, as I sit here.

16 THE COURT: Well, let's find out.

17 MR. ROSEN: Okay. So we've got that issue. As I

18 --

19 THE COURT: Hold on.

20 MR. ROSEN: Okay.

21 THE COURT: General ledger, Exhibit K to the

22 Debtor's response -- direct expenses.

23 MR. ROSEN: Broken out by principal in here, I

24 think, and interest. We gave you one month for the last

25 month and then we gave you over a couple of years. So I

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 57 of 94
Page 57

1 don't know if you're going to be able to break out by year,

2 Your Honor.

3 THE COURT: Well, let's take a look. Yeah, here

4 we go. So page 3 of Exhibit K, debt expense, first mortgage

5 --

6 MR. ROSEN: Interest is 70 --

7 THE COURT: -- year-to-date --

8 MR. ROSEN: -- yeah, but that's one month, Your

9 Honor, so it's $7,800 a month on interest without principal.

10 THE COURT: No, there's a year-to-date column.

11 MR. ROSEN: Oh, I'm sorry.

12 THE COURT: Right, you see period to date?

13 MR. ROSEN: Yep, mm hmm.

14 THE COURT: Year-to-date.

15 MR. ROSEN: $86,000.

16 THE COURT: Okay, $86,000.

17 MR. ROSEN: Of interest without principal.

18 THE COURT: Right, mortgage payments -- I don't

19 know what that -- so interest, there looks like there's a

20 little bit of an amortization of principal. So $86,000 is

21 not a whole heck of a lot, right?

22 MR. ROSEN: No, no, but it's still -- Your Honor,

23 my point is, you've heard the city say if the 7A

24 Administrator comes in, whatever funds go into it to finish

25 this will prime that mortgage and spark a default.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 58 of 94
Page 58

1 THE COURT: Okay and?

2 MR. ROSEN: To answer your other questions in

3 there, all right --

4 THE COURT: Have you approached --

5 MR. ROSEN: We haven't. We've been trying to get

6 them to assign counselor. We've reached out to them twice.

7 They haven't assigned counsel yet.

8 THE COURT: Who is it -- who did you say it was?

9 MR. ROSEN: Flushing Bank.

10 THE COURT: Flushing Bank?

11 MR. ROSEN: Yeah, they haven't assigned counsel

12 yet. If you want to talk to them --

13 THE COURT: What's the likelihood that they're

14 going want to go into default and foreclose on this

15 property?

16 MR. ROSEN: It depends on how much money they'll

17 get -- the 7A Administrator. If the 7A Administrator --

18 THE COURT: How much is the building worth?

19 MR. ROSEN: We think the building's worth $5

20 million.

21 THE COURT: Yeah, so it's not going to happen,

22 right?

23 MR. ROSEN: Well, I don't know, Your Honor,

24 because there's going to be at least $500,000 worth of work

25 --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 59 of 94
Page 59

1 THE COURT: Right.

2 MR. ROSEN: -- and if the city does this --

3 THE COURT: So your mortgage is --

4 MR. ROSEN: -- it's probably going to be a million

5 -- it'll probably be up over a million by the time you're

6 done. You going to have to get all new permits; you're

7 going to have to get -- you're going to have the expenses of

8 the 7A Administrator; you're going to have all -- everything

9 else going there. And I'll address your core issue of where

10 you think this is going in a minute. But it's not an

11 inexpensive process.

12 THE COURT: Okay, so at that level --

13 MR. ROSEN: So the answer is --

14 THE COURT: -- at that level the Debtor is still

15 going to -- how much did the Debtor pay for the building --

16 for the mortgage?

17 MS. CACUCI: $3.7 million.

18 THE COURT: How much?

19 MS. CACUCI: $3.7 million.

20 THE COURT: 3.7?

21 MR. ROSEN: Right and they put over -- and they've

22 already put over a million into it.

23 THE COURT: A million?

24 MR. ROSEN: Yeah.

25 MS. CACUCI: According to the papers, $700 --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 60 of 94
Page 60

1 MR. ROSEN: Can I ask her not to interrupt me?

2 THE COURT: Ms. Cacuci?

3 MS. CACUCI: Sorry.

4 THE COURT: You know that those are the rules.

5 MR. ROSEN: All right, we've got $750,000 in

6 additional over all of the rent roll that's gone in, plus

7 there were fire insurance proceeds, the amount from the

8 apartment; the amount that's gone in is about $1.2 million.

9 THE COURT: Okay, the Debtor's investment --

10 MR. ROSEN: And we anticipate at least another --

11 THE COURT: -- the Debtor's investment --

12 MR. ROSEN: -- half a million dollars.

13 THE COURT: I'm sorry.

14 MR. ROSEN: We anticipate at least another laying

15 out another half a million dollars.

16 THE COURT: And you don't believe that if you went

17 to the first mortgagee that you would get covenant relief to

18 allow for a priming?

19 MR. ROSEN: I don't know, Your Honor, but the --

20 THE COURT: Have you asked?

21 MR. ROSEN: No, because they haven't responded to

22 us yet. We just got served with -- we haven't even

23 responded to us on trying to work out something on cash

24 collateral. All right, I mean, the answer is, Your Honor --

25 what wasn't explained to you is my understanding is that to

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 61 of 94
Page 61

1 do that -- to prime them, they have to commence a separate

2 action for them to get the financing to prime the mortgagee

3 on the 7A. And to answer the first question that I think

4 you asked was it was my client's understanding --

5 THE COURT: What you are saying is, don't do any

6 of this --

7 MR. ROSEN: No, I'm not saying that. Sorry.

8 THE COURT: -- don't do any of this. Allow the

9 Debtor to remain in control and the Debtor will continue to

10 put that money in, right?

11 MR. ROSEN: Actually, Your Honor, I'm saying a lot

12 less than that, right. But what -- can I --

13 THE COURT: Well, no, no, no. But the threshold

14 question is, what's the commitment of the equity owner to

15 fund the ongoing remediation and renovation of the building?

16 Because if it's a matter of priming then, the owner can

17 still put the money into the building and not be primed.

18 MR. ROSEN: Okay, it is my client's understanding

19 of the law and I haven't heard anyone -- no one knows the

20 answer here, but from reading the J51 and reading the other

21 things, the client must put the money -- the client must put

22 the money in. So if it's --

23 THE COURT: So let him put it in.

24 MR. ROSEN: -- but if the J -- if there's a 7A

25 Administrator extending the funds, this is his understanding

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 62 of 94
Page 62

1 that he loses the right to go for the J51 and you get --

2 loses the right to go for the rent increases on that.

3 THE COURT: There's --

4 MR. ROSEN: That's -- this is a very technical

5 statute, that's it.

6 THE COURT: Okay, I do technical all the time.

7 MR. ROSEN: I know --

8 THE COURT: You know what, and that just is not --

9 that, that's not at all complacent.

10 MR. ROSEN: And, of course, he doesn't know the

11 answer and I -- from my understanding, that's the answer.

12 So -- can I -- if I can -- I want to -- I'll answer your

13 questions here. I have a proposal in the way I think this

14 should work and what's going on. I mean --

15 THE COURT: Well, let me --

16 MR. ROSEN: -- I have five people argue and I

17 tried to take notes to deal with all and --

18 THE COURT: Go ahead.

19 MR. ROSEN: -- I don't want anything to get lost.

20 Your Honor, let's go to your issue -- your concept of the

21 operating trustee because we did raise it in the papers, all

22 right? And the issue here is ,despite what the City of New

23 York is saying and what we said, again, we conceded. And I

24 did the research on this before we filed, you know. We

25 conceded that we could not -- that there was halting the 7A,

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 63 of 94
Page 63

1 rather the New York City's action, right. And New York

2 City's action will continue to go forward. The contempt

3 proceeding will go and will compliance.

4 Our problem has been, which I tried to lay forth

5 to you, we've been the catch 22. Because he's in the AEP

6 Program and we've gone through the fact that he's cured an

7 awful lot of those violations. He can't get them cleared of

8 record until he comes out, but hundreds of violations have

9 been cleared.

10 The roof's been replaced. The gas lines have been

11 replaced. A bunch of the risers have been replaced. A lot

12 of -- the entire electrical system's been replaced. There's

13 a -- if you go through there, there's proof in there,

14 especially if you look at the October report which he gave

15 which is Exhibit J to the papers, the (indiscernible) report

16 which we gave to AEP going through what had been done and

17 what's still open at the end of August, rather, I think it's

18 October.

19 You'll see there's been a tremendous amount of

20 work. There was an inspection there the other day and we --

21 THE COURT: Then why are the number of violations

22 go up?

23 MR. ROSEN: Because they don't -- won't clear the

24 old ones of record until you're coming out of

25 (indiscernible).

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 64 of 94
Page 64

1 Supposedly, yesterday, they went through the area

2 and got told there's almost a hundred violations coming off.

3 As we repair thing, the idea on doing all of these -- and

4 the other thing that happens is every time there's dust or

5 they call and there's more violations, they're violations

6 for the same thing, for dirt or debris. We're getting -- we

7 had 20 violations the other day, a lot of which are from

8 people who won't get out of the apartment saying my

9 apartment's a mess.

10 We want to move you out of the apartment so we can

11 finish the apartment. That's what we want to do.

12 THE COURT: When did the Debtor acquire the

13 building, Mr. Rosen?

14 MR. ROSEN: In 2011.

15 THE COURT: And what year is it today?

16 MR. ROSEN: It's 2017.

17 THE COURT: Six years.

18 MR. ROSEN: Well, it was actually -- no, was it

19 2012 -- it was 2012. That's five.

20 THE COURT: Eleven. All the papers say '11.

21 MS. CACUC: I attached the deed.

22 THE COURT: All the papers say '11.

23 MR. ROSEN: Right.

24 THE COURT: Why are we here in 2017 doing this?

25 MR. ROSEN: We're here because --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 65 of 94
Page 65

1 THE COURT: Why are we here?

2 MR. ROSEN: Because to answer one of the earlier

3 questions about this, Your Honor, because he originally did

4 go -- there's a special funding program that he was in that

5 they held off doing the work while he made the application.

6 It was taking too long, so he decided to self-fund --

7 THE COURT: But I'm going to change the topic,

8 okay. I want to change the topic.

9 MR. ROSEN: You get to change the topic.

10 THE COURT: I want you to explain to me very

11 clearly exactly why this case was filed when it was filed.

12 MR. ROSEN: Fine. This case was filed because the

13 tenants brought an order to show cause that sought to stop

14 all work at the building and he was in the middle of being

15 under a consent decree from HPD and he wanted to do the work

16 including continuing to do the lead paint abatement. If you

17 look at that stipulation --

18 THE COURT: That was why the case was filed?

19 MR. ROSEN: The case was filed because if all the

20 work -- if the work was stopped, he was going to lose his

21 contractors. They're going to walk off the job and he was

22 going to be in contempt and because the two actions were in

23 conflict with one another, HPD was saying A and the tenants

24 were saying doing B, he had to comply with the police power.

25 This we did not view as a police power. We viewed it as an

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 66 of 94
Page 66

1 economic. We looked at the law and we said, you know what,

2 if HPD were to say we want to bring a petition for a 7A

3 Administrator, I wouldn't have filed this case because I

4 read the case law.

5 I looked this and I said, we've got somebody being

6 in a perfect catch 22 who if he -- if that order's put in

7 place, the tenant -- the work is not going to get done.

8 THE COURT: Okay.

9 MR. ROSEN: So we went ahead and we believe that

10 it was a valid exercise to protect the equity in the

11 property --

12 THE COURT: Stop.

13 MR. ROSEN: -- to protect the tenants and the

14 creditors.

15 THE COURT: All right. Stop for a minute. Ms.

16 Schwartz, does that sound like a good faith basis for filing

17 a Chapter 11 in this Court?

18 MS. SCHWARTZ: No, it does not, Your Honor.

19 MR. ROSEN: I think it is, Your Honor. I think it

20 is. It's given the fact --

21 THE COURT: You filed Chapter 11 petition to

22 reorganize. You filed a Chapter 11 petition when you're not

23 paying your debts as they regularly become due. You just,

24 on the record, gave an explanation that has nothing to do

25 with --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 67 of 94
Page 67

1 MR. ROSEN: Yes, it does, Your Honor. I'm sorry.

2 I'll -- it does because the defaults that would have caused

3 would have destroyed the building.

4 THE COURT: You just said that the reason you

5 filed the case was to stop the tenants from moving forward

6 with their relief. There's not an existing monetary

7 default. There's nothing --

8 MR. ROSEN: But it would have caused a monetary

9 default, Your Honor.

10 THE COURT: That's not why you get to file

11 bankruptcy.

12 MR. ROSEN: No, Your Honor.

13 THE COURT: You don't get to filed bankruptcy to

14 stop someone from litigating. When somebody gets a judgment

15 and they're about to levy on your property and you want time

16 to appeal the judgment, then you file. When somebody gets a

17 judgment and they go to court and they're going to have a

18 foreclosure sale --

19 MR. ROSEN: HPD, Your Honor, HPD --

20 THE COURT: That's when you file.

21 MR. ROSEN: You know, HPD was assessing hundreds

22 of thousands --

23 THE COURT: So what, go to the Housing Court and

24 tell the Housing Court to stop HPD from levying these

25 assessments.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 68 of 94
Page 68

1 MR. ROSEN: No because we would be in default

2 because of the action being brought by the tenants.

3 THE COURT: So what.

4 MR. ROSEN: If the say was put there, Your Honor.

5 It was clearly an economic --

6 THE COURT: Why is that a reason --

7 MR. ROSEN: -- damage. Hundreds of thousands of

8 dollars are fine.

9 THE COURT: You don't get to file bankruptcy to

10 prevent the occurrence of economic damage. Otherwise,

11 everybody who's in the middle of a trial or who is

12 threatened with a legal proceeding pursuant to which they

13 can be held to a judgment -- a monetary judgment which would

14 hurt their economics would file a bankruptcy. I would be

15 even busier than I already am.

16 MR. ROSEN: Your Honor --

17 THE COURT: Mr. Rosen, you know better.

18 MR. ROSEN: No, Your Honor, on this one, I really

19 don't because of the pendency of the other action and what

20 was going on here, we were going to be -- it was going to

21 cause the default. We had daily accruing penalties that

22 were going to increase -- continue. It wasn't some

23 contingent financial debt out there. There was an HPD

24 action where things were accruing on a daily basis.

25 THE COURT: So what? I literally do not

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 69 of 94
Page 69

1 understand conceivably how that could be an appropriate

2 basis on which to file a Chapter 11 case. You go to the

3 Housing Court and you make your argument on the merits and

4 you convince one or more of the Housing Court judges, please

5 stop this, it's not in the interests of the tenants.

6 In fact, consistent with what's in all of your

7 papers, your position is in no small measure comprised of

8 arguments that the tenants are bringing this on themselves.

9 So you should go to the Housing Court and convince the house

10 court judge to not let that happen. You don't file a

11 bankruptcy in anticipation of suffering some economic

12 downside.

13 MR. ROSEN: Your Honor, it wasn't -- again, I've

14 said my position. Because of the pending HPD act and the

15 damage it was causing -- the economic damage was already

16 caused and we believed that Chapter 11 was appropriate to

17 stop that -- to try and adjudicate it.

18 THE COURT: Tell me what the debts are. What are

19 the debts -- what are the claims?

20 MR. ROSEN: Well, HPD's got a claim right now that

21 they’ve asserted that they said is well over $800,000.

22 MS. CACUCI: But Your Honor, he had just consented

23 that HPD can go forward no matter what, so I don't quite

24 understand this argument.

25 MR. ROSEN: No, no, no. We've consented that the

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 70 of 94
Page 70

1 HPD -- there's not a claim in the case, but --

2 MS. CACUCI: But we consent to HPD.

3 MR. ROSEN: Their enforcement proceedings can go

4 forward. They’re police powers, all right? Whatever

5 happens with the fines, happens with the fines. You're

6 asking me what the debts are.

7 THE COURT: (indiscernible).

8 MR. ROSEN: Okay, $800,000. We've got the debt.

9 We've got potential claims over the lead poisoning with

10 claims over against the contractor that did it; that we

11 don't know what those numbers are. We may have some very

12 large there.

13 THE COURT: You've got claims being asserted

14 against the Debtor?

15 MR. ROSEN: We may. We may. We've had papers

16 filed claiming that there's lead paint damage. If the

17 contractor did it, I assume at some point they're going to

18 come after the Debtor and we're going to have to bring in

19 the contractor that did the work.

20 THE COURT: That's a claim against the contractor.

21 That's not a claim --

22 MR. ROSEN: No, the tenants are going to assert --

23 like I already said, they're going to assert claims --

24 THE COURT: Okay.

25 MR. ROSEN: -- claims against the Debtor. So

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 71 of 94
Page 71

1 there are those claims against the Debtor. They're claiming

2 the Debtor did this. So we have those potential claims

3 which could be very large.

4 Can I go back for one second to what I wanted --

5 where I thought this was going and -- we tried to lay out

6 what the problems were here and I -- from practice I've

7 found to be -- maybe I was right, maybe I was wrong, but

8 thought that you were going to want a solution to this

9 problem. To try and --

10 THE COURT: I do want a solution to this problem.

11 MR. ROSEN: -- okay. To try --

12 THE COURT: Of course, I do. That's why I raised

13 with Mr. Pasquali from the get go the prospect of a Chapter

14 11 Trustee.

15 MR. ROSEN: Can Your Honor -- that's why I raised

16 it in my papers because it would be preferable. I need to

17 talk to my -- I didn't think right now. What I thought is

18 right we now have five vacant apartments that we're

19 finishing up that we can move people in. If this Court and

20 I never intended for you to try this case.

21 My concern was that -- my theory of this case was

22 that the HPD action would go forward. They have the ability

23 to supervise this for the benefit of all tenants in the

24 building. Those represented by this group and those not

25 represented, all right. They're in there daily doing the

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 72 of 94
Page 72

1 enforcement. We would have the jurisdiction through this

2 Court if we need it. Just as we have access problems,

3 because right now, we have no efficient way to get access in

4 the landlord-tenant court. It's an incredibly onerous

5 process. We set that forth.

6 You either have to bring a separate eviction

7 proceeding or move in the supreme court. The Housing Court

8 does not have a jurisdiction to say to a tenant, let them

9 in. All right, we have -- if you go through what we've done

10 there, we have done everything they have asked so far and

11 moving forward. I would like you, I thought the better

12 thing was to do was to treat this --

13 THE COURT: Would you be happy if your family was

14 living in this building, Mr. Rosen?

15 MR. ROSEN: No, but I'd take the offer to move

16 into one of the other apartments. I wouldn't want -- and

17 you now what? If you look at the pictures of some of the

18 renovated apartments, I'd be okay with that. They're pretty

19 nice. They're pretty nice. They're done top to bottom.

20 All right and if you look at the bathrooms when they're

21 done, if you take a look at the pictures, they're not being

22 shabbily. And the problem is, Your Honor, is they lay out -

23 - I know a little bit about -- whenever you build five

24 houses myself, the construction here -- you've got a hundred

25 year old building with water leaking.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 73 of 94
Page 73

1 THE COURT: I understand that, but that -- but

2 when you -- I think Ms. Cacuci said it best. When you

3 undertake to buy a building, it comes with responsibilities,

4 so that it's a decision to spend your money and make an

5 investment in a hundred year old building.

6 MR. ROSEN: I understand that.

7 THE COURT: And with that goes responsibilities.

8 So it is today, 2017, Debtor has been in possession of the

9 building for five to six years. You put -- you could build

10 a skyscraper in that period of time. For goodness sake --

11 MR. ROSEN: Not with people living in it while

12 you're building it, Your Honor.

13 THE COURT: All right, so then move them out.

14 MR. ROSEN: Well, the problem is when you had to

15 have the space, so as apartments became available, we did

16 that.

17 THE COURT: No, I don't think that's -- but that's

18 a limitation that in my view is made up. There's nothing

19 that says you have to put people in empty apartments in the

20 building. That's why I asked Ms. Rudolph about what the law

21 requires. Find them an apartment in another building.

22 MR. ROSEN: We actually voluntarily did that for

23 one person, Your Honor. People didn't want to leave the

24 building. If you go through those emails, you'll see people

25 refusing to leave for whatever reason. Some people -- one

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 74 of 94
Page 74

1 person left and their two sons stayed. So, we put that

2 person up in another building and --

3 THE COURT: What's the rent role of the building?

4 MR. ROSEN: The rent role is about sixty --

5 $54,000 a month, am I right?

6 DEBTOR: Yeah.

7 MR. ROSEN: It's a little bit less right now

8 because we've got --

9 MAN 1: Yes.

10 MR. ROSEN: -- five vacancies. If they were

11 occupied, it would be about $52, 54,000. There's a -- when

12 we have those apartments, there's about $10,000 positive NOI

13 a month. We gave a detailed analysis of that

14 (indiscernible). So, Your Honor, can I go back to my point

15 on -- for a second on where I think --

16 THE COURT: Go ahead.

17 MR. ROSEN: -- the best way to go on this?

18 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

19 MR. ROSEN: So my thinking on this case is I

20 understood that we were -- we would prefer a Chapter 11

21 Operating Trustee before a 7A Administrator, absolutely.

22 All right. And we would continue to fund the repairs on

23 that because through the Operating Trustee, we know we would

24 not have a problem with the money still be coming from the

25 Debtor or (indiscernible) --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 75 of 94
Page 75

1 THE COURT: Would you support that offer with a

2 commitment letter?

3 MR. ROSEN: I'll have to talk to my --

4 THE COURT: Would you support that letter -- that

5 offer with a commitment letter?

6 DEBTOR: Yes.

7 MR. ROSEN: Is that my client? Well, obviously,

8 I'm trying to talk to him before I do that, Your Honor.

9 THE COURT: You can talk to him.

10 MR. ROSEN: Okay, but Your Honor, but -- let me do

11 the but if I can --

12 THE COURT: Mm hmm.

13 MR. ROSEN: -- all right? It seemed to me that

14 the way to do this, we have been moved -- we have 15 people

15 there yesterday. We got those apartments. We have cleared

16 one line. We're on the other one. The only thing stopping

17 us from finishing with the other one is getting access to

18 the ground floor apartment. If we get the ground floor

19 apartment, we can have that other line done quickly and now,

20 we've got the apartments and we can move forward.

21 My suggestion was to keep that Operating Trustee

22 motion as the sort of dam -- over my client's head. Give

23 him a brief period of time without an operating --

24 THE COURT: That's not the proposal from the

25 table.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 76 of 94
Page 76

1 MR. ROSEN: Okay, but --

2 THE COURT: There's a Housing Court action that's

3 scheduled to go forward tomorrow.

4 MR. ROSEN: Mm hmm.

5 THE COURT: You filed this case in order to

6 prevent that from happening.

7 MR. ROSEN: Mm hmm.

8 THE COURT: There's no dispute about that. You

9 articulated that as the reason for the filing.

10 MR. ROSEN: Okay.

11 THE COURT: So that's the position that you have

12 staked out.

13 MR. ROSEN: All right.

14 THE COURT: So there's that or there's the Chapter

15 11 Trustee, frankly, today because that's the only bull

16 work, if you will, against the possibility of there being

17 slippage sideways. So one of the things that you said

18 you're concerned about, I have no idea how the rent

19 abatement works and apparently, very smart, experienced

20 people don't know how the rent abatement works.

21 There's nothing that I've heard and I think I saw

22 something in the transcript of the proceeding -- the case

23 that was before Judge Gerber almost 10 years ago, that after

24 a 7A Administrator comes in, 7A Administrator can leave and

25 then that there's nothing that precludes an application for

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 77 of 94
Page 77

1 the rent abatement. And the other thing is that there is --

2 was no commitment whatsoever in any of the papers that, that

3 would be -- that benefit would be -- the extent to which

4 that benefit would be made available to the tenant. So

5 that's purely about the owner preserving --

6 MR. ROSEN: That's in the statute, Your Honor.

7 There's a formula -- I attached the J51 application which

8 has a very complicated formula in it and it specifically

9 says that a portion based on -- gets rebated to the tenant.

10 It's in the rent control law. It's not something we

11 volunteer to do. It's statutory. If you're going to get

12 it, you have to do this.

13 THE COURT: And yours to the benefit of the equity

14 owner. It is for the benefit of the equity owner.

15 MR. ROSEN: But a portion of it gets passed on to

16 the tenant.

17 THE COURT: Understood.

18 MR. ROSEN: So --

19 THE COURT: Understood.

20 MR. ROSEN: Okay.

21 MS. CACUCI: Your Honor, I have to object because

22 no application has been filed.

23 THE COURT: No, I understand.

24 MS. CACUCI: So it's all --

25 THE COURT: Hypothetical.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 78 of 94
Page 78

1 MS. CACUCI: Conjecture.

2 THE COURT: It's hypothetical.

3 MR. ROSEN: Well, you have a limited time to do

4 it. I can assure you that we intend to do it, so it's not.

5 I think it's -- has it been submitted?

6 MAN 1: No, we have to finish it.

7 MR. ROSEN: You have to finish what?

8 MAN 1: Well, there is some segments of the work

9 that it could be submitted for. Yes.

10 MR. ROSEN: Okay.

11 MS. CACUCI: Right, they've already for the money

12 is already put in, a person could believe they can -- the

13 $700,000 --

14 MR. ROSEN: Right.

15 MS. CACUCI: -- preventing them from doing that.

16 MR. ROSEN: I don't know the answer to that. I'm

17 not sure that, that's true, Your Honor. All right, Your

18 Honor, I heard you loud and clear. May I have a moment to

19 speak with my client?

20 THE COURT: Sure.

21 MR. ROSEN: Your Honor, may we take five minutes -

22 -

23 THE COURT: Yeah, I think that's a --

24 MR. ROSEN: -- I'd like to speak with the U.S.

25 Trustee as well.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 79 of 94
Page 79

1 THE COURT: I think that's a good idea. So let's

2 take a little bit more than five minutes. Let's call it 12

3 minutes and we'll come back at 2:30. I do have a conference

4 call I have to take at 3:30 and I hope that we can finish

5 before then.

6 MR. ROSEN: Well, I don't think we -- we'll try

7 and be done with (indiscernible).

8 MS. CACUCI: Your Honor, can I just maybe -- Mr.

9 Rosen can check with the client and clarify for the record,

10 we believe that answer in state court was due long before

11 the filings, so the stay would not have --

12 THE COURT: Well, you --

13 MR. ROSEN: My understanding, no, there was a

14 stipulation there that this answer was due --

15 THE COURT: We'll figure it out.

16 (Recess)

17 THE COURT: Have a seat. All right, thank you

18 everybody for your patience. We have had the benefit of

19 some extensive conversations in chambers and we should go to

20 next -- whatever is next. Mr. Pasquale?

21 MR. PASQUALE: Your Honor, I think just to put on

22 the record is what we have discussed with respect to the

23 motion to abstain and remand and the separate motion to lift

24 stay, to dismiss the case and for sanctions that the Court

25 will carry both of those motions; not decide those today.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 80 of 94
Page 80

1 THE COURT: Right. Mr. Rosen, understood?

2 MR. ROSEN: Yes.

3 THE COURT: Okay, very good.

4 MR. PASQUALE: In lieu of that, Your Honor and I

5 would ask the Court if it would like us to propose an order

6 that we had discussed and the Court is prepared as we

7 understand it to enter an order for an Operating Trustee, a

8 Chapter 11 Trustee immediately and that, that Trustee would

9 have duties in addition to the normal duties, but the duties

10 of an Article 7A Administrator. Again, Your Honor, we can

11 prepare that order if you would like.

12 THE COURT: Right, with input from Mr. Rosen.

13 MR. ROSEN: But I thought it was not the duties,

14 but the rights. I mean, but we can work that out in the

15 order.

16 THE COURT: I'm sorry. What's the issue?

17 MR. ROSEN: As I understood it and I just -- and

18 we can work it out in the order, it wasn't necessarily the

19 duties of a 7A Administrator, I think it was to have all the

20 rights of a 7A Administrator.

21 THE COURT: What's the difference, Mr. Rosen?

22 MR. ROSEN: Because I think there may be duties of

23 a 7A Administrator that might conflict with an Operating

24 Trustee. I don't know all of them.

25 THE COURT: I can't imagine -- I can't imagine

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 81 of 94
Page 81

1 what those would be. So let's be clear that --

2 MR. ROSEN: I thought it came up with a conflict

3 of -- if the 7A Administrator -- if the Operating Trustee

4 had to get funds from the city. That was the context it

5 came up in that came up and maybe he'd have to --

6 THE COURT: Yes.

7 MR. ROSEN: -- he’d have the right. He clearly

8 has to comply with the AEP order which --

9 THE COURT: Right.

10 MR. ROSEN: -- would be that, but as I sit here, I

11 don't know what other duties a 7A Administrator has in terms

12 of reporting or anything else, so I just thought he was

13 given the rights.

14 THE COURT: Let me put it this way. The Chapter

15 11 Trustee, who will be appointed by the U.S. Trustee,

16 right, this is a two-step process. The order that I enter

17 depending upon when you get it to me either later today or

18 tomorrow, will for good cause shown, direct the appointment

19 of a Chapter 11 Trustee to operate the Debtor. That has the

20 effect of displacing the Debtor and its principals from

21 control and management of the property and everything

22 related to the property. Because the property is in the AEP

23 Program, the Chapter 11 Trustee takes the asset that he's

24 taking control of as is, where is, so to speak, so that he

25 will step into the shoes of the Debtor and continue to

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 82 of 94
Page 82

1 manage and operate the building as is required under

2 applicable state and also, bankruptcy law.

3 One of the duties of a Chapter 11 Trustee under

4 the bankruptcy code is to maximize the value for the benefit

5 of all the creditors and the constituents here because, at

6 least at this juncture, it has been represented to me that

7 there is equity value in the property, then the presumption

8 is at this point that, that Trustee will act in a way that

9 preserves that equity value.

10 We've all discussed at length today the fact that

11 renovations, remediation cost money. There are two sources

12 at least for that funding. I would say there are three. It

13 could come in the form of a continued equity contribution by

14 the principal of the Debtor. It could come in the form of

15 third-party funding from a private source, subject to

16 whatever issues may arise with respect to existing

17 stakeholders and lien holders against the property, or

18 three, as I understand it from the folks who are here on

19 behalf of the tenants and the city, that there is funding

20 available pursuant to various city programs, subject to

21 application therefore, and compliance with all the

22 requirements that go with that funding.

23 So one of the immediate tasks of the Operating

24 Trustee when he or she assumes their position is going to be

25 to immediately begin to investigate any and all sources of

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 83 of 94
Page 83

1 funding. And to the extent that the Operating Trustee gets

2 a number of different offers, they're going to figure out in

3 the exercise of their business judgment what the best one

4 is. So where we started was the difference between duties

5 and rights, I don't think that's a real thing. Ms.

6 Schwartz?

7 MS. SCHWARTZ: Just one friendly amendment to

8 that, Your Honor, when Your Honor was right -- discussing

9 the appointment of the Trustee, I noticed that counsel was

10 feverishly writing down notes, but this would be an

11 appointment with the consent of the Debtor and I didn't

12 understand --

13 THE COURT: I didn't understand that either.

14 MS. SCHWARTZ: Yeah, I didn't --

15 THE COURT: The Debtor has the option to consent,

16 but it's not a condition.

17 MR. ROSEN: My understanding was that you were

18 directing it, Your Honor.

19 THE COURT: I'm directing it.

20 MR. ROSEN: I asked that question.

21 THE COURT: Does it make a difference to you, Ms.

22 Schwartz?

23 MS. SCHWARTZ: It does make a difference --

24 THE COURT: Why is that?

25 MS. SCHWARTZ: -- Your Honor, because if Your

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 84 of 94
Page 84

1 Honor is finding it for good cause shown, Your Honor hasn't

2 had an evidentiary hearing and we want to make sure that

3 there wouldn't be any appeal of the Court's order --

4 THE COURT: Okay.

5 MS. SCHWARTZ: -- so that's why I understood it to

6 be with the consent of the Debtor.

7 MS. CACUCI: The Debtor suggested it.

8 MR. ROSEN: I suggested it, Your Honor. I just

9 had a discussion with my client and told him that the Court

10 was ordering it because we had -- as you know, we had

11 requested a bunch of other things.

12 THE COURT: Mr. Rosen, let's just cut to the

13 chase. You have parties who appear here that have appellate

14 rights. You have due process rights. I need to know

15 whether or not if I enter an order directing the appointment

16 of a Chapter 11 Trustee, you plan to take an appeal.

17 MR. ROSEN: As of right now, Your Honor --

18 THE COURT: No, as of right now is not a good

19 enough answer.

20 MR. ROSEN: No, I --

21 THE COURT: I need a yes or a no.

22 MR. ROSEN: May I talk --

23 THE COURT: Because if the answer is that I need

24 to make an evidentiary record, then we'll take a break and

25 we'll get started.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 85 of 94
Page 85

1 MR. ROSEN: Let me talk to my client. One second.

2 THE COURT: Okay.

3 MR. ROSEN: We have no intentions of appealing it,

4 Your Honor.

5 MR. PASQUALE: So then I will include in the order

6 onset, that'll resolve --

7 MR. ROSEN: Well --

8 MR. PASQUALE: -- that issue.

9 THE COURT: What are we doing --

10 MR. ROSEN: What?

11 THE COURT: -- here, Mr. Rosen? If you don't want

12 it to be on consent, then I need an -- a representation not

13 that there's no intent but that there will be no appeal.

14 MR. ROSEN: No, there will be no appeal, Your

15 Honor. When I say intent, I'm not equivocating with you; it

16 was just a manner of speak.

17 THE COURT: So we were waiving those rights?

18 MR. ROSEN: We will not appeal. We were -- we're

19 waiving our rights to appeal this order.

20 THE COURT: All right. That's very clear.

21 MR. PASQUALE: Then we will prepare the order and

22 submit --

23 THE COURT: Okay.

24 MR. PASQUALE: -- on notice to Mr. Rosen.

25 THE COURT: All right. So just --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 86 of 94
Page 86

1 MR. ROSEN: I'd like to -- I want to see the

2 questions.

3 MR. PASQUALE: Yes, what I --

4 THE COURT: Yes, of course. The usual procedure

5 will follow. You'll draft an order, you'll share it with

6 Mr. Rosen, you'll share it with all --

7 MR. PASQUALE: Of course.

8 THE COURT: -- counsel who have appeared here

9 today, you'll submit it to my Chambers with a representation

10 that everyone agrees and then for the benefit of those other

11 folks in the courtroom, the process that ensues is that in

12 fact, I've asked Ms. Schwartz not even to wait for the order

13 to appear on the docket. She is going to begin to engage in

14 communication with the various parties to take their

15 suggestions with respect to who should fill the role, that's

16 what happens in every case in which a Chapter 11 Trustee is

17 directed to the appointment.

18 The U.S. Trustee will then take all of those

19 letters and suggestions into consideration and with regard

20 to the statements that had been made, that certain emergency

21 conditions exist; we'll work with all deliberate speed to

22 make an appointment.

23 The individual will then be identified in a notice

24 that gets filed on the docket of the case indicating that

25 the U.S. Trustee has appointed X or Y person to assume the

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 87 of 94
Page 87

1 role and then that person will swing into action

2 immediately.

3 Mr. Rosen, you know, and I know you know, but I'm

4 just saying it for the benefit of those who haven't been in

5 this situation before, that the Debtor in all respects and

6 the Debtor's principal, is expected to cooperate in every

7 respect in order to get the individual up to speed. And to

8 the extent that rents are due and are paid, as they should

9 be, that the -- one of the first things that the operating

10 Trustee also will be to understand the accounts and take

11 control of the operating the accounts of the building.

12 But there is obviously, a very long history here.

13 We have not had an evidentiary hearing. There are always

14 two sides of the story and the operating Trustee certainly

15 will, I expect, listen to everybody and try to come up with

16 the best path forward, spending hopefully the least amount

17 of money in order to get this building repaired and,

18 frankly, get out of Chapter 11, either pursuant to a plan or

19 because the case is dismissed.

20 And even though the Debtor will be divested of the

21 day-to-day control of the property, Debtor remains a party

22 in interest in the case, the Debtor's principal remains a

23 party in interest in case, the tenants, the city all remain

24 parties in interest in the case under Section 1109 of the

25 code and you have a right to be heard and I will hear you.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 88 of 94
Page 88

1 MR. ROSEN: Thank you, Your Honor.

2 MR. PASQUALE: Thank you, Your Honor.

3 THE COURT: All right. Thank you very much.

4 MS. SCHWARTZ: Thank you, Your Honor.

5 THE COURT: Folks, if I could ask you to -- Ms.

6 Schwartz, if you need to leave that's fine, but because of

7 the -- because I have folks in the courtroom who are not

8 lawyers who are tenants and parties in interest, before we

9 leave, there's a lot of technical stuff that we've talked

10 about. We've been here a long time, and I just want to give

11 folks, even though you're represented by the counsel, the

12 opportunity to ask any questions or voice any concerns that

13 you have.

14 Come on up. I -- just come up so that we can get

15 your name and speak into the microphone so that it can be

16 recorded. Everything in the courtroom is recorded.

17 (MS. DEMALDINADO?): Thank you, Your Honor.

18 THE COURT: Come on up. Come up to the podium

19 here. Give me your name, please.

20 MS. MALDONADO: My name is (indiscernible)

21 Maldonado.

22 THE COURT: Okay.

23 MS. MALDONADO: I just truly want to take the time

24 to thank you for listening to us --

25 THE COURT: Sure.

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 89 of 94
Page 89

1 MS. MALDONADO: -- and making our voices be heard

2 now. It means a lot to me for us to be here to fight,

3 because we been fighting with Mr. Miller for --

4 THE COURT: Okay.

5 MS. MALDONADO: -- many years. Him and myself

6 know that I, myself, personally, try to work with him.

7 THE COURT: Okay.

8 MS. MALDONADO: So this is not something that we

9 do maliciously. We just wanted our services, because 90

10 percent of us tenants in that building, we're working

11 people. And all we wanted from him was our services and the

12 respect that we deserve. That's all we wanted.

13 THE COURT: Okay.

14 MS. MALDONADO: Okay. Thank you, Your Honor, for

15 listening to us.

16 THE COURT: You're very welcome. I'm just -- I

17 view what I'm doing as my job.

18 MS. MALDONADO: Yeah.

19 THE COURT: And I'm just trying to do my job the

20 best way that I know how.

21 MS. MALDONADO: And I -- believe me, Your Honor,

22 just by listening to you today in the hearing, the outcome,

23 I understand that because I took the lead role of being the

24 tenant patrol president just so we can all work together.

25 You know, it was a big role, but it -- I see things being

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 90 of 94
Page 90

1 done.

2 THE COURT: Okay. But you should understand that

3 --

4 MS. MALDONADO: Mm hmm.

5 THE COURT: -- it may seem like I have a magic

6 wand --

7 MS. MALDONADO: No, I know.

8 THE COURT: -- but I don't.

9 MS. MALDONADO: I know.

10 THE COURT: I don't have a magic wand, and I often

11 say that if I had a money press in the back, I would just

12 print off money. But I don’t have that either. So you

13 should have appropriate expectations. Hopefully, things are

14 going to start to move. One of the advantages for the

15 tenants and also for Mr. Miller is, we're going to be moving

16 forward instead of continuing to fight, so folks get to save

17 money that they would otherwise spend on lawyers and the

18 already overburdened Housing Court can have one fewer thing

19 to do. And if things go as I hope and expect they will it

20 should take very little of this Court's time, as well. But

21 you will have the ability -- all of you will have the

22 ability to continue to speak your minds and hopefully we

23 can, you know --

24 MS. MALDONADO: Move forward. That's why I think

25 on behalf --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 91 of 94
Page 91

1 THE COURT: -- move forward.

2 MS. MALDONADO: -- of all my tenants are here,

3 supported this, I want to thank you just for just letting us

4 -- just hearing us -- just -- even though I know it was a

5 quick thing, and I'm glad it was -- it just happened.

6 THE COURT: Okay.

7 MS. MALDONADO: All right, thank you so much.

8 THE COURT: You're very welcome. Does anyone have

9 any questions?

10 MS. CACUCI: Any questions, or should -- you guys

11 can ask me, too.

12 THE COURT: So one of the questions that counsel

13 asked, and I'll confirm it with Mr. Rosen on the record, is

14 a question of access. So that as soon as the Trustee comes

15 in, that he will be the one following the procedures to ask

16 for access to the building. He will have access to the

17 building, but in terms of access to the particular

18 apartments, he will go through the appropriate procedures to

19 ask you for access, and Mr. Miller understands that he will

20 no longer have the right to access.

21 Now, he has a big role to play here because he's

22 the owner of the building and because he knows a lot about

23 the history of the renovations and he knows a lot about --

24 how can I say it? You know, the ins and outs of certain

25 physical things in the building, and the new Trustee is

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 92 of 94
Page 92

1 going want to take advantage of that knowledge that he has.

2 So Mr. Miller may in fact be going to the building with the

3 new Trustee. So I expect that you'll treat him with

4 respect, he's -- will treat you with respect and

5 everything's just going to move forward in an orderly

6 fashion.

7 MS. MALDONADO: Can I say one more thing, Your

8 Honor?

9 THE COURT: Sure.

10 MS. MALDONADO: Okay. Your Honor, one thing I can

11 guarantee you -- and Mr. Miller knows this well -- when it

12 comes to any of the tenants and any help in the apartments

13 or getting in, that would not be a problem for me or none of

14 tenants, and I expect that from all of them. You'll

15 definitely have our support there with that. As long as we

16 get the right things that are supposed to be done. The

17 legal way is not the illegal way. I will not be part of

18 this moment on.

19 THE COURT: Okay.

20 MR. ROSEN: I guarantee you that, Your Honor.

21 THE COURT: Okay.

22 MR. ROSEN: And, Your Honor, I just want --

23 THE COURT: Yeah.

24 MR. ROSEN: I just want everyone to be clear, also

25 -- this is Avrum Rosen, for the record -- that until the --

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 93 of 94
Page 93

1 you know, we are still under the HPD order and there are

2 people that are --

3 THE COURT: Yes.

4 MR. ROSEN: -- working there today and will be

5 tomorrow, and that work is still going to be going forward,

6 and we ask that people cooperate with it, so it's not like

7 anything stopped when the operating Trustee is appointed.

8 It will probably take him a few days to get up --

9 THE COURT: Right.

10 MR. ROSEN: -- to speed, also, so --

11 THE COURT: Right. We shouldn't lose -- every day

12 is precious, and --

13 MR. ROSEN: Thank you.

14 THE COURT: -- we shouldn't lose that and we

15 shouldn't have, you know, any folks walking off the job or

16 any other interruptions. You know, we don't know, you know,

17 what the weather, we could have a storm. Let's just keep --

18 we're just going to keep on going. All right?

19 MS. MALDONADO: Thank you, Your Honor.

20 MR. ROSEN: Thank you very much, Your Honor.

21 MS. CACUCI: Thank you, Your Honor.

22

23 (Whereupon these proceedings were concluded at 4:17 PM)

24

25

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400
16-13569-scc Doc 52 Filed 03/16/17 Entered 03/16/17 12:43:16 Main Document
Pg 94 of 94
Page 94

1 C E R T I F I C A T I O N

3 I, Sonya Ledanski Hyde, certified that the foregoing

4 transcript is a true and accurate record of the proceedings.

5 Digitally signed by Sonya Ledanski

6
Sonya Hyde
DN: cn=Sonya Ledanski Hyde,
o=Veritext, ou,

7
Ledanski Hyde email=digital@veritext.com, c=US
Date: 2017.02.27 15:16:48 -05'00'

8 Sonya Ledanski Hyde

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20 Veritext Legal Solutions

21 330 Old Country Road

22 Suite 300

23 Mineola, NY 11501

24

25 Date: February 27, 2017

Veritext Legal Solutions


212-267-6868 www.veritext.com 516-608-2400

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi