Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
These two “circles”, the Celestial Equator and Ecliptic, are neither concentric nor
at right angles to one another. On the other hand, Ecliptic is inclined to the Equator at
an angle of about 23°.5. This is known as Obliquity of the Ecliptic. It is directly
responsible for the declination of planets since as we know by now, declination is
another name of distance of planets or luminaries etc. north or south from the equator.
For the earth/sun, whose latitude is zero, it cannot exceed the maximum obliquity of the
Ecliptic. For other planets, with latitudes (distance above or below the ecliptic) more or
less than zero, declinations can be more than the maximum obliquity of the ecliptic.
The Celestial Equator cuts the Ecliptic at two points and every year the sun
(actually the earth) joins this point on two occasions. They are known as Vernal and
Autumn Equinoxes --- when the days and nights are equal throughout the world. The
earth is not a complete sphere but a spheroid with the polar axis being shorter than the
equatorial axis by about 43 kms. (27 miles). Therefore, because of the gravitational
effects of the sun and planets, especially the Moon, on the earth, which keep on pulling
on its equatorial bulge, earth has a “different” equator every year. Since it is that very
equator that becomes celestial equator when projected to the heavens, we can say that
it is actually a “different” Equator that cuts the ecliptic at a different point every year.
The “movement” of the ecliptic is very slow – about 47 arc-seconds a century. Thus
every year there is a new “Vernal” and “Autumnal” Equinox. The best way to
understand Precession is to explain it with a diagram:
2
In the above diagram, the circle Eq1 is the equator on the first of January 1,
2003. Let us say it cut the ecliptic, when the sun (actually the earth) also joined it, on
the point V1. The date was March 22, 2003. The sun had then a longitude of zero
degrees, latitude of zero degrees and declination as well Right Ascension of zero
degrees. It was thus the Vernal Equinox of 2003. This is also known as the First point of
Aries. From this point the longitudes and Right Ascension of planets etc. are measured.
3
At the end of the year, however, the Equator Eq1 will have undergone a
“metamorphosis” because of the gravitational effects and it then becomes Eq.2, the
“new equator”. It will cut the ecliptic at a different point and when the sun (actually the
earth) also joins that point it will be the Vernal Equinox of 2004, around March 21, 2004,
named V2. We can thus say that Equinox V1 has precessed to the position V2 during
one year. This is what is meant by Precession of Equinoxes. It has to be noted here
that all the observatories the world over will measure the longitudes and Right Ascension
of planets for the year 2004 from this new Vernal Equinox i.e. the First Point of Aries.
Similarly, declinations North or South for 2004 will be measured from the new Equator
i.e. V2.
Precession and Solstices: We know that there are two more cardinal points in the
phenomenon of seasons. They are formed when the sun (the earth) during its sojourn
through the Ecliptic reaches a point which is at the maximum distance of north from the
Equator. The sun has the maximum declination of North (whereas the earth has the
maximum declination of South) then and it starts “coming down” and “turning” to south
(and the earth towards North). That is why it is known as Dakshinayana viz. Summer
Solstice when the day is the longest in northern hemisphere---around June 22 these
days. Similarly, when the sun reaches the point on the ecliptic which has the maximum
southern distance from the Equator (and the earth the maximum Northern Declination),
it comes as if to a “halt” momentarily and starts going to North (and the earth towards
South). it is known as Uttarayana --- Winter Solstice, when the day is the shortest---
December 22 this year. When we say the Equinoxes are precessing, it is actually as if
the whole Equator is precessing and therefore, even the Winter and Summer Solstices
also are precessing. Our Vedic Rishis had made the month of Madhav start from Vernal
Equinox and the month of Tapah from the Winter Solstice and so on since they had
linked the months to seasons. We can thus say that the months Madhu, Madhava etc.
also are precessing since all of them are linked to the four cardinal points viz. the two
equinoxes and solstices.
The rate of precession in 2000 BC was about 49”.31, in 1 AD it was about 49”.84
and presently it is about 50”.28 per year. Thus the point V1 will have precessed to V2
by about 50.28 seconds of arc between 2003 and 2004. As we can judge from the
diagram, when the sun (actually the earth) reaches V2, it will have to travel a distance
of about 50”.28 less than if the VE1 had remained “fixed”, like a “Fixed Star”. The sun
travels about one degree (3600 seconds of arc) in a day i.e. 24X60 = 1440 minutes. It
means the distance of the precession of 50.28 seconds of arc will be covered in a lesser
time of about (1440/3600)X50.28 = 20.11 minutes approximately than the “fixed”
equinox. That is why we say that the tropical year – distance covered by the sun/earth
from one Vernal Equinox to another Vernal Equinox – is shorter than the sidereal year –
distance covered by the sun from a Fixed Star to the same star again---by about 20
minutes. A simple mathematical calculation tells us that at the present rate of
precession, it will be about 71.6 years when one degree of precession will be the
difference whereas in 2000 BC it would have taken about 72.89 years for a degree of
precession. We can thus safely say that on an average, during the last few thousand
years, the Equinoxes and solstices etc. precessed at an average rate of about 1 degree
every 72 years.
Constellations vis-à-vis Precession:
The precession of equinoxes/solstices is always vis-à-vis the constellational belt,
i.e. against the background of a particular constellation at a particular point of time. For
example, when we want to find out the position of the Vernal Equinox or Winter Solstice
etc. say at the time of Shatapatha Brahmana, which was about 3000 BC, we cannot just
pin it against a void! We must have some “area”-–some canvas---where and against
which we can position/locate it! e.g., when we want to “find” Delhi, we have to say, “It
is in India, which is a part of Asia”! Similarly, to find the position of the Vernal Equinox
etc. astronomers have taken the background Constellations as the canvass. Thus when
Lokamanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak said in his “Orion” that in 3000 BC the Vernal Equinox
was in the Constellation of Krittikas, he was talking of those very Constellations.
4
Constellations as per modern astronomy:
There are actually about 88 Constellations as per modern astronomy out of which
thirteen (fourteen including Ceti i.e. Cetus meaning a “Whale”) are the major ones of the
zodiac i.e. the constellational belt “hovering” around the ecliptic. These constellations
were given their names because of their resemblance to some particular figure e.g. when
Lokamanya Tilak referred to ORION as the “Hunter” it was only because it had
resembled that figure in the hoary past and does so even today to some extent.
Similarly, Aries resembled a ram; Taurus a bull and so on. Though these days most of
these “Bulls” and “Rams” have lost their resemblance with their original nomenclatures,
however, they are still known by those very names. And that is absurd, to say the least!
Out of the 13/14 prominent constellations, Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo,
Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius and Pisces are the twelve constellations
that comprised the zodiac initially as per the Chaldean, later Greek and still later
Western astrologers. They called them “signs”. Hindu astrologers know these very
“signs” by the names of twelve Rashis viz. Mesha, Vrishab, Mithun, Karkat, Simha,
Kanya, Tula, Vrischik, Dhanu, Makar, Kumbha and Mina respectively in that order. In
fact, “Hindu” names of Rashis are just the equivalents of their Chaldean/Greek names.
There is also a thirteenth constellation of the zodiac by the name of Ophiuchus and a
fourteenth by the name of Cetus, but these are neither recognized by Western nor by
Eastern astrologers.
We must have some “coordinates” to measure the “distances” or “longitudes” of
these constellations as well. There are no starting or ending demarcation lines described
in the Vedas for these constellations. e.g. they do not tell us as to when “Apbharni” ends
and “Krittikas” start or vice-versa. However, International Astronomical Union has given
the boundaries of these constellations in Right Ascension and Declination etc. as per the
Vernal Equinox of 1930, which are naturally slightly different from the ones given earlier
as per 1875 equinox. These revised boundaries, when translated to the Vernal Equinox
of 2004 AD, lead to their longitudes as given in the last but one column of the below
table.
Indian Institute of Astrophysics has this to say in its website about the IAU list of
constellations, “The definitive list of 88 constellations was established in 1930, under the
authority of the International Astronomical Union. Its rectilinear constellation boundaries
preserve the traditional arrangements of naked eye stars. The standard boundaries
define an unambiguous constellation for each star.
‘Nevertheless, it has to be admitted that the constellations that we have today,
are neither logical nor convenient. The largest constellation Hydra covers 1303 square
degrees of the sky; the smallest, Cruz, only 68 square degrees. Centaurus includes 49
stars above the fifth magnitude, while Mensa does not have even one. However, the
patterns are now well established that it is unlikely that they will be altered.”
5
equinox 22 Sep
Libra 23.1 23 31 Oct 23 Sep
Scorpio 6.4 6 23 Nov 24 Oct 9876 AD
Ophiuchus 18.9 19 29 Nov 8598 AD
Sagittarius 33.4 34 17 Dec 22 Nov 6271 AD
solstice 21 Dec
Capricornus 28.1 29 19 Jan 22 Dec 4312 AD
Aquarius 23.8 24 16 Feb 20 Jan 2597 AD
Pisces 37.2 38 12 Mar 19 Feb 68 BC
equinox 20 Mar
Cetus (3) 27 Mar
Table showing the starting dates of Vedic months vis-à-vis Surya Siddhnta, Lahiri, Raman,
Cyril Fagan, Grahalaghava, Revati & “O. C. Ayanmsha” as compared to actual constellations
S. Vedic Season Sankr- Eng Vedic/ Lahiri Rama Fagan Graha Tilak/ OC- Constellational
N. month anti nam S.Sidh date n date date Lagh Revti Ay. Longitude Date
Date
1 Madhav Vasant Mesh Arie Mar Apr 14 Apr 12 Apr 15 Apr 15 Apr10 Apr 19 31.0 Apr 21
21
2 Shukra Grishm Vrish Tau Apr 20 May May May16 May May11 May 53.5 May
15 13 16 20 15
3 Shuchi Grishm Mithu Ge May Jun 15 Jun 14 Jun 16 Jun 16 Jun 11 Jun 21 90.0 Jun 22
21
4 Nabhah Varsha Karka Can Jun 22 Jul 17 July Jul 18 Jul 17 Jul 12 Jul 22 117.5 July
15 21
5 Nabhas Varsha Simha Leo July Aug Aug Aug18 Aug18 Aug13 Aug 136.5 Aug 10
23 17 15 22
6 Isha Sharat Kanya Vir Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep18 Sep13 Sep 172.0 Sep 15
23 17 15 18 22
7 Urja Sharat Tula Libr Sep Oct 17 Oct 16 Oct 18 Oct 18 Oct13 Oct 23 217.5 Oct 30
23
8 Sahas Hemant Vrisch Sco Oct 24 Nov Nov Nov17 Nov17 Nov12 Nov 239.5 Nov 22
16 15 22
9 Ophiuchus (Serpent It has not been accounted for in any Rashichakra 248.0 Dec 1
Bearer)
10 Sahasy Hemant Dhanu Sag Nov Dec Dec15 Dec Dec Dec Dec 266.5 Dec 19
i 22 16 17 17 12 21
11 Tapah Shishir Makar Cap Dec Jan 14 Jan 13 Jan 15 Jan 15 Jan 10 Jan 19 299.0 Jan 20
22
12 Tapas Shishir Kumb Aqu Jan Feb Feb 11 Feb Feb Feb 9 Feb 326.0 Feb 15
20 13 14 14 18
13 Madhu Vasant Mina Pis Feb Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar 11 Mar 357.5 Mar 18
19 15 13 15 15 20
(We have not included Cetus deliberately since it is not very prominent yet!)
Even a cursory glance at the above table shows that the constellations are of
irregular dimensions instead of being of say 30 or 40 degrees each. But then we must
not forget that these constellations are “line of sight effects” --- they are not of the
actual shape of a ram or bull! They are just like clouds assuming the shapes of a bull or
a ram etc. instead of actually becoming a bull or ram etc.! The only difference is that the
clouds assuming those shapes are transitory phenomena whereas the constellations look
like those resemblances for a long time. Even if the constellations had been in actual
shapes of “rams” and “bulls” and “crabs” and “scales” etc., it would have been “unwise”
for us to presume that they would have been of equal size! As we know, “a pitcher
(Aquarius)” cannot be equal in size (nor in weight, for that matter!) to a “bull” (Taurus),
6
nor can a “Crab” (Cancer) be equal to a “Virgin” (Virgo), least of all can a “Scorpion”
(Scorpio) be equal to an “Archer” (Sagittarius) and so on. Similarly, to say that “Scales”
(Libra) are equal to “Crocodile/Goat” (Capricorn) would be “silly” on our part, and I am
sure that is the last “adjective” anyone would like to reserve for himself/herself! In fact,
Mother Nature does not like symmetry at all since may be that is a sign of “stagnation”.
E.g. years – whether tropical or sidereal or anomalistic or Eclipse or synodic are never a
whole number of days – nay even hours--- they are always in fractions! Same is
the case with lunar months whether sidereal or synodic or anomalistic—they also have a
fraction of days---nay even hours! For that matter, hardly two days in a year have
actual 24 mean solar hours---when the days and nights are equal---since all other days
are either less or more than 24 hours! Similarly, no season has complete 60 or 90 days
– some have more and others less. Even the mean daily motion of none of the planets,
least of all the Moon, is a whole number of degrees, nay even seconds of arc! It is in
fractions of arc-seconds!
So naturally, Nature does not believe in making exceptions --- at least in the case
of making constellations of equal size! Even if she had obliged us by doing so, then the
constellations of the zodiac would have to be divided into at least twenty eight parts as
that is the number of asterisms/nakshatras that can be said to have been “recognized”
by the Vedas---and their actual longitudes are much different from the “nakshatras” that
we are aware of. Similarly, even for “astrological purposes” there are at least thirteen---
instead of twelve--- prominent “constellations” (Rashis) since they include Ophiuchus
also (It has been translated as “Nagadhari” --- Serpent Bearer---in India! Thus the
zodiac---including the 360° ecliptic---would have to be divided into at least thirteen
equal parts and not twelve! It is therefore clear that astrologers have divided the
zodiac into twelve (instead of thirteen, by excluding Ophiuchus) equal divisions for their
computational ease just as “Hindu astrologers” divided it into 27 (instead of 28, by
excluding Abhijit) nakshatra divisions of equal lengths! It makes no difference to Mother
Nature as to what nomenclature we give to those twelve equal divisions i.e., Rashis
(Signs) or 27 divisions of nakshatras---whether they are the same as given to
constellations or different, because those divisions are man-made!
7
2003 minus 3852 = -1849 i.e. 1850 BC. Jean Meeus has given the actual date of that
entry as 1865 BC.
When did the “Vedic” and “Anti-Vedic” zodiacs coincide? And what is the “only
correct (OC)” Ayanamsha?
We often hear “Vedic astrologers” talking about the “two zodiacs” “having
coincided some time in the past”. As we have seen in our other articles and as is evident
from the present discussion, it is clear that there is but one zodiac. What these
astrologers are actually trying to say is that they want to find out as to when the First
Point of Aries was actually conjunct the first point of Constellation Aries. It was thus
actually neither 285 AD (Lahiri), nor 390 AD (Raman) nor 444 Shaka (Grahalaghava)
nor 496 Shaka (Revati Paksha/Tilak Panchang) etc but 68 BC. As these “Vedic
astrologers” call the so called nirayana zodiac as the “Vedic zodiac” it means all other
zodiacs are “non-Vedic i.e. anti-Vedic”. They can thus claim that the “two zodiacs i.e.
Vedic and anti Vedic zodiacs coincided in 68 BC”.
Precession since then till January 1, 2000 AD has been 29° 0’ 13”.2. As it is this
very precession of “the First Point of Aries” viz. Vernal Equinox from the “Aries”
Constellation that these “Vedic Astrologers” call Ayanamsha, they must adopt this as the
only Correct Ayanamsha (OC) --- though actually there is no Ayanamsha whatsoever!
Surprisingly, a cursory glance at the table will also reveal that the seasonal i.e.
Vedic months are behind by almost exactly one month from even the so called sidereal
zodiac months if we take the actual astronomical so called ayanamsha of the First Point
of Aries!
When will the “Aquarian Age” start? We hear a lot these days about Aquarian Age
being just to start. What does it actually mean? We know the Vernal Equinox is passing
through Pisces constellation from 68 BC. Pisces Constellation ranges from 350°.5 to
29°.5. It will remain in that constellation for (29°.5 minus 350.5=-321 which is equal to
360 minus 321 i.e. 39X72=) 2808 years from 68 BC or 2741 AD. However, as per
precise astronomical calculations, the Vernal Equinox will enter the constellation of
8
Aquarius in 2597 AD. (Jean Meeus Mathematical Morsels of Astronomy page 304). That
is exactly when the Aquarian Age will begin.
9
11 Hasta (160-0 to173-20 Ga. Corvi 190-40 Ep.Corvi 191-36 De.Cor 193-23 BeCor197-18
Kanya 10-0 to 23-20 166-52 167-49 169-36 (Chitra) 173-31
12 Chitra (173-20 to186-40 Al.Virgi.203-47 Ironically, the main pillar of Chitrawallas has regressed to Kanya from Tula!
Kanya 23-20 to Tula 6-40 179-59 What a tragedy for them!
13 Swati (186-40 to200-0 Al.Booti204-10
Tula 6-40 to 20-00 (Chitra)180-23
14 Visha(200-0to213-20 Al.Librae 225-01 Beta Lib 229-19 SigmaLi230-37
Tula 20-0 to Vrischik 3-20 201-14 205-31 206-49
15 Anura(213-20 to226-40 De Scorp 242-31 Pi Scorpii 242-53 Beta Sc243-08
Vrischik 3-20 to 16-40 218-43 219-05 219-20
16 Jyeshth(226-40 to240-0 Alp Sco 249-42
Vrisc. 16-40 to Dhanu 0-0 (Anuradha)225-54
17 Mula (240-0 to253-20 Ep. Scorpii 255-16 Nu.Scorpi263-57 La.Scor264-31
Dhanu 00-00 to 13-20 (Vri/Jyesh) 231-29 240-09 240-44
18 P Ash(253-20 to266-40 De.Sagi.274-31 Ep. Sagit 275-01
Dhanu 13-20 to 26-40 (Mula) 250-43 251-13
19 U Ash(266-40 to280-0 Sigma Sa. 282-19 Zeta Sag.i. 283-23 No star in
Dhan 26-40 to Makar10-0 (P.Ashada) 258-32 (P.Ashada) 259-36 U.Ashada
AA Abhijit(Vega/Alpha Lyrae) Al. Lyrae 285-15 Ironically, Subhash Kak says “This (Abhijit) name refers to a satisfactory
(P.Ashada) 261-28 completion of the system of nakshatras”!
20 Shrona(280-0 to 293-20 Al.Aquillae 301-43 Gama Aqu. 300-53 Beta Aqu.302-22 No star in
Makar 10-00 to 23-20 (U. Ashada)277-55 (U.Ashada) 277-05 (U.Asha)278-34 Shrona
21 Shravi(293-20 to 306-40) Be.Delphini 316-17 Alpha Del317-19 Delt Del 318-3 Ga Del.319-18
Makar23-20to Kumb 6-40 (Shrona) 292-29 293-31 294-16 295-31
22 Shatabih(306-40to320-0 Lam.Aqua341-31 The distance between Beta Delphini and Lambda Aquarii
Kumba 6-40 to 20-00 317-43 is more than 25 degrees!
23 Proshtha.(320-0to 333-20 Al.Pegasi 353-25 Beta Pegasi359-18
Kumba 20-0 to Mina 3-20 329-38 (Shatabish) 335-31
24 U.Prosh (333-20to346-40 Gama Pegasi 9-6 Alpha Andromda 014-14
Mina 3-20 to 16-40 345-18 Revati 350-27
25 Revati(346-40to360-00 Eta Piscium 26-46 Kak has also shown Alpha Piscium instead of Zeta Piscium as a star of
Mina 16-40 to Mesha 0-0 (Ashvini) 2-58 Revati but it is not listed in Indian Astro. Ephem.
26 Ashvayujau (0-0 to 13-20 BetaArietis33-54 Alpha Arietis 37-36
Mesha 00-00 to 13-20 10-07 (Bharani) 13-48
27 Bharani (13-20 to26-40 35 Arietis 46-52 41 Arietis 48-08 Subhash Kak has also listed 39
Mesha 13-20 to 26-40 23-05 24-21 Arieitis that is not in IAO
10
Surya Sidhanta VIII/2-4 lists twenty-eight nakshatras including Abhijit; so does
Brahmasphuta Sidhanta, Lallatantra and even the world famous Sidhanta Shiromani of
Bhaskaracharya of 12th century AD lists twenty-eight nakshatras as per XVI/1-6. Our
“neither-so-good nor-so-old” rather the worst culprit for spreading the “nirayana
mayhem”, viz. Grahalaghava as per XI/1-2 also lists twenty-eight nakshatras!
All the real scholars also vouch for an unequal nakshatra division in the Vedas:
In his magnificent work on nakshatras vis-à-vis the Vedas, viz “The Orion – or
Researches into the Antiquity of the Vedas”, Lokamanya Tilak has this to say on page
26, “The Vedic observations could not again be such as need any minute or detailed
arithmetical operations. I shall therefore adopt for the present the simplest possible
method of calculation---a method which may be easily understood and followed by any
one, who can watch and observe the stars after the manner of the ancient priest. We
shall assume that the zodiac was divided into 27 parts, not by compass but by means of
the leading stars, which Prof. Max Muller rightly calls the milestones of the heavens. The
Vedic priest, who ascertained the motion of the sun by observing with his unaided eye
the nearest visible star, cannot be supposed to have followed a different method in
making other celestial observations; and if so, we cannot assume that he was capable of
recognizing and using for the purposes of observation any artificial divisions of the
ecliptic on a mathematical principle, such as those which would result from the division
of 360° of the zodiac into 27 equal parts, each part thus extending over 13° 20’ of the
ecliptic. …When we therefore find it stated in the Vedic works that the sun was in the
Krittika, it is more probable that the fixed asterism, and not the beginning of the
artificial portion of the zodiac, was intended.”
Similarly, the main “pillar” of nirayana confusion viz. late N. C. Lahiri is very
emphatic on page Xi of his Foreword to Popular Hindu Astronomy by Kali Nath Mukherji
(1969- Calcutta) when he says, “In India the ecliptic stars were divided into 28 divisions
even in the Vedic times. These are known as nakshatra divisions or lunar mansions. As
these clusters of stars do not cover equal lengths of the ecliptic the original divisions
were naturally of unequal length. We get a description of this unequal division in the
work of Bhaskaracharya, who has stated that it was introduced by early sages (those like
Garga)”.
11
us to close our eyes to the real facts and just go by the jugglery they are keeping before
us!
12
“range” of zodiac which means most of them could not have been seen by the naked
eye.
13
besides “Vedic astrologers” as these months are being linked to so called sidereal
zodiac).
14
related to seasonal months as per the Vedas! How come he has just “forgotten” all
these statements himself and made Vaishakha start with the sun in Krititka and
therefore Vrishabha! As he has shown it himself, Vernal Equinox was taking place in
Krittika, which means it was Mesha and not Vrisha Sankranti that was taking place in
Krittas, if at all our Vedic Rishis had “invented” or “discovered” astrological Rashis then!
15
of Tapah and that would make hardly any difference. There was no fun or need to name
it after some constellation like Makar Rashi if it was not to be linked to that constellation
permanently. We have therefore to delink “Makara Rashi” from Constellations as well as
seasons. But that is exactly what the “sidereal i.e. nirayana” trap is! As we have seen,
on the one hand, nirayana can never be linked to seasons since to say that nirayana
Makara Sankranti and Uttarayana took place simultaneously in 6000 BC will be the
greatest absurdity as Lahiri Ayanamsha in 6000 BC was about 86°! Thus though the real
Vedic “Makar Sankranti” would have taken place on February 4, 6000 BC (TDT) but the
“almighty” Lahiri “Makar Sankranti” would have taken place on November 10, 5999 BC
(TDT). These “Rashis” cannot be linked to constellations either since Constellations are
of unequal divisions of irregular dimensions! It would therefore have been tantamount
to making a still more gibberish mockery of the Rishis by saying something like: “(We
know that) Makara Sankranti is neither linked to any season nor to any constellation but
as our ‘Vedic Rishis had just gone honkers’ they named it as ‘Makara Sankranti’ though it
took place in ‘Mesha’ i.e. ‘Aries’ in 6000 BC, then in Pisces and Aquarius till about 2500
BC, then in Capricorn till 131 BC and is taking place in Sagittarius at present but still we
call it “Makar Sankranti”!!
Only “Rashtriya Panchanga” and “Vedic Astrologers” can create such hilarious
situations! It would have been a hilarious situation that only our Rashtriya Panchanga
and other Panchanga copyists of that ilk (besides, of course “Vedic astrologers”!) can
create! It has been explained on page 84 of my “Shri Krishen Universal Ephemeris &
Panchang” for 2001, under the heading “How many times does the sun enter the same
‘Vedic’ sign? In other words, how many times can there be a solar Sankranti (ingress of
the sun) into the same Rashi in one month?” and I quote, “While talking of Rashtriya
Panchanga, let us take it for the year 2000-2001. We find on the very first page of
Chaitra ‘Vedic Madhav (Mesha)” from March 21 since the sun had entered it on March
20, 2000 at 13hrs. 5mts. It means that the details being given in that page are for the
month that is known as ‘Madhav’ in the Vedas. As the word Mesha is in brackets it also
means that it is the month when the sun is in Mesha as per the same Vedas (though
actually there are no rashis in the Vedas!). Then on April 12 we find ‘Saura Vaishakha’
26-31 which means that the sun has entered Mesha then! Then on April 13 we find ‘sun
enters Mesha at 17-22’! An interesting question arises here. If the sun is in “Vedic
Mesha” at the very start of the Shaka new year viz. Chaitra then the Sankranti of the
sun into the same Vedic sign thrice in the same Shaka month is just not possible. It is
clear that the other two are imaginary Sankrantis then. Since the other two are not
Vedic, they are non-Vedic. In other words, they are anti-Vedic and we are made to
celebrate Kumbha Mela on the same anti-Vedic Makar Sankrantis!
Besides, as explained on page 108 of my ephemeris for 1999, Vernal Equinox in
6001 BC took place on May 10 and in 10001 BC it took place on June 10, which is just
earlier by ten days when the Summer Solstice is taking place these days! A simple
mathematical calculation tells us that Winter Solstice took place earlier by 90° i.e. about
92 days (or about 273 days later) i.e. around February 13 in 6001 BC and about March
13 in 10001/10000 BC!
16
Ayanamsa on 1st Vaishakha +90° 0’ 0”. (The National Year is supposed to start from the
day of Vernal Equinox, which according to the same Rashtriya Panchanga is another
name of Madhava, and that month, according to all the Vedas and Puranas etc. is a
synonym of Vaishakha. However, as “Vedic scholars of extra-ordinary calibre”, our
“Calendar Makers to the Nation” call it Chaitra as that is the name given to this solar
month on every Vernal Equinox day in the Rashtriya Panchanga! But may be, out of
sheer “indulgence” to the real Vedic Rishis in 6300 BC, they would have named it
Vaishakha, as that is the real definition of the month of Madhava).
Then as usual in their “infinite wisdom” they would have repeated (like they are
doing every year these days!) in their “Indian Astronomical Ephemeris” on page
477 ,”For the purpose of calculation of rasis and nakshatras, an initial point which
occupies a fixed position (sic!) on the ecliptic has been adopted as the origin for the
measurement of longitudes. The position of that initial point will coincide with the vernal
equinoctial point of vernal equinox day of 285 A.D. i.e. about 6584 years from today.
For the purpose of assigning a precise position to that (yet to be established) initial
point, the tropical longitude of that (future) fixed initial point for any day is known as
ayanamsha. The longitude of a celestial body measured from that “would be” initial
point is known as nirayana longitude”. Similarly, “almighty” Lahriwalas would have
penned the following “glorious legend” on page 3 of their “Vedic astrology bible” viz.
Lahiri’s Indian Epehemeris, “The ephemeris is based on nirayana or sidereal system of
calculation. The basis of the nirayana zodiac is the adoption of 285 AD or 207 Shaka as
the zero ayanamsa year. This value is (to be) adopted by “His most exalted Highness”
N. C. Lahiri in his Ephemeris from (the coming) 1948 issue i.e. about 8250 years from
today. The Calendar Reform Committee (to be) appointed by the Govt. of India in 1952
(will then) recommend adoption of that very value of ayanamsa and later the Govt. of
India also (will) adopt this system of ayanamsa in 1953. In view of this, it (will be
called) as ‘his most exalted highness’ Lahiri ayanamsa. This value of ayanamsa will
then be used in almost all the reformed (thus actually deformed!) panchangas and
ephemeris in India as well as in the Indian Astronomical Ephemeris and the Rashtriya
Panchangs of the Govt. of India. It is worth mentioning that the date of coincidence of
the Sayana and nirayana zodiacs (sic!) on the Vernal Equinox day of 285 AD based on
the position of the star Chitra (Alpha Virginis) that will be determined by the “would-be-
born” “His most exalted highness”, N. C. Lahiri during his life time. The value will be
almost the same as will be derived from the data (that will be then) available from the
Astronomniches Rechen Institut of Heidelberg, Germany”. Both these “magnificent”
publications viz. Lahiri Ephemeris and the Rashtriya Panchanga would have then
published a legend, “All the Vedic rishis are hereby admonished that they better follow
this Lahiri Rashichakra right from today that is May 13, 6300 BC as otherwise they will
be discarded from all the religious functions, since it will be declared by all the Kaliyugi
Jyotishis as Vedic Ayanamsha and if it is not adopted it will affect the sales of Lahiri as
well as other ‘dharmic’ panchangas as and when they are published after about eight
thousand years!” As the Rashtriya Panchanga is supposed to have “maintained” a
“permanent distance of 23° -15’- between the real Vernal Equinox and their own
imaginary “Equinox” as on Marhc 21, 1956, then after exactly about 24 days of that
phenomenon, the Rashtriya Panchanga would declare, in 6300 BC “Saura Vaishakha --
June 7, 6300 BC”. With the “almighty” Lahiri Ayanamsha being exactly 90° on May 12,
6304 BC, it would have further published under the same date i.e. May 12, 6304 BC,
“sun enters Karkata Rashi at hrs 26-26”. Obviously, the month of solar Shravana would
have started immediately (with the month of Vaishakha!), since it is supposed to start
from the moment the sun enters Karkata!
Similarly, on 13-8-6304 BC the “magnificent” Rashtriya Panchanga would have
printed on the top of the page, “Month of Shravana - Vedic month Nabhas (Karkata);
Varsha Ritu – 1st month; Dakshinayana: Uttara Gola. Sun in Mithuna, enters Karkata on
13th at hrs 19-47. Ayanamsha on 1 st Ashadha: 89° 59’ 52”. Then on the same page
under the same date, it would have published, “sun enters Tula at hrs 19-50” which
means it would have been the beginning of the month of Kartika (simultaneously with
Shrvana!).
17
Then again on 8-11-6304 BC it would have printed, “Month of Kartika, Vedic
month: Urja (Tula); Sarat Ritu : 2nd month; Dakshinayana: Dakshina Gola. Sun in
Kanya, enters Tula at hrs 24-34.” Ayanamsha on 1 st Kartika 89°59’ 41”. Then on the
same page, under the same date it would have printed “sun enters Makara at hrs 24-
37”. In their infinite wisdom it would have said, “Makaradi Snana, Pongal, Makara
Sankranti…etc. etc.”. It would have also been the start of the month of Magha
(simultaneously with the month of Kartika!)
Then further onwards, for the same year viz. Shaka -6382, but for 6303 BC, it
would have said on 7-2-6303 BC, “Month of Magha. Vedic month Taps (Makara);
Uttarayana: Dakshina Gola; Sun in Dhanus, enters Makara on 7 th at hrs. 20-33.
Ayanamsha on 1st Magha :89° 59’ 30”. Further under the same date viz. 7-2-6303 BC.,
it would have said, Uttarayana”. Then in the same line it would have published sun
enters Mesha at hrs 20-45. Then it would have been ‘Meshadi. Vaishakhi. Chadak Puja,
Chairoba” It would have also been the start of the month of Vaishakha, obviously (and
simultaneously with the start of Magha)!
I hope you have realized the hilarious (tragic!) situation our “Rashtriya
Panchanga” and their ilk like Lahiri Ephemeris besides all the Panchanakars of India,
apart from the “Vedic astrologers” like “Vamadeva” and “Parashara” and “Vedic
astronomers” like Messrs Subhash Kak and Company would have created then! Mesha
Sankranti and Karkata Sankranti falling on the same day - nay in the same hour!
Karkata Sankranti coinciding with Tula Sankranti! Tula Sankranti and Makara Sankranti
being celebrated simultaneously and Makara Sanranti coinciding exactly with Mesha
Sankanti! It would have also meant, “Madhava – the Vedic Vaishakha coinciding with
Shravana; Vedic Nabhas viz Shravana coinciding with Kartika; Vedic Urja also known as
Kartika coinciding with Magha; Vedic Tapas also known as Magha coinciding with
Vaishakha! It is not only these four cardinal “months” that would have got juxtaposed
with one another, but in fact all the months would have been coinciding with the months
that were supposed to fall after ninety days i.e. three months! And still Messrs “Subhas
Kak, Vamadev, Parashar & Co.” would like us to believe that at the most “it would be out
of step by one”. What a “sensible” statement! Only “Vedic astronomers” are bestowed
with such extraordinary “insight” into the real “Vedic Rashichakra”!
18
15’ and so on. The calculation for this purpose has thus been done not with a variable
ayanamsa as in the case of rasis and nakshatras but with a fixed ayanamsa of 23° 15’.
These months are shown for purpose of illustration only, but are not used in practice for
actual luni-solar adjustment”. If we interpret these “guidelines” in the light of the
position of “Rashtriya Panchanga” in 6300 BC and 6685 AD, we will have to start every
solar month three times every year --- once when the real Vedic ingress takes place;
then when the Lahiri ingress takes place and then in between the two when the “fixed
Ayanamsha” ingress takes place which must be after about 24 days of the real Vedic
ingress!
“Out of step by six” ----a complete “Shirshasana”!: Subhash Kak had said, “At
worst we get a sequence of rashis which is out of step by one”. But we have seen that if
in 6300 BC Lahiri Mesha Sankranti coincided with the real Vedic “Karkata Sankranti”, but
in 6685 AD Lahiri Tula Sankranti will coincide with the same “Vedic Karkata Sankranti”.
In 6300 BC it was “behind by three steps” and in 6685 AD it will be “ahead by three
steps”. That means Lahiri Sankrantis virtually turning on their head! These sankrantis
will be “out of step by six” from their own “ghosts” since six is the number of rashis
between Mesha and Tula Sankanti! In other words, it will be a complete “Shirshasana”
--- headlong posture---from the postion that had obtained in 6300 BC!
I wonder why these “eminent Vedic astronomers” do not even do their spade
work properly!
“Rashi” numbers in the Vedas: Subhash Kak, on page 14 of the same article, has
also gone to the length of “proving” that the names of Rashis are directly related to the
numbers of months in the Vedas by making fantastic statements like “the ninth month
relates to ‘Archer’ i.e. Sagitarius” and so on! Though we have already seen that there is
no ghost of Rashis in the Vedas, even presuming that some “Vedic astronomers” have
proved “astrological signs” therein, it is surprising as to how they can be related to the
numbers of months. E.g. Kak has himself said on page 13 , “Figure 1: …The first Rashi
is Vrisha with the corresponding month of Vaishakha” which means then that the 9 th
Rashi should have been Capricorn and not Sagittarius. Further he has shown that in
about 3000 BC, VE took place in Kritikas and therefore Taurus. The ninth month then
would have been the “Goat” (Capricorn) and not the “Archer” (Sagittarius). By the same
19
logic in 6000 BC, as per Subhash Kak himself, since in 6000 BC Vernal Equinox was
falling in Punarvasu, it means that Rashichakra would have to be counted from Karka
Rashi and the ninth Rashi would have been then Mina and not the so called “Archer” as
Kak would like us to believe! It is sad that a scholar like Subhash Kak should have
missed such contradistinctive quagmires.
“Vedic astrology” and “Vedic astrologers”: Subhash Kak has said on page 318 of
his work “Astronomy Across Cultures” published by Kluwer Academic Publishers, London,
“Although it is certain that the planets were studied by the Rigvedic people, we do not
find a single place in the texts where the names are listed together”. Obviously, the first
part of this statement is a surmise whereas the second part is a “Statement of facts”. I
would go to the length of stating further that let alone at one place, there is no mention
of Budha (Mercury), Mangal (Mars), Shani (Saturn) at all, even if we somehow believe
that by Vena planet Shukra (Venus) is meant in the Vedas! (We are here overlooking the
fact that Venus is not a Sanskrit name and Vena is a king as per the Puranas who lived
the life of a “debauchee” and had to meet with a premature death due to the curse of
Brahmins who later churned his body to bring forth a pious king named Prithu!).
Everybody knows that Vedic Rishis were not shy of declaring in unambiguous
terms what they perceived and if at all they had desired to “describe” planets they would
certainly have done so as they had done about the sun, moon and “Swarbhanu” – lunar
nodes. Even Brihaspati (Jupiter) is not referred to as a planet in any of the Vedas but
only as the preceptor of gods.
Longitudes of nakshatras in the Vedic times: Aitreya Brahmana, I, 1.2.1 says that
Krittikas are the “Mukham” i.e., “face” (or the “mouth”) of nakshatras. Suppose our
Vedic Rishis wanted to “measure” the position of this nakshatra. The question arises as
to wherefrom was this “face” or “mouth” to be measured! Subhash Kak also says by
Kritikas the Vedas meant Pleiades. There is no problem if it was to be measured from
the Vernal Equinox as is being done these days. As per the FK5 catalogue of Stars, the
actual longitude of Alcyone would then have been 350° 34’ 32” i.e. less by about 9.5
degrees/days from the date of Vernal Equinox as on January 1, 3000 BC. The longitude
of Alcyone these days is about 60° -2’. We can see from the above constellational Table
that the sun’s sojourn in Taurus constellation starts earlier by about seven degrees/days
of its conjunction with Alcyone these days. There being nothing to the contrary on
record, we can safely presume that the distance between the starting of Taurus
constellation and the Alcyone Star was the same even in 3000 BC. i.e. it was about
seven degrees. But then since the Pleiades cluster does not stretch over more than two
degrees, it means Krittikas would have included some other prominent cluster also
because Shatapatha Brahmana 2/1/2/2 is very clear that “Though other nakshatras have
just one, two or three or four nakshatras but these Kritikas have many”. We also see
Krittikas being listed as the first nakshatra right from the time of the Yajurveda through
Shatapatha Brahmana to Vedanga Jyotisha to Vishnu Purana---which means that right
from at least 3000 BC to about 500 BC the Vernal Equinox was falling in this “nakshatra”
as otherwise it would not have got such a place of pride. For about 2500 years the
precession would have been 2500/71.5=35 degrees whereas the total sweep of the
entire Taurus constellation is about 37.5 degrees as per IAU. Surprisingly, we do not
see any reference to the VE falling either in Rohini or Bharani in the Vedas, Brahmanas
or even the Puranas though these nakshatras also have been listed in the Vedas as well
as the Puranas. Besides, sidhantas refer to “Paushanantam to Bhaganam” i.e. Ashvini
---the First Point of Aries. We know that that there are no first or second or even third
magnitude Stars in either the modern “Krittikas” i.e. Pleaides nor in Bharani group, nor
in Ashvini nakshatra, for that matter. But since all the Vedas eulogize Krittikas, the only
reason is that it must have included what is now known as “Rohini” in the equal division
because that is the only group which contains several Bright Stars. If we confine
ourselves to “Pleaides” only, the VE could not be around “Krittika nakhatra” then for
more than 71.5X13.3333=953.3333 i.e. at the most for about a thousand years. The
longitude of Krittika nakshatra even in the earlier unequal division of Garga etc. is equal
20
to the daily mean motion of 13° 10’ 35” but that of Rohini nakshatra is one and a half
times to that i.e. 19° 15’ 52”. Together these two “nakshatras” thus account for 32° 26’
27”. We give below the longitudes of all the prominent stars of “Rohini” as on January 1,
3000 B.C and 1300 BC together with their magnitudes etc.
No. 3000 BC 1300 BC Mag distan
Alcyone Eta Tauri Krittika 139 350° - 35’ 14° - 15’ 2.86 541
Aldebaran Alpha Tauri Rohini 168 0° - 37’ 23° - 59’ 0.85 68
BetaOrionis Rigel 194 7° - 35’ 31° - 0’ 0.14 900
GamaOrionis Bellatrix 201 11° - 40’ 35° - 10’ 1.64 360
Brahmahrid AlphaAurigae Capella 193 12° - 47’ 36° - 6’ 0.08 42
EpsilonOrionis Anilam 210 14° - 7’ 36° - 49’ 1.71 1600
Thus the sun’s sojourn in Krittikas, if their starting point coincided with the starting point
of Taurus constellation, would have started earlier by about seven days if the Vernal
Equinox was to be taken to the starting point.. In other words, the Equinoctial point
would have started being in the constellation of Taurus by about 3000 BC minus (17X72
=) 1224 years which would be about 4200 BC. Subhash Kak says that VE was in Rohini
in 3000 BC, presumably on the basis of a so called equal division of nakshatras.
However, he has contradicted himself on page 18 by saying that the epoch where it is
stated that Krittika never swerve from the east correspond to 2950 BC. Let us see
whether it is astronomically feasible. The longitude of Aldebaran (Alpha Tauri) as on Jan
1, 3000 B.C was 0° 33’ 36”. Obviously the VE was almost conjunct that star. Now we
cannot have a cake and eat it as well -- either the VE is in Krittikas then or it was in
Rohini. The problem arises only when we opt for a so called equal division as otherwise
“Rohini” is actually in Taurus constellation!
Kritika (Pleiades) nakshatra does not have any star of such an extraordinary
magnitude from which it could be measured! Even Subhash Kak has not listed any
prominent star in this “nakshatra” though he has listed stars in Rohini, Ardra etc.
However, let us suppose that even our Vedic Rishis measured it from Alcyone, which is
the “brightest” star of Pleiades since its visual magnitude is 2.86 whereas all other stars
have a visual magnitude of more than 3.5. As we know the more the magnitude of a
Star, the more difficult it is to visualize it with the naked eye. So if the Vedic Rishis had
started the nakshatra charka from some “visible milepost” instead of the Vernal Equinox,
it would have been obviously Alcyone. Thus it would have been the zero point then. If
so, then Krittikas started in “Mesha” and not Vrisha! Even if for the sake of argument
we agree that the sun was in Vrisha at the time of VE, we cannot forget that in equal
division of nakshatras, Krittikas start in Mesha and not Vrisha! So even then the
Rashichakra would have started from Mesha, though from the fag end!
21
All they would say was, “We should get consecrated at the time of Kritikas because they
are the most visible and/or the first of the “nakshatras”” i.e. because the “Vishuva” i.e.
the Vernal Equinox was falling in that “nakshatra” then.
This is exactly the reasons for my saying that unfortunately, these days we are
celebrating our festivals neither as per the constellation belt nor as per the real Vedanga
Jyotish! E.g. if we want to correlate our Makar Sankranti these days to the constellation
of that name, then we have to celebrate it neither on December 21, 2002 (Uttarayana)
nor on January 14, 2003 (Lahiri) but on January 21 since it is on that date when the sun
will enter that constellation actually! That is why I have been crying hoarse that our
“Jyotishis” have denuded us of any sense of real astronomy whether Vedic or modern
and in the name of “Vedic astrology” our present “Varahamihiras”, “Vamadevas” and
“Parasharas” are cocking a snook on the real Vedic Vamadevas and Parasharas! You can
rest assured that they are doing it at their own peril now since the facts are being
brought to the notice of a common man and the day is not far off when they will be
caught “red-handed” while cheating on the real Vedic Rishis.
Vedic solar months vis-à-vis lunar months: Subhas Kak has listed on page 11 of his
article “Babylonian and Indian astronomy” 12 lunar months and given their presiding
deities but then he has started Vaishakha from Bharani nakshatra on page 12 saying
that first Rashi is Vrishabha corresponding to Vaishakha! I have given an avalanche of
proofs in my earlier ephemerides, especially the 1999 one quoting all the Vedas,
Upanishads, Puranas, Itihasas, Smritis and sidhantas that Sayana Mesha is the first solar
month and the lunar months are related to these very sayana i.e. seasonal months.
Since Subhash Kak has himself given the names of Vedic months as Madhu, Madhav etc.
and tried to quote Vishnupurana for Vrisha and not the Mesha Rashi as the first month
of Vaishakha, let us quote what we had said on pages 87 and 88 of our ephemeris for
1999,
“This is what Maharshi Prashara has to say in Shri Vishnupurana 2 nd Amsha
Eighth Adhyaya (verses 27 to 89) Jhfo".kqiqjk.k
dqykypØi;ZUrkss Hkzeés"k fnokdj%A djksR;gLrFkk jkf=a
foeqapUesfnuha f}tAA27AA
22
v;uL;ksÙkjL;knkS edja ;kfr HkkLdj%A rr% dqEHka p ehua
p jk'ks jk';Urja f}tAA28AA
f="osrs"oFk Hkqäs"kq rrks oS"kqorha xfre~A iz;kfr lfork
dqoZégksjk=a rr% lee~AA29AA
rrks jkf=% {k;a ;kfr o)Zrs·uqfnua fnue~AA30AA
rr'p feFkquL;kUrs ijka dk"Bkeqikxr%A jkf”kaa ddZVda
izkI; dq#rs nf{k.kk;ue~AA31AA
lw;kZs }kn'kfHk% 'kS?z;kUeqgwrSZnZf{k.kk;usA
=;ksn'kk)Ze`{kk.kkeg~uk rq pjfr f}tAA
eqgwrZSLrkon`{kkf.k uäe"Vkn'kS'pju~AA34AA
dqykypØe/;LFkks ;Fkk eUna izliZfrA rFkksnx;us lw;Z%
liZrs eUnfoØe%AA35AA
rLekíh?kZsu dkysu HkwfeeYika rq xPNfrA
v"Vkn'keqgwrZa ;nqÙkjk;.k if'pee~AA36AA
vgHkZofr rPpkfi pjrs eUnfoØe%AA37AA
eUnkg~fu ;fLeé;us 'kh?kzk uäa rnk xfr%A 'kh?kzk fuf'k
;nk pkL; rnk eUnk fnok xfr%AA42AA
,dizek.kesoS"k ekxZa ;kfr fnokdj%A vgksjk=s.k ;ks
Hkq³~äs leLrk jk'k;ks f}tAA43AA
"kMso jk'khu~ ;ks Hkq³~äs jk=koU;k”p
"kM~fnokAA44AA
jkf'kizek.k tfurk nh?kZgzLokRerk fnusAArFkk fu'kk;ka
jk'kkhuka izek.kSyZ?kqnh?kZrkAA45AA
fnuknsnhZ?kgzLoRoa rn~HkksxsuSo tk;rsAA mÙkjs izØes
'kh?kzk fuf'k eUnk xfrfnZokAA46AA
nf{k.ks Ro;us pSo foijhrk fooLor%AA47AA
n'kiapeqgwrZa oS vgoZS"kqora Le`re~AA65AA
o)Zrs gzlrs pSokI;;us nf{k.kksÙkjsAAvgLrq xzlrs jkf=a
jkf=xzZlfr oklje~AA66AA
'kj}lUr;kseZ/;s fo"kqoa rq foHkkO;rsAA rqykes"kxrs
HkkukS lejkf=fnua rq rr~AA67AA
ddZVkofLFkrs HkkukS nf{k.kk;ueqP;rsAA mÙkjk;.keI;qäa
edjLFks fnokdjsAA68AA
f=a'kUeqgwrZa dfFkregksjk=a rq ;Ue;kAA rkfu iapn'k
czãu~ ;}k bR;fHk/kh;rsAA69AA
ekl% i{k};suksäks }kS eklkS pkdZtko`rq%AA_rq=;a
pkI;;ua }s·;us o"kZlafKrsAA70AA
laoRljkn;% iap prqekZl fodfYirk%AA fu'p;% loZdkyL;
;qxfeR;fHk/kh;rsAA71AA
laoRljLrq izFkeks f}rh;% ifjoRlj%AA b}RljLr`rh;Lrq
prqFkZ'pkuqoRlj%AA
oRlj% iape'pk= dkyks·;a ;qx lafKr%AA72AA
23
;% “osrL;ksÙkj% 'kSy% J`³~xokfufr foJqr%AA =hf.k rL; rq
J`³~xkfu ;Sj;a J`³~xokULe`r%AA73AA
nf{k.ka pksÙkja pSo e/;a oS"kqora rFkkAA 'kj}lar;kseZ/;s
rn~Hkkuq% izfri|rsAA
es"kknkS p rqyknkS p eS=ks; fo"kqofRLFkr%AA74AA
rnk rqY;egksjk=a djksfr frfejkig%AAn'kiapeqgwrZa oS
rnsrnqHk;a Le`re~AA75AA
izFkes ÑfÙkdkHkkxs ;nk HkkLokaLrnk
'k'khAAfo'kk[kkuka prqFkZas·'ks equs
fr"BR;la'k;e~AA76AA
fo'kk[kkuka ;nk lw;Z'pjR;a'ka r`rh;de~A rnk pUæa
fotkuh;kRÑfÙkdkf'kjfl fLFkre~AA77AA
rnSo fo"kqok[;ks·;a dky% iq.;ksfHk/kh;rsArnk nkukfu
ns;kfu nsosH;% iz;rkRefHk%AA78AA
czã.ksH;% fir`H;'p eq[kesrÙkq nkuteAAnÙknkuLrq
fo"kqos ÑrÑR;ks·fHktk;rsAA79AA
riLriL;kS e/kqek/kokS p 'kqØ% 'kqfp'pk;ueqÙkja L;kr~AA
uHkksuHkL;kS p b"kLrFkkstZLlg% lgL;kfofr nf{k.ka
rr~AA81AA f}rh; va] v0 8
”The whole second Chapter of Second Amsha of Shri Vishu Purana is in fact like a
commentary on the Mantras of the Vedas, Upanishads and Brahmana quoted above. It
is also a complete 'lesson' on the phenomenon of seasons. In the simplest of terms and
plain poetic language and meters it says, 'The sun enters Makara on the day of
Uttarayana which is the shortest day in the year and it goes on increasing during the
sun’s transit of Kumbha and Mina. Days and nights are equal on Vishuva day when the
sun enters Mesha Rashi. After that the duration of the days gets longer than that of the
nights and it becomes longest on the day of Dakshinayana when the sun enters Karkata
Rashi. Vishuv---Equinoxes----occur in the midst of the Sharad and Vasant Ritus and
the days and nights are then equal on the Mesha and Tula Sankranti days of thirty ghatis
each. Any charities given during the Ayana and Vishuva Sankrantis viz on the days of
transit of the sun into Makara, Mesha, Karkata and Tula yield thousand-fold results.
Dakshinayana takes place when the sun is in Karkata and Uttarayana when the sun is in
Makara. A five year yuga starts after the Uttarayana in the following manner:
Samvatsarah, Parivatsarah, Idvatsarah, Anuvatsarah and Vatsarah. The Uttarayana
months of Makara to Mithuna (viz. Makara, Kumbha, Mina, Mesha, Vrisha and Mithuna)
are also known respectively as Tapah, Tapasya, Madhu, Madhava, Shukra and Shuchih
whereas the Dakshinayana months of Karkata to Dhanu (viz Karkata, Simha, Kanya,
Tula, Vrischik and Dhanu) are also known as Nabah, Nabhasya, Isha, Urja, Saha and
Sahasya respectively'.
"In verses 43 to 45, we find mention of the sun passing through twelve Rashis in
a day of sixty ghatis. It is clearly an explanation of the signs rising on the eastern
horizon as these verses mention clearly that the sun takes unequal time to cover these
Rashis of equal length i.e. 30º each. There is absolutely no doubt that even these are
Tropical and not any Lahiri or Ramana Lagnas!
“Obviously, there could hardly be a worse rebuke to and a better rebuttal of the
presumptions of these predictive astrologers (actually frauds) that Parashara Rishi was
following and advocating some Lahiri Rashichakra (One of the translators of the so called
Brihat Parashara has had the hardihood of making such foolish statements as 'Lahiri
Ayanamsha is the first best!').
24
“Verses 77 to 81 link Krittika Nakshatra to Mesha Rashi and Vernal Equinox and
Vishakha Nakshatra and Tula Rashi to Autumn Equinox. It means that the Nakshatra
division also was Sayana and strated with the Krittika nakshatra and Tropical sign Aries
(Mesha) In those days” just like that of the Surya Siddhanta!
Obvioulsy, the Vishnu Purana has more or less replicated the Surya Sidhanta
Rashichakra, with the names of Vedic months Madhu, Madhava also being clubbed with
those very Sayana rashis, as we shall see shortly!
“REAL VEDIC SEERS WERE CELEBERATING ALL THE FESTIVAL INCLUDING
MAHASHIVARATRI AND NAVARATRAS AS PER TROPICAL SOLAR AND SOLI-
LUNAR MONTHS AND NOT AS PER SOME LAHIRI OR RAMANA SOLAR OR LUNAR
MONTHS:
“Vishnu Purana” says further in Eleventh Adhyaya of Second Amsha (verses 3 to 19):
/kkrk ØrqLFkyk pSo iqyLR;ks oklqfdLrFkkA
jFkHk`n~xzke.khgsZfrLrqEcq#'pSo lIre%AA3AA
,rs olfUr oS pS=s e/kqekls lnSo fgA eS=s; L;Unus Hkkuks
% lIr eklkf/kdkfj.k%AA4AA
v;Zek iqyg'pSo jFkkStk% iaqftdLFkykAA izgsfr%
dPNohj'p ukjn'p jFks jos%AA5AA
ek/kos fuolUR;srs 'kqfplaKs fucks/k esAA6AA
fe=ks·f=Lr{kdks j{k% ikS#"ks;ks·Fk esudkAA gkgk
jFkLou'pSo eS=s;srs olfUr oSAA7AA
o#.kks ofl"Bks ukx'p lgtU;k gwgw jFk%AA jFkfp=kLrFkk
'kqØs olUR;k"kk<laKdsAA8AA
bUæks fo'okolq% lzksr ,ykiq=LrFkkf³~xjk%AAizEykspk p
uHkL;srs lfiZ'pkdssZ olfUr oSAA9AA
fooLokuqxzlsu'p Hk`xqjkiwj.kLrFkkAA vuqEykspk
'k³~[kikyks O;k?kzks Hkkæins rFkkAA10AA
iw"kk olq#fpokZrks xkSreks·Fk /kuat;%AA lq"ks.kks·U;ks
?k`rkph p olUR;k'o;qts jokSAA11AA
fo'okolqHkZj}kt% itZU;SjkorkS rFkkAAfo'okph lsuftPpki
% dkfrZds p olfUr oSAA12AA
va'kdk’;ir{;kZLrq egkin~eLrFkksoZ'khAAfp=lsuLrFkk fo|
qUekxZ'kh"kZs·f/kdkfj.k%AA13AA
_rqHkZxLrFkks.kkZ;q% LQwtZ% ddksZVdLrFkkAA
vfj"Vusfe'pSokU;k iwoZfpfÙkoZjkIljk%AA14AA
ikS"kekls olUR;srs lIr HkkLdje.MysAA yksdizdk'kukFkkZ;
foizo;kZf/kdkfj.k%%AA15AA
Ro"Vk’p tenfXu'p dEcyks·Fk fryksÙkekAAczãksisrks·Fk
_rftn~ /k`rjk"Vªks·Fk lIre%AA16AA
ek?kekls olUR;srs lIr eS=s; HkkLdjsAAJw;rka pkijs lw;sZ
QkYxqus fuolfUr ;sAA17AA
fo".kqj'orjks jEHkk lw;ZopkZ’p lR;ftr~AA fo'okfe=LrFkk
j{kks ;Kksisrks egkequsAA18AA
ekls"osrs"kq eS=s; olUR;srs rq lIrdk%AAlforqeZ.Mys
czãfUo".kq’kDR;qic`‘afgrk%AA19AAf}rh; va'k v0 11
25
“In the very first verse i.e. the third verse of the Adhyaya quoted above it has
been said “Dhata, Kratu, Pulastya, Vasuki, Rathabrid, Gramani and Tumburu—these
seven ‘officer-bearers’ reside always in the chariot of he Sun during the month of Madhu
ALSO KNOWN AS CHAITRA”. Then in verse No. 8, similarly, names of ‘office-bearers’
presiding over the month of Shukra have been given but here also its synonym ASHADA
has been listed simultaneously. In fact in all the above verses we find that ABSOLUTELY
NO DISTINCTION HAS BEEN MADE BETWEEN THE VEDIC NAMES OF SOLAR MONTHS
LIKE MADHU, MADHAVA ETC. AND THEIR LUNAR NAMES LIKE CHAITRA, VAISHAKHA
ETC”.
Let us give a running translation of verses 77 to 81 of the Tenth Adhyaya and
also see their implications with respect to the names of Lunar Months as per the verses
of Eleventh Adhyaya. It is “When the sun is in the first part of Krittika then (on the full
Moon day) the moon is definitely in the last part of Vishakha and when the Sun is in the
third quarter of Vishakha the Moon (on the full Moon day) has to be definitely in the first
part of Krittika. These are the days of Equinoxes without any doubt”.
We have already seen that as per verse 67 of Chapter 10,”It is Vishuva (Equinox)
when the sun is in Mesha or Tula and the days and nights are equal then throughout the
globe”. These two months after the equinoctial month have been named as Madhava
and Urja in verse number 81, leaving no body in doubt that these are the Vedic months
and therefore seasonal and therefore tropical instead of the so called Lahiri or Ramana.
Then in Adhyaya 11, verse 3, Madhu has been named as Chaitra. In other words, lunar
Chaitra starts immediately after Solar Mina Sankranti and therefore with the Spring
Equinox i.e. the month of Mahdava, when the sun is in Mesha, it is Vaishakha and so on
as per Vishnupurana. It is, therefore, surprising as to how Subhash Kak has clubbed
Vrishabha Sun with lunar Vaishakha on the shoulers of Vishnu Purana, when in an
unequivocal manner, Chaitra has been linked to the month of Mahdu and the sun in
Mina, and Vaishakha to sun in Mesha, as seen above.
CLEARLY, EVEN THE LUNAR MONTHS HAVE BEEN PEGGED TO SAYANA VEDIC
MONTHS IN THE PURANAS.
Now let us see what other Puranas have to say. We shall first of all take the
“Shrimad Bhagavata” of Maharshi Vyasa and see as to how we are being compelled by
these so called Vedic astrologers and Vedic astronomers to celebrate Janmashtami on
some imaginary Lahiri Shravana Krisha Ashtami (Fifth Skanda, adhyaya 21 and 22):
;Ue/;xrksHkxokaLrirkEifrLriu~ vkrisu f=yksdha
izriR;oHkkl;R;kReHkklk l ,"k mnx;u
nf{k.kk;uoS"kqorlaKkfHkekZU|'kS?
z;lekukfHkxZfrfHkjkjksg.kkojksg.klekuLFkkus"kq
;FkklouefHki|ekuks edjkfn"kq jkf'k"ogksjk=kkf.k nh?
kZgzLolekukkfu fo/kÙksAA3AA
;nk es"krqy;ksoZrZrs rnkgksjk=kf.k lekukfu HkofUr ;nk
o`"kHkkfn"kq iaplq p jkf'k"kq pjfr rnkgkU;so o/kZUrs
gzlfr p ekfl ekL;sdSdk ?kfVdk jkf="kq AA4AA
;nk o`f'pdkfn"kq iaplq orZrs rnkgksjk=kkf.k foi;Z;kf.k
HkofUrAA5AA ;koíf{k.kk;uegkfu o/kZUrs ;konqnx;ua jk=;
%AA5AA iapaeLdU/k & ,dfoa'kksv/;k;%A
l ,"k Hkxokukfniq#"k ,o lk{kkékjk;.kks yksdkuka LoLr;
vkRekua =;he;a deZfo'kqf) fufeÙka _f"kfHkjfi p osnsu
foftKkL;ekuks }k'k/kk foHkT; "kV~lq olUrkfn"o`rq"kq
;Fkksitks"ke`rqx.kku~ fon/kfrAA3AA resrfeg iq#"kL=;~;k
fo|;k o.kkZJekpkjkuqiFkkmPpkopS%
26
deZfHkjkEukrS;kZsxforkuS'p J);k ;tUrks·atlk Js;%
lef/kxPNfUrAA4AA
vFk l ,"k vkRek yksdkuka |koki`fFkO;ksjUrjs.k uHkksoy;L;
dkypØxrks }kn'keklkUHkq³~äs jkf'k laKku~
laoRljko;oku~ ekl% i{k};a fnok uäa psfr
likn{kZ};eqifn'kfUr ;kork "k"Bea'ka Hkaqthr l oS
_rqfjR;qifn';rs laoRljko;o%AA5AA iapeLdU/k & }
kfoa'kksv/;k;%A
“Surya Bhagvan — the Sun god—energises the whole world by its slow or quick
movements vis-a-vis Uttarayana, Dakshinayana and Vishuvas. The days are the
shortest on Makara Sankranti-cum-Uttarayana, equal with nights on Mesha Sankranti-
cum-Vishuva, longest on Karkata Sankranti-cum-Dakshinayana and again equal with
nights on Tula Sankranti-cum-Vishuva. The self same Parmatma in the form of sun
divides Itself into twelve parts known as Rashis (which are) equal to six seasons of
Vasanta etc. of two months each. During the sojourn of one month, the sun covers two
and a quarter nakshatras. Each Ritu comprises two months which are one sixth of a
Samvatsara”.
It has said further in Book 12 Chapter 11---verses 34 to 46:
v;Zek iqygk·FkkStk% izgsfr% iaqftdkLFkyhA ukjn%
dPNuhj”p u;UR;srs Le ek/koe~AA34AA
/kkrk ÑrLFkyh gsrqokZlqdh jFkÑUequsA
iqyLR;LrqEcq#fjfr e/kqekla u;UR;ehAA35AA
ofl"Bks o#.kks jEHkk lg tU;LrFkk gqgq%A
'kqØf'p=Lou'pSo 'kqfpekla u;UR;ehAA36AA
bUæks fo’okolq% Jksrk ,yki=LrFkkf³~xjk%A izEykspk
jk{klks o;kZs uHkksekla u;UR;ehAA37AA
fooLokuqxzlsu'p O;k?kz vklkj.kks Hk`xq%A vuqEykspk
'k³~[kikyks uHkL;k[;a u;UR;ehAA38AA
iw"kk /kuat;ks okr% lq"ks.k% lq#fpLrFkkA ?k`rkph
xkSre'psfr riksekla u;UR;ehAA39AA
ØrqoZpkZ Hkj}kt% itZU;% lsuftÙkrFkkA fo'o ,sjkor'pSo
riLkk[;a u;UR;ehAA40AA
vFkka’kq% d’;iLrk{;Za _+rlsuLrFkksoZ’khA fo|
qPN=qeZgk’k³~[k% lgksekla u;UR;ehAA41AA
Hkx% LQwtksZ·fj’Vusfe:.kZ vk;q”p iape%A ddksZVd%
iwoZfpfÙk% iq’;ekla u;UR;ehAA42AA
Ro’Vk _phd ru;% dEcy”p fryksÙkekA czãkisrks·Fk
“krftn~ /k`rjk’Vª b”kEHkjk%AA43AA
Fo’.kqj”orjks jEHkk lw;ZopkZ”p lR;ftr~A fo”okfe=ks
e[kkisr ÅtZekla u;UR;ehAA44AA
,rk Hkxorks fo’.kksjkfnR;L; foHkwr;%A Lejrka
la/;;ksu¤.kka gjUR;agks fnus fnusAA45AA
In these verses the names of deities presiding over various Vedic months like Madhu,
Madhava etc. together with other attendant paraphernalia have been listed in the same
manner as in the Vishnuprana. What is noteworthy here is that in the 42nd verse the
month after Saha is Pushya instead of Sahasya which has been referred to in verse No.
27
41. It is a clear indication that for Maharshi Vyasa also there was no difference between
Mina, Mesha and Madhu, Madhava or Chaitra and Vaishakha respectively. THUS SHRI
KRISHNA WAS BORN IN A LUNAR SHRAVANA LINKED TO THE VEDIC I.E. TROPICAL
SHUCHI i.e.. KARKA SANKRANTI AND NOT SOME IMAGINARY LAHIRI OR RAMANA
SHRVANA KRISHNA ASHTAMI . WHEN THESE “VEDIC ASTROLOGERS” PREPARE LORD
KRISHNA’S NATAL CHART ALSO ON THE BASIS OF LAHIR/RAMANA SHRAVANA KRISHNA
ASHTAMIS AND “DELINEATE THE RESULTS CORRECTLY”, THEY ARE ONLY MAKING A
LAUGHING STOCK OF THEMSELVES ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY ARE CLAIMING THAT THE
BIRTH PARTICULARS HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM THESE VERY PURANAS ETC. Similarly,
when “Vedic astronomers” like Subhash Kak interpret these Puranas also in an atrocious
manner and claim with pride, “At worst, we get a sequence of Rashis which is out of step
by one (page 12 of Babylonian and Indian Astronomy)” one has to take their statements
not with a “pinch” but “at least a kilogram” of salt!
Rashis in the Ramayana are an interpolation of a much later date: There is a lot
of confusion about the birth date/time of Bhagwan Rama since He is said to have been
born in “Navmi tithi coincident with Punarvasu nakshatra with the Moon and Jupiter in
Karkata”. That can definitely happen but the problem arises when we posit the sun in
Aries (Mesha) simultaneously. Let us analyze this situation thoroughly.
As per the Valmiki Ramayana, Balakanda, Canto 18, verses 7 to 10, “Sri Rama
was born after six seasons had elapsed since the yagnya was over. It was the month of
Chaitra, Shukla Paksha Navmi tithi, and Punarvasu Nakshatra with five planets either
exalted or in their own Rashis. He was born in Karkata Lagna with the Moon and Jupiter
therein”. Maharshi Valmiki has not said it anywhere that the sun was in Mesha! As we
have seen already, Chaitra is also another name of the Vedic month Madhu, the first
month of Vasanta Ritu.
Goswami Tulsidas also says the same thing in Balakanda 191 “Navmi tithi
madhumas puneeta, shukal paksha abhijit hari preeta”---“It was Madhumasa and Navmi
tithi of Shuklapaksha, in Abhijit Muhurta”. He has not said anywhere that the sun was in
Mesha.
It is only in the Adhyatma Ramayana 1/3/14-15 that we read “Mesham Poohsani
samprapte, pushpavrishtirpapata hai” i.e when the sun was in Mesha….”. However, in
the 14th verse of the same chapter it says,
“madhumase site paksha navmyam karkate shubhe, punarvasu riksha sahite uchhasthe
grahpanchake” i.e. it was shukla paksha (bright lunar half) of the month of Madhu,
Karkata lagna, navmi tithi, Moon in punarvasu nakshatra, and five planets either exalted
or in their own rashis”.
It is actually an astronomical impossibility that has been created by Adhyatma
Ramayana. If the month is Madhu the sun cannot be in Mesha since it is the start of
Madhava! However, if we go by the statements of “Vedic astrologers” and presume the
Rashis to be so called nirayana, the confusion becomes worst confounded! According to
Dr. B. V Rama’s “Notable Horoscopes” Ayanamsha at the time of Shri Krishna’s birth as
28
on July 19, 3228 BC, was +50° 40’. It means that the so called nirayana sankrantis
were earlier by about 51 days than their sayana counterparts. Obviously, at the time of
Shri Rama’s birth it would have been at least +60° i.e. at the start of the month of Vedic
Madhu, the sun would have just entered so called nirayana Makara!
There are now two options: we either presume the entire Adhyatma Ramayana to
be a concoction of the worst order or presume the astrological rashis as a later
interpolation! Personally, I feel that it is better to choose the lesser of two evils since I
find Adhyatma Ramayana full of Vedantic truths that cannot be easily found in a work of
absolute fiction! The Rama-Gita in Adhyatma Ramayana is the best example of
expounding the Vedanta philosophy. Therefore, such astrological verses are plain
interpolations included by some early “Vedic astrologers” just as there are interpolations
in the Surya Sidhanta about the verses of Ayanamsha!
Similarly, as yet no astrologer has found the solution to the riddle as to how it
could be Navmi tithi, with the moon in Cancer and Punarvasu nakshatra if the sun was in
Mesha! For navmi tithi the moon has to be “ahead” by at least 96° from the sun. If the
sun is really in Mesha, the moon will be in Karkata, no doubt, but as Punarvasu
nakshatra ends just at 3° 20’ of Cancer, it cannot be possible because if the sun is even
in zero degrees of Mesha, the moon will have to be in at least sixth degree of Karkata for
navmi tithi to start! On the other hand, if we take the sun in Mina such a problem gets
automatically resolved since with the moon in Karkata, say at two degrees, the sun
would have been earlier by 96° i.e. in 26th degree of Mina.
Was Shri Rama born with the sun in Karkata or the sun in Mesha?
The Valmiki Ramayana itself has created a lot of confusion further in verses 15
and 16 of the same canto (18) when it states, “Bharata was born in Pushya nakshatra
and Mina lagna whereas the twin sons of Sumitra were born in Ashlesha nakshatra when
the sun was in Kuleera i.e. Cancer (Karkata) Rashi”. If Shri Rama was born with the sun
in Mina (Madhu) or Mesha (exalted) Lakshmana and Shattrugana, who were younger
than Rama by just a day-or-two could not have been born with the sun in Karkata. The
planetary position, except for the Moon and lagna would virtually have remained the
same more or less as that of Shri Rama. E.g. the Moon is the only “planet” that could
have changed signs but as Bharata was born in Pushya and Lakshmana and Shatrugna
in Ashlesha, even that “fasterst moving planet” was in the same sign as that of Shri
Rama viz. Cancer i.e. Karkata because in “equal division of nakshtras”, Simha rashi
starts with the end of Ashlesha (and start of Magha) nakshatra! Irnoically, if the sun
(besides the Moon) also was in Cancer then it could not have been Shukla Paksha Navmi
tithi for Shri Rama but Krishna Paksha Trayodashi or Chatrudashi whereas Lakshmana
and Shatrugna must have been born in Krishna Chaturdashi/Amavasya! Besides, the
month of Madhu and the Sun in Cancer are just not compatible at all!
29
Non existence of Rashis in the Mahabharata has a lot of significance: The
Mahabharata claims, and rightly so, that what is contained in that monumental work
may be found in other scriptures also but what is not there is impossible to be found
anywhere else! And we must rake our brains as to why there are no Rashis in the
Mahabharata when there are references to tithis and nakshatras etc. times without
number! Obviously, there were no Rashis prevailing in India at the time of the
Mahabharata!
Mahashivaratri and Magha: Obviously, the world famous Mahashivaratri will be the
first Krishna Trayodashi/Chaturdashi after that Magha Shukla Paksha which follows
Uttarayana immediately. By the same logic, Utarayana in 2004 takes place on
December 21 and the Shukla Paksha after that starts on January 11, 2005 and Krishna
Paksha after that starts on January 26, 2005. Naturally, Magha (Phalguna in Northern
India) Krishna Trayodashi at Nishitha (midnight) will fall on February 6, 2005 and
Chaturdashi on February 7, 2005 but our “Kaliyugi Panchangamakers” advise us to
celebrate it on 7th/8th of March, 2005!
30
Harishchandra, by Babu Shivnandan Sahay has been published by Hindi Samiti,
Lucknow. Pt. Sudhakar Dwivedi is well known as a Sanskrit commentator of
Panchasidhantika and Surya Sidhanta etc. He has prepared a horoscope of the said poet
in the same book. In his preface to that horoscope he has said on page 4, “There is no
doubt that planets were calculated on tropical basis in India during the last several
centuries and horoscopes also were prepared accordingly. It has been just out of sheer
lethargy on the part of our “jyotishis” that they stopped observing the actual longitudes
of the sun, moon etc. through gnomon etc. and resorted to some myth called
ayanamsha with the result that the so called nirayana rashichakra was invented”. He
had written this in 1883 AD, i.e. about 120 ears back!
Misinterpretation of Vedic Mantras: Some “Vedic astrologers” say that there are
references to “Shani” (Saturn) in the Vedas as there are Mantras like “Shan-nodevir-
abhishtay, Apo Bhavantu peetaye; Shamyorabhi sravantu-nah” (Shukla Yajurveda
36/12) becaue the word “Shan” is there. Nothing could be further from the truth since
the plain and simple meaning of this Mantra is “Let the gods bestow desired blissful
objects on us; Let the waters flowing in all directions shower ‘sham’ – peace on us”.
In the same vein, Sukta I, 154 of the Rigveda is interpreted by some astrologers
to mean that this mantra has reference to “fixed signs (Rashis) Taurus, Leo and
Aquarius”! What a fantastic statement!
The first Mantra of this Sukta refers to Vishnu’s three strides in which He
“measured” the entire universe. The second Mantra says, “Vishnu, residing in mountain
tops, like a ‘Mrigon Bhimah….” i.e. “like a terrible Mrigah”. This word (“Mrigah”) has
been defined by Sir Monier Williams in his “Sanskrit English Dictionary” page 828 as, “a
forest animal or a wild beast, game of any kind, (esp) a deer, fawn, gazelle, antelope,
stag, musk-deer, R.V., &c. &c”. Thus according to him it means anything but a lion!
Even in our day to day conversations, Mriga in Sanskrit or Hindi is known as a “deer”.
Kalidasa’s Abhigyan Shakuntalam has a legend attached to it, as king Dushyanta was
hunting a “lovely Mriga” (deer) of the Kanva Ashrama when he met Shakuntala! Pandit
Shankar Dutt Shastri and Shivnath Ahitagni also have translated it as “a terrible animal”
– they have not referred to it as a ‘lion’. However, Sayana Acharya has translated this
Mantra as a “….like a terrible lion residing in forests”. It must be noted here that it is a
similie with the lion rather than a reference to Vishnu the lion himself! We must also
know that lions do not live in mountains but in forests, since they cannot tolerate cold
weather on the mountains, especially of northern clime!
The third Mantra says, “Let this prayer/praise reach the highly extolled ‘Vrishna’
who resides on the mountains”. This word “Vrishna” has been translated by Sir William
Monier on page 1012 as “…drawn by stallions (as a chariot) RV.; …being among
stallions; possessing or bringing great wealth RV”. Shankar Dutt Shastri and Shivnath
Ahitagni have translated it as “nar-pashu i.e. half man and half animal” like a
“Narasimha”. Sayanacharya has translated it as “one who ‘rains’ –bestows--the desired
results”…something akin to Monier’s connotation as “possessing or bringing great
wealth”. This word does not have any connotation of a “bull”. Maybe “Vrishna” is being
confused with “Vrisha” or “Vrishabha”---a “Bull”. Even if it is agreed that Vishnu has
been compared with “Vrishna” which means the bull, it is also a moot point as to
whether bulls really reside on mountains rather than plains unless we are talking
especially of Nandi the “vehicle” of Lord Shiva!
The fifth Mantra says, “May I attain that abode of Vishnu where the god-loving
men enjoy, since He (Vishnu) alone is the real ‘bandhu’…”. This word “bandhu” means,
according to Monier Williams,(page 721) “relation i.e. relative, kindred, kinship (RV.)”.
In other words, it means anything but a “friend”. Shankar Dutt Shastri and Shivnath
Ahitagni have translated it as “bandhav”—a close relative. Sayanacharya has translated
it as “bandhubhuto hitakaro” which means “a well wisher like a very close relative”. In
our day to day prayers we repeat very often, “Tvam eva mata cha pita tvam eva, tvam
eva bandhuh cha sakha tvam eva” “O Almighty, You are my mother, my father, my
‘bandhu’ i.e. kindred and my ‘sakha’ i.e. a ‘friend’. In other words, Sanskrit language
differentiates between a “sakha” – a friend and a “bandhu” i.e. “(close) kin”. You can say
31
a “bandhu is a bandhu and a sakha is a sakha---a friend is a friend; a kindred is a
kindred”
Aurobindo, one of the greatest yogis of modern times, is said to have translated
these three words “Mrigah”, “Vrishnah” and “Bandhuh” as LION, BULL and FRIEND
respectively. Obviously, he must have given a running translation instead of a word for
word one, which the “rashi-linkers” are trying to do! Aurbodindo could never have even
imagined, in spite of his being a Yogi, that after his death his interpretation would be
linked to a non-existent, so called ”fixed Rashichakra” by his disciples.
Presuming for a moment that by “Bandhu” a friend is meant, but what does that
have to do with the astrological sign Aquarius that is supposed to mean a “pitcher”? One
can understand the connection between the lion and Simha rashi, or between the Bull
and Vrisha rashi but what on earth has a “friend” to do with a “pitcher” i.e. Kumbha
Rashi. It is worthwhile to indicate here that a “pitcher is a pitcher and a friend is a
friend”! Surprisingly, these three are supposed to refer to “fixed signs” but ironically
neither the “lion” nor the “bull” and least of all the “friend” are “fixed”. So they do not
have any “common characteristics” with the “fixed rashis” which they are supposed to
represent in the Vedas. Then even Aurobindo himself has not stated anywhere that the
“bull” and the “lion” and the “bandhu” were the three measuring “mileposts” for Vishnu!
On ther other hand all the translators and interpreters are unanimous that these are the
likenesses of Vishnu – a lion, a bull and a “bandhu”! So why misinterpret them to suit
some one’s fancy? That is not service but disservice to the Hindu community as a
whole, which has already been bogged down by so many misinterpretations about the so
called Rashichakra!
Tapasya and Rashichakra!
To say that some “seer” has visualized this interpretation of some astrological
signs (Rashis) during meditation is to give licence to every one to claim having visualized
his or her wishful thinking in meditation! In fact, charlatans claim that they have
intuition! I may equally claim that during “meditation I visualized that some people were
trying to play pranks with us by claiming to have visualized a link between the
“astrological rashis” and Vedic Mantras!
“Meditation” is a dangerous tool. There is a joke in Kashmiri. A thug went to the
son of a deceased rich man and claimed that his father had visited him (the thug) in the
dreams and asked him to claim some “munificence” from his son. The son informed him
that his father had visited him (the son) also in the dream and warned him that so-and-
so would claim to have visited him in a dream and stake a claim to some munificence!
The thug retorted, “Your father is a liar---he told me something in my dreams and has
told you exactly an opposite thing in your dreams”. So these “meditations” are like
“dreams”---even hallucinations and may inform someone exactly of the opposite
meaning to the reality! Better beware!
“Astrological Ages”:
When these astrologers say that they are waiting with a baited breath for the
Aquarian Age, what they mean is that the Vernal Equinox will regress into that
Constellation and not the “Rashi” of that name! It is actually an astronomical
phenomenon. It will take place exactly in the year 2597 AD. Similarly, when it is said
that the “First Point of Aries” regressed into Pisces, they mean the Constellation Pisces
and not the Rashi of a similar name – whether sayana or so called nirayana! Western
astrologers have delinked the Rashis from their namesake constellations and mercifully
declared them openly to be tropical and related to seasons. On the other hand, “Vedic
astrologers” are clinging to non existing myths.
Besides, astronomically, it is not only the Vernal Equinox that has to be
“explained/evaluated/co-related” then while precessing from one constellation to the
other but even the Autumn Equinox as well as both the Solstices. We cannot overlook
the fact that there was a time in hoary past when Winter Solstice was supposed to be
the beginning of the new solar year in India as per the Vedanga Jyotisha and even as per
Sushruta Samhita, as seen already. Equally important is the fact that Autumn Equinox is
the “Spring Equinox” and Summer Solstice the “Winter Solstice” of Southern regions.
32
The only thing we have to remember is that in such cases the actual divisions of
constellations, and not the artificial nakshatras or Rashichakras, are taken into accout by
astronomers. Instead of concentrating just on the VE, on the other hand, astronomers
try to integrate such precessional regressions of the four cardinal points over the last
several millennia with the evolutionary cycle.
33
It can be easily inferred from the (above) Table that the names are of Babylonian
origin, but their exact significance is not always known. ….
It is seen that Varahamihira’s alternative names given in column (5) are simply
the Greek names corrupted in course of transmission and as adopted for Sanskrit; with
the exception of the name for Scorpion, which is given as ‘Kaurpa’. This has phonetic
analogy with the corresponding Babylonian sign names Akrabu for Scorpion. The purely
Sanskrit names given in column (6) are all translations of Greek names with the
exceptions of:
(3) Twin which become Mithuna or ‘Amorous Couple’.
(9) the Archer, which becomes the ‘Bow’,
(10) the Goat, which becomes the ‘Crocodile’
(11) Water bearer, which becomes the ‘Waterpot’.
Some of them appear to have been translations of Babylonian names.
The Babylonian names, as interpreted by F. K. Ginzel (in his book—published in
1906--Handbuch der Mathematischen und Technischen Chronologie, Bd. I. Leipzig) are
given in the seventh column, with their meanings.
It is thus seen that the names of the zodiacal signs are originally of Babylonian
origin. They were taken over almost without change by the Greeks, and subsequently
by the Romans, and the Hindus, from Graeco-Chaldean astrology…..
“These signs were taken up by almost all nations in the centuries before the
Christian era on account of the significance attached to them by astrologers. In Greece,
they were first supposed to have been introduced by the early Greek astronomer
Cleostratos, an astronomer who observed about 532 BC in the island of Tenedos off the
Hellespont who introduced the designation ‘Zodiac’ to describe the belt of stars about the
ecliptic. The twelve ‘Zodiacal Signs’ are not known in older ritualistic Indian literature
like the Brahmanas. They appear to have come to India in the wake of the Macedonian
Greeks or of nations like the Sakas who were intermediaries for transmission of Greek
culture to India…..
“The hesitation of medieval astronomers in accepting precession can be easily
understood. Most of them earned their livelihood by practising the ‘Astrological Cult’
which was reared on the basis that the signs of the zodiac are fixed, and coincident with
certain star-groups; but this assumption crumbles to the ground if precession is
accepted. But as historical records now show, though astronomers had clearly
recognised that the initial point should be the point of intersection of the equator and the
ecliptic, there was no unanimity even amongst ancient astronomers of different ages
regarding the locationof this point in the heavens because it was not occupied by any
prominent star at any epoch and the ancients were unaware of the importance of its
motion”
Rashichakra was imported into India from Babylon via the Greeks:
We have seen that the so called Mesha etc. Rashichakra cannot be linked to any so
called sidereal i.e. constellational zodiac. So the only alternative left for the Vedic Rishis
was to have “invented” or discovered” a Rashichakra linked to the seasonal months! Let
us try to understand as to how sheepish our Vedic Rishis would have looked today if they
had really done so! We know that the first month of the Vasanta Season is known as
Madhu and the month of Vernal Equinox as Madhav as per the Vedas. Let us suppose
that these months were also named Mina and Mesha by our Vedic Rishis! But then Mina
means a “Fish” and Mesha a “Ram” in Sanskrit and the question arises as to why they
would have named the months like that? Even our “extraordinarily intelligent Vedic
astronomers” cannot discern any resemblance between the Spring season and “Fishes”
or “Rams”!! Similarly, according to our “Vedic astronomers” like Subhas Kak they had
named Shukra as Vrisha (a Bull!) and Shuchi as Mithuna i.e. ”an amorous couple”! We
know that these two months are of “Grishma” i.e Summer --- hardly having any
resemblance to either a “Bull” or “an amorous couple”. By the same logic why should
they have named Summer Solstice --- Nabhah -- as Karkata since it does not at all look
like a “Crab” nor does the month of Nabhasya (rains) resemble at all a Simha - a
“Lion!”. Simlarly, the month of Isha of Sharad Ritu has no resemblance to a Kanya – ” a
34
Virgin”. The second month of Sharad Ritu viz. Urja---the Autumn Equinox--- is the only
month – rather the only day when it can be said to resemble a Tula -“Scales” since the
day and night are equal then throughout the globe! The month of Sahas of Hemant Ritu
has nothing to do with “Vrishchika” – “A Scorpion” unless it is to get a sting in our
hands by trying to erect a Rashichakra! The month of Sahasya is supposed to have been
named Dhanu – a bow or an Archer! The most ironic part of it is that the months of
Tapa and Tapasya – the latter also being the Winter Solstice – are supposed to resemble
“Makar” and Kumbha” “a goat”– when actually Makar means a Crocodile and Kumbha a
Pitcher! Unfortunately for these “Vedic astronomers” our Vedic Rishis did not invent any
such Racshichakra with such fantastic names, and that is what is bothering them and
that is why they are hell-bent to “prove” that they did do so -- which actually proves the
ignorance of these “Vedic astronomers” and of course, Kaliyugi Jyotishis” who call
themselves Vedic Jyotishis.
We have thus proved conclusively that the Vedic Rishis did not either “invent” or
“discover” a Rashichakra named Mesha etc. Rashis because they were not that
“illiterate” to have done so and make a fool of themselves. It is only our “modern Vedic
astronomers” besides “Vedic astrologers” who are ascribing a Rashichakra to our Vedic
Rishis! It eludes one’s imagination as to why they are hell-bent to make a laughing
stock of our “Vedic Rishis” by way of ascribing to the Rishis an invention” which they
never did just to belittle the claim that the Rashichakra with the nomenclature of Mesha
(Ram) etc. rashis was invented by Babylonians! If we are the real followers of our Vedic
Rishis, even if they had “invented” such a Rashichakra, we should have tried to
undermine that “invention” since it brings hardly any credit to anyone to ascribe a
discovery to our exalted Rishis which would have made a mess of everything!
35
Vedic scholar at all or he is just kowtowing the line of swarming “Vedic Astrologers” out
of ulterior motives. Fie on such scholars and their scholarship!
Rashis have to be Sayana: If at all we have to live with Mesha, Vrishabha etc. Rashis,
we must choose the lesser of two evils, viz. a Sayana Rashi-chakra and de-link it
completely from the constellational belt as is done by “Western astrologers”. It is better
to admit that it is a Chaldean “discovery/invention” and we are using it only because
everybody else is using it, instead of ascribing it to our Vedic Rishis. If at all we have to
link the so called nakshatra division of 27 nakshatras, it is better to link it to these very
seasonal rashis as was done in the time of Alberuni (Please see page 99 of my Shri
Krishen Universal Ephemeris for 2001). For that matter, even Vishnudharmotara has
done the same thing, i.e. linked the nakshatras to Sayana Rashis which have been made
inseparable from Ayanas and Vishuvas etc. Acharya Abhinavgupta has linked the Rashis
to seasons and cardinal points and his commentator Jayaratha has explicitly explained
the same thing vide his commentary on Tantraloka --
36