Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DECISION
CHICO-NAZARIO , J : p
In this Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of
Court, petitioner SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION-PHILIPPINE
TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS ORGANIZATION (SMCEU-PTGWO) prays that
this Court reverse and set aside the (a) Decision 2 dated 9 March 2005 of the Court of
Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 66200, a rming the Decision 3 dated 19 February 2001 of
the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) of the Department of Labor and Employment
(DOLE) which upheld the Certi cate of Registration of respondent SAN MIGUEL
PACKAGING PRODUCTS EMPLOYEES UNION–PAMBANSANG DIWA NG
MANGGAGAWANG PILIPINO (SMPPEU–PDMP); and (b) the Resolution 4 dated 16
January 2006 of the Court of Appeals in the same case, denying petitioner's Motion for
Reconsideration of the aforementioned Decision.
The following are the antecedent facts:
Petitioner is the incumbent bargaining agent for the bargaining unit comprised of
the regular monthly-paid rank and le employees of the three divisions of San Miguel
Corporation (SMC), namely, the San Miguel Corporate Staff Unit (SMCSU), San Miguel
Brewing Philippines (SMBP), and the San Miguel Packaging Products (SMPP), in all
o ces and plants of SMC, including the Metal Closure and Lithography Plant in Laguna.
It had been the certified bargaining agent for 20 years — from 1987 to 1997.
Respondent is registered as a chapter of Pambansang Diwa ng Manggagawang
Pilipino (PDMP). PDMP issued Charter Certi cate No. 112 to respondent on 15 June
1 9 9 9 . 5 In compliance with registration requirements, respondent submitted the
requisite documents to the BLR for the purpose of acquiring legal personality. 6 Upon
submission of its charter certi cate and other documents, respondent was issued
Certi cate of Creation of Local or Chapter PDMP-01 by the BLR on 6 July 1999. 7
Thereafter, respondent led with the Med-Arbiter of the DOLE Regional O cer in the
National Capital Region (DOLE-NCR), three separate petitions for certi cation election
to represent SMPP, SMCSU, and SMBP. 8 All three petitions were dismissed, on the
ground that the separate petitions fragmented a single bargaining unit. 9
On 17 August 1999, petitioner led with the DOLE-NCR a petition seeking the
cancellation of respondent's registration and its dropping from the rolls of legitimate
labor organizations. In its petition, petitioner accused respondent of committing fraud
and falsi cation, and non-compliance with registration requirements in obtaining its
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
certi cate of registration. It raised allegations that respondent violated Articles 239 (a),
(b) and (c) 1 0 and 234 (c) 1 1 of the Labor Code. Moreover, petitioner claimed that
PDMP is not a legitimate labor organization, but a trade union center, hence, it cannot
directly create a local or chapter. The petition was docketed as Case No. NCR-OD-
9908-007-IRD. 1 2
On 14 July 2000, DOLE-NCR Regional Director Maximo B. Lim issued an Order
dismissing the allegations of fraud and misrepresentation, and irregularity in the
submission of documents by respondent. Regional Director Lim further ruled that
respondent is allowed to directly create a local or chapter. However, he found that
respondent did not comply with the 20% membership requirement and, thus, ordered
the cancellation of its certi cate of registration and removal from the rolls of legitimate
labor organizations. 1 3 Respondent appealed to the BLR. In a Decision dated 19
February 2001, it declared:
As a chartered local union, appellant is not required to submit the number
of employees and names of all its members comprising at least 20% of the
employees in the bargaining unit where it seeks to operate. Thus, the revocation
of its registration based on non-compliance with the 20% membership
requirement does not have any basis in the rules.
While the BLR agreed with the ndings of the DOLE Regional Director dismissing
the allegations of fraud and misrepresentation, and in upholding that PDMP can directly
create a local or a chapter, it reversed the Regional Director's ruling that the 20%
membership is a requirement for respondent to attain legal personality as a labor
organization. Petitioner thereafter led a Motion for Reconsideration with the BLR. In a
Resolution rendered on 19 June 2001 in BLR-A-C-64-05-9-00 (NCR-OD-9908-007-IRD),
the BLR denied the Motion for Reconsideration and a rmed its Decision dated 19
February 2001. 1 5
Invoking the power of the appellate court to review decisions of quasi-judicial
agencies, petitioner led with the Court of Appeals a Petition for Certiorari under Rule
65 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 66200. The Court
of Appeals, in a Decision dated 9 March 2005, dismissed the petition and a rmed the
Decision of the BLR, ruling as follows:
In Department Order No. 9, a registered federation or national union may
directly create a local by submitting to the BLR copies of the charter certi cate,
the local's constitution and by-laws, the principal o ce address of the local, and
the names of its o cers and their addresses. Upon complying with the
documentary requirements, the local shall be issued a certi cate and included in
the roster of legitimate labor organizations. The [herein respondent] is an a liate
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
of a registered federation PDMP, having been issued a charter certi cate. Under
the rules we have reviewed, there is no need for SMPPEU to show a membership
of 20% of the employees of the bargaining unit in order to be recognized as a
legitimate labor union.
In view of the foregoing, the assailed decision and resolution of the BLR
are AFFIRMED, and the petition is DISMISSED. 1 6 DHECac
Hence, this Petition for Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court
where petitioner raises the sole issue of: DHaECI
b. The names of its o cers, their addresses, the principal address of the labor
organization, the minutes of the organizational meetings and the list of the
workers who participated in such meetings;
c. The names of all its members comprising at least twenty percent (20%) of all
the employees in the bargaining unit where it seeks to operate;
d. If the applicant union has been in existence for one or more years, copies of its
annual financial reports; and
e. Four (4) copies of the constitution and by-laws of the applicant union, minutes
of its adoption or rati cation and the list of the members who participated
in it. 1 7 SCDaHc
Petitioner also insists that the 20% requirement for registration of respondent
must be based not on the number of employees of a single division, but in all three
divisions of the company in all the o ces and plants of SMC since they are all part of
one bargaining unit. Petitioner refers to Section 1, Article 1 of the Collective Bargaining
Agreement (CBA), 1 8 quoted hereunder: aEDCAH
ARTICLE 1
SCOPE
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
Section 1. Appropriate Bargaining Unit. The appropriate bargaining unit
covered by this Agreement consists of all regular rank and le employees paid on
the basis of xed salary per month and employed by the COMPANY in its
Corporate Staff Units (CSU), San Miguel Brewing Products (SMBP) and San
Miguel Packaging Products (SMPP) and in different operations existing in the
City of Manila and suburbs, including Metal Closure and Lithography Plant
located at Canlubang, Laguna subject to the provisions of Article XV of this
Agreement provided however, that if during the term of this Agreement, a plant
within the territory covered by this Agreement is transferred outside but within a
radius of fty (50) kilometers from the Rizal Monument, Rizal Park, Metro Manila,
the employees in the transferred plant shall remain in the bargaining unit covered
by this Agreement. (Emphasis supplied.)
Petitioner thus maintains that respondent, in any case, failed to meet this 20%
membership requirement since it based its membership on the number of employees
of a single division only, namely, the SMPP. HSDIaC
A perusal of the records reveals that respondent is registered with the BLR as a
"local" or "chapter" of PDMP and was issued Charter Certi cate No. 112 on 15 June
1999. Hence, respondent was directly chartered by PDMP.
The procedure for registration of a local or chapter of a labor organization is
provided in Book V of the Implementing Rules of the Labor Code, as amended by
Department Order No. 9 which took effect on 21 June 1997, and again by Department
Order No. 40 dated 17 February 2003. The Implementing Rules as amended by D.O. No.
9 should govern the resolution of the petition at bar since respondent's petition for
certi cation election was led with the BLR in 1999; and that of petitioner on 17 August
1999. 2 6 DSAICa
(b) The names of the local/chapter's o cers, their addresses, and the principal
office of the local/chapter; and
(c) The local/chapter's constitution and by-laws; Provided, That where the
local/chapter's constitution and by-laws is the same as that of the
federation or national union, this fact shall be indicated accordingly. SACTIH
The Implementing Rules stipulate that a local or chapter may be directly created
by a federation or national union. A duly constituted local or chapter created in
accordance with the foregoing shall acquire legal personality from the date of ling of
the complete documents with the BLR. 2 9 The issuance of the certi cate of registration
by the BLR or the DOLE Regional O ce is not the operative act that vests legal
personality upon a local or a chapter under Department Order No. 9. Such legal
personality is acquired from the ling of the complete documentary requirements
enumerated in Section 1, Rule VI. 3 0 CAIHTE
Still, petitioner postulates that respondent was not validly and legitimately
created, for PDMP cannot create a local or chapter as it is not a legitimate labor
organization, it being a trade union center. TcaAID
PDMP was registered as a trade union center and issued Registration Certi cate
No. FED-11558-LC by the BLR on 14 February 1991. Until the certi cate of registration
of PDMP is cancelled, its legal personality as a legitimate labor organization subsists.
Once a union acquires legitimate status as a labor organization, it continues to be
recognized as such until its certi cate of registration is cancelled or revoked in an
independent action for cancellation. 4 1 It bears to emphasize that what is being directly
challenged is the personality of respondent as a legitimate labor organization and not
that of PDMP. This being a collateral attack, this Court is without jurisdiction to
entertain questions indirectly impugning the legitimacy of PDMP.
Corollarily, PDMP is granted all the rights and privileges appurtenant to a
legitimate labor organization, 4 2 and continues to be recognized as such until its
certi cate of registration is successfully impugned and thereafter cancelled or revoked
in an independent action for cancellation.
We now proceed to the contention that PDMP cannot directly create a local or a
chapter, it being a trade union center. TDcAIH
This Court reverses the nding of the appellate court and BLR on this ground, and
rules that PDMP cannot directly create a local or chapter.
After an exhaustive study of the governing labor law provisions, both statutory
and regulatory, 4 3 we nd no legal justi cation to support the conclusion that a trade
union center is allowed to directly create a local or chapter through chartering.
Apropos, we take this occasion to reiterate the rst and fundamental duty of this Court,
which is to apply the law. The solemn power and duty of the Court to interpret and
apply the law does not include the power to correct by reading into the law what is not
written therein. 4 4 HAIaEc
Presidential Decree No. 442, better known as the Labor Code, was enacted in
1972. Being a legislation on social justice, 4 5 the provisions of the Labor Code and the
Implementing Rules have been subject to several amendments, and they continue to
evolve, considering that labor plays a major role as a socio-economic force. The Labor
Code was rst amended by Republic Act No. 6715, and recently, by Republic Act No.
9481. Incidentally, the term trade union center was never mentioned under Presidential
Decree No. 442, even as it was amended by Republic Act No. 6715. The term trade
union center was rst adopted in the Implementing Rules, under Department Order No.
9. cEaCAH
(a) The list of its member organizations and their respective presidents and, in the
case of an industry union, the industry where the union seeks to operate;
(b) The resolution of membership of each member organization, approved by the
Board of Directors of such union;
(c) The name and principal address of the applicant, the names of its o cers and
their addresses, the minutes of its organizational meeting/s, and the list of
member organizations and their representatives who attended such
meeting/s; and
(d) A copy of its constitution and by-laws and minutes of its rati cation by a
majority of the presidents of the member organizations, provided that
where the rati cation was done simultaneously with the organizational
meeting, it shall be su cient that the fact of rati cation be included in the
minutes of the organizational meeting. 4 7
The Implementing Rules, as amended by Department Order No. 9, provide that "a
duly registered federation or national union" may directly create a local or chapter. The
provision reads: HScCEa
Republic Act No. 9481 or "An Act Strengthening the Workers' Constitutional Right
to Self-Organization, Amending for the Purpose Presidential Decree No. 442, As
Amended, Otherwise Known as the Labor Code of the Philippines" lapsed 5 2 into law on
25 May 2007 and became effective on 14 June 2007. 5 3 This law further amends the
Labor Code provisions on Labor Relations.
Pertinent amendments read as follows: SCcHIE
(b) The chapter's constitution and by-laws: Provided, That where the
chapter's constitution and by-laws are the same as that of the federation or
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
the national union, this fact shall be indicated accordingly.
The additional supporting requirements shall be certi ed under oath
by the secretary or treasurer of the chapter and attested by its president.
(Emphasis ours.) ICTaEH
Article 234 now includes the term trade union center, but interestingly, the
provision indicating the procedure for chartering or creating a local or chapter, namely
Article 234-A, still makes no mention of a "trade union center." IDaEHC
Also worth emphasizing is that even in the most recent amendment of the
implementing rules, 5 4 there was no mention of a trade union center as being among the
labor organizations allowed to charter. ISaCTE
This Court deems it proper to apply the Latin maxim expressio unius est exclusio
alterius. Under this maxim of statutory interpretation, the expression of one thing is the
exclusion of another. When certain persons or things are speci ed in a law, contract, or
will, an intention to exclude all others from its operation may be inferred. If a statute
speci es one exception to a general rule or assumes to specify the effects of a certain
provision, other exceptions or effects are excluded. 5 5 Where the terms are expressly
limited to certain matters, it may not, by interpretation or construction, be extended to
other matters. 5 6 Such is the case here. If its intent were otherwise, the law could have
so easily and conveniently included "trade union centers" in identifying the labor
organizations allowed to charter a chapter or local. Anything that is not included in the
enumeration is excluded therefrom, and a meaning that does not appear nor is intended
or re ected in the very language of the statute cannot be placed therein. 5 7 The rule is
restrictive in the sense that it proceeds from the premise that the legislating body
would not have made speci c enumerations in a statute if it had the intention not to
restrict its meaning and con ne its terms to those expressly mentioned. 5 8 Expressium
facit cessare tacitum. 5 9 What is expressed puts an end to what is implied. Casus
omissus pro omisso habendus est. A person, object or thing omitted must have been
omitted intentionally. aSTcCE
Therefore, since under the pertinent status and applicable implementing rules,
the power granted to labor organizations to directly create a chapter or local through
chartering is given to a federation or national union, then a trade union center is without
authority to charter directly. DAEaTS
The ruling of this Court in the instant case is not a departure from the policy of
the law to foster the free and voluntary organization of a strong and united labor
movement, 6 0 and thus assure the rights of workers to self-organization. 6 1 The
mandate of the Labor Code in ensuring strict compliance with the procedural
requirements for registration is not without reason. It has been observed that the
formation of a local or chapter becomes a handy tool for the circumvention of union
registration requirements. Absent the institution of safeguards, it becomes a
convenient device for a small group of employees to foist a not-so-desirable federation
or union on unsuspecting co-workers and pare the need for wholehearted voluntariness,
which is basic to free unionism. 6 2 As a legitimate labor organization is entitled to
speci c rights under the Labor Code and involved in activities directly affecting public
interest, it is necessary that the law afford utmost protection to the parties affected. 6 3
However, as this Court has enunciated in Progressive Development Corporation v.
Secretary of Department of Labor and Employment, it is not this Court's function to
augment the requirements prescribed by law. Our only recourse, as previously
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
discussed, is to exact strict compliance with what the law provides as requisites for
local or chapter formation. 6 4
In sum, although PDMP as a trade union center is a legitimate labor organization,
it has no power to directly create a local or chapter. Thus, SMPPEU-PDMP cannot be
created under the more lenient requirements for chartering, but must have complied
with the more stringent rules for creation and registration of an independent union,
including the 20% membership requirement.
WHEREFORE, the instant Petition is GRANTED. The Decision dated 09 March
2005 of the Court of Appeals in CA-GR SP No. 66200 is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The
Certi cate of Registration of San Miguel Packaging Products Employees Union–
Pambansang Diwa ng Manggagawang Pilipino is ORDERED CANCELLED, and SMPPEU-
PDMP DROPPED from the rolls of legitimate labor organizations.
Costs against petitioner.
SO ORDERED.
Ynares-Santiago, Austria-Martinez, Nachura and Reyes, JJ., concur.
Footnotes
1. The Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) was omitted as public respondent from the title of the
case. In appeals via Petition for Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court,
the tribunal promulgating the appealed Decision is not impleaded.
2. Penned by Associate Justice Mario L. Guarina III with Associate Justices Marina L. Buzon
and Santiago Javier Ranada, concurring; Rollo, pp. 23-31.
d. Financial Report
e. Organization Meeting and Joint Resolution and Petition for Certification Election
7. Certificate of Creation of Chapter/local; CA rollo, p. 44.
8. On 15 June 1999, within the freedom period of the Collective Bargaining Agreement,
respondent filed a Petition for Certification Election covering SMC-SMPP. The three
petitions were consolidated on appeal with an earlier petition for certification election
filed by San Miguel Corporation Employees Union Greater Manila and Canlubang Area
(SMCEU-GMCA) docketed as OS-A-2-17-00.
9. Id. at 18; Section 2 of Rule XI, Book V of the Implementing Rules, as amended by D.O. No. 9
provides that where two or more petitions for certification election involving the same
bargaining unit are filed in one Regional Office, the same shall be automatically
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
consolidated.
10. Article 239. Grounds for Cancellation of Union Registration. The following shall constitute
grounds for cancellation of union registration:
a. Misrepresentation, false statement or fraud in connection with the adoption or
ratification of the constitution and by-laws or amendments thereto, the minutes of
ratification, and the list of members who took part in the ratification;
b. Failure to submit the documents mentioned in the preceding paragraph within thirty
(30) days from adoption or ratification of the constitution and by-laws of amendments
thereto;
b. The names of its officers, their addresses, the principal address of the labor
organization, the minutes of the organizational meetings and the list of the workers who
participated in such meetings;
c. The names of all its members comprising at least twenty percent (20%) of all the
employees in the bargaining unit where it seeks to operate;
d. If the applicant union has been in existence for one or more years, copies of its annual
financial reports; and
e. Four (4) copies of the constitution and by-laws of the applicant union, minutes of its
adoption or ratification and the list of the members who participated in it.
12. CA rollo, pp. 33-39.
20. Article 212 (g), Labor Code; Section 1 (i), Rule 1, Book V of the Implementing Rules, as
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
amended by Department Order No. 9.
21. Article 242 of the Labor Code grants the following:
Rights of Legitimate Labor Organizations. A legitimate labor organization shall have the
right:
(a) To act as the representative of its members for the purpose of collective bargaining;
24. San Miguel Foods, Inc.-Cebu B-Meg Feed Plant v. Laguesma, 331 Phil. 356, 371 (1996).
25. Progressive Development Corporation-Pizza Hut v. Laguesma, 338 Phil. 310, 321 (1997).
26. Section 1, Rule XXVI, Department Order No. 40, which states:
27. Rule VI, Book V, Implementing Rules, as amended by Department Order No. 9. Additionally,
section 2 thereof provides that a duly registered workers' association may likewise
charter any of its branches, subject to the filing of the documents prescribed under
Section 1.
28. Section 1, Rule VI, Book V of the Implementing Rules, as amended by Department Order No.
9.
29. Section 3, Rule VI of the Implementing Rules of Book V, as amended by Department Order
No. 9, clearly states:
37. A labor organization is any union or association of employees which exists in whole or in
part for the purpose of collective bargaining or for dealing with employers concerning
terms and conditions of employment. [Section 1 (h), Rule 1, Book V of the Implementing
Rules, as amended by Department Order No. 9].
38. Article 212 (g), Labor Code; Section 1 (i), Rule 1, Book V of the Implementing Rules, as
amended by Department Order No. 9.
39. Section 1 (p), Rule I, Book V, of the Implementing Rules, as amended by Department Order
No. 9.
40. Tagaytay Highlands International Golf Club Incorporated v. Tagaytay Highlands Employees
Union-PGTWO, 443 Phil. 841, 852 (2003).
41. Laguna Autoparts Manufacturing Corporation v. Office of the Secretary, Department of
Labor and Employment, supra note 29.
42. Under Article 234 of the Labor Code, any applicant labor organization, association or group
of unions or workers shall acquire legal personality and shall be entitled to the rights and
privileges granted by law to legitimate labor organizations upon issuance of the
certificate of registration upon compliance with the documentary requirements.
43. As amended by Department Order No. 9, Department Order No. 40-03, and Department Order
No. 40-B-03.
44. Agote v. Lorenzo, G.R. No. 142675, 22 July 2005, 464 SCRA 60, 76.
45. As aptly put by Justice Laurel, social justice is the humanization of laws and the
equalization of social and economic forces by the state so that justice in its rational and
objectively secular conception may at least be approximated.
46. Section 1 (p), Rule I, Book V, of the Implementing Rules, as amended by Department Order
No. 9.
47. Under a different section; Section 2 (III), Rule III, Book V of the Implementing Rules, as
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
amended by Department Order No. 9.
48. Rule I (m), Book V, Implementing Rules, as amended by Department Order No. 9.
51. Section 1 (i), Rule I, Book V, Implementing Rules, as amended by Department Order No. 40-
03.
52 Republic Act No. 9481 was not signed by the President, but lapsed into law by virtue of the
provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution.
53. Republic Act No. 9481 was published on 30 May 2007 in a newspaper of general circulation
(MALAYA). The date of effectivity is computed 15 days from date of publication.
54. Subsequently amended by Department Order No. 40-B-03, Department Order No. 40-C-05,
and Department Order No. 40-D-05.
55. Black's Law Dictionary, p. 581; Office of the Ombudsman v. Valera, G.R. No. 164250, 5
September 2005, 471 SCRA 715, 746 and City Government of San Pablo, Laguna v.
Reyes, 364 Phil. 842, 853 (1999).
56. Sarmiento, III v. Mison, G.R. No. 79974, 17 December 1987, 156 SCRA 549, 552; Integrated
Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora, 392 Phil. 618, 642 (2000).
57. Singapore Airlines Local Employees Association v. National Labor Relations Commission,
215 Phil. 420, 428 (1984).
58. San Pablo Mfg. Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 147749, 22 June 2006,
492 SCRA 192, 200.
59. Abakada Guro Party List v. Ermita, G.R. No. 168056, 1 September 2005, 469 SCRA 1,
Espiritu v. Cipriano, G.R. No. 32743, February 15, 1974, 55 SCRA 533, 538.
60. Chapter 1, Book V, Labor Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 6715.
61. As embodied under Article 3 of the Labor Code.
(a) To act as the representative of its members for the purpose of collective bargaining;
(b) To be certified as the exclusive representative of all the employees in an appropriate
collective bargaining unit for purposes of collective bargaining;
(c) To be furnished by the employer, upon written request, with the annual audited
financial statements, including the balance sheet and the profit and loss statement,
within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of receipt of the request, after the union
has been duly recognized by the employer or certified as the sole and exclusive
bargaining representatives of the employees in the bargaining unit, or within sixty (60)
calendar days before the expiration of the existing collective bargaining agreement, or
during the collective bargaining negotiation;
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2019 cdasiaonline.com
(d) To own property, real or personal, for the use and benefit of the labor organization
and its members;
(e) To sue and be sued in its registered name; and
(f) To undertake all other activities designed to benefit the organization and its members
including cooperative, housing welfare and other projects not contrary to law.
64. Supra note 22.