Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Course Description:
Some people may be under the impression that Political Scientists simply engage in argumentative
discussions about contemporary politics with one another, much like in talk shows. Political Science,
however, is driven primarily by curiosity, a desire to comprehend how the (political) world works. Rather
than giving easy answers, students should learn to ask the right questions about particular events or
processes in order to come to some preliminary understanding of them. In this course, you will be
confronted with the basic approach to political inquiry: that is, how to ask questions, and how to go
about answering them. You will learn about the two logics of political inquiry, quantitative and
qualitative. You will pursue research projects both in a group setting and individually. In the end, you
should have an idea of how to write a research paper. But more importantly, I hope that you will have
gained new insight on how to approach and understand the world as a whole
Course Objectives:
Understand how political scientists seek to understand the world, particularly by asking the right
questions
Know how to organize and start writing a research paper
Use appropriate citation format
Understand what variables are, how they can be put together to create hypotheses, and how
hypotheses lead to theories
Understand the difference between qualitative and quantitative research
Understand basic principles of descriptive statistics
Create survey and apply it to FC College
Understand principles of structured interviews and how to use them to help test hypotheses
Learn how to work effectively in groups
Course Requirements:
In this course, as in every course at this university, your work must be entirely your own. Cheating is not
only dishonest; it is unfair to your fellow students who have worked to get the grades they receive.
Providing or receiving help during exams, submitting the work of another as your own, or copying even
small portions of an electronic or printed source without directly quoting and citing it, all constitute
academic misconduct. The standard penalty for these or any other forms of academic misconduct is a
failing grade for the course; more severe penalties are also possible. WHEN IN DOUBT, DON’T DO IT (OR
ASK ME BEFORE YOU DO!).
Course Outline
Assignment Nr.1:
Assignment Nr. 2: individual analysis of Group Survey Research Data: November 7th
Module 3 (November 12th through December 17th): Introduction to Qualitative Approach: In-
Depth Interviewing
o Research Design I: The Case Study
Reading:
Van Evera “What are Case Studies?”
Ragin “Method of Difference and Method of Agreement”
o Interviewing Principles
Reading:
Weiss “Learning from Strangers”
Leech “Asking Questions: Techniques for Semistructured Interviews”
Berry “Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing”
Tansey “Process-Tracing and Elite Interviewing”
Group Interview Guide, along with hypotheses, and interview plan: due December 10th
Group Paper, analyzing interviews, and confirming/disconfirming hypotheses: due December 19th