Strategy for handling Infrastructure and Livelihood Based Slum Area efforts

improvement income in the Bareng Village of Malang City Using Fuzzy AHP
and Pentagonal Asset Methods

Abstract
Bareng Village is one of the village that has been targeted by Malang City
Government in handling slum areas. Bareng Village has the most extensive area of
the slum area of 81.56 Ha. This research includes descriptive quantitative research
that uses Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Pentagonal asset data analysis
methods. Research instruments used were interviews, questionnaires and
observations. Research was conducted on stakeholders involved in determining
strategies for handling slum areas. Based on the results of the infrastructure-based
strategy research using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method with an
infrastructure weight value of 0.21, that the solid waste management indicator in
infrastructure is a priority indicator compared to other infrastructure indicators.
While the strategy with a weight value of 0.62, that the restoration strategy is a
priority strategy compared to other strategies. Waste management with a restoration
strategy applies the 3R principle and the procurement of waste banks which can be
realized by composting and handicraft materials that can increase income.
Livelihood-based strategy by used the pentagonal asset method by empowering the
community in terms of environmental management with a hydroponic farming
system and utilizing financial institutions. To support the implementation of the
strategy, is needed from the relevant regional government in carrying out and
implementing policies to support the handling of infrastructure and livelihood-
based slums as an effort to increase income.
Keywords: Infrastructure, Slums, Livelihood
Regional development in developing countries, for example, Indonesia has one of
the characteristics of a rapidly growing population. Therefore the need for the
provision of residential land and employment will also increase, either through new
increase or development. For this the government gave an effort to deal with the
population, namely by the program of urbanization of the village residents into the
city. The program to empower rural communities to stay in cities so they can
provide hope with increase income and better livelihoods.
The urbanization program continuously only have a positive impact but also have
a negative impact. One of the negative impacts is the problem of the spread of the
village residents who are looking for livelihood sources in urban areas, resulting in
increased demand for space in cities such as environmental facilities and
infrastructure. The necessity and demand for high settlements are not supported by
the availability of increasingly limited land, resulting in many people looking for
other alternatives to meet their needs, by establishing settlements in non-residential
development areas such as riverside, railroad edges, around beaches, ponds and

1
others other. Dense area caused of limited land will develop into be poorly
populated area or we often call them slums.
Basically slum settlements are identical to the existence of land that is not in
accordance with spatial planning, building density that is erected in a very limited
area, socially prone to diseases, very low quality of buildings, and inadequate
provision of environmental infrastructure and endangering the life of its
sustainability. Population growth is often the trigger for these slums, especially
those with low incomes and for those who receive less attention from the
government in controlling growth and providing adequate infrastructure. Poor
people with low income can not just meet the needs of their homes and shelter, they
have to fulfill other needs such as eating, dressing and medical treatment.
Specifically, the impact caused by the existence of slums will create a bad paradigm
especially for local government, by giving a negative image impact on the
powerlessness and inability of the government in regulating the life services of its
citizens. On the other hand in the field of socio-cultural order, communities living
in economically slum is generally categorized as low-income communities, which
is often the reason for the degradation of discipline and disorder in various social
orders. Seeing that the formation of slums has a multidimensional effect including
in the dimensions of government administration that is able to provide a negative
image for the government, a social-cultural order that is often seen as a cause of
discipline and disorder, physical environment and political dimensions which are
often used as negotiations for various interests political (Muta'ali, 2016).
Basically the slums in Law No.1 of 2011 are uninhabitable settlements due to
building irregularities, high building density, and the quality of buildings and
facilities and infrastructure that do not meet the requirements. Population growth is
often the trigger for these slums, especially those with low incomes and for those
who receive less attention from the government in controlling growth and providing
adequate infrastructure. Poor people with low income can not just meet the needs
of their homes and shelter, they have to fulfill other needs such as eating, dressing
and medical treatment. Specifically, the impact caused by the existence of slums
will create a bad paradigm especially for local government, by giving a negative
image impact on the powerlessness and inability of the government in regulating
the life services of its citizens. On the other hand in the field of socio-cultural order,
communities living in economically slum settlements are generally categorized as
low-income communities, which is often the reason for the degradation of
discipline and disorder in various social orders.
One of the targets of residential area development is the achievement of reducing
urban slum settlements to 0 hectares through the handling of 38,431 Ha of slum
areas and also increasing access to basic infrastructure and services in urban slums
to support the realization of livable, productive and sustainable urban settlements.
As well as what is contained in the vision of Malang City to be achieved in the
Malang City Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD) for 2013-2018, is the
realization of Malang City as a City of Dignity, specially in efforts to realize the

2
ninth mission, is the "Developing Integrated Transportation and Infrastructure
Systems What Is Convenient for Improving the Quality of Life for Communities ",
the existence of slum areas in this city space is a big homework for the Government
of Malang City to handle it. In its efforts to overcome the existing slums in the city
of Malang City, Malang City Government stipulates Regional Regulation Number
12 of 2014 concerning Housing and Settlement Development and Development
Plans (RP3KP) of Malang City. Following up on the aforementioned matters,
Malang City Government determined the area of slums through the Mayor of
Malang Decree Number 188.45 / 86 /35.73.112/2015 concerning the Determination
of Slum Housing and Settlement Environment, where the area of slums in Malang
City is 608.60 Ha which includes 29 Urban villagein 5 Subdistricts in Malang City.
Table 1 List of Determination of the Housing and Slum Settlement Environment
No Location Large (Ha)
1. Klojen sub-district 346,51
- Oro-oro Dowo urban village 22,40
- Samaan urban village 30,40
- Penanggungan urban village 53,01
- Gading Kasri urban village 42,62
- Kauman Urban village 3,10
- Bareng Urban village 81,56
- Kasin Urban village 48,20
- Sukoharjo Urban village 39,20
- Kiduldalem Urban village 26,02
2. Blimbing sub-district 25,04
- Blimbing Urban village 0,25
- Balearjosari Urban village 2,27
- Pandanwangi Urban village 0,17
- Purwantoro Urban village 0,05
- Polehan Urban village 17,50
- Jodipan Urban village 4,80
3. Lowokwaru sub-district 22,69
- Merjosari Urban village 0,05
- Tlogomas Urban village 2,54
- Sumbersari Urban village 10,20
- Jatimulyo Urban village 0,40
- Lowokwaru Urban village 9,50
4. Sukun sub-district 132,80
- Ciptomulyo Urban village 62,60
- Bandungrejosari Urban village 0,45
- Sukun Urban village 34,35
- Tanjungrejo Urban village 8,40
- Bandulan Urban village 27,00
5. Kedungkandang sub-district 72,90
- Kotalama Urban village 25,70
- Mergosono Urban village 47,20
Source : Malang Mayor's Decree Number 188.45/ 86 /35.73.112/2015
Bareng urban village is a urban village located in Klojen sub-District,
Malang City. According to Malang Mayor's Decree Number 188.45 / 86

3
/35.73.112/2015 Bareng urban village is the widest urban village with a residential
and slum area of 81.56 hectares. Therefore, a strategy is needed to deal with the
slum area. Bareng urban Village has an area of 10,650 km2 with a population in
2016 that inhabits the area of 14,074 people. The high rate of population growth
will have an impact on increasing settlement development in Malang City. Bareng
urban Village is a village that is close to the center of Malang City and is passed by
a highway which is an alternative road to Western Malang that connects several
regions in Malang City. But for cities that are already densely populated, population
growth caused by migrants who open businesses along the road has made road
conditions narrow and full of illegal traders. In addition, the Bareng urban village
which is adjacent to several public facilities such as schools, hospitals, stations and
so on has resulted in the growth of residential areas which are quite dense and cause
the growth of settlements classified as slums in the Sub-District. In overcoming
slum settlements, various efforts have been made such as by improving the quality
of the residential environment such as restoring houses, providing sanitary
facilities, garbage bins, sanitation repairs and providing clean water. This is in
conjunction with the current government which focuses on infrastructure and
concepts from the Directorate General of Human Settlements of the Ministry of
Public Works and Public Housing, which is aimed at dealing with the quality of
settlements such as clean water, slums and sanitation. The concept also focuses on
improving community livelihood activities. But it has not been able to focus solely
on one infrastructure that is considered to be still less overall, so that the handling
has not been maximized.
The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is an approach model
developed from the AHP method. Fuzzy AHP has the advantage of being able to
cover weaknesses found in AHP, namely problems with criteria that have more
subjective characteristics, uncertainty in numbers represented by a sequence of
scales (Chang, 1996). This method has the ability to solve multi-objective and
multicriteria problems, which are based on preference comparisons of each element
in the hierarchy. To obtain maximum results from weighting priorities on the
criteria for slum settlements, the first step is to choose and determine the right
priorities and then implement them correctly. Stakeholders will easily understand
the priority setting of criteria and strategies for handling slum areas using the FAHP
method.
Pentagonal assets are a form of spider diagrams as an explanation of aspects found
in livelihoods that are generally described as pentagonal. Aspects of livelihood are
used to empower local economies carried out by the Kotaku program, in an effort
to increase the income and quality of livelihoods of low-income communities
(MBR) in slum areas. Grand strategy Local economic empowerment for MBR is to
integrate community economic empowerment activities at the community / urban
villagelevel with the district / city level. This approach uses the capacity / ability
and ownership of resources (assets) to reach the expected level of life through
grouping.

4
In determining the strategy for handling slum area Agustina R (2012) claim that the
handling of slum has a focus on the organization that handles it slum area in
Semarang City and the result are less focused on slum area, so it considered not
maximal. But this study uses quantitative method with fuzzy AHP which are
considered superior in determining strategies with many criteria. to determine
infrastructure and livelihood-based strategies needed support from improving and
providing infrastructure and livelihood enhancement activities for the MBR. The
idea of livelihood is described to reduce the poverty rate faced by developing
countries (DFID, 1999). Livelihood is a community life that is described about how
people have the power and resources to improve their quality of life. With the
increase in income and livelihood of MBRs (low-income communities) in the slums
later on, it is expected that they can hold facilities and infrastructure (infrastructure)
independently. Based on the law on housing and residential areas No. 1 of 2011,
low-income people (MBR) are people of money who have limited purchasing
power, so that they need to get government support to get a house. With this
purpose, it is encouraging researchers to conduct research using the method of fuzzy
analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and pentagonal assets. Fuzzy AHP is used to
determine the priority of slum settlement strategies and criteria as an effort to
improve the quality of infrastructure-based settlements. While pentagonal assets are
used to explain the aspects contained in the livelihood approach, as a step to
increase the income and quality of low-income communities (MBR) in slum areas.
METHOD
This research is classified as descriptive quantitative research. In quantitative
research, research design has been designed more specifically from the beginning,
has clear direction, and has been detailed in detail since the beginning of the
research to be done (Idrus, 2009: 29) This clarity concerns the design, subject,
variables and analysis techniques to be used. By using quantitative descriptive
research, the whole series of studies is almost the same as quantitative research but
the difference lies in the method of data collection used as qualitative research. This
study will describe in depth about the situation or process under study and not to
test the hypothesis.
The research instruments used in this study were interviews, questionnaires,
observation and literature studies. With the three instruments above, researchers are
expected to be able to understand the actual situation of respondents. So that
researchers are able to understand the real situation. In this study the population
used is all parties who conduct assessments and mentoring in slum areas in the
Urban village Bareng, Malang City. While the determination of the sample used
using the Non-probable sampling technique is purposive sampling technique. The
purposive sampling technique is also called the judgmental sampling used by
determining specific criteria for the sample, especially those who are considered
experts (Prasetyo & Jannah, 2012: 135). The researcher will try so that in the sample
there are representatives from all existing population layers. Thus the sample used
was 9 respondents consisting of housing services and residential areas in Malang,

5
Korkot Malang City, members of the BKM / LKM Bareng Village, and RW heads
whose areas belong to the slums in Bareng Village.
For data processing using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Prosess (FAHP) and
pentagonal assets methods with Microsoft Excel programs and RALED analysis
tools. From data management using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) data
processing based on fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process method which is
questionnaire form which has been filled by respondents from the local Urban
villageBKM / LKM, Korkot City of Malang, parties from housing and residential
areas and RW leaders the area falls into the category of slums. Processed by
structuring priority hierarchies, this arrangement is determined by interviews with
related parties.

Strategy of Handling
Residential Area

Drinking water Environmental Waste water Waste

Building Road Fire
supply drainage management management
environment protection

Restoration Rejuvenation Resettlement

Figure 1 Research Hierarchy in Infrastructure Based Handling and Strategy

Then change the kuesioner into a paired comparison matrix. Then determine the
normalization matrix and the priority vector criteria. Then look for ℷ value the
𝑐𝑖1
maximum value with the formula ℷ value maxiumum= ∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑎𝑟𝑖1. Then change the
valuation results in the form of a numerical value to the TFN value. Then rate result
in the from of comparison matrix value changed into TFN value.
Table 2 : Fuzzy triangle value scale
Intensity of
Scale Invers
interest Variabel Definition Linguistik
TFN Scale TFN
AHP
1 (1,1,1) (1,1,1) Comparison of the same two criteria
2 (1/2,1,3/2) (2/3,1,2) Middle
One ellement is quite important from the
3 (1,3/2,2) (1/2,2/3,1)
other
One ellement is more important from the
4 (3/2,2,5/2) (2/5,1/2,2/3)
other
One ellement is strong important than the
5 (2, 5/2,3) (1/3,2/5,1/2)
other

6
 6 (5/2,3,7/2) (2/7,1/3,2/5) Middle
One ellement is more important than the
7 (3,7/2,4) (1/4,2/7,1/3)
other
8 (7/2,4,9/2) (2/9,1/4,2/7) Middle
One absolute element is more important than
9 (4,9/2,9/2) (2/9,2/9,1/4)
the other
Source: Chang(1996)

Next, determine the value of priority fuzzy synthesis (Si), determine the
vector value of the criteria, determine the ordinate value and normalize the value of
vector weights. The value of the weight of the vector can be seen its priority by
looking at the largest value.
While Pentagonal Asset data processing is use Excel, and data analysis used
in this study is a method of pentagonal livelihood asset analysis, using RALED
analysis tool which is a development of the RAPFISH (Rapid Appraisal for
Fisheries) method developed by Fisheries Center from the University of British
Coulumbia, Canada. The basis of RALED analysis is Multidimensional scaling
(MDS). Euclidean Distance based MDS is getting closer to the ideal point the better
and vice versa, the farther from the ideal point the condition gets worse. RALED is
usually used to analyze local economic development (PEL) but this time the
RALED is used to analyze livelihoods that have 5 dimensions, that is (1) human
resources; (2) natural resources; (3) financial capital; (4) physical resources
(infrastructure) and (5) social capital. RALED is also used to determine the leverage
attribute (attribute lever or attribute that needs to be improved) on a dimension in
order to increase the index or livelihood status of an area. By using the above
method, it will be known the strategy for handling infrastructure and livelihood-
based slum areas as an effort to increase income in the Bareng Sub-District.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The strategy for handling infrastructure and livelihood-based slum areas is
determined using the fuzzy AHP and pentagonal asset methods. The infrastructure-
based strategy uses the fuzzy ahp method to identify priority weights for each
priority for the criteria and strategies for handling infrastructure. This analysis was
carried out on each respondent, on each of the factors, objectives and alternative
indicators and strategies. Respondents consisting of housing and residential areas
in the city of Malang, Korkot Malang City, members of the BKM / LKM Urban
village Bareng, and each RW chairman in Bareng Sub-District filled in the
questionnaire. After fill up the questionnaire, which was compiled based on the
preparation of priority hierarchies, the geomean value of the results of the 9
respondents questionnaire was searched. The geomean value is presented in the
table of paired comparison matrices as follows:

7
A. Infrastructure indicator
Table 3 pairwise comparison matrix of infrastructure indicator
Indicator C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
C1 1.000 0.522 0.585 0.325 0.393 0.241 0.429
C2 1.915 1.000 0.988 0.335 0.563 0.542 1.087
C3 1.710 1.011 1.000 0.648 0.545 0.332 1.757
C4 3.060 2.977 1.418 1.000 1.774 0.552 1.894
C5 2.536 1.775 1.832 0.563 1.000 0.452 1.677
C6 4.134 1.841 3.005 1.728 2.204 1.000 2.332
C7 2.325 0.918 0.569 0.527 0.596 0.491 1.000
count 16.680 10.045 9.397 5.126 7.075 3.610 10.176

Source : processed data

The calculation of the geomean value is done for each comparison. The geo-value
obtained by combining 9 questionnaires that have been filled in by the
respondents, then looking for the geo-value.
B. Strategy
Table 4 pairwise comparison matrix of strategy

Strategy A B C
A 1.000 2.786 3.765
B 0.359 1.000 2.949
C 0.265 0.339 1.000
count 1.624 4.125 7.714
Source : processed data.
Of the 9 questionnaires distributed, the geomean value which previously consisted
of questionnaires filled out by respondents was obtained. After determining the next
pairing comparison matrix, determine the normalization matrix and the priority
vector value criteria.
A. Infrastructure indicator
Table 5 normalization matrix and priority indicator value

Indicator C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 priority
C1 0.060 0.052 0.062 0.063 0.056 0.067 0.042 0.057
C2 0.115 0.100 0.105 0.065 0.080 0.150 0.107 0.103
C3 0.102 0.101 0.106 0.126 0.077 0.092 0.173 0.111
C4 0.183 0.296 0.151 0.195 0.251 0.153 0.186 0.202
C5 0.152 0.177 0.195 0.110 0.141 0.125 0.165 0.152
C6 0.248 0.183 0.320 0.337 0.312 0.277 0.229 0.272
C7 0.139 0.091 0.061 0.103 0.084 0.136 0.098 0.102
Source : processed data
From the above matrix, priority values can be passed on each indicator.
Indicators that have the highest priority value are indicators of solid waste

8
management. This means that solid waste management indicators are the main
indicators in determining the most priority infrastructure indicators.
B. Strategy
Table 6 normalization matrix and priority indicator value
Strategy A B C Priority
A 0.616 0.675 0.488 0.593
B 0.221 0.242 0.382 0.282
C 0.163 0.082 0.130 0.125
Source : processed data
From the above matrix, priority values can be identified in each strategy.
The strategy has the highest priority value is the restoration strategy. This means
that the restoration strategy is the main strategy in determining the strategy of the
most priority slums. Next Search for ℷ maximum,
A. Infratructur indicator
Table 7 B matrix and synthesis of infrastructur inndicator
Indicator C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 count
C1 0.057 0.054 0.065 0.066 0.060 0.066 0.044 0.411
C2 0.110 0.103 0.110 0.068 0.086 0.147 0.111 0.734
C3 0.098 0.104 0.111 0.131 0.083 0.090 0.179 0.797
C4 0.176 0.307 0.157 0.202 0.270 0.150 0.193 1.455
C5 0.146 0.183 0.204 0.114 0.152 0.123 0.171 1.092
C6 0.238 0.190 0.334 0.349 0.335 0.272 0.237 1.955
C7 0.134 0.095 0.063 0.107 0.091 0.134 0.102 0.724
Source : processed data
B matrix is obtained at each multiplication element in the first column of the
paired comparison matrix. Then to synthesize infrastructure indicators by summing
the matrix B that has been formed. In total (synthesis of infrastructure indicators)
that in the C6 indicator has the greatest total value among other indicators.
 Value ℷ maximum
Table 8 ℷ maximum infrastructure
count value results
C1 0.411 0.057 7.157
C2 0.734 0.103 7.127
C3 0.797 0.111 7.172
C4 1.455 0.202 7.196
C5 1.092 0.152 7.178
C6 1.955 0.272 7.183
C7 0.724 0.102 7.112
results 50.124
ℷ Max 7.161

9
Source : processed data
ℷ (eigen) maximum is used to determine CI and CR so the results can be
concluded that the questionnaire that has been obtained can be consistent. Can be
seen in the table above the maximum ℷ value is 7.161 obtained from the total
divided by the total indicator used.
B. Strategy
Table 9 B matrix and syhntesis strategy

Strategy A B C count
A 0.593 0.785 0.471 1.849
B 0.213 0.282 0.369 0.864
C 0.157 0.096 0.125 0.378
Souce : processed data
The B matrix is obtained at each multiplication element in the first column of the
paired comparison matrix. Then to synthesize infrastructure indicators by summing
the matrix B that has been formed. In total (synthesis of infrastructure indicators)
that in strategy A has the greatest total value among other strategies.
 Value ℷ maximum strategy
Table 10 ℷ maximum strategy slum area

count value results

A 1.849 0.593 3.118
B 0.864 0.282 3.064
C 0.378 0.125 3.023
count 9.204
ℷ max 3.068

Source : processed data

ℷ (eigen) maximum is used to determine CI and CR so the results can be
concluded that the questionnaire that has been obtained can be consistent. Can be
seen in the table above the maximum value ℷ is 3,068 obtained from the total
divided by the total indicator used. Next, calculate the Consistency Index and
Ratio (CI & CR).
A. Infrastructure indicator
7.161−7
CI = =0.027
7−1
0.027
CR = 1.32 = 0.020 consistent because value CR <0.1
B. Strategy
3.068−3
CI = 3−1 = 0.034
0.034
CR = 0.58
= 0.059 consistent because value CR <0.1

10
 After knowing CI and CR then change the value of the comparison matrix
to Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN). The comparison of slum indicators of
infrastructure and strategy strategies matrix that have been consistent then changed
into the TFN scale and calculated the total number of rows in the column. The TFN
scale consists of l, m, u. The TFN comparison matrix can be seen in tables 11 and
12.
A. Infrastructure indicator
Table 11 matrix comparison to Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN) of
infrastructure

Source : processed data

Table 11 is the result of conversion from the AHP comparison matrix from
the infrastructure indicator in table 4.3 to the triangular fuzzy number (TFN) scale.
As seen in row C1 column C1 values l, m, and u are 1.1, and 1, because the result
of the conversion of the value of K1 column K1 is worth 1 into the TFN. After all
the values in conversion are then calculated the total l, m, and u of each criterion.
The value of l = 3.496 in the column number, obtained from the sum of the value
of l in each row C1-C6. The total values of l, m, and u of each criterion will then be
summed to produce the total values of l, m, and u of all criteria.
B. Strategy
Table 12 matrix comparison to Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN) of strategy

Source : processed data

Table 12 is the change from the AHP comparison matrix from the infrastructure
indicator in table 4.4 to the triangular fuzzy number (TFN) scale. As seen in row
C1 column C1 values l, m, and u are 1.1, and 1, because the result of the conversion
of the value of K1 column K1 is worth 1 into the TFN. After all the values in
conversion are then calculated the total l, m, and u of each criterion. The value of l
= 5,551 in the column number, obtained from the sum of the value of l in each row
A-C. The total values of l, m, and u of each criterion will then be summed to produce
the total values of l, m, and u of all criteria. Next calculate the Fuzzy Synthesis
Value After the number of columns and rows of the TFN comparison matrix as in

11
table 11 and 12. the next step is to calculate the value of fuzzy synthesis. The results
of the calculation of fuzzy synthesis values can be seen in table 13.
A. Infrastructure Indicator
Table 13 value of infrastructure indicator fuzzy synthesis

Indicator I M U count
C1 0.034 0.056 0.231 0.321
C2 0.043 0.104 0.302 0.448
C3 0.038 0.113 0.316 0.468
C4 0.074 0.204 0.454 0.732
C5 0.056 0.158 0.385 0.600
C6 0.098 0.262 0.541 0.901
C7 0.034 0.103 0.302 0.439
Source : processed data
The value of fuzzy synthesis line K1 column u is obtained from the results
of the number of criteria u divided by the total value of u in tables 11 and 12.
B. Strategy
Table 14 value of strategy fuzzy synthesis

Strategy L M U count
A 0.318 0.561 0.722 1.600
B 0.189 0.320 0.603 1.112
C 0.092 0.119 0.344 0.556
Source : processed data
Based on tables 13 and 14, the value of fuzzy synthesis line K1 column l is obtained
from the results between the number l criteria 1 with a total value of l in tables 8
and 9. The value of fuzzy synthesis line K1 column m is obtained from the quotient
between number m criteria 1 with the total value of m in tables 11 and 12, while the
value of fuzzy synthesis line K1 column u is obtained from the results between the
number of criteria u with a total value of u in tables 11 and 12.
Then determine the value of Vector (V) and the defuzzification ordinate value. In
this process, the fuzzy approach is fuzzy implication
minimum (min) fuzzy. Based on tables 13 and 14 which will be obtained
defuzzification vector and ordinate values of each criterion by comparing the value
of fuzzy synthesis between indicators. The resulting vector value is then selected
for the minimum value.
A. Infrastructure Indicator
Tabel 15 Vektor(V) value for infrastructure indicator

Indicator C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
C1 1.000 0.800 0.773 0.810 0.632 0.392 0.807
C2 1.000 1.000 0.966 0.695 0.818 0.563 1.000

12
 C3 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.727 0.851 0.594 1.000
C4 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.861 1.000
C5 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.872 1.000 0.735 1.000
C6 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
C7 1.000 1.000 0.966 0.694 0.818 0.563 1.000
Source : Processed data
The value of vector (V) is determined by an equation Calculating the probability of
M2≥M1 where the value of M2 = (l2, m2, u2) and M1 = (l1, m1, u1), Assume that
ḋ (Ai) = min V (Si ≥ Sk ).
Tabel 16 ordinate value defuzzifikasi
Indicator Defuzzifikasi
C1 0.392
C2 0.563
C3 0.594
C4 0.861
C5 0.735
C6 1.000
C7 0.563
count 4.710
Source : Processed data
Fuzzy ordinate values are determined by looking at the minimum value of
the vector (V) value on the infrastructure indicator.
B. Strategy
Table 17 Vektor (V) value for strategy

indicator A B C
A 1.000 1.000 1.000
B 0.542 1.000 1.000
C 0.057 0.436 1.000
Source : Processed data
In determining the value of vector (V) the strategy uses a fuzzy approach
that is fuzzy minimum implications (min) fuzzy.
Table 18 Ordinate Value defuzzifikasi
Strategy Defuzzifikasi
A 1.000
B 0.542
C 0.057
count 1.599

Source : Processed data

13
Fuzzy ordinate values are determined by looking at the minimum value of the vector
(V) value in the strategy. Next normalize the Vector Weight Value (V).
Normalization of vector values is obtained by each vector weight element divided
by the number of vector weights themselves. Where the number of normalized
weights will be 1.
A. Infrastructure indicator
Table 19 Normalization vektor weight value infrastructure indicator
Indicator Normalization
C1 0.083327482
C2 0.119644844
C3 0.126172827
C4 0.182800532
C5 0.156138808
C6 0.212325805
C7 0.119589702
total 1

In the normalization process the vector weight value of the infrastructure

indicator is the largest value located in C6, which is an indicator of solid waste
management.
B. Strategy
Table 20 Nomalization vektor weight value strategy
strategi Normalisasi
A 0.625482564
B 0.338966465
C 0.035550972
total 1
Source : processed data
In the normalization process the value of vector weight of the infrastructure
indicator is the biggest value lies in A, namely the restoration strategy. From the
calculation of the analysis that has been done with the fuzzy AHP method, waste
management can be obtained in the form of 3R, namely reuse (reusing used goods
that can still be used), reduce (try to reduce waste) and reycle (recycle waste to be
used). The application of 3R (Rause-Reduce-Reycle) can be realized in the form of
composting garbage for organic material waste, such as vegetables and fruit peels,
and can also be inorganic waste banks such as plastic, glass and others that can be
used as handicraft materials that can increase income of the community in the area.
This is in accordance with Aryenti (2012) which states that the concept of waste
banks makes people aware that garbage has a selling value that can generate money
that can increase income, starting from the process of sorting, composting, to
making waste as an economically valuable item. Other studies that discuss waste
management in slums have other strategies for managing.

14
From the results of the livelihood analysis obtained by using the pentagonal asset
method, the potential to increase community income is done by developing an
activity strategy by maximizing the potential of strong money assets in order to
support weak asset potential. This is in accordance with Chambers (in Saragih,
2007: 20) which states that "Livelihoods in the community can be said to be
sustainable if the livelihoods undertaken by individuals or households are able to
overcome problems and restore all pressures and shocks, by increasing their
capabilities and assets as means of living to obtain their welfare, and not to reduce
the quality of natural resources ".

PENTAGONAL ASET
Human resources
100
80
60
40
social capital natural resources
20
0

physical resources
(infrastructure) financial capital
Series1

Figure 2 spider web asset pentagonal index value on livelihood dimension

(data source: processed by the author)

Livelihood analysis results through 5 dimensions or livelihood aspects, that

is 1). Human resources 2). Natural resources 3). Financial capital 4). Physical
resources and 5) social capital through RALED calculations can be formed in the
pentagonal spider web of assets with results on human resources which are worth
89.91, natural resources worth 16.67, financial capital worth 38.84, physical
resources (infrastructure) worth 73.09 and social capital worth 99.99. With an
average value from the dimension of livelihood 63.7 which has been declared
sufficient, it still needs to be improved again so that its value is maximized. The
interval index value <24.9 is in bad status, interval 25-49.9 is in a low status,
interval 50-74.9 is in sufficient status, and interval> 75 is in good status (Kruskal
modification in Johnson and Wichern, 1992 in Hasrat 2014).
From the analysis of the five dimensions of livelihood it can be seen that spider
webs that move away from the intersection are the best value. The dimensions of
the net away from the meeting point are the dimensions of social capital, the
dimensions of social capital are dimensions that succeed and achieve high values
compared to other dimensions. Whereas the other dimensions do not mean that they

15
are not successful but only need a more significant increase. For dimensions that
have the lowest value, namely on the dimensions of natural resources and financial
capital, this is different from the research conducted by Forina L., which states that
the most vulnerable dimensions of life in urban areas are financial and human
resources dimensions. In this case, even though it is the same in urban areas, the
difference is from its geographical location. Because in the livelihood conditions
that exist in urban areas, often they experience limitations on vacant land so that it
tends to result in low spider web values, and there are few financial institutions such
as BPR (People Credit Bank) and cooperatives.
But with the dimensions of social capital which is in good condition it is considered
positive, because it will tend to encourage an increase in human capital. The more
people socialize, the more knowledge increases. For other dimensions that are still
in poor condition and lacking, it must be repaired immediately so that they can
improve the status of livelihood for the better. The strategy used to increase the
income of low-income and livelihood communities (community livelihoods) in
Bareng Village. The following is an analysis of the conditions in each dimension of
livelihood in the urban village bareng, including:
1. Livelihood conditions in the dimension of human resources
Based on the results of research conducted by researchers, it can be seen that the
dimensions of human resources in the Bareng Urban Village are in good status. In
aspects of human resources such as public health, education, knowledge and skills,
capacity to work and capacity to adapt need to be improved so that sustainable and
efficient management of assets is sustainable. In the analysis of attribute leverage,
it can be seen that aspects of knowledge and skills are the most sensitive aspects
that influence the index value of the human resource dimension. In this case, the
dimensions of human resources have weaknesses in aspects of knowledge and
skills. This aspect can be improved by conducting community training such as
knitting skills training, because previously the community in the urban villagehad
once participated in knitting skills training, but the skills training was not continued.
To improve this need to do training in knitting skills with different knitting systems
and motifs such as the existence of a knitwear from the people who have different
knitting motifs and can be marketed as an artificial product from the community of
the urban village that they can increase people's income. In addition to this,
partnerships from certain government / social institutions require free skills training
programs. So that aspects of knowledge and skills can also increase.
2. Livelihood conditions in the dimension of natural resources
Based on the results of research conducted by researchers, it can be seen that the
dimension of natural resources in Bareng urban Village is in a bad status. In aspects
of land natural resources, fisheries, livestock, springs and biodiversity still need to
be greatly improved. Meanwhile on the analysis of leverage attributes on the aspects
of spring sources becomes an aspect that gives a sensitive influence on the
dimensions of natural resources. Therefore in the aspect of the spring, the only

16
aspect in the dimension of natural resources is already in good condition. In
livelihoods that are in urban areas in general they do not have the remaining land to
be used as a foundation for life such as rice fields for agriculture, ponds for fisheries
and vacant land for livestock. In this case the source of the spring is already in good
condition but not used as well as possible. Therefore, a hydroponic farming system
with an agricultural system is needed to minimize land and good use of springs. So
that people can earn income with the hydroponic system even though they do not
have sufficient land. Besides this, partnerships are also needed to make this happen,
such as the agricultural service. So that aspects of the natural resource dimension
besides the aspect of the spring can also increase.
3. Livelihood conditions in the dimensions of financial capital
Based on the results of research conducted by researchers, it can be seen that the
dimensions of human resources in Bareng Urban Village are in a bad status. In
aspects of financial capital such as level of income, utilization of business
opportunities, ownership of savings, and investment ownership need to be increased
so that the management of assets is efficient and sustainable. In terms of analysis
of leverage attributes on the level of income aspects are aspects that influence the
dimensions of financial capital. In this aspect of the level of income can be
increased by utilizing existing financial institutions such as cooperatives and banks.
So that they are able to obtain business capital that can be used to start a non-
agricultural business (trading business, transportation and workshop service
business). With these efforts they can increase their income, besides that partnership
is also needed from the government in this case the service of small and medium
business cooperatives through soft loan programs to the weak and middle economic
community. With this, aspects of the dimensions of financial capital can also be
improved.
4. Livelihood conditions in the dimensions of physical resources (infrastructure)
Based on the results of research conducted by researchers, it can be seen that the
dimensions of physical resources (infrastructure) in Bareng urban Village are of
good status. in aspects in the dimensions of physical resources (infrastructure) such
as road conditions, availability of public facilities, ease of access to sub-district
centers, availability of transportation modes and availability of road signs still need
to be improved so that sustainable and efficient asset management is sustainable. In
the analysis of leverage attributes aspects of the existence of road signs affect the
dimensions of physical resources (infrastructure). This aspect can be improved by
making road signs themselves when the relevant agency does not follow up on
requests for road signs. The existence of these signs can certainly minimize
accidents that occur so that the income owned by the community can be used for
other purposes such as business capital and repairs to the housing infrastructure it
has. With this aspect the existence of road signs in the dimension of physical
resources (infrastructure) can also be increased.

17
5. Livelihood conditions in the dimensions of social capital
Based on the results of research conducted by researchers, it can be seen that the
dimensions of human resources in the Bareng Urban Village have a very good or
almost perfect status. However, in aspects of social capital such as harmony
between neighbors, local wisdom, community empowerment and formal and
informal group institutions still need to be maintained and improved so that
sustainable and efficient management of assets is sustainable. In the analysis of
leverage attributes the aspects of harmony between neighbors influence the
dimensions of social capital. This aspect can be improved by maintaining friendship
between neighbors and mutual cooperation so that good relations between
neighbors can be maintained.
CONCLUSION
Prioritizing criteria and strategies for handling slum areas, based on infrastructure
as an effort to increase revenue in the Bareng urban village using fuzzy AHP
method is known as solid waste management infrastructure indicators with recovery
strategies, obtaining scores on infrastructure indicators of 0.21 and superior
strategies of 0.62. Waste management with a waste recovery strategy can be carried
out in the form of applying 3R which can be realized in the form of composting
garbage for organic material waste, such as vegetables and fruit peels, and can also
be inorganic waste banks such as plastic, wasted glass and others that can be used
as materials handycrafts. The strategy to handle livelihood-based slum areas as an
effort to increase income in the Bareng urban village uses the pentagonal asset
method. It is known that the lowest value dimension is the dimension of natural
resources and financial capital and the strongest dimension lies in the dimension of
social capital. The strategy used to handle livelihood-based slum areas includes
community empowerment in terms of environmental management, hydroponic
farming systems and utilizing financial institutions to obtain business capital. By
implementing an infrastructure and livelihood-based strategy, it is hoped that it can
increase the income of the community in low-income slums.
REFERENCES
Aryenti. (2011). Peningkatan Peran serta Masyarakat Melalui Gerakan Menabung
Pada Bank Sampah Di Urban villageBabakan Surabaya, Kiaracondong
Bandung. Jurnal Permukiman, 6(1), 40-46.
BAPPEDA.(2014). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD)
Kota Malang Tahun 2013-2018. Malang: BAPPEDA Kota Malang
Chang, D.Y. (1996). Application of The Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP.
European Journal of Operational Research, 95:649-655
Departement for Internasional Development (DFID). (1999). Sustainable
Livelihood Guidance Sheets. DFID:London UK
Hasrat, AS. (2014). Status Keberlanjutan Pengelolaan Perikanan Budidaya Di
Pulau-Pulau Kecil Makassar. Jurnal Manajemen Perikanan dan Kelautan
,1(1).

18
Idrus, M. (2009). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial, Pendekatan Kualitatif dan
Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Erlangga
FAO. (2003). Local Institutions and Livelihood for Guideline Analysis
Forina,L. (2006). Identifikasi Tingkat Kerentanan Masyarakat Permukiman
Kumuh Perkotaan Melalui Pendekatan Sustainable Urban Livelihood
(SUL) (Studi Kasus : Urban villageTamansari, Bandung)
Kusumawardhani,V.,Sutjahjo,S.H., Dewi,I.K., & Panjaitan,N.F. 2016. Penyediaan
Infrastruktur Pengelolaan Persampahan di Lingkungan Permukiman
Kumuh Kota Bandung. Jurnal Permukiman,11(2), 100͞ 109
Muta’ali, L.& Nugroho, A.R. (2016). Perkembangan Program Penanganan
Permukiman Kumuh di Indonesia dari masa ke masa. Yogyakarta:Gadjah
Mada University Press.
Pemerintahan Kota Malang.(2015). Surat Keputusan Walikota Malang Nomor
188.45/ 86 /35.73.112/2015 tentang Daftar Penetapan Lingkungan
Perumahan dan Permukiman Kumuh.
Pemerintah Kota Malang.(2014). Peraturan Daerah Nomor 12 Tahun 2014 tentang
Rencana Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Perumahan dan Kawasan
Permukiman (RP3KP) Kota Malang.
Prasetyo, B.& Jannah,L.M. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta:
Rajawali Pers
Rahmawati,A., Murcahyanto,H.,& Musawa,M.(2012). Strategi Penanganan
Permukiman Kumuuh (Studi Kasus: Kawasan Kaligawe, Semarang).
Journal of Public and Management Review, 1(1), 11-20
Saragih, dkk. (2007). 2390_SL-Chapter1 Kerangka Penghidupan Berkelanjutan
(Sustainable Livelohood Framework)
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perumahan dan Kawasan
Permukiman. (2018, November 27). Retrieved from
http://www.sanitasi.net/undang-undang-no-1-tahun-2011-tentang-
perumahan-dan-kawasan-permukiman.html.

19
20