Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2018; 20180002
Abstract:
Emerging and developing countries around the world are playing an increasingly important role in the global
economy. They move up in the global value chain very quickly. However, these countries constantly facing a
plethora of challenges covering a wide range of issues. This paper addresses some key challenges confronting
Vietnam economy which potentially deteriorate its economic growth prospects. These include economic slow-
down, credit booming, the rise of protectionism around the world, and risk from greater opening of the do-
mestic markets. Addressing these challenges are important for Vietnam to maintain its comparative advantage
and foundation for economic growth.
Keywords: challenges, Vietnam
DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2018-0002
1 Introduction
Emerging and developing countries around the world are playing an increasingly important role in the global
economy. They move up in the global value chain very quickly. However, these countries constantly facing
a plethora of challenges covering a wide range of issues. Addressing these challenges is a continuous task of
policy makers in order to achieve inclusive and sustainable development. It is also more important because
developing countries regularly require structural change and the continuous development of productive ca-
pacities.
Vietnam is a successful transition economy toward a more market-oriented practice due to gradual economic
reforms starting from the mid-1980s. The transformation process is equipped with cautious and sequenced
adoption of market institutions. As a result, Vietnam has been among the top economic growth countries and
economic performance in the last decades. However, similar to other emerging economies, Vietnam is facing a
variety of challenges in maintaining a sustainable economic growth. This article discusses some key challenges
for Vietnam in the globalized world. This important topic potentially draws strong attention from economists
Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd
By the time writing this paper, it has been about a decade after the great global financial crisis. However, it is
a consensus among economists that the global economy has been recovered at a slower pace than expected.
Xuan Vinh Vo is the corresponding author.
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Specially, some experts even suggest that the slow recovery is an indicator the global economy is getting into a
secular stagnation.
Figure 1 presents the economic growth of Vietnam in the last decade. Even though the pace of growth
has reduced, it is still among the highest rate in Asia. However, a number of factors might cause difficulty for
Vietnamese economy in maintaining high growth rate in the near future. Firstly, the economy is relied heavily
on export. Particularly, Vietnam is among the highest growth in Asia thanks to increasing level of export. The
high level of export is also supported by a high level of FDI in exporting industries. In the last few decades,
Vietnam has successfully maintained this growth momentum which help to fuel economic development. This
growth momentum also spills over to significant expansion of different economic sectors. However, since export
is significantly influenced by recent protectionism trend around the world, Vietnam is under pressure to prevent
potential economic slowdown.
Secondly, Vietnam is facing challenges in fostering innovation and productivity in state sectors. Specially,
government owned firms have strong political connections and access to huge resources. However, these firms
are under pressure to maintain productivity. Hence, it is important that Vietnamese government should con-
duct further structural economic reforms in order to maintain stable economic growth and employment status.
Clearly, the reforms should aim at fostering innovation and productivity.
the economy is supported by bank credit in many large projects. However, the current scale of credit boom is
still not sustainable. Claessens et al. (2010) state that credit growth is a factor which strongly and significantly
associated with financial crises. It is important to note that massive buildups in bank credit is associated with fi-
nancial instability (Bordo and Meissner 2012). In the case of Vietnam, there are raising concerns that the current
trend of credit boom might end up in severe banking crisis.
These concerns also arise from the banking sector which are still vulnerable to shocks because crisis in Viet-
nam banking sector has actually happened in 2011. We acknowledge that there is an improvement in banking
sector in the last few years, however, the level of non-performing loan remains very high. Further, the credit
boom is also creating stress to the banking system. This suggests that policymakers should address the credit
growth aiming at stabilizing the economy.
pact negatively affects Vietnam as a signatory and exporter. Vietnam is expected to take advantage of trade
expansion when the country is being a member of this trade pact. Consequently, the unsuccessful formation of
this trade pact severely affects Vietnam.
Many studies assert the importance of market opening. For example, Ke (2015) examines factors relevant to mar-
ket integration. This paper also states that domestic market openness significantly improves regional economies
and in return size and growth of regional economies further promote market integration in China. Recent evi-
dence by Kant (2018) suggests that the opening of domestic market has a positive effect on institutional quality
of developing countries.
Domestic market opening brings several benefits. For example, Johansson and Ljungwall (2009) suggest that
market integration have strong spillover effects. Other studies show that market integration attributes to pro-
ductivity growth (Bekaert, Harvey, and Lundblad 2011) and reduction in regional inequality in many countries
(Ezcurra and Rodríguez-Pose 2013).
However, the opening of domestic market also bring several challenges to Vietnam economy. As a small
and partially open emerging economy, Vietnam is vulnerable to even small external shocks. Fratzscher and
Imbs (2009) also highlight the importance of institutional quality for containing the adverse effects of glob-
alization. Vietnam has been quickly integrated into the global economy thanks to its active participation in
different bilateral and multilateral agreements. The pace of economic opening is greater than the improvement
of institutional quality. Therefore, it is important to accelerate the process of improving institutional quality to
reduce the adverse effects and reap the greater benefit of globalization.
3 Concluding Remarks
In this paper, we address some key challenges confronting Vietnam economy. These include economic slow-
down, credit booming, the rise of protectionism around the world, and risk from greater opening of the domes-
tic markets. Addressing challenges facing the Vietnam economy is important to maintain constant and stable
economic development.
Even though Vietnam economic growth prospects might deteriorate by these challenges, these are not insur-
mountable challenges. We suggest that policy makers and other stakeholders should devote further attention
on alleviating adverse effects of these challenges to push up the economy to a higher level of global supply
chain.
Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd
References
Bekaert, G., C. R. Harvey, and C. Lundblad. 2011. “Financial Openness and Productivity.” World Development 39 (1): 1–19.
Bordo, M. D., and C. M. Meissner. 2012. “Does Inequality Lead to a Financial Crisis?” Journal of International Money and Finance 31 (8): 2147–2161.
Claessens, S., G. Dell’Ariccia, D. Igan, and L. Laeven. 2010. “Cross-country Experiences and Policy Implications from the Global Financial Cri-
sis.” Economic Policy 25 (62): 267–293.
Ezcurra, R., and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2013. “Does Economic Globalization Affect Regional Inequality? A Cross-country Analysis.” World Devel-
opment 52: 92–103.
Fratzscher, M., and J. Imbs. 2009. “Risk Sharing, Finance, and Institutions in International Portfolios.” Journal of Financial Economics 94 (3):
428–447.
Georgiadis, G., and J. Gräb. 2016. “Growth, Real Exchange Rates and Trade Protectionism Since the Financial Crisis.” Review of International
Economics 24 (5): 1050–1080.
Johansson, A. C., and C. Ljungwall. 2009. “Spillover Effects Among the Greater China Stock Markets.” World Development 37 (4): 839–851.
Kant, C. 2018. “Financial Openness & Institutions in Developing Countries.” Research in International Business and Finance. DOI:
10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.03.001.
Ke, S. 2015. “Domestic Market Integration and Regional Economic Growth – China’s Recent Experience from 1995–2011.” World Development
66: 588–597.
Lang, F. P. 1984. “Neo-protectionism and Economic Growth.” Intereconomics 19 (3): 129–133.
Rodriguez, F., and D. Rodrik. 2000. “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-national Evidence.” NBER Macroeco-
nomics Annual 15: 261–325.