Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
You are here: Home / MCAT / MCAT Biochemistry / Amino Acids / Amino Acid Charge in Zwitterions and Isoelectric Point MCAT Tutorial
Looking at this standard drawing of an amino acid, it appears to be neutral–how does that MCAT Resources
relate to the pl?
This drawing is simplified, and is actually incorrect. Find Your MCAT Tutorials
MCAT Home Page
At physiological pH, amino acids will exist with a net charge of zero. That’s not because they MCAT Math Tutorial Videos
have no charge: it’s because their charges balance or cancel out. MCAT Physics
MCAT Chemistry
The standard structure contains both a carboxyl and an amine in the backbone. Acidic and
basic amino acids may have additional groups in their side chains.
(Learn more about amino acid side chains link)
If we lower the pH of a solution by adding a strong acid like HCl, there will be an
abundance of H+ in the solution. These free H+ ions will protonate any free acetate ions in
solutions thus favoring the product of this equilibrium reaction. According to Le Chatelier’s
principle, if product is added, the system will shift to the left to reestablish equilibrium.
The reaction now favors the protonated acetic acid form.
As the pH is increased with the addition of a strong base like sodium hydroxide (NaOH), the
equilibrium will now shift to the right. Since the OH- will react with the free H+ in solution
to form water, Le Chatelier’s principle says the reaction must shift to the right to reform that
H+. As the pH increases, equilibrium will continue to shift to the right
right, favoring the
deprotonated acetate form over the protonated acetic acid.
What is the turning point of this equilibrium?
Since acetic acid is considered a weak acid (strong within the scale of weak acids), there is a
range at which the acetic acid and acetate will form a stable buffer.
Using the
Henderson-
Hasselbalch
equation for
buffers, it’s possible
to calculate the pH
based on the ratio
of acid to conjugate base, or calculate the ratio given the pH and pKa value. You REALLY
don’t want to waste time with calculations like this on the MCAT.
That’s where my Henderson Hasselbalch trick comes in handy, as explained in the video
below.
In fact, since you are provided with pKa acid values, we have to look at this molecule as the
reaction between the protonated amine and its deprotonated conjugate base methylamine.
The pKa value given for the amino group on any amino acid specifically refers to the
equilibrium between the protonated positive nitrogen and deprotonated neutral nitrogen.
You’ll never see a neutral nitrogen deprotonated to form a negative on an amino acid.
The pKa of the protonated methylamine conjugate acid is like this: at physiological pH,
there is an abundance of free H+ in the solution, which shifts equilibrium to the left, to the
protonated positive nitrogen.
As the pH rises towards the pKa value, there will be deprotonation. At the pKa value, there
will be a 50/50 mix of protonated and deprotonated molecules in a perfect buffer (see video
above). As the pH continues to rise, more and more molecules will deprotonate till the
neutral uncharged form dominates.
The key to understanding isoelectric point is to understand how to find what the charge is
at any pH, including when the net charge is zero.
To calculate amino acid charge we must take into account the backbone amino group,
backbone carboxyl group, and potential acid/base side chain or variable group. (see them all
here)
Let’s start with the simplest amino acid, glycine.
With just a hydrogen in place of its variable group,
we only have the backbone to examine.
Since pKa relates to an equilibrium constant, you will always have one more structure
than the number of pKa values; for example, if there were two pka values, we would expect
three structures.
pKa 1 represents the carboxyl group and pKa2 represents the protonated amine group.
When the pH is considerably lower than the pKa we expect both sides to be fully
protonated.
There will be no charge at the carboxy, and a positive charge at the nitrogen for a net
charge of +1.
When we raise the pH a few units above the first pKa, and still well below the second pKa
value, the carboxyl group will lose its proton; however, the amino group is still protonated.
This is the zwitterion form, with a positive and negative to cancel out.
When you raise the pH to well above the amino value, the nitrogen will lose its proton and
thus its charge. We now have negative and zero for a net charge of -1.
The zwitterion form can exist anywhere between the the 2 pKa values. So how does this
relate to the isoelectric point? Do we randomly pick a value?
The answer is no, but let’s take a closer look at the pKa values first.
As explained in the buffer video above , when the pH is exactly at the pKa value, we have an
ideal buffer where the molecules exist in equilibrium. For example, if pH = 2.34, which is the
pKa of the carboxyl group, what is the net charge?
Since this is the carboxyl buffer zone, we’ll have 50% neutral molecules where the carboxyl
is deprotonated, and 50% positive molecules where the carboxyl is protonated.
Now if we raise the pH to 9.60, the pKa of the protonated amino group, we get yet another
buffer.This time there is an equilibrium between the protonated neutral zwitterion and the
deprotonated negative molecule; once again in a 50/50 ratio.
So if each pKa value gives us a 50% neutral molecule, and the isoelectric point is the pH of
exact neutrality, we need to go EXACTLY halfway between the two values that give us 50%
neutral. The first value gives us 50% neutral and 50% +1. The second value gives us 50%
neutral and 50% -1.
The isoelectric point is the average of the 2 pKa values that have a neutral molecule as one
of its equilibrium species.
In other words, find the pKa that takes the amino acid from neutral to -1 (9.60 for glycine),
find the pKa value that takes the amino acid from neutral to +1 (2.34 for glycine), and then
find the halfway point or average.
pI = (pKa 1 + pKa 2) / 2
Now let’s try it without the drawing, in case you need quick answers from a table on your
MCAT.
Given: 2.34 and 9.60, let’s find the average MCAT Style NO Calculator
On the MCAT, close enough is good enough, and this is pretty darn close.
This sounds like a great deal of work for an amino acid with just 2 side chains. But if you
can understand the logic for a simple structure, you’ll be able to apply it to something more
complex.
This is especially critical when dealing with acidic or basic amino acids that have a third
pKa value for their side chain.
Do we take the average of all three? If just two, which two?
This pKa represents the equilibrium between the side chain protonated neutral carboxyl
and the deprotonated net negative form. We can stop here to find the pKa but let’s continue
for the sake of completing this thought.
Let’s raise the pH above the carboxyl value but still below
the amino value at a random value of 6.5.
Since the final pKa value represented the equilibrium between -1 and -2, it is not used for
pI calculations since pI looks at the pKa values near zero and +/- 1.
We average the 2 pKa values which have zero charge in their equilibrium.
pI for Arginine
Once we raise the pH to 14, which is more basic when compared to any of the pKa values,
we get a full deprotonated molecule with a negative carboxylate and 2 neutral nitrogen
atoms for a net charge of -1.
Now ask yourself, which 2 pKa values had zero in its
equilibrium?
In Conclusion:
Amino acids can exist as zwitterions containing a protonated amine group and
deprotonated carboxyl group. The pI, or isoelectric point, corresponding to the zwitterion
form lets you calculate the pH at which an amino acid will have a net zero charge. This next
zero charge or isoelectric point comes from the average of the 2 pKa values that allow the
amino acid to exist in equilibrium between the neutral and positive or negative form.
Filed Under: Amino Acids Tagged With: amino acid charge, isoelectric point, pi, zwitterion
Comments
Pritesh says:
September 15, 2016 at 3:24 pm
This really helps me a lot.. Thanks for clearing my concept and make it firm.
Reply
Leah4sci says:
September 19, 2016 at 1:26 pm
Reply
Bodhisatwa says:
June 1, 2016 at 9:50 am
Really the article was amazing and very helpful.. It made my concept of isoelectric
point crystal clear. I must say the teachers should teach like this way in the classes so
that the students can easily understand without a bit of confusion.. You are doing a
great job. Thank You.
Reply
Leah4sci says:
June 10, 2016 at 3:10 pm
Thanks Bodhisatwa! Glad you found it helpful! Since teachers won’t all suddenly
change, be sure to share this with your classmates
Reply
AHMAD says:
April 19, 2016 at 1:30 am
Reply
Leah4sci says:
April 20, 2016 at 8:43 pm
Reply
Yusuf says:
December 30, 2015 at 9:24 pm
Thanks so much for this series on Amino Acids! I have a question – once we
understand the methods shown above for finding pI, can we just say that once we find
a case where above or below a given pKa leaves either +/- 2 charge on the amino acid,
then we could just find the average of the remaining pKa’s? You need 2 pKa values to
take the average of, and if you can eliminate one of the three pKa’s, then you know
what’s left to average. Is there ever an exception to that case? I hope that question
made sense. Thanks!
Reply
Leah4sci says:
January 2, 2016 at 6:36 pm
I’m not sure I understand what you’re getting at. If there are 3 pKa values take the 2
closer ones and average them as a ‘shortcut’
Reply
This is Emilio from Spain. I was lost until I found you Leah4sci.
Reply
Leah4sci says:
January 2, 2016 at 6:42 pm
Reply
sonali says:
September 9, 2015 at 4:40 am
Reply
Leah4sci says:
September 9, 2015 at 8:52 pm
I don’t recommend it. Have a general understanding of carboxyl and amino side chain
values, acids and bases, and Histidine which is the oddball at around 6.
Reply
This is the best article ever! It explains everything in detail with examples and videos.
It never gets better than that! Thank you Leah4sci.com
Reply
Leah4sci says:
June 21, 2015 at 12:43 am
Thank you so much for the kind words Malek. Remember the deep questions you
asked on live workshops I know that you’re a thinker and so your comment really
made my evening.
Reply