Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Continent?” is that Europe did not know much about Africa until the 19th century.
But that answer is misleading and disingenuous. Europeans had known quite a lot
about Africa for at least 2,000 years, but because of powerful imperial impulses,
European leaders began purposefully ignoring earlier sources of information.
At the same time, the campaign against slavery and for missionary work in Africa
actually intensified Europeans’ racial ideas about African people in the 1800s.
They called Africa the Dark Continent, because of the mysteries and the savagery
they expected to find in the interior.
It is true that up until the 19th century, Europeans had little direct knowledge of
Africa beyond the coast, but their maps were already filled with details about the
continent. African kingdoms had been trading with Middle Eastern and Asian
states for over two millennia. Initially, Europeans drew on the maps and reports
created by earlier traders and explorers like the famed Moroccan traveler Ibn
Battuta, who traveled across the Sahara and along the North and East coasts of
Africa in the 1300s.
During the Enlightenment, however, Europeans developed new standards and tools
for mapping, and since they weren’t sure precisely where the lakes, mountains, and
cities of Africa were, they began erasing them from popular maps. Many scholarly
maps still had more details, but due to the new standards, the European explorers—
Burton, Livingstone, Speke, and Stanley—who went to Africa were credited with
(newly) discovering the mountains, rivers, and kingdoms to which African people
guided them.
The maps these explorers created did add to what was known, but they also helped
create the myth of the Dark Continent. The phrase itself was actually popularized
by the British explorer Henry M. Stanley, who with an eye to boosting sales titled
one of his accounts "Through the Dark Continent," and another, "In Darkest
Africa." However, Stanley himself recalled that before he left on his mission, he
had read over 130 books on Africa.
Imperialism was global in the hearts of western businessmen in the 19th century,
but there were subtle differences between the imperialist hunger for Africa
compared to other parts of the world. Most empire building begins with the
recognition of trading and commercial benefits that could be accrued. In Africa's
case, the continent as a whole was being annexed to fulfill three purposes: the spirit
of adventure, the desire to support good work of "civilizing the natives," and the
hope of stamping out the slave trade. Writers such as H. Ryder Haggard, Joseph
Conrad, and Rudyard Kipling fed into the romantic depiction of a place that
required saving by strong men of adventure.
An explicit duality was set up for these adventurers: dark versus light and Africa
versus West. The African climate was said to invite mental prostration and
physical disability; the forests were seen as implacable and filled with beasts; and
crocodiles lay in wait, floating in sinister silence in the great rivers. Danger,
disease, and death were part of the uncharted reality and the exotic fantasy created
in the minds of armchair explorers. The idea of a hostile Nature and a disease-
ridden environment as tinged with evil was perpetrated by fictional accounts by
Joseph Conrad and W. Somerset Maugham.
By the late 1700s, British abolitionists were campaigning hard against slaveryin
England. They published pamphlets described the horrid brutality and inhumanity
of plantation slavery. One of the most famous images showed a black man in
chains asking “Am I not a man and a brother?”
Once the British Empire abolished slavery in 1833, however, abolitionists turned
their efforts against slavery within Africa. In the colonies, the British were also
frustrated that former slaves didn’t want to keep working on plantations for very
low wages. Soon the British were portraying African men not as brothers, but as
lazy idlers or evil slave traders.
At the same time, missionaries began traveling to Africa to bring the word of God.
They expected to have their work cut out for them, but when decades later they
still had few converts in many areas, they began saying that African people’s
hearts were unreachable, "locked in darkness." These people were different from
westerners, said the missionaries, closed off from the saving light of Christianity.
By the 1870s and 1880s, European traders, officials, and adventurers were going to
Africa to seek their fame and fortune, and recent developments in weaponry gave
these men significant power in Africa. When they abused that power—especially
in the Congo—Europeans blamed the Dark Continent, rather than themselves.
Africa, they said, was what supposedly brought out the savagery in man.
Over the years, people have given lots of reasons why Africa was called the Dark
Continent. Many people think it is a racist phrase but can't say why, and the
common belief that the phrase just referred to Europe's lack of knowledge about
Africa makes it seem out-dated, but otherwise benign.
Race does lie at the heart of this myth, but it is not about skin color. The myth of
the Dark Continent referred to the savagery that Europeans said was endemic to
Africa, and even the idea that its lands were unknown came from erasing centuries
of pre-colonial history, contact, and travel across Africa.
https://www.thoughtco.com/why-africa-called-the-dark-continent-43310