Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

People vs Tibayan  CA: Rape

o contracted at the time the check  SC: Rape


was issued o The money given by Pascua was
o Lack of or insufficiency of funds to not intended to lure them for
cover the check money. If anything is was for the
o The payee was not informed by purpose of buying their silence to
the offender and the payee did ensure that nobody discovered his
not know that the offender had no dastardly acts
funds o Also even if there was no force,
o Anent the third requisite, it must intimidation was used on the
be proven that the accused had victim and she submitted to the
guilty knowledge of the fact that rapist’s lust for fear of her
the drawer of the check had no personal safety.
funds in the bank at the time
accused indorsed it Taguinod vs People
o Prosecution failed to prove the
same. In fact, Juaquico attempted  Ang: Taguinod tried to cut in on a
to look for the source of checks vehicle queue in the Rockwell parking
o Nevertheless, Chan is still held lot; Ang did not concede to Taguinod.
civilly liable  Consequently, the rearview mirrors of
their two vehicles bumped each other.
 Afterwards, Taguinod rammed Ang’s
vehicle from the rear.
 Taguinod: it was Ang who accelerated
backwards.
 A complaint of malicious mischief
Beltran vs People
was nevertheless filed against
Taguinod
 Beltran was legally married to Felix;
 MeTC: Malicious mischief
however he had illicit relations with
another woman, prompting latter to  RTC: Malicious mischief
file concubinage against her husband.  CA: Malicious mischief
 Beltran argues that the trial for  SC: Malicious mischief
concubinage be suspended, as the o Offender deliberately caused
petition for declaration of nullity of damage to the property of another
their marriage is also pending before o Does not constitute arson or other
the court. crimes involving destruction
 RTC: denied to defer proceedings o The act of damaging another’s
property be committed merely for
 SC: Affirmed
the sake of damaging it
o Parties to the marriage should not
o Act be motivated by hate, revenge,
be permitted to judge for
and other evil motive.
themselves its nullity. Only a
judicial declaration of nullity of
marriage would suffice.
o Family Code prohibits any other

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi