Shear ST Ability OF Mul Tigrade Crankcase Oil

I
SHEAR STABILITY
OF
MULTIGRADE CRANKCASE OIL
Establishment of Field Data and

Correlation with Laboratory
Engine and Bench Test Results
DS49
• AMERICAN SOCIElY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS

ANTVIVF.RSARY
SHEAR ST ABILITY OF
MUL TIGRADE CRANKCASE OIL
Establishment of Field Data and
Correlation with Laboratory
Engine and Bench Test Results
Prepared by the
Data Analysis Panel of
ASTM Committee D-2
Research and Development Division VI I 8-1
on the Shear Stability of Crankcase Oils
ASTM DATA SERIES PUBLICATION OS 49
List price $7.75

05-049000-12
•
ANNIVERSARY
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103
© by American Society for Testing and Materials 1973
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 73-78863
NOTE
The Society is not responsible, as a body,
for the statements and opinions
advanced in this publication.
Printed in New Carlisle, Ohio

June 1973
DS49-EB/Jun. 1973
-1-
I. SUMMARY
Extensive field test data have been obtained which can serve
as a basis for evaluating the ability of various laboratory methods to
predict the shear stability of multigrade crankcase oils. This basis
was developed by determining the average viscosity changes of one single
grade and twelve multigrade reference oils in six separate car fleets.
The twelve multigrade oils were formulated with all of the chemical types
of VI improvers currently in use, or likely to be used, in the near future.
As a second part of the program, four types of bench tests

and three different laboratory engine tests were evaluated for their
ability to predict the average viscosity changes of the thirteen refer-
ence oils observed in the fleet tests. Correlation of the laboratory
methodJresults with the field data was marred by the non-conformance of
two multigrade oils. This non-conformance was more noticeable in the
bench test results than in the laboratory engine test data.
The control oil (AR0-113) which did not contain a VJ.improver,

showed a measurable viscosity increase in the 1500 mile field tests.
This indicated that factors other than mechanical shear may have influ-
enced the viscosity changes of the multigrade oils in the field tests.
Consequently, these factors must be recognized in any attempt to adjust
test conditions for a bench test so that its results agree with the field
test data.
II. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Evaluation of the viscosity stability of multigrade oils has

been a major concern of Section B of ASTM R&D Div. VII since its organiza-
tion in 1952. In 1955, six participants ran tests on two hydraulic fluids
formulated with two different molecular weight V.I. improvers of the same
chemical type (polyalkylmethacrylates). Techniques evaluated at that time
included sonic (magnetostrictive) oscillators, pumps with sharp-edged
orifices or pressure release valves, and a diesel fuel injector. On plot-
ting percent viscosity loss of one reference fluid against percent viscosity
loss of the other reference fluid under identical test conditions, members
of the section found that data points from most of the shear methods studied
fell reasonable well on a single curve. They therefore concluded (l)* that
the various shear methods gave equivalent results under conditions of
identical severity.
In 1957, R&D Div. VIIB conducted a cooperative program in which

12 laboratories evaluated a sonic oscillator method. This program led to
a publication in 1961 (2) of a method for measuring the sonic shear stability
of polymer-containing oils. The three reference oils used in this program
were each prepared by adding sufficient V.I. improver to a 150 neutral
base oil to double its viscosity at 100 F. Three different chemical types
of V.I. improvers were selected for the program without regard for molecular
weight and consequent shear stability. The sonic method, though somewhat
lacking in precision and having unknown correlation with field performance,
was published for information because it promised to be a useful tool for
monitoring lot-to-lot variations in the manufacture of a given polymer con-
centrate or blend. While the simplicity and rapidity of the sonic
* Numbers in parentheses designate References at end of paper.

Copyright © 1973 by ASTM International www.astm.org
- 2 -
shear method have appeal, attempts to extend its use to different chemical
types of v.I. improvers have met with difficulties (3).For lack of a
better method, R&D Div. VIIB voted in 1966 to republish the sonic method
as a tentative (4) despite the evidence of poor correlation with tests
designed to simulate specific service conditions.
In 1967, a new Subsection, B-1, was formed "to study ways of

evaluating the shear stability of polymer-containing oils under conditions
closely related to service". The Subsection circulated a questionnaire
to representatives of industry, government and research organizations to
find out what methods were being used for the measurement of shear stability.
Response to the questionnaire led to the decision to obtain field data on
a representative set of fully formulated multigrade crankcase oils contain-
ing all of the V.I. improver chemical types then available or likely to
be available in the near future. These data would then be used by the
Subsection to judge the relative merits of various laboratory engine tests
and bench te$t devices for evaluating the shear stability of multigrade
oils in automotive use.
Members of R&D DVII B-1 then selected a set of 13 test oils and,
with the aid of a $5,000 appropriation from the American Petroleum Institute,
blended and distributed appropriate quantities of the oils to field test
and laboratory test participants in the U.S.A. and overseas. The u.s.A.
portion of the initial program has been completed and is SUlllllBrized in
this report, but the overseas program will not be completed for some time.
II I • PROGRAM
ASTM Reference Oils (ARO's) •Reference oils are a necessary

link between field tests and bench tests. The following criteria were
used for the formulation of the Reference Oils:
• Representation of all chemical types of polymers

suitable for V.I. improver use. In this way, any
sensitivity of a particular shear device to certain
polymer types would become evident.
• Inclusion of V.I. 1mprovers covering a broad range

of shear stability.
• Inclusion of two v.1. improvers of the same chemical

type but having appreciably different molecular
weights to investigate the effect of molecular weight
on shear stability.
• Inclusion of two sets of oils containing the same

v.r. improver, but formulated to two different
viscosity levels to determine the effect of viscosity
level on breakdown.
- 3 -
• Formulation of all polymer~containing oils to

SAE lOW/40 levels, with the exception of the two
lOW/30 oils which were formulated to fulfill the
requirements of the previous criterion, to maximize
viscosity loss and to investigate a class of multi-·
grade oils that has grown in consumer acceptance.
o Inclusion of one oil for control purposes that

does not contain any v.1. improver.
The v.r. improver types selected for this program are shown in Table 1.
slcng with the viscosities of blrnds with and without their v.r. improver.
In addition, the average 210 and 100 F viscosities determined by all of
the participants aTe compared to those reported by laboratory "P".
The ARO's were all blended with two base stocks from the same
comrnerical source* and the same batch of a commercial detergent-inhibitor
additive package. Viscosity targets were set as follows:
ARO Nos. 101-110 111,112 113
Number of Oils 10 2 1
SAE Grades lOW/40 lOW/30 20W/20
Viscosity Target at
210°F, cSt 15. 0 11.0 6.7
0°F, cP 2000 2000 2600
The ratio of the two base stocks had to be tailored to each V.I. improver.
To determine the amount of viscosity contribution by the v.r. improver,
the 210°F viscosity of each blend was determined both before and after
v.r. improver was added.
A 400 gallon batch of each oil was blended not only to supply
the proposed vehicle test, but also to provide a more than adequate inven-
tory of these oils to evaluate bench shear devices.
An approval procedure, described in Appendix Table A-1, has been

set up to control distribution of these valuable reference oils. All
requests for ARO's must be approved by the Chairman of the Mechanical
Shear Stability Subsection R&D Div. VII B-1. If the request is approved,
a charge of $10 per gallon is made. Net proceeds from these charges
are sent annually to AP! as reimbursement for their initial grant to cover
additive and base stock costs. As a matter of policy, no approval will
be granted for any bench test requiring an oil charge of more than one
gallon per test. Approvals are also contingent upon disclosing all shear
device data developed with ARO's to R&D Div. VII B-1.
* Base stocks were 95 v.r. mid-continent origin, +5°F pour point

with nominal viscosities of 100 SUS and 200 SUS at 100°F.
- 4 -
Field Test Design .. Th~ vehfrle field test was composed of six
individual fleets, with each fleec test being run by a different laboratory.
(Laboratory participants are shown in Appendix Table A-2). Each test
fleet consisted of thirteen passenger cars operated under typical owner
driving conditions. Each car used only four of the thirteen reference
oils according to a pre-determined 13X4 incomplete Latin (Youden) Square
test design(6) which is outlined in Table 2. Other test designs were
considered but this design was selected because it seemed the most
appropriate for this program. While a greater number of test oils involv-
ing additional SAE viscosity grades, v.r. improvers and cars may have
been desirable, it was felt that they were unnecessary.
Vehicle Selection - Each test vehicle fleet was envisioned as

a ''mini-population" of U.S. passenger vehicles driven under typica 1 opera t-
ing conditions, e.g., an employee car test fleet. The composition of the
"ideal" mini-population would be as follows:
• Vehicle Make and Number

No. of
Manufacturer Vehicles
General Motors 5
Ford 4
Chrysler 3
AMC 1
13
• Engine and Transmission - 11 of the 13 cars should

have V-8 engines and automatic transmissions; the
other two should have 6-cylinder engines and manual
transmissions.
• Engine Condition - Carshaving mileage accumulations

between 8,000 to 50,000 miles and no external oil
leakage were recommended for selection. Oil consump-
tion rate should be 2,000 miles/quart or better to
preclude the addition of oil during the 1,500 mile
test period.
• Mileage Accumulation Rate - to complete the field

test in a six month period, vehicles that accumulate
at least 1,000 miles per month were sought.
Vehicle fleet tests that had other operating regimes were also
welcomed. For example, a test is underway in a high-spE:ed tire evaluation
fleet that provides sustained turnpike driving without significant stop-
and-go operation. Th1.s type of test must be analyzed separately because
of its different nature.
- 5 -
Test Procedure - Vehicles selected for the test were to undergo

the detailed procedure shown in Appendix Table A-3. The test procedure
called for two flushes of the engine with test oil prior to the actual
test oil charge. A one-ounce sample was taken after 1,000 miles of driv-
ing and was held in reserve against unexpected contingencies. Each 1,500-
mile (nominal) drain sample was to be stripped of fuel dilution, as des-
cribed in the subsequent section.
In general, test drivers were urged not to add oil during the
test. If the oil leve 1 fe·ll to one quart be low full before 1, 500 test
miles was attained, the car was to be brought in, the oil drained, and
the next test sequence initiated.
Stripping Procedure - Since fuel dilution affects the viscosity

of the used oil significantly, it was necessary to remove fuel dilution
from all samples prior to viscosity measurement. To accomplish this,
several existing proprietary procedures were evaluated since no universally
accepted method was available. The criteria for this evaluation were
three-fold. The method should:
e Remove all dilution
e Not remove light ends from the lubricant
e Be repeatable.
To check on dilution removal, a special oil (AR0-100) was

blended with 5% mineral spirits to simulate fuel dilution. The 210°F
viscosity of this blend was as follows:
Mineral Spirits, Wt. % 210°F Viscosity, cSt
0 13. 98
5 11.02 (AR0-100)
The goal was to strip to a viscosity level of 13.90 to 14.10 est.
To check on removal of light ends from the base stock, AR0-103

which contains the lowest viscosity base stock was stripped by each lab-
oratory. If the 210°F viscosity of a fresh sample of AR0-103 increased
from its initial value by more than 0.10 est., it was assumed that light
ends were being removed from the lubricant. Evaluation of one technique
that used a 240°F (116°C) temperature and 100 mmHg absolute pressure
indicated that these conditions could remove light ends. However, when
the temperature was lowered to 210°F (100°C), the method then attained
the desired balance of removing fuel dilution, but not light ends of the
base stock. The original development data for the method are shown in
Appendix Table A-4.
- 6 -
This initial procedure was later found to vary in results from

laboratory to laboratory. The variation was later attributed to the nitro-
gen sparging rate, whi.:.1 had not been quantitatively specified in the
original procedure. Tt1e revised method (Appendix Table A-5) calls for a
~etered flow rate ot oae gram of nitrogen per minute.
The precision of the revised stripping procedu~e appears to be

good, as shown by results on AK0-100 in Appendix Table A-6. The maximum
differences within and between laboratories for the combined stripping
and viscosity determination are roughly equivalent to the, precision of the
viscosity measurement alone, as summarized in the following table:
Max. Difference in Vis.@ 210°fCcSt

Within Labs Between Lab Means
Combined Stripping and Vis. Deter-
mination (Labs A.K,B.D,H*) 0.07 0.08
Vis. Determination (ASTM 0445) 0.05 (or 0.35%) 0.10 (or o. 7%)
,•r Laboratory C data omitted.
Results from Lab C were omitted from the foregoing comparison

because the viscosity levels are substantially higher than other labora-
tories. The viscosity measurement rather than the stripping procedure
seems to be at fault sinee the viscosity before stripping is also higher
for Lab C than for Labs K and D. Inter-laboratory viscon.~ter effects can
be minimized by comparing viscosity change, as follows:
Avg. Viscosity @ 210°F for ARO_-_l_O_o._,_c_S_t_______

Lab Before Stripping After Stripping Viscosity Change
c 11.10 14.07 2.97
K 11.01 13.99 2.98
D 11.04 13.93 2.89
The 0.09 cSt maximum difference among labs in viscosity change is within
the 0.10 cSt limit of viscosity reproducibility.
A different stripping method was used by one laboratory instead

of the method developed by the Subsection. A copy of this method is
shown in Appendix Table A-7. A single result on AR0-100 reported by this
laboratory, 13.90 cSt at 210°F, is within the range of results obtained
hy other laboratories otiiug Lb~ vacuum str ipp.~ng technil1ue.
European Field Test Program - A field test was also initiated

in Europe to evaluate shear stability in European cars. Such a test will
provide a direct comparison between U. ::; • and European cars in terms of
shear severity.
- 7 -
The European test program is using two seven-car fleets. One

fleet consists solely of cars that have a conunon sump for both the engine
and manual transmission, whereas the other fleet is composed of conven-
tional systems with separate sumps for engines and transmissions.
As of March, 1972, there were some incomplete portions of that

test; hence, results from the European field test were not available for
analysis.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL DATA
Car Data - The cars in each of the six car-fleets are listed
in Appendix Tables B-1 through B-6. Make of car, number of cylinders,
displacement, mileage at the start of the program and the program periods
are included. In addition, the mileage interval and the oil consumption
rate for each sample are shown if reported to the Data Analysis Panel.
Fleet Viscosity Data - The original field viscosity data, sub-

mitted by each processor of the used oil samples, are shown in Appendix
Tables C-1 through C-13. The fresh oil viscosities at 210 and 100 F
determined by each processor are shown along with their used oil viscosi-
ties after roughly 1,500 miles of use in each test car. Each used oil
viscosity was measured after the drain sample was stripped and filtered
by the revised stripping procedure. The calculated viscosity losses at
210°F for each processor are shown in Sections 1 and 2 of Appendix Tables
D-1 through D-13. To minimize viscosity error,each viscosity loss was
calculated by subtracting the used oil viscosity from its corresponding
fresh oil viscosity as determined by the same laboratory. Viscosity
losses for each fleet, corrected for car effect, are shown underscored
at the bottom of Section 3 of the same tables just above the correspond-
ing uncorrected viscosity losses. The viscosity losses at 100°F shown
in Appendix Tables D-14 through D-25, were obtained so that used oil
viscosity data at other temperatures could be predicted by extrapolation
from mean viscosities at 210°F and 100°F if desired.
An analysis of variance, illustrated in Section 4 of these

tables, was performed on each set of 210 and 100°F data to assess the
significance of phase and car effects. Based on the viscosity losses at
210°F, the car effects were significant at the 95% confidence level in
five of the six fleets;but the phase effect, or order of running, was
generally not significant in any fleet. The results at 100°F lead to the
same conclusions. A comparison of the corrected and uncorrected viscos-
ity losses, shown at the bottom of Appendix Tables D-1 through D-13
indicated that the maximum overall car effect correction in viscosity at
210°F was 0.51 est.
Bench Test Data - The original bench test data submitted by

each participant are shown in Appendix Tables E-1 through E-10. Both
210 and 100°F data are included where available. As with the fleet data,
the bench test viscosity losses were obtained by subtracting the sheared
oil viscosities from the fresh oil viscosities measured in the same lab-
-8-
oratory. The only exceptions were three cases where 15-laboratory average
values were substituted for fresh oil viscosities that deviated too much
from the average. These corrections appear in Appendix Tables E-3 and
E-10.
Laboratory Engine Test Data - Three separate laboratory engine

test programs were conducted to evaluate the shear stability of the reference
oils. The engine test results shown in Appendix Table F-1 were obtained with
a 327 CID V-8 engine motored at 2000 RPM. This method eliminates the need for
stripping used oil samples. Appendix Table F-2 lists the viscosity losses
obtained after 10 hours under L-38 engine test conditions. A special reference
oil (RE0-192) was run several times during this program to allow corrections
for cylinder wall roughness to be made. This was necessary because the engine
was not rebuilt between tests. Appendix Table F-3 shows the corrected viscosity
losses obtained after 16 hours of use in a Ford MS Sequence VC test. Since the
VC test engine was not always rebuilt between tests, these results were also
corrected for cylinder wall condition by running AR0-104 frequently as a reference
oil.
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fleet Test Results - The average 210°F viscosity losses for each
fleet are compared to the Six-Fleet average data in Table 3. Since each
sample processor's data were corrected for car effect, the average losses
for each fleet and the Six-Fleet average results are also corrected for
car effect'. The corrected viscosity losses obtained by all of the used
oil sample processors are shown in Appendix Table G-1. All samples from
each fleet except Fleet "F", were stripped by more than one processor.
Fleet "F" did not retain enough of each drain sample for another laboratory
to process.
Average viscosity losses for each fleet correlate* very well with
the Six-Fleet average results, as shown in Table 4. As an example, Figure 1
illustrates graphically the close fit of data from Fleet "D" and the Six-Fleet
average data to the regression equation line.
Car effects were found to be highly significant in individual thirteen-

car fleets as shown in the analysis of variance calculations listed in the
Appendix D Tables (Section 4). Additionally, an individual car effect was
calculated** by a different method, the method of Natrella(l2) This is the
difference between the viscosity loss for a given oil in that car and the
average viscosity loss on the same oil in all cars in that fleet. The
For a perfect linear correlation the standard error of estimate must be

* "zero" and the correlation coefficient must be "one". It is also desirable,
but not essential, for the intercept to be "zero" and the slope to be "one".
c=4R-ETj
13 where c = individual car effect in a given fleet
Section 2
R = row total for that car of
} A . "D"
LTj =sum of colwnn totals for each of 4 oils teste ppen d ix
Tables
in that car
Example: Car 1, Fleet A, Appendix Table D-1
4(3.47) = (6.53 + 8.59 + 1.28 - 0.681 =
c -0.14 cSt.
13
-9-
magnitude and distribution of car effects for each fleet and all fleets, as
calculated by the method of Natrella, are given in Table 5. A histogram (Figure
2) of the qata for all fleets shows the overall distribution of car effect
corrections to be fairly symmetrical with most corrections in the -0.3 to +o.4
cSt range. A review of individual fleet data indicates that large outliers
(e.g. -1.2 or + 1.0 cSt) would significantly bias results. Consequently,
car effect corrections are important for thirteen-car fleets.
The overall Six-Fleet viscosity results are essentially insensi-

tive to car effects. As seen in Table 5 and Figure 2, as the sampling grows
to a better 78 vehicle simulation of the true car population, car effect
outliers on one side of the mean become balanced by those on the other side.
As this process occurs, the corrected viscosity loss results should become
equal to the uncorrected results. In Table 6, a comparison between uncorrected
and corrected Six-Fleet results* confirms that the values have become virtually
identical.
Thus, through use of the large nl.Ullber of cars in this cooperative

field test, a set of reliable viscosity loss targets has been established
for the ASTM Reference Oils. These viscosity loss criteria provide excellent
standards for the evaluation of candidate bench test shear devices even
though individual car results vary widely as shown in Table 7.
Laboratory Test Results - The viscosity losses for all of the

bench test data and all of the laboratory engine test data are shown in
Appendix Table G-3, along with the Six-Fleet average losses. Each set
of these laboratory viscosity loss data was correlated with the Six-Fleet
average results (Appendix Table G-4) to determine how well it predicted
shear stability performance in the six car-fleets. The correlation obtained
between the data from the best of each laboratory method and the Six-Fleet
average results are swnmarized in Table 8. In addition, the correlations
between the data from the best of each laboratory method and the Six-Fleet
average results are shown graphically in Figures 3 through 9. The viscos-
ity losses obtained using the best data from each bench test method and
the best laboratory engine test data are found in Table 9 along with the
Six-Fleet average lossese
All of the bench test methods predicted more viscosity loss for
Oil AR0-109 and less viscosity loss for oil AR0-106 than was observed in the
field tests. Of the laboratory engine tests, the Ford MS-VC did as well on
these two problem oils as it did on several other oils, but the regression
line intercept was more than one centistoke low. Both the L-38 and the
motored engine tests predicted more viscosity loss for Oil AR0-109 than was
obtained in field tests but they did fairly well on the rest of the oils.
* See Appendix Tables G-1 and G-2 for individual values that make up the
Six-Fleet Averages.
- 10 -
Many investigators (6, 7, 8) have reported the shear stability

of multigrade crankcase oils in terms of % viscosity loss* and Shear
Stability Index* (SSI). For comparison purposes, all ASTM viscosity loss
data, i.e. bench test, lab engine test, and field test, have been converted
to% viscosity loss and Shear Stability Index (See Appendix Table G-5).
Linear regression analyses were conducted using data in these

three forms to determine if improved correlations between the various
sets of laboratory test method data and the Six-Fleet average results
could be found. The correlation coefficients from these regression analyses
are summarized in Appendix Table G-6. These results show that viscosity
losses generally gave the highest correlation coefficents, the % viscos-
ity losses gave coefficients which were generally second and the ~1ear
Stability Indices gave the lowest coefficients in several cases. The
actual differences among the three sets were quite small. In only one
instance did the correlation coefficient obtained using another parameter
exceed that using the viscosity losses. These results justify the use
of simple viscosity losses to evaluate the various laboratory methods in
this program.
Summary of Best Correlations - The linear correlations obtained

between the corrected Six-Fleet average viscosity losses and (a) the
uncorrected Six-Fleet losses, (b) the best single set of fleet data, (c)
the best set of bench test results and (d) the best laboratory engine data
are all compared in Table 10. These results show that the uncorrected
Six-Fleet losses and the best set of car fleet data both correlate very well
with the corrected Six-Fleet target data; but the best laboratory engine
data and the best bench test results have either intercepts or correlation
coefficients that are unsatisfactory. The poor intercept obtained with
the MS VC test data after 16 hours would probably improve i f oil samples
were taken earlier, e.g. at perhaps 10 hours; however, the regression
analysis of the motored engine data shown in Appendix Table G-4 suggests
that as the intercept improves, the slope may deteriorate. As shown in
Figure 3 1 the best bench test method predicted the viscosity change of
AR0-109 unsatisfactorily. The best diesel injector method correlation,
shown in Figure 4, could not determine the viscosity change of either
AR0-109 or 106 satisfactorily.
* % Viscosity Loss is viscosity loss/fresh oil viscosity expressed

in percent.
Shear Stability Index is viscosity loss/polymer-contributed vis-

cosity express~d in percent.
If FOV = fresh oil viscosity, UOV = used oil viscosity and
BBV = viscosity before polymer addition
Then: % Viscosity loss = POVf OV

-· UOV
x 100
(' , .
S .... J.
FOV - BBV
-11-
Linear regression analyses relating laboratory test results to

the fleet data were rerun omitting the AR0-109 data. These analyses,
shown in Table 11, reflect the substantial improvements in correlation
coefficients achieved by eliminating the AR0-109 results. However, at this
time there is no justification for rejecting these data.
Effect of Viscosity Level on Shear Stability Index - To investi-

gate the effect of viscosity level upon Shear Stability Index (SSI), two
pairs of lOW/30 and lOW/40 reference oils were included in the ARO series.
Field test results on these oils - - ARO's 101, 111, 103 and 112 - - indicate
higher SSI results for each VI improver type in the higher viscosity lOW/40
blends (See Table 12).
This effect can also be noted in data published by Behrens ~ al

(9) in which the used oil viscosity after 20 hours in a CLR engine was
higher for a given multigrade test oil when the water jacket temperature
was higher. At the higher ring belt temperature, the viscosity was
lower and lower breakdown resulted in a higher used oil viscosity. One
can hypothesize that at a constant shear rate, higher viscosity requires
a higher shear stress which, in turn, would be expected to cause greater
breakdown or SSI.
The sonic shear test, in which shear stress does not increase
as viscosity increases, shows the reverse effect of lower SSI as vis-
cosity increases. This result confirms observations of this defect by
Goodson and Vick (10) and Pearce (11).
Laboratory engine tests and other mechanical shear bench tests

showed a mixed pattern of SSI versus viscosity level. Further data are
necessary to resolve this effect in these particular tests.
Effect of Polymer Molecular Weight on Viscosity Stability - In

order to evaluate the effect of molecular weight on polymer shear stability,
two of the test oils (AR0-101 and 102) were formulated from two polymeth-
acrylate v.I. improvers that differed only in average molecular weight.
The molecular weight of PMA-2 was about 1.8 times that of PMA-1. The
Shear Stability Index data, sunnnarized in Table 13, indicate that the
molecular weight of V.I. improver consistently influenced its shear sta-
bility in the car fleets and the laboratory test methods. The SSI of the
lower molecular weight V.I. improver was generally one-half of the SSI
of the higher molecular weight one.
Precision of Program - This program was designed so that the

precision of the viscosity determination method and the stripping procedure
could be determined. The fleet test program also included some repeat
tests to serve as a measure of a car's ability to shear the test oils
repeatably.
The pooled reproducibility standard deviation for viscosity

determinations at 210°F for fresh oils was calculated to be 0.08 cSt.
This value was calculated from the fresh oil viscosities determined on
-12-
each of the ARO's by 15 laboratories (Appendix Table G-7). Three

outliers were omitted from the averages and the pooled reproducibility
standard deviation. The calculated ASTM reproducibility in centistokes
is as follows:
Reproducibility = l.T" R • t/'2 tl75 = 0.08 x 1.414 x 1.96 = 0.22 est
WhereCT"' R is the reproducibility standard deviation
t is the students t @ the 95% confidence level and

175
175 degrees of freedom.
The ASTM reproducibility in percent is calculated by dividing the repro-

ducibility in cSt by the average oil viscosity in cSt.
Therefore:
0 22
Reproducibility = •
15
x 100 = 1.47%
The reproducibility for the ASTM D445 viscosity determination method, 0.70%,
is appreciably better than that achieved in this program. Fresh oil vis-
cosities at 100°F obtained by 11 laboratories are shown in Appendix Table
G-8. No reproducibility results were calculated.
The pooled reproducibility standard deviation obtained for the

combined stripping operation and viscosity determinations at 210°F was
found to be 0.10 cSt. This value was calculated from the results shown
in Appendix Table G-1 where one, two or three laboratories each stripped
the various used oil samples and determined their viscosities at 210°F,
The calculated reproducibility of the combined operation is as follows:
Reproducibility =crR • j/2" . t 78 = 0.10 X 1.414 X 1.96 = 0,28 cSt
When this reproducibility is compared to the reproducibility obtained with

the viscosity determinations alone, it shows that only about 0.06 cSt
increase in reproducibility was contributed by the stripping operation.
The car fleet program included some repeat tests by adding a

fifth phase to the original four-phase program. This fifth phase con-
sisted of re-evaluating the shear stability of the various test oils in
the same cars in which they were previously run. This part of the pro-
gram was added to establish an independent measure of a car's ability
to shear the various test oils repeatably. The pooled repeatability stan-
dard deviation calculated from the data shown in Appendix Table G-9 was
0.28 est. This value includes the stripping and viscosity determination
variations in addition to the repeatability of a car's shearing ability.
The calculated repeatability of the combined operation is as follows:
Repeatability =o-R • ~ t = 0.28 X 1.414 X 2.12 = 0.84 cSt

16
-13-
Role of Thickening - One oil (AR0-113) which contained no V.I.

improver was included in the fleet test program for control purposes. This
oil contained the same detergent and oxidation inhibitor package as the other
oils and was blended with the same base stocks. The average viscosity increase
at 210°F obtained with this oil after 1,500 miles of use in the test fleets was
0.31 cSt, with individual determinations ranging from 0.11 cSt viscosity decrease
to 0.82 cSt viscosity increase. This is an indication that the additive package
did only a fair job of preventing thickening. However, there is no evidence
that any or all of the V.I. improved oils responded in the same manner as the
control oil. Therefore, we know of no technique which would satisfactorily
correct the field data for possible thickening effects.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
~ Extensive field test data have been obtained which can serve
as a basis for evaluating the ability of the various laboratory
methods to predict the viscosity stability of multigrade crank-
case oils.
~ The high degree of correlation achieved between the data from

each of the six car fleets and the Six-Fleet average viscosity
losses indicates that if additional field data are needed, a
single fleet test of an appropriate design rather than six
fleets, would be adequate.
~ A reliable fuel stripping method was developed which makes it

possible to remove essentially all of the fuel from used oil
samples without removing an appreciable amount of the light
ends of the oils. This makes possible an accurate measure of
viscosity change free from dilution.
~ The current bench test results do not satisfactorily predict

all of the viscosity changes observed in field test data.
~ Laboratory engine tests were found to be better than the

bench tests in predicting viscosity changes in the field test; however,
these tests are considered to be impractical because of their large
oil sample requirements and the high cost of such evaluations.
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS
Since the power steering pump tests and the Diesel injector pump
tests appear to hold the most promise, it is the rec011U11endation of the Data
Analysis Panel that ASTM participants having this equipment should investigate
ways of improving these tests. For example, the participants who submitted
diesel injector pump test data might try running their tests at a variety
of temperatures, pressures and pump speeds, passes and etc. These
investigations should be implemented in an orderly manner by a Task Force to
avoid duplication of effort and assure the maximum improvement for the effort
spent.
In view of the thickening encountered with the control oil in the

field tests, perhaps a reassessment of the goals of the subsection should be
considered. It may be unrealistic to adapt a mechanical shear bench test to
the extent required to predict all of the viscosity changes observed in the
field tests.
-14-
References
1. Determination of the Shear Stability of Non-Newtonian Liquids, ASTM

STP 182, 1955.
2. Proposed Method of Test for Shear Stability of Polymer-containing

Oils, ASTM Standards on Petroleum Products and Lubricants, 1961.
3. The Effects of Polymer Degradation on Flow Properties of Fluids

and Lubricants. ASTM S'l)> 382, 1965.
4. Test for Sonic Shear Stability of Polymer-Containing Oils, ASTM D 2603-

67T.
5. w. G. Cochran and G. M. Cox, "Experimental Designs", Second Edition,page 523

Incomplete Latin Square - plan 13.5.
6. I. R. H. Crail and A. L. Neville, "The Mechanical Shear Stability of

Polymeric V. I. Improvers" Journal Institute of Petroleum, Vol. 55
(1969) pp. 100-108.
7. "Shear Stability Index - The Determination of Viscosity Loss of Multi-

graded Oils" Philadelphia: Rohm and Haas Company, April 1969.
8. H. H. Radtke, R. L. Stambaugh and N. v. Messina, "Measurement of

Shear Stability of Polymer Thickened Oils", Presented at 10th
Anniversary Meeting of Japan Petroleum Institute, Tokyo, Japan,
October, 1968.
9. M. D. Behrens, s. w. Rein, G. w. Roth, and H. T. Marshall, "An Auto-

mated Fuel Injector Shear Stability Tester", SAE Paper No. 690158,
January, 1969.
10. R. M. Goodson and G. K. Vick, "Viscosity Loss in Polymer-Thickened

Oils During Use", ASTM STP 382, 1965.
ll. A. F. Pearce, "A Laboratory Method for Predicting the Permanent

Viscosity Loss of Polymeric Crankcase Oils in Field Service", SAE
Paper 680069, presented at Detroit, January, 1968.
12. M. G. Natrella, "Experimental Statistics", NBS Handbook 91, pages

13-45' 13-46.
TABLE 1
VISCOSITIES OF ASTM REFERENCE OILS
210°F Viscositlz c St
ARO SAE 15 Lab Avg. Lab P 100°F Viscosit~ 1 cSt 0° F Viscosi t;i::, cP
Oil Viscosity Finished Finished Without Polymer Finished Blend Finished 'Blend
~ Blender v.I. Im2r over T;r2e Grade Blend Blend v.r. Imi;!rovers Contributed 11 Lab Avg 1!.Lf Lab P
101 B Polymethacrylate-1 lOW/40 15.08 15.05 5. 71 9.34 86.33 86.19 2040
102 B Polymethacrylate-2 lOW/40 15.03 15.02 5.83 9.19 85.92 85.93 2030
103 G Polyisobutylene lOW/40 14.98 15.02 4.84 10.18 97. 91 98.09 1970
104 G Olefin Copolymer-I lOW/40 14.98 14.96 6.15 8.81 108.62 108.9 1960
105 G Vinyl Copolymer lOW/40 14.87 15.05 5.67 9.38 83.94 84.54 1930
106 s Polyacrylate lOW/40 14.96 15 .01 5 .65 9.36 76 .27 76.95 1940
107 s Polyalkylstyrene lOW/40 15 .14 15.15 5.49 9.66 97.26 97.58 2000
I
I-'
108 s Olefin Terpolymer lOW/40 14.96 15.00 5.47 9.53 104.84 105.1 1880 V1
I
109 H Styrene Polyester lOW/40 15.23 15.23 5.36 9.8 7 90.53 90.81 1940
110 J Olefin Copolymer-2 lOW/40 15.01 15.00 5.19 9.81 104.26 104.4 1950
111 B Polymethacrylate-1 lOW/30 10.97 10.97 5.93 5.04 66.31 66.29 2020
112 G Polyisobutylene lOW/30 11.03 11.06 5.52 5.54 74.88 74.84 2100
113 H None 20/20W 6. 72 6. 70 6. 70 o.oo 48.54 48.55 2600

- 16 -
TABLE 2
FIELD TEST DESIGN>'<
ARO No. Used in Phase

Car No. I II III IV
1 113 101 103 109
2 101 102 104 110
3 102 103 105 111
4 103 104 106 112
5 104 105 107 113
6 105 106 108 101
7 106 107 109 102
8 107 108 110 103
9 108 109 111 104
10 109 110 112 105
11 110 111 113 106
12 111 112 101 107
13 112 113 102 108
* Incomplete Latin Square, Cochran and Cox, "Experimental Designs",

Second Edition, page 523, plan 13.5.
TABLE 3
ASTH SHEAR STABILITY FIELD TEST RESULTS
ARO Six-
Oil Average 210 F Viscositv Losses 2 cSt. 2 After 1 2 500 Miles of Use Fleet
No. Fleet A _ B_ c _D_ _E_ _F_ Avg.
101 1. 65 l. 54 l.Li 9 1. 76 1. 78 1. 60 1.64

102 3.12 3.20 2 • .55 3.24 3.48 2.57 3.03
103 2.06 1.44 1.42 1.95 1. 75 1.87 1. 75
104 2.28 2.07 1. 67 2.29 2.12 1.80 2.04
105 3.94 3.97 3. 71 4.13 4.62 3.9S 4.06
106 4.05 3.74 3.39 3.88 4.11 3.94 3.85 .-

-....J
107 2.36 2.12 1.89 2.15 2.47 2.05 2.17
108 2.51 2.18 2.14 2.34 2. 62 2.42 2.37
•
109 0.41 -0.27 -0.01 0.21 -0.14 0.05 0.04
110 0.48 0.25 0.32 0.46 0.32 0.23 0.34
111 0.88 0.58 0.41 0.82 0.81 0.51 0.67

112 0.86 0.66 0.57 0.82 0.84 o. 71 0.74
113 -0.20 -0.38 -0.45 -0.18 -0.07 -0.55 -0.31
TABLE 4
RESULTS OF REGRESSION ANALYSES RELATING

INDIVIDUAL FLEET RESULTS WITH THE SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
Equation Model: Y = A+BX Where Y is the Six-Fleet average and

X is individual fleet averages
FLEET - A _B_ c D E F
Intercept (A) -0.21 0.15 0.12 -0.14 0.01 0.12

I-'
00
Slope (B) 1.03 0.97 1.09 1.02 0.90 0.98
Std. Error 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.16
Corr. Coef. 0.997 0.996 0.998 0.998 0.996 0.994

-19-
TABLE 5
DISTRIBUTION OF CAR EFFECTS BY FLEET
Group Limits Nwnber of Cars in Car Fle·ets

cSt. @ 210 1" A .JL. c _Q_ _.]_ _L_ Total
1.01 to 1.10 1 1
0.91 to 1.00 0
0.81 to 0.90 0
o. 71 to 0.80 1 1
o. 61 to 0.70 1 1 2
0.51 to 0.60 1 1
0.41 to 0.50 1 1 1 3
0.31 to 0.40 1 1 2 1 2 7
0.21 to 0.30 1 2 3 1 2 9
0.11 to 0.20 1 1 1 1 2 6
0.01 to 0.10 3 3 1 1 1 1 10
-0.09 to o.oo 2 1 2 2 1 8
-0.19 to -0.10 2 1 1 3 3 1 11
-0.29 to -0.20 2 1 1 2 1 7
-0.39 to -0.30 1 1 1 3
-0.49 to -0.40 1 1 2
-0.59 to -0.50 1 1 2
-0.69 to -0.60 1 1
-0.79 to -0.70 1 1
-0.89 to -0.80 0
-0.99 to -0.90 1 1
-1.09 to -1.00 1 1
-1.19 to -1.10 0
-1.29 to -1.20 1 1
Car Totals 13 13 13 13 13 13 78
- 20 -
TABLE 6
THE OVERALL CAR CORRECTION EFFECT AND

CORRELATION WITH THE UNCORRECTED AVERAGE
ARO
Oil Six-Fleet Average Viscosity Loss, cSt.
No. Corr. For Car Effect Uncorrected
101 l. 64 1. 66
102 3.03 3.13
103 1. 75 1. 71
104 2.04 2.10
105 4.06 3.99
106 3.85 3.82

107 2.17 2.19
108 2.37 ·2.34
109 0.04 -0.04
110 0.34 0.35
111 o. 67 0.74
112 0.74 0.68
113 -0.31 -0.23
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
Equation Model Y = A+BX where Y is the Six-Fleet Average

viscosity loss (corrected for car effect
and X is the uncorrected six-fleet average
viscosity loss.
Intercept Slope Std. Error Corr. Coef.
-0.01 1.00 0.06 0.999

-21-
TABLE 7
95% CONFIDENCE LIMITS

FOR UNCORRECTED FLEET DATA
Viscosity Losses 2 cSt.

Standard 95% Confidence Limits*
ARO Average Deviation ~ Lower
101 1. 66 0.46 2.61 o. 71

102 3.13 o. 69 4.55 1. 71
103 1. 71 0.59 2.93 0.49
104 2.10 0.50 3 .13 1.07
105 3.99 0.60 5.23 2.75
106 3.82 0.47 4. 79 2.85
107 2.19 0.40 3.01 1.37
108 2.34 0.45 3.27 1.41
109 -0.04 0.76 1.53 -1. 61
110 0.35 0.68 1. 75 -1.05
111 0.74 0.32 1.40 0.08
112 0.68 0.33 1.36 o.oo

113 -0.23 0.22 0.22 -0.68
* Individual uncorrected viscosity losses obtained in the

six fleets fall within these limits 95% of the time.
TABLE 8
RESULTS OF REGRESSION ANALYSES RELATING THE BEST*

BENCH TEST AND LABORATORY ENGINE RESULTS TO THE SIX-FLEET DATA
Equation Model: Y = A+BX Where Y is the Six-Fleet average and X is the

Bench Test and Laboratory Engine Results
Best Bench Tests Best Laboratory Engine Tests

Power Diesel Kady
Steering Injector Dispersion Sonic Motored
l'ump Nozzle Mill Shear MS VC Engine L-38
1-Hr. 10-Passes 6-Hr. 10 Min. 16-Hrs. 3-Hrs. 10 Hrs.
•
~
Intercept (A) -0.32 -0.41 -0.07 0.12 -1.11 -0.16 -0.37 ~
•
Slope (B) 1.06 0.98 1.09 0.84 1.00 1.40 1.23
Std. Error 0.63 0.66 o. 72 0.84 0.34 0.43 0.48
Corr. Coef. 0.90 0.89 0.85 0.82 0.97 0.96 0.94
* The best results are based on their correlation coefficient

when correlated with the Six-Fleet Average. In cases where correlation
coefficients are essentially equal, standard error of estimate, slope
and intercept are taken into consideration.
TABLE 9
SHEAR STABILITY OF ASTM OILS IN THE BEST* LABORATORY BENCH TESTS AND
BEST* LABORATORY ENGINE TESTS COMPARED TO THE SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
210 F ViscositI Losses 1 est. z BI the Various Test Methods

Diesel Power Kady
ARO Injector Steering Sonic Dispersion Motored Six-Fleet
Oil Nozzle Pump Shear Mill Engine L-38 MS VC Average
No. 10-Passes 1-Hr. 10-Min. 6-Hr. 3-Hr. 10-Hr. 16-Hr. 1500 Miles
101 2.31 2.17 2.22 1.49 0.96 1.33 2.55 1. 64

102 3. 71 3.25 3.83 3.30 2.22 2.60 3.99 3.03
103 1.95 1.44 1.00 1.19 1. 77 1. 70 3.4 7 1. 75
104 2.26 1. 75 1.31 2. 05 1.30 1.46 3.03 2.04
105 4.85 4.49 4.78 3.88 3. 24 3.75 4.94 4.06 N
\.>)
106 2.99 3.18 3.19 2.30 2.45 3.31 4.65 3.85

107 2.36 1.96 2.10 1.56 1.44 2.35 3.72 2.17
108 2. 70 2.08 1.48 2. 26 1.93 1.92 3.oo 2.37
109 2.07 1. 75 2.07 1.47 0.70 1.30 1. 59 0.04
110 0.85 0.85 0.49 0.57 0.53 0.58 1. 27 0.34
111 1.17 1.31 1.43 0.79 0.38 0.85 1.46 0.67

112 1.12 o. 75 o. 76 0.67 0.57 0.85 1. 73 0.74
113 -0.07 0.03 0.07 -0.07 -0.31
* The best results are based on their correlation coefficient

when correlated with the Six-Fleet Average. In cases where correlation
coefficients are essentially equal, standard error of estimate, slope
and intercept are taken into consideration.
- 24 -
TABLE 10
SUMMARY OF BEST REGRESSION ANALYSIS

RESULTS BY EACH METHOD
Equation Model: Y = A+BX Where Y is the Six-Fleet Average

and X is the various other results
Uncorrected Best Best Best

Six Fleet Car Lab Lab-Bench
Average Fleet Engine Test
Intercept (A) -0.01 -0.14 -1.11 -0.26
Slope (B) 1.00 1.02 1.00 1.07
Std. Error 0.06 0.09 0.34 0.64
Corr. Coef. 0.999 0.998 0.97 0.90

TABLE 11
RESULTS OF REGRESSION ANALYSES RELATING THE BEST BENCH TEST

AND LABORATORY ENGINE RESULTS TO THE SIX-FLEET DATA WITH OIL AR0-109 DATA OMITTED
Equation Model: Y = A+BX Where Y is the Six-Fleet average and X is the

Bench Test and Laboratory Engine Results
Best Bench Tests Best Laborator~ Engine Tests

Power Diesel Kady
Steering Injector Dispersion Sonic Motored
Pump Nozzle Mill Shear MS VC Engine L-38
1-Hr. 10-Passes 6-Hr. 10 Min. 16-Hrs. 3-Hrs. 10 Hrs. N
V1
Intercept (A) -0.17 -0.26 0.15 0.24 -0.93 -0.02 -0.14
Slope (B) 1.05 0.97 1.05 0.86 0.96 1.35 1.17
Std. Error C.44 0.44 0.54 0.64 0.32 0.36 0.28
Corr. Coef. 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.89 0.97 0.97 0.98

- 26 -
TABLE 12
EFFECT OF VISCOSITY ON POLYMER BREAKDOWN
Polvmethacrylate-1 Polyisobutylene
ARO No. 111 101 112 103

SAE Grades lOW/30 lOW/40 lOW/30 lOW/40
Viscosity @ 210 F, est. 11.0 15.l 11.1 15.0
Shear Stabilit~ Index @ 210°F

Six Fleet Average 13.3 17.6 13.4 17.2
MS-VC, 16 Hrs. 29.0 27.3 31. 2 34.1

L-38, 10 Hrs. 16.9 14.2 15.3 16. 7
Motored Engine 7.5 10.3 10.3 17 .4
Power Steering Pump Test 26.0 23.2 13.5 14.1

Diesel Injector Rig 23.2 24.7 20.2 19.2
Kady Mill 15.7 16.0 12.1 11. 7
Sonic Shear 28.4 23 .8 13. 7 9.8
- 27 -
TABLE 13
EFFECT OF MOLECULAR WEIGHT ON THE SHEAR STABILITY

OF A POLYMETHACRYLATE VI IMPROVER
Polymethacrylates
PMA-1 PMA-2
Relative Molecular Wt. 1.0 1.8

ARO No. 101 102
Shear Stabilitv Index @ 210°F

Six-Fleet Average 17.6 33.0
MS-VC, 16 Hrs. 27.3 43.4

L-38, 10 Hrs. 14. 2 28.3
Motored Engine 10.3 24. 2
Power Steering Pump Test 23.2 35.4

Diesel Injector Rig 24. 7 40.4
Kady Mill 16.0 35.9
Sonic Shear 23.8 41. 7
- 28 -
FIGURE I
CORRELATION BETWEEN THE BEST
FLEET DATA AND THE SIX - FLEET AVERAGE
,.
Cl)
/
Cf)
0
..J
4
>- AR0-106 e'
~
-
Cf)
0
0
~ lJ. 3
>
w -0
(!)
~ ~
C\I
2 /.
• ....~,,-REGRESSION LINE
w .:
>
<(
Cl)
u •••
~
w
w
..J
lJ.
I
./
,/
x
Cl) 0 /ffAR0-109
•
0 2 4 3 5
FLEET D VISCOSITY LOSS, cSt,(Q) 210 F
- 29 -
FIGURE 2
DISTRIBUTION OF CAR EFFECT CORRECTIONS
FOR SIX FLEETS
14
13 - -
12 - I
-
II - ,.,.;>., -
10 - ~
'»
~
~
~
,
~
Ny
y,)
-
9 .....
>-)A
>-)A >)? M -
>;' "')? ,,.,>'~
-
) )
>- ·b >y
0
z 8
-,?, ~
)I )
·,
)~
)~
~
-
LIJ y
)
:::>
0
LIJ
7 - ¥
-
Y'
~~
9J ~
~")I
""'
-
0::
6 ..... ~ '> ~)
-
"" ' ,('
.
5 ..... w ~
-
4 ..... I\ -
-
3 - - x -
2 - )I
""'~"
-
- ~" ))
~
~-1
~,('
iv ...,
)~
~~
-
~) >C
... ~~
)(
0
I I
-1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
CAR EFFECT CORRECTIONS, est ((j) 210 F
- 30 -
FIGURE 3
CORRELATION BETWEEN THE BEST POWER
STEERING PUMP TEST DATA AND THE
SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
gf
0
..J
>-
-
t-
C/)
4
AR0-106• •
0
0
Cl)
; LL 3
LL.I 0
(!) -
<t (\J
REGRESSION LINE
a::~ 2
LL.I ,.
> -
<t Cl)
CJ
• •
t-
i.LI
LL.I
..J
~
I
•
-x
Cl)
0
eAR0-109
0 2 3 4 5
POWER STEERING PUMP TEST VISCOSITY LOSS,
cSt,(Ci) 210F
- 31 -
Fl GU RE 4
CORRELATION BETWEEN THE
BEST DIESEL INJECTOR TEST DATA
AND THE SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
,.
(/)
(/)
0
_J
4
>-
t-
AR0-106 e
-
(/)
0
0
Cf) LL 3
-o
>-
(\J
\.Ll
~@ REGRESSION LINE
Q: ,. 2
IJJ -
>(/)
~ u
t-
IJJ
IJJ
_J
LL
I
x
-
(/)
0 •AR0-109
•
0 2 3 4 5
DIESEL INJECTOR VISCOSITY LOSS,
est,@ 2\0 F
- 32 -
FIGURE 5
CORRELATION BETWEEN THE
KADY Ml LL VISCOSITY LOSS DATA
AND THE SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
(/)
..
(/)
0
...J 4
AR0-106 e
>-
....
-
( /)
0
(..) lL
(/)
-o
3 •
>-
w C\I
~@ 2
a: ,.
w - e -L.GRESSION LINE
> (/)
<r u
....w
w
...J
lL
I
)(
./
/-.
(/)
0 eAR0-109
0 2 3 4 5
KADY MILL VISCOSITY LOSS,
est, (0) 210 F
- 33 -
FIGURE 6
CORR ELATION BETWEEN THE
BEST SONIC SHEAR TEST DATA
AND SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
5
en
..
en
0
_J
>-
I-
4
AR0-106
• •
-en
0
0
~ LL 3
>o
-
w C\I
~@ •
0: 2 • REGRESSION LINE
w .:
> en
<( u
•
I-
w
w
_J
LL
x
I
-en
/-. •
eAR0-109
0
•
0 I 2 3 4 5
BEST SONIC SHEAR VISCOSITY LOSS,
est, (Ci) 210 F
- 34 -
Fl GURE 7
CORRELATION BETWEEN MS-VC DATA
AND SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
C/)
.
C/)
0
..J
>-
4
AR0-106
• •
~
-
C/)
0
(J
C/)
u.. 3
-o
./•.•
>-
C\J
l1J
<!>@
a:: ..
<t
2
l1J -
> Cl)
<t u REGRESSION LI NE
._
l1J
l1J
..J
u..
I
••
-x
Cl)
0 Y.AR0-109
0 I 2 3 4 5
MS-VC VISCOSITY LOSS, cSt, (Ci) 210 F
- 35 -
FIGURE 8
CORRELATION BETWEEN L-38 ENGINE TEST
DATA AND SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
5
fl)
..
fl)
0
..J
>- 4
.... AR0-106 . / •
-
f l)
0
0
fl)
-
> ~
3
0
L&J -
(!) (\J
:~,.
L&J
-
2 • • REGRESSION LINE
>
<{
f l)
(.) ••
....
L&J
w
...J
~
x
I
,
•
./
-
fl)
0
/ eAR0-109
0 I 2 3 4 5
L-38 VISCOSITY LOSS, cSt,(Q) 210F
- 36 -
FIGURE9
CORRELATION BETWEEN THE BEST MOTORED
ENGINE TEST DATA AND THE
SIX-FLEET AVERAGE
(./')
..
(./')
0
...J 4
AR0-106 e
....>-
(./')
0
(.)
~ ~
> 0
3 •
LLJ N
-
:@
C)
2
LLJ
> (./')
<( -
0
..
•
REGRESSION LINE
....
LLJ
LLJ
...J
IJ..
x
I
••
(./')
0 /eAR0-109
•
0 2 3 4 5
MOTORED ENGINE VISCOSITY LOSS,
est, (Ci) 210 F
- 37 -
Appendix A
PROGRAM DETAILS
- 38 -
APPENDIX TABLE A-1
AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURE FOR
ASTM REFERENCE OILS (ARO's)
MARCH, 1972
1. Requestor writes a letter to Mechanical Shear Stability Subsection

Chairman* stating the details of a proposed mechanical shear test,
field correlation (if any), and ARO oil requirements.
2. If the request is granted, a letter of approval with an extra copy

is sent to the requestor specifying the amount of each ARO that can
be ordered.
3. The requestor attaches the copy of the approval letter to his

purchase order for the specified ARO's. The purchase order is
to be made out to and sent to SwRI·**· All ARO's will be
billed at $10.00 per gallon FOB San Antonio. Hence, all ship-
ments will be sent freight COLLECT. If air freight delivery is
desired, the purchase order should specify so.
4. SwRI will send a shipping notice to the requestor (with a carbon

copy to the Mechanical Shear Stability Subsection Chairman) and
will bill the requestor accordingly.
* M. F. Smith, Jr.
Enjay Additives Laboratory
P. o. Box 536
Linden, New Jersey 07036
** Southwest Research Institute

8500 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78228
Attn: F. J. Westphal
- 39 -
APPENDIX TABLE A-2
PARTICIPANTS IN ASTM SHEAR STABILITY PROGRAM
Vise.
of Bench Tests Lab. Engine Tests
Cooperating ARO Oil Car New Auxiliary Diesel Steering Sonic Kady Motored 10-Hr. MS
Agency Blending Fleet Oils Stripping Injector Pump Shear Mill Engine --1.::lL vc
Anny
• • •
Cannon
•
Chevron
• • ----------
Chrysler
• • •
Cities
Service •
Dow
• • -----------
DuPont
• •
Es so
• • • •
Esso Pet.
(Ltd.) • • ----
Enjay
• • •
Gulf
• • • • •
Lubrizol
• • • -------------~--- --------
Mobil
• • • •
NRC (Canada)
• •
Rohm & Haas
• • • • •
Sun
• •
SWRI
•
Texaco
• • • •
DATA ANALYSIS PANEL OF
ASTM R&D DIV. VII B-1
R. M. Stewart (Gulf), Chairman

H. R. Stringer (Rohm and Haas)
M. F. Smith, Jr. (Enjay)
- 40 -
APPENDIX TABLE A-3
TEST PROCEDURE FOR VEHICLES
After the test vehicles have been selected, the following steps
should be taken;
Phase I
1. Check each engine for external oil leakage and PCV valve
pluggage.
2. Warm up engine.
3. Drain oil.
4. Replace oil filter with adapter.
S. Charge three quarts of Phase I test lubricant (see Table )

run engine and 10 minutes and drain.
6. Repeat step 5 for second flush.
7. Replace adapter with new oil filter.
8. Charge appropriate number of quarts of Phase I test oil and

check dipstick level.
9. Run vehicle for 1000 miles; take one ounce sample at that
point.
10. Terminate Phase I either at 1500 miles or when one quart low,
whichever occurs first. Bring vehicle in for oil change.
Phase II
Repeat steps 1-10 with following changes:
• Step 3 - save oil drain; record actual drain mileage; vehicle

number and date.
• Steps 5 and 8 - use Phase II test lubricant in place of Phase I

lubricant.
Phase III and IV
• Repeat previous steps substituting proper phase where applicable.

- 41 ~
APPENDIX TABLE A-4.
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON STRIPPING WJ'.TH Ifil.!JAI,.,,,P!,10~@!IB].
Mineral
Spirits Stripping Viscosity 2 cSt.
Added, % Treatment *,'r oc..... 210 F F
Oils* Teme.
--- -100
A None None 13, 63 79.40
A None Stripped 120 D«l3 79.17
A 5 Stripped 120 13" 73 78.85
A 5 Stripped 120 13.73 79.40
B None None 13.86 79.89
B None Stripped 120 14.03 99.75
B None Stripped 100 l.3. 90 98.58
B None Stripped 82 l3o89 98.25
B 5 None 11.33 70.02
B 5 Stripped 120 14.06 99.78
B 5 Stripped 101 13.:>0 98.40
B 5 Stripped 82 13.81 97 .4 7
Used c None Stripped 120 13. 69 85.49
Used c None Stripped 100 13.49 83.45
Used D None Stripped 120 12091 80.40
Used D None Stripped 100 12087 78.28
"' These are not At<.O Reitrt!nce Oils.
** Stripping procedure consisted of reducing absolute pressure to 100 nnn Hg

along with a nitrogen sparge for one hour.
- 42 -
APPENDIX TABLE A-5
METHOD FOR REMOVAL OF FUEL DILUTION FROM USED ENGINE OIL (1)
Apparatus
1. 200 or 250 ml R.B. flask with thermometer well (such as Corning No. 4323
or 93291) •
2. Gas inlet adapter (such as Corning No. 96800 with 24/40 S joint).
3. Thermometer (ASTM 9F with 20 to 230°F. range).
4. Connecting tube (such as Corning No. 8920 24/40 joints).
5. Receiver adapter (such as Corning No. 8946).
6. 200 ml R.B. receiving flask (such as Corning No. 4320).
7. Dry ice trap (such as Corning No. 7728).
8. Manometer (0 to 130 mm).
9. Vacuum pump.
10. Glascol mantle for heating flask.
11. Powerstat.
12. Nitrogen cylinder with valve.
13. Seitz filter with SJlfilter pads.
14. Nitrogen flowmeter for 1.0 g/min rate! 0.1 g/min, which is 860 cc/min
at 760 mm Hg or 6500 cc/min at 100 nun Hg (such as rotameters*).
Procedure
1. Weight 50 g. of well-mixed sample into tared flask, recording weight to
ne a re s t 0 • 1 g •
2. Equip with thermometer, gas inlet tube and heating mantle.
3. Bubble nitrogen through the sample while reducing the absolute pressure
to 100 mm Hg. Nitrogen flow rate must be maintained at 1.0 g/min. ! 0.1
g/min .
4. Heat to 210 ! 2°F. run for one hour at this temperature using special
nitrogen flow rate.
Wt. loss )
5. Reweigh flask and oil (approximate% dilution= 100 x Wt. Sample).
6. Filter oil through 5µ Seitz pad while warm.
7. Determine viscosity of filtered sample at 210°F. and 100°F. and, if
desired, CCS viscosity at 0°F.
*Following rotameters are suitable for operating at 100 mm Hg pressure (e.g.

control valve upstream; no valve between rotameter and sparger):
Max. Air Rate Scale Reading
~ Tube No. Ball cc/min at STP (100 mm Hg)
Brooks R-2-15-B SS 4570 1.0
Fischer & Porter 1/8-25-G-5/54 SS 3660 20.0
(1) Revised 4/14/71.
- 43 -
APPENDIX TABLE A-6
STRIPPING RESULTS ON AR0-100 USING REVISED PROCEDURE {4/1/71}
Viscosit~Results 1 cSt
210°F 100°F
Lab Individua 1 {Mean} Individual (Mean}
Before Stripping
K 11.01
D 11.04 65.94
c 11.13 66.03
11.07 ( 11.10)
After Stripping
A 13.99 97 .75
14 .03 (14.01) 91 .38 (97 .57)
K 13.98 96.8
13.99 ( 13 .99) 97.4 (97 • 1)
B 13.89 97.43
13 .96 (13.93)
D 13 .96 97 .41
13 .89 (13.93) 97.89 (97 .65)
H 13 .90
13 .95 (13.93)
c 14 .17 99 .14
14 .03 98.45
14.04 97. 61
14 .o~ 97.99
14 .10 97 .96
14.08 98.37
14 .27 97 .81
14.04 98 .67
14 .03 99.05
14 .12 98.31
13 .96 98.05
14 .02 98.33
14 .02 (14.07) 98 .13 (98.30)
R* 13.90 99.0
Different Stripping technique, see Appendix A-7.

*
a 44 -
APPENDIX TABLE A-7
§TRIPPING METHOD USED BY LAB R
SUBJECT: STRIPPING OF DILUTED OIL SAMPLES (10% or LESS DILUTION)
EQUIPMENT: Aluminum Evaporating Dishes (4 oz. size)

Forced Air Drying Oven
Mettler Balance
PROCEDURE:
A .. St rippfog_
1 - Weigh aluminum evaporating dish on Mettler Balance.
2 - Add 30 mls of the diluted used oil (approx. 20 grams) to the

dish.
3 - Reweigh to determine weight of oil added. Call this weight

Wu.
4 Place in preheated oven for 4 hours under the following

conditions:
a - Temperature controlled @ 190 F
b - Air Flow - 6 cu. ft. per minute on Precision Scientific
Model 605 oven.
B - To approximate % dilution -
1 - Obtain a sample of the new (not diluted) oil.
2 Prepare a dish as in A-1 and 2.
3 - Reweight the dish to determine weight of new oil added. Call

this weight Wn.
4 - As in A-4, expose the new oil. to the identical stripping

procedure as the used oil.
5 - Reweigh the dishes, calculate the final weights of the new

and used oils. Call the final weight of new oil Xn and the
final weight of the used (stripped) oil Xu.
6 - The% dilution will be:

~ i_Wn-Xn)W~
'(Wu-XEJ ~u !:1?___-} X 100
- 45 -
APPENDIX B
VEHICLE DETAILS
APPENDIX TABLE B-1
CAR DATA - FLEET A
Car Engine Mileage Date of Program Miles on Each Used Oil SamEle Oil ConsumEtion Rate (Miles/Quart}
No. Make CID
f.l'..h @ Start Start Finish Phase I II III IV v Phase I II III IV v
1 Mercury 8 429 11, 735 3/20/70 12/1/70 1,603 5,535 2,100 1,683 1,854 1,358
2 Plymouth 8 383 16,591 4/1/70 11/3/70 1,496 1,501 2,834 2,512 4, 246 2,248
3 Ford 6 200 9,426 4/2/70 11/23/70 1,510 1,524 1,479 19,895 5,974 71,449 "",,'(
4 Dodge 8 383 34,094 3/13/70 8/24/70 1,505 1,451 1,507 1,570 2,184 1,089 1,614
5 Chevrolet 8 350 14,191 3/17/70 12/2/70 1,765 1,584 1,549 3' 646 3,544 2,613 3,084 3,226
..,..
6 Chrysler 8 383 8,043 4/6/70 1/7 /71 1,750 1,453 2,502 2, 716 2,224 2,470 1,579 °'
7 Ford 8 289 27,056 3/18/70 9/4/70 1,554 1,443 10,814 3,844 3,559 7,832
8 Chevrolet 6 250 16, 613 3/18/70 8/7/70 1,506 1,489 1,507 2,617 1,819 2,482 2,742
9 Pontiac 8 428 22,846 3/18/70 6/16/70 1,548 1,651 1,508 1, 719 1,951 1,971 1,636
10 Chevrolet 8 307 22,519 3/6/70 12/30/70 1,508 1,504 1,450 6,133 3,498 3' 749 3,107 3,938
11 Ford 8 302 16,144 3/26/70 9/21/70 1,506 1,458 1,469 3,032 3,616 2,464 19,930
12 Buick 8 350 17,808 3/31/70 11/9/70 1,412 1,504 3,557 2,799 3,005 4,111
13 Rambler 6 232 39,157 3/31/70 7/6/70 1,497 1,530 1,541 4,190 3,949 6,683 4,243
* Oil Consumption Negative 0.445 Lbs,

APPENDIX TABLE 6-2
CAR DATA - FLEET B
Car Engine Mileage Date of nrogram Mile8 on Each Used Oil Sample Oil ConstnnEtion Rate (Miles/Quart}
No. Make Cyl. CID @ Start Start Finish Phase I I! -1!..L IV v Phase I _!l__ III IV v
..., Ford 8 289 50,493 5/5/70 12/11/70 1,420 1,462 1,584 1,4 76
2 Rambler 6 199 33,946 4/14/70 12/15/70 1,494 1,504 1,542 1,554
3 Dodge e 383 16,855 4/14/70 9/22/70 1,532 1,547 1,498 1,498 1,513
4 Buick 8 350 21, 115 4/14/70 S/21/70 1,551 1,632 1,577 1,409 1,7::4
5 Ford 8 289 36,228 4/2fi/70 12/i.6/70 1,492 1,626 1,443 1,467
"'
-..J
6 Oldsmobile 8 425 32,351 4/28/ J 11/30/70 1,511 1,683 1,566 1, 645
7 Plymouth 8 318 23,588 4/28/70 10/?.9/70 1, 564 1,508 1,643 1,527
8 Plymouth 8 318 10,284 4/28/70 9/8/70 1,594 1,735 1,499 1,789 1,493
9 Pontiac 6 230 35,629 5/6/70 12/11/70 1,674 1,618 1,655 1,199
10 Buick 8 340 41,502 5/5/70 12/3/70 1,680 1,475 1,595 1,494
11 Ford 6 200 36,154 5/5/70 11/3/70 1,415 1,497 1,485 1F552
12 Ford 8 289 49,~05 10/13/70 3/8/71 1,501 1,450 1,381 1,627
13 Oldsmobile 8 330 49,360 5/5/70 11/6/70 1,498 1,687 1,474 1,509 1,426
APPENDIX TABLE B-3
CAR DATA - FLEET C
Car Engine Mileage Date of Program Miles on Each Used Oil SamEle Oil ConsumEtion Rate {Mil es /Quart}
No. Make g_y.L_ CID @ Start Start Finish Phase I _..!.!_ __!ll_ _1Y_ v Phase I _..!.!_ III IV v
1 Pontiac 8 326 38,414 6/ll/70 2/17/71 1,574 1,490 1,538 1,531
2 Cadillac 8 429 30,627 5/5/70 12/31/70 1,499 1,501 1,514 1,495 1,484
3 Buick 8 300 36,251 5/12/70 9/14/70 1,489 1,445 1,524 1,507
4 Cadillac 8 472 37,044 5/8/70 7/1/70 1,613 1,468 1,565 1, 536
5 Chevrolet 6 250 59,170 5/4/70 10/15/70 1,623 1,499 1,610 1,607
.,_
6 Lincoln 8 462 45,992 5/ll/70 8/6/70 1,528 1,796 1,501 1,683 00
7 Ford 8 390 49,573 5/5/70 ll/3/70 1,460 1,228 1,447 2,089 2,806
8 Ford 8 302 21, llO 5/6/70 10/16/70 1,492 1,719 1,514 1,471
9 Ford 6 240 60,941 5/7 /70 9/21/70 1,426 1, 549 1, 649 1,511 1,455
10 Dodge e 318 33,291 5/7/70 8/14/70 1,761 1,683 1,848 1,405
11 Chrysler 8 440 22,900 5/6/70 10/5/70 1,498 1,426 1,452 1,530
12 Dodge 8 383 38,467 5/8/70 10/16/70 1,474 1,586 1,525 1,595
13 Rambler 8 290 32,631 5/4/70 11/10/70 1,452 1,508 1,493 1,508 1,508
APPENDIX TABLE B-4
CAR DATA - FLEET D
Car Engine Mileage Date of Proi;;ram Miles on Each Used Oil SamEle Oil Consum2tion Rate {Miles/Quart}
No~ Make £1..h CID @ Start Start Finish Phase I II III IV v Phase I __!.!.__ III IV v
1 Chevrolet 8 283 34,446 4/7 /70 1:'9171 1,357 1,021 1,832 1,438
2 Ford 8 302 17,170 5/12/70 2/::/71 3,530 5 ,340 9 ,340 2,920
3 Oldsmobile 8 455 24,353 4/9/70 8/3(70 964 2,365 4,155 4,340
4 Plymouth 8 383 46,078 4/2/70 9/'..5/70 1,715 2,6C4 1,890 1,364
5 Oldsmobile 8 350 19,083 4/2/70 11/24/70 4, 675 4,350 4,925 4,060

I
.!:-
6. rlymouth 8 318 29,869 4/6/70 11/5/70 3,065 2,494 1,571 2,307 '°
7 Ford 8 390 33,607 4/9/70 10/28/70 1,928 2,123 2.100
e Chevrolet 8 327 16,326 4/7 /70 l?../11/70 2,896 2,058 2,398 2,200
9 Chrysler 8 4!tC 43,398 4/'J/70 1C'/15/70 1,051 1,105 1,546
lC Rambler 6 232 8,214 4/16/70 11/5/70 8,490 2,966 1,612 3,461
11 Oldsmobile 8 330 18,363 4/14/70 4/27/71 7,185 3,280 2,224 4,450
12 Plymouth 6 225 43,389 4/16/70 9/11/70 3,464 3,897 3,062 2,057
13 Ford 8 390 16,543 4/14/70 7/15/70 1,154 1,450 1,850

APPENDIX TABLE B-5
CAR DATA - FLEET E
Car Engine Mileage Date of Program Miles on Fach Used Oil Samnlc Oil Consum12tion Rate {Miles /guar t)
~ Make fyh CID @ Start Start Finish Phase I II ...11.L IV v Phase I _u_ III IV v
1 Chevrolet 8 307 14. 850 5/1/70 9/18/70 1, 563 1, 516 1,461 1,490
2 Chevrolet 6 250 29, 840 5/4/70 8/31/70 1,473 1,516 1,529 1,526
3 Pontiac 8 400 21,170 5/21/70 1,516 1,466 1,719
4 Chrysler 8 383 2,715 5/12/70 9/21/70 1,678 1,235 1,533 1,206
5 Plymouth 8 318 9,950 5/4/70 8/31/70 1, 618 1,456 1,424 1,566
Ul
0
6 Plymouth 8 383 18,670 5/5/70 B/22/70 1,670 1,523 1,501 1,502
Ford 8 289 37,830 5/ 5/70 11/25/70 1,543 1,506 1,444 1,589
8 Rambler 8 343 22,673 6/26/70 12/29/70 1,460 1,452 1,744 1,482
9 Ford 8 302 50,107 7 /2/70 10/21/70 1,521 1,515 1,500 1,480
10 Ford 8 352 50,010 5/5/70 10/10/70 1,414 1,517 1,561 1, 518
11 Chevrolet 8 283 49,615 5/14/70 1/5/71 1,563 1,601 981 1,511
12 Ford 8 289 49,850 5/12/70 11/10/70 1,543 1,515 1,482 1,486
13 Chevrolet 8 283 27,170 5/13/70 12/3/70 1,542 1,514 1,453 1,466

APPENDIX TABLE B-6
CAR DATA - FLEET F
Car Engine Mileage Date of Program Miles on Each Used Oil Sample Oil ConsumPtion Rate (Miles /Quart2
l~o. Make f.tl:. CID @Start Start Finish Phase I _g_ III IV v Phase I II III IV _v__
1 Buick 8 310 49,488 4/22/70 10/7 /70 1,584 1,516 1,519
2 Cadillac 8 390 51, 169 4/2.3/70 9/23/70 1,547 1,120 1,380
3 Rambler 6 195 50,399 4/23/70 10/12/70 1,506 1,524 1,554
4 Dodge 8 318 12,719 4/28/70 9/11/70 1,500 1, 264 957
5 Ford 8 292 2,000 4/28/70 2/21/71 1,488 1,546 1,497
\JI
.....
6 Ford 8 289 so, 167 4/23/70 11/11/70 1,650 1,393 1,572
7 Dodge 8 440 27' 500 4/28/70 8/6/70 1,605 1,517 1,000

8 Chevrolet 8 283 62,232 5/4/70 10/7 /70 1,539 1,518 1,546
9 Plymouth 8 383 14,902 5/4170 11/4/70 1,484 1,464 2, 636
10 Ford 8 302 22,250 5/5/70 9/10/70 1,523 1, 624 1,704
11 Ford 8 390 27,706 5/6/70 11/20/70 1,487 1,503 982
12 Chevrolet 8 350 8,887 5/7/70 2/21/71 766 1,525 1,435
13 Chevrolet 6 292 44,833 5/8/70 5/3/71 1,937 1,524 1,440

- 52 -
APPENDIX C
FIELD TEST VISCOSITY RESULTS

APPENDIX TABLE C-1
FIELD TEST VISCOSITY

------RESULTS
FLEE~(A DRAIN PROCE_SSOR_,_~
ARO 210°F Viscosi~J:'...z_SSt. 100°F Viscosi_~~----

Oil Fresh Oil Phase Phase Phase Phase Phase Phase Phase Phase
No. 210°F 100° F I II III IV I II III IV
101 15.05 86.11 12.89 13 .40 13. 88 13.50 78.48 82.66 83.67 81.59
102 15.02 86. 04 11.43 11.43 11. 78 12. 35 68.71 70.28 71. 54 74.29
103 14.97 97.09 12.71 12.58 13. 23 12. 77 86.58 81.98 88.91 84.10
104 15. 02 109. 2 12.31 12.78 12.26 12. 77 90.31 93.37 89.55 92.47
105 14.70 83.40 10. 74 10.95 10.28 11.04 66.66 67.80 62.05 67. 73
106 15.01 75.82 11. 12 11. 14 11.02 10. 71 64.60 66.05 65.57 62.85
\J1
""
107 15. 15 96.82 12.84 13.15 12.85 12.83 85.81 87.19 86.01 85.09
108 14.98 104.4 12.06 12.46 12.93 12.46 84.51 86. 73 91.08 86. 74
109 15. 23 89.63 14. 63 14.87 15.39 14.75 94. 36 100.5 95.40 98.96
110 15.00 104. 0 14.82 14.80 14.57 13. 96 103.4 103. 9 101.9 97.56
111 10. 99 66.13 10.30 10.29 10.03 9.45 65.30 63.88 62.88 57.50
112 11.05 74.86 10.04 10.43 1o.31 10.27 68.48 71.71 70.63 72. 99
113 6.72 48.15 7.12 6.81 6.80 6.83 53.05 49.18 48.64 49.55
PHASE V
Repeat of cst. 1 @ 1 1 500 Miles
ARO No. Car No. Phase @ 210 F @ 100 F
103 1 III 13.13 88.74
107 5 III 12.88 86.50
112 10 III 10.24 70.18
101 6 IV 13.04 77. 71
APPENDIX TABLE C-2
FLEET A_ DRA I N.J's~oc ES_S QR J -
ARO 210°F V_iscosity~t. - - - 10Q .L_YJ.. ~Sl,!y_,___c~.t-,_ -·---

0
Oil Fresh Oil Phase J>hase Phase Phase Pha!H~ Phase Phase Phase
No. 210°F_ _ _l00° F I II III IV _I_ I I III IV
101 15.07 86.40 12.84 13. 59 13.82 13.55
102 15.00 86.00 11.42 11.39 11. 77 12.24
103 14.98 97.60 12.99 12.47 13. 27 12.82
104 14.87 108.10 12.58 12.70 12.13 12.89

105 14.81 84.20 10.79 11.0i 10.38 11.15
i
106 14.94 75.80 11. 21 11.55 11.06 10. 77
V1
+'-
107 15.12 97.50 12. 71 13.10 12.88 12. 77

108 14.92 104.50 12.02 12.37 12.98 12.36
109 15.23 90.80 14. 71 15.11 14.97
110 15.05 104.90 14.32 14.52 14.46 13.86

111 10.98 66.20 10.29 10.23 10.05 9.74
112 ll.01 74.80 9.96 10.36 10.28 10.25
113 6. 68 48.30 7.06 6.76 7.09 6.82
PHASE V
Repeat of cSt. 1 @ 1 1 500 Miles
103 1 III 13.11

107 5 III 13.02
112 10 III 9.98
101 6 IV 13.03
APPENDIX TABLE C-3
fLE~T B DRAIN PROCESSOR B
ARO 210°F Viscosit~ 1 cSt. 100°F Vis~ositl 1 cSt.

No. 210°F 100°F _ I_ _11_ ....!!L JY._ -~--
_g_ _ _JJL ....lL_
101 15.01 86.03 12.97 13.44 13.29 13.64 76.54 80.71 79.09 83.10
102 14.96 85.74 13.38 10.25 11.06 11.90 86.53 63.58 67 .41 72.13
103 14.88 98.91 14.22 13.48 13.37 13.80 97.55 90.50 89.97 93.15
104 14.95 108.40 12.55 13. 61 12. 67 12.06 92.17 101.60 92.12 88.22
105 14. 78 83.60 10.73 10.86 10.95 11.21 67.53 67.38 68.09 69.92
106 14.90 76.87 11.03 10. 72 11.53 11.53 65.10 66.01 69.92 68.88 VI
VI
107 15.11 97.08 13.04 13.10 12.52 13.47 88.50 87.20 84.57 89.76
108 14.91 106.20 12.38 12.98 12.82 12.69 87.00 92.30 90.93 88.27
109 15.16 90.07 16.31 15.27 15.20 15.59 113.42 101.22 97.45 101.07
110 14.93 102.70 14.75 15. 54 15.22 13.57 104.52 111. 72 108.93 93.39
111 10.95 66.12 10.40 10.62 10.35 10.27 64.50 67.56 65.20 64. 26
112 10.99 74.66 10.28 10.67 10.62 10.82 71.39 74.38 73.49 75.57
113 6.73 48.55 7.01 7.02 6.93 7.12 51.23 51.66 50.80 51. 71
PHASE V
Repeat of cSt. 1 ~ 1 1 500 Miles
102 13 Ill 11.83 71.26

104 4 II
107 8 I 13. 59 91.49
111 3 IV 10.19 64.11
APPENDIX TABLE C-4
FU:_!._!~_'..fEST JJSCOS ITUJ~SULTS
FT.EE't' I ORA lll~~o_g_~g; OR A
ARO ~_1J_0°F Visc~sity, cSt. 100°F ytsc~s_!!y, cSt.

No. 210°F ].00°P I II III IV I II _JJ_I_ ~
101 15.05 86.11 12.88 13.42 13.29 13.62 74.98 80.02 78.64 82.59
102 15.02 86.~ 13.43 10.18 10.89 11.93 86.46 62. 77 66.79 72.10
103 14.97 91'.9' 14.18 13.42 13.46 13. 72 97.16 89.70 89.67 93.41
104 l!.02 lQf.2 12.74 13.55 12.58 12.28 94.39 100.8 91.24 88.43
105 14. 70 83.40 10. 69 10.78 10.90 11.10 67.36 66.59 67.34 68.99
\J1
106 15.01 75.82 11.12 11.21 12.06 11.36 64. 54 67.03 70.75 67.41 °'
107 15.15 96.82 13.12 13.08 12.38 13.53 88.19 86.29 82.13 90.07
108 14.98 104.4 12.33 13.08 12.70 12.59 85.69 92.51 88.89 86.95
109 15.23 89.63 16.12 15.16 14. 97 15.12 115.1 101.0 95.55 97.67
110 15.00 104.0 14. 67 15.56 15.23 13.15 104.1 111. 22 108.2 88.04
111 10.99 66.13 10.44 10. 73 10.36 10.26 64. 78 67. 63 64.79 63. 67
112 11. 05 74.86 10.28 10.29 10.58 10.83 71.12 70.16 72. 62 75.17
113 6. 72 48.15 7.00 7.01 6.90 7.09 50.74 51. 56 50.52 50.93
PP.ASE V
Repeat of cSt. 1 @ 1 2 500 Miles
ARO Ne. Car No. Phase @ 210 F @ 100 F
102 13 III 11.66 69.78

104 4 II 13.81 103.1
107 8 I 13.60 91.05
111 3 IV 10.20 63. 66
APPENDIX TABLE C-5
FLEETC DRAIN PROCESS01i...£._
ARO 210°F ViJ;cositX 1 cSt. 100° F Viscositx. cg_. _____

No. 210°F 100°F I II _ill_ _.JL_ _I_ II -~lL IV
101 lS.24 86. 72 13.18 13.24 13.07 14.4S 78.97 79. 76 78.69 87.18
102 lS.06 86.01 12.42 11. 78 12.32 12.46 74. so 71.40 73.86 7S.62
103 14.91 97.62 13.93 13.60 12.94 13.78 92.89 89.04 8S.23 92.69
104 lS.06 108.9 13.49 13.SS 12.68 12.87 97.S4 98.13 91.01 92.62
lOS 14.74 83.41 11.98 11.01 ll.S3 12.06 7S.OO 66.43 68.74 74.76
106 lS.00 76.08 ll.S8 12.S4 11. 76 10.93 68.6S 73.S3 69.36 64.12 \JI
.....,
107 lS.14 97.39 13. 26 12.98 13. 69 12.87 87. 73 8S.49 90.S3 84. 78
108 14.99 lOS.O 12.80 13.15 13.93 12.13 90.88 93.37 99.67 83.96
109 lS.31 90.76 17.16 lS.76 14.66 14.02 120.00 104.8S 93.27 93.94
110 14.94 104.6 14.48 16.19 lS.lS 13. 71 100.S 116.2S 108.2 9S.63
111 11.03 66.13 10. 36 10.20 10.46 10.S7 63.6S 63.62 6S.1S 64.46
112 11.06 7S.02 10.68 10.03 11.42 10.S8 73.18 69.87 81.83 73.11
113 6.77 48.4 7 7.11 6.98 6.86 6.8S so. 72 S0.09 48.8S 49.01
PHASE V
ABO Ng. Car No.

Re~eat
hase
of cSt.
@ 21 0~ 1 1 500 Miles
@ IOU F
102 7 IV 11. 76 73.78

104 10 IV 13.27 9S.20
108 13 IV 12.18 84.91
110 2 IV 14.41 96.31
APPENDIX TABLE C-6
FIELD TEST VISCOSITY RESUJ.TS
FLEET C DRAIN PROCESSOR D
I.RO 210°F Viscosity 2 cSt. 100°F Viscosit~ 2 cSt.

!_1£.!_
!.01
210"F
15.01
100°F
86.10
-I
12.94
II
13.07
III
12.90
IV
14.55
I
77.67
II
78.27
III
77.01
IV
87.66
102 14.97 85.95 12.15 11. 73 12.36 12.58 73.17 71.16 74. 70 76.59
103 15.01 97.92 13.87 13.48 12.75 13.80 93.00 88.44 84.06 92.16
l.04 14. 94 i08.78 13.41 13. 53 13.02 13.18 97.44 99.30 94.92 94.86
VI
105 14.91 83.73 11.87 10.93 11.20 12.03 74.16 66.78 67.86 74.64 Q)
1.06 14. 97 75. 72 11. 77 12.58 11.80 10.85 67.95 73.95 69.33 63.99
107 15.13 97.60 13.27 13.05 13.40 12.35 88.08 86.01 87.09 80.37
108 14.94 104.40 12. 71 13.10 13.93 12.54 88.86 92.91 99.18 87.36
109 15.18 90.30 16.86 15.37 14.31 14.34 116. 50 97. 77 88.56 93.90
110 15.00 104.55 14.51 15.98 15.16 12. 71 100.30 116.40 107.00 83.25
111 10.99 66.15 10.37 10.21 10.41 10.40 63.84 63.36 65.19 64.14
112 11.02 74. 76 10.55 10.18 11.38 10.50 72. 72 70.53 81.39 72.06
113 6. 72 48.39 6.65 6.80 6.69 6.85 48.90 48.57 47.43 49.24
APPENDIX TABLE C-7
FIELD TEST VISCOSITY RESUIXS
FLEET C DRAIN PROCESSOR K
ARO _ _ 210°F Viscositv 7_..£§._t. 100°F Viscosit~ 1 cSt.

No. 210°F 100°F __I_ II III IV I II _III IV
101 15.0S 85.8 13.13 13.07 13.04 14.44 78.6 78.7 78.1 86.5
102 15.06 86.1 12.31 11.68 12.19 12.43 73.8 71.0 73.5 75.0
103 14.87 97.8 13.77 13.42 12. 76 13. 67 92.8 88.3 84.3 91.9
104 14.90 108.8 13.31 13. 57 12.66 12.49 97.2 99.7 92.0 88.6 V't
105 14.58 82.8 11.86 10.90 11.27 12.01 74.3 66.1 68.2 74.7 '°
106 14.91 75.5 11.50 12.43 11.69 10.92 68.4 73.4 69.0 63.9
107 15.04 96.9 13.16 12.92 13.67 12.89 87.5 85.0 91.3 86.4
108 14.90 104.3 12.66 13.10 13.92 12.21 90.6 93.5 100.6 85.1
109 15.17 90.3 17.03 15.56 14. 61 14.07 123.2 104. 7 93.1 93.1
110 14.95 104. 3 14.40 15.81 15.07 13.60 101.0 115.9 107.5 93.5
111 10.88 65.8 10.33 10.19 10.30 10.41 63.8 63.4 64.9 64.1
112 10.99 74.8 10. 55 10.07 11.37 10.52 72.5 69.4 81.8 72.5
113 6.66 48.12 7 .03 6.89 6.91 6.83 50.4 49.68 48.97 48. 77
APPENDIX TABLE C-6
FIELD TEST VISCOSITY ~ESULTS
fl&!LU DRAIN PROCESSOR D

------·----
ARO 210°1" Viscosi!iJ_cSt. __ · - - __ _!_90°F Vis5osi_t.:_y_,_c_St. _
No. 210°F 1C'.:1°F I II III IV I II III IV
--- -- ---- --- ----
101 15.01 £6.10 12.96 12.95 13.22 13.05 77 .22 76.92 79.35 78.57
102 14.97 85.95 11. 61 11.69 12.18 11. 77 71.30 70. 53 73.77 73.08
103 15.01 9;. 92 12.82 13.24 12.78 13.24 84.90 88.98 84.00 88.10
104 14. 94 108.78 12.29 12.56 12.20 13.40 88.08 89.40 87.90 98.73
°'
0
105 14.91 83.73 10.39 10.28 10.98 10.76 62.76 63.18 68.79 65.91
106 14.97 75. 72 11. 58 11. 28 11.05 10.83 67.29 68.94 64.80 63.60
107 15.13 97.60 12.81 13.14 12.88 12.97 83.97 88.35 85.02 86.19
108 14.94 104.40 12.61 12.59 12.92 12.89 89.18 87.66 92.00 90.40
109 15.18 90.30 14.01 15.82 15.83 14.01 86.76 105.70 103.08 89.60
110 15.00 1C4.55 13.95 14.47 15.00 13.93 96.30 101.19 105.42 97.30
111 10.99 66.15 9.87 9.96 10.65 10.49 60.06 61. 95 68.85 65.67
112 11.02 74.76 10.38 9.80 10.19 10.12 71.31 65.55 69.81 68. 64
113 6.72 48.39 6.76 6.92 6.85 6.61 48.00 50.13 48.99 46.29
APPENDIX TABLE C-9
FIELD 1' EST VISCOSITY RESULTS
FLEET ...Q DRAIN PROCESSOR c
ARO 210°F Viseositvz eSt. lOO'F Viscoslty 2 eSt.

Oil Fresh Oil Phase Phase rhase Phase I'hase Phase Phase Phase
No. 21CcF 100°F I _g_ III IV IV
-- --- I II -1.!.L
101 15.24 86. 72 13.12 13.22 13.33 13.27 77 .84 79.18 80.88 80.78
102 15.06 86.01 11.64 11.82 12.37 11.82 72. 27 71.38 74.34 73.65
103 14.91 97.62 12.88 13.22 13.06 13.04 85.67 89.48 86.00 86.94
104 15.06 108.9 12. 50 12.81 12.27 13.43 91. 78 94.21 87. 71 98.84 '
"'......
105 14.74 83.41 10.89 10.38 11.16 10.85 66.74 64. 62 65.88 66.52
106 15.00 76.08 11. 35 11.40 11.00 10.86 67 .45 71.21 69.44 63.11
107 15.14 97.39 13.07 13.28 12.92 13.16 87.57 89.67 85.37 87 .43
108 14.99 105.00 12.73 12. 72 13.02 12.94 91.10 88. 64 93.63 90.70
109 15.31 90.76 14.22 16.10 16.06 14.17 90.99 110. 92 107 .2 91.95
110 14.94 104. 60 14.31 14.58 15.11 14.04 99.64 102.5 106.1 98.59
111 11.03 96.13 11.27 9.99 10.67 10.60 64.19 62.24 69.41 66.15
112 11.06 75.02 10.49 9.99 10.30 10.29 72. 26 67.49 70.33 71.02
113 6.77 48.47 6.90 6.80 6.87 6. 77 49.32 48.82 49.14 48.09
APPENDIX TABLE C-10
FLEET D DRAIN ,!'ROCESSOR G
ARO 210°F Vi~eosity, eSt. 100°F \'.'_i_s...::csity, eSt.

No. 210°F 100°F I II 111 IV I II 111 IV
---·
101 15.01 86.10 12.99 13.lO 13.22 13.88 77.70 78.6C 79.38 80.64
102 14.97 85.95 11.64 11. 66 12.13 11.65 69.63 68.53 74.07 70.91
103 15.01 97.92 12. 72 13.24 12. 77 12.98 84.30 88.80 84.70 85.95
104 14.94 108.78 12.43 12.70 12.03 13.37 90.18 91..44 86.61 98.58 O'\
N
105 14.91 83.73 10.65 10.34 10.99 10. 72 65.40 63.24 69.30 65.74
106 14.97 75.72 11.53 10.97 11.03 10.78 65.26 64.89 62.79 62.55
107 15.13 97.60 13.02 13.12 12. 71 13. 05- 86.61 89.85 84.75 86.67
108 14.94 104.40 12.69 12.61 13.10 12.87 89.88 81.75 94.86 90.39
109 15.18 90.30 14. 64 16.04 16.16 13.99 88.56 102.3/ 100.66 88.91
110 15.00 104.55 14.14 14.46 14.92 13. 96 98.70 101.40 104.80 97.59
111 10.99 66.15 10.01 9.90 10.66 9.90 62.16 61.65 69.09 61.80
112 11.02 74.76 10.42 9.86 10.18 10.22 71.64 66.21 69.42 70.47
113 6. 72 48.39 b.75 6.89 6.80 6.65 47.31 49.98 48.69 46.92
APPENDIX TABLE C-11
FIELO n:sr VISCOS !TY RESULTS
FLEET E DRAIN PROCES5:__0R 1_
ARO 210°F Viscosit~z cSt. l00°F Viscositi 1 cSt.

Oil Fresh _Oil Phase: Phase Phase Phase Phase Phase Phase Phase
~ 210°F 100°F _I_ ...!.!__ -11.L IV I _!.L_ -1!L _!Y_ _
101 15.10 87.00 13.31 13.64 12.80 13.26 79.4 81.1 74.8 80.0
102 14.99 86.60 11. 57 11. 78 11.61 10.78 70.0 71.3 68.5 63.7
103 15.07 98.70 13.01 12.54 13.91 13.50 87.5 80.6 96.7 90.6
104 14.99 105.50 12.41 12.95 13.09 12.64 89.4 94.6 95.0 89.1
105 14.96 84.80 10.43 10.92 9.53 10.29 66.6 67.2 58.2 64.8
106 14.94 76.90 10.98 10.99 11.09 10.10 66.8 63.8 66.7 60.5 a-
U>
107 15.16 96.90 12.31 13.31 13.04 11.80 81.0 90.3 86.8 75.6
108 14.96 105.40 12.80 12.78 11.68 12.06 90.4 93.8 79.5 82.1
109 15.25 90.50 15.81 15.05 15.60 15.30 109.0 93.6 98.4 95.4
110 15.00 104.80 14. 22 14.93 15.15 14.74 101.2 106.6 108.0 103.2
111 10.99 67.30 10.14 10.08 10.55 62.3 64. 2 67.6
112 11.01 76.00 10.07 10.05 10.43 10.13 67.7 68.5 72.1 69.8
113 6.77 50.30 6.84 6.87 6.80 6.89 51. 6 49.2 48.4 49.4
PHASE V
Repeat of cst. 1 @ 1 1 500 Miles
105 6 I 10.41 63.50

109 9 II 14. 64 92.70
112 10 III 10.17 70.40
113 1 I 6.85 48.90
APFE~DlX TABLE C-12
!~.ELD TE~r VISCOSITY REStn.TS
FLEE1.:..!_ DRAIN PROCESSO~_Q_
ARO 210°F Viscosit~ 2 cSt. __ _!.Q_0° F yiscosit:_y...z......£.~---·-

No. 2l0°F -·-1ooc F I II III IV I II III IV
--- ---
101 15.01 S6.10 13.27 13.63 12. 68 13.24 79. 77 81.36 75.15 79.59
102 14.97 85.95 11. so 11.85 11. 62 10.94 69.66 71. 25 69. 72 65.34
103 15.01 97.92 13.02 12.54 13.99 13.67 87.42 80.82 93.70 91.95
104 14.94 108.78 12.41 12.99 13.14 13.83 89.67 94.38 95.37 101.79
105 14.91 83. 73 10.39 10.91 9.36 10.36 63.33 67.08 56.40 66.12 0\
~
106 14.97 75. 72 10.81 10.79 11.11 10.65 65.61 62.88 66.39 64.47
107 15.13 97.60 12.34 13.33 13.16 12.14 81.18 90.48 86.91 79. 77
108 14.94 104.40 12. 71 12.78 11.81 12.28 89.52 89.46 81.18 84.27
109 15.18 90.30 15.61 15.22 15. 65 15.47 110.91 94.41 101.8 98.00
110 15.00 104.55 14.33 14.94 14. 72 14.75 98.62 102.41 104 .35 99.41
111 10.99 66.15 10.09 10.04 10.58 9. 24 62.49 64.17 65.13 56.01
112 11.02 74. 76 10.02 9.98 10.47 10.12 66.43 67. 68 73.11 69.57
113 6.72 48.39 6.83 6.77 6.78 6.90 49.74 48.39 48.90 49.71
APPENDIX TABLE C-13
1"1E1=°-. TEST VISCOSITY RE~lTLTS_
F L~'§..T_t DRAIN PROSESSOR H
ARO 210°F Viscosity, cSt. 100°F Viscos~_£_g_! _ _ _ _

No. 210°F 100°F I II III IV __
I __ II III IV
-·--
101 14.98 86.60 13.79 14.29 13.99 13.06 87.50 89.09 85. 77 80.21
102 15.18 86.10 13.06 13.02 12.63* 11.81 73.17 80.19 75. 23i< 72.33
103 14.91 97.70 12.85 12.80 14. 73 12.50 87.09 83.53 101.46 79.68
104 15.02 108.38 12.99 13.18 14.11 12.56 95.92 96.21 105. 71 91.51
105 14.89 85.05 ll.11 9.97 10.89 11.17 71.40 57.70 67.14 68.51
°'
VI
106 15.06 76.08 10.82 10.95* 11.43 10.61 66.51 64.95* 65.78 62.55
107 15.16 97.22 13.43 13.11 12.20 12.97 90.18 95.06 80.20 90. 75
108 14.87 104.59 12.19 12.61 12.27 12.36* 84.86 89.07 86.15 86. 69*
109 15.20 90.98 15.10 14.61 14.69 16.65 95.50 94.02 94.88 117. 21
110 15.05 104.27 14.40 15.08 14.20 15.93 102.50 105.30 98.65 115.57
111 10.89 66.98 10.16* 9.95 10.64 9.89 62.34* 62.73 64.54 59.75
112 11.06 74.60 10.27 10.34* 10.44 10.32 69.57 70.82* 73.03 69.85
113 6. 72 48.37 7.37 6.78 7 .37 7.54 55.07 47.03 49.03 53.60
* Missing Data Filled in by Method of Cochran and Cox, Experimental Designs, Second Edition.
- 66 ..
APPENDIX D
ANALYSIS OF FIELD TEST DATA

APPENPIX D
TABLE D·l
DRAIN PROCESSOR A
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
210'F Vis, Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles 210'F Viscosity Losses est. After 1500 Miles
~
I II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 12)
~
.n 1.n
1
2
-0.40
2.16
1. 65
3.59
-··-- -
1. 74
2. 76
--
--
0.48
1.o4- ·-
----
1 _L_6,5_ - -·- - - -
2 2.16 3.59
l·. 74 ·- ----
2. 7_6
----
--· - -
-
--- - -
- - - - >--- -----
- - - - · - - - - - - 0 4A
----- ---- - - __ 1, Qi, __
' 1.7
9. 55
3 3. 59 2.39 4.42 1. 54 3 i - - - - - - ~_SJ__ 2,39 __4.M__ 1 .54 11. 94
4 z. Zb z.z4 3.9~ 0. 78- - - 4 - --2:26- - -2.-24 3.~L_ ...________ ____ n 7A 9. 27
r--
5 2. 71 3. 75 2.30 -0.11 5 2. 71 3. 75 2 1n -n. II 8. 65
-·- - - - - - f - -
~I
3. 96
3.89
2.31
3. 87
2.00
2. 52
2. 05
-o. 16
0.43
1. 55
2.6_7__
2. 20
6
~=i_
1.55 ·--
2. 67
- ----
--- ~- _2_._.w -
- - - -3.96
-·----
3.87 -- __2,~_
- _l._!!L_ f---2_.00 - - - - --
- 2_.?_1__ 2. 52
.n,.
;,~
11.43
8.40
7 .46
9 2.92 0.36 0.96 2. 25 9 ,__-2.-25-_.- --2.92 0.36 0.96 6.49
- - - - ------- - - ~
10 u.ou u.w U, /4 j, •• -10 _ _J,M_ __ 0.60 0.20 o. 74 5. 20
----- - - - - ----
11 0.18 0. 70 -0.08 4.30 11
f-------- - - - - - · - - - -
_4.30__
--
0.18 o. 70 -0.08 5.10
12 o. 69 0.62 1.17 2. 32 12 1.17 - _l_,__li __ - - · - - 0. 69 o. 62 4.80
~:24
i----- - - e--------
~-t --
13 1.01 -0.09 3. 24 2. 52
Tj (3)
13
6.53 13.09 a. 59 9. 96 15. 79 I 16,05
2. 52 1.01 -0.09 •••
23.80 23. 56
-· --t---- - _ _8__.9~ 10.01 1. 28 1. 85 3.89 3.15 -0.68 (4)98.44
Aj (1) '""" 25. 20
--·- --·- - -- - - - - ·-
~1-o4 ~r
--~
- - - SV'TT<\N ' - OILS I

SECTION 4 101 102 103 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 0\
Source s s
.u..tvsrs OF VARIANC
D.F IM,.,an Sn " Ratio
1
2
3 47
9. 55
- - - ML
9. 55 9. 55
-
3_47
9. 55
1.47
- --r
(11) Phases o. 2862 3 o. 0954 2,8392 3 -u.94 ~ 11-:-94- - - - - - -11.94 - 11.94
f----· --- f----·--- ---
(12) Cars Adj, 2.8142 12 E• 0.2345 6.9791 4 9, 27 9. 2_7__ - - - - ~_,n_ 9.27
(13) Oils 89.7526 12 7 4793 222.5982. 5 8. 65 __8.~ 8. 65 a. 65
(14) Error 0,8082 24 E. 0,0336 "'' 6 11.43 ~-
11.43 __ _ 1~ - · · 11.43
( 5) Total 93. 6612 51 !51 7 ~,_4-0 8.40 8,40 8.40
-~~-46 ...
-~
- 8 ~.
7 .46 7.46 7 .46
Uncorre ted Sum f Sq. 280.0156 9 6.49
-- ~-
6.49 6.49 6.49

10 5.20 s. 20 5.20 s.20
- -
Correct on Term c - 186,3544 11 5.10 s.10 5.10 5.10
12 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80
a • E>-·E· f r lh..'E""' 13 6.68 6. 68 6.68 6.68
39 Eb Bi (6) 29. 25 36. 57 32, 14 33. 96 37. 22 34.20 29 .31 32.06 23. 56 27. 31 28. 33 25. 95 23.90
µ.,
- 0 2345 o. 0136
9 .1455
(7) 58. 77 117.81 77 ,31 89,64 142.11 144.45 80.37 90.09 11. 52 16. 65 35.01 28. 35 -6.12
Lv
- 0,0219 (Car Cori ection
Factor)
(8\
(9)
351. 00
295. 32
438.84
295. 32
-385.68
295, 32
407. 52
295. 32
446. 64
295. 32
410.40
295.32
351. 72
295. 32
384. 72
295. 32
282.72
295. 32
327. 72
295. 32
339. 96
295. 32
311.40
295. 32
286.80
295. 32
Wi(lO) 3.09 -25. 71 -13,05 -22.56 -9. 21 29 .37 23.97 o. 69 24.12 -15. 75 -9. 63 12. 27 2.40
y 6. 59 76 12.5270 8, 3043 9 .4660 15. 5884 16. 6900 9.4549 10. 0251 1.8082 1. 5051 3. 679 2 3.4187 -0. 627 5
Correct• d Ava. Vlsc, Los a~ s I Yi/4) 1. 65 3.13 2,08 2. 37 3. 90 4 17 2. 36 2. 51 0.45 0.38 0.92 0.85 -0.16
uncorre l'"C::U AVI• v~1c. l.IUll aea Raw Ava. ) 1. 63 3. 27 2, 15 2.49 3. 95 4.01 2.23 2.50 0 32 0.46 0.97 o. 79 -0.17
* ~igni ~icant 4t tha ,,~ 'onfidenc e level.

APPENDIX D
ANALYSIS OF FIELD.i:EsT DATA
DRAIN PROCESSOR J
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
210°F Vis. Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles 210°F Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles
,,_~I....,..,--.,..--,-II.,...,..__,.......,~I~I~I--..-~I-V,..,...--.~--~.....,.1~0~1-~-l·0-2_ ___,__:1~0~3~-..--1~04~___,__:1~0~5-~-~1~0~6-~_;:10~7:_____,__~1~0~8~~~10~9;.,__~-~1~10:_~__:1~1~1-~_;:1~12:_~__,,.:l:.;:13 _ __ (~ _
~-_o::.:·c.;3c:::8-+-7
1.,_.4"'8._+--__.,1::.:.-=17
1_1-_;..:.o. 26
·--· ___!____~_._4~-~- _ i. 71 ____ . o. 26 -o. 38 3. 01
2.23 3.61
2.74 l.f9 <---· 2 2.23 3.61 2. 74 - _J.tl2._ Q 77
3 3.58 2.51
4.43- -Li4 -- 3 3.58 2.51 _. 4.~3 __ , ___ --+-------+-----+-----+--- ---+---1~·~2~4-+---_---+-----<+--1_1~.1_6----<
4 1.--'1~·~9~9-+-.=-2:_.1~7~--+-~3~·.=-8=8_.__=0.76 4 ·1:99- 2.17 3.8~~-- 0.76 8.80
2.29 3.74 2.24 -0.14 5 _ _?_.29 3.74 --+~2~.2"4'-+----f-----+----+----+----f---0~.~1~4--111--c=8:_.l~3'--I
._4_._0_2_ _..__3_.3_9_ __,___1_._9_4_.___1._5_2_ _,,___---=
6 - _____l._g_ ~ _____ . 4.02 3.39 1.94 10.81
~I
._3_._7_3_+-_2_.0_2_-+--_o_._0_<>**_+--_2._1_6_ _.. ____ ~1_1__+ --~ 2.76- __ ~--- _3_._7_3 __ ~_2.02 __ o_.o_~ 8.51
~2,_..~4'=1-+-~2~.5"'5:-----+---;o,.,.~5~9-f--~2.~1~6:-----_.__-·_u_l,8----+--- ~ ,!6 ____ ·--- ____ _ ?. 4_1 __ ~-· 5_5_t-------+~:__o-~.~5-~9-_-_--;_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_.-1-_-_-_-_-_-_-_--;_-_-_-_-_-_-_--:._+-_-~-7~.~71~~'
9 J---2_._9_0_+-_o_.1~2-+--_o_._9_3_+-_1_.9-8--1--_.1- _ _ _ _ .____ ___ ~- _ _ _ _ __1_,J8 _ -'-------- -----+~2~·~9-'-o-f---'-o~.1~2~+----f--=0·~90.03~+----f------+~5~·9~3,__
10 J---o--'.'-5_2_+-_o_.2_3_+--_o_._1_3_+-_3_.6_6_-1-----'1~0-+----+- _ _ __ ___ __ :i_,_~"6'-~-----+----+----1-----'o'-'-•.o.5_..2~_,,_o._,.2"3'---1------1-o"-•._,1_,,3:--.--1-------1-5,__,._.1"4---i
11 ._o_._1_3_+-_o_.1_5_ __.__-_o_._4_1_t--4_.1_1_ _,____1~1'-'-----+ ________ -· ______ ~--- . . 4_._1_7_ __ ~-·-·~--1------4f------+-'o-'-. .cc73"-+--0-.,.,_,7,=-5_+-_ ___,_---'o,.,.""4.=-1__,f-"-5"'.2"'4'---I
12 0.69 0.65 1.25 2.35 12 1.25 2.35 0.69 0.65 4.94
13 i.os -0.08 3.23 2.56 13 3.23 .- - - -·-- '-------· - l 2.56 1.05 -0.08 6.76
I
l-"'25'-'-'7-"6-+--"2~3Ll.,4'--+-'2,.3~2=6--1_,2,,,4c._.4"-7'---+-T=-'',_,(-'-3"-)-+___c_6.c.:4,_~8'-__-_ ~3.1.8 - - :_~~37 _- ~~=-t1~;=-_r~5-:!' -r~~02 __._9U--l--2·7_4--+_3_,_.-'-6=1__f--3.C.."'1~9-+---Cl~.o.1 (4)96-:·63-

__=9_.9_5_-_-_-+-·--u-
SECTION4 - - - + - - - - + - - - - - + - t SECTION 3 ~- OILS- ----+----f------t----+----+------4----1
1---s-.-s""'.~
""-~2.~i!o;~~O:!'.,FM..::.~~l!ln~IANC
2sn~.<.!E;...-F-R_a_t_i_o+------1~10l- -1~-- - ~03 - - i~ - 1-.;~ · h-0~6--+--10-7--l--l~0-8--+--10~9---+--1-1~0--l--1~1-1--rr2---+--1~1~3---+------<
Source
-(1-1_,.).,.P"'h"'a"'s""es-- 0.3467 3 0.1155 3.8245• 1 3.0_7__ ----· 3.07 + I J.u1 3.07
(12) cars Adj.
(13) Oils
>-2~·~84~2=6---1-=1=2~E~h·-t--~0=·=23=6~8-+-_7~·~84=10.c.-i---~'._.~9~'·=7~7->-~9~.7~7_4 _ -=--~.Ti-4
86.5085 12 7.2090 238.7086 o 11.76-+11.76 --
- \ -----+------4--·
TC76 I--
9. 77
----+----+-----t--.,~,.~,.--+-----t-----+-----<
~l~~ ;:;:~
9 ~:~:~ ~~ Ee
"-"-'=='-+-=----1----->------l---~--1--1-0-.-8-7-
0.0302 4 =-~-~=~~!<J-~~~ r~.l3 $-8~B~0-+---.--+----f-----+----+----+-~8-.-8~0-f---.-1J--+----1
- · - - - - - ' - - - - \ 10.87 -10.87
8 13 10.87
0
~:::u;_:n~c~or::;r;_::e;c;_:t~ed~::;s~...
;:;:o;_::f;::~s:::a;-:.::::::~2~69;_:.::;9::;5~8;-:7:::::~::1::::::::::~~===--+-----"-8".5,_,1,__-_--I----_-_--_-+------ - - - - · - - -a:sr- 8. 51 8. 51
l-,---+.-~-+-~-~j_---f--U-J-=--.+----f------f--'7~·~7:_1__;1_. ___ _J__. ___-+-----j-~7~.~71::_+--7~.~7~1-1-----~--+-'-·-'-'-+-~~-+----f------+---~
._c_o_r_re_c_t-1-1-·o_n_T_e_rm_._~_ _ _~1~79_._5_64_5_.__~9_._ _ _-+-----+-----~~---+-----+---~-::c5.~9:.::3_+-~5~.~93;.--1---_~-+--=5~·9~1J::_-1---~~-+-----l-----J
10 --+------1----'-'_-5.14_+-----t----+-----1----5-._1_4--+--5._1_4--1----+---5-._1_4--1----+----~
-A-. ._.,Eb,,_-_,E.,e'-+--_-,f_-::oro._+=:i>:"'-":.='E"'---o--1---'l'-'1--1------1------1-----~-----1-- 5.24 5.24 5. 24 5.24
l------1"3..,·9~E..,b,_--t----+----+----'1"2--l--4:.:.__:9_4~-1----- . ----~ ·---->-------1- _ 4. •4 4. 9-4--+--4-.-94_ __,___ _ _,__ __,
13 6.76 b./b 6.76 6. 76
-A- 0.2368-0 0302
<------+----9_._23_.·$,_2_ ___,_ _ _--1---~( 16~·)'--'~2~8~.-'-6=5--l-~3.~~~-32. 63 35. 90 33. 42 29.29~1.27 22.65 27.86 27. 87 25.64 23.20
----t------<
~ 0.0223 ~'(Car Cor,ect:ci.,o"'n'--+--.,._(7'-')'---!_5::c8"'.--'j-=2-i-:1:.::l=-8.c..6:.c2=--+75.33 82.62 142.65 136.53 81.18 89. 55 8.10 24. 66 32.49 28. 71 -9.09
Factor) ---------------
7
- - : ------,------ -
'8' 343. 80 441. 60 3 76. 08 . 3g1:561+30. aQ4oi. 04 351.;;a-37-5~.-2;:4_--+_27~1~·~8_0---t-_3--_3-4_-~·"'3_2'_:_-.=_:3:_-3cc4-=-·-=-44-=--=--=+~3-;_o-7~-·~-6~8-=--=-:-2_7-:_8-:_.-4_:0~---j+---_-_-_:_:_----lj
,' - - - - , -'
(9) 289. 89 289. 89 2·8--9-.89 -289.
89 -r~-9 289. 8--9----1--28..9.. 89 -+--'_H•_._H_•--+<_o_,_._
H•--+- 89_,_'_"'-·8_9--+------<
<o>_·_·H_•--+-<_o,_.H_•--+-'"'-·-
-· ::--_J_-_·-~- -~-+-------tw--1<_1_0_)--+---4-.4-1-+_-3_3__-09---1--10. 86 -19. 05 i. 74 25.38 . 19'-.~5=9- 4-4~.~2~0-r--,2~6-.=19~-+---~19~.~7~7-r--~1~2.o~o--+-1-0.=
9z->-~,.. 4~0--+--
----T--- - r
I y, 6.5783 12.4421 8.1279 8.7552 15.8888 15.7359 9.4568 10.0436 1.4840 2.2992 3.3411 3 .4JJ5 -o. 9>00
,.. ___ --t-' A•c Vise. i osses y,/4) 1.64 3.11 2.03 2.19 3.97 3 .93 z ,. U.Oi U.!14 U.HO_
n ... ,. .... , 1¥ACte.d Al- Vise. Losses Raw Ava. 1. 62 3.30 2.09 2.30 3.96 3. 79 2.26 2.49 0.23 0.69 0.90 0.80 -0.25
* Si2n ficant a
** Miss ng Data
APPENDIX D
DRAIN PROCESSOR B
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
~ OILS
II Ill IV 101 102 103 104 lOS 106 107 (2)

-u.,.
~
1. S8
0.66
4.71
l.40-
1.34
1.)/
2. 28
3.83
3.37
-U.43_
l.>l
1.36
0.68
0.17
~ 1. S7
2.~ 4, 71
.1_. S8
o.
l
1. Sl
1.40
66
2. 28
3.83
1- 3. 37
2.36
7 &o
4
2.40 3. 92 2:59-- - -0.40
4
s
··t' - 1.34
2.40 3. 92 -- __2,S9
S.S4
2.09 --1.37- ~~
~I
4.0S 4.18 1.37_ ( 4.0S [--::_;::18- t1 60
3.87 2.01 ~().04- - 3:06
-~o. z9 l.08
7 3.06 I
3 .81 2.01 _8.~Q__
8 2.07 1. 93 8 1.08 2.07 1.93 .:_o_. 2L __ ---+------ ~- 4. 79
9 2. S3 -0.11
--~
0.60
o-:-:Jr-
2.89 9 f 2.89 t 2.S3 -0-:11 0.60
----~~-----+-----+----+-----t•-----i
S.91
10 -1. lS -o. 61 3.S7 10 3. S7 -1.lS -0.6! ---+-~0~·~3~7_.,__ ___,,_~2~-~18._,
11 0.18 o.33 -o~ :i.37 11 -· -- --l\ 3.:i1 - j --- -- - o.-~--,__ci.33 -0.21 3.61
12 1-c~c:--+--=o~.
O. SS 3~20-- - i:72- --L 61.-- 12 1. 12 \ i. 64- - -~ ------._---+-_~o__~.7s~s--+--~~:7·~·~~---_-:-_-_-o:.~3:0~-=-~~~4-6_:-:;~-~;--<-"
_
13 >--~~-+--_~o.
0.71 3~o - -3.90- - z.-2r· - 13 1 3.90 t 2. 22
1-l~IQ=2=0___,,_2=0~·~6~9 _ __£1_,j2 _-iO,sa_:: !i (3) i 6.70 ( 13.2S 4.65- 8.91 lS.37 14.79 8.31 l 8.77 ~ -1.7~-=- -=~= ---z.161:s7----=1_._20(1)-8ZT9-
1-----+---5ECTIONT---;- II fECTION 3 l_ OILS - t· · - - - - - +--------+---------+------+--~-----
~(~ll_,)..:S=.po~'°':"'~"':-,-- ~
"" ~.. "'' . '·'"' "u .,

(13) Oils 03.6889
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE -
0.2470 3
n F _ ~ FO~zgz
i»~,~ "" .~_

__!._6/±_Q7 44.3S67
101
2.36
'"·"
I
102
I~ '"·"
7.49
103
2.36
7.49
104
'"·"
lOS
7.49
i 106
I-
-ici7
- I
'
I
I
!I
108 - J.()9--
2.36
'"·"
- -
110 111
7.~-
112 113
2.36
(14) Error '+.OIOL 24 Ee 0.1948 4 I s.s4 S.54 s.~4 - s. S4

( S) Total lS.4909 Sl ---1 ~ ~ ll.
69
t 8.51 \ l~:~~ : ll.
69
\ ~8_.Sl --i ii. 69
_ -
8. Sl
~
:::::, ::',: :·- -:~~~~~ ;i =·--- J:':''

•~ = Eb-Ee f_o_r_ ...,,.;:{: <'
'" I '·"
;
'·" f '-''=t1-}:::12i: ~;-
i--'"' :_- 7
::::
_,--_--+~~-~-+--:o-3~.6;;7o---+--.-=-t-=~--t--.-=-t-------i
3. 67 3. 67
'-Ql
2.18
: : - _: :
t-----t~3~9~E-- ---- - g 4.23 6.S3 -I -- _l,_.23 __ j..6.53--·----+------t----+-~~~-+----~+-----<
4. 23 4. 23
6. S3 6. S3
_A z 0 S733• ).i.948 ---- -- -- ' ' ,-· -· I
~. o.o: :~-c-=~~ -~~--+i;;;~-:-+~~~~~j::~: t:::_~:- -~. :::;:~tt~1~~i~~*'

3 2 21.30 18.48 21. 07
- - - -- - - - - -
= :::: 19.44 14.13 -10.80

Factor) I I _( ' -+-----t----T-----;------t-----+-----1
1-~----L+----
__-_--+-------- - - --<!>- 3,.,.--:-041399._12 -~_.16_ --r~·~~~-p:s~._44 _-{3st._6_0_::-FLi6__ ,34t:l)4-- m·~.2~,u~+.2~s"2~.,~o--t.~--,-,,--t.-.~~-+~~~_,___
12SS. OU ai.7o ___ _ ·L>L.H'+
~· ~ =: ~~-----1-----(9) i~.y~___ 2_46_.2-t4~~s1-- 12i.__6;s1 ~46,_~1_ lz4_6_~~tz46._si__-r-2¥.s1 J46.s1 12_4_6_._s.1__t246.

--- S7- - +
246.
-- S7- - +246.
--- S7- + - - - -
r-------+----_,,__-:::::-::-:::~=~---+-;ii~·-_c~102_~1t..:__-~3,Jll_:_ _£6_,_~137:44 j 26:46 lz_i_'-os__ ~Tn~ -~1-.·2~0·-+---·o~.0~3-+-~~--+~~-+-~~--+--

10.41 38.94 -17. 07
t - - - - + - - - - + - - - - t - - - - - r v _ , '---+--6_._07_1_9-+_12_._67
_ 71 s .4317 8. 2773f!.?.:8J.dls. 1631 8. 3809 8. 4060 -1. 7 so2 o. o» s z. 33S9 2. <LOU -1. qoo<
1-!<l!l'.l~~··l_llA,yg·-.__i"~.J.£.
·c~_J, 0•S§$l"'"L--1ll4'~L4'
lf,Q§_
. I '2 ~ ·t= l.._3 6-- P-.Q1-~~+-39s : 3 79 2. 10 -2-.-1-0-t---0-.4-4-+--o-.-16--+----+-----c---t-----+------t
O.S8 O.S6 -o. 37
Uncorre ted Avg. Vise. Lo ses (a<awTvg.) 1. 68 3.31 --(1.~l2:23- I 3.tl4 I 3. 70 2.uH 2:19- --=u;;n- ---U: to U.)4 u.J~ -u. JU
* Significant at the 95% Confidence level.
APPENDIX D
~
DRAIN PROCESSOR A
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
OILS
II III IV 101 102 103 104 lOS 107 108 109 llO lll ll2 113 (2)
-o.2a
-~
t.63
4.84
1.s1
2.44
0.11
-1:as
i.oJ
2.11 4.84 1--o--c
1
1.s1 1
j 2.44 ~- _
I o •. n__
_ ~81___ ______ -·-----+-'1~1~·~30_-<
-o.2a 2.91
t.s9 1.55- -3-.ao- 0.13 1.s9 -1 1.ss- _3.8_0 _s ·~.~-~-~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ o. 0.73 ls.~73
4 0.79 1.47 ~_:::0;22_ - 4 f' 0.7~ 1.47 20 9 22 ~
,_2~·~2~a-+---=-3_,_.9~2'--+--2~·~1~1-1----o.32_~_?__ I 2.2a ,_.:i_._9J_t*-
- -.:: 2.11 - =-=----------+----·-+-----+----+---=-o°'.3"'1-+-_,a"".=-60=--+
I-~"':"'~~!-+--=-~=-:~~~'-+--'~~:-=;=-:- }:~} r8~ ~ji- -------------.~-------_-_-_-_-+..__________-_~1-1-:-:===~:.~l-!,_-::-";--=-~----=:

~I
l.43 3.09 I _1,.01_ 2-.07 t 2.2_8 - -o.2_r-
2.03 1.90 -0.23 1.2s - 1.2s
1
2.03 I t.9o _ .:_Q_.~2.3~-+----+----- 4.9s
,_2~.~6-S-+---0-.0-7--+--o-.-63-- ·2. 74- 2. 74 ' _2_. 6_S __ _ o. 01__ f--------l-'o~.co6=-3-+-----+----+-~6,_,.0,_,9__,
~~ -~:~~ -~:~: -~:~_;_ __ n~_-_ -1-~--a~--+---c~_:_~-~-+----o_.2_6_-+--_0_·_4__+----_o_.1_a_+--_~_:_~6-__,

3 60 1 2
lf • . f-3.6s -··
12 o.ss 0.16 i.16 ___ __1_._g_ i2 1.11;-f I , 1.62- o.ss 0.16 4.69
13 o 11 -0.29 4.13 1----+-'4"'.'-'i"'3-+----+---+---+-----+---+-"2~.3"'9'--+----i----+---+--'o"'.'"'7..:.7_+---"o.:..2"'9'--....__1,_,._,,o"'o---l
2.39 13 -
(l),_,__.~=-~~-_~~-+- ~··-.~s~- ~ c:::-!L (:lJ
19 8 9 2 1 42 22 9 3
6.99 13.6s f s.10_ a.93 is.33 • 14.29 i a.49
t
9.22 -o.4s t-19.______2._12_ ----2,.2_2____-~_!_._l2___0l_a_6_._2_!___
t SECTION 3 - OILS ···- - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - + - -...J
1-----+----- ----· -~----
101 102 1 103 104 lOS I 106 107 108 -10-9--l-10_-+_1_1_1--+--ll-2--+-1-1-3--+---------l 0
SECTION 4
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE 2.97 2.97 2. 97
Source • • n.F ••an Sn ~-
L
2
_2_. 97
11. 30 11. 30 11.30 i --
11. 30
3 7.67 7.67 t-··· ·- --·- -- -------- -='----+----+----+------+-----!
7. 67
(11)
(12)
Phases
Cars Adj.
0,3409
8. S41S
3
12 Eb
0.1136 O.S629
,___Q,2!12._ . 3. 5267• 4
7. 67
s.43 s.43 r s.43 f S.43
!·~:ii .•; ;; l~:::--~§,-,,

(13) Oils 94,6401 12 1.8866 ~.oa1j~
(14) Error 4 .8438 24 Eo O. 2018 ll .S2_
( S) Total 108.3663 SI 9. 31 i .' " '·'" ':: :: -+--·4-.-9-s-+------;---·+---a._6_o_+--- -
'-'U~n_c=-or'-r~e~c._e_d_S_um~04'~S•~·~=-F-S~l.•292S ? _______ , 6.09- t----- - - -6:09-6.09 6.09

"'c-o-rr_e_c_t_i._m_T_e_rm_c-+---.---+-4-2-.9T62--~t_- -~----=------~-JI-
-
-- :
- '
2062
)
I
~
4.0_Ei __
:::_-=:_ - -- ------+-2-.--6--2 ----+---r-:~-!-+----4-.-0-6---1-2-·-6-2-+--4-,-0 6--+--------<
h_ --------
- - - - - 12___4_.~!l__
u- = E•-E• ~+------+-·-13 7~oo
I
-- - 1- --1-I - -4.69- --1.~o"o·-+-------<-----+----+--1~.~o~o-+~1-.0-0--+----<
4.69 4.69
39 ~ l- __ \- I \
JN s o. • Bi__!6l T]~ ~._2a __ 21.o:f_-t~1:4.2__-{fo.41__:-t:T TUs 29.so 20. 99 22. 93 ii. SI 19. 74 2Z.bJ
7117 0 2018
=--=~7I___t _6_2_.9T-,122~as s:~o ~J~.J2.9_i _f~a_._61 _-_1_6_-;-_4_·_1_-_i"'+-a_2:::_.'"9_a-::::_~::::--_4=:.::o=:s:::_~~=1:2:::_.s:1:::_::::~:::_1:9=:.::s:3:::_~~-1~9_-._9:1a=::::_~-:::_·1::u=:.:
7
39 ro 7117' 4 /o :3 7.._=r_· uH::::_~:::_:::::::_:::_:::_::::::::;
1
IN = 0.0183 !Car Correction (8) ~365:76 42).36- t2S2.24 -i372.'._~ ~64.9_2 __ +3_63._84~30~~+3S4. 7_2 2Sl.88 27S.16 270.12 236.88 lll.S6
t
Factor
+------+-----+----+--------+---~~-258. 63 ·pa-. ~/2.5~~3__
2s~3.sa. 63_ ~ffa:63_
•H~.~o:J~~;_2-s-:a:;.~6_3 -1-+--2~s-c..a-'-.-6~3~~=2::s~a~._6~3~~=-2~s~a~.:6~3~~:2-:s_a~_.-_6~,3~~=~~~~~~--1
ff 2_sa. TI"_ ___
=~~;~ ;;~;;;:- ?~~s;-1~:~4~::~_-_t;~~~ ~~-:

4 41
1-----+---+----+----- :-:-+----:-:- -:-:-:-+--·:-,1-: :-:-+-_·-:-:-:-:--+---1·-. 0432--+--2 u_S4'-+-------I
' I
Corr•ct rt Avt;t,. VilRc,. Loset s l. SS 3.22 l.Sl 2 ,06 3.98 3. 68 2.14 2. 2S -0.10 0.33 o. SS o. 7S -0.39
\------+----+----+-----+----+----+---c--+-------1------1----- --
l.llJOJ:.Ct1'1:.ei:l;etod..Al"~·-~'!l.IJ"'-L'---'~T~->sla~jtjl_
•• _ _~l•~a!JLuAAv~•OL>llJ_~l.~7~Sc__j_~3~.4~1L___j____l~.cc2=8-+-1~2=-'2~3~+--3~·~83_---!l--3-•,_S_7_t--2~.-12_+--2-._3_1_+---U,1_1_+--U-•_J<J_-+---U·0_4-+--U'_>o_\-·v_._.,_D--1---~
* Sioni ficant al the 9S% ~on.:.:f,~i.:.de:cn.:.";..:•;...:.1e.:.v"'e-'1.:.•.J.-._ __._ _ __..__ _ _- ' - - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - - ' - - - - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - - . l - - - - - - ' - - - - - L - - - . J _ - - - . . . J
APPENDIX D
TABLE D-5
DRAIN PROCESSOR C
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
210°F Vis. Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles 210°F Viscosity tosse1 cSt. After 1500 Miles
Q..ill.
II 111 IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
_n .,, -
l -0.·34 2.00 1.97 1. 29 _!..._ L--2_,J)_Q _ - - 1.97
~----- ·---- ...... - - - - --- ----- 1. 29
L__ - -
b. Q?
2 2.06 3.28 2.38 1. 23 ___ 2__ - 2.3~ 8.95
0.7'0--
2.06 3.28 --··-· -- - - -·---- ---·--- _1_._21_
_i.___ _ _
·-
3 2.114 1.31 3,21 3 2. 64 _L31_ ~.l_l __ ---- 0.46 7. 62
4 0.98 1. 51 3.24 0.48 _f; .. Jl.98 1. 51 3. 24 0.48 6 21
-
5 1. 57 3. 73 1.45 -0.08 5 1. 57 3. 73 1.45 -0.08 6. 67
2.46 1.06 0.79 !!ii 6 7. 07
~I
6 2. 76 o. 79 2. 76 2.46 1. 06
7 3.42 2.16 o. 65 2.60 :':I 7
-- 2. 60 3.42__ .___2.16 -- ,___ - --·-·--· o. 65 8.83
·--·· -· - · --··
8 -0.21 1.13 H _l.D_ - -o. 21 4.64
1.88 1.84 - --- ------ _!_J!~-- 1.84
9 2.19 -0.45 0.57 2.19 9 2.19 2.19 -0.45 o. 57 4.50
- - ·-- ---· ·-· -· - -
10 -1.85 -1.25 -0.36 2. 68 -1.85 -1. 25 -0.36 -o. 78
-· ·- ·--~'~
10 -·-- ----
11 0.46 0.83 ·0.09 4.07 11 _4.07 . ~-
0.46 0.83 ·0,09 5. 27
12
13
0.67
0.38
1.03
-0.21
2.17
2. 74
2. 27
2.86
12
13
2.17 -
~74-
---
;
----- --1
--·· ~-2 .27
L_____...._.. _ _ _ _
2.86
o. 67 1. 03
0.38 ·O, 21
6.14
5. 77
»
~ 7.65~-i?2~~;--f~~:~ ON7~: 01 ~T.95
Aj (1) 16.82 18.24 18.78 21.97 T1 (]) 7. 02 11.26_ 5.39 ·0.36 o. 23 2. 53 1.53 ·O, 72 ( 75:SC
-..J
SECTIO 4
------ ,.....
--- ------ ----
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCI I
S.S. D.F. Mean So. F Ratio 101 102-- 103 104 I 105 -1--106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Source
(11) Phases 1. 0915 3 o.'3638 3.8660 * 1 4.9!__ 4.92 T 1 4.92 4.92
8.95 -----~--~--~-·ii
:---,,..,.
(12) Cars Adj. 13.5478 12 Eb 1.1289 11. 9968 • 2 8.95 8.95 8.95
(13) Oils ' 70 4142 12 5.8678 62. 3570 3 '·~·" 7. 62
(14)
( 5)
Error
Total
2. 2606
Jrh)!_41
24 Ee
51
n na1.•
Oll
4
s
7 .07
=-----_____-~~l----T-~:gJ-6~.6H=6.21
.
-+--7_~_
6. 67
7 .07
6. 21
6. 67
··-
-
b
1--7 .07
Uncorrec ted Sum c f So. 197 8363 c:ir 7 8.83 8.83 8.83 8.83
Correcti on Term C = 110, ,,,,

8
9
10
·---·
4. 64
-+--- - 4.50
' -0. 78
4.64 4.64
4. 50 4. 50
-o. 78
4.64
·O, 78
4.50
-o. 78
~ = Eh·E. for E'-'>E 11 5. 27 5. 27 5. 27 5. 27
39 Eh 12 6.14 6. !4 6. 14 6.14
I 13 5. 77 5.77 5. 77 5. 77
/"(_ = 1 121<• - n nn 1 '
4"- '271 (6) 27 .08 31.17 23.39 26.33 20.58 27. 38 26. 28 21.98 17 .47 18.08 23. 53 17.34 22. 63
__./'"(; - 0.0235 Car Corr •ction

Factor)
(7) 63.18 101. 34 48. 51 68.85 111.42 118. 71_ _69.84 71. 55 ·3.24 2. 07 22. 77 13. 77 -6.48
18\ 324.96 374.04 280. 68 315. 96 246. 96 328.56 315. 36 263. 76 209. 64 216.96 282. 36 208.08 ·271.56
19\ 227 .43 227 .43 ·227.43 227. 43 227 .43 227 .43 ·u-7.43 227.43 227 .43 227.43 «t.43 «t.43 ,,, .43
I
"" 110\ ·34.35 -45. 27 -4. 74 -19.68 ' 91.89 i 1 • 58--+:-rs. 09 35. 22 14.55 12. 54 32.16 33.12 ·50. 61
y, 6. 2128 10.1962 5. 2787 7, 1876 14.5394 13.6031 7 .3349 8. 7776 -o. 0181 0.5246 1. 7743 2.JUHJ ·l. •u•.
~----
Correct kd AvR. V sc. Loss~s ( y /4) 1.55 2.55 1.32 1.80 3.63 3.40 l._l!:l l..s.!i Jl.,_11!1 .2..s.ll .!!.·..'!!! 0, 5H -u.4r
,
Uncorre ~ted Avg. Vise. Lo ses ( l\aw Av5.), 1. 76 2.82 1. 35 1.91 3.10 3. 30 1.94 1. 99 ·O.u9 u.uo o. 63 0.36 -U. J,O
* Significant at the 951 Confidence level.

APPENDIX D
TABLE D-6
DRAIN PROCESSOR D
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
210° F Viscosity Losses est. After 1500 Hiles
210°F Vis. Losses est. After 1500 Hiles
Q.!1§.
PHASES
II - - - I l l IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
__+-_'·'~"-J-2_.=26 ____ "- u.lJ4_ L _
1-----·u_._u __ l _ _ l_.<94 2. 26 __ o.~84---+------+-------+---------1r--o~·~l~3__,_4~·~91__- - j
2 2 07 3 24 1.92 2.29 2 1.92 - _2-12_ 9. 52
3 -T.sz ·T.sY- -3.11- 0.59 - j l.~3 -~_.z_l__ 0.59 8.65
4 1.14 1.41 3.17 0.52 - --4- - 1,14 1.41_ -~1.7__ ~-- 0. 52 6. 24
.• lY- -- · 5
-f------
5 ,__1~.~5~3-+--4-.~01--+--·1~.~73--+----o ______ 1.53 4.01 1.73 -0.13 7.14

3.04 2.39 1.01 0,46 6 0.46 __--+~2···3·9----1-~~-+--1.0_1__r-~-~-+-------+-------+-------f-------+·6~.~90i----i
-----+--3_.04
~I
7 1----'3'-'.-=2.::.0-+--=2.::.•0"-8'----+--occc.87
8
9
1.86
2.23
1.84
-0.19 o.58
2 • 3 9 Lfil 7 ·
-o.16L-:1.Zi -1~ 8-
L 76 9
1---_-1-'.-6-'-8-+-_-o-".-98~-+--_o~.·3~6--+-~2-.8~8-~------1-0:- - - - -
2.39
_ f - -_ _ _ _
l.~---=--==------_
----- - - ___!,1_6 - - - - -
3.20
---
2.08
_1_,86
-------+----- -
0.87
1~84
--2.-23---.:0.19-~ 0.58
8.54
---:0:-1-"6--f--------~-+-------+-------1---4.::.'c.75'-----+
4.38
10 ----------- - -- 2.88 -1.68 -0.98 -0.36 -0.14
11 0.49 0.78 0.03 4.12 11 --·----- 4.12 __f-------+-------+-------+-~o~.~49'----+--o~.~1~8--+-----_j--o~.~0~3_.j~5~·4~2=---+
12 0.02 U.H'> 2.11 z.78 2. 78 0.62 0.84 6.35
13 0.47 -0.08 2.61 2.40 2.40 0.47 -0.08 5.40
1----------+-------+-------+-------<=T j __Q 2___§._~L -~1,c1~.'-06'---+--6"-'.'-'1'-'4---'- ,6. 62
Aj (1)1----1~7~·~6-=-6-+~l-=8.::..8=1'----+-=19~·~4'-8--+--"2.::.2.::.•l~l,____,__ _____ _.________ , ___
SECTION 4
ANALYSIS OF VARIANC
4.38 4.38
-0.14 -0.14 -0.14
Correct on Term 117 .1800 11 5.42 5.42 5.42 ,,,.,
12 6.35 6.35 6.35 6.35
for Ei;o.E 13 5.40 ),'>U ).'>U 5.40
39 Eb
16\ 27.68 32.11 24.55 27 .28 22. 55 27~ 10 26. 78 21.43 17. 69 19. 55 24.80 17. H) 22. H7
~ - 1.2279-0 1161
47.888 (7) 59.22 99. 54 55.26 59. 58 122. 76 115. 92 76.05 67 .32 -1.44 l'>,70 ZJ,U U.ZJ -2.1•
~"--'~"----=-·+-'O~·~o~23~2'---4~'~'c~a~r~C~or~~ec~t~i~on=--+----~'-8~"4=3.::.3.::.2.'-'1'-'6'---~3'-'5-=5.::.•.::.32=--+=2-'-94~.~6-=0--~3-=2.::.7.::..3~6'---+::270.60 325.20 321.36 __ ~__._1_6__,_2_1_2._2_8__r2_3_4_._60__+-2_97_._6_0__r2_1_4_._20__+-2_74_._4_4__,_____ ---l

Factor
1--------+-------+-------+-------t----.::.(9'-')'--'-'2-'-34'-.~l'-'8--+-2_34.18 234.18 234.18 234.18 234.18 234.18 234.18 234.18 234.18 234.18 234.18 234.18
(10) -38. 76 -51. 60 -5.16 -33.60 86.34 24.90 -11.13 44.34
Yj s.oou8 •. COL> 6.ULUO 5.0'l'JO 15.b4JU IT.7i57o Od>LO o.~ou 0.3146 1.9726 1.6353 2.2 ..... -1.))87
ltY./4 \ 1-42 2 ,,, 1. 51 1.46 3.91 3.36 2 05 .L.ll 0.49 0.41 0.56
Uncorreclted Avg. !o'isc. Lo• see Raw Avg. 1. 65 2. 77 1.54 1.66 3.41-- 3.22 2.11 1 1.87 -0.04 UA! 0,64 u. J7 -0.0H
* Siani icant at the 95% l onfidenc e level.

APPENDIX D
TABLE D-7
DRAIN PROCESSOR K
SECTION 1
~
210°F Vls. Losses eSt. After 1500 Mllee 210°F Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles
Q.l!&
II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
1 -0.37 2.01 2.11
1.10 _l__ ~OL_ ___ 1 2.11 ____ .... ______ __1_._!_o_ __,____._____-+----+----'0~.~3~7-+-~4~.8=5~__,
2 1-c.,_,9'=5--t---=-3-"'.3o.;8 ___ ._2_.24 -
_1.3_5 ~ _2_ '---1· 95 3.3~_ 2. 24 1 35 8 92
~ 2.15 1.45 o_••'_+_1___ L _ _3__ '-·---~_1,J5___
3.31 _1 •___
4 5____ __ • e-3·3!____ -----<------------+-----+------~----l--__,-o,_..--4._7_--1---------1----+--'--1:,__,9"'8'----"
0 47
1-1'-'.'-'1=0-+--<-1'--.3,.;3.--+-•3--'.~22~-+-~-c..-+----~
4 1 10 1 33 3.22 _ .. ---------+----+--o"'.'-'4"-7-+-------1f-'6".~1---2__,
5 1.59 3.68 1.37 -0.17 5 1.59 3.68 -- 1.37··-~- -0.17 6.47
~I ~:~~ g-~: -~ ~ 1----==-
6 _ ___().~_
7 ~--~~~:~---2~._.~7.~2:_-~~~~2~._,.4-s:_~:_--=--1--__-0-._9_8_ __,~-----+-----+----+-------1----+--6-.-a-2'----"
6 2 •48 _ _ _
~ '.i"' .
91-~~:~2-4-+--=0':~~9.--+--~-~-:~~
8 88 1 0 i.20
2.41
I~:+
- - - --
2 63
-~
1.2.Q-
_l._i.1
- l-_3.41 _-J~-~L i.ao - _o~_
-2''". f- 2 s.12
.:-24"--+-_-0.-3-9--+--_-0c-•.::_l=--+-0-.-5-8-+-----l----I-----"'~-'-:~'-'!'---'
10 -1.86 -O.B6 -0.38 z.57 ·--ro--- -- - ~----- 2.57 -1.86 -0.86 -0.38 -o.53
11 ,__o_._5_5-+-o_._6_,_+---o_.2~5---+-_3_._9_9_+-_1_1_+--------1--- _____ _ __ _:~ -=---:-=-+--3-. 9_9___++-~---_-_-_-_-_-:_-_-_-_-_~---+t----~-----~-__,+_-_-=o:.~5~5::::_0=-_.-_6"'9::::::::::::-_o=-_.-=2~5::::~4:._9=-~s:--_--j-
12 1-=oc:·-=-5~5-+-o'--.'-'9_2_+-_2'-.04-----1-2--'._1_5_+-_1~2-+--"'2"-.,,,04.___-+----+---- _ ____ _____ __ 2._1s_ _ _ _ _ _ +----+----+---'o"-.5~5~-+-,o<'._,_9,2_+-"',,.-~---i5-·...,.66 I
13 0 44 -o 23 2.87 2.69 13 2.87 2.69 0.44 -0.23 5. 771
(l)i-.--~.~=-+==-.~.-+.~-.=~-+-~-.~.s~o-+'-','-"<3c-)_ 1__.6,_,._,,,64___
16 9 5 18 38 1 8 53 21 11.63 5.8~_ _1..27__ ! 12_._2a__ +]_3_._!_0__ i __ 7_._52_ --~n -0.59 0.92 2.29 1.45 -i.02 (4)75.36_-j
1----1---S-EC_T_I_,O_U_4---+----+----+--10_1__ --102-::-:- ---=-::=- - 1~~ - f- lOS- _ _; s-~ ~ :;,;-I;.;Ci,:;NFl """1"=~'=7~0I¥L~S:._--~l0~8.--t-----=1~09~-t--l~l~O.--t-----ocl7l~l--l--'1~1~2--t---~11~3.--I----~

;;..J
1-------.llAN:ll"~vl.S'S~TS-lO=':F'-l.VAR~I~AN:!:!C~E~---+--"~-l---"4~.85__ _ _ 4,;.8~~5'--+-------1- 4. 85 4. 85
_ _,,_so"'u,.,r_,e,.e_ _l--'s'-'.-"s"-.--t----'D"'."'F_,_._,_,_M~e=an"-'S=o.f-'F'-"R"'a-'-tl"'o"-+--~2 ___ '-_!!_.92 ____8_._92 ___ 8.92 _ I _ _ ____ 8.92
mm::~~,.
;~~~~
:::m: :! ~ ::~:: :::::~ :-~ . -~ l:::T::\
~2"-.--'l'--7lc'9-+~24~_E_,,e-t_o_.CYJ_04----1----+-<:;>!l','f-"6._+---'6~.,a_2 -=_:-_-=- -~-
t;::: . ., . ., 7. 98
6.12
((1;))
7
~8~6--'.~25'--5'--6-+_51~---+-----+----+--'~-"--'~-+----+---8~·-7~2
___ -6-.8~-2~·-+-_-6~."s=2-+-~----:~:~~-~·:-:•_:z::::_:;::;:;:~:::::::~::::::~:::::::~::::::~:::::::
8._7_2_+-~8~.7~2,_+----1-"-··_7_2_+----1------+-----+----+----
1-------+----+---~>-----+-~8-4 _ _ __,_____ -_i:.l~- ~=~----- ---+--4--'.'--7_6_+-~4--'.~76--+----+--4_._76_--+----+ -----+---+----
~U~n~e~or~r~e=e+=-ed::__-S=um=--co~-"S-"-'--o._-_1~9~5~·~4~69~6'-+---,1~~-+-------1-----1-----~--t----~o~.~53.--+----+----t-4~.--'8C4__+-_=~~:~~3-+--~o-.•5•3-+-4--'.'--8_4_+-_,o•.•53~-+----t----
Correcti n Term C 09.2140 11 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.98
12 5. 66 5. 66 5.66 5. 66
or E . . _ ... 13 5. 77 5. 77 5. 77 5. 77
31.39 23. 71 26.35 20.74 !O.U 23.46 17. 02 22.07

J---;µ.,-:----+-,--noo-·2-+-nc--non1-.f---+-B''---'(·6) 26.25
1------+-~3_._9~<:1~.+'-5'--92~:)~_,----+--~("-7~)-+~5"-9'--.7~6._+lc_04c~·~6'--7- _5_2_.2~_~8.13 ~1~~2-+l'-'1'--7'-.9'--0'----+--67~._68_-+_6_:_9'--.3c'9_+----'5--'._3_1_1-_a'--.2_s_+-2_0_._6_1_1--l3_._o_5_+---9_._1a_-+----1

J;.J = 0.9688 (8) -315.00 376.68 -284.52 -316.20 -248.88
f-,.<=--+.::.:.:..::::"'--j----l--;c::---+---'-"-'----F-=-~-=--F'-'-:_::__:_--F'-;_:_::-=--F.::c:..::_::__:__+:-~
-319.68 307.32 266.28 214.5b
----~----l-----+----1------+-----+-----+----1
Z17.5b zol.>Z ,.,..,z4 -,o~.04
41.3088 0 0234 (Car
f-'---+---+----H~<"~-"-~r~t~"';,;·•.,,1,,_on,,_,t-"-·9,____\-F2'-=:2-"6'".o=a._+2~2,~6"-.-"oa=-----F2=-:26"'.,_,08:.::_--+2=:2"'6_._.o=a-__--F22=-6. oa 226. oa 226._o_s_+-2_2_6_._o_a_--+-22_6_._o_a_,__2_2_6_.o_a_+2_2_6_._o_s_,__2_2_6._o_a_ __,1_2_6_._oa_--+-------1
~. (10) -29.16 -45.93 -5. 70 21. 99 87. 72 24.30 -13_._5_6_+-2_9_.1_9_-+-_6_._2_1_1-1_6._s_o_ -_3_4_._s3_--+-_34_.._s_9_ ·_47_.9_'4--+-_ ___,
4 4
' 5.9577 10.5553 5.7267 7.0555 14.3361 13.6686 7.2027 8.3930 -0.4447 1.3131 1.4750 2.2664 -2.1417
Correct~d Avu u r Ac- _., l- .. 1.49 2. 64 1.43 1. 76 3. 58 3.4l r.ou 2.10 -0.11 0.33 o. 37 0. 57 -0.54
Uneorreoted Ava. Vise. Lessee (Raw Ava .B 1. 66 2.91 1.4 7 1.89 3.07 3.28 1. 88 -U.D u." -u. zo
I
7r :nan..1.. cant at tne 7Jlo onfidenc level.
APPENDIX D
DRAIN PROCESSOR D
SECTION l ~
~ Q!!&
II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110. 111 112 113 (2)
- -- 2.06 2.23
l -o 04 2 06 2.23 I LJL__ >--- _ _l_ >------ f----- -·· -·---- --- ----- - - - - -- - - - >----1.17 -o 04 5 42
2 2.05 3.28 2.]4--+ _ l.0! - 1---·--2 r----2-05 3.28 2. 74 --- - - - - · - - - ------ ~ _l_,_QZ_ Q.14
3 3.36 1. 77 3.93 0.50 3 r----1.-.36__ l._?.]___ .___}-~- ·- 0. •O Q ..
·-
4 . 2.19 2.38 3.92 0.90 4 2.19 2.38 3.92 0.90 9 39
~-5 ---·- - - - ---~
~-65- 4~63-
--,-·-
5 •• 65 4.03 2.25 o.ir- -2.25 0.11 9.64
--- - - - ~
6 4.52 3.69 2.02 1.96 6 ~.!_,J~-- ------- -·----~

~.52 3. 69 --~_._O_L 1? 10
81 ~ ,_,.
3.39 1. 99 -o. 65 3.20
~·---
l. 77 f-m-{ - - - __3,20_ - -
=---=-=~---3_,_39
__1_.99_ -----
___2.}2 __ ___2_. 35
_-:<i. 65 7 a•
2.33
2.35
-0.64
o.00-
0.34 1.54 - ·---- 1----- - - · ~- l.__72 - -- o.o 6.44
_ _J_ f - - - - - - - 1-----------
.. __ l.54_ - -·
2. 33 -0.64 0.34 3 57
10 •• i t o.53 0.83 4.15 10 ___ l,.]_?_ 1.17 0. 53 0.83 6.6R
------- ----· - --- -
11 1.05 1.03 -0.13 4.14 11 4.14 1.05 l. 03 -0.13 6.09
---·---- I--- ---·
12 ! . <£ !,44 i." 4. !0 12 1. 79
-~-·
- - - ------ - - - · - --- -- ~ Ll§ 1.12 l. 22 6 2Q

13 0.64 -0.20 2. 79 2.05 13 2.79- 2.05 0.64 -o. 20 5. 28
Ti (3) 7 .86 12. 63 7. 96 9.31 17.23 15.14 ~2- _8_.75 1. 05 2. 65 2.99 3.59 -0.26(4 97. 62
·--- -
__::__ --~---sfc:~-I:~ -
(1) 2o. 75 l4 U>0 2l.UO 24. 72
101 102 -103- -104-- .. ·105 106

-107OILS 108 109 110 111 112 113
S~""'ION 4
<>vsrs nF 1
~:.::-+~·-1_4 1~:~6- f---

pnTAMr<
'41__ ' 42 ' 4?
Source f----· s s D.F I Mean Sa. F Ratio 2 __Jl~-1~
-9.-14 9.14
(11) Phase 0.8613 3 IO. 2871 3.2477 3 --g;sr 9. 56
o.,,,..
~€ ---t-.-c!'"
(12) Cars Adj. 3.8699 !2 Eb )oD'+/V 4 9.39
(13) Oils 86. 7494 12 7. 2291 81. 7771 5 ~-~---- 9.64 9.64
(14) Error 2.1219 24 F... 0.0884 6 12.19 - 12.19
Oll 7
-· . ·_1_9___+12.19
7. 93 7. 93
--
( 5) Total 93.6025 51 _l.~- 7. 93
Uncorre :ted Sum f Sq. = 276.8652

t:ll 8
9
-_ .--+----- - -
3.57
6.44 6.44
3. 57 3. 57
6.44
3. 57
Correct on,..., ...... r. = '., ..., lo

11
6.68
->---
o.U>
6.68 6.68
o.u. o.u9
6.68
o.u9
..
12 6. 29 6. 29 6. 29 6. 29
--""< = Eh-l°o For Eb>E 13 5.28 5. 28 5.28 5. 28
~
D (b) 33.04 31.91 30.81 31. 74 38.07 35.60 30.30 27 .48 23.60 28.35 25. 51 27.64 26.43
i....r-.. &
u. -
12. 5736 (7) 70. 74 113. 67 _ __71.64 __ __ll3. 79 155. 07 136. 26 78.48 78. 75 9.45 23.85 26. 91 32.31 -2.34
/'( . 0.0186 (Car Co rection

Factor
(8) 396.48 382.92 369. 72 380.88 ~56.84 427. 20 - 363. 60 329.76 283. 20 340.20 306.12 331. 68 317.16
(9) 292.86 2?2.86 292. 86 292. 86 292. 86 292. 86 292.86 292. 86 292.86 292. 86 292. 86 292. 86 292.86
~j (10) -32. 88 23. 61 -5. 22 -4. 23 -8.91 1.92 I 7,7!±__~.85 19.11 -23.49 13. 65 -6. 51 -26. 64
f--- - - --i--
IY1 7.2485 13.0691 7 .8630 9.2314. 17.0643 'lDmf-s.8639 9.5284 1.4054 2. 2131 3. 2438 3.4690 -0.7555
Correct ed Avv.. I isc. Los1 es ( y,/4) l 81 3.27 1.97 2.31 4.27- 3. 79 2.22 2.38 0.35 0.55 0.81 0.87 -0.19
Uncorre "ted Avg. Vue. Le sees (Raw AvgJ 1.9 7 3.16 1. 99 2. 3 3 4.31 3. 79 2.18 2.19 0.26 0.66 - ro-;-15- ~o -u. U7
* Sign! ficant a the 95'!. Confiden e level.

APPENDIX D
TABLE D-9
M!.Af.YSIS OF FIELD TEST DATA
DRAIN PROCESSOR C
SECTION I SECTION 2
210°F \liB. Loues cSt. After 1500 Miles 210°F Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles
I II III !V 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
1----'o,_,.c:1=3--1--"-2'-.o,_,2:..___+....:1:.:."'8.,_5_1-_::;1.=-=1,_4:_ _ _1_ r---2.,_o~ _ , i.85 _ ___ __ __,1._,._.,1"4--f--------+-----+-----+---,,_o~.1,_,3,___,r--4...M._
_z_,_g__ -~ -~79 __0.90 _ _ _2 ~_b!1_ _ _3.2.'!_r~ __ 2.79 __ __ 9,JQ__ _ __,_______ ~--+~9~-Y0.5'---'
4
~~~~:~~~~!,::::::::::~!:j~~~=~=~~~::~~~==~=~~:~}-=-=--i-=~~3_.42~_ ~ t~-~:~:-- :~~:~ ~-4:00- -2.2~--~---<-----+-- -0.43 0.77 0.00 ::~!
.__,3,__,."'8"'5_ _,___"-3~-6'-'0'---l---'l,_,.-'-97.___j__l,,;·~9"7_ ::11 6 l. 97 3. 85 3. 60 l. 97 11. 39
~I 1
8
'--'3~·~6~5_ _,___~1~.8_6f--_1--~o~.7_L_f--~~4__
2 01 2.21 -0.11 1.87
_<?LL
8
- - 3.24 1 - ---
1.87
- - - - 3.65 1.86
____ --2~0_7 _ i:21
- - --=-o.75--
-- - ---=-o~-Y--
8.oo
6.04
9 2.• 26 -0.79 0.36 1.63 9 1.63 -2.26 -0.79 0.36 3.46
10 h1r.'i<o<o9-+-.;r.o .• 3.-Z--6---1---;o~.~
7';--6+-3;;;.:..°'nr-- -10 f----- ------- _ _ _ -__-_ -:._-_:_- -_::: ~-:l~J!f_ :=-- -~ 1.09 o.36 _ o. 76 6.10
11 0 63 104 -0.10 4.14 11 -- - - - -----~-- - 4_._!l> - o. 63 l. 04 -0.10 5. 71
12 0.76 1.01 1.91 1.98 12 1.91 1.98 0.76 1.07 5.72
13 0.57 -0.03 2.69 2.05 13 ~2.69- ---- - -~--- --~- - ---- 2-;oy·· U.57 -U.03 ).~
I
Aj (1) ' 24.88 2~.94 TI.TI 24.0l T (3) 8:-02-- ._!?.S9_ _z,_~.__J_,_n___:_ -15_,_6~-~t-:i5.39 _:::--s;-13- ~_8_._5_5-_··__.·_o_._6_9---i_l_._7_2_,,___2_._5_9----<_3_._1_7_.__-_o_._26 () 92.94
_ _..::S::::o:ur:.:c"'•'--
(11) Phases
ts=.=s=.~~S~~~-~·T~O~~N1i4l5Me~abjn~S"~:::F:::_R:::a:::t:::i:::ot===t·:_1:1~-~-fo2~ ~1~3-=~ -
l--'0"-'--'6"'0"'84"-+-,-;,3-.,~-+---'o,_,_.2,,_02..,8"-+__.,1~.8"-'6"'3"-9-+----'-.._l---'4"'.j!!!__~ __ _ _4~L~---
104-_:_ :f 105-: - -
4.88
:o~- -<IJl'~c~ l .lm0.l.l7"i3. _.•_·.ln!.lo. ,~:~
0
4.88
-\-1-0-9--+-ll-O---t-l-l-l--+-ll-2---t--l-13-+----I
-.I
V1
(12) Cars Adj. i---=3"-".:::20,,_,2,_,l+l:::l2:._cE::.~"Yf--'0"-• .:::26,,,6,,,8+.;2~·;;;45::.;2·.;2+'--'~..-29'..!•-"'05,__-I-- ~ _ _ 9. 05 _ __ _ - t - - - - + - - - - + - - - + - - 9 _ .0_5_-1---~-+---+-----+----I

(13) Oils f-'8e_,5~-~2'f74;.7~~1~2---:,--+-'"C...C'ft='":.+.:::65:.;·:..:3..:l..:.43=-+---=3'--11---- ~!.?_ ___ _Ll_L - - - ~ 9_. !_L --_-c-c---+-----t------+----+-----+--'9-'._12__-+-~--+------lf-----l
( 14) Error f-.!2:.!.~6:!.1!::25:'...1-~2:;:.4--!E:'.&...-+-1nl..l.''W!l
---4----+----=4'.......J~-----+------ ~ 9_. 05_ -~ _ _ _ ~ 9_,_Q5 _ 9. 05
( 5) Total •l 6•41 51 5 9.14 9.14_ --'-9_,_.,,_14~+--=-+----+----1----4 ----f---'9'-'"..:14::.-t------<
0§1 6 1i~J9-~- - - - ~- 11.39 -i1.-39_-+~~,.--+-l_l~.3~9--+-~
~U~n=c~o,,_rr:.;e"-'c~~~e~d-'S~um=-=F-'-=S:i:.•·---f'~:.;-57~·c:8c:0..:64-'+-u--'--'1~x7r-ll----+-"-8~.o~o'---l--~--J----+-----+---8_~_0o_·_·-1--'8~·=00----t-,-,.c.---+--8·<m_-+--.~~-+----+----f------+-----j
- 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04
correctibn Term l - !166.1123 3.46 3.46 3.46 3.46
6.10
/---r;c---::+o:--=--t----+---l--~100'-11---+----11---+---f--'6.10 6.10 6.10
./'"£ • Eh·E- for ~_;,. :>"'-'E-+-~1.._1-+--=~:--+----t-----+---+---··i-"'-5._.7:.;l,__+-~=-1------l-----l--5:'..'.,_.7~1-+-~5.:_·7;.:l~-+-~--+--5:'..'.,_.7~1'-l----1
;;;-. 12 5.72 5.72 5.72 5.72
D U 5.28 >.lH >.<H
A_J • O. 2268-h.1088
10 ~052 (6) 31.04 31.45 29.09 30.70 35. 75 34.15 28.90 26.17 22.44 26.90 24.01 26.15 25.01
/[.£. • 0.0151 tear Coriection f7\ 72.18 113.31 66.96 83. 07 141. 12 138.,_,.c:5:.ol__+--"7_-_3._.l:.:7c..-+_7._,6•.•-"9.:=_5_t-.::6:.;·2,,_,l,__+--'l:.:5c:·..:4::.8_i--=23:.;•::;3c:lc,_+-'2~8.:..:.;53:..._+_-....:2::·.::34::._J-----4
Factor
18) 372.48 377.40 349.08 368.40 ;29.00 409.80 346.80 314.04 269.28 322.80 288.12 313.80 -JUU.12
~- - - - - -r----r--;(;;-9);-t.;2:;78;;-.-;;8:;2-t;;2:;18°.-;;8:;2-t.;2:;18°.08°2-t;;2:;18°.08°2-t.;2"18°.08°2-f;;2:;78°.08"'2--1"2"18°.08°2--1"2"18°.08"'2-f..2"18°.-5••2--1"2"1s•.••s...--2-+..12""'18.-."5...--2-+..,,,,.,•.-.-.8,,,.-2+.....
,, ••.-..........
82+---l
---+---
w, (10) -21.48 14. 73 -3.30 -6.51 -9.06 7 .53 5.19 '>Lo I, L>. I> -28.0U L'>.UL -6.45 -£.Jo O't-
v. 7.6957 12.8124 7.3902 9.1317 15.5432 15.5037 8.2083 9.1801 0.9278 1.2897 2.8015 3.0727 -0.6lb
Correc1 ed AvR. , isc. Los es I rf •/4) 1.92 3.20 1.85 2.28 3.89 3.88 2.05 2.30 u.23 U.32 u. 70 u. /{ -U.D
Uncorr cted Avrz. Vise. L1 sees tlR.aw Avg. 2.01 3.15 1.86 2.31 3. 92 3.85 2.03 2.14 0.17 0.43 0.65 o. 79 -U.UI
* Si5niUcant at the 95-Z Confidence level.

APPENDIX D
TABLE D-10
DRAIN PROCESSOR G
~ SECTION 2
210°F Vis. Losses est. After 1500 Miles 210°F Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles
II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2}
-0.03 1.91 2.24_ 1.19 l_~._9~ 2.24 j 2 91_ _l._!_9__ ~--------+-----+-----0~·~0~3-t-~s~."-31'---1
.___~~-'.--'~~~----+~~-~-'-:+,,_~_-___,---;~.c:-":_!_._ - ~ -~-·~, - ~- ___ ~ _ ~~ •~ __ } ;j~7 - . 3. 92 ------+------+---- __-1 ---'1-'-.o-'-9'--___,f----

__ ~= -_-_-+----~'=--=l~~:::'.~ ~_-:'.
4 .___2_._2_9_+--_2_.2~4--+_3.94 o.so
l--2-'o'-'5_1_-j----'-4-'-.5'-7--+-_2_c-•_4_2_+-o:-01-
___ _,._ _________ il ;:i_~ _L7c-24 _ _ _ 3._94 _ - - - - - - + - - -
2._~!___ 4"2- ______ ___c2o;"C-'4CC2_-I---
____
0.07
----+----+--~o~.s~o~-+----0--~9~·~2~1___,
9. 57
5
4.26 4.00 1.84 1.13 -~_67 -1.13-- -- - _4._26 ___ - ~~-°- 1.84___ 11.23
~I 8~ :=3:;.:4-:4-_-_-+r--~2~.-o""-1:_-_;-_---'o~.9s --:i~ ----c§l -~
.___2_._1_1_-+---_2_.3_3_ _.__o_.__o_s_--_-+---2_._0__3_- __ -~
3.32 .
1 2.03 -1
3.44 2.01
2.11 :_~.3_3_
-::o:98--_-____,-___-+-------'- --+---'1__,_.-'-19"--"
-+--'o'-.-'o_,_s_+----f------~---+----'6_:_.~ss'--'
9 .1--2~·~2~s--+----~o_.s~6--+--o-·~3 3_+- __
7
i.s~--- 9__ ~ _ - -1._si: L.:~~ -----~-----1,~"-s-+----"-o...s,._.6.___-+------1--o_,..,__3,__3_-+------1-----+-3'"-'...2,_,,9--t
10
11
~:~: ~:~: -~:: ::~: ~i-1------ --- J -;.-:-i-9~---+-----+--'0'-"-"''~"-+-~00~.~~6·~--1--1-.-0-9-l--n"---'•,,.__,.--t-_-o-.o-s--lf---'~L..--'-o'L'6__,
12
13
~::~ -~:~~ !:~! ~:~~ ~~ i.19-_2_-:,;=--+---: - l --~-~:--+------;------+-o_.9_8__ ~~-'-:"-!~'----+-_-0-.-1-1-+-"--~:'-~-'!--l
t - - - - - + - - - - 1 - - - - - - + - - - - - - ' - - - - + - - - - - - - - - _I _____ - - - - - -
.___2s_._1_6--+---2-3~.ss_-1-2_2_._09_-+-_24_._1_1_+--T-·<_:3_'__ ~--s~ _~1-2_,_so_{ _s,n-:-----~:13__ 116.94 _,_( ls~_s1 --~:-6~-=--~--4~9-~--_:-~-~o_.__1__1-_---++_-_-2~·~s-2_____:_3_.4_9_--+_-_3_._3_s_--__,_,______
__o_:-:2_w1_<_-+r---9_s-_.9_0--1-
I
sEcric~ 4 j · s CTION 3 nns .. _+----+--- --------+------+------< -i
~
Source
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
s""'=n=.F~=,.~e=a=n=S=la~.,_.F_R_a_t_i·o-+-------W1 -- ~ 102 -
t---s-.---' !I lOJ - -
- -
-104 ' - 105 i 106---t--l0~7--+-uis- __1_0_9--t--11-0~-+~l~l~l--+--l-1~2--+-l~l-3--t-----___, "'I
-(l_l_)=Ph""a"'s"'e~.-- 0.4306 1 n "''° 1 '·"'· i-· 5.31 j 5.31 ~ 5.31 5.31
(12) Cars Adj. 1--'4'-'""'-2"'21'-'7-+~l,__2___,,E"'--L+--"0".,3~5~___1,~_2_1~5+-_ _,2'---j->--__.9.2.L__ - 9.28 - +-9-:ZSi -----if--9~.-2~8c--+----___,f-----+---+------l
}Q.!!-_:-110.11_~-+--==~110.11 --+- _- -_+;_-_-_---~--t+---_-_-_-_-~;1---~l-0~-·~1--=1-::_-::_-:-::_-::_-::_-c-::_-::_-::,:_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_:_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_,
4
(13) Oils 90.9204 12 7.5767 75.8428 3 _:::::_ _
~l~~ ;~~~~ 9~:~~~! ~~ E~ 0.0999 ~I~ 11.-23~__-=-:_ - ~9_~:_1-tjJ~~~-1N~-r__l_:~1;~ ~-}[-=~;=-=-------t"----+------+-9-·_21_-+-_9_._5__7-+-----i

Uncorrec eds ... o' So. ·~74.8326 di 9~ 7.79 -6~5-T - -L--=----1 _7_._7_'3__, -:::: 6.55 __2_~--6:-"ss _ _ _ _ _
Correcti n Term C l/0.8617 -~ 3.29 3.29 3.29
r--~~-+----l--z-==--t---~=--+-~l-0--f----+----+--------1------'----'6.!! 6.11 6.11 6.11
-"" • EL-E• for E,;>E. 11 6.06 6.06 6.06 6.06
1------+-=3Q~-,,;:-..,____,_ _ _--+----+---~l=2___,~5~·-'-9~9-1--~c. -------+-----+--~·_99_-+-~~-+-------t----+--5_.9_9_-+-~5~·~99~-+-~~~+-------+
13 5.34 5.34 ~.34 ;.34
......-'t • 0-3518- 0.0999
!-----+---~1~3---.·'~2~0_2_ _+-----+--(_6_)--1_3_1_._8_1_.__3:2_._s_2___ 31~~ 1. 41 37. 02 34. 3,----iq~ ~o lO. 41 lZ. JU zs. uu ZS. 45 Zb. 71 Zb. 28
/
......- '- • 0.0183 (Car Cor ection 17) 61.65 115.20 74. 97 83.07 1152.46 140.13 77. 58 76.41 -o. 99 22. 68 31.41 30.42 -1. 89
Factor
f8\ 181.72 190.24 174.88 -176.92 -444.24 H2.20 358.80 3l6.92 270.00 336.00 305.40 320.52 315.36
19) 287. 70 287. 70 287. 70 287. 70 187. 70 287. 70 -287.70- 287. 70 287. 70 287. 70 287. 70 287. 70 287. 70
w (10) -32.37 12. 66 -12.21 -6.15 -4.08 15. 63 6.48 47.1" 10./1 -D.Ol lJ. / 1
v 6.2577 13.0316 8.1066 9.1175 16.8654 15.8560 8.7385 9.3535 0.1957 2.0512 3.7408 3.3361 -0.750
Correc ed Ava. 171sc. Los es 11l,/4) 1 <6 3 26 2.03 2.28 4.22 3. 96 2.18 2.34 o.os o. 51 U.94 0.63 -U.19
uncorr cteo AVS vise. L sees CRaw Ava. 1. 71 3.20 2.08 2.31 4.24 3.89 2. [6 2.12 -U.U3 u.01 UoDJ
-o.os
* Significant st the 951. Confidence level.
APPENDIX D
TABLE D-11
DRAIN PROCESSOR G
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
OILS
r-_,,_~;;,l"'l-.,.-..,..::I,::;I,_...,.....,...I.,,I,.,,I_,...-.,,....IV,;.,..-,.-----.---,10,,,l_,..._._1_0_2_...,.....,...10-=3---l-04_~-l-0_5_-r-_10_6_-,--l-0_7_ _ _ 108 _ _1_0=9-

0 110 111 112 113 ( 2)
3
4
~-=~=:=z=~= :=-=~=: =1~= :·=-=~=:=i=!= :=~=~=~ ~1~_-_- +-~- ~- i-~_-_t_:_~ - - ~_J_~H-;~;r__-=- +- ~i=-:~s~il- _ ~·~L.
r 1.99 1.95 3.8 -- - 1.95 ---- _3_._86__
- --
------- ---
- - J ~~~2~+---~~2~_ ~:-75
- -----+----f--~o~.9~0-__,_____-4-_~8~.7~0--1
t ~ ~11~~
2.53 4.00 1.97 -0.18 5 2,53 4.00 1.97 -- - ----- ------+-----f------1--~0~·=18-'--',___8~·~3~2--1
~I 6 ___ ~~_!_8_ ____ ~3.60
~I
4.52 4.18 3.13 1.11 i.11 ---- - _3._1_3_ _____ _
.__4~·~1~6_ _,_~1~·~80_ _,__-o~._4~7_,___4~.o'--'3'-_,___;,..,u,__17'----''~---- 4,-03 - -- ---- 4,16 1.80 -0.47 _ _ __,_____ _ _ _ _!1.,_g_
8
9
10
1--=~:~~~~-+--~~=:=~~-+--~~:·~~=~-+--=t~:~=i~-_,_
__ -+ ~~~---~-~- 1.~ ~ - 1 .~i=-~ -=-~- --~ -~~--~~9 -L}~f--;.-;,-~-t~_o_:_2C _o.41 _ ~:~~
-0.43 0.06 o.55 4.55 10 __ 1,.55_ -0.43 _0_~·_0_6__+-----+~0~·=5=5_,_____-+_~4~.7~3---<
11 0.67 0.95 -0.06 4.32 11 ---- --- . ----- 4.32 - -- 0.67 0.95 -0.06 5.88
12 ,__o_._9_0_+-_1_.04_--1_2_.~3~3-1--~2_.9_9_ _,_ __ 1=2'--',__2=·c~3~3---<1-------+---- ___ ___ -i.99 -----+----+----1---0.-9-0-+--l-.-04--+-------7.26
13 1.00 -0.05 3,35 2.66 13 3.35 2-:66 -----+----+-----4-1-.00 -0.05 ~~
~~WtT(J·_lE_+--c_:r_:·_,,-+_1_._
'"---+_4_.u1 J ,z;-g-- --;;iy;qinr+J_::1]7;1iU-
E;;,;;:;:;>r ] , ~-OILS - - - - - ' 1 - - - - - - f - - - - + - - - - + - - - - 1 - - - - - - 1
Source 107 108 109 110 111 112 113

(11) Phases 0,3170 3 0.1056
o. 7106 1 2.0_Q_ ---- 2_._Q~ -- 2.00 2.00
(12) Cars Adj. 3. 7285 12
Eb 0.3107
2.0c:_9_0__8::+----=-2-+__6:c.,__,9!_ _ _ 6.91 6.91 ________ -----+----l------+----f--6_.9_1_+-~=----J----+----1-----1
(13) Oils 116.1584 12 9.6798
65.1399' 3 13.243_!3_,JL_ _ _ ' 13_.24 13.24
(14) Error 3.5677 24
Ee 0.1486 4 ___ 8. 70 8. 70 8. 70 _ ~·~--<----1---- ---<1------+-----_!_·7_ru__ f--~~r+- ~
( 5) Total 23.7716 51 5 _ 8.32 8.3~- ~·~~-+--8_._3_2_f------+-----+----+---->------·o_.__,._..._______,
l-----+---+----1=----+---'°'-'-=6--+~1"'3'-'-.--"6-=-0-~I---=--=-:_-. - - - - - 13. 6~ - _ _!_3,_••6"'0_ -t--,,---...----+-1_3_._6_0---1
Uncorrected Sun cf Sq. • 306.2092 '51 7 9.52 9.52 9.5i --g-;n
'-""~~-+-~~---1-~--+--"-'-'-"-'----'5--'----+-----+-,--,,-t------=_-----+----+-6-5-7-+--6-.5-7--+-----+--6-.5-7-+----
~------• -- Term C • 182.4376 3.71 3.71 3.71 3. 7l

~----+-----+-----lf------+--~1~0--l-----+----+------1----+--4.~7~3-+--~--+----+----+--4_._7_3----J-4~.7~3~+-~~----J-4_.~7-3_..__~~.-4---~
.L, • Eh-F...-t-f~o~r~-+~"'-""'-"~-E~--0-+--~ll~t----+----+----1------+-----l---=-5~,8~8:__1-~~--+----l-----l--~5~,~88_1---~>-·"~8__)_~-~-1--5~.~8~8.l------l
19 E 12 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26
13 6.96 •• ,. "·'" "·""
_./"tC • 0.3107- J. h.A&
12.1 76 (6) 29.77 36.63 30. 51 27.64 39.89 37. 70 31.6JTJ0.84 19.96 24.09 27. &5 23.16
~ 1: • O. 0133 f~s~ ~--- cH on '7' 64.98 125.73 61.38 66.51 167.58 148.68_ _8~~-- -~-1,62 -11.07 11.34 36.09 31.41 -3.60--
Factor)
(8) 357.24 439.56 366.12 331.68 478.68 '452.40 •JHU.UZ.-'J7u;mr- lJ~.Ol 289.08 361.08 ·JJl.Slf ·lll.n
,_________.!_- ---4'-----+---("9_,_)-+2_9_2-'-._2_0----J_2_92_._2_0_+-2_9_2_._20_+-29_2_._2_0__1-2_92. 20 ~- ~~-+-'"__._,_u-+-'-"_,,,_u-+_29_2_._2_0--1_2_9_2_.2_0_+-2_9_2_.__

20 _____ _
(10\ -o 06 -21 63 -12.54 27.03 -18.90---u.52-- ---~3~-41:61 14.46 -32.79 -8.19 10.68
y 7 • 2193 13. 6824 6.6533 7. 7494 18.3687 16.3668 9. 5249 10. 3b27 -U. b7bO 1.4>lJ J. 0/]5 ] 0 J8ll -U.<>C
i
Correctjed Ava. lJtLsc. Losi ies Y,/4) 1.80 3.42 1.66 1.94 4.59 2.38 2.59 -0.17 I 0.3b U.8~ 0.85 -U.Ub
Uncorrected Ave. Vise. Le isses Raw Ava, 1.81 3.49 1. 71 1.85 4.66 4.13 2.39 2. 55 -0.31 I 0.32 1.UU 0.8( -o.1u
* Si5nificant at the 95'7.. Confidence level.

APPENDIX D
TABLE D-12
DRAIN PROCESSOR R
SECTION l ill!!Q!Ll.
210°F Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles 210°F Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles
Q!!&.
II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
3
-0.07
-JJ.2
1.70
1.37
3.21
1.16
1.90
2.5:J_ __ ~_._~
t
f -0.05
0.26
1. 26*
2
3
1.37
i.10 3.21
1.16
3.42 ----- 2. 53
1.90
5.43
jI I -0.05
o._2_6_
-- - - - --
_______
-0.01 2.41
1.01
~l.,__,2~6c+*'----+----i--~1~2~.64=-j
-~:~~ ~:~ :-_9895~-----~l·.~81;5_ ~ :::~
4 ,___2._0_6--+__2_.04_-+----3~·-8~5
5 2.58 4.04 2.12__J_ 4 2.06 4.04 - -333.• 0.88 -0.12
6 4.53 3.95 3.28 1. 7 5 -::rr- ~ 1. 7 5 4. 53 - . 3. 28 ---- ·+-------1-----+---+--1~3,_,.~5=1-;
~J ~ o---~~:~:~:-+---~~-:~~~,--+-=~:-}~ i:;~ ~I -o,~ 5- ~.1=5c-+----+----- ~·;,~
4 21
8 ' 1.57 2.85 j 2.18 ___-_o__
9 2.16 0.20 0.44 2.35 9 2.35 0 44 ' "
10 -0.56 0.07 0.58 ·4.67-· 10 2.21 \ 4.67 0.07 0.58 4.76
11 0.18 o.91 -0.03 4.84 iC 4.84 ---+-~0~·~18,__,_~0~·=9=1-+-----+---~0~·=0=3_.__=6·~5~0'-"
i2 o.85 o.96 2.21 3.36 i2 r 3:J6- - o.85 o.96 1.38
13 1---o~.~9~4--+-_~o-.~10~--3~.~3~5-+---~2:9il 13 +--:c-::'::-!-~3~·~3~8-+--.,,-,::-=-+---::-:::-l--':"::'-o-::-+--:-:-.,.,,..+--..,..,:-:-=-1---=""2~.9~0-+-..,,-~-+--,,-,,..,..+--.,_,..,....~-o~.~9~4-+--~o~.1~0;.,..i1:--::-~1~.~1~2-i
1
(l)r--~~.~~-+~=-.~--+_ ,••-=~ _
25 20 23 2 1 203 82
:~ -=_T~-~3)
27 7.03 14.22 ' 7._32 f 8.87 18.67 16.60 i 10._18_1 10.52 -0.76 o.96 __3.46 3.36 -o_.3Jj_IU_l_OO.ll,_
1
l SECTION 3 - OILS
~--- SECTION 4 101 102 103 I 104 105 i 106 1 07 I in• mo 11n .....
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE _ _l 2.41 2.41 f ----+-----+----+-~2.41 00
Source s.s D.F. Mean So. I F i~tio 2 7 .07 7. 07 7 .07 _z~Q]__ I
(11) Phase 0,9944 3 0.3314 2.2498 3 12. 64 12. 64 12. 64 - - - - - ___1_2~.64--+----+------+----t
(12) Cars Adj. 3,1318 12 El.. 0.2609 -1.f7ii 4
l 8.83 8. 83 8.83 - - 8. 83
1-1-19~.'-'0=64=7+--~1=2~'--'-9. 9i2ii 67. 359i •.
--- - - - i - - - - - - ~··t-------;r-----+------+----t------<
(13) Oils 8. 62 8. 62 8. 62 8. 62
(14) Error 3.3900 23 Ee 0,1473 -- - - 13. 51 --13.5C~---
( 5) Total 126 5809 50 --l ~- 6.45

13. 51
9. 67 -- 9: iii
-6.-45 ~- 6.45-
- f---9·.--6-"7--f-----+----t---- +----+- -
- - - 6.45
5;15 --5-:TI +----t-~5-.1~5--+
Uncorre< ted Sum f Sq. = 319.3119 9 5.15
4.76 -- - - - - - -- f--- 4.-76- ---,, 76 4. 76
10
P'Co,,,r,_,rc>e,,,c=t'Fo,_,n,_._T"'erm=C"!----·---+'l'"-9-"-2.._.7~3. ~lQ_ ------} f 6.50- f-----
--7-.38 f----
t - - - -- - 1------+-~6-.=50=----1--6~.~5~0-+----+--6~.~5=0-+-------1
7.38
~--
Uncorre teo. Avg. V1sc. Lo see t Raw AvgJ l. 7t> -Y:-St> 1-~~ -=-~~--=- ~-~-~J __~_:_ --'-·-''__,'___
'· o_'+----·u_.L_•+-_u_._"_'t---u.a_'+-_u_._""_t-_-_v.v_Q+-----1
11' ;:;i.an1 :1cant at tne ~:Jt. on:r1aenc~ J.eve1. ---~ f---------1------+-----+-------+---t-----t-----t----+---+---~
i
** Missina Data Filled 1n HY M.etnoa ot l;Ocnran ana {.;OX, t;xper wcncaJ. ues1gns, ;:;econa a:.u.i.ci.on.
APPENDIX D
TABLE D-13
DRAIN PROCESSOR H
SECTION l SECTION 2
210°F Vis, Losses cSt, After 1500 Miles 210°F Viscosity Losses cSt, After 1500 Miles
PHASES OILS
1
2
-o. 65
1.19
II
0,69
2.16
III
0,18
0,91
IV
-1.45
-0.88 ~2
1
101
0.69
1.19
~----
2.16
102
--
103
0,18 ·-·
104
- - - ·------
0.91 --
105
--- ---
----- ---
106
~---
107 108
~---
----
109
~:1_._IQ_
110
-0.88
111 112
_n
113
~<
(2)
_,
3.38
..
3 2.12 2.11 4.00 1.00- 3 2.12 2.11 1.-.00 1.00 9.23
4 2,06 1.84 3.63 o. 74 4 --2:~ T:-84 3.63 o. 74 8.27
5 2,03 4.92 2.96 -0,82 5 2.03 4.92 2.96 -0.82 9.09
~I
6
7
3. 78
4.24
4,16"*
2.05
2,60
o. 51
1. 92
3.37
6
·-·
1. 92
'!ii 7 ~---
..,,
-·-
1,17_
-·
I
---·---- 3. 78
i--~·24
4.16**
2.05
2. 60
0. 51
12.46
10.17
8
9
1. 73
2,68
2.26
0.59
0,85
0.25
2.41
2.46
8
9
_2_.~-
--
--- - - -
2.46 --:--- ____!.i3 -- 2~26-
2.68 0.59
0.85
0.25
7. 25
5.98
10 0.10 -0,03 0.62 J, /l 10 3. 72 I 0.10 -0.03 0.62 4.41
--- - --·-·- . ---·
11 0.65 0.94 -o. 65 4.45 11 4.45 0.65 0.94 -0.65 5.39
12 0,30"* 0,63- 0.99 2.19 0,99 0,JU"'* 0. 63** 4.11
12 I
--r- --· - 2._!!_
13 o. 79 -0,06 2.67ri 2.94** 13 2. 67** 2.94** o. 79 -0.06 6.34
T1 13\ 4. 79 10.32 6. 76 7. 24 _!{j.42 __ ~~8_ - __!,9_~_ 10.48 -o. 25 0.59 2.49 2. 78 -2.18(4 84.85
Aj (1) 21.02 22.26 19.52 22.05 - - - -- - - - - - - -
·-·- -- -- --- ----- ·- - - S"CTlnN 3 - OIT.S
S",.,.Tnv '· 101 102 103 104 105 T 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Al!ALY§IS OF V•»IANCE 1 -1.23
-
-1.23 -1. lJ -l. 23
~ource s s n.F_ M•sn So F Ratio 2 3.38 3.3~ 3.38 - ! 3.38

-9.23 - -~-9:23-1---.
(11)
( 12)
(13)
(14)
Phases
Cars Adj.
Oils
Error
0.3616
105.9065 12
5,ou1
3
7 ,9990 12 Eb
l.:1 t.ie
0, 1205 0,4088
o. 6665 2. 2612*
8.8255 29.~'""*
u,.,~
3
4
5
12.46
rt
9.23
~s:21 8.21 I
I
-- ---
9,09
-8.21
9.or
i2-;~ -12.46
•• u.
1<.<tO
9. 23
"·" 9.09
,
( 5) Total 119.8682 46
--·
ll!I 7
..,, 8
b
10
5
-=-0
- _.I-'i_--he I
10.17
..
10.17
7.25 7 .25
1u. l7
7 .25
9 5.98 5.98 5.98 5.98
Uncorre ted SlDD. f So, ~ 258. 3205 10 I 1~.41 4.41 4.41 4.41
11 __ 5.39 5.J. 5.39 5.39
-
Correct on Term c ~ 138.4523 12 4.11 4.11 4.11 4.11
13 6,34 6.34 6.34 6.34
~ EL-Eo f r E»E• (6) 29.12 26. 72 35.19 36. 29 30,62 32,03 19.JJ 2U,4J l4.7l U.13 1•.>•
...
~ 18. 72 ]3.52
-
AJ .
39 EL
2.2616- .2947
(7) 43.11 92.88 60.84 65.16 L47. 78
·-
148,32 au.>1 .... ,, - , ,,,. ,,, .. 1 l5.U2 -1' •• ,
/J/J, LVL' f8\- 124.64 -J49.44 ~282.24 -!20. 64 - 22. 28 - 35.48 •67.44 384.36 231. 96 245.16 -296.52 -277.56 235.08
../It . o. 0222 Car Corrt <:tion Fa tor) (9) 54.55 254. 55 254. 55 154.55 54. 55 154.55·- 25435- 254.55 L_,..,,, '"'·JO LJ~• lJ .,... JO ,, .. ,55
110) 73,02 -2.01 33.15 -0.93 19.95 32.61 -32.52 -35.49 20.34 14. 70 19. 56 2.01 -0.15
: --
--+--
....---~----
y, 6.4110 10. 2754 7 .4959 7. 2194 15. 9772 15. 75~8. 2081 9.09Zl U,lUll U,'10J l,vno <.oL~U "'L • .LQ-".,.
Corrected Avg. v sc. LOSSES Y1/4l 1.60 2. 57 1.87 1.80 3.99 3.94 2.05 2.42 U,05 U,lJ U.ll U,/! -u.JO
Uncorr cted AVR Vise, L sses Raw Ava. l.20 2. 58 1. 69 1.81 4.11 4.12 2.23 2. 62 -0.06 u.15 u.02 U,/U -u.0>
I--- - -
--~
* Sionif icant at lthe 957. < onfidenc Level.
' '
'llr"1f M1SB1T 18 Data .r .led 1n 1 ~ Method ot cochr n ana co: , EXper'-"ental De,ligns, Se~cmd 1'.~cin.
- __ ____L_ _ I I
APPENDIX D
TABLE D-14
DRAIN PROCESSOR A
SECTION l §fil!Q!Ll
100° p Vis. Losses cSt. After 1500 Hiles 100°F Viscosity Lo9Ses cSt. After 1500 Hiles
T- --
OILS
II Ill IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 -109 110 111 112 113 (2)
-4.90 3,45 8.18 -:·.4343 _21_ I-+~~ -fs. 76 ~l
8.18 19.65 - -9.33__ +--6-.-4-4_,____ ____._ _ ____,__-4-'-.'-'9'--o-~~-=~'°·.-=-zo8c____J
2
3 1;-:1i-- ~~:-H- H-:~~- -8.63
i.-iii
- 3 e-- -~_=--rr:n 15.11- __ _B.~_5_ ---~- 8 63
-+----_J-----+----+--'"'''-'"'-+--1-.8-7--+---_J'-"~-"-8 '"'.'!'-'~'---1
2
4 10.51 15.83 io.25 4 io,51 15.83 io.25
1--1"8"'.-"8-"-9-,__-_1"-5'""',6~0'-----l--'1"'0'-'-.=-81"---1---'-_1:~.4o- - 5 - ----- ' -18;89--15. 60- - -- - io-.-8c-1~-+-----+--· - - · ----+----+--=::.:__-e-_1-.-4-0-l--=4-=3-",9:::0=-----1
5
i-:::16:.:.-=7-=-4-+---'-9'--.7'-'7--+-l'-'3-=-.-=-3_=-2-l-----4,52 6 4.52 - -- - -1 - __
_!!· 71+___ 9'."'7-=-7_J~="'----+~1~3-.-=-32~+----\--------f---+---+~=_j~44~.~3~5'.____j
~I
6
7 11 2
l--11-:-~-1--1-1-;-'-::'-'~'--+----=~-':c~-'-~- f!~!-------B~ ll.
75
12.99 :_:__ t 2
lh2_ __ ___f~~~~ 52
li._67_-+-_-_-·__7-__ --+--_2c-.1-o--+------1-----l---+-'!=~"-:-=~~=-----1
8
10
11
~~:!~ -1~~~~ -~~!i ~tit-
~:~~
fr~~;~ ~~
13-~----
-- - ;~~~3 ~ ~5~67 -t:~ 11-.-1-3--+--19_._8_9_+---~-=~~:8_7~~-+----~~:~!=~-+---:-::-:--+----4_,_.~2=-3-+--_-o.-4-9--'--'!"'!-'-:=-~~'--'
--~--
0 83
~:~! ~~:!~
_
12
13
-1.03 14.50 17.66 14.50- - - - -- - + - 17-:-66- ' -1.03
I
96~::I :0:.82 !8~04~ ~~r~~: ~1~1r, _69.3~ --:::::N ~--3--~-:-~-s--t---6_8_.-=-5~4~--:-~3~0~·-1~0__-,+-_-_-=9~-~2-4:::::::~1=4~--9_6==~=-l:.:5~·=6~3::::::::::-~7-.8--2-/£."--14-2_1_._8_7_J

Aj (1) : : _ _
r .. TU'"!T('.'
0
n1 H.__.., .. ,..,.,
uo.23 T1 J)
+ 3 I
CXl
0
h~e s.s. D.F. M~~.F~io ~~i~o-=i--+~---=-~~-~~---4--~l~~-=-i~+-1~0:__4:__~~~-~:__4~1~0~6==~~=~10~7:==t=~l~0~8==~==1~0~9~==t=~l~l0~==1==l~l~l===t=~ll~2~==1=~1~1;3::j~:::::::::::::j I
(11) Phases 10.9575 3 3.6525 1,4979 -i -2.60 I •2.60 -2.60 -2.60
(12) Cars Adj 160.2631 12 E• 13.3552 5.47.7Q: ~1_ 49.f.S - -~ 4gJ.s - r- -- -- 4-9-:481 49.48
(13) Oils '4171.31192 12 b55,9491 \04.'660' 3 ~- - - - -62.42- 62~42--~---16z-:-4T- 62.42
4-~- - ~ - - - )s];6-~4(;- J8-:-4-6-L--~~ r- . -
(14)
( 5)
Error
Total
58.5235
"""~::::,c::d
24 Ee 2.4384
Sum k>f Sq. • -

~723,7159 y-8~ 44~3~~~~ ~- ·~~j~~~lt-tcl~~T;:~!~-- ::-:=-:=--l-4-4-.-3_5-l-2-6-.-8-3-+-----1-------+-=3:o8:.:_•:::_46::__,__4_3_.-9~0--l-
l-------t----+-----b.-c~-c---1--~-+-----l-----+~4~3~·~7~7->--------
Correct on Term C f)'.22..58il!i 9 a ~---1
-------f-----ji---=4~3~.7~7-+-;4~3=-·~77;._+~~==~~4~3~.~7~7==~=======~======~======~~=====~
29.00 29,UO 29.UU
l-----+---+----+----+------'1~0~-~---+ 15.21 -r-_-~~~~~;-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c'~1~~5:.:_.,72:;1~~;-:;1~5-~.-~2-1~~~~~~~~~~;-~1~5-~.-2;;1C-~~~~~~-~~~C-~~~~~_j
"--/---+-~R3 .~9 -~·~""------l-f-o_r_---1-E-'•_~·E_-+----'~~~'-+~1:.:8:.:_:1• 5 -~~----~~~~1~5~·±3~3--j-.-l"a.',i...--5 -+---+----~1~5~.3~3,__~~~50~:~~~30 ___J~1 ~8 -_1_5_-l--,1~5~·~33,,__~_ ___J
13 37.51 37.51 37.51 37.51
~ 13,1552- ?,4384
• F5"'2"'0"'.8"'5'-2+==-+----+--(~6·c.)- lo9_._3_8_,__1_7_6_.2-4-+l-4-2-~-~5--'--_i__-60·-_'._-~~.94 - 124. 9 7 132; 6'"5-"1"5"4-."63~--+-070'0."5-..-o--+-.1•2~3.0~5~+1~
i. z~4.~
•u__,~l~OlJ.-.J~9---+-9~4.~
14--+------l
f--r.,.-t---+,-----,-----+---o---+------,----+--:-:-~-+-----~--- i
>---'_./'-£::_-=-=•'--+-~0~.0~2~0~9--+~'~'C=aro__:C:ooc;F-•e~c~t~l=on:.:__-1---'(~7L--1)1~6"'2~."-3~6_J~5~34~.~0~6:__+4~2~1~.~ll,___--l-"6.3~9~.-'-'90
Factor) --r--l6~~'397_,_~~-3~8~~--~!6._8_6__+--27_6_._3_0-t_8_3._1_6_+-1_3_4_._64_--l-14_0_._6_7_+---7_0_.3_8_+------1
~--+----4---+------+--('--8~)--1'-'_1,_2_._56_--12_1l4_.8_8_--1"-u'"_•6_0_--+1_9_'.Il--'---.08 -1991.28 l/+99.64 - 1591.80 - 185_5_.5_6_+8_2_2_.o_o_-+-L4-18_6_.2_!0_-+-11>_9_8.a_o_-+-13-12_.6_8_-_._11___:_2-g-_
••_o__j__ _____J
f------+----- ----i---+--1-9,+2-6_5_.6-1-+12-16_5___6_1__ u6s. 61 1265. 61 ~265. 61 il265,61_-u65. 61 --t-uo-c,65~.6~1-+12~,6~5-.-6°7

l__,l:_2_6~5.-6~1-+--26~5-.~6~1_Ju-,65~.-6-1--'-12-16-5-.6=1-t---~
wi ( 10) 115 .41 315. 21 -17. 88 -24. 5 7 101.4'.>___j_~--+-co:i.,.,,--.=4J--+-z=-o.-..-9,r-1+=Lo',..-,·.....--

J i--+~u7'.~
.,,----f=-,~o.=
,,----f-.,~.~ ,,-+--)-j
ou_j-o~o.=
I
Y ?0 '-<on co ' " 0 '· J.6 4164 70.5865 67.2402 47.6346 44.4847 69.1024 -27,2033 6.3678 12.9004 17.5862 -6,4501
Corrected Ave. v sc, Losses Y1/4) 5 11 13.19 11.60 17. 65 16. 81 11.91 11.12 17. 28 -o.J!Q 4.40
U•corr<l:ted Avg. Vlsc, L,IBses ( Raw Avg. 4.51 14.84 11. 70 17. 78 17. 34 11.05 10.80 17 .14 -7. 00 l. Jl J, /4 3. 91 -1.96
* Slgnlflcant at the 957. Confidence level.
APPENDIX D
·.
TABLE D-15

IIIAIN PROCESSOR B
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
I
DO
II
J.>l
"·""
III
-u.uu
IV
1
101 102 103 104 105 106
!!!1§.
107 lO!I 109
-11.uu
110 111 112 ,,
-2. 68
. 12\
0.58
- - 2 ~-2·~~
..
1 -lo
- j -· ·-- 8.J4
- - --1---- - -
2 9.49 22.16 16.
--
289.31 f--· 9.49 22.16_ ,________ 16. 28 ·- - --·--- - -- - -- -- ~1L 57.24
3 -0.79 8:4C T5.51 1.86 ~-3
_ __-_Q_. 7'L ___8..__4L c--1_5.._51_
~
, ·-
4 1.36 6.80 6.95 -0.91- - 1--~4- - - - - - - 1--1._L f - - =6_;_80

---6.9_5_
-0.91
'"' qq
14.20
16. 23 16. 22 12~51- ---=3~16 5
- - - --·- --16:22-
------ f---1i:Si- ~- ~--
-- -3.16 41.80
5 -- --·. - - - - - 16.23
6 16. 07 10.86 15.27 2.93 6 2.93 16.07 10.86 15.27 45.13
~I 7 11. 77 9.88 -7.38_ f -13.61

---
"''
::!I 7 · - - · - - 13.61
--~ -- ----
--- -·-- -
11.
.
77 -
9.88 -
-7 .38 27 .88
8 -~6.23 22.01
8.58 13.90 -6.23 5. 76 ----- - " -- -~._76 -- - - - - - · - · - - - __ 8_.58_ 13.90
9
10
11
19.20
-23.45
-1.82
-11.15
-9.02
-1.44
0.92
1.17
-2. 25
20.18
13.68
7 .99
·--9
---,_-u- r - - - - - - - ------- - - - - - - - - 20.~JL 13:68
11
---- - - - - - t----- -
19.20 -11.15
-23.45 -9.02
0.92
1.17
-2. 25
29.15
-17. 62
2.48
- - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - · - - - - -7.99
- --
~T.32--
~
-1. 82 -1.44
12 1.62 0.28 6.94 7 .32 12 6.94 1. 62 0.28 16.16
- ----
13 3.27 -3.11 18.33 17 .93 13 18.33
f---·--- - - - - - - 1-----
i --u.-93 j. 21 -3.11 JD.42
"·"T"""
I----::-.~- -
!
--r--·-- -
53;3_L -v.~-y:::
- - -~6.30
(1) 58.85 69.11 86.96 85.50 T1 (3) 24.68 - -35~29- -52. 98 -7. 76 2.96 3. 81 -11._20(' )3-00.4:Z-
,,_,~
Aj I
SECTION 4
- - ------ ~----- ----
00
1--'
---- -- ---- -- - -- BllCTION 3 - OILS
Source
(11) Phases
s.s.
42.212'
D.F. M:ean Sa. F Ratio
3 14.0708 1.1674 1
101
--
102
- 103--
!l__.1_1!__ ----- -- 0,5_1l__ - - - - -
-105 -
-
-106
--
107 108 109
0.58
110 111 112 113
0.58
'
(12) Cars Adj. 538.8913 12 E~ 44.9076 3. 7258• 2 57.24 57. 24 f--57. 24 __ 57. 24
f--
(13) Oils S678.8374 12 306. 5697 25.4359 3 24.99 24-:99 :_24~~~ ---
24.99
(14) Error 289.262• 24 Eo 12.0526 4 14.20 14.20- f--14. 20 14.20
( 5) Total ~549.2031 51 5 41.80 41.80 41.80 41.HU
- - - - -··--
~I 6 45.13
-·-·
45.13
--
45.13 45.13
Uncorrec lted Sum o ~ Sq. Q 6284.8224 !'ll 7 27.88 27 .88 27 .88 27 .88
8 22.01 22.01 22.01 22.01
--·
Correct! on Term C Q (1735.618 9 29 15 29.15 29.15 29.15
~
10 -17. 62 -17. 62 -17.62 -17. 62

,/ Eb-Ee for Eh>! - ii 2.48 2.48 2.48 2.48
.....- l' - 39 Eb 12 16.16 16.16 16.16 16.16
36.42
-. .
13 36.42 36.42 36.'>l I
_,6 !,4.9076- [2.0526
1751.3 e64 (6) 119.11 146. 53 61. 78 142.39 94.30 89.69 107. 85 132. 71 j .... O'>. l l 72. 78 49. lb 01. ' "
.......-i: 0.0187 (Car Cori ection 17) 22.12 479. 79 220.23 535.41 553.32 338.13 344. 61 596. 70 -476.82 -69.84 Zb.64 34.29 -1vv.ou
Factor)
-741.36 1131. oO lu7o. zo
(8) 1429.32 1758.36 1708. 68 1'•'+. lU
'""·" .... ,:r.lSO - •u:r • .,).£ -87 3. 36 -589.92 -975.36
-- ·--- (9) 901. 26 901.26 901.26 901.26 901. 26 >U!o2b 9Ul.Zb >V<.Zb 901. 26 901. 26 9Ul • lO •Ul. lD 7V!, £0
w. -305.94 -377.31 380.13 -272.01 322.98 163.11 -48. 33 -94. 56 -55.44 62.10 J<+. ~4 ><+>.b] -J.1 ... :rv
- /10,
Y1 18.9591 46. 2544 31. 578• 54.4035 67 .5197 40.6201 37 .3863 64.5318 -54.016 I -6.5988 3.9798 1U.2TJZ -!<+ ... NO
Correct• d Avg. Vi~c. Lo••• s Y1/4 ) 4. 74 11.56 7.89 u.ou lb.OH 10.16 9.35 16.13 -13.50 -1. 65 u.n '• ,, -J. 02
i
uncorrec eq AV8o ~i.ac. LOE ses Raw Avg. 6.17 13.33 6.12 l'>.O/
"·" 9.39 9.57 16. 5H -lJ.2' -1. ' "
v.t'> o. 95 -2.80 i
* Si9nificant at the 951 Confidence level.
APPENDIX D
TABLE 0·16
A~YSIS OF FIELD TEST DATA
DRAIN PROCESSOR A
SECTION l ~
100°F Vis. Losses cSt. After 1500 Hiles 100°F Viscosity Loues cSt. After 1500 Hiles
~ Q.!.!e
I II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 1n• 109 110 _ 112 _---113 _ (2) __
1
2
3
1------2
-0.4 2
_ _ _7_-'_"-+-~--8.u<+
.• 5--19_ _6.0--19
11.13 23.27
7. 39
17.96
16. 06
15.% _ 2
2 .46
___l--+--6~
3
0 0_9-+----- I -7~42-. -
11.13 23.27
-0.42 7. 39
-
- ~
17._96_~-- ---~-=~-~
---t----~8~.04~--+-----+---t------t--=2~-~~9-r-=2.R~B
- -- -+~1_6._0~6-+-_ ------+-------1----t-----1-----+-~2=4~6-r-----r------1r--~2 49---j

_____
------+--~1=5~.9~6~+------+------t--------t---6R~.1......_,2
'-=
4 -0.07 8.40 5.07 -0.31 4 -+---~,o~-.-~0~7-_+--_8=·~4=0--+-----+---=5.07 _n " .. no
5 14. 81 16.81 14. 69 -2. 78 5 -+-----1---- -1-------1-----"li!-4..!8ull--1----'1J16L!.Bu.__l-J------1----'"~··0L•-J.------l-----l-------l----+-------l--'-'-'2~._,_,7R"---+--"''"'-'" ''"'--j1
~I 6
1
16.04
11.28
8.79
10.53
15.51
-5.92
3.52
13.94
"'' 6
:<I 1
3.52
- ~13-:-~f_
16.04 8.79
~ 11 28 ___!()_,_5l_ r·-
_!,1_,,_5-'-'.5'-'1'-l-----+-------+----l-------+---+_,.,·•,.,,,_,,
-5.92
. .-1
'" ••
8 8.63 11.89 -4.20 3.68 -· 8 _ _ f.68 _ _ - - e - - - - _ ___._ 8.~63~ --=-11~·=8~9-+-----+---4~·=2~0-+-------t-----r----t-~2=0~·=00"--1 1
9 18. 71 -11.3 7 1.34 20. 77 9 --~--- 20. 77 ---+-----lf----=-18°'.~7~1-+---'l'-'l'-'."-3~7-.;----+--=l"-."-34~-+----+----+~2~9~·~4=5-t
10 -25 .4 7 -7. 22 2. 24 14 .41 10 14, 41 ---+-----lf------+---'2~5~·~4~7-.;--7~·~'~2~+----.;~'~n~-+----t--~·'~'•~=nt..-t
11 ,___-_o_._10--+__ -o_._9_0-+--_-_2_._3_7-+-_8_._4_1-+_ _1_1_,____ __,______ ~- _ _a,_t,__~1--+-----+-----if------+--'-'-"--o.• 10..__-+--=--n.,.....o,,._n-+----+--~··~_._,_•,_1---_...._.<n1"'----1.
~~ ~:~! -~-~~ l~:~~ l~-~~ ~; - --~~·~"-1-1~1c---.--c4~5-1-----1-----+--~·==-r--~3:~~=~-+---3-.-4-1----jr--2~~~~.~'~~3-1

7 47 75 1 35 4 7
• 19.25 T
1---"'5'"1-.04=--+--7"'4,.._-=9•7--+--=94~.5..2~+--9"'6'.-=2•2-+-,,,T-,c~3--c,i-+--2~8~.2-1 56._Q!>__ l~-42 61.94 t- 63.32 -r3J-:-5-5 __ ,4,_,o"-~=6o"--lr---f---"'63"'--.~5,_,6·c:-_-:--~-5,_,o~.:8"'0,,_-_-_;-_-:;4~.,_,4:,4c:-_-::_-:;_-::_-:,4c::._,:2-=5;:_-_:-~1~-=o;;.=':_1=::_-::_-:;_-.~1-:-1~~·-1_-,,:-c_4~,,-=3-=22-,-·.-1s-
sECTI.oN 4 ------~ H - ~--__::-_ f---=-1--SECTION 3 - nH
Source
1----s-s-.ANAL"""~~~-!-~~O~F-~-~-a~~-=-1~-~1---F-R_a_t-ic+----.;-1~0~1--1--1~02~ l.o~-~'104 105 - f -1~0-=6--1----10~1--+-1-=0~8--+-~10~9--t-'-=1-=1-=o--.;-11-=1--t--:1-=1~2--.;~1-=1-=3--1-------1 (X)
(11)
(12)
(13)
Phases
cars Adj.
Oils
t--::7,::~7~='~-=';~=i----=-17~--::E!..c--tf--"~=~~~=6,,-"'-l~.~.'---7!~::""~'C'~~;..---c~c--t-6c~~~'.?i--6e.32- i---£~L -68~- - -
3443.icm 12 286.9331 21.091!1* 3 25.49 25.49
-J-- -
2.88 68.32
-h5j!i_}------1--------+----1--------+-==-+--2-5.-4-9-+-------+----t-----<
2.8B
N
I
(14)
( 5)
Error
Total
~3~2~6."'4~96f---=2~4--'E"'e-+-_1_3"-.6_04_1-+-V----1---4--11--------+------1-l=3.__()9_ _13.09
1-4~5~7~4~.6~.,.-=t--5_1_-.;-----+---+---,--;~- 1------ ~-- - - 43. 53 43. 53
13.09
1 ----i=· 13 09
---00-.-1---~43~·~5=3--+---.--=--=--+-----t-----.;-----+----+-4~3=·~5~3--il-------t
1-----+----+-----+-----+---o~.,_l_6----;1----4_3_._8_6--1---- _________ I __ ~ 8~ 4_3_._86_,i-------+-4_3_.8_6----;1--------1------+--------+----+-------;1-------<
l-'~~n~c~or~··'-'*·~t~ed,._,,S~t.m..yo~f"----"S,._,_o~·'-J"~~-57u7~·~8~9~6'4-~~,,.___l--'7'-----l~---+--=-2~9~.8~3'-----l----- __ti '---+-2~9_.8_3_____,_2__9_._8_3---+-----+---2_9_._8_3_t--------+-----+----+------i-----<
8 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Correct on Term C • 29.45- 29.45 29.45 29.45
. -- ----+----1----~-+--'--,---+-~~-+----.;-.,.-~,.,--+---+------\
10 -16~.04'-----+------+---+------+~-1~6~."-04-'--+--1~6~."-04-'---+------+--1-6~._04_--+---_ _---+_-----t
Eb - Ee for 11 'Ob. 5rv. 5 04 5 04
39 Eb 20. 27 20.27 20. 27 20.27
13 " 37.03 37.03 37 .03
~ 60.5144- 13.6040
•--t-"=2""3'"60"'--.""b6..l<.:6==-+------l---(6~)--+-1-=-35~.~3-3H · 160.-~ 61.46~+-1--::5~4-.3~9----;c---9~6~.84- 91.82 U3.63113~0~.-3'~4-+'4'6-.7
+--=-
12:---t-~77~.·3~2--t--:8-=o-.2"'5,..--+-5~4,.._-=3=5-t--:8=8-.4~8~+---'-----I
r--------+--------+---+---+---+-------+---+---+---+-------+-------1
t-l/"<.--::;;,.,_--::.-+---::o=-.-=0"'1-=-98:-t--cl-1ca_r_C_o_rt-ec-t--,i-on-r---(:-:7:-:-)-+-2:-:5c.:3:--.·8;:9::--t-I-=5-=-04c-.-:3--::6----t--l6S. 78 55 7. 4 6 I 56 9. 88 3o1. 9 5 3 65. 40 572.04 457.20 39.96 38. 25 93.33 100.35
r-----+-----+--'=Fa~c~t~or=r-~~~-+---~-+------+--------+-----+-----+----------;-------+-
18) 1623.96 1928.04 737.52 •1852.68 1162,08 1101.84 1363.56 1564.08 553.44 927.84 963.00 652.20 - 061.76
,_____ -
r----
----·-----1-----+---c=+-=~----;-~~-:-c--+------1-------..--~
(9) 968. 25 968. 2 5 968. 25 ~-~-9~ ~ 5 I 968 ~2~_9_68_._2_5--+_9_68_._2_5-+9_6_8_.2_5_1--9_6_8_.2_5_+9_6_8_.2_5_+9_6_8_.2_5_+9_1b_8_.2_5__+-------1
---_-f----
..,,--,,,1""0~,_~4--::0--:1-.-8--::2---t--4-=-55c. 43
r-----1-----1'-----+------1-.,,, 39 6. 51 - 32 6. 97 316. o 5 1 168. 36 --2--9-.-9-1--+---_2--3-.-7-9--+-.-42-.-3-9- +-~8000-.~31=--+--4"'3-."'50=---+4-,.,09=--,-=-38=---+.-c19"'3-.-=-86.,--+----- -
1-------+-------ll-------+----.;-,_,_=<-t---'=-"~---+--=-=-=----r~~-+--='-'-'-''-'----l---''-'--'-~---+--=~=-+-~~'--t-~=--~+--='-"-'---+---'1~~---+-'-"--'-"-'------+-'-'-""-'----I=--"-=-'----+----~
1------+----1----t------+~y-,--.;--.2~0-.•25~4.-.1---4~7•.•o'-2od-Z!i'2~6-."21"'0"'8.+--5~5·.-r;r4&111J,,,._-.7•0•.1~6~5+--'3~6-.-=-553=-'l---T40".'0~0""1-n--,o....---,.""'u~9'*--,.•5r1.~
.•~J9~3t-,o~.~uJ1,..nJ___.,>r.•1~1......-1Jt--:l-.8-.4~7~5'"7-+-.-1~4-.~9~88=4.+------4
Correetel Avg. Vi c. Loa1e1 5.06 11. 76 6.57 13.87 17.69 9. 22 10.00 15.77 ......
Uncorree ed Avg. he. Losses Raw Avg. 7.05 14.01 4.61 15.49 1).8] lU.1' "15·89 -12.70 1.11 l.Ob -2. 79
* Significant: at the !J5't Coofideuee level.
APPENDIX D
TABLE D-17

FLEET C DRAIN PROCESSOR C
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
100°F Vis. Losses est. Af~er lSOO Miles lOOUF Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles
PHASES OILS
I II III IV 101 102 103 104 lOS 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 - (2)
~
-2.2s
_]_,_7S
6.96
_l~,_6!_
12.34_
17. 89
-3.18
8. 97 1-~;.~,~~:~~---~-~-:--}-~--~-7li~;~;~;~,-:-:-:8-;~----~~~~~6-7-1--~-~--~-)--T~---~--~-----~~~~--~---~-~~3~.~~~-~----~~~.-9-7~----~l~.~~--~--~-~~.~~-l--~--~2~.2~S~-~~~~~
3 11.Sl 8. SB l'!..._~_ - l,_67
4. 73 4
4 10. 77 ~-~- 1. 91
s 11.36 16. 98 6,86 __ -:o-: 54-- s I 11,36 __ i_6._9.e_ ".86 _ _ _ ______ -n .,,_ ,,,_ 66
8.41 2. SS S.33 -:0:46- ~-
-o:46 j : _ B.4_1_ _ ___2o1S_ s.33 lS.83
~I 8
e---7~~?
9.66
11.90
11. 63
-2. Sl 10. 39
-3_. ~-0- -~'_93 --
~-7
8
l 10.39:
f-
1~43 11.90
__ 9,66
-2...SL_____ --+---~°'·~~'"-'---<
U.63_____ ____-3_.filLc-------c-------+~~-'-.-6_
7 29
4.93 . t 2__,
~------ -~-=-_J_:::- ~'.~ _;lt~_-ll.6S

9 14 .12 -14. 09 Q_._9_8_ 16. 28 16 28 14
10 -29. 24 -11. 6S -~ -~·~~ 10 8.6S D.9B -6.81 -39.0S
11 4.10 2. Sl -0.38 11. 96 11 11.96 1---- 4.10 2.Sl -0.38 18.19
12 2.48 S. lS 8-.()3-- ·12:-61- 12 8.03 12. 61
1 2.48 S. lS 28. 27
13 1.84 -1. 62 12. lS 21-:~- 1_3 i2.1S 1 I -- -2i.04 ----- ----+---i~84
-1. 62 33.41
Aj (1) S1. '" ""· ,~ /l,O/ .,,,; 23 - Tj_ (3) 22. 28 30, SB S6.30 48.71 i 28.66
L
j 41,()3
--
SECTION 4 J__ SECTION 3 - OILS -- - - - --- - - - c---·----r------+-----t--------1

ANALYSIS OJ VARIANCE
Source _s.s..___ -----1J....E.__ M_ea_n_:>_q_._ y R;.t io 1- - 1--1_01_-+_1_0_2_-+-_10_3_ _.._1_0_4_ _ _
1o_s_ _.__1_0_6_+-_1_0_1_-+-_1_oa_-+--·i_o_9_-+----+---.-,----+---+-------1
(11) Phases 7' 3 ~--2.28_731 13.87 13,87 - 13.8]
(12) Cars Adj. 928.448.<I 12 Eb 77._370_7 1Q_.4Sl2t _ 49.22 49_.22 49.2_2
~733.932( 12 t 36.43
tj -
(13) Oils 227 .8276 3Q_. 77SQ_r 36.43 36.43 - ----
(14) Error 177 ,.,., ,~ •- _l_.4_Q,1Q______ 4 I 24.13 24.u 24.13 - -
( S) Total
~13.063 Sl ~---_I_ ___ _ , S lS.B 34. 66 34. 66 ____ __14._66_
1 6 3 l~.83 _1s_,Jl}_ _ _ _ _ _ -12&L
= s443.~1 ~ 7
_::_-
Uncorrected Sum <f Sq. __ _ ___n._21 27 21 27 21 27. 21
-jj- 22.6:Z- "----~22:62- 22.62
Correct on Term C = 1S30.17i-'='-_-}- - - - - . -- ---- 17,29 __ --=~
.. -=-17.-29---t--17-_,__-2-9--+----+----cc--+-------t-----+---------i
---;;-t-;;;:::::-;---+-- 10_ -- ' -- - - F39.0S ___-39.0S
t :}- -,,-. . !
f - --- - - ·- - -- -- -
, Eb-Ee ~o~ j-_Eb>Ee -t_\1_ __ __ __ -l _ ---- -- - j -~ll._1_9__~-- --------+-----+---+-----+------+----
, ::.:,,_ '·'"" • "•rn -"'~- - - ·! ---,·_''·" "·" --+----+--="---+--~-'-7':--1-~~-+--___,

f------+-~3017. 4 73 -_:_c_~ ~iQ1-:19- -11;01 : - 97 ~OS _ 12~_,_Jp~ 7. 87 t~~,_3_§ J-i1.-_,,2_,_.7'-'6=---+l--_8""90'~'-'l-=-S--+--=l-=-9.:_•3"-'2'--+~==--+===-+--="-'-=--1-
~
- " ""' I '~:,:: '~"-
,,,-i-,.,_,,- ,, !
r-----+----t------+--------<-~<~a)_13_8!-~7~4~~·6o-+-1~u:_-_"o+- .41._f_o~o:::r~;-n-
~-\'"· F!'-'I;;;" ,~~" I "'·-"~~- M_ ... L "
rn69__.,.a;:-o~:-:=2_3"'1=:.:=a=4~======~======~:======~======:====~__,
f-- <~._8_46_.~_ -~~2~ Lsi._6. 24_ _::s_~~4J _a_4_6. ~~t-s~ ~4_:i -34~ _!4fa_:_-2_4--+_84_6_.~2e74=:======::=-=-==~=:======:===::=~=:=====~-j
,__>----
__-----+-------- ~_,-rr--_-::::::::::::::::=:=====---+w~l~,__(10)- -=239. sL~o§_: ~ c:-150, 66 -l- 7io. ~9 l_-_2_9_~~ t~_1__ +--2-'4-"-s-'-:-,s_2_-+__11_3_::_2_2-+----+-----"-+------+----+----------i
Y· 16.747 37.77f!I. 29.S83 S2.81~ 6S.11SJ 30.s~. J7.o>L S/.1'C -4~.Ul~
------r------+------+---+------t----+----t----+------t----1
l"K;_, ,orocr,_,e"'c-=t.: e•'l- '-A~v_.,_,_~.- 'V'-'i"l-=-1c-=-._.L-o -=s-=-•=e. __ __,(+Y-JL'--'-4)_-1--4.19-·_-+-~~ ...,.-2.,_0~--+r-----'l"'6"',2"'8"-+j_-=-=7'.;,.~6~3=~==~Ll2.-;,;4"'.;;;;:1=~~1,.,4~.;;,4~5=~=-=1:;:1-.•2:s:_:=======;~======:====::=;~=-=:::;;=::======~

1.dQ.µ;,ff
Uncorre ted Avg. Vise. Lo ses Raw Ava. s. s 1 12. 17 1. 6S +-14.-0-a---+-1--2-.-1a--+--1-.--1-1-+--1-o-.2·-6--+--1-3.-0-3---+--_-1-2-.-26---+-----+---+-----+--------+------<
APPENDIX D
TABLE D-18
DRAIN PROCESSOR D
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
100°F Vis. Losses cSt. After lSOO Miles lOOaF Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1)00 Mi.lea
I 11 Ill IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
.,_-_0_;5_1_-+--_7_._8_3_,__13_._8_6_+----3_.60 1 7.83 _____ 13.86 _ __ ---~------ ________ 1 _--=-3=-.6'--0'--+-~=-~----+-----+---0~·~5~1--tt---"l'-7"--.5;.;8~

___
2 8.43 14. 19 13.86 n . 3 o ~_2__ ~--43_-_-__,____14_._1_9_+-___ __,_u-:-a6- 21.30 58.38
3 ~12"-'"c;7,::8'-+-:.;:9-=-.4;c8o---+-"-'15;.-•:.;:8:.;:7_+--;:2=-.o;-;-1 _ _ _ _3_.__ 12.78 9.48 -_ _Di·~--~--- ~- - - -------- - - - -i.01 40.14
4 ,_4_.c_9_2_+--_9_.4_8_ _.____6_._3_9_..__2_.0_7_ _.___ ___,4 - _ _-_::_:_ -~ .92-- 9.48 - - - - 6. 39_ - --------=.~-=--=--=--=--=--=-:-=--=--=----- -~----_--_ _-_-__,+_-_-_-_-_-_-_-:f--_-_2~_.~0~1::~::::::_::;:_2=o2~.~8~6_::::
__---1
11.34 l~:~~ 10.51 =~:~~ ~ -l. 56 -1 =_:__- 11.34 -1~:~-~- - l. 77
5022 10.51 -0.S5 ~~:~~
::::~::::~~:::;::::::::::1::;1-;:.5:::9:::::::~:::~:::::::~:::!:::::::::::::9:::.3:::6::::::~:::~~~1:::::::1:::::~::::::::::::=: -9036 _ l.:_7_~--
~I
11.59 - - - - - - __
1. n 30.46
9.52 11.49 -2.45 5.76 ;:)I 8 ____ -~~- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9-,5C+---'1~1__:_4-=-9--+----1----2-=-.4-'5-+--c---1-------1----+--24_.~3~2--j
9 l-"-15=·~54~--+--~7~.4=-7~-+--o~·~9~6-+-=l-=-3~.9~2~_.____9__,_____+ - - - - - _ -----~1~----- ------+------1--"-15'-'."'54'-'----+--~7-'-.4-7-+----+--'-o-'-.9'-6'---+----+----J-2-'-2-'-.'--95'---"
10 26. 20 -11. 85 -6. 63 9. 09 10 ____ -~- _ _ _ ~, ()9___ +~~=---l----+---+--2=-6-'._2_0_t---l,l'c.8._,5,__+-,.=-1----6=-.6-'3--+-~~..--11---n35;r._,5"'9--j
11 1--4"-'":.;:2-;:5-+--;:2_,_.7:.;9~-+--;o;.-•:.;:9.;.6_+-:.;:l.;.l,_.7;.:;3~-1---11~1------+------~-- __ _ _ _ _ _ 11_:__7~ --+-~~---11-----+-----+--4_._2_5_+-~2_.~79~-+--=-+---u.9_6-1-~1~9·=".,---j
2.31 4.23 9.09 17.23 12 9 09
12
13
1--2-.~04--+-_~o-.~18--+-1~1~.~2=5--1=1-.04~--1---=-13~1--=-:•:_::.:___-+-1~1-.=2=5·->--- - - - - - -- - - - - - - + --- - 17.<J i.H 4.23
-- -!7--:1l4 +----t--------1-----+-~
'· ""~---1--~-u~.~
32.8b
•o-+--=,u,.~.,~
1
l------+---+----1-----+----+---~--
t-"-'_ 7n_·--"-·-+~-·=--·=--"'-t-'-
'"-+-- n._•_n-+"'_,__
'3'_'---1-2-3_._7_9_
-
=-~-:-- _34. 02 _ ~~ 6~
--- -
_ !! .4~ =t~~.. - -+--- - - - - - - - - ----:-;::: -·
66 t4~. 85 -'-49'-'"-2-'9--+--'3'-5_._5_3-+-_l_l.'--,<_5_+--
o.__
07---11--1._.c_,_·1_+-_-__
u_. _>ot•IJ 316. ,.
Source .s..L. J2.L.

SECTION 4
~---ANALJ__y-"s"'Is""'"'o.::.F::.V.;:AR~IAN-C_JE_ _ _
•~an Sn ~
-+-----r------=
101
.
==-- _ --- --- 102 103
<
t ~-
104
-
-1- SECTION 3~---0-IL-+----+------11-----+----+----+------l----I
! 105
=-~-+--:;-:o:----I-=--+--_,-=-=---+-~~--1f-c=--+-~~-1--~~-+-----l
-106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
CX>
~
I
(11) Phues 74.2753 3 24.7584 2.1916 1 17.5~-~--- µ7_~~- --~- -- 17.58 17.58
(12) .....,,.,6n~~1...2~"-..,_+g,_,,_,_4__,.43,_,8,,9c+--'8._,_,,35"-'9'-'9'+-'---'2'--l~5,._.8'-"."-38,.___.__.5~ ------~8.38
Cars Adj. """..,.. 1 _ ---1-----+---l-----+-5_8_:_.3_8_-1-.,.___--1-_ _ __j__ ___.__ _~
(13)
(14)
Oils
Error ~-x:~1~~·~~~~3~2~~1+-"~4,,_2_E_e--1~r~i~:~~~~~~!'-+=-15~·~44c::.-".5~8•+-----'~'-l--_-_-_-_~~4~0~._1~4~:-__,·t_·}~-:i~_ ~86""-~~-~~r.-86 ~-~-·-----+----+----+-4_0_._14_-+-_22_._8_6_+--=~,.--if----<
( 5) Total 3572.496C 51 5 - - --~37.95j~~- L __ - . .. c--~3-'-'7"".'.9:.::5_+-.. ....--+---1-----+---+----+_::3:..:7.:_:9:.::5-+----I
6 15.00 115.00 15.00 15.00
:n:;n:.c:o;::rr:<e~c;:;;e::d:::•:-um::::n;f:::s~•:;:.::::::-:::;~:so-~2~.1+~1;.;1:;;2:::::;;g:1::::::1:::~==~:::::::::::::::3~0:::.4:_:6e::::: ~ - - 7
- - - - - - J0~.-,-4-,-6-·i--3 0-.4-6-+---'-___,i--30~.-4'6-+------11-----1-
t------+---,J------~.,.,.,~·9=2~12=-+_u_''__,89~----+----l-2-4:_:•_:_3_:_2_;_____ _ _ _ _ 24.,, 24.3_2_+-c----+-2_4_._3_2_t-cc_ _--+----+-----+------1
Correcti>n Term C ,~ 22.95 22.95 22.95 22.95
:-::_-::_-:_-::_-::_-::_:-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_~-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_:-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_:-::_-::_-::_-::_1-~o~~-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_-::_~_:_-_-_-:_-_-_-_-;_-_-_-_-:_-__- __-+J_-""_""_'"'_"'_'-_-~·~--3=-_5-.:;5"'-9-:_-_·+-o--~=:~:::1:::::::::::::::::::~~:~~~:::1-j3~5~.~5-'-9~_--i-1-'---:3;,.5~.~5:9::::::1~:~~~:::j:::-c.3~5=·~5=9::::::1::::::::::j~:::::::::::::::j
-'-'"'"-"1.A.~[.._.=•l-"JE~IL-_,E,.,__-1----1-----1----'l:_:l__.__ _ __,__ _ __j__ _ _L__ __J______ 19. 73 19. 73 19. 73 19. 73
w..... 12 32.86 32.86 32.86 32.86
, 13 30.15-- 30.15 30.15 30.15
_,- z • 94.4389- 11.2966 '
3683.11 1 (6) 123.82 159.13 104.90 · 142.14 57.50-- 88.0""5--lh-1•25•.•5"9-if--.. 92•.•4•:2-f-=3:5.'.4,,,_o+=bb.-.84.-r--+.1-.-D"".'b~s-+~5=-o.~2~8-hl7 05~.~4-.l-+----I
~-.--+-~~"+-"---+-----+--~-+----+----~-__J_--_-·------t---t---t-----t---t----11-----lf-=-'C:.::..::'--t-=-=:.::..:..C:.::_;f-----I
-/-:-h"(-•-+O-:-.-:Oc:2-:-2-:-5-+-,-,,C-a_r_C_o_•,..,+e-c-ti-on--+--(o-c707)-+2"'1'"'4-.-.1•1-f.-4...-33".'6'"'2,-·+.3'"0c6. 18 [43 7. 40 463. 32 248. 94 '4>~. oo 443. 61 319. 77 101. 25 72. 63 15. 39 -5. 22
-----+---+-'F'-'a"'c"'t""or°')'-+-----t---(8-)--1-'48~5--.-84--+-lll9=.-5-6--1+2~5'~8.80 -~7o5:6ll 690.0o~o=;~- -~~-.----+li:-2-,4-.-ou--+·-ou-<.-.u-o--+""'°""--1-0--+-60_3___3_6__.._12_64._9_2--+------'
f------+-- - . -
t9) 9so.31 9 so. 31 9so.31 9 so. 31 9so.31 9-5-0-.3-7--"-9-5-0-.37-t-:9"'5-00--c.3=-:70--+9•5°'0'"".-3"...-1--1r:9~5•0-c.3"'7-+9"'5"0'""."3=-7---1"'9-.-50•.•3~7-+-9~5~0-.3""7.-1----1
-------r-
------- ' w. c10) 321.36 525.57 -2.25 317.91 723.b9 i4:r;11--iuT.uo
'
"'"·~" 205.80 249.54 3b}.lb ,.,_40 -319.11
Y, 16.5594 36.3547 33.9694 41.4471 67.7630 30.8709 46.2162 55.7011 -30.8995 16.00<+0 -0.1461 9.8640 -7.774
1",.._..""'cte Avo Vi c. Losee (Y)4) 4-14 10.36 16.94 7. 72 1..1.X> l3.93 -l..ll... 1l..l2... -0.04 2.47 -1.94
Uncorrec ed Av2. iec. Loe es C!Raw Avg.) 5. 95 12.05 8.51 12.15 12.87 b.92 TZ.21 iz.,, -u. LJ
* Significant at the 9S1. Confidence level.
APPENDIX D
·,
TABLE D-19

DRAIN PROCESSOR K
SECTION 2
SECTION 1 100°F Viscosity ~t. After 1500 Hiles
100°F Vis. Losses cSt. After 1500 Hiles
~
I II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
-2~80
----,
-2.28 7 .10 13.50 i 7 .10 13.50
I -2.80
~::;:
2 7.20 15.10 io.80 2 16:80 7.20 _!5.10 16.80 10.~!J- --r------
3 ~50
T:i:36 1. 70 14.60
4 5.00 9.10 -i.30
3
4 6.50-
12.30 9.50
5.00 9 .10 - - - -1---
6.50_ ~
--- ---- -
- ----
1. 70
2. ln oo on
11.60 16. 70 5 •.6~ :0.65 11.60 - _....-_MO_ __ __ r-- _ _ _
----- 5
-o. 70
~I 7
8
8.50
7.10
-----
2.10 3. 70
11.90 f--- -2.80
9.40 -10.80 -3. 20
11.10
5.90
6
7 -ffi -o. 70
11.10
8.50 _ 2.10 -
7.10 11.90 t
3.70
-2.80
- 13. 60
27 30
9
10
13. 70
-32. 90
-14.40 - 6.90-
-11.60 f--~r:oo
-
-20:20
8.10
8
9
10
5.90
20.20
8.10
9.40
l
j 10.80
13. 70
- -l.l.O_ -----+------
-14_. 4Q_ - ----+--0~._90_>-----+----+-·-2_0~._4_0__,
t -:u..20_ _olLJio_t-----+--~
?? Q(\
10_0-+-----+--~4~3·~4_0--t
11
12
3.30
2.00
2.40
5.40
-0.85
1:10
11.60
i0.50
11
7. 70
\ 11.60
10:50-
~ -
t _
~-~3_0,,_.__2~·~4~o-+-----+---~o~•.~85~,___=16~·~4-=5--+
13 2 30 -1.56 12.60- 19.20

12
13 -- l2~ 60 ! I 19. 20
' 2.00 5.40
-- ~----2.-w--=i.56
25.60
32.54
I I
Aj (1) 47 .22 62.54-~~os_ -97 .25 _Ti- (3) 21.30 51.10 33.90 ! 57. 70 47 .90 27.30L.i.Q t7.40
SEC'[•" ___ SECTION 3 - OILS
Sow.roe S.S.
ANALYSTS OF ,,.._ • .,,.E
D.F Mean So. F Ratio 101
15. 52
I 102 ~ 103
15. 52
104 105 106 I- 107 - I 108 109
15. 52
111 112 113
15. 52
00
\.J1
(11) Phases 101 .1418 3 - 33 .71:)5 - - 3.321,
(12) Cars Adj. rl~0~48~.56=~'oc-+-_ 1 2~"'-"'-lc-~87.3BOC
77 8.609! * 2 49.90 49.90 49.90 t ~~o"---l-~~-+------+-------t---- I
(13) Oils r2~~'-"27
3=.54~•r.7.l---.1.2~_-+-__2,3.5~ _23.183; * 3 38.10 38.10 38.10 f ____ -~3~8,.._l__o~r------+----+---
243.586 24 Ee 10.11+94
~-__ _1£._9"fQ_"~---
(14)
( 5)
Error
Te>tal 4216.835' 51
----- ---
4
~
I
I
22.90 22.90
33.25 ~Vi~
t 22.90
13.60 I 31.25
I
~13.60
!'
-~-- -
--- -
--- -- _33.25
r---Un-c-or-r-·e+---te-d~Stem--+o-fc---Sa-.--=].67_1.7_!\ i:._1 13.60127.30 2_2.90 ' 27.:i~~_:!-i ~2~90--1- ~7.30 - 22.90-~---=- ___:::__ -_-_-_-++_-_-_-_-_-_-__,-!
t---C-o-r-re_c_t+~-,on_T_e_rm--<-c---.i-o-14~5~4-.-96°=~-:---t 1
20.40 \ _ _)_____ ~~.40 2_0_._4__0_-+-----+-2_0_.4_0--;----+----+------+
10 t~-43. 1:0 ' _._:-43.40 -43.40
-43.40
~~Eb_-_E_e_-i---_f_o_~r--t~h_ ~-
I
_j
I
It_-__ _ __ I 16_.45____ -:-:__-_ _ 16.4516.45 16.45
r------+=3~9~.,,~--1----+-- 23 ?5.60
-32-.54
1· - - j - - - _2~.60_f--,-32·.-54-~-- --+---+--==~+--~~--;~~~-+-------1
25.60 25. 60
32. 54 32. 54
>-__...&:__-~-,.-+-8~7-.~38~0~0--,_o~.-1-494--+-~--- - / I 1
'
f------+--3407.8'00 ) -\ _!o4-:-§2 14-7~ i- 99.42 l 126.45 j 41.5_5 - ! 80.25 1109.05__ ~ 8_~4_4_1--1_9_._82--l·-4_5_._8_5-+----f------+---1-------+
100. 55 37.64 97. 76
/'L = 0.0226 (car coirectio;,_--=iD -:12i:.._1~._:459;9o_J3_0~.10 ~519.3(1}>-31:10 :-245.io:p3~426.6o_ ,:476.10 63.00 27 .oo -48. 06
-6.3_0--Jf------+-----+----+-----1
_-~- _ Fact:_r- --- -=-=-~ill:__Iill:,_~_,_1J7~~~-ti93_.ci4 ~l~l~:~o-~-498.60 r-963-.00 ~OJ.60 il07~~8 t-_2_3-_7;_8_4-+_-_5_5_0._2_0--+---+-----+----t-------1

1206. 60 -451. 68 1173.12
l==L_:_-~ 1-- ~ -=-- ~~~-- ~2s.~s::-a25_.18: j 82_5.18 ! 825~18 la_25.18182~.18 r825=~8 __i8?_s.rn-1_s25.1~ +--8_2_5_._18--1----+----1--825.18 825.18 825. lH
c-~-~--1-----+-----1c------tlli--m-1o
f------+----1-----+-----;~v._,__
__L___+,_"'·'': :"'·" I·~>.~ ~ 1"·"
j'"·"-. ""''~!."~'"-·7w7~+-m-~..=4+-<0-·_·o=·+-~~=o1-~=-+---~----" I"'.
-
'---+~1=5·9a!.§ _ 4_Q_,_D_486f- _3_2. 481 l 53 .7921 65_,_()~_29.73~0,_~~2! .434 1 -50.3860 i ~5~·-3_72-+---f------+---'--1-------+

-0.1962 12 .0513 -14.2896
-.Jll>.4Z 4VVo>U -,~OoU\J
98...__·l--~--'"lo..,·:...o""-Ct 8.-~_ f 13&.+J-6~2E ):~ !:;!>L

2 .,__,v_Ji=-•c:::c•'----'L"'o.._ss"'''F"'-----+-'Y_,_-1'-/4'-'-)---+>-·-.-3_,,....
µCo"'r,_,r"'e"'c-"t•+d'-"A"'-v"- -=8,,,.,,,5,,,2,.__f--1_2_.8_6_+---1_2_._
_,,
ou-+-~=1·=,~4-1---~==-1-=="--+~==--+-----I
-U,U) ,.Ul )/
t-Un_c_o_r_r_e,+t-e_d_A_v-,2-.-+-V-is_c_.-Lo-+-s-e-s--(+R-a_w_A_v_•2~.)c+--5-.-33-t--l2-.-7-8--+ -8~48 t;";1;3f--ff.~6.83->--u51l-.8."'5-+--~1~3-.~z:3..--1-~-u·-.~l~H+--~~.---1-~~-+-~~+-------l

u.,, L. I> -1. ,q
* Significant at the 9570 Confidence level.

APPENDIX D
TABLE D-20
DRAIN PROCESSOR D
SECTION 2
100"F Vis. Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles 100°F Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles
PHASES OILS
105 106 107 108 109 110 (2)
0.39 9.18 13.92 0.70 1 ll 9.18 13.92 0.70 0.39 24.19
8.88 15.42 20.88 7.25 2 8.88 15.42 ~ 20.88 7.25 52.43
14.65 8.94 " 14.94 """0.48~ 3 14.65 ...fiJ4_ 14.94 0.48 39.01
.13.02 19.38 10.92 6.12 4 13.02 ~Y9.~38—" 10.92 6.12 49.44
20.70 20.55 12.58 2.10 5 20.70 20.55 12.58 2.10 55.93
20.97 6.78 12.40 7.53 6 _ 7^53 20.97 6.78 12.40 47.68
8.43 9.25 -12.78 12.87 s
m
7 ~ 12.87 8.43 9.25 -12.78 17.77
13.63 16.74 -0.87 9.82 " 8 9.82^ 13.63 ~~if.lu~ -0.87 39.32
14.62 -15.40 -2.70 10.05 _9 10.05 14.62 -15.40 -2.70 6.57
3.54 3.36 4.95 17.82 10 17.82 3.54 3.36 4.95 29.67
8.25 4.20 -0.60 12.12 11 12.12 8.25 4.20 -0.60 23.97
6.09 9.21 6.75' ' 11.41 12 6.75
12.18
. ... . 11.41
14.00
6.09 9.21
3.45 -1.74
33.46
27.89
3.45 -1.74 12.18 14.00 13
(1) 136.62 105.87 92.57 112.27 Tl (3) I 32.34 L_55.12 45.70 71.01 74.28 38.25 46.87 57.76 -23.94 17.99 8.07 23.73 0.15© 447.33 I
OO
SECTTON 4 1 . "s ECTION 3 - OILS
S.S. D.F. Mean Soj. F Ratio 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Source
(11) Phases 78.5544 3 26.1846 4.322S * 1 24.19 24.19 24.19 24.19
(12) Cars Adj. 339.679C 12 Eh 28.3065 4.6728 * 2 52.43 52.43 52.43 52.43
(13) Oils 2465.248: 12 205.4373 33.9134 1 3 39.01 39.01 39.01 39.01
(14) Error 145.3869 24 Ee 6.0577 4 49.44 49.44 49.44 49.44
( 5) Total 3028.8688 51 5 55.93 55.93 55.93 55.93
sal 6 47.68 47.68 47.68 47.68
Uncorre :ted Sum )f Sq. = 1028.8688 3"' 8
17.77
39.32
17.77 17.77
39.32 39.32
17.77
39.32
Correct .on Term C S848.1563 9 6.57 6.57 6.57 6.57
10 29.67 29.67 29.67 29.67
4.- Eh-Ee
39 Eh
for EB 'Ee 11
12 33.46
23.97
33.46
23.97 23.97
33.46 33.46
23.97
1
13 27.89 27.89 27.89 11.89
4 - 18.3065-6 0577
1103.95 15 (6) 157.76 137.10 151.96 164.37 172.29 138.86 146.48 121.46 78.20 145.39 103.01 140.46 131.98
^C - 0.0201 (Car Cor ection (7) 291.06 496.08 411.30 639.09 668.52 344.25 421.83 519.84 -215.46 161.91 72.63 213.57 1.35
Factor)
_ (8)" L893.12 - 1645.20 - L823.52 - 1972.44 - '067.48 - 1666.32 - 1757.76 - 1457.52 -938.40 - 1744.68 - 1236.12 -, 1685.52 - L583.76
_.._._ L341.99 1.341.99 1341.99 1341.99 1341.99 1341.99 1341.99 1341.99 1341.99 1341.99
(9) L341.99 1341.99 L341.99
»1 (10) -260.07 192.87 -70.23 8.64 -56.97 19.92 6.06 404.31 188.13 -240.78 178.50- -129.96 -240.42
'1 27.1126 58.9966 44.2884 71.1836 73.1350 38.650: 46.99U 65.8866 -20.158( 13.1503 11.657! 21.1179 -4.6824
Correcte 1 Avg. VI c. Losse ( r,/4) 6.78 14.75 11.07 17.80 18.28 9.66 11.75 16.47 -5.04 3.29 2.91 5.28 -1.17
Uncorrec :ed AvR.

r
lsc. Los ies f>aw Avg. 8.09 13.78 11.43 17.75 18.57 9.56 11.72 14.44 -5.99 4.50 2.02 5.93 0.04
APPENDIX D
TABLE D·21
DRAIN PllQCESSOR G
SECTION l SEC:IION 2
100° F y1a, Loaa11 cSt, After 1500 Hiles 100°F Viecoaity Loaaea cSt. After 1500 Mil••
PHASES .Q!Y
II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 lU 113 (2)
l--'1"-"oa,,___+-_1,_,.,.s"'o--1_ _,,1,c3'-"'.n-~3_j__ _ l 1 .so 13.22 ___ ---·-·· _____ _ _ ____________ --1-~1• ._.1"'-q+----1-----+----+--''"n.-....,_--+-~··._.,•.2.-1•
_ _,8,,_."'4=-o---+--"-11,_."'4'-'2'--'---"2_2.,_!L,__.. 6,J~_ _ ?. 8 40 17 "'2 22.11 _____ -··- _ -~- -----~--------1----'°'"--·~·
16. 32 9. 12 14 .43 4. 35 -+----3-+-----~_l§_.)L _9_J_2__ ___ _ _ ____1~!!__=-=o--t----+---+----1------+---'4-'-'"'35=--1--=--+----+---,44~."='2=-i2
4 13,62 17.34 12.93 4.29 4 13.62 17.34 12.93 4.29 48.18
51-!1~8L.6~0'--1f--'2~0£,4~9'--jf----"1~2~8~5'+---"1£•4~7'---jf--,~~5'-1----+------ -~----J--~1~8,_.,_::_60,,__l--'2~0.!.,4~9'-+----1-l'-'2~,_::_8::_5-l-----1----l-----1----1-----+-~1:_:•~4_,_7-J..----'5~3.._.~41:;..j
~I ~ i- -:~:.:~. _:4_._!=--t---~,_,:'-'~-"-~--l--~1,,~.,_,:;+._,6+_1:,~,_.:-=~~_--t-----'~"l._-;~~ --~~ 1~:~-
3 1 6
~~~!__ _ _-+-·._1,.o.._.-=-3-=-6-+---+----1------1----+--'~:.:~.._:-=-!9::..i
18 3 3 9 54 6
________,____ .___ 1 1. 1_s_1--___·_

51-'1"'0"--'-99,___+--"16"''"'6"'5--1--·=-o,_,.2,_,s'-+-_1,,_,1,_,._,9_,__7-+_ _8_-+----+-- ___ _ __ 1_i. 97 _ __ I lo. 9,9__ +-"1_6__,_.6.._s--1__,-~--+--o"'..._2.._s--+----+----1-----1,____,3.._9-'-."-3-'-l6
91-'1"'4.!.'-""s2,,__+--..,12.,.,,,o"-1--1--'·_,,_2,_,.9"'4'-+-_1.,o,_,.~2=-o-+---'9 _______ ~-o 14.52 -12.01 -2.94 9, 11
10 i 71.. 3 i' • 31.. 17 99 Hf--------~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-._+_-_-1-7.-9-9-!-----l------+-''-'-'=-+~l:.;.:_:7c:.4-+--3-.-15-l--_c:_:c.::..:.-+--5-.3-4-l------+--28:_:,:_:2..::2_.i
11 5 85 4 50 -0.30 13.17 11 __.__ _ __,__ _1_::_3_,_.=-17'---J---,---+----+----1--_:::5•.._8.._5--1_ _;4_:_•;;.50;.___1--~~--1-·-=0.::.3:::0~1--_.;2;:;3;..:•.;:2~2
12 3.09 8 s• 6 1• lo 93 12 6.~1_2_+---+----~·----~ ___ --~ __1_0_._93_--J-~---1------1----+--3-·_99-+--8_.~ss_+---~--+--1-o.~19
13 3-12 -1 59 11 88 14 Ol 13 11.88 14.01 3.12 ·l.59 27.42
Aj ( l) 1-'l.._2-'-7'--.0.._2'--,f-'l.._0-'-"-9.64'-'--l----'-9-'-5•.._2.._3-l--1:.:lc:..::
7, 2=--3-+--"T'..L-
1C,,::J-"--1
)___:2=6'0=-=--6-+---"'
bO_._,b:_:_b-1-..::c:.
47_:_:•9:_:-3_-+--=
68_,.,3-.:__
l__j__._._'f_._i-:24:::_ 4 7, 39 ~--
'"·-"-'+--'--- l ~.;:_:.J-'---U+-=
)4-:_:'I_''---1--·--'- ~. ~-'---U+-=
l ':..:'7..::'l--1-'-"' ll .06< liJ """ .TZ
U:_:'J-'---U-1-__
I
'-----'--~'"'·CT~··uw~··~1..:t...._j___ _---4-----+------->------+-~-=- =-=_:_:~'--__-=:-_~---~s*!:-:,:;c:r~1~o~N-_-·~3-,+:.• ..iu
~·.i.il.·s-1---------1----1------+----+-----+-----1----1 00
-..J
ANALYSIS OF \TAiiIANCE
source
-(-l~l)=P~h~as=-e-s- 41.4956 3
Ra-t-io--+---+--l-O-l--1---10_2__ _j._ l_0_3_-+-_104--+--l-0_5_ --~l0~6,---+---=1=0=7-+-~l~0~8-l--=1~09---+-1~1=0--+~11~1--+-1=1=2--+~11~3--+----I
1----s-.s-.-"r"'D=F"'.-'<;'-H-"e"an=s=-.rF--
13.8318 2.9748 1 23,19 _.__2_3_.__l!_~------- 23.19 23,19
•
23,_ 2 5 2 9 s , 0 o_J o"-t---~2~ 1---"5'-'4_,_.,?_L _54.95
4 1 0 267 9
(12) Cars Adj 279.0358 12"' --~---1--~4.9~ ____ _
(13) Oils F~'lll""-"2~·~55~3'-'0t--1~2,___-+'~-'-"''-<'-'\--"',_,_:"'-'-"-+--~3,_~----1-----"'44~.~2~2-t-~44..._,_.22
19 1 8 7 94 0
44"'-'-.2~2'-+---+-----l----+---+-----1-~44~.~2~2--+----+---11------1
(14) Error 111,5926 24 E- 4.6496 4 48,18 48.18 .~4,_,8co·~l,,_8-+-~~-+----i-----+----+-----l-~4"-8'-'.1::8--1~-~-ll-----
( 5) Total ~"~~1.1_=-'67•7'-"-t-0~~''---1----+---+-----"5~----+---·---------1-5-3_,4_1--t_~S73~.4~1c+--c-.--+--5-3_.4_1--+-~--+----+----l----+----l---5-J,_41-ll-----1
·-· 6 44.16 - ·-- 44.16 44.16 44.16
Uncorrec ed SlD. o Sa. • 5613.6918 ~I 7 22.89 22.89 22.89 22.89
UJ 8 39.36 39.36 39.36 39.36
Correcti bn Term C • M79,0148 9. 71 9. 71
1------+---+----1----+~·-1_0__,_ _ _-+-----+-----l-----l--·28=.c.~2'-'2'-t-----1------1-----+---=28:_:•.._2=2-+---=2:.::8_:_.2~2'--li-----+--=2_:_8;:_:.2::2--1~---11-----
,/. _ E>.·E. for E!YE> 11 23,22 23.22 23.22 23,22
12 30.19 30.19 J0.19 J0.19
13 27.42
-"~ - 23.2529-4.6496
906.86 l I 6\ 15 2,49 149. 48 --'l::.:54=·9::5._-l--'1"6:.::6~,2"'5'--1---'l"-7_0:.:.:•O:.:l+lc_:3:.::8..:..4cc5=--+-'l=--4:.:5_:_•8:::5=--+_1:::2:.:0_._.:::65=-t--=84=.0:::1=--+-'l=--•4:.:5_._.7=--5=-t_l:_:Oc:.7_:_.3=-4---4_1:::.3:..:'4_:_'=.
Ol+l:::,'7:_:_:_.=-24:..-i---
1--=-~__..__•+-'0"''"'o'-"2,,_n5"-l_..t1C"'a"'r'-"C"'or._,.,e,,,c"'t""io,,,n,___-1-_,,,<7'-')--1~2::.:5:.::2_:_•:_:72,__l---"54:::5::''-"9:.::4-1...::4:.::3..:.1.:.:·3::7--11.-..::c6l,,,4,_,._._7_:_9--+---=64=-l:::•:.::l:.:6..L4::.:2:.::6:.:·_:_5l=-iL.::382 • 68 49,. 48 -1 73 • 70 1•u. 39 89. 10 191. 70

Factor)
(8) 1829.88 1793.76 1859.40 1995.00 -2040,12 1661.40 1750.20 1447.80 1008,12 1749.00 1288.08 1608.12 1526.88
>------+----·- 36-:---tl734~7~,~3~6--tl~3~4~7-,3~6C---i-:cl3~4~7~,7
----t----1------,{~'9:--\tl~3~4~7~,3~6,---t~l3~4~7~,7 376*1~374~7~,3~6--+~l3'C4~7-,73 7
6-+cl73~47~,~3~6--f-1~3~4=7-,3~6,,_j71=34~7~,=3=6--+l~3~4=7-,3~6,--j=13~4~7~,=3=6-l,,l=3~4=7~,3~6---4---~
w, (10) -229,80 99.54 -80.67 -32.85 -51,60 112,47 -20.16 392.04 165,54 -.ou,,5 11.A,38 -69.06 ·173.58
23.369 62.700 46.276 67,6361 70.!B22 49. 695 42.1068 62.7568 -15.9065 10.3749 12,,,.u7 19.11114; -2,......,
Correct Id Avg. V ac. Loa• a 5,84 15 68 ..!1..2'.i 12,1.2 1U,)J 1),0~ -3 98 2.59 3 ,24 4, 97 -o. 72
Uncorrec tea Avg. lVIac. --i.o aea \ IRaw AvgJ 7 .02 15. 17 11,98 17.0B 17.81 11.85 lU,bJ u.oe 2.48 5.JJ 0.11 I
* Significant at the 95l Confidence level.
APPENDIX D
TABLE D-22

FLEE.T D DRAIN PROCESSOR C
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
OILS
-0.85
I
7 .54
Ill
II
11.62
- .!,~8_ 14.63_ ~2_1.19_
IV
-1.19
6.01 2
101
7.54
8.88
102
' 11.62 !'
--14.6q
103 104
21.19
105 106 107
j
108 109
-1.19
110
6.ch--
111
:
112
-r- 113 (2)
I -0..fil_ _ll..lL
.so_ 71
'-~ .· :~:: .::~:t:. t:: ;;;;; ;:~r~:: I-"·" . . "I -==- ··;~':''_f ~i.-=~-=
3 13. 74 8 14 _ _ll._2.1_ :0~0-2. .3
4 11.95 14.69 6.64_ 4.00 4
5 <--~--+--~~-I--~--+
17 .12 18. 79 12.02 38- _ _ _ 5_
5~94--
-o:
, ~=-,~,·- ---- j_:_.:0~61-

i~ ~'~: ~
6 16. 67 4.87 11.37 6
~I 7
8
10
11
8. b3
-o. 23
4.96
7. 72 -=-16.44 - ii. '.ff
-9~82""--16.36" '---:'"i:
13.90 -20.16
2.10
3.89
16. 68
-3.28~10;06
u so
4. 69
-0.67
8
16, 89
12-:97·- -
-;1-7
10
ii
. .. II . .. 12~~;---!--r •.•:lI-. ." ., _,. '_ ,~-~~:._~2-
16.89 - - ~1~:~~- 13.90 -0.23 - - 4. 69
- -- _ _1,2/! _ _7_.li_~--
----
12 1.94 7 .53 5.84 9.96 - _l2 1 ) :' 9.96 i 25,21_

13 2. 76 -0.35 11.67 14;~ 13 r 14.03 2.16 . -o.3s 2s.11
Aj (1) 109.29 85.75 8~~~~ . 1·.-1. Tio.) ~8.20J 52_.40 42.39 t 63.06 69.88 33.ll t 39.52 J 55.66 i-38..Q~ j_)i-:-j1- -:.:i.:Jj.::_ --iB:~ _-1.49_(~ 3?7~~~--=
~~.,~:i:E~. ~:::~~~ F:t:~J--
1
srcr1 ;7~~f-
1
Source
- 101 102 103 I 104 105 106 :::s I Fll~~~~~~~l~: =~~3-:J>=--...:.'
109 _ _:: I
CP
(11)
(12)
Phases
Care Adj.
'"
311.6717
OHO
12 Eb
, --1.J...9.31l, _L.810~
25.972E 3.3728_ .
1
2
17.12
50.71 .rf
-
50.71
17.12
50.71
!
I
I
'
I
·
17.12 ; ---~- - -
50 71 l
- __:___~39:39]·_ ~.;;---------<
- [_7.12 CP
3
(13) Oils 2730.8017 12 227.5668 29.5525 3 39.39 39.39 • 39.39 I 1 +- j I
:.~::: E'.~_sE: .:_:'°~,,~_,,,J >Ju~ _! t-1~2-_.2_, i~: : P'·"l "·" __:

(14) Error 37 28
( 5) Total 1
38
0 . _:::_:_ _--
-:·_" "·" "" ::::: ;;:;; _:-_J::=--"·'_·-+----<
c3t _ 1
j' _ _:_-_i:..)~~6_; _]5_._~_:___- _ 35;-f6 - - -
1
39 E.
,. _ , •.• _ ... 35.36 ,
f_:o~52 f- _ _
t------- ! 23.45 ~
_
_ --+-
- ---L-
~ o.52
I I
r
o >_2__{---~--+-o'"'.'-'5"'2-+-----+---l-----4
23.45 t 23.45 23.45
>-----+-----i----+----+-·__u_ _
~ 25,9726- 7004
_
_U_ _ ..2_5_.27__ _ --
----1
-+--- +--
j --~ .j
-+- - -- _;
_21._1~--ff2' ~T~
- . 1- - •_7 __j - -- --
--1t ---=--~~-·-2~1_.~15~~-=-+--2_1_.• _15__,_ _ _-<
25. 27 25.27
1012.9314 13 28.11 ' 28.11 ' 28.11 28.11
J~ = 0.0180 (Car Car ection::::::.:__0~;_u_3l.95 _ 1_~6._48 !J.29.iS t136.82 ~fs0.00 'nl955 t f21:.2C( l02:8'Ct~ 130.67 86.33 114.11 114.69
m_:_ili3:_a_Q~~i 1 ,.§9:_f m.~t f 291.99~-3:s.~8--:·sao.9~-f3~2~8~ 1~~~;=-ii~ l?~~-f~i:i_~-==

1
Factor) (567_._54 . 628._92

1
--+-- - (8) 1553 '.~IS~..76.:!54_9~86 ?~_1_;84_-.Jeoo._cio_ fii4 : i;_c1 :12'54. 52_:f_i:231..os -l640.32-TS68.04-1il35.96TI69."12-:tr37b.2a~ -
>-----+-----<----+-----+--(_9)___ 1~32_ 1_13_3_~37_Jh_33.32.._t~~.37 }133.37 !1133.37 :1133.37 ~11l'f.::r7 f!-13!-_Tf ~-1133.37 1133.37 112~~-+---:-=
~34,J-2.. ~ 59:or~ -31. •n ~Ci._2Ltt5~~f 3_0.5i.__~~- -256.32~-
1
w1(10)-oi96.ji: 39;:21 , 115.16

1
34._53 : -65.13
>-----+-----+---->-----+--y-,·---+-2·4. 6679 53.1057 41. 761~23f69_~lOJ;'~ 35~ill~--40.J4 62._:8_64l-3~~304 5. 620 4. 69_3_ ___..i:_7 .807 -b:lOJ
Corrected Avg. V ec. Lose s Y1/4) 6.17 -D.ia-:- __l_0.~6:of:..l. 17.~~ ;-- ~t- lO~<li+ I 15:12-f- :e grt--r.-z;rh:U-1--4.'+) -1.n
'--u-nc_o_r_r_e.,.4t-e-,d~Av-g-.-+-V-i-sc-.-L-o._a_e_a_ _(°'"i>-.a-w_A_v_g_. ....__)_7_.-05__,___13_._1_0__,__ io: 60- i 15.77-- )-1.T.li!J - a·.2a· r-- 9.llBj 13.'lf.' -~- -'l~T-t--""2. "' O. bJ 4. I~ -u. JI

APPENDIX D
TABLE D-23
DRAIN PROCESSOR G
SECTION l
~
100°F Vis. Losses cSt. After 1500 Miles 100°F Viscosity Losses cSt. After 1500 Hiles
OILS
II III IV 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
2
3
4
~I 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
,_1_1_0._oo--+-1_0_9._5_a~~1-0_6._2_4-----<11e--a-.3-5--+--T-'L_31\-----<-2-a_.5_3_- _67.83 :_37~~~-;gr ~-81~9l~ 4!~-,,1~·-0o -~~ -43.92 n.41

_________,1-----+- -J. T8(4)444:rr
SECTION 4
A •ATV~IS OF VARTANC
_J---~--- _ __ _ _ _ ___ -j _ __ _ _ _ _ t_ §ECTION 31- OILS
1
_ ----+---+-------+-----+-
109 110
- - - - - - - ~--U~--+-3-9.-5~8~,--<------+
Correct on Term c . 3793.9805
-I Eb-Ee for Et» Ee

..... ~
3q R,
-- I 25. 0268- 14.9941

976.045
* Siantficant at the 957~ Confidence level.

APPENDIX D
TABLE D-24

~ DRAIN PROCESSOR R
SJ!<'.UON l SEC110N 2
1Q2°F Vis 1 Los!es cStt: After lSOO Miles 100°F Viscosity Losee• cSt. After 1500 Miles
PHASE~ ~
II III IV 101 102 103 104 lOS 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
S , 9 0 , -~ -- -
1 -1 31) 5 .QO 2.00 -4.99 1 S.00:- .________ -- ··- ----·-- -- -4.90 -1.30 1. 70
1.~301
r--- - - - -
2 1.60 3S.00
- 1. 6_0
_t ____
2 7 60 15 30 10 S.<L e--1-0.SO r--------~ - -- -- · - - - - ------
16,60 . 18.10 26,60 8.80* 3 8.80** 7!!..10
3 16~60__ 18, 10 r---------- - ~~6.,60
4 11.20 10.90 10.20 6,20 • 4 11~2Q_ ._]._~ J0,20 6.20 38.50
· - -·-
s 16, 10 17 ,60 10.10 o.9o s - - - - - + - - - - - - - ~16.10
-17.60- 10.10 0.90 44 70
6 18.20 13.10 25.90 7,00 18. 20- 13.10 2S.90 64.20
~I 1 -22~90-- -
6 1 00
-7 .90 22.90 "''
--*-_L • >-yQ,TQ -7. 90 31. 70
7 10.10 6.60
r----- - - - -· ----- -·-·
6.60
- - -- - ·
-3:20 8:16-
r---
- -
8 lS. 90 11. 60 .8_ - - - - a:@_:::_ r-·-16,40- - - - - - - -----· -
___fs~9o - 11. 60 -3. 20 32.40
9 15.00 -3.10 -0.30 16,40 9 lS.00 -3 .10 -0.30 28.00
-18.SO -1.80 3,90 20.00 - lo- ·-------· --· - -1----- --·- -· -18. so -1. 80 3.90 3. 60
--··-- r-~o.oo
10 ···- -- - - ---· - -
- -- -
11 j,60 3.10 1.90 16.40 11 16.40 3.60 3.10 1,90 25.00
-- --- - ----- ~--- -~·-- r---
12 s.oo 1.so 12,20 21.30 12 ~-
12. 20 -
----·--- .,____ __ -- 21.30
--- - - - - - - -
s.oo 7. so 46.00
13 8.30 1.10 18.10 23.30 13 -i8:i:o- U,JU 6.JU l, lU )U,6U
Aj (1) 107 .80 105.90 110.00 148,0U T (3)_ t-32.

---
70- 72.90· 39.40--
----·- -------·---
,__~ ~::-t --~~ r-· SECTION 3 - OILS

---- -- - ----
-
-_
_J______
f---~3_,__!10 +-82~0 i-- ---·-r--
49.80 ~ S3.90 7S.80 -34.40 0.20 16. 60 25 •.90 2:00\l }471.70-
SECTION 4
Source
s.s. D.F. Mean Sa. F Ratio 101 102 103
- =- ~ - -=·=t--~
1--- -
104
--
lOS 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 !
(11) Phases 93,236
(12) Cars Adj, 326.56/K
3
12 Eh
31 07R7 2. l49l·j _ _ __l_ - _h_70 f - - - - -
?7 ?1 '1 1.8819 2 3S.00 3S.00q
_1_.l_Q_
3S ._QQ_
-- - - - 1 - - - - "-;;-1
f---· ~
1. 70
35.00
1. 70
'°t
0
(13) Oils 3486.S679 12 290,5473 20. 0922 3 r
,___70_,_ 1_0 _2Q._!Q_. _:: 70.10 70.10
14.4601 -3-s~so-- 38. so 38. so
r---l=~
(14) Er rot' 332,S!<>! 23 Ea 4
( S) Total 4238, 965 so s _44-:70- 44. 70
-
44.70
-·~--
44. 70
--
----
.
-·-
6 64.20 64~ 64.20 64.W
-:fl-:70 ---- 31. 70 Jl, 7U Jl, /U
--
Uncorre r:ted SllD. bf Sa. SlB.0100 ~I 7
UI
8 1_2.4_~ 32.40 32.40 32.40
Correc ion Term C 279/)446 - 9 --28.00 28.00 28,0U L6.UU
10 3. 60 3. 60 3. 60 3.60
~
Eb
39 Eh
Ee -for Eb> E@ 11
12 46,00
- · 2S.uu
46.00
<>,VU 2S.00
46.00 4b,UO
2>.UU
13 so.so 5U.~U so.so so •.so

'
h-4-- 27 ,2137- 14.4607
1061, 3 l43 (6) 146,90 187. 60 ,_142. 70 146.20 -1--m.60 1S9.40 1S4. 80 17S.40 6S.OO 96.00 169.10 138.90 122.20
__,c, ~
0.0120 {Car Cor ection (7) 294.30 6S6.10 3S4. 60 48S._1.Q_ 241. 60 _448.20__ ~_!IS.10 682. zo -309.60 1.80 149.40 233 .10 23.40
Factor
(8) 1762,80 1712.40 17S4.40 2191. 20 1912.80 18S7. 60 -780.00 11S2. 00 2029, 20 1666.80 1466,40
- ' I
22Sl. 20
·- ~·---- - 2104.80
- ---
I (9) 141S.10
141S.10 141S,.!.O___ ~lS.lQ_ 141S.10 141S.10 141S.10 14 lS. 10 141S.10 141S.10 141S.10 1415.10 141S.10
I r-
~· - 1- w, (10) -S3 .40- -180.00 S7 .30 14S.80 -34:-so+ -49.SO 42. 60 -7. so 32S. so 264. 90 -464. 70 -18. 60 -27. 90
--
_ _:--[-=--_ -=+=--= I
' I
Yi 70.7400 40.0876 SS.6494 81,,,.,.,u 49,<UOU S4.4112 75.7100 -J"""~"u 3 .3788 11D236 25 .6768 2,2652
32.0S92 - --
Correcte Av2, Vi c. Lossell (Y,/4) 8 ,01 17,69 10.02 13 .91, 20.so 12.30 13 6(!I 18 .93 -7 .62 0.84 2. 76 6.42 0.57
Uncorrec ed Av2. isc. Los es (Raw Avg, 8.18 18. 23 9.8S 13,48 20. 60 12.4S 13.48 18.9S -8.60 0. OS 4. lS 6.48 0,65
.. Shni fie ant at the 9S7. onfidenc e Level .

I
--t---···------ +------- ---·- ~· -
** Missin• Data P lled in bv Metho of Coch an and C x Exoer mental D shms S cond Edi ion._---{-
-- - ·-·- --- - ----- -. - -
wmrx o
TABLE D-25
AllALYSIS OP FIELD TEST DATA
DRAIN PROCESSOR H
SECTION l SECTION 2
IOO"F Vis. LoHq cSt, After ISOO Miles I00°B Viscosity Losses cSt. After I500 Hiles
~
II Ill IV 101 102 103 104 lOS 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 (2)
1
2
3
-6. 70
--0.90
~ 12.9'.f
-2.49
S.90
~-·-
14.17
-3. 76
2.61
·- ----
17 .91
-26.23
- 7. 23 ~--3__
_1_ --1.,49 -
-11,36- ~-- 2 _:_Q.f90 s. 90 i
12.93 } 14.17
-3, 76
---· --
2.~_ --
-
-- - - - - --
_1_7_._91_
'-------
- - -
-
.-------------
-- -- - ----· ,.::26. 23
-- - - --·- - - - - cll.3ll__ --
7. 23
I-------f --
-·
-6 70 .•o
-• ..
1A
S2. 24'
4
s
10. 61
12.46
12.17
27,3S
10.3~ __!!_,_7_S-
17.02 ~.S.23
~- s
-
-" '
- -- 4 - - 12.46 27. 3S
---
- - - lQ_,g_ ~-·_F_ ---- - - - _1_0_._10_ ~----·--

17 .02
·---- -· 4 7<
-s. 23
17 .A•'
Sl. 60
, .• 77
6 13.6S 10,2""" 18.44 ~.39_ -- 6.3.2_ - 13.6S 10.29*' __l)l.44
®I 7 9.S7 2.16- - -3.gQ__ 11,n ·---- - ...:::it 13.77·.-- ---· '-- --

- -- - - - - __9._5_L_ 2.16 -3.90
-1--------
21. 60 I
~~ r~~
7 .04 1s.s2 5.62 18.02 __ - - - - ---1.~~ H.52 -S.62 46. 20
8 -- -··· --
9 19. 73 -3.04 2.44 16.87 _9__ - - - 16.87 19. 73 -3.04 2.44 36.00
10 -4. S2 -1.03 l.S7 16.54 10 -4. S2 -1.03 1. S7 12. S6
16.S=t
11 __!,]7_ ~ ~s __-2._6L 1_3~_ 11 1. 77 4.2S -o. 66 18.89:
12 -1. 94• ~ -() S7** (). 83
--- -- ---u- -- --- -- _l.l-23 --- ~·· ---
-1.94*' -O.S7*' 4. 79'
6.47 0.83
16.45* _ _ _ - - - - ·-t ---- ~~7
13 S.03 1.34 16.4S** 18.47"* 13 18.4 7* S.03 1.34 41. 29
78. 73 86.02
- Ti (3)
----- ·-
1s.4sT~.69-
I
~---
-11.2S 41328.90
Aj (1) 84.87 79.28 3.83 49.0S 39.04 44.11 32. 69 .J2.16 -37. 69 -4.94 11. 98 10. 78
SECTION 4
- - - - - - - - - .,________ -·- - - - - - -· --s;; ---
CTION 3 OILS
- - - - · - - - - ---- --- ·--
ANALYST~ OF VARIANC' ··--- -
Source s.s. D.F. .,._.,n "- F Rat" o 101 102 103 104 lOS 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
(11) Phase• , ""2
9S3 .3711
•
12 Eh
•
79.4476
no,_o n "'-...,.._
3.63"-4 •
1
2
-39.lj!_ - - - ·
-3.69 -3. 69
_-J2,_!.L - - - -
-3. 69
--- ---- - --- -39 18
-3. 69
-39 .18
(12) Cs rs Adj. .
(13) Oils '3319AJ66 12 76.6180 12. 6S44 • 3 S2.24 S2.24 22.24 S2. 24
(14) Error 41S.3301 19 E. 21.8S94 4 37 .83 37 .83 _37.83 37.83
Sl. 60
( S) Total 14691.371 l 46 s
6
·--
48. 77
-- Sl. 60 Sl.60
48. 77 48. 77
Sl. 60
48. 77
Uncorr ... "ed Sum bf Sa. • &771. 6631 ~I 1 21. 60 21. 60 21.60 21.6_o_ - -
<ii 8 46.20 46. 20 46.20 46. 20
Correct on Term c • 2080. 292 9 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00
10 12. S6 12. 56 12. S6 12. S6
Eb-Ee for E•'>E 11 18.89 18.89 18.89 18.89
--4---· 39 Eb 12 4. 79 4. 79 4. 79 4. 79
13 /,.1 oa 41. 29 41. 29 41. 29
79.4476- 21.8S94
-A-- 3098. S64 l6l 10.69 111.44 97.09 121. 74 16S.17 127.09 124.19 172. 26 30.98 73.96 111.92 96.47 72.60
_/'( • 0.018S lCar Cor e.ctfon ,,, 34.47 441.4S 3Sl. 36 396. 99 679. OS 393.21 294.21 649.44 339.21 -44.46 107. 82 97 .02 -101. 2S
Factor)
(8) 128.28 1337.28 116S.08 1460. 88 1982.04 1S2S.08 1490. 28 2067 .12 371.76 887. S2 1343.04 11S7.64 -871. 20
- · - - -_J__ r-
---t -
l9) 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70 986. 70
-- ----'-·-
~ J ___
_,_.
_=:_
T
_:::___T
I
Wi (10) 892.89 90.87 172.98 -77 .19 -316. 29 - .:J:45:17 ---209. 37 -430. 98 27S.73 S4. 72 -248. S2 -73.92 14. 2S
-
~·· --~->·
' y, 20.3484 so. 731 42.240 42. 682 69.S98 41.0044 28. 816 64.11!!>!1 -32. S890 -3. 9277 7.3824 9A12S -103!64
--
Correct 'Av2. Vi c. Lo88•B (Yi/4) S.09 12.68 10.56 To.67 17 .40 10. :rs 7. 20 16.0S •l!_.!2_ :.2...2§. l 85 £.]2 -2. 7S
Uncorrec ted Avg~ isc. Los ~es 11l•w Ava. 0.96 1_2. 26 9. 76 11.03 18.86 10.92 8.17 18.04 -9.42 -1. 24 3.00 2. 70 -2.81
--
* Sis• ficant s the 9S~ Confider i:e Level.
--- - - - - - - - ~--·
---
** Mils Ina Data illed in bv Methe kl of Coe! Iran snd I ox, Expel limental I le•i81ls;· Second Edition.
T - - -1
'-------~-..:------
·--- ~--
--1-- --
""'"' __...::a_.:o_!:z:::-=::,,._
----- ·---- ·- ·--
- 92 -
APPENDIX E
BENCH TEST DATA

APPENDIX TABLE E-1
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB.C
(DIESEL INJECTOR RIG)
ARO Fresh Oil Sheared Oil Viscositlz est.

Oil Viscosity 1 est. 1 Pass 5 Passes 10 Passes
No. 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F
101 15.24 86. 72 12. 64 74.06 11.39 68.39 10.97 66.13
102 15.06 86.01 11. 29 67. 00 9.92 61.02 9.53 58.89
103 14.87 97.83 12. 96 84.05 11. 51 73.97 11.13 71.87
'°
w
104 15.06 108.90 13.01 93.52 11.68 83. 96 11.40 81.37
105 14. 74 83.41 10. 03 60.30 8.89 54. 93 8.55 53.49
106 15.00 76.08 11. 64 64.44 10.17 59. 03 9.75 57.43
107 15.14 97.39 12. 71 82.27 10.87 70. 57 10.33 67.37

108 14.99 105.00 12.48 86.13 10.99 74. 66 10.70 72.30
109 15.31 90.76 12.84 77. 27 11. 69 70.94 11. 25 68.49
110 14.94 104.60 14.03 96. 77 13.18 90.56 12.95 88.60

111 11. 03 66.13 9.61 59. so 9.01 55.88 8. 71 54. 63
112 11.06 75.02 9.78 65.80 9.12 60.60 8.90 59.29
113 6. 77 48.47 6.74 48.41 6.73 48.55 6.73 48.38
APPENDIX TABLE E-2
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB. L
ARO Fresh Oil Sheared Oil Viscosity

Oil Viscosity est. cSt. @ 210°F
No. 210°F {20 Passes}
lOJ.. 15.14 12.22
102 15.06 10.66
103 15.06 12. 63 l,Q
~
104 14.99 12.13

105 14.78 9.54
106 14.91 10.92
107 15.06 12.30

108 14.98 11.83
109 15.22 12.65
110 15.05 13.83

111
112
113
APPENDIX TABI.E E-3
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB, M
ARO Fresh Oil Sheared Oil est.

Viscosit~ 2
Oil Viscosit:z: 2 est. 5 Passes 10 Passes 20 Passes
No. 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F
101 15.14 86.37 13.46 77.49 12.83 74.82 12.17 71. 70
102 15,06 85.99 12.34 70. 67 11.35 67 ,81 10,57 65.30
103 14.87 97.45 13 .31 86.61 12.92 83.58 12.49 80. 64
104 14.89 108.10 13.05 93.76 12. 63 90.36 12.24 86.90 "°
V\.
105 14.87* 84.03 10.53 63.40 10.02 61.12 9.74 59.04

106 14. 7 7 75.79 12.41 65.44 11. 78 63.19 11. 23 61.45
107 15.10 97.26 13.26 85.58 12.74 82.18 12.06 78.14

108 14.89 104. 70 12.50 85. 71 12.19 82.41 11. 84 79.60
109 15.21 91.01 13.57 81. 73 13.14 78.80 12.57 75.79
110 14.98 103.90 14.27 90.40 14.13 96.26 13.81 94.86

111 10.96 66.30 10.00 61.30 9.79 59.99 9.47 59.07
112 10.98 74.53 9.82 67.87 9.86 66.13 9.61 64. 77
113 6.68 48.41 6. 71 48.44 6.75 48.48 6.75 48.65
* This is the 15-Lab. average that was substituted for the reported value.
APPENDIX TABLE E-4
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB. J
ARO Fresh Oil Sheared Oil ViscositI 1 cSt.

Oil Viscosity 2 -~ 5 Passes 20 Passes
No. 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F
101 15.07 86.40 12.91 75.60 11.84 70.20
102 15.00 86.00 11.10 66.90 10.29 62.70
103 14.98 97.60 12.50 80.70 12.11 77 .80
\D
104 14.87 108.10 12.43 88.90 12.03 85.70 °'
105 14.81 84.20 10.09 61.30 9.35 57.20
106 14.94 75.80 11.66 63.70 10.48 60.80
107 15.12 97.50 12. 77 82.60 11. 28 73. s.O

108 ll~. 92 104. 50 11. 69 11.16
109 15.23 90.80 13.05 79.10 12.21 74.40
110 15.05 104.90 13.94 96.30 13.73 94.20

111 10.98 66.20 9.70 60.10 9.22 57.70
112 11.01 74.80 9.93 66.50 9.56 63.90
113 6.68 48.30 6.79 48. 70 6.75 48.80
APPENDIX TABLE E-5
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB, D
(POWER STEERING PUMP TEST)
ARO
Oil Fresh Oil Viscosity 4-Hour Test
No. cSt, @ 210°F Viscosit:t:z cSt, @ 2l0°F
101 15.01 11. 57
102 14.97 10.07
103 15.01 12.31
104 14.94 12.35

105 14.91 9.34
106 14. 97 10.22
107 15.13 11.30

108 14.94 11. 65
109 15.18 ll.89
110 15.00 13.57

111 10.99 9.22
112 11.02 9.49
113 6,72 6. 76
APPENDIX TABLE E-6
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB. R
ARO
Oil Fresh Oil Viscosity 1-Hour Test
N2.!. est. @ 210°F ViscositXz cSt. @ 210°F
101 15.01 12.39
102 14.99 11.02
103 15.07 12.28
'°00
104 14.99 12.88
105 14.96 9.80
106 14.94 10. 67
107 15.16 12.18

108 14.96 12. 63
109 15.25 12.60
110 15.00 14.01

111 10.99 9. 63
112 11.01 9.74
113 6.77 6.94
APPENDIX TABLE E-7
BENCH TEST DATA - 1.AB. A
ARO Fresh Oil Sheared Oil Viscos1t:t 1 est.

Oil Viscosit:t 1 cSt. 5-Min.* 1-Hr. 2-Hr. 4-Hr. 6-Hr.
No. 210°F l00°F 210°F l00°F 210°F 100°F 210°F 100 8 F 210°F l00°F 210°F 100°F
101 15.05 S6.ll 14. 26 81.36 12.SS 75.17 12.07 70.39 11.37 67.27 11.09 65.40
102 15.02 S6.04 13.S2 S0.14 11. 77 69.77 11.07 66.45 10.41 63.22 10.01 61.lS
103 14.92 97.09 14.50 94.47 13.53 SS.05 13.09 S4.4S 12.51 S0.39 12.09 77.69
104 15.02 109.20 14.09 101.90 13.27 95.46 12.SS 92.41 12.36 SS.27 11.9S S5.22
105 14. 70 S3.40 13.01 71.7S 10.21 61.S9 9. 72 59.52 9.30 57.23 S.9S 55.74 \0
\0
106 15.01 75.S2 13.91 72.33 ll.S3 65.04 11.15 62. 63 10.43 60.03 10.01 5S.37
107 15.15 96.S2 14. 51 92.94 13.19 S4.S2 12.50 S0.37 ll.5S 74.75 10.96 70.53
lOS 14.9S 104.40 13.62 93.79 12.90 S7.SO 12.34 S4.06 11. 77 S0.03 11.43 77 .13
109 15.2S S9.63 14. 71 S7.75 13.4S so.so 12.94 77.44 12.14 73.29 11.64 70.41
110 15.00 104.00 14.34 99.32 14.15 97.70 13.49 95.71 13.53 93.03 13.2S 90. 71
111 10.99 66.13 10.6S 63.78 9.6S 59.3S 9.39 57.73 9.02 56.12 s.so 54. 74
112 11.05 74.S6 10.S5 72.95 10.30 6S.29 9.S2 65.94 9.4S 63.5S 9.29 62.06
113 6. 72 4S.15 6.73 4S.25 6. 69 4S.02 6.74 4S.OS 6.69 47.9S 6.72 48.05
* Sample taken as soon as te•t conditions were achieved (usually about 5-min. from start of test).
APPENDIX TABLE E-8
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB. B
(5-MIN. SONIC SHEAR TEST)
ARO Fresh Oil Vise. cSt. after 5-Min.

Oil Viscositx est. Sonic Shear Test
No. 210°F 100°F 210°F 100°F
101 15.01 86.03 13.08 76. 24
102 14.96 85.74 11.46 68.44
103 14.88 98.91 13.91 90.60
I
,...
104 14.95 108.40 13. 76 98.19 0
0
105 14.78 83.60 10.12 60.80
106 14.90 76.87 12.22 64.87
107 15.11 97.08 13.30 85.87

108 14.91 106.20 13.40 92.90
109 15.16 90.07 13.42 80.81
110 14.93 102.70 14.50 100.40

111 10.95 66.12 9.57 59.04
112 10.99 74.66 10.16 68.79
113 6.72 48.55
APPENDIX TABLE E-9
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB. A
(10-MIN, SONIC SHEAR TEST)
ARO Fresh Oil Viscosit:y 2 est. @ 210 F

Oil Viscosit~· est. Viscosity
No. 210°F 100°F After 10-Min. Sonic Shear Loss
101 15,05 86.11 12.83 2.22
102 15.02 86.04 11.19 3.83
103 14.97 97.09 15.97 1.00
~
0
104 15.02 109.20 13. 71 1.31 ~
105 14.70 83.40 9.92 4.78

106 15.01 75.82 11.82 3.19
107 15.15 96.82 13.05 2.10

108 14. 98 104.40 13.50 1.48
109 15.23 89. 63 13.16 2.07
110 15.00 104.00 14.51 0.49

111 10.99 66.13 9.56 1.43
112 11.05 74.86 10.29 o. 76
113 6. 72 48.15 6.65 0.07
APPENDIX TABLE E•lO
BENCH TEST DATA - LAB. T
(6-HOUR KADY DISPERSION MILL)
ARO
Oil Fresh Oil Viscosity Sheared Oil Viscosity
!!2.!. est. ~ 210°F est. @ 210°F
101 15.13 13.64
102 15 • 03')'r 11. 73
103 14.87 13.68
104 14.96 12.91

105 14.78 10.90 ...
0
106 14.96'>'r 12.66 N
I
107 15.12 13.56

108 14.95 12. 69
109 15.26 13.79
110 14.96 14.39

111 11.00 10.21
112 10.96 10.29
113
* These are the 15-Lab. average values that were substituted for
the reported values.
- 103 ..
APPENDIX F
LABORATORY ENGINE TEST DATA

- 104 -
APPENDIX TABLE F-1
LABORATORY ENGINE TEST DATA - LAB. N
(327 CID V-8 ENGINE)
ARO Viscosity cSt. @ 210 F

Oil Fresh Oil After Use in Motored Engine
No. Vise. cSt. 1/2 Hr. 3 Hrs. 10 Hrs. 24 Hrs.
101 15.16 14.87 14. 20 13.36 12.52
102 15.15 14.29 12.93 11. 76 11.19
103 15.15 14. 63 13.38 12.58 12.00
104 15.14 14.40 13.84 13.07 12. 64
105 15.10 13.52 11.86 10. 72 10.14
106 15.12 13.92 12.67 11. 60 10.99
107 15.30 14. 72 13.86 12.60 11. 72
108 15.10 14.13 13.17 12.31 12.13
109 15. 36 15.10 14. 66 13.84 13.63
110 15.19 14. 90 14. 66 14.41 14. 24
111 11.06 10.97 10.68 10.31 10.02
112 11.14 10.94 10.57 10.17 9.95
113 6.76 6.81 6.83 6.84 6.90

- 105 -
APPENDIX TABLE F-2
LABORATORY ENGINE TEST DATA - LABS, T & G
(SINGLE CYLINDER CLR ENGINE - 10 HOUR TEST)
ViscositI at 210°F 1 cSt.

After 10-Hr. L-38 Test Visco~it~ Loss(a)
Test No. Oil Code Fresh Oil Unstripped Stripped Actual Corrected(b)
1 REO 192 16.10 13.30 13.34 2.80 2.20

2 ARO 101 15.15 13.51 13.55 1.60 1.33
3 ARO 102 14.92 11.95 11.97 2.95 2.60
4 ARO 103 15.12 13 .31 13.31 1.81 1. 70
5 ARO 104 15.01 13.55 13.56 1.45 1.46
6 ARO 105 14.90 11.35 11.42 3.48 3.75
7 ARO 106 15.12 12.18 12.29 2.83 3.31
8 REO 192 16.10 14.37 1. 73 2.20
(Rebuilt Engine)
1 REO 192 16.10 13.~4 13.54 2.56 2.20

2 ARO 107 15.31 12.66 12.77 2.54 2.35
...
J GRO 108 (c) (c) (c) (C) (C)
4 REO 192 (d) 16.10 14.34 14. 25 1. 76 2.20
5 REO 192 (d) 16.10 14.20 14.17 1.90 2.20
6 REO 192 (d) 16.10 14.23 14.23 1.87 2.20
7 ARO 109 15.28 14.31 14.40 0.88 1.30
8 GRO 110 (c) (c) {c) (c) (c)
9 ARO 111 11.05 10. 53 10.61 0.44 o.85
(Rebuilt Engine)
1 REO 192 (d) 16.10 12.92 12.99 3.18 2.20

2 ARO 108 15.01 12.29 12.41 2.60 1.92
3 ARO 110 15.04 14.26 14.31 o. 73 0.58
4 ARO 112 11.00 9.94 10.01 0.99 0.85
5 REO 192 (d) 16.10 13. 74 2.36 2.20
(a) Unstripped viscosities were used for the reference oils (REO-Oila) since not all
stripped viucosities were available.
(b) Viscosities uf the stripped used oils were adjusted based on an average
of 13.9 est. for the REO 192 used oil.
(c) No results obtained since these were Gear Reference Oils.
(d) Viscosities of these reference oils were supplied by Organization F.

.. 106 ..
APPENDIX TABLE F-3
LABORATORY ENGINE TEST DATA - LAB. D
(16-HOUR FORD MS VC ENGINE TEST)
ARO ViscositI at 210°F 2 cSt,

MS-vc Oil Blend after 16-Hr. MS-VC Viscosit:t: Loss
Test No. ~ Fresh Oil Unstri122ed Stri22ed Actual Corrected *
1 104 15.01 10.06 11.90 3, 11 3 11
I
2 109 15.28 11.93 13. 76 1. 52 1. 54

3 101 15.15 11.00 12.63 2.52 2.58
4 102 14.92 9.65 11. 07 3.85 3.98
5 103 15.12 10.16 11. 79 3.33 3.47
6 106 15.12 9.30 10, 71 4.41 4.65
7 107 15.31 10.25 11.82 3.49 3. 72
8 104 15.07 10.56 12.27 2.80 3.03
9 **
10 *~~
11 111 11.05 8.45 9.74 1.31 1.46

12 112 11.00 8.07 9.47 1.53 1. 73
13 105 14, 90 9.00 10.44 4.46 5.10
14 104 15.06 10.58 12.32 2.74 3.17
15 108 15.0l 10.31 11.94 3,07 3.60
16 110 15.04 12.15 13. 97 1.07 1. 27
17 105 14.92 9.48 10.71 4.21 5.05
18 104 15.07 10.74 12.50 2.57 3.12
(Rebuilt Engine)
19 104 15. 04 10.38 11.85 3.19 3.19
20 109 15. 24 12.43 13 67
I 1. 57 1. 60
21 101 15.12 11. 20 12.68 2.44 2.49
22 102 14. 96· 9.• 65 11.01 3.92 4.04
23 105 14.92 9.16 10.33 4,59 4.81
* Engine sevet'ity decreased for each succeeding 16-Hr. test.

** No results obtained since Gear Reference Oils were tested by mistake.
- 107 -
APPENDIX G
MISCELLANEOUS DATA SUMMARIES

APPENDIX TABLE G-1
SUMMARY OF CORRECTEl:f'VISCOSITY LOSS DATA FROM THE

ASTM SHEAR STABILITY FLEET TESTS
ARO 210 F Viscosity Losses, est., After 1,500 Miles of Use

Oil Fleet A B B C C C C D D D D E E F Six-Fleet**
_n_ Avg. _c_ _n_ _G_
No. Pl.1Xe ssor - _ J_ _B_ Avg. _K_ _c_ Avg. _R_ _G_
-"-- Average
101 1.65 1.64 1.65 1.55 1.52 1.54 1.49 1.55 1.42 1.49 1.92 1.81 1.5~ 1.76 1,76 1,80 1.78 1.60 1.64
102 3.13 3.11 3.12 3.22 3.17 3.20 2.64 2.55 2.47 2.55 3.20 3.27 3.26 3.24 3.53 3.42 3.4G 2.57 3.03
103 2.08 2.03 2.06 1.51 1.36 1.44 1.43 1.32 1.51 1.42 1.85 1.97 2.03 1.95 1.84 1.66 1.75 1.87 1. 75
104 2.37 2.19 2.28 2.06 2.07 2.07 1.76 1.80 1.46 1.67 2.28 2.31 2.28 2.29 2.29 1.94 2.12 1.80 2.04
105 3.90 3.97 3.94 3.98 3.95 3.97 3.58 3.63 3.91 3.71 3.89 4.27 4.22 4.13 4.6S 4.59 4.62 3.99 4.06
....
106 4.17 3.93 4.05 3. 68 3.79 3.74 3.42 3.40 3.36 3.39 3.88 3.79 3.96 3.88 4.12 4.09 4.11 3. 94 3.85 0
OD
107 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.14 2.10 2.12 1.80 1.83 2.05 1.89 2.05 2.22 2.18 2.15 2.56 2.38 2.47 2.05 2.17
108 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.25 2.10 2.18 2.10 2.19 2.13 2.14 2.30 2.38 2.34 2.34 2.65 2.59 2.62 2.42 2.37
109 0.45 0.37 0.41 -0.10 -0.44 -0.27 -0.11 0.00 0.08 -0.Cl 0.23 0.35 0.05 0.21 -0.11 -0.17 -0.14 0.05 0.04
110 0.38 0.57 0.48 0.33 0.16 0.25 0.33 0.13 0.49 0.32 0.32 0.55 0.51 0.46 0.27 0.36 0.32 0.23 0.34
111 0.92 0.84 0.88 0.58 0,58 0.58 0.37 0.44 0.41 0.41 0.70 0.81 0.94 0.82 0,73 0.89 0.81 0.51 0.67
112 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.75 0.56 0.66 0.57 0.58 0.56 0.57 0.77 0.87 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.84 o. 71 o. 74
113 -0.16 -0.24 -0.20 -0.39 -0.37 -0.38 -0.54 -0.48 -0.33 -0.45 -0.15 -0.19 -0.19 -0.18 -0.08 -0.06 -0.07 -0.55 -0.31
Overall Pooled Reproducibility Standard Deviation • 0.10 est.

* Viscosity losses for each fleet and processor corrected for car effect.
'** Six-fleet average obtained by averaging the average values from each of the six-fleets,
Af PENPIX TABLE c-2
SUHHARY OF THE UNCORRECTED VISCOSITY LOSS DATA FRCM THE

ASIM SHEAR STABILITY FLEET TESTS
ARO 210 F Viscosity Losses, est., After 1,500 Hiles of Use Uncorrected
on Fleet - A A B B C C C D D D E E F Six-Fleet
~ Pm:essor- ~ _J_ _ A_ _ B_ Avg. _K_ _c_ .JL_ Avg. _c_ _D_ _c_ _1._ _c_ _H_ Average
101 1.63 1.62 1.63 1.75 l.68 1.72 1.66 1.76 1.65 1.69 2.01 1.97 1.71 1.90 1.76 1.81 1.79 1.20 1.66
102 3.27 3.30 3.29 3.41 3.31 3.36 2.91 2.82 2.77 2.83 3.15 3.16 3.20 3.17 3.56 3.49 3.53 2.58 3.13
103 2.15 2.09 2.12 1.28 1.16 1.22 1.47 1.35 1.54 1.45 1.86 1.99 2.08 1.98 1.83 1.71 1.77 1.69 1. 71
104 2.49 2.30 2.40 2.23 :.2J 2.23 1.89 1.91 1.66 1.82 2.31 2.33 2.31 2.32 2.22 1.85 2.04 1.81 2.10
105 3.95 3.96 3.96 3.83 3.84 3.84 3.07 3.10 3.41 3.19 3.92 4.31 4.24 4.16 4.67 4.66 4.67 4.11 3.99
...
~
106 4.01 3.79 3.90 3.57 3.70 3.64 3.28 3.30 3.22 3.27 3.85 3.79 3.89 3.84 4.15 4.13 4.14 4.12 3.82
107 2.23 2.26 2.25 2.12 2.08 2.10 1.88 1.94 2.11 1.98 2.03 2.18 2.16 2.12 2.55 2.39 2.47 2.23 2.19
108 2.50 2.49 2.50 2.31 2.19 2.25 1.93 1.99 1.87 1.93 2.14 2.19 2.12 2.15 2.63 2.55 2.59 2.62 2.34
109 C.32 0.23 C.28 ·0.11 ·C.Gl ·0.27 -0.15 -0.09 -0.04 -0.09 0.17 0.26 ·0.03 0.13 -0.19 -0.31 -0.25 -0.06 -0.04
llO o.46 o.69 o.58 0.35 0.16 0.26 0.23 0.06 0.41 0.23 0.43 0.66 0.63 0.57 0.24 0.32 0.28 0.15 0.35
111 0.97 0.90 0.94 C.54 0.54 0.54 0.57 0.63 0.64 0.61 0.65 0.75 0.87 0.76 0.87 1.00 0.94 0.62 0.74
112 0.79 0.80 0.80 0.56 0.3~ 0.48 0.36 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.79 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.84 0.87 0.86 0.70 0.68
113 -0.17 -0.25 -0.21 -0.28 -0.30 ·0.29 -0.26 -0.18 -0.08 -0.17 -0.07 -0.07 -0.05 -0.06 -0.08 -0.10 -0.09 -0.55 -0.23
APPENDIX TABLE L-3
MECHANICAL SHEAR STABILITY OF ASTM OILS IN LABORATORY RENCH TEST,

L/\BORATORY ENGINE TESTS AND FLEET TESTS
210 F Viscosity Losses, cSt., by the Various Shear Stability Test Methods
Kady Laboratory Engine Type Tests
Diesel Intector Nozzle Type Power Steering Pump Type Tests S<rd.c Shear .J!!!.!... Motored Engine Test L-38 ~
ARO Lab.- J C L M A DRAB T N T G Six-
011 5 20 5 10 20 5 10 20 5 4 6 -4- --1- l c ) -5- - 6 - - 1/2 3 10 24 -io- ~ Fleet
~ ~ ~ ~ ..J!!..:_ _.!!!.:. !:!!....... ~
101 2.16 3.23 2.60 3.85 4.27 2.92 1.68 2.31 2.97 0.79 2.17 2.98 3.68 3.96 3.44 2.62 2.22 1.93 1.49 0.29 0.96 1.80 2.64 1.33 2.55 1.64
102 3.90 4.71 3.77 5.14 5.53 4.40 2.72 3.71 4.49 1.20 3.25 3.95 4.61 5.01 4.90 3.97 3.83 3.50 3.30 o.86 2.22 3.39 3.96 2.60 3.99 3.o3
103 2.48 2.87 1.91 3.36 3.74 2.43 1.56 1.95 2.38 0.47 1.44 1.88 2.46 2.88 2.70 2.97 1.00 0.97 1.19 0.52 1.77 2.57 3.15 1.70 3.47 1.75
104 2.44 2.84 2.05 3.38 3.66 2.85 1.84 2.26 2.65 0.93 1.75 2.14 2.66 3.04 2.59 2.11 1.31 1.19 2.05 0.74 1.30 2.07 2.50 1.46 3.03 2.04
105 4.72 5.46 4.71 5.85 6.19 5.24 4.34 4.85 5.13 1.69 4.49 4.98 5.40 5.72 5.57 5.16 4.78 4.66 3.88 1.58 3.24 4.38 4.96 3.75 4.94 4.06
106 3.28 4.46 3.36 4.83 5.25 3.99 2.36 2.99 3.54 l.10 3.18 3.86 4.58 5.00 4.75 4.27 3.19 2.68 2.30 1.20 2.45 3.52 4.13 3.31 4.65 3.85 •
....
107 2.35 3.84 2.43 4.27 4.81 2.77 1.84 2.36 3.04 0.64 1.96 2.65 3.57 4.19 3.83 2.98 2.10 1.81 1.56 0.58 1.44 2.70 3.58 2.35 3.72 2.17 c;
108 3.23 3.76 2.51 4.00 4.29 3.15 2.39 2.70 3.05 1.36 2.08 2.64 3.21 3.55 3.29 2.33 l.48 1.51 2.26 0.97 1.93 2.79 2.97 1.92 3.60 2.37
109 2.18 3.02 2.47 3.62 4.06 2.56 1.64 2.07 2.64 0.52 1.75 2.31 3.09 3.59 3.29 2.65 2.07 1.74 1.47 0.26 0.70 1.52 1.73 1.30 1.59 0.04
llO 1.11 1.32 0.91 1.76 1.99 1.22 0.71 0.85 1.17 0.66 0.85 1.51 1.47 1.72 1.43 0.99 0.49 0.43 0.57 0.29 0.53 0.78 0.95 0.58 1.27 0.34
lll 1.28 1.76 1.42 2.02 2.32 0.96 1.17 1.49 0.31 1.31 1.60 1.97 2.19 1.77 1.36 1.43 1.38 0.79 0.09 0.38 0.75 1.04 0.85 1.46 0.67
ll2 1.08 1.45 1.28 1.94 2.16 1.16 1.12 1.37 0.20 0.75 1.23 1.57 1.76 1.53 1.27 0.76 0.83 0.67 0.20 0.57 0.97 1.19 0.85 1.73 0.74
ll3 -0.11 -0.07 0.03 0.04 0.04 -0.03 -0.07 -0.07 -0.01 0.03 -0.02 0.03 o.oo 0.04 -0.17 0.07 -0.05 - -0.07 -0.08 -0.14 -0.31
- 111 -
APPENDIX TABLE G-4
RESULTS OF LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSES USING

ALL BENCH TEST AND LABORATORY ENGINE DATA
Equation Model: Y = A+BX

Where Y is Six-Fleet Average and X is Bench Test
and Laboratory Engine Data
Intercept Slope Std. Corr.

(A) (B) Error Coef.
Diesel Injector Nozzle
Lab. J 5 Passes -0.53 0.97 0.63 0.84
20 Passes -0.69 0.81 0.64 0.90
Lab. c 1 Pass -0.51 0.99 0.72 0.87
5 Passes -0.88 o. 77 0.70 0.88
10 Passes -0.91 0.71 0.74 0.86
Lab. L 20 Passes -1.07 1.02 0.68 0.87
tab. M 5 Passes -0.33 1.15 0.69 0.88
10 Passes -0.41 0.98 0.66 0.89
20 Passes -0.57 0.88 0.69 0.88
Power Steering Pump
Lab. A 5 Min. -0.14 2.46 0.76 0.86
1 Hour -0.26 1.07 0.64 0.90
2 Hours -0.59 0.95 0.66 0.89
4 Hours -o. 72 0.83 0.70 0.88
6 Hours -o. 77 o. 76 0.74 0.86
Lab. D 4 Hours -0.63 0.78 0.74 0.88
Lab. R 1 Hour -0.41 0.86 0.68 0.89
Kady Mill
Lab. T 6 Hours -o .01 1.09 0.72 0.85
Sonic Shear
Lab. A 10 Min, 0.12 0.84 0,84 0.82
Lab, B 5 Min. 0.28 0.85 0.86 0.78
Motored Engine
Lab. N 0.5 Hour 0.12 2.77 0.50 0.94
3 Hours -0.16 1.40 0.43 0.96
10 Hours -0.43 1.03 0.45 0.95
24 Hours ·0.51 0.89 0.47 0.95
L-38 Engine Test
tab. T 10 Hours -0.37 1.23 0.48 0.94
MS vc Ensine Test
tab. G 16 Hours -1.11 1.00 0.31+ 0.97
APPERDIX TABLE C· 5
C<K'AlUSOll OF VISCOSITY LOSSES, 'T. LOSSES AND SKEAll STABILITY INDEXES 'T. OF
THE ARO OILS BY THE DIFFERENT MECHANICAL SJ{EARINC METHODS
Viacoaity Loeeee,(b) cSt,, 7. Loae(c) and Shear Stability Index(d) t of Blended Oils Obtained By Various Methods of Shearinr
SUl-rl.eetJWg,@ 1500Ml'.lee 16~. Ford MS VC Teet 10-Hr. Ir38 Engine Test 3-Rr. Hota:e:I Engine '11111: l·Hr, Power Slll!ring 'll!et Diesel Injector 10 Ame: 6-Hr. Kady Hill Teet 10-¥.in. Sonic Shear Tut
AllO Shear Shear Shear Shear Shear She.ar Shear Shear
Oil ~-·- Stability Loa a Stability Loss Stability Lose Stability Lou Stability Lose Stability Loae Stability Lou Stability
:'!!!· £.H.:.. ...l_ Indu .s&. _.!.. Index cSt. 7. Index ill... _7._ Index £!k. _t_ Index cSt. "£ Index ill...~ Index ill... _'T._ Index
ICll I, 6 10.9 17.6 2.6 16.9 27.3 1.3 8,8 14.2 1.0 6.4 10.3 2.2 14.4 23.2 2.3 15.3 24.7 1.5 9.9 16.0 2.2 14.8 23.8
102 3.0 20.2 33,0 4.0 26.6 43.4 2.6 17.3 28.3 2.2 14,8 24.2 3.3 21.6 35.4 3.7 24.7 40.4 3.3 22.0 35.9 3.8 25.5 41. 7
103 1,8 1\, 7 17.2 3.5 23.1 34.1 1.7 11.3 16.7 1.8 11.8 17.4 1.4 9.6 14. l 2.0 13.0 19.2 1.2 7.9 11. 7 1.0 6.7 9.8
IOt. 2,0 13.6 23.2 3,0 20,3 34,4 1.5 9,8 16.6 1.3 8. 7 14.8 1.8 11. 7 19.9 2.3 15. l 25.7 2.1 13.7 23.3 1.3 8.8 14.9
105 4.1 27.0 43.2 4.9 32.8 52.7 3.8 24.9 40.0 3.2 21.5 34.S 4. 5 29.8 47.9 4.9 32.2 51. 7 3.9 25.8 41.4 4.8 31.8 51.0
10(> 3,9 B.6 41.l 4.7 31.0 49.7 3.3 22.1 35,4 2.5 16.3 26.2 3.2 21.2 34.0 3.0 19,9 31.9 2.3 15.3 24.6 3.2 21.3 34.1
107 2.1 14.3 2a.5 3. 7 24.6 38.5 2.4 15.5 24.3 1.4 9.5 14.9 2.0 12.9 20.3 2.4 15,6 24.4 1.6 10.3 16.1 2.1 13.9 21.7
108 2,4 l~.8 24.9 3,6 24,0 37.8 1,9 12,8 20.1 1.9 12.9 20.3 2.1 13.9 21.8 2.7 18.0 28.3 2.3 15.l 23. 7 1.5 9.9 15.5
109 o.o 0.3 0.4 1.6 10.4 16.1 1,3 8.5 13.2 0.7 4.6 7.1 1.8 11.5 17.7 2.1 13,6 21.0 1.5 9.7 14.9 2.1 13.6 21.0
110 0,3 2.3 3.5 1.3 8,5 12.9 0.6 3,9 5,9 0.5 3.5 5,4 0,9 5.7 8.7 0,9 5.7 8.7 0,6 3.8 5.8 0.5 3.3 5.0
111 o. 7 6,1 13.3 1.5 13.3 29,0 0,9 7.7 16,9 0,4 3.5 7.5 1.3 11.9 26.0 1.2 10. 7 23,2 0.8 7.2 15.7 1.4 13.0 28.4
112 0,7 6.7 13.4 1.7 15.6 31,2 0,9 7.7 15.3 0.6 5.2 10.3 0,8 6.8 13.5 1.1 10.l 20,2 0,7 6.1 12.1 0,8 6.9 13.7
113 -0.J -4.6 -0.1 -1.0 o.o 0.4 -0.1 -1.0 0.1 1.0
(a) Freeh oil viecoaitiea determine~ by Lab. P.

(b) Viacoeity loeeea, cSt,, obtain•d by aubtracting sheared oil viecoeitiee from fre•h oil viocoaities.
(cj t lose ia the viecoaity loaa divided by blended fre•h oil viscosity.
(d) Shear stability index i• calculated by dividing viacoeity looa by the nev oil polymer contributed viscosity.
- 113 - ,
I
APPENDIX TABLE.G-6
RESULTS OF LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSES USING VISCOSITY

LOSSES. % LOSSES AND SHEAR STABILITY INDICES
Equation Model: Y = A+BX
Where Y is the Six-Fleet Average Data and

X is the Laboratory Data
Correlation Coefficients
% Shear
Vise. Vise. Stability
!e!! 12!!, _!ndex
Laboratory Engine Tests
MS VC 16 Hours 0.97 0.97 0.97
Motored Engine 3 Hours 0.96 0.96 0.94

L-38 10 Hours 0.94 0.93 0.93
Bench Tests
Power Steering Pump 0.90 0.90 0.84
Diesel Injector 0.89 0.90 0.86
Kady Mill 0.85 0.84 0.84
Sonic Shear o.a2 0.80 0.74

AP?ENDIX TABLE G-7
ASTM REFERENCE OILS

NEW OIL VISCOSITIES, est., AT 210 F
ARO
Oil 15-Lab.
No. Lab.- A _B_ c _ E_ _ G_ H _ R_ _J_ _ K_ _ L_ _M_ N _T_ p _JL_ Average
101 15.05 15.01 15.24 15.11 15.01 14.98 15.01 15.07 15.08 15.14 15.14 15.16 15.13 15.05 14. 99 15.08
102 15.02 14.96 15.06 14.78 14. 97 15.18 14.99 15.00 15.06 15.06 15.06 15.15 14.27* 15.02 15.04 15. 03
103 14. 97 14.88 14.91 15.10 15.01 14.91 15.07 14.98 14.87 15.06 14.87 15.15 14.87 15.02 15.02 14.98
104 15.02 14. 95 15.06 14.95 14.94 15.02 14.99 14.87 14.90 14.99 14.89 15.14 14.96 14.96 15.00 14.98
105 14.70 14. 78 14. 74 15.00 14.89 14.96 14,81 14,58 14.78 14,44' 15, 10 14.78 15.05 14.94 14.87 ......
14.91
0
'
......
~
106 15.01 14.90 15.00 15.08 14.97 15.06 14.94 14. 94 14.91 14.91 14.77 15.12 14. 63* 15.01 14.85 14.96
107 15.15 15.11 15.14 15.15 15.13 15.16 15.16 15.12 15.04 15.06 15.10 15.30 15.12 15.15 15.17 15.14
108 14. 98 14.91 14.99 15.05 14.94 14.87 14.96 14.92 14.90 14.98 14.89 15.10 14.95 -15.00 14.97 14.96
109 15.23 15.16 15.31 15.28 15.18 15.20 15.25 15.23 15.17 15.22 15. 21 15.36 15.26 15.23 15.19 15.23
110 15.00 14.93 14.94 15.00 15.00 15.05 15.00 15.05 14.95 15.05 14.98 15.19 14.96 15.00 15.06 15.01
111 10.99 10.95 11.03 10.97 10.99 10.89 10.99 10.98 10.88 10.96 11.06 11.00 10.97 10.95 10.97
112 11.05 10.99 11.06 11.06 11.02 11.06 11.01 11.01 10.99 10.98 11.14 10.96 11.06 11.09 11.03
113 6. 72 6. 72 6. 77 6.73 6.72 6. 72 6. 77 6. 68 6.66 6.68 6.76 6.70 6.69 6. 72
Pooled Reproducibility Standard Deviation = o.os est.

* Outlier omitted from average and pooled reproducibility standard deviation.
APPENDIX TABLE G-8
ASTM REFERENCE OILS

NEW OIL VISCOSITIES 1 cSt. 1 AT 100 F
ARO
Oil 11-Lab.
Ne. Lab - A B c -- E G H R J K M p Average
-
101 86.11 85.03 86. 72 86.35 86.10 86.60 87.00 86.40 85.80 86.37 86.19 86.33
102 86.04 85.74 86 01 84. 64 85.95 86.10 86.60 86.00 86.10 85.99 85.93 85.92
103 97.09 98.91 97. G~ 98.09 97.92 97.70 98.70 97.60 97.80 97.45 98.09 97.91
104 109.20 108.40 108.90 108.60 108.78 108.38 105.50* 108.10 108.80 108.10 108.90 108.62
105 83.40 83.60 83.41 83.83 83.73 85.05 84.80 84.20 82.80 84.01 84.54 83.94
......
......
VI
106 75.82 76.87 76.08 77.44 75. 72 76.08 76.90 75.80 75.50 75.79 76.95 76.27
107 96.82 97.08 97.39 97. 63 97.60 97.22 96.90 97.50 96.90 97.26 97.58 97.26
108 104.40 106.20 105.00 104. 65 104.40 104.59 105.40 104.50 104.30 104.70 105.10 104.84
109 89. 63 90.07 90.76 90.69 90.30 90.98 90.50 90.80 90.30 91.01 90.81 90.53
110 104.00 102.70 104.60 104.41 104. 55 104. 27 104.80 104.90 104.30 103.90 104.40 104.26
111 66.13 66.12 66.13 65.99 66.15 66.98 67.30 66.20 65.80 66.30 66.29 66.31
112 74.86 74. 66 75.02 74.82 74.76 74.60 76.00 74.80 74.80 74. 53 74.84 74.88
113 48.15 48.55 48.47 48.30 48.39 48.37 50.30 48.30 48.12 48.41 48.55 48.54
*Outlier omitted from average

- 116 -
APPENDIX TABLE G-9
REPEATABILITY OF COMBINED ENGINE TEST,

STRIPPING PROCEDURE AND VISCOSITY DETERMINATION
ARO 210 F Viscosity Loss,

Oil cSt. 2 @ 1 1 500 Miles
Fleet No. Processor 1st Test 2nd Test
101 1.55 2.01

A 103 A 1. 74 1.84
107 2.30 2.27
112 0.74 0.81
102 4.13 3.36

B 104 A 1.47 1.21
107 2.03 1.55
111 0.73 0.79
102 2.60 3.30

c 104 c 2.19 1. 79
108 2.86 2.81
110 1.22 0.53
105 4.53 4.55

E 109 R 0.20 0.61
112 0.58 0.84
113 -0.07 -0.08
Pooled R~pcatability StanJard Deviation - 0.28 cSt.

Shear ST Ability OF Mul Tigrade Crankcase Oil

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Shear ST Ability OF Mul Tigrade Crankcase Oil

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

I

Establishment of Field Data and

• AMERICAN SOCIElY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS

ASTM DATA SERIES PUBLICATION OS 49

List price $7.75

Printed in New Carlisle, Ohio

As a second part of the program, four types of bench tests

The control oil (AR0-113) which did not contain a VJ.improver,

II. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Evaluation of the viscosity stability of multigrade oils has

In 1957, R&D Div. VIIB conducted a cooperative program in which

* Numbers in parentheses designate References at end of paper.

In 1967, a new Subsection, B-1, was formed "to study ways of

ASTM Reference Oils (ARO's) •Reference oils are a necessary

• Representation of all chemical types of polymers

• Inclusion of V.I. 1mprovers covering a broad range

• Inclusion of two v.1. improvers of the same chemical

• Inclusion of two sets of oils containing the same

• Formulation of all polymer~containing oils to

o Inclusion of one oil for control purposes that

ARO Nos. 101-110 111,112 113

SAE Grades lOW/40 lOW/30 20W/20

210°F, cSt 15. 0 11.0 6.7

0°F, cP 2000 2000 2600

An approval procedure, described in Appendix Table A-1, has been

* Base stocks were 95 v.r. mid-continent origin, +5°F pour point

Vehicle Selection - Each test vehicle fleet was envisioned as

• Vehicle Make and Number

• Engine and Transmission - 11 of the 13 cars should

• Engine Condition - Carshaving mileage accumulations

• Mileage Accumulation Rate - to complete the field

Test Procedure - Vehicles selected for the test were to undergo

Stripping Procedure - Since fuel dilution affects the viscosity

e Remove all dilution

e Not remove light ends from the lubricant

To check on dilution removal, a special oil (AR0-100) was

Mineral Spirits, Wt. % 210°F Viscosity, cSt

The goal was to strip to a viscosity level of 13.90 to 14.10 est.

To check on removal of light ends from the base stock, AR0-103

This initial procedure was later found to vary in results from

The precision of the revised stripping procedu~e appears to be

Max. Difference in Vis.@ 210°fCcSt

,•r Laboratory C data omitted.

Results from Lab C were omitted from the foregoing comparison

Avg. Viscosity @ 210°F for ARO_-_l_O_o._,_c_S_t_______

c 11.10 14.07 2.97

K 11.01 13.99 2.98

D 11.04 13.93 2.89

A different stripping method was used by one laboratory instead

European Field Test Program - A field test was also initiated

The European test program is using two seven-car fleets. One

As of March, 1972, there were some incomplete portions of that

IV. EXPERIMENTAL DATA

Fleet Viscosity Data - The original field viscosity data, sub-

An analysis of variance, illustrated in Section 4 of these

Bench Test Data - The original bench test data submitted by

Laboratory Engine Test Data - Three separate laboratory engine

V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Car effects were found to be highly significant in individual thirteen-

For a perfect linear correlation the standard error of estimate must be

The overall Six-Fleet viscosity results are essentially insensi-

Thus, through use of the large nl.Ullber of cars in this cooperative

Laboratory Test Results - The viscosity losses for all of the