Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Law on Business Organizations 3.

Property carried in partnership books as


partnership asset
MIDTERMS Reviewer
- Partnership property
I. Property rights of a Partner 4. Other factors tending to indicate property
ownership
Art. 1810. – Extent of property rights of partner - If income generated by the property is
1. Principal rights received by the partnership
a. His rights in specific partnership property - Taxes are paid by partnership
b. His interest in the partnership - The sole fact that partnership funds
c. His right to participate in the management were later used to repair and maintain
2. Related rights property isn’t sufficient
a. Right to reimbursement for amounts Art. 1811. –Nature of partner’s right in specific
advanced to the partnership and to partnership property
indemnification for risks in consequence of
management  A partner is a co-owner with his partners in
b. Right of access to partnership books specific partnership property, but the rules on
c. Right to true and full things affecting co-ownership do not necessarily apply.
partnership
Legal incidents of this common right are distinctively
d. Right to formal account of partnership
characteristic of the partnership relations:
affairs under certain circumstances
e. Right to dissolution 1. Equal right of possession of the property for
partnership purposes
Partnership property vs. Partnership capital
- Should any of them use it for own
1. Changes in value profit, he must account to the
a. Property- is variable, its value may vary partnership the profits derived
from day to day with changes in the market - Any partner shall have a right to formal
value of partnership assets account of partnership affairs if he is
b. Capital- constant; remains unchanged as wrongfully excluded from the
the amount fixed by partnership agreement possession of its property by his
- not affected by fluctuations partners
2. Assets included - The wrongful exclusive possession of
a. Property- includes not only the original P.Property may be a ground for
capital contributions of the partners, but all dissolution
the property subsequently acquired on - The right to possess specific partnership
account of the partnership property may be surrendered.
b. Capital- the aggregate of the individual 2. Assignment of right to the property
contributions made by the partners. - A partner cannot assign his right to the
land, but all of the can assign their
Ownership of certain property
rights in the same property
1. Property used by the partnership - Primary reasons for the non-
- Partner may allow his separate property assignability of partner’s right: 1) it
to be used in the partnership business, prevents interference by outsiders in
without intending to transfer ownership partnership affairs, 2) it protects the
of it rights of other partners and partnership
- Partner may hold title to partnership creditors to have partnership assets
property in his own name without applied to firm debts, 3) it is often
having it belong to him. (Intent of the impossible to measure or value a
parties is the controlling factor) partner’s beneficial interest in a
2. Property acquired by partner with partnership particular asset.
funds 3. Attachment or execution
- Presumption: partnership property - Property is not subject to attachment or
- Unless contrary intention appears execution except on a claim against the
- If property was acquired after partnership and not the partners.
dissolution but before winding up, it 4. Legal support
would be his separate property but he - The right to partnership property is not
would be liable to account to the subject to legal support under the
partnership for the funds used in the Family code, but their interest in the
acquisition. partnership is subject to legal support.

1
5. Partner’s interest not a debt due from 1. Application for a charging order after securing
partnership judgment on his credit – subjecting the interest
- Separate creditors of an individual of the debtor-partner in the partnership with
partner cannot go after any specific the payment of the unsatisfied amount of such
partnership property. judgment with interest.
- A partner is not a creditor of the 2. Claims of partnership creditors must be
partnership for the amount of his share satisfied first before the separate creditors of
the partners
Art.1812. – Nature of Partner’s Interest in the
3. The court may resort to other courses of action
Partnership Property
provided (appointment of receiver, sale of
1. Shares of the profits and surplus interest) if the judgment debt remains
- Proportionate share unsatisfied.
- Profit = sales – expenditures
Rule: no specific partnership property is attached.
- Surplus= assets –liabilities
- Profits shared in conformity with the Redemption or purchase of interest charged by court:
agreement; otherwise, according to
1. Redemptioner- the interest of the debtor-
capital contribution
partner may be redeemed with the separate
2. Extent of the partner’s interest
property of any one or more partners, or with
- Until after an account has been taken of
partnership property but with the consent of all
the debts and credits et.al., it is
partners whose interests are not so charged or
impossible to determine the extent of
sold.
the partner’s interest.
2. Redemption price- market or actual value.
Art. 1813. –Effect of assignment of partner’s whole 3. Right of redeeming non debtor partner- does
interest in partnership not acquire absolute ownership over the
debtor-partner’s interest but holds it in trust for
 Sale, donation, or as collateral security to a loan
him consistent with the principles of fiduciary
without causing dissolution
relationship.
 Rights withheld from assignee: II. Obligations of Partners with Regard to
1. To interfere in the management Third Persons
2. To require any information or account
3. To inspect any of the partnership books Art. 1815.- Partnerships operate under a firm
 Status and rights of assignor in partnership is
Firm – name, title, or style under which a company
unaffected
transacts business. (Company)
Rights of assignee of a partner’s interest:
 A firm name is necessary to distinguish the
1. To receive in accordance with his contract the partnership which has a distinct and separate
profits accruing to the assigning partner juridical personality from the individuals
2. To avail himself of the usual remedies provided composing the partnership and from other
by law in the event of fraud in management partnerships.
3. To receive the assignor’s interest in case of  Such firm name must be registered with DTI
dissolution
Right of partners to choose firm name:
4. To require an account of partnership affairs, but
only in case the partnership is dissolved 1. Individual partner
2. Surnames of all the partners
Dissolution of the partnership
3. Surname/s of one or more of the members with
1. Dissolution not intended- if assigning partner the addition of “And company”
neglects his partnership duties after 4. Individual names wholly distinct from the
assignment, the other partners may dissolve the names of any of the members
partnership.  Use of misleading name – it should not be
2. Dissolution intended- only when it is clear that identical with or deceptively similar to a name
the parties contemplated and intended the which was previously adopted by any other
entire withdrawal from the partnership of such entity, or interfere with the right of others, or is
partner and the termination of the partnership contrary to law.
as between the partners.  Use of names of deceased persons –
permissible provided that the firm indicates in
Art. 1814. – Remedies of separate judgment creditor of
all its communications that said partner is
a partner
already deceased.

2
 Liability for inclusion of name in firm name – 1. If any partner acts in the usual/ ordinary course
they do not acquire the rights of a partner, but of business
they shall be subject to the liability of a partner - Binds the partnership
insofar as third persons without notice are 2. If act is in the usual way of business but partner
concerned has no authority
- Binds the partnership
Art. 1816. – Liability for contractual obligations of the
3. If act is in usual way of business, partner has no
partnership
authority and third person has knowledge that
1. Partnership Liability- Partners are liable to third the partner has no authority
persons who have dealt with one of them. - Does not bind partnership
- A partner has the right to make all 4. Act not in the usual way of business
partners liable for contracts he makes - Does not bind partnership
for the partnership 5. Act not in the usual way of business but partner
2. Individual liability- the partner is personally has the authority
bound by his contract even if only the - Binds the partnership
partnership is shown to have derived benefits
Two requisites in order that the partnership will not be
from it.
liable:
Nature of Individual liability of partners:
1. The partner so acting has, in fact, no authority
 all partners, including industrial partners, are 2. The third person knows that the acting partner
liable to creditors of the partnership for has no authority
obligations contracted in partnership’s name.  Acts of strict dominion or ownership =
1. Pro rata- equally or jointly and not authorization of ALL of the partners
proportionately; not on the amount of the  Liability of partner acting without authority – he
partner’s individual contributions to the is personally liable to the contract. Such partner
common fund binds himself in no matter what name he
2. Subsidiary – the partners become personally contracts
liable only after all the partnership assets have
Art. 1819. – Conveyances of Real Properties
been exhausted.
3. Liability of industrial partner – although not Real properties can be registered through the ff:
liable for losses, he still has to pay but he can
1. In the name of the partnership
recover the amount he has paid from the
2. In the name of one or more but not all partners
capitalist partners unless there is an agreement
3. All partners
to the contrary.
4. One or more or all of the partners or in trust to
Art. 1817. – Stipulation against liability a third person

Any stipulation among partners contrary to the pro rata Examples of conveyances:
and subsidiary liability expressly imposed by Art. 1816 is
1. Title in partnership name, conveyed in
void and has no effect insofar as it affects third persons.
partnership name
It shall only be enforceable among the partners
- The conveyance passes the title to the
themselves.
third person, but the partnership can
Art. 1818. – Power of the partner as an agent of the recover the property if the conveyance
partnership was not in the usual way of business
and the third person has knowledge of
 All partners have equal rights
partner’s lack of authority.
 Limitations upon the authority of any of the 2. Title in partnership name, conveyance in
partners are not binding upon innocent third partner’s name
persons. - The third person does not become the
Third persons: owner of the property. He only gets the
equitable interest of the firm, assuming
1. No duty to make inquiries as to acting partner’s that the selling of the property is in the
authority usual course of business.
2. Presumption that acting partner has the - Third person will not be entitled to
authority to bind partnership equitable interest if the selling is not in
3. No right to assume that acting partner has the usual course of business and he had
unlimited authority knowledge of the partner’s lack of
Liability of partners for acts of partners: authority although the sale was made in
the usual course of business.
3
3. Title in name of one or more partners, 2. Knowledge of the partner acting in the
conveyance in name of partner or partners particular matter then present to his mind
whose name title stands - May be acquired before the partnership
- The title is conveyed to the third and the same was then present to his
person. mind
4. Title in name of one or more or all partners or a 3. Knowledge of any other partner who
third person in trust for partnership, reasonably could and should have
conveyance in the partnership name or in name communicated it to the acting partner
of partner
Art. 1822- Liability arising from partner’s wrongful act
- The conveyance will pass only the
or omission, or breach of trust
equitable interest of the firm.
5. Title in the name of all partners, conveyance in Solidary liability- the creditor may proceed against any
the name of all partners one of the solidary debtors or some or all of them
- Passes title to the third person simultaneously.
- Even if done not in the usual way of
business Requisites for liability:

Protection of innocent purchasers for value: 1. The partner must be guilty of wrongful act or
omission
1. Legal title to partnership property in partner 2. He must be acting in the ordinary course of
making the conveyance business or with the authority of his co-partners
2. Legal title of property in partnership name, even if the act is not connected with the
conveyed in partnership name business
3. Authorization or ratification of conveyance
Art. 1823- the partnership is liable for any losses
Art. 1820- Admissions made by a person in regard to suffered by a third person whose money or property is
the liability of a third person shall take no effect misappropriated by:
 A person is not bound by the act, admission, 1. a partner who received it within the scope of his
statement or agreement of another of which he authority
has no knowledge. 2. any other partner after it was received by the
 Partnership – exception to the general rule partnership in the ordinary course of business
above because all partners are agents of the while in its custody
partnership (contract of agency)
ex. Misappropriation of ring as a security for a loan
 If it happens during the existence of the
obtained from a pawnshop
partnership, it can be used as evidence against
the partnership. Art. 1824. – Solidary liability
 Necessity of proving existence of partnership:
1. Evidence other than the admission itself  All partners are liable solidarily with the
2. Declaration made by the partner acting for partnership for everything chargeable to the
partnership – any partner speaking for the partnership under art. 1822 and 1823
partnership concerning partnership affairs,  Even innocent partners are personally liable
while acting with the scope if his authority. without prejudice to their right to recover from
3. Declaration made in the presence of a the guilty partner.
partner Art. 1825- Partner by estoppel
Art. 1821- Notice to, or knowledge of, a partner of Estoppel- a bar which precludes a person from denying
matter affecting partnership affairs or asserting anything contrary to that which has been
 Operates as a notice to, or knowledge of the established as the truth by his own deed or
partnership except in cases of fraud (fraud by a representation, either express or implied.
third person to the partnership) - To protect third persons
 If notice is delivered to a partner by a third 1. Liability pro rata- when there is no existing
person, that is an effective communication to partnership and all those represented as
the partnership, notwithstanding the failure of partners consented to the representation, or
the partner to communicate such notice or not all partners consented to the
knowledge to his co-partners. representation
- Liability of partner by estoppel and all
Three cases of Knowledge of a partner
those who consented to such
1. Knowledge of the partner acting in the representation is joint and pro rata
particular matter acquired while a partner

4
2. Liability separate- there is an existing 1. Without violation of the agreement between
partnership, person acted alone in the the partners
representation; there is no existing partnership a. Termination of definite term- partnership
and not all but only some of those represented with a fixed term
consented b. Express will of any partner- provided that it
- Person who represented himself + is a partnership at will and there must be
those who consented to his being a good faith
partner are liable. c. Express will of all partners- this happens
 A partnership liability results if all partners before the termination of the specific term
consent to the representation. or particular undertaking of the partners
and must be unanimous
Art. 1826.- Liability of incoming partner for existing
d. Expulsion of any partner- Good faith, a
obligations
partner expelled in bad faith can claim for
1. Limited to his share in partnership property for damages.
existing obligations- unless there is a stipulation 2. Dissolution effected in contravention of the
to the contrary partnership agreement
2. Extends to his separate property for subsequent - Delectus personae- Power of
obligations dissolution always exists
- Withdrawing partner- liable for
Art. 1827- Preference of partnership creditors in damages for unjustified dissolution but
partnership property in no case shall he be compelled to
-Partnership creditors are entitled to priority of remain in the partnership
payment over those creditors of each partner 3. Business becomes unlawful
- Happens when a supervening event
-The partnership, treated as a legal entity distinct and makes the business itself unlawful
separate from the members composing it, should apply 4. Loss of a specific thing- loss before delivery
its property to the payment of its debts in preference to -loss after delivery – partnership not dissolved
the claim of any partner or his creditors. -loss where only use or enjoyment is
Remedy or private creditors of partner: contributed – owner is in default with respect
to his contribution, partner bears lost alone
 The creditors of each partner may ask for the 5. Death of any partner- winding up
attachment and public sale of the share of the - Partnership agreement may provide
latter in the partnership assets. that it will not effect a dissolution
6. Insolvency of any partner or of partnership
III. Dissolution and Winding Up - Liability exceeds assets
7. Civil interdiction of any partner
Art. 1828. – Terms defined
- A partnership requires the capacity of
1. Dissolution- the change in the relation of the the partners. A convicted person
partners caused by any partner ceasing to be suffering from the accessory penalty of
associated in the carrying on of the business. civil interdiction cannot validly give
-That point where partners cease to carry on consent as his capacity to act is limited.
the business together. It represents the demise
Civil interdiction- deprives the offender during the time
of the partnership.
of his sentence of the right to manage his property and
2. Winding up- the process of settling the business
dispose of such property by any act or conveyance inter
or partnership affairs after dissolution
vivos to take effect during his lifetime.
3. Termination- is that point in time when all
partnership affairs are completely wound up 8. By decree of court under the following article
and finally settled. It signifies the end of the
partnership life.

Art. 1829.- Partnership not terminated by dissolution

- No new partnership business should be


undertaken, but affairs should be
liquidated and distribution made to
those entitled to the partner’s interest
- The partnership continues until the
winding up is completed.

Art. 1830- Causes of dissolution

5
6

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi