Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
D = 1,210
E = 7.16625
0.5 0.5
D = 1,210
0.5 0.5 E = 6.48375
D = 810
E = 6.48375
0.5 0.5
D = 810
E = 5.86625
If the company onshores production, the period 2 analysis is as follows (Given that production is
onshored it stays at $10 and is not affected by exchange rate fluctuations. Revenue stays at $20 per unit
for each period):
When discounted to the present, the onshoring discounted profits are $17,355.
If production is offshored, the yuan exchange rate comes into play because costs are now incurred in
yuan. Revenue stays $20 per unit. Period 2 results are as follows (it is best for Forever Young to order
990 units for period 2):
Period 1 analysis is as follows (it is best for Forever Young to preorder 1100 units for period 1):
In this case, the strategy is to order a base load of 900 units from China for each period and make up any
difference from the onshore source (at $11 / unit). Period 2 results are as follows:
The discounted Period 0 results for the hybrid strategy results in profits of $19,331. Thus, the offshoring
option (with different order quantities for the two periods) is the best option unless the cost of
onshoring in the hybrid option can be reduced to $10.84 (set cell B4 in hybrid sourcing to 10.84).
If hybrid sourcing can be used with a base load order in period 2 of 810 (set cell B7 in hybrid sourcing to
810) and period 1 of 900, the expected profit increases to $19,350. In this case, the hybrid strategy is
more profitable if the onshoring cost for the hybrid option can be lowered to $10.95.