Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SEAMEO Regional Centre for Quality Improvement of Teachers and Education Personnel
(QITEP) in Mathematics
2013
Table of Contents
E. Iceberg Metaphor....................................................................................................................5
G. Progressive Formalization/Schematization.............................................................................7
H. Guided Reinvention.................................................................................................................8
RME finds its basis in Freudenthal's (1971,1977) idea that mathematics is a human
activity, and consequently must "be connected to reality, stay close to children and
should be relevant to society. Students should learn mathematics by developing and
applying mathematical concepts and tools in daily-life problem situations that make
sense to them" (Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, 2003). Contexts are used which are
meaningful to students, but may as equally be based on fantasy as on "real-world"
scenarios. The main concern in RME is that the problem is imaginable no matter it is real
or just a fiction.
The idea behind this scenario is that students are expected to re-invented mathematics
concepts and ideas. In RME students are seen as re-inventors. The role of teachers are
guiding and making conscious to student the mathematization of reality, with an eye to
encouraging students to reflect on the process. RME demands that teachers establish a
link between children’s own world and the world of mathematics ideas.
B. The History
RME theory is originally developed in the Netherlands. Professor Hans Fredenthal (1905-
1990) and his colleagues had designed an approach of mathematics teaching and
learning. Freudenthal believed that children may work as mathematicians in inventing
mathematical formulas. According to him learning process might be arranged in favor to
students to use every single situation and opportunity to reinvent mathematics by
RME later gains attentions from scholars around the world due to research and
development conducted by Dutch mathematics educators who work at Freudenthal
Institute. They are not only implementing RME in the Netherlands schools but also in the
USA (MiC Project) and other parts of the world such as South Africa (REMESA) and in
Indonesia (PMRI).
In RME the learning is started by giving students contextual problems so that they
can involve in the learning process immediately. While in conventional class
teacher starts with explaining formal procedures of mathematics, usually followed
by examples to enhance their understanding to the procedures explained. In RME
the role of the teacher is mostly as facilitator in guidance students to their re-
invention of mathematics ideas from informal to formal one.
Students’ activity and interactivity is the main ingredient of RME lesson. Students
may work alone and in a group (through discussion and reflection) in dealing with
the problems.
In horizontal mathematization (HM) students start from realistic problems and try to
describe them using their own strategy which mostly informal and less structured. They
might refine their solutions to pre-formal (structure) during discussion and reflection. In
vertical mathematization (VM) students utilized their pre-formal solution to develop
certain procedures. These procedures later can be used to solve any analogue problem
directly without the help of context.
Freudenthal (1991) stated that HM involves going from the world of life into the world of
symbols, while VM means moving within the world of symbols. But he adds that the
difference between these two types is not always clear cut.
The following activities are examples of HM: identifying or describing the specific
mathematics in a general context, schematizing, formulating and visualizing a problem in
different ways, discovering relations, discovering regularities, recognizing isomorphic
aspect in different problems, transferring a real world problem to a mathematical
problem, and transferring a real world problem to a known mathematical problem. On
the other hand, VM is the process of reorganization within the mathematical system
itself. The following activities are example of VM: representing a relation in a formula,
proving regularities, refining and adjusting models, using different models, combining and
integrating models, formulating a mathematical model, and generalizing.
Teachers have a tendency to invest a lot in the teaching and training of the top of the
iceberg (formal mathematics, sums) whereas most of the important insights and skills are
developed before that (floating capacity). Especially for the lower achievers, one should
take time to create a solid basis... The iceberg has proved to be a very powerful metaphor
to suggest how children need a broad range of mathematical representations and
experiences to make sense of the formal mathematical representations.
Models at the informal levels are models-of and models at the pre-formal level
are models-for, and are used as a basis for reasoning and reflection.
Tenet Two: Multiple learning lines can be mapped through resources of the domain to a
potential end point.
Tenet Three: The real phenomena in which the formalization occurs produces
connections
It is realistic - In Dutch, the word zich realiseren means to imagine, and so the
term 'realistic' refers to situations which can be imagined (Panhuizen, 2003). RME
initially presents knowledge within such a concrete context allowing pupils to
develop informal strategies, but gradually through the process of guided
'mathematization', allows students to progress to more formal, abstract, standard
strategies. (Note that these contexts are chosen to help students' mathematical
development, not simply because they are interesting!) As Bell and Shiu have
suggested 'Abstract relationships are expressed by symbol-systems, and rules are
developed for the manipulation...meaning can only be restored to the
manipulations by recognising the underlying concepts' (1981:1). It is where no
meaning is offered that misconceptions arise.
The RME problems, set in real world contexts, are presented, so that along with
giving meaning and making mathematics more accessible to learners, they also
illustrate the countless ways in which mathematics can be applied.
It incorporates the use of effective models - The use of various models e.g. ratio
tables and combination charts, provide a more visual process of doing
mathematics.
G. Progressive Formalization/Schematization
According to Freudenthal, mathematics can be best be learned by doing, and
mathematizing is the goal of mathematics education. Freudenthal distinguishes
'horizontal' and 'vertical' mathematizing. Initially, HM is the process of ordering, applying
HM is the first step in progressive formalization. As noted previously, this is the gradual
transition from, whether instinctive or acquired in earlier phases of education, through
pre-formal strategies, which pupils' naive strategies expand the initial models developed
to systemize the naive strategies, to more formalized strategies of symbolic
representation.
How People Learn describes progressive formalization as one of the “approaches to the
development of curricula that supports learning with understanding and encourages
sense making.”
H. Guided Reinvention
Guided by the instructional materials and the teacher as facilitator, the pre-formal
models and strategies progressively develop into more formal and abstract mathematical
procedures, concepts, and insights.