http://bpmsg.

com

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial

3.0 Singapore License.
(You need to give credit to the author)
To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/sg/
or send a letter to Creative Commons,
171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

Author: Klaus D. Goepel

http://bpmsg.com
Revisions
Date Comment
3/5/2012 1st draft based on AHPcalc vers 27.8.11 (single input);
allows input from max. 7 participants

11.12.2012 Algorithm of Power Method to solve Eigenvalue was modified

released (new sheet 8x8) resulting in much higher accuracy. By
default 12 iterations
08.02.2013
released final tests
2/19/2013 corrected formatting problem of weights in summary sheet
5/7/2013 Introduced weights for individual participants (weighted
geometric mean) in sheet multInp
Extend to 20 participants
12/24/2013 For the 3 most inconsistent judgments the ideal judgment
resulting in lowest inconsistency is displayed
5/9/2014 Change of check for convergence of power method
7/26/2014 corrected wrong ref in multInp (Matrix13)
4/9/2015 changed name of consol. Matrix from MatrixC to m_p0
CHOOSE in Summary sheet now p_sel+1 and m_p0 included
(IF cond removed)
changed the min of 3 to 2 criteria
6/7/2015 correction for 2 criteria: sheet 10x10 Cell M41 limit to 12
CGI in summary sheet to "n/a" for n=2, text (2 - 10)
5/4/2016 Corrected display of the selected scale in the summary sheet

5/4/2017 Corrected AHP consensus indicator (H gamma max)

8/22/2018 Balanced scale replaced by generalized balanced scale
(Balanced-n), Added adaptive scale.
Power method max no of iterations increased from 12 to 20.
9/15/2018 Inconsistency matrix pi/pj limited between 1/9 and 9
Error estimate for EV
Error estimate for RGGM, Ordinal inconsistency Psi
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (EVM multiple inputs)

K. D. Goepel Version 15.09.2018 Free web based AHP software on: http://bpmsg.com
Only input data in the light green fields and worksheets!
n= 2 Number of criteria (2 to 10) Scale: 1 AHP 1-9

N= 1 Number of Participants (1 to 20) a: 0.1 Consensus: n/a

3 9
p= 0 selected Participant (0=consol.) 2 7 #REF!
Objective

Author
Date Thresh: 1E-08 Iterations: #N/A EVM check: #N/A

Table Criterion Comment Weights +/-

1 Crit-1 #REF! #REF!
2 Crit-2 #REF! #REF!
3 #REF! 0.0%
4 #REF! 0.0%
5 #REF! 0.0%
6 #REF! 0.0%
7 #REF! 0.0%
8 #REF! 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the #REF! 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) #REF! 0.0%

Result Eigenvalue Lambda: #REF! MRE: #REF!

Consistency Ratio 0.37 GCI: n/a Psi: n/a CR: #REF! MRE est #REF!

Matrix normalized
principal
Crit-1

Crit-2

Eigenvector
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Crit-1 1 1 #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF!

Crit-2 2 #REF! 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 #REF!

7
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 #REF!

8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 #REF!

9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 #REF!

10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 #REF!

by K. Goepel 440428907.xlsx-Summary
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 1

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM +/-

1 Crit-1 50.0% 0.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0% 0.0%
3 0.0% 0.0%
4 0.0% 0.0%
5 0.0% 0.0%
6 0.0% 0.0%
7 0.0% 0.0%
8 0.0% 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0% 0.0%

Participant 1 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00 ###
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In1
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 2

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 2 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In2
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 3

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 3 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In3
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 4

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 4 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In4
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 5

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 5 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In5
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 6

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 6 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In6
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 7

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 7 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1.00

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In7
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 8

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 8 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In8
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 9

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 9 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In9
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 10

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 10 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In10
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 11

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 11 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In11
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 12

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 12 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In12
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 13

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 13 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In13
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 14

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 14 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In14
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 15

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 15 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In15
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 16

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 16 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In16
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 17

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 17 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In17
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 18

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 18 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In18
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 19

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 19 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In19
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 20

Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Crit-1 50.0%
2 Crit-2 50.0%
3 0.0%
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Participant 20 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Crit-1 Crit-2 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 3 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 4 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

440428907.xlsx-In20
http://bpmsg.com AHP 10/04/2019
Multiple Input Sheet
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
bpmsg.com Multiple Input Summary Sheet

1 = k number of participants
Consolidated = Weighted geometric mean off participants 2 = n number of criteria

C Consolidated 1 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2 #REF! ### #REF! 3 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

4 #REF! ### #REF! 5 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

6 #REF! ### #REF! 7 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

8 #REF! ### #REF! 9 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

10 #REF! ### #REF! 11 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

23 of 24 440428907.xlsx-multInp
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (10x10 Matrix) 2
Power Method (Dominant Eigenvalue)
Iterations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20
1 1.00 #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
2 #REF! 1.00 - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
3 - - 1.00 - - - - - - - 0.10 #REF!
4 - - - 1.00 - - - - - - 0.10 #REF!
5 - - - - 1.00 - - - - - 0.10 #REF!
6 - - - - - 1.00 - - - - 0.10 #REF!
7 - - - - - - 1.00 - - - 0.10 #REF!
8 - - - - - - - 1.00 - - 0.10 #REF!
9 - - - - - - - - 1.00 - 0.10 #REF!
10 - - - - - - - - - 1.00 0.10 #REF!
Sum (col) #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scaling
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
Normalization
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
Eigenvalue: #REF!
Check #N/A err: 1.0E-08 #REF!
#REF! Iterations: #N/A #REF!
#REF! check: #N/A #REF!
#REF! #REF!
I*I #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!

#REF! #REF! - - - - - - - -
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Convergence
1E-02
A-I*I - - - #REF! - - - - - -
- - - - #REF! - - - - - 1E-04
- - - - - #REF! - - - - 1E-06
- - - - - - #REF! - - -
- - - - - - - #REF! - - 1E-08
- - - - - - - - #REF! - 1E-10
- - - - - - - - - #REF!
1E-12
(A-I*I)x #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 1E-14
1E-16
12

Iterations