0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
46 vues3 pages
1) The Supreme Court ruled that for a trial in an NDPS case to be fair, the investigation must also be fair and raise no doubts about its veracity.
2) Prior cases established that the prosecution has the initial burden to prove the investigation was fair under the NDPS Act's reverse burden of proof. If foundational facts are not proven, possession cannot be established.
3) One case highlighted that physical samples of seized substances must be produced as primary evidence to prove the substance was heroin under the Customs Act. Failure to do so means possession cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
1) The Supreme Court ruled that for a trial in an NDPS case to be fair, the investigation must also be fair and raise no doubts about its veracity.
2) Prior cases established that the prose…