Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
MEMO filed by Advocate P.MICHAEL for and on behalf of the above named
Petitioner/Accused
The petitioner humbly submit that this petitioner/accused had filed a petition
before this Hon’ble Court under section 311 Cr.P.C on 15/02/2016 to recall PW1
to PW10, PW16 to PW19. This Hon’ble Court allowed the petition as per
CMP.NO: 210/2016 on 26/02/2016. On 26/02/2016 itself the process had been
paid . subsequently the process had been paid in the further hearing dates. While
the CMP.NO: 210/2016 is pending this Hon’ble Court had posted the case for
DWS. The petitioner/accused had filed the list of witness schedule and this
Hon’ble Court passed an order on 06/09/2016 that the witnesses should be
produced through special messenger. On 09/09/2016 the petitioner /accused filed
witness schedule and process memo and it is pending.
The petitioner humbly submit that this petitioner/accused had filed a process on
05/10/2016 and it has been numbered as 1160. This Hon’ble Court had returned
the process stating “The case is posted on 06/10/2016. No time for service”. On
06/10/2016 the case had been adjournrd to 03/11/2016 hence on 07/10/2016 the
process had been resubmitted and it had been numbered as 1180. But on
14/10/2016 this Hon’ble Court has returned the process by stating “ How this
process memo maintainable at this stage. Hence returned”.
The petitioner humbly submit that the CMP.NO: 210/2016 is allowed by this
Hon’ble Court. Hence the process filed by the petitioner is maintainable. And
today the petitioner files process before this Hon’ble Court and it may be accepted.
Hence it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to accept the memo
inaccordance with law.
Nagercoil
03/11/2016
Advocate
BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK
MAHILA COURT AT NAGERCOIL
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Process Memo
Advocate
BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK MAHILA COURT AT NAGERCOIL
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
1.M.Mariyadhas
s/o.Kuruz
Mullanganavilai
Vilavancode Taluk
Kanyakumari district.
2.Santhamary
w/o. Mariyadhas
Mullanganavilai
Vilavancode Taluk
Kanyakumari district.
3.Rajan
s/o. Mariyadhas
Mullanganavilai
Vilavancode Taluk
Kanyakumari district.
4.Rasul raj
s/o.Ponnumani
Paloor
Vilavancode Taluk
Kanyakumari district.
Nagercoil
03/11/2016
Advocate
BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK MAHILA COURT AT NAGERCOIL
CMP.NO: /2017
IN
S.C.NO: 101 /2012
Between
Bellarmin Samraj, aged 41 years
S/o.Rajayyan,
Paeppali vilai,
Thakkalivillai,
Pallapallam. ………Petitioner/ Accused
and
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Due to oversight the petitioner had appeared before this Hon’ble Court on
01/01/2017 and signed in the condition note and did not appear before this
Hon’ble Court on 02/01/2017 hence this court issued Non Bail able Warrant to the
petitioner/accused.
The petitioner voluntarily surrender before this Hon’ble court today in view of the
Non Bailabe Warrant issued by this Hon’ble Court on 02/01/2017 for non
appearance.
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Due to oversight the petitioner had appeared before this Hon’ble Court on
01/01/2017 and signed in the condition note and did not appear before this
Hon’ble Court on 02/01/2017 hence this court issued Non Bail able Warrant to the
petitioner/accused.
The petitioner voluntarily surrender before this Hon’ble court today in view of the
Non Bailabe Warrant issued by this Hon’ble Court on 02/01/2017 for non
appearance.
The non-appearance of the petitioner is not willful but only due to the above stated
reason.
Hence it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to cancel the Non
Bailable Warrant issued against the petitioner/accused and allow this petition in the
interest of justice..
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
The petitioner voluntarily surrender before this court today in view of the Non
Bailabe Warrant issued by this Hon’ble Court on 02/01/2017 for non appearance
and the case has been adjourned to 27/1/2017
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Advocate
BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK MAHILA COURT AT NAGERCOIL
CMP.NO: /2017
IN
S.C.NO: 101 /2012
Between
Bellarmin Samraj, aged 41 years
S/o.Rajayyan,
Paeppali vilai,
Thakkalivillai,
Pallapallam. ………Petitioner/ Accused
and
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Due to oversight the petitioner had appeared before this Hon’ble Court on
01/01/2017 and signed in the condition note and did not appear before this
Hon’ble Court on 02/01/2017 hence this court issued Non Bail able Warrant to the
petitioner/accused.
The petitioner voluntarily surrender before this Hon’ble court today in view of the
Non Bailabe Warrant issued by this Hon’ble Court on 02/01/2017 for non
appearance.
The non-appearance of the petitioner is not willful but only due to the above stated
reason.
Hence it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to condone the non
compliance of condition on 02/01/2017 and allow this petition in the interest of
justice..
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Memo of Appearance
Nagercoil ADVOCATE
26/11/2014
BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK
MAHILA COURT AT NAGERCOIL
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Memo of Appearance
CMP.NO: /2016
IN
S.C.NO: 101 /2012
Between
Bellarmin Samraj, aged 42 years
S/o.Rajayyan,
Paeppali vilai,
Thakkalivillai,
Pallapallam. ………Petitioner/ Accused
and
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
GROUNDS
1. The petitioner is quite innocent of the offences alleged against him in the
F.I.R
2. The petitioner is no way connected with the occurrence alleged in the F.I.R.
4. CECT/NECT had been taken and the doctor had given the following
Impression
Thick walled abscess cavity in apical and posterior basal segment of
right lower lobe. Air space pneumonitis in right middle lobe, left
lingular lobe, basal segments of right lower lobe.
Mild pneumonitis in anterior segment of left upper and in left lower
lobe.
Mediastinal lymphadenopathy
5. The petitioner had no intention to abscond nor evade from the process of
law.
6. For the purpose of the case the petitioner had requested the doctor to
discharge on 30/6/2016 and appeared before this Hon’ble Court for further
hearings.
7. Now the petitioner health is in risk and the petitioner requires better
treatment to safe guard his life
8. There are solvent sureties to secure their presence before court of law.
9. No similar petition is filed or pending before this Hon’ble court or before the
Hon’ble High Court. This Hon’ble court had dismissed earlier two
application. This is the third application.
10.This Hon’ble Court had dissmissed the first bail application in CMP.NO:
684/2016 dated 30/8/2016. Due to the illhealth the petitioner is in pathetic
stage without further medical treatment. And already all the medical records
had been produced before this Hon’ble Court for perusal.
P.MICHAEL
CMP.NO: /2016
IN
S.C.NO: 101 /2012
Between
Bellarmin Samraj, aged 42 years
S/o.Rajayyan,
Paeppali vilai,
Thakkalivillai,
Pallapallam. ………Petitioner/ Accused
and
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Advocate
BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK MAHILA COURT AT NAGERCOIL
CMP.NO: /2016
IN
S.C.NO: 101 /2012
Between
Bellarmin Samraj, aged 42 years
S/o.Rajayyan,
Paeppali vilai,
Thakkalivillai,
Pallapallam. ………Petitioner/ Accused
and
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
1. The petitioner is quite innocent of the offences alleged against him in the
F.I.R
2. The petitioner is no way connected with the occurrence alleged in the F.I.R.
.
3. The petitioner will not abscond nor evade the process of law.
Hence it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to relax
the condition imposed on the Petitioner/accused and allow this petition in the
interest of justice.
Advocate
4.
BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK
MAHILA COURT AT NAGERCOIL
CMP.NO: /2016
IN
S.C.NO: 101 /2012
Between
Bellarmin Samraj, aged 42 years
S/o.Rajayyan,
Paeppali vilai,
Thakkalivillai,
Pallapallam. ………Petitioner/ Accused
and
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
Advocate
BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK MAHILA COURT AT NAGERCOIL
CMP.NO: /2016
IN
S.C.NO: 101 /2012
Between
Bellarmin Samraj, aged 42 years
S/o.Rajayyan,
Paeppali vilai,
Thakkalivillai,
Pallapallam. ………Petitioner/ Accused
and
Inspector of police
Karungal ……….Respondent/Complainant
This Hon’ble court granted bail to the petitioner/accused subject to condition that
the petitioner should execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties
each for a likesum to the satification of this Hon’ble Court
The petitioner produces two solvent sureties along with VAO Certificate,Tax
receipts and Ration card .