Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 34

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Entrance and steps in the building


Workplace Regulations. 1992

Hazard Description
Slip and trip

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Trip All persons entering and leaving premises
Fall

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 3 – Possible 9 – Medium

Existing Controls
Entrance and steps are soundly constructed and properly maintained.
Entrance and steps are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages.
Entrance and steps are swept daily of dirt and refuse and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly.
A secure and substantial handrail is provided and maintained at least one side on every staircase.
Emergency lighting is provided for all staircases

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 2– Unlikely 6 – Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 2

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Condition of Floors and traffic routes


Workplace Regulations. 1992 Hard surface

Hazard Description
Slip and trip

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Trip All persons on site
Fall

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 2 – Marginal 3 – Probable 6 – Medium

Existing Controls
Floors and walkways are soundly constructed and properly maintained.
Floors and walkways are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages.
Wet areas are suitably drained
Yellow Signs are used when cleaning to warn people.
Floors and walkways are swept daily of dirt and refuse and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly.
No unprotected cables trail across floor
Gangways and other areas used for evacuation or fire point access are clearly marked

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 1 – Negligible 2– Unlikely 2 – Low priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 3

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Condition of Floors


Workplace Regulations. 1992 Carpets and mats

Hazard Description
Slip and trip

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Trip All persons on site
Fall

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 3 – Probable 6 – Medium

Existing Controls
Floors and walkways are soundly constructed and properly maintained.
Floors and walkways are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages.
Floors and walkways are cleared of refuse daily and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly.
Carpets and mats are maintained in good condition, securely fixed and do not have curling edges.
No unprotected cables trail across floor.
Regular floor walks of the building are carried out to check for dangers.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 1 – Minor 2– Unlikely 2 – Low priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 4

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Temperature
Workplace Regulations. 1992

Hazard Description
Extremes of temperature

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Hypothermia All people on site
Excessive heat

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4 – Serious 1 – Almost Impossible 4 – Low priority action

Existing Controls
Heating is provided to maintain a reasonable temperature
Doors and windows are kept closed whenever possible

Cooling can be achieved by opening windows and roof vents


Water is available free to the public in the bar
Employees have access to refreshments at all times.
Mechanical fans are provided to achieve increased air movement.
Air conditioning available on level 3

Further Controls Deadline


New Air conditioning planned for the main bouldering floor due to be
completed in early 2017.
New Air conditioning fitted to The Cave in December 2016

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 1 – Negligible 1– Almost impossible 1 – No further action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 5

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Lighting
Workplace Regulations. 1992

Hazard Description
Inability to move about safely

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Contact with hard object All employees and public
Trip and fall

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 2 – Minor 4 – Probable 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls
Suitable and sufficient lighting is provided throughout the premises.
Where natural light is used, windows and skylights are cleaned
Where artificial light is used lights are repaired, cleaned or replaced as necessary.
Where emergency lighting is necessary for reasons of safety it is powered by a separate energy source.
Emergency lighting is tested on full test yearly and monthly visual checks.

Further Controls Deadline


EAP (emergency Action plan) in place

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 1 – Negligible 1– Almost impossible 1 – No further action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 6

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Cleanliness and waste materials


Workplace Regulations. 1992

Hazard Description
Accumulation of waste materials

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Trip and fall All employees and public
Pest infestations

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 2 – Minor 4 – Probable 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls
.
Floors and walkways are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages.
Floors and walkways are swept daily of dirt and refuse and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly.
Interior walls, ceilings and work surfaces are cleaned at suitable intervals.
Surface treatments are renewed when they can no longer be kept clean.
Cleaning is carried out by an effective and suitable method that does not expose anyone to a health and safety risk.
Action pest control are contracted to control pests

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 2 – Minor 2– Unlikely 4 – Low priority action

Notes

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed


Master No.
Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 7

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reassessment Workstations and seating
Workplace Regulations. 1992

Hazard Description
Difficult movement, stooping, cramped conditions, repetitive movement

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Musculoskeletal Persons at workstations

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4 – Serious 2 – Unlikely 8 – Medium Priority Action

Existing Controls
Administration and Management have offices with correct office chairs and space.
Any requests for better controls are reviewed as requested.
Reception provided with a raised seat for periods of inputting data

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Serious 1– Unlikely 3 – Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 8

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Windows
Workplace Regulations. 1992 Fall

Hazard Description
Fall from height

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Contact with hard surface All persons on premises

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 3 – Possible 9 – Medium

Existing Controls
All openable windows, skylights and ventilators can be operated safely.

Openable windows operate in a manner which will not expose any other person in the workplace to danger.

All windows can be cleaned in a safe manner.


Metal Safety bars fitted to low level windows in the bouldering room

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 2– Unlikely 6 – Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 9

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Sanitary conveniences


Workplace Regulations. 1992

Hazard Description
Lack of availability and/or unsanitary conditions

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Stress All persons
Infection

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 4 – Probable 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls
Rooms containing sanitary conveniences are adequately ventilated and lit
The facilities and the rooms containing them are kept in clean and orderly condition
Separate rooms are provided for men and women, except where and so far as each convenience is in a separate
room the door of which is capable of being secured from the inside
Water closets are connected to a suitable drainage system and are provided with an effective means for flushing
with water
Toilet paper and coat hooks are provided
For water closets used by women suitable means for the disposal of sanitary dressings is provided.
Sufficient numbers of facilities are provided for the maximum number of people likely to be in the workplace
The introduction of a nappy bin in the disabled toilets in the cafebar due to the mini mice toddler group service.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 1– Almost impossible 3 – Low priority action

Notes
Sanitary conveniences are set on a contract and therefore maintained on a two week basis.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 10

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Washing facilities


Workplace Regulations. 1992

Hazard Description
Contamination of the skin by harmful or offensive materials

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Infection All persons

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 3 – Probable 9 Medium action

Existing Controls
Rooms containing washing facilities are adequately ventilated and lit
The facilities and the rooms containing them are kept in clean and orderly condition
Separate rooms are provided for men and women, except where and so far as each convenience is in a separate
room the door of which is capable of being secured from the inside
Washing facilities include a supply of clean hot and cold, or warm running water, soap, towels or other drying means
The facilities are arranged to ensure adequate privacy for the user
Sufficient numbers of facilities are provided for the maximum number of people likely to be in the workplace

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 1– Almost Impossible 3 – Low priority action

Notes
Washing facilities are cleaned daily

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 11

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Drinking water


Workplace Regulations. 1992

Hazard Description
Contaminated water

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Gastric Infection All persons

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 2 – Minor 4 – Probable 8 – High priority action

Existing Controls
Drinking water is obtained from a public supply by means of a tap connected directly to the water main or a cistern
that complies with the requirements of the UK Water Bye-Laws
Drinking water taps are installed in sanitary conditions
Cups or beakers are provided.
Drinking water supplies are marked as such if people may otherwise drink from supplies that are not meant for
drinking.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 1 – Negligible 1– Almost Impossible 1 – No further action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 12

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Noise
Noise at Work Regulations 1989

Hazard Description
High noise levels

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Hearing Damage All Employees
Neighbours (Nuisance)

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4– Serious 4 – Probable 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls
Daily personal noise exposure is kept below the first action level of 85dB(A)
Ipod docks on party rooms are restricted to a set level so cannot harm.
Music level is monitored by staff on floorwalking duties

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 2 – Minor 2– Unlikely 4 – Low priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 13

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Stress
Workplace Regulations 1992 Organisational

Hazard Description
Being unable to cope with sustained or continual challenges such as, trying to meet unrealistic time pressures or
working in a hostile environment.

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Distress/Exhaustion/Breakdown All employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 - Constant 4 – Serious 3 – Possible 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls
The company creates a climate in which employees have the confidence to seek assistance and discuss their work-
related problems. Policies covering discrimination, aggression, bullying and harassment are in place.
Possible work-related stressors are identified and monitored by managers.
Work related environmental, organisational and people stressors are reduced as far as reasonably practicable.
Where appropriate, training will be provided in communication, time management and handling difficult situations.
Employees experiencing work-related stress are treated the same as those with any other occupationally induced
health problem.
Appropriate support is provided for distressed employees.
Adequate rehabilitation is ensured for employees returning to work.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 - Constantly 4 – Serious 1– Almost Impossible 4 – Low priority action

Notes
The Warehouse has clear policies covering discrimination, aggression, bullying and harassment.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 14

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Electricity
Electricity at Work Regulations

Hazard Description
Electric shock due to faulty electrical system or equipment

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Electric shock All Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4– Serious 4 – Probable 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls
New installations and modifications to existing system are undertaken by a competent electrician in accordance with
the IEEW Regulations. A completion certificate is routinely obtained.
The electrical system is examined by a competent electrician every 5 years. An inspection certificate is routinely
obtained.
Regular inspection is undertaken of electrical equipment. Particularly equipment that is subject to vibration or
corrosion, isolator boxes, socket outlets, plugs, flexible conduits and cables.
Annual inspection of portable and transferable electrical equipment is undertaken
Inspection and testing are routinely undertaken whenever there is reason to suspect equipment may be defective,
after any repair or modification, in accordance with the manner and frequency of use and environment.

Further Controls Deadline


.

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 2– Unlikely 6 – Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 15

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Extension cables


Electricity at Work Regulations

Hazard Description
Electric shock due to fault or damaging cable.

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Electric shock All Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4– Serious 4 – Probable 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls
Extension cables are only used on a temporary basis
Cables are situated to avoid physical damage or hot surfaces
Pat testing takes place yearly

Further Controls Deadline

Extension cables need to be checked quarterly

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 3 – Marginal 2– Unlikely 6 – Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 16

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Multi-adapter sockets


Electricity at Work Regulations

Hazard Description
Fire from electrical overload

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Burns All Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4– Serious 3 – Possible 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls
Amperage of appliances is kept below safe operating level of adapter.
Visual inspection of the sheath, plug casings and pins for damage or discolouration
NO LONGER IN USE AT THE WAREHOUSE 2017 REVIEW JC ONLY EXTENSION CABLES IN USE.

Further Controls Deadline


NO LONGER TO BE USED UNLESS FOR SHORT PERIODS AGREED BY THE
GM

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 2 – Minor 1– Unlikely 2 – Low priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 17

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Compressed Gas Cylinders


Pressure Systems and Transportable Gas
Containers Regulations 1989/COSHH 1994

Hazard Description
Explosion and fire

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Violent contact with hard surface Persons in vicinity of discharge
Shock
Fire

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4 – Serious 4 – Probable 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls
- CO2 and Mixed Gas used for beer and soft drinks is stored in the bar area and when in use is connected
through a pressure valve that is maintained annually
- Only staff trained in the beer cellar duites can change a cylinder.

Further Controls Deadline


Beer Gas no longer on site, reduced risk as less gas supply on site

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4 – Serious 2– Unlikely 8 – Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 18

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Steps & Ladders


Provision and Use of Work Equipment

Hazard Description
Fall from height

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Fracture/break/Incision wound Users
Passers by

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
2 - Monthly 4 – Serious 3 – Possible 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls
An assessment is made to determine if the task can be undertaken safely with the steps or ladders available.
A mobile tower or scaffolding is provided if steps or ladders are unsuitable.
Steps and ladders meet the requirements of the British or European standards.
Steps and ladders are long enough for the purposes for which they are required.
Ladders are maintained in sound condition. Ladders are recorded in a register ( Papertrail ) and their condition is
regularly checked.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
2 - Monthly 4 – Serious 2 – Unlikely –8 Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 19

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Company Vehicles


Provision and Use of Work Equipment

Hazard Description
Road accident as a result of unsafe vehicle or driver

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Crush Injury Company Vehicle Drivers

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
4 – Daily 4 – Serious 4 – Probable 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls
The vehicle is serviced in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
The vehicle is maintained to meet the requirements of transport legislation.
The driver holds a suitable driving licence.
The driver is not required or permitted to use a mobile phone while driving without a hands free kit
The driver is not required to drive excessive distances at the end of a long tiring day.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
4 – Daily 4 – Serious 2– Unlikely 8 – Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 20

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Lone Working


Workplace Regulations 1992 Securing Premises

Hazard Description
Serious injury prevents lone worker summoning help.
Security of a lone person

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Treatment delayed Last person leaving premises
Safety relating to Security

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
4 – Daily 3 – Marginal 2 – Unlikely 6 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls
Means of access and/or egress are kept clear.
Responsible Person is physically fit.
Responsible Person is fully trained in safe lock-up procedures and what to do if something goes wrong.
Responsible Person has access to first aid supplies.
On closing down the premises the Responsible person leaves at the same time as the Bar person so two members
of staff are on the premises to lock up.
On reviews from recent Health and Safety in the climbing centre. It was agreed that working on the back of the wall
for safety checks needs to be reported to another team member who can check on the worker from time to time.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
1 – Rare 2 – Minor 1– Almost Impossible 2 – Low priority action

Notes
No member of staff should lock up or be left in the building on their own.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 21

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Young Persons (work experience included)


Management of Health & Safety at Work
Regulations 1992

Hazard Description
Lack of experience, potential for games and practical jokes

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


All hazards All persons

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 – Constant 4 – Serious 4 – Probable 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls
Young persons are only permitted to work while under constant supervision of a responsible person.
Additional training and instruction are provided until the young person has demonstrated a satisfactory level of
competence.
In addition to the specific training needed to carry out their assigned work tasks, further training is given in respect of
:-
All Work experience students must attend an interview before starting worl
On day one an induction will take place and the student will be introduced to the person they will shadow
- the inappropriateness of running, games and practical jokes in the workplace.
- the need for tidiness, the hazards and precautions associated with chemicals, electricity and lifting/carrying.
- the rules in respect of smoking, accident reporting and the arrangements for first aid.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 - Constant 4 – Serious 2 – Unlikely 8 – Medium priority action

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 22

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Smoking
Fire (Places of Work) Designated

Hazard Description
Ignition of flammable materials by cigarette ends

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Burns All staff
Crush

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
5 - Constantly 4 – Serious 3 – Possible 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls
SMOKING IS NOT PERMITTED IN ANY AREA OF THE BUILDING.
No Smoking signs are in place on the windows.
E Cigarettes are seen as coming under the same strict rules as part of our company policy.
Staff are asked not to smoke near the outside of the building or in uniform.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 - Constant 3 – Marginal 1 – Unlikely 3– Medium priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 23

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Emergency Evacuation


Fire (Places of Work)

Hazard Description
Emergency lighting failure impedes escape

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Burns All staff , visitors & contractors

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
4 – Serious 2 – Unlikely 8 – Medium priority action
Existing Controls
Emergency lighting is tested at Quarterly intervals
These are now recorded on Papertrail. Together with replacements and repairs.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 - Constantly 2 – Minor 1 – Almost Impossible 2 – No action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 24

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Safety of staff in event of fire


Fire (Places of Work)

Hazard Description
Malfunction of fire alarm failing to alert persons present

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Suffocation All staff , visitors & contractors
Burns
Crushing

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
4 – Serious 2 – Unlikely 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls
Alarm is tested weekly by operation of call points

Alarm panel shows fault conditions

Further Controls Deadline


Test alarm at a set time each week to aid recognition
Alarm is examined by a competent engineer at least once a year

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 - Constantly 2 – Minor 1 – Almost Impossible 2 – No action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 25

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Safety of staff in event of fire


Fire (Places of Work)

Hazard Description
Lack of training impedes escape

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Suffocation All staff, visitors & contractors
Burns
Crushing

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
4 – Serious 2 – Unlikely 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls
Fire drills are held for the team every January and at intervals when new staff join the team.
All shifts are included in drill arrangements

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 - Constantly 2 – Minor 1 – Almost Impossible 2 – No action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 26

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Safety of staff in event of fire


Fire (Places of Work)

Hazard Description
Spread of small fire

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Suffocation All staff , visitors & contractors
Burns
Crushing

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
4 – Serious 2 – Unlikely 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls
Fire fighting equipment appropriate to the task is provided at specific locations throughout the premises
The fire fighting equipment is serviced annually by a competent fire extinguisher engineer.
Only staff who have been trained, to assess the risk and make the correct selection and use of the equipment
available, are allowed to tackle a fire.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 - Constantly 2 – Minor 1 – Almost Impossible 2 – No action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 27

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Escape routes


Fire (Places of Work)

Hazard Description
Blocked exit routes and fire exits

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Suffocation All staff , visitors & contractors
Burns
Crushing

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
4 – Serious 2 – Unlikely 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls
Staff are trained to keep exit routes clear
Staff are trained to keep exit doors clear of obstacles
Building check daily by staff carried out.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
5 - Constantly 2 – Minor 1 – Almost Impossible 2 – No action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 28

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed


Master No.

Reassessment Maintenance

Hazard Description
Changing Flu tubes and Bulbs

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Falling / Electric Shock Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
Monthly 4 – Serious 3 – Possible 12 – High Priority action

Existing Controls
Use correct Equipment
Isolate Supply

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
2 – Monthly 2 – Minor 2 – Unlikely 4 – Low Priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 29

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Maintenance

Hazard Description
Window Cleaning / Painting at heights / Working at heights

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Falling Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
Monthly 4 – Serious 3 – Possible 12 – High Priority action

Existing Controls
Use correct Equipment
Ladders provided

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
2 – Monthly 4 – Serious 1 – Unlikely 4– Medium Priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 30

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Maintenance

Hazard Description
Window Cleaning / Painting at heights / Working at heights/ Route setting

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Dropping items Employees & Customers

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
Monthly 3 – Marginal 4 – Probable 12 – High Priority action

Existing Controls
Cordon off area below
Safety equipment used. Helmets to be worn in the area below.
Tools to be secured with back up rope.
Specific bags designed to work at height used for raising
Contractor used for high level windows.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
2 – Monthly 3 – Marginal 2 – Unlikely 6 – Medium Priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 31

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Maintenance

Hazard Description
Floor Mopping

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Slipping Employees & Customers
Fractures / Bruises

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
Daily 2 – Minor 4 – Probable 8 – Medium Priority action

Existing Controls
Cordon off area
Restricted to quiet /off peak hours

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
4 – Daily 2 – Minor 2 – Unlikely 4 – Low Priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 32

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Maintenance

Hazard Description
Vacuuming

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups


Trip Hazard Employees & Customers
Fractures / Bruises

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
Daily 2 – Minor 4 – Probable 8 – Medium Priority action

Existing Controls
Vigilant and put away after use
Limited to Off peak hours

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Residual Risk Rating
4 – Daily 2 – Minor 2 – Unlikely 4 – Low Priority action

Notes

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 33

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed
Master No.

Reassessment Disabled access to The Warehouse

Hazard Description
The Warehouse is an old building set on 4 floors. The access in some
areas is restrictive due to the design and restrictions of the structure.

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups

Access Members of the Public with disabilities


Access and facilties on all levels
Fire evacuation procedures
The Climbing Activity itself

Risk Assessment (without control measures)


Frequency Severity Likelihood Initial Risk Rating
Constantly 2 – Marginal 4 – Probable 8 – High Priority action
Existing Controls
Entrance to the building. Access via the Cafebar allows full access to the centre
A disabled toilet is available on the ground floor in the cafebar.
The cafebar count has a lower level for serving
From the cafebar there is a lift to all levels of the building. Level 1 where the main climbing
arena is located
There is one small step up onto safety matting on level 1 this can be fitted with a ramp to gain
access.
The corridors from the lift to the main arena are narrow. The corridors are kept clear to allow
access
Staff working with groups have had previous experience with groups.
Full body harnesses are used to give extra support
Helmets are provided for all groups and helpers
Areas can be sectioned off to restrict access and keep equipment such as chairs safe while the
activity takes place.
Additional staff members are given to the group to assist with climbing
All the staff are qualified and trained climbers
All Climbing staff are trained in first aid
All climbing staff are trained in rescue procedures on the walls.
In the case of a fire the staff are trained to stay with the group they are teaching to assist with
evacuation. Head counts, and safe evacuation is followed.
Level 3 has the Digital wall which is another facility which has proved popular with groups.
Access is via the lift
There is plenty of room on this level.
The use of the digital wall would need to be out of chairs as the matting in front of the wall would
restrict movement and is unsuitable for wheelchairs. The games which can be played on the
wall can develop team work and are good for warm up activities. The wall is 2 metres high so

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018
Risk Assessment Hazard No. 34

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.


some of the higher holds would not be accessable. Therefore the games would need to be
adapted for this.

Further Controls Deadline

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7th January 2017 6th January 2018

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi